1: \documentclass[12pt]{emulateapj}
2: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
3: \usepackage{epsfig}
4: \usepackage{graphicx}
5: \usepackage{amssymb}
6: \usepackage{lscape}
7: \usepackage{longtable}
8: \usepackage{natbib}
9: \usepackage{lscape}
10: %\usepackage{txfonts}
11: \bibpunct{(} {)} {;} {a} {} {,}
12: \newcommand*{\DISKBB}{\texttt{DISKBB}}
13: \newcommand*{\DISKPN}{\texttt{DISKPN}}
14: \newcommand*{\EQPAIR}{\texttt{EQPAIR}}
15: \newcommand*{\THCOMP}{\texttt{THCOMP}}
16: \newcommand*{\COMPTT}{\texttt{COMPTT}}
17: \newcommand*{\DBBTT}{\texttt{DBBTT}}
18: \newcommand*{\DBBEQPAIR }{\texttt{DBBEQPAIR}}
19: \newcommand*{\DBBTTPEG }{\texttt{DBBTTPEG}}
20: \newcommand*{\PEGPWRLW}{\texttt{PEGPWRLW}}
21: \def\sco{Scorpius X-1}
22: \def\msun{$M_{\odot}$}
23: \def\mdot{$\dot{M}$}
24:
25: \shorttitle{Spectral Evolution of \sco}
26: \shortauthors{A. D' A{\'\i} et al.}
27:
28: \begin{document}
29:
30: \title{Broad-band Spectral Evolution of Scorpius X-1 along its Color-Color Diagram}
31: \author{A. D'A\'i\altaffilmark{1}, P. $\dot{Z}$ycki\altaffilmark{2},
32: T. Di Salvo\altaffilmark{1},R. Iaria\altaffilmark{1},
33: G. Lavagetto\altaffilmark{1}, N.R. Robba\altaffilmark{1}}
34:
35: \altaffiltext{1}{Dipartimento di Scienze Fisiche ed Astronomiche,
36: Universit\'a di Palermo, Archirafi 36, 90123 Palermo, Italy; email: dai@fisica.unipa.it}
37: \altaffiltext{2}{Nicolaus Copernicus Astronomical Center, Bartycka 18, 00-716 Warsaw, Poland}
38:
39: \begin{abstract}
40: We analyze a large collection of RXTE archive data from April 1997
41: to August 2003 of the bright X-ray source Scorpius X-1 in order to
42: study the broadband spectral evolution of the source for different
43: values of the inferred mass accretion rate by studying energy
44: spectra from selected regions in the Z-track of its Color-Color
45: Diagram. A two-component model, consisting of a soft thermal
46: component interpreted as thermal emission from an accretion disk and
47: a thermal Comptonization component, is unable to fit the whole
48: 3--200 keV energy spectrum at low accretion rates. Strong residuals
49: in the highest energy band of the spectrum require the addition of a
50: third component that can be fitted with a power-law component, that
51: could represent a second thermal Comptonization from a much hotter
52: plasma, or a hybrid thermal/non-thermal Comptonization, where the
53: electrons in the Comptonizing cloud have a Maxwellian distribution
54: of velocities with a power-law hard tail. The presence of this hard
55: emission in \sco~ has been previously reported, however, without a
56: clear relation with the accretion rate. We show, for the first
57: time, that there exists a common trend in the spectral evolution of
58: the source, where the spectral parameters change in correlation with
59: the position of the source in the CD. In particular, using a hybrid
60: thermal/non-thermal Comptonization model (EQPAIR code), we show that
61: the power supplied to the non-thermal distribution can be as high as
62: half of the total hard power injected in heating the electron
63: distribution. We also found that a small sample of spectra, when
64: the source resides at the top of the FB can also show intense hard
65: X-ray emission. We discuss the physical implications derived from
66: the results of our analysis, with a particular emphasis on the
67: hardest part of the X-ray emission and its possible origins.
68: \end{abstract}
69: \keywords{accretion discs -- stars: individual: \sco\ --- stars: neutron
70: stars --- X-ray: stars --- X-ray: general --- X-ray: binaries}
71: \maketitle
72: \section{Introduction}
73: \subsection{Scorpius X-1}
74: \sco~ is the brightest persistent X-ray source in the sky and the
75: first identified X-ray extra-solar source \citep{giacconi62}. The
76: X-ray source is an old, low magnetized neutron star (NS), accreting
77: matter transferred through Roche-lobe overflow from a low-mass
78: companion \citep[recently identified as an M class star of $\sim$ 0.4
79: \msun,~][]{steeghs02}. \sco~ is a prototype of the class of the
80: Low-Mass X-ray Binaries (LMXBs), and assuming a distance of $2.8 \pm
81: 0.3$ kpc \citep{bradshaw99}, the source emits close to the theoretical
82: Eddington limit for a 1.4 \msun~ NS ($L_{Edd} \sim 2~\times~10^{38}~$
83: erg s$^{-1}$).\\
84: Based on the timing behavior of LMXBs in correlation with the position
85: of a given source in the X-ray color-color diagram (CD),
86: \citet{hasinger89} grouped these sources into two categories: the Z
87: sources and the Atoll sources. The former are brighter, radiating
88: close to $L_{Edd}$, the latter are less bright, emitting at 0.01--0.1
89: $L_{Edd}$. Z sources exhibit the classical three-shaped branches
90: describing a Z pattern in the CD: the Horizontal Branch (HB) at the
91: top of the Z track, followed by the Normal Branch (NB) and the Flaring
92: Branch (FB) at the bottom of the pattern. There are strong
93: indications \citep[e.g.][]{vrtilek91} suggesting that what drives the
94: changing in the spectral and temporal properties of LMXBs is the
95: instantaneous accretion rate ($\dot{M}$), which, for Z sources, is
96: believed to increase monotonically from the HB to the FB. Similarly,
97: Atoll sources, display two different spectral/timing states: the soft
98: and luminous banana state, associated to higher accretion rates, and
99: the hard and less luminous island state, associated to lower \mdot.
100: This early and straightforward classification has now moved to a more
101: complex picture, as the patterns that Atoll and Z sources describe in
102: their CDs, when displayed on long timescales, appear to be more and
103: more similar to each other \citep{muno02, gierlinski02}, although some
104: observational facts still hold: Z sources move on the CDs on
105: shorter timescales, have higher luminosities and present a timing
106: phenomenology different from that of the Atoll sources.\\
107: \sco, as all the sources of its class, shows several quasi-periodic
108: oscillations (QPOs) along all the branches of its CD: the horizontal
109: branch oscillations (HBOs), the normal branch oscillations (NBOs) and
110: the flaring branch oscillations (FBOs). In \sco~ NBOs, with peak
111: frequencies in the range 4.5--7 Hz, and FBOs, in the frequency range
112: 6--25 Hz, seem to be physically related to each other since the NBO
113: peak frequency smoothly joins the FBO peak frequency as the source
114: moves from the NB to the FB \citep{casella05}. Van der Klis et al.
115: (1996) reported the first observation of HBOs in \sco~ at 45 Hz, with
116: an inferred harmonic near 90 Hz; the power spectrum can also show a
117: pair of QPOs, whose frequencies are in the range 800-1100 Hz, denoted
118: kHzQPOs, that shift simultaneously in frequency, with an almost
119: constant or weakly frequency-dependent peak separation \citep[see
120: e.g.][]{zhang06}. The physical interpretation of these timing
121: features is not unique and the related scientific debate is still open
122: \citep[see][~for a review]{klis04}.\\
123: Spectral studies of \sco~ have been so far not so extensive and
124: detailed as timing studies. This is in part due to the strong
125: brightness of the source that actually prevents its observation with
126: the most sophisticated and high-resolution X-ray satellites like
127: BeppoSAX and ASCA in the recent past and Chandra and XMM-Newton at
128: present. Three articles have investigated so far the broad-band
129: spectral behavior of the source, using data from the Rossi X-ray
130: Timing Explorer (RXTE). \citet{barnard03} used data from both the
131: Proportional Counter Array (PCA) and the High Energy X-ray Timing
132: Experiment (HEXTE), showing that the spectrum, in the energy range
133: 2.5--50 keV, can be fitted by a simple two-component model, a
134: black-body soft component and a cutoff power-law, plus a broad
135: Gaussian line, and interpreted these results in the framework of the
136: so called Birmingham model \citep{church01}. In this interpretation
137: the spectral emission consists of black-body emission from the NS plus
138: Comptonized emission from an extended accretion disk corona.
139: \citet{bradshaw03} used only PCA data (in the 2.5--18.2 keV range),
140: adopting a model consisting of a black body emission plus a bulk
141: motion Comptonization component and a reflection component in the form
142: of a broad Gaussian line. \citet{damico01} studied HEXTE data above
143: 20 keV, in order to test the presence of high energy X-ray emission in
144: the spectra of the source. Data were fitted, using a bremsstrahlung
145: component, to mimic the effects of the thermal component, and a
146: power-law component, whenever the statistics and clear residuals in
147: the fit required it. In this way no apparent correlation was found
148: between the presence of the hard tail and position of the source in
149: the CD, contrarily to what had been reported for other Z sources.\\
150: More recently, \citet{disalvo06}, using INTEGRAL data in the 20--200
151: keV energy band, detected a hard X-ray tail, with photon index values
152: between 2 and 3.4, whose intensity decreased as the source moved
153: towards higher accretion rates. Data did not show evidence of a
154: high-energy cutoff up to $\sim$ 200 keV, suggesting a non-thermal
155: origin for the hard tail.\\
156: \sco~ is also an interesting source of radio emission.
157: \citet{formalont01}, through an extensive VLBA monitoring campaign,
158: have shown that the radio emission is composed of a point-like radio
159: core emission at the position of the X-ray source and of two opposite
160: radio lobes, moving through the ISM with relativistic speeds $v/c
161: =0.45 \pm 0.03$, and with an angle of 46$^{\circ} \pm$6$^{\circ}$ with
162: respect to our line of sight. It is also evident a connection between
163: the phenomenon of radio flare at the core of the source and the
164: following flaring of the lobes, so that it is argued that the energy
165: production of the radio emission is confined near the NS and only
166: afterward transported to the lobes via the working surface of a jet
167: \citep[see e.g. the magnetohydrodynamical simulations of][]{kato04}.\\
168: These results stimulated the search for the possible connection
169: between inflow and outflow mechanisms working in the violent regimes
170: of accretion onto a NS or a black hole (BH). Energetic mass outflows,
171: collimated sometimes in a typical jet pattern, can be produced not
172: only in extragalactic X-ray sources, such as quasars and active
173: galactic nuclei (AGN), but also in galactic X-ray binary systems
174: \citep[see~][~for a review]{fender02}. It has been observed that
175: galactic BH binary systems are able to produce strong jet emission
176: (sources for which a jet has been already spatially resolved are
177: usually denoted \textit{microquasars}), with radio-loud states
178: associated to hard/low X-ray states, alternated to periods of
179: radio-quenching during soft/high X-ray states. For NS systems
180: radio-loud episodes are generally interpreted as a jet signature. In
181: this context, all the Z sources seem to owe, under certain conditions,
182: a radio-jet nature. Detections of radio-loud states are usually
183: associated with spectral states of low \mdot, i.e.\ on the HB of the
184: Z-track \citep{fender00}, while the few radio detections in atoll
185: systems found the sources residing in the island state of their CDs
186: \citep{migliari03}.
187: \subsection{Spectral properties of Z sources class} \label{introduction}
188: We rapidly review in this section the spectral properties of the Z
189: sources. The class of the Z sources display a homogeneous pattern of
190: spectral properties; their energy spectra can be usually decomposed as
191: follows:\\
192: \begin{itemize}
193: \item a soft thermal component, with characteristic temperatures in
194: the 0.5--1 keV range, interpreted as thermal emission from the NS
195: surface or an optically thick, geometrically thin accretion disk;
196: \item a thermal Comptonized component, where the electron cloud
197: distribution has a temperature in the 2.5--3 keV range, the soft
198: seed photon temperature is around 1 keV and the optical depth can
199: have rather large values ($\tau \geq$ 3); this relatively cold
200: thermal Comptonization is thought to take place close to the NS
201: surface; the soft seed photon temperature generally exceeds the
202: highest temperature reached in the accretion disk, so that the
203: source of the soft emission is probably confined in the boundary
204: layer between the inner edge of the accretion disk and the NS
205: surface. The high optical depth values associated to the cloud
206: saturates the seed photon spectrum close to the electron
207: temperature, so that a quasi Wien spectrum results. A theoretical
208: interpretation of this spectral decomposition has been given by
209: \citet{inogamov99}, where the boundary layer emission is expected to
210: be radiation pressure supported and its emission is locally at the
211: Eddington rate. Change in luminosity is attributed to a change in
212: the emitting area rather than in its emissivity. Phase resolved
213: spectroscopy of bright LMXBs \citep{revnivtsev05} further supports
214: this interpretation, establishing in all the analyzed Z sources a
215: common cut-off, due to the boundary layer thermal emission, at
216: $\simeq$ 2.4 keV.
217: \item a reflection component, often simply modelled with a broad
218: Gaussian line, in the 6.4-6.9 keV range. In all the Z sources this
219: line has been always observed; spectra from BeppoSAX or RXTE
220: observations were not able to constraint the shape of the line,
221: while the relative width was in the range 0.1-1 keV. High
222: resolution spectra in this energy range have been obtained so far
223: only with the BBRXT \citep{smale93} and the XMM-Newton satellites
224: \citep{costantini02} for Cygnus X-2; in both observations the line
225: was associated to highly ionized iron (centroid energy $\simeq$ 6.7
226: keV), while the line appears to be intrinsically broad (FWHM $\sim$
227: 1 keV). \citet{brandt94} pointed out that the determination of the
228: line profile can be a primary diagnostic tool, but, at the same
229: time, kinematic and relativistic effects can greatly distort the
230: line from the simple Gaussian profile. Moreover, if reflection is
231: caused by hard X-rays reflected by a cold accretion disk, the
232: contribution of the Compton reflected continuum should be taken into
233: account, when the iron line emission is a considerable contribution
234: to the total energy flux;
235: \item a power-law hard tail, which can contribute up to few percent to
236: the total energy flux, whose strenght usually varies in correlation
237: with the position of the source in the CD, namely being the
238: strongest on the HB, gradually decreasing as the source moves to
239: higher accretion rates and totally fading in the FB \citep[e.g. GX
240: 17+2,][]{disalvo00}. The photon index of the power-law was
241: generally found in the range 1.5--3 with no evident high energy
242: cutoff up to energies of about 200 keV.
243: \end{itemize}
244: In this article we report a complete investigation of the spectral
245: properties of \sco~ through an extensive analysis of RXTE archive
246: data, indicating a clear connection between position of the source on
247: the CD and spectral behavior.
248: \section{Data reduction and analysis}
249: The scientific payload of RXTE consists of three instruments, the PCA,
250: the HEXTE, and the All Sky Monitor (ASM). The PCA consists of five
251: co-aligned Xenon proportional counter units (PCUs) with a total
252: effective area of about 6500 cm$^2$. The instrument is sensitive in
253: the energy range from 2 keV up to 60 keV \citep{jahoda}, although the
254: response matrix is best calibrated in the energy range 3-22 keV. Data
255: can be processed using several different configuration modes; for our
256: analysis we exclusively use the \textit{Standard2} mode, with 16 s
257: time resolution and 128 energy channels in the 2--60 keV energy range.
258: The HEXTE consists of two cluster of four NaI/CsI-phoswich
259: scintillation counters that are sensitive from 15 keV up to 220 keV
260: \citep{rothschild}. We use the \textit{Standard Mode}, with 64 energy
261: channels, for the reduction and analysis of the HEXTE data. Background
262: subtraction is done by using the source-background rocking of the
263: collimators. We use HEXTE response matrices of 1999 August.\\
264: We collected a large amount of RXTE archive data, discarding only
265: minor shorter observations, from April 1997 up to August 2003. We
266: present in Table~\ref{tab1} the datasets we used for our analysis,
267: indicating the associated proposal number, the starting and ending
268: times of each observation in Terrestrial Time, and the corresponding
269: exposure times.\\
270: Data have been processed using the standard selection criteria,
271: discarding data taken during Earth occultations and passages through
272: the South Atlantic Anomaly. We only used data from PCU2 for the PCA
273: and data from Cluster A for the HEXTE instrument. We constructed
274: color-color diagrams (CDs) of the source by extracting
275: energy-dependent lightcurves using PCA energy channels 5--10,
276: 11--16,17--22 and 23--44, with a 64 s bintime. These channel ranges
277: correspond to the energy ranges 1.94--4.05 keV, 4.05--6.18 keV,
278: 6.18--8.32 keV, 8.32--16.26 keV respectively. We define the Soft
279: Color (hereafter SC) as the ratio of count rates in the 4.05--6.18 keV
280: and 1.94--4.05 energy bands, while the Hard Color (hereafter HC) as
281: the ratio of count rates in the 8.32--16.26 keV and 6.18--8.32 keV
282: energy ranges. However, the channel to energy conversion depend on
283: the period of activity of the satellite (there are 5 different
284: instrumental Epochs), most of our data belong to Epoch 3 for which the
285: given energy bands are appropriate; for the Epoch 5 datasets the
286: energy ranges are slightly shifted, so that this results in a
287: consequent shift on the HC and on the SC axes. Because we are not
288: interested in the secular shifts of the track in the CD, nor we want
289: to accumulate spectra taken at different Epochs, but to perform a
290: statistical study of the broad-band spectral behavior of the source
291: for different CD positions in different datasets, we did not perform
292: the energy dependent corrections to the colors.\\
293: We selected regions in the CDs for each observation dataset, in order
294: to cover a homogeneous part of the Z-track and to have at the same
295: time a suitable statistics. From these selections we derived the good
296: time intervals (GTI) which we used for extracting the corresponding
297: spectra for the PCA and HEXTE data.\\
298: Given the high luminosity of the source all the PCA spectra have been
299: dead-time corrected. Some observations were performed with the use of
300: an offset pointing; in these cases we extracted the responses matrixes
301: of both the HEXTE and the PCA instruments, following the indications
302: given in the on-line Data Analysis documentation pages. We processed
303: and analyzed data using version 6.0 of the FTOOLS package suite and
304: version 11.3.1 of Xspec.
305: \section{The Data}
306: \input{tab1}
307: Hereafter we shall refer to a collection of close in time pointed
308: observations used to extract one CD by using its proposal number.
309: From datasets 20035 (and 30035) we have obtained two different CDs; we
310: will label them, respectively, 20035A and 20035B (30035A and 30035B,
311: see the {\textit Spectrum} column in Table~\ref{tab2}). Datasets
312: 20035A, 20035B, 30036, 30035A, 30035B and 40020 belong to Epoch 3,
313: while datasets 70014, 70015 and 80021 belong to Epoch 5. Datasets
314: 70014 and 70015 have been merged in one CD, because these observations
315: were close in time and the source pointing was the same.\\
316: The eight CDs that we have extracted present the source mostly on the
317: NB/FB, as these are the states where the source spends most of the
318: time. In \sco~ the HB is not \textit{horizontal} but rather a
319: vertical continuation of the NB (a characteristic shared also by GX
320: 17+2 and GX 349+2, the so-called Sco-like sources). For visual
321: clarity we will refer to the \sco~ CD pattern, mainly making the
322: distinction between the left (or FB) track and the right (NB and HB)
323: track, and between the top (harder) parts and the bottom (softer)
324: parts of the tracks.\\
325: The count rates associated with the extracted spectra show a
326: significant trend, generally correlated with the HC; HEXTE and PCA
327: count rates are the highest at the top of the FB and monotonically
328: decrease towards the FB/NB apex; following the direction bottom NB
329: $\rightarrow$ HB, the trend is inverted. This behavior is mostly
330: stressed in the HEXTE data (compare the countrate in spectrum 07 in
331: the top FB with spectrum 10 in the transition region FB/NB, for which
332: the rate is reduced by two thirds in the HEXTE, but only by one third
333: in the PCA).\\
334: \begin{figure*}
335: \centering
336: \begin{tabular}{l l l l}
337: \includegraphics[height=3.5cm, width=2.5cm ]{f1a.ps} &
338: \includegraphics[height=3.5cm, width=2.5cm ]{f1b.ps} &
339: \includegraphics[height=3.5cm, width=2.5cm ]{f1c.ps} &
340: \includegraphics[height=3.5cm, width=2.5cm ]{f1d.ps} \\
341: \includegraphics[height=3.5cm, width=2.5cm ]{f1e.ps} &
342: \includegraphics[height=3.5cm, width=2.5cm ]{f1f.ps} &
343: \includegraphics[height=3.5cm, width=2.5cm ]{f1g.ps} &
344: \includegraphics[height=3.5cm, width=2.5cm ]{f1h.ps} \\
345: \end{tabular}
346: \caption{ \small \linespread{1}
347: CDs extracted from RXTE datasets used in our spectral analysis.
348: Different colors indicate different selected regions from which the CD-resolved
349: spectra were produced.
350: We label the spectra through a progressive numbering as shown in the CDs.}
351: \label{fig1}
352: \end{figure*}
353: In four datasets (20035A, 20035B, 40020 and 30036) the satellite
354: pointed the source on axis; in three datasets (30035A, 30035B, 80021)
355: an offset pointing has been used. This influenced the high energy
356: statistics, where in the same position on the CD, an offset pointing
357: produced an HEXTE count rate lowered by almost one order of magnitude.
358: Spectra extracted from datasets 70014 and 70015 have also low
359: statistics in the HEXTE band, as the integration time is shorter
360: compared with the other spectra.\\
361: We generally used a 3.0--22 keV energy band for the PCA spectra and a
362: 20--200 keV energy band for the HEXTE spectra. HEXTE channels from 28
363: to 63 have been rebinned, grouping four channels into one. In some of
364: the spectra that we extracted we found, however, model-independent
365: mismatches in the overlapping energy region between the HEXTE and the
366: PCA; because these mismatches are of instrumental origin we
367: occasionally restrict these energy bands until these features did no
368: longer impact on our fit results. In Table~\ref{tab2} we report the
369: exact energy bands used for the PCA and the HEXTE datasets for the
370: selected spectra.\\
371: The choose to assign an appropriated systematic error for the PCA data
372: is an essential step in the analysis of the spectra. This operation is
373: not straightforward, as the commonly used standard candle, the Crab,
374: provides in this case only a partial calibration tool. The Crab
375: countrate for every energy channel below $\sim$ 20 keV is about one
376: order of magnitude less than the \sco~ countrate, thus making the
377: extrapolation of the Crab based systematic error to the \sco~
378: spectra riskful. The mostly adopted view to assign a 1\% systematic
379: error for all the energy channels has a strong impact on the softer
380: part of the spectrum, where there are the mostly weighted channels; we
381: found that in this case the fit is strongly driven by residuals in
382: the 3-6 keV range, leading to a modelization of the spectrum that does
383: not seem physically plausible. The overall effect is a shift of any
384: soft component outside the RXTE energy band, and unrealistic high
385: values for the extrapolated flux.\\
386: The only way to avoid the strong driving effect of the first channels
387: is to arbitrarily raise the systematics in this range; we found that
388: assigning a 3\% systematic error for channels between 3 and 3.9 keV
389: (namely the first two PCA channels available in our spectra), while
390: leaving a 1 \% systematic error for all the other channels, allows to
391: derive a physically plausible scenario for the spectral evolution of
392: the source, does not result in extreme lower/higher values of reduced
393: $\chi^2$ for every fit performed, allows us to exploit all the
394: available energy band and to generally constrain all the spectral
395: components of the adopted models. We occasionally still found in some
396: fits systematical residuals in the soft part of the spectrum, that are
397: more stressed in the softer spectra, whose origin can be presumedly
398: instrumental and related to the xenon L-edge near 5 keV. We choose to
399: ignore these effects, in order to not overparameterize the fit, as
400: they do not influence the determination of the spectral parameters and
401: do not impact the $\chi^2$ values of the fits.\\
402: No systematic error has been associated to the HEXTE data. A
403: normalization constant is left free to vary between the PCU2 and HEXTE
404: spectra to take into account residual flux calibration uncertainties.
405: \section{Spectral models} \label{spectralmodels} As pointed out in
406: Section 1, spectra of LMXBs are usually described as the sum of at
407: least two spectral components. Because the PCA energy band starts
408: from 3 keV, it is not possible to constrain the effect of the
409: photoelectric interstellar absorption on the source flux. Following
410: \citet{christian97}, we fixed its value to 3 $\times$ 10$^{21}$
411: cm$^{-2}$, for each fit performed. To fit the CDs selected spectra,
412: we tried at first a series of models given by the combination of a
413: soft thermal component, such as a blackbody or multicolor disk
414: blackbody \citep[\DISKBB~ in Xspec,~][]{mitsuda84}, and a thermal
415: Comptonized component. For the latter we, alternatively, tried the
416: \texttt{COMPPS} \citep{poutanen96}, {\texttt{COMPTT}
417: \citep{titarchuck94} and \THCOMP~ \citep[not included in the
418: standard XSPEC package, see~][]{zdziarski96} Comptonization models.
419: For any model adopted, large residuals in the 6--10 keV energy range
420: indicated the presence of iron features, that we simply modelled
421: with a broad Gaussian line in the 6--7 keV energy range. We noted a
422: general tendency for any adopted model to have a very broad Gaussian
423: line (with $\sigma \geq 0.8$ keV) and, generally, with centroids at
424: energies $\leq 6.4$ keV. In order to avoid unrealistically large
425: Gaussian lines, absorbing the underneath continuum, we constrained
426: the line to have centroid energies only in the 6.4--7.0 keV energy
427: range, with a line width less than 0.8 keV, while the normalization
428: of the line was a completely free to vary parameter.\\
429: We found an adequate description of the data, for energies below 30
430: keV, using a two-component model given by the combination of the
431: \DISKBB~ and the \COMPTT components, a modelization that was
432: firstly introduced by \citet{mitsuda84}, and that is known as the
433: {\it Eastern model}. Other Comptonization models can also
434: statistically equally well represent the spectral sample, but we
435: preferred to illustrate our results using this Compton model as it
436: is one of the mostly used in the LMXBs spectral analysis and allows
437: an easy way to compare our results with results obtained for other
438: sources.\\
439: Using the other often used modelization, the Western model
440: \citep{white86} that predicts a $\sim$ 1--2 keV blackbody thermal
441: emission and a Comptonization component with disk soft seed-photon in
442: the 0.4--0.8 keV energy range \citep[see e.g][]{barnard03}, we found
443: higher $\chi^2$ values for each spectrum and an extrapolated
444: super-Eddington luminosity along each part of the Z-track, that would
445: be dramatic for some FB spectra which would overcome by more that an
446: order of magnitude the Eddington limit, thus making this assumption
447: not realistic. Moreover, the power dissipated in the Comptonizing
448: disk corona would be constantly much greater than the power dissipated
449: as thermal emission on the NS-surface and this breaks our expectations
450: that the power dissipated near the compact object should be at least
451: of the same order of the power dissipated along the disk, if the disk
452: is very close to the NS \citep[see also][~for a more extensive
453: discussion]{done02}.\\
454: The \DISKBB~ has two free parameters, the temperature expressed in keV
455: at the inner disk radius (kT$_{DB}$) and a normalization factor that
456: depends on the inner radius of the accretion disk, the distance from
457: the source and the inclination angle between the line of sight and the
458: normal to the disk; the \COMPTT~ has four free parameters: the soft
459: seed photon temperature, kT$_{0}$, the electron temperature of the
460: Comptonizing cloud, kT$_e$, the optical depth, $\tau$, and a
461: normalization constant. We assumed that the Comptonizing geometry is
462: spherical. We will refer to this two-component model as the \DBBTT~
463: model.\\
464: As it is evident from Table ~\ref{tab2} the \DBBTT~ model is, however,
465: gradually unable to satisfactorily fit the whole energy spectrum as
466: the source resides in zones of low inferred accretion rate. The
467: residuals, with respect to this model, clearly indicated an excess of
468: flux at energies greater than 30 keV. There is also a second group of
469: spectra (namely spectra 7,8,12,13 and 26) that gave for the same
470: reason an unsatisfactory high $\chi^2$ value. These spectra lie at the
471: top of the FB in the datasets that have the higher HEXTE statistics.
472: We will refer to this particular set as the top-FB spectra.\\
473: Because the mechanisms producing this hard excess in the Z sources are
474: not clear yet, in the following we will adopt two working hypothesises
475: to fit the broadband continuum of the source: a) as in the case of the
476: quasi saturated boundary layer Comptonization, this component is also
477: the result of a thermal Comptonization process, but from a much hotter
478: plasma; b) a broad band spectrum is the result of a hybrid electron
479: velocity distribution, i.e. a thermal electron distribution, which
480: produces the optically thick Comptonization, with a power-law
481: non-thermal tail which is responsible for the high-energy excess.
482: Because, for case a), the hot plasma can only reside in regions close
483: to the central compact object, where magnetic and gravitational
484: effects are the strongest, we assume that the boundary layer radiation
485: field is the primary source of soft-seed photons also for this second
486: thermal Comptonization. We note that this assumption is also needed
487: in order to avoid an overestimation of the contribution of steep hard
488: tail at low energies. The use of an unbroken power-law at steep
489: photon indeces can give a major contribution in the lowest energy band
490: of the spectrum so that the fit is driven by low-energy residuals,
491: possibly resulting in an erroneous continuum modelization.
492: Thereafter, a low-energy cutoff at the seed-photon temperature must be
493: taken into account as the expected photon field spectrum is within the
494: instrumental range.\\
495: We added, thereafter, to our basic two-component model, a power-law in
496: order to mimic this second Comptonization, multiplied by a low-energy
497: cut-off. We set the value of the low-energy cut-off anchored to the
498: kT$_0$ value of the \COMPTT~ component, while we choose the power-law
499: to have a pegged normalization expressed as flux of this component in
500: the 20.0--200.0 keV energy range (\PEGPWRLW, in XSPEC). We checked
501: for each spectrum the $\chi^2$ improvement by adding a high energy
502: cutoff, noting that we could obtain only lower limits on the cutoff
503: energy, generally in the 30--100 keV range without any significant
504: improvement in the $\chi^2$. Thereafter we did not use a high energy
505: cutoff. We will refer at this model simply as \DBBTTPEG~ or
506: \textit{two Comptonizations} model.\\
507: To model the possibility given in case b) we also fitted the spectra
508: showing a strong hard excess (namely spectra for which the \DBBTT~
509: model gave a null hypotesis probability less than 0.05 (it generally
510: corresponded to a reduced $\chi^2$ value of 1.4) with a model given by
511: the sum of a thermal disk component plus the recently developed
512: thermal/nonthermal hybrid Comptonization model named \EQPAIR~
513: \citep[see][~for a full description of the model]{coppi99,coppi00}.
514: It embodies Compton scattering, $e^{\pm}$ pair production and
515: annihilation, $pe^{\pm}$ and $e^{\pm}e^{\pm}$ thermal and non-thermal
516: bremsstrahlung, and energy exchange between thermal and non-thermal
517: parts of the $e^{\pm}$ distribution via Coulomb scattering. Selected
518: electrons are accelerated to suprathermal energies and the thermal
519: part of the $e^{\pm}$ distribution can be additionally heated. This
520: model assumes a spherical plasma cloud with isotropic and homogeneous
521: distribution of photons and $e^{\pm}$, and soft seed photons produced
522: uniformly within the plasma, with a thermal temperature of $kT_{BB}$.
523: The properties of the plasma depend on its compactness, ${\it l}
524: \equiv \mathcal{L} \sigma_T / (\mathcal{R} m_e c^2)$ where
525: $\mathcal{L}$ is the total power in the source, $\mathcal{R}$ is the
526: radius of the sphere and $\sigma_T$ is the Thomson cross section. The
527: compactness is divided in a hard compactness, ${\it l_h}$, which
528: corresponds to the power supplied to the electrons, and a soft
529: compactness, ${\it l_s}$, corresponding to the power supplied in the
530: form of soft photons. The compactnesses corresponding to the electron
531: acceleration and to the additional heating of the thermal part of the
532: $e^{\pm}$ distribution are denoted as ${\it l_{nth}}$ and ${\it
533: l_{th}}$, respectively, and ${\it l_h} \equiv {\it l_{nth}} + {\it
534: l_{th}}$. The non-thermal energy distribution of the electrons in
535: the plasma is assumed to be a power law replacing the Maxwellian
536: exponential tail from a gamma Lorentz factor $\gamma_{min} = 1.3$ up
537: to a $\gamma_{max} = 1000$ with an energy index $G_{inj}$. The total
538: Thomson optical depth and the electron temperature of the plasma are
539: computed self-consistently from the assumed optical depth $\tau_p$ of
540: the background electron-proton plasma.\\
541: We choose to model the thermal disk emission using as in the hot
542: Comptonization model the \DISKBB~ component for spectra in HB/NB,
543: while we adopted the post-Newtonian model \DISKPN~
544: \citep{gierlinski99} in the case of the topFB spectra, as, in this
545: accretion state, we expect the disk to reach its minimum inner disk
546: radius, close to the NS; the \DISKPN~ model takes into account the
547: effective gravitational potential in the neighborhood of the compact
548: object by computing the emergent disk spectrum using a more
549: appropriate post-Newtonian potential. We assumed that the disk
550: reaches the last stable orbit at 6 R$_g$ and fixed this parameter for
551: the fits performed, while we left free to vary the maximum disk
552: temperature (T$_{max}$) and a normalization factor (K = $M^2 cos(i)/
553: D^2 \beta^4 $, where $M$ is the central mass expressed in solar units,
554: $i$ is the inclination of the disk, $D$ is the distance to the source
555: in kpc, $\beta$ the color/effective temperature). We have left free
556: to vary for the \EQPAIR~ component the following parameters:
557: $kT_{BB}$, $l_h/l_s$, $l_{nth}/l_{h}$, $\tau_p$ and the normalization
558: factor. The $G_{inj}$ was not very sensible to variations in the
559: range between 1.5 and 3 for spectra in the HB/NB, while for the topFB
560: spectra had to be left as a free to vary parameter, as this gave a
561: significant decrease in the $\chi^2$ when left as a free to vary
562: parameter. The value of the soft compactness ${\it l_s}$ was
563: unconstrained by the fit (it is mainly driven by the pair production
564: rate, which manifests itself with the annihilation line at energies
565: $\simeq$ 500 keV, obviously far beyond our energy limits), and we kept
566: it frozen at the value of 10 \citep[see also][]{gierlinski99}. All
567: the other parameters of the model were frozen at the default values.
568: We will refer to this modelization as the \DBBEQPAIR~ model, or simply,
569: the \textit{hybrid Comptonization} model.
570: \section{Results and discussion}
571:
572: \input{tab2}
573: We have examined 43 energy spectra of \sco~ in the 3.0--200 keV energy
574: band using RXTE pointed observations from April 1997 to August 2003;
575: the spectra have been extracted from selected regions chosen in the
576: X-ray CD. We produced a CD for each close in time dataset in order to
577: avoid shifts of instrumental origin, and repeated our analysis for
578: each CD obtained in this way, thus having at hand a robust
579: representation of the spectral evolution of the source in all its
580: accretion states.\\
581: To fit the spectra we firstly adopted a two-component model given by
582: the sum of a soft thermal disk emission and a hard Comptonized
583: emission. We checked for the presence of harder X-ray emission by
584: adding a high-energy power-law to our basic model, while for a subset
585: of spectra we adopted a hybrid thermal/non-thermal Comptonization as
586: described in the previous section.\\
587: We find that the basic two-component model \DBBTT~ can fit the 3-200
588: keV energy band spectrum (fits for which we obtained a $\chi^2_{red}
589: \leq 1.4 $) in 25 out of a total 43 spectra; these spectra mostly
590: belong to the FB and to the NB. Hard tails, in this group of spectra,
591: are not significantly detected in 14 spectra (these are spectra 1, 9,
592: 14, 15, 17, 18, 22, 23, 24, 29, 34, 35, 39, 40, see Table~\ref{tab2})
593: when the source lies in the FB/NB apex of its CD. For the other 11
594: spectra, although the addition of a new component is not strictly
595: required by the fit, we found a general improvement in the $\chi^2$
596: value.\\
597: On the contrary, we find that this model fails to describe the spectra
598: in 18 of the 43 selected spectra (fits for which we obtained a
599: $\chi^2_{red} \geq 1.4 $); the fits generally getting worse and worse
600: from the bottom of the FB to the upper NB. From the residuals with
601: respect to this model, it is clearly seen an excess of hard emission
602: at energies above 30 keV. We report in Figure~\ref{fig9} four
603: representative deconvolved spectra for the case in which the \DBBTT~
604: model does not give an adequate description to the broad-band spectral
605: behavior, choosing three spectra from the HB/NB zone and one for the
606: topFB zone: spectrum 06 (at the top of the left track of dataset
607: 20035A), spectrum 16 (at the top of the left track of dataset 30036),
608: spectrum 31 (at the top of the left track of dataset 40020) and
609: spectrum 07 (at the top of the right track of dataset 20035B).\\
610: In the following we will group the spectra according to the relative
611: position in their CDs, in: topFB spectra (spectra 7, 8, 12, 13, 17,
612: 22, 26, 32, 37), FB spectra (1, 9, 14, 18, 27, 28, 33, 38), NB spectra
613: (2, 3, 10, 15, 19, 20, 23, 24, 29, 30, 34, 35, 39, 40) and HB spectra
614: (4, 5, 6, 11, 16, 21, 25, 31, 36, 41, 42, 43). We caution the reader
615: that this distinction is based only on the results of our spectral
616: analysis for spectra taken in particular zones of the Z-track, without
617: any reference to the temporal behavior of the source. Although it is
618: clear, looking just at the lightcurves, to distinguish within one
619: dataset the FB from the NB, the distinction between the NB and the HB
620: is rather subtle, as the two track mostly overlap. For this reason a
621: HB spectrum, for this analysis, is to be considered only as a
622: simple label for a spectrum extracted from the top part of left
623: track of each CD.\\
624:
625: \section{The hot Comptonization model}
626: \subsection{Energetics}
627: In the following we will discuss the fit results based on the adopted
628: model \DBBTTPEG. Although in some spectra this model over-parameterizes
629: the fit, the spectral behavior of the source and our conclusions would
630: not change, if we used the best-fitting values of the \DBBTT~
631: modelization (we show in Table~\ref{tab3a} and~\ref{tab3b} the best-fit values of the
632: spectral parameter, together with associated errors quoted at 90\%
633: confidence level). In some cases we had to freeze some parameters in
634: order to make the fit physically consistent and avoid solutions
635: without physical meaning. In spectra 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 37, 38 the
636: electron temperature had to be fixed to 10 keV (a value consistent
637: with what we found in other CDs for the same CD zone; if free the fit
638: would give a best-fit with kT$_0 >$ kT$_e$ which is clearly wrong),
639: the photon index of the \PEGPWRLW~ component in spectra where this
640: component is not significantly detected, or when its value is
641: unconstrained by the fit, is frozen to a reference value of 2; the
642: \DISKBB~ parameters of spectra 42 and 43 had to be fixed to the
643: best-values as obtained by the best-fit model \DBBTT~ (if free, this
644: component vanishes, while the \COMPTT~ and \PEGPWRLW~ have comparable
645: flux values).\\
646: In this spectral decomposition we calculated
647: the total luminosity as follows:
648: \begin{equation}
649: L_x = 4 \pi D^2 (F_{TT} + F_{PEG} + a \xi N_{DB} T_{DB}^4)
650: \end{equation}
651: where $F_{TT}$ is the \COMPTT~ flux and $F_{PEG}$ is the \PEGPWRLW~
652: flux extrapolated in the 0.1--200 keV energy range; $\xi = 1/(f^4
653: \kappa^2)$, where $f$ is the spectral hardening factor
654: \citep{shimura95}, is assumed equal to 1.7, and $\kappa \sim 0.4$
655: corrects for the fact that the radius at which is reached the maximum
656: temperature is greater than the inner disk distance
657: \citep{vierdayanti06}. $a$ is a constant dependent on the distance of
658: the source, which we assumed to be 2.8 kpc, and the inclination of the
659: disk, which we assumed 45$^{\circ}$. In Figure~\ref{fig1} we show the
660: contribution of the disk and of the Comptonized component to the total
661: flux. The luminosities on both axis are in Eddington units for a 1.4
662: \msun.\\
663: The source span a luminosity range between 0.9 L$_{Edd}$ and 2.4
664: L$_{Edd}$, thus being in a super-Eddington state almost independently
665: of the position of the source on the CD. We note that the only way to
666: drastically reduce this range is to suppose a much massive compact
667: object (the possibility of a massive NS hosted in the \sco~ system is
668: also discussed in \citet{stella99} in the framework of the
669: relativistic precession model used to explain the frequencies of
670: quasi-periodic oscillations in NSs and BH systems) given that both the
671: distance and the inclination angle are known with good accuracy (10\%
672: and 13\% relative error, respectively).\\
673: The disk flux and the hard flux correlate as expected with the total
674: flux, although the disk emission presents a more pronounced linear
675: relation, while the hard flux seems to saturate as the total flux
676: reaches the highest values. If we assume a linear dependency of the
677: two contributions versus the total emission we derive a constant of
678: proportionality equals to 0.56 for the disk flux and 0.44 for the
679: Comptonized flux. When we look at the ratio of the two contributions
680: along the Z-track (see Figure~\ref{fig2}}, a 5\% error on this ratio
681: is assumed, after having tested the corresponding hard and soft flux
682: values for different parameter values of the spectral components
683: inside the uncertainties errorbars as derived from the fits), there is
684: a general trend to have a higher hard/soft ratio as the source moves
685: from higher to lower accretion states; this is in agreement with our
686: expectation that, at lower accretion rate the disk could be truncated
687: and the fraction of the power dissipated in the boundary layer should
688: correspondently increase. Spectra 7, 12, 13 and 32 do not follow this
689: trend; these spectra belong to the topFB spectra, and in these cases,
690: we are possibly, underestimating the disk contribution, or
691: overestimating the hard flux.
692:
693: \begin{figure*}
694: \centering
695: \begin{tabular}{l l}
696: \includegraphics[height=6cm, width=4cm, angle=-90]{f2a.eps} &
697: \includegraphics[height=6cm, width=4cm, angle=-90]{f2b.eps} \\
698: \end{tabular}
699: \caption{ \small \linespread{1} Left panel: soft (disk) luminosity for
700: the extracted spectra vs. total (0.1-200 keV) luminosity. Right
701: panel: hard (Comptonized) luminosity for the extracted spectra vs.
702: total (0.1-200 keV) luminosity. All luminosities are in Eddington
703: units for a 1.4 \msun~ NS. }
704: \label{fig2}
705: \end{figure*}
706:
707: \begin{figure*}
708: \centering
709: \begin{tabular}{l l l l }
710: \includegraphics[height=4cm, width=2.8cm]{f3a.eps} &
711: \includegraphics[height=4cm, width=2.8cm]{f3b.eps} &
712: \includegraphics[height=4cm, width=2.8cm]{f3c.eps} &
713: \includegraphics[height=4cm, width=2.8cm]{f3d.eps} \\
714: \includegraphics[height=4cm, width=2.8cm]{f3e.eps} &
715: \includegraphics[height=4cm, width=2.8cm]{f3f.eps} &
716: \includegraphics[height=4cm, width=2.8cm]{f3g.eps} &
717: \includegraphics[height=4cm, width=2.8cm]{f3h.eps} \\
718: \end{tabular}
719: \caption{ \small \linespread{1}
720: Ratio of the hard/soft luminosities for all the CD extracted spectra.
721: In the x-axis the number refers to the spectrum as indicted in Table ~\ref{tab2}.
722: We assumed a 5\% error for ratio of the two fluxes.}
723: \label{fig3}
724: \end{figure*}
725:
726:
727: \subsection{Disk emission and thermal Comptonization}
728: We present in Figure~\ref{fig3} the dependency of the inner disk
729: radius and of the inner disk temperature, plotted against the
730: hard/soft luminosity ratio. It is shown, both in Table
731: ~\ref{tab3a},~\ref{tab3b} and in Figure ~\ref{fig4}, the apparent
732: radius, derived without considering important correction factors, due
733: to the color/effective temperature ratio, relativistic effects, and
734: the non-zero torque boundary conditions; moreover, it should be noted
735: that these corrective factors can also vary, depending on the
736: accretion state. The sum of all these effects could be a drastical
737: rescale of the measured inner radii up to almost an order of magnitude
738: higher \citep{merloni00}, but the general trend that correlates this
739: parameter with the accretion state of the source should be
740: qualitatively preserved.\\
741: The apparent inner disk radius, for spectra in the topFB has the
742: lowest values, $\leq$ 10 km, while the average value for NB spectra
743: and HB spectra is considerably higher (average value: $\sim$ 18 km for
744: the HB and NB, $\sim$ 13.5 km for the FB and $\sim$ 10.2 km for the
745: topFB). The inner disk temperature, on the other hand, presents the
746: highest values, as one could expect, on the FB, while the temperature
747: diminishes with the accretion rate. A small subset of FB spectra falls
748: out of the trend, but as pointed out earlier, in this case, the exact
749: determination of the relative contributions of the two components
750: could suffer of systematic uncertainties linked to the particularly
751: luminous state of the source. On the FB the disk temperature has an
752: average value of 2.12 keV, while on the lower part of the FB sinks to
753: 1.73 keV. There is not any appreciable difference on temperature for
754: spectra taken on the NB and on the HB with an average value of 1.43
755: keV.\\
756: \begin{figure*}
757: \centering
758: \begin{tabular}{l l}
759: \includegraphics[height=6cm, width=4cm, angle=-90]{f4a.eps} &
760: \includegraphics[height=6cm, width=4cm, angle=-90]{f4b.eps} \\
761: \end{tabular}
762: \caption{ \small \linespread{1} Left panel: inner disk radius vs. the
763: hard/soft ratio. Right panel: temperature at the inner disk radius
764: vs. the hard/soft ratio.}
765: \label{fig4}
766: \end{figure*}
767:
768: For the hard, thermal Comptonized, component the accurate
769: determination of all the spectral parameters was not always possible.
770: The soft-seed photon temperature presents, for each spectra analyzed,
771: a substantially higher value with respect to the disk temperature at
772: the inner radius. We hence propose that the soft photons are
773: originated from the boundary layer/NS surface, partially thermalized
774: with the softer photons of inner part of the accretion disk around the
775: NS. Moreover, calculating the radius of the soft-seed photons emitting
776: region $R_w$ from:
777: \begin{equation}
778: R_w = 3 \times 10^4 d \sqrt{\frac{f_{bol}}{1+y}}/(kT_0)^2,
779: \end{equation}
780: where $d$ is the distance to the source in kpc, $f_{bol}$ is the
781: \COMPTT~ bolometric flux and $y$ (see Eq. \ref{ypar}), the Compton
782: parameter, we derived for our sample values in the 3--6 km range, that
783: clearly indicate a rather small emitting region, thus supporting our
784: identification.\\
785: \begin{figure*}
786: \centering
787: \begin{tabular}{l l}
788: \includegraphics[height=6cm, width=4cm, angle=-90]{f5a.eps} &
789: \includegraphics[height=6cm, width=4cm, angle=-90]{f5b.eps} \\
790: \end{tabular}
791: \caption{ \small \linespread{1} Left panel: soft seed-photon
792: temperature kT$_{0}$ vs. the inner disk temperature kT$_{DB}$.
793: Right panel: soft seed-photon temperature kT$_{0}$ vs. hard
794: (\COMPTT+\PEGPWRLW) luminosity.}
795: \label{fig5}
796: \end{figure*}
797: The CD correlated changing of the thermal temperatures is compatible
798: with a scenario in which the position of the source on the CD is
799: determined by the instantaneous \mdot, and higher accretion rates
800: correspond to higher seed-photons temperatures, resulting in a hotter
801: radiation field. The soft seed-photon temperature has a 2.2 keV,
802: 2.4 keV, 2.9 keV average values for spectra on the HB/NB, FB and topFB
803: respectfully. When plotted against each other, the disk temperature
804: and the soft seed-photon temperature (see Figure~\ref{fig5}, left panel)
805: follow each other quite closely, being these two parameters the main
806: driving physical quantities related to the accretion state of the
807: source. The correlation between the CD resolved spectra and the two
808: temperatures shows, although in a qualitative representation, that the
809: link between the spectral evolution of the source and its accretion
810: state is well motivated.\\
811: \begin{figure*}
812: \centering
813: \begin{tabular}{l l}
814: \includegraphics[height=6cm, width=4cm, angle=-90]{f6a.eps} &
815: \includegraphics[height=6cm, width=4cm, angle=-90]{f6b.eps} \\
816: \end{tabular}
817: \caption{ \small \linespread{1} Left panel: optical depth vs. electron
818: temperature (all spectra). Right panel: optical depth vs. electron
819: temperature (subset of spectra on the HB/NB). Errorbars show 1.0
820: $\sigma$ errors.}
821: \label{fig6}
822: \end{figure*}
823: The other two spectral parameters, that describe the high-energy
824: curvature of the Comptonized component, the electron temperature of
825: the Comptonizing plasma (kT$_e$) and the optical depth of the cloud
826: $\tau$, are not always well constrained by the fit. As it is evident
827: from Figure~\ref{fig6}, for spectra at high accretion rate we obtained
828: high values for the electron temperature (kT$_e \geq$ 10 keV) and low
829: values for the optical depth ($\tau \leq$ 1). As the sources resides
830: on zones of lower \mdot, the Comptonizing cloud substantially
831: thickens, while the electron temperature correspondently diminishes.
832: Plotting the subset of the spectra in the NB and HB helps to better
833: visualize this tendency (Figure ~\ref{fig6}, right panel). It is to
834: be noted that the determination of these two parameters is partially
835: related with the hard power-law component; although there are spectra
836: where the \PEGPWRLW~ component is not strictly necessary for a good
837: fit, its introduction slightly shifts the the thermal Comptonized
838: component to lower energies, thus giving a noticeable reduction in the
839: uncertainties of the Compton curvature.\\
840: In all the spectra it is required a Gaussian line at energies $\sim$
841: 6.4 keV. It mostly appear rather broad, with a line width that often
842: reaches our constraint of 0.8 keV. The equivalent widths associated
843: with the line are in 80-200 eV range, and are to be taken as rather
844: indicative given the low energy resolution of the PCA and the presence
845: of systematic residuals in this energy range.
846:
847: \subsection{The hard tail behavior}
848: The presence of a hard X-ray excess in the extracted spectra of \sco~
849: is mostly evident in 18 spectra from a total of 43 CD selected spectra.
850: There is little evidence of the presence of hard X-ray excess for
851: spectra lying in the bottom part of the FB and of the NB, namely for
852: spectra taken near the apex that connects the left and right track
853: that compose the V pattern.\\
854: In all the examined CD patterns we always detect a power-law
855: high-energy excess, dominant above $\sim$ 40 keV, as the source
856: resides at the top of the left track, i.e.~ a portion of the diagram
857: that we tentatively identified with the HB, and which should
858: correspond to the lowest mass accretion rate. This group of spectra
859: are characterized by the lowest values of inner disk temperature and
860: soft seed-photon temperature; the derived inner disk radii correspond
861: to a disk truncated at about 10-15 R$_g$, while the Comptonizing
862: optical cloud is substantially thicker with respect to any other
863: spectrum in other zones of the CD; the fraction of the total power
864: dissipated in the Comptonizing corona has the highest values, with a
865: ratio hard/soft luminosity well above unity.\\
866: \begin{figure*}
867: \centering
868: \begin{tabular}{l l}
869: \includegraphics[height=6cm, width=4cm, angle=-90]{f7a.eps} &
870: \includegraphics[height=6cm, width=4cm, angle=-90]{f7b.eps} \\
871: \end{tabular}
872: \caption{ \small \linespread{1} Left panel: hard tail luminosity (in
873: the 20-200 keV energy range) vs. the hard/soft ratio. Right panel:
874: the energy index of the \PEGPWRLW~ component vs. its 20--200 keV
875: luminosity (the subset of spectra for which the photon index was not
876: costrained by the fit is excluded from this figure).}
877: \label{fig7}
878: \end{figure*}
879: Apart from this consistent group of HB/NB spectra, we also found a
880: minor group of spectra (namely 5 spectra: 7, 8, 12, 13 and 26), for
881: which the fit required a third high-energy component. These spectra
882: belong to 3 CDs (20035B, 30036 and 40020) and are spectra taken at the
883: top of the FB. Although these spectra are located in the same CD
884: region, not all the CD that display a topFB clearly show this excess.
885: This could be due to a statistical reason, as in all the other CDs the
886: HEXTE countrate (see Table ~\ref{tab2}) drops of about one order of
887: magnitude with respect to these 3 CDs; because the countrate is
888: essentially concentrated in the 20--35 keV energy band, that is the
889: range that constrains the curvature of the thermal Comptonized
890: component, the energy channels in this energy band with a high
891: statistic will drive the fit, and any small excess above the
892: exponential tail of the Comptonized component will statistically be
893: more accentuated. However, we cannot exclude that an opposite
894: reasoning is true, i.e. that we are underestimating instrumental
895: effects that appear only for higher count-rates as dead-time
896: corrections or poor background estimate, so that these particular hard
897: tails are artifacts of an incorrect modelization of the thermal
898: Comptonization curvature. As we have no apparent way to better
899: calibrate our spectra, we discuss also the appearance of this
900: component for this group of spectra. Future observations with other
901: high-energy satellites, such as INTEGRAL or SUZAKU, will test if this
902: particular topFB state of the source is also accompanied by a high
903: energy excess or it is an HEXTE faked detection.\\
904: The hard excess has no evident relation with the total luminosity of
905: the source, but this could be expected since the different zones of
906: the CD track are not related with the total X-ray luminosity. Using
907: the pegged power-law, we directly derived from the normalization value
908: of this component, the flux in the 20.0-200.0 keV energy band. We
909: show in Figure~\ref{fig6}, left panel, the hard tails luminosity in the
910: 20--200 keV range vs. the hard/soft ratio. From the plot it can be
911: clearly seen that the hardening of the spectrum is reflected in the
912: increasing luminosity of the hard-tail component; the CD resolved
913: spectra are, correspondently, disposed on this plot: the FB spectra
914: reside on the bottom left of the diagram with hard fluxes $\leq 2
915: \times 10^{-10}$ erg s$^{-1}$, NB spectra are harder and half of them
916: show significant fluxes ($\sim 4 \times 10^{-10}$ erg s$^{-1}$), while
917: the HB spectra, in the right part of the plot, show the strongest hard
918: X-ray emission (in the range 6--12 $\times 10^{-10}$ erg s$^{-1}$).\\
919: As pointed out in the previous section, we found for the topFB sample,
920: spectra with no detectable hard X-ray emission, that occupy the left
921: bottom part of this figure and that smoothly join the correlation
922: between hard/soft ratio and hard flux and spectra that do not follow
923: this trend and for which there is both in the \COMPTT~ and in the
924: \PEGPWRLW~ component a hard flux higher than we expected. From the
925: figure is also evident that one of the most luminous hard tail is
926: found in a particular spectrum on the topFB (namely spectrum 26 of CD
927: 40020); the luminosity of this component is related to the total
928: broad-band high luminous state of the source, that reaches in this
929: case the highest value of total luminosity (2.6 L$_{Edd}$) observed in
930: our sample.\\
931: On the other hand, the values of the photon index present a well
932: defined bimodal distribution according to the position of the source
933: on the CD. We find quite flat power-laws, with index values less that
934: unity for all the FB and topFB spectra, while for the other group of
935: spectra, values generally range between 1.5 and 2 (Figure~\ref{fig6},
936: right panel).
937: \subsection{The hybrid Comptonization model}
938: Models of hybrid Comptonization have so far been mostly adopted to
939: explain state transitions both in black-hole candidate systems (as in
940: Cyg X-1, \citealt{gierlinski99}; GRS 1915+105, \citealt{zdziarski01};
941: or GX 339+4, \citealt{wardzinski02}) and in NS system \citep[GX
942: 17+2,~][]{farinelli05}.\\
943: We tried to model the spectra for which we detected a hard tail,
944: making the hypothesis that both the hard tail and the thermal
945: Comptonized component were related to each other. In this way, all the
946: broad-band evolution of the source is covered in a self-consistent way
947: by only two spectral components: the thermal soft disk emission and
948: the hard hybrid Comptonized component. In table \ref{tab4} we present
949: the results of our fits for the group of 18 spectra, distinguishing
950: between the HB/NB group (top part of the table), for which we used the
951: \DISKBB~ component as in the case of \DBBTTPEG~ modelization, and the
952: topFB spectra, for which we used the \DISKPN~ component, under the
953: assumption that for this state the disk is not truncated, and reaches
954: the surface of the NS (we assumed that this happens at a distance of 6
955: R$_g$).
956:
957: \begin{figure*}
958: \centering
959: \begin{tabular}{l l}
960: \includegraphics[height=6cm, width=4cm, angle=-90]{f8a.eps} &
961: \includegraphics[height=6cm, width=4cm, angle=-90]{f8b.eps} \\
962: \end{tabular}
963: \caption{ \small \linespread{1} Left panel: soft seed-photon
964: temperature kT$_{BB}$ vs. inner disk temperature kT$_{DISK}$ (which
965: corresponds to the kT$_{DB}$ value of the \DISKBB~ component for the
966: HB/NB spectra and to the kT$_{max}$ value of the \DISKPN~ component
967: for the topFB spectra) for spectra fitted using the \DBBEQPAIR~
968: modelization. Right panel: the soft seed-photon temperature is
969: plotted against the hard compactness parameter.}
970: \label{fig8}
971: \end{figure*}
972:
973:
974:
975:
976: As in the case of the previously adopted modelization, the thermal
977: disk temperature and the soft-seed photon temperature are the main
978: driving physical parameters that determine the changing of the
979: spectral state of the source. We show in Figure~\ref{fig8} (left panel),
980: the correlation between the two temperatures: the topFB spectra occupy
981: the top right part of the plot, with an average $kT_{BB}$ value of
982: 2.73 keV and inner disk temperature $kT_{DB}$ of 1.97 keV, while the
983: set of the HB-NB spectra are disposed along a linear trend in the
984: 1.2-1.8 keV energy range for the disk temperature and 1.9-2.5 keV
985: range for the soft seed-photon temperature. The plot closely follows
986: the plot of Figure~\ref{fig5}, right panel.\\
987: The hard compactness ${\it l_h}$ results for all the examined spectra
988: only a small fraction of the soft compactness ${\it l_s}$, with values
989: of hard/soft ratio ${\it l_h/l_s}$ below 0.2. The HB/NB spectra span
990: almost an order of magnitude in the ${\it l_h}$ range, while the topFB
991: spectra are all grouped in a more narrow range of values, around ${\it
992: l_h}$ = 0.6--0.8 (see Figure~\ref{fig8}, right panel).\\
993: The two groups of spectra significantly differ both in the $\tau$ and
994: ${\it l_{nth}/l_h}$ values (it is to be noted, however, that the
995: optical depth reported from the fits has not the same physical meaning
996: of the classical Thomson optical depth of the Comptonizing cloud, as
997: it more properly refers to the optical depth associated with the
998: background photon radiation field): HB spectra present generally
999: higher values of optical depth (with an average value of $\tau_p \sim$
1000: 2.2) and a hybrid electron distribution (with 0.3 $< {\it
1001: l_{nth}/l_{h}} < $ 0.8, and an average value of 0.55), while the
1002: topFB spectra have considerably lower values of $\tau_p \leq 1$ and
1003: essentially non-thermal spectra, with ${\it l_{nth}} \simeq 1$. The
1004: slope of the high-energy power-law of the hybrid electron
1005: distribution, $\Gamma_{inj}$ is consistent with a value of 2, for the
1006: HB-NB spectra, while for the topFB spectra its value is considerably
1007: lower (between 0 and 1).\\
1008:
1009: \begin{figure*}
1010: \centering
1011: \begin{tabular}{l l l l}
1012: \includegraphics[height=4cm, width=4.8cm,angle=-90 ]{f9a.eps} &
1013: \includegraphics[height=4cm, width=4.8cm,angle=-90 ]{f9b.eps} &
1014: \includegraphics[height=4cm, width=4.8cm,angle=-90 ]{f9c.eps} &
1015: \includegraphics[height=4cm, width=4.8cm,angle=-90 ]{f9d.eps} \\
1016: \includegraphics[height=4cm, width=1.8cm,angle=-90 ]{f9e.eps} &
1017: \includegraphics[height=4cm, width=1.8cm,angle=-90 ]{f9f.eps} &
1018: \includegraphics[height=4cm, width=1.8cm,angle=-90 ]{f9g.eps} &
1019: \includegraphics[height=4cm, width=1.8cm,angle=-90 ]{f9h.eps} \\
1020: \includegraphics[height=4cm, width=4.8cm,angle=-90 ]{f9j.eps} &
1021: \includegraphics[height=4cm, width=4.8cm,angle=-90 ]{f9k.eps} &
1022: \includegraphics[height=4cm, width=4.8cm,angle=-90 ]{f9l.eps} &
1023: \includegraphics[height=4cm, width=4.8cm,angle=-90 ]{f9m.eps} \\
1024: \includegraphics[height=4cm, width=1.8cm,angle=-90 ]{f9n.eps} &
1025: \includegraphics[height=4cm, width=1.8cm,angle=-90 ]{f9o.eps} &
1026: \includegraphics[height=4cm, width=1.8cm,angle=-90 ]{f9p.eps} &
1027: \includegraphics[height=4cm, width=1.8cm,angle=-90 ]{f9q.eps} \\
1028: \includegraphics[height=4cm, width=4.8cm,angle=-90 ]{f9r.eps} &
1029: \includegraphics[height=4cm, width=4.8cm,angle=-90 ]{f9s.eps} &
1030: \includegraphics[height=4cm, width=4.8cm,angle=-90 ]{f9t.eps} &
1031: \includegraphics[height=4cm, width=4.8cm,angle=-90 ]{f9u.eps} \\
1032: \includegraphics[height=4cm, width=1.8cm,angle=-90 ]{f9v.eps} &
1033: \includegraphics[height=4cm, width=1.8cm,angle=-90 ]{f9w.eps} &
1034: \includegraphics[height=4cm, width=1.8cm,angle=-90 ]{f9x.eps} &
1035: \includegraphics[height=4cm, width=1.8cm,angle=-90 ]{f9y.eps} \\
1036: \end{tabular}
1037: \caption{ \scriptsize \linespread{1} Deconvolved spectra, in the E*f(E)
1038: representation, and contributions per channel to the $\chi^2$ for
1039: four spectra of our sample; first column: spectrum 06, second
1040: column: spectrum 16, third column: spectrum 31, fourth column:
1041: spectrum07. Deconvolved spectra (upper panels) and contributions to
1042: the $\chi^2$ (lower panels) from the best-fit using the \DBBTT,
1043: \DBBTTPEG~ and \DBBEQPAIR~ models for the first, second and third
1044: row respectively. In the spectral decomposition the green line
1045: component shows the disk emission, the blue line shows the
1046: Comptonized emission, red line the Gaussian line, the thin blue line
1047: the \PEGPWRLW~ component.}
1048: \label{fig9}
1049: \end{figure*}
1050:
1051: \section{Conclusions}
1052: We outline our main conclusions from an extensive analysis of \sco~
1053: RXTE observations in the 3--200 keV energy range: we observe a
1054: spectral evolution of the source that is clearly dependent on the
1055: position of the source along its CD track; the spectral decomposition
1056: consists of four different spectral components that we interpret, from
1057: the softest to the highest X-rays respectively, as follows: a soft
1058: thermal component from an optically thick accretion disk, a thermal
1059: Comptonization from the boundary layer, a reflection component which
1060: mainly manifests in a broad Gaussian line at 6.4 keV and a variable
1061: hard excess above 30 keV, mostly present at low \mdot.\\
1062: We have shown that the CD correlated variations of the two thermal
1063: temperatures (disk temperature and soft seed-photon temperature), the
1064: trend in the hard/soft ratio, the Compton thickening of the
1065: Comptonizing cloud and the apparency of significant hard X-ray
1066: emission on the HB/NB are the main spectral characteristics of the
1067: source.\\
1068: We paid particular attention to the modelization of the hardest X-ray
1069: component, which is of primary importance for the understanding of all
1070: the continuum emission, as it has a major impact on the determination
1071: of all the other spectral parameters. To fit this hard excess we
1072: modelled our spectra using a phenomenological component, i.e. a
1073: power-law with a low energy exponential cut-off at the seed-photon
1074: temperature and a self-consistent physical model, a hybrid
1075: thermal/non-thermal Comptonization code. In both cases we found an
1076: adequate description of the spectra for each source state, and the two
1077: modelizations are statistically equivalent.\\
1078: The use of simple power-laws to fit the hard tails in the Z-class
1079: sources, but also in some atolls \citep{tarana07,fiocchi06}, has been
1080: largely used in the past, given the lack of broad-band coverage up to
1081: the MeV energies, and a poor understanding of the physical origins of
1082: this component. Contrary to what previously reported \citep{damico01},
1083: the presence of the hard tail $is$ related to the broad-band spectral
1084: evolution of the source as inferred from the source position on the Z
1085: track of its CD: the presence and the values of the photon indexes in
1086: \sco~ are consistent with the results from fits to spectra on the same
1087: zone of the CD for the other Z sources \citep{asai94, disalvo00,
1088: disalvo01, disalvo06}; at the same time, the flux contribution to
1089: the total energy output of the sources is of the same order and is
1090: anticorrelated to the inferred mass accretion rate. This is clearly
1091: shown in the case of the CD 20035A, where the hard tail flux
1092: monotonically increases as the source moves from the bottom to the top
1093: of its NB/HB.\\
1094: The only difference, between \sco~ and the other similar sources, is
1095: constituted by rather flat hard tails that we found when the source is
1096: at the top of the FB and which has never been observed in other NSs
1097: sources; however, while for every CD that we obtained, we
1098: systematically found a hard tail as the source was at the top of left
1099: V track, the detection on the FB is presumedly dependent on the HEXTE
1100: statistics. Past surveys with the use of scintillation counters
1101: on-board on balloons reported the unusual flattening of the spectrum
1102: of \sco~ above 40 keV \citep{agrawal71}, as well as more recent
1103: surveys \citep{manchanda06}; it would be interesting to definitively
1104: assess the existence of such component; from our analysis, we can only
1105: conjecture that this component, could be a signature, on the FB, of
1106: the trespassing of the Eddington limit on the interface between the
1107: accretion disk and the board of the boundary layer, followed by a
1108: violent expulsion of part of the accreting matter.\\
1109: Hard tails on the HB could have a thermal origin, as in the case of
1110: the thermal Comptonized component that dominates the spectrum at lower
1111: energies (less than 20 keV); in this case the power-law, as long as
1112: the optical depth is low and the electron temperature is not too high,
1113: is a good approximation of the Comptonized spectrum, whose $y$
1114: parameter
1115: \begin{equation} \label{ypar}
1116: y = \frac{4 k T_e}{m_e c^2} \times (\tau + \tau^2)
1117: \end{equation}
1118: is related to the photon index of the power-law by the following relation:
1119: \begin{equation}
1120: \alpha = - \frac{1}{2} + \sqrt{\frac{9}{4}+\frac{\pi^2}{3y}}.
1121: \end{equation}
1122: In the case of \sco~ spectra on the HB/NB, we derived photon indexes
1123: in the 1.8--2.2 range, that imply a $y$ Compton parameter in the
1124: 0.6--1.1 range; a $\tau = 1$ thick plasma would then require a $\sim$
1125: 50 keV thermal plasma, while a $\tau = 2$, on the contrary, a $\sim$
1126: 15 keV electron temperature. We did not find any evidence of
1127: high-energy cut-off, obtaining only lower limits in the 50--100 keV
1128: energy range, and this constraints the optical depth to be less than
1129: one while the electron temperature would be greater than 50 keV. The
1130: formation of hot zones, or blobs, of very hot plasma, possibly powered
1131: by episodes of magnetic reconnection above the disk, constitutes a
1132: plausible scenario \citep{haardt94}; this model has been also proposed
1133: in the case of the hard/low states of BH candidates \citep{malzac04},
1134: which share with the bright Z-sources systems, from a spectral point
1135: of view, similar values of the hard photon indexes and the low
1136: accretion state, while they naturally differ from the strong boundary
1137: layer emission present in the NSs sources and absent in the BH case.\\
1138: A thermal origin, on the other hand, for the topFB hard tails seems to
1139: be excluded, as it would require unrealistic large values of the
1140: electron temperature.\\
1141: Our analysis has shown that this scenario is statistically equivalent
1142: to a hybrid Comptonization model, where the non-thermal fraction of
1143: the power injected in the electron heating counts up to half of
1144: the total injected power. The non-thermal fraction is significantly
1145: higher with respect to the value found by \citet{farinelli05} in the
1146: case of GX 17+2. The non-thermal fraction for the topFB spectra must
1147: be distinguished from the non-thermal spectra of the BH sources, as in
1148: the case of \sco, the hard luminosity is a small fraction of the soft
1149: luminosity, that dominates the 10--30 keV energy spectrum. Most of the
1150: soft photons do not Compton interact with the electron cloud, because
1151: of the low optical depth values.\\
1152: Another possible physical mechanism to explain the hard X-ray
1153: variability is the bulk motion Comptonization
1154: \citep[e.g.][]{psaltis01}, present in systems with a high velocity
1155: radial accretion flows. This radiation mechanism, used to explain the
1156: hard power-law component in BH systems spectra in their soft/high
1157: states, is, however, not able to account for the the absence of any
1158: cut-off up to energies of 0.5 MeV and for the hard photon indexes
1159: observed ($\Gamma \leq$ 2.0) \citep{niedzwiecki06}. In the case of
1160: bright NS systems, the high radiation pressure of the inner boundary
1161: layer constitutes a strong barrier for any incoming convergent bulk
1162: motion flow. On the other side, because jets have been observed in
1163: the radio from \sco, bulk motion Comptonization inside the jet can be
1164: an important production mechanisms also of hard X-ray radiation.
1165: Theoretical spectra and energetic contribution according to the
1166: relevant physical parameters involved in the case of a strict coupling
1167: with inflow (i.e. accretion to the compact object through the
1168: formation of an accretion disk) and outflow (i.e. jets), are a
1169: promising way to cover in a self-consistent way all the phases of
1170: accretion. Details about the geometry of the scattering media, amount
1171: of reflection on the cold disk and dependence from the accretion state
1172: of the source are yet to be fully explored. Moreover, in this case
1173: synchrotron emission of soft photons by a beamed population of
1174: relativistic electrons becomes a competitive source of photons with
1175: respect to the thermal soft photon emission of the boundary layer and
1176: accretion disk. An attempt to explicitly compute a jet spectrum, from
1177: radio to hard X-rays, has been recently proposed by \citet{markoff05},
1178: where the jet base subsumes the role of the static Comptonizing
1179: corona; spectral fits in the case of BH systems (namely Cyg X-1 and GX
1180: 339-4) in hard states are consistent with this scenario, but BH soft
1181: states and NS systems spectra need yet to be tested in order to
1182: understand the limits of validity of the jet model.\\
1183: Questions to be further addressed in future observations are: the exact
1184: shape and contribution of the soft component below the 3 keV range,
1185: the investigation with good spectral resolution in the 6--10 keV range
1186: of the reflection features, the extension up to 0.5 MeV of the
1187: spectral coverage in order to constrain the physical parameters
1188: characterizing the non-thermal electron distribution of the
1189: Comptonizing plasma. The latter point is well within the capabilities
1190: of the recently launched SUZAKU satellite, so that future observations
1191: in this direction can be a stringent test to our conclusions.
1192: \bibliographystyle{apj}
1193: \bibliography{references}
1194: \clearpage
1195: \input{tab3}
1196: \input{tab4}
1197: \end{document}
1198: