1: \documentclass[usenatbib]{mn2e}
2:
3: % input macros for figures
4: \usepackage{psfig}
5: %input{epsf}
6:
7: % Symbol definitions
8: %\input{defs.tex}
9: %\nobrackets % no brackets in cite macros
10: %\seceqnum % equations numbered by section
11: \def\gsim{\mathrel{\raise0.35ex\hbox{$\scriptstyle >$}\kern-0.6em
12: \lower0.40ex\hbox{{$\scriptstyle \sim$}}}}
13: \def\lsim{\mathrel{\raise0.35ex\hbox{$\scriptstyle <$}\kern-0.6em
14: \lower0.40ex\hbox{{$\scriptstyle \sim$}}}}
15: \def\gs{\mathrel{\raise0.35ex\hbox{$\scriptstyle >$}\kern-0.6em
16: \lower0.40ex\hbox{{$\scriptstyle \sim$}}}}
17: \def\ls{\mathrel{\raise0.35ex\hbox{$\scriptstyle <$}\kern-0.6em
18: \lower0.40ex\hbox{{$\scriptstyle \sim$}}}}
19:
20: \def\kms{\,\hbox{km}\,\hbox{s}^{-1}}
21: \def\Msol{\mathrel{\rm M_{\odot}}}
22: \def\Wm2{\,\hbox{W}\,\hbox{m}^{-2}}
23:
24: \def\apj{ApJ}
25: \def\apjl{ApJL}
26: \def\mnras{MNRAS}
27: \def\pasp{PASP}
28: \def\apss{APSS}
29: \def\aaps{AAPS}
30: \def\aap{A\&AP}
31: \def\aj{AJ}
32: \def\araa{ARA\&A}
33: \def\apjs{APJS}
34: \def\jrasc{JRASC}
35: \def\nat{Nature}
36:
37: \begin{document}
38:
39: \title[A $z\sim0.9$ Supercluster in the UKIDSS/DXS]{The discovery of a massive
40: supercluster at z\,=\,0.9 in the UKIDSS DXS}
41:
42: \author[Swinbank et al.]{
43: \parbox[h]{\textwidth}{
44: A.\,M.\ Swinbank,$^{1,*}$
45: A.\,C.\ Edge,$^{1}$
46: Ian Smail,$^{1}$
47: J.\,P.\ Stott,$^{1}$
48: M.\ Bremer,$^{2}$
49: Y.\ Sato,$^{3}$\\
50: C.\ van Breukelen,$^{4}$
51: M.\ Jarvis,$^{4}$
52: I.\ Waddington,$^{5}$
53: L.\ Clewley,$^{4}$\\
54: J.\ Bergeron,$^{6}$
55: G.\ Cotter,$^{5}$
56: S.\ Dye,$^{7}$
57: J.\ E. Geach,$^{1}$
58: E.\ Gonzalez-Solares,$^{8}$
59: P.\ Hirst,$^{9,10}$
60: R.\,J.\ Ivison,$^{11,12}$
61: S.\ Rawlings,$^{4}$
62: C.\ Simpson,$^{13}$
63: G.\,P.\ Smith,$^{14}$
64: A.\ Verma,$^{15}$
65: T.\ Yamada$^{16}$
66: }
67: \vspace*{6pt} \\
68: $^{1}$Institute for Computational Cosmology, Department of Physics, Durham University, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK \\
69: $^{2}$H.H. Wills Physics Laboratory, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TL, UK\\
70: $^{3}$National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, 2-21-1, Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588 Japan\\
71: $^{4}$Department of Physics, Denys Wilkinson Building, Keble Road, Oxford, OX1 3RH, UK\\
72: $^{5}$Astronomy Centre, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9QH, UK\\
73: $^{6}$Institut d'Astrophysique de Paris, CNRS, 98 bis Bd., Arago, 75014, Paris, France\\
74: $^{7}$Cardiff University, School of Physics \& Astronomy, Queens Buildings, The Parade, Cardiff, CF24 3AA, UK\\
75: $^{8}$Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0HA, United Kingdom\\
76: $^{9}$Joint Astronomy Center, 660 N.\ A.`ohoku Place, Hilo, HI 96720, USA\\
77: $^{10}$Gemini Observatory, 670 N.\ A`ohoku Place, Hilo, HI 96720, USA\\
78: $^{11}$UK Astronomy Technology Centre, Royal Observatory, Blackford Hill, Edinburgh, EH9 3HJ, UK \\
79: $^{12}$Institute for Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Royal Observatory, Blackford Hill, Edinburgh, EH9 3HJ, UK\\
80: $^{13}$Astrophysics Research Institute, Liverpool John Moores University, Twelve Quays House, Egereton Wharf, Birkenhead, CH4 1LD, UK\\
81: $^{14}$School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, Edgebaston, B15 2TT, UK\\
82: $^{15}$Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik, Garching D-85741, Germany\\
83: $^{16}$Subaru Telescope, 650 N A'ohoku Place, Hilo, HI96720 U.S.A.\\
84: $^*$Email: a.m.swinbank@durham.ac.uk \\
85: }
86:
87: \maketitle
88:
89: \begin{abstract}
90: We analyse the first publicly released deep field of the UKIDSS Deep
91: eXtragalactic Survey (DXS) to identify candidate galaxy
92: over-densities at $z\sim1$ across $\sim$1 sq. degree in the ELAIS-N1
93: field. Using $I-K$,$J-K$ and $K-3.6\mu$m colours we identify and
94: spectroscopically follow-up five candidate structures with
95: Gemini/GMOS and confirm they are all true over-densities with between
96: five and nineteen members each. Surprisingly, all five structures
97: lie in a narrow redshift range at $z=0.89\pm0.01$, although they are
98: spread across 30\,Mpc on the sky. We also find a more distant
99: over-density at $z=1.09$ in one of the spectroscopic survey regions.
100: These five over-dense regions lying in a narrow redshift range
101: indicate the presence of a supercluster in this field and by
102: comparing with mock cluster catalogs from $N$-body simulations we
103: discuss the likely properties of this structure. Overall, we show
104: that the properties of this supercluster are similar to the
105: well-studied Shapley and Hercules superclusters at lower redshift.
106: \end{abstract}
107:
108: \begin{keywords}
109: galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: clusters
110: \end{keywords}
111:
112: %
113: % Figure 1
114: %
115: \begin{figure*}
116: \centerline{\psfig{file=f1.ps,angle=0,width=7in}}
117: \caption{The $J-K$, $I-K$ and $K-3.6\mu$m colour-magnitude plots for
118: each cluster. The colour-magnitude diagrams represent a
119: 1.5\,arcminute region around each cluster. The dashed lines show
120: the limits used to select candidate cluster members via the red
121: sequence. We identify the spectroscopically confirmed $z=$0.89
122: cluster members (filled squares), as well as the fore-/background
123: galaxies (filled circles). % and highlight those sources which are
124: % detected at 24$\mu$m.
125: In the DXS4 field we identify separately the members of the higher
126: redshift structure in this field (at $z=1.09$). Note also that
127: some spectra were taken for objects outside the colour-magnitude
128: limits (marked as dashed boxes) to fully populate the GMOS masks. }
129: \label{fig:dxs_area}
130: \end{figure*}
131:
132: %
133: %
134: %
135: \section{Introduction}
136:
137: The structure and evolution of clusters of galaxies and their
138: constituent substructures provides a powerful test of our understanding
139: of both the growth of large scale structure and dark matter in the
140: Universe. In the current hierarchical paradigm of structure formation,
141: massive galaxy clusters arise from the extreme tail in the distribution
142: of density fluctuations, so their number density depends critically on
143: cosmological parameters. One of the remarkable successes of the
144: $\Lambda$-CDM paradigm is the match to the number density, mass and
145: evolution of clusters of galaxies out to $z\sim0.5$--1
146: \citep{Jenkins01,Evrard02}. However, due to the very limited number of
147: clusters known at $z\gsim1$ (where the number density is most sensitive
148: to the assumed cosmology), the full power of the comparisons to
149: theoretical simulations has not yet been exploited.
150:
151: The paucity of clusters known at $z\gsim 1$ stems from the limitations
152: of current survey methods. For instance, optical colour-selection of
153: clusters \citep{Couch91,Gladders00}, which relies on isolating the
154: 4000\AA\ break in the spectral energy distributions of passive, red
155: early-type galaxies (the dominant population in local clusters) becomes
156: much less effective at $z\gsim0.7$ where this feature falls in or
157: beyond the $i$-band, in a region of declining sensitivity of
158: silicon-based detectors. Recent progress has been made in identifying
159: clusters using X-ray selection with {\it Chandra} and {\it XMM-Newton}
160: \citep{Romer01,Rosati02,Mullis05} and these studies have identified
161: galaxies clusters out to $z\sim 1.5$ \citep{Stanford06,Bremer06}.
162: However, the X-ray gas in these clusters appears more compact than for
163: comparable systems at lower redshifts and hence there are concerns that
164: the accurate comparison of cluster properties with redshift required to
165: constrain cosmological parameters could be subject to potential
166: systematic effects related to the thermal history on the intra-cluster
167: medium. Thus a complimentary technique for cluster selection is
168: required.
169:
170: One solution to this problem is to extend the efficient optical
171: colour-selection method beyond $z\gsim0.7$ using near-infrared
172: detectors \citep{Hirst06}. This approach has been impressively
173: demonstrated by \citet{Stanford06} who find a $z=1.45$ cluster in the
174: NOAO-DW survey selected from optical-near-infrared colours. The
175: commissioning of the new wide-field WFCAM camera on UKIRT provides the
176: opportunity to significantly expand deep panoramic surveys in the
177: near-infrared. The Deep eXtragalactic Survey (DXS) is a component
178: within the UK Infrared Deep Sky Survey (UKIDSS) \citep{Warren07} with
179: the aim of imaging an area of 35 square degrees at high Galactic
180: latitudes in the $J$- and $K$-band filters to a depth $J_{AB}$=23.2 and
181: $K_{AB}$=22.7 respectively. The principal goals of the DXS include
182: measuring the abundance of galaxy clusters at $z\sim 1$--1.5, measuring
183: galaxy clustering at $z\sim1$ and measuring the evolution of bias.
184: This paper presents the first results from a spectroscopic follow-up of
185: five high redshift galaxy cluster candidates identified in the DXS
186: Early Data Release (EDR; \citealt{Dye06}).
187:
188: The structure of this paper is as follows. In \S2 we describe the data
189: on which our analysis is based: a combination of optical, near- and
190: mid-infrared imaging with Subaru, UKIRT and {\it Spitzer} which is used
191: to select cluster candidates and the follow-up Gemini/GMOS
192: spectroscopy. In \S3 we present an analysis of the cluster properties.
193: We discuss these and give our conclusions in \S4. Unless otherwise
194: stated, we assume a cosmology with $\Omega_{m}$=0.27, $\Lambda=$0.73
195: and $H_{0}$=70$\kms$\,Mpc$^{-1}$. All magnitudes are given in the AB
196: system.
197:
198: %
199: %
200: %
201: \section{Observations and Reduction}
202:
203: We utilise the UKIDSS-DXS EDR for the ELAIS-N1 region which covers a
204: contiguous area of $0.86^{\circ}\times0.86^{\circ}$ centred on
205: $\alpha=16$\,11\,14.400; $\delta=+54$\,38\,31.20 (J2000). The survey
206: data products for this region reach 5-$\sigma$ point source limits of
207: $J_{AB}=22.8$--23.0 and $K_{AB}=22.9$--23.1. To complement these
208: observations we exploit deep $I$-band imaging obtained with Suprime-Cam
209: on Subaru Telescope. These observations cover the entire ELAIS-N1/DXS
210: field and are described in Sato et al.\ 2007 (in preparation) and reach
211: a 5-$\sigma$ point-source limit of $I_{AB}=26.2$. As part of the {\it
212: Spitzer} Wide-area InfraRed Extragalactic (SWIRE) survey
213: \citep{Lonsdale03}, the ELAIS-N1 region was also imaged in the IRAC
214: (3.6, 4.5, 5.8 and 8.0$\mu$m) bands as well as at 24$\mu$m with MIPS.
215: These catalogs are described in \citet{Surace04}.
216:
217: \subsection{Optical-Infrared matching}
218:
219: In order to efficiently select cluster candidates, accurate colours are
220: required for galaxies in the coincident regions of the DXS, Subaru and
221: SWIRE. The DXS catalogue was constructed using {\sc SExtractor}
222: \citep{Bertin96} with a detection threshold of 2$\sigma$ in at least
223: five pixels. Objects which lay in the halo or CCD bleed of a bright
224: star were also removed before the final catalog was constructed. This
225: catalogue was then matched to the optical catalogue, with the closest
226: match within $1''$ being used. During the first pass cross-correlation
227: the average offsets between the optical and near-infrared catalogues
228: was $\Delta \alpha=0.33\pm0.05''$, $\Delta\delta=-0.20\pm0.04''$ (i.e.\
229: the optical sources were offset to the south-east of the near-infrared
230: sources, which are tied to FK5 through 2MASS stars, \citealt{Dye06}).
231: This systematic offset was removed from the optical catalog and the
232: cross-correlation recalculated resulting in an rms offset of
233: $\sim0.1''$. Since accurate colours were required in order to select
234: cluster candidates, we extracted 2$''$ aperture magnitudes from the
235: optical and near-infrared catalogs. In both cases, the magnitude
236: zero-points were calculated using 2$''$ photometry of (unsaturated)
237: stars in the field.
238:
239: The near-infrared and mid-infrared catalogs were cross-correlated in
240: exactly the same way as above, with a systematic offset between the
241: mid-infrared and near-infrared sources of $\Delta
242: \alpha=-0.30\pm0.05''$, $\Delta\delta=0.33\pm0.04''$, which again was
243: removed before a second pass cross-correlation was performed.
244:
245: \subsection{Cluster Selection}
246:
247: As this was a pilot study, we choose to identify candidate
248: high-redshift galaxy clusters in three ways. First, we searched for
249: the sequence of passive red galaxies in high-redshift clusters by
250: selecting galaxies from photometric catalogue in the $(J-K)$--$K$ and
251: $(I-K)$--$K$ colour-magnitude space. We first identified candidates
252: using slices of $\Delta(J-K)_{AB}=0.4$ stepped between
253: $(J-K)_{AB}=0$--2.5. This selection includes a small correction for
254: the tilt of the colour-magnitude relation for early type galaxies of
255: $d(J-K)_{AB}/dK_{AB}=-0.025$. Consecutive slices overlapped by 0.2
256: magnitudes to ensure that no sequence was omitted. Each position in
257: the resulting spatial surface density plot for a colour slice was then
258: tested for an over-density using consecutively larger apertures from
259: 0.01 to 0.05 degrees (corresponding to approximately 250\,kpc to 1\,Mpc
260: at $z=1$). If the over-density in the central aperture was $\geq
261: 3\sigma$ above the background and the density decreased with increasing
262: aperture radius then a region was marked as a candidate cluster. A
263: similar procedure was carried out using the $(I-K)$--$K$
264: colour-magnitude space to refine the selection of cluster candidates.
265: Independently, we identified cluster candidates by identifying peaks in
266: the surface density in $K_{AB}-3.6\mu$m colour space (using an
267: approximate colour cut of $K_{AB}-3.6\mu{\rm m}>0.3$ which should be
268: efficient at selecting elliptical at $z\sim$1). Having defined these
269: cluster candidates, we checked that each of these met the selection
270: criterion recently used by \citet{VanBreukelen06} (which is based on a
271: projected friends of friends algorithm). Using these three selection
272: criteria we identified fifteen candidates, of which eight were
273: identified using all three criteria. Five of the most promising eight
274: cluster candidates (which showed the tightest colour-magnitude
275: sequences and a clear over-density of red objects), were then targeted
276: for spectroscopic follow-up. In Fig.~\ref{fig:dxs_area} we show the
277: colour-magnitude diagrams for a 1.5~arcminute region around each of the
278: over-density peaks which were spectroscopically targeted (the dashed
279: boxes in Fig.~\ref{fig:dxs_area} show the colours used to select the
280: cluster candidates).
281:
282: %
283: % Figure 2
284: %
285: \begin{figure}
286: \centerline{\psfig{file=f2.ps,angle=0,width=3in}}
287: \caption{Example spectra of the cluster members from the GMOS
288: spectroscopy. The example spectra cover the range of $I$-band
289: magnitude of the spectroscopic sample ($I\sim$21.0--23.5). The
290: dashed lines mark the expected position of the emission and
291: absorption lines of [O{\sc ii}]3727, Ca\,H\&K, G-band, H$\beta$ and
292: [O{\sc iii}]4959,5007. The grey region shows the position of the
293: uncorrected telluric absorption band.}
294: \label{fig:example_spec}
295: \end{figure}
296:
297: %
298: % Figure 3
299: %
300: \begin{figure}
301: \centerline{\psfig{file=f3.ps,angle=0,width=2.8in}}
302: \caption{Top: The total redshift distribution for the five regions
303: targeted in our spectroscopic follow-up. This clearly shows the
304: strong overdensity in these regions at $z=0.9$. Middle: The
305: redshift histograms for each individual cluster with the mean and
306: 1-$\sigma$ scatter overplotted (using the method described in
307: \S3.2). The Bottom panel shows the redshift distribution for the
308: whole sample on the same velocity scale. For reference the bin
309: size in the lower panels is 1000\,km\,s$^{-1}$ (in the rest frame
310: of the cluster).}
311: \label{fig:histograms}
312: \end{figure}
313:
314: \subsection{GMOS Spectroscopy}
315: \label{sec:GMOSspec}
316:
317: Spectroscopic follow-up observations of five candidate overdense
318: regions were taken with the Gemini Multi-Object Spectrograph (GMOS) on
319: Gemini-North between 2006 May 23 and June 18 U.T.\ in queue mode. As
320: our target clusters were expected to be at $z\sim 1$ we placed a strong
321: emphasis on good sky subtraction, to identify weak features in the
322: presence of strong and structured sky emission.
323:
324: For this reason we employed the Nod \& Shuffle mode of GMOS. In Nod \&
325: Shuffle, the object and background regions are observed alternately
326: through the same regions of the CCD by nodding the telescope. In
327: between each observation the charge is shuffled on the CCD by a number
328: of rows corresponding to the the centre-to-centre spacing into which
329: each slit is divided. Each alternate block is masked off so that it
330: receives no light from the sky but acts simply as an image store. The
331: sequence of object and background exposures can be repeated as often as
332: desired and at the end of the sequence, the CCD is read, incurring a
333: read-noise penalty only once (see \citealt{Glazebrook01} for further
334: details of this general approach). For each spectrum, the two spectra
335: block are identified and subtracted to achieve Poisson-limited sky
336: subtraction.
337:
338: For our observations we micro-step the targets in the 3.2$''$ long
339: slits by 1.5$''$ every 30 seconds. We used the OG515 filter in
340: conjunction with the R400 grating and a central wavelength of 840\,nm
341: which results in a wavelength coverage of $\sim580$--1100\,nm. The
342: spectral resolution in this configuration is
343: $\lambda/\Delta\lambda\sim1700$ and the slit width was 1.0$''$. To
344: counter the effects of bad pixels and the GMOS chip gaps, the
345: observations were taken with two wavelength configurations, each
346: comprising two 2.8-ks exposures at central wavelengths of 840\,nm and
347: 850\,nm respectively. Each of the five masks was observed for a total
348: of 3.2 hours in $\lsim0.7''$ seeing and photometric conditions. In
349: total 134 galaxies are included on these five masks and we list the
350: positions and photometric properties ($IJK$ and the IRAC/MIPS bands) of
351: these in Tables 2\&3.
352:
353:
354: To reduce the data, we first identified charge traps from a series of
355: dark exposures taken during the run and used these to mask bad pixels.
356: We extract the nod and shuffle regions from the data frames and then
357: mosaiced the three GMOS CCDs. The frames were then flat-fielded,
358: rectified, cleaned and wavelength calibrated using a sequence of Python
359: routines (Kelson, priv. com.). The final two-dimensional mosaic was
360: generated by aligning and median combining the reduced two-dimensional
361: spectra using a median with a 3-$\sigma$ clip to remove any remaining
362: cosmic rays or defects. For flux calibration, observations of
363: BD+28d4211 were taken, however, no tellurics were taken and so we have
364: not attempted to correct for the $A$-band absorption at 7600\AA\
365: although this is unimportant for deriving redshifts in any of our
366: spectra. While flux-calibration and response correction are not
367: necessary for redshift determination via cross-correlation, we perform
368: these steps in order to present the spectra in
369: Fig.~\ref{fig:example_spec}.
370:
371: %
372: %
373: %
374: \section{Analysis}
375:
376:
377: % Table 1
378: %
379: \begin{table*}
380: \begin{center}
381: {\centerline{\sc Table 1.}}
382: {\centerline{\sc Properties of the Cluster Candidates}}
383: \begin{tabular}{lcccccccc}
384: \hline
385: \noalign{\smallskip}
386: Cluster & R.A.\ & Dec.\ & n$_{slits}$ & n$_{cl}$ & $z$ & $\sigma$ & $\sigma$' \\
387: & \multispan2{(J2000)} & & & & (km\,s$^{-1}$) & (km\,s$^{-1}$) \\
388: \hline
389: DXS1 & 16\,08\,27.0 & +54\,35\,47 & 26 & 5 & 0.8800[19] & $1030\pm270$ & 640$\pm$330 \\
390: DXS2 & 16\,08\,26.9 & +54\,45\,12 & 25 & 9 & 0.8960[19] & $700\pm230$ & 440$\pm$170 \\
391: DXS3 & 16\,09\,05.7 & +54\,57\,23 & 29 & 17 & 0.8970[14] & $730\pm220$ & 570$\pm$160 \\
392: DXS4a & 16\,13\,01.7 & +54\,46\,06 & ... & 5 & 0.8800[12] & $660\pm180$ & 470$\pm$230 \\
393: DXS4b & & & 25 & 8 & 1.0918[14] & $1200\pm340$ & \\
394: DXS5 & 16\,10\,43.6 & +55\,01\,35 & 29 & 12 & 0.8920[20] & $1000\pm290$ & 550$\pm$240 \\
395: \hline
396: \hline
397: \label{table:dxs_clusters}
398: \end{tabular}
399: \vspace{-0.5cm}\caption{Names, central positions and properties of the
400: spectroscopic sample. n$_{slits}$ and n$_{cl}$ denote the number of
401: spectroscopic slits on the mask and the number of confirmed cluster
402: member respectively. $\sigma$ is the velocity dispersion of the
403: spectroscopic sample and $\sigma$' is the velocity dispersion after
404: removal of substructure. The values in the [] denote the errors in
405: the last decimal place.}
406: \end{center}
407: \end{table*}
408:
409: \subsection{Redshift determination and velocity dispersions}
410: \label{sec:redshift}
411:
412: For redshift determination we first attempt to identify strong emission
413: or absorption features in the spectra including [O{\sc
414: ii}]$\lambda$3726.2,3728.9 emission, the 4000\AA\ break, Ca H\&K
415: absorption at $\lambda$3933.44,3969.17 or the G-band at
416: $\lambda$4304.4. From the sample of 134 galaxies with spectroscopic
417: observations, 111 yielded secure redshifts, with only 23
418: unidentifiable, giving a 85\% success rate. As expected for
419: absorption-line spectroscopy, the non-detections can in large part be
420: attributed to optical faintness: the median $I_{AB}$ magnitude of the
421: 111 galaxies with secure redshifts is $22.15\pm0.2$, whereas for the
422: galaxies without redshifts the median magnitude was
423: $I_{AB}=22.65\pm0.4$. The measured redshifts for all sources are
424: listed in Tables 2\&3.
425:
426: Having identified an approximate redshift for a galaxy we compute a
427: robust velocity by cross-correlating each the spectrum with an
428: elliptical galaxy template spectrum. For the template we use solar
429: metallicity, 1\,Gyr burst models with ages of 3,5 or 7\,Gyr from
430: \citet{Bruzual03}. The errors on the redshifts are determined from the
431: shape of the cross-correlation peak and the noise associated with the
432: spectrum and are typically in the range 30--150\,km\,s$^{-1}$. We
433: present typical example spectra from each of the masks in
434: Fig.~\ref{fig:example_spec} and report the errors on the redshifts of
435: the individual candidate cluster members in Table~2.
436:
437: Figure~\ref{fig:histograms} shows the redshift distribution for all
438: galaxies in our sample. We see that the vast majority of the
439: spectroscopic sources lie in a narrow redshift range at $z\sim 0.9$.
440: This indicates that most of the galaxies we have selected lie within
441: the overdense regions we targeted and that these structures themselves
442: appear to form a coherent structure across the whole survey region.
443:
444: %
445: % Figure 4
446: %
447: \begin{figure*}
448: \centerline{\psfig{file=f4.ps,angle=90,width=7in}}
449: \caption{{\it Panel A:} Colour-selected surface density map of the
450: ELAIS-N1 region based on the $I-K$, $J-K$ and $K$-3.6$\mu$m colours
451: used to select galaxy clusters (the cluster candidate selection is
452: described in \S2). The image is smoothed with a Gaussian kernel
453: with a FWHM of $60''$ (420\,kpc at $z=0.9$). The large open
454: circles represent the cluster candidate colour selection using
455: $J-K$ (large circles) and $K$-3.6$\mu$m (slightly smaller) colours.
456: The dashed square box in the bottom right hand corner shows the
457: size of the GMOS field of view. For the five regions targeted in
458: our GMOS observations we mark the individual galaxies which are
459: known to be members and in addition we plot those galaxies from the
460: literature which lie between $z=0.870$ and $z=0.915$. The cluster
461: candidates marked A-D have colour-magnitude sequences consistent
462: with the z=0.89 supercluster. It is clear that the supercluster
463: potentially spans the whole field (the most prominent region is at
464: 16:10:09, 54:25:00) and beyond. {\it Panels DXS1-5:} The spatial
465: distribution of the galaxies within in each of the five over-dense
466: regions selected for spectroscopic study. We plot the positions of
467: all of the galaxies which meet our colour-selection (see \S2.2) and
468: we identify those which are spectroscopically confirmed as cluster
469: members or non-members. For the members, the sizes and colours of
470: the symbols denote the rest-frame velocity offset with respect to
471: the cluster redshift given in Table~1 (on a velocity scale from
472: $-2000$ to $+2000$\,km\,s$^{-1}$). In addition, in the DXS4 field
473: we identify the members of the background $z=1.09$ structure. }
474: \label{fig:area_vel}
475: \end{figure*}
476:
477: To calculate the membership of the structure in each field, we have
478: followed the iterative method used by \citet{Lubin02}. Initially we
479: estimated the central redshift for the overdensity, and select all
480: other galaxies with $\Delta z < \pm0.06$ in redshift space. We then
481: calculated the bi-weight mean and scale of the velocity distribution
482: \citep{Beers90} which correspond to the central velocity location,
483: $v_{c}$, and dispersion, $\sigma_{v}$ of the cluster. We used this to
484: calculate the relative radial velocities in the restframe: $\Delta v =
485: c(z-z_{c})/(1+z_{c})$. The original distribution was revised, and any
486: galaxy that lies $>3\sigma_{v}$ away from $v_c$, or has $| \Delta {v} |
487: > 3500$\,km\,s$^{-1}$ was rejected from the sample and the statistics
488: were re-calculated. The final solution is achieved when no more
489: galaxies are removed by the iterative rejection. The results are
490: presented in Table~1, with 1-$\sigma$ errors on the cluster redshift
491: and dispersion corresponding from $10^{3}$ bootstrap re-samples. We
492: plot the redshift histograms for the structures in each field in
493: Figure~\ref{fig:histograms} along with a Gaussian curve showing the
494: measured mean redshift and velocity dispersion.
495:
496: The most striking result from these histograms is the discovery that
497: all five structures lie within 3000\,km\,s$^{-1}$ of each other even
498: though they are spread across nearly a degree on the sky (approximately
499: 30\,Mpc in projection). This strongly suggests that this field
500: intercepts a ``supercluster'' like structure at $z=0.9$ -- we discuss
501: the posterior likelihood of this in \S\ref{sec:discussion} and next
502: discuss the the properties of the individual structures.
503:
504: \subsection{Searching for Substructures}
505:
506: We list the centres of the structures identified from our dynamical
507: analysis in Table~1, along with the number of members, the mean
508: redshift and the estimate of the velocity dispersion for each
509: structure. Since the central positions and redshifts of the clusters
510: are not well constrained we define the central velocity as the median
511: redshift in the cluster and determine the centre of the cluster from
512: the peak in the cluster surface density plot (Fig.~\ref{fig:area_vel}).
513: The uncertainties on the velocity dispersions are derived from
514: bootstrap resampling the observed sample of members. Measuring the
515: velocity dispersions from clusters with $\sim$10 members is
516: particularly difficult, and in the rest-frame, the cluster velocity
517: dispersions are unusually high ($\sim$1000$\kms$). We derive more
518: secure velocity dispersions by first investigating how relaxed each of
519: the structures are, and construct position--velocity diagrams (similar
520: to Dressler--Shectman plots; \citealt{Dressler88}). In
521: Figure~\ref{fig:area_vel} we mark the positions of all of the galaxies
522: for which a radial velocity measurement was obtained (we note that the
523: flat distribution of galaxies in this plot reflect the spatial sampling
524: by GMOS). Together with Fig.~\ref{fig:histograms}, this shows that the
525: only structure with a discernible non-gaussian velocity distribution is
526: DXS5, where four galaxies form a higher velocity substructure. As
527: noted above, unfortunately, the small numbers of members in each
528: structure compromise the conclusions we can draw from this analysis.
529: However, we can attempt to derive average velocity dispersions from the
530: whole sample. We de-redshift and stack the five clusters (according to
531: their central redshifts) and measure a velocity dispersion of
532: 900$\pm$200$\kms$ which may remain artificially high due to
533: substructure. In order to better define the cluster membership via a
534: simple method we use both the velocity and spatial information. This
535: technique was first used in the CNOC surveys \citep{Carlberg96} %and is
536: %based on the assumption that clusters are single isothermal spheres
537: and is described in detail in \citet{Carlberg97c} and briefly described
538: here. Firstly, the mean redshift of the cluster is normalised to the
539: observed velocity dispersion ($\sigma_{z}$). This is plotted against
540: the projected radius away from the center of the cluster in units of
541: $r_{200}$ (Fig.~\ref{fig:DvDr}). The mass model of \citet{Carlberg97c}
542: can then be used to mark the 3$\sigma$ and 6$\sigma$ limits which are
543: used to differentiate between cluster members and near-field galaxies
544: (or galaxies which reside in filaments/structures surrounding the
545: clusters). In this analysis $r_{200}$ is calculated under the
546: assumption that a cluster is a single isothermal sphere and is defined
547: to be the clustocentric radii at which the mean density interior is
548: 200$\times$ the critical density at the redshift of the cluster. We
549: calculate $r_{200}$ as $r_{200}$ = $\sqrt{3}\sigma_{z}$/10$H(z)$. where
550: $H(z)$ is defined by $H(z)=H_{0}^{2}(1+z)^{2}(1+\Omega_{0}z)$ (see
551: \citet{Carlberg97c} for a detailed discussion). Restricting our
552: analysis to the galaxies which lie within the 3$\sigma$ limits we
553: recalculate the velocity dispersion for the clusters as an ensemble and
554: derive a velocity dispersion of 540$\pm$100$\kms$.
555:
556: Given the limited number of cluster members, it is not practical to
557: establish accurate limits on the fraction of velocity substructures.
558: However, using the analogy with the Shapley supercluster which has
559: several multi-component velocity clusters (e.g.\ A\,1736 and A\,3528),
560: we can state that the observed fraction of 20\% in the five DXS
561: clusters is consistent with other superclusters at low redshift
562: (although this clearly suffers from small number statistics).
563:
564: \subsection{Spectral Classification}
565:
566: To investigate the spectral properties of the cluster galaxies, we
567: spectroscopically classify the galaxies in our sample according to the
568: classification of \cite{Dressler99}. We find an average spectral mix
569: of: k, $29\pm7$\% ($17\pm4$); k+a: $24\pm8$\% ($14\pm5$); e(a):
570: $17\pm3$\% ($10\pm2$); e(c): $28\pm7$\% ($16\pm4$); e(b): $2\pm2$\%
571: ($1\pm1$). The structure in DXS3 (and to a lesser extent DXS5) show
572: excess numbers of active galaxies (e(c) and e(a)) compared to the other
573: fields, but these are only marginally significant. These spectral
574: mixes are similar to previous spectroscopic studies of similarly
575: high-redshift galaxy cluster members (e.g. \citealt{Jorgensen05}) as
576: well as that seen in local ($z\sim0.1$) galaxy clusters (e.g.
577: \citealt{Pimbblet06}) which have found that the mix of k and k+a
578: galaxies make up 50-70\% of the population whilst star-forming galaxies
579: contribute $\sim$20\% with the remaining having properties consistent
580: with e(a) galaxies. The most significant difference is that the DXS
581: clusters have up to 20\% of galaxies with e(a) signatures, which is
582: slightly higher than local clusters or other high-redshift clusters.
583:
584: We note that there is also a large dispersion in the fraction of [O{\sc
585: ii}] detections in the cluster members of each of the six clusters.
586: In total there are 56 cluster members, of which 27 have significant
587: [O{\sc ii}] emission ($48\pm9$\% with an equivalent width above 3\AA)
588: which is comparable to that found in similar $z>0.6$ clusters
589: \citep{Finn05,Poggianti06}. However, this global fraction hides a wide
590: range in the fraction from cluster to cluster (between 20 and 75\% for
591: DXS4 to DXS3 respectively). While the median $I-K$ colour of members
592: with or without [O{\sc ii}] are indistinguishable (both
593: $I-K=2.41\pm0.28$), this may be due to the fact that the $I$-band
594: data cover rest-frame emission redward of the 4000\AA\ break.
595:
596: In terms of the 24$\mu$m detections, we note that of the six galaxies
597: which have 24$\mu$m counterparts in the clusters, two have spectral
598: properties consistent with passive galaxies (k+a), three are strongly
599: star-forming (with strong [O{\sc ii}], H$\beta$ and [O{\sc iii}]
600: emission lines) and one galaxy (DXS4-11) shows high excitation lines
601: (such as [Ne{\sc v}]3346,3426 and [Ne{\sc iii}]3343,3868.7) which
602: unambiguously identifies this source as a highly-obscured AGN.
603:
604:
605: %
606: %
607: %
608: \section{Discussion}
609: \label{sec:discussion}
610:
611: The most striking result from our survey is the discovery of five
612: clusters at $z$=0.89 across 30\,Mpc in projection. The velocity
613: dispersions and physical sizes of each of these individual clusters
614: bear a number of similarities to (well studied) local superclusters,
615: and therefore lead us to interpret the results in the context of a
616: ``super-cluster'' at $z$=0.89.
617:
618: \subsection{How much of the supercluster have we identified?}
619:
620: To investigate how much of the supercluster remains unidentified (since
621: only the first five cluster candidates we spectroscopically targetted),
622: we colour cut the ELAIS-N1 catalog and construct a surface density plot
623: to look for other potential supercluster members. Using the colour
624: cuts $K=18.8$--21.3; $(J-K)=0.7$--1.35; $(I-K)=1.95$--2.95 and
625: $K-3.6\mu$m$>0.3$; (see Fig.~\ref{fig:dxs_area}) we construct a
626: colour-selected density map of the ELAIS-N1 region and present the
627: results in Figure~\ref{fig:area_vel}. We also overlay the
628: spectroscopically identified cluster members from DXS1-5 and objects
629: from previous studies that have spectroscopically identified
630: $z\sim$0.90 galaxies in this field
631: \citep{Scott00,Chapman02b,Manners03}.
632:
633: This surface density map identifies all the candidate clusters we
634: selected. Of the seven cluster candidates we did not observe, four
635: (marked A-D in Fig.~\ref{fig:area_vel}) have colour sequences
636: consistent with a cluster at $z=0.90$ (the other candidates have
637: colour-magnitude sequences which are likely lower redshift). We also
638: note that since all five supercluster members are close to the edge of
639: the WFCAM field, we may have only partially sampled the full
640: supercluster. Although we currently do not have the near-infrared
641: imaging outside the $0.8\times0.8$\,degree field to efficiently select
642: other supercluster candidates we estimate that we may have missed up to
643: 50\% of the full structure. Therefore, there are potentially between 7
644: and 18 rich clusters in the supercluster on a scale of 50--60\,Mpc.
645: This is consistent with local superclusters such as Shapley and
646: Hercules (which have seven and nine Abell class two or above clusters
647: in a redshift range equivalent to 4000$\kms$ across $\sim$60\,Mpc; e.g.
648: \citealt{Barmby98}). Thus, the observations presented here highlight
649: the need to study fields on scales of several degrees to best
650: characterise such large structures even at $z\sim1$.
651:
652: \begin{figure}
653: \centerline{\psfig{file=f5.ps,angle=90,width=3in}}
654: \caption{The cluster membership technique of Carlberg, Ellingson \&
655: Yee (1997) applied to our cluster sample. The solid curve denotes
656: the 3$\sigma$ contour of the mass model; the dashed curve is the
657: 6$\sigma$ contour. The filled symbols denote galaxies which lie
658: within the 3$\sigma$ contours whilst the open symbols denote
659: galaxies which lie outside the 3$\sigma$ contours. This test shows
660: that significant substructure is evident in DXS5, with outliers
661: also evident in DXS1, 2 \& 3. Restricting our analysis to the
662: galaxies within the central 3$\sigma$ limits we derive velocity
663: dispersions for the whole sample of 540$\pm$100$\kms$.}
664: \label{fig:DvDr}
665: \end{figure}
666:
667: \subsection{How rare are superclusters?}
668:
669: The discovery of a massive supercluster in the first DXS survey field
670: of nearly fifty is surprising given their low space density below
671: $z$=0.1. Cluster surveys at higher redshift have also identified
672: superclusters similar to the structure presented here (e.g.\
673: Cl\,1604+4321 $z=0.90$, \citealt{Gal04}) and quasar surveys have
674: revealed massive overdensities at still higher redshift
675: \citep{Graham96}. Therefore, this system is not unique but it is
676: important to estimate how likely it is that we should have identified
677: one in the first UKIDSS-DXS field.
678:
679: Using the statistics from \citet{Tully86,Tully88} for the local space
680: density of superclusters, we estimate that there are five superclusters
681: over the high galactic latitude sky $within~z=0.1$. This corresponds
682: to one supercluster per 0.04\,Gpc$^3$. The total volume sampled in the
683: complete DXS survey between redshifts 0.7 to 1.4 (the farthest we can
684: efficiently select galaxy clusters from the DXS and reliably recover
685: redshifts for from optical spectroscopy) will be 0.27\,Gpc$^3$
686: (comoving). Scaling from the local space density of superclusters, we
687: expect a total of seven superclusters in the complete DXS survey. To
688: find one such system in the first field from the DXS is fortunate
689: ($\sim$15\% probability) but not so unlikely for us to question the
690: validity of our interpretation of this system as a rich supercluster.
691:
692: To estimate the potential masses of this structure and the clusters
693: within it, we compare the observed space density of clusters in the
694: ELAIS-N1 region to the predictions of the expected space density of
695: dark matter halos from the $N$-body simulations of \citet{Reed05}.
696: Within the survey volume covered by this DXS field, the halo mass
697: functions from \citet{Reed05} suggest that at $z$=0.9 there should be
698: $\sim$60, 25, 2 and 0.05 halos of mass log$(M/\Msol$)=13,13.5,14.0 and
699: 15.0 respectively within our survey volume of
700: 3$\times$10$^{6}$Mpc$^{3}$. Thus, the number density of massive halos
701: found in the region we have surveyed is consistent with halos of mass
702: $\sim$10$^{13.5-14.0}\Msol$.
703:
704: However, these estimates disregard clustering of clusters and so we
705: also exploit the Hubble Volume cluster catalog \citep{Evrard02} which
706: uses giga-particle $N$-body simulations to study galaxy cluster
707: populations in CDM simulations out to $z=$1.4. We exploit the NO sky
708: survey catalog of the $\Lambda$CDM cluster simulation which covers a
709: redshift from $z=$0 to $z=$1.5 in a solid angle of $\pi$/2 steradians.
710: We randomly sample this catalog in volumes comparable to the DXS
711: ELAIS-N1 survey, and find that the probability of finding five clusters
712: with velocity dispersions $\gsim$450$\kms$ between $z=$0.7 and $z=$1.4
713: is $\sim$75\%. However, the chance of all five clusters lying within a
714: 2000$\kms$ slice is only $\sim$20\%. When this criterion is met, we
715: note that median mass of each cluster is $\sim10^{13.5-14.0}\Msol$
716: (crudely suggesting a total mass for five clusters $>10^{14.7}\Msol$).
717:
718: \section{Conclusions}
719:
720: We present the results of the first spectroscopic follow-up of
721: candidate high-redshift clusters selected from the UKIDSS DXS. This
722: pilot programme was designed to test the feasibility of identifying
723: high-redshift ($z$=0.8--1.4) galaxy clusters in the first DXS survey
724: field through an extension of the red-sequence method which efficiently
725: selects galaxy clusters at $z\lsim$0.7 \citep{Gladders00}. The main
726: results are summarised as follows:
727:
728: \begin{enumerate}
729:
730: \item Using ($J-K$), ($I-K$) and ($K$-3.6$\mu$m) colours we extend the
731: efficient red-sequence cluster detection method developed by
732: \citet{Gladders00} and identify fifteen cluster candidates in the 0.8
733: square degree DXS ELAIS-N1 field. Five cluster candidates were
734: targetted with GMOS spectroscopy, all of which yielded significant
735: overdensities between $z$=0.88 and $z$=1.1 with between five and
736: nineteen members. The 100\% success rate of this cluster search
737: confirms that the colour selection is efficient at selecting the
738: highest redshift galaxy clusters.
739:
740: \item The most striking result from our observations is that five of
741: the six galaxy clusters lie within 3000$\kms$ of each other across
742: 30\,Mpc in projection. This overdensity is most naturally explained
743: by the presence of a supercluster at $z$=0.9 (at least part of) which
744: our observations intersect.
745:
746: \item The clusters have velocity dispersions of between 600 and
747: 1200$\kms$, although by removing substructures, we derive velocity
748: dispersions of 540$\pm$100$\kms$ (consistent with individual halos of
749: mass $\sim10^{13.5-14.0}\Msol$).
750:
751: \item We find that the mix of $k$ and $k+a$ galaxies make up 50-70\% of
752: the population, whilst star-forming galaxies comprise 20\% with the
753: remaining galaxies having properties consistent with e+a signatures.
754: The spectroscopic mix of galaxies is similar to previous studies of
755: both low- ($z\sim$0.1) and high- ($z\sim$0.7) redshift clusters. We
756: also derive redshifts for six cluster 24$\mu$m sources, two of which
757: are passive ($k+a$), three strongly star-forming (strong [O{\sc ii}],
758: [O{\sc iii}] and H$\beta$) and one with high excitation lines
759: indicating an AGN.
760:
761: \item By comparing the number of clusters in our survey volume with the
762: number density of massive halos from N-body simulations we suggest
763: that each of these clusters will have masses of order
764: $10^{13.5-14.0}\Msol$. Moreover, we also compare the cluster abundance
765: with predictions from giga-particle $N$-body simulations to estimate
766: the probability of finding such a structure as $\sim$25\% in the
767: current cosmological paradigm.
768:
769: \end{enumerate}
770:
771: Whilst simulations and mock cluster catalogs provide extremely useful
772: constraints on the likelihood of finding such a structure and crude
773: estimates of the mass, the ultimate goal of the complete DXS survey
774: area (35 square degrees) is to measure cluster abundances between
775: $z\sim$0.8-1.4. In order to constrain cluster abundance, a combination
776: of follow-up spectroscopy and sophisticated mock catalogs will be
777: required in order to accurately constrain the masses of the clusters
778: from galaxy velocity dispersions (e.g\,\citealt{Eke06}). If reliable
779: halo masses can be derived, then for a fixed set of cosmological parameters
780: ($\Omega_{m}$, $\Omega_{\Lambda}$), the resulting cluster abundance
781: will reflect on $\sigma_8$ (the rms mass fluctuation amplitude in
782: spheres of 8\,$h^{-1}$Mpc which measured the normalisation of the mass
783: power spectrum). For clusters with mass $\gsim10^{14.5}$, the cluster
784: abundance is expected to rise by a factor of 6$\times$ and 20$\times$
785: between $\sigma_{8}$=0.7 and 0.8 and $\sigma_{8}=0.7$ and 0.9
786: respectively. Thus, once complete, the DXS has the opportunity to use
787: galaxy cluster abundances as a precision tool for cosmology and we look
788: forward to undertaking this task in the future.
789:
790: The discovery of a supercluster in the first DXS field highlights the
791: importance of the combination of depth and area in surveys of the
792: $z=0.5$--2 Universe. Surveys of one WFCAM field or less are unlikely
793: to contain a structure as rare as a supercluster or, even if they do,
794: will only cover part of it. As such, surveys of this size are still
795: affected by cosmic variance, and any attempt to measure cosmological
796: parameters are severely compromised (e.g. \citealt{Retzlaff98}). Only
797: contiguous surveys of several degrees (such as the UKIDSS/DXS,
798: VISTA/VIDEO and VISTA/VIKING), will have sufficient area and depth
799: coverage to identify large structures in statistically significant
800: numbers whilst reliably accounting for the effects of cosmic variance
801: (see \citealt{Borgani06} for a review).
802:
803: Indeed, the implications of how cosmic variance affects the analysis of
804: cluster surveys of relatively small volumes and/or many non-contiguous
805: areas are subtle but in an era of ``precision cosmology'' must be
806: considered (e.g.\, \citealt{Schuecker01}).
807:
808: \section*{acknowledgements}
809: We gratefully acknowledge the anonymous referee for their suggestions
810: which improved the content and clarity of this paper. We would also
811: like to thank Vince Eke, Gus Evrard, Adrian Jenkins and Inger
812: J{\o}rgensen for useful discussions. AMS and CJS acknowledge PPARC
813: Fellowships, ACE and IRS acknowledge support from the Royal Society.
814: We gratefully acknowledge the UKIDSS DXS. The United Kingdom Infrared
815: Telescope which is operated by the JAC on behalf of PPARC. The GMOS
816: observations were taken as part of programme GN-2006A-Q-18 and are
817: based on observations obtained at the Gemini Observatory, which is
818: operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy,
819: Inc., under a cooperative agreement with the NSF on behalf of the
820: Gemini partnership: the NSF (United States), PPARC (United Kingdom),
821: the NRC (Canada), CONICYT (Chile), the ARC (Australia), CNPq (Brazil)
822: and CONICET (Argentina). This paper is also partially based on data
823: collected at Subaru Telescope which is operated by NAO of Japan as well
824: as observations made with the Spitzer Space Telescope, which is
825: operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of
826: Technology under a contract with NASA.
827:
828: \bibliographystyle{apj}
829: \bibliography{/Users/ams/Projects/ref}
830:
831:
832: \newpage
833:
834: \begin{table*}
835: \begin{center}
836: {\scriptsize
837: {\centerline{\sc Table 2: Member Galaxies}}
838: \begin{tabular}{lccccccccccccc}
839: \hline
840: \noalign{\smallskip}
841: ID & R.A.\ & Dec.\ & $I$ & $J$ & $K$ & 3.6$\mu$m & 4.5$\mu$m & 5.8$\mu$m & 24$\mu$m & $z$ & Sp Type \\
842: & $^{h}$ $'$ $''$ & $^{\circ}$ $'$ $''$ \\
843: \hline\hline
844: &&&& \multispan2{$z=0.90$ Cluster Galaxies} \\
845: \hline\hline
846: DXS1-11$^{[1]}$ & 16\,08\,26.474 & +54\,35\,33.79 & 22.18[01] & 21.03[03] & 20.19[03] & 19.86 & 20.19 & ... & ... & 0.88853[$-$25,+24] & k \\
847: DXS1-12 & 16\,08\,27.386 & +54\,35\,40.38 & 22.25[01] & 20.83[09] & 19.83[01] & 19.18 & 19.68 & ... & ... & 0.88590[$-$17,+13] & k \\
848: DXS1-13 & 16\,08\,27.480 & +54\,35\,49.09 & 22.40[01] & 21.29[04] & 20.22[02] & 19.92 & 20.38 & ... & ... & 0.89252[$-$13,+13] & k \\
849: DXS1-19 & 16\,08\,34.152 & +54\,36\,17.75 & 24.09[03] & 23.23[25] & 22.19[10] & ... & ... & ... & ... & 0.88294[$-$39,+39] & e(a) \\
850: DXS1-22 & 16\,08\,27.818 & +54\,38\,00.82 & 21.82[01] & 20.61[02] & 19.76[01] & 19.11 & 19.44 & 19.68 & 17.07 & 0.87894[$-$32,+95] & k \\
851: DXS1-25 & 16\,08\,36.910 & +54\,37\,41.77 & 21.16[01] & 20.16[02] & 19.26[01] & 18.82 & 19.34 & 19.64 & ... & 0.91071[$-$14,+15] & k \\
852: \hline
853: DXS2-0 & 16\,08\,05.302 & +54\,45\,29.16 & 22.55[01] & 21.43[05] & 20.11[02] & 19.49 & 19.78 & ... & 16.75 & 0.87830[$-$18,+21] & k \\
854: DXS2-6 & 16\,08\,21.552 & +54\,44\,53.30 & 20.97[01] & 20.51[02] & 19.82[01] & 19.44 & 19.83 & 19.66 & ... & 0.89761[$-$16,+15] & k+a \\
855: DXS2-7 & 16\,08\,24.792 & +54\,44\,25.48 & 22.00[01] & 20.94[03] & 19.76[01] & 18.94 & 19.39 & ... & ... & 0.90421[$-$18,+16] & k+a \\
856: DXS2-8 & 16\,08\,25.368 & +54\,44\,35.71 & 22.50[01] & 21.52[05] & 20.39[02] & 20.05 & 20.46 & ... & ... & 0.90525[$-$37,+33] & e(a) \\
857: DXS2-10 & 16\,08\,25.632 & +54\,45\,09.68 & 22.15[01] & 20.76[03] & 20.18[02] & 19.12 & 19.44 & 19.21 & 16.83 & 0.90602[$-$05,+06] & e(c) \\
858: DXS2-11 & 16\,08\,29.520 & +54\,44\,41.46 & 22.41[01] & 20.91[03] & 20.15[02] & 19.55 & 19.97 & ... & ... & 0.90036[$-$45,+35] & k+a \\
859: DXS2-12 & 16\,08\,28.992 & +54\,45\,02.95 & 21.60[01] & 20.24[02] & 19.61[10] & 19.23 & 19.72 & ... & ... & 0.89816[$-$09,+09] & k+a \\
860: DXS2-13 & 16\,08\,28.992 & +54\,45\,19.36 & 22.65[02] & 21.16[04] & 20.88[03] & 20.62 & 21.25 & ... & ... & 0.89878[$-$27,+24] & k \\
861: DXS2-15 & 16\,08\,30.190 & +54\,46\,00.41 & 22.71[01] & 21.53[05] & 20.70[03] & 20.39 & 20.78 & ... & ... & 0.89931[$-$19,+18] & e(c) \\
862: \hline
863: DXS3-1 & 16\,09\,02.614 & +54\,59\,15.28 & 21.83[01] & 21.06[03] & 20.25[02] & 19.80 & 20.24 & ... & ... & 0.90651[$-$17,+18] & e(c) \\
864: DXS3-3 & 16\,09\,02.592 & +54\,58\,39.43 & 22.39[01] & 21.83[07] & 20.81[03] & 20.40 & 21.01 & ... & ... & 0.89953[$-$27,+23] & e(c) \\
865: DXS3-7 & 16\,09\,01.344 & +54\,58\,04.15 & 21.84[01] & 20.93[03] & 20.03[01] & 19.64 & 20.00 & ... & ... & 0.90646[$-$20,+19] & e(a) \\
866: DXS3-10 & 16\,09\,04.392 & +54\,57\,32.69 & 21.89[01] & 20.76[03] & 19.84[01] & 19.52 & 19.88 & ... & ... & 0.89543[$-$09,+09] & e(a) \\
867: DXS3-11 & 16\,09\,03.288 & +54\,57\,22.03 & 21.74[01] & 20.73[03] & 19.85[01] & 19.34 & 19.60 & ... & ... & 0.90075[$-$13,+13] & e(c) \\
868: DXS3-12 & 16\,09\,01.392 & +54\,57\,15.44 & 22.12[01] & 20.99[03] & 19.87[01] & 19.39 & 19.73 & ... & ... & 0.90739[$-$25,+25] & e(a) \\
869: DXS3-13 & 16\,08\,59.974 & +54\,57\,11.30 & 21.54[01] & 20.15[02] & 19.06[01] & 18.39 & 18.84 & 19.13 & ... & 0.90081[$-$46,+35] & e(c) \\
870: DXS3-14 & 16\,08\,56.280 & +54\,57\,09.40 & 22.27[01] & 21.22[04] & 20.20[02] & 19.88 & 20.14 & ... & ... & 0.90097[$-$34,+31] & k+a \\
871: DXS3-15 & 16\,09\,01.224 & +54\,56\,45.24 & 23.01[02] & 21.95[08] & 20.88[03] & 20.61 & 21.09 & ... & ... & 0.90329[$-$45,+41] & k \\
872: DXS3-16 & 16\,08\,59.594 & +54\,56\,34.01 & 21.53[01] & 20.18[02] & 19.18[01] & 18.75 & 19.18 & 19.53 & ... & 0.90628[$-$10,+11] & k+a \\
873: DXS3-17 & 16\,09\,00.168 & +54\,56\,25.59 & 21.61[01] & 20.27[02] & 19.33[01] & 18.90 & 19.28 & 19.30 & ... & 0.90896[$-$19,+21] & k \\
874: DXS3-18 & 16\,08\,57.386 & +54\,56\,22.30 & 23.09[02] & 22.20[10] & 20.84[03] & 20.37 & 20.85 & ... & ... & 0.90936[$-$49,+55] & e(c) \\
875: DXS3-19 & 16\,09\,01.728 & +54\,56\,06.87 & 23.08[02] & 22.29[10] & 20.71[03] & 20.28 & 20.49 & ... & ... & 0.90328[$-$45,+46] & e(a) \\
876: DXS3-20 & 16\,09\,03.146 & +54\,55\,53.91 & 22.35[01] & 21.21[04] & 20.17[02] & 19.67 & 19.96 & ... & ... & 0.90581[$-$50,+49] & e(c) \\
877: DXS3-22 & 16\,08\,53.738 & +54\,55\,45.01 & 23.21[02] & 22.42[12] & 20.99[03] & 20.96 & 21.52 & ... & ... & 0.90524[$-$12,+12] & e(a) \\
878: DXS3-23 & 16\,09\,02.112 & +54\,55\,18.05 & 22.27[01] & 21.05[03] & 19.99[01] & 19.32 & 19.74 & ... & ... & 0.90047[$-$34,+35] & e(c) \\
879: DXS3-24 & 16\,08\,56.042 & +54\,55\,20.25 & 22.67[01] & 21.49[05] & 20.29[02] & 20.01 & 20.32 & ... & ... & 0.89286[$-$40,+37] & e(a) \\
880: \hline
881: DXS4a-3 & 16\,13\,12.792 & +54\,47\,16.30 & 21.90[01] & 20.62[02] & 19.75[01] & 19.14 & 19.45 & 19.52 & 17.53 & 0.88743[$-$48,+39] & k \\
882: DXS4a-7 & 16\,13\,05.424 & +54\,46\,46.35 & 22.60[01] & 21.21[04] & 20.39[02] & 20.16 & 20.76 & ... & ... & 0.88082[$-$40,+34] & k \\
883: DXS4a-16 & 16\,12\,55.678 & +54\,45\,51.26 & 22.35[01] & 20.85[03] & 20.12[02] & 19.97 & 20.26 & ... & ... & 0.88487[$-$24,+21] & k+a \\
884: DXS4a-18 & 16\,12\,54.482 & +54\,45\,11.52 & 23.24[02] & 21.96[08] & 21.19[04] & ... & ... & ... & ... & 0.87986[$-$71,+55] & k \\
885: DXS4a-21 & 16\,12\,50.736 & +54\,44\,57.00 & 22.08[01] & 20.78[03] & 20.07[01] & 19.57 & 19.85 & 19.85 & 17.33 & 0.90438[$-$21,+20] & e(c) \\
886: DXS4a-22 & 16\,12\,42.554 & +54\,46\,23.88 & 22.83[02] & 21.27[04] & 20.48[02] & 20.17 & 20.61 & ... & ... & 0.88396[$-$50,+62] & k+a \\
887: \hline
888: DXS5-0 & 16\,10\,32.256 & +54\,59\,12.77 & 22.48[03] & 21.13[03] & 19.77[01] & 19.06 & 19.47 & ... & ... & 0.90927[$-$42,+25] & k \\
889: DXS5-3 & 16\,10\,30.576 & +55\,00\,44.96 & 22.01[01] & 20.75[02] & 20.01[01] & 19.74 & 20.21 & ... & ... & 0.90944[$-$28,+28] & k+a \\
890: DXS5-7 & 16\,10\,36.430 & +55\,00\,27.53 & 21.82[01] & 20.82[02] & 20.14[01] & 19.85 & 20.29 & ... & ... & 0.90038[$-$85,+59] & k+a \\
891: DXS5-8 & 16\,10\,31.464 & +55\,01\,55.38 & 23.17[01] & 22.65[15] & 20.66[02] & 20.21 & 20.47 & 19.76 & ... & 0.90946[$-$25,+25] & e(c) \\
892: DXS5-10 & 16\,10\,40.130 & +55\,00\,58.61 & 22.17[01] & 21.10[03] & 20.17[01] & 19.88 & 20.16 & ... & ... & 0.89330[$-$42,+42] & e(c) \\
893: DXS5-13 & 16\,10\,42.122 & +55\,01\,20.06 & 22.05[01] & 20.89[03] & 20.04[01] & 19.64 & 20.02 & 20.22 & ... & 0.89137[$-$10,+08] & e(c) \\
894: DXS5-14 & 16\,10\,42.792 & +55\,01\,26.68 & 22.12[02] & 20.47[02] & 19.45[00] & 19.03 & 19.41 & 19.84 & ... & 0.89043[$-$18,+23] & e(c) \\
895: DXS5-16 & 16\,10\,43.968 & +55\,01\,36.12 & 23.34[02] & 22.09[08] & 21.09[03] & 20.74 & 21.04 & ... & ... & 0.88947[$-$71,+71] & k+a \\
896: DXS5-17 & 16\,10\,42.840 & +55\,02\,07.11 & 22.19[01] & 21.00[03] & 20.09[01] & 19.78 & 20.14 & ... & ... & 0.89275[$-$56,+56] & e(c) \\
897: DXS5-20 & 16\,10\,51.624 & +55\,00\,48.96 & 22.68[01] & 21.33[04] & 20.64[02] & 20.54 & 20.91 & ... & ... & 0.90677[$-$10,+10] & k \\
898: DXS5-23 & 16\,10\,56.426 & +55\,00\,41.40 & 22.68[01] & 22.21[10] & 20.80[02] & 20.53 & 21.01 & ... & ... & 0.89174[$-$61,+61] & k+a \\
899: DXS5-24 & 16\,10\,56.232 & +55\,01\,05.45 & 22.07[02] & 21.08[03] & 20.03[01] & 19.56 & 19.92 & ... & ... & 0.89869[$-$17,+13] & k \\
900: \hline\hline
901: &&&& \multispan2{$z=1.09$ Cluster Galaxies} \\
902: \hline\hline
903: DXS4b-4 & 16\,13\,07.752 & +54\,47\,55.60 & 21.62[01] & 21.56[06] & 20.96[03] & 20.20 & 20.48 & ... & ... & 1.09347[$-$45,+53] & k \\
904: DXS4b-8 & 16\,13\,03.264 & +54\,46\,41.16 & 22.84[02] & 20.98[03] & 20.14[02] & 19.71 & 19.95 & ... & ... & 1.08570[$-$26,+27] & k \\
905: DXS4b-11$^{[4]}$& 16\,13\,01.680 & +54\,46\,09.98 & 21.87[01] & 20.31[02] & 19.28[01] & 18.53 & 18.74 & 19.04 & 16.20 & 1.09168[$-$07,+09] & e(c) \\
906: DXS4b-12 & 16\,13\,01.270 & +54\,46\,02.06 & 23.17[02] & 21.04[03] & 20.27[02] & 19.72 & 19.93 & ... & ... & 1.08921[$-$52,+38] & e(a) \\
907: DXS4b-13 & 16\,12\,58.846 & +54\,46\,20.00 & 23.36[02] & 22.35[11] & 21.62[06] & ... & ... & ... & ... & 1.09052[$-$55,+72] & e(b) \\
908: DXS4b-14 & 16\,12\,57.840 & +54\,46\,05.19 & 22.22[01] & 21.19[04] & 20.32[02] & 19.63 & 19.88 & ... & ... & 1.09105[$-$27,+26] & k+a \\
909: DXS4b-17 & 16\,12\,53.112 & +54\,45\,42.74 & 23.31[02] & 21.23[04] & 20.69[03] & 20.30 & 20.55 & ... & ... & 1.09789[$-$14,+13] & k+a \\
910: DXS4b-19 & 16\,12\,50.782 & +54\,45\,39.14 & 22.12[01] & 20.55[02] & 19.59[01] & 19.00 & 19.25 & 19.69 & ... & 1.09690[$-$04,+09] & e(a) \\
911: \hline\hline
912: \label{tab:DXS1-5a}
913: \end{tabular}
914: }
915: \caption{Note: The RA and Dec are in the J2000 co-ordinate system. The
916: value in the [] is the error in the last decimal place and we note
917: that 1\,$\mu$Jy corresponds to m$_{AB}$=23.90. {\bf $^[1]$} {\it
918: Lenses:} We have searched for any unidentified lines in the spectra
919: to search for lensed background galaxies and identify one candidate
920: from the cluster and two from the field population. DXS1-11 has
921: unambiguous identification of [O{\sc ii}]3727, Ca\,H\&K and G-band
922: for $z=$0.89, but we also identify weak line emission at 8594.5
923: (spatial offset $<$0.5$''$) which we tentatively identify as [O{\sc
924: ii}]3727 at $z$=1.306. {\bf $^[2]$} {\it Noteworthy Objects:} We
925: note that the brightest cluster member in DXS4b at $z=$1.09 has a
926: number of high ionisation lines such as [Ne{\sc v}]3346,3426 and
927: [Ne{\sc iii}]3343,3868.7. The strong 24$\mu$m detection suggests
928: that this galaxy contains a highly obscured AGN, although it has a
929: low infrared luminosity ($\lsim$5$\times$10$^{11}$L$_{\odot}$ from
930: the lack of a 70$\mu$m detection).}
931: \end{center}
932: \end{table*}
933:
934:
935: \begin{table*}
936: \begin{center}
937: {\scriptsize
938: {\centerline{\sc Table 3: Non-member Galaxies}}
939: \begin{tabular}{lcccccccccc}
940: \hline
941: \noalign{\smallskip}
942: ID & R.A.\ & Dec.\ & $I$ & $J$ & $K$ & 3.6$\mu$m & 4.5$\mu$m & 5.8$\mu$m & 24$\mu$m & $z$ \\
943: & $^{h}$ $'$ $''$ & $^{\circ}$ $'$ $''$ \\
944: \hline\hline
945: DXS1-0 & 16\,08\,18.842 & +54\,33\,30.28 & 22.38[01] & 21.64[06] & 21.03[04] & ... & ... & ... & ... & 1.057 \\
946: DXS1-1 & 16\,08\,20.928 & +54\,33\,25.20 & 21.75[01] & 20.65[02] & 19.95[01] & 19.65 & 20.14 & ... & ... & 0.652 \\
947: DXS1-2 & 16\,08\,15.696 & +54\,34\,13.08 & 20.43[00] & 19.89[01] & 19.05[01] & 19.48 & 19.53 & ... & ... & 0.322 \\
948: DXS1-3 & 16\,08\,12.576 & +54\,34\,43.86 & 23.45[02] & 22.04[09] & 20.82[03] & 19.91 & 19.98 & ... & ... & ... \\
949: DXS1-4 & 16\,08\,20.592 & +54\,34\,48.72 & 21.85[01] & 20.81[03] & 19.97[01] & 19.81 & 20.46 & ... & ... & 0.780 \\
950: DXS1-5 & 16\,08\,17.498 & +54\,35\,22.80 & 23.51[02] & 21.76[07] & 20.43[02] & 19.81 & 19.77 & ... & ... & 1.143 \\
951: DXS1-6 & 16\,08\,15.506 & +54\,35\,49.02 & 22.28[01] & 20.91[03] & 19.94[01] & 19.64 & 19.95 & 20.02 & ... & 1.097 \\
952: DXS1-7 & 16\,08\,23.470 & +54\,35\,05.24 & 21.68[01] & 20.99[03] & 20.26[02] & 20.03 & 20.55 & ... & ... & 0.663 \\
953: DXS1-8 & 16\,08\,26.426 & +54\,34\,52.50 & 22.19[01] & 21.51[05] & 20.53[02] & 20.25 & 20.64 & ... & ... & ... \\
954: DXS1-9 & 16\,08\,16.464 & +54\,36\,14.00 & 20.81[01] & 19.91[01] & 19.12[01] & 18.31 & 18.60 & 18.56 & 16.19 & ... \\
955: DXS1-10 & 16\,08\,20.544 & +54\,35\,54.02 & 22.13[01] & 21.83[07] & 20.93[03] & ... & ... & ... & ... & ... \\
956: DXS1-14 & 16\,08\,28.512 & +54\,35\,53.66 & 22.43[01] & 22.11[09] & 21.25[04] & 21.04 & 21.35 & ... & ... & 1.030 \\
957: DXS1-15 & 16\,08\,27.554 & +54\,36\,09.94 & 21.50[01] & 20.62[02] & 19.63[01] & 19.40 & 19.85 & ... & ... & 0.799 \\
958: DXS1-16 & 16\,08\,28.846 & +54\,36\,08.38 & 23.22[02] & 23.08[22] & 21.26[04] & ... & ... & ... & ... & ... \\
959: DXS1-17 & 16\,08\,29.880 & +54\,36\,11.02 & 22.93[02] & 21.68[06] & 20.33[02] & 19.68 & 19.58 & ... & ... & ... \\
960: DXS1-18 & 16\,08\,34.006 & +54\,36\,05.54 & 22.67[01] & 22.51[10] & 21.28[04] & 20.98 & 21.30 & ... & ... & 0.606 \\
961: DXS1-20 & 16\,08\,19.200 & +54\,38\,15.11 & 22.64[01] & 21.52[05] & 19.85[01] & 18.85 & 18.49 & 17.98 & 15.65 & 1.225 \\
962: DXS1-21 & 16\,08\,20.566 & +54\,38\,18.06 & 22.14[01] & 20.62[02] & 19.72[01] & 19.20 & 19.39 & ... & ... & 1.135 \\
963: DXS1-23 & 16\,08\,31.850 & +54\,37\,51.16 & 21.72[01] & 20.61[02] & 19.60[10] & 19.29 & 19.68 & ... & ... & ... \\
964: DXS1-24 & 16\,08\,43.104 & +54\,36\,41.22 & 22.43[01] & 21.63[06] & 20.98[03] & 20.65 & 20.98 & ... & ... & 1.021 \\
965: \hline
966: DXS2-1 & 16\,08\,10.752 & +54\,44\,21.92 & 23.51[03] & 21.36[05] & 20.93[03] & 20.37 & 20.58 & ... & ... & 1.156 \\
967: DXS2-2 & 16\,08\,19.680 & +54\,42\,41.01 & 22.20[01] & 20.77[03] & 19.83[01] & 19.04 & 19.33 & 19.55 & 16.68 & 1.020 \\
968: DXS2-3 & 16\,08\,17.930 & +54\,43\,48.53 & 22.04[01] & 20.97[03] & 20.10[02] & 19.73 & 20.10 & ... & ... & 0.693 \\
969: DXS2-4 & 16\,08\,19.152 & +54\,43\,57.72 & 23.23[02] & 22.85[19] & 21.54[06] & 21.21 & 21.13 & ... & ... & ... \\
970: DXS2-5 & 16\,08\,21.600 & +54\,44\,14.93 & 22.17[01] & 21.35[05] & 20.31[02] & 19.99 & 20.49 & ... & ... & 0.670 \\
971: DXS2-9$^{[3]}$ & 16\,08\,24.096 & +54\,45\,12.52 & 21.57[01] & 20.79[03] & 20.58[02] & 20.43 & 21.14 & ... & ... & 0.674 \\
972: DXS2-14 & 16\,08\,33.936 & +54\,44\,28.94 & 22.84[02] & 21.62[06] & 20.73[03] & 20.17 & 20.54 & ... & ... & 0.763 \\
973: DXS2-16 & 16\,08\,32.112 & +54\,45\,49.02 & 23.79[03] & 21.92[08] & 21.37[05] & 20.83 & 20.88 & ... & ... & 1.329 \\
974: DXS2-17 & 16\,08\,37.680 & +54\,45\,05.46 & 22.17[01] & 21.47[05] & 21.04[04] & 20.98 & 21.14 & ... & ... & 0.734 \\
975: DXS2-18 & 16\,08\,33.120 & +54\,46\,34.10 & 22.82[02] & 22.10[10] & 21.16[04] & ... & ... & ... & ... & 0.763 \\
976: DXS2-19 & 16\,08\,40.536 & +54\,45\,13.79 & 23.82[03] & 21.40[05] & 20.99[03] & 20.56 & 20.86 & ... & ... & ... \\
977: DXS2-20 & 16\,08\,44.088 & +54\,44\,44.46 & 22.00[01] & 20.90[03] & 20.33[02] & 20.14 & 20.75 & ... & ... & 0.800 \\
978: DXS2-21 & 16\,08\,47.498 & +54\,44\,13.13 & 21.93[01] & 20.48[02] & 19.88[01] & 19.62 & 20.09 & ... & ... & 0.775 \\
979: DXS2-22 & 16\,08\,38.448 & +54\,46\,49.88 & 22.83[02] & 21.80[07] & 20.59[02] & 20.00 & 20.43 & ... & ... & 0.812 \\
980: DXS2-23 & 16\,08\,41.064 & +54\,46\,26.15 & 22.80[02] & 21.75[07] & 21.12[04] & 20.46 & 20.44 & ... & ... & 0.641 \\
981: DXS2-24 & 16\,08\,40.346 & +54\,46\,57.14 & 21.93[01] & 20.83[03] & 19.91[01] & 19.48 & 19.99 & ... & ... & 0.802 \\
982: \hline
983: DXS3-0 & 16\,09\,08.738 & +54\,59\,16.02 & 22.92[02] & 22.00[08] & 21.17[04] & 20.58 & 20.72 & ... & ... & 1.3348 \\
984: DXS3-2 & 16\,09\,16.102 & +54\,58\,45.26 & 22.11[01] & 21.68[06] & 20.73[03] & 20.85 & 21.58 & ... & ... & 0.9510 \\
985: DXS3-4 & 16\,09\,00.648 & +54\,58\,31.30 & 22.67[01] & 21.67[06] & 20.59[03] & 20.54 & 20.92 & ... & ... & 0.6841 \\
986: DXS3-5 & 16\,09\,07.658 & +54\,58\,13.54 & 22.73[01] & 21.90[08] & 20.53[02] & 20.05 & 20.23 & ... & ... & 0.9342 \\
987: DXS3-6 & 16\,08\,53.016 & +54\,58\,26.08 & 21.90[01] & 21.64[06] & 20.78[03] & 21.17 & 21.23 & ... & ... & 1.3155 \\
988: DXS3-8 & 16\,09\,00.816 & +54\,57\,57.13 & 21.26[01] & 20.26[02] & 19.50[01] & 19.66 & 19.92 & ... & ... & ... \\
989: DXS3-9 & 16\,08\,59.062 & +54\,57\,48.25 & 23.56[03] & 22.05[09] & 21.08[04] & 20.61 & 21.10 & ... & ... & 1.2889 \\
990: DXS3-21 & 16\,08\,51.888 & +54\,55\,59.84 & 22.49[01] & 22.19[10] & 20.68[03] & 20.43 & 20.33 & 19.80 & ... & 1.3910 \\
991: DXS3-25 & 16\,08\,53.686 & +54\,55\,17.18 & 22.66[01] & 21.76[07] & 20.53[02] & 20.01 & 19.81 & 19.77 & 17.19 & ... \\
992: DXS3-26 & 16\,08\,51.504 & +54\,54\,58.25 & 22.24[01] & 21.97[08] & 21.05[04] & ... & ... & ... & ... & 0.2999 \\
993: DXS3-27 & 16\,09\,00.768 & +54\,54\,35.24 & 23.16[02] & 21.66[06] & 20.06[01] & 19.17 & 19.24 & 19.46 & 17.47 & ... \\
994: DXS3-28$^{[4]}$ & 16\,08\,52.704 & +54\,54\,32.76 & 21.82[01] & 21.16[04] & 20.20[02] & 20.33 & 20.72 & ... & ... & 0.6675 \\
995: \hline
996: DXS4-0 & 16\,13\,15.600 & +54\,47\,46.47 & 22.90[02] & 21.54[05] & 21.15[04] & ... & ... & ... & ... & 0.758 \\
997: DXS4-1 & 16\,13\,16.128 & +54\,47\,29.00 & 22.84[02] & 20.64[02] & 19.89[01] & 19.33 & 19.43 & ... & ... & 1.332 \\
998: DXS4-2 & 16\,13\,13.968 & +54\,47\,29.98 & 22.29[01] & 21.92[08] & 22.02[09] & ... & ... & ... & ... & 0.644 \\
999: DXS4-5 & 16\,13\,10.200 & +54\,46\,59.09 & 21.56[01] & 20.89[03] & 20.25[02] & 20.42 & 20.41 & ... & ... & 0.493 \\
1000: DXS4-6 & 16\,13\,00.792 & +54\,48\,01.26 & 23.46[02] & 21.39[05] & 21.11[04] & 20.40 & 20.67 & ... & ... & 1.309 \\
1001: DXS4-9 & 16\,13\,04.754 & +54\,45\,55.69 & 23.30[02] & 21.66[06] & 20.58[02] & 19.90 & 19.97 & ... & ... & ... \\
1002: DXS4-10 & 16\,13\,00.792 & +54\,46\,33.54 & 23.51[02] & 21.06[03] & 20.17[02] & 19.31 & 19.39 & ... & ... & ... \\
1003: DXS4-15 & 16\,12\,54.240 & +54\,46\,26.97 & 21.06[01] & 20.35[02] & 19.78[01] & 20.16 & 20.37 & ... & ... & 0.453 \\
1004: DXS4-20 & 16\,12\,50.618 & +54\,45\,22.54 & 21.45[01] & 20.57[02] & 19.63[01] & 19.66 & 20.15 & ... & ... & 0.600 \\
1005: DXS4-23 & 16\,12\,46.586 & +54\,45\,18.29 & 23.67[02] & 21.50[05] & 20.42[02] & 19.63 & 19.51 & 19.56 & ... & ... \\
1006: DXS4-24 & 16\,12\,46.802 & +54\,44\,56.65 & 23.41[02] & 21.42[05] & 20.76[03] & 20.37 & 20.37 & ... & ... & 1.344 \\
1007: \hline
1008: DXS5-1 & 16\,10\,26.880 & +55\,00\,58.57 & 22.78[01] & 21.14[03] & 20.07[01] & 19.50 & 19.75 & ... & ... & ... \\
1009: DXS5-2 & 16\,10\,34.776 & +54\,59\,22.17 & 22.12[01] & 21.28[04] & 20.54[02] & 20.86 & 21.50 & ... & ... & 0.634 \\
1010: DXS5-4 & 16\,10\,36.098 & +54\,59\,35.98 & 22.94[06] & 22.10[09] & 21.12[03] & ... & ... & ... & ... & 0.807 \\
1011: DXS5-5 & 16\,10\,40.224 & +54\,58\,48.64 & 21.65[01] & 20.76[02] & 19.76[01] & 19.60 & 20.17 & ... & ... & 0.807 \\
1012: DXS5-6 & 16\,10\,28.730 & +55\,02\,02.54 & 22.85[01] & 21.31[04] & 20.04[01] & 19.62 & 19.78 & ... & ... & ... \\
1013: DXS5-9 & 16\,10\,32.978 & +55\,02\,18.50 & 23.46[01] & 21.46[05] & 21.17[04] & ... & ... & ... & ... & ... \\
1014: DXS5-11 & 16\,10\,45.576 & +54\,59\,54.78 & 23.67[01] & 21.76[06] & 20.79[02] & 20.22 & 20.15 & ... & ... & ... \\
1015: DXS5-12 & 16\,10\,44.616 & +55\,00\,22.25 & 23.38[01] & 22.34[11] & 21.22[04] & 21.26 & 21.51 & ... & ... & ... \\
1016: DXS5-15 & 16\,10\,43.488 & +55\,01\,29.56 & 22.67[01] & 21.27[04] & 20.24[01] & 19.32 & 19.62 & 19.92 & 17.13 & ... \\
1017: DXS5-18 & 16\,10\,48.432 & +55\,00\,57.10 & 21.72[01] & 20.63[02] & 19.58[00] & 19.36 & 19.88 & 19.94 & ... & 0.713 \\
1018: DXS5-21 & 16\,10\,47.878 & +55\,02\,14.35 & 23.68[01] & 21.50[05] & 21.04[03] & 20.28 & 20.11 & 19.85 & ... & 1.33 \\
1019: DXS5-22 & 16\,10\,51.240 & +55\,01\,44.11 & 23.81[01] & 22.91[19] & 22.46[13] & ... & ... & ... & ... & 1.13 \\
1020: DXS5-25 & 16\,10\,54.744 & +55\,02\,09.42 & 21.85[01] & 21.02[03] & 20.07[01] & 19.88 & 20.24 & ... & ... & 0.806 \\
1021: DXS5-26 & 16\,10\,57.770 & +55\,01\,47.28 & 23.47[01] & 22.36[11] & 20.70[02] & 20.06 & 20.01 & 20.00 & ... & ... \\
1022: DXS5-27 & 16\,10\,52.512 & +55\,03\,20.84 & 23.60[02] & 22.35[11] & 20.67[02] & 20.29 & 20.61 & ... & ... & ... \\
1023: DXS5-28 & 16\,10\,59.378 & +55\,02\,28.18 & 22.86[01] & 22.91[19] & 21.20[04] & 21.61 & 21.72 & ... & ... & ... \\
1024: \hline\hline
1025: \label{tab:DXS1-5b}
1026: \end{tabular}
1027: }
1028: \vspace{-0.5cm}
1029: \caption{Note: {\it Lenses:} $^{[3]}$ DXS2-9 is a $z=$0.67 galaxy
1030: through identification of Ca\,H\&K, H$\beta$4861 and [O{\sc
1031: iii}]4959,5007. However we also identify [O{\sc ii}]3727 and
1032: Ca\,H\&K at 8109, 8555 and 8632\AA\ respectively (spatial offset
1033: $<$0.5$''$) giving a redshift of $z=$1.175. $^{[4]}$ DXS3-28 is
1034: identified as a $z=$0.67 galaxy from [O{\sc ii}]3727 emission and
1035: Ca\,H\&K absorption. However, spatially offset by $\sim$0.75$''$ to
1036: the south we also identify line emission at 6748,8801,8979\&9067\AA\
1037: which corresponds to redshifted [O{\sc ii}]3727, H$\beta$ and [O{\sc
1038: iii}]4959,5007 for $z=0.81$}.
1039: \end{center}
1040: \end{table*}
1041:
1042: \end{document}
1043: