1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2:
3: \slugcomment{}
4:
5: \shorttitle{ABUNDANCES OF HD~88609}
6: \shortauthors{HONDA et al.}
7:
8: \begin{document}
9:
10: \title{Neutron-capture elements in the very metal-poor star HD~88609: another star with excesses of light neutron-capture elements\altaffilmark{1}}
11:
12: \author{Satoshi Honda\altaffilmark{2,3}, Wako Aoki\altaffilmark{2}, Yuhri Ishimaru\altaffilmark{4}, and Shinya Wanajo\altaffilmark{5}}
13:
14: \altaffiltext{2}{National Astronomical Observatory, Mitaka, Tokyo,
15: 181-8588, Japan; e-mail: honda@optik.mtk.nao.ac.jp, aoki.wako@nao.ac.jp}
16: \altaffiltext{3}{Current address: Gunma Astronomical Observatory, 6860-86 Nakayama, Takayama, Agatsuma, Gunma 377-0702, Japan}
17: \altaffiltext{4}{Academic Support Center, Kogakuin University, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-0015, Japan; kt13121@ns.kogakuin.ac.jp}
18: \altaffiltext{5}{Department of Astronomy, School of Science, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8654, Japan; wanajo@astron.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp}
19: \altaffiltext{1}{Based on data collected at the Subaru Telescope,
20: which is operated by the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan.}
21:
22: \begin{abstract}
23: We obtained a high resolution, high signal-to-noise UV-blue spectrum
24: of the extremely metal-poor red giant HD~88609 to determine the
25: abundances of heavy elements. Nineteen neutron-capture elements are
26: detected in the spectrum. Our analysis revealed that this object has
27: large excesses of light neutron-capture elements while heavy
28: neutron-capture elements are deficient. The abundance pattern shows a
29: continuously decreasing trend, as a function of atomic number, from
30: Sr to Yb, which is quite different from those in stars with excesses
31: of r-process elements. Such an abundance pattern is very similar to that
32: of HD~122563 that was studied by our previous work. The results
33: indicate that the abundance pattern found in the two stars could
34: represent the pattern produced by the nucleosynthesis process that
35: provided light neutron-capture elements in the very early Galaxy.
36:
37: \end{abstract}
38:
39: \keywords{nuclear reactions, nucleosynthesis, abundances -- stars : individual (\objectname{HD~88609}) -- stars: Population II}
40:
41: \section{Introduction}
42:
43: Over the past few decades, a considerable number of studies have been
44: conducted to identify the origin of neutron-capture
45: elements. Measurements of heavy elements for very metal-poor stars
46: provide a unique opportunity to determine the abundance patterns
47: produced by individual nucleosynthesis processes in the early Galaxy
48: \citep[e.g., ][]{mcwilliam95b}, which are key to understanding the
49: astrophysical sites of the processes. In particular, detailed
50: abundance studies for selected neutron-capture enhanced, metal-poor
51: stars have revealed that heavy neutron-capture elements ($Z\geq 56$)
52: show an abundance pattern that is identical, within the measurement
53: errors, to that of the r-process component of solar-system material
54: \citep[e.g., ][]{sneden96}.
55:
56:
57: %However, the abundances of light neutron-capture elements in these
58: %objects show some deviation from the solar-system r-process abundance
59: %pattern \citep[e.g., ][]{sneden00}, suggesting the presence of the second component of the r-process that provided light neutron-capture elements.
60: However, these objects show some deficiencies in light neutron-capture elements ($Z < 56$) compared to the scaled solar r-process curve \citep[e.g.,][]{sneden00,hill02}.
61: This means that the r-process abundance pattern in solar-system material is not fully explained by the component that makes the pattern found in such r-process-enhanced stars (sometimes referred to as ``main'' r-process), but another component that yields light neutron-capture elements with small production of heavy ones is required.
62: Indeed, a some fraction of very metal-poor stars have high
63: abundance ratios of light neutron-capture elements Sr, Y, and Zr,
64: while their heavy ones (e.g., Ba, Eu) are very deficient
65: \citep[e.g.,][]{mcwilliam98,aoki05}.
66: Such objects possibly record the abundance patterns
67: produced by the second component.
68:
69: The component that is responsible for light neutron-capture elements of the r-process fraction of
70: solar-system material is not well understood, and no established name is given.
71: We here refer to this process as ``weak'' r-process \citep{wanajo06}.
72: It should be noted that the r-process component in the solar system is derived by subtracting the s-process component from the solar abundances, based on the s-process models \citep{kap89}.
73: %That is, the component of other than the component which makes the pattern like these
74: %objects (``main'' r-process) are required to explain the solar system r-process component
75: %(which is subtracting the s-process component from the solar system abundances).
76: %This suggests the presence of the ``weak'' r-process \citep{wanajo06} that fulfills the
77: %lighter counterpart ($Z < 56$) of the abundance curve in these stars.
78: %We here use the term ``weak r-process'', because such a component is required to
79: %explain the r-process abundance pattern in solar-system material.
80: Therefore, the weak r-process referred in this paper possibly corresponds to some processes other than r-process.
81:
82:
83:
84: The bright metal-poor ([Fe/H]$=-2.7$) star HD~122563 is one of the stars having
85: excesses of light neutron-capture elements.
86: Our previous work obtained high resolution spectroscopy for
87: this object and determined the abundances of 19 neutron-capture
88: elements from Sr to Yb ($Z=38-70$) \citep[][; hereafter Paper
89: I]{honda06}. The abundances of neutron-capture elements in this star
90: continuously decrease with the increase of atomic number. That is, the
91: elements with intermediate mass ($41 \leq Z \leq 47$) have moderate
92: enhancements with respect to heavy ones ($Z\geq 56$).
93: This is the first determination of the overall abundance pattern that could
94: represent the yields of the weak r-process mentioned above.
95:
96: In this paper, we report the abundance pattern of neutron-capture
97: elements in the extremely metal-poor red giant HD~88609. Previous
98: studies \citep[e.g., ][]{honda04} showed that this object has large
99: excesses of light neutron-capture elements and underabundances of
100: heavy ones similar to HD~122563. The metallicity of HD~88609 ([Fe/H]$\sim
101: -3.0$) is even lower than that of HD~122563 ([Fe/H]$\sim -2.7$). Hence,
102: HD~88609 could be an ideal object in order to study the nature of
103: the weak r-process.
104: However, abundance measurements of the neutron-capture elements for this
105: object are quite limited because of the deficiency of heavy neutron-capture elements.
106: We determined the detailed
107: abundance pattern of heavy elements for this object based on
108: a high resolution, high signal-to-noise ratio spectrum. The
109: observation and abundance measurements are reported in \S~2 and 3,
110: respectively.
111: The results are compared with previous work in \S~4.
112: In \S~5, the results are compared with the abundance pattern of the solar-system
113: r-process component, and with that of HD~122563.
114: Implications of our new measurement for HD~88609 are also discussed.
115:
116:
117: \section{Observations}
118:
119: High dispersion spectroscopy of HD~88609 was carried out with the Subaru Telescope High Dispersion Spectrograph \citep[HDS: ][]{nogu02} on 30 April, 2004 and 19-20 October 2005.
120: Our spectrum covers the wavelength range from 3020 to 4780 {\AA} with a resolving power of $R$ = 90,000, as in the study for HD~122563 (Paper I).
121: The total exposure time of the two observing runs is 12600 seconds.
122: In addition, the spectrum around 5000 {\AA} obtained by \citet{honda04} was used to determine the abundances of Cu, Zn, Y, and Ba abundances (see Table 1 for the details of the observations).
123:
124: The data reduction was carried out in a standard manner using the IRAF echelle package\footnote{IRAF is distributed by National Optical Astronomy Observatories, which are operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation} as described in Paper I and \citet{honda04a}.
125: The signal to noise ratio (S/N) of the spectrum (per 0.9 km s$^{-1}$ pixel) estimated from the photon counts is 50 at 3100 {\AA}; 200 at 3500 {\AA}; 370 at 3900 {\AA}; 510 at 4200 {\AA} and 650 at 4500 {\AA}.
126: These S/N ratios are not as high as those of the spectrum of HD~122563 (Paper I), but sufficient for our purposes.
127:
128: \section{Analysis}
129:
130: For our quantitative abundance measurements, we used the analysis program SPTOOL developed by Y. Takeda (private communication), based on Kurucz's ATLAS9/WIDTH9 \citep{kurucz93}.
131: SPTOOL calculates synthetic spectra and equivalent widths of lines on the basis of the given model atmosphere, line data, and chemical composition, under the assumption of LTE.
132:
133: We adopted the model atmosphere parameters (effective temperature: $T_{\rm eff}$, gravity: $g$, micro-turbulent velocity: $v_{\rm turb}$, and metallicity: [Fe/H]) derived by \citet{honda04}: $T_{\rm eff}$ = 4550 K, $\log g$ = 1.1, $v_{\rm turb}$ = 2.4 km s$^{-1}$, and [Fe/H] $= -3.07$.
134:
135: We adopted the line list used in the previous study for HD~122563 (Paper I), which is given in Table \ref{tab:table2}.
136: All the lines used in the previous study were also detected in the spectrum of HD~88609.
137: An advantage in the present analysis is that, since the metallicity of this object is lower than that of HD~122563, the effect of the blends of lines decreases.
138: Equivalent widths of isolated lines are measured by fitting a gaussian profile.
139: The lines of \ion{Cu}{1} 5105, \ion{Zn}{1} 4810, \ion{Y}{2} 4883, \ion{Y}{2} 5087, and \ion{Ba}{2} 4934 are analyzed using the spectrum of \citet{honda04a}, which has sufficient S/N in this wavelength region (150 at 5000 {\AA}).
140: The values of the equivalent widths of \ion{Ba}{2} 5853 and 6141 {\AA} are adopted from \citet{johnson02a}.
141: The results are given in Table \ref{tab:table3}.
142: A spectrum synthesis technique is applied to lines which are severely affected by blending and/or hyperfine splitting.
143: Equivalent widths of such lines given in Table \ref{tab:table2} are calculated by spectrum synthesis for the derived abundances.
144: We used the solar system abundances obtained by \citet{asplund05} to derive [X/Fe] values.
145: Figure \ref{fig:fig1} depicts representative examples of the quality of the observed spectra, and the fits to synthetic spectra.
146: The abundances of HD~122563 are also given in this table for comparison purposes.
147: We note that the list of abundances in Table 2 of Paper I contains small mistakes, which are corrected in Table 3 of the present paper.
148: The difference is at most 0.08 dex (Ce), and does not have significant influence on the conclusions of the previous paper.
149:
150: The size of the random errors is estimated from the standard deviation (1$\sigma$) of the abundances derived from individual lines for elements that have four or more lines available for the abundance analysis.
151: For the abundances of elements based on less than four lines, we employ the mean of the random errors estimated from those elements with four or more lines available (0.12 dex).
152: For most of these elements, the abundances derived from individual
153: lines distribute within 0.12 dex around the mean abundance that is
154: adopted as the final result.
155: Exceptions are Cu, Dy, and Er, for which we adopt 0.20 dex as the
156: random errors.
157: %Although the almost two or three lines are settled within 0.12 dex, Dy and Er are slightly large.
158: %For these lines, it should be careful.
159: We also estimate the random errors in the abundance measurement from the uncertainties of equivalent width measurements, which are estimated using the relation $\sigma_{\rm w}\simeq({\lambda}n_{\rm pix}^{1/2})/(R[S/N])$ \citep{norris01}.
160: The errors of abundances from equivalent width measurement are smaller than 0.12 dex for most lines.
161: The estimated errors for \ion{Cu}{1} {$\lambda$}5105 and \ion{Gd}{2} ${\lambda}$3549 are very large,
162: because of the weakness of these lines.
163: However, the abundance results do not significantly change if these lines are excluded in the analysis.
164: %Exceptions are some lines of Cu, Nb, Sm, Gd, and Dy.
165: %Abundances derived from these lines should be interpreted with caution.
166: %Since there may be a little problems in some lines (Eu 3819, 4205, Gd 3481) by
167: We note that, since contaminations to the \ion{Eu}{2} $\lambda$3819, $\lambda$4205, and \ion{Gd}{2} $\lambda$3481 are possibly significant, these lines are not used to derive final results.
168: %of other lines (Paper I) , these lines are not used to derive final results.
169:
170: Although the S/N ratio of the HD~122563 spectrum is better than the HD~88609 one,
171: %Although the errors of equivalent width measurement are very small in the high quality data of HD~122563,
172: the standard deviation of the abundances derived from four or more lines for HD~88609 (0.12 dex) is slightly smaller than those for HD~122563 (0.14 dex).
173: This suggests that factors other than the quality of the spectrum also affect the random errors.
174:
175: The atmospheric parameters of HD~88609 are quite similar to those of HD~122563, and the same line set is used for the abundance analysis.
176: %The estimated uncertainties which are
177: %for HD~88609 (Honda et al. 2004) are almost the same as that of HD~122563.
178: Therefore, we adopt the errors due to the uncertainties of the atmospheric parameters
179: ($\Delta T_{\rm eff}$ = 100 K, $\Delta \log g$ = 0.3 dex, $\Delta v_{\rm turb}$ = 0.5 km s$^{-1}$, and $\Delta$[Fe/H] = 0.20 dex)
180: estimated for HD~122563 (Table 3 of Paper I).
181: The total systematic errors which are shown in Table 3 ($\sigma$) are derived by the root sum square (r.s.s.) of the uncertainties contributed by the four parameters.
182: %The errors are in general systematic, and
183: Such systematic errors do not significantly affect the abundance ratios of neutron-capture elements, in particular those derived from species with the same ionization stage.
184: %However, the behavior of the change shows a little difference in a various ionization states.
185: %We also estimated the fluctuation of the quantity of the change for each elements
186: %which are the differences from the average of quantity with parameter changed.
187: %The value of r.s.s of the fluctuation with four parameters are shown in Table 3.
188: %We include those value, when discussing about abundance ratio.
189: The effects of uncertainties of atmospheric parameters on abundance ratios (and the abundance pattern) of neutron-capture elements are estimated by the following procedure; 1) we calculate the average of the abundance changes due to the change of each atmospheric parameters (e.g., $\Delta T_{\rm eff}$) for neutron capture elements (19 species); 2) we calculate the deviation of the abundance changes for individual species from the above average value; 3) we adopt the r.s.s. of the above deviations for the four parameters as the systematic errors for the discussion on the abundance ratios ($\sigma_{\rm n-cap}$ in Table 3).
190: The typical value is 0.07 dex for the ionized species, while that is 0.12 dex for the neutral ones.
191:
192:
193: The radial velocity is measured using 14 clean iron lines.
194: The derived radial velocity is --37.69 $\pm$ 0.3~km s$^{-1}$ from the data of Oct. 2005.
195: This value agrees well with the value --37.28 $\pm$ 0.43~km s$^{-1}$ derived by our previous study \citep{honda04a}.
196: There is, so far, no evidence that this object belongs to a binary system.
197:
198:
199: \section{Comparisons with previous studies}
200:
201: In spite of the brightness of HD~88609, abundance measurements of neutron-capture elements have been reported only for several species in previous work, because of the deficiency of heavy neutron-capture elements.
202: Figure \ref{fig:fig2} shows comparisons of the abundances of neutron-capture
203: elements derived by the present analysis with recent studies by \citet{johnson02a}, \citet{fulbright04}, and \citet{honda04}.
204:
205: Since the present work adopts the atmospheric parameters determined by \citet{honda04} for the abundance analysis, no systematic error is expected.
206: Although Sr, Y, Zr, and Ba are detected by \citet{honda04}, many lines are added to previous
207: data by this analysis.
208: The abundances of these elements determined by the two studies agree within the errors.
209: We note that the Ba abundance derived by the present work is higher than the value of \citet{honda04}, but this is because the present analysis includes the two lines in the red region that give systematically higher abundances than those from the two resonance lines.
210:
211: \citet{johnson02a} and \citet{johnson01,johnson02} analyzed the neutron-capture elements in this object.
212: A comparison of equivalent widths of 25 lines of Zn, Y, Zr, and Ba (Figure \ref{fig:fig2a}) shows a systematic difference by 11\% between the two studies.
213: %no significant systematic difference in the measurements of equivalent widths by the two studies
214: %(Figure \ref{fig:fig2a}).
215: %A systematic difference by 11\% between the two studies (Figure \ref{fig:fig2a}).
216: This results in the abundance difference of at most 0.1 dex.
217: Indeed, the abundances of Y, Zr, and Ba derived by our analysis technique using the equivalent width of \citet{johnson02a} and \citet{johnson01,johnson02}, differ only 0.03 -- 0.08 dex from their results.
218: %and compared the results.
219: %As the results, each differences are Y 0.07 dex, Zr 0.03 dex, and Ba (4554) 0.08 dex.
220: %Those different are smaller than the random error.
221:
222: The abundances determined by the present study agree well with their results.
223: However, the atmospheric parameters adopted in their analysis differ from ours:
224: the effective temperature adopted in our analysis is 150K higher than that of \citet{johnson02a}, while our gravity ($\log g$) is 0.7 dex higher than their value.
225: The differences of these parameters could result in systematic abundance differences of about 0.3 dex, which are not found between the two studies.
226: %The reason for this result is not identified.
227:
228: \citet{fulbright04} reanalyzed the spectrum of HD~88609 partially using the equivalent widths of \citet{johnson02a}.
229: Since they derived the atmospheric parameters by a similar method to \citet{honda04}, the values are in good agreement with ours.
230: However, systematic difference in the derived abundances is found between the two works (Figure \ref{fig:fig2}).
231:
232: The comparisons of our results with those of \citet{johnson02a}, \citet{johnson01,johnson02}, and \citet{fulbright04} show that systematic differences exist in abundances of neutron-capture elements, taking account of adopted atmospheric parameters.
233: A possible reason for this discrepancy is the difference of abundance analysis tools.
234: We note that, although we can not identify the reason for this systematic difference, the abundance ratios (patterns) of neutron-capture elements show relatively good agreement between these works.
235:
236: %One possibility is to assume that the difference of analysis tool.
237: %Although \citet{johnson02a}, \citet{johnson01,johnson02}, and \citet{fulbright04} were analyzed using MOOG \citep{sneden73}, we use SPTOOL for abundance analysis.
238: %In older version of MOOG and SPTOOL, the difference may exist in the handling of Rayleigh scatter (Sneden private communication).
239:
240:
241:
242: \section{Discussion and concluding remarks}
243:
244: Our abundance analyses for HD~88609 based on high resolution
245: spectroscopy determined the abundances of 19 neutron-capture elements
246: as for HD~122563 by our previous work. The discussion in this section
247: focuses on the comparison of the abundance patterns of these elements
248: between the two objects, and implications of the new results obtained
249: for HD~88609.
250:
251: Figure \ref{fig:fig3} shows the abundance pattern of HD~88609, compared
252: with that of the solar-system r-process component. This figure
253: clearly shows that the abundances of light neutron-capture elements
254: (38 $\leq$ Z $\leq$ 47) are much higher than those of heavy ones in
255: HD~88609, compared to the solar-system r-process pattern. This
256: indicates that the neutron-capture elements of HD~88609, as
257: we found for HD~122563, are not a result of the main r-process, but were
258: produced by another process.
259:
260: Figure \ref{fig:fig4} shows the abundance differences from the solar system
261: r-process component in the logarithmic scale for HD~88609 (this work), HD~122563 (Paper I),
262: and CS~22892-052 \citep{sneden03}.
263: A clear result is that the abundance pattern of HD~88609 is very similar to that of HD~122563.
264: This result was partially expected from the sample selection: we selected objects
265: having high abundance ratios between light and heavy neutron-capture
266: elements (e.g., Sr/Ba). However, an important finding is that the two
267: objects have quite similar abundance patterns of elements between the
268: first and second abundance peaks ($41 \leq Z \leq 47$), which are
269: determined for HD~88609, for the first time, by the present work.
270:
271: We discussed possible nucleosynthesis processes that explain the abundance pattern of HD~122563 in Paper I.
272: The main r-process and the main s-process are excluded, because they produce much higher
273: abundance ratios of heavy to light neutron-capture elements than found
274: in HD~122563. The weak s-process is unlikely to be the source of
275: neutron-capture elements of HD~122563, because of the moderate
276: excesses of elements with intermediate mass (e.g., Pd).
277: We concluded that an unknown component of the r-process is responsible for the light
278: neutron-capture elements in HD~122563. We referred to the ``lighter
279: element primary process (LEPP)'' proposed by \citet{travaglio04} and the
280: ``weak'' (or ``failed'') r-process \citep{wanajo06} as the possible
281: sources of neutron-capture elements in Paper I.
282: Our present study reveals that HD~88609 is the second example of
283: metal-poor stars that have the abundance pattern representing such a
284: process, and HD~122563 is not a peculiar object.
285:
286: Here we inspect the difference of the abundance patterns between the
287: two objects in some detail.
288: Figure \ref{fig:fig5} shows the abundance differences
289: of neutron-capture elements on a logarithmic scale between HD~88609 and
290: HD~122563 as a function of atomic number. The least square fit to the
291: data points suggests that the decreasing trend is steeper in HD~88609
292: than that in HD~122563. The regression analysis and the Spearman rank
293: correlation test indicate that the null hypothesis that there is no
294: correlation between the abundance difference and the atomic number is
295: rejected at the 95\% confidence level. Hence, though the result is not
296: definitive, a correlation between the two values likely exists.
297:
298: Our conclusion here is that the abundance patterns of neutron-capture elements in HD~88609 and HD~122563 are quite similar, though a small difference is suggested.
299: One might recall the proposed uniqueness of the abundance pattern produced by the main r-process, which is confirmed by the observations of several r-process enhanced, extremely metal-poor stars \citep[cf.][]{cowan06}.
300: Theoretical studies based on the neutrino wind scenario also predict the robustness of abundance patterns when the requisite physical conditions (e.g., high entropy, short dynamic timescale, or low electron fraction) for the production of the main r-process nuclei are obtained \citep{Wana01, Wana02}.
301: However, the similarity of the abundance patterns found in the two objects can not be interpreted as uniqueness of the pattern produced by the weak r-process (or LEPP), because the two objects were selected to have similarly high Sr/Ba abundance ratios.
302: Model calculations for insufficient conditions for the main r-process show that the r-processing appears to be highly sensitive to the model parameters (e.g., electron fraction), resulting in
303: various abundance curves (S. Wanajo et al., in preparation).
304: It may be possible, therefore, that we have just found two similar ones out of various abundance curves from the very weak r-process (producing only Sr, Y, and Zr) to the main r-process (producing Ba, Eu, and heavier).
305: Further observations of objects having different Sr/Ba
306: ratios will uncover the diversity of abundance patterns.
307: In case that the similarity of the weak r-process patterns
308: is confirmed for a larger sample of stars, it will provide unique
309: constraints on the theoretical r-process modeling.
310:
311: We also discussed the origin of heavy neutron-capture elements ($Z\geq
312: 56$) in HD~122563, whose abundances significantly deviate from the solar-system
313: r-process abundance pattern, in Paper I. We argued the possibility of
314: some contamination of the s-process that can partially explain the
315: excesses of Ba, La, and Ce with respective to Eu, though an s-process contribution is unlikely significant at the metallicity of that object, i.e. [Fe/H]$=-2.7$. The
316: metallicity of HD~88609 ([Fe/H]$\sim -3.0$) is even lower than that of
317: HD~122563. No previous studies suggest contributions of the s-process
318: to objects with such low metallicity.\footnote{Exceptions are
319: carbon-enhanced metal-poor stars, which are presumably affected by
320: nucleosynthesis of asymptotic giant branch stars and mass transfer
321: across a binary system \citep[e.g.,][]{aoki07}. HD~88609, as well as HD~122563, is not an object belonging to this class.} Therefore, we conclude that the
322: deviation of the abundances of heavy neutron-capture elements in
323: HD~88609, and probably in HD~122563, from the main r-process pattern is not a result of contamination
324: of the s-process yields, but implies that the weak r-process produces a different abundance pattern of heavy
325: neutron-capture elements from that produced by the main r-process.
326: This result gives another constraint on the models of the process that
327: yielded light neutron-capture elements in the very early Galaxy.
328:
329:
330: \acknowledgments
331:
332: We would like to thank Dr. Sean G. Ryan for his great help and useful comments.
333: We also thank Dr. Akito Tajitsu for their support to our observations.
334: This work was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for the Japan-France
335: Integrated Action Program (SAKURA), awarded by the Japan Society for the
336: Promotion of Science, and Scientific Research (17740108) from the
337: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan.
338: Most of the data reduction was carried out at the Astronomical Data
339: Analysis Center (ADAC) of the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan.
340:
341:
342: \begin{thebibliography}{}
343: \bibitem [Aoki et al. (2005)]{aoki05} Aoki, W., et al. 2005, ApJ, 632, 611
344: \bibitem [Aoki et al. (2007)]{aoki07} Aoki, W., Beers, T. C., Christlieb, N., Norris, J. E., Ryan, S. G., \& Tsangarides, S. 2007, ApJ, 655, 492
345: \bibitem [Asplund et al. (2005)]{asplund05} Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., \& Sauval, A. J. 2005, in ASP Conf. Ser. 336, Cosmic Abundances as Records of Stellar Evolution and Nucleosynthesis, ed. T. G. Barnes III \& F. N. Bash (San Francisco: ASP), 25
346: \bibitem [Cowan et al. (2002)]{cowan02} Cowan, J. J., et al. 2002, ApJ, 572, 861
347: \bibitem [Cowan \& Sneden (2006)]{cowan06} Cowan, J. J. \& Sneden, C. 2006, Nature, 440, 1151
348: \bibitem [Den Hartog et al. (2003)]{denhartog03} Den Hartog, E. A., Lawler, J. E., Sneden, C. \& Cowan,J. J. 2003, ApJS, 148, 543
349: \bibitem [Fulbright et al. (2004)]{fulbright04} Fulbright, J. P., Rich, R. M., \& Castro, S. 2004, ApJ, 612, 447
350: \bibitem [Hill et al. (2002)]{hill02} Hill, V., et al. 2002, A\&A, 387, 560
351: \bibitem [Honda et al. (2004a)]{honda04a} Honda, S., et al. 2004a, ApJS, 152, 113
352: \bibitem [Honda et al. (2004b)]{honda04} Honda, S., et al. 2004b, ApJ, 607, 474
353: \bibitem [Honda et al. (2006)]{honda06} Honda, S., Aoki, W., Ishimaru, Y., Wanajo, S., \& Ryan, S. G. 2006, ApJ, 607, 474 (Paper I)
354: \bibitem [Johnson \& Bolte (2001)]{johnson01} Johnson, J. A. \& Bolte, M. 2001, ApJ, 554, 888
355: \bibitem [Johnson (2002)]{johnson02a} Johnson, J. A. 2002, ApJS, 139, 219
356: \bibitem [Johnson \& Bolte (2002)]{johnson02} Johnson, J. A. \& Bolte, M. 2002, ApJ, 579, 616
357: \bibitem [Johnson \& Bolte (2004)]{johnson04} Johnson, J. A. \& Bolte, M. 2004, ApJ, 605, 462
358: \bibitem[K\"{a}ppeler et al. (1989)]{kap89} K\"{a}ppeler, F., Beer, H.,\& Wisshak, K., 1989,
359: Rep. Prog. Phys., 52, 945
360: \bibitem [Kurucz \& Bell (1995)]{kurucz95} Kurucz, R. L., \& Bell. B 1995, Kurucz
361: CD-ROM,No.23 (Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics)
362: \bibitem [Kurucz (1993)]{kurucz93} Kurucz, R. L. 1993, Kurucz
363: CD-ROM,No.13 (Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics)
364: \bibitem [Lawler et al. (2004)]{lawler04} Lawler, J. E., Sneden, C., \& Cowan, J. J., 2004, ApJ, 604, 850
365: \bibitem [Lawler et al. (2001a)]{lawler01a} Lawler, J. E., Bonvallet,
366: G., \& Sneden, C. 2001a, ApJ, 556, 452
367: \bibitem [Lawler et al. (2001b)]{lawler01b} Lawler, J. E., Wickliffe,
368: M. E., Den Hartog, E. A., \& Sneden, C. 2001b, ApJ, 563, 1075
369: \bibitem [McWilliam (1998)]{mcwilliam98} McWilliam, A. 1998, AJ, 115, 1640
370: \bibitem [McWilliam et al. (1995)]{mcwilliam95b} McWilliam, A,
371: Preston, G. W., Sneden, C, \& Searle, L 1995,
372: AJ, 109, 27
373: \bibitem [Noguchi et al. (2002)]{nogu02} Noguchi, K.,et al. 2002, PASJ,
374: 54, 855
375: \bibitem [Norris et al. (2001)]{norris01} Norris, J. E., Ryan, S. G., \& Beers, T. C. 2001, ApJ, 561, 1034
376: \bibitem [Simmerer et al. (2004)]{simmerer04} Simmerer, J., Sneden, C., Cowan, J. J., Collier, J., Woolf, V. M., \& Lawler, J. E. 2004, ApJ, 617, 1091
377:
378: \bibitem [Sneden (1973)]{sneden73} Sneden, C. 1973, ApJ, 184, 839
379:
380: \bibitem [Sneden et al. (1996)]{sneden96} Sneden, C., McWilliam, A.,
381: Preston, G. W., Cowan, J. J., Burris, D. L., \& Armosky,
382: B. J. 1996, ApJ, 467, 819
383: \bibitem [Sneden et al. (2000)]{sneden00} Sneden, C, Cowan,
384: J. J., Ivans, I. I., Fuller, G. M., Burles, S,
385: Beers, T. C., \& Lawler, J. E. 2000, ApJ, 533, L139
386: \bibitem [Sneden et al. (2003)]{sneden03} Sneden, C., et al. 2003, ApJ,
387: 591, 936
388: \bibitem [Travaglio et al. (2004)]{travaglio04} Travaglio, C., Gallino, R., Arnone, E., Cowan, J., Jordan, F., \& Sneden, C. 2004, ApJ, 601, 864
389: \bibitem[Wanajo et al.(2001)]{Wana01}
390: Wanajo, S., Kajino, T., Mathews, G. J., \& Otsuki, K. 2001, \apj, 554, 578
391: \bibitem[Wanajo et al.(2002)]{Wana02} Wanajo, S., Itoh, N., Ishimaru, Y., Nozawa, S., \& Beers, T. C. 2002,
392: \apj, 577, 853
393: \bibitem [Wanajo \& Ishimaru(2006)]{wanajo06} Wanajo, S. \& Ishimaru, Y. 2006, \nphysa, 777, 676
394: \bibitem [Westin et al. (2000)]{westin00} Westin, J., Sneden, C., Gustafsson, B., \& Cowan, J. J. 2000, ApJ, 530, 783
395:
396: \end{thebibliography}
397:
398: \clearpage
399:
400: \begin{deluxetable}{lccc}
401: \tablewidth{0pt}
402: \tablecaption{OBSERVATION LOG AND ADOPTED ATMOSPHERIC PARAMETERS\label{tab:table1}}
403: \startdata
404: \tableline
405: Obs. Date & April 20. 2004 & October 19-20. 2005\\\hline
406: Wavelength & 3070 - 4780 {\AA} & 3020 - 4610 {\AA}\\
407: Resolution & 90,000 & 90,000\\
408: Exp. Time & 3600 sec & 9000 sec\\
409: SN @ 3500 & 120 & 150\\
410: SN @ 4000 & 240 & 330\\\hline
411: $T_{\rm eff}$ & 4550 K\\
412: $\log g$ & 1.1\\
413: $v_{\rm turb}$ & 2.4 km s$^{-1}$\\
414: $$[Fe/H] & --3.07 $\pm$ 0.2\\
415: \tableline
416: \enddata
417: %\tablenotetext{from Honda et al. 2004}
418: \end{deluxetable}
419:
420:
421:
422: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccccccc}
423: \tablewidth{0pt}
424: \tablecaption{LINE DATA AND EQUIVALENT WIDTHS \label{tab:table2}}
425: \startdata
426: \tableline
427: \tableline
428: Wavelength & L.E.P.(eV) & log$gf$ & log$\epsilon$ & {\it W}(m{\AA}) & $\Delta${\it W} & error & ref \\\hline
429: \ion{Cu}{1}, $Z=29$ & & & & & \\\hline
430: 3247.53 & 0.000 & --0.060 & 0.75 & 110.2* & 1.07 & 0.03 & 8\\
431: 3273.95 & 0.000 & --0.360 & 0.85 & 103.2* & 0.99 & 0.03 & 8\\
432: 5105.55 & 1.390 & --1.520 & 0.39 & 1.8** & 1.16 & 0.49 & 2\\\hline
433: \ion{Zn}{1}, $Z=30$ & & & & & \\\hline
434: 3302.98 & 4.030 & --0.057 & 1.90 & 15.6* & 0.92 & 0.03 & 1 \\
435: 3345.02 & 4.078 & 0.246 & 1.96 & 26.3 & 0.83 & 0.02 & 1 \\
436: 4722.15 & 4.030 & --0.390 & 1.91 & 10.4 & 1.24 & 0.06 & 5 \\
437: 4810.54 & 4.080 & --0.170 & 1.90 & 14.2**& 1.22 & 0.04 & 5\\\hline
438: \ion{Sr}{1}, $Z=38$ & & & & & \\\hline
439: 4607.33 & 0.000 & 0.280 & --0.21 & 2.2 & 0.24 & 0.04 & 7\\\hline
440: \ion{Sr}{2}, $Z=38$ & & & & & \\\hline
441: 4077.71 & 0.000 & 0.170 & --0.20 & 169.8 & 0.31 & 0.01 & 6 \\
442: 4215.52 & 0.000 & --0.170 & --0.18 & 154.2 & 0.28 & 0.01 & 6\\\hline
443: \ion{Y}{2}, $Z=39$ & & & & & \\\hline
444: 3327.88 & 0.410 & 0.130 & --0.93 & 55.4 & 0.86 &0.02 & 8 \\
445: 3549.01 & 0.130 & --0.280 & --1.00 & 50.6 & 0.56 & 0.01 & 7\\
446: 3584.52 & 0.100 & --0.410 & --1.09 & 41.5* & 0.53 & 0.01 &10 \\
447: 3600.74 & 0.180 & 0.280 & --1.15 & 68.5 & 0.52 & 0.01 & 7 \\
448: 3611.04 & 0.130 & 0.010 & --1.12 & 60.2 & 0.51 & 0.01 & 7\\
449: 3628.70 & 0.130 & --0.710 & --0.96 & 31.3 & 0.50 & 0.01 & 10\\
450: 3710.29 & 0.180 & 0.460 & --1.10 & 82.6 & 0.45 & 0.01 & 10\\
451: 3747.55 & 0.100 & --0.910 & --0.97 & 25.3 & 0.43 & 0.01 & 7 \\
452: 3774.33 & 0.130 & 0.210 & --1.04 & 78.2 & 0.42 & 0.01 & 6\\
453: 3788.70 & 0.100 & --0.070 & --1.02 & 67.4 & 0.41 & 0.01 & 6\\
454: 3818.34 & 0.130 & --0.980 & --0.77 & 29.7 & 0.40 & 0.01 & 6 \\
455: 3950.36 & 0.100 & --0.490 & --0.95 & 49.6 & 0.35 & 0.01 & 6 \\
456: 4398.01 & 0.130 & --1.000 & --0.83 & 29.1 & 0.26 & 0.01 & 6 \\
457: 4883.69 & 1.080 & 0.070 & --0.91 & 22.3** & 1.20 & 0.03 & 6\\
458: 5087.43 & 1.080 & --0.170 & --0.94 & 13.7** & 1.16 & 0.04 & 6\\\hline
459: \ion{Zr}{2}, $Z=40$ & & & & & \\\hline
460: 3438.23 & 0.090 & 0.420 & --0.27 & 93.1 & 0.68 & 0.02 & 7\\
461: 3457.56 & 0.560 & --0.530 & --0.07 & 33.7 & 0.66 & 0.02 & 7\\
462: 3479.02 & 0.530 & --0.690 & --0.31 & 18.6 & 0.63 & 0.02 & 7\\
463: 3479.39 & 0.710 & 0.170 & --0.47 & 39.3 & 0.63 & 0.01 & 7\\
464: 3499.58 & 0.410 & --0.810 & --0.52 & 13.5 & 0.61 & 0.02 & 7\\
465: 3505.67 & 0.160 & --0.360 & --0.39 & 52.0 & 0.60 & 0.01 & 7\\
466: 3536.94 & 0.360 & --1.310 & --0.22 & 10.5 & 0.57 & 0.03 & 7\\
467: 3551.96 & 0.090 & --0.310 & --0.29 & 64.2 & 0.56 & 0.01 & 8\\
468: 3573.08 & 0.320 & --1.040 & --0.25 & 18.2 & 0.54 & 0.02 & 7\\
469: 3578.23 & 1.220 & --0.610 & --0.20 & 4.9 & 0.54 & 0.05 & 7\\
470: 3630.02 & 0.360 & --1.110 & --0.24 & 14.7 & 0.50 & 0.02 & 7\\
471: 3714.78 & 0.530 & --0.930 & --0.23 & 15.2 & 0.45 & 0.01 & 7\\
472: 3836.77 & 0.560 & --0.060 & --0.39 & 45.3 & 0.39 & 0.01 & 6\\
473: 3998.97 & 0.560 & --0.670 & 0.09 & 39.8 & 0.33 & 0.01 & 7\\
474: 4050.33 & 0.710 & --1.000 & --0.12 & 11.1 & 0.32 & 0.01 & 7\\
475: 4208.98 & 0.710 & --0.460 & --0.13 & 30.7 & 0.29 & 0.01 & 6\\
476: 4317.32 & 0.710 & --1.380 & --0.04 & 6.1 & 0.27 & 0.02 & 6\\\hline
477: \ion{Nb}{2}, $Z=41$ & & & & & \\\hline
478: 3163.40 & 0.376 & 0.260 & --1.63 & 14.9 & 1.47 & 0.06 & 1\\
479: 3215.59 & 0.440 & --0.190 & --1.81 & 3.4 & 1.19 & 0.20 & 6\\\hline
480: \ion{Mo}{1}, $Z=42$ & & & & & \\\hline
481: 3864.10 & 0.000 & --0.010 & --1.00 & 2.7 & 0.38 & 0.07 & 8\\\hline
482: \ion{Ru}{1}, $Z=44$ & & & & & \\\hline
483: 3498.94 & 0.000 & 0.310 & --1.02 & 3.5 & 0.61 & 0.07 & 6\\
484: 3728.03 & 0.000 & 0.270 & --0.81 & 5.3 & 0.44 & 0.03 & 6\\\hline
485: \ion{Rh}{1}, $Z=45$ & & & & & \\\hline
486: 3692.36 & 0.000 & 0.174 & $<$--1.25 & syn & & & 6\\\hline
487: \ion{Pd}{1}, $Z=46$ & & & & & \\\hline
488: 3404.58 & 0.810 & 0.320 & --1.35 & 6.2* & 0.73 & 0.05 & 6\\\hline
489: \ion{Ag}{1}, $Z=47$ & & & & & \\\hline
490: 3280.68 & 0.000 & --0.050 & --2.03 & 5.1* & 0.97 & 0.10 & 6 \\\hline
491: \ion{Ba}{2}, $Z=56$ & & & & & \\\hline
492: 4554.04 & 0.000 & 0.170 & --1.82 & 96.7 & 0.24 & 0.00 & 6\\
493: 4934.10 & 0.000 & --0.150 & --1.76 & 86.8** & 1.19 & 0.02 & 6\\
494: 5853.70 & 0.604 & --1.010 & --1.58 & 8.4*** & 2.80 & 0.19 & 6\\
495: 6141.70 & 0.704 & --0.070 & --1.67 & 36.1*** & 2.94 & 0.05 & 6\\\hline
496: \ion{La}{2} $Z=57$ & & & & & \\\hline
497: 3794.77 & 0.240 & 0.210 & --2.68 & 3.2* & 0.41 & 0.06 & 7\\
498: 3988.52 & 0.400 & 0.210 & --2.81 & 1.5 & 0.34 & 0.10 & 4\\
499: 3995.75 & 0.170 & --0.060 & --2.81 & 1.6* & 0.34 & 0.09 & 4 \\
500: 4086.71 & 0.000 & --0.070 & --2.54 & 4.7* & 0.31 & 0.03 & 4\\
501: 4123.23 & 0.320 & 0.130 & --2.93 & 1.2* & 0.30 & 0.13 & 4\\\hline
502: \ion{Ce}{2} $Z=58$ & & & & & \\\hline
503: 4222.60 & 0.120 & --0.180 & --2.19 & 1.1 & 0.28 & 0.14 & 6 \\
504: 4523.08 & 0.520 & --0.080 & --1.73 & 1.3* & 0.24 & 0.07 & 10 \\
505: 4539.78 & 0.330 & --0.080 & --2.11 & 1.0 & 0.24 & 0.10 & 10\\
506: 4562.37 & 0.480 & 0.190 & --2.13 & 1.1 & 0.24 & 0.09 & 10\\
507: 4572.28 & 0.680 & 0.290 & --1.95 & 1.1* & 0.24 & 0.09 & 8\\\hline
508: \ion{Pr}{2} $Z=59$ & & & & & \\\hline
509: 4179.40 & 0.200 & 0.480 & --2.22 & 7.3 & 0.29 & 0.02 & 7 \\
510: 4189.48 & 0.370 & 0.380 & --2.18 & 4.0 & 0.29 & 0.03 &8 \\\hline
511: \ion{Nd}{2} $Z=60$ & & & & & \\\hline
512: 3784.25 & 0.380 & 0.150 & --2.28 & 1.6 & 0.41 & 0.13 & 9\\
513: 3826.42 & 0.064 & --0.410 & --2.10 & 1.7 & 0.40 & 0.12 & 9 \\
514: 4061.08 & 0.471 & 0.550 & --2.10 & 4.8 & 0.32 & 0.03 & 9 \\
515: 4232.38 & 0.064 & --0.470 & --1.98 & 2.0* & 0.28 & 0.07 & 9 \\\hline
516: \ion{Sm}{2} $Z=62$ & & & & & \\\hline
517: 4318.94 & 0.280 & --0.270 & --2.52 & 0.8* & 0.27 & 0.21 & 7 \\
518: 4642.23 & 0.380 & --0.520 & --2.31 & 0.6 & 0.23 & 0.18 & 7\\\hline
519: \ion{Eu}{2} $Z=63$ & & & & & \\\hline
520: 3819.67\tablenotemark{a} & 0.000 & 0.510 & --2.96 & syn & &&5\\
521: 4129.70 & 0.000 & 0.220 & --2.89 & 7.7* & 0.30 & 0.02 & 5\\
522: 4205.05\tablenotemark{a} & 0.000 & 0.210 & --2.81 & syn &&& 5\\\hline
523: \ion{Gd}{2} $Z=64$ & & & & & \\\hline
524: 3331.40\tablenotemark{a} & 0.000 & --0.140 & $<$-2.3 & syn & &&7\\
525: 3481.80\tablenotemark{a} & 0.490 & 0.230 & --1.66 & 5.5* & 0.63 & 0.05 & 7\\
526: 3549.37 & 0.240 & 0.260 & --2.92 & 0.7 & 0.56 & 0.85 & 7\\
527: 3768.40 & 0.080 & 0.360 & --2.73 & 2.3 & 0.42 & 0.09 & 7\\\hline
528: \ion{Dy}{2} $Z=66$ & & & & & \\\hline
529: 3460.97 & 0.000 & --0.070 & --2.71 & 1.8 & 0.65 & 0.22 & 7 \\
530: 3531.71 & 0.000 & 0.770 & --2.98 & 6.5 & 0.58 & 0.04 & 8 \\\hline
531: \ion{Ho}{2} $Z=67$ & & & & & \\\hline
532: 3398.94 & 0.000 & 0.410 & $<$--2.20 & syn & &&11 \\\hline
533: \ion{Er}{2} $Z=68$ & & & & & \\\hline
534: 3499.10 & 0.060 & 0.136 & --2.96 & 1.9 & 0.61 & 0.12 & 10\\
535: 3692.65 & 0.050 & 0.138 & --2.63 & 4.3 & 0.46 & 0.06 & 6\\\hline
536: \ion{Tm}{2} $Z=69$ & & & & & \\\hline
537: 3701.36 & 0.000 & --0.540 & $<$--2.8 & syn &&& 8 \\\hline
538: \ion{Yb}{2} $Z=70$ & & & & & \\\hline
539: 3289.37 & 0.000 & 0.020 & --2.99 & 18.2* & 0.95 & 0.03 & 8\\
540: 3694.19 & 0.000 & --0.300 & --2.90 & 13.4* & 0.46 & 0.02 &8\\\hline
541: \ion{Ir}{1} $Z=77$ & & & & & \\\hline
542: 3220.76\tablenotemark{a} & 0.350 & --0.510 & $<$--1.00 & syn &&& 7\\
543: 3800.12 & 0.000 & --1.450 & $<$--1.30 & syn &&& 7 \\\hline
544: \ion{Th}{2} $Z=90$ & & & & & \\\hline
545: 4019.12 & 0.000 & --0.270 & $<$--2.65 & syn & && 7\\\hline
546: \tableline
547: \enddata
548: \tablenotetext{*}{indicate synthesized values calculated for the abundance derived by spectrum synthesis.}
549: \tablenotetext{**}{indicate the data taken from Honda et al. 2004a}
550: \tablenotetext{***}{indicate the data taken from Johnson 2002.}
551: \tablenotetext{a}{$ $Lines that were not used to derive final results.
552: References.-- 1.Kurucz \& Bell (1995); 2.Westin et al. (2000); 3.Lawler et al. (2001a); 4.Lawler et al. (2001b); 5.Johnson (2002); 6.Hill et al. (2002); 7.Cowan et al. (2002); 8.Sneden et al. (2003); 9.Den Hartog et al. (2003); 10.Johnson et al. (2004); 11.Lawler et al. (2004).}
553: \end{deluxetable}
554:
555:
556: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccccccccc}
557: \tablewidth{0pt}
558: \tablecaption{ELEMENTAL ABUNDANCES OF HD~88609 and HD~122563 \label{tab:table3}}
559: \startdata
560: \tableline
561: \tableline
562: & & HD~88609 & & & & HD~122563& & &&\\\hline
563: species & {\it Z} & log$\epsilon$ & $\sigma$ & [X/Fe] & N & log$\epsilon$ & $\sigma_{\rm random}$ & [X/Fe] & $\sigma_{\rm atm}$\tablenotemark{a} & $\sigma_{\rm n-cap}$\tablenotemark{b} \\\hline
564: Cu & 29 & 0.66 & 0.20 & --0.48 & 3 & 0.98 & 0.14 & --0.46 & 0.36 & 0.29\\
565: Zn & 30 & 1.92 & 0.03 & +0.39 & 4 & 2.01 & 0.15 & +0.18 & 0.08 &0.07\\
566: Sr & 38 & --0.20 & 0.12 & --0.05 & 3 & --0.12 & 0.14 & --0.27 & 0.14, 0.34 & 0.10, 0.27\\
567: Y & 39 & --0.98 & 0.10 & --0.12 & 15 & --0.93 & 0.09 & --0.37 &0.20 & 0.12\\
568: Zr & 40 & --0.24 & 0.16 & +0.24 & 17 & --0.28 & 0.16 & --0.10 & 0.15 & 0.06\\
569: Nb & 41 & --1.72 & 0.12 & --0.07 & 2 & --1.48 & 0.14 & --0.13 & 0.14 & 0.06\\
570: Mo & 42 & --1.00 & 0.12 & +0.15 & 1 & --0.87 & 0.14 & --0.02 & 0.19 & 0.12\\
571: Ru & 44 & --0.91 & 0.12 & +0.32 & 2 & --0.86 & 0.14 & 0.07 & 0.20 & 0.12\\
572: Rh & 45 & $<$--1.25 & & $<$+0.70 & 1 & $<$--1.20 && $<$+0.45\\
573: Pd & 46 & --1.35 & 0.12 & +0.03 & 1 & --1.31 & 0.14 & --0.23 & 0.20 & 0.12\\
574: Ag & 47 & --2.03 & 0.12 & +0.10 & 1 & --1.88 & 0.14 & --0.05 & 0.21 & 0.13\\
575: Ba & 56 & --1.71 & 0.10 & --0.81 & 4 & --1.65 & 0.12 & --1.05 & 0.15 & 0.05\\
576: La & 57 & --2.75 & 0.15 & --0.81 & 5 & --2.60 & 0.16 & --0.96 & 0.13 & 0.08\\
577: Ce & 58 & --2.02 & 0.18 & --0.53 & 5 & --1.91 & 0.17 & --0.72 & 0.12 & 0.07\\
578: Pr & 59 & --2.20 & 0.12 & +0.14 & 2 & --2.15 & 0.14 & --0.09 & 0.14 & 0.06\\
579: Nd & 60 & --2.11 & 0.12 & --0.49 & 4 & --2.01 & 0.16 & --0.69 & 0.13 & 0.07\\
580: Sm & 62 & --2.41 & 0.12 & --0.35 & 2 & --2.16 & 0.14 & --0.40 & 0.13 & 0.07\\
581: Eu & 63 & --2.89 & 0.12 & --0.33 & 1 & --2.77 & 0.14 & --0.52 & 0.14 & 0.08\\
582: Gd & 64 & --2.83 & 0.12 & --0.88 & 2 & --2.44 & 0.14 & --0.76 & 0.15 & 0.07\\
583: Dy & 66 & --2.85 & 0.20 & --0.92 & 2 & --2.62 & 0.14 & --0.99 & 0.14 & 0.08\\
584: Ho & 67 & $<$--2.20 & & $<$+0.36 & 1 & $<$--2.00 && $<$+0.26\\
585: Er & 68 & --2.79 & 0.20 & --0.65 & 2 & --2.66 & 0.14 & --0.82 & 0.14 & 0.08\\
586: Tm & 69 & $<$--2.80 & & $<$+0.27 & 1 & $<$--3.00 && $<$--0.23\\
587: Yb & 70 & --2.94 & 0.12 & --0.95 & 2 & --2.78 & 0.14 & --1.09 & 0.14 & 0.06\\
588: Ir & 77 & $<$--1.30 & & $<$+0.39 & 2 & $<$--1.60 && $<$--0.21\\
589: Th & 90 & $<$--2.65 & & $<$+0.36 & 1 & $<$--3.05 && $<$--0.34\\
590: \tableline
591: \enddata
592: \tablenotetext{a}{$\sigma_{\rm atm}$ indicates the root sum square of the uncertainties contributed by the four atmospheric parameters.}
593: \tablenotetext{b}{$\sigma_{\rm_n-cap}$ indicates the fluctuation of the quantity of the change for each elements which are the differences from the average of quantity with atmospheric parameter changed in HD~122563.}
594: \end{deluxetable}
595:
596: \clearpage
597:
598: \begin{figure}[p]
599: \includegraphics[width=10cm,angle=-90]{f1a.eps}
600: \includegraphics[width=10.5cm,angle=-90]{f1b.eps}
601: \caption{The spectra of \ion{Yb}{2} 3694 {\AA}, and \ion{Gd}{2} 3768 {\AA}.
602: Dots: observations;
603: solid lines: synthetic spectra computed for the adopted abundance (see Table 1)
604: and values $\pm$0.3 dex different;
605: dashed lines: synthetic spectra with no contribution from the line of interest.}
606: \label{fig:fig1}
607: \end{figure}
608:
609: \clearpage
610:
611: \begin{figure}[p]
612: \includegraphics[width=6.4cm,angle=-90]{f2a.eps}
613:
614: \includegraphics[width=6.4cm,angle=-90]{f2b.eps}
615:
616: \includegraphics[width=7cm,angle=-90]{f2c.eps}
617: \caption{Comparisons with the abundances derived by the present analysis and
618: previous studies (Honda et al. 2004, Johnson \& Bolte 2001, 2002, and Fulbright et al. 2004) in the sense
619: log$\varepsilon_{\rm this}$ $-$ log$\varepsilon_{\rm other}$,
620: as a function of atomic number. }
621: \label{fig:fig2}
622: \end{figure}
623:
624: \clearpage
625:
626: \begin{figure}[p]
627: \includegraphics[width=12cm]{f3.eps}
628: \caption{Comparison of equivalent width ({\it W}) measurements (m{\AA}) by Johnson (2002) and this work.}
629: \label{fig:fig2a}
630: \end{figure}
631:
632: \clearpage
633:
634: \begin{figure}[p]
635: \includegraphics[width=12cm,angle=-90]{f4.eps}
636: \caption{The abundances of HD~88609 compared to the scaled solar-system r-process pattern (normalised at Eu). The solar system abundances are taken from \citet{asplund05}, and the r-process fraction in the solar system given by Simmerer et al. (2004).}
637: \label{fig:fig3}
638: \end{figure}
639:
640: \clearpage
641:
642: \begin{figure}[p]
643: \includegraphics[width=12cm,angle=-90]{f5.eps}
644: \caption{Logarithmic differences from the solar system r-process
645: pattern (log$\varepsilon_{\rm object}$ $-$ log$\varepsilon_{\rm solar-r}$). The open triangles mean CS~22892-052, the open circles mean HD~122563, and the filled circles mean HD~88609.}
646: \label{fig:fig4}
647: \end{figure}
648:
649:
650: \clearpage
651:
652: %\begin{figure}[p]
653: %\includegraphics[width=12cm,angle=-90]{f6a.eps}
654: %\caption{Comparison of the elemental abundances between HD~88609 and HD~122563 (log$\varepsilon_{\rm HD88609}$ $-$ log$\varepsilon_{\rm HD122563}$), as a function of atomic number.}
655: %\label{fig:fig5}
656: %\end{figure}
657: %
658: %\clearpage
659:
660: \begin{figure}[p]
661: \includegraphics[width=12cm,angle=-90]{f6.eps}
662: \caption{Comparison of the elemental abundances between HD~88609 and HD~122563 (log$\varepsilon_{\rm HD88609}$ $-$ log$\varepsilon_{\rm HD122563}$), as a function of atomic number.}
663: \label{fig:fig5}
664: \end{figure}
665:
666:
667:
668: \end{document}
669:
670:
671: