1: %\documentstyle[11pt]
2: \documentclass[emulateapj]{emulateapj}
3: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
4: %\markboth{Currie}{A Hybrid Mechanism for Gas Giant Planet Formation}
5: %\pagestyle{myheadings}
6: %\nofiles
7:
8: % Some definitions I use in these instructions.
9:
10: %\def\emphasize#1{{\sl#1\/}}
11: %\def\arg#1{{\it#1\/}}
12: %\let\prog=\arg
13:
14: %\def\edcomment#1{\iffalse\marginpar{\raggedright\sl#1\/}\else\relax\fi}
15: %\marginparwidth 1.25in
16: %\marginparsep .125in
17: %\marginparpush .25in
18: %\reversemarginpar
19: \begin{document}
20: \shorttitle{Terrestrial Zone Disks in h and $\chi$ Persei }
21: \shortauthors{Currie, T. et al.}
22: %\setcounter{page}{1}
23: \title{Terrestrial Zone Debris Disk Candidates in h and $\chi$ Persei }
24: %\title{Possible Evidence for Terrestrial Planet Formation from Strong IRAC-excesses in h \& $\chi$ Persei }
25: %\title{Strong IRAC-excess sources in h \& $\chi$ Persei: Possible Evidence for Terrestrial Planet Formation}
26: \author{Thayne Currie\altaffilmark{1}, Scott J. Kenyon\altaffilmark{1}, George Rieke\altaffilmark{2},
27: Zoltan Balog\altaffilmark{2, 4},\& Benjamin C. Bromley\altaffilmark{3}}
28: \altaffiltext{1}{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden St. Cambridge, MA 02140}
29: \altaffiltext{2}{Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, 933 N. Cherry Av. Tucson, AZ 85721}
30: \altaffiltext{3}{Department of Physics, University of Utah, 201 JFB, Salt Lake City, UT 84112}
31: %\altaffiltext{4}{Department of Physics \& Astronomy, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095}
32: \altaffiltext{4}{on leave from Dept. of Optics and Quantum Electronics, University of Szeged, H-6720, Szeged, Hungary}
33: \email{tcurrie@cfa.harvard.edu}
34: \begin{abstract}
35: We analyze 8 sources with strong mid-infrared excesses in the 13 Myr-old double cluster
36: h and $\chi$ Persei. New optical spectra and broadband SEDs (0.36-8 $\mu m$) are
37: consistent with cluster membership. We show that material with T$\sim$300-400 K and L$_{d}$/L$_{\star}$
38: $\sim$10$^{-4}$-10$^{-3}$ produces the excesses in these sources. Optically-thick blackbody disk models - including
39: those with large inner holes - do not match the observed SEDs. The SEDs of optically-thin
40: debris disks produced from terrestrial planet formation calculations match the observations
41: well. Thus, some h and $\chi$ Persei stars may have debris from terrestrial zone planet formation.
42: \end{abstract}
43: \keywords{planetary systems: formation planetary systems: protoplanetary disks}
44: \section{Introduction}
45: Radiometric dating (Yin et al. 2002) suggests
46: that the Earth had $\sim 90\%$ of its mass $\sim$ 30-40 Myr after the formation of the Sun.
47: Terrestrial planet formation models suggest that
48: most of this mass accumulation was complete by $\sim$ 10 Myr and was
49: dominated by mergers of moon-mass oligarchs (Kenyon \& Bromley 2006,
50: hereafter KB06; Chambers 2001). How terrestrial planets form around
51: other stars is unresolved.
52:
53: Optically-thin infrared (IR) emission from collisionally-produced debris
54: is an important observational signature of planet formation (Kenyon \& Bromley
55: 2004, hereafter KB04; Rieke et al. 2005, hereafter R05; KB06).
56: For a 1-2 M$_{\odot}$ star, terrestrial planet formation should
57: produce debris (and hence strong 5-10 $\mu m$ emission) for $\approx$
58: 10-20 Myr. The 5-10 $\mu m$ signature of debris
59: production should then begin to fade (KB04; R05; KB06).
60: While many debris disk surveys (R05; Gorlova et al. 2006; Su et al. 2006) have discovered evidence for
61: Kuiper-belt analogues from 24--70 $\mu m$ excess emission around
62: early A stars, there have been fewer searches for terrestrial zone debris disks around
63: $\sim$ 1-2 $M_{\odot}$ stars.
64: Previous searches (e.g. Meyer et al. 2006; Silverstone et al. 2006)
65: have also concentrated on protoplanetary disks
66: $\lesssim$ 5 Myr old, or on the evolution
67: of classical debris disks (ages $\gtrsim$ 30 Myr) when
68: planet formation is nearly complete and debris production
69: is declining.
70:
71: The double cluster h and $\chi$ Persei (d=2.34 kpc, $\sim$ 13 Myr old) provides an ideal probe of
72: terrestrial planet formation. The clusters contain $\gtrsim$ 5000 stars with
73: masses $\gtrsim$ 1.3 $M_{\odot}$, an order of magnitude larger population than other
74: nearby, evolved clusters.
75: The recent IRAC 3.6-8 $\mu m$ survey of h and $\chi$ Persei by Currie et al.
76: (2007; hereafter C07) discovered a large population of sources
77: with IR excess emission in the IRAC bands (up to 4-8\% at 8$\mu m$). C07 showed
78: that the frequency of disk emission is larger for less massive stars
79: and at greater distances from the central star.
80: The IR excesses are bluer, $K_{s}$-[IRAC]$\sim$ 0.5-1.5, than those
81: for Class II T Tauri stars (e.g. Kenyon \& Hartmann 1987;
82: hereafter KH87), which suggests that the disks are less optically thick and
83: perhaps in an evolved state.
84:
85: The goal of this paper is to constrain the source of the excess IR emission
86: in h and $\chi$ Per stars by modeling the SEDs and IRAC/MIPS colors of
87: sources with high quality IR/optical photometry and spectra.
88: In \S 2 we describe our sample and explain our
89: SED fitting. In \S 3 we show that the IR excess is best
90: explained by debris from terrestrial planet
91: formation. Both photospheric emission and optically-thick disk models
92: fail to explain the SED slopes and IRAC colors. Optically-thick disk +
93: inner hole models are marginally consistent with photometry $\le$ 5.8 $\mu m$ but are not
94: consistent with either the 8$\mu m$ ([8]) data or MIPS data.
95: % and search for debris disks
96: %around lower-mass stars.
97: %If confirmed, these results provide evidence for
98: %terrestrial planet formation around other stars.
99: %\section{Source Selection, Dereddening, and Spectral Typing}
100: \section{Infrared Photometry and Spectral Typing}
101: The C07 survey covered $\sim$ 0.75 sq. deg. centered on h and
102: $\chi$ Persei. We select stars with J$\le$16
103: and with 'strong excesses' at multiple IRAC bands, $K_{s}$-[5.8] $\ge$ 0.5
104: (or $K_{s}$-[4.5] $\ge$ 0.5 in absence of [5.8] data) and $K_{s}$-[8]$\ge$0.75.
105: All of these sources have K$_{s}$$\ge$13.5. In this sample, 1,915 have
106: 5$\sigma$ detections at [5.8] (or [4.5]) and [8], lie along the
107: h and $\chi$ Per isochrone, and were not flagged for contamination
108: by background galaxies (see \S 2.3 of C07 for criteria).
109: Eight of these sources (see Table 1) have 'strong excesses' and
110: have high-quality optical photometry from Keller et al. (2001; UBVI)
111: or Slesnick et al. (2002; V band only).
112:
113: We derive a worst-case probability that the [5.8]
114: and [8] emission from these 8 sources are contaminated by z=0.1-0.4
115: PAH-emission galaxies that escaped flagging and could masquerade as a 'strong excess' source.
116: We assume that all sources from our population
117: are as faint as our faintest source ($K_{s}$=15) and that any superimposed galaxy with [5.8] $\le$ 15
118: will trigger selection of one of the 1,915 sources.
119: We also assume that all galaxies are PAH-emission galaxies, that none were removed by flagging, and
120: that each star covers an 'area' of $\pi$2$^{2}$ square arcseconds.
121: Using the galaxy number counts for the Bootes field from Fazio et al.
122: (2004; $\sim$ 1,165/sq. deg. for [5.8]$\le$15), the expected
123: number of contaminated sources is N$_{p}$$\sim$ 2.2 ($\pi$2$^{2}$$\times$1165/(3600$^{2}$)$\times$1915).
124: If we adopt the number density of PAH-emission galaxies for this field
125: (Stern et al. 2005) instead of the number density of \textit{all}
126: galaxies, the predicted number of contaminated sources is N$_{p}$$\sim$0.3.
127: Thus, even under the most pessimistic assumptions no more than $\sim$
128: 2/8 sources are contaminated.
129:
130: We obtained Hectospec (Fabricant et al. 2005) and FAST (Fabricant et al. 1998) spectra of these 8 sources
131: on the 6.5m MMT and 1.5m Tillinghast telescope at F. L. Whipple Observatory
132: during September-November 2006.
133: For the FAST sources, we took $\sim$ 10 minute exposures using
134: a 300 g mm$^{-1}$ grating blazed at 4750 $\AA$ and
135: a 3$\arcsec$ slit. These spectra cover 3800--7500 $\AA$ at 6 $\AA$ resolution.
136: For each Hectospec source (the six faintest), we took three, 10-minute exposures
137: using the 270 g mm$^{-1}$ grating. This configuration yields spectra at
138: 4000-9000$\AA$ with 3$\AA$ resolution. The data were
139: processed using standard FAST and Hectospec reduction pipelines (e.g. Fabricant et al. 2005).
140: %We wavelength-calibrate the spectra
141: %in NOAO IRAF\footnote{IRAF is distributed by the National Optical
142: %Astronomy Observatory, which is operated by the Association of
143: %Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc. under contract to the
144: %National Science Foundation.}.
145: %After trimming the CCD frames, we correct for the bias level, flat-field each frame,
146: %apply an illumination correction, and derive a full wavelength
147: %solution from calibration lamps acquired immediately after each
148: %exposure. The wavelength solution for each frame has a probable
149: %error of $\pm$0.5 $\dot{A}$ or better. To construct final 1-D spectra,
150: %we extract object and sky spectra using the optimal extraction
151: %algorithm APEXTRACT within IRAF.
152: The resulting spectra typically
153: have moderate signal-to-noise, S/N $\gtrsim$ 30 per pixel (Figure 1a).
154:
155: To measure spectral types, we derived
156: spectral indices of $H_{\alpha}$, $H_{\beta}$, $H_{\gamma}$,
157: $H_{\delta}$, the G band (4305 $\dot{A}$), and Mg I (5175 $\dot{A}$) as in
158: O'Connell (1973). We derived piecewise linear relationships
159: between spectral indices and spectral type from the Jacoby et al. (1984) standards,
160: similar to the method of Hernandez et al. (2004). All sources have spectral
161: types consistent with those expected for 13 Myr h \& $\chi$ Persei sources reddened by E(B-V)$\sim$
162: 0.52 (Bragg \& Kenyon 2005) at a distance of 2.4 kpc. None are foreground M stars or background O/B stars.
163: No sources have a $H_{\alpha}$ equivalent width $\ge$10$\dot{A}$ indicative of
164: gas accretion. As an additional check on our spectral types, we fit the SED
165: from U through $K_{s}$ to photospheric models in $\lambda$ vs. $\lambda$$F_{\lambda}$ space.
166: Spectral types derived from spectroscopy and SED fitting agree to within 2-3 subclasses.
167: To model their intrinsic SEDs through [8], the sources were dereddened in all
168: bands. We use Bessell \& Brett (1988) and Keller et al. (2001), respectively, to
169: calibrate the V-I and U-B reddening from E(B-V), and
170: the IR extinction laws from Indebetouw (2005) to deredden the 2MASS and IRAC bands.
171:
172: Finally, we acquired MIPS 24 $\mu m$ photometry
173: with an integration time of 80 seconds/pixel.
174: The frames were processed using the MIPS Data Analysis Tool;
175: PSF fitting in the IRAF/DAOPHOT package was used to
176: obtain photometry adopting 7.3 Jy for the zero-point magnitude (Gordon et al. 2005).
177: We derive the MIPS 5$\sigma$ upper limits from the histogram of
178: the number counts as a function of magnitude. The MIPS data are complete to $\sim$ 10.5
179: and yield a 5$\sigma$ detection for only one source, source 5,
180: with [24]$\sim$9.9$\pm$0.05.
181: We estimate the [24] reddening from Mathis (1990): $A_{[24]}$$\approx$0.025.
182: Therefore, our one 5$\sigma$ detection at [24] has $K_{s}$-[24]$\sim$4.4.
183: %Table 1 shows a list of the sources to be analyzed.
184: \section{Modeling of Disk Emission}
185: %\subsection{Disk Models}
186: Figure 2 shows the source SEDs (filled diamonds). To compare them with stellar
187: photospheres, we used optical/IR colors for each spectral type
188: from Kenyon \& Hartmann (1995; KH95) and converted from colors to
189: $\lambda$$F_{\lambda}$ in the Johnson-Cousins system.
190: The zero-point flux from the models was scaled to match the
191: dereddened V through J fluxes for each source (Allen 2001; Cohen et al. 2003).
192: All sources have photospheric fluxes through [3.6]; one source (4) clearly has
193: IR excess at [4.5]. All sources with [5.8] and [8] measurements show clear evidence
194: for circumstellar emission. The SEDs are
195: similar to some 'anemic' disks around A-F stars in IC 348 (Lada et al. 2006).
196:
197: To characterize the emission, we calculate the
198: dust blackbody temperatures that match the observed [8] flux but do not overproduce
199: the flux at other wavelengths.
200: The range of dust blackbody temperatures (typically 300-400 K) for each source
201: imply terrestrial zone emission. Derived disk luminosities are L$_{d}$/L$_{\star}$
202: $\sim$ 10$^{-4}$-10$^{-3}$, comparable to debris disks (R05).
203:
204: To investigate the disk emission in more detail, we constructed
205: three disk models spanning a
206: range of evolutionary states for disks surrounding $\sim$ 10 Myr old stars.
207: The optically thick, non accreting,
208: flat disk model (KH87) assumes that the disk
209: passively reradiates photons from the star and extends
210: from the magnetospheric truncation radius to $\gtrsim$ 2000 R$_{\star}$.
211: In a second disk model, an 'inner hole' model, all disk material $\le 50$
212: $R_{\star}$ ($\sim$ 1 AU for R=2 R$_{\odot}$, this was the best fit)
213: from the star is removed from the optically thick, flat disk model.
214: This model is similar to the morphology expected for 'transition' T Tauri disks (e.g KH95).
215:
216: Finally, we model the IR emission from an optically-thin debris disk.
217: In a debris disk, modest IR excesses result from small grains produced by destructive collisions
218: between $\sim 1-10$ km planetesimals during the oligarchic growth stage of planet
219: formation (see KB04; Kenyon \& Bromley 2005). As in the KB04 calculations, the starting radial surface
220: density ($\Sigma$) profile follows a minimum mass solar nebula, $\Sigma \propto r^{-3/2}$
221: (Hayashi 1981). Planetesimal collisions are modeled in the terrestrial zone,
222: $\sim$ 1.5-7.5 AU away from a $2 M_{\odot}$ primary star. Disk emission is tracked for
223: $\sim 100$ Myr from the start of collisions. The resulting SED is computed and 2MASS and
224: IRAC colors are determined.
225:
226: Figure 2 compares predictions from the three disk models to the data (Figure 2).
227: Optically-thin, debris disk models (dash-three dot line)
228: consistently match the [5.8] and [8] IRAC fluxes. While the debris
229: disk models can overpredict the flux at [3.6] and [4.5] by
230: $\sim$ 25$\%$, the predictions at [5.8] and [8] typically fall within
231: 20$\%$ of observed values. In some cases (sources 2-4, 8) the agreement is excellent.
232: Standard optically-thick disk models (long dashes, source 1 only)
233: and the best-fit optically-thick disk + inner hole models (dashes) fail to match the SEDs.
234: The optically-thick disk models overestimate the flux by $\ge$ a factor of 10
235: beyond [3.6]. The inner hole model matches the observed SEDs through [3.6] but
236: typically overpredicts the [5.8] ([8]) fluxes by factors of 1.5 (3).
237: Furthermore, the optically-thick flat disk and inner hole models consistently
238: predict a 24$\mu m$ flux $\sim$ 10-20$\times$ greater (or $\sim$ 3 magnitudes redder)
239: than the observed flux (one source) or the 5$\sigma$ upper limits (5 sources).
240: The debris disk model, which predicts $K_{s}$-[24]$\sim$3,
241: is consistent with the 24 $\mu m$ upper limits of the sources
242: not detected with MIPS. The debris disk prediction is $\sim$ 2.5 times fainter
243: ($\sim$ 1 magnitude bluer) than the observed $K_{s}$-[24] color from source 5.
244: However, planet formation calculations at 30-150 AU predict significant 24 $\mu m$
245: emission ($K_{s}$-[24] $\approx$ 3.5-4) by $\sim$ 10-30 Myr around
246: 2 $M_{\odot}$ stars (Currie et al. in prep., Kenyon \& Bromley, in prep.), so
247: regions beyond the terrestrial zone may contribute some [24] emission.
248: More massive disks or those with flatter density profiles (e.g. $r^{-1}$) than assumed here
249: may also yield slightly larger [24] excesses.
250: %\subsection{IRAC colors \& MIPS photometry/upper limits}
251:
252: Figure 3 shows the results in $K_{s}$-[4.5]/$K_{s}$-[8] and $K_{s}$-[5.8]/$K_{s}$-[8]
253: color-color diagrams. In both figures, the IRAC colors of our sources (diamonds/triangles) lie halfway
254: between the photospheric and inner hole models (left square and dotted line).
255: At the peak of debris disk emission (solid line), the
256: debris disk model also produces IR colors about halfway between the photospheric and inner hole models.
257: The colors show good agreement with debris disk predictions in
258: $K_{s}$-[5.8] and $K_{s}$-[8], typically within 0.2 mags, and
259: fair agreement with the [4.5] data.
260: Inner hole models for earlier (later) spectral types predict $K_{s}$-[8]
261: $\sim$ 1.75 (3), or $\sim$ 1-2 magnitudes too red.
262: Many of the sources are, at best, marginally consistent
263: with any star+background galaxy colors (dot-dashed enclosed region):
264: 3/7 (4/7) are consistent with contamination in the $K_{s}$-[4.5]/$K_{s}$-[8]
265: ($K_{s}$-[5.8]/$K_{s}$-[8]) diagrams. Only 2/8 are consistent with
266: contamination in both plots. Even considering systematic
267: errors/uncertainties (model uncertainties, photometric
268: errors), the sources occupy a very small region of possible star+galaxy colors
269: and are still only marginally consistent with contamination.
270:
271: The optically thick disk+inner hole model fails
272: to model the IRAC/MIPS data in all cases; the debris disk model is consistent with
273: the IRAC data and more consistent with the MIPS detection/upper limits.
274: Thus, debris from planet formation is the most plausible explanation for
275: near-to-mid IR emission from these sources.
276: \section{Discussion}
277: Near-to-mid IR-excess emission for our sample originates from dust
278: with T$\sim$300-400 K and L$_{d}$/L$_{\star}$$\sim$10$^{-4}$-10$^{-3}$.
279: Circumstellar debris produced from terrestrial planet
280: formation is the most likely explanation for this emission.
281: Future observations with the Spitzer Space Telescope and the James Webb
282: Space Telescope can provide stronger constraints on the SEDs of these
283: terrestrial zone debris disk candidates and greatly expand the
284: sample of $\sim$ 13 Myr-old candidates in h and $\chi$ Persei.
285: Current IRAC/MIPS data require that the disks have little dust out to distances
286: probed by [4.5] and are optically thin out to
287: [24]. For a 13 Myr, K0 (F1) star with a luminosity of $\sim$ 1.49 (7.4) $L_{\odot}$,
288: the disks are dust free out to $\sim$ 0.23 (0.51) AU and optically thin to
289: $\sim$ 6.6 (14.6) AU. Deeper MIPS [24] observations of these sources may
290: more conclusively constrain the disk SED to compare with debris disk and transition disk models.
291: Mid-IR spectroscopy may also aid source identification from the $\sim$ 10-20$\mu m$ flux levels and
292: and the strength of the 10 $\mu m$ silicate feature (see
293: Sicilia-Aguilar et al. 2007).
294: \acknowledgements
295: We thank Matt Ashby, Rob Gutermuth, and Anil Seth for useful discussions regarding galaxy contamination and
296: the anonymous referee for a thorough review. We acknowledge support from the
297: NASA Astrophysics Theory Program grant NAG5-13278, TPF Grant NNG06GH25G and the Spitzer GO program (Proposal 20132).
298: T. C. received funding from an SAO Predoctoral Fellowship; Z. B.
299: received support from
300: Hungarian OTKA Grants TS049872, T042509, and T049082.
301: This work was supported by contract 1255094, issued by JPL/Caltech to the University
302: of Arizona.
303: %This research has made use of the NASA/IPAC Infrared Science Archive, which is
304: %operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract
305: %with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
306: \begin{thebibliography}{}
307: %\bibitem[Au (1999)]{Au99} Augereau, J., et al., 1999, A\&A, 348, 557
308: %\bibitem[Ba (2003)]{Ba03} Bary, J., et al. 2003, ApJ, 586, 1136
309: \bibitem[Al (2001)]{Al01} Allen, C. W., 2001, Allen's Astrophysical Quantities, Fourth Ed., Arthur N. Cox (ed.), Springer-Verlag
310: \bibitem[Be (1988)]{Be88} Bessell, M., Brett, J., 1988, PASP, 100, 1134
311: \bibitem[BK (2005)]{BK05} Bragg, A. \& Kenyon, S., 2005, ApJ, 130, 134
312: \bibitem[Ch (2001)]{Ch01} Chambers, J., 2001, Icarus, 152, 205
313: \bibitem[Co (2003)]{Co03} Cohen, M., et al., 2003, AJ, 126, 1090
314: \bibitem[Cu (2007)]{Cu07} Currie, T., et al., 2007, \apj,659, 599
315: %\bibitem[Cu (2007)]{Cu07} Currie, T., et al., 2007, astro-ph/0701441
316: \bibitem[Fa (1998)]{fab98} Fabricant, D., et al., 1998, \pasp, 110, 79
317: \bibitem[Fa (2005)]{Fa05} Fabricant, D., et al., 2005, \pasp, 117, 1411
318: \bibitem[Fz (2004)]{Fz04} Fazio, G., et al., 2004, ApJS, 154, 39
319: \bibitem[Go (2005)]{Go05} Gordon, K. D., et al., 2005, \pasp, 117, 503
320: \bibitem[Gr (2006)]{Gr06} Gorlova, N., et al., 2006, ApJ, 649, 1028
321: %\bibitem[Ha (2005)]{Ha05} Hartmann, L., et al., 2005, ApJ, 629, 881
322: \bibitem[Ha (1981)]{Ha81} Hayashi, C.,1981, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl., 70, 35
323: \bibitem[He (2004)]{He04} Hernandez, J., et al., 2004, AJ, 127, 1682
324: \bibitem[Ja (1984)]{Ja84} Jacoby, G., et al., 1984, ApJS, 56, 257
325: \bibitem[Ke (2001)]{Ke01} Keller, S.C., et al., 2001, AJ, 122, 248
326: \bibitem[KB (2004)]{Kb04} Kenyon, S., Bromley, B., 2004, ApJL, 602, 133
327: \bibitem[KB (2005)]{Kb05} Kenyon, S., Bromley, B., 2005, AJ, 130, 269
328: \bibitem[KB (2006)]{Kb06} Kenyon, S., Bromley, B., 2006, AJ, 131, 1837
329: \bibitem[KH (1987)]{Kh87} Kenyon, S., Hartmann, L., 1987, ApJ, 323, 714
330: \bibitem[KH (1995)]{Kh95} Kenyon, S., Hartmann, L., 1995, ApJS, 101, 117
331: \bibitem[In (2005)]{In05} Indebetouw, R., et al., 2005, ApJ, 619, 931
332: \bibitem[Ma (1990)]{Ma90} Mathis, J., 1990, ARA\&A, 28, 37
333: \bibitem[Mi (2007)]{Mi07} Meyer, M., et al., 2006, astro-ph/0606399
334: %\bibitem[MS (1979)]{Ms79} Miller, G., \& Scalo, J., 1979 ApJS, 41, 513
335: \bibitem[Oc (1973)]{Oc73} O'Connell, R., 1973, \aj, 78, 1074
336: \bibitem[La (2006)]{La06} Lada, C.J., et al., 2006, AJ, 131, 1574
337: \bibitem[Ri (2005)]{Ri05} Rieke, G., et al., 2005, ApJ, 620, 1010
338: %\bibitem[Si (2000)]{Si00} Siess, L., et al., 2000, A\&A, 358, 593
339: \bibitem[Si (2007)]{Si07} Sicilia-Aguilar, A., et al., 2007, astro-ph/0701321
340: \bibitem[Si (2006)]{Si06} Silverstone, M., et al., 2006, \apj,639, 1138
341: \bibitem[Sl (2002)]{Sl02} Slesnick, C., et al., 2002, ApJ, 576, 880
342: \bibitem[St (2005)]{St05} Stern, D., et al., 2005, ApJ, 631, 163
343: \bibitem[Su (2006)]{Su06} Su, K., et al., 2006, ApJ, 653, 675
344: %\bibitem[Wi (2007)]{Wi07} Winston, E., et al., 2007, ApJ submitted
345: \bibitem[Yin (2002)]{Yi02} Yin, Q., et al., 2002, Nature, 418, 949
346: \end{thebibliography}
347:
348: \clearpage
349:
350: \begin{deluxetable}{llllllllllllllll}
351: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
352: \tablecolumns{16}
353: %\tablecolumns{13}
354: \tablecaption{Sources analyzed in this paper (Dereddened, A$_{V}$$\sim$1.62)}
355: \tablehead{{$\#$}&{$\alpha$}&{$\delta$}&{ST}&{V}&{U-B}&{B-V}&{V-I}&{J}&{H}&{$K_{s}$}&{[3.6]}&{[4.5]}&{[5.8]}&{[8]}&{[24]}}
356: %\tablehead{{RA}&{DEC}&{V}&{U-B}&{B-V}&{V-I}&{J}&{H}&{$K_{s}$}&{[3.6]}&{[4.5]}&{[5.8]}&{[8]}}
357: \startdata
358: 1&2:17:34.7&56:47:25 &F1&14.15& - & - & - & 13.58& 13.51& 13.52& 13.38$\pm$0.01& 13.29$\pm$0.05& 12.97$\pm$0.05& 12.15$\pm$0.04&-\\
359: 2&2:17:38.0&56:53:51 &A9&14.03& 0.09& 0.17& 0.06& 13.61& 13.55& 13.45& -& -& 12.55$\pm$0.06& 12.35$\pm$0.14&-\\
360: 3&2:19:11.3&57:09:53 &F1&14.72& 0.46& 0.37& 0.34& 13.88& 13.64& 13.64& 13.31$\pm$0.03& 13.23$\pm$0.02& 13.23$\pm$0.11& 12.89$\pm$0.08&$>$10.5\\
361: 4&2:22:06.4&57:07:06 &F7&15.44&-& -& 0.51& 14.62& 14.22& 14.28& -& 13.77$\pm$0.19& -& 13.38$\pm$0.12&$>$10.5\\
362: 5&2:19:07.7&57:14:05 &F9&15.77& 0.35& 0.63& 0.53& 14.65& 14.26& 14.29& 14.27$\pm$0.06& 14.19$\pm$0.09& 13.83$\pm$0.10& 13.03$\pm$0.09&9.9\\
363: 6&2:17:59.3&56:53:45 &G9&16.40&-& -& 0.45& 15.15& 14.60& 14.87& 14.71$\pm$0.07& 14.73$\pm$0.11& 14.27$\pm$0.13& 14.06$\pm$0.19&$>$10.5\\
364: 7&2:17:39.5&57:20:26 &K0&16.43&-& -& 0.76& 14.85& 14.43& 14.69& 14.43$\pm$0.06& 14.50$\pm$0.05& 14.29$\pm$0.18& 13.68$\pm$0.14&$>$10.5\\
365: 8&2:17:46.0&57:10:18 &K1&16.72&-& -& 0.78& 15.12& 14.54& 14.43& 14.59$\pm$0.09& 14.35$\pm$0.10& 14.03$\pm$0.11& 13.51$\pm$0.12&$>$10.5\\
366: \enddata
367: %\tablecomments{Spectral types for sources 3-8 were derived from Hectospec observations and verified with SED fitting from
368: %U through $K_{s}$. Sources 1-2 were outside the Hectospec coverage, so the spectral types shown are those most consistent
369: %with the source SEDs. While these spectral types are somewhat uncertain, we note that the agreement is excellent between
370: %spectral types from Hectospec and those most consistent with SED fitting.}
371: \end{deluxetable}
372:
373: \clearpage
374:
375: \begin{figure}
376: \epsscale{0.4}
377: \plotone{f1.eps}
378: %\plotone{Hspect.ps}
379: \caption{FAST and Hectospec spectra for our sample, with spectral types ranging from F1/A9 (top) to K0/K1 (bottom).
380: The bottom source (8) has a 2000 count offset; spectra near the edges approach zero counts.}
381: \end{figure}
382: \begin{figure}
383: \epsscale{0.5}
384: %\plottwo{f2a.eps}{f2b.eps}
385: \plotone{f2a.eps}
386: \plotone{f2b.eps}
387: \caption{Spectral energy distributions of the sources. Filled diamonds denote
388: detections; down arrows identify MIPS 5$\sigma$ upper limits.
389: The SED fits from V through [3.6] match photospheric predictions (dot-dashed line).
390: Sources have clear, strong IR excess at [5.8] and [8].
391: The dust blackbody temperatures indicate terrestrial zone emission.
392: Both standard optically-thick flat disk models (shown in the first plot only, large dashed line/open triangles) and
393: optically-thick models with inner holes (dashed line/asterisks) overpredict the flux at [8]. Debris disk models (three dot-dashed line/open diamonds) appear to be
394: consistent with the data.}
395: \end{figure}
396: %\clearpage
397: \begin{figure}
398: \epsscale{0.5}
399: \plotone{f3a.eps}
400: \plotone{f3b.eps}
401: \caption{$K_{s}$-[IRAC] colors for sources --triangles for sources earlier than G2, diamonds for sources later--
402: and predictions for photospheric, and standard optically-thick disk
403: models (left and top-right squares), and a range of optically-thick disk + inner hole models (K0 to F0).
404: The median errors in IRAC are shown in the lower left-hand corner.
405: The photospheric and optically-thick disk colors are for a spectral type of G2 and vary little with spectral type.
406: Overplotted as a thick solid line are the expected colors for emission produced by
407: optically-thin debris, a byproduct of terrestrial planet formation. The debris disk colors change due to
408: the evolving dust production rate from planet formation. The dot-dashed region encloses possible
409: colors for photospheric sources+background galaxy contamination; PAH galaxies have [5.8]-[8]=1-3 and any
410: star+galaxy composite 'source' with [4.5,5.8]-[8]$\gtrsim$1 would have been flagged as a contaminated source and
411: removed from our sample.
412: The debris disk model fits to within $\sim$ 0.3 mags in all cases; only 2/8 sources are consistent
413: with star+PAH galaxy-contaminated colors.}
414: \end{figure}
415:
416: \end{document}
417: