1: \documentstyle[12pt,psfig,draft,lscape,array,amssymb,longtable]{nature-ejb}
2: %\documentclass[12pt]{aastex}
3:
4: %\usepackage{epstopdf}
5: %\usepackage{lscape}
6: %\usepackage{array,amssymb,longtable,ulem}
7: %\usepackage{graphics}
8: %\usepackage{epstopdf}
9:
10: \textwidth16cm
11: \textheight23cm
12: \hoffset+1.5cm
13:
14: \def\simlt{\mathrel{\hbox{\rlap{\hbox{\lower4pt\hbox{$\sim$}}}\hbox{$<$}}}}
15: \def\simgt{\mathrel{\hbox{\rlap{\hbox{\lower4pt\hbox{$\sim$}}}\hbox{$>$}}}}
16: \def\ale{\mathrel{\hbox{\rlap{\hbox{\lower4pt\hbox{$\sim$}}}\hbox{$<$}}}}
17: \def\age{\mathrel{\hbox{\rlap{\hbox{\lower4pt\hbox{$\sim$}}}\hbox{$>$}}}}
18:
19: \begin{document}
20: \title{\Large An unusually brilliant transient in the galaxy Messier\,85}
21: \vspace{-0.1in}
22: \author{\small S. R. Kulkarni\affiliation[1]
23: {Caltech Optical Observatories 105-24,
24: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA\,91125,
25: USA\vspace{0.1in}},
26: E.~O.~Ofek\affiliationmark[1],
27: A.~Rau\affiliationmark[1],
28: S.~B.~Cenko\affiliation[2]
29: {Space Radiation Laboratory 220-47,
30: California Institute of Technology, CA\,91125, USA\vspace{0.1in}},
31: A.~M.~Soderberg\affiliationmark[1],
32: D.~B.~Fox\affiliation[3]
33: {Department of Astronomy,
34: Pennsylvania State University,
35: State College, PA\,16802, USA\vspace{0.1in}},
36: A.~Gal-Yam\affiliationmark[1],
37: P.~L.~Capak\affiliationmark[1],
38: D.~S.~Moon\affiliationmark[2],
39: W.~Li\affiliation[4]
40: {Astronomy Department, 601 Campbell Hall, University of California,
41: Berkeley, CA\,94720, USA \vspace{0.1in}},
42: A.~V.~Filippenko\affiliationmark[4],
43: E.~Egami\affiliation[5]
44: {Steward Observatory, 933 N Cherry Avenue, University of Arizona, Tucson AZ 85721, USA\vspace{0.1in}},
45: J.~Kartaltepe\affiliation[6]
46: {Institute of Astronomy, University of Hawaii,
47: 2680 Woodlawn Drive, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA}
48: \&\
49: D.~B.~Sanders\affiliationmark[6]
50: }
51:
52: \dates{2006 May 14}{}
53: \headertitle{Brilliant transient in Messier\,85}
54: \mainauthor{Kulkarni et al.}
55:
56:
57: \summary{
58: Historically, variable and transient sources have both surprised
59: astronomers and provided new views of the heavens. Here we report
60: the discovery of an optical transient in the outskirts of the
61: lenticular galaxy Messier 85 in the Virgo Cluster. With a peak
62: absolute $R$ magnitude of $-12\,$ this event is distinctly brighter
63: than novae, but fainter than type Ia supernovae (expected from
64: a population of old stars in lenticular galaxies). Archival images
65: of the field do not show a luminous star at that position with an
66: upper limit of $g\sim-$4.1, so it is unlikely to be a giant eruption
67: from a luminous blue variable star. Over a two month period the
68: transient emitted radiation energy of almost 10$^{47}$\,erg and
69: subsequently faded in the opical sky. It is similar to, but more
70: luminous at peak by a factor of 6 than, an enigmatic transient in
71: the galaxy M31. A possible origin of M85\,OT2006-1 is a stellar
72: merger. If so, searches for similar events in nearby galaxies
73: will not only allow to study the physics of hyper-Eddington sources,
74: but also probe an important phase in the evolution of stellar
75: binary systems.
76: }
77:
78: \maketitle
79:
80:
81: On January 7, 2006, the Lick Observatory Supernova Search {\it(LOSS)}
82: team, in their daily circular, reported a source with apparent
83: unfiltered magnitude of $\sim19.3$ projected 2.3\,kpc from the
84: center of the lenticular (S0) galaxy Messier\,85 (M85; also known
85: as NGC~4382)\footnotemark\footnotetext{see
86: \texttt{http://nedwww.ipac.caltech.edu}}, a member of the Virgo
87: cluster of galaxies; see Figure~\ref{fig:M85_HSTKeck}.
88: For reasons stated below we believe that the transient lies within
89: M85 and thus we name the source as
90: M85\,Optical Transient 2006-1 (or M85\,OT2006-1 for
91: short). Fortuitously this field was observed by the {\it Hubble Space
92: Telescope} (HST) three years earlier. From the archival HST data we
93: derive a pre-explosion
94: limiting magnitude of
95: F475W=$-4.3$.
96:
97:
98: On UT 2006~January~8 we initiated an optical photometric campaign
99: with the automated Palomar 60-inch telescope (see Figure~\ref{fig:LC}
100: and Table in the electronic supplementary material).
101: The light curve with a plateau of 70 days
102: is unlike that of type Ia supernova. The plateau duration is also too short
103: for an outburst from a Luminous Blue Variable (LBV; $\eta$ Carina).
104:
105: We began a program of spectroscopic observations with the Palomar
106: Hale and the Keck I telescopes (Figure~\ref{fig:SpectrumDBSPLRIS}).
107: The Palomar spectrum obtained on UT 2006 January 8 did not contain
108: any strong emission feature; the spectrum could be adequately
109: described by a black body spectrum with effective temperature of
110: approximately $T_{\rm eff}\sim 4600\,$K. Likewise the UT 2006
111: February 3 Keck spectrum was also featureless but unfortunately
112: did not cover H$\alpha$. The UT 2006 February 23 and 24 Keck spectra
113: showed a similar continuum but a number of emission lines were
114: readily detected (Figure~\ref{fig:SpectrumDBSPLRIS}). Since the
115: latter spectra were the deepest it is likely that the lines were
116: seen due to better sensitivity.
117:
118: We associate the strongest line at wavelength, $\lambda\simeq
119: 6587$\,\AA\ and that at $\lambda\simeq 4874$\,\AA\ with H$\alpha$
120: and H$\beta$, respectively. Accepting this identification, the
121: mean heliocentric (peak) velocity of the pair is $880\pm 130$
122: km\,s$^{-1}$. We were unable to conclusively identify the remaining
123: lines but do note that the spectra of many hypergiants contain a
124: number of unidentified\cite{hd94,hjp+06} emission lines.
125:
126: The systemic velocity\cite{slh+00} of M85 is $729\pm2$\,km\,s$^{-1}$
127: and the velocity dispersion\cite{ecp+04} in the vicinity of the
128: optical transient is 200\,km\,s$^{-1}$. The peak velocity of the
129: Balmer lines is thus consistent with M85\,OT2006-1 being located
130: in M85.
131: Accepting that M85 is the host galaxy (for which we adopt
132: a distance of 15\,Mpc, the standard distance to the Virgo
133: cluster\cite{fmg+01}) the absolute $R$-band magnitude of M85\,OT2006-1
134: is $-12\,$mag. This peak flux is ten times brighter than the
135: brightest nova but (at least) ten times less luminous than supernova
136: of the Type Ia (the sort expected in a lenticular galaxy).
137: The
138: narrow line width of the H$\alpha$ line,
139: $\sim 350\pm 140\,$km\,s$^{-1}$ (see Figure~\ref{fig:SpectrumDBSPLRIS}),
140: argue independently against both a nova and a supernova (including
141: of type II) origin.
142:
143: The Galactic foreground extinction towards M85 is negligible, $A_{\rm
144: R}=0.08$\cite{sfd98}. The source intrinsic attenuation can be
145: derived by comparing the observed ratio of the emission lines
146: fluxes of H$\alpha$ [$(3.2\pm0.2) \times
147: 10^{-16}\,$erg\,s$^{-1}$\,cm$^{-2}$] and H$\beta$ [$(0.9\pm0.1)
148: \times 10^{-16}\,$erg\,s$^{-1}$\,cm$^{-2}$] and the theoretical
149: value of 3.05\footnote{Case B recombination\cite{o89}, low-density limit,
150: $T=5000\,$K.}. We estimate $E(B-V) = 0.14_{-0.14}^{+0.17}$
151: which corresponds to an $R$-band extinction of $0.40_{-0.40}^{+0.48}$\,mag.
152: This is to low to explain the unusual color and temperature of
153: M85\,OT2006-1 with a strongly absorbed nova, supernova or LBV.
154:
155:
156:
157: We searched archival data from HSTe,
158: the Spitzer Space Telescope and the Chandra X-ray Observatory
159: with the view of constraining the progenitor.
160: There is no evidence for
161: a bright progenitor nor do we see tracers of massive star progenitors
162: (see Figure~\ref{fig:M85_HSTKeck}). This finding (and the shorter duration) rule out
163: that M85\,OT2006-1 is an LBV because
164: LBVs are amongst\cite{hd94} the brightest stars, $M_{\rm V}<-8$.
165: Along these lines we note that M85 is a galaxy composed of old stars with a
166: possible trace of
167: a spiral arm. We conclude that the M85\,OT2006-1 likely arises
168: from a population of stars with mass of few $M_\odot$ or smaller.
169:
170:
171: We now turn to the physical parameters of M85\,OT2006-1.
172: The bolometric luminosity flux (as traced by $4\pi d^2\nu f_\nu$;
173: here, $f_\nu$ is the spectral flux density at frequency $\nu$) of
174: M85\,OT2006-1 peaks at $L_p\sim2\times 10^{40}\,$erg\,s$^{-1}$. Over
175: the first two months the total radiated energy is about $E_{\rm ph}
176: \sim 6\times 10^{46}\,$erg. The inferred blackbody radius of the
177: object is substantial, $R=[L_p/(4\pi\sigma_B T_{\rm eff}^4)]^{1/2}\sim
178: 17 (T_{\rm eff}/4600\,{\rm K})^{-2}\,$AU.
179:
180:
181: The closest analog to M85\,OT2006-1 is M31\,RV, a bright
182: event\cite{rmp+89} (serendipitously) found in the bulge of Messier\,31 and still lacking
183: a satisfactory explanation. The extra-ordinary brilliance of
184: M85\,OT2006-1 (Figure~\ref{fig:Mtau}) makes it doubly mysterious.
185: The Galactic transient V838~Mon\cite{bws+02},
186: while considerably less luminous (see Figure~\ref{fig:Mtau}),
187: exhibit similar plateau light curves and redward evolution of the
188: broad-band spectrum.
189:
190:
191:
192: The distinctive physical parameters
193: (relative to novae and supernovae; see Figure~\ref{fig:Mtau}) and
194: the potential connection to a fundamental stellar process (merger)\cite{tylenda05}
195: may warrant coining a name. We suggest the simple
196: name {\it luminous red nova} with the adjectives highlighting
197: the principal characteristics of M85\,OT2006-1.
198: Statistics (including especially the nature of the
199: host galaxies) and follow up studies would help astronomers unravel
200: the origin of these enigmatic transients and also study the physics
201: of hyper-Eddington sources.
202:
203: \bibliographystyle{nature}
204: \bibliography{journals,m85}
205:
206: \bigskip\bigskip
207:
208: \noindent {\bf Supplementary Information} is linked to the online version of the paper at www.nature.com/nature.
209:
210: \bigskip
211:
212: \noindent {\bf Acknowledgments:} We thank D. Frail for discussion and constructive criticism. We
213: would like to express our gratitude to astronomers who maintain the
214: NED database at IPAC and the data archives of the Hubble Space
215: Telescope, the Spitzer Space Telescope and the Chandra X-ray
216: Telescope. Our work has been in part by NASA, NSF, the Sylvia and
217: Jim Katz Foundation and the TABASGO Foundation.
218:
219: \bigskip
220:
221: \noindent {\bf Author Information:} Reprints and permissions information is available at npg.nature.com/reprintsandpermissions. The authors declare no competing financial interests. Correspondence and requests for materials should be adressed to S.R.K (srk@astro.caltech.edu).
222:
223: \newpage
224: \begin{figure}[ht]
225: \centerline{\psfig{file=f1.ps,width=5in,angle=0}}
226: \caption[]
227: {{\small Optical images of the field around M85\,OT2006-1 obtained
228: at two epochs. Data were
229: obtained with the Low-Resolution Imager and Spectrograph
230: (LRIS;\cite{occ+95}) at Keck
231: (a) on Feb 3, 2006, and the Advanced Camera for
232: Surveys aboard the Hubble Space Telescope (b - F475W filter; c -
233: F850LP filter) on Feb 1, 2003. The event is located about 30" from the
234: center of M85 at $\alpha$=${\rm 12^h 25^m 23.82^s}$ and $\delta$=$18^\circ
235: 10^\prime56.2^{\prime\prime}$ (J2000).
236: After registering the Keck image to the HST image (rms of the
237: transformation was 40 mas) we were able to place the following
238: limits for
239: a pre-cursor object (progenitor star): $26.8\,$mag in the F475W filter
240: (exposure 750\,s) and $24.7\,$mag in the F850LP filter (exposure time
241: 1150\,s). These limits exclude an LBV\cite{hd94}
242: origin (for which $M_{\rm V}\sim -8\,$mag). Furthermore, we find no evidence for
243: young stars (supergiants, clusters and HII regions). An analysis of
244: Spitzer Space Telescope Infared Array Camera data obtained
245: on Dec 21, 2004, result in 3$\sigma$ upper limits of 25, 30, 60 and 75\,$\mu$Jy at 3.6,
246: 4.5, 5.8 and 8.0\,$\mu$m, respectively.
247: {\it LOSS} observed M85 two hundred and twenty
248: times over 2000--2006. We found no transient at the position of
249: M85\,OT2006-1 to (roughly $R$-band) magnitudes ranging from 20
250: to 21.
251: No X-ray emission was detected
252: in a {\it Chandra} X-ray Observatory observation\cite{ssi+03} obtained in
253: June, 2002, with a flux upper limit of $2.7\times10^{-4}\,$cnt~s$^{-1}$ in
254: the 0.3--10~keV band.}}
255: \label{fig:M85_HSTKeck}
256: \end{figure}
257:
258:
259:
260: \newpage
261: \begin{figure}[ht]
262: \centerline{\psfig{file=f2a.eps,width=5in,angle=0}}
263: \centerline{\psfig{file=f2b.eps,width=5.5in,angle=0}}
264: \caption[]
265: {{\small Temporal evolution of
266: M85\,OT2006-1. (a) observed light curve uncorrected for Galactic foreground extinction and (b) $\nu f_\nu$ including foreground extinction correction of $A_{V}=0.08$\cite{sfd98}.
267: Data for the plots are given in Photometry Table of the electronic
268: supplement and come from the following sources: Palomar 60-inch
269: (P60; $gRIz$), the Large Format Camera (LFC) on the Palomar Hale 200-inch
270: (P200; $zRI$), the Widefield Infrared Camera (WIRC) on P200 ($JHK$),
271: LRIS on the Keck-I 10-m telescope ($gRI$), Persson's Auxilary Nasmyth
272: Infrared Camera (PANIC) on the Magellan 6.5-m Baade telescope ($YJK$),
273: Near Infared Echelle Spectrograph (NIRSPEC) on the Keck-II 10-m
274: telescope ($JHK$) and the Wide Field Infrared Camera (WFCAM) on the
275: 3.8-m United Kingdom Infrared Telescope (UKIRT; $JHK$).}}
276: \label{fig:LC}
277: \end{figure}
278:
279: \newpage
280: \begin{figure}[htb]
281: \centerline{\psfig{file=f3.eps,width=4in}}
282: \caption[]
283: {{\small Optical spectra of M85\,OT2006-1. Data were obtained with the Double Beam Spectrograph\cite{oke81} (DBSP) at the Palomar Hale
284: 200-inch telescope (grey line, 1800\,s integration, Jan 8.53 UT, 2006) and Keck/LRIS
285: (blue line, 3000\,s, Feb 24.59 UT, 2006). Not strong emission or absorption
286: features are seen in the (native) DBSP spectrum. Specifically we place a limit of $6\times 10^{-16}$\,erg
287: s$^{-1}$\,cm$^{-2}$
288: for an emission line in the vicinity of H$\alpha$.
289: In the LRIS red channel spectrum the brightest emission feature is
290: at $\lambda=6587$\,\AA\ (flux of $(3.2\pm0.2) \times
291: 10^{-16}\,$erg\,s$^{-1}$\,cm$^{-2}$) which we identify with
292: redshifted H$\alpha$. The velocity of the line center is $1020\pm
293: 150$\,km\,s$^{-1}$ (see inset). On the blue side, the strongest
294: feature is at $\lambda=4875$\,\AA\, corresponding to
295: redshifted ($700\pm100\,$km\,s$^{-1}$) H$\beta$ (flux of $(0.9\pm0.1) \times
296: 10^{-16}\,$erg\,s$^{-1}$\,cm$^{-2}$) . The equivalent widths are
297: $10\pm1$\,\AA\ (H$\alpha$) and $5\pm1$\,\AA\ (H$\beta$). The full width
298: at half maximum (FWHM) of the H$\alpha$ line, after accounting for
299: the instrumental FWHM, is $350\pm 140$\,km\,s$^{-1}$.
300:
301: In addition we detect the following emission lines
302: (central wavelengths, typical uncertainty of 1\,\AA; and
303: fluxes, unit of $10^{-16}\,$erg\,s$^{-1}$\,cm$^{-2}$):
304: 4115\,\AA\ ($0.3\pm 0.1$), 6428\,\AA\ ($0.9\pm 0.1$), 6527\,\AA\
305: ($1.5\pm 0.4$), 8079\,\AA\ ($0.8\pm 0.1$) and 8106 ($0.7\pm 0.1$).
306:
307: Further LRIS spectra were obtained on UT 2006 February 3 and 23
308: (not shown here). The February 3rd LRIS spectrum did not include
309: the H$\alpha$ wavelength. For this spectrum, using a sliding
310: 10\,\AA\ window we were able to set a 3-$\sigma$ upper limit of
311: $\simlt 6\times 10^{-18}\,$erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ in the vicinity
312: of H$\beta$.
313: }}
314: \label{fig:SpectrumDBSPLRIS}
315: \end{figure}
316:
317: \newpage
318: \begin{figure}[ht]
319: \centerline{\psfig{file=f4.eps,width=5in}}
320: \caption[]
321: {{\small Phase space of cosmic explosive and eruptive transients. The
322: vertical axis is the peak brightness in the $R$-band and the
323: horizontal axis is the duration of the event ($\tau$). Events are
324: represented by circles with the color at peak magnitude coded as
325: follows: blue ($g-r\simlt 0$), green ($1\simgt g-r\simgt 0$) and
326: red ($g-r\simgt 1$). M85\,OT2006-1 and the M31\,RV\cite{rmp+89}
327: clearly stand out in this figure in the following respects: ({\it
328: i}) brighter than novae but ({\it ii}) less luminous than most
329: supernovae (especially of type Ia indicated with a 2$\sigma$
330: brightness band) and ({\it iii}) distinctly red color when compared
331: to sub-luminous core collapse supernovae (such as SN 1987A). Finally,
332: the two events,
333: unlike LBVs and core collapse supernvoae, do not arise in star-forming
334: regions. For any reasonable progenitor mass, both events exhibit
335: hyper-Eddington peak luminosities, similar to the sources
336: V838~Mon\cite{rm03,tylenda05}. Furthermore, both sources also
337: characterized by low expansion velocity ($<1000\,$km\,s$^{-1}$) and
338: a strong redward evolution of the peak frequency. For these objects,
339: $\tau$, is the ``plateau" time scale. For novae, $\tau$ is the
340: time scale in which the nova fades by two magnitudes, $t_{2}$.
341: Filled circles show the positions of 82 novae observed\cite{arp56,cdr+89}
342: in Messier\,31 (assuming\cite{dbk+04} $V-R=0.56$ at peak). The
343: brightest stars in our Galaxy are highly variable but these objects
344: (marked ``LBV'') are clearly distinguished by long variability
345: timescales and a high quiescent magnitude. The dashed line
346: ($R=-7.5\,$mag) is the Eddington limit for a 1\,$M_\odot$ G-type
347: star.
348: }}
349: \label{fig:Mtau}
350: \end{figure}
351:
352: \end{document}
353:
354: \begin{longtable}{rcccc}
355: \hline \hline
356: Facility & Band & Jd-2453000 & Mag & Err \\
357: \hline \hline
358: \endfirsthead
359: \hline\hline
360: Facility & Band & Jd-2453000 & Mag & Err \\
361: \hline\hline
362: \endhead
363: P60 & g & 747.956 & 21.310 & 0.272 \cr
364: P60 & g & 773.931 & 21.394 & 0.347 \cr
365: P60 & g & 775.760 & 21.243 & 0.279 \cr
366: P60 & g & 775.879 & 21.351 & 0.258 \cr
367: P60 & g & 777.755 & 21.291 & 0.265 \cr
368: P60 & g & 778.832 & 21.285 & 0.378 \cr
369: P60 & g & 779.825 & 21.507 & 0.412 \cr
370: P60 & g & 788.785 & 21.570 & 0.412 \cr
371: P60 & g & 789.771 & 21.167 & 0.297 \cr
372: P60 & g & 790.791 & 21.759 & 0.380 \cr
373: P60 & g & 791.756 & 21.833 & 0.406 \cr
374: P60 & g & 793.791 & 21.819 & 0.409 \cr
375: P60 & g & 796.765 & 21.455 & 0.412 \cr
376: P60 & g & 797.718 & 21.528 & 0.307 \cr
377: P60 & g & 800.698 & $>$21.55 & \cr
378: P60 & g & 803.750 & $>$21.84 & \cr
379: P60 & R & 743.874 & 19.711 & 0.313 \cr
380: P60 & R & 744.887 & 19.652 & 0.244 \cr
381: P60 & R & 746.033 & 19.646 & 0.225 \cr
382: P60 & R & 747.972 & 19.420 & 0.223 \cr
383: P60 & R & 748.836 & 19.005 & 0.309 \cr
384: P60 & R & 752.004 & 19.150 & 0.302 \cr
385: P60 & R & 769.839 & 19.585 & 0.257 \cr
386: P60 & R & 770.900 & 19.663 & 0.230 \cr
387: P60 & R & 773.968 & 19.498 & 0.244 \cr
388: P60 & R & 774.880 & 19.552 & 0.237 \cr
389: P60 & R & 775.784 & 19.668 & 0.287 \cr
390: P60 & R & 775.843 & 19.695 & 0.243 \cr
391: P60 & R & 776.907 & 19.663 & 0.229 \cr
392: P60 & R & 777.781 & 19.592 & 0.224 \cr
393: P60 & R & 778.865 & 19.478 & 0.369 \cr
394: P60 & R & 779.863 & 19.661 & 0.242 \cr
395: P60 & R & 788.810 & 19.749 & 0.305 \cr
396: P60 & R & 789.797 & 19.734 & 0.261 \cr
397: P60 & R & 790.824 & 19.750 & 0.260 \cr
398: P60 & R & 791.781 & 19.876 & 0.280 \cr
399: P60 & R & 793.827 & 19.617 & 0.218 \cr
400: P60 & R & 796.790 & 19.516 & 0.318 \cr
401: P60 & R & 797.751 & 20.044 & 0.328 \cr
402: P60 & R & 799.730 & 20.151 & 0.444 \cr
403: P60 & R & 803.799 & 20.129 & 0.401 \cr
404: P60 & I & 747.980 & 18.566 & 0.304 \cr
405: P60 & I & 748.870 & 18.955 & 0.302 \cr
406: P60 & I & 752.010 & 18.284 & 0.352 \cr
407: P60 & I & 752.860 & 18.840 & 0.286 \cr
408: P60 & I & 766.778 & 17.925 & 0.532 \cr
409: P60 & I & 767.774 & 18.747 & 0.300 \cr
410: P60 & I & 768.767 & 18.897 & 0.293 \cr
411: P60 & I & 769.827 & 18.892 & 0.289 \cr
412: P60 & I & 770.807 & 18.902 & 0.249 \cr
413: P60 & I & 773.957 & 18.731 & 0.254 \cr
414: P60 & I & 774.792 & 18.484 & 0.298 \cr
415: P60 & I & 775.772 & 18.681 & 0.289 \cr
416: P60 & I & 775.830 & 18.953 & 0.263 \cr
417: P60 & I & 776.893 & 18.993 & 0.264 \cr
418: P60 & I & 777.768 & 19.068 & 0.299 \cr
419: P60 & I & 778.848 & 18.606 & 0.348 \cr
420: P60 & I & 779.844 & 18.937 & 0.272 \cr
421: P60 & I & 788.797 & 18.934 & 0.309 \cr
422: P60 & I & 789.784 & 19.140 & 0.344 \cr
423: P60 & I & 790.808 & 19.066 & 0.299 \cr
424: P60 & I & 791.768 & 19.122 & 0.320 \cr
425: P60 & I & 793.809 & 18.723 & 0.234 \cr
426: P60 & I & 796.777 & 18.762 & 0.347 \cr
427: P60 & I & 797.730 & 19.481 & 0.406 \cr
428: P60 & I & 799.715 & 19.524 & 0.444 \cr
429: P60 & I & 800.711 & 19.539 & 0.436 \cr
430: P60 & I & 803.785 & 19.327 & 0.399 \cr
431: P60 & I & 811.838 & $>$19.0 & \cr
432: P60 & z & 774.963 & 18.587 & 0.325 \cr
433: P60 & z & 775.796 & 18.516 & 0.343 \cr
434: P60 & z & 776.921 & 18.735 & 0.335 \cr
435: P60 & z & 777.794 & 18.662 & 0.308 \cr
436: P60 & z & 778.889 & 18.587 & 0.350 \cr
437: P60 & z & 779.891 & 18.594 & 0.296 \cr
438: P60 & z & 788.823 & 18.440 & 0.316 \cr
439: P60 & z & 789.811 & 18.597 & 0.300 \cr
440: P60 & z & 790.841 & 18.815 & 0.367 \cr
441: P60 & z & 791.794 & 18.665 & 0.311 \cr
442: P60 & z & 793.845 & 18.769 & 0.384 \cr
443: P60 & z & 796.803 & 18.290 & 0.313 \cr
444: P60 & z & 797.767 & 18.772 & 0.334 \cr
445: P60 & z & 799.754 & 18.691 & 0.319 \cr
446: P60 & z & 800.740 & 18.495 & 0.259 \cr
447: P60 & z & 811.869 & $>$18.3 & \cr
448: P60 & z & 817.859 & $>$20.1 & \cr
449: P200/WIRC & J & 756.010 & 17.95 & 0.11 \cr
450: P200/WIRC & H & 756.0240& 17.13 & 0.09\cr
451: P200/WIRC & K & 756.0320& 16.96 & 0.10\cr
452: P200/WIRC & J & 811.8920& 19.00 & 0.26\cr
453: P200/WIRC & H & 811.9070& 17.80 & 0.18\cr
454: P200/WIRC & K & 811.9150& 17.85 & 0.21\cr
455: Magellan/PANIC& Y & 814.744 & 19.2 & 0.1 \cr
456: Magellan/PANIC& J & 814.7310& 18.82 & 0.05\cr
457: Magellan/PANIC& K & 814.7490& 17.94 & 0.07\cr
458: P200/LFC & z & 844.764 & $>$23.0 & \cr
459: P200/LFC & I & 844.706 & $>$23.5 & \cr
460: P200/LFC & R & 844.742 & $>$24.0 & \cr
461: Keck/NIRSPEC & J & 848.117 & 20.38 & 0.12\cr
462: Keck/NIRSPEC & H & 848.114 & 19.42 & 0.09\cr
463: Keck/NIRSPEC & K & 848.112 & 18.57 & 0.08\cr
464: Keck/LRIS & I & 827.920 & 21.024 & 0.21\cr
465: Keck/LRIS & g & 847.930 & $>$24.4 & \cr % 2860s
466: integration
467: Keck/LRIS & R & 847.950 & $>$24.4 & \cr % 1800s
468: Keck/LRIS & I & 847.917 & 23.5 & 0.7 \cr % 1200s
469: Keck/LRIS & g & 848.804 & $>$25.8 & \cr % 1200s
470: Keck/LRIS & R & 848.773 & $>$25.3 & \cr % 1200s
471: Keck/LRIS & I & 848.813 & 23.72 & 0.5 \cr % 1610s
472: UKIRT/WFCam & J & 859.6 & 21.6 & $0.3$ & \cr %
473: UKIRT/WFCam & H & 857.6 & $>$19.5 & \cr %
474: UKIRT/WFCam & K & 858 & 18.9 & 0.2 \cr %
475: \hline
476: \caption[]{\small Photometry in the optical and near-IR bands.
477: The calibration of the JHK bands is based on the 2MASS catalog,
478: and the calibration of the gRIz bands is based on
479: spectrophotometric calibration of the transient spectrum on 2006 Feb 23.
480: All the magnitudes are given in the Vega system. The facilities are
481: as noted in Figure~\ref{fig:LC}}
482: \label{tab:Photometry}
483: \end{longtable}
484: \end{document}
485: \begin{table}
486: \caption{Emission lines}
487: \begin{tabular}{ccr}
488: \\
489: \hline
490: \hline
491: Observed Wavelength & Species & Flux \\
492: (Angstrom) & & (10$^{-16}\,{\rm erg\,s}^{-1}\,{\rm cm}^{-2}$) \\
493: \hline
494: \hline
495: 4115 & H$\delta$ & $0.3\pm0.1$ \\
496: 4874 & H$\beta$ & $0.7\pm0.1$ \\
497: 6428 & ul & $0.9\pm0.1$ \\
498: 6527 & ul & $1.5\pm0.4$ \\
499: 6587 & H$\alpha$ & $2.5\pm0.1$ \\
500: 8079 & ul & $0.8\pm0.1$ \\
501: 8106 & ul & $0.7\pm0.1$ \\
502: \hline
503: \end{tabular}
504: \label{tab:Lines}
505: \end{table}
506: Note: Lines without identification are marked as ``ul''.
507:
508:
509:
510:
511: {\bf Figure~3:}{\small
512: Spectra of M85\,OT2006-1 at two epochs: UT 2006 January 8.53, obtained
513: with the Double Beam Spectrograph\cite{oke81} (DBSP) at the Palomar Hale 200-inch telescope
514: (integration time of 1800\,s)
515: and UT 2006 Feb 24.59, obtained with the Low Resolution Imaging
516: Spectrometer\cite{occ+95}
517: (LRIS) at the Keck-I 10-m telescope (integration time of
518: 3000\,s).
519:
520: The DBSP spectrum (at native
521: resolution) did not show any strong emission or absorption features.
522: \uwave{
523: Specifically we place a limit of $6\times 10^{-16}$\,erg s$^{-1}$\,cm$^{-2}$
524: for an emission line in the vicinity of H$\alpha$.}
525: In view of the low signal-to-noise the DBSP spectrum
526: has been
527: binned to emphasize the broad band distribution.
528: The LRIS spectrum shows a number of emission features.
529: Both, the binned DBSP and the binned
530: LRIS spectra can be adequately accounted by blackbody spectra with
531: effective temperatures, $T_{\rm eff}\sim 4600\,$K and $T_{\rm eff}\sim
532: 4100\,$K, respectively.
533:
534: In the LRIS red channel spectrum the brightest emission feature is
535: at $\lambda=6587$\,\AA\ (flux of $(2.5\pm0.1) \times
536: 10^{-16}\,$erg\,s$^{-1}$\,cm$^{-2}$). We identify this feature with
537: redshifted H$\alpha$. The velocity of the peak is $1020\pm
538: 150$\,km\,s$^{-1}$ (see inset). On the blue side, the strongest
539: feature is at $\lambda=4875$\,\AA\ which we identify with redshifted
540: ($700\pm100\,$km\,s$^{-1}$) H$\beta$. The equivalent widths are
541: $10$\,\AA\ (H$\alpha$) and $3$\,\AA\ (H$\beta$). The full width
542: at half maximum (FWHM) of the H$\alpha$ line, after accounting for
543: the instrumental FWHM, is $350\pm 140$\,km\,s$^{-1}$.
544:
545: In addition we detect the following emission lines
546: (central wavelengths, typical uncertainty of 1\,\AA; and
547: fluxes, unit of $10^{-16}\,$erg\,s$^{-1}$\,cm$^{-2}$):
548: 4115\,\AA\ ($0.3\pm 0.1$), 6428\,\AA\ ($0.9\pm 0.1$), 6527\,\AA\
549: ($1.5\pm 0.4$), 8079\,\AA\ ($0.8\pm 0.1$) and 8106 ($0.7\pm 0.1$).
550:
551:
552: Further LRIS spectra were obtained on UT 2006 February 3 and 23
553: (not shown here). The February 3rd LRIS spectrum did not include
554: the H$\alpha$ wavelength. For this spectrum, using a sliding
555: 10\,\AA\ window we were able to set a 3-$\sigma$ upper limit of
556: $\simlt 6\times 10^{-18}\,$erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ in the vicinity
557: of H$\beta$.
558:
559: }
560:
561: {\bf Figure~4:}{\small
562: The phase space of cosmic explosive and eruptive transients as
563: represented by their peak brightness ($R$-band) and the duration
564: of the event ($\tau$).
565: M85\,OT2006-1 (this paper) and the M31\,RV\cite{rmp+89}
566: are considerably brighter than
567: novae but less luminous than most supernovae (especially
568: of the type Ia).
569: Furthermore, both these sources have
570: hyper-Eddington luminosities. The closest analogue to these sources is
571: V838~Mon\cite{rm03,tylenda05}. These three sources are
572: are characterized by low expansion velocity ($<1000\,$km\,s$^{-1}$)
573: and a strong redward evolution of the peak frequency.
574: For these objects, $\tau$, is the ``plateau" time scale.
575: The dashed line ($R=-7.5\,$mag, assuming G spectral type)
576: is the Eddington limit for a 1\,$M_\odot$ object.
577:
578: For novae, $\tau$ is the time scale in which the nova fades by two
579: magnitudes, $t_{2}$. Novae follow the well known Maximum Magnitude
580: Rate of Decay\cite{dl95} relation in which brighter novae fade
581: faster.
582: Red points represent 82 novae observed\cite{arp56,cdr+89}
583: in Messier\,31 (assuming\cite{dbk+04} $V-R=0.56$ at peak).
584:
585: The known supernova (of type Ia) follow the track shown in the
586: Figure. The track termed as {\it Macronova} represents supernovae
587: with considerably smaller radioactive ejecta or with different
588: radioactive material such as decaying neutrons\cite{k05}.
589: The brightest stars in our Galaxy are highly
590: variable but these objects (marked ``LBV'') are clearly distinguished
591: by long variability timescales and a high quiescent magnitude.
592: }
593: