1: \documentclass{emulateapj}
2: \topmargin=-1in
3: \addtolength{\voffset}{0.75in}
4: \setlength{\unitlength}{1mm} %Required for tube drawing
5: \usepackage{color,graphicx,lscape,natbib}
6: \shortauthors{Morrissey et al.}
7: \begin{document}
8: \title{The Calibration and Data Products of the Galaxy Evolution Explorer}
9: \slugcomment{Accepted to the Ap.J.Suppl. (special GALEX issue)}
10: \author{Patrick Morrissey\altaffilmark{1},
11: Tim Conrow\altaffilmark{1},
12: Tom A. Barlow\altaffilmark{1},
13: Todd Small\altaffilmark{1},
14: Mark Seibert\altaffilmark{7},
15: Ted K. Wyder\altaffilmark{1},
16: Tamas Budavari\altaffilmark{5},
17: Stephane Arnouts\altaffilmark{4},
18: Peter G. Friedman\altaffilmark{1},
19: Karl Forster\altaffilmark{1},
20: D. Christopher Martin\altaffilmark{1},
21: Susan G. Neff\altaffilmark{8},
22: David Schiminovich\altaffilmark{10},
23: Luciana Bianchi\altaffilmark{2},
24: Jose Donas\altaffilmark{4},
25: Timothy M. Heckman\altaffilmark{5},
26: Young-Wook Lee\altaffilmark{3},
27: Barry F. Madore\altaffilmark{7},
28: Bruno Milliard\altaffilmark{4},
29: R. Michael Rich\altaffilmark{9},
30: Alex S. Szalay\altaffilmark{5},
31: Barry Y. Welsh\altaffilmark{6},
32: Sukyoung K. Yi\altaffilmark{3}}
33: \altaffiltext{1}{California Institute of Technology, MC 405-47, 1200 East California Boulevard, Pasadena, CA 91125}
34: \altaffiltext{2}{Center for Astrophysical Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N. Charles St., Baltimore, MD 21218}
35: \altaffiltext{3}{Center for Space Astrophysics, Yonsei University, Seoul 120-749, Korea}
36: \altaffiltext{4}{Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de Marseille, BP 8, Traverse du Siphon, 13376 Marseille Cedex 12, France}
37: \altaffiltext{5}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, The Johns Hopkins University, Homewood Campus, Baltimore, MD 21218}
38: \altaffiltext{6}{Space Sciences Laboratory, University of California at Berkeley, 601 Campbell Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720}
39: \altaffiltext{7}{Observatories of the Carnegie Institution of Washington, 813 Santa Barbara St., Pasadena, CA 91101}
40: \altaffiltext{8}{Laboratory for Astronomy and Solar Physics, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771}
41: \altaffiltext{9}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095}
42: \altaffiltext{10}{Department of Astronomy, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027}
43:
44: \begin{abstract}
45: We describe the calibration status and data products pertaining to the GR2 and
46: GR3 data releases of the Galaxy Evolution Explorer (GALEX). These releases have
47: identical pipeline calibrations that are significantly improved over the GR1
48: data release.
49: GALEX continues to survey the sky in the Far Ultraviolet (FUV,
50: $\sim 154$~nm) and Near Ultraviolet (NUV, $\sim 232$~nm) bands, providing
51: simultaneous imaging with a pair of photon counting, microchannel plate, delay
52: line readout detectors. These 1.25$^{\circ}$ field-of-view detectors are
53: well-suited to ultraviolet observations because of their excellent red
54: rejection and negligible background. A dithered mode of observing and photon
55: list output pose complex requirements on the data processing pipeline,
56: entangling detector calibrations and aspect reconstruction algorithms. Recent
57: improvements have achieved photometric repeatability of 0.05 and 0.03 m$_{AB}$
58: in the FUV and NUV, respectively. We have detected a long term drift of
59: order 1\% FUV and 6\% NUV over the mission. Astrometric precision is of order
60: 0.5\arcsec\ RMS in both bands. In this paper we provide the GALEX user with a broad overview of
61: the calibration issues likely to be confronted in the current release.
62: Improvements are likely as the GALEX mission continues into an extended phase
63: with a healthy instrument, no consumables, and increased opportunities for
64: guest investigations.
65: \end{abstract}
66:
67: \keywords{space vehicles: instruments --- surveys --- telescopes ---
68: ultraviolet: general}
69:
70: \section{Introduction}
71:
72: \notetoeditor{This paper is submitted for consideration in the GALEX
73: special issue of the Astrophysical Journal Letters.}
74:
75: We describe the calibration status and data products pertaining to the combined
76: GR2 and GR3 data releases of the Galaxy Evolution Explorer (GALEX). GALEX is a
77: NASA Small Explorer mission performing an all-sky ultraviolet (UV)
78: survey in the Far UV (FUV$\sim 154$~nm) and Near UV (NUV$\sim 232$~nm) bands
79: with 4~--~6\arcsec\ resolution and $\sim 50$~cm$^{2}$ effective area. At the
80: time of this writing, over 13500 square degrees of this survey are available to
81: the public via the Internet from the Multimission Archive at Space Telescope
82: Science Institute (MAST).\footnote{galex.stsci.edu}
83:
84: The GR2 and GR3 releases have identical pipeline calibrations that are
85: significantly improved over the previous GR1 release. Photometric precision at
86: a given epoch is 0.05 and 0.03 m$_{AB}$ in the FUV and NUV respectively. We
87: have detected a long term drift of order 1\% FUV and 6\% NUV over the mission.
88: The astrometric precision has been improved to 0.5\arcsec\ RMS.
89:
90: The path from raw telemetry to corrected catalogs, images and spectra is a
91: complicated one for the GALEX pipeline. This fact is illustrated by
92: Fig.~\ref{dither}, which shows a GALEX image in detector and sky
93: coordinates, which are representative of the pre- and post-pipeline images.
94: This overview highlights the data quality,
95: errors and peculiarities that are likely to confront astronomers. As is true
96: for any large dataset, knowledge of these basic characteristics is essential to
97: avoid confusion.
98:
99: The GALEX mission continues into an extended phase with a
100: healthy instrument, no consumables, and increased opportunities for guest
101: investigations. While the survey is on-going, it is likely that we will make
102: improvements to the calibration and discover additional sources of error. We
103: expect to provide updates to this paper on the web at
104: \textsc{www.galex.caltech.edu}, as well as in the literature.
105: \begin{figure*}
106: \begin{center}
107: \begin{tabular}{lr}
108: \includegraphics[width=3in]{f1asm.eps} &
109: \includegraphics[width=3in]{f1bsm.eps}
110: \end{tabular}
111: \end{center}
112: \caption{\textit{Left panel:} A GALEX NUV ``dose'' image of M101 in spacecraft
113: coordinates clearly showing the 1\arcmin\ dither pattern, which is used for all
114: observations to smooth out the effects of the detector flat field and reduce MCP
115: fatigue. \textit{Right panel:} The fully processed, background-subtracted NUV image
116: of M101 in sky coordinates, which provides the basis for the source
117: catalog data.\label{dither}}
118: \end{figure*}
119:
120: This paper is organized as follows. In Section~\ref{overview} we summarize the
121: design of the mission and instrument. In Section~\ref{pipeline} we describe
122: how GALEX data are reconstructed and what the key pipeline products are. In
123: Section~\ref{photometry} we describe the photometric calibration of the data,
124: including a discussion of saturation effects and drift. In
125: Section~\ref{resolution} we describe the instrument resolution across the field
126: of view and as a function of detector gain. In Section~\ref{astrometry}
127: we describe the astrometric performance of the instrument. In
128: Section~\ref{spectroscopy} we describe the spectroscopy calibration and present
129: an example extraction. Finally, in Section~\ref{conclusions} we summarize the
130: key points of the paper.
131:
132: \section{Mission and Instrument Overview}
133: \label{overview}
134:
135: GALEX was launched on an Orbital Sciences Corporation (Orbital) Pegasus rocket
136: on 2003 April 28 at 12:00~UT from the Kennedy Space Center into a circular,
137: 700~km, 29\degr\ inclination orbit. This 0.5~m diameter instrument has a very
138: wide 1.25$^{\circ}$ field of view sensitive to m$_{\rm AB}\sim 21$\ in the All
139: Sky Imaging Survey (AIS), and to m$_{\rm AB}\sim 25$\ in the Deep Imaging
140: Survey (DIS). The instrument provides simultaneous FUV and NUV imaging with a
141: pair of photon counting, microchannel plate, delay line readout detectors.
142: These detectors are well-suited to ultraviolet observations because of their
143: excellent red rejection and negligible background. An objective grism mode is
144: also available for low resolution spectroscopy. The last comparable survey in
145: this wavelength range, which extended to m$_{\rm AB}\sim 9$\ was performed by
146: the Belgian/UK Ultraviolet Sky Survey Telescope on the TD1 satellite launched
147: in 1972 and described by \citet{boksenberg1973}.
148:
149: GALEX makes science observations on the night side of each orbit (to keep sky
150: background to a minimum) during ``eclipses'' that are typically in the range of
151: 1500~--~1800~s. In the AIS, as many as 12 targets are observed during an
152: eclipse, while the Medium Imaging Survey (MIS) has one target per eclipse and
153: the DIS returns to the same target for 30 or more eclipses. As of this
154: writing, we have observed over 19,000 square degrees of sky and accumulated
155: over 4 terabytes of science telemetry.
156: An overview of key performance parameters is presented in Tab.~\ref{performance}.
157:
158: \begin{deluxetable*}{lcc}
159: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
160: \tablecaption{Summary of measured performance parameters for GALEX.\label{performance}}
161: \tablehead{\colhead{Item} & \colhead{FUV Band} & \colhead{NUV Band}}
162: \tablewidth{0pt}
163: \startdata
164: Bandwidth:\tablenotemark{a} & 1344~--~1786~\AA
165: & 1771~--~2831~\AA \\
166: Effective wavelength ($\lambda_{eff}$):\tablenotemark{b}
167: & 1538.6~\AA & 2315.7~\AA\\
168: Mean effective area: & 19.6 cm$^2$ & 33.6 cm$^2$\\
169: Peak effective area: & 36.8 cm$^2$ at 1480~\AA & 61.7 cm$^2$ at 2200~\AA\\
170: Astrometry (1$\sigma$, $R \le 0.6^{\circ})$:
171: & $\pm 0.59$\arcsec & $\pm 0.49$\arcsec\\
172: Field of view: & 1.27$^{\circ}$
173: & 1.25$^{\circ}$\\
174: Photometry (1$\sigma$): & $\pm 0.05 m_{AB}$ & $\pm 0.03 m_{AB}$\\
175: Zero point ($m0_{UV}$): & 18.82 & 20.08\\
176: Image resolution (FWHM): & 4.2\arcsec & 5.3\arcsec\\
177: Spectral resolution ($\lambda/\Delta\lambda$):
178: & 200 & 118 \\
179: Spectral dispersion & 1.64\AA-arcsec$^{-1}$ & 4.04\AA-arcsec$^{-1}$\\
180: Detector background (typical):\\
181: \hspace{2em}Total: & 78 c-s$^{-1}$ & 193 c-s$^{-1}$\\
182: \hspace{2em}Diffuse: & 0.66 c-s$^{-1}$-cm$^{-2}$ & 1.82 c-s$^{-1}$-cm$^{-2}$\\
183: \hspace{2em}Hotspots: & 47 c-s$^{-1}$ & 107 c-s$^{-1}$\\
184: Sky background (typical):\tablenotemark{c}
185: & 1000 c-s$^{-1}$ & 10000 c-s$^{1}$\\
186: Limiting magnitude ($5\sigma$):\\
187: \hspace{2em}AIS (100~s): & 19.9 & 20.8\\
188: \hspace{2em}MIS (1500~s): & 22.6 & 22.7\\
189: \hspace{2em}DIS (30000~s): & 24.8 & 24.4\\
190: Linearity:\\
191: \hspace{2em}Global (10\% roll off): & \multicolumn{2}{c}{18000 c-s$^{-1}$} \\
192: \hspace{2em}Global (50\% roll off): & \multicolumn{2}{c}{91000 c-s$^{-1}$} \\
193: \hspace{2em}Local (10\% roll off):\tablenotemark{e}
194: & 114 c-s$^{-1}$ & 303 c-s$^{-1}$\\
195: Pipeline image format: & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$3840\times3840$ elements with 1.5\arcsec\ pixels}\\
196: \enddata
197: \tablenotetext{a}{Includes wavelengths with effective area at least 10\% of the peak value.}
198: \tablenotetext{b}{Wavelength-weighted: $\lambda_{eff} = \frac{\int A_{eff}\times \lambda}{\int A_{eff}}$}
199: \tablenotetext{c}{These correspond to 246 and 601~photons-s$^{-1}$-cm$^{-2}$-sr$^{-1}$-\AA$^{-1}$, respectively.}
200: \tablenotetext{d}{These are worst-case values for point sources.}
201: \end{deluxetable*}
202:
203: A GALEX detector head is shown schematically in Fig.~\ref{detector_head}.
204: Individual photons incident at the cathode set off an isolated avalanche of
205: current inside parallel 10-12~micron diameter microchannel plate (MCP) pores as they accelerate through a
206: few-keV field. The resulting charge cloud at the rear of the MCP stack,
207: approximately $10^7$ electrons in size, is deposited on a double-layer anode,
208: divided, and finally measured at each of four outputs. The layers of the anode
209: form a pair of orthogonal delay lines. Timing differences measured for the
210: charge pulses at each corner of the anode are proportional to the position of
211: the initiating photon event. For faint UV observations, the combination of low
212: background (zero read noise) and high red rejection that these detectors
213: possess represents a favorable trade-off against the superior QE and field
214: flatness of more conventional CCD detectors. Furthermore, MCP detectors do not
215: require cooling, an important consideration in the contamination-sensitive UV
216: band. In order to improve photometric performance, observations are dithered
217: in a spiral pattern approximately 1\arcmin\ in diameter (at a rate of
218: approximately 0.5 revolutions per minute) that smooth out small scale
219: variations in the flat field and reduce bright source fatigue on the MCPs.
220: \begin{figure}
221: \begin{center}
222: \includegraphics[width=3in,angle=0]{f2.eps}
223: \end{center}
224: \caption{GALEX sealed tube detector head electro-mechanical block diagram. The
225: NUV and FUV tube heads are nearly identical with the principal differences
226: being the choice of photocathode material (CsI for FUV and Cs$_2$Te for NUV)
227: and window material (MgF$_2$ for FUV, SiO$_2$ for NUV). Also, the cathode
228: material is deposited on the detector window in the NUV channel but directly on
229: the MCP in the FUV channel. Instead of a cathode, the FUV window has a charged
230: grid of wires that enhances the sensitivity of the detector. The NUV cathode is
231: proximity focused on the front MCP, and due to its reentrant design is more
232: prone to reflections from off-field sources. $HV_{in}$ represents the negative
233: applied voltage, 5-6~keV, while a resistor chain ($R_{gap}\sim 10$~MOhm in
234: series with the MCPs at about $30$~MOhm each) sets the voltage across the gap
235: ($V_{gap}\sim 500$~V) and MCP stack ($V_{MCP}\sim 4500$~V) driving a detector
236: bias current $I_{MCP}\sim 50\ \mu$A. The detector pulse outputs in one
237: dimension are labeled START and STOP (or sometimes ``A'' and
238: ``C'').\label{detector_head}}
239: \end{figure}
240:
241: A more detailed instrument overview is provided in
242: \citet{morrissey2005}, while the mission design is described by
243: \citet{martin2005}. Further details of our mission operations experience are
244: described in \citet{forster2006} and \citet{morrissey2006}.
245:
246: \section{Image Reconstruction Overview}
247: \label{pipeline}
248: The GALEX detector output is a list of time-ordered 40-bit photon positions and
249: pulse heights. These data are delivered to the instrument Data Processing Unit
250: (DPU), which adds a timing stamp every 5~ms (or every 20~$\mu$s in uncompressed
251: mode). The time stamp is derived from the spacecraft clock, which has a drift
252: of the order of 1~s each week that is corrected with ground updates. Data are
253: stored in the 2.8~GB ring buffer of a Solid State Recorder (SSR), which is
254: down-linked to a ground station approximately four times each day.
255:
256: The ground pipeline reconstructs a list of photon positions and arrival times
257: into an image. Broadly speaking, the photon lists are corrected for detector
258: effects and image motion, projected into sky coordinates, binned into images,
259: flat fielded, and finally background subtracted. These final image products
260: are then scanned by the open-source SExtractor program \citep{bertin1995} to
261: produce catalogs of source positions and fluxes. The steps along this path are
262: described in more detail in the following sections.
263:
264: \subsection{Static Calibration}
265:
266: The static calibrations are those used to assemble raw detector event positions
267: into accurate locations in the GALEX focal plane. They also flag events that are not
268: photon generated, such as the periodic ''STIM'' pulses that are always
269: electronically superimposed (in parallel with real photon events) on the
270: detector anodes, and regions on the MCPs that are dominated by hotspots.
271:
272: Each photon event in the GALEX science telemetry is a heavily encoded group of
273: fields that, when decoded and assembled, produces key values listed in
274: Tab.~\ref{40bit}. In the GALEX design \citep{jelinsky2003}, a free-running
275: coarse clock subdivides the large detector areas into an $8\times 8$ grid.
276: Detector event pulses are measured asynchronously while this clock runs, so
277: that each position (proportional to the measured arrival time difference of
278: pulses from either side of the delay line anode on each axis) comprises an
279: integer number of coarse clock steps plus a fine position (essentially the
280: coarse clock phase).
281: \begin{deluxetable}{lll}
282: \tablecaption{Key data contained in the GALEX RAW6 format photon lists.
283: Photons from the detector itself are not time stamped but rather time
284: ordered, and the time stamp is added by the DPU
285: before being written to the SSR.\label{40bit}}
286: \tablehead{\colhead{Column} & \colhead{Bits} & \colhead{Description}}
287: \startdata
288: t & 40 & Event detection time\tablenotemark{a}\\
289: $X_{AmC}$ & 12 & Raw X detector position in FEE pixels \\
290: $Y_{AmC}$ & 12 & Raw Y detector position in FEE pixels \\
291: $X_A$ & 5 & Wiggle (the phase of the TAC)\\
292: $X_B$ & 3 & X axis coarse clock\\
293: $Y_B$ & 3 & Y axis coarse clock\\
294: Q & 5 & Detected pulse height \\
295: \enddata
296: \tablenotetext{a}{In high resolution mode, the timing precision uses 40
297: bits to attain 20~$\mu$s resolution, however this mode is rarely used. For
298: most data, only 32 bits are significant, attaining 5~ms resolution.}
299: \end{deluxetable}
300:
301: In order to construct a raw source position $(X,Y)$ from these data, one would apply the
302: following formulas:
303: \begin{eqnarray}
304: X & = & X_{AmC} + \alpha X_B \\
305: Y & = & Y_{AmC} + \beta Y_B,
306: \end{eqnarray}
307: where the constants $\alpha$ and $\beta$ are in the range of 2000 (solved by
308: minimizing source widths across the field of view), $X_B$ and $Y_B$ are the
309: coarse clock counters, and $X_{AmC}$ and $Y_{AmC}$ are the ''fine'' position
310: measurements representing the coarse clock phase.\footnote{The notation derives
311: from the ends of the delay line ``A'' and ``C'', or sometimes ``START'' and
312: ``STOP'' in other work, thus the position is proportional to a timing difference of $A-C$ or
313: ``AmC.''} After the detector positions are assembled, the
314: following static corrections are applied (in order) to correct the raw
315: positions to a linear representation of the actual source position in the focal
316: plane:
317: \begin{itemize}
318: \item{\textbf{Centering and scaling:} Coarsely scales the raw positions from bins to
319: microns. The scale factors are different for each axis.}
320: \item{\textbf{Wiggle:} The GALEX coarse-bit sub-array approach allows
321: degenerate combinations of coarse and fine components for a given detector
322: location. Each of these may have a slightly different electronic
323: non-linearity correction owing to the differing phases of the
324: time-to-amplitude converter (TAC) for each event. The image of a single point
325: source on the detector is thus \textit{blurred} by the superposition of all
326: of the TAC data, an effect referred to as wiggle. This contrasts with
327: smaller, more conventional time-to-amplitude conversion systems. These do not
328: utilize a coarse counter bit and translate all electronic
329: non-linearities into source \textit{position} errors rather than source
330: \textit{widths}. With careful part selection, ``wiggle'' in the flight
331: units has been minimized considerably. In order to eliminate it completely,
332: each detected event includes a 5-bit value $X_A$, which represents where in
333: the TAC range each measurement was made. Residual electronic
334: non-linearities are then removed using lookup tables for combinations of
335: $(X,X_A)$ and $(Y,X_A)$. Both axes use the same $X_A$ data because
336: the $X$ and $Y$ pulses are correlated in time for a given detector
337: position.}
338: \item{\textbf{Walk:} This transformation corrects position-vs-pulse-height (Q) errors. A lookup table correction applied in a similar manner as
339: wiggle, reflective of the
340: fact that the electronics can not perfectly compensate for pulse sizes that
341: vary by a factor of 10 across the detector.}
342: \item{\textbf{Spatial non-linearity (distortion):} A lookup table corrects
343: high voltage detector edge effects, which cause electrons
344: to bend from their optimal path, distorting the image especially near the
345: edge of the field.}
346: \item{\textbf{Hotspot masking:} Each detector has numerous small, high count
347: rate features resulting from a combination of microscopic MCP debris and
348: channel defects that combined generate about half of the intrinsic detector
349: background. These spots come and go, and are best handled by
350: direct masking, which eliminates only about a percent of the detector area.
351: New masks are generated roughly annually; hotspots are generally easy to pick
352: out of images because they ``reverse dither'' (since they are fixed in
353: detector space) and create $\sim1$\arcmin\ circular artifacts in GALEX
354: sky-space images. In the data pipeline, the hot spot masks create
355: localized regions of zero effective sensitivity in detector space, one reason
356: why dithered observations are preferred for these detectors. Depending
357: on pointing accuracy in a given observation, the dither typically maps these
358: regions into ''donuts'' of reduced (but not zero) response on the sky.}
359: \end{itemize}
360:
361: \subsection{Dynamic Aspect Correction}
362:
363: The fully-corrected event positions in spacecraft coordinates accurately record
364: where each photon landed in the GALEX focal plane. The next step is to
365: reconstruct the spacecraft pointing on the sky as a function of time in order
366: to remove the dither pattern from the observed data. This is the 3-parameter
367: ``aspect,'' which includes the right ascension, declination, and roll of the
368: telescope boresight. For imaging mode data, a precise estimate is arrived at
369: by refining the spacecraft Attitude Control System (ACS) pointing estimate with
370: NUV data\footnote{The process will run with FUV-only data, although owing to
371: the generally decreased numbers and brightnesses of stars in FUV data, some
372: parameters such as the interpolation interval need to be adjusted.} binned into
373: 1~s slices. These snapshot images are each matched to the ACT catalog
374: \citep{urban1998} of known stars,\footnote{Occasionally, matches to known stars
375: cannot be found, usually due to pointing errors. In these rare cases, a good
376: Point Spread Function (PSF) is achieved by performing the aspect refinement
377: relative to \textit{any} sources of emission detected in the field that are
378: reasonably compact. This is called relative aspect refinement mode and results
379: in images with good PSFs but poor absolute astrometry. Roll is not refined in
380: relative mode.} and the average error vector from the matches to the catalog
381: stars are used to establish a correction to apply to the ACS estimate. The
382: source positions are then transformed to sky coordinates (J2000) using a
383: Gnomonic projection based on the pointing at the interpolated time.
384:
385: Grism data undergoes a similar process, but the software can not match spectra
386: to known stars at this stage of processing. A relative aspect solution is
387: performed based solely on the instantaneous spectral image positions, and
388: astrometric refinement is added at a later stage.
389:
390: Once sky coordinates have been assigned to each photon, an "extended photon
391: list" is computed for internal use by the pipeline in forming the final data
392: products. In cases where detailed, time-dependent behavior of one or more
393: objects over the course of an exposure is of interest, the extended photon list
394: can be written out to a so called "x-file," by special request.
395:
396: \subsection{Pipeline Products}
397:
398: Images and catalogs from various stages of pipeline processing reveal many
399: characteristics of the complex, multidimensional GALEX dataset and are included
400: with each data release as pipeline products. A description of key products is
401: provided here for reference.
402:
403: The corrected photon data are binned into images and flux calibrated in order
404: to form the basis for the GALEX catalogs. Count images (\textit{-cnt}), which
405: contain aspect-corrected detector counts per sky pixel are scaled by the
406: effective area and exposure time to form the flux-calibrated intensity
407: (\textit{-int}) images. This step is accomplished with the relative response
408: (\textit{-rr}) image, which contains the effective exposure for each pixel:
409:
410: \[rr(X,Y) = \Sigma_{t=0}^{T} flat(X(t),Y(t)) \times (1 - f_{dead}(t)) \times dt(t),\]
411:
412: where $flat(X(t),Y(t))$ is the detector flat field\footnote{The flat field has
413: a value of 1 in regions for which a zero-point-magnitude source generates
414: exactly 1~deadtime-corrected photon-s$^{-1}$.} shifted to properly align with
415: the dithered image time slice, $f_{dead}$ is the global electronic dead time
416: based on the measured STIM pulser rate during each time slice,\footnote{Since
417: the electronic STIM pulses occur at a precisely known rate, the fraction that
418: are missing from the event list over a given interval will be known. This is
419: the fractional dead time, which corrects the global rates only and does not
420: account for local MCP saturation.} and $dt(t)$ is the fraction of each 1~s
421: time slice during which data was collected (i.e. HV was on and the detector
422: was otherwise in a nominal observing mode). Building the effective exposure
423: time in this way properly handles the fact that the edges of the image
424: receive less exposure than the middle, and that the sources each sample a
425: 1\arcmin\ region on the flat field. The high resolution relative response
426: image (\textit{-rrhr}), which properly matches the count and intensity map
427: pixel scales, is up-sampled from the 6\arcsec\ relative response array. The
428: intensity image is simply the count image divided by the high resolution
429: relative response image.
430:
431: As a final step, the background in each intensity image must be estimated and
432: removed. Since the GALEX detectors have negligible intrinsic background and
433: the UV sky is dark, estimation of the true background is not properly handled
434: by the code within SExtractor. Instead, we create a custom threshold image for
435: SExtractor that allows a bypass of the normal process for distinguishing low
436: rate sources from background. The typical sky background count rates in high
437: Galactic latitude GALEX pointings are $\sim 10^{-4}$ ($\sim 10^{-3}$)
438: photons-s$^{-1}$-arcsec$^{-2}$ in the FUV (NUV), thus it is necessary to use
439: the full Poisson distribution. The background is determined in a set of large
440: bins, 192\arcsec\ on a side. In images with exposure times greater than
441: 10,000~s, the bins are 96\arcsec\ on a side. For the Poisson
442: distribution, the probability of observing greater than or equal to $k$ events
443: for a mean rate $x$ is given by the incomplete gamma function $P_k(x)$
444: \citep{press1992}. The average is computed iteratively within each background
445: bin by clipping out high pixels where $P_k(x) < 1.35 \times 10^{-3}$, a
446: probability equivalent to $3\sigma$ for a Gaussian distribution. Even after
447: clipping, bright or extended sources can still bias the background
448: determination, therefore, a $5\times5$ median filter is applied to the
449: background bins. The resulting background values are linearly interpolated to
450: the full resolution of the images. We have determined that the background may
451: be biased by a few percent due to contamination from the wings of objects. To
452: address this problem, background estimation and source extraction software is
453: run twice on each GALEX image. The second run uses source position data from
454: the first iteration to mask out source pixels and recompute the sky background
455: and background-subtracted intensity images. The resulting background image
456: (\textit{-skybg}) is subtracted from the intensity image to form the
457: background-subtracted intensity image (\textit{-intbgsub}), which is the image
458: scanned by SExtractor.
459:
460: There remain issues with the background at the 5\% level that affect the MIS
461: survey at the faint end. Furthermore, there are numerous artifacts not removed
462: by the current pipeline that the user should be alert for. These include:
463: bright star glints in the NUV images near the edge of the detector window;
464: large out-of-focus pupil images resulting from reflections in the imaging
465: window and dichroic beam splitter; a 1\arcmin\ diameter skirt around bright NUV
466: sources (at the few-percent level in total energy) resulting from the
467: proximity-focused photocathode; and photoemission and diffraction from the
468: quantum-efficiency (QE) enhancing grid wires on the FUV detector window that
469: appear as linear features around bright sources. Work is being done to flag
470: and remove these features automatically in the pipeline software, but at
471: present they amount to a small fraction of the survey coverage area ($\sim
472: 1$\%).
473:
474: The primary pipeline image products and descriptions are listed in
475: Tab.~\ref{arrayproducts}, while catalog products are listed in
476: Tab.~\ref{tableproducts}. All of the catalog output products are generated by
477: SExtractor, with the exception of the very useful merged catalog
478: (\textit{-mcat}), which combines FUV and NUV data in one table and adds derived
479: columns including the detector coordinates of a source, detector intrinsic
480: pulse height, number and brightness of nearby neighbors to a source, and many
481: more. Matches between the bands are made by assigning a match probability to
482: each pair of sources using the source separations and positional uncertainties.
483: Sources with signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio of less than 2 or a separation greater
484: than 3\arcsec\ are not matched across bands (but do appear in the merged
485: catalog). GALEX fields are uncrowded enough that the probability of a
486: mis-match is very small, however a multiple candidate chain technique is used
487: to assure that candidates are always matched the same way regardless of the
488: order in which the process is started.
489:
490: \begin{deluxetable*}{lll}
491: \tablecaption{Binary tables generated by the GALEX pipeline.\label{tableproducts}}
492: \tablehead{\colhead{Extension} & \colhead{Description}}
493: \startdata
494: -cat & Primary SExtractor source catalogs for each band\\
495: -fcat & SExtractor catalog of NUV extractions based on FUV coordinates\\
496: -gauss & Listing of the Gaussian filter elements used by SExtractor for image convolution\\
497: -mcat & Merged catalog for both NUV and FUV extractions\\
498: -ncat & SExtractor catalog of FUV extractions based on NUV coordinates\\
499: -sexcols & Listing of SExtractor catalog column names\\
500: -sexparams & Listing of SExtractor parameters used\\
501: \enddata
502: \end{deluxetable*}
503:
504: The GALEX data products are made available to the general public through the
505: GALEX Science Database at MAST. A dedicated website provides access to the
506: pipeline output files via a web-based browser, as well as other derived
507: products, such as JPEG images. The catalog data are also stored in a commercial
508: SQL Server database engine fine-tuned for astronomy applications, which
509: provides sophisticated query interfaces supporting, for example, efficient
510: spatial and color searches. The GALEX MAST database also contains enhancements
511: over the photometric pipeline outputs, e.g.\ spatial crossmatching to the Sloan
512: Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) catalog. Also, since adjacent GALEX fields overlap
513: slightly, a \textit{primary resolution} algorithm deals with the problem of
514: unique sample selection. The formal GALEX footprint definitions of the GALEX
515: surveys are published in the National Virtual Observatory's online Footprint
516: Service \citep{budavari2006}. On this
517: site,\footnote{http://voservices.net/footprint} one can not only search and
518: visualize the GALEX sky coverage but also compute the exact area in square
519: degrees or intersect it with other surveys.
520:
521: \section{Photometry}
522: \label{photometry}
523:
524: \subsection{GALEX Magnitude Reference System}
525: \label{magref}
526: The GALEX photometric calibration is tied to the \textit{Hubble Space
527: Telescope} (HST) through reference spectra supplied in the CALSPEC database and
528: described by \citet{bohlin2001}. Almost all of the white dwarfs in this
529: database are too bright for a photon counting instrument such as GALEX in
530: direct imaging mode. As such, we are restricted to the dimmest sources in the
531: catalog, which are all ultimately based on the \textit{International
532: Ultraviolet Observer} (IUE) calibration. All of these data have been
533: reprocessed for the HST calibration program, as detailed in \citet{bohlin1996}.
534: The GALEX calibration is thus traceable to a hydrogen white dwarf model scaled
535: using the ground based photometry of \citep{landolt1992} in combination with
536: several white dwarf transfer standards measured with the HST Faint Object
537: Spectrograph. The combination of models and measurements was used to define
538: corrections to the IUE calibration, thus transferring the HST calibration and
539: allowing a fairly large group of standards from the IUE library to enter the
540: CALSPEC database. Of these, we have observed 18 as detailed in
541: Tab.~\ref{standards}, however we use one of the dimmest, LDS749b, as our
542: primary standard for direct imaging. For the most part this white dwarf is in
543: the linear range of the GALEX detectors -- bright enough for high
544: S/N measurements in just a few minutes, but dim enough not to
545: saturate the microchannel plates. At the edge of the field in the NUV, where
546: the detector gain is lowest, we apply a $\sim 20$\% correction for local
547: saturation. This effect was discovered relatively recently as our database of
548: white dwarf observations has expanded to include a much finer sampling of the
549: detectors in regions where the gain is an issue.\footnote{Since the detector
550: MCPs are clamped at the edges, there is less chance for a charge packet at the
551: edge of the field to spread laterally while traversing the stack. At the
552: detector center, where there are small gaps between the plates, charge can
553: spread across the pores. Thus the edges of the detectors tend to saturate more
554: quickly than the centers. This effect can be seen for bright objects with
555: multiple measurements by plotting the observed magnitude against the
556: unsaturated detector pulse height, \textsc{\#uv\_q}, tabulated in the merged
557: catalog for each source. This quantity is the \textit{normal} unsaturated
558: pulse height of the detector at the location the source was measured. Note
559: that the effect is minimized for large measuring apertures because the core of
560: the PSF is primarily affected.} At the time of this writing we are planning
561: observations of the (dimmest) CALSPEC white dwarf, LB227, in order to improve
562: our confidence in the NUV zero point. Unfortunately this source is not much
563: dimmer than LDS749b, but since we believe the saturation of LDS749b is mild it
564: should provide very useful verification of our saturation correction.
565:
566: \begin{deluxetable*}{lllll}
567: %\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
568: \tablecaption{\textit{HST} White Dwarf Standards observed by GALEX.\label{standards}}
569: \tablewidth{0pt}
570: \tablehead{
571: \colhead{Star}
572: & \colhead{m$_{\rm FUV}$\tablenotemark{a}}
573: & \colhead{m$_{\rm NUV}$\tablenotemark{a}}
574: & \colhead{$\alpha$(2000)\tablenotemark{b}}
575: & \colhead{$\delta$(2000)\tablenotemark{b}}}
576: \startdata
577: GD50 & 11.98 & 12.57 & \phantom{0}3$^h$ 48$^m$ 50.4$^s$
578: & \phantom{0}-1$^{\circ}$ \phantom{0}1\arcmin\ 26.8\arcsec\\
579: HZ4 & 14.53 & 14.50 & \phantom{0}3$^h$ 55$^m$ 22.0$^s$
580: & \phantom{-0}9$^{\circ}$ 47\arcmin\ 18.2\arcsec\\
581: HZ2 & 12.86 & 13.25 & \phantom{0}4$^h$ 12$^m$ 43.6$^s$
582: & \phantom{-}11$^{\circ}$ 51\arcmin\ 49.9\arcsec\\
583: G191B2B & - & 10.17 & \phantom{0}5$^h$ \phantom{0}5$^m$ 30.7$^s$
584: & \phantom{-}52$^{\circ}$ 49\arcmin\ 49.3\arcsec\\
585: GD108 & 12.39 & 12.77 & 10$^h$ \phantom{0}0$^m$ 47.3$^s$
586: & \phantom{0}-8$^{\circ}$ 26\arcmin\ 28.5\arcsec\\
587: HZ21 & 12.55 & 13.13 & 12$^h$ 13$^m$ 56.3$^s$
588: & \phantom{-}32$^{\circ}$ 56\arcmin\ 30.8\arcsec\\
589: GD153 & 11.33 & 11.91 & 12$^h$ 57$^m$ \phantom{0}2.4$^s$
590: & \phantom{-}22$^{\circ}$ \phantom{0}1\arcmin\ 53.6\arcsec\\
591: HZ43 & 10.75 & 11.36 & 13$^h$ 16$^m$ 21.8$^s$
592: & \phantom{-}29$^{\circ}$ \phantom{0}5\arcmin\ 57.8\arcsec\\
593: HZ44 & 10.02 & 10.27 & 13$^h$ 23$^m$ 35.0$^s$
594: & \phantom{-}36$^{\circ}$ \phantom{0}7\arcmin\ 58.8\arcsec\\
595: GRWp70d5824 & 12.14 & 12.75 & 13$^h$ 38$^m$ 49.2$^s$
596: & \phantom{-}70$^{\circ}$ 17\arcmin\ \phantom{0}4.6\arcsec\\
597: SAP041C & - & 16.69 & 14$^h$ 51$^m$ 58$^s$
598: & \phantom{-}71$^{\circ}$ 43\arcmin\ 17.4\arcsec\\
599: BD$+33^{\circ}2642$ & 10.51 & 10.47 & 15$^h$ 51$^m$ 59.9$^s$
600: & \phantom{-}32$^{\circ}$ 56\arcmin\ 54.8\arcsec\\
601: SAP177D & - & 18.35 & 15$^h$ 59$^m$ 13.5$^s$
602: & \phantom{-}47$^{\circ}$ 36\arcmin\ 41.4\arcsec\\
603: SAP330E & - & 17.84 & 16$^h$ 31$^m$ 33.8$^s$
604: & \phantom{-}30$^{\circ}$ \phantom{0}8\arcmin\ 46.3\arcsec\\
605: LDS749B\tablenotemark{c}
606: & 15.57 & 14.71 & 21$^h$ 32$^m$ 16.4$^s$
607: & \phantom{-0}0$^{\circ}$ 15\arcmin\ 15.0\arcsec\\
608: G93-48 & 12.14 & 12.39 & 21$^h$ 52$^m$ 25.2$^s$
609: & \phantom{-0}2$^{\circ}$ 23\arcmin\ 17.9\arcsec\\
610:
611: NGC7293 & 10.93 & 11.70 & 22$^h$ 29$^m$ 38.5$^s$
612: & -21$^{\circ}$ \phantom{0}9\arcmin\ 47.9\arcsec\\
613:
614: LTT9491 & 16.09 & 14.58 & 23$^h$ 19$^m$ 35.4$^s$
615: & -18$^{\circ}$ 54\arcmin\ 32.0\arcsec\\
616: \enddata
617: \tablenotetext{a}{Magnitudes shown are predictions based on the GALEX bandpass
618: and publicly available reference spectra from the \textit{HST} CALSPEC database
619: at http://www.stsci.edu/instruments/observatory/cds/calspec.html.}
620: \tablenotetext{b}{Coordinates are GALEX-measured in the NUV.
621: One exception is BD$+33^{\circ}2642$, which was only observed in grism mode; the coordinate provided is
622: from \citet{bohlin2001}.}
623: \tablenotetext{c}{This white dwarf is the primary GALEX standard.}
624: \end{deluxetable*}
625:
626: \subsection{Magnitude Zero Point}
627: \label{drift}
628: GALEX uses the AB magnitude system of \citet{oke1983} with the FUV and NUV
629: magnitudes defined as follows:
630: \[m_{UV} = m0_{UV} - 2.5\log f_{UV}\]
631: Here, $f_{UV}$ is the dead-time-corrected count rate for a given source
632: \textit{divided by the flat field map,} which has a median value of order 0.85,
633: and $m0_{UV}$ is the zero point that corresponds to the AB magnitude of a
634: 1~count-s$^{-1}$ (cps) flat-field-corrected detection. There are independent
635: relative response functions, and the zero points are:
636: \begin{eqnarray}
637: m0_{FUV} & = & 18.82 \\
638: m0_{NUV} & = & 20.08.
639: \end{eqnarray}
640: The GALEX project has maintained these zero points constant; they are based on
641: the imaging-mode bandpass determined during ground calibration. Improvements
642: in calibration have been incorporated by adjusting the flat field, which is a
643: stacked sky background image modified by an interpolated grid of white dwarf measurements.
644: Since GALEX has a large field of view, this has the effect of moving the
645: positions in the field of view for which sources with zero point magnitudes
646: correspond to a true 1~count-s$^{-1}$ at the detector. For the most part this
647: is not a major consequence since the flat field peak-to-valley variations for
648: most of the useful field amount to about a factor of 2 even in FUV, and just
649: 15\% in NUV. There is thus only a modest effect on the estimation of the true
650: expected noise for a given source with field position. In order to estimate
651: any systematics resulting from application of the new flat field, a large
652: sample of sources common to both the GR1 and GR2/GR3 releases have been
653: compared. We find that \textit{on average} sources in GR2/GR3 are shifted 0.04
654: and 0.01 $m_{AB}$ fainter in FUV and NUV, respectively, compared to GR1. One
655: must of course be careful applying these figures to any individual measurement
656: because the flat has changed shape as well as its average value.
657:
658: We have measured a drift in GR2/GR3 photometry of $0.003\pm
659: 0.001$~mag-year$^{-1}$ FUV and $0.016\pm 0.0005$~mag-year$^{-1}$ NUV. This was
660: identified with two independent means. In the first method (yielding the
661: quoted results), we compared the GR2/GR3 photometry of 197 FUV and 547 NUV deep
662: field sources between magnitudes 15 and 20 measured at approximately yearly
663: intervals over the course of the mission. We have checked this result against
664: the LDS749b white dwarf data, however this second result required considerable
665: reprocessing. By design, the GR2/GR3 sample of white dwarf measurements
666: through 2005 shows no drift. Each
667: measurement was given equal footing in order to improve the
668: spatial sampling, which only included 20 measurements per year early in the mission.
669: In 2005, we identified the
670: NUV white dwarf saturation effect in low gain areas, and also recovered the FUV
671: detector from a major anomaly. In light of these circumstances, we implemented
672: an extensive recalibration campaign. Over 1500 NUV measurements were added,
673: but only 137 in the FUV because the detector was still completing its recovery.
674: Thus the GR2/GR3 flat, generated with all of the white dwarf samples from the
675: mission through 2005, is biased to 2005 in both bands and very strongly so in
676: NUV. However, areas of the flat field sampled only in, say, 2003, will reflect
677: the proper calibration for that epoch, which means that there is an additional
678: systematic built into the flats for isolated areas. To address the drift, we reprocessed all of the GALEX LDS749b white
679: dwarf data using a new flat field based on a grid of 165 LDS749b field
680: measurements made over 2 days in 2006. We used a nearby field star of moderate
681: NUV count rate rather than the bright LDS749b to generate the NUV flat (for
682: FUV we used the white dwarf), mitigating concerns about the NUV
683: saturation. The results of the white dwarf and deep field analyses are
684: consistent with each other and are presented together in Fig.~\ref{contamination}.
685: \begin{figure}
686: \includegraphics[width=2.25in,angle=90]{f3.eps}
687: \caption{The measured photometric drift for deep field sources between
688: magnitudes 15 and 20 over the course of the GALEX mission. FUV data is shown
689: in blue: diamonds for the deep field sources and circles for LDS749b. NUV
690: data is shown in red: triangles for the deep field sources and circles for
691: LDS749b. The deep field data shown represent the mean binned in 1000 eclipse segments.
692: The drift is defined to
693: be zero at eclipse 12000, which occurred in summer 2005 during the extensive
694: white dwarf observing campaign upon which the current calibration is mostly
695: based. It is not clear if the trend is due to contamination in the
696: instrument, or due to a mild global gain decrease (fatigue) in the
697: detector microchannel plates.\label{contamination}}
698: \end{figure}
699: The data are consistent with a linear drift (although less certain
700: in the FUV band). We define the time of zero correction to be at eclipse
701: 12000 based on the weight of that epoch in generating the GR2/GR3 flats.
702:
703: We have not included an FUV LDS749b data point for 2005
704: in Fig.~\ref{contamination}. This is because of a second issue we discovered
705: during this analysis, which is that the 2005 FUV white dwarf data reads bright
706: by about 5\% when reprocessed with the 2006 single-epoch flat field. This is a result of the way the measurements were made in
707: 2005 while the FUV detector was completing its recovery from an anomaly. During
708: that period (approximately a month), the detector was being cycled on and off
709: for only very short observation periods ($\sim$minutes) while its stability was
710: being tested. Since the detector was ramped to high voltage literally minutes
711: before the observation began, it was still warming up during the observations,
712: offsetting the calibration slightly. This means that there is a
713: field-dependent systematic built into the GR2/GR3 FUV flat field of
714: approximately 5\% in the sense that most (about 77\%) objects are actually
715: brighter in the FUV than they appear. NUV is unaffected.
716:
717: We have not determined if the observed drift is due to contamination or a global MCP fatigue.
718: Since the performance of each MCP pore is sensitive to its total exposure,
719: We would expect fatigue to affect NUV more since it typically
720: detects
721: photons at about 10 times the FUV rate. Furthermore, contamination would normally be expected to preferentially affect the FUV band. On the other hand, the effect we observe appears
722: to affect bright and dim objects the same.
723: Whichever effect is at play, we expect to apply
724: a correction automatically in the pipeline during a future calibration
725: update, however it is not accounted for in GR2/GR3.
726:
727: \subsection{Relative precision}
728:
729: For accurate and repeatable measurements of unresolved sources, aperture
730: magnitudes are usually best since they are fixed from measurement to
731: measurement. One needs to take care to choose an appropriate aperture for
732: the task at hand. Smaller apertures are more useful for unresolved sources,
733: but larger ones become desirable, even for point sources, when comparing the photometry of objects
734: measured at the center and edge of the field (where the PSF is degraded), or
735: for bright objects that have saturated cores. For the purposes of this paper,
736: the SExtractor \textsc{mag\_aper\_4} magnitude is used unless otherwise noted.
737: This 12\arcsec\ diameter aperture is a good compromise between the very large
738: apertures required to gather almost all of the GALEX flux in the extended PSF
739: (as is done for the white dwarf calibration) and the small ones that are
740: optimal for minimizing the contribution of background. The relationship
741: between the various standard SExtractor aperture magnitudes and the large
742: tailor-made apertures used for white dwarf calibration are presented in
743: Fig.~\ref{growthcurve}.
744: \begin{figure}
745: \includegraphics[width=2.25in,angle=90]{f4.eps}
746: \caption{GALEX photometric ``curve of growth,'' which shows the median
747: magnitude offsets relative to the largest aperture used for the white dwarf
748: LDS749b. NUV measurements have been restricted to high pulse height areas of
749: the detector to minimize any effect due to saturation.\label{growthcurve}}
750: \end{figure}
751:
752: In the GR2/GR3 release, the scatter in white dwarf measurements has been
753: reduced to about 0.02~mag RMS in NUV and 0.045~mag RMS in FUV. This compares
754: to a scatter of order 0.1~mag in both bands for the GR1 release. We attribute
755: the improvement in precision to the way the flat field has
756: been generated, using white dwarf measurements to modify the flat locally
757: rather than using the average to scale a sky background field. As with any
758: instrument, care should be taken when interpreting the magnitudes of
759: objects expected to have significantly biased spectral content compared to the
760: white dwarf. These may have more scatter due to optical effects across the
761: field of view.
762:
763: We have also verified the performance of the flat field by means independent of
764: the partially saturated (in the NUV) white dwarf standard. For this purpose,
765: we have examined the sample of data from the DIS described in
766: Section~\ref{drift}. This comprises a series of fields with several dozen
767: full-eclipse-length observations, many at different roll angles (thus sampling
768: multiple detector locations with the same source). By matching compact ($\le
769: 10$\arcsec\ FWHM) sources with no neighbors closer than 12\arcsec\ in the
770: co-added catalogs to the individual visit catalogs, a “visit” database of
771: sources and magnitude errors (with the co-added catalog considered to be the
772: truth catalog) has been generated. A comparison of high and low gain detector
773: measurements for a given source reveals the count rate required to cause local
774: saturation. For both detectors, the onset of saturation is at approximately
775: m$_{AB}\sim15$ (corresponding to 34~counts-s$^{-1}$ FUV and 108~counts-s$^{-1}$
776: NUV) \textit{in the lowest gain regions of the detector}. We thus restrict
777: further analysis in this Section to the range $15 \le m_{AB} \le 17$.
778:
779: With the unsaturated magnitude range determined over the whole field, we can
780: proceed to compute the photometric repeatability as shown in
781: Fig.~\ref{dmhist}. Here, we present histograms of the 12\arcsec-diameter
782: aperture magnitude errors in each band. The Poisson error associated with each
783: detection is of order 0.5\% to 1.5\%, while the total scatter we measure in the
784: bright deep field sources is $\pm 0.05\ m_{AB}$ RMS in FUV and $\pm 0.03\
785: m_{AB}$ RMS in NUV. These figures agree well with the white dwarf results,
786: thus concerns about the (mild) LDS749b NUV saturation correction are reduced.
787: If the white dwarf saturation had not been properly accounted for, the flat field
788: would have been adversely affected in the NUV low gain areas, which would in turn
789: increase the photometric scatter of dimmer (definitely unsaturated) deep field
790: sources in those same regions, and thus we would not expect good agreement in
791: the scatter between the white dwarf and deep field samples.
792: \begin{figure}
793: \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f5.eps}
794: \caption{GALEX photometric precision as determined by repeated measurements of
795: bright but unsaturated sources in the GALEX deep fields. These measurements
796: are in good agreement with the results determined directly from repeat
797: measurements of the white dwarf calibrators.\label{dmhist}}
798: \end{figure}
799:
800: The deep field \textit{visit} magnitude errors are also presented as a function
801: of the co-added ''truth'' magnitude in Fig.~\ref{dmvsm}, which serves to
802: illustrate an interesting bias effect on the faint end of the 1500~s depth MIS.
803: Here, the predicted $3\sigma$ errors (including the flat-field-limited values
804: derived for bright sources) are overplotted, showing good agreement with most
805: of the observed distribution but failing on the faint end. This effect is
806: similar in magnitude but opposite in direction for each detector. In the FUV,
807: sources are detected in the co-added image that are not detected in the visit
808: images except when the Poisson errors tilt the detection to the bright side
809: (the Eddington bias), thus faint FUV detections are biased bright by about
810: 0.1~m$_{AB}$ compared to the ''truth'' catalog. Similarly in the NUV, more
811: sources are detected in the co-added image, however the effect of the
812: undetected sources is to force an overestimate of the NUV background of about
813: 5\% (with large scatter). In this case, faint NUV detections are biased
814: \textit{dimmer} by about 0.1~m$_{AB}$ compared to the ''truth'' catalog. In
815: each panel, solid overplotted lines show the median of the magnitude errors in
816: each magnitude bin, while dot-dash lines show the same quantity after the visit
817: magnitudes have been re-computed using the co-add background estimation. This
818: correction is indistinguishable from the solid line median in the FUV panel
819: because the background is negligible, but completely cancels the faint end bias
820: in the NUV. Since the effects of these two biases are in opposite directions
821: for each band, they have a more significant effect on the UV color, about
822: 0.2~m$_{AB}$ at the faint end of the distribution.
823: \begin{figure*}
824: \includegraphics[width=3in,angle=90]{f6.eps}
825: \caption{GALEX photometric repeatability as a function of magnitude as
826: determined by repeated measurements of sources in the GALEX deep fields (with
827: individual measurements of order 1000~s). In each panel, heavy dashed lines
828: are the 3$\sigma$ values that would be expected given the flat field
829: precision and Poisson counting statistics, while the $\times$ symbols show the
830: actual value for each magnitude bin. Solid overplotted lines show the median
831: of the magnitude errors in each magnitude bin, while dot-dash lines show the
832: same quantity after the visit magnitudes have been re-computed using the
833: co-add background estimation.\label{dmvsm}}
834: \end{figure*}
835:
836: For completeness, we present a similar analysis of the photometric errors
837: in the 100~s AIS sample relative to cross-matched sources in overlapping MIS fields. As
838: illustrated in Fig.~\ref{aisdmvsm}, we find that the AIS magnitudes are
839: biased bright at the faint end relative to the MIS for \textit{both} detectors,
840: and that corrections to the AIS magnitudes using MIS backgrounds have no effect
841: at all. This result stems from the shallower depth of the AIS survey, which is
842: source rather than background-limited.
843: \begin{figure*}
844: \includegraphics[width=3in,angle=90]{f7.eps}
845: \caption{GALEX AIS photometric repeatability as a function of magnitude as
846: determined by repeated measurements of sources in overlapping MIS fields. In
847: each panel, heavy dashed lines are the 3$\sigma$ values that would be
848: expected given the flat field precision and Poisson counting statistics,
849: while the $\times$ symbols show the actual value for each magnitude bin.
850: Solid overplotted lines show the median of the magnitude errors in each
851: magnitude bin, while dot-dash lines show the same quantity after the visit
852: magnitudes have been re-computed using the co-add background estimation (in
853: the AIS this correction does not have a significant effect). At the very
854: faint end, there is an apparent bias toward visit magnitudes brighter than
855: co-added magnitudes due to Eddington bias in the source-limited
856: sample.\label{aisdmvsm}}
857: \end{figure*}
858:
859: \subsection{Linearity}
860: There are two sources of photometric non-linearity in the instrument: global
861: non-linearity resulting from the finite period required for the electronics to
862: assemble photon lists (during which time new events are locked out), and local
863: non-linearity resulting from the MCP-limited current supply to small regions
864: around a bright sources. The local effect complicates the NUV white dwarf
865: calibration measurements.
866:
867: Global effects are easily measured using the
868: on-board ``STIM'' pulser, which electronically stimulates each detector anode
869: with a steady, low rate stream of electronic pulses. These are resolved as
870: point sources in the corners of the dose (\textit{-scdose}) images. Since the real
871: rate of STIM pulses is accurately known, the measured rate is used by the
872: pipeline to scale the effective exposure. The count rates for all sources in
873: the field are simultaneously corrected. This effect is typically about 10\% in
874: NUV and a few percent in FUV, however it can become quite significant ($\sim
875: 50$\%) for the brightest fields.
876:
877: Local non-linearity can not be corrected well with the existing
878: calibration. It affects not only the measured count rate of an individual
879: bright source but also the source shape and position. Furthermore, the effects
880: vary around the field of view with the gain of the detector (as exemplified by
881: the white dwarf saturation correction described in Section~\ref{magref}). We
882: have used standard stars to estimate the local non-linearity in each band as shown
883: in Fig.~\ref{locallin}. This data may be used to approximately correct bright
884: sources that are within the measured range. Note that the measurements
885: presented in the Figure are for 34.5\arcsec\ (\textsc{aper\_7}) and 3\arcmin\
886: diameter apertures; the effect will be much \textit{worse} when small apertures
887: are used. The NUV detector is more robust to bright sources because its
888: photoelectrons are proximity-focused and thus present a larger source image
889: (with lower count density) to the MCP. Local photometric non-linearity is
890: strongly source-size dependent. The saturation shown in Fig.~\ref{locallin} is
891: a worst-case scenario (using stars). Wide scatter in measurements of bright
892: sources is an indication of the variation of the onset of saturation at
893: different detector locations.
894:
895: We have increased the local count rate limit to 30,000~cps per source in
896: NUV, which corresponds to approximately 9th magnitude. This new limit allows
897: most of the sky to be observed. The FUV local limit is maintained at
898: 5,000~counts-s$^{-1}$, which is not currently a survey constraint. Global
899: detector limits are set in hardware (rather than the planning system) to
900: 100,000~counts-s$^{-1}$, a limitation based largely on the boundaries of ground
901: testing and engineering judgment about safe rates of gas generation inside the
902: sealed detector tubes. Areas such as the galactic plane and the Magellanic
903: Clouds are still restricted by the 100,000~cps global limit
904: \begin{figure}
905: \includegraphics[width=2.25in,angle=90]{f8.eps}
906: \caption{Measured count rate versus predicted count rate for the white dwarf
907: standards measured to date by GALEX using 34.5\arcsec\ (\textsc{aper\_7}) and
908: 3\arcmin\ diameter apertures. These measurements represent a worst case
909: because they are for point sources. The non-linearity will be much
910: \textit{worse} when measuring fluxes using small apertures, since this effect
911: is concentrated at the core of each image.\label{locallin}}
912: \end{figure}
913:
914: \subsection{The GALEX Deep Fields}
915:
916: The specific case of faint DIS photometry presents its own special challenges. The relatively large GALEX PSF
917: affects the photometry of faint sources, mostly due to source confusion
918: \citep{xu2005}. As an alternative to the GALEX pipeline for faint source
919: extraction, a Bayesian approach has been attempted by others
920: \citep{guillaume2006} to estimate the UV flux using prior information from
921: external, well-resolved images (mostly from visible wavelengths). The basic
922: idea is to generate an image with prior sources convolved with the GALEX PSF,
923: and to estimate what scaling factors to apply that will best fit the UV
924: image. The implemented method is based on a maximum likelihood parametric
925: optimization in the presence of Poisson noise. Scaling factors were extracted
926: via an iterative procedure to solve the set of non-linear equations based on
927: the Expectation-Maximization (EM) method. In order to test the reliability of
928: the photometry extracted using this method, simulated objects (with a large
929: range of UV flux) were added to the GALEX DIS images. For an NUV DIS image with
930: 60~ksec exposure, it was possible to recover the photometry of simulated sources
931: with an accuracy of 0.3~m$_{AB}$ to NUV$\sim$25.5, extending the faint-end
932: limit of the survey by about a magnitude.
933:
934: \section{Resolution}
935: \label{resolution}
936: There are numerous contributors to the width of the GALEX PSF, including the
937: optics, detectors, and ground pipeline. The reconstruction algorithms for
938: GR2/GR3 have improved to the point that the instrumental contributions are now
939: the largest share, particularly in the proximity-focused NUV channel. As we
940: will show, the GALEX detectors dominate in this area and have significantly
941: position-dependent performance.
942:
943: To verify the fundamental instrument performance from on-orbit data, some
944: bright stars were analyzed individually, outside the pipeline. These results
945: show performance that is consistent with or better than what was measured
946: during ground tests. We have also verified the end-to-end performance
947: including the pipeline by stacking images of stars from the MIS survey that
948: were observed at different locations on the detector. The results of these
949: composites are shown in Figures~\ref{composite_fuv_psf}
950: and~\ref{composite_nuv_psf}. Performance is reasonably uniform except at the
951: edge of the field, where it is significantly degraded. Some remaining degraded
952: areas of the images may yet be improved with updates to the static calibration.
953: Note that DIS surveys co-add data with many roll angles, so the DIS PSF is considerably more symmetrical across the field of view.
954: \begin{figure}
955: \includegraphics[width=3.25in]{f9sm.eps}
956: \caption{Composite PSFs for the GALEX FUV channel in detector coordinates. The
957: individual images are exaggerated for clarity.
958: Upper data values in the format N@(X,Y), where N is the number of stacked images and (X,Y)
959: is the position in minutes of arc from the field center. The FWHM is specified in
960: seconds of arc for each detector axis. Q is the typical pulse height at the
961: specified detector location, in bins. The pulse height scale is not extremely well
962: calibrated, but it is linear with 10~bins $\sim 1\times10^7$
963: electrons).\label{composite_fuv_psf}}
964: \end{figure}
965: \begin{figure}
966: \includegraphics[width=3.25in]{f10sm.eps}
967: \caption{Composite PSFs for the GALEX NUV channel in detector coordinates. The
968: individual images are exaggerated for clarity. Upper data values are
969: N@(X,Y), where N is the number of stacked images and (X,Y) is the position in
970: minutes of arc from the field center. The FWHM is specified in seconds of
971: arc for each detector axis. Q is the typical pulse height at the specified
972: detector location, in bins. The pulse height scale is not extremely well
973: calibrated, but it is linear with 10~bins $\sim 1\times10^7$
974: electrons).\label{composite_nuv_psf}}
975: \end{figure}
976:
977: Many of the regions with
978: degraded resolution correlate with low detector gain, an effect illustrated in
979: Fig.~\ref{fwhm_vs_q}. The relative detector gain (or charge, 'Q') in the
980: region of measurement for each source is tabulated in the merged catalog. This
981: gain measurement is obtained from a look-up table that represents the detector
982: in an unsaturated condition. The \textit{actual} gain measured during the
983: observation is available in the pulse height (\textit{-scq}) image data product.
984: \begin{figure}
985: \includegraphics[width=2.5in,angle=90]{f11.eps}
986: \caption{The full width at half maximum of the GALEX PSF based on composite
987: images for each detector as a function of \textit{intrinsic} detector pulse
988: height. In general, low pulse height regions are near the edge of the
989: detector.\label{fwhm_vs_q}}
990: \end{figure}
991:
992: It is also evident that the GALEX PSF has structure a significant distance from
993: the center. We have characterized this by building a composite PSF of the
994: white dwarf calibrator LDS749b as shown in Fig.~\ref{extended_ee_curve}. The
995: effects of local non-linearity are also illustrated here by the highly
996: saturated white dwarf HZ~44, the brightest we have observed with GALEX in
997: imaging mode. The effect of the saturation is strongest in the core of the
998: PSF, causing the wings to be strongly emphasized.
999: \begin{figure}
1000: \includegraphics[width=2.5in,angle=90]{f12.eps}
1001: \caption{GALEX FUV and NUV composite encircled energy curves for two white
1002: dwarf standards. A composite of LDS749b measurements forms the unsaturated
1003: (solid) curve, while the brightest standard that we have observed, HZ~44,
1004: defines the saturated curve. The reference count rates for the saturated
1005: curves are the predicted values; measured rates are much
1006: lower as indicated by the low encircled energy values.\label{extended_ee_curve}}
1007: \end{figure}
1008:
1009: \section{Astrometry}
1010: \label{astrometry}
1011: The GALEX GR2/GR3 astrometric precision represents an improvement of order 20\%
1012: over GR1 (and much more compared to the Early Data Release). The dynamic
1013: pipeline transformation is generally not a limiting factor as it had been in
1014: earlier releases. The static transformation (primarily the distortion map) is
1015: also performing very well for most of the field of view. Improvements could
1016: still be made that would not only improve the global astrometric precision but
1017: also the point spread function (PSF) at the edge of the field.
1018:
1019: The distortion maps for the GR2/GR3 calibration are the result of several
1020: flight-based iterations on the pre-flight calibration. The first, which was
1021: implemented for the GR1 data release, used Tycho-2 catalog \citep{hog2000}
1022: reference stars to refine the distortion map for each detector independently.
1023: An iterative technique was used until the measured GALEX positions converged
1024: with the reference positions, a technique that relied on the assumption that
1025: the distortion across a $\sim1$\arcmin\ ($\sim 1$~mm) region of the detector
1026: (the footprint of the dither pattern) is reasonably represented by a single
1027: average value. This technique worked well, however there were relatively few
1028: FUV stars available to perform the analysis (a few thousand). The FUV-NUV
1029: relative astrometry retained some noticeable ($\sim 1$\arcsec) misalignments.
1030: We have addressed this issue with cross-matched SDSS data. Since the SDSS
1031: astrometry is better than $0.1$\arcsec\ RMS \citep{pier2003}, it can be
1032: regarded as essentially perfect for our purposes. The sample we gathered
1033: contains 69642 objects spectroscopically classified as quasars (SDSS
1034: \textsc{specClass} = 3, a convenient point source sample compiled for other
1035: applications). Objects were considered matches if they fell within 2.5\arcsec\
1036: of each other. There was no discrimination based on location in the GALEX
1037: field of view. We binned these results into a relatively coarse grid ($\sim
1038: 1$\arcmin), the intent of which was to ``stretch'' the existing plate solution
1039: to remove low spatial frequency errors. The result of this improvement is that
1040: the GR2/GR3 absolute astrometric precision achieved by the GALEX MIS within
1041: $0.6^{\circ}$ of the field center for bright (signal-to-noise ratio $\ge 10$)
1042: point sources is 0.49\arcsec\ RMS in the NUV and 0.59\arcsec\ RMS in the FUV,
1043: with similar relative precision between the two bands.
1044:
1045: In Fig.~\ref{g2_astrometry} we present histograms of the position errors for
1046: high S/N SDSS quasars detected by GALEX. The most noticeable image defect
1047: resulting from the current astrometric solution is the degraded PSF at the edge
1048: of the field. As shown in Figures~\ref{radialposfuv}
1049: and~\ref{radialposnuv}, the astrometric precision in the outer 5\arcmin\ of the
1050: detector, while degraded, still performs nearly at the level of the central
1051: 30\arcmin. Generally speaking, matches between GALEX and other surveys can
1052: be safely performed with a 2\arcsec\ window as indicated by
1053: Fig.~\ref{matchpercent}.
1054: \begin{figure}
1055: \includegraphics[width=2.25in,angle=90]{f13.eps}
1056: \caption{Distribution of absolute astrometric errors in the
1057: GALEX GR2/GR3 survey data for quasars with S/N$ \ge 10$ in each band
1058: matched against the SDSS.\label{g2_astrometry}}
1059: \end{figure}
1060:
1061: \begin{figure}
1062: \includegraphics[width=2.25in,angle=90]{f14.eps}
1063: \caption{FUV GR2/GR3 MIS absolute astrometric performance for field center and
1064: field edge distributions of SDSS quasars with GALEX
1065: S/N$ \ge 10$\label{radialposfuv}}
1066: \end{figure}
1067:
1068: \begin{figure}
1069: \includegraphics[width=2.25in,angle=90]{f15.eps}
1070: \caption{NUV GR2/GR3 MIS absolute astrometric performance for field center and
1071: field edge distributions of SDSS quasars with GALEX S/N$
1072: \ge 10$\label{radialposnuv}}
1073: \end{figure}
1074:
1075: \begin{figure}
1076: \includegraphics[width=2.25in,angle=90]{f16.eps}
1077: \caption{The percentage of GALEX-SDSS matches as a function of matching radius.
1078: An MIS sample with S/N$ \ge 10$ and field radius less than $0.6^{\circ}$ was
1079: used for this analysis. Note that the matched sample is limited to
1080: 2.5\arcsec\ maximum error, although based on the shape of the distribution
1081: this does not appear to be an issue.\label{matchpercent}}
1082: \end{figure}
1083:
1084: The most promising future improvement to the astrometric calibration probably
1085: involves a new pipeline module that would scale the amplitude of the distortion
1086: maps by a factor determined from measurements of the STIM pulses at the corners
1087: of each image. Much of the necessary data to eliminate this ``breathing'' mode
1088: is already available. Another more complex possibility involves reprocessing
1089: the reference star data in $\sim20$~s intervals to reduce the footprint of each
1090: source sample on the detector and thus more finely sample the detector grid.
1091: Such an analysis would be most useful near the edge of the detector where the
1092: distortion map is changing rapidly.
1093:
1094: \section{Spectroscopy}
1095: \label{spectroscopy}
1096: The spectroscopic mode utilizes a CaF$_{\rm 2}$ grism (a prism with a ruled
1097: surface) that can be moved into the converging beam of the telescope to form
1098: simultaneous (slitless) spectra of all sources in the field in both bands.
1099: Many spectra will normally overlap, a problem addressed by rotating the grism
1100: on its axis to different position angles during repeat observations of the same
1101: field. Each spectrum has an ``undeviated wavelength point'' around which it
1102: will rotate as the grism position angle is changed (thus any given spectrum
1103: will have an optimal set of grism position angles depending on the location of
1104: nearby sources). As the position angle changes, the undeviated wavelength
1105: point remains fixed in the field as illustrated by Fig.~\ref{grismpinwheel}.
1106: The resulting spectra can be combined to eliminate confusion.
1107: \begin{figure}
1108: \begin{center}
1109: \includegraphics[width=3in,angle=270]{f17sm.eps}
1110: \caption{A composite image of GALEX grism spectra collected with multiple grism
1111: position angles. As the grism is rotated in its mount, each spectrum spins
1112: around its own undeviated wavelength point to form a ``pinwheel'' in the
1113: composite, illustrating the optimal grism angle (producing an unconfused
1114: spectrum) for each source.\label{grismpinwheel}}
1115: \end{center}
1116: \end{figure}
1117: The standard GALEX spectroscopy pipeline is designed for isolated point sources,
1118: which are detected in the GALEX direct image observations. Extended or
1119: overlapping sources, or sources which do not appear in the direct image catalog
1120: require a special pipeline reduction with modified parameters.
1121:
1122: A relative position correction as a function of time is applied to the spectral
1123: image data using a technique very similar to that used for direct image
1124: photons. Using the brightest sources from the catalog, an aspect
1125: correction is applied to the entire exposure by fitting four parameters: shift
1126: in dispersion direction, shift in spatial direction, spacecraft roll angle, and
1127: grism position angle. A spectrum points North (blue to red) when the grism
1128: position angle is $0^{\circ}$ and towards the East when it is $90^{\circ}$.
1129:
1130: Bright sources may show grism orders ranging from -4 to +5 across the field,
1131: however only two orders in each band are typically extracted. For NUV, the
1132: highest response is in first order with a total system peak response of
1133: 40~cm$^2$. For FUV, the strongest order is 2nd with a peak response of
1134: 20~cm$^2$. The dispersion angles $\gamma_{FUV}$ and $\gamma_{NUV}$ in
1135: arcseconds from the undeviated wavelength point for FUV 2nd order and NUV 1st
1136: order are given by:
1137:
1138: \begin{tiny}
1139: \begin{eqnarray*}
1140: \gamma_{FUV} & = & -4530.7 + 7.3859\lambda - 3.9254\times 10^{-3}\lambda^2 + 7.4750\times 10^{-7}\lambda^3 \\
1141: \gamma_{NUV} & = & -882.1 + 7.936\times 10^{-1}\lambda - 2.038\times 10^{-4}\lambda^2 + 2.456\times 10^{-8}\lambda^3
1142: \end{eqnarray*}
1143: \end{tiny}
1144: where $\lambda$ is the wavelength in Angstroms, accurate to a few tenths of an arcsecond.
1145:
1146: Using the catalog positions, image strips (aligned to the dispersion direction)
1147: are created for each source using the corrected photon positions.
1148: Fig.~\ref{grism} shows how a portion of the field image translates into a
1149: dispersion-aligned image strip for each band. The Figure shows image strips
1150: covering 1700 arcseconds in the dispersion direction to illustrate the weaker
1151: orders. Only 900 arcseconds (from -100 to +800 arcseconds relative to the
1152: undeviated point) covering the two strongest orders in each band are stored
1153: during actual data reductions. The width of each image strip is 78 arcseconds.
1154: \begin{figure*}
1155: \includegraphics[width=6in,angle=270]{f18sm.eps}
1156: \caption{Example bright object GALEX spectra. Circular images at top show the
1157: reconstructed FUV and NUV spectral image data. A rectangular region of
1158: interest identifies the same spectrum in each band, while an $\times$ marks the
1159: undeviated wavelength point around which the spectra would spin if the grism
1160: were rotated. The rectangular regions are enlarged and annotated in the
1161: middle of the frame, where wavelength ranges and spectral orders are
1162: identified. In the bottom panel, the calibrated spectrum is shown in blue
1163: for the FUV portion and red for the NUV portion.\label{grism}}
1164: \end{figure*}
1165: Fig.~\ref{grism} also shows the undeviated point in each image strip (marked
1166: with an $\times$) which occurs at about 1700~\AA\ in 1st order in both bands.
1167: This is the point where the spectral images for all position angles intersect.
1168:
1169: The spectral shape, strength, and position of neighboring sources are estimated
1170: from the direct image catalog and are masked from each image strip. Additional
1171: masking is done on each strip when the exposures are coadded to eliminate other
1172: artifacts not predicted by known neighboring sources, which may be due to
1173: reflections, ghosts, hot spots, or unidentified sources near the edge of the
1174: field. The response map is then applied and the background is fit and
1175: subtracted at each wavelength point. An aperture extraction (summation) is
1176: computed for the primary spectrum using the brightest order in each band (NUV
1177: 1st and FUV 2nd). An optimal extraction is also computed using a PSF model. A
1178: 20 Angstrom region is set to zero in the spectrum at around 1820~\AA\
1179: indicating the separation between FUV and NUV.
1180:
1181: A list of sources for which spectra will be extracted is determined
1182: by estimating what the final S/N of a given source will be after coadding all grism
1183: observations.
1184: Any source which will achieve a S/N per resolution element in
1185: the coadded result of $\geq 2$ in FUV or $\geq 3$ in NUV is selected for
1186: spectral extraction.
1187: For multi-exposure data reductions, the masked image-strip photon
1188: and response data are coadded for each source.
1189: For both
1190: individual and coadded spectra, a response correction is applied as a function
1191: of wavelength and the spectra are rebinned to a linear scale. The primary (NUV
1192: 1st order and FUV 2nd order), secondary (NUV 2nd order and FUV 3rd order), and
1193: optimal (the primary spectrum with PSF weighting in the spatial direction)
1194: extractions are stored in 3 arrays in the final reduced data file. The
1195: estimated S/N for unresolved sources in single-orbit spectra is shown in
1196: Tab.~\ref{specsn}.
1197: \begin{deluxetable}{ccc}
1198: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1199: \tablecaption{Typical signal-to-noise ratio for unresolved GALEX spectra at MIS
1200: depth (1500~s).\label{specsn}}
1201: \tablewidth{0pt}
1202: \tablehead{\colhead{m$_{AB}$} & \colhead{FUV S/N} & \colhead{NUV S/N}}
1203: \startdata
1204: 16 & 10.4 & 21.2\\
1205: 18 & 3.4 & 6.1\\
1206: 20 & 0.79 & 1.22\\
1207: 22 & 0.14 & 0.20\\
1208: \enddata
1209: \end{deluxetable}
1210:
1211: The usable wavelength range is approximately 1300 to 1820~\AA\ for FUV (2nd order) and
1212: 1820 to 3000~\AA\ for NUV (1st order).
1213: The average dispersion is 1.64 and 4.04 \AA\ per arcsecond for FUV (2nd order)
1214: and NUV (1st order), respectively.
1215: The average resolution ($\lambda/\Delta\lambda$)
1216: for a point source (assuming a 5 arcsecond PSF) is about 200 (8\AA) and 118 (20\AA)
1217: for FUV (2nd order) and NUV (1st order), respectively.
1218:
1219: Although there is evidence that the response may vary with position on the
1220: detector or with the grism position angle, a single wavelength-dependent
1221: calibration is used for each band. These variations may introduce a
1222: calibration error of about 3\% in the body of each spectral order and about
1223: 10\% near the edges of each order.
1224:
1225: \section{Conclusions}
1226: \label{conclusions}
1227: We have described the GALEX performance and calibration results for the GR2 and
1228: GR3 data releases. These releases have identical pipeline calibrations that
1229: are significantly improved over the previous GR1 release. The analysis we
1230: have presented provides an overview of the data quality, errors and
1231: peculiarities that are likely to confront astronomers.
1232:
1233: The relative photometric precision is 0.05 and 0.03 m$_{AB}$ in the FUV and NUV
1234: respectively. We have identified several photometry issues that will be
1235: improved in future calibrations. The first is a systematic drift with time of
1236: order 1\% in FUV and 6\% in NUV, total, over the period of the released data
1237: ($\sim$4 years). The sense of the drift is that objects appear to be growing
1238: fainter with time. The second issue is that the current FUV calibration relies
1239: on data collected in a non-standard mode during the 2005 FUV recovery, and this
1240: data appears bright by 5\% compared to other measurements of the same objects
1241: collected in the standard mode. The third issue is that the NUV zero point is
1242: defined by a white dwarf calibrator that is at least partially saturated.
1243: While we have evidence that the saturation is mild and correctable, we are
1244: planning confidence-building observations of an additional white dwarf, the
1245: dimmest in the CALSPEC catalog, to help resolve the issue.
1246:
1247: The astrometric precision has been improved, about 20\%, to
1248: 0.5\arcsec\ RMS. There is evidence that it may be improved further by
1249: accounting for the detector ''breathing'' mode already measured with existing
1250: data from an external pulser that runs in parallel during all detector
1251: operations.
1252:
1253: All of our performance parameters continue to meet flight requirements. As the
1254: mission continues, we naturally expect the calibration to evolve. The
1255: instrument itself continues to function nominally in spite of a series of
1256: flight anomalies especially with the FUV detector. We have modified operations
1257: and flight software over the mission to respond to these issues. While some of
1258: them have significantly affected the FUV observation efficiency, none give any
1259: indication of affecting the instrument performance. We believe there is room
1260: to increase the count rate limits for both detectors (especially FUV), and
1261: to the extent possible we plan to explore higher rate fields closer to
1262: the Galactic plane after the primary surveys are completed.
1263:
1264: \acknowledgments
1265:
1266: GALEX (Galaxy Evolution Explorer) is a NASA Small Explorer, launched in April
1267: 2003. We gratefully acknowledge NASA's support for construction, operation,
1268: and science analysis for the GALEX mission, developed in cooperation with the
1269: Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales of France and the Korean Ministry of Science
1270: and Technology.
1271:
1272: {\it Facilities:} \facility{GALEX}
1273:
1274: \begin{thebibliography}{}
1275: \bibitem[Bertin and Arnouts (1995)]{bertin1995}
1276: Bertin, E., and Arnouts, S., \aaps, 117, 393-404.
1277:
1278: \bibitem[Bohlin et~al.~(2001)]{bohlin2001}
1279: Bohlin, R. C., et~al., 2001, \aj, 122, 2118.
1280:
1281: \bibitem[Bohlin (1996)]{bohlin1996}
1282: Bohlin, R. C., 1996, \aj, 111, 1743.
1283:
1284: \bibitem[Boksenberg et~al.~(1973)]{boksenberg1973}
1285: Boksenberg, A., et~al., 1973, \mnras, 163, 291.
1286:
1287: \bibitem[Budavari et~al.~(2006)]{budavari2006} Budavari, T., et~al., 2006,
1288: "Footprint Services for Everyone" in Astronomical Data Analysis Software and
1289: Systems XVI, ASP Conference Series.
1290:
1291: \bibitem[Forster et~al.~(2006)]{forster2006}
1292: Forster, K., et~al., 2006, Proc. SPIE, 6270, 627004.
1293:
1294: %\bibitem[Fukugita et~al.~(1996)]{fukugita1996}
1295: % Fukugita, M., Ichikawa, T., Gunn, J. E., et al., 1996, \aj, 3(4), 1748.
1296:
1297: \bibitem[Guillaume et~al.~(2006)]{guillaume2006}
1298: Guillaume, M., et~al., 2006, Proc. SPIE, 6064, 606411.
1299:
1300: \bibitem[Hog et~al.~(2000)]{hog2000}
1301: Hog, E., et~al., 2000, \aap, 355, L27.
1302:
1303: \bibitem[Jelinsky et~al~(2003)]{jelinsky2003}
1304: Jelinsky, P., et~al., 2003, Proc. SPIE, 4854, 233.
1305:
1306: \bibitem[Landolt (1992)]{landolt1992}
1307: Landolt, A., 1992, \aj, 104, 340.
1308:
1309: \bibitem[Martin et~al.~(2005)]{martin2005}
1310: Martin, D. C., et~al., 2005, \apjl, 619, L1.
1311:
1312: \bibitem[Morrissey et~al.~(2005)]{morrissey2005}
1313: Morrissey, P., et~al., 2005, \apjl, 619, L7.
1314:
1315: \bibitem[Morrissey (2006)]{morrissey2006}
1316: Morrissey, P., 2006, Proc. SPIE, 6266, 62660Y.
1317: \textit{(See update at: http://www.galex.caltech.edu/DATA/gr2\_docs/}
1318: \textit{Lessons\_learned\_SPIE\_update\_Morrissey.pdf)}
1319:
1320: \bibitem[Oke and Gunn (1983)]{oke1983}
1321: Oke, J. B., and Gunn, J. E., 1983, \apj, 266, 713.
1322:
1323: \bibitem[Pier et~al.~(2003)]{pier2003}
1324: Pier, J. R., et~al., 2003, \aj, 125, 1559.
1325:
1326: \bibitem[Press et~al.~(1992)]{press1992}
1327: Press, W., et~al., 1992. Numerical Recipes in C, Second Edition, 216.
1328:
1329: \bibitem[Urban et~al.~(1998)]{urban1998}
1330: Urban, S. E., et~al., 1998, \aj, 115, 2161.
1331:
1332: \bibitem[Xu et~al.~(2005)]{xu2005}
1333: Xu, C. K., et~al., 2005, \apjl, 619, L11.
1334:
1335: \end{thebibliography}
1336:
1337: \clearpage
1338: \begin{turnpage}
1339: \begin{deluxetable*}{llcccl}
1340: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
1341: \tablewidth{0pt}
1342: \tablecaption{A summary of GALEX pipeline product array content and format.\label{arrayproducts}}
1343: \tablehead{
1344: \colhead{Product} & \colhead{Extension} & \colhead{Format} & \colhead{Units} & \colhead{Scale} & \colhead{Description}}
1345: \startdata
1346: Artifact Flags & -flags & $480\times480$ & &
1347: 12\arcsec-pixel$^{-1}$
1348: & Artifact flags for each pixel\\
1349: Background-Subtracted Intensity & -intbgsub
1350: & $3840\times3840$ & counts-s$^{-1}$ & 1.5\arcsec-pixel$^{-1}$
1351: & Intensity-Sky Background\\
1352: Count & -cnt & $3840\times3840$ & counts &
1353: 1.5\arcsec-pixel$^{-1}$
1354: & Aspect-corrected image, no flat field.\\
1355: Dose & -scdose & $2250\times2250$ & counts &
1356: 3\arcsec-pixel$^{-1}$
1357: & Detector space, corrected for walk, wiggle and distortion.\\
1358: Exposure & -exp & $960\times960$ & s &
1359: 6\arcsec-pixel$^{-1}$
1360: & Exposure, \textit{un}corrected for flat field or dead time \\
1361: Intensity & -int & $3840\times3840$ & counts-s$^{-1}$ &
1362: 1.5\arcsec-pixel$^{-1}$
1363: & Count image divided by relative response image\\
1364: Movie & -movie & $480\times480$ & counts &
1365: 12\arcsec-pixel$^{-1}$
1366: & Count map slices at 16~s intervals\\
1367: Object Mask & -objmask & $3840\times3840$ & &
1368: 1.5\arcsec-pixel$^{-1}$
1369: & Areas masked during sky background estimation\\
1370: Pulse height & -scq & $2250\times2250$ & bins &
1371: 3\arcsec-pixel$^{-1}$
1372: & Average pulse height per pixel\\
1373: Relative response & -rrhr & $3840\times3840$ & s &
1374: 1.5\arcsec-pixel$^{-1}$
1375: & Effective exposure, corrected for dither, flat field and dead time \\
1376: Relative response & -rr & $960\times960$ & s &
1377: 6\arcsec-pixel$^{-1}$
1378: & Effective exposure, corrected for dither, flat field and dead time \\
1379: Sky Background & -skybg & $3840\times3840$ & counts-s$^{-1}$ &
1380: 1.5\arcsec-pixel$^{-1}$
1381: & Sky background estimate\\
1382: Threshold & -wt & $3840\times3840$ &
1383: & 1.5\arcsec-pixel$^{-1}$ & Background-subtracted intensity map divided by
1384: estimated Poisson noise\\
1385: \enddata
1386: \end{deluxetable*}
1387: \end{turnpage}
1388:
1389: \end{document}
1390:
1391: