1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2:
3: \newcommand{\lam}{$\lambda$}
4: \newcommand{\Del}{$\Delta$}
5:
6: %Editorial Information should be placed here
7:
8: %Name and data of the journal submitted to should be placed here (p. 3)
9:
10: \begin{document}
11:
12: \title{Spitzer/IRS Imaging and Spectroscopy of the luminous infrared
13: galaxy NGC\,6052 (Mrk 297)}
14:
15: \author{D. G. Whelan\altaffilmark{1}, D. Devost\altaffilmark{1},
16: V. Charmandaris\altaffilmark{2,3}, J.A. Marshall\altaffilmark{1},
17: J. R. Houck\altaffilmark{1}}
18:
19: \altaffiltext{1}{Center for Radiophysics and Space Research, Cornell
20: University, 219 Space Sciences Building, Ithaca, NY 14853-6801, USA}
21:
22: \altaffiltext{2}{University of Crete, Department of Physics, P.O. Box
23: 2208 GR-71003, Heraklion, Greece}
24:
25: \altaffiltext{3}{IESL, Foundation for Research and Technology-Hellas,
26: GR-71110, Heraklion, Greece, and Chercheur Associ\'{e}, Observatoire
27: de Paris, F-75014, Paris, France}
28:
29: \email{whelan@isc.astro.cornell.edu,
30: devost@astro.cornell.edu,\\vassilis@physics.uoc.gr,
31: jam258@cornell.edu, jrh13@cornell.edu}
32:
33: \begin{abstract}
34: We present photometric and spectroscopic data of the interacting
35: starburst galaxy NGC\,6052 obtained with the Spitzer Space
36: Telescope. The mid-infrared (MIR) spectra of the three brightest
37: spatially resolved regions in the galaxy are remarkably similar and
38: are consistent with dust emission from young nearly coeval stellar
39: populations. Analysis of the brightest infrared region of the
40: system, which contributes $\sim$18.5\% of the total 16\micron\ flux,
41: indicates that unlike similar off-nuclear infrared-bright regions
42: found in Arp\,299 or NGC\,4038/9, its MIR spectrum is inconsistent
43: with an enshrouded hot dust (T$>$300K) component. Instead, the three
44: brightest MIR regions all display dust continua of temperatures less
45: than $\sim$ 200K. These low dust temperatures indicate the dust is
46: likely in the form of a patchy screen of relatively cold material
47: situated along the line of sight. We also find that emission from
48: polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and the forbidden atomic
49: lines is very similar for each region. We conclude that the
50: ionization regions are self-similar and come from young ($\lesssim$
51: 6 Myr) stellar populations. A fourth region, for which we have no
52: MIR spectra, exhibits MIR emission similar to tidal tail features in
53: other interacting galaxies.
54: \end{abstract}
55:
56: \keywords{dust, extinction ---
57: infrared: galaxies ---
58: galaxies: individual(NGC6052) ---
59: galaxies: starburst ---
60: galaxies: interactions ---
61: stars: formation}
62:
63:
64: \section{Introduction}
65: \label{int}
66:
67: NGC\,6052 (also known as Mrk\,297, Arp\,209, VV\,86) is an interacting
68: system located at a distance of 70.4\,Mpc and having an L$_{\rm
69: IR}=1\times10^{11}~$L$_{\odot}$ \citep{Sanders03}, which puts it
70: into the class of luminous infrared galaxies (LIRGs). The peculiar
71: morphology of the system has made it the subject of several
72: multi-wavelength observations
73: \citep[e.g.][]{Weedman72,Taniguchi91}. There is a general consensus
74: that NGC\,6052 is a merger of two galaxies
75: \citep{Burenkov88,Alloin79,Taniguchi91}, although the exact
76: morphological type of the galaxies involved is still
77: unclear. H-$\alpha$ imaging revealed a number of star formation
78: regions throughout the system \citep{Cairos01II}. \citet{Hecquet87}
79: identified the locations of forty-three different optical knots in
80: NGC\,6052, distributed along the central bar-like structure of the
81: galaxy and on the spiral-arm/tidal feature which extends along the
82: north-south direction.
83:
84: An extensive study of the infrared properties of the system was
85: performed with the Infrared Space Observatory (ISO) involving both MIR
86: imaging with ISOCAM and spectroscopy with PHOT-S and LWS
87: \citep{Metcalfe05}. Seven MIR knots were visible in the 14.3\micron\
88: images of the system. The most luminous of these sources, identified
89: as ``region-1'' by \citet{Metcalfe05}, is approximately 8\arcsec\ to
90: the north of the main bulge of the galaxy. This source contributes
91: $\sim$22\% of the 15\micron\ flux of NGC\,6052, yet the ISO data
92: indicated that it was faint optically. This suggested that it may be
93: a more extreme example of the infrared-bright, optically-obscured
94: ``overlap region'' region found between the two galactic nuclei of the
95: Antennae galaxies \citep{Vigroux96}. The MIR luminosity of the
96: NGC\,6052 source is a factor of $\sim$14 higher than that of the
97: Antennae source. An alternative possibility is that the source is an
98: obscured active galactic nucleus, like IC\,694 \citep{Gallais04}. This
99: hypothesis was tested by \citet{Metcalfe05} using infrared
100: diagnostics, who concluded that an AGN in the NGC\,6052 source would be
101: deeply embedded and needed to be confirmed with hard X-ray
102: observations.
103:
104: In this paper, we present photometry and spectroscopy of the three
105: brightest MIR regions in NGC\,6052 and photometry of a fourth region,
106: using the Infrared Spectrograph\footnote{The IRS was a collaborative
107: venture between Cornell University and Ball Aerospace Corporation
108: funded by NASA through the Jet Propulsion Laboratory and the Ames
109: Research Center.} (IRS) on board the Spitzer Space Telescope. We
110: present the observations and data reduction in \S 2, the analysis in
111: \S 3, and discuss the implications of our observations in \S 4.
112:
113:
114: \section{Observations and Data Reduction}
115: \label{sec:Observations}
116:
117: NGC\,6052 was observed in mapping mode with the Spitzer/IRS
118: \citep{Werner04,Houck04} in both the short-low (SL, 5.2-14.5\micron)
119: and long-low (LL, 14.0-38.0\micron) modules. The SL data were obtained
120: on 15 July 2004 and the LL data on 4 March and 17 July 2004, resulting
121: in a map of the central area of the system over the whole
122: 5.3--37\micron\ range. The total exposure time per IRS slit was 44~sec
123: for SL, and 20~sec for LL. Target acquisition was performed using the
124: IRS blue (16 \micron) peak-up camera.\footnote{For details on the IRS
125: peak-up, see chapter 7 of Spitzer Observing Manual at
126: http://ssc.spitzer.caltech.edu/documents/som/} As a result of the
127: IRS peak-up procedure, a 16\micron\ image with a total exposure time
128: of 201~sec centered on the brightest position of our target was
129: obtained. The field of view of the image is
130: 60\arcsec$\times$72\arcsec\ and its scale is 1.8\arcsec\
131: pixel$^{-1}$. All the observations were processed by the {\em Spitzer}
132: Science Center pipeline version 13.2. The stability of Spitzer's
133: pointing enables the registration of the image on a world coordinate
134: system (WCS) grid with an accuracy which is better than the pixel size
135: of the peak-up array. The 16\micron\ contours along with 2MASS
136: contours are overlaid on the HST image in Figure \ref{puimage}.
137:
138: Two different spectral extractions were performed. First, an
139: integrated spectrum of NGC\,6052 was extracted using the Spectral
140: Modeling, Analysis, and Reduction Tool \citep[SMART
141: Ver. 5.5.1][]{Higdon04} for all the SL and LL pointings of the
142: spectral map. The 2D images were coadded together and a standard full
143: slit extraction was performed on each coadded low resolution
144: aperture. The resulting spectrum is shown in Figure
145: \ref{intspec}. Second, we extracted individual sources (labeled A, B,
146: and C in Figure \ref{puimage}) in the SL module. Sources A and C were
147: located within the same slit, requiring the development of custom
148: software to perform a Gaussian model fit to the spatial profile of
149: multiple sources within a slit. Each source in the slit was traced
150: using information about the location of each wavelength element on the
151: array \citep{Whelan05}. We estimate the cross-contamination between
152: sources A and C to be $\lesssim\ 5$\%. The full-width at half-maximum
153: of each curve fit was assumed to be the same as that of a stellar
154: point-source, and therefore was allowed to vary with
155: wavelength. Source B was extracted in a likewise fashion, for one
156: source within a slit. The spectral map does not cover source D.
157:
158: We flux calibrated the data using observations of $\alpha$ Lac that
159: were extracted in exactly the same manner as the object spectra. The
160: extracted spectrum from the star was used in conjunction with a
161: template to produce a Relative Spectral Response Function (RSRF)
162: \citep{Cohen03}. The RSRF was applied to each extracted spectrum of
163: NGC\,6052. The spectra of sources A, B and C are shown in
164: Figure~\ref{multispec}. We estimate our spectrophotometry to be better
165: than 10\%.
166:
167: The flux from the various polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH)
168: features was calculated using the fitted Drude profiles from the
169: spectral decompositions described in
170: \S\ref{sec:SpectralDecomposition}. The [Ne~{\sc ii}]12.81\micron\ line
171: flux was also measured using this fitting method since it is blended
172: with the 12.7\micron\ PAH feature in the SL module. All other atomic
173: lines have a well defined continuum, so we calculated their total
174: fluxes by simply summing the pixel values following a local continuum
175: subtraction. Our PAH feature and line measurements are presented in
176: Table~\ref{tabflux}.
177:
178: Near-IR J, H, and K aperture photometry was performed on the 2MASS
179: images \citep{Skrutskie06} at the positions of sources A, B, C, and D.
180: These measurements are included with the spectra in
181: Figure~\ref{multispec}, as they are important to the spectral
182: decompositions (discussed in \S\ref{sec:SpectralDecomposition}). To
183: compare the overall optical morphology of the system to the thermal
184: dust emission we use a V-band (F555W) Hubble Space Telescope (HST)
185: image of the galaxy from the HST archive (Figure~\ref{puimage}).
186:
187: We also use archival broadband MIR images of NGC\,6052 obtained with
188: the Infrared Array Camera (IRAC) instrument on Spitzer
189: \citep{Fazio04}. The images were obtained on March 27, 2005 with the
190: 3.6, 4.5, 5.8, and 8.0 \micron\ broadband filters and they were
191: processed with the Spitzer Science Center pipeline version 14.0. The
192: FWHM of the point spread function of the images varies between
193: 1\arcsec.6 and 2\arcsec.0 for the different filters. The images have a
194: pixel size of 1.2\arcsec\ $\times$1.2\arcsec\ and a field of view
195: 5.2\arcmin\ $\times$ 5.2\arcmin\. The total integration time per
196: filter was 150s.
197:
198: \section{Analysis}
199:
200: \subsection{Global Morphology}
201: \label{sec:GlobalMorphology}
202:
203: The distribution of dust and star emission from NGC\,6052 is displayed
204: in Figure~\ref{puimage}, where we overlay contours of the 16 \micron\
205: Blue Peak-Up (BPU) and 2MASS K-band images onto the optical HST
206: image. The regions marked A, B, C, and D align with optically visible
207: HII regions, but none are associated with the two brightest optical
208: regions, which are labeled by \citet{Alloin79} as the compact regions
209: of the merged galaxies forming NGC\,6052. See Table~\ref{srcid} for a
210: comparison of our source identification to the MIR regions from
211: \citet{Metcalfe05} and the B-R color knots from \citet{Hecquet87}.
212:
213: Source alignment was based on the reconstructed pointing of Spitzer
214: and the astrometry of the 2MASS image. With the better registration of
215: Spitzer and 2MASS, we find that source A is shifted 4\arcsec\ north
216: relative to the optical, compared to the ISO data presented in
217: \citet{Metcalfe05}, and is not as optically-obscured as was previously
218: thought based on ISOCAM data. The pointing accuracy of Spitzer is a
219: factor of two smaller than the 1.8\arcsec\ pixel size of the
220: 16\micron\ image. We confirmed our astrometry using 2MASS J, IRAC 3.6,
221: 4.5, 5.8 and 8.0 \micron, and IRS 16.0 \micron\ images, as shown in
222: the Figure~\ref{astrometry} mosaic. This mosaic best illustrates the
223: centroid shifts of the sources. The location of the near-IR bulge of
224: the galaxy is indicated by a white cross and we observe an obvious
225: shift in the emission as wavelebgth changes from predominantly main
226: sequence star light in the 2MASS image, to PAH and hot dust in the
227: IRAC bands, to just dust at 16.0 \micron. It is clear that the
228: concentration of warm dust and PAH emission as traced by the IRAC 5.8
229: and 8\micron\ bands lies to the north and east of the NIR bulge, in
230: regions A, B and C, and more faintly along the eastern tidal arm,
231: where source D lies. At 16\micron, where more embedded star forming
232: regions may be probed, the spatial resolution is lower, but most of
233: the emission originates from regions A and B.
234:
235: The total MIR flux of the galaxy at 16\micron\ is measured as 260 mJy
236: $\pm$ $\sim$ 12\% (see Table~\ref{srcid} for a complete list of flux
237: densities). \citet{Metcalfe05} found a 15 \micron\ flux density of 289
238: mJy $\pm$ $\sim$ 15\%. This flux density, as well as our 16\micron\ image,
239: globally match the MIR morphology presented by \citet{Metcalfe05}
240: using ISOCAM.
241:
242: \citet{Metcalfe05} showed that region A in NGC\,6052 contributes 22\%
243: of the total emission at 15 \micron. In contrast, see
244: Table~\ref{srcid}, we find that region A contributes only 18.5\% of
245: the total emission at 16 \micron. This difference in flux density
246: between the ISOCAM measurements and the Spitzer IRS BPU measurements
247: is equal to 18.5 mJy. A similar difference of 67 mJy between the
248: ISOCAM 7.7 \micron\ and the IRAC 8 \micron\ fluxes, where the ISOCAM
249: measurement is again higher than what we measure, is also noted. The
250: reason for these differences is unclear. All of our flux measurements
251: appear to be systematically lower than those given by
252: \citet{Metcalfe05}.
253:
254: \subsection{Radio Continuum Emission}
255: \label{sec:RadioContinuumEmission}
256:
257: Since radio emission is also an extinction-free tracer of star forming
258: regions, we use the high resolution radio continuum map of
259: \citet{Yin94} to compare the radio morphology of the galaxy to our
260: 16\micron\ image. The radio map gives evidence for a bright radio
261: supernova located at the position of knot 14 in \citet{Hecquet87}
262: \citep{Lonsdale92, Sage93, Yin94}. Knot 14, which is unresolved in the
263: MIR, does not coincide with either regions A or C (see
264: Figure~\ref{puimage}), but it does fall within the SL slit. As a
265: result it is possible that some of the emission from the source
266: surrounding the radio supernova may contribute to the extracted IRS
267: spectra of sources A and C. \citet{Yin94} notes that the flux from
268: Hecquet's knot 14 is either from SN 1982aa (five years after the
269: explosion) or from an HII region. As is discussed by
270: \citet{Metcalfe05} the most likely type for SN 1982aa is Ib/c. The HST
271: image of Figure~\ref{puimage} indicates that the position attributed
272: to knot 14 of \citet{Hecquet87} is a diffuse HII region. However, the
273: supernova presumed to be associated with knot 14 is not visible in
274: recent optical and near-IR images and the spectra of regions A and C
275: do not greatly differ in spectral continuum slope or feature strength
276: from that of region B (see \S\ref{sec:SpitzerSpectroscopy} below). In
277: other words, we see no MIR features associated with the supernova, and
278: its HII region is unresolved.
279:
280: There is a region to the northeast of SN 1982aa in Yin's radio
281: continuum map which is associated with our region A. There is also
282: diffuse radio emission associated with regions B and C. Region D is
283: not resolved in the radio continuum map.
284:
285: \subsection{Spitzer Mid-IR Spectroscopy}
286: \label{sec:SpitzerSpectroscopy}
287:
288: Our spectrum, displayed in Figure~\ref{intspec}, is in overall
289: agreement with the 6--11\micron\ spectrum obtained by ISO/PHOT-S in
290: \citet{Metcalfe05}. Our spectrum displays strong emission from
291: polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) at 6.2, 7.7, 8.6, 11.25 12.7
292: and 17.1 \micron. Several fine structure lines, including [Ne~{\sc
293: ii}], [Ar~{\sc iii}], [S~{\sc iv}], and [Ne~{\sc iii}], are also
294: clearly visible in the spectrum, as well as the molecular hydrogen
295: lines: S(3)$\lambda$9.66\micron; and S(2)$\lambda$12.27\micron. The
296: ratio [Ne~{\sc iii}]/[Ne~{\sc ii}]=0.84 $\pm$0.16 while the [S~{\sc
297: iv}]/[S~{\sc iii}]=0.52 $\pm$0.18. This is similar to typical values
298: ( $\sim$1 and $\sim$0.5 respectively) found in other starburst
299: galaxies \citep{Brandl06} and lower than those seen in Blue Compact
300: Dwarf galaxies \citep{Wu06}.
301:
302: In addition, the narrow width of the IRS SL slits (3.6\arcsec) enable
303: us to obtain 5.3--15\micron\ spectra for the three brightest MIR
304: regions in the galaxy. Extending the spectrum of those regions to
305: longer wavelengths was not possible since the individual regions are
306: unresolved within the 9.7$\arcsec$ width of the IRS 15--37\micron\ LL
307: slit. Inspection of our IRS spectra, displayed in
308: Figure~\ref{multispec}, reveals that the MIR spectra for all three
309: regions are surprisingly similar. For instance, even though region A
310: is brighter than regions B or C at 16 \micron, lending to a marginally
311: steeper MIR slope, the PAH spectrum shows few noticeable differences.
312: Of special note is the shallow 9.6\micron\ silicate absorption
313: feature. We will elaborate on a possible physical explanation of these
314: features in \S\ref{sec:Discussion}.
315:
316: Table~\ref{tabflux} lists the integrated line fluxes and major
317: PAH features for the whole system, as well as in the individual
318: regions A, B, and C.
319:
320: \subsection{Spectral Decomposition}
321: \label{sec:SpectralDecomposition}
322:
323: In order to characterize the properties of the emitting and obscuring
324: dust (including dust temperatures, optical depths, and PAH feature
325: strengths), we decompose the infrared spectral energy distribution of
326: each spectrum into emission from: (1) multiple dust components at
327: different characteristic temperatures; (2) stellar photospheres; (3)
328: PAHs; and (4) atomic and molecular lines. The contribution from each
329: dust component is calculated using a realistic dust model consisting
330: of a distribution of thermally emitting carbonaceous and silicate
331: grains. The model accounts for stochastic emission from PAHs by
332: fitting observationally derived PAH templates to the spectra. Details
333: of the method are described in \citet{Marshall07} (and see
334: \citet{Armus06, Armus07} for additional applications).
335:
336: For the integrated spectrum of the galaxy we find that three dust
337: components fit the data well, at temperatures of 25, 57, and 203
338: $\pm$5 K. The $\tau$$(9.7)$ for the global spectrum was found to be
339: 0.9 $\pm$ 0.5, where the uncertainty is due to statistics, as well as
340: the dependence on model choice for the PAH template and dust geometry.
341: This number is far more than the optical depth computed by
342: \citet{Takagi03} of $\tau$$_{V}$ $=$ 0.9 which corresponds to
343: $\tau$$(9.7)$ $\sim$0.1 using a standard extinction curve.
344: \citet{Takagi03} derive their $\tau$$_{V}$ from the modeled mass
345: fraction of hydrogen and the mass fraction of stars. In contrast, our
346: optical depth estimate is derived from the MIR spectrum.
347:
348: The integrated PAH luminosity of the system is $\sim$6.5\% $\pm$ 0.5\%
349: of the total L$_{\rm IR}$, nearly 50\% higher than the value found for
350: the prototypical starburst galaxy NGC\,7714 \citep{Brandl04,
351: Marshall07}. The sum of the 6.2\micron\ PAH feature strengths from
352: regions A, B, and C is $\sim$19\% of the total 6.2\micron\ PAH feature
353: strength from the integrated spectrum. In comparison, the 14\micron\
354: flux from regions A, B, and C totals to $\sim$40\% of the 14\micron\
355: flux from the integrated spectrum. The PAH emission in the galaxy is
356: therefore dominated by the diffuse regions, not associated with the
357: brightest MIR sources.
358:
359: Regions A, B, and C have derived warm dust temperatures of 187~K
360: (source A); 179~K (source B); and 201~K (source C), with statistical
361: uncertainties from the fits of a few K. The lack of higher spatial
362: resolution photometry beyond 15\micron\ for this system clearly limits
363: our ability to trace the behavior of colder dust components for
364: individual regions. The optical depths at 9.7\micron\ of the warm dust
365: components are 0.76, 0.58, and 0.75 $\pm$ 0.2 for regions A, B, and C,
366: respectively. In addition, optical depths from the interstellar
367: radiation field (ISRF, \citet{Mezger82}) are 0.31, 0.47, and 0.24
368: $\pm$ 0.2 for sources A, B, and C, respectively. Generally speaking,
369: each region has a similar optical depth at 9.7 \micron, $\sim$0.6-0.8,
370: and the ISRF optical depth is about uniform for each region,
371: $\sim$0.3-0.4.
372:
373: To confirm our estimates for source extinction and age based on MIR
374: data, an independent assessment using broadband photometry from
375: \citet{Hecquet87} and a standard extinction curve \citep{Mathis90} was
376: established. Using the B-R colors published by \citet{Hecquet87} and
377: the ages derived in our Starburst models (see
378: \S\ref{sec:StarburstModeling}) we derived E(B-R) for regions A, B, and
379: C, and compared these values to the standard extinction curve. The
380: $\tau$$(9.7)$ values for our three sources are 0.27, 0.17, and 0.16,
381: respectively. These values are a factor of two or three less than
382: those derived from the MIR spectra. The MIR probes more deeply into
383: dust-enshrouded regions than optical light, which tends to be
384: dominated by emission from less-obscured stars. Thus MIR indicators of
385: extinction tend to give higher values than optical.
386:
387: \subsection{Starburst Modeling}
388: \label{sec:StarburstModeling}
389:
390: The atomic lines present in the single source spectra
391: (Figure~\ref{multispec}) enable us to investigate the nature of the
392: sources powering the MIR in NGC\,6052. [Ar~{\sc iii}], [Ne~{\sc ii}],
393: and [S~{\sc iv}] lines are detected in all three regions. By applying
394: the measurements of these atomic lines to young stellar population
395: models, we have estimated relative ages for the young stellar
396: populations of sources A and C, and have established an upper limit
397: for source B. We used Starburst99 \citep{Leitherer99} to model the
398: radiation from the underlying stellar population, and MAPPINGS III
399: \citep{Dopita00, Kewley01} to estimate the flux from the photoionized
400: regions. The stellar population models were used as input to the
401: photoionization code. The age of the stellar population was allowed to
402: vary and the models were run for several metallicities between
403: Z$_{\odot}$/20 and 2Z$_{\odot}$. The reason we varied the metallicity
404: was also motivated by the fact that there is a scatter in the
405: published values of the metallicity of Mrk 297. \citet{Shi05}
406: estimates [O/H] to be 8.34. Assuming solar abundance of 8.83
407: \citep{Grevesse98}, this scales to $\sim$ $0.25Z_{\odot}$. Likewise,
408: \citet{Calzetti94} and \citet{James02} found [O/H] =8.61 and 8.65
409: respectively (Z $\simeq$ $0.5Z_{\odot}$). Our best fit models are for
410: solar metallicity. The IMF is fixed at the standard Salpeter values of
411: $\alpha =$ 2.35, M$_{down} =$ 1.0 M$_{\odot}$ and M$_{up} =$ 100
412: M$_{\odot}$, and the star formation mode was instantaneous. As such,
413: the variation of the ionization parameter is only linked to the
414: variation in age and metallicity of the stellar population. We find
415: that the young stellar populations in source A is $\sim$3 Myr $\pm$
416: 0.5 Myr, while for source C it is $\sim$5.5 $\pm$ 0.5 Myr. For source
417: B though we can only place an upper limit of $\lesssim$ 5 Myr due to
418: the fact that the models were degenerate for region B's atomic line
419: ratios, which are consistent with ages of both $\sim$1.5 and $\sim$4
420: Myr.
421:
422: \section{Discussion}
423: \label{sec:Discussion}
424:
425: As mentioned in the previous section and presented in Figure
426: \ref{multispec}, there is a strong similarity in all three MIR-bright
427: region spectra in NGC\,6052. Starburst models have shown regions A, B,
428: and C are nearly coeval, which suggests that some mechanism induced
429: star formation across the galaxy simultaneously. This mechanism is
430: most probably the collision of two galaxies as discussed in
431: \citet{Taniguchi91}, though why the burst of star formation should
432: come 150 Myr after the two galaxies' closest approach is unclear.
433:
434: The shallow 9.6\micron\ silicate absorption feature observed in all of
435: our spectra (indicative of low optical depths), in conjunction with
436: the morphological properties discussed in \S\ref{sec:GlobalMorphology}
437: lead us to believe NGC\,6052 has a nonuniform obscuring dust screen
438: associated with it. The shallow 9.6\micron\ feature implies that the
439: dominant sources of MIR emission are not embedded dusty star forming
440: regions but rather exposed in a manner where we can readily sample the
441: MIR contribution from the photodissociation regions. An embedded
442: geometry would be proposed if the silicate feature were much deeper,
443: as is seen in ULIRGs \citep{Armus07}, where hot dust temperatures
444: suggest that the dust is very close to the hot, young stars heating
445: it. This is clearly not the case in NGC\,6052. Dust temperatures in
446: NGC\,6052 of around 200 K (as opposed to the $\sim$700 K found in by
447: \citet{Armus07} or even the $>$ 300 K dust temperatures implied in the
448: overlap region of the Antennae described by \citet{Mirabel98}) mean
449: the dust is relatively far away from the heating source, likely in the
450: form of a dust screen in front of the exciting sources. A non-embedded
451: geometry would also explain why the continuum is not as steep as other
452: embedded systems. However, we believe this screen to be nonuniform
453: because the system is still in an early stage of interaction and has
454: not reached the merger phase. There are no apparent symmetries visible
455: in the MIR morphology of the system; the coincidence of concentrated
456: MIR flux with a select few HII regions appears arbitrary.
457:
458: That NGC\,6052 is enshrouded nonuniformly by dust is in general
459: agreement with other published indications of
460: nonuniformity. \citet{Rothberg04} found ``large residuals'' in their
461: K-band model-subtracted image of the galaxy and concluded that
462: NGC\,6052 has a ``thin diffuse patchy structure''. The predicted
463: morphology of the system based on dynamical modeling of the stellar
464: component by \citet{Taniguchi91} demonstrated that when they can
465: reproduce the overall morphology of the system (see their Figures 2
466: and 4), one of the tidal tails extends to the north of the central
467: bulge of the galaxy, across the location of regions A and C, while the
468: other tidal tail extends eastward, across region B and including
469: region D. Based on this scenario it is thus conceivable that clumpy
470: gas and dust associated with these tails are associated with the four
471: distinct regions we see in the infrared.
472:
473: In \S\ref{sec:GlobalMorphology} we noted that region A, which emits
474: most at 16 \micron, contributes 18.5 \% of the total flux. This fact
475: begs comparison to the fluxes of the obscured regions of the Antennae
476: galaxies and IC\,694, since both of these systems have off-nuclear
477: sources which contribute largely to the MIR emission. The hidden
478: source in the Antennae galaxy contributes 15 \% of the total
479: luminosity between 12.5\micron\ and 18\micron\ \citep{Mirabel98}, and
480: IC\,694 contributes $\sim$ 26 \% of the total flux between 12\micron
481: and 18\micron. However, neither of the hidden sources present such
482: spectral similarities with other regions of their host galaxy as
483: region A does to the other regions of NGC\,6052 (cf. the spectra
484: presented in \citet{Vigroux96,Mirabel98,Gallais04}). Also, we now know
485: that all of the MIR-bright regions in NGC\,6052 are optically visible
486: (see Table~\ref{srcid}). For this reason, and because there is
487: currently no evidence which allows region A to be considered an AGN
488: (as is the case with the obscured source in IC\,694), a comparison
489: between NGC\,6052 and these two objects yields very little information
490: about the physical properties of the MIR-bright regions.
491:
492: Because all of the MIR bright regions in NGC\,6052 lie within the dust
493: trail or in one of the two tidal tails, we compare NGC\,6052 to other
494: galaxies with bright sources existing in the tidal tails. One obvious
495: comparison can be drawn with the MIR-bright region in NGC\,2207 /
496: IC\,2163. This region (called ``feature i'') contributes 12\% of the
497: total 24\micron flux, and also dominates the H-$\alpha$ and radio
498: continuum emission \citep{Elmegreen06}. The implication of this
499: finding is that ``feature i'' is a compact region of star
500: formation. Our region A also exhibits bright MIR flux and
501: corresponding radio emission (see \S\ref{sec:RadioContinuumEmission}
502: and \citet{Yin94}). Tidal tail-induced star formation is also present
503: in the Arp\,82 system, where the brightest off-nuclear clump
504: contributes $\sim$ 7\% of the total 24 \micron\ flux
505: \citep{Hancock07}. Region D likewise contributes $\sim$ 5\% of the
506: total 16 \micron\ flux.
507:
508: We can also calculate the MIR luminosities of the regions in NGC\,6052
509: and compare them with studies which include other interacting galaxy
510: samples \citep[i.e.][]{Smith07}. For regions A, B and C we find that
511: the 3.6\micron\ luminosities, which we treat as a proxy of the stellar
512: mass content, are 1.34, 1.38 and 1.77$\times$10$^{42}$ ergs s$^{-1}$
513: respectively. The 8.0\micron\ luminosities, which probe the emission
514: from PAH molecules and thus are tracers of the star formation
515: activity, are 7.46, 7.13 and 8.30$\times$10$^{42}$ ergs s$^{-1}$ for
516: the same three regions. These values are very similar to values found
517: in the spiral galaxy and the tidal feature samples of \citet{Smith07}
518: (see their Figs. 12 and 13) if one takes into account that there is an
519: RMS of $\sim$0.5 in dex in the values of the Smith et al. sample. When
520: we examine region D in the tidal tail of NGC6052 we find that its 3.6
521: and 8.0\micron\ luminosities are 7.05$\times$10$^{41}$ ergs s$^{-1}$
522: and 2.50$\times$10$^{42}$ ergs s$^{-1}$ respectively. These
523: luminosities are slightly higher than the mean value of the tidal
524: features in the Smith et al. sample. However, NGC\,6052 is also nearly
525: 3 times more distant than the furthest source in the Smith et
526: al. survey, so in our photometry for all four regions of our galaxy we
527: may be including other parts of the galaxy which would have likely
528: been excluded by \citet{Smith07}. This inherent error is likely
529: biasing our luminosity measurements towards measurements made of
530: entire galaxies, and away from small-scale tidal features.
531:
532: \section{Conclusions}
533: \label{sec:Conclusion}
534:
535: We have presented photometric and spectroscopic results of the
536: NGC\,6052 system. The main conclusions of our analysis are as follow:
537: (1) The brighteset MIR region, labeled A, contributes $\sim$ 18.5\% of
538: the total 16\micron\ flux, and resembles the brightest 24 \micron\
539: source from NGC\,2207 / IC\,2163 photometrically, but is dissimilar
540: spectroscopically from the hidden sources in the Antennae galaxies and
541: Arp\,299; (2) the spectra of regions A, B, and C are all surprisingly
542: similar, and are consistent with dust emission from nearly coeval
543: young stellar populations; (3) the geometry of this system includes a
544: patchy dust screen of colder material in front of the young stellar
545: clusters, and these clusters are not deeply embedded in dusty
546: material; and (4) region D has MIR properties which are typical of
547: those found in tidal tails.
548:
549: \acknowledgments
550:
551: This work is based [in part] on observations made with the Spitzer
552: Space Telescope, which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory,
553: California Institute of Technology, under NASA contract 1407. Support
554: for this work was provided by NASA through Contract Number 1257184
555: issued by JPL/Caltech.
556:
557: D.G. Whelan would like to thank an anonymous referee whose comments
558: greatly improved this paper, and H. Spoon for stimulating
559: conversations. We would also like to thank C. Markwardt for
560: distributing the MPFIT
561: package\\(\url{http://cow.physics.wisc.edu/craigm/idl/mpfittut.html}).
562:
563: Some of the data presented in this paper were obtained from the
564: Multimission Archive at the Space Telescope Science Institute (MAST).
565: STScI is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in
566: Astronomy, Inc., under NASA contract NAS5-26555. Support for MAST for
567: non-HST data is provided by the NASA Office of Space Science via grant
568: NAG5-7584 and by other grants and contracts.
569:
570: This research has made use of the NASA/ IPAC Infrared Science Archive,
571: which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California
572: Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics
573: and Space Administration.
574:
575: {\it Facilities:} Spitzer (IRS)
576:
577: \begin{thebibliography}{}
578:
579: \bibitem[Alloin \& Duflot(1979)]{Alloin79}
580: Alloin, D., \& Duflot, R. 1979, \aap, 78, L5.
581:
582: \bibitem[Appleton et al.(2006)]{Appleton06}
583: Appleton, P.N., et al. 2006, \apj, 639, L51.
584:
585: \bibitem[Armus et al.(2006)]{Armus06}
586: Armus, L., et al.\ 2006, \apj, 640, 204.
587:
588: \bibitem[Armus et al.(2007)]{Armus07}
589: Armus, L., et al.\ 2007, \apj, 656, 148.
590:
591: %\bibitem[Benvenuti et al.(1982)]{Benvenuti82}
592: % Benvenuti, P., Casini, C., \& Heidmann, J. 1982, \mnras, 198, 825.
593:
594: \bibitem[Bevington and Robinson, 2003]{Bevington03}
595: Bevington, P.~R., \& Robinson, D.~K.
596: \\\emph{Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences.}
597: Boston, McGraw Hill, 2003.
598:
599: \bibitem[Brandl et al.(2004)]{Brandl04}
600: Brandl, B., et al.\ 2004, \apjs, 154, 188.
601:
602: \bibitem[Brandl et al.(2006)]{Brandl06}
603: Brandl, B., et al.\ 2006, \apj, 653, 1129.
604:
605: \bibitem[Burenkov(1988)]{Burenkov88}
606: Burenkov, A.N. 1988, Astrofizika 28, 47.
607:
608: %\bibitem[Cair\'{o}s et al. (2001a)]{Cairos01I}
609: % Cair\'{o}s, L.M., V\'{i}lchez, J.~M., P\'{e}rez,
610: % J.~N.~G., Iglesia-P\'{a}ramo, J., \& Caon, N. 2001,
611: % \apjs, 133, 321.
612:
613: \bibitem[Cair\'{o}s et al. (2001)]{Cairos01II}
614: Cair\'{o}s, L.M., Caon, N. V\'{i}lchez, J.~M., P\'{e}rez,
615: J.~N.~G., \& Mu\~{n}oz-Tu\~{n}\'{o}n, C. 2001, \apjs, 136, 393.
616:
617: %\bibitem[Cair\'{o}s(2003)]{Cairos03}
618: % Cair\'{o}s, L.~M., Caon, N., Papaderos, P., Noeske, K., V\'{i}lchez,
619: % J.~M., Lorenzo, B.~G., \& Mu\~{n}oz-Tu\~{n}\'{o}n, C. \apj, 593,
620: % 312.
621:
622: \bibitem[Calzetti et al.(1994)]{Calzetti94}
623: Calzetti, D., Kinney, A.L., \& Storchi-Bergmann, T. 1994, \apj, 429, 582.
624:
625: \bibitem[Charmandaris et al.(2002)]{Charmandaris02}
626: Charmandaris, V., Stacey, G.~J., \& Gull, G. 2002, \apj, 571, 282.
627:
628: \bibitem[Cohen et al.(2003)]{Cohen03}
629: Cohen, M., Megeath, S.T., \& Stauffer, J. 2003, \aj, 125, 2645.
630:
631: \bibitem[Dopita et al.(2000)]{Dopita00}
632: Dopita, M.~A., Kewley, L.~J., Heisler, C.~A., \& Sutherland, R.~S.\
633: 2000, \apj, 542, 224.
634:
635: %\bibitem[Dubinski et al.(1999)]{Dubinski99}
636: % Dubinski, J., Mihos, J.~C., \& Hernquist, L.\ 1999, \apj, 526, 607.
637:
638: %\bibitem[Duflot(1976)]{Duflot76}
639: % Duflot, R., Lombard, J., \& Perrin, Y.\ 1976, \aap, 48, 437.
640:
641: \bibitem[Dunne et al.(2000)]{Dunne00}
642: Dunne, L., Eales, S., Edmunds, M., Ivison, R., Alexander, P., \&
643: Clements, D.~L.\ 2000, \mnras, 315, 115.
644:
645: \bibitem[Elmegreen et al.(2006)]{Elmegreen06}
646: Elmegreen, D.~M., Elmegreen, B.~G., Kaufman, M., Sheth, K., Struck,
647: C., Thomasson, M, \& Brinks, E.\ 2006, \apj, 642, 158.
648:
649: \bibitem[Fazio et al.(2004)]{Fazio04}
650: Fazio et al.\ 2004, \apjs, 154, 10.
651:
652: \bibitem[Gallais et al.(2004)]{Gallais04}
653: Gallais, P., Charmandaris, V., Le Floc'h, E., Mirabel, I.~F., Sauvage,
654: M., Vigroux, L., \& Laurent, O. 2004, \aap, 414, 845.
655:
656: \bibitem[Grevesse et al.(1998)]{Grevesse98}
657: Grevesse, N., \& Sauval, A.~J. 1998, SSR, 85, 161.
658:
659: \bibitem[Haas et al.(2000)]{Haas00}
660: Haas, M., Klaas, U., Coulson, I., Thommes, E., \& Xu, C.\ 2000,
661: \aap, 356, L83.
662:
663: \bibitem[Hancock et al.(2007)]{Hancock07}
664: Hancock, M., Smith, B.~J., Struck, C., Giroux, M.~L., Appleton,
665: P.~N., Charmandaris, V., \& Reach, W.~T.\ 2007, \aj, 133, 676.
666:
667: \bibitem[Hecquet et al.(1987)]{Hecquet87}
668: Hecquet, J., Coupinot, G., \& Maucherat, A.J. 1987, \aap, 183, 13.
669:
670: \bibitem[Heeschen et al.(1983)]{Heeschen83}
671: Heeschen, D., Heidmann, J, \& Yin, Q.F. 1983, \apj, 267, L73.
672:
673: %\bibitem[Heidmann et al.(1982)]{Heidmann82}
674: % Heidmann, J., Klein, U., \& Wielebinski, R. 1982, \aap, 105, 188.
675:
676: \bibitem[Higdon et al.(2004)]{Higdon04}
677: Higdon, S.~J.~U., et al.\ 2004, \pasp, 116, 975.
678:
679: \bibitem[Houck et al.(2004)]{Houck04}
680: Houck, J.~R., et al.\ 2004, \apjs, 154, 18.
681:
682: \bibitem[James et al.(2002)]{James02}
683: James, A., Dunne, L., Eales, S., \& Edmunds, M.~G. 2002, \mnras, 335, 753.
684:
685: \bibitem[Kewley et al.(2001)]{Kewley01}
686: Kewley, L.~J., Dopita, M.~A., Sutherland, R.~S., Heisler, C.~A., \&
687: Trevena, J.\ 2001, \apj, 556, 121.
688:
689: \bibitem[Laurent et al.(2000)]{Laurent00}
690: Laurent, O., Mirabel, I.~F., Charmandaris, V., Gallais, P., Madden,
691: S.~C., Sauvage, M., Vigroux, L., \& Cesarsky, C.\ 2000, \aap, 359, 887.
692:
693: \bibitem[Leitherer et al.(1999)]{Leitherer99}
694: Leitherer, C., et al.\ 1999, \apjs, 123, 3.
695:
696: \bibitem[Lonsdale et al.(1992)]{Lonsdale92}
697: Lonsdale, C.~J., Lonsdale, C.~J., \& Smith, H.~E.\ 1992, \apj, 391, 629.
698:
699: \bibitem[Marshall et al.(2007)]{Marshall07}
700: Marshall, J.A., et al. 2007, \apj, submitted.
701:
702: \bibitem[Mathis(1990)]{Mathis90}
703: Mathis, J.S. 1990, \araa, 28, 37.
704:
705: \bibitem[Metcalfe et al.(2005)]{Metcalfe05}
706: Metcalfe, L., et al.\ 2005, \aap, 444, 777.
707:
708: \bibitem[Mezger et al.(1982)]{Mezger82}
709: Mezger, P.~G., Mathis, J.~S., Panagia, N. 1982, \aap, 105, 372.
710:
711: %\bibitem[Mihos \& Hernquist(1996)]{Mihos96}
712: % Mihos, J.~C., \& Hernquist, L.\ 1996, \apj, 464, 641.
713:
714: \bibitem[Mirabel et al.(1998)]{Mirabel98}
715: Mirabel, I.F., et al. 1998, \aap, 333, L1.
716:
717: \bibitem[Peeters et al.(2004)]{Peeters04}
718: Peeters, E., Spoon, H.W.W., \& Tielens, A.G.G. 2004, \apj, 613, 986.
719:
720: \bibitem[Rothberg et al.(2004)]{Rothberg04}
721: Rothberg, B., \& Joseph, R.D. 2004, \aj, 128, 2098.
722:
723: \bibitem[Sage et al.(1993)]{Sage93}
724: Sage, L.~J., Loose, H.~-H., \& Salzer, J.~J. \aap, 273, 6.
725:
726: \bibitem[Sanders et al.(2003)]{Sanders03}
727: Sanders, D.~B., Mazzarella, J.~M., Kim, D.-C., Surace, J.~A., \&
728: Soifer, B.~T.\ 2003, \aj, 126, 1607.
729:
730: \bibitem[Shi et al.(2005)]{Shi05}
731: Shi, F., Kong, X., Li, C., \& Cheng, F.~Z. \aap, 437, 849.
732:
733: \bibitem[Skrutskie et al.(2006)]{Skrutskie06}
734: Skrutskie, M.~F., et al.\ 2006, \aj, 131, 1163.
735:
736: \bibitem[Smith et al.(2007)]{Smith07}
737: Smith, B.~J., Struck, C., Hancock, M., Appleton, P.~N.,
738: Charmandaris, V., \& Reach, W.~T.\ 2007, \aj, 133, 791.
739:
740: \bibitem[Sofue et al.(1990)]{Sofue90}
741: Sofue, Y., Taniguchi, Y., Handa, T., Wakamatsu, K., Nakai, N.,
742: Fujisawa, K., \& Yasuda, N.\ 1990, PASJ, 42, L45.
743:
744: \bibitem[Spinoglio et al.(1995)]{Spinoglio95}
745: Spinoglio, L., Malkan, M.~A., Rush, B., Carrasco, L., \&
746: Recillas-Cruz, E.\ 1995, \apj, 453, 616.
747:
748: %\bibitem[Sugerman et al. (2006)]{Sugerman06}
749: % Sugerman, Ben E.~K., Ercolano, B., Barlow, M.J., Tielens, A.G.G.M.,
750: % Clayton, G.C., Zijlstra, A.A., Meixner, M., Speck, A., et al. 2006,
751: % Sci, 313, 196S.
752:
753: \bibitem[Takagi et al.(2003)]{Takagi03}
754: Takagi, T., Arimoto, N., \& Hanami, H.\ 2003, \mnras, 340, 813.
755:
756: \bibitem[Taniguchi et al.(1987)]{Taniguchi87}
757: Taniguchi, Y. \& Tamura, S. 1987, \aap, 181, 265.
758:
759: \bibitem[Taniguchi et al.(1991)]{Taniguchi91}
760: Taniguchi, Y. \& Noguchi, M. 1991, \aj, 101, 1601.
761:
762: \bibitem[Vigroux et al.(1996)]{Vigroux96}
763: Vigroux, L., et al.\ 1996, \aap, 315, L93.
764:
765: \bibitem[Weedman(1972)]{Weedman72}
766: Weedman, D. W. 1972, \apj, 171, 5.
767:
768: \bibitem[Werner et al.(2004)]{Werner04}
769: Werner, M.~W., et al.\ 2004, \apjs, 154, 1.
770:
771: \bibitem[Whelan et al.(2005)]{Whelan05}
772: Whelan, D.G., Devost, D., Charmandaris, V., \& Houck, J.R. 2005, in
773: proceedings of ``The Spitzer Science Center 2005 Conference:
774: Infrared Diagnostics of Galaxy Evolution.''
775:
776: \bibitem[Wu et al.(2006)]{Wu06}
777: Wu, Y., Charmandaris, V., Hao, L., Brandl, B.~R., Bernard-Salas, J.,
778: Spoon, H.~W.~W., \& Houck, J.~R.\ 2006, \apj, 639, 157.
779:
780: \bibitem[Xu et al.(1999)]{Xu99}
781: Xu, C., Sulentic, J.~W., \& Tuffs, R.\ 1999, \apj, 512, 178.
782:
783: \bibitem[Yin(1994)]{Yin94}
784: Yin, Q.~F.\ 1994, \apj, 420, 152.
785:
786: \end{thebibliography}
787:
788: \clearpage
789: % Tables
790:
791: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccccccccc}
792: \tabletypesize{\tiny} \setlength{\tabcolsep}{0.02in}
793: \tablecaption{Source Identification\tablenotemark{a}\label{srcid}}
794: \tablewidth{0pt}
795: \tablehead{\multicolumn{3}{c}{Labels} & \multicolumn{8}{c}{Fluxes in mJy} \\ \colhead{Spitzer} & \colhead{Metcalfe\tablenotemark{b}} & \colhead{Hecquet\tablenotemark{c}} & \colhead{J band} & \colhead{H band} & \colhead{K band} & \colhead{3.6$\micron$} & \colhead{4.5$\micron$} & \colhead{5.8$\micron$} & \colhead{8.0$\micron$} & \colhead{16.0$\micron$}}
796: \startdata
797: A & 1 & 7,8 & 0.96 & 1.16 & 1.05 & 2.68 & 2.46 & 10.6 & 33.1 & 48.0 \\
798: B & 2 & 22,23 & 1.89 & 2.42 & 2.11 & 2.76 & 2.21 & 9.73 & 31.6 & 36.1 \\
799: C & 4 & 15 & 1.26 & 1.43 & 1.34 & 3.53 & 2.42 & 11.5 & 36.8 & 30.1 \\
800: D & 7 & 41 & 1.21 & 1.36 & 1.26 & 1.41 & 1.04 & 3.68 & 11.1 & 11.9 \\
801: all & $--$ & $--$ &43.65\tablenotemark{d} &56.23\tablenotemark{d} &38.90\tablenotemark{d} &22.3 &16.4 &63.2 &179 &260 \\
802: \enddata
803: \tablenotetext{a}{Errors in flux densities are measured to be about 12 \% systematically.}
804: \tablenotetext{b}{Taken from \citet{Metcalfe05} Figure 1, sources 1, 2, 4, amd 7 refer to the MIR regions they labeled from the ISOCAM 14.3 \micron\ image}
805: \tablenotetext{c}{Taken from \citet{Hecquet87} Figure 2b, a B-R color image of NGC\,6052}
806: \tablenotetext{d}{Global flux density values for the J, H, and K bands are taken from \citet{Spinoglio95}}
807: \end{deluxetable}
808:
809: \clearpage
810:
811: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccc}
812: \tabletypesize{\small} \setlength{\tabcolsep}{0.02in}
813: \tablecaption{Mid-IR Emission Features of NGC\,6052\label{tabflux}}
814: \tablewidth{0pt}
815: \tablehead{\colhead{} & \multicolumn{4}{c}{Flux $\times 10^{-20}$\,W\,cm$^{-2}$}\\
816: \colhead{Feature} & \colhead{Region A} & \colhead{Region B} & \colhead{Region C } & \colhead{Total}}
817: \startdata
818: PAH 6.2\micron\ & 4.32 $\pm$0.04 & 3.41 $\pm$0.03 & 4.92 $\pm$0.04 & 65.6$\pm$0.8 \\
819: PAH 7.7\micron\ &15.8 $\pm$0.2 &15.0 $\pm$0.7 & 1.85 $\pm$0.03 & 198 $\pm$6 \\
820: PAH 8.6 \micron\ & 2.93 $\pm$0.5 & 2.96 $\pm$0.6 & 3.45 $\pm$0.06 & 30.1$\pm$0.7 \\
821: PAH 11.3\micron\ & 3.72 $\pm$0.8 & 3.4 $\pm$0.1 & 4.4 $\pm$0.1 & 38.9$\pm$0.9 \\
822: PAH 12.7\micron\ & 2.75 $\pm$0.4 & 2.56 $\pm$0.4 & 2.36 $\pm$0.08 & 15.0$\pm$0.5 \\
823: ${\rm[ArIII]}\lambda$8.99\micron\ & 0.139 $\pm$0.002 & 0.196$\pm$0.001 & 0.071$\pm$0.002 & 5.7$\pm$0.3 \\
824: ${\rm[SIV]}\lambda$10.51\micron\ & 0.43 $\pm$0.02 & 0.41 $\pm$0.04 & 0.20 $\pm$0.02 & 2.3$\pm$0.5 \\
825: ${\rm[SIII]}\lambda$19.01\micron\ & $---$ & $---$ & $---$ & 4.4$\pm$0.5 \\
826: ${\rm[NeII]}\lambda$12.81\micron\ & 0.65 $\pm$0.11 & 0.95 $\pm$0.11 & 0.74 $\pm$0.11 & 6.3$\pm$0.6 \\
827: ${\rm[NeIII]}\lambda$15.80\micron\ & $---$ & $---$ & $---$ & 5.3$\pm$0.5 \\
828: $H_{2}S(3)$$\lambda9.7\mu$m & 0.0792$\pm$0.007 & 0.171$\pm$0.01 & 0.17 $\pm$0.02 & 8.9$\pm$0.7 \\
829: $H_{2}S(2)$$\lambda12.3\mu$m & 0.10 $\pm$0.01 & 0.16 $\pm$0.01 & 0.101$\pm$0.01 & 6.5$\pm$0.3 \\
830: \enddata
831: \end{deluxetable}
832:
833: \clearpage
834: % Figures
835:
836: \begin{figure}
837: \epsscale{1.0}
838: \plotone{f1.eps}
839: \caption{The HST optical (F 555W) image of the galaxy, over-plotted
840: with 2MASS K-band image (white) and Spitzer/IRS 16\micron\ image
841: (black). The three regions from which IRS spectra were extracted are
842: labeled A, B, and C. Source D is also labeled. Note that region A
843: emits most at 16 \micron. The position of SN 1982aa (see
844: \S\ref{sec:RadioContinuumEmission}) is marked by a
845: square.\label{puimage}}
846: \end{figure}
847:
848: \clearpage
849:
850: \begin{figure}
851: \epsscale{1.0}
852: \plotone{f2.eps}
853: \caption{A snapshot composite of the near-IR 2MASS J-band image of
854: NGC\,6052, along with the 3.5, 4.0, 5.8, and 8.0\micron\ IRAC images
855: as well as the IRS 16\micron\ peak-up image. Each snapshot is
856: centered at RA(J2000)=16:05:12.89, Dec(J2000)=+20:32:32.5, which
857: coincides with the location of the near-IR bulge of the galaxy as
858: indicated by the J-band image.\label{astrometry}}
859: \end{figure}
860:
861: \clearpage
862:
863: \begin{figure}
864: \epsscale{0.6}
865: \plotone{f3.eps}
866: \caption{Top: The integrated Spitzer/IRS spectrum of NGC\,6052, with
867: all strong MIR spectral features marked. Bottom: The 1 \micron\ to
868: 100 \micron\ SED of the system. The far-IR photometric points for
869: the systems were obtained from \citet{Metcalfe05} and \citet{Dunne00}
870: (filled symbols were used in the spectral decomposition while open
871: symbols were not), and the near-IR photometric points are from
872: \citet{Spinoglio95}. The warm dust, PAH, and interstellar radiation
873: field (ISRF) components of the model fits are also
874: indicated.\label{intspec}}
875: \end{figure}
876:
877: \clearpage
878:
879: \begin{figure}
880: \centering
881: \includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{f4a.eps}
882: \includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{f4b.eps}
883: \includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{f4c.eps}
884: \caption{The $\sim$5--15\micron\ IRS SL spectrum of sources A, B, and C. The
885: filled circles indicate the J,H, and K 2MASS points for each region. The
886: warm dust, PAH, and interstellar radiation field (ISRF) components of the
887: model fits are also indicated.\label{multispec}}
888: \end{figure}
889:
890:
891: \end{document}
892: