1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %\documentclass{emulateapj}
3: %\usepackage{apjfonts}
4: %\usepackage{lscape}
5:
6: \shorttitle{Spectra of Young Nearby Stars}
7: \shortauthors{White et al. 2006}
8:
9: \usepackage{amsmath}
10: \usepackage{natbib}
11:
12: \begin{document}
13:
14: \title{High Dispersion Optical Spectra of Nearby Stars Younger Than the Sun}
15:
16: \author{Russel J. White\altaffilmark{1}, Jared M. Gabor\altaffilmark{2}, Lynne A. Hillenbrand}
17: \affil{Department of Astronomy, California Institute of Technology, MS
18: 105-24, Pasadena, CA 91125}
19: \email{russel.white@uah.edu, jgabor@orion.as.arizona.edu, lah@warning.caltech.edu}
20:
21: \altaffiltext{1}{Present Address: University of Alabama in Huntsville, 301 Sparkman Dr., OB 201 B,
22: Huntsville, AL 35899}
23:
24: \altaffiltext{2}{Present Address: University of Arizona, 933 N. Cherry Ave, Rm. N204, Tucson, AZ
25: 85721}
26:
27: \begin{abstract}
28: We present high dispersion (R $\sim$ 16,000) optical ($3900 - 8700$ \AA)
29: spectra of 390 stars obtained with
30: the Palomar 60-inch Telescope. The majority of stars
31: observed are part of the Spitzer Legacy Science Program \textit{The
32: Formation \& Evolution of Planetary Systems}. Through detailed analysis
33: we determine stellar properties for this sample, including radial and rotational
34: velocities, Li\,I $\lambda$ 6708 and $H\alpha$ equivalent widths, the chromospheric
35: activity index $R'_{HK}$, and temperature- and gravity-sensitive
36: line ratios. Several spectroscopic binaries are also identified. From our tabulations,
37: we illustrate basic age- and rotation-related correlations among measured indices.
38: One novel result is that Ca\,II chromospheric emission
39: appears to saturate at $v$sin$i$ values above $\sim 30$ km s$^{-1}$, similar to the well
40: established saturation of x-rays that originate in the spatially separate coronal
41: region.
42: \end{abstract}
43:
44: \keywords{stars: fundamental parameters --- stars: activity --- stars: pre-main sequence}
45:
46: \section{Introduction}
47:
48: We have obtained high dispersion spectra of several hundred solar type stars
49: within 20-160 pc of the Sun in order to determine fundamental stellar properties.
50: Our work is in support of the {\it Spitzer}/Legacy Program ``Formation and
51: Evolution of Planetary Systems" \citep[FEPS;][]{meyer06}, which
52: aims to understand the evolution of circumstellar dust from
53: the primordial planet-building phase at an age of $\sim 3$ Myr to mature debris disk
54: systems up to an age of $\sim 3$ Gyr. While data from the {\it Spitzer} Space
55: Telescope probe the dust characteristics, a wide range of ancillary
56: ground-based observations are required to estimate stellar properties.
57: High dispersion spectroscopy, in particular, is a valuable tool for
58: determining radial and rotational velocities, effective temperatures and
59: surface gravities, abundances, and chromospheric activity diagnostics.
60: These in turn provide useful constraints on stellar masses and ages.
61: The stellar parameters derived from these spectroscopic observations
62: thereby permit multiple axes of investigation for the infrared data from
63: {\it Spitzer}, such as whether dust disk characteristics can be
64: (anti-)correlated with stellar mass, signatures of youth, and/or stellar
65: multiplicity.
66:
67: In Section 2 we describe the observed sample and the spectroscopic observations.
68: In Sections 3 and 4 we summarize the spectroscopic reductions and the methods
69: used to extract spectroscopic properties. In Section 5 we discuss the spectroscopic
70: binaries identified in the sample and illustrate basic age related correlations among
71: the measured properties; the relation and apparent saturation of chromospheric Ca\,II
72: emission versus projected rotational velocity is highlighted.
73: The analysis is meant to be representative rather than complete. The
74: spectroscopic properties are presented primarily to assist more detailed
75: studies of individual FEPS stars.
76:
77: \section{Sample and Observations}
78:
79: Our primary sample for high dispersion spectroscopic observations consists
80: of actual FEPS targets as well as many candidate targets eventually dropped from the
81: FEPS program. The source list for FEPS is comprised of young near-solar
82: analogs that range in mass from 0.7-1.5 M$_\odot$ and span ages
83: between 3 Myr and 3 Gyr. This source list was drawn from
84: three samples of young solar-analogs.
85: The first sample was assembled from the D. R. Soderblom (2000, private communication)
86: volume-limited ($<$ 50 pc) spectroscopic study of stars with B-V colors between 0.52 and 0.81
87: mag (spectral types ~ F8-K0) and Mv magnitudes within 1.0 mag of the solar-metallicity
88: zero-age main sequence; approximate ages are provided from the chromospheric activity
89: index $R'_{HK}$.
90: Since this nearby field sample primarily consists of stars older than a few\,$\times\,
91: 10^8$ yr, a second sample was assembled with an targeted age range of 3-300 Myr.
92: Stars in this sample were identified based on observational investigations to identify
93: young main-sequence and pre-main sequence solar-type stars with strong x-ray
94: emission, high lithium abundances, and kinematics appropriate for the young
95: galactic disk \citep[e.g.][]{mamajek02}.
96: The third sample consists of stars in nearby well-studied clusters, including 4
97: open clusters [IC 2602 (55 Myr), Alpha Per (90 Myr), Pleiades (125 Myr),
98: Hyades (650 Myr)] and 3 younger T Tauri age clusters [R Corona Australis (3 Myr),
99: Upper Scorpius (5 Myr), Upper Centaurus Lupus (10 Myr)]. Stars in these clusters
100: serve to benchmark our field star selection criteria
101: by providing sub-samples nearly identical in age, composition, and birth
102: environment. These three parent samples and the procedure for downselecting
103: to the final FEPS sample observed with {\it Spitzer}
104: are described more fully in \citet{meyer06}. In addition to stars in this primary
105: sample, a handful of other young and/or chromospherically active stars (e.g.
106: RS CVn) were observed for comparison, and $\sim 20$ stars with precisely
107: known radial velocities \citep{nidever02} were observed for calibration and analysis
108: purposes.
109:
110: High dispersion spectroscopic observations were obtained for 363 stars
111: among the sample described above; 284 of these stars are among the 326 stars
112: that comprise the final FEPS program as executed with {\it Spitzer}
113: (the vast majority of FEPS stars not observed are in the southern hemisphere
114: and thus inaccessible from Palomar Observatory). Fifty-two of the 363 stars
115: observed are members of the 3 open clusters and 31 stars are members of the
116: 3 young clusters. For calibration purposes,
117: we also observed 13 giant stars with spectral types ranging from G5
118: to M2, 5 early- to mid-M dwarf stars, and 9 early A type stars with nearly
119: featureless continua. Tables 1\footnote{The complete version of Table 1
120: is available online.} and 2 list the observed sample (excluding
121: non-solar type calibration stars), ordered by right ascension; Table
122: 1 contains spectroscopic single stars and candidate single-lined
123: spectroscopic binaries (for which stellar properties could be determined)
124: while Table 2 contains known or newly discovered double-lined spectroscopic
125: binaries. Coordinates for all stars are from the 2MASS All-Sky Catalog of
126: Point Sources \citep{cutri03}, as interpreted by VizieR \citep{ochsenbein00}.
127:
128: Spectroscopic observations were obtained on 9 observing runs
129: between July 2001 and June 2003 with the Palomar 60-inch telescope
130: and facility spectrograph \citep{mccarthy88} in its echelle mode.
131: This instrument is no longer available.
132: A 1\farcs43$\times$7\farcs36 slit was used, yielding spectra spanning
133: from approximately 3900 \AA\, to 8700 \AA, with some small gaps between
134: the redder orders. While the 2-pixel resolving power of this instrument is
135: $\sim 19,000$, the achieved resolving power was typically $\sim 16,000$
136: because of image quality issues.
137: The wavelength coverage
138: was chosen so as to include both the Ca\,II H\&K features at
139: the blue end and the Ca\,II infrared-triplet at the red end. The spectrograph
140: images the echelle spectra onto an 800$\times$800 CCD; the consequence
141: of projecting the broad wavelength coverage onto this modest sized CCD
142: is that the orders are closely spaced, especially at the red end.
143: The detector has a gain of 1.5 and
144: read noise $\sim 12$ electrons. During each night of
145: observations, series of bias exposures and flat field exposures were
146: obtained to effect standard image processing. Because of the large
147: spectral range of the
148: instrument, the flat field images were taken with two separate incandescent
149: lamps, one appropriate for illumination of the blueward range of the
150: detector (at 60 seconds exposure time) and the other appropriate for the
151: redward range (5 seconds exposure time). For wavelength calibration,
152: spectra of Thorium-Argon lamps were obtained (45 seconds exposure time)
153: generally before or after each on-sky group of target exposures,
154:
155: Each target observation consisted of between 1 and 3 consecutive exposures.
156: The dates for these observations are listed in Tables 1 and 2; multiple
157: epoch observations are listed separately. At least 3 stars with precisely
158: known radial velocities from \citet{nidever02} were observed per observing
159: run.
160:
161: One feature of this instrument is that the optimal focus for the bluest orders
162: is not optimal for the reddest orders, so subjective compromises had to be
163: made in focusing the spectrograph. Additionally, the spectroscopic focus was
164: temperature sensitive, and therefore had to be tuned periodically throughout
165: the night to achieve the best spectral resolution. On the night of 2002 Feb 2,
166: many spectra were obtained at an exceptionally poor focus setting. When poorly
167: focused, the spectrograph produces spectra that are stigmatic - spectral lines
168: skewed relative to the dispersion direction which degrades resolution (by an
169: amount that is wavelength dependent). To help assess how poor focus may
170: compromise
171: the analysis (e.g. $v$sin$i$ measurements), on the night of 2002 Sep 18 we
172: observed the radial velocity standard HD 164992 over a broad range of focus
173: values.
174:
175: \section{Spectroscopic Reductions}
176:
177: \subsection {Image Processing}
178:
179: Raw data frames were processed using tasks in IRAF and custom IDL
180: scripts. First, the detector
181: bias was removed. Although the bias pattern appeared to be stable during
182: the course of an observing run, the absolute bias level drifted
183: substantially on time scales of hours, changing by as much as 30\% over the
184: course of a night. Bias subtraction was performed, therefore, in a
185: two-step process. First, the bias sequence obtained on each night was
186: median combined using the IRAF ``zerocombine" task, rejecting the highest
187: and lowest valued bias images. Second, since the detector bias level
188: for a given image may have drifted from the median value determined at
189: the beginning or end of the night, a bias scaling factor was also determined.
190: This was done by measuring the median pixel value
191: within a specified area
192: in the most poorly illuminated, inefficient portion of the array,
193: located well below 3600 \AA\, where useful spectra
194: could not be extracted; even the brightest, bluest stars observed
195: on our program showed essentially zero counts above bias in this portion
196: of the array. For each target image, the median bias image from the
197: beginning or end of the night was scaled by this factor and then
198: subtracted.
199:
200: Next, images were trimmed to exclude two unilluminated columns at the
201: rightmost edge of the array. Cosmic ray events were removed using
202: IRAF's ``cosmicrays" task and fairly liberal parameter settings that
203: restricted the corrections to only bona fide cosmic rays.
204:
205: The blue and red flat field sequences from each night were median combined
206: using IRAF's ``flatcombine" procedure with sigma clipping. The blue and
207: red medians were then stitched together approximately 1/3 of the way up
208: the detector (at line 250) which has the effect of distorting the one
209: (curved) spectral order which intersects
210: this line. IRAF's ``apflatten" task was used to normalize the combined flat
211: for each night by fitting its intensity along the dispersion using a low
212: order (typically 3) polynomial while setting all pixels outside an order to
213: unity. Flat fielding was performed by dividing each image by the normalized
214: flat field image using IRAF's ``ccdproc" task.
215:
216: Cosmetically, the images contain ``tadpole streaks" of high count levels,
217: comprised of short ``heads" along the dispersion direction
218: and then decaying count levels along long, mostly single pixel, ``tails"
219: perpendicular to the dispersion direction which thus affect multiple orders.
220: The number of such defects per image was related to exposure time.
221: A custom procedure was developed to crawl down each column comparing values
222: on either side of the column and thus identifying these features. The
223: pixels in the tail of the streak and a small square around the tadpole head
224: were interpolated over.
225:
226: The close spacing of the spectral orders did not permit measurement or
227: removal of scattered light, an effect common in echelle spectrographs.
228: However, comparisons of our extracted spectra with spectra previously obtained
229: with other instruments (Section 3.2) and of measured equivalent widths
230: with those from the literature (Section 4.1) suggest that the majority of
231: excess flux caused by scattered light is removed during background
232: subtraction.
233:
234: \subsection {Spectral Extraction and Wavelength Calibration}
235:
236: One dimensional spectra were extracted from the processed two dimensional
237: images using IRAF's ``doecslit" task. Sixty orders were identified over
238: the 800 x 800 pixel$^2$ array. A moderate (9th) order trace was employed
239: and the spectra in each order were summed over 3-5 pixels perpendicular to
240: the dispersion. Variance weighting was used for ``optimal" extraction.
241: The small separation between orders made removal of background and
242: scattered light especially challenging. After exploring a variety of
243: methods for accomplishing this, the most robust method identified was
244: simply to subtract the average minimum value within 2 background regions,
245: one on each side of the spectrum.
246: Aperture definition, background region definition, and order tracing
247: were attended as opposed to automated processes.
248:
249: To test the accuracy of the adopted background/scattered light subtraction,
250: Jeff Valenti kindly provided a careful comparison of our spectra with spectra
251: obtained with the HIRES spectrograph \citep{vogt94}
252: on the W. M. Keck I Telescope. The widely spaced orders of HIRES permit
253: accurate background and scattered light corrections. These comparisons
254: demonstrated that the average scattered and/or background light remaining
255: in our spectra is approximately 4\% at 3900 \AA, and drops roughly linearly
256: to 0\% at 6200 \AA. The implication is that equivalent widths of features at
257: blue wavelengths may be diminished by a small amount. Rather than
258: attempt to correct for this in the reduction process, we account for this in
259: the relative calibration of properties extracted from blue wavelength features
260: (Sections 4.3 and 4.4).
261:
262: Although multiple Thorium-Argon spectra per night were obtained
263: (often one for each star observed), in practice we established
264: wavelength calibration as follows. The extraction trace defined by
265: a single bright star on each night was applied to its corresponding
266: Thorium-Argon exposure to extract a one-dimensional wavelength reference
267: spectrum. A wavelength solution was determined using the ``ecidentify''
268: task in IRAF, and this solution was applied to all spectra for a given
269: night. This established wavelength solution was then interpolated onto a
270: log-linear scale.
271:
272: From analysis of spectra taken on the same night,
273: small spectral shifts of $\sim 0.1$ \AA\, were
274: common, as inferred from comparisons of the location of telluric absorption
275: lines. These shifts were likely due to flexure of the instrumental optics
276: with telescope pointing, and consequently resulted in wavelength solution
277: offsets of this order for many spectra. As discussed below, this wavelength
278: offset is accounted for in determining radial velocities by cross-correlating
279: telluric features.
280:
281: \section{Spectroscopic Properties}
282:
283: Figure \ref{fig_spectra} shows portions of the echelle spectra for 7 stars near
284: the Ca\,II H\&K, Li\,I $\lambda$6708 \AA, and H$\alpha$ features.
285: To help assess the quality of the spectra, two signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs)
286: are estimated, one at $\sim 6700$ \AA\, and one at $\sim 3950$ \AA\, (labeled
287: as Li and HK, respectively). The
288: SNR at $6700$ \AA\, is determined from the gain-corrected median signal
289: within the central portion of this order. The SNR at $3950$ \AA\,
290: is determined similarly, but is based the average of the values determined
291: for the two adjacent
292: orders containing the Ca II H (3968 \AA) and K (3934 \AA) features, and thus
293: represent an approximate average over the continuum and broad absorption.
294: These estimates are valid above values of $\gtrsim 20$, in which the noise
295: is dominated by photon statistics. Lower values may actually over-estimate
296: the SNR, because of the increased relative error in the background, scattered
297: light and bias level subtractions (Section 3.1). The SNR distribution at 6700 \AA\,
298: is shown in Figure \ref{snr_hist}.
299:
300: \begin{figure*}
301: \epsscale{1.0}
302: \plotone{fig1.ps}
303: \caption{Portions of the extracted spectra. The top 3 spectra are G5 stars with
304: decreasing levels of Ca\,II H\&K emission (log$R'_{HK} = -4.13, -4.59, -5.01$). The
305: next 3 spectra are Pleiads (and thus coeval), with spectral types of F5 (HII 1200),
306: G2 (HII 250), and K0 (HII 2106). With a SNR of only $\sim 18$ in the Ca\,II region,
307: HII 2106 is typical of the poorest quality spectra from which log $R'_{HK}$ values can
308: be extracted; strong core emission can be seen in this case. The bottom spectrum
309: shows the spectroscopic binary HD 78899, whose features are clearly doubled.
310: \label{fig_spectra} }
311: \end{figure*}
312:
313: The following sections described the procedures used to extract stellar properties
314: from these spectra. In comparisons
315: with previous measurements, values determined in this study are referred to as P60
316: values. Specifically, equivalent widths (EWs) of Li\,I $\lambda$6708 \AA\,
317: and H$\alpha$ are measured in Section 4.1, radial and rotational velocities
318: are determined in Section 4.2, temperature and surface gravity indices are
319: discussed in Section 4.3, and measured S values and calculated $R_{HK}^{'}$
320: indices are presented in Section 4.4.
321:
322: \begin{figure}
323: \epsscale{1.0}
324: \plotone{fig2.ps}
325: \caption{Signal-to-Noise distribution of all spectra obtained
326: (includes multiple measurements and stars observed for calibration) of the 390
327: unique targets.
328: \label{snr_hist} }
329: \end{figure}
330:
331: \subsection{Equivalent Widths of Li\,I 6708 \AA\, and H$\alpha$}
332:
333: Equivalent widths of the Li\,I $\lambda$6708 \AA\ doublet ($\lambda$6707.76, $\lambda$6707.91),
334: which is spectroscopically unresolved in our observations,
335: and H$\alpha$ ($\lambda6562.8$ \AA) are measured for all spectra using the $splot$
336: task within $IRAF$. For measurement of the Li\,I absorption feature which is located
337: near the peak of the blaze function in these spectra, the local continuum is determined
338: by fitting a legendre polonomial to a $\sim 30$ \AA\, portion of the spectrum, excluding
339: values less than 2$\sigma$ below the continuum (e.g. stellar absorption features)
340: or more than 4$\sigma$ above the continuum (e.g. noise spikes) in this
341: fit. The order of the polynomial is varied (typically from 4 to 7) to best
342: match the local continuum. With the continuum
343: defined in this way, the EW values are determined by fitting a Gaussian
344: profile to the absorption feature. Multiple measurements on a single
345: night are averaged, while separate epochs are listed independently.
346: If no feature is discernable in the spectrum, upper limits
347: are determined from the noise in the local continuum. Table 1 lists
348: the measured values.
349:
350: The measured Li\,I EW values include a contribution from an Fe\,I line at
351: 6707.441 \AA. \citet{soderblom93} find that the strength of this temperature
352: sensitive Fe\,I
353: feature varies with $B-V$ color as EW[Fe\,I $\lambda$6707.441] = 20($B-V$) - 3 m\AA.
354: Since the $B-V$ values of most stars are known or can be estimated (Section
355: 4.4), the contribution of this Fe\,I line to the Li\,I EW values can be
356: removed.
357:
358: To assess possible systematic uncertainties caused by the subjective aspects
359: involved in measuring EW values (e.g. continuum determination) or instrumental
360: effects, we compare our measurements to previous
361: values determined from high dispersion spectroscopy. Of the
362: spectroscopically single stars observed here, 21 Pleiads were observed by
363: \citet[][$R=50,000$]{soderblom93}, 19 Hyads were observed by
364: \citet[][$R=26,000 - 32,000$]{thorburn93}, 26 field stars were
365: observed by \citet[][$R=40,000$]{wichmann03}, and 28 field stars were
366: observed by \citet[][$R=25,000$]{strassmeier00}. The uncertainties in the
367: EW[Li]s from these previous studies are typically 5-10 m\AA. Of these 94
368: stars, 19
369: were observed twice by us, yielding a total of 113 measurements for
370: comparison. Figure \ref{lithium} shows the difference between the P60 and
371: previous EW values; all values are as measured and thus uncorrected for
372: the contamination of the Fe\,I line. Overall the agreement is good. The
373: average and/or median difference for any of the 4 studies is $\pm 15$ m\AA,
374: with standard deviation of differences that range from 16 - 21 m\AA. The
375: average difference with the entire comparison sample is -8 m\AA\, with a
376: standard deviation of 20 m\AA. We conclude that any systematic bias in our
377: measurements is $\lesssim 10$ m\AA. We adopt a uniform uncertainty
378: of 0.02 \AA.
379:
380: \begin{figure}
381: \epsscale{1.0}
382: \plotone{fig3.ps}
383: \caption{Comparison of measured EW[Li\,I $\lambda$6708 \AA] values with values from
384: \citep[][$squares$]{soderblom93},
385: \citep[][$circles$]{thorburn93},
386: \citep[][$diamonds$]{wichmann03}, and
387: \citep[][$triangles$]{strassmeier00}.
388: \label{lithium} }
389: \end{figure}
390:
391: For H$\alpha$ EWs, considerable care had to be taken both in normalizing to
392: the local continuum and in fitting a functional form to the line profiles
393: because of the broad wings. The local continuum was determined by fitting
394: a legendre polonomial generally of order 10 to the entire spectral order,
395: excluding values less than 2$\sigma$ below or more than 4$\sigma$ above
396: the continuum. The procedure varied slightly as dictated by the noise
397: level in the data, by the line breadth (because of, for example, rapid rotation),
398: or if H$\alpha$ was found to be in emission. Both the sigma-rejection
399: limits and the fitting order were modified in these cases to optimize
400: the continuum fit. The EW values were determined by fitting a Voigt
401: profile to the absorption feature; in a few cases of dramatically filled
402: in H$\alpha$, direct integration was used to determine the EW
403: rather than function fitting. EWs are listed in Table 1; negative values indicate
404: H$\alpha$ emission.
405:
406: Four stars (HD 143006, RX J1842.9-3532, RX J1852.3-3700, LH98 196) show
407: especially strong H$\alpha$ emission ($> 10$ \AA); their H$\alpha$ profiles are
408: shown in Figure \ref{fig_halpha}. In these cases, the strength and breadth of
409: these emission-line profiles are greater than that expected from chromospheric
410: activity alone, and more consistent with that expected from the accretion of
411: circumstellar material \citep[e.g.][]{muzerolle98, wb03}. We suggest that these
412: stars are accreting.
413:
414: For the 8 stars identified as double-lined spectroscopic binaries, EW[Li\,I]s
415: and EW[H$\alpha$]s for the individual components were determined by fitting
416: two Gaussian profiles to the doubled features, when possible. For these
417: pairs, we also measured EWs of the temperature sensitive Ca\,I
418: $\lambda$6717 \AA\,
419: feature, which can be used to identify better the primary and the secondary.
420: The EW values for the binaries are listed in Table 2.
421:
422: \begin{figure}
423: \epsscale{1.0}
424: \plotone{fig4.ps}
425: \caption{H$\alpha$ profiles for the 4 strong emission-line stars normalized by
426: the local continuum; the H$\alpha$ equivalent width for each star is given in
427: parentheses. A velocity width of 300 km s$^{-1}$ is indicated.
428: \label{fig_halpha} }
429: \end{figure}
430:
431: \subsection{Radial and Rotational Velocities}
432:
433: Radial velocities and projected rotational velocities are determined via a
434: cross-correlation analysis similar to that of \citet{wh04}. The analysis is
435: restricted to the 36 orders spanning from $\sim$ 4000-7500 \AA, excluding
436: the 3 orders containing the telluric B-band, H$\alpha$, and Na\,II D features;
437: orders at longer wavelengths have poorer wavelength solutions and those at
438: shorter wavelengths
439: typically have low SNRs. From this restricted range, orders having an
440: average SNR greater than $\sim 25$ are then cross-correlated with the spectral
441: orders of at
442: least 3 slowly rotating comparison standards that have radial velocities
443: accurate to 0.3 - 0.4 km s$^{-1}$ \citep{nidever02}. The radial velocity, relative
444: to each standard, is then determined from the average velocity offset
445: measured from all orders.
446:
447: To determine the heliocentric radial velocities of the stars, the relative
448: radial velocity must be corrected for barycentric motions and possible
449: errors in the wavelength solution of either the standard or
450: target spectrum. The former is determined using the \textit{rvcorrect}
451: task in IRAF. The latter correction is determined by cross-correlating
452: the telluric A- and B-bands of the standard and the target star; the
453: telluric correlations would yield an offset of zero for perfect
454: wavelength calibration, but are typically 1-3 km s$^{-1}$ for the spectra
455: analyzed here. The multiple heliocentric radial velocity estimates,
456: determined from multiple radial velocity standards, are then averaged
457: to find the final radial velocity.
458:
459: Uncertainties in the radial velocities are estimated from a combination of
460: statistical and empirical error estimates. First, the uncertainty in
461: the radial velocity relative to each stardard is assumed to be the
462: uncertainty in the mean value of all orders used, combined with the
463: uncertainty in the radial velocity of the standard (typically 0.3 km
464: s$^{-1}$). The radial velocity estimates from all standards are then
465: combined using a weighted average; the resulting statistical
466: uncertainties are typically small (0.1 - 0.3 km s$^{-1}$). As an
467: empirical check on these uncertainty estimates, the radial velocity of each
468: standard is determined from all other radial velocity standards observed
469: during that run and
470: compared to its assumed value. The average agreement of the radial
471: velocity standards is typically a couple times larger than the statistical
472: uncertainties, except in low SNR cases where the statistical uncertainty
473: dominates. This suggests there may be systematic effects unaccounted for
474: in the statistical uncertainty estimates. Thus, we combine the statistical
475: uncertainty with this empirical uncertainty to determine final
476: (conservative) radial velocity uncertainty estimates given in Table 1.
477: Figure \ref{fig_rv_hist} shows the distributions of radial velocities for the
478: field, open cluster, and young cluster samples.
479:
480: \begin{figure}
481: \epsscale{1.0}
482: \plotone{fig5.ps}
483: \caption{Distributions of radial velocities of the observed sample. The top
484: panel shows the distribution for field stars and the bottom four panels show
485: the distributions for cluster stars.
486: \label{fig_rv_hist} }
487: \end{figure}
488:
489: Rotational velocities ($v$sin$i$) for the observed targets are determined
490: from the width of the peak in their cross-correlation with a slowly
491: rotating standard. Specifically, the peak is fit by a parabola with the
492: fitted width at half-peak maximum. To
493: convert this width to a $v$sin$i$ value, an empirical width versus
494: $v$sin$i$ relation is determined by cross-correlating many artificially ``spun-up''
495: spectra with the same slowly rotating standard. These artificially broadened spectra
496: are constructed using the rotational profiles given in \citet[][$\epsilon = 0.6$]{gray92}.
497: This procedure is computed for each order, yielding a $v$sin$i$ estimate for
498: each order. For each standard used, a
499: $v$sin$i$ value is computed from the median of all order estimates; a median is
500: preferred since the $v$sin$i$ measurements are often upper limits.
501:
502: Uncertainties in $v$sin$i$ are determined first from the standard deviation
503: of the multiple $v$sin$i$ measurements provided by all standards used. For
504: observations consisting of multiple exposures, the uncertainty is the
505: average standard deviation of these measurements.
506: The $v$sin$i$ values are assumed to be upper limits if less than 10 km s$^{-1}$
507: (just over one-half the velocity resolution), or if $v$sin$i$
508: is less than 3 times the uncertainty in $v$sin$i$.
509: We find that all templates of F, G, and K spectral types give consistent
510: $v$sin$i$ values; an exact match in spectral type is not critical in
511: determining $v$sin$i$.
512:
513: As noted in the introduction, poor focus plagued some of our measurements,
514: especially on the night of 2002 Feb 2. To assess how this may affect
515: inferred properties, the above radial velocity and rotational velocity
516: analysis was conducted on the observations of radial velocity standard HD
517: 164922 observed at multiple focus settings (Section 2). Fortunately the
518: inferred radial velocities for modest focus offsets, typical of changes
519: over a given night, agree with the nominal value to $\sim 1$ km s$^{-1}$,
520: consistent with the inferred uncertainties. For extreme focus offsets,
521: however, the discrepancy can be as large as 3 km s$^{-1}$. Similarly, for modest
522: focus offsets from nominal, the inferred $v$sin$i$ values would increase modestly, but
523: since the standard deviation of measurements among the orders
524: correspondingly increased,
525: the end result is simply larger upper limits (e.g. $<$ 16 km s$^{-1}$ for HD
526: 164922, compared with $< 10$ when observed at nominal focus).
527: However, for extreme focus offsets, the spectrsopic blurring
528: resulted in a large apparent $v$sin$i$ (e.g. $22.0 \pm 3.3$ km s$^{-1}$ for HD
529: 164922). Since the majority of our spectra have at most only modest focus
530: errors, no correction for this is made. Rotational
531: velocities inferred from observations made on 2002 Feb 2, however, are
532: marked with a colon in Table 1 as likely being artificially too large.
533:
534: To empirically assess systematic errors in our radial and rotational
535: velocity measurements, our values are compared with values measured by
536: \citet[][which appeared after all of our data were taken]{nordstrom04}.
537: There are 135 stars in common between the surveys
538: that (1) are not previously identified spectroscopic binaries, (2) are not used
539: as radial velocity standards by us, and (3) have radial velocity
540: uncertainties less than 4 km s$^{-1}$.
541: Figure \ref{fig_rv_compare} shows the
542: difference between our radial velocities and those of \citet{nordstrom04}.
543: The agreement is quite good; the average difference is -0.2 km s$^{-1}$
544: with a standard deviation of 2.4 km s$^{-1}$. With the exception of 2 stars,
545: HIP 67904 and HIP 61072, all measured radial velocity values
546: agree to within 10 km s$^{-1}$. HIP 67904 and HIP 61072, on the
547: other hand, have significantly different radial velocity measurements ($>
548: 25 \sigma$ difference). As discussed below, we suggest these stars are
549: spectroscopic binaries. This comparison also demonstrates that the radial
550: velocities of stars with $v$sin$i$ values as large as 45 km s$^{-1}$
551: can be measured without significantly degraded precision.
552:
553: In Figure \ref{fig_vsini_compare} are shown \citet{nordstrom04} $v$sin$i$
554: values versus the P60 $v$sin$i$ values for the overlapping sub-sample
555: described above. While \citet{nordstrom04} report $v$sin$i$ values
556: as low as 0 km s$^{-1}$ (which is likely unrealistic), our lower resolution
557: data restrict us to $v$sin$i$ upper limits of 10 km s$^{-1}$ or greater. The
558: majority of our $v$sin$i$ upper limits are thus greater than the values measured
559: by \citet{nordstrom04}, which inhibits interpretation of an overall comparison.
560: However, a comparison of the 22 stars with measured
561: values, however, suggests a systematic difference. The P60 $v$sin$i$ values are
562: larger, in the median, than those of \citet{nordstrom04} by 8.6 km s$^{-1}$.
563: A portion of this difference
564: may be a consequence of the spectroscopic blurring caused by the focus errors
565: discussed above. When the 3 measured values from 2002
566: Feb 2 are removed, the P60 values are then larger by only 6.3 km s$^{-1}$, in the
567: median. However, an independent comparison of the 389 stars with $v$sin$i$
568: measurements in both \citet{nordstrom04} and \citet{strassmeier00}, upper
569: limits excluded, indicate the \citet{nordstrom04} values are less than the
570: \citet{strassmeier00} values by 2.6 km s$^{-1}$. Thus, a portion of the
571: difference with our measurements may be a consequence of artificially low values
572: reported by \citet{nordstrom04}. Overall we conclude that the majority of our
573: measured $v$sin$i$ values suffer from no systematic biases greater than $\sim
574: 5$ km s$^{-1}$. The exceptions are stars observed on 2002 Feb 2, which may
575: be biased toward artificially large values by $\sim 10 - 20 $ km s$^{-1}$ because
576: of especially poor focus. Since we are uncertain what the systematic
577: correction to the $v$sin$i$ values for these stars should be, if any, we make
578: no correction for this in the values presented in Table 1.
579:
580: \begin{figure}
581: \epsscale{1.0}
582: \plotone{fig6.ps}
583: \caption{Difference between P60 radial velocities and values
584: reported by \citet{nordstrom04}. The \textit{solid squares} are
585: likely spectroscopic binaries. \label{fig_rv_compare} }
586: \end{figure}
587:
588: \begin{figure}
589: \epsscale{1.0}
590: \plotone{fig7.ps}
591: \caption{Comparison of measured $v$sin$i$ values with values from
592: \citet{nordstrom04}. \textit{Triangles} are upper limits and
593: \textit{squares} are measured values; \citet{nordstrom04} report no upper
594: limits. The 3 x's indicate measurements from the night of 2002 Feb 2,
595: which had significant focus problems (Section 4.2).
596: \label{fig_vsini_compare} }
597: \end{figure}
598:
599: \subsection{Temperature and Gravity Indicators}
600:
601: \begin{figure}
602: \epsscale{1.0}
603: \plotone{fig8.ps}
604: \caption{Gravity sensitive equivalent width ratios
605: versus B-V color. Dwarf stars are indicated with \textit{solid
606: circles} and giant stars are indicated with \textit{crosses}. \label{fig_gravity} }
607: \end{figure}
608:
609: Within the broad wavelength coverage provided by our echelle spectra are
610: many temperature- and gravity-sensitive lines. Empirically, we find that the
611: EWs of the photospheric features Fe\,I $\lambda$4063, Fe\,I $\lambda$4071,
612: and Ca\,II $\lambda$4226 \citep[see][]{jaschek87} are especially useful
613: temperature diagnostics. In our data, these features all
614: increase in strength in a roughly linear fashion from spectral types F8 to K5,
615: before degenerate flattening and turnover occurs towards later spectral types.
616: However, fits of the EWs versus $B-V$ color for main sequence stars (not
617: shown here)
618: are accurate to only 0.05-0.1 in $B-V$. This implies that if we were to attempt
619: spectral classification from the EWs, spectral type uncertainties of more than one
620: spectral subclass would result. Therefore
621: we do $not$ use these features to estimate spectral types. Spectral types
622: instead are taken from several catalogues of stellar spectral classification,
623: when available. These, in order of
624: preference are Houk \& Swift (1999), Skiff (2005), Kharchenko (2001),
625: Kharchenko, Piskunov, Scholz (2004). The spectral types are listed in
626: Table 1; 349 of the 370 stars observed have stellar spectral types.
627:
628: For gravity indicators, we considered the ratios of the gravity sensitive Sr\,II
629: $\lambda$4216 and $\lambda$4077 lines \citep[see][]{jaschek87} to the above
630: temperature sensitive lines. In Figure \ref{fig_gravity} we show for our dwarf
631: and giant standard stars the ratios (Sr\,II $\lambda$4216 + $\lambda$4077)
632: to (Ca\,I $\lambda$4226 $+$ Fe\,I $\lambda4063$ + Fe\,I $\lambda4071$) and Sr\,II
633: $\lambda$4216 to Ca\,I $\lambda$4226, as a function of $B-V$ color. These
634: ratios are sensitive to both temperature and gravity; the dwarf
635: and giant stars are reasonably well separated in these plots. Parabolic fits
636: to the dwarf and giant points are shown. The majority of our target
637: objects cluster around the dwarf locus, though some are securely
638: between the dwarf and giant loci. Other diagnostic figures, such as
639: Sr\,II $\lambda4077$ / (Fe\,I $\lambda4063$ + Fe\,I $\lambda4071$)
640: versus Ca\,I $\lambda4226,$ (which has the advantage of considering only
641: our spectroscopic data), have similar appearances. In principle one might
642: use such figures to quantitatively estimate the surface gravities of our program
643: stars; in practice, however, the data do not allow this to be
644: carried out with the precision normally expected of surface gravity
645: measurements. Rather than estimate surface gravities, we simply identify
646: all stars which are more than the 1$\sigma$ above the dwarf loci in both
647: diagnostic planes. Sixty-six potentially low surface gravity stars are
648: identified by these criteria and marked in Table 1.
649:
650: \subsection{Chromospheric Ca II H and K Activity Measurements}
651:
652: Core emission in the Calcium H and K spectral lines serves as an indicator
653: of stellar chromospheric activity, which is known to be correlated with
654: stellar age \citep[e.g.][]{soderblom91}, primarily as a consequence of rotation.
655: We parameterize the core emission
656: in our spectra using the standard Mount Wilson Project procedures
657: \citep{wilson68, vaughan78}. Our prescription for
658: measuring the core emission closely follows that outlined by
659: \citet{duncan91}. First we define the index of core emission, $S,$ as
660: %
661: \begin{equation}
662: \label{eq:S}
663: S = \frac{N_H + N_K}{N_R + N_V},
664: \end{equation}
665: %
666: where $N_i$ is the number of counts in band $i$. The continuum bands, $R$
667: and $V,$ are $20$ \AA\, wide and centered at $4001.07$ \AA\, and $3901.07$ \AA,
668: respectively. The emission bands, $H$ and $K,$ are centered on the
669: emission features whose natural centers are at $3968.470$ \AA\, and
670: $3933.664$ \AA, respectively. The bandpass for the $H$ and $K$ channels is
671: triangular, with a full width at half maximum of $1.09$ \AA.
672: Before measuring the counts within these four bands, the spectra are
673: normalized to account for the blaze function and shifted to correct
674: for radial velocity. The spectra are normalized in a two step iterative
675: process. First, a $\sim 4$th order polynomial is fit to
676: the spectra; the broad $H$ and $K$ absorption features are excluded in
677: this fit. A second polynomial
678: is then fit to the spectra, excluding all spectral features that extend
679: 0.5 $\sigma$ below the initial polynomial fit. The spectra are then normalized
680: by dividing by this polynomial. The velocity shift is determined
681: by cross-correlating the 2 spectra orders with the Ca II H and K
682: features, with the spectrum of a bright comparison standard. The implied
683: radial velocity is compared with that determined in Section 4.2 to ensure
684: consistency; for the chromospheric activity analysis we adopted values
685: determined directly from these orders as they typically
686: provide the most accurate shift for these orders.
687:
688: With velocity shifted and normalized spectra, the counts within
689: the continuum and emission bands of the S index are summed.
690: For the emission bands,
691: the number of counts in each pixel is first multiplied by a number from
692: 0 to 1 to mimic a triangular bandpass with a full-width at half-maximum
693: of $1.09$ \AA. With these sums, equation \eqref{eq:S} is used to compute
694: $S$.
695:
696: % A signal-to-noise ratio estimate is also calculated as the square
697: % root of the median number of counts in the continuum between the Ca
698: % II H and K features.
699:
700: To correct for systematic offsets in the measured $S$ values relative to
701: previous work, possibly due to slight differences in the methodology or data
702: quality, the $S$ values are compared to those
703: measured by \citet[][also appearing after all data
704: for this program were gathered]{wright04}. These comparisons
705: permit transformation of the $S$ values to what we
706: refer to as Mount Wilson $S$ values, $S_{MW}$. This is realized as a first
707: order regression analysis on log $S$ in the form of
708: \begin{eqnarray}
709: \log S_{MW} & = & A + B\log S.
710: \label{eq:Smw}
711: \end{eqnarray}
712: %
713: The uncertainty, $\sigma_{S_{MW}}$, is given by the
714: standard formula
715: %
716: \begin{equation}
717: \label{eq:sigmasquared}
718: \sigma_{S_{MW}}^2 = \left( \frac{\partial S_{MW}}{\partial A} \sigma_A
719: \right)^2 + \left( \frac{\partial S_{MW}}{\partial B} \sigma_B \right)^2.
720: \end{equation}
721:
722: The analysis was performed on 8 of the 9
723: observing runs and for the entire overlapping sample; there were
724: too few overlapping stars for the 2001 December observing run for comparison.
725: Fortunately, the uncertainties in the implied correction estimates for
726: 7 of the 8 observing runs agree well with that determined for the entire
727: overlapping sample. The one exception was for the July 2001 observing
728: run, for which the corrections appeared significantly different. Therefore,
729: the corrections determined for this run were used to transform its $S$
730: values to $S_{MW}$ values, while the remaining runs used the corrections
731: determined for the entire sample, which are more precise. The resulting Mount
732: Wilson Calcium index values and uncertainties are listed in Table 1.
733: Stars with uncertainties that are possibly much larger than reported, because
734: of a large systematic uncertainty that is not formally propagated (e.g. radial
735: velocity error) are marked with an "e" in Table 1.
736:
737: Finally, the $S_{MW}$ values are converted to $R'_{HK}$ values, which express
738: the activity as a fractional ratio with the underlying star, following
739: the prescription described in \citet{noyes84}. However, this conversion
740: requires proper characterization of the underlying photospheric flux, which
741: can be assessed from the intrinsic stellar $B-V$ color. $B-V$ colors for most
742: stars are obtained from the Tycho-2 catalogue \citep{hog00}. These values are
743: transformed to Johnson $B-V$ colors, following the relations in
744: \citet{mamajek02}\footnote{There is a typographical error in the relations
745: of \citet{mamajek02}. The +0.007813 in equation C6 should be -0.007813.}.
746: For objects without Tycho photometry, the $B-V$ colors are estimated from the
747: stellar spectral type (Section 4.3) following the relations of \citet{johnson66}.
748:
749: $R'_{HK}$ is calculated as the difference in the logarithms of the flux
750: calibrated core emission, $R_{HK}$, and photospheric emission, $R_{phot}$:
751: %
752: \begin{equation}
753: \label{eq:R'_HK}
754: R^{\prime}_{HK} = R_{HK} - R_{phot}.
755: \end{equation}
756: %
757: Here $R_{HK}$ is calculated from the $S_{MW}$ values and calibrated using
758: the stellar $B-V$ color, and $R_{phot}$ is calculated from the $B-V$ color
759: alone (see Appendix b in Noyes et al. 1984 for explicit formulae). Although the
760: calibration of these terms is determined over the restricted $B-V$ range of
761: $0.44<(B-V)<0.82,$ we use it for the full $B-V$ range of the observed sample
762: ($0.19 <(B-V)<1.65$). The resulting $R'_{HK}$ values
763: are listed in Table 1.
764:
765: \section{Sample Properties}
766:
767: \subsection{Spectroscopic Binaries}
768:
769: Table 2 lists the 8 stars with photospheric spectral features that are doubled
770: in our observations. Two of these double-lined spectroscopic binaries were
771: previously known (HE 848, SAO 178 272), while HD 78899, TYC 7310 503 1,
772: TYC 7305 380 1, and HD 140374 are newly identified. The multiple epoch
773: observations of some stars also allows us to identify single-lined binaries based
774: on changes in
775: radial velocity. We consider an object a candidate binary if its radial velocity
776: changed by more than 10$\sigma$ between observations; 3 stars meet this criteria:
777: HD92855 (HIP52498), HD132173 (HIP73269), HD61994 (HIP38018; see Table 1).
778: Similarly, based on comparisons with radial velocities published in \citet{nordstrom04},
779: HD108944 (HIP61072) and HD121320 (HIP67904) are candidate binaries (see Figure
780: \ref{fig_rv_compare}). All 5 are newly identified candidate binary systems. Finally, since the
781: radial velocity dispersion in young clusters is typically $< 2$ km s$^{-1}$, comparison of
782: cluster member radial velocity measurements
783: with the median cluster values can identify
784: single-lined spectroscopic binaries. Based on these comparisons, the two Pleiades
785: members HII 571 and LH98 103 are identified as spectroscopic binaries; both
786: have been identified previously as such \citep{mermilliod92, queloz98}.
787:
788: \subsection{Sample Age Dispersion}
789:
790: Several of the quantities extracted from the observed spectra are likely
791: to be correlated with stellar age, based on extensive studies in the literature.
792: Generally speaking, younger stars tend to be more rapidly rotating, have
793: larger lithium abundances, and have stronger chromospheric emission lines
794: such as Ca\,II H\&K and H$\alpha$. Thus the measured quantities
795: $v$sin$i$, EW[Li\,I $\lambda$6708], log $R'_{HK}$, and EW[H$\alpha$]
796: should correlate with age. Unfortunately the precision with which stellar ages
797: can be estimated from these quantities is in general poor, in part because of
798: the additional dependencies upon stellar spectral type and rotation.
799: Rather than attempting to disentangle these complicating effects for individual
800: stars, we simply present the data to illustrate the empirical correlations
801: amongst the measured quantities and to assess the overall age range of the
802: observed sample.
803:
804: \begin{figure}
805: \epsscale{1.0}
806: \plotone{fig9.ps}
807: \caption{EW[Li\,I 6708], EW[H$\alpha$] and $v$sin$i$ versus the chromospheric
808: activity diagnostic log\,$R'_{HK}$. Measured values are shown as \textit{squares}
809: while upper limits are shown as \textit{triangles}.
810: \label{fig_rphk_age} }
811: \end{figure}
812:
813: Figure \ref{fig_rphk_age} shows the distributions of EW[Li\,I 6708], EW[H$\alpha$]
814: and $v$sin$i$ versus log\,$R'_{HK}$. Error bars are
815: not displayed due to crowding, but can be inferred from the information in Table 1.
816: The EW[Li\,I] and log $R'_{HK}$ values are reasonably well correlated, as expected
817: if strong lithium absorption and strong chromospheric emission, as traced by Ca II
818: emission, both indicate stellar youth. The EW[H$\alpha$] and log $R'_{HK}$ values
819: are at best weakly correlated; stars with larger log $R'_{HK}$ values have, on average,
820: smaller EW[H$\alpha$] values, suggesting they are partially filled in by emission. The
821: strong spectral type dependence of this temperature sensitive line likely masks much
822: of the underlying correlation which might be revealed by considering an
823: analogously defined quantity $R'_{H\alpha}$.
824: The $v$sin$i$ values are well correlated,
825: in the mean, with log $R'_{HK}$ values. This is expected since increased rotation is
826: believed to cause increased chromospheric activity, a characteristic common in young
827: stars. Finally, in Figure \ref{fig_lithium_age} are shown the distributions of
828: EW[H$\alpha$]
829: and $v$sin$i$ versus EW[Li\,I]. Both the EW[H$\alpha$] and $v$sin$i$ values are
830: correlated with EW[Li\,I], in the mean, though both show a large
831: scatter at all EW[Li\,I] values.
832:
833: \begin{figure}
834: \epsscale{1.0}
835: \plotone{fig10.ps}
836: \caption{EW[H$\alpha$] and $v$sin$i$ versus the EW[Li\,I 6708]. Measured values
837: are shown as \textit{squares} while upper limits are shown as \textit{triangles}.
838: \label{fig_lithium_age} }
839: \end{figure}
840:
841: The above correlations corroborate the suggestion that these measured quantities
842: trace stellar age. While the large scatter in these correlations inhibits assigning specific
843: ages to individual stars, the ensemble distributions can help assess the age of the
844: observed sample. Since the stellar temperature can also affect these quantities,
845: we consider these distributions as a function of $B-V$ color, a proxy for stellar temperature.
846: The range of observed values at any $B-V$ color should therefore (mostly) be a
847: consequence of the age spread in the sample; a comparison of the spread of values at
848: different colors can serve as a check for age biases with respect to temperature.
849:
850: In Figure \ref{fig_bmv_age} are shown the distributions of $v$sin$i$,
851: EW[Li\,I $\lambda$6708], log $R'_{HK}$, and EW[H$\alpha$] versus $B-V$
852: color (as assembled in Section 4.4). The observed dwarf standards are
853: distinguished in order to illustrate the properties of old slowly rotating stars.
854: The distributions of $v$sin$i$ and log $R'_{HK}$ are independent of $B-V$
855: color, indicating a similar spread in rotation rate and chromospheric activity
856: over the range of spectral types observed. The EW[Li\,I] values span a
857: broad range at each $B-V$ color. The larger EW[Li\,I] values at the red
858: end is a temperature effect; for a specified lithium abundance,
859: the EW[Li\,I] increases with decreasing stellar temperature \citep{pm96}.
860: The EW[H$\alpha$] values show the strongest $B-V$ trend, as
861: expected for this temperature sensitive line; the EW[H$\alpha$] values
862: decrease with increasing $B-V$ color. There is also a larger scatter at
863: larger $B-V$ values. The scatter above the dwarf loci can be interpreted as
864: stars with some H$\alpha$ emission, whether this is partially or completely
865: (e.g. EW[H$\alpha$] $< 0.0$) filling in the photospheric absorption line. Four
866: stars with strong H$\alpha$ emission (EW[H$\alpha$] $> -10$ \AA) are not
867: plotted; their profiles are shown in Figure \ref{fig_halpha}. Stars with some
868: H$\alpha$ emission span the full range of $B-V$
869: colors, though there appear to be many more at redder colors ($B-V > 1.0$)
870: than bluer colors ($B-V < 0.6$). However, since an EW is defined relative to
871: the continuum flux, a unique EW[H$\alpha$] value corresponds to
872: much less H$\alpha$ flux for cooler (red) stars than hotter (blue) stars.
873: Overall, these age indicators are consistent
874: with the observed sample having ages that span from a few million years
875: to a few billion years, as was intended. Moreover, all spectral types appear
876: to span this range of ages; there is no strong age bias with spectral type
877: amongst the observed sample.
878:
879: \begin{figure}
880: \epsscale{1.0}
881: \plotone{fig11.ps}
882: \caption{Projected rotational velocity ($v$sin$i$), EW[Li\, $\lambda$6708],
883: log $R'_{HK}$ and EW[H$\alpha$] versus $B-V$ color. \textit{Filled circles} indicate
884: dwarf standard stars. For clarity, a few stars in the observed sample are bluer
885: than (SAO 41857) or redder than (HIP 108467, HIP 90190, and HIP 60783 )
886: the B-V range shown here, the values are nevertheless included in Table 1.
887: Similarly, in the bottom
888: panel four stars with strong H$\alpha$ emission (EW[H$\alpha$] $< -10$; Figure
889: 4) are not shown.
890: \label{fig_bmv_age} }
891: \end{figure}
892:
893: \subsection{Ca\,II H\&K Saturation in Young Stars}
894:
895: While log $R'_{HK}$ values have been shown to correlate with stellar age
896: \citep[e.g.][]{soderblom91}, this diagnostic
897: typically has not been used to estimate ages less than $\sim 100$ Myr. This primarily stems
898: from the lack of $R'_{HK}$ measurements for stars in young clusters of known age, from
899: which the age relation could be calibrated. Although the P60 $R'_{HK}$ measurements
900: of young cluster members presented here may help establish this calibration, we illustrate
901: that accurate ages will be inhibited by the broad range in rotation rates for stars at a
902: given young age and the saturation of flux at high rotation rates.
903:
904: In Figure \ref{fig_saturate} are shown the $R'_{HK}$ measurements versus projected
905: rotational velocity ($v$sin$i$) of stars in the open clusters represented in our sample,
906: including $\alpha$ Persei,
907: the Pleiades, the Hyades and collectively (post) T Tauri stars in Upper Scorpius, Upper Centaurus
908: Lupus, and R Corona Australis. As expected, the $R'_{HK}$ measurements are correlated
909: with $v$sin$i$; the most rapidly rotating stars have, on average, the largest $R'_{HK}$
910: values. However, Figure \ref{fig_saturate} also indicates that once the $v$sin$i$ values
911: increase above $\sim 30$ km s$^{-1}$, the $R'_{HK}$ values stay roughly constant,
912: implying no increase in the Ca\,II H\&K emission line flux toward larger rotation rates.
913: A similar ``saturation" phenomenon has been seen before based on observations of other
914: emission lines originating in stellar chromospheres (OI\,1304, C\,II 1335), as well as X-rays
915: originating in stellar corona \citep[e.g.][]{vilhu84}. It is not yet known whether the cause
916: for flux saturation is internal (e.g. dynamo) or external (e.g. active regions) to the star
917: \citep[see][]{gudel04}. Saturation of the Ca\,II H\&K fluxes, as measured by the $R'_{HK}$
918: diagnostic, has not been demonstrated before.
919:
920: While saturation of the Ca\,II H\&K flux seems consistent with other chromospheric
921: and coronal observations of rapidly rotating stars, we considered the possibility that
922: this saturation is simply a consequence of the method used to determine
923: the $S$ values, which are used to calculate $R'_{HK}$. Specifically, since the
924: prescription outlined in Section 4.4 involves measuring the Ca\,II K
925: and H emission with a triangular passband of specified width, apparent saturation
926: could be caused by emission line flux being rotationally broadened outside of
927: this passband, and thus not included in the measurement. To test this, we remeasured S values for a
928: set of stars that were artificially rotationally broadened from 10 to 150 km s$^{-1}$; we assume
929: the core emission is rotationally broadened by the same amount as the photosphere. This
930: showed that the technique used to measure the $S$ values begins to miss core emission
931: flux above $v$sin$i$ of $\sim 100$ km s$^{-1}$. Since the saturation observed for
932: $R'_{HK}$ occurs well below this value, we interpret the saturation as a real effect.
933:
934: To further demonstrate the case for saturation, in Figure \ref{fig_saturate} we also
935: illustrate the ratio of X-ray flux to bolometric flux ($L_X/L_{bol}$) for the stars in these
936: clusters which have the available data. X-ray fluxes are from ROSAT observations
937: and bolometric
938: fluxes are determined from the atmospheric model which best fits the stellar energy
939: distribution (see Mamajek et al. 2007 for a complete description of the $L_X/L_{bol}$
940: derivation). A saturation trend is identified for coronal X-rays similar to that for chromospheric
941: Ca\,II H\&K core emission. The most rapidly
942: rotating stars are the most fractionally X-ray bright, but $L_X/L_{bol}$ remains roughly
943: constant above $v$sin$i$ values of $\sim 30$ km s$^{-1}$. This phenomenon has been
944: demonstrated previously by many authors. What we have newly demonstrated here is
945: that the same young cluster
946: stars that have saturated X-ray emission also have saturated chromospheric Ca\,II H\&K
947: emission.
948:
949:
950: \begin{figure}
951: \epsscale{1.0}
952: \plotone{fig12.ps}
953: \caption{$R'_{HK}$ and $L_X$/$L_{Bol}$ measurements of open cluster members
954: versus $v$sin$i$. \textit{Filled circles} are $\alpha$ Per members, \textit{squares}
955: are Pleiads, \textit{triangles} are Hyads and \textit{open circles} are T Tauri stars
956: in Upper Scorpius, Upper Centaurus Lupus, and R Corona Australis. Stars with a
957: $v$sin$i$ upper limit are plotted with a $v$sin$i$ of 5 km s$^{-1}$ for clarity.
958: \label{fig_saturate} }
959: \end{figure}
960:
961:
962: \acknowledgements
963: We are grateful to the observing assistants formerly present at the Palomar 60-inch,
964: Karl Dunscombe
965: and Skip Staples, for their help and patience in acquiring this large data set.
966: We thank E. Mamajek and C. Slesnick for assisting with the observations and
967: Jonathan Foster, Francesca Colonnese, and Michael Inadomi for their assistance with
968: data reduction and analysis. We appreciate greatly the scattered light analysis
969: provided by J. Valenti for some of our spectra.
970: This research has made use of the SIMBAD and 2MASS
971: databases. We acknowledge support for these observations from NASA contract
972: 1224566 administered through JPL.
973: This work has benefited from the ability to organize our data within the FEPS
974: database created by John Carpenter.
975:
976:
977: \newpage
978:
979: \begin{thebibliography}{}
980:
981: \bibitem[Cutri et al. (2003)] {cutri03} Cutri, R. M. et al. 2003, The IRSA 2MASS All-Sky Point
982: Source Catalog, NASA/IPAC Infrared Science Archive
983:
984: %\bibitem[D'Antona \& Mazzitelli (1997)] {dm97} D'Antona, F. \& Mazzitelli,
985: % I. 1997, 'Evolution of Low Mass Stars' in ``Cool Stars in Clusters and
986: % Associations'', eds. R. Pallavicini \& G. Micela, Mem. S. A. It., 68,
987: % n. 4
988:
989: \bibitem[Duncan et al. (1991)] {duncan91} Duncan, D. K., et al. 1991,
990: \apjs, 76, 383
991:
992: \bibitem[Gray (1992)] {gray92} Gray, D. 1992, The Observation and Analysis
993: of Stellar Photospheres (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
994:
995: \bibitem[G\"udel (2004)]{gudel04} G\"udel, M. 2004, \araa, 12, 71
996:
997: \bibitem[H\o g et al. (2000)] {hog00} H\o g, E., et al. 2000, \aap, 357, ,367
998:
999: \bibitem[Jaschek \& Jaschek (1987)] {jaschek87} Jaschek, C. \& Jaschek, M. 1987, The
1000: Classification of Stars (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
1001:
1002: \bibitem[Johnson (1966)] {johnson66} Johnson, H. L. 1966, \araa, 4, 193
1003:
1004: \bibitem[Mamajek et al. (2002)] {mamajek02} Mamajek, E. E., Meyer, M. R. \&
1005: Liebert, J. 2002, AJ, 124, 1670
1006:
1007: \bibitem[McCarthy (1988)] {mccarthy88} McCarthy, J. K. 1988, Ph.D. thesis, California Institute of Technology
1008:
1009: \bibitem[Mermilliod et al. (1992)] {mermilliod92} Mermilliod, J. -C., Rosvick, J. M.,
1010: Duquennoy, A. \& Mayor, M. 1992, \aap, 265, 513
1011:
1012: \bibitem[Muzerolle et al. (1998)] {muzerolle98} Muzerolle, J., Calvet, N. \& Hartmann, L. 1998, \apj, 492, 743
1013:
1014: \bibitem[Meyer et al. (2006)] {meyer06} Meyer, M. R., et al. 2006, \pasp, in press
1015:
1016: \bibitem[Nidever et al. (2002)] {nidever02} Nidever, D. L., Marcy, G. W.,
1017: Butler, R. P., Fischer, D. A. \& Vogt, S. S. 2002, \apjs, 141, 503
1018:
1019: \bibitem[Nordstrom et al. (2004)] {nordstrom04} Nordstrom, B., et al. 2004,
1020: \aap, 418, 989
1021:
1022: \bibitem[Noyes et al. (1984)] {noyes84} Noyes, R. W., Hartmann, L. W.,
1023: Baliunas, S. L., Duncan, D. K., \& Vaughan, A. H., 1984, \apj, 279, 763.
1024:
1025: \bibitem[Ochsenbein et al. (2000)] {ochsenbein00}
1026: Ochsenbein, F., Bauer, P., \& Marcout, J. 2000, \aaps, 143, 23
1027:
1028: \bibitem[Pavlenko \& Magazz\'u (1996)] {pm96} Pavlenko, Y. V. \& Magazz\'u, A. 1996, \aap, 311, 961
1029:
1030: \bibitem[Queloz et al. (1998)] {queloz98} Queloz, D., Allain, S., Mermilliod, J. -C,
1031: Bouvier, J. \& Mayor, M. 1998, \aap, 335, 183
1032:
1033: \bibitem[Soderblom et al. (1991)] {soderblom91} Soderblom, D. R., Duncan,
1034: D. K. \& Johnson, D. R. H. 1991, \apj, 375, 722
1035:
1036: \bibitem[Soderblom et al. (1993)] {soderblom93} Soderblom, D. R., Jones,
1037: B. F., Balachandran, S., Stauffer, J. R., Duncan, D. K., Fedele, S. B.,
1038: Hudon, J. D. 1993, \aj, 106, 1059
1039:
1040: \bibitem[Strassmeier et al. (2000)] {strassmeier00} Strassmeier, K.,
1041: Washuettl, A., Granzer, Th., Scheck, M. \& Weber, M. 2000, \aaps, 142,
1042: 275
1043:
1044: \bibitem[Thorburn et al. (1993)] {thorburn93} Thorburn, J. A., Hobbs,
1045: L. M., Deliyannis, C. P. \& Pinsonneault, M. H. 1993, \apj, 415, 150
1046:
1047: %\bibitem[Tinney et al. (2002)] {tinney02} Tinney, C. G., McCarthy, C.,
1048: % Jones, H. R. A., Butler, R. P., Carter, B. D., Marcy, G. W., \& Penny,
1049: % A. J., 2002, \mnras, 332, 759.
1050:
1051: \bibitem[Vaughan et al. (1978)] {vaughan78} Vaughan, A. H., Preston,
1052: G. W. \& Wilson, O. C. 1978, \pasp, 90, 267
1053:
1054: \bibitem[Vilhu (1984)] {vilhu84} Vilhu, O 1984, \aap, 133, 117
1055:
1056: \bibitem[Vogt et al. (1994)] {vogt94} Vogt, S. S., et al. 1994, Proc. SPIE, 2198, 362
1057:
1058: \bibitem[White \& Hillenbrand (2004)] {wh04} White, R. J. \& Hillenbrand,
1059: L. A. 2004, \apj, 616, 998
1060:
1061: \bibitem[White \& Basri (2003)] {wb03} White, R. J. \& Basri, G. 2003, \apj, 582, 1109
1062:
1063: \bibitem[Wichmann et al. (2003)] {wichmann03} Wichmann, R., Schmitt,
1064: J. H. M. M., Hubrig, S. 2003, \aap, 399, 983
1065:
1066: \bibitem[Wilson (1968)] {wilson68} Wilson, O. C. 1968, \apj, 153, 221
1067:
1068: \bibitem[Wright et al. (2004)] {wright04} Wright, J. T., Marcy, G. W., Butler, R. P.
1069: \& Vogt, S. S. 2004, \apjs, 152, 261
1070:
1071: \end{thebibliography}
1072: \clearpage
1073:
1074: \begin{deluxetable}{lllllllcccllccccc}
1075: \rotate
1076: \tabletypesize{\tiny}
1077: \tablecaption{Spectroscopic Properties of Observed Single(-Lined) Stars\label{tab_single} }
1078: \tablewidth{0pt}
1079: \tablehead{ \colhead{HD}
1080: & \colhead{HIP}
1081: & \colhead{other}
1082: & \colhead{Grp}
1083: & \colhead{RA(2000)}
1084: & \colhead{DEC(2000)}
1085: & \colhead{Epoch}
1086: & \colhead{SNR}
1087: & \colhead{EW[Li\,I]}
1088: & \colhead{EW[H$\alpha$]}
1089: & \colhead{RV}
1090: & \colhead{vsini}
1091: & \colhead{SNR}
1092: & \colhead{}
1093: & \colhead{Spectral}
1094: & \colhead{}
1095: & \colhead{} \\
1096: \colhead{}
1097: & \colhead{}
1098: & \colhead{}
1099: & \colhead{}
1100: & \colhead{}
1101: & \colhead{}
1102: & \colhead{}
1103: & \colhead{$at Li$}
1104: & \colhead{(\AA)}
1105: & \colhead{(\AA)}
1106: & \colhead{(km s$^{-1}$)}
1107: & \colhead{(km s$^{-1}$)}
1108: & \colhead{$at HK$}
1109: & \colhead{$S_{MW}^a$}
1110: & \colhead{Type$^b$}
1111: & \colhead{B-V$^c$}
1112: & \colhead{R'$_{HK}^{a,d}$} }
1113: \startdata
1114: 224873 & 110 & RX J0001.4+3936 & Field & 00 01 23.66 & +39 36 38.1 & 2001 Dec 2 & 105 & $0.032$ & 1.74 & $-5.6\pm1.4$ & $<16.3$ & 50 & 0.365 0.068 & K0 & 0.76t & -4.49 0.11 \\
1115: 105 & 490 & RX J0005.9-4145 & Field & 00 05 52.55 & -41 45 10.9 & 2001 Dec 2 & 217 & $0.156$ & 3.06 & $1.6\pm1.2$ & $<18.2$ & 16 & 0.675e 0.118 & G0V & 0.59t & -4.03e 0.09 \\
1116: 377 & 682 & 1RXS J000826.8+063712 & Field & 00 08 25.74 & +06 37 00.5 & 2001 Jul 27 & 348 & $0.122$ & 2.34 & $-3.8\pm2.2$ & $<12.0$ & 135 & 0.348 0.12 & G2V & 0.63t & -4.41 0.20 \\
1117: 691 & 919 & V344 And & Field & 00 11 22.40 & +30 26 58.4 & 2002 Oct 29 & 256 & $0.122$ & 2.20 & $-2.4\pm0.8$ & $<10.$ & 84 & 0.388 0.072 & K0V & 0.78t & -4.47 0.10 \\
1118: & & & & & & 2002 Sep 18 & 174 & $0.115$ & 2.14 & $-3.0\pm0.8$ & $<13.7$ & 84 &0.391 0.073 & " & 0.78t & -4.47 0.10 \\
1119: 984 & 1134 & 1RXS J001410.1-071200 & Field & 00 14 10.25 & -07 11 57.0 & 2001 Jul 27 & 315 & $0.099$ & 2.99 & $-3.2\pm2.2$ & $42.1\pm1.7$& 131 & 0.296 0.104 & F7V & 0.50t & -4.43 0.22 \\
1120: 1326A & 1475 & GJ 15 A & Mstar & 00 18 22.57 & +44 01 22.2 & 2002 Oct 30 & 198 & $<0.01$ & 0.51 & $12.0\pm0.9$ & $<20.5$ & 38 & 0.568 0.101 & M2V & 1.48t & \nodata \\
1121: 1326B &\nodata & GJ 15 B & Mstar & 00 18 25.50 & +44 01 37.6 & 2002 Oct 30 & 87 & $<0.02$ & 0.17 & $10.7\pm0.9$ & $<18.9$ & 14 & 1.083 0.181 & M5V & 1.61s & \nodata \\
1122: 3765 & 3206 & GJ 28 & Field & 00 40 49.29 & +40 11 13.3 & 2002 Sep 17 & 259 & $0.015$ & 1.31 & $-63.8\pm0.7$ & $16.3\pm5.1$& 65 & 0.218 0.043 & K2V & 0.97t & -4.97c 0.10 \\
1123: \nodata &\nodata & QT And & Field & 00 41 17.32 & +34 25 16.8 & 2002 Oct 29 & 160 & $0.128$ & -0.17 & $6.0\pm0.8$ & $24.4\pm2.2$& 40 & 1.617 0.259 & G & 0.94t & -3.99c 0.11 \\
1124: & & & & & & 2002 Sep 18 & 83 & $0.166$ & -0.23 & $5.1\pm0.7$ & $25.1\pm2.2$& 27 & 0.705 0.123 & " & 0.94t & -4.37c 0.11 \\
1125: 6434 & 5054 & GJ 9037 & Field & 01 04 40.15 & -39 29 17.4 & 2001 Dec 2 & 231 & $<0.004$ & 2.37 & $21.9\pm1.2$ & $<10.$ & 28 &0.396 0.074 & G2/3V & 0.60t & -4.32 0.11 \\
1126: %
1127: 6963 & 5521 & SAO 36995 & Field & 01 10 41.92 & +42 55 54.7 & 2002 Sep 17 & 206 & $<0.003$ & 2.05 & $-31.7\pm0.7$ & $<12.58$ & 77 & 0.226 0.045 & G7V & 0.73t & -4.75 0.14 \\
1128: 7661 & 5938 & SAO 147702 & Field & 01 16 24.18 & -12 05 49.3 & 2003 Feb 8 & 185 & $0.075$ & 2.04 & $5.2\pm0.4$ & $<10.$ & 33 & 0.479 0.087 & K0V & 0.77t & -4.35 0.10 \\
1129: \nodata & 6276 & SAO 147747 & Field & 01 20 32.26 & -11 28 03.6 & 2003 Feb 8 & 178 & $0.153$ & 1.99 & $8.3\pm0.4$ & $<10.$ & 29 & 0.619 0.110 & G0 & 0.80t & -4.25 0.09 \\
1130: 8467 & 6575 & SAO 54666 & Field & 01 24 27.98 & +39 03 43.6 & 2002 Sep 17 & 172 & $<0.011$ & 1.64 & $15.0\pm0.7$ & $<10.$ & 60 & 0.278 0.054 & G5 & 0.77t & -4.65 0.12 \\
1131: 8941 & 6869 & SAO 92453 & Field & 01 28 24.36 & +17 04 45.2 & 2001 Jul 29 & 421 & $0.006$ & 2.59 & $9.3\pm2.2$ & $<10.96$ & 181& 0.175 0.035 & F8IV-V & 0.52t & -4.83 0.18 \\
1132: & & & & & & 2002 Sep 18 & 233 & $<0.004$ & 2.69 & $8.29\pm0.70$ & $<12.3$ & 123& 0.190 0.069 & F8IV-V & 0.52t & -4.76 0.31 \\
1133: 8907 & 6878 & IRAS 01256+4200 & Field & 01 28 34.35 & +42 16 03.8 & 2001 Jul 26 & 266 & $0.048$ & 1.55 & $6.3\pm2.2$ & $<14.34$ & 142 & 0.263 0.093 & F8 & 0.49t & -4.50 0.24 \\
1134: 9472 & 7244 & SAO 74789 & Field & 01 33 19.03 & +23 58 32.1 & 2002 Sep 18 & 190 & $0.055$ & 2.28 & $10.9\pm0.7$ & $19.33\pm4.22$& 83 & 0.277 0.053 & G0 & 0.68t & -4.59 0.13 \\
1135: \nodata &\nodata & RX J0137.6+1835 & Field & 01 37 39.41 & +18 35 33.2 & 2001 Jul 28 & 194 & $0.416$ & -0.59 & $1.8\pm2.2$ & $21.25\pm3.26$& 26 & 0.512e 0.171 & K3Ve & 1.03t & -4.64e,c 0.23 \\
1136: 10780 & 8362 & IRAS 01441+6336 & Field & 01 47 44.88 & +63 51 09.1 & 2001 Jul 28 & 203 & $0.012$ & 1.66 & $1.4\pm2.2$ & $<10.$ &55 & 0.237 0.085 & K0V & 0.80t & -4.77 0.22 \\
1137: 11850 & 9073 & SAO 75038 & Field & 01 56 47.28 & +23 03 04.1 & 2002 Oct 29 & 176 & $0.018$ & 2.32 & $3.3\pm0.8$ & $<12.08$ & 54 & 0.287 0.055 & G5 & 0.69t & -4.57 0.12 \\
1138: & & & & & & 2002 Sep 18 & 138 & $0.015$ & 2.27 & $1.6\pm0.7$ & $<12.38$ & 76 & 0.292 0.056 & " & 0.69t & -4.56 0.12 \\
1139: \enddata
1140: \tablenotetext{a}{Stars with especially uncertain S values are marked with an "e".}
1141: \tablenotetext{b}{Stars which appear low surface gravity are marked with an asterisk.}
1142: \tablenotetext{c}{B-V colors from the Tycho catalogue are marked with a "t" while those from the stellar spectral type are marked with an "s".}
1143: \tablenotetext{d}{Stars with B-V colors outside the range over which R'$_{HK}$ values are
1144: calibrated are marked with a "c". }
1145: \end{deluxetable}
1146:
1147: \begin{deluxetable}{lllllllcccc}
1148: \tabletypesize{\tiny}
1149: \tablecaption{Observed Double-Lined Binary Stars \label{tab_binary} }
1150: \tablewidth{0pt}
1151: \tablehead{ \colhead{}
1152: & \colhead{}
1153: & \colhead{}
1154: & \colhead{}
1155: & \colhead{}
1156: & \colhead{}
1157: & \colhead{}
1158: & \colhead{SNR}
1159: & \colhead{EW[Li\.I]}
1160: & \colhead{EW[Ca\,I]}
1161: & \colhead{EW[H$\alpha$} \\
1162: \colhead{HD}
1163: & \colhead{HIP}
1164: & \colhead{other}
1165: & \colhead{Assoc}
1166: & \colhead{RA(2000)}
1167: & \colhead{DEC(2000)}
1168: & \colhead{Epoch}
1169: & \colhead{$at Li$}
1170: & \colhead{(m\AA)}
1171: & \colhead{(m\AA)}
1172: & \colhead{(\AA)} }
1173: \startdata
1174: \nodata & \nodata & Cl~Melotte~20~848 & aPer & 03 29 26.24 & +48 12 11.74 &2002 Oct 31 & 149 & 45/69 & 61/85 & 1.65/0.95 \\
1175: 78899 & 45187 & GJ 3539 & Field & 09 12 28.24 & +49 12 23.4 &2003 Feb 9 & 260 & 11/50 & 91/121 & 0.83/0.72\\
1176: \nodata & \nodata & SAO 178272 & Field& 09 59 08.42 & -22 39 34.57 &2002 Feb 4 & 107 & 87/162 &105/153& em.\\
1177: " & " & " & " & " & " &2001 Dec 2 & 134 &\nodata &\nodata & em.\\
1178: " & " & " & " & " & " &2002 Apr 19 & 51 &103/204&174/233 & -0.1/-0.2 \\
1179: \nodata & \nodata & TYC 7310 503 1 & Field & 14 58 37.69 & -35 40 30.27 &2003 Jun 5 & 82 & 121/222& 99/180 & em.\\
1180: \nodata & \nodata & TYC 7305 380 1 & Field & 14 50 25.82 & -35 06 48.66 &2002 Feb 3 & 85 & 132/250& 103/66 &\nodata \\
1181: " & " & " & " & " & " &2003 Jun 5 & 79 & 307/60 & 120/54 &\nodata \\
1182: 140374 & 77081 & TYC 7331 1235 1 & Field & 15 44 21.06 & -33 18 54.97 &2003 Jun 4 & 145 & 112/116 & 61/77 & -0.96/-1.17\\
1183: 142229 & 77810 & SAO 121238 & Field & 15 53 20.01 & +04 15 11.5 &2002 Feb 2 & 119& 56/121 & 29/79 &\nodata\\
1184: 218738 & 114379 & KZ And & Field & 23 09 57.34 & +47 57 30.0 &2003 Jun 6 & 73 & 69/107 & 108/165 &\nodata \\
1185: \enddata
1186: \end{deluxetable}
1187:
1188: \end{document}
1189:
1190:
1191: