1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: \shorttitle{SN~2005hj}
3: \shortauthors{Quimby et al.}
4: \usepackage{epsfig}
5: \begin{document}
6:
7: \title{SN~2005hj: Evidence for Two Classes of Normal-Bright SNe~Ia and Implications for Cosmology\footnotemark[1]}
8:
9: \author{
10: Robert Quimby\altaffilmark{2},
11: Peter H\"{o}flich\altaffilmark{3},
12: J. Craig Wheeler\altaffilmark{2}
13: }
14: \footnotetext[1]{Based on observations obtained with the Hobby-Eberly
15: Telescope, which is a joint project of the University of Texas at
16: Austin, the Pennsylvania State University, Stanford University,
17: Ludwig-Maximilians-Universit\"{a}t M\"{u}nchen, and
18: Georg-August-Universit\"{a}t G\"{o}ttingen.}
19: \altaffiltext{2}{Department of Astronomy, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712, USA}
20: \altaffiltext{3}{Department of Physics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32312, USA}
21:
22: \begin{abstract}
23: HET Optical spectra covering the evolution from about 6 days before to
24: about 5 weeks after maximum light and the ROTSE-IIIb unfiltered light
25: curve of the ``Branch-normal'' Type Ia Supernova SN~2005hj are
26: presented. The host galaxy shows \ion{H}{2} region lines at redshift
27: of $z=0.0574$, which puts the peak unfiltered absolute magnitude at a
28: somewhat over-luminous $-19.6$. The spectra show weak and narrow
29: \ion{Si}{2} lines, and for a period of at least 10 days beginning
30: around maximum light these profiles do not change in width or depth
31: and they indicate a constant expansion velocity of $\approx 10,600$ km
32: s$^{-1}$. Our observations indicate that Si is confined to a relatively
33: narrow velocity region. We analyzed the observations based on detailed
34: radiation dynamical models in the literature. The models considered
35: include delayed detonations, deflagrations, pulsating delayed
36: detonations, and tamped detonation/merger scenarios. Whereas the first
37: two classes of models have been used to explain the majority of
38: SNe~Ia, they do not predict a long velocity plateau in the \ion{Si}{2}
39: minimum with an unvarying line profile. Pulsating delayed detonations
40: and merger scenarios form shell-like density structures with
41: properties mostly related to the mass of the shell, $M_{shell}$, and
42: we discuss how these models may explain the observed \ion{Si}{2} line
43: evolution; however, these models are based on spherical calculations
44: and other possibilities may exist. SN~2005hj is consistent with
45: respect to the onset, duration, and velocity of the plateau, the peak
46: luminosity and, within the uncertainties, with the intrinsic colors
47: for models with $M_{shell}=0.2 M_\odot$. Our analysis suggests a
48: distinct class of events hidden within the Branch-normal SNe~Ia. If
49: the predicted relations between observables are confirmed, they may
50: provide a way to separate these two groups. We discuss the
51: implications of two distinct progenitor classes on cosmological
52: studies employing SNe~Ia, including possible differences in the peak
53: luminosity to light curve width relation.
54:
55:
56: \end{abstract}
57:
58:
59: \keywords{Supernovae, \objectname[SN 2005hj]{SN 2005hj}, cosmology}
60:
61: \section{Introduction}
62:
63: Type Ia supernovae (SNe~Ia) are thought to be thermonuclear
64: disruptions of white dwarf (WD) stars \citep{hf60}, but the details
65: remain uncertain. One possibility for the progenitors is the single
66: degenerate model in which main sequence stars or post main sequence
67: red giants transfer mass to a WD through Roche Lobe overflow or a
68: common envelope and the WD grows close to the Chandrasekhar mass
69: $M_{Ch}$. Due to compression, the thermonuclear runaway starts near
70: the center leading to the explosion of the WD and a rapidly expanding
71: envelope with a mass close to $M_{Ch}$. A second possibility is the
72: double degenerate model in which a pair of WDs merge and lead to an
73: explosion. In most such cases, the resulting mass of the rapidly
74: expanding envelope will be different from $M_{Ch}$. Residual material
75: from these mergers surrounding the explosions will get swept up by the
76: ejecta forming dense, shell-like structures. Although the explosion
77: of single WDs seems to be favored for the majority of objects, we may
78: expect mergers to contribute to the SNe~Ia population (see \S
79: \ref{obs}).
80:
81: The possibility of different progenitor channels, the population of
82: which may vary with redshift, may pose a challenge for the use of
83: SNe~Ia in cosmological studies that rely on a single parameterization,
84: such as a light curve width to peak luminosity relation, LWR, to
85: reduce the intrinsic scatter in the peak magnitudes and render them
86: standard candles \citep{phillips1993,perlmutter1997}. To first order,
87: the LWR relation can be understood as a result of different amounts of
88: $^{56}$Ni produced during the explosion
89: \citep{hoeflich1996,umeda99}. There may be some spread and an offset
90: in LWR introduced by one of the channels if the masses of the envelope
91: differ from $M_{Ch}$, and/or the density structures differ. This can
92: lead to a systematic shift of LWR with redshift if the evolutionary
93: time scales of the progenitor systems differ. Even if the different
94: progenitor scenarios obey the same LWR, differences in the color could
95: introduce systematic errors in cosmological studies because SNe~Ia are
96: known to suffer to some degree from reddening in their respective host
97: galaxies which has to be taken into account. To correct for this, the
98: maximum light color excess (usually $E_{B-V}$) and an average reddening
99: law are used to determine the amount of absorption. SNe~Ia that are
100: intrinsically redder as compared to the average local sample will thus
101: be over-corrected in this fashion to a higher luminosity.
102:
103: Similarly to the two distinct progenitor channels, qualitative
104: variations in the explosion physics may lead to various classes of
105: SNe~Ia even within the single degenerate scenarios. Standard explosion
106: models include delayed detonations (DD) and deflagrations. In these
107: scenarios, burning during the deflagration phase leads to an unbound
108: WD. In DD models, the deflagration turns into a detonation in an
109: expanding envelope. Because the density structure of the WD declines
110: monotonically with radius, the resulting density structure in the
111: expanding envelope also smoothly declines with mass and radius. A
112: variation of DD models are the pulsating delayed detonation models
113: (PDD; \citealt{khokhlov1993,hoeflich1995}). In these models, the
114: total energy production during the deflagration phase is, by
115: construction, lower and insufficient to unbind the WD. This results in
116: large amplitude pulsations. Because the fall-back time increases with
117: distance, the inner regions contract and leave a shell behind at
118: larger distances. Due to infall driven compression, a detonation is
119: triggered, the material behind the burning front is accelerated, and
120: this expanding material runs into the low-velocity material left at
121: larger distances. Similar to the merger scenario, a shell-like
122: structure is formed with very similar light curve and spectroscopic
123: properties, but with a total mass close to $M_{Ch}$
124: \citep{hoflich_khokhlov1996}.
125:
126: These two groups, consisting of DD and deflagration models such as W7
127: \citep{nomoto1984}, which lack shells, and the models with shells
128: (mergers and PDDs), can be differentiated by their predictions for the
129: photospheric evolution and maximum light colors \citep{khokhlov1993,
130: hoflich_khokhlov1996}. For the former group, the photospheric
131: velocities, $v_{ph}$, smoothly decline with time and the models show a
132: blue color at maximum light, $B-V \approx 0^m$; in the latter group,
133: $v_{ph}$ shows a plateau in the evolution as the photosphere recedes
134: through the shell. These models are intrinsically redder and slightly
135: over-luminous because of the lower expansion rate in the inner region.
136: As shown in \citet{khokhlov1993} the color, length and velocity of the
137: plateau are correlated with the mass of the shell, and this
138: potentially allows the two groups to be distinguished even for similar
139: brightnesses.
140:
141: Indeed, there is a growing sample of SNe~Ia showing photospheric
142: velocity plateaus (e.g. 1990N;
143: \citealt{leibundgut1991,mueller_hoeflich1994}; 1991T, 1999aa;
144: \citealt{garavini2004}; 1999ee; \citealt{hamuy2002}; 2000cx;
145: \citealt{li2001}; see also \citealt{benetti2005} ). Many of these
146: SNe~Ia have been reported as having a red color $B-V$ at maximum, but
147: this is typically attributed to reddening along the line of
148: sight. Alternatively, this sample may suggest the contribution of
149: events with shell-like density structures in the observed
150: population. These events may be understood in terms of mergers or
151: PDDs; however, the inhomogeneities and incompleteness of individual
152: data sets in the literature preclude definite conclusions.
153:
154: To address this problem and others, we started the Texas Supernovae
155: Search (TSS; Quimby et al. in prep.) with the goal of providing a
156: homogeneous set of quality data for several supernovae beginning well
157: before maximum light. In this paper, we present our observations of
158: SN~2005hj and analysis of the data. In \S{\ref{obs}} we describe the
159: discovery and give the details for both the photometric and
160: spectroscopic follow-up. In \S \ref{models} we discuss generic
161: properties of explosion models and suggest a secondary parameter to
162: separate models with and without shells, and analyze the peculiarities
163: of SN~2005hj. Conclusions and discussion are presented in
164: \S{\ref{conclusions}}.
165:
166:
167: \section{Observations}\label{obs}
168:
169: SN~2005hj was discovered on October 26.13 UT in the field of Abell 194
170: as part of the TSS. The TSS uses the wide field ($1\fdg85 \times
171: 1\fdg85$) 0.45m ROTSE-IIIb telescope \citep{akerlof03} at the McDonald
172: Observatory in Texas to scan nearby galaxy clusters nightly for
173: transients with a modified version of the PSF-matched image
174: subtraction code from the Supernova Cosmology Project. SN~2005hj was
175: found at an unfiltered magnitude (calibrated against the USNO-B1.0 R2)
176: of $C_R=17.4$ and is located at $\alpha=01^h26^m48\fs27$,
177: $\delta=-01\arcdeg14\arcmin16\farcs8$. The foreground reddening at
178: this location is $E_{B-V}=0.039 ^m$ \citep{schlegel1998}. Examination
179: of ROTSE-IIIb images from Oct. 20 and Oct. 22 shows the SN was
180: detected prior to discovery, but not significantly well to pass the
181: search pipeline's automatic cuts. Figure \ref{lc} shows the ROTSE-IIIb
182: light curve for SN~2005hj through 40 days after maximum light. To
183: construct the light curve, we co-added images taken on a given night
184: (usually 6) excluding any frames of significantly lower quality due to
185: passing clouds or wind sheer, and then subtracted the reference image
186: convolved to the same PSF. Magnitudes were determined by fitting the
187: local PSF (derived from the co-added nightly images) to the location
188: of the SN on the subtracted frame using custom software and the
189: DAOPHOT PSF-fitting routines (\citealt{stetson87} ported to IDL by
190: \citealt{landsman89}).
191:
192: The unfiltered CCD response of ROTSE-IIIb has an approximate full
193: width of $\sim 4000$~\AA\ centered in the $R$-band around 6000~\AA.
194: Because we do have some sensitivity in the blue and since the $B-V$
195: colors of SNe~Ia typically grow $\sim 1.0$ mag redder in the 30 days
196: after maximum \citep{phillips1999,krisciunas2003}, there is a blue
197: deficit at later times that causes our unfiltered magnitudes to
198: decline more rapidly than the true $R$-band fading. Note that $V-R$
199: colors of SNe~Ia are close to zero at maximum light. We therefore
200: limit the light curve fitting to data taken before 10 days after
201: maximum (determined through several iterations of the fit), during
202: which the color evolution is minimal. The best fit $R$-band template
203: from \citet{knop2003} is also shown in Figure \ref{lc}. The date of
204: maximum light determined from the fit is Nov. 1.6 with a formal error
205: of 0.7 days (note the template phases are relative to the $B$-band
206: maximum). The best fit stretch factor \citep{perlmutter1997} for the
207: light curve width is $s=1.2 \pm 0.1$. The preliminary measurement of
208: the observed $B-V$ color at $V$ maximum from the Carnegie Supernova
209: Project is $0.07^m \pm 0.05$ after removal of the host light but
210: before any extinction or $k$-corrections are applied (M. M. Phillips,
211: private communication).
212:
213: Near real-time photometric analysis combined with target of
214: opportunity (ToO) time on the neighboring 9.2m Hobby-Eberly Telescope
215: (HET) allowed us to obtain optical spectra just 4 hours after the
216: discovery images were taken and every few days over the next 6
217: weeks. These observations are detailed in Table \ref{spec}. The
218: instrumental response is such that very little second order light is
219: expected blue of 8900~\AA\ even with the GG385 blocking filter. The
220: data were reduced in the optimal manner using IRAF\footnote{IRAF is
221: distributed by the National Optical Astronomy Observatories, which are
222: operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy,
223: Inc., under cooperative agreement with the National Science
224: Foundation.} and custom IDL scripts. The wavelength scale was
225: calibrated against Cd and Ne lamps and its accuracy was verified by
226: comparing night sky lines to the spectral atlas of
227: \citet{hanuschik2003}. Because the HET pupil size varies for different
228: tracks, absolute flux calibration cannot reliably be achieved;
229: however, we used the standard stars of \citet{massey1988} and
230: \citet{massey_gronwall1990}, which were observed using the same
231: setups, to achieve {\it relative} spectrophotometric calibration and
232: to remove strong telluric features.
233:
234: The redshift of the host galaxy was derived from narrow emission lines
235: around 7000~\AA\ (observed), which we attribute to H-$\alpha$,
236: [\ion{N}{2}], and [\ion{S}{2}] in the host galaxy. We combined all
237: the spectra and simultaneously fit these lines with Gaussians to
238: determine the line centers. The line redshifts are best fit by
239: $z=0.0574 \pm 0.0002$, and we adopt this value for the SN. This gives
240: SN~2005hj an absolute peak magnitude of $-19.6$ in our unfiltered band
241: pass (assuming H$_{0}$=71 km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$, $\Omega_{m}=0.3$,
242: and $\Omega_{\Lambda}=0.7$), and places the host well behind Abell 194
243: ($z=0.0180$; \citealt{struble_rood1999}). The brightness and broad
244: light curve shape suggest that SN~2005hj is a slightly over-luminous
245: SN~Ia.
246:
247: The unfiltered ROTSE-IIIb reference image shows that the host for
248: SN~2005hj is relatively bright ($C_R = 17.8$) and compact, and is
249: therefore likely a significant contaminant to our spectra. Thus, we
250: have to subtract the galaxy contribution (see Fig. \ref{spec0}).
251: Lacking an observed spectrum for the host galaxy excluding the SN
252: light, we constrained the galaxy SED using archival Sloan Digital Sky
253: Survey (SDSS) $ugriz$ observations and obtained a template galaxy
254: spectrum (N. Drory 2005, private communication). The relative amounts
255: of SN and galaxy light in the spectral apertures will vary not only
256: with the changing SN brightness, but also with the seeing, slit width
257: and positioning. Also plotted in figure \ref{spec0} is a spectrum of
258: SN~1999aa (blue curve) constructed via a linear interpolation of the
259: $-7$ day and $-3$ day spectra presented by \citet{garavini2004}.
260: Noting the similarity of the spectral features of SN~1999aa and
261: SN~2005hj, we assume that we can model our observed spectra as a
262: linear combination of our galaxy template and the SN~1999aa spectra
263: interpolated to the same phase as the SN~2005hj observations. We
264: perform a least squares fit to determine the relative contributions of
265: each component. The red line in figure \ref{spec0} shows the derived
266: contribution of galaxy light in the $-6$ day spectrum. Aside from a
267: few small differences (most noticeably in the \ion{Mg}{2}
268: $\lambda$4481 triplet), some of which may be explained by calibration
269: errors, the combined SN~1999aa + host spectrum (purple curve) is a
270: good fit. The over all fit is improved if we interpolate the SN~1999aa
271: spectra to $-5$ days instead of $-6$, especially in the 5400~\AA\ to
272: 6500~\AA\ range, which could imply a $\sim$1 day error in the date of
273: maximum light or different time scales for the spectral evolutions of
274: the two SNe. We repeated this process for all the SN~2005hj spectra,
275: each time using the same galaxy template and the SN1999aa spectra
276: (interpolated to the appropriate phase) as reference to determine the
277: relative amount of galaxy light. In general, the galaxy template added
278: to the SN~1999aa spectra does an excellent job of reproducing the
279: observed SN~2005hj spectra. The galaxy light typically dominates the
280: flux red of 7000~\AA. Figure \ref{spec} shows the spectral evolution
281: of SN~2005hj recorded by the HET between days $-6$ and $+34$ with the
282: derived galaxy contribution subtracted.
283:
284:
285: \subsection{Spectral Characteristics of SN~2005hj}\label{spec_char}
286:
287: Overall, SN~2005hj shows spectra with lines dominated by intermediate
288: mass and iron group elements as is typical for SNe~Ia. While the lines
289: show normal expansion velocities, the absorption components are more
290: narrow and, for the early phases, weaker than typically observed, as
291: exemplified by the \ion{Si}{2} $\lambda$6355 line (see
292: Fig. \ref{spec1}). SN~2005hj also shows an atypical velocity evolution
293: of these features over time.
294:
295: Line minima are useful diagnostic indicators of the ejecta structure
296: as they give the abundances and velocities of the material. The
297: actual measurement of the velocity at the minimum of the line profile
298: is complicated by the presence of the continuum, other blended lines,
299: and some uncertainty in the true line profile shape. Detailed modeling
300: is required to accurately sort out all the components and how they
301: relate to the photospheric layer to reveal the velocity distribution
302: of the ejecta\footnote{In general, \ion{Si}{2} lines form above the
303: photosphere and velocities measured from such absorption minima can be
304: 1000 to 2000 km s$^{-1}$ larger than those measured from weak
305: lines. However, for shell models the steep density gradients cause
306: even strong lines to from very close (in radius) to the actual
307: photosphere.}. Such models have shown that the absorption minima
308: approximate the photospheric expansion velocities to within about 1000
309: km s$^{-1}$ at maximum light \citep{hoeflich1995,marion2006}. Thus,
310: simple line fitting can lead to a rough description of the ejecta
311: velocities, and allows a useful comparison to discriminate between
312: different models. At late times the photosphere will recede below the
313: Si rich layer and so the velocities derived from the \ion{Si}{2}
314: $\lambda$6355 line will become increasingly discrepant with the
315: photospheric velocity. For deflagration and classical detonation
316: models, this departure will begin to set in 1-2 weeks after maximum
317: light \citep{hoflich_khokhlov1996}.
318:
319: The strength of the \ion{Si}{2} $\lambda$6355 line and its persistence
320: from at least 2 weeks before to 4 weeks after maximum light make it a
321: valuable tool for probing the ejecta. Its evolution with time is
322: shown in figure \ref{SiII} for the case of SN~2005hj. To determine the
323: velocity, we smooth the spectra by Fourier Transform filtering, divide
324: by the estimated continuum, and then select the lowest point using
325: spline interpolation over a selected range. The continuum is
326: represented by a medium order (6th - 7th) polynomial fit to regions of
327: the spectra that are not strongly affected by lines. To smooth the
328: spectra, we use a Fourier Transform to convert the data into a power
329: spectrum, and then multiply this by a filter to remove high frequency
330: variations. We then apply a reverse FT to the filtered power spectrum
331: to recover the smoothed spectrum. The filter has the functional form
332:
333: \begin{equation}
334: \Phi(\nu) = \left\{
335: \begin{array}{ll}
336: 1 & \rm{for}\; -\nu_{c} \le \nu \le \nu_{c}\\
337: \exp[-(\nu-\nu_c)^2/2\sigma^2] & \rm{otherwise}
338: \end{array}
339: \right.
340: \end{equation}
341:
342: \noindent The filter cutoff frequency, $\nu_{c}$, and attenuation
343: scale, $\sigma$, were determined as follows: 1) the spectra were
344: converted into a power spectrum, $P(\nu)$, via Fourier Transform; 2)
345: the slope of $\log(P)$ is fit over the noise dominated high
346: frequencies and interpolated through the low frequencies to determine
347: the noise spectrum; 3) $\nu_{c}$ is taken as the frequency at which
348: $\log(P)$ drops to within three times the dispersion about the noise
349: spectrum; 4) $\sigma$ is chosen such that the slope of
350: $\log[P(\nu_{c}+2\sigma)]$ is twice the noise spectrum slope
351: (i.e.. $\nu=\nu_{c}+2\sigma$ is the frequency above which noise is
352: clearly the dominate component). For this analysis, only the spectral
353: bins with signal to noise above 25 were considered (note the peak
354: throughput for HET/LRS is near the \ion{Si}{2} $\lambda$6355
355: line). For consistency, we adopt a single filter for all our analysis,
356: choosing the results from our nosiest data,
357: $\nu_{c}=0.0066$~\AA$^{-1}$ and $\sigma=0.0053$~\AA$^{-1}$, which
358: removes noise in the data but also some real information related to
359: ``sharp'' features in the spectra such as the narrow core to the
360: \ion{Si}{2} $\lambda$6355 absorption in the day $+10$ spectrum.
361:
362: Using the relativistic Doppler formula and the $gf$-weighted
363: \ion{Si}{2} $\lambda$6355 rest velocity in the host galaxy frame, we
364: convert the wavelengths of the line profile minima into expansion
365: velocities. For each spectrum we conducted 250,000 Monte Carlo
366: simulations in which normally distributed noise based on the
367: statistical flux errors was added to the data and the FT smoothed
368: minimum was found. The peak of the distribution and the interval
369: containing 68\% of the simulation results were used to calculate the
370: velocity of the minimum and its error, respectively. We also measured
371: the relative shift in the \ion{H}{2} region lines over all epochs and
372: found the scatter to be 80 km s$^{-1}$, which we add in quadrature to
373: the individual errors. The results are given in table \ref{linedata}
374: and plotted in figure \ref{linevel}. We find that the data points are
375: at 10,600 $\pm$ 150 km s$^{-1}$ between maximum light and $+18$ days,
376: somewhat faster prior to maximum, and significantly slower on day
377: $+25$. By day $+34$, the \ion{Si}{2} $\lambda$6355 absorption has all
378: but completely disappeared.
379:
380: % talk about blue wing
381: From maximum light through day $+10$, the \ion{Si}{2} $\lambda$6355
382: line profile shows little change in both depth and width in addition
383: to maintaining a constant absorption minimum velocity. Of specific
384: relevance is the blue wing of the absorption profile; this section of
385: the line is formed by the material at the greatest distance from the
386: photosphere and at the highest velocities, and as such it should be
387: the first to vanish as the photosphere recedes. The consistency of
388: this blue wing from maximum light through day $+10$ suggests the
389: photosphere falls within the Si enriched layers for at least this
390: period. By day $+18$ the blue wing has shifted significantly to the
391: red, while the red wing remains constant except for the effects of an
392: \ion{Fe}{2} blend around 6250~\AA. Other \ion{Fe}{2} features begin to
393: appear or strengthen at this phase as well. This behavior could be a
394: signal that the Si layers are becoming detached from the photosphere
395: by day $+18$.
396:
397: % double minimum at +25 days
398: The day $+25$ spectra show a double minimum at the location of the
399: \ion{Si}{2} $\lambda$6355 feature (see figure \ref{day25}). Telluric
400: absorption is weak in this wavelength range, and the line profile is
401: clearly seen in each of the three individual exposures, which support
402: the reality of this feature. A possible explanation for this feature
403: is contamination from the host that is not removed by the template
404: subtraction; however, galaxy spectra do not typically exhibit features
405: in this range that could cause such interference, and even if such
406: were the case, we would expect to see similar behavior in the $+34$
407: day spectra. A second possibility is contamination from \ion{Fe}{2}
408: lines. Using the spectral analysis tool SYNOW
409: \citep{jeffery_branch1990,fisher1997,fisher1999}, and the example of
410: SN~1994D as a starting place \citep{branch2005}, we find that while
411: \ion{Fe}{2} likely produces the absorption dips $\sim 100$~\AA\ away
412: on either side of the \ion{Si}{2} $\lambda$6355 line, it is unlikely
413: responsible for the double minimum. The third possibility, which we
414: favor, is that this double minimum simply appears because we are
415: resolving the \ion{Si}{2} $\lambda$6355 doublet. This result implies
416: that the \ion{Si}{2} seen in the $+25$ day spectra is confined to a
417: very narrow region of velocity space ($\Delta v \approx 1,500$ km
418: s$^{-1}$). If accurate, the true minimum of the \ion{Si}{2}
419: $\lambda$6355 doublet would be about 100-200 km s$^{-1}$ faster than
420: indicated in figure \ref{linevel} and table \ref{linedata}, but still
421: significantly below the plateau velocity. The emergence of this thin
422: layer may also be responsible for the appearance of the narrow core in
423: the $+10$ day spectrum as well as the apparent double minimum to the
424: $+18$ day data. Some remnant of the blue component to the doublet may
425: persist to the $+34$ day spectrum. Figure \ref{day25} also shows the
426: spectra of several other SNe~Ia taken around 25 days after maximum
427: light. While the distinctly double minimum appears unique to
428: SN~2005hj, the width and depth of the \ion{Si}{2} feature is roughly
429: consistent with the others.
430:
431: SN~2005hj clearly belongs to the low velocity gradient (LVG) group in
432: the classification scheme of \citet{benetti2005}, but moreover the
433: velocity derivative from maximum light through day $+18$, $\dot{v}=3
434: \pm 7$ km s$^{-1}$ day$^{-1}$, is consistent with no
435: change\footnote{As defined by \citet{benetti2005}, $\dot{v}$ is the
436: average daily rate of decrease in the expansion velocity from maximum
437: light through the last available spectrum before the \ion{Si}{2}
438: $\lambda$6355 line disappears; therefore, including the day $+25$
439: spectrum, SN~2005hj formally has $\dot{v}=27 \pm 4$ km s$^{-1}$
440: day$^{-1}$, but with a $\chi^2$ per degree of freedom of 3.2}. From
441: the line profile evolution (table \ref{linedata}, figures \ref{SiII}
442: and \ref{linevel}) we can deduce a plateau phase starting at $-2.5 \pm
443: 2.5$ days which lasts no more than 30 days. Noting the change in the
444: \ion{Si}{2} $\lambda$6355 line profile in the $+18$ day spectrum, we
445: conservatively mark the end of the plateau phase as day $17.5 \pm 7.5$
446: days, which gives the plateau phase a total duration of $20 \pm 10$
447: days.
448: The \ion{Si}{2} $\lambda$6355 velocity evolution derived from the
449: minima of FT smoothed spectra of several selected SNe~Ia is plotted in
450: figure \ref{linevels}. The velocity plateau of SN~2005hj is similar to
451: that of other over-luminous SNe~Ia such as
452: SN~1999aa~\citep{garavini2004} and SN~2000cx~\citep{li2001}, but it is
453: distinct from normal SNe~Ia such as SN~1994D~\citep{patat1996} and
454: SN~1992A~\citep{kirshner1993} that do not show a plateau
455: phase\footnote{We removed the data point at day $-3$ from the
456: SN~1999aa curve because all spectral features in these data seem to be
457: frequency shifted including the telluric features.}.
458:
459:
460:
461:
462: \section{Physical Constraints from Explosion Models}\label{models}
463:
464: There is general agreement that SNe~Ia result from some process
465: involving the combustion of a degenerate C/O white dwarf
466: \citep{hf60}. Within this general picture, two classes of models are
467: most likely. The first is an explosion of a C/O-WD with a mass close
468: to the Chandrasekhar limit ($M_{Ch}$) that accretes matter through
469: Roche-lobe overflow from an evolved companion star
470: \citep{Whelan73}. In this case, the explosion is triggered by
471: compressional heating near the WD center. Alternatively, the SN could
472: be an explosion of a rotating configuration formed from the merging of
473: two low-mass WDs, after the loss of angular momentum
474: \citep{it84,pac85}. Candidate progenitor systems have been observed
475: for both scenarios: WD binary systems with the correct period to merge
476: in an appropriate time scale with an appropriate total mass
477: \citep{max2000}; and supersoft X-ray sources
478: \citep{greiner91,vdh92,rap94,kah97} showing accretion onto the WD from
479: an evolved companion. There are still open questions about the details
480: of both the merging and accretion processes
481: \citep[e.g.][]{nomoto82,benz90,piersanti2003,nomoto03}.
482:
483: From the observed spectral and light curve properties, the first
484: scenario appears to be the most likely candidate for the majority of
485: normal SNe~Ia. In particular, delayed detonation (DD) models
486: \citep{khokhlov1991,yamaoka92,woosley_weaver1994} have been found to
487: reproduce the majority of the observed optical/infrared light curves
488: (LC) and spectra of SNe~Ia reasonably well
489: \citep{hoeflich1995b,fisher95,hoflich_khokhlov1996,lentz2001,hoflich2002,marion2003,marion2006}. In
490: the DD scenario, a slow deflagration front turns into a
491: detonation. The WD pre-expands during the deflagration and undergoes
492: complete burning during the detonation phase. Similarly, the classical
493: deflagration models W7 \citep{nomoto1984} show similar behavior to DDs
494: but only by neglecting instabilities due to the deflagration fronts
495: \citep{gamezo2003}. For recent reviews see
496: \citet{branch1998,hillebrandt2000,hoeflich2006b}.
497:
498: Despite the success of classical DD and W7 models, both lack the basic
499: features seen in SN~2005hj. Neither predicts a long plateau in
500: velocity; they instead show a smooth decline of the photospheric
501: velocity\footnote{Although the \ion{Si}{2} $\lambda$6355 line is an
502: imperfect tracer of the photospheric velocity as mentioned in
503: \S\ref{spec_char}, the observed SNe~Ia population typically exhibits a
504: 1000-3000~km~s$^{-1}$ decrease in the measured line velocities between
505: 1 week before maximum light to 2 weeks
506: after\citep{branch1988,benetti2005}, and the deflagration and
507: classical delayed detonation models employed to explain these events
508: have shown a correspondingly large decrease in photospheric velocities
509: over the same period \citep{khokhlov1993}. These models are
510: inconsistent with the corresponding $\approx 300$~km~s$^{-1}$ shift
511: measured for SN~2005hj.} as a function of time
512: (Fig. \ref{modelvel}). This happens because in expanding envelopes the
513: photosphere recedes in mass and, because of the homologous expansion,
514: in velocity as well. This behavior results from the smoothly
515: declining density structure of the WD and the fact that variations in
516: the specific energy production are small.
517:
518: In contrast, shell-like density structures will produce velocity
519: plateaus in a natural way because the photosphere remains in the shell
520: for some time as shown by \citet{khokhlov1993,hoflich_khokhlov1996}.
521: To form a shell-like structure requires interaction of rapidly
522: expanding material with a surrounding envelope. Various mechanisms
523: have been suggested to supply this surrounding matter: the pulsating
524: delayed detonation scenario \citep{hoeflich1996}, mergers or tamped
525: detonation models. Shells may also form by the interaction of an
526: exploding single WD within the progenitor system
527: \citep{gerardy2004,quimby2006}.
528:
529: We analyzed the observations of SN~2005hj based on detailed, spherical
530: models for supernovae published in the literature. The models are
531: based on detailed calculations for the explosion, light curve and
532: spectra. The models considered include delayed detonations,
533: deflagrations, pulsating delayed detonations and tamped
534: detonation/merger scenarios. In figure \ref{modelvel}, we show the
535: photospheric velocities as a function of time for these models along
536: with the Branch-normal SNe~Ia to illustrate the formation of a plateau
537: in the models that naturally form a shell. Note for lower shell
538: masses, this ``plateau'' is more accurately described as a period of
539: slowly declining velocities.
540:
541: In classical delayed detonation models and for normal-bright SNe~Ia,
542: Si is present over a wide range in mass, spanning about $ 0.4 $ to
543: $0.5 M_\odot$, which corresponds to velocities from about 8,000 to
544: 9,000 km s$^{-1}$ to more than 20,000 km s$^{-1}$. The Si layer is
545: thick (in the mass frame) because explosive oxygen burning occurs over
546: a wide range of temperatures. The density gradient is smooth and Si is
547: mostly in \ion{Si}{2}, so initially the velocity derived from the
548: minimum of the \ion{Si}{2} $\lambda$6355 line smoothly declines with
549: the receding photosphere governed by the geometrical dilution of the
550: expanding envelope. Eventually, the photosphere begins to recede below
551: the Si layer at which point the evolution of the \ion{Si}{2}
552: $\lambda$6355 line profile will show the following behavior: 1) the
553: optical depth of the highest velocity material at the largest radii
554: will begin to decline below 1 and as such the blue wing of the line
555: profile will start to drift toward the red; 2) as the optical depth
556: decreases, the strength of the line as measured from the line depth
557: will decrease; 3) the line minimum may continue to slow, but it will
558: grow increasingly discrepant with the photospheric velocity. This
559: phase typically begins 1-2 weeks after maximum light for normal SNe~Ia
560: and is heralded by the appearance of \ion{Fe}{2} lines. While this
561: behavior is commensurate with observations of normal-bright SNe~Ia
562: such as SN~1994D, this behavior is not consistent with the
563: observations of SN~2005hj.
564:
565: The \ion{Si}{2} $\lambda$6355 line seen in SN~2005hj is narrow, and
566: during the plateau phase the wings do not change, the depth does not
567: change, and the velocity of the minimum does not change to within the
568: errors. The data require a narrow distribution of \ion{Si}{2} in
569: velocity space, and we suggest this may be explained by an interaction
570: that compresses the Si rich layers as predicted by merger and
571: pulsating delayed detonation models. The shell models are also
572: consistent with the velocity drop seen after the plateau because a
573: significant amount of Si is located below the shell
574: \citep{khokhlov1993,hoflich_khokhlov1996}.
575:
576: In Fig. \ref{modelprop}, we show general properties of these models.
577: As discussed in the papers above, to first order, the observational
578: signatures of the shell depend on the mass of the shell $M_{shell}$.
579: Almost the entire WD is burned, and momentum conservation determines
580: the amount of high velocity matter that can pile up in the expanding
581: shell. With increasing shell mass, more material of the SN envelope
582: is slowed down. As a consequence, the velocity of the shell
583: $v_{shell}$ decreases with $M_{shell}$. Because it will take longer
584: for the photosphere to recede into the lower velocity matter, the time
585: until the beginning of the plateau phase, $t_0$, increases with
586: $M_{shell}$. The optical depth increases with $M_{shell}$, duration
587: of the plateau, $\Delta t_{shell}$, also increases, the temperature
588: gradient becomes steeper, and the photosphere becomes cooler
589: (i.e. $B-V$ increases) with increasing $M_{shell}$
590: \citep{khokhlov1993,hoflich_khokhlov1996}. The duration of the
591: plateau, $\Delta t_{shell}$, is defined by the velocity spread $\delta
592: v $ around $v_{Shell}$ with $\delta v = 500$ km s$^{-1}$, which puts
593: the end of the plateau phase safely into the parts of a rapidly
594: declining $v_{ph}$. We choose a larger value than in the observations
595: to avoid ambivalences due to discreetness, which, in some of the
596: models, is of the order of $\approx 100$ km s$^{-1}$. By increasing
597: $\delta v $ from 200 to 500 km s$^{-1}$ the nominal duration is
598: increased by $\approx 1$ day. However, we also note that the actual
599: width depends on the velocity spread in the shell (see \S
600: \ref{conclusions}).
601:
602: Given the model predictions, we can use different observational
603: indicators to test which $M_{shell}$ is consistent with SN~2005hj
604: (Fig. \ref{modelprop}). All three parameters, $v_{shell}$,
605: $t_{shell}$, and $t_0$ suggest $M_{shell} \approx 0.2 M_\odot$, with
606: the allowed ranges specifically bracketed by 0.15-0.6, 0.1-0.25, and
607: 0.1-0.25 $M_\odot$ for the plateau length, shell velocity, and plateau
608: onset, respectively, taking the observed errors into account. The
609: comparison between the $B-V$ color as a function of $v_{shell}$,
610: $t_{shell}$, or $t_0$, however, shows only marginal consistency
611: between the observations and the models if we assume only foreground
612: redding by the Galaxy. We note, that the intrinsic $B-V$ color of the
613: models is uncertain by about 0.05 to $0.1^m$ at maximum light. The
614: two best-fitting models, {\tt pdd3} and {\tt det2env2}, show a peak
615: brightness, $M_{V}$, of $ -19.42^m$ and $-19.41^m$, respectively, with
616: an uncertainty of $\approx 0.1 ^m$ \citep{hoflich_khokhlov1996} vs. a
617: typical DD model with $-19.2^m$ \citep{hoflich2002}, i.e. they are
618: brighter by about 20 \% mostly due lower escape probablity of
619: $\gamma$-rays that results when the $^{56}$Ni layers are slowed down
620: because of the interaction \citep{hoflich1991}.
621:
622: \section{Discussion and Conclusions}\label{conclusions}
623:
624: We have presented photometric and spectroscopic data for SN~2005hj, a
625: slightly over-luminous Type Ia. The most striking feature is an
626: apparent plateau in the expansion velocity evolution, which we derive
627: from the \ion{Si}{2} $\lambda$6355 line. The velocities remain at
628: about $10,600$ km s$^{-1}$ for about 3 weeks starting slightly before
629: maximum light, and this plateau is bracketed by preceding and
630: succeeding decelerations. We find that Si is confined to a relatively
631: narrow velocity region. Analysis of the detailed observations in
632: concert with published models suggest there may be some physical
633: distinction between SN~2005hj and other normal-bright SNe~Ia that may
634: systematically affect their use as distance indicators if not properly
635: taken into account.
636:
637: The models considered include delayed detonations, deflagrations,
638: pulsating delayed detonations and tamped detonation/merger scenarios.
639: In order to explain the narrow \ion{Si}{2} $\lambda$6355 line and its
640: plateau in velocity, we suggest an early interaction that forms a
641: dense shell as predicted by merger and PDD models. The spectral and
642: photometric peculiarities are consistent with respect to the velocity,
643: duration, and onset of the plateau, and marginally consistent with the
644: maximum light color, for models that have shells of about $0.2
645: M_\odot$. As indicated by earlier works
646: \citep{khokhlov1993,hoflich_khokhlov1996}, the mass of the interacting
647: shell has been found to be the parameter that dominates the details of
648: these observational signatures independent of how this shell may
649: form. The tight predicted relation between each of $v_{shell}$,
650: $t_{shell}$, and $t_0$ may provide a stable means to separate
651: SN~2005hj like events from regular Branch-normal SNe~Ia. Although the
652: agreement between the shell models and the observations is good, the
653: predictions are not necessarily unique and other possibilities may
654: exist. For example, we have not considered 3-D models such as the
655: detonation from a failed deflagration scenario recently examined by
656: \citet{kasen_plewa2006}. For SN~2005hj then the agreement of the
657: plateau velocity and its duration to that predicted by shell models
658: may simply be a fluke, and in such case this concordance should then
659: not hold for other SNe with similar \ion{Si}{2} $\lambda$6355
660: evolution. Given the data and models considered, we suggest either
661: PDDs or merger events are responsible for SN~2005hj, and this implies
662: the existence of two different progenitor channels.
663:
664: It is important to understand how these two progenitor channels, which
665: may occur in relatively varying fractions as a function of redshift,
666: will impact studies using SNe~Ia as distance indicators.
667: \citet{li2000} estimate that 20\% of SNe~Ia in their sample are either
668: 1991T-like or 1999aa-like. These SNe show spectral features and a
669: velocity plateau similar to SN~2005hj. \citet{branch2001} found 5
670: 1999aa-like events in the \citet{li2000} sample out of 20 total SNe~Ia
671: that were observed early enough to show 1999aa-like spectral features,
672: and one that was 1991T-like; however, in the pre-LOSS sample they do
673: not classify any of the 7 SNe~Ia with early spectra as
674: 1999aa-like. These nearby samples are constructed from targeted galaxy
675: searches that have different selection biases than the deep
676: cosmological surveys, but we will assume a uniform 2005hj-like rate of
677: 25\% for all SNe~Ia. SNe~Ia that appear spectroscopically similar to
678: SN~2005hj in a single epoch could none the less arise from different
679: progenitors, and the mass of the low-density envelope around PDDs or
680: mergers may effect their peak magnitudes and/or light curve shapes,
681: but we will further assume that all such events deviate uniformly from
682: the LWR of Branch normal SNe~Ia. \citet{hoeflich1996} calculated the
683: relation between peak $V$ band magnitudes, $M_V$, and the fading
684: between maximum light and +20 days, $dM_V(20)$, for a variety of
685: theoretical models and found that shell models produced $dM_V(20)$
686: that were 0.2 to 0.3 mag smaller than for (in vacuum) delayed
687: detonations reaching the same peak magnitude. Therefore using the same
688: LWR for shell models will result in corrected peak magnitudes
689: systematically offset by 0.1 to 0.2 mag. Also, the observed peak
690: magnitudes of SNe~Ia are usually corrected for absorption along the
691: line of sight using the observed $B-V$ color at maximum light and a
692: reddening law. For events that are intrinsically red, this will
693: increase the estimated peak magnitude above its already over-luminous
694: intrinsic value. Cosmological studies may therefore need to remove or
695: at least separately handle SN~2005hj-like events to avoid systematic
696: errors in distance.
697:
698: As a case for the importance of separating different progenitors, let
699: us consider SN~1999ee. Very similar to SN~2005hj, SN~1999ee shows a
700: plateau with $v_{shell}=10,500$ km sec$^{-1}$, a duration of $14\pm 3
701: $ days, and an onset at day $-3 \pm 1 $ relative to maximum
702: (\citealt{hamuy2002}; see Fig. \ref{linevels}). The $B-V$ color of
703: SN~1999ee was also quite red at maximum light; $+0.28^m \pm 0.04$
704: after correction for galactic extinction
705: \citep{stritzinger2002,krisciunas2004}. Based on the standard
706: brightness decline relation and the corresponding colors,
707: \citet{hamuy2002} derived reddening in the host galaxy of $0.28 \pm
708: 0.04$ which implies an absolute brightness of $M_V=-19.95^m$ similar
709: to SNLS-03D3bb which \citet{howell2006} attributed to a
710: super-Chandrasekhar mass WD. Taking into account the spectroscopic
711: information about the velocity plateau, its length and onset, we
712: attribute a portion of the red color to the intrinsic properties of
713: the supernova. We find that the duration of the velocity plateau, its
714: onset and size are consistent with a shell mass of $0.2 M_\odot$ which
715: suggests an intrinsic color $B-V$ of $0.15^m \pm 0.02$ (see
716: Fig. \ref{modelprop}). This reduces the reddening in the host galaxy
717: to $\approx 0.13^m$ and the absolute brightness $M_V$ to $-19.53^m$,
718: which compares favorably to the model predictions of $-19.42^m$ and
719: $-19.41^m$ for {\tt pdd3} and {\tt detenv2}, respectively, within the
720: model uncertainties. Note that there is an interstellar sodium line in
721: the spectra that implies some degree of reddening within the
722: host. There are some apparent spectral differences when compared to
723: SN~2005hj, namely SN~1999ee has a slightly broader blue wing in
724: \ion{Si}{2} and stronger absorption around 4900~\AA. This may either
725: hint toward different explosions scenarios (i.e. pulsations versus
726: mergers), or different viewing angles of asymmetric envelopes.
727:
728: This brings us to the limitation of our studies. Except for the color,
729: SN~2005hj fits remarkably well with the merger and PDD model
730: predictions but, still, it is a single event and the good agreement
731: may be coincidental. We need a large, well-observed sample of similar
732: objects to test and verify or falsify the models and to determine the
733: shell mass distribution. Moreover, 3D effects have been neglected. In
734: reality, we must expect some dispersion. Though pulsating delayed
735: detonation models may be expected to be rather spherical, mergers may
736: be asymmetric with directionally dependent luminosities and colors. In
737: fact, both classes may be realized in nature. As mentioned above, the
738: duration of the plateau, $\Delta t_{shell}$, is defined by the
739: velocity spread around $v_{Shell}$. The physical width of the shell
740: depends, to first order, on the distance at which the interaction
741: occurs and the density distribution of the interacting expanding media
742: and shell during the hydrodynamical phase of the interaction
743: \citep{gerardy2004}. For obvious reasons, asymmetries of the shell
744: will increase the velocity gradient seen over the shell. The
745: observations of SN~2005hj indicate a very flat plateau that, in
746: principle, may further constrain the properties of the shell. For
747: SN~2005hj, this may already indicate a rather spherical shell and hint
748: toward the PDD scenario or mergers with an intermediate disk of very
749: large scale heights. However, additional information needs to be
750: taken into account such as detailed line profiles and statistical
751: properties to break this degeneracy between mergers and PDDs.
752:
753: As a next step, detailed models for the explosion, light curves and
754: spectra tailored toward individual events need to be
755: constructed. Whereas the mean velocity of the shell for a given mass
756: is dictated by momentum conservation, the thickness of the shell is
757: limited by the distance of the shell material, the distance sound can
758: travel during the interaction, and the specific density profile within
759: the shell. With increasing distance of the shell, the relative size
760: (and corresponding velocity spread) becomes smaller because the sound
761: speed remains about the same. The intrinsic color will be sensitive to
762: the optical depth of the shell, which is governed by the magnitude of
763: the density jump and thus depends on the distance of the interacting
764: shell from the WD \citep{gerardy2004}. The blue $B-V$ color for
765: SN~2005hj may hint of a need to modify the distance and structure of
766: the shell. Precise analysis of such ``non-stable'' features requires
767: detailed model fitting beyond the scope of this paper.
768:
769: In the recent past, both the scenarios leading to shell-like
770: structures have been discounted. PDD models have been dismissed
771: because 3D deflagration models showed that the WD becomes unbound and
772: thus pulsations would not occur
773: \citep{roepke2003,hillebrandt2000}. However, it has recently been
774: shown that this solution depends mainly on the ignition conditions,
775: namely the number and locations of ignition points leading to single
776: or multiple bubble solutions, and mixture of bubble solutions leading
777: to Raleigh-Taylor instabilities. As a result, solutions with fewer
778: bubbles are likely to result in a reduced amount of burning, thus only
779: slightly unbinding the WD and increasing the possibility of PDDs
780: \citep{livne2005,plewa2004}. Similarly, the merging scenario has been
781: dismissed because the WD may undergo burning during the merger and
782: result in an accretion induced collapse \citep{nomoto1991}, and also
783: on the basis of the long merging time scale. However both of these
784: results depend sensitively on the initial conditions, and new pathways
785: to the actual merging may effect the results \citep{lu2006}. In light
786: of our results, the predicted death of both of these scenarios may be
787: premature, and further studies are needed.
788:
789: \acknowledgments We would like to thank the staff of the Hobby-Eberly
790: Telescope and McDonald Observatory for their support and the ROTSE
791: collaboration. We give specific thanks to J. Caldwell, S. Odewahn,
792: V. Riley, B. Roman, S. Rostopchin, M. Shetrone, E. Terrazas, and
793: M. Villarreal for their skilled observations with the HET, and to
794: F. Castro, P. Mondol, and M. Sellers for their efforts in screening
795: potential SN candidates. This work made use of the SUSPECT on-line
796: database of SNe spectra
797: (\url{http://bruford.nhn.ou.edu/$\sim$suspect/index1.html}). This
798: research is supported, in part, by NASA grant NAG 5-7937 (PH) and NSF
799: grants AST0307312 (PH) and AST0406740 (RQ \& JCW).
800:
801:
802: \begin{thebibliography}{76}
803: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi
804:
805: \bibitem[{{Akerlof} {et~al.}(2003){Akerlof}, {Kehoe}, {McKay}, {Rykoff},
806: {Smith}, {Casperson}, {McGowan}, {Vestrand}, {Wozniak}, {Wren}, {Ashley},
807: {Phillips}, {Marshall}, {Epps}, \& {Schier}}]{akerlof03}
808: {Akerlof}, C.~W., {Kehoe}, R.~L., {McKay}, T.~A., {et~al.} 2003, \pasp, 115,
809: 132
810:
811: \bibitem[{{Benetti} {et~al.}(2005){Benetti}, {Cappellaro}, {Mazzali},
812: {Turatto}, {Altavilla}, {Bufano}, {Elias-Rosa}, {Kotak}, {Pignata}, {Salvo},
813: \& {Stanishev}}]{benetti2005}
814: {Benetti}, S., {Cappellaro}, E., {Mazzali}, P.~A., {et~al.} 2005, \apj, 623,
815: 1011
816:
817: \bibitem[{{Benz} {et~al.}(1990){Benz}, {Cameron}, {Press}, \&
818: {Bowers}}]{benz90}
819: {Benz}, W., {Cameron}, A.~G.~W., {Press}, W.~H., \& {Bowers}, R.~L. 1990, \apj,
820: 348, 647
821:
822: \bibitem[{{Branch}(1998)}]{branch1998}
823: {Branch}, D. 1998, \araa, 36, 17
824:
825: \bibitem[{{Branch}(2001)}]{branch2001}
826: ---. 2001, \pasp, 113, 169
827:
828: \bibitem[{{Branch} {et~al.}(2005){Branch}, {Baron}, {Hall}, {Melakayil}, \&
829: {Parrent}}]{branch2005}
830: {Branch}, D., {Baron}, E., {Hall}, N., {Melakayil}, M., \& {Parrent}, J. 2005,
831: \pasp, 117, 545
832:
833: \bibitem[{{Branch} {et~al.}(1988){Branch}, {Drucker}, \&
834: {Jeffery}}]{branch1988}
835: {Branch}, D., {Drucker}, W., \& {Jeffery}, D.~J. 1988, \apjl, 330, L117+
836:
837: \bibitem[{{Elias-Rosa} {et~al.}(2006){Elias-Rosa}, {Benetti}, {Cappellaro},
838: {Turatto}, {Mazzali}, {Patat}, {Meikle}, {Stehle}, {Pastorello}, {Pignata},
839: {Kotak}, {Harutyunyan}, {Altavilla}, {Navasardyan}, {Qiu}, {Salvo}, \&
840: {Hillebrandt}}]{elias-rosa2006}
841: {Elias-Rosa}, N., {Benetti}, S., {Cappellaro}, E., {et~al.} 2006, \mnras, 369,
842: 1880
843:
844: \bibitem[{{Fisher} {et~al.}(1999){Fisher}, {Branch}, {Hatano}, \&
845: {Baron}}]{fisher1999}
846: {Fisher}, A., {Branch}, D., {Hatano}, K., \& {Baron}, E. 1999, \mnras, 304, 67
847:
848: \bibitem[{{Fisher} {et~al.}(1995){Fisher}, {Branch}, {H\"{o}flich}, \&
849: {Khokhlov}}]{fisher95}
850: {Fisher}, A., {Branch}, D., {H\"{o}flich}, P., \& {Khokhlov}, A. 1995, \apjl,
851: 447, L73+
852:
853: \bibitem[{{Fisher} {et~al.}(1997){Fisher}, {Branch}, {Nugent}, \&
854: {Baron}}]{fisher1997}
855: {Fisher}, A., {Branch}, D., {Nugent}, P., \& {Baron}, E. 1997, \apjl, 481, L89+
856:
857: \bibitem[{{Gamezo} {et~al.}(2003){Gamezo}, {Khokhlov}, {Oran}, {Chtchelkanova},
858: \& {Rosenberg}}]{gamezo2003}
859: {Gamezo}, V.~N., {Khokhlov}, A.~M., {Oran}, E.~S., {Chtchelkanova}, A.~Y., \&
860: {Rosenberg}, R.~O. 2003, Science, 299, 77
861:
862: \bibitem[{{Garavini} {et~al.}(2004){Garavini}, {Folatelli}, {Goobar}, {Nobili},
863: {Aldering}, {Amadon}, {Amanullah}, {Astier}, {Balland}, {Blanc}, {Burns},
864: {Conley}, {Dahl{\'e}n}, {Deustua}, {Ellis}, {Fabbro}, {Fan}, {Frye}, {Gates},
865: {Gibbons}, {Goldhaber}, {Goldman}, {Groom}, {Haissinski}, {Hardin}, {Hook},
866: {Howell}, {Kasen}, {Kent}, {Kim}, {Knop}, {Lee}, {Lidman}, {Mendez},
867: {Miller}, {Moniez}, {Mour{\~a}o}, {Newberg}, {Nugent}, {Pain}, {Perdereau},
868: {Perlmutter}, {Prasad}, {Quimby}, {Raux}, {Regnault}, {Rich}, {Richards},
869: {Ruiz-Lapuente}, {Sainton}, {Schaefer}, {Schahmaneche}, {Smith}, {Spadafora},
870: {Stanishev}, {Walton}, {Wang}, \& {Wood-Vasey}}]{garavini2004}
871: {Garavini}, G., {Folatelli}, G., {Goobar}, A., {et~al.} 2004, \aj, 128, 387
872:
873: \bibitem[{{Gerardy} {et~al.}(2004){Gerardy}, {H{\" o}flich}, {Fesen}, {Marion},
874: {Nomoto}, {Quimby}, {Schaefer}, {Wang}, \& {Wheeler}}]{gerardy2004}
875: {Gerardy}, C.~L., {H{\" o}flich}, P., {Fesen}, R.~A., {et~al.} 2004, \apj, 607,
876: 391
877:
878: \bibitem[{{Greiner} {et~al.}(1991){Greiner}, {Hasinger}, \&
879: {Kahabka}}]{greiner91}
880: {Greiner}, J., {Hasinger}, G., \& {Kahabka}, P. 1991, \aap, 246, L17
881:
882: \bibitem[{{Hamuy} {et~al.}(2002){Hamuy}, {Maza}, {Pinto}, {Phillips},
883: {Suntzeff}, {Blum}, {Olsen}, {Pinfield}, {Ivanov}, {Augusteijn}, {Brillant},
884: {Chadid}, {Cuby}, {Doublier}, {Hainaut}, {Le Floc'h}, {Lidman},
885: {Petr-Gotzens}, {Pompei}, \& {Vanzi}}]{hamuy2002}
886: {Hamuy}, M., {Maza}, J., {Pinto}, P.~A., {et~al.} 2002, \aj, 124, 417
887:
888: \bibitem[{{Hanuschik}(2003)}]{hanuschik2003}
889: {Hanuschik}, R.~W. 2003, \aap, 407, 1157
890:
891: \bibitem[{{Hillebrandt} \& {Niemeyer}(2000)}]{hillebrandt2000}
892: {Hillebrandt}, W. \& {Niemeyer}, J.~C. 2000, \araa, 38, 191
893:
894: \bibitem[{{H\"{o}flich}(1995)}]{hoeflich1995b}
895: {H\"{o}flich}, P. 1995, \apj, 443, 89
896:
897: \bibitem[{{H{\"o}flich}(2006)}]{hoeflich2006b}
898: {H{\"o}flich}, P. 2006, Nuclear Physics A, 777, 579
899:
900: \bibitem[{{H{\"o}flich} {et~al.}(2002){H{\"o}flich}, {Gerardy}, {Fesen}, \&
901: {Sakai}}]{hoflich2002}
902: {H{\"o}flich}, P., {Gerardy}, C.~L., {Fesen}, R.~A., \& {Sakai}, S. 2002, \apj,
903: 568, 791
904:
905: \bibitem[{{H{\"o}flich} \& {Khokhlov}(1996)}]{hoflich_khokhlov1996}
906: {H{\"o}flich}, P. \& {Khokhlov}, A. 1996, \apj, 457, 500
907:
908: \bibitem[{{H\"{o}flich} {et~al.}(1996){H\"{o}flich}, {Khokhlov}, {Wheeler},
909: {Phillips}, {Suntzeff}, \& {Hamuy}}]{hoeflich1996}
910: {H\"{o}flich}, P., {Khokhlov}, A., {Wheeler}, J.~C., {et~al.} 1996, \apjl, 472,
911: L81+
912:
913: \bibitem[{{H\"{o}flich} {et~al.}(1995{\natexlab{a}}){H\"{o}flich}, {Khokhlov},
914: \& {Wheeler}}]{hoeflich1995}
915: {H\"{o}flich}, P., {Khokhlov}, A.~M., \& {Wheeler}, J.~C. 1995{\natexlab{a}},
916: \apj, 444, 831
917:
918: \bibitem[{{H\"{o}flich} {et~al.}(1995{\natexlab{b}}){H\"{o}flich}, {Khokhlov},
919: \& {Wheeler}}]{hoflich1995}
920: ---. 1995{\natexlab{b}}, \apj, 444, 831
921:
922: \bibitem[{{H{\"o}flich} {et~al.}(1991){H{\"o}flich}, {Mueller}, \&
923: {Khokhlov}}]{hoflich1991}
924: {H{\"o}flich}, P., {Mueller}, E., \& {Khokhlov}, A. 1991, \aap, 248, L7
925:
926: \bibitem[{{Howell} {et~al.}(2006){Howell}, {Sullivan}, {Nugent}, {Ellis},
927: {Conley}, {Le Borgne}, {Carlberg}, {Guy}, {Balam}, {Basa}, {Fouchez}, {Hook},
928: {Hsiao}, {Neill}, {Pain}, {Perrett}, \& {Pritchet}}]{howell2006}
929: {Howell}, D.~A., {Sullivan}, M., {Nugent}, P.~E., {et~al.} 2006, \nat, 443, 308
930:
931: \bibitem[{{Hoyle} \& {Fowler}(1960)}]{hf60}
932: {Hoyle}, F. \& {Fowler}, W.~A. 1960, \apj, 132, 565
933:
934: \bibitem[{{Iben} \& {Tutukov}(1984)}]{it84}
935: {Iben}, Jr., I. \& {Tutukov}, A.~V. 1984, \apjs, 54, 335
936:
937: \bibitem[{{Jeffery} \& {Branch}(1990)}]{jeffery_branch1990}
938: {Jeffery}, D.~J. \& {Branch}, D. 1990, in Supernovae, Jerusalem Winter School
939: for Theoretical Physics, ed. J.~C. {Wheeler}, T.~{Piran}, \& S.~{Weinberg},
940: 149--+
941:
942: \bibitem[{{Jha} {et~al.}(1999){Jha}, {Garnavich}, {Kirshner}, {Challis},
943: {Soderberg}, {Macri}, {Huchra}, {Barmby}, {Barton}, {Berlind}, {Brown},
944: {Caldwell}, {Calkins}, {Kannappan}, {Koranyi}, {Pahre}, {Rines}, {Stanek},
945: {Stefanik}, {Szentgyorgyi}, {V{\"a}is{\"a}nen}, {Wang}, {Zajac}, {Riess},
946: {Filippenko}, {Li}, {Modjaz}, {Treffers}, {Hergenrother}, {Grebel},
947: {Seitzer}, {Jacoby}, {Benson}, {Rizvi}, {Marschall}, {Goldader}, {Beasley},
948: {Vacca}, {Leibundgut}, {Spyromilio}, {Schmidt}, \& {Wood}}]{jha1999}
949: {Jha}, S., {Garnavich}, P.~M., {Kirshner}, R.~P., {et~al.} 1999, \apjs, 125, 73
950:
951: \bibitem[{{Kahabka} \& {van den Heuvel}(1997)}]{kah97}
952: {Kahabka}, P. \& {van den Heuvel}, E.~P.~J. 1997, \araa, 35, 69
953:
954: \bibitem[{{Kasen} \& {Plewa}(2006)}]{kasen_plewa2006}
955: {Kasen}, D. \& {Plewa}, T. 2006, ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints
956:
957: \bibitem[{{Khokhlov} {et~al.}(1993){Khokhlov}, {Mueller}, \&
958: {H\"{o}flich}}]{khokhlov1993}
959: {Khokhlov}, A., {Mueller}, E., \& {H\"{o}flich}, P. 1993, \aap, 270, 223
960:
961: \bibitem[{{Khokhlov}(1991)}]{khokhlov1991}
962: {Khokhlov}, A.~M. 1991, \aap, 245, 114
963:
964: \bibitem[{{Kirshner} {et~al.}(1993){Kirshner}, {Jeffery}, {Leibundgut},
965: {Challis}, {Sonneborn}, {Phillips}, {Suntzeff}, {Smith}, {Winkler}, {Winge},
966: {Hamuy}, {Hunter}, {Roth}, {Blades}, {Branch}, {Chevalier}, {Fransson},
967: {Panagia}, {Wagoner}, {Wheeler}, \& {Harkness}}]{kirshner1993}
968: {Kirshner}, R.~P., {Jeffery}, D.~J., {Leibundgut}, B., {et~al.} 1993, \apj,
969: 415, 589
970:
971: \bibitem[{{Knop} {et~al.}(2003){Knop}, {Aldering}, {Amanullah}, {Astier},
972: {Blanc}, {Burns}, {Conley}, {Deustua}, {Doi}, {Ellis}, {Fabbro}, {Folatelli},
973: {Fruchter}, {Garavini}, {Garmond}, {Garton}, {Gibbons}, {Goldhaber},
974: {Goobar}, {Groom}, {Hardin}, {Hook}, {Howell}, {Kim}, {Lee}, {Lidman},
975: {Mendez}, {Nobili}, {Nugent}, {Pain}, {Panagia}, {Pennypacker}, {Perlmutter},
976: {Quimby}, {Raux}, {Regnault}, {Ruiz-Lapuente}, {Sainton}, {Schaefer},
977: {Schahmaneche}, {Smith}, {Spadafora}, {Stanishev}, {Sullivan}, {Walton},
978: {Wang}, {Wood-Vasey}, \& {Yasuda}}]{knop2003}
979: {Knop}, R.~A., {Aldering}, G., {Amanullah}, R., {et~al.} 2003, \apj, 598, 102
980:
981: \bibitem[{{Krisciunas} {et~al.}(2004){Krisciunas}, {Phillips}, {Suntzeff},
982: {Persson}, {Hamuy}, {Antezana}, {Candia}, {Clocchiatti}, {DePoy}, {Germany},
983: {Gonzalez}, {Gonzalez}, {Krzeminski}, {Maza}, {Nugent}, {Qiu}, {Rest},
984: {Roth}, {Stritzinger}, {Strolger}, {Thompson}, {Williams}, \&
985: {Wischnjewsky}}]{krisciunas2004}
986: {Krisciunas}, K., {Phillips}, M.~M., {Suntzeff}, N.~B., {et~al.} 2004, \aj,
987: 127, 1664
988:
989: \bibitem[{{Krisciunas} {et~al.}(2003){Krisciunas}, {Suntzeff}, {Candia},
990: {Arenas}, {Espinoza}, {Gonzalez}, {Gonzalez}, {H{\"o}flich}, {Landolt},
991: {Phillips}, \& {Pizarro}}]{krisciunas2003}
992: {Krisciunas}, K., {Suntzeff}, N.~B., {Candia}, P., {et~al.} 2003, \aj, 125, 166
993:
994: \bibitem[{{Landsman}(1989)}]{landsman89}
995: {Landsman}, W.~B. 1989, \baas, 21, 784
996:
997: \bibitem[{{Leibundgut} {et~al.}(1991){Leibundgut}, {Kirshner}, {Filippenko},
998: {Shields}, {Foltz}, {Phillips}, \& {Sonneborn}}]{leibundgut1991}
999: {Leibundgut}, B., {Kirshner}, R.~P., {Filippenko}, A.~V., {et~al.} 1991, \apjl,
1000: 371, L23
1001:
1002: \bibitem[{{Lentz} {et~al.}(2001){Lentz}, {Baron}, {Branch}, \&
1003: {Hauschildt}}]{lentz2001}
1004: {Lentz}, E.~J., {Baron}, E., {Branch}, D., \& {Hauschildt}, P.~H. 2001, \apj,
1005: 547, 402
1006:
1007: \bibitem[{{Leonard} {et~al.}(2002){Leonard}, {Filippenko}, {Gates}, {Li},
1008: {Eastman}, {Barth}, {Bus}, {Chornock}, {Coil}, {Frink}, {Grady}, {Harris},
1009: {Malkan}, {Matheson}, {Quirrenbach}, \& {Treffers}}]{leonard2002}
1010: {Leonard}, D.~C., {Filippenko}, A.~V., {Gates}, E.~L., {et~al.} 2002, \pasp,
1011: 114, 35
1012:
1013: \bibitem[{{Li} {et~al.}(2001{\natexlab{a}}){Li}, {Filippenko}, {Gates},
1014: {Chornock}, {Gal-Yam}, {Ofek}, {Leonard}, {Modjaz}, {Rich}, {Riess}, \&
1015: {Treffers}}]{li2001}
1016: {Li}, W., {Filippenko}, A.~V., {Gates}, E., {et~al.} 2001{\natexlab{a}}, \pasp,
1017: 113, 1178
1018:
1019: \bibitem[{{Li} {et~al.}(2001{\natexlab{b}}){Li}, {Filippenko}, {Treffers},
1020: {Riess}, {Hu}, \& {Qiu}}]{li2000}
1021: {Li}, W., {Filippenko}, A.~V., {Treffers}, R.~R., {et~al.} 2001{\natexlab{b}},
1022: \apj, 546, 734
1023:
1024: \bibitem[{{Livne} {et~al.}(2005){Livne}, {Asida}, \& {H{\"o}flich}}]{livne2005}
1025: {Livne}, E., {Asida}, S.~M., \& {H{\"o}flich}, P. 2005, \apj, 632, 443
1026:
1027: \bibitem[{{L{\"u}} {et~al.}(2006){L{\"u}}, {Yungelson}, \& {Han}}]{lu2006}
1028: {L{\"u}}, G., {Yungelson}, L., \& {Han}, Z. 2006, \mnras, 372, 1389
1029:
1030: \bibitem[{{Marion} {et~al.}(2003){Marion}, {H{\" o}flich}, {Vacca}, \&
1031: {Wheeler}}]{marion2003}
1032: {Marion}, G.~H., {H{\" o}flich}, P., {Vacca}, W.~D., \& {Wheeler}, J.~C. 2003,
1033: \apj, 591, 316
1034:
1035: \bibitem[{{Marion} {et~al.}(2006){Marion}, {H{\"o}flich}, {Wheeler},
1036: {Robinson}, {Gerardy}, \& {Vacca}}]{marion2006}
1037: {Marion}, G.~H., {H{\"o}flich}, P., {Wheeler}, J.~C., {et~al.} 2006, \apj, 645,
1038: 1392
1039:
1040: \bibitem[{{Massey} \& {Gronwall}(1990)}]{massey_gronwall1990}
1041: {Massey}, P. \& {Gronwall}, C. 1990, \apj, 358, 344
1042:
1043: \bibitem[{{Massey} {et~al.}(1988){Massey}, {Strobel}, {Barnes}, \&
1044: {Anderson}}]{massey1988}
1045: {Massey}, P., {Strobel}, K., {Barnes}, J.~V., \& {Anderson}, E. 1988, \apj,
1046: 328, 315
1047:
1048: \bibitem[{{Maxted} {et~al.}(2000){Maxted}, {Marsh}, \& {North}}]{max2000}
1049: {Maxted}, P.~F.~L., {Marsh}, T.~R., \& {North}, R.~C. 2000, \mnras, 317, L41
1050:
1051: \bibitem[{{Mueller} \& {H\"{o}flich}(1994)}]{mueller_hoeflich1994}
1052: {Mueller}, E. \& {H\"{o}flich}, P. 1994, \aap, 281, 51
1053:
1054: \bibitem[{{Nomoto}(1982)}]{nomoto82}
1055: {Nomoto}, K. 1982, \apj, 253, 798
1056:
1057: \bibitem[{{Nomoto} \& {Kondo}(1991)}]{nomoto1991}
1058: {Nomoto}, K. \& {Kondo}, Y. 1991, \apjl, 367, L19
1059:
1060: \bibitem[{{Nomoto} {et~al.}(1984){Nomoto}, {Thielemann}, \&
1061: {Yokoi}}]{nomoto1984}
1062: {Nomoto}, K., {Thielemann}, F.-K., \& {Yokoi}, K. 1984, \apj, 286, 644
1063:
1064: \bibitem[{{Nomoto} {et~al.}(2003){Nomoto}, {Uenishi}, {Kobayashi}, {Umeda},
1065: {Ohkubo}, {Hachisu}, \& {Kato}}]{nomoto03}
1066: {Nomoto}, K., {Uenishi}, T., {Kobayashi}, C., {et~al.} 2003, in From Twilight
1067: to Highlight: The Physics of Supernovae, ed. W.~{Hillebrandt} \&
1068: B.~{Leibundgut}, 115--+
1069:
1070: \bibitem[{{Paczynski}(1985)}]{pac85}
1071: {Paczynski}, B. 1985, in ASSL Vol. 113: Cataclysmic Variables and Low-Mass
1072: X-ray Binaries, ed. D.~Q. {Lamb} \& J.~{Patterson}, 1--12
1073:
1074: \bibitem[{{Patat} {et~al.}(1996){Patat}, {Benetti}, {Cappellaro}, {Danziger},
1075: {della Valle}, {Mazzali}, \& {Turatto}}]{patat1996}
1076: {Patat}, F., {Benetti}, S., {Cappellaro}, E., {et~al.} 1996, \mnras, 278, 111
1077:
1078: \bibitem[{Perlmutter {et~al.}(1997)Perlmutter, Deustua, Gabi, Goldhaber, Groom,
1079: Hook, Kim, Kim, Lee, Pain, Pennypacker, Small, Goobar, Ellis, Glazebrook,
1080: McMahon, Boyle, Bunclark, Carter, Irwin, Newberg, Filippenko, Matheson,
1081: Dopita, Mould, \& Couch}]{perlmutter1997}
1082: Perlmutter, S., Deustua, S., Gabi, S., {et~al.} 1997, in NATO ASIC Proc. 486:
1083: Thermonuclear Supernovae, ed. P.~{Ruiz-Lapuente}, R.~{Canal}, \& J.~{Isern},
1084: 749--+
1085:
1086: \bibitem[{{Phillips}(1993)}]{phillips1993}
1087: {Phillips}, M.~M. 1993, \apjl, 413, L105
1088:
1089: \bibitem[{{Phillips} {et~al.}(1999){Phillips}, {Lira}, {Suntzeff}, {Schommer},
1090: {Hamuy}, \& {Maza}}]{phillips1999}
1091: {Phillips}, M.~M., {Lira}, P., {Suntzeff}, N.~B., {et~al.} 1999, \aj, 118, 1766
1092:
1093: \bibitem[{{Piersanti} {et~al.}(2003){Piersanti}, {Gagliardi}, {Iben}, \&
1094: {Tornamb{\'e}}}]{piersanti2003}
1095: {Piersanti}, L., {Gagliardi}, S., {Iben}, I.~J., \& {Tornamb{\'e}}, A. 2003,
1096: \apj, 598, 1229
1097:
1098: \bibitem[{{Plewa} {et~al.}(2004){Plewa}, {Calder}, \& {Lamb}}]{plewa2004}
1099: {Plewa}, T., {Calder}, A.~C., \& {Lamb}, D.~Q. 2004, \apjl, 612, L37
1100:
1101: \bibitem[{{Quimby} {et~al.}(2006){Quimby}, {H{\"o}flich}, {Kannappan},
1102: {Rykoff}, {Rujopakarn}, {Akerlof}, {Gerardy}, \& {Wheeler}}]{quimby2006}
1103: {Quimby}, R., {H{\"o}flich}, P., {Kannappan}, S.~J., {et~al.} 2006, \apj, 636,
1104: 400
1105:
1106: \bibitem[{{Rappaport} {et~al.}(1994){Rappaport}, {Chiang}, {Kallman}, \&
1107: {Malina}}]{rap94}
1108: {Rappaport}, S., {Chiang}, E., {Kallman}, T., \& {Malina}, R. 1994, \apj, 431,
1109: 237
1110:
1111: \bibitem[{{R{\"o}pke} {et~al.}(2003){R{\"o}pke}, {Niemeyer}, \&
1112: {Hillebrandt}}]{roepke2003}
1113: {R{\"o}pke}, F.~K., {Niemeyer}, J.~C., \& {Hillebrandt}, W. 2003, \apj, 588,
1114: 952
1115:
1116: \bibitem[{{Schlegel} {et~al.}(1998){Schlegel}, {Finkbeiner}, \&
1117: {Davis}}]{schlegel1998}
1118: {Schlegel}, D.~J., {Finkbeiner}, D.~P., \& {Davis}, M. 1998, \apj, 500, 525
1119:
1120: \bibitem[{{Stetson}(1987)}]{stetson87}
1121: {Stetson}, P.~B. 1987, \pasp, 99, 191
1122:
1123: \bibitem[{{Stritzinger} {et~al.}(2002){Stritzinger}, {Hamuy}, {Suntzeff},
1124: {Smith}, {Phillips}, {Maza}, {Strolger}, {Antezana}, {Gonz{\'a}lez},
1125: {Wischnjewsky}, {Candia}, {Espinoza}, {Gonz{\'a}lez}, {Stubbs}, {Becker},
1126: {Rubenstein}, \& {Galaz}}]{stritzinger2002}
1127: {Stritzinger}, M., {Hamuy}, M., {Suntzeff}, N.~B., {et~al.} 2002, \aj, 124,
1128: 2100
1129:
1130: \bibitem[{{Struble} \& {Rood}(1999)}]{struble_rood1999}
1131: {Struble}, M.~F. \& {Rood}, H.~J. 1999, \apjs, 125, 35
1132:
1133: \bibitem[{{Umeda} {et~al.}(1999){Umeda}, {Nomoto}, {Kobayashi}, {Hachisu}, \&
1134: {Kato}}]{umeda99}
1135: {Umeda}, H., {Nomoto}, K., {Kobayashi}, C., {Hachisu}, I., \& {Kato}, M. 1999,
1136: \apjl, 522, L43
1137:
1138: \bibitem[{{van den Heuvel} {et~al.}(1992){van den Heuvel}, {Bhattacharya},
1139: {Nomoto}, \& {Rappaport}}]{vdh92}
1140: {van den Heuvel}, E.~P.~J., {Bhattacharya}, D., {Nomoto}, K., \& {Rappaport},
1141: S.~A. 1992, \aap, 262, 97
1142:
1143: \bibitem[{{Whelan} \& {Iben}(1973)}]{Whelan73}
1144: {Whelan}, J. \& {Iben}, I.~J. 1973, \apj, 186, 1007
1145:
1146: \bibitem[{{Woosley} \& {Weaver}(1994)}]{woosley_weaver1994}
1147: {Woosley}, S.~E. \& {Weaver}, T.~A. 1994, \apj, 423, 371
1148:
1149: \bibitem[{{Yamaoka} {et~al.}(1992){Yamaoka}, {Nomoto}, {Shigeyama}, \&
1150: {Thielemann}}]{yamaoka92}
1151: {Yamaoka}, H., {Nomoto}, K., {Shigeyama}, T., \& {Thielemann}, F.-K. 1992,
1152: \apjl, 393, L55
1153:
1154: \end{thebibliography}
1155:
1156: \clearpage
1157:
1158: \begin{deluxetable}{cccccc}
1159: \tablewidth{0pt}
1160: \tablecaption{Observing Log for HET Spectra of SN~2005hj}
1161: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1162: \tablehead{
1163: \colhead{Date (UT)} &
1164: \colhead{JD-2400000.5} &
1165: \colhead{Phase (day)} &
1166: \colhead{Exp. (s)} &
1167: \colhead{Filter} &
1168: \colhead{Slit ($''$)}
1169: }
1170: \startdata
1171: Oct 26.30 & 53669.30 & -6 & 2x600 & GG385 & 2.0 \\
1172: Oct 27.20 & 53670.20 & -5 & 4x600 & OG590 & 1.5 \\
1173: Oct 27.28 & 53670.28 & -5 & 2x600 & GG385 & 1.5 \\
1174: Nov 1.27 & 53675.27 & 0 & 2x600 & GG385 & 1.5 \\
1175: Nov 1.29 & 53675.29 & 0 & 2x550 & OG515 & 1.5 \\
1176: Nov 3.27 & 53677.27 & 2 & 2x480 & GG385 & 1.5 \\
1177: Nov 4.26 & 53678.26 & 3 & 2x600 & OG515 & 1.5 \\
1178: Nov 6.17 & 53680.17 & 5 & 2x600 & GG385 & 1.5 \\
1179: Nov 6.18 & 53680.18 & 5 & 2x600 & OG515 & 1.5 \\
1180: Nov 11.25 & 53685.25 & 10 & 3x600 & OG515 & 1.5 \\
1181: Nov 19.22 & 53693.22 & 18 & 4x600 & OG515 & 1.5 \\
1182: Nov 26.20 & 53700.20 & 25 & 2x600 & OG515 & 1.5 \\
1183: Dec 5.18 & 53709.18 & 34 & 3x600 & OG515 & 2.0 \\
1184: \enddata
1185:
1186: \tablecomments{Phases are relative to the derived date of maximum
1187: light, 2005 Nov. 1.6, and rounded to the nearest day. Effective
1188: wavelength ranges for the GG385, OG515, and OG590 setups are
1189: 4100-8900~\AA, 5100-9800~\AA, and 5900-10,800~\AA, respectively. All
1190: spectra from a given night were combined for the figures and
1191: analysis.}
1192:
1193: \label{specobs}
1194: \end{deluxetable}
1195:
1196:
1197: \clearpage
1198:
1199: \begin{deluxetable}{rrrrr}
1200: \tablewidth{0pt}
1201: \tablecaption{Derived Quantities for the SN~2005hj \ion{Si}{2} $\lambda$6355 Line}
1202: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1203: \tablehead{
1204: \colhead{Phase} &
1205: \colhead{Velocity} &
1206: \colhead{$\sigma_{\rm{vel}}$} &
1207: \colhead{Depth$^{a}$} &
1208: \colhead{FWHM} \\
1209:
1210: \colhead{(days)} &
1211: \colhead{(km s$^{-1}$)} &
1212: \colhead{(km s$^{-1}$)} &
1213: \colhead{} &
1214: \colhead{(\AA)}
1215: }
1216: \startdata
1217: $-6$ & 10820 & 140 & 0.38 & 140 \\
1218: $-5$ & 10800 & 110 & 0.32 & 120 \\
1219: 0 & 10640 & 90 & 0.52 & 110 \\
1220: 2 & 10440 & 100 & 0.60 & 110 \\
1221: 3 & 10640 & 90 & 0.57 & 110 \\
1222: 5 & 10680 & 80 & 0.57 & 110 \\
1223: 10 & 10530 & 100 & 0.60 & 100 \\
1224: 18 & 10550 & 120 & 0.48 & 90 \\
1225: 25 & 9850 & 90 & 0.25 & 60 \\
1226: 34 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1227: \enddata
1228:
1229: \tablecomments{Quantities measured from the FT smoothed data. The
1230: \ion{Si}{2} $\lambda$6355 line is not clearly detected in the $+34$
1231: day spectrum and thus no measurements are reported.}
1232: \tablenotetext{a} {Similar to \citet{leonard2002}, depth is defined as
1233: $(f_c - f_{\rm{min}})/f_c$ where $f_{\rm{min}}$ is the flux at the
1234: minimum of the smoothed line and $f_c$ is the estimated continuum
1235: level at the corresponding wavelength.}
1236:
1237: \label{linedata}
1238: \end{deluxetable}
1239:
1240: \clearpage
1241:
1242: \begin{figure}
1243: \epsfig{file=f1.eps,angle=90,width=\columnwidth}
1244: \caption{ROTSE-IIIb unfiltered light curve of SN~2005hj (filled
1245: circles). The best fit $R$-band template from \citet{knop2003} is
1246: plotted as a solid line over the fitting range, and as a dotted line
1247: continuing on to later phases when the rapid decline of the flux below
1248: $\sim$5500~\AA\ causes our unfiltered light curve to fade faster than
1249: the $R$-band decline rate. Arrows mark 5-$\sigma$ upper limits of the
1250: subtractions determined from the noise level in annuli centered on the
1251: location of the SN. Epochs with HET spectra are marked with ``S.''}
1252: \label{lc}
1253: \end{figure}
1254:
1255: \clearpage
1256:
1257: \begin{figure}
1258: \epsfig{file=f2.eps,angle=90,width=\columnwidth}
1259: \caption{HET/LRS spectrum of SN~2005hj at $-6$ days (black line). The
1260: blue curve shows the relative contribution from a SN~1999aa-like
1261: supernova at the same phase from a linear interpolation of the $-7$ and
1262: $-3$ day spectra presented by \citet{garavini2004}, and the red line
1263: gives the estimated relative host galaxy light contamination. The
1264: relative scaling for the galaxy and SN components were determined
1265: through a least squares fit to the SN~2005hj spectrum. The purple line
1266: shows the fit (portions of the spectra effected by telluric lines were
1267: excluded from the fitting as shown by gaps in the fit curve).}
1268: \label{spec0}
1269: \end{figure}
1270:
1271: \clearpage
1272:
1273: \begin{figure}
1274: \epsfig{file=f3.eps,angle=0,width=0.75\columnwidth}
1275: \caption{Spectral evolution of SN~2005hj recorded by the HET from $-6$
1276: to $+34$ days after maximum light (2005 Nov. 1.6). The estimated
1277: galaxy contamination has been subtracted and the spectra have been
1278: shifted for clarity. For display purposes, portions of the spectra
1279: with low signal to noise have been smoothed (thin line segments). The
1280: typical telluric absorption spectrum is shown by the grey shading
1281: along the top of the figure. }
1282: \label{spec}
1283: \end{figure}
1284:
1285:
1286: \clearpage
1287:
1288: \begin{figure}
1289: \epsfig{file=f4.eps,angle=0,width=0.75\columnwidth}
1290:
1291: \caption{Comparison of the spectra of SN~2005hj (colored lines) and
1292: SN~1994D (black lines; \citealt{patat1996}) at 5 days before and 2
1293: days after maximum light. The spectra have been shifted for
1294: clarity. At both phases shown, the absorption component of the
1295: \ion{Si}{2} $\lambda$6355 line is more narrow for SN~2005hj. The
1296: relative line depths for this feature are similar at $+2$ days,
1297: however, the \ion{Si}{2} $\lambda$6355 absorption is much weaker for
1298: SN~2005hj in the $-5$ day spectrum. Despite these differences, the
1299: velocities inferred from the minima of the \ion{Si}{2} $\lambda$6355
1300: lines are consistent between SN~2005hj and SN~1994D to within 5\%,
1301: the former being 560 km s$^{-1}$ slower at $-5$ days and 150 km
1302: s$^{-1}$ slower at $+2$ days.}
1303:
1304: \label{spec1}
1305: \end{figure}
1306: \clearpage
1307:
1308: \begin{figure}
1309: \epsfig{file=f5.eps,angle=0,width=0.75\columnwidth}
1310:
1311: \caption{Evolution of the \ion{Si}{2} $\lambda$6355 line. In the top
1312: plot, the spectra have been shifted by arbitrary factors for clarity
1313: with the youngest spectrum on the top and the oldest on the bottom,
1314: and they are colored as in figure \ref{spec}. Each spectral bin is
1315: plotted as a rectangle with the height indicating the statistical
1316: 1-$\sigma$ error interval. The effects of the FT smoothing are shown
1317: by the grey curves, and open circles mark the FT smoothed
1318: minima. The bottom plot shows the data normalized by the continua to
1319: emphasize the relative spectral evolution. The vertical dashed line
1320: marks the plateau velocity of 10,600 km s$^{-1}$.}
1321: \label{SiII}
1322: \end{figure}
1323:
1324: \clearpage
1325:
1326: \begin{figure}
1327: \epsfig{file=f6.eps,angle=0,width=\columnwidth}
1328: \caption{Velocity of the \ion{Si}{2} $\lambda$6355 line minimum as
1329: determined from the FT smoothed minima. The error bars are the
1330: quadrature sum of the 1-$\sigma$ confidence intervals found via Monte
1331: Carlo simulations and the 80 km s$^{-1}$ scatter found in the \ion{H}{2}
1332: region line centers among the different epochs.}
1333:
1334: \label{linevel}
1335: \end{figure}
1336:
1337: \clearpage
1338:
1339: \begin{figure}
1340: \epsfig{file=f7.eps,angle=0,width=0.75\columnwidth}
1341: \caption{Spectra near the \ion{Si}{2} $\lambda$6355 doublet for
1342: SN~2005hj and other SNe~Ia around 25 days after maximum light (1994D;
1343: \citealt{patat1996}; 1999aa; \citealt{garavini2004}; 1999ee;
1344: \citealt{hamuy2002}; 2003cg; \citealt{elias-rosa2006}). Vertical
1345: dotted lines mark the doublet components blue shifted by 10,000 km
1346: s$^{-1}$. The doublet is clearly resolved only in the case of
1347: SN~2005hj, while the flat bottom to the SN~1999aa profile may suggest
1348: similar behavior. }
1349:
1350: \label{day25}
1351: \end{figure}
1352:
1353: \clearpage
1354:
1355: \begin{figure}
1356: \epsfig{file=f8.eps,angle=0,width=\columnwidth}
1357: \caption{Velocity of the \ion{Si}{2} $\lambda$6355 line minima for
1358: SN~2005hj and other well-observed SNe~Ia (1992A;
1359: \citealt{kirshner1993}; 1994D; \citealt{patat1996}; 1998bu;
1360: \citealt{jha1999}; 2000cx; \citealt{li2001}; 1999aa;
1361: \citealt{garavini2004}; 1999ee; \citealt{hamuy2002}; 2005cg;
1362: \citealt{quimby2006}). All velocities were calculated from the FT
1363: smoothed minima using the same filter. The ordinate shows the change
1364: in velocity relative to the (interpolated) day $+20$ value. Lines
1365: connecting the data points are intended only to guide the eye. The
1366: sample was not drawn randomly from the parent population; instead it
1367: was tailored to show the range of behaviors present in well-observed
1368: in normal-bright events.}
1369:
1370: \label{linevels}
1371: \end{figure}
1372:
1373:
1374: \clearpage
1375:
1376: \begin{figure}
1377: \epsfig{file=f9.eps,angle=270,width=\columnwidth}
1378:
1379: \caption{Photospheric velocity versus time since explosion for models
1380: of Branch-normal SNe~Ia. The photosphere is defined by the radius of
1381: last scattering, and because Thomson scattering is the dominate source
1382: of continuum opacity, this position is largely wavelength
1383: independent. Shown are the classical delayed detonation model {\tt
1384: 5p0z02.25} \citep{hoflich2002}, the pulsating delayed detonation
1385: models {\tt pdd3} and {\tt pdd9} \citep{khokhlov1993,hoflich1995}, and
1386: the tamped detonation models {\tt det2en2}/{\tt 4}
1387: \citep{hoflich_khokhlov1996}. The X's mark the velocities of SN~2005hj
1388: as measured from the minima of the \ion{Si}{2} $\lambda$6355 line
1389: assuming a 22 day rise to peak. The dotted horizontal lines mark the
1390: region with $>1$\% Si abundance in model {\tt pdd3}. As discussed in
1391: the text, the \ion{Si}{2} $\lambda$6355 line minimum is an imperfect
1392: indicator of the photospheric velocities, and a systematic offset can
1393: develop at later times once the photosphere has receded below the Si
1394: rich layers. This may explain the discrepancy between the model
1395: predictions and the last two observations, which show weakening Si and
1396: strengthening Fe lines. The low velocities observed at early times for
1397: SN~2005hj may indicate that rather little outward mixing took place.
1398: }
1399:
1400: \label{modelvel}
1401: \end{figure}
1402:
1403: \clearpage
1404:
1405:
1406:
1407: \begin{figure}
1408: \epsfig{file=f10.eps,angle=270,width=\columnwidth}
1409: \caption{ Properties of Branch-normal SNe~Ia models with interacting
1410: shells of mass $M_{Shell}$ including delayed detonations ({\tt
1411: 5p0z22.25} with $M_{Shell}=0.01, 0.05$ and $0.1 M_\odot$, open
1412: circles \citealt{gerardy2004}), pulsating delayed detonation models
1413: (open stars; {\tt pdd3};
1414: \citealt{khokhlov1993,hoflich_khokhlov1996}; {\tt pdd9};
1415: \citealt{hoflich1995}) and merger models (open triangles; {\tt
1416: det2env2/4/6}; \citealt{khokhlov1993,hoflich_khokhlov1996}). In the
1417: upper plots, we give as a function of $M_{Shell}$ the duration of
1418: the velocity plateau $\Delta t_{plateau}$, its velocity
1419: $v_{plateau}$ defined by $\delta v \leq 500$ km s$^{-1}$ (see text),
1420: and its starting point $t_{0}$ relative to maximum light. In the
1421: lower plots we give observational relations, namely $B-V$ at maximum
1422: light as a function of $v_{plateau}$, $\Delta t_{plateau}$ and
1423: $t_0$. Note that $B-V$ is uncertain by about $0.05$ to $0.1^m$. In
1424: addition, we give the observations of SN~2005hj (filled squares)
1425: including error bars. }
1426: \label{modelprop}
1427: \end{figure}
1428:
1429:
1430: \end{document}
1431: