1: \documentclass{emulateapj}

2: 

3: \lefthead{van der Wel et al.}

4: \righthead{Star Formation Rates of $z=1$ Early-Type Galaxies}

5: \slugcomment{Accepted for publication in ApJ}

6: 

7: \begin{document}

8: 

9: \title{Low Star Formation Rates for $z=1$ Early-Type Galaxies in the

10:   Very Deep GOODS-MIPS Imaging: Implications for their

11:   Optical/Near-Infrared Spectral Energy

12:   Distributions\altaffilmark{1,2}}

13: 

14: \author{A.~van~der~Wel\altaffilmark{3}, M.~Franx\altaffilmark{4},

15:   G.D. Illingworth\altaffilmark{5} P.G.~van~Dokkum\altaffilmark{6}}

16: 

17: \altaffiltext{1}{Based on observations with the \textit{Hubble Space

18:     Telescope}, obtained at the Space Telescope Science Institute,

19:   which is operated by AURA, Inc., under NASA contract NAS 5-26555}

20: \altaffiltext{2}{This work is based in part on observations made with

21:   the \textit{Spitzer Space Telescope}, which is operated by the Jet

22:   Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology under NASA

23:   contract 1407.}

24: \altaffiltext{3}{Department of Physics and Astronomy,

25: Johns Hopkins University, 3400 North Charles Street, Baltimore, MD

26: 21218; wel@pha.jhu.edu}

27: \altaffiltext{4}{Leiden Observatory, Leiden University, P.O.Box 9513, NL-2300 AA Leiden, Netherlands}

28: \altaffiltext{5}{University of California

29: Observatories/Lick Observatory, University of California, Santa Cruz,

30: CA 95064}

31: \altaffiltext{6}{Department of Astronomy, Yale

32: University, P.O. Box 208101, New Haven, CT 06520-8101}

33: 

34: \begin{abstract}

35:   We measure the obscured star formation in $z\sim 1$ early-type

36:   galaxies.  This constrains the influence of star formation on their

37:   optical/near-IR colors, which, we found, are redder than predicted

38:   by the model by Bruzual \& Charlot (2003).  From deep ACS imaging we

39:   construct a sample of 95 morphologically selected early-type

40:   galaxies in the HDF-N and CDF-S with spectroscopic redshifts in the

41:   range $0.85<z<1.15$.  We measure their $24~\mu\rm{m}$ fluxes from

42:   the deep GOODS-MIPS imaging and derive the IR luminosities and star

43:   formation rates. The fraction of galaxies with $>2\sigma$ detections

44:   ($\sim 25~\mu\rm{Jy}$) is $17_{-4}^{+9}\%$. Of the 15 galaxies with

45:   significant detections at least six have an AGN.  Stacking the MIPS

46:   images of the galaxies without significant detections and adding the

47:   detected galaxies without AGN we find an upper limit on the mean

48:   star formation rate (SFR) of $5.2\pm 3.0~M_{\odot}~\rm{yr^{-1}}$,

49:   and on the mean specific SFR of $4.6\pm

50:   2.2\times10^{-11}~\rm{yr}^{-1}$.  Under the assumption that the

51:   average SFR will decline at the same rate as the cosmic average, the

52:   \textit{in situ} growth in stellar mass of the early-type galaxy

53:   population is less than $14\pm 7\%$ between $z=1$ and the present.

54:   We show that the typically low IR luminosity and SFR imply that the

55:   effect of obscured star formation (or AGN) on their rest-frame

56:   optical/near-IR SEDs is negligible for $\sim 90\%$ of the galaxies

57:   in our sample.  Hence, their optical/near-IR colors are most likely

58:   dominated by evolved stellar populations.  This implies that the

59:   colors predicted by the Bruzual \& Charlot (2003) model for stellar

60:   populations with ages similar to those of $z\sim 1$ early-type

61:   galaxies ($\sim 1-3~\rm{Gyr}$) are most likely too blue, and that

62:   stellar masses of evolved, high-redshift galaxies can be

63:   overestimated by up to a factor of $\sim 2$.

64: \end{abstract}

65: 

66: \keywords{galaxies: evolution---galaxies: active---galaxies:

67:   elliptical and lenticular---galaxies: fundamental

68:   parameters---galaxies: photometry---galaxies: starburst--- infrared:

69:   galaxies}

70: 

71: \section{INTRODUCTION}

72: 

73: A convenient way to estimate stellar masses of galaxies is through

74: modeling their spectral energy distributions (SEDs) with stellar

75: population models

76: \citep[e.g.,][]{worthey94,vazdekis96,bruzual03,maraston05}.  This is

77: the most efficient method to quantify the stellar mass function at

78: high redshift

79: \citep[e.g.,][]{kauffmann04,drory04,forster04,rudnick06,borch06}.  The

80: robustness of this method relies on the reliability of the assumed

81: model parameters, such as the star formation history.  The correctness

82: of the models, given the star formation history and other parameters,

83: is an obvious requirement as well.

84: 

85: With the advent of the Infrared Array Camera \citep[IRAC,][]{fazio04}

86: on the \textit{Spitzer Space Telescope} \citep{werner04} the

87: rest-frame near-infrared (near-IR) has become a commonly used part of

88: the SED to infer stellar masses of $z\gtrsim 1$ galaxies.  However,

89: especially in the near-IR different stellar population models differ

90: from each other \citep{maraston05}, which indicates that there might

91: be systematic biases in such mass estimates.  In \citet{vanderwel06a}

92: we used IRAC imaging of a sample of early-type galaxies at $z\sim 1$

93: in the GOODS-South field with dynamically measured masses in order to

94: infer the evolution of the rest-frame near-IR $M/L$ of early-type

95: galaxies between $z=1$ and the present. We compared this with the

96: evolution of the rest-frame optical $M/L$ and the predictions from

97: several stellar population models.  We found that the near-IR $M/L$ of

98: the $z\sim 1$ galaxies are lower (or, the rest-frame $B-K$ colors

99: redder) than predicted by, for example, the model by \citet{bruzual03}

100: for a range of model parameters.  This indicates that stellar mass

101: estimates inferred from near-IR photometry suffer from significant

102: systematic uncertainties \citep{vanderwel06b}.

103: 

104: \begin{figure*}

105: \includegraphics[angle=180,width=18cm]{f1.eps}

106: \epsscale{0.9}

107: \caption{ ACS $z_{850}$-band cutouts of nine early-type galaxies with

108: bright ($>83~\mu\rm{Jy}$) $24~\mu\rm{m}$ detections (\textit{top row})

109: and nine randomly selected early-type galaxies from our sample with

110: similar rest-frame $B$-band luminosities but without significant

111: $24~\mu\rm{m}$ detections (\textit{bottom row}).  The cutouts are

112: $1\farcs 9$ on the side, which corresponds to $15~\rm{kpc}$ at $z=1$.

113: The morphologies of all 18 galaxies are S0/a or earlier ($T\leq 0$),

114: even though some of the galaxies with MIPS counterparts have somewhat

115: more irregular morphologies than the galaxies without MIPS

116: counterparts.}

117: \label{stamps}

118: \end{figure*}

119: 

120: The most straightforward interpretation of this result is that the

121: model colors are too blue, but this depends on the assumption that the

122: stellar populations of early-type galaxies are simple and can be well

123: described by a single burst stellar population.  If we add a

124: significant population of young, heavily obscured stars ($\gtrsim

125: 10\%$ in mass), then we would reconcile the observations with the

126: Bruzual \& Charlot model \citep{vanderwel06b}.  Moreover, such a high

127: level of obscured star formation could account for the observed

128: increase of the stellar mass density of red sequence galaxies between

129: $z=1$ and the present \citep{bell04b,faber05,borch06,brown06}.  Hence,

130: determination of the star formation rate is interesting and relevant

131: in its own right.  Recently, \citet{rodighiero07} showed through

132: pan-chromatic SED modeling that, indeed, a significant fraction of the

133: early-type galaxy population at $z<1$ shows signs of hidden activity.

134: 

135: In this paper we construct a sample of morphologically selected

136: early-type galaxies with spectroscopic redshifts at $z\sim 1$, and

137: measure (upper limits of) their $24~\mu\rm{m}$ fluxes with the

138: Multiband Imaging Photometer for Spitzer \citep[MIPS,][]{rieke04} on

139: the \textit{Spitzer Space Telescope} (Sec. 2).  We use these to

140: constrain their star formation rates (SFRs) and the increase of their

141: stellar masses with cosmic time in Sec. 3.  Then we proceed, in

142: Sec. 4, to test the hypothesis that the rest-frame optical/near-IR

143: colors of $z\sim 1$ early types are significantly affected by obscured

144: star formation or Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN), and can explain the

145: observed red colors.  We summarize our conclusions in Sec. 5.

146: Throughout the paper we adopt the concordance cosmology,

147: $(\Omega_{\rm{M}},~\Omega_{\Lambda},~h) = (0.3,~0.7,~0.7)$.

148: 

149: \section{SAMPLE SELECTION AND MULTI-WAVELENGTH PHOTOMETRY}

150: We select galaxies with spectroscopic redshifts and early-type

151: morphologies from \textit{Hubble Space Telescope}/Advanced Camera for

152: Surveys (HST/ACS) imaging from the Great Observatories Origin Deep

153: Survey \citep[GOODS,][]{giavalisco04} in the Chandra Deep Field-South

154: (CDF-S) and the Hubble Deep Field-North (HDF-N).  Several

155: spectroscopic surveys conducted in the CDF-S

156: \citep{lefevre04,mignoli05,vanderwel05,vanzella06} are combined to

157: give 381 spectroscopic redshifts in the range $0.85< z< 1.15$.

158: Similarly, the compilation from \cite{wirth04} and the fundamental

159: plane study by \citet{treu05b} are combined to give 404 redshifts in

160: the same redshift range in the HDF-N.

161: 

162: Early-type galaxies are morphologically distinguished from late-type

163: galaxies by fitting Sersic models to the F850LP (hereafter, $z_{850}$)

164: GOODS images of all galaxies using the technique developed by

165: \citet{vandokkumfranx96}.  The best fitting $n$-parameter was

166: determined for every galaxy, with $n$ an integer, 1, 2, 3 or 4.  The

167: asymmetry $A$, the fraction of the total $z_{850}$ flux not situated

168: in the point-symmetric part of the light distribution, was also

169: determined for each object.  The criteria used to select early-type

170: galaxies are $n\geq 3$, $A<0.15$, $\chi^2<3$, and

171: $r_{\rm{eff}}>0\farcs 09$.  The latter three criteria are chosen upon

172: visual inspection of the images and the residuals of the fits.  The

173: limit $\chi^2<3$ excludes galaxies that are poorly fit by any model,

174: and the requirement $r_{\rm{eff}}>0\farcs 09$ excludes galaxies that

175: are very compact and for which the shape of the light distribution

176: cannot be reliably inferred.  The majority of the galaxies satisfying

177: these criteria have early-type morphologies as visually determined,

178: but a small number of Sa galaxies with clear spiral structure and

179: compact galaxies with small-scale irregularities, most likely mergers,

180: are rejected upon visual inspection.  The sample contains 95

181: early-type galaxies with E+S0+S0/a morphologies, with $T\leq 0$ in the

182: classification scheme of \citet{postman05}.  Total $z_{850}$-band

183: magnitudes are derived from the fitted profiles.  PSF-matched ACS and

184: GOODS IRAC images are used to measured rest-frame $B-K$ colors within

185: $5''$ diameter apertures, as described by \citet{vanderwel06a}.  Even

186: though the used spectroscopic surveys are neither complete nor

187: necessarily representative for the $z\sim 1$ galaxy population, there

188: is no reason to assume that our morphologically selected sample has a

189: bias in favor of or against early-type galaxies with obscured star

190: formation or AGN.  Therefore, we can assume that our sample is

191: representative for $z\sim 1$ early types as far as their IR properties

192: are concerned.

193: 

194: \begin{figure}

195: \epsscale{1.2}

196: \plotone{f2.eps}

197: \caption{ Panel (a): The number and redshift distribution of the

198: early-type galaxies in our sample.  The heavily shaded area indicates

199: the distribution of the galaxies with significant detections in the

200: $24~\mu\rm{m}$ MIPS image.  The non-shaded area indicates the

201: distribution of the galaxies without significant counterpart. For six

202: galaxies confusion prevented reliable identification of the MIPS

203: counterpart.  Panel (b): The redshift distribution of the

204: $24~\mu\rm{m}$ fluxes.  The galaxies with significant ($>2\sigma$) and

205: secure MIPS counterparts are indicated with the solid dots.  The other

206: data points are the $2\times \sigma$ fluxes for the non-detections,

207: i.e., galaxies with measured fluxes lower than $2\sigma$.  The six

208: possibly misidentified galaxies are omitted. }

209: \label{z_histM}

210: \end{figure}

211: 

212: We use the GOODS MIPS

213: images\footnote{http://data.spitzer.caltech.edu/popular/goods/Documents/goods\_dr3.html}

214: to obtain $24~\mu\rm{m}$ photometry for our sample of 95 early-type

215: galaxies.  Six galaxies turn out to be located in areas with exposure

216: times less than 10\% of the deepest parts of the images.  We

217: henceforth exclude these objects from the analysis, such that we have

218: a final sample of 89 early-type galaxies.  The publicly available

219: catalogs from the GOODS

220: team\footnote{http://www.stsci.edu/science/goods/} are used as a

221: reference to verify our own photometry, which we push deeper than than

222: the $83~\mu\rm{Jy}$ flux limit from the GOODS catalogs.  This limit is

223: a trade-off between completeness and the number of spurious

224: detections, but since we already know the positions of our objects,

225: deeper photometry is justified. Deeper photometry is necessary because

226: \citet{bell05} already concluded that the vast majority of early-type

227: galaxies at $z\sim 0.7$ are not detected down to $83~\mu\rm{Jy}$, an

228: upper limit that is too conservative for our goals.

229: 

230: We determined the two-dimensional background across the image with the

231: Sextractor software \citep{bertin96}, using the global background

232: setting.  We subtracted this background to obtain an image with

233: background set to zero.  Following, e.g., \citet{papovich04} and

234: \citet{zheng06}, we produce composite PSF-images for both fields,

235: comprised of isolated stars (identified in the ACS images), which we

236: use to create model images of MIPS sources at the positions of the

237: galaxies in our sample and objects in their vicinity.  The $3.6~\mu

238: \rm{m}$ IRAC images are used as a reference to identify these sources

239: and pinpoint their positions\footnote{The GOODS ACS, IRAC and MIPS images

240: are registered to the same world coordinate system with high accuracy,

241: with virtually no systematic offset ($<0.1"$) and a rms of $\sim

242: 0.4''$ in the difference between the centroid positions of bright MIPS

243: sources and their IRAC counterparts, such that uncertainties therein

244: do not affect our measurements.}  The total flux of an object is

245: inferred from the PSF fitting model.  By default, the positions of the

246: $24~\mu m$ sources are left as free parameters, however, in case of

247: obviously erroneous results, we fix the positions at the IRAC

248: positions. This is necessary for very low $S/N$ sources.  In all

249: cases, IRAC and ACS images are used to visually identify the

250: counterpart of $24~\mu\rm{m}$ sources.  This procedure gives robust

251: $24~\mu\rm{m}$ flux measurements for 83 out of 89 galaxies in our

252: sample, of which 15 have a significant $24~\mu\rm{m}$ fluxes, with a

253: signal-to-noise ratio of at least two.  For six galaxies we cannot

254: produce reliable measurements because the centers of the low $S/N$

255: $24~\mu\rm{m}$ objects cannot be defined sufficiently accurate to

256: identify their counterparts with any confidence.  We label these

257: objects as 'possibly misidentified'.

258: 

259: The photometric error is dominated by noise and the uncertainty in the

260: background level.  In addition we include a 5\% error due to the

261: uncertainty in the aperture correction and a 2\% error due to the

262: uncertainty in the absolute photometric calibration.

263: 

264: 10 of the galaxies with the brightest MIPS counterparts are also found

265: in the GOODS catalogs. The total fluxes as listed in the GOODS

266: catalogs agree within $\sim 5\%$ with the values that we derive,

267: except for one confused object for which we determined an accurate

268: flux measurement with the deconvolution method described above.  As an

269: \textit{a posteriori} verification of our morphological classification

270: methodology we show ACS $z_{850}$-band cutout images of nine of these

271: galaxies in Fig. \ref{stamps}, together with nine randomly selected

272: galaxies without significant MIPS counterparts: even the IR-bright

273: galaxies in our sample are genuine early types, as far as their

274: optical morphologies are concerned. We conclude that our morphological

275: selection criteria described above are sufficiently stringent to

276: exclude all late-type galaxies.

277: 

278: We list the measured fluxes in Table 1, and in Fig. \ref{z_histM}a we

279: show the redshift distribution of our sample.  The mean redshift is

280: $z=0.984$.  The shaded regions in Fig. \ref{z_histM}a show the

281: galaxies with MIPS counterparts.  The lightly shaded regions indicate

282: the six galaxies with possibly misidentified MIPS counterparts.  The

283: fraction of galaxies in our sample with MIPS counterparts (typically

284: $\gtrsim 25~\mu\rm{Jy}$) is $f=0.17_{-0.04}^{+0.09}$.  If we adopt the

285: brighter flux limit of $83~\mu\rm{Jy}$, the limit used for the GOODS

286: MIPS catalogs, we find $f=0.11\pm 0.03$.  In Fig. \ref{z_histM}b we

287: show the $24~\mu\rm{m}$ flux distribution.  The typical flux of the

288: objects with significant detections is $S_{24}\sim 100~\mu\rm{Jy}$,

289: and ranges from $\sim 25~\mu\rm{Jy}$ up to almost $1~\rm{mJy}$.  As

290: mentioned above, most galaxies in the sample have no significant

291: $24~\mu\rm{m}$ counterparts. For those galaxies the $2\sigma$ flux

292: levels, i.e., $2\times$ the photometric error, are shown.

293: 

294: \section{CONSTRAINTS ON THE STAR FORMATION RATE}

295: We use $S_{24}$ to constrain the bolometric infrared luminosity and

296: SFR.  \citet{papovich06} have shown that this is feasible with

297: reasonable accuracy.  First, given $S_{24}$, we compute $L_{12}=\nu

298: L_{\nu,12~\mu\rm{m}}$ for $z=1.0$ and $L_{15}=\nu L_{\nu,15~\mu\rm{m}}$

299: for $z=0.6$.  With the conversions from \citet{chary01} (Equations 4

300: and 5) we estimate the associated values for the bolometric infrared

301: luminosity $L_{\rm{IR}}$.  We introduce a $K$-correction by

302: interpolating between the values for $L_{\rm{IR}}$ inferred from

303: $L_{12}$ and $L_{15}$ to obtain $L_{\rm{IR}}$ at the observed redshift

304: $z$ of each object.  The $K$-correction is generally small (typically

305: 10\%) since all redshifts are in the range $0.85<z<1.15$.  Finally,

306: assuming a Salpeter IMF, $L_{\rm{IR}}$ is converted into a SFR as

307: $(1.71\times10^{-10}~L_{\rm{IR}}/L_{\odot})~M_{\odot}~\rm{yr}^{-1}$

308: \citep{kennicutt98}.

309: 

310: The systematic uncertainties in the derived $L_{\rm{IR}}$ and SFR are

311: considerable. According to \citet{chary01} the uncertainty in the

312: transformation of $L_{12}$ into $L_{\rm{IR}}$ is of order 50\%.

313: Furthermore, as noted by \citet{papovich06}, the models by

314: \citet{dale02} yield $L_{\rm{IR}}$ that are lower by a factor of 2-3

315: for the most luminous objects ($L_{\rm{IR}}>10^{12.5}~L_{\odot}$).

316: For less luminous objects, like the objects in our sample, the

317: differences are smaller, therefore we adopt a systematic uncertainty

318: of 50\%.  Finally, the conversion of $L_{\rm{IR}}$ into SFR is

319: uncertain by about 30\%, such that the total uncertainty in the

320: derived SFR is a factor of two.

321: 

322: We have 15 galaxies with significant and secure detections, six of

323: which have X-ray counterparts \citep{alexander03}, with total X-ray

324: luminosities in the range

325: $L_{\rm{X}}=1-25\times10^{42}~\rm{erg~s^{-1}}$, which most certainly

326: means that these galaxies harbor type 2 AGN.  This is corroborated by

327: the fact that in all cases at least half of $L_{\rm{X}}$ is due to

328: hard X-rays.

329: 

330: Assuming that the $24~\mu\rm{m}$ flux of the other nine galaxies is

331: due to dust heated by star formation, we find SFRs ranging from 5 to

332: 80 $M_{\odot}~\rm{yr^{-1}}$.  The IRAC colors of the two galaxies with

333: SFR exceeding 50 $M_{\odot}~\rm{yr^{-1}}$ are consistent with the

334: colors of a star-forming galaxy, and, moreover, in the rest-frame UV

335: F435W and F606W ACS filters these galaxies clearly show irregular

336: morphologies.  We stress, however, that, according to their rest-frame

337: optical morphologies, these galaxies are genuine early-type galaxies

338: with $\sim 90\%$ of the $z_{850}$-band flux accounted for by a smooth

339: De Vaucouleurs profile (see Fig. \ref{stamps}).

340: 

341: \begin{figure}[t]

342: \epsscale{1.1}

343: \plotone{f3.eps}

344: \caption{ Stacked $24~\mu\rm{m}$ image (38" on the side) of the

345:   galaxies without significant individual detections and without X-ray

346:   counterparts.  The average flux is $6.8\pm 1.2~\mu\rm{Jy}$, which, at

347:   the average redshift of $z=0.97$, corresponds to a SFR of

348:   $1.2~M_{\odot}~\rm{yr}^{-1}$.  This SFR is an upper limit to the

349:   real SFR, as some of the flux might be due to AGN activity or

350:   silicate emission. }

351: \label{stack}

352: \end{figure}

353: 

354: In order to constrain the SFR of the galaxies without significant

355: individual detections we stack their MIPS images.  We omit the

356: galaxies with X-ray counterparts. The stacked image shown in Figure

357: \ref{stack} is created by co-adding the individual images, clipping

358: the pixels (outside a 6'' radius aperture centered on the fiducial

359: position of the co-added object) at $2.3\sigma$ to mask surrounding

360: objects \citep[see also, e.g.,][]{burgarella06}. Then we proceed to

361: determine the total flux within a $12"$ diameter aperture.  To compute

362: the total flux, we subtract the background (the median in a concentric

363: annulus between $30"$ and $40"$) and multiply by the aperture

364: correction 1.697.  The uncertainty is determined by the noise

365: properties of the stacked image, the systematic uncertainties in the

366: zero point calibration and aperture correction, and an additional

367: uncertainty of 5\% due to sub-pixel variations in the source positions

368: of the individual images \citep{zheng06}.  The measured flux is

369: $6.8\pm 1.2~\mu\rm{Jy}$ per galaxy.  This corresponds to a SFR of

370: $1.2~M_{\odot}~\rm{yr}^{-1}$ for a galaxy at the average redshift of

371: the sample ($z=1$), which should be regarded an upper limit to the

372: true SFR. Some of the flux will be due low-luminosity AGN, and, in

373: addition, low levels of silicate emission can be expected from

374: circumstellar dust around Asymptotic Giant Branch stars \citep[see,

375: e.g.,][]{bressan98,piovan03,bressan06}.  It is beyond the scope of

376: this paper to constrain the various contributions of the measured

377: flux.

378: 

379: The average SFR of the galaxies without significant detections (those

380: used to create the stacked image) and the nine galaxies with

381: significant detections but without X-ray counterparts is

382: $5.2\pm3.0~M_{\odot}~\rm{yr}^{-1}$.  This is an order of magnitude

383: lower than the SFR of the typical MIPS source at $z\sim 1$

384: \citep{perez05}. Also, $\sim 80\%$ of the star formation is accounted

385: for by $\sim 10\%$ of the galaxies, which suggests either interlopers

386: or that such obscured star-formation events in early-type galaxies are

387: short lived.

388: 

389: Next, we estimate an upper limit on the specific SFR.  We assume that

390: $M/M_{\odot}=2 \times L_{\rm{B}}/L_{\odot,\rm{B}}$, which is the

391: typical $M/L$ as was determined by recent $z\sim 1$ fundamental plane

392: studies \citep{vanderwel05,treu05b}.  The inferred masses are

393: typically in the range of $5\times 10^{10} - 2\times 10^{11}

394: M_{\odot}$.  We find an upper limit for the average specific SFR of

395: $4.6\pm 2.2\times10^{-11}~\rm{yr}^{-1}$, that is, a growth in stellar

396: mass of 5\% per Gyr.  This is two orders of magnitude lower than the

397: specific SFR of a typical MIPS source at $z\sim 1$, which has a

398: stellar mass of $M/M_{\odot}=10^{10} M_{\odot}$ \citep{perez05}. We

399: can use the specific SFR to crudely constrain the growth in stellar

400: mass of the early-type galaxy population between $z\sim 1$ and the

401: present.  In the case that the SFR remains constant for the population

402: as a whole, i.e., that obscured bursts of star formation are as

403: prevalent in the local universe as they are at $z=1$, the stellar mass

404: would increase by $35\pm 17\%$.  It is quite unlikely that the average

405: SFR in early types has remained constant over the past 7.5 Gyr, as

406: many studies have shown that the SFR has decreased by an order of

407: magnitude since $z\sim 1$

408: \citep[e.g.,][]{madau96,wolf03,lefloch05,bell05,perez05,zheng06}.  If

409: we assume that the SFR declines exponentially and by a factor of 10

410: between $z=1$ and the present, the growth in stellar mass is $14\pm

411: 7\%$.  We stress that these numbers are upper limits due to the

412: various other potential contributors to the measured IR flux.  Most

413: likely, the true \textit{in situ} growth of the stellar mass of the

414: early-type galaxy population is still lower.

415: 

416: These upper limits are consistent with the residual stellar mass

417: growth of $\sim 7\%$ estimated by \citet{gebhardt03} and the residual

418: star formation of $\sim 2~M_{\odot}~\rm{yr^{-1}}$ derived by

419: \citet{koo05} for early-type galaxies and bulges in the Groth Strip

420: Survey.  \citet{treu05b} find significant young stellar populations in

421: low-mass early-type galaxies ($M<10^{11}~M_{\odot}$) at redshifts

422: $0.2<z<1$ in the HDF-N, which suggests a considerable growth in

423: stellar mass ($20-40\%$) between $z=1.2$ and the present.  For more

424: massive galaxies, they find that the growth in stellar mass is

425: negligible.  The upper limits that we derive here are marginally

426: consistent with a mass increase of more than $20\%$, but then we have

427: to assume that all the observed $24~\mu\rm{m}$-flux is due to star

428: formation, which is probably unrealistic.  The specific SFRs for

429: galaxies more and less massive than $10^{11}~M_{\odot}$ (the median

430: mass) are $5.1\pm 2.5\times10^{-11}~\rm{yr}^{-1}$ and $3.3\pm

431: 1.6\times10^{-11}~\rm{yr}^{-1}$, respectively.  This difference is not

432: statistically significant since the co-added fluxes only differ from

433: each other on the $1.2\sigma$ level.  Still, if anything, the specific

434: SFR of high-mass early types is higher than that of low-mass early

435: types, but, in addition to the low significance of the measurement, we

436: should keep in mind that high mass galaxies are more likely to have

437: AGN that might contribute to the $24~\mu\rm{m}$ flux.  To reconcile

438: these results with the large fraction of young stars in low-mass early

439: types \citep{treu05b}, these young stellar populations must have

440: formed in other galaxies that later became part of an early type, or

441: at a time when the galaxies had not yet attained their early-type

442: morphologies.

443: 

444: We conclude that the \textit{in situ} SFR of the early-type galaxy

445: population at $z\sim 1$ is low, and can only account for an increase

446: in the stellar mass density of early-type galaxies by $\lesssim 20\%$

447: between $z=1$ and the present.  Additional mergers and/or

448: morphological transformations of galaxies are required to explain the

449: observed increase in stellar mass density of red galaxies by a factor

450: of two \citep{bell04b,faber05,borch06,brown06}.

451: 

452: \section{THE EFFECT OF STAR FORMATION ON THE OPTICAL/NEAR-IR COLOR}

453: Now we explore the question whether star formation affects the

454: rest-frame optical/near-IR colors of the galaxies in our sample, or

455: whether light from evolved stellar populations dominates that part of

456: their SEDs, as is usually assumed. In order to do so, we use the

457: (upper limits on the) specific star-formation rate derived in the

458: previous section, and compare this with the rest-frame $B-K$ color

459: (see Fig. \ref{ssfr_bk}).  The median $B-K$ color of the galaxies

460: without significant $24~\mu\rm{m}$ fluxes is $B-K=3.52$.  The median

461: $B-K$ of the 15 galaxies with significant $24~\mu\rm{m}$ fluxes is 0.2

462: mag redder, whereas the uncertainty in the $B-K$ color is only

463: $\lesssim 0.05$ mag.  This implies that obscured activity can indeed

464: affect the $B-K$ colors of galaxies.

465: 

466: We compare the colors of the galaxies in our sample with the expected

467: color of a $z=1$ galaxy with an evolved stellar populations. We

468: estimate this expected color as follows.  Given the measured evolution

469: of $M/L$ \citep{treu05b,vanderwel05}, the \citet{bruzual03} model

470: (with solar metallicity and a Salpeter IMF) predicts a certain amount

471: of evolution in $B-K$.  Therefore, from the $B-K$ color of local early

472: types \citep{vanderwel06a}, we can derive the expected color for

473: $z\sim 1$ early types. We find $B-K=3.29$.  We note that the $B-K$

474: colors of the galaxies with measured dynamical $M/L$

475: \citep{vanderwel06a} do not deviate from those of the larger sample

476: presented in this paper.

477: 

478: The median observed color is 0.2 mag redder than the expected color

479: $B-K=3.29$ (see Fig. \ref{ssfr_bk}). In particular, the galaxies

480: without significant $24~\mu\rm{m}$ counterparts are redder than

481: $B-K=3.29$. The question is how much room the upper limits on their

482: $24~\mu\rm{m}$ fluxes leave for attenuation of the $B-K$ color by

483: obscured star formation.  With the star-formation rates derived in

484: Sec. 3 we can constrain this scenario.

485: 

486: In Fig. \ref{ssfr_bk} we show two-component Bruzual-Charlot models,

487: consisting of an evolved stellar population with $B-K=3.29$ (see

488: above) and a 200 Myr old stellar population with a constant star

489: formation rate (solar metallicity, Salpeter IMF). Varying the age of

490: the young population with constant star formation between 50 and 500

491: Myr does not significantly change the models shows in

492: Fig. \ref{ssfr_bk}.  Besides the specific SFR, the attenuation

493: $A_{\rm{V}}$ (increasing from bottom to top) is the only other

494: variable. Only the young component is attenuated: $A_{\rm{V}}$ of the

495: evolved component with $B-K=3.29$ is assumed to be zero.  We assume

496: the \citet{calzetti00} extinction law.

497: 

498: \begin{figure}

499: \epsscale{1.2}

500: \plotone{f4.eps}

501: \caption{ Specific SFR vs. rest-frame $B-K$ for galaxies with robust

502:   photometry (the six confused sources are left out).  Data points

503:   with error bars indicate galaxies with a significant MIPS detection,

504:   the other data points are upper limits for the galaxies without

505:   significant detections.  The lines are Bruzual \& Charlot models

506:   consisting of two components: an evolved stellar population and a

507:   young, obscured population with a constant SFR and $A_{\rm{V}}$

508:   increasing from bottom to top. See text for details.  The observed

509:   values of the specific SFR are much lower than predicted by the

510:   model for the majority of the galaxies, which implies that star

511:   formation likely does not significantly affect their $B-K$ colors.}

512: \label{ssfr_bk}

513: \end{figure}

514: 

515: As expected, models with low $A_{\rm{V}}$ predict blue colors for high

516: SFRs, whereas models with high $A_{\rm{V}}$ predict red colors.

517: Models with highly obscured star formation can reach $B-K$ colors that

518: match those of the galaxies in our sample. However, the associated

519: SFRs of those models are only observed for a handful of objects that

520: have significant MIPS detections. For the majority of the galaxies in

521: our sample, the observed SFRs are much lower than expected on the

522: basis of these models. This implies these models are inconsistent with

523: the red colors of the galaxies in our sample.  As indicated in Sec. 3,

524: the measured SFRs are systematically uncertain on the level of a

525: factor of two or so. The discrepancy with the model SFRs is much

526: larger than this (an order of magnitude for most galaxies).

527: 

528: Besides obscured SFR, obscured AGN could potentially also redden the

529: $B-K$ color of a galaxy. However, the vast majority of the galaxies in

530: our sample do not show evidence for nuclear activity in the IR or in

531: X-ray \citep[see also][]{rodighiero07}. It is highly unlikely that AGN

532: affect the $B-K$ colors of the majority of the galaxies without

533: leaving a trace at other wavelengths that are commonly used to

534: identify AGN.  The most straightforward conclusion is that the

535: \citet{bruzual03} model predicts colors that are too blue for stellar

536: populations in the age range of those of early-type galaxies at $z\sim

537: 1$ ($1-3~\rm{Gyr}$, assuming solar metallicity).

538: 

539: 

540: \section{SUMMARY}

541: From MIPS $24~\mu\rm{m}$ imaging we derived constraints on the IR

542: luminosities of a sample of 89 morphologically selected early-type

543: galaxies at $z\sim 1$ with the purpose to identify obscured star

544: formation or AGN activity.  We find that 15 ($17^{+9}_{-4}\%$) have

545: $>2\sigma$ ($\sim 25~\mu\rm{Jy}$) $24~\mu\rm{m}$ counterparts.  The

546: X-ray luminosities of six of these indicate that an obscured AGN is

547: responsible for the IR emission. These findings are consistent with

548: recent work by \citet{rodighiero07} who study obscured activity in a

549: $z<1$ sample of morphologically selected early-type galaxies.

550: 

551: We derive an upper limit on the $24~\mu\rm{m}$ flux of the galaxies

552: without significant individual detections by stacking their MIPS

553: images.  When we add this sample to the galaxies with significant

554: detections but without luminous AGN we find $5.2\pm

555: 3.0~M_{\odot}~\rm{yr^{-1}}$ as the upper limit of the average star

556: formation rate.  If we assume that the SFR of the early-type

557: population as a whole is constant between $z=1$ and the present, this

558: implies that the increase in stellar mass density of the early-type

559: galaxy population through \textit{in situ} star formation is at most

560: $35\pm 17\%$.  More realistically, if we assume that the average SFR

561: declines by an order of magnitude between $z=1$ and the present, i.e.,

562: if we assume that it follows the evolution of the average cosmic SFR,

563: we find $14\pm 7\%$.  This amount is too small to explain the observed

564: increase by a factor of $\sim 2$

565: \citep{bell04b,faber05,borch06,brown06}.

566: 

567: $10\%$ of the galaxies account for as much as $\sim 80\%$ of the

568: integrated IR luminosity, i.e., the majority of the galaxies are

569: quiescent in terms of star formation and AGN activity \citep[see

570: also,][]{bell05}.  The low IR luminosities of the galaxies imply that

571: the optical/near-IR colors of $z\sim 1$ early-type galaxies are

572: dominated by their evolved stellar populations, and are most likely

573: not significantly affected by obscured star formation or AGN (see

574: Sec. 4). Hence, the conclusions from \citet{vanderwel06a} and

575: \citet{vanderwel06b} hold: the rest-frame $B-K$ colors of the stellar

576: populations of $z\sim 1$ early-type galaxies are most likely redder

577: than predicted by the stellar population model from \citet{bruzual03},

578: and, consequently, stellar masses of evolved galaxies at high redshift

579: that are inferred from optical/near-IR photometry are overestimates by

580: up to a factor of two relative to stellar mass estimates at low

581: redshift.

582: 

583: \acknowledgements{ We thank the referee for very useful comments, and

584: we thank Eric Bell for stimulating discussions.  A. v. d. W. thanks

585: Andrew Zirm for providing MIPS photometry software, and acknowledges

586: support from NASA grant NAG5-7697.  }

587: 

588: \bibliographystyle{apj}

589: \begin{thebibliography}{47}

590: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi

591: 

592: \bibitem[{{Alexander} {et~al.}(2003){Alexander}, {Bauer}, {Brandt},

593:   {Schneider}, {Hornschemeier}, {Vignali}, {Barger}, {Broos}, {Cowie},

594:   {Garmire}, {Townsley}, {Bautz}, {Chartas}, \&

595:   {Sargent}}]{alexander03} {Alexander}, D.~M. et al. 2003, \aj, 126,

596:   539

597: 

598: %\bibitem[{{Alonso-Herrero} {et~al.}(2006){Alonso-Herrero},

599: %  {P{\'e}rez-Gonz{\'a}lez}, {Alexander}, {Rieke}, {Rigopoulou}, {Le

600: %  Floc'h}, {Barmby}, {Papovich}, {Rigby}, {Bauer}, {Brandt}, {Egami},

601: %  {Willner}, {Dole}, \& {Huang}}]{alonso06} {Alonso-Herrero}, A. et

602: %  al. 2006, \apj, 640, 167

603: 

604: \bibitem[{{Bell} {et~al.}(2004){Bell}, {Wolf}, {Meisenheimer}, {Rix},

605:   {Borch}, {Dye}, {Kleinheinrich}, {Wisotzki}, \&

606:   {McIntosh}}]{bell04b} {Bell}, E.~F. et al. 2004, \apj, 608, 752

607: 

608: \bibitem[{{Bell} {et~al.}(2005){Bell}, {Papovich}, {Wolf}, {Le

609:   Floc'h}, {Caldwell}, {Barden}, {Egami}, {McIntosh}, {Meisenheimer},

610:   {P{\'e}rez-Gonz{\'a}lez}, {Rieke}, {Rieke}, {Rigby}, \&

611:   {Rix}}]{bell05} {Bell}, E.~F. et al. 2005, \apj, 625, 23

612: 

613: \bibitem[{{Bertin} \& {Arnouts}(1996)}]{bertin96} {Bertin}, E., \&

614: {Arnouts}, S. 1996, \aaps, 117, 393

615: 

616: \bibitem[{{Borch} {et~al.}(2006){Borch}, {Meisenheimer}, {Bell},

617:   {Rix}, {Wolf}, {Dye}, {Kleinheinrich}, {Kovacs}, \&

618:   {Wisotzki}}]{borch06} {Borch}, A. et al. 2006, \aap, 453, 869

619: 

620: %\bibitem[{{Brandl} {et~al.}(2006){Brandl}, {Bernard-Salas}, {Spoon},

621: %  {Devost}, {Sloan}, {Guilles}, {Wu}, {Houck}, {Weedman}, {Armus},

622: %  {Appleton}, {Soifer}, {Charmandaris}, {Hao}, {Higdon}, \&

623: %  {Herter}}]{brandl06} {Brandl}, B.~R. et al. 2006, \apj, 653, 1129

624: 

625: \bibitem[{{Bressan} {et~al.}(1998){Bressan}, {Granato}, \&

626: {Silva}}]{bressan98} {Bressan}, A., {Granato}, G.~L., \& {Silva},

627: L. 1998, \aap, 332, 135

628: 

629: \bibitem[{{Bressan} {et~al.}(2006){Bressan}, {Panuzzo}, {Buson},

630:   {Clemens}, {Granato}, {Rampazzo}, {Silva}, {Valdes}, {Vega}, \&

631:   {Danese}}]{bressan06} {Bressan}, A. et al. \apjl, 639, L55

632: 

633: \bibitem[{Brown et al.(2006)}]{brown06} Brown, M. et al. 2006, \apj,

634: in press, astro-ph/0609584

635: 

636: \bibitem[{{Bruzual} \& {Charlot}(2003)}]{bruzual03} {Bruzual}, G., \&

637: {Charlot}, S. 2003, \mnras, 344, 1000

638: 

639: \bibitem[{{Burgarella} {et~al.}(2006){Burgarella},

640:   {P{\'e}rez-Gonz{\'a}lez}, {Tyler}, {Rieke}, {Buat}, {Takeuchi},

641:   {Lauger}, {Arnouts}, {Ilbert}, {Barlow}, {Bianchi}, {Lee}, {Madore},

642:   {Malina}, {Szalay}, \& {Yi}}]{burgarella06} {Burgarella}, D. et

643:   al. 2006, \aap, 450, 69

644: 

645: \bibitem[{{Calzetti} {et~al.}(2000){Calzetti}, {Armus}, {Bohlin},

646:   {Kinney}, {Koornneef}, \& {Storchi-Bergmann}}]{calzetti00}

647:   {Calzetti}, D., {Armus}, L., {Bohlin}, R.~C., {Kinney}, A.~L.,

648:   {Koornneef}, J., \& {Storchi-Bergmann}, T. 2000, \apj, 533, 682

649: 

650: \bibitem[{{Chary} \& {Elbaz}(2001)}]{chary01} {Chary}, R., \& {Elbaz},

651: D. 2001, \apj, 556, 562

652: 

653: \bibitem[{{Dale} \& {Helou}(2002)}]{dale02} {Dale}, D.~A., \& {Helou},

654: G. 2002, \apj, 576, 159

655: 

656: %\bibitem[{{Devriendt} {et~al.}(1999){Devriendt}, {Guiderdoni}, \&

657: %  {Sadat}}]{devriendt99}

658: %{Devriendt}, J.~E.~G., {Guiderdoni}, B., \& {Sadat}, R. 1999, \aap, 350, 381

659: 

660: \bibitem[{{Drory} {et~al.}(2004){Drory}, {Bender}, {Feulner}, {Hopp},

661:   {Maraston}, {Snigula}, \& {Hill}}]{drory04} {Drory}, N., {Bender},

662:   R., {Feulner}, G., {Hopp}, U., {Maraston}, C., {Snigula}, J., \&

663:   {Hill}, G.~J. 2004, \apj, 608, 742

664: 

665: \bibitem[{{F{\" o}rster Schreiber} {et~al.}(2004){F{\" o}rster

666:   Schreiber}, {van Dokkum}, {Franx}, {Labb{\' e}}, {Rudnick}, {Daddi},

667:   {Illingworth}, {Kriek}, {Moorwood}, {Rix}, {R{\" o}ttgering},

668:   {Trujillo}, {van der Werf}, {van Starkenburg}, \&

669:   {Wuyts}}]{forster04} {F{\" o}rster Schreiber}, N.~M. et al. 2004,

670:   \apj, 616, 40

671: 

672: \bibitem[{{Faber et al.}(2005)}]{faber05} {Faber}, S.~M. et al. 2005,

673: \apj, submitted, astro-ph/0506044

674: 

675: \bibitem[{{Fazio} {et~al.}(2004){Fazio}, {Hora}, {Allen}, {Ashby},

676:   {Barmby}, {Deutsch}, {Huang}, {Kleiner}, {Marengo}, {Megeath},

677:   {Melnick}, {Pahre}, {Patten}, {Polizotti}, {Smith}, {Taylor},

678:   {Wang}, {Willner}, {Hoffmann}, {Pipher}, {Forrest}, {McMurty},

679:   {McCreight}, {McKelvey}, {McMurray}, {Koch}, {Moseley}, {Arendt},

680:   {Mentzell}, {Marx}, {Losch}, {Mayman}, {Eichhorn}, {Krebs},

681:   {Jhabvala}, {Gezari}, {Fixsen}, {Flores}, {Shakoorzadeh}, {Jungo},

682:   {Hakun}, {Workman}, {Karpati}, {Kichak}, {Whitley}, {Mann},

683:   {Tollestrup}, {Eisenhardt}, {Stern}, {Gorjian}, {Bhattacharya},

684:   {Carey}, {Nelson}, {Glaccum}, {Lacy}, {Lowrance}, {Laine}, {Reach},

685:   {Stauffer}, {Surace}, {Wilson}, {Wright}, {Hoffman}, {Domingo}, \&

686:   {Cohen}}]{fazio04} {Fazio}, G.~G. et al. 2004, \apjs, 154, 10

687: 

688: \bibitem[{{Gebhardt} {et~al.}(2003){Gebhardt}, {Faber}, {Koo}, {Im},

689:   {Simard}, {Illingworth}, {Phillips}, {Sarajedini}, {Vogt}, {Weiner},

690:   \& {Willmer}}]{gebhardt03} {Gebhardt}, K. et al. 2003, \apj, 597,

691:   239

692: 

693: \bibitem[{{Giavalisco} {et~al.}(2004){Giavalisco}, {Ferguson},

694:   {Koekemoer}, {Dickinson}, {Alexander}, {Bauer}, {Bergeron},

695:   {Biagetti}, {Brandt}, {Casertano}, {Cesarsky}, {Chatzichristou},

696:   {Conselice}, {Cristiani}, {Da Costa}, {Dahlen}, {de Mello},

697:   {Eisenhardt}, {Erben}, {Fall}, {Fassnacht}, {Fosbury}, {Fruchter},

698:   {Gardner}, {Grogin}, {Hook}, {Hornschemeier}, {Idzi}, {Jogee},

699:   {Kretchmer}, {Laidler}, {Lee}, {Livio}, {Lucas}, {Madau},

700:   {Mobasher}, {Moustakas}, {Nonino}, {Padovani}, {Papovich}, {Park},

701:   {Ravindranath}, {Renzini}, {Richardson}, {Riess}, {Rosati},

702:   {Schirmer}, {Schreier}, {Somerville}, {Spinrad}, {Stern},

703:   {Stiavelli}, {Strolger}, {Urry}, {Vandame}, {Williams}, \&

704:   {Wolf}}]{giavalisco04} {Giavalisco}, M. et al. 2004, \apjl, 600, L93

705: 

706: \bibitem[{{Kauffmann} {et~al.}(2004){Kauffmann}, {White}, {Heckman},

707:   {M{\'e}nard}, {Brinchmann}, {Charlot}, {Tremonti}, \&

708:   {Brinkmann}}]{kauffmann04} {Kauffmann}, G. et al. 2004, \mnras, 353,

709:   713

710: 

711: \bibitem[{{Kennicutt}(1998)}]{kennicutt98} {Kennicutt}, R.~C. 1998,

712: \araa, 36, 189

713: 

714: \bibitem[{{Koo} {et~al.}(2005){Koo}, {Simard}, {Willmer}, {Gebhardt},

715:   {Bouwens}, {Kauffmann}, {Crosby}, {Faber}, {Harker}, {Sarajedini},

716:   {Vogt}, {Weiner}, {Phillips}, {Im}, \& {Wu}}]{koo05} {Koo}, D.~C. et

717:   al. 2005, \apjs, 157, 175

718: 

719: \bibitem[{{Le F{\`e}vre} {et~al.}(2004){Le F{\`e}vre}, {Vettolani},

720:   {Paltani}, {Tresse}, {Zamorani}, {Le Brun}, {Moreau}, {Bottini},

721:   {Maccagni}, {Picat}, {Scaramella}, {Scodeggio}, {Zanichelli},

722:   {Adami}, {Arnouts}, {Bardelli}, {Bolzonella}, {Cappi}, {Charlot},

723:   {Contini}, {Foucaud}, {Franzetti}, {Garilli}, {Gavignaud}, {Guzzo},

724:   {Ilbert}, {Iovino}, {McCracken}, {Mancini}, {Marano}, {Marinoni},

725:   {Mathez}, {Mazure}, {Meneux}, {Merighi}, {Pell{\`o}}, {Pollo},

726:   {Pozzetti}, {Radovich}, {Zucca}, {Arnaboldi}, {Bondi}, {Bongiorno},

727:   {Busarello}, {Ciliegi}, {Gregorini}, {Mellier}, {Merluzzi},

728:   {Ripepi}, \& {Rizzo}}]{lefevre04} {Le F{\`e}vre}, O. et al. 2004,

729:   \aap, 428, 1043

730: 

731: \bibitem[{{Le Floc'h} {et~al.}(2005){Le Floc'h}, {Papovich}, {Dole},

732:   {Bell}, {Lagache}, {Rieke}, {Egami}, {P{\'e}rez-Gonz{\'a}lez},

733:   {Alonso-Herrero}, {Rieke}, {Blaylock}, {Engelbracht}, {Gordon},

734:   {Hines}, {Misselt}, {Morrison}, \& {Mould}}]{lefloch05} {Le Floc'h},

735:   E. et al. 2005, \apj, 632, 169

736: 

737: \bibitem[{{Madau} {et~al.}(1996){Madau}, {Ferguson}, {Dickinson},

738:   {Giavalisco}, {Steidel}, \& {Fruchter}}]{madau96} {Madau}, P.,

739:   {Ferguson}, H.~C., {Dickinson}, M.~E., {Giavalisco}, M., {Steidel},

740:   C.~C., \& {Fruchter}, A. 1996, \mnras, 283, 1388

741: 

742: \bibitem[{{Maraston}(2005)}]{maraston05} {Maraston}, C. 2005, \mnras,

743: 362, 799

744: 

745: \bibitem[{{Mignoli} {et~al.}(2005){Mignoli}, {Cimatti}, {Zamorani},

746:   {Pozzetti}, {Daddi}, {Renzini}, {Broadhurst}, {Cristiani},

747:   {D'Odorico}, {Fontana}, {Giallongo}, {Gilmozzi}, {Menci}, \&

748:   {Saracco}}]{mignoli05} {Mignoli}, M. et al. 2005, \aap, 437, 883

749: 

750: \bibitem[{{Papovich} {et~al.}(2004){Papovich}, {Dole}, {Egami}, {Le

751:   Floc'h}, {P{\'e}rez-Gonz{\'a}lez}, {Alonso-Herrero}, {Bai},

752:   {Beichman}, {Blaylock}, {Engelbracht}, {Gordon}, {Hines}, {Misselt},

753:   {Morrison}, {Mould}, {Muzerolle}, {Neugebauer}, {Richards}, {Rieke},

754:   {Rieke}, {Rigby}, {Su}, \& {Young}}]{papovich04} {Papovich}, C. et

755:   al. 2004, \apjs, 154, 70

756: 

757: \bibitem[{{Papovich} {et~al.}(2006){Papovich}, {Moustakas},

758:   {Dickinson}, {Le Floc'h}, {Rieke}, {Daddi}, {Alexander}, {Bauer},

759:   {Brandt}, {Dahlen}, {Egami}, {Eisenhardt}, {Elbaz}, {Ferguson},

760:   {Giavalisco}, {Lucas}, {Mobasher}, {P{\'e}rez-Gonz{\'a}lez},

761:   {Stutz}, {Rieke}, \& {Yan}}]{papovich06} {Papovich}, C. et al. 2006,

762:   \apj, 640, 92

763: 

764: \bibitem[{{P{\'e}rez-Gonz{\'a}lez}

765:   {et~al.}(2005){P{\'e}rez-Gonz{\'a}lez}, {Rieke}, {Egami},

766:   {Alonso-Herrero}, {Dole}, {Papovich}, {Blaylock}, {Jones}, {Rieke},

767:   {Rigby}, {Barmby}, {Fazio}, {Huang}, \& {Martin}}]{perez05}

768:   {P{\'e}rez-Gonz{\'a}lez}, P.~G. et al. 2005, \apj, 630, 82

769: 

770: \bibitem[{{Piovan} {et~al.}(2003){Piovan}, {Tantalo}, \&

771: {Chiosi}}]{piovan03} {Piovan}, L., {Tantalo}, R., \& {Chiosi},

772: C. 2003, \aap, 408, 559

773: 

774: \bibitem[{{Postman} {et~al.}(2005){Postman}, {Franx}, {Cross},

775:   {Holden}, {Ford}, {Illingworth}, {Goto}, {Demarco}, {Rosati},

776:   {Blakeslee}, {Tran}, {Ben{\'{\i}}tez}, {Clampin}, {Hartig},

777:   {Homeier}, {Ardila}, {Bartko}, {Bouwens}, {Bradley}, {Broadhurst},

778:   {Brown}, {Burrows}, {Cheng}, {Feldman}, {Golimowski}, {Gronwall},

779:   {Infante}, {Kimble}, {Krist}, {Lesser}, {Martel}, {Mei},

780:   {Menanteau}, {Meurer}, {Miley}, {Motta}, {Sirianni}, {Sparks},

781:   {Tran}, {Tsvetanov}, {White}, \& {Zheng}}]{postman05} {Postman},

782:   M. et al. 2005, \apj, 623, 721

783: 

784: \bibitem[{{Rieke} {et~al.}(2004){Rieke}, {Young}, {Engelbracht},

785:   {Kelly}, {Low}, {Haller}, {Beeman}, {Gordon}, {Stansberry},

786:   {Misselt}, {Cadien}, {Morrison}, {Rivlis}, {Latter},

787:   {Noriega-Crespo}, {Padgett}, {Stapelfeldt}, {Hines}, {Egami},

788:   {Muzerolle}, {Alonso-Herrero}, {Blaylock}, {Dole}, {Hinz}, {Le

789:   Floc'h}, {Papovich}, {P{\'e}rez-Gonz{\'a}lez}, {Smith}, {Su},

790:   {Bennett}, {Frayer}, {Henderson}, {Lu}, {Masci}, {Pesenson},

791:   {Rebull}, {Rho}, {Keene}, {Stolovy}, {Wachter}, {Wheaton}, {Werner},

792:   \& {Richards}}]{rieke04} {Rieke}, G.~H. et al. 2004, \apjs, 154, 25

793: 

794: \bibitem[{{Rodighiero} {et~al.}(2007){Rodighiero}, {Gruppioni},

795:   {Civano}, {Comastri}, {Franceschini}, {Mignoli}, {Fritz}, {Vignali},

796:   \& {Treu}}]{rodighiero07} {Rodighiero}, G. et al. 2007, \mnras,

797:   accepted, astro-ph/0701178

798: 

799: \bibitem[{{Rudnick et al.}(2006)}]{rudnick06} {Rudnick et al.} 2006,

800: \apj, accepted, astro-ph/0606536

801: 

802: \bibitem[{{Treu} {et~al.}(2005){Treu}, {Ellis}, {Liao}, {van Dokkum},

803:   {Tozzi}, {Coil}, {Newman}, {Cooper}, \& {Davis}}]{treu05b} {Treu},

804:   T. et al. 2005, \apj, 633, 174

805: 

806: \bibitem[{{van der Wel} {et~al.}(2006{\natexlab{a}}){van der Wel},

807:   {Franx}, {van Dokkum}, {Huang}, {Rix}, \&

808:   {Illingworth}}]{vanderwel06a} {van der Wel}, A., {Franx}, M., {van

809:   Dokkum}, P.~G., {Huang}, J., {Rix}, H.-W., \& {Illingworth},

810:   G. 2006{\natexlab{a}}, \apj, 636, L21

811: 

812: \bibitem[{{van der Wel} {et~al.}(2005){van der Wel}, {Franx}, {van

813:   Dokkum}, {Rix}, {Illingworth}, \& {Rosati}}]{vanderwel05} {van der

814:   Wel}, A., {Franx}, M., {van Dokkum}, P.~G., {Rix}, H.-W.,

815:   {Illingworth}, G.~D., \& {Rosati}, P. 2005, \apj, 631, 145

816: 

817: \bibitem[{{van der Wel} {et~al.}(2006{\natexlab{b}}){van der Wel},

818:   {Franx}, {Wuyts}, {van Dokkum}, {Huang}, {Rix}, \&

819:   {Illingworth}}]{vanderwel06b} {van der Wel}, A., {Franx}, M.,

820:   {Wuyts}, S., {van Dokkum}, P.~G., {Huang}, J., {Rix}, H.-W., \&

821:   {Illingworth}, G. 2006{\natexlab{b}}, \apj, 652, 97

822: 

823: \bibitem[{{van Dokkum} \& {Franx}(1996)}]{vandokkumfranx96} {van

824: Dokkum}, P.~G., \& {Franx}, M. 1996, \mnras, 281, 985

825: 

826: \bibitem[{{Vanzella} {et~al.}(2006){Vanzella}, {Cristiani},

827:   {Dickinson}, {Kuntschner}, {Moustakas}, {Nonino}, {Rosati}, {Stern},

828:   {Cesarsky}, {Ettori}, {Ferguson}, {Fosbury}, {Giavalisco}, {Haase},

829:   {Renzini}, {Rettura}, {Serra}, \& {The Goods Team}}]{vanzella06}

830:   {Vanzella}, E. et al.  2006, \aap, 454, 423

831: 

832: \bibitem[{{Vazdekis} {et~al.}(1996){Vazdekis}, {Casuso}, {Peletier},

833:   \& {Beckman}}]{vazdekis96} {Vazdekis}, A., {Casuso}, E., {Peletier},

834:   R.~F., \& {Beckman}, J.~E. 1996, \apjs, 106, 307

835: 

836: \bibitem[{{Werner} {et~al.}(2004){Werner}, {Roellig}, {Low}, {Rieke},

837:   {Rieke}, {Hoffmann}, {Young}, {Houck}, {Brandl}, {Fazio}, {Hora},

838:   {Gehrz}, {Helou}, {Soifer}, {Stauffer}, {Keene}, {Eisenhardt},

839:   {Gallagher}, {Gautier}, {Irace}, {Lawrence}, {Simmons}, {Van Cleve},

840:   {Jura}, {Wright}, \& {Cruikshank}}]{werner04} {Werner}, M.~W. et

841:   al. 2004, \apjs, 154, 1

842: 

843: \bibitem[{{Wirth} {et~al.}(2004){Wirth}, {Willmer}, {Amico},

844:   {Chaffee}, {Goodrich}, {Kwok}, {Lyke}, {Mader}, {Tran}, {Barger},

845:   {Cowie}, {Capak}, {Coil}, {Cooper}, {Conrad}, {Davis}, {Faber},

846:   {Hu}, {Koo}, {Le Mignant}, {Newman}, \& {Songaila}}]{wirth04}

847:   {Wirth}, G.~D. et al. 2004, \aj, 127, 3121

848: 

849: \bibitem[{{Wolf} {et~al.}(2003){Wolf}, {Meisenheimer}, {Rix}, {Borch},

850:   {Dye}, \& {Kleinheinrich}}]{wolf03} {Wolf}, C., {Meisenheimer}, K.,

851:   {Rix}, H.-W., {Borch}, A., {Dye}, S., \& {Kleinheinrich}, M. 2003,

852:   \aap, 401, 73

853: 

854: \bibitem[{{Worthey}(1994)}]{worthey94} {Worthey}, G. 1994, \apjs, 95,

855: 107

856: 

857: \bibitem[{{Zheng} {et~al.}(2006){Zheng}, {Bell}, {Rix}, {Papovich},

858:   {Le Floc'h}, {Rieke}, \& {P{\'e}rez-Gonz{\'a}lez}}]{zheng06}

859:   {Zheng}, X.~Z., {Bell}, E.~F., {Rix}, H.-W., {Papovich}, C., {Le

860:   Floc'h}, E., {Rieke}, G.~H., \& {P{\'e}rez-Gonz{\'a}lez},

861:   P.~G. 2006, \apj, 640, 784

862: 

863: \end{thebibliography}

864: 

865: \input{tab1.tex}

866: 

867: \end{document}

868: