1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2:
3: %\usepackage{natbib, psfig}
4:
5: \citestyle{aa}
6:
7: \shorttitle{\ion{N}{4}] Emitting Quasars}
8:
9: \begin{document}
10: \title{Discovery of Two Spectroscopically Peculiar, \\ Low-Luminosity
11: Quasars at $z\sim 4$\altaffilmark{1}}
12:
13: \author{Eilat Glikman\altaffilmark{2}, S.~G. Djorgovski\altaffilmark{2},
14: Daniel Stern\altaffilmark{3}, Milan Bogosavljevi\'{c}\altaffilmark{2}, \&
15: Ashish Mahabal\altaffilmark{2}}
16:
17: \altaffiltext{1}{The data presented herein were obtained at the W.M. Keck
18: Observatory, which is operated as a scientific partnership among the
19: California Institute of Technology, the University of California and the
20: National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The Observatory was made
21: possible by the generous financial support of the W.M. Keck Foundation.}
22:
23: \altaffiltext{2}{Astronomy Department, California Institute of Technology,
24: Pasadena, CA, 91125, email: [eilatg,george,milan,aam]@astro.caltech.edu}
25:
26: \altaffiltext{3}{Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Mail Stop 169-506,
27: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109,
28: email: stern@thisvi.jpl.nasa.gov}
29:
30: \begin{abstract}
31:
32: We report the discovery of two low-luminosity quasars at $z \sim 4$,
33: both of which show prominent \ion{N}{4}] $\lambda$1486\AA\ emission.
34: This line is extremely rare in quasar spectra at any redshift;
35: detecting it in two out of a sample of 23 objects (i.e., $\sim 9\%$
36: of the sample) is intriguing and is likely due to the low-luminosity,
37: high-redshift quasar sample we are studying. This is still a poorly
38: explored regime, where contributions from associated, early starbursts may
39: be significant. One interpretation of this line posits photoionization
40: by very massive young stars. Seeing \ion{N}{4}] $\lambda$1486\AA\
41: emission in a high-redshift quasar may thus be understood in the context
42: of co-formation and early co-evolution of galaxies and their supermassive
43: black holes. Alternatively, we may be seeing a phenomenon related to the
44: early evolution of quasar broad emission line regions. The non-detection
45: (and possibly even broad absorption) of \ion{N}{5} $\lambda$1240\AA\ line
46: in the spectrum of one of these quasars may support that interpretation.
47: These two objects may signal a new faint quasar population or an early
48: AGN evolutionary stage at high redshifts.
49:
50: \end{abstract}
51:
52: \keywords{quasars: emission lines --- quasars: general --- galaxies:
53: evolution --- quasars: individual (DLS1053$-$0528) --- quasars: individual
54: (NDWFS1433+3408)}
55:
56:
57: \section{Introduction}
58:
59: A growing body of theoretical models backed by emerging observational
60: evidence paints a picture of joint formation and evolution of
61: galaxies and quasars; for reviews see, e.g., the proceedings edited
62: by \citet{Ho04}, \citet{Djorgovski05}, and references therein.
63: In this picture, merger-driven build-up of massive halos trigger both
64: vigorous star formation and fuel the central black hole igniting a
65: quasar \citep{Kauffmann00,Hopkins06}. AGN feedback is now believed
66: to be an essential factor in the formation and evolution of galaxies.
67: Understanding the AGN-starburst connection is especially interesting
68: at high redshifts, as we probe the epoch of the initial assembly of
69: massive galaxies. Observationally, this is challenging in the case
70: of host galaxies of luminous Type~I quasars, as the AGN activity far
71: outshines any star formation related processes. However, by observing
72: lower luminosity Type~I quasars or Type~II (e.g., obscured) quasars, the
73: blinding intensity of the central engine is reduced, allowing properties
74: of the host galaxy to be studied.
75:
76: In this Letter, we report the discovery of two low-luminosity Type~I
77: quasars where we may be seeing evidence for a simultaneous starburst
78: with a top-heavy IMF, and AGN activity. Both quasars show a prominent,
79: moderately-broad \ion{N}{4}] $\lambda 1486$\AA\ emission line, which is
80: rarely seen in quasar spectra at any redshift.
81:
82:
83: \section{Observations}
84:
85: The two objects are low-luminosity quasars at $z \sim 4$, found in
86: a sample of 23 objects used to measure the low-luminosity end of the
87: quasar luminosity function (QLF) at $z \sim 4$ \citep{Bogosavlevic07}.
88: The parent sample ranges in redshift from $z=3.7$ to $z=5.1$.
89: The candidates for this sample were selected from the NOAO Deep Wide
90: Field Survey (NDWFS) Bo\"{o}tes field \citep{Jannuzi99} and the Deep
91: Lens Survey \citep[DLS;][]{Wittman02}. Quasar candidates were selected
92: based on the colors of simulated quasars in the $3.5<z<5.2$ redshift
93: range, incorporating a range of spectral slopes, Ly$\alpha$ equivalent
94: widths, and intervening neutral hydrogen absorbers, down to the limiting
95: magnitude of $R=24$. Finding charts for the two \ion{N}{4}] quasars are
96: presented in Figure \ref{fig:finding_charts}. Details of the survey and
97: candidate selection will be presented by Bogosavljevi\'{c} et al. (2007).
98:
99: We obtained spectroscopic followup for our candidates on UT 2006
100: May 20 through 22 with the Low-Resolution Imaging Spectrometer
101: \citep[LRIS;][]{Oke95} on the Keck I telescope. Only the red camera was
102: used, with the 400 lines mm$^{-1}$ grating blazed at 8500\AA. The spectra
103: were reduced using BOGUS, an IRAF package developed by Stern, Bunker, \&
104: Stanford\footnote{\url{https://zwolfkinder.jpl.nasa.gov/$\sim$stern/homepage/bogus.html}}
105: for reducing slitmask data, modified slightly for our single-slit data.
106: DLS1053$-$0528 was discovered in a 1800 second exposure of a candidate in
107: the DLS F4 field and NDWFS1433$+$3408 was identified from a 900 second
108: exposure of a candidate in the Bo\"{o}tes field. The final spectra are
109: presented in Figure \ref{fig:spectra} and the source parameters are
110: listed in Table \ref{table:data}.
111:
112: Several things are worth noting. First is the detection of the
113: \ion{N}{4}] $\lambda 1486$\AA\ emission lines, which is particularly
114: strong in DLS1053$-$0528 (e.g., in comparison with the \ion{C}{4} $\lambda
115: 1549$\AA\ line). At the same time, the commonly observed \ion{N}{5}
116: $\lambda 1240$\AA\ emission line is entirely absent, and may even be
117: seen in absorption in DLS1053$-$0528 (see Figure \ref{fig:niv_fits}).
118: This latter observation is somewhat unusual since the \ion{C}{4}
119: $\lambda 1549$\AA\ line in this source does not show broad absorption.
120: While broad absorption lines are seen in approximately 10\% of quasars,
121: such quasars will show broad absorption in all permitted species.
122:
123: The permitted emission lines for the two \ion{N}{4}] quasars are narrow
124: compared with typical quasar line-widths. A single component Voigt fit
125: to Ly$\alpha$ measures a full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) of $\sim
126: 500$ km s$^{-1}$. Since the blue side of the Ly$\alpha$ profile is
127: absorbed, we forced symmetry in the line by mirroring the red side of
128: the line profile over the peak wavelength. To search for a broad-line
129: component we fit a two-component Gaussian to the Ly$\alpha$ profile. For
130: DLS1053$-$0528, we measure a narrow-line FWHM of 434 km s$^{-1}$ and
131: a broad-line FWHM of 1727 km s$^{-1}$. In NDWFS1433$+$3408 we measure
132: a narrow-line FWHM of 713 km s$^{-1}$ and a broad-line FWHM of 3015 km
133: s$^{-1}$. Therefore, while these objects have significant contribution
134: from their narrow-line components ($50\%$ of the line flux in DLS1053$-$0528
135: and $24\%$ in NDWFS1433$+$3408), their broad-line velocities of $>1000$
136: km s$^{-1}$ place them in the quasar regime. Using the velocity widths
137: from the broad-line component of Ly$\alpha$ as a proxy for \ion{C}{4}
138: or H$\beta$, and the black hole mass estimators from \citet{Dietrich04}
139: and \citet{Vestergaard06}, we obtain $M_{BH} \sim (5 - 15) \times 10^6
140: ~M_\sun$ for DLS1053$-$0528 and $M_{BH} \sim (32 - 77) \times 10^6
141: ~M_\sun$ for NDWFS1433$+$3408. Consistent with the somewhat narrow
142: line widths (for a broad-lined quasar) and the low-luminosity, these
143: inferred black hole masses are much lower than the masses inferred for
144: luminous quasars.
145:
146:
147: On UT 2007 January 23 we imaged DLS1053$-$0528 with the Slit-viewing
148: Camera (SCAM) of the NIRSPEC instrument on Keck-II. We used the $J$-band
149: filter and imaged the source with a 9-point dither pattern of 120 second
150: exposures, for a total of 1080 seconds at the position of the quasar. The
151: seeing was 0\farcs7. The data were reduced using the XDIMSUM package
152: in IRAF. We calibrate our image to the 2MASS $J$-band using a 15.26
153: magnitude point source that is detected in the field. The quasar is not
154: detected, with a 3$\sigma$ magnitude threshold of 24.9 (Vega) magnitudes.
155:
156: NDWFS1433$+$3408 was observed as part of FLAMEX, a near-infrared survey
157: overlapping 4.1 deg$^2$ of the Bo\"{o}tes area \citep{Elston06}. The
158: quasar is detected at $\sim 5\sigma$ in both the $J$ and $K_s$ images.
159: In addition, this quasar was observed in the IRAC Shallow Survey,
160: an 8.5 deg$^2$ {\em Spitzer} imaging survey of the Bo\"{o}tes field
161: \citep{Eisenhardt04}. The source is faintly ($<5 \sigma$) detected
162: at 3.6\micron\ and 4.5\micron\ at 19.0 and 19.1 (Vega) magnitudes,
163: respectively. We list the 4\arcsec\ aperture magnitude from the
164: FLAMEX catalog as well as the IRAC detections in Table \ref{table:data}.
165: The quasar is not detected in the 5.8\micron\ or 8.0\micron\ images, whose
166: $5\sigma$ detection thresholds are $15.9$ and $15.2$ (Vega; 3\arcsec\
167: aperture) magnitudes, respectively. Note that the [3.6]$-$[4.5] colors
168: for this object are quite blue compared to typical mid-infrared colors
169: of AGN \citep[e.g.,][]{Stern05}. The result is not unexpected: at $z
170: \sim 4$, H$\alpha$ emission is shifted into the shortest wavelength IRAC
171: band, causing AGN at this redshift to have blue [3.6]$-$[4.5] colors.
172:
173: Figure \ref{fig:sed} plots the spectral energy distributions (SEDs)
174: of both objects, using all available photometry. We compare this
175: SED with the SDSS composite spectrum \citep{VandenBerk01} as well as
176: the starburst template from \citet{Kinney96} with $E(B-V)<0.1$, both
177: shifted to $z=3.88$. Significant deviations are seen, especially at
178: long wavelengths where both objects appear much bluer than the average
179: quasar and starbusrt spectra. The SED of NDWFS1433$+$3408 seems more
180: consistent with the starburst spectrum, at least in the rest-frame
181: ultraviolet, but DLS1053$-$0528 deviates strongly from both.
182:
183:
184: \section{Discussion}
185:
186: The most striking feature in the spectra of these two faint quasars is the
187: presence of the extremely unusual \ion{N}{4}] $\lambda 1486$\AA\ emission
188: line. The quasar population generally shows remarkable spectroscopic
189: similarity out to the highest observed redshifts, with no obvious signs of
190: evolution \citep[e.g.,][]{Fan06b}. {\em None} of the published average
191: quasar spectral templates show any trace of the \ion{N}{4}] $\lambda
192: 1486$\AA\ line (Figure \ref{fig:composites}). The top spectrum (solid
193: line) is the SDSS quasar composite from \citet{VandenBerk01}. The quasars
194: that contribute to this part of the spectrum are at redshifts comparable
195: to the quasars in our sample, but they sample the bright end of the quasar
196: luminosity function. The bottom spectrum (dotted line) is the {\em HST}
197: UV composite spectrum from \citet{Telfer02}. The objects contributing
198: to this part of the spectrum are low-redshift quasars ($z<1$).
199:
200: The only strong detection of this line in a quasar that we are aware of is
201: in the nitrogen quasar Q0353$-$383 \citep{Osmer80}. This object has been
202: analyzed by \citet{Baldwin03} who derive an overabundance of nitrogen
203: by a factor as high as $5-15$ times solar in this object. A sample
204: of apparently nitrogen-rich quasars was compiled by \citet{Bentz04}
205: from the 6650 quasars in the SDSS DR1 database with $1.6<z<4.1$
206: (allowing for the detection of \ion{N}{4}] $\lambda 1486$\AA\
207: and \ion{N}{3}] $\lambda 1750$\AA). \citet{Bentz04} estimate that
208: ``nitrogen-enriched'' quasars make up at most $0.2\%-0.7\%$ of quasars.
209: Their sample has luminosities in the range $M_i = -28.07$ to $M_i =
210: -24.63$. We found two such objects in a sample of 23 quasars ($8.7\%$)
211: that are concentrated at $z\sim 4$ and are 0.7 magnitudes deeper than
212: the SDSS sample. They found 20 quasars with equivalent widths $\geq$
213: 2.0\AA\ in both nitrogen lines and 33 quasars with EWs $\geq$ 2.0\AA\
214: in only one of the nitrogen lines. In these quasars the \ion{N}{4}]
215: $\lambda 1486$\AA\ line is accompanied by similarly strong \ion{N}{5}
216: $\lambda 1240$\AA\ and \ion{N}{3}] $\lambda 1750$\AA, the latter of which
217: is outside our wavelengths range. We fit Voigt profiles to the nitrogen
218: lines in our spectra (as well as to Ly$\alpha$ and \ion{C}{4} $\lambda
219: 1549$\AA) to determine line fluxes, equivalent widths and dispersion
220: velocities (Table \ref{table:lines}, Figure \ref{fig:niv_fits}). The mean
221: \ion{N}{4}] $\lambda 1486$\AA\ equivalent widths for the \citet{Bentz04}
222: sample is 3.7\AA\ ($\sigma_{EW}=$ 1.5\AA), while the equivalent widths of
223: \ion{N}{4}] $\lambda 1486$\AA\ for our quasars are 280.2\AA\ for the DLS
224: source and $24.5$\AA\ for the Bo\"{o}tes source. This, combined with the
225: non-detection (and possible absorption) of \ion{N}{5} $\lambda 1240$\AA\
226: in the DLS source suggests that these quasars may be of a different ilk
227: than the ``nitrogen-enriched'' population.
228:
229: In galaxies with no AGN signature, we are aware of only two other
230: instances of this line being seen in the high-redshift Universe. One
231: especially telling detection is in the spectrum of the Lynx arc,
232: a gravitationally lensed HII galaxy at z=3.357 \citep{Fosbury03}.
233: The line intensities in this object's spectrum, strong \ion{N}{4}]
234: $\lambda\lambda 1483,1487$\AA, \ion{O}{3}] $\lambda\lambda 1661,1666$\AA,
235: and \ion{C}{3}] $\lambda\lambda 1907,1909$\AA, as well as the absence of
236: \ion{N}{5} $\lambda 1240$, favor a hot (80,000 K) blackbody over an AGN
237: as the ionizing source. The \citet{Fosbury03} modeling of the spectrum
238: suggests a top heavy IMF, which is especially interesting since such
239: an IMF is now believed to be characteristic of early, metal poor star
240: formation, e.g. Population~III stars. Alternatively, \citet{Binette03}
241: suggest an obscured AGN as the photoionizing source of the Lynx arc.
242: Their model invokes dense absorbing gas near a central AGN that filters
243: the powerlaw and mimicks the hot blackbody suggested by \citet{Fosbury03}
244: This model does require at least a weak \ion{N}{5} $\lambda 1240$\AA\
245: line detection.
246:
247: The second known \ion{N}{4}] $\lambda 1486$\AA\ emitter is a $z=5.55$
248: galaxy in the GOODS survey \citep{Vanzella06,Fontanot07}. Similar to the
249: Lynx arc, this object shows an extremely strong Ly$\alpha$ line as well
250: as \ion{N}{4}] $\lambda 1486$\AA, while \ion{N}{5} $\lambda 1240$\AA\
251: is absent. No detailed analysis has been published on this source as yet.
252:
253: An alternative possibility is that we are witnessing an evolutionary
254: effect in the quasar broad-emission-line region. This is suggested
255: by the traditional broad-line shape of \ion{N}{4} $\lambda 1486$\AA\
256: in DLS1053$-$0528 as well the peculiar absence (or even absorption)
257: of \ion{N}{5} $\lambda 1240$\AA\ in its spectrum. Detailed modeling
258: of such effects is beyond the scope of this paper.
259:
260: The detection of such a rare emission line in two out of 23 $z\sim 4$
261: quasars in our sample (i.e., $\sim 9$\% of the sample) suggests that
262: it occurs more commonly in low luminosity quasars at high redshifts,
263: a regime which we are now exploring systematically for the first time.
264: At these luminosities we are probing deep into the QLF where the effects
265: of a luminous starbursts can be detected more easily; if there is an
266: evolutionary trend, such phenomena may be present at high redshifts,
267: and not in the better studied quasar samples at $z \sim 0 - 2$. As the
268: sample sizes of comparably faint AGN at these redshifts increase, we will
269: be able to determine whether this is indeed a systematic evolutionary
270: effect related to the early stages of co-formation and co-evolution of
271: galaxies and AGN. \\ \\
272:
273: We thank the referee for helpful feedback. We are grateful to the staff
274: of W. M. Keck observatory for their assistance during our observing runs.
275: This work was supported in part by the NSF grant AST-0407448, and by
276: the Ajax foundation. The work of DS was carried out at Jet Propulsion
277: Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under a contract with
278: NASA.
279:
280: \clearpage
281:
282: \begin{thebibliography}{}
283: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi
284:
285: \bibitem[{{Baldwin} {et~al.}(2003){Baldwin}, {Hamann}, {Korista}, {Ferland},
286: {Dietrich}, \& {Warner}}]{Baldwin03}
287: {Baldwin}, J.~A., {Hamann}, F., {Korista}, K.~T., {Ferland}, G.~J., {Dietrich},
288: M., \& {Warner}, C. 2003, \apj, 583, 649
289:
290: \bibitem[{{Bentz} {et~al.}(2004){Bentz}, {Hall}, \& {Osmer}}]{Bentz04}
291: {Bentz}, M.~C., {Hall}, P.~B., \& {Osmer}, P.~S. 2004, \aj, 128, 561
292:
293: \bibitem[{{Binette} {et~al.}(2003){Binette}, {Groves}, {Villar-Mart{\'{\i}}n},
294: {Fosbury}, \& {Axon}}]{Binette03}
295: {Binette}, L., {Groves}, B., {Villar-Mart{\'{\i}}n}, M., {Fosbury}, R.~A.~E.,
296: \& {Axon}, D.~J. 2003, \aap, 405, 975
297:
298: \bibitem[{Bogosavljevi{\'c} {et~al.}(2007)}]{Bogosavlevic07}
299: {Bogosavljevi{\'c}}, M., {Glikman}, E., {Djorgovski}, S.~G., {Mahabal}, A.,
300: {Stern}, D., {Jannuzi}, B.~T. \& {Dey}, A., 2007, in preparation
301:
302: \bibitem[{Dietrich} \& {Hamann}(2004)]{Dietrich04} {Dietrich}, M., \&
303: {Hamann}, F.\ 2004, \apj, 611, 761
304:
305: \bibitem[{{Djorgovski}(2005)}]{Djorgovski05}
306: {Djorgovski}, S.~G. 2005, in The Tenth Marcel Grossmann Meeting., ed.
307: M.~{Novello}, S.~{Perez Bergliaffa}, \& R.~{Ruffini}, Singapore: World Scientific Publishing, 422
308:
309: \bibitem[{{Eisenhardt} {et~al.}(2004){Eisenhardt}, {Stern}, {Brodwin}, {Fazio},
310: {Rieke}, {Rieke}, {Werner}, {Wright}, {Allen}, {Arendt}, {Ashby}, {Barmby},
311: {Forrest}, {Hora}, {Huang}, {Huchra}, {Pahre}, {Pipher}, {Reach}, {Smith},
312: {Stauffer}, {Wang}, {Willner}, {Brown}, {Dey}, {Jannuzi}, \&
313: {Tiede}}]{Eisenhardt04}
314: {Eisenhardt}, P.~R. {et~al.} 2004, \apjs, 154, 48
315:
316: \bibitem[{{Elston} {et~al.}(2006){Elston}, {Gonzalez}, {McKenzie}, {Brodwin},
317: {Brown}, {Cardona}, {Dey}, {Dickinson}, {Eisenhardt}, {Jannuzi}, {Lin},
318: {Mohr}, {Raines}, {Stanford}, \& {Stern}}]{Elston06}
319: {Elston}, R.~J. {et~al.} 2006, \apj, 639, 816
320:
321: \bibitem[{{Fan}(2006)}]{Fan06b}
322: {Fan}, X. 2006, New Astronomy Review, 50, 665
323:
324: \bibitem[{{Fontanot} {et~al.}(2007){Fontanot}, {Cristiani}, {Monaco}, {Nonino},
325: {Vanzella}, {Brandt}, {Grazian}, \& {Mao}}]{Fontanot07}
326: {Fontanot}, F., {Cristiani}, S., {Monaco}, P., {Nonino}, M., {Vanzella}, E.,
327: {Brandt}, W.~N., {Grazian}, A., \& {Mao}, J. 2007, \aap, 461, 39
328:
329: \bibitem[{{Fosbury} {et~al.}(2003){Fosbury}, {Villar-Mart{\'{\i}}n},
330: {Humphrey}, {Lombardi}, {Rosati}, {Stern}, {Hook}, {Holden}, {Stanford},
331: {Squires}, {Rauch}, \& {Sargent}}]{Fosbury03}
332: {Fosbury}, R.~A.~E. {et~al.} 2003, \apj, 596, 797
333:
334: \bibitem[{{Ho}(2004)}]{Ho04}
335: {Ho}, L.~C., ed. 2004, in {Coevolution of Black Holes and Galaxies}, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 496
336:
337: \bibitem[{{Hopkins} {et~al.}(2006){Hopkins}, {Hernquist}, {Cox}, {Di Matteo},
338: {Robertson}, \& {Springel}}]{Hopkins06}
339: {Hopkins}, P.~F., {Hernquist}, L., {Cox}, T.~J., {Di Matteo}, T., {Robertson},
340: B., \& {Springel}, V. 2006, \apjs, 163, 1
341:
342: \bibitem[{{Jannuzi} \& {Dey}(1999)}]{Jannuzi99}
343: {Jannuzi}, B.~T., \& {Dey}, A. 1999, in ASP Conf. Ser. 191, Photometric Redshifts and the Detection of High Redshift Galaxies, ed. R.~{Weymann} {et~al.}, 111
344:
345: \bibitem[{{Kauffmann} \& {Haehnelt}(2000)}]{Kauffmann00}
346: {Kauffmann}, G., \& {Haehnelt}, M. 2000, \mnras, 311, 576
347:
348: \bibitem[Kinney et al.(1996)]{Kinney96} Kinney, A.~L., Calzetti,
349: D., Bohlin, R.~C., McQuade, K., Storchi-Bergmann, T., \& Schmitt, H.~R.\
350: 1996, \apj, 467, 38
351:
352: \bibitem[Oke et al.(1995)]{Oke95} Oke, J.~B., et al.\ 1995,
353: \pasp, 107, 375
354:
355: \bibitem[{{Osmer} \& {Smith}(1980)}]{Osmer80}
356: {Osmer}, P.~S., \& {Smith}, M.~G. 1980, \apjs, 42, 333
357:
358: \bibitem[{{Stern} {et~al.}(2005){Stern}, {et al.}}]{Stern05}
359: {Stern}, D. {et~al.} 2005, \apj, 631, 163
360:
361: \bibitem[{{Telfer} {et~al.}(2002){Telfer}, {Zheng}, {Kriss}, \&
362: {Davidsen}}]{Telfer02}
363: {Telfer}, R.~C., {Zheng}, W., {Kriss}, G.~A., \& {Davidsen}, A.~F. 2002, \apj,
364: 565, 773
365:
366: \bibitem[{{Vanden Berk} {et~al.}(2001){Vanden Berk}, {Richards}, {Bauer},
367: {Strauss}, {Schneider}, {Heckman}, {York}, {Hall}, {Fan}, {Knapp},
368: {Anderson}, {Annis}, {Bahcall}, {Bernardi}, {Briggs}, {Brinkmann}, {Brunner},
369: {Burles}, {Carey}, {Castander}, {Connolly}, {Crocker}, {Csabai}, {Doi},
370: {Finkbeiner}, {Friedman}, {Frieman}, {Fukugita}, {Gunn}, {Hennessy},
371: {Ivezi{\' c}}, {Kent}, {Kunszt}, {Lamb}, {Leger}, {Long}, {Loveday},
372: {Lupton}, {Meiksin}, {Merelli}, {Munn}, {Newberg}, {Newcomb}, {Nichol},
373: {Owen}, {Pier}, {Pope}, {Rockosi}, {Schlegel}, {Siegmund}, {Smee}, {Snir},
374: {Stoughton}, {Stubbs}, {SubbaRao}, {Szalay}, {Szokoly}, {Tremonti}, {Uomoto},
375: {Waddell}, {Yanny}, \& {Zheng}}]{VandenBerk01}
376: {Vanden Berk}, D.~E. {et~al.} 2001, \aj, 122, 549
377:
378: \bibitem[{{Vanzella} {et~al.}(2006){Vanzella}, {Cristiani}, {Dickinson},
379: {Kuntschner}, {Nonino}, {Rettura}, {Rosati}, {Vernet}, {Cesarsky},
380: {Ferguson}, {Fosbury}, {Giavalisco}, {Grazian}, {Haase}, {Moustakas},
381: {Popesso}, {Renzini}, {Stern}, \& {The Goods Team}}]{Vanzella06}
382: {Vanzella}, E. {et~al.} 2006, \aap, 454, 423
383:
384: \bibitem[{Vestergaard} \& {Peterson}(2006)]{Vestergaard06} {Vestergaard},
385: M., \& {Peterson}, B.~M.\ 2006, \apj, 641, 689
386:
387: \bibitem[{{Wittman} {et~al.}(2002){Wittman}, {Margoniner}, {Tyson}, {Cohen},
388: {Becker}, \& {Dell'Antonio}}]{Wittman02}
389: {Wittman}, D.~E., {Margoniner}, V., {Tyson}, J.~A., {Cohen}, J.~G., {Becker},
390: A., \& {Dell'Antonio}, I.~P. 2002, in \procspie, 4836, Survey and Other Telescope Technologies and Discoveries., ed. J.~A. {Tyson} \& P.~S.~. {Wolff}, S., 21
391:
392: \end{thebibliography}
393:
394: \clearpage
395:
396: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccccccc}
397: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
398: \tablecolumns{7}
399: \tablewidth{0pt}
400: \tablehead{
401: \colhead{} & \colhead{R.A.} & \colhead{Dec.} & \colhead{} &
402: \colhead{$R$} & \colhead{$J$} & \colhead{$K_s$} &
403: \colhead{[3.6]} & \colhead{[4.5]} \\
404: \colhead{Name} & \colhead{(J2000)} & \colhead{(J2000)} & \colhead{$z$} &
405: \colhead{(mag)\tablenotemark{a}} &
406: \colhead{(mag)} & \colhead{(mag)} & \colhead{(mag)} & \colhead{(mag)}
407: }
408: \tablecaption{\ion{N}{4}] Emitting Quasars \label{table:data}}
409: \startdata
410: DLS1053$-$0528 & 10 53 46.1 & $-$05 28 59 & 4.02 & 23.83 & $>$26.4 &\nodata&\nodata&\nodata \\
411: NDWFS1433$+$3408 & 14 33 24.5 & $+$34 08 41 & 3.88 & 22.62 & 21.49 & 19.94 & 19.0 & 19.1 \\ %& $>17$ & $>16.5$\\
412: \enddata
413: \tablenotetext{a}{AB magnitudes. All other magnitudes are Vega-based magnitudes.}
414: \end{deluxetable}
415:
416: \clearpage
417:
418: \begin{deluxetable}{lccc}
419: \tablecolumns{4}
420: \tablewidth{0pt}
421: \tablehead{
422: \colhead{} & \colhead{Line Flux} & \colhead{rest-frame EW} & \colhead{FWHM} \\
423: \colhead{Line} & \colhead{(10$^{-16}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$)} & \colhead{(\AA)} & \colhead{(km s$^{-1}$)}
424: }
425: \tablecaption{Quasar Line Properties \label{table:lines}}
426: \startdata
427: \sidehead{DLS1053$-$0528:}
428: Ly$\alpha$ & $2.92\pm0.08$ & 762.1 & 1726.8\tablenotemark{a} \\
429: \ion{N}{5} & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
430: \ion{N}{4}] & $1.048\pm0.008$ & 280.2 & 807.5 \\
431: \ion{C}{4} & $0.55\pm0.02$ & 91.1 & 1101.5 \\
432: \sidehead{NDWFS1433$+$3408:}
433: Ly$\alpha$ & $3.8\pm0.3$ & 244.6 & 3015.6\tablenotemark{a} \\
434: \ion{N}{5} & $0.25\pm0.18$ & 11.6 & 1086.9 \\
435: \ion{N}{4}] & $0.21\pm0.07$ & 24.5 & 524.9 \\
436: \ion{C}{4} & $1.3\pm0.3$ & 91.1 & 1334.0 \\
437: \enddata
438: \tablenotetext{a}{These line widths are from the broad component of a two-component Gaussian fit to the Ly$\alpha$ line. See \S2 for details on the fitting procedure.}
439: \end{deluxetable}
440:
441: \clearpage
442:
443: \begin{figure}
444: \epsscale{.60}
445: \plotone{f1.ps}
446: \caption{3\arcmin $\times$ 3\arcmin\ finding charts from the $R$-band
447: images of the original survey data. DLS1053$-$0528 is on the {\em top}
448: (the gray stipe through the center of the image masks a bleed trail from
449: a nearby saturated star) and NDWFS1433$+$3408 is displayed on the {\em
450: bottom}. In these images, north is up and east is to the left. The white
451: circles mark the locations of the quasars.}\label{fig:finding_charts}
452:
453: \end{figure}
454:
455: \clearpage
456:
457: \begin{figure}
458: \epsscale{1.0}
459: \plotone{f2.ps}
460: \caption{Keck LRIS spectra of the \ion{N}{4}] $\lambda$1486\AA\
461: emitting quasars. {\em Top}: $z=4.02$ quasar found in the DLS field.
462: This spectrum {\em lacks} \ion{N}{5} $\lambda 1240$\AA\ in emission
463: but the line appears present as a broad absorption line. {\em Bottom}:
464: $z=3.88$ quasar found in the NDWFS Bo\"{o}tes field. This object shows a
465: weaker \ion{N}{4}] $\lambda 1486$\AA\ line and a possible weak detection
466: of \ion{N}{5} $\lambda 1240$\AA.}\label{fig:spectra} \end{figure}
467:
468: \clearpage
469:
470: \begin{figure}
471: \epsscale{1.0}
472: \plotone{f3.eps}
473: \caption{Voigt profile fits (dotted lines, with continuum model shown
474: by the dot-dashed line) to Nitrogen lines in our quasars. The line
475: fits to DLS1053$-$0528 are shown in the top panels and the fits to
476: NDWFS1433$+$3408 are shown in the bottom panels.}\label{fig:niv_fits}
477: \end{figure}
478:
479: \clearpage
480:
481: \begin{figure}
482: \plotone{f4.eps}
483: \caption{Rest-frame spectral energy distribution (SED) for
484: NDWFS1433$+$3408 ({\em squares}) and DLS1053$-$0528 ({\em triangles})
485: compared with the SDSS quasar composite spectrum from \citet[{\em
486: solid line;}][]{VandenBerk01} and an unobscured starburst template with
487: $E(B-V)<0.1$ from \citet[{\em dashed line;}][]{Kinney96}.} \label{fig:sed}
488: \end{figure}
489:
490: \clearpage
491:
492: \begin{figure}
493: \plotone{f5.eps}
494: \caption{Composite quasar spectra showing the absence of \ion{N}{4}]
495: $\lambda 1486$\AA. The top spectrum (solid line) is the SDSS quasar
496: composite from \citet{VandenBerk01}. The quasars that contribute to
497: this part of the spectrum are highly luminous high-redshift quasars.
498: The bottom spectrum (dashed line) is the {\em HST} UV composite spectrum
499: from \citet{Telfer02}. The objects contributing to this part of the
500: spectrum are low-redshift ($z<1$) quasars. The absence of \ion{N}{4}] in
501: both composite spectra suggests that it is necessary to probe deep into
502: the QLF at high-reshifts to witness the interaction of star formation
503: with AGN activity.}\label{fig:composites} \end{figure}
504:
505: \end{document}
506: