1: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint,usenatbib]{aastex}
2: \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
3: %\documentclass[manuscript,usenatbib]{aastex}
4:
5: %\usepackage{emulateapj5}
6:
7: \newcommand{\Mj}{$M_{\rm Jup}$}
8: \newcommand{\kms}{km\,s$^{-1}$}
9:
10: \slugcomment{Revised version. Submitted to ApJ}
11:
12: \shorttitle{Space velocities of L- and T-type dwarfs}
13: \shortauthors{Zapatero Osorio et al.}
14:
15:
16: \begin{document}
17:
18: \title{Space Velocities of L- and T-type Dwarfs}
19:
20: \author{M. R. Zapatero Osorio, E. L. Mart\'\i n\altaffilmark{1} and
21: V. J. S. B\'ejar}
22: \affil{Instituto de Astrof\'\i sica de Canarias, E-38205 La Laguna,
23: Tenerife, Spain}
24: \email{mosorio,ege,vbejar@iac.es}
25:
26: \author{H. Bouy\altaffilmark{2}}
27: \affil{University of California at Berkeley, Astronomy Dept., 601
28: Campbell Hall, Berkeley CA 94720, USA}
29: \email{hbouy@astro.berkele.edu}
30:
31: \author{R. Deshpande}
32: \affil{University of Central Florida, Department of Physics, P.O. Box
33: 162385, Orlando, FL 32816-2385, USA}
34: \email{rohit@physics.ucf.edu}
35:
36: \and
37:
38: \author{R. J. Wainscoat}
39: \affil{Institute for Astronomy, 2680 Woodlawn Drive, Honolulu, HI 96822,
40: USA}
41: \email{rjw@ifa.hawaii.edu}
42:
43: \altaffiltext{1}{Also at University of Central Florida, Dept$.$ of Physics,
44: P.\,O$.$ 162385, Orlando FL 32816-2385, USA}
45: \altaffiltext{1}{Also at Instituto de Astrof\'\i sica de Canarias, E-38205
46: La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain}
47: %%
48:
49: \begin{abstract}
50: We have obtained radial velocities of a sample of 18 ultracool dwarfs
51: with spectral types in the interval M6.5--T8 using high-resolution,
52: near-infrared spectra obtained with NIRSPEC and the Keck II
53: telescope. Among our targets there are two likely field stars of type
54: late M, one M6.5 Pleiades brown dwarf, and fifteen L and T likely
55: brown dwarfs of the solar neighborhood with estimated masses in the
56: range 30--75\,\Mj. Two dwarfs, vB\,10 (M8V) and Gl\,570\,D
57: (T7.5V/T8V), are known wide companions to low-mass stars. We have
58: confirmed that the radial velocity of Gl\,570\,D is coincident with
59: that of the K-type primary star Gl\,570\,A, thus providing additional
60: support for their true companionship. The presence of planetary-mass
61: companions around 2MASS\,J05591914$-$1404488 (T4.5V) has been analyzed
62: using five NIRSPEC radial velocity measurements obtained over a period
63: of 4.37\,yr. Using our radial velocity data and the radial velocities
64: of an additional set of eight L-type dwarfs compiled from the
65: literature in combination with their proper motions and trigonometric
66: parallaxes, we have computed $UVW$ space motions for the complete
67: expanded sample, which comprises a total of 21 L and T dwarfs within
68: 20\,pc of the Sun. This ultracool dwarf population shows $UVW$
69: velocities that nicely overlap the typical kinematics of solar to
70: M-type stars within the same spatial volume. However, the mean
71: Galactic ($v_{\rm tot}$\,=\,44.2\,\kms) and tangential ($v_{\rm
72: t}$\,=\,36.5\,\kms) velocities of the L and T dwarfs appear to be
73: smaller than those of G to M stars. A significant fraction
74: ($\sim$40\%) of the L and T dwarfs lies near the Hyades moving group
75: (0.4--2\,Gyr), which contrasts with the 10--12\%~found for
76: earlier-type stellar neighbors. Additionally, the distributions of all
77: three $UVW$ components ($\sigma_{UVW}$\,=\,30.2, 16.5, 15.8\,\kms) and
78: the distributions of the total Galactic ($\sigma_{v_{\rm
79: tot}}$\,=\,19.1\,\kms) and tangential ($\sigma_{v_{\rm
80: t}}$\,=\,17.6\,\kms) velocities derived for the L and T dwarf sample
81: are narrower than those measured for nearby G, K, and M-type stars,
82: but similar to the dispersions obtained for F stars. This suggests
83: that, in the solar neighborhood, the L- and T-type ultracool dwarfs in
84: our sample (including brown dwarfs) is kinematically younger than
85: solar-type to early M stars with likely ages in the interval
86: 0.5--4\,Gyr.
87: \end{abstract}
88:
89: \keywords{stars: low-mass, brown dwarfs --- stars: kinematics ---
90: stars: late-type}
91:
92: \section{Introduction}
93:
94:
95: L- and T-type dwarfs are very cool ($T_{\rm eff}$\,$\le$\,2200\,K),
96: intrinsically faint objects of recent discovery
97: \citep{nakajima95,ruiz97,delfosse97,martin97,kirk05}, which are
98: frequently referred to as ``ultracool'' dwarfs. Over 500 of these
99: ultracool objects have been identified to date. Many of them are found
100: isolated in the solar neighborhood, i.e., within 50\,pc of the Sun;
101: only a few appear as widely separated ($a$\,$\ge$\,10\,AU) companions
102: to stars
103: \citep{nakajima95,rebolo98,burgasser00,kirk01,liu02,potter02,metchev04}
104: and as tight stellar companions \citep{freed03}. Yet their physical
105: and kinematic properties are not fully known. According to theoretical
106: evolutionary models \citep{burrows97,chabrier00}, the late L and T
107: dwarfs of the solar neighborhood are brown dwarfs with likely
108: substellar masses in the range 0.03--0.075\,$M_{\odot}$.
109:
110: The detailed studies of low-resolution spectra and color--magnitude
111: diagrams of L and Tdwarfs
112: \citep{leggett02,patten06,kirk99,martin99,geballe02,burgasser02} are
113: beginning to shed light on the physical characteristics of these
114: low-mass objects because an increasing number of trigonometric
115: parallaxes (distances) have been determined for field ultracool dwarfs
116: \citep{dahn02,tinney03,vrba04,knapp04}. Besides distance and proper
117: motion, the additional ingredient for a complete kinematic study
118: employing space velocity components is radial
119: velocity. \citet{reid02}, \citet{mohanty03} and \citet{bailer04} have
120: obtained the first radial velocity measurements available for L-type
121: dwarfs in the solar vicinity using high-resolution optical
122: spectra. The marked low luminosities of the T dwarfs prevent
123: accurate velocity determination at visible wavelengths.
124:
125: Therefore, interpretation of the kinematics of the least massive
126: (including the substellar) population of the solar vicinity is less
127: developed than in the case of stars. Various groups have investigated
128: the dynamics and age of the Galactic disk by examining the observed
129: and simulated kinematics of nearby stars \citep{nordstrom04}. It is
130: found that the space velocity dispersion of stars increases with time
131: to the $\alpha$ power ($t^\alpha$) with $\alpha$\,=\,0.33
132: \citep{binney00}. Statistically, most solar-type to early M stars
133: within 50\,pc of the Sun show kinematic ages very similar to the age
134: of our solar system at about 5\,Gyr. A small fraction of these stars
135: turn out to be members of stellar moving groups characterized by much
136: younger ages from a few hundred megayears to a few gigayears
137: \citep{zuckerman04}. However, the nearby, coolest M dwarfs appear to
138: behave differently. As noted by \citet{reid02} and \citet{dahn02},
139: their kinematics suggest that the latest M stars of the solar
140: neighborhood are on average younger than earlier-type stars.
141:
142: Here, we report on radial velocity measurements of ultracool L and T
143: dwarfs obtained from near-infrared spectra (Section 2). Radial
144: velocity variability has been investigated for a few targets in
145: Section 3. These data have been combined with trigonometric parallaxes
146: and proper motions published in the literature to derive galactic
147: velocities in Section 4. Our final remarks and conclusions are given
148: in Section 5.
149:
150:
151:
152:
153: \section{The sample and observations}
154:
155: The sample of targets is listed in Table~\ref{vh}. It comprises three
156: late M-type dwarfs, one of which (PPl\,1 or Roque\,15) is a young,
157: lithium-bearing brown dwarf of the Pleiades cluster
158: \citep{stauffer98}. The remaining targets are six L- and nine T-type
159: field dwarfs recently discovered by the 2MASS, SLOAN, and Denis
160: surveys. The discovery papers are all indicated in Table~1 of
161: \citet{osorio06}. The spectral types given in the second column of
162: Table~\ref{vh} are taken from the literature
163: \citep{kirk97,kirk99,kirk00,martin99,geballe02,burgasser06,phan-bao06}. They
164: were derived from optical and/or near-infrared low-resolution spectra
165: and are in the interval M6.5--T8. There are objects that have been
166: classified differently by the various groups; we provide all
167: classifications in Table~\ref{vh}, first that of \citet{kirk99} and
168: \citet{burgasser06}, second that of \citet{geballe02}, and finally,
169: the classification from \citet{martin99}. In terms of effective
170: temperature, our sample spans the range 2700--770\,K
171: \citep{leggett00,vrba04}. J0334$-$49 and vB\,10 can be stars in our
172: sample while the remaining targets are very likely substellar.
173:
174: We collected high-resolution near-infrared spectra of the 18 ultracool
175: dwarfs using the Keck II telescope and the NIRSPEC instrument, a
176: cross-dispersed, cryogenic echelle spectrometer employing a
177: 1024\,$\times$\,1024 ALADDIN InSb array detector. These observations
178: were carried out on different occasions from 2000 December through
179: 2006 January and are part of our large program aimed at the study of
180: radial velocity variability. The complete journal of the observations
181: is shown in Table~1 of \citet{osorio06}, since these data were
182: previously used to determine the rotational velocities of the sample,
183: including the young, lithium-bearing field brown dwarf
184: LP\,944$-$20. We note that the radial velocity of LP\,944$-$20 using
185: NIRSPEC spectra is fully discussed in \citet{martin06}. In the echelle
186: mode, we selected the NIRSPEC-3 ($J$-band) filter and an entrance
187: slit width of 0\farcs432 (i.e., 3 pixels along the dispersion
188: direction of the detector), except for eight targets (J2224$-$01,
189: J1728$+$39, J1632$+$19, J1346$-$00, J1624$+$00, J1553$+$15,
190: J1217$-$03, and GL\,570D) for which we used an entrance slit width of
191: 0\farcs576. The length of both slits was 12\arcsec. All observations
192: were performed at an echelle angle of $\sim$63\arcdeg. This
193: instrumental setup provided a wavelength coverage from 1.148 up to
194: 1.346\,$\mu$m split into ten different orders, a nominal dispersion
195: ranging from 0.164 (blue wavelengths) to 0.191\,\AA/pix (red
196: wavelengths), and a final resolution element of 0.55--0.70\,\AA~at
197: 1.2485\,$\mu$m (roughly the central wavelength of the spectra),
198: corresponding to a resolving power
199: $R$\,$\sim$\,17800--22700. Individual exposure times were a function of
200: the brightness of the targets, ranging from 120 to 900\,s.
201:
202: \subsection{Data reduction}
203:
204: Raw data were reduced using the ECHELLE package within
205: IRAF\footnote{IRAF is distributed by National Optical Astronomy
206: Observatory, which is operated by the Association of Universities for
207: Research in Astronomy, Inc., under contract with the National Science
208: Foundation.}. Spectra were collected at two or three different
209: positions along the entrance slit. Nodded images were subtracted to
210: remove sky background and dark current. White-light spectra obtained
211: with the same instrumental configuration and for each target were used
212: for flat-fielding the data. All spectra were calibrated in wavelength
213: using the internal arc lamp lines of Ar, Kr, and Xe, which were
214: typically acquired after observing the targets. The vacuum wavelengths
215: of the arc lines were identified and we produced fits using a
216: third-order Legendre polynomial along the dispersion axis and a second-order
217: one perpendicular to it. The mean rms of the fits was 0.03\,\AA, or
218: 0.7~\kms. In order to correct for atmospheric telluric absorptions,
219: near-infrared featureless stars of spectral types A0--A2 were observed
220: several times and at different air masses during the various observing
221: runs. The hydrogen line at 1.282\,$\mu$m, which is intrinsic to these
222: hot stars, was removed from the spectra before using them for division
223: into the corresponding science data. Finally, we multiplied the
224: science spectra by the black-body spectrum for the temperature of
225: 9480\,K, which is suitable for A0V type \citep{allen00}.
226:
227: We have plotted in Figures~\ref{spec_o05} to~\ref{spec_o08} all of our
228: spectra corresponding to the echelle orders centered at 1.230\,$\mu$m,
229: the K\,{\sc i} doublet (1.2485\,$\mu$m), and 1.292\,$\mu$m. These are
230: orders relatively free of strong telluric lines. Effective temperature
231: (i.e., spectral type) decreases from top to bottom. Note that all
232: spectra have been shifted in velocity to vacuum wavelengths for easy
233: comparison of the atomic and molecular features. The signal-to-noise
234: ratio of the data varies for different echelle orders and different
235: targets depending on their brightness. In general, the red orders show
236: better signal-to-noise ratio than the blue orders, except for the
237: reddest order centered at 1.337\,$\mu$m in T dwarfs since these
238: wavelengths are affected by strong methane and water vapor absorptions
239: below 1300\,K.
240:
241: \subsection{Data analysis: radial velocities}
242:
243: We note that systematic errors or different zero-point shifts may be
244: present in the instrumental wavelength calibration of our data, which
245: may affect the radial velocity measurements. Various authors
246: \citep{tinney98,martin99b,mohanty03,basri_reiners06} have reported on
247: the stable heliocentric velocity of the M8V dwarf vB\,10, finding an
248: average value of $+$35.0\,\kms. From our two NIRSPEC spectra and using
249: the centroids of the K\,{\sc i} lines, we derived $+$35.0 and
250: $+$34.3\,\kms~with an estimated uncertainty of
251: $\pm$1.5\,\kms~associated with each individual determination. These
252: measurements are fully consistent with those in the
253: literature. Furthermore, we have compared NIRSPEC spectra
254: corresponding to echelle orders that contain a considerable number of
255: telluric lines and that were observed during a night and on different
256: nights. We found that the telluric lines typically differ by less than
257: 1\,\kms~in velocity. All this suggests that any systematic errors or
258: different zero-point shifts in our radial velocities are likely
259: smaller than the measurement uncertainties, which are typically
260: $\ge$1\,\kms.
261:
262: We derived heliocentric radial velocities, $v_h$, via a
263: cross-correlation of the spectra of our tarets against spectra of
264: dwarfs of similar types with known heliocentric velocity. The details
265: of the procedure are fully described in the literature
266: \citep{marcy89}. Summarizing, heliocentric radial velocities were
267: obtained from the Doppler shift of the peak of the cross-correlation
268: function between the targets and the templates. To determine the
269: center of the cross-correlation peak we typically fit it with a
270: Gaussian function using the task FXCOR in IRAF. This provides observed
271: velocities that are corrected for the Earth's motions during the
272: observations and converted into heliocentric velocities. Only orders
273: for which we unambiguously identified the peak of the
274: cross-correlation function and obtained good Gaussian fits were
275: employed (see Figure~\ref{gauss} for examples of cross-correlation
276: functions and Gaussian fits). We typically used between 4 and 8
277: echelle orders depending on the signal-to-noise ratio of the data. All
278: results were then averaged to produce the final
279: $v_h$~measurements. Uncertainties are derived from the standard
280: deviation of the mean.
281:
282: We used the M8V-type dwarf vB\,10 as the primary reference/template
283: object for several reasons: first, it is a slow rotator
284: \citep{mohanty03}, thus providing narrow cross-correlation peaks;
285: second, its radial velocity is well determined in the literature to be
286: $+$35.0\,\kms; and third, the signal-to-noise ratio of its NIRSPEC
287: spectra is reasonably good (see Figures~\ref{spec_o05}
288: to~\ref{spec_o08}), minimizing the data noise introduced in the
289: cross-correlation method. This technique assumes that the target and
290: template spectra are of similar type and differ only in the rotation
291: velocity. Nevertheless, \citet{bailer04} has recently shown that
292: M-type templates can also yield accurate velocities for L dwarfs. In
293: our sample, the energy distribution of T dwarfs does differ
294: significantly from M dwarfs, and we found that for the early T-type
295: targets the cross-correlation with vB\,10 gives reasonable results if
296: the resonance lines of K\,{\sc i} are avoided and only molecular
297: (particularly water vapor) lines are used in the
298: cross-correlation. For the late-type objects, cooler templates are
299: required. We employed J2224$-$01 (L4.5V), J0559$-$14 (T4.5V), and
300: J1217$-$03 (T7--8V) as secondary reference dwarfs to obtain the radial
301: velocities of the L- and T-type objects in the sample. Rotation
302: velocities of all targets are provided in column~10 of
303: Table~\ref{vh}~\citep{osorio06}. The three secondary templates have
304: moderate rotation in the interval $v_{\rm
305: rot}$\,sin\,$i$\,=\,22--31\,\kms. However, the derived error bars on
306: radial velocity do not appear to be significantly higher than using
307: the slow rotator vB\,10, suggesting that, for the spectral resolution
308: and signal-to-noise ratio of our data, radial velocity accuracy shows
309: little dependence on rotation velocity up to $v_{\rm rot}$\,sin\,$i$
310: $\sim$ 30\,\kms.
311:
312: Columns 5 through 8 of Table~\ref{vh} show our measured $v_h$ for all
313: objects observed on different occasions in this program. We also give
314: the observing dates in columns 3 (Universal Time) and 4 (Modified
315: Julian Date). Whenever there is more than one observation available
316: per object, the first spectrum also acts as a template spectrum to
317: obtain radial velocities via the cross-correlation technique, and the
318: derived velocities are provided in column 9 of Table~\ref{vh}. This
319: minimizes the effects of using templates of different spectral types
320: and serves as a test of consistency. Furthermore, such a procedure will
321: allow us to study binarity. Previous radial velocities reported in the
322: literature are listed in the eleventh column of the Table. We note
323: that, with the exception of PPl\,1 (see below), all of our measurements
324: agree with the literature values to within 1-$\sigma$ of the claimed
325: uncertainty.
326:
327:
328: \section{Binarity}
329:
330: Gl\,570D is a known wide companion ($\sim$1500\,AU) to the multiple
331: system Gl\,570ABC \citep{burgasser00}. We have determined its
332: heliocentric velocity to be $+$28.5\,$\pm$\,2.7\,\kms, which is
333: coincident with the radial velocity of the K-type star Gl\,570A
334: ($v_h$\,=\,$+$27.0\,$\pm$\,0.3\,\kms) as measured by
335: \citet{nidever02}. This suggests that Gl\,570D is not a short-period
336: binary of mass ratio near 1. The secondary companion, Gl\,570BC, is a
337: spectroscopic binary whose radial velocities span the range
338: 8.8--37.9\,\kms~\citep{marcy89}.
339:
340: Multiple NIRSPEC spectra obtained on different occasions are available
341: for five dwarfs in our sample. These are shown in Table~\ref{meanv},
342: where we also provide the time elapsed between the first and last
343: observation and the mean heliocentric velocity per object with the
344: associated average error bar. Inspection of all velocities listed in
345: Table~\ref{vh} reveals no obvious trace of moderate velocity
346: perturbation in any of the dwarfs since all their measured $v_h$
347: agree within the uncertainties over the time span of the data. This
348: indicates that the dwarfs of Table~\ref{meanv} are not very likely to be
349: close equal-mass binaries.
350:
351: To relate companion mass to the dispersion of our radial velocities we
352: use the mass function derived from the Keplerian equations
353: \citep{marcy89}. The most constraining case in our sample is the T4.5V
354: dwarf J0559$-$14. For it we can study the presence of planetary-mass
355: companions in short (a few days or $\sim$0.01~AU) and intermediate (a
356: few years or $\sim$0.4~AU) orbits. J0559$-$14 radial velocity curve
357: exhibits 1-$\sigma$ standard deviation of 0.50\,\kms. For a primary
358: mass of about 60\,\Mj, expected for mid-T field dwarfs with an age of
359: $\sim$5\,Gyr \citep{chabrier00}, and at the 3-$\sigma$ level,
360: companions more massive than 2\,\Mj~(short periods) and
361: 10\,\Mj~($\sim$1-yr period) can be excluded. Figure~\ref{j0559}
362: summarizes these results graphically. The region of parameter space
363: excluded for planets around J0559$-$14 is comparable to the region
364: excluded around stars. However, because of the time coverage of our
365: observations of J0559$-$14, we cannot reach firm conclusions on the
366: presence of companions with orbital periods between days and less than
367: a year. Circular orbits have been adopted to compute these
368: estimates. We consider these minimum mass estimates to represent
369: approximate guidelines in future corroborative spectroscopic work.
370:
371: Regarding J0036$+$18 and J0539$-$00, the null detection of radial
372: velocity variations over a few years suggests that no companions of
373: $\sim$10\,\Mj~or more can exist near them. Similarly, very close-in
374: companions of a few Jupiter masses may be ruled out orbiting PPl\,1 or
375: J0334$-$49 with a periodicity of a few days. However, we stress
376: that two radial velocity data points constitute statistically too few
377: observations to reach a final conclusion on the presence of Jovian
378: planets around these objects. Further measurements are certainly
379: required to constrain firmly the minimum mass of any possible
380: companion. However, this exercise indicates that companions with
381: masses in the planetary domain lie near the detectability limit in our
382: data.
383:
384: Interestingly, \citet{martin98} measured the heliocentric velocity of
385: the Pleiades brown dwarf PPl\,1 at $+$15.4\,$\pm$\,1.6\,\kms, which
386: deviates from our measurement (see Table~\ref{meanv}) by more than
387: 4\,$\sigma$. Despite the fact that such a difference may suggest the
388: presence of a second object (future observations are pending to test
389: this hypothesis), its total amount seems to be rather large for a
390: planetary companion even though it might account for the peak-to-peak
391: amplitude of the primary radial velocity curve. This may indicate that
392: the companion has a broad orbit and a mass above the deuterium-burning
393: mass limit, i.e., $\ge$13\,\Mj, thus, it belongs to the brown dwarf
394: regime. From the locus of PPl\,1 in the $K$ vs $(I-K)$ color-magnitude
395: diagram of the Pleiades cluster, \citet{pinfield03} concluded that
396: this object is a probable binary with a mass ratio in the interval
397: $q$\,=\,0.75--1. We note that our NIRSPEC heliocentric velocity of
398: PPl\,1 is fully consistent with the systemic velocity of the Pleiades
399: measured at $+$5.4\,$\pm$\,0.4\,\kms~\citep{liu91,kharchenko05}, hence
400: providing additional evidence for its membership of this star cluster.
401:
402:
403: \section{Galactic space motions and kinematics}
404:
405: Using our radial velocity measurements and the proper motions and
406: trigonometric parallaxes provided in the literature by \citet{dahn02},
407: \citet{vrba04}, \citet{knapp04}, and \citet{an07} we have calculated
408: the $U$, $V$, and $W$ heliocentric velocity components in the
409: directions of the Galactic center, Galactic rotation and north
410: galactic pole, respectively, with the formulation developed by
411: \citet{johnson87}. Note that the right-handed system is employed and
412: that we will not subtract the solar motion from our calculations. The
413: uncertainties associated with each space-velocity component are
414: obtained from the observational quantities and their error bars after
415: the prescriptions of \citet{johnson87}. Our derivations are shown in
416: Table~\ref{vgal}. Unfortunately, two T dwarfs in the sample lack
417: distance and proper motion measurements, thus preventing us from
418: determining their Galactic velocities (these dwarfs are not shown in
419: Table~\ref{vgal}). No trigonometric parallaxes are available for
420: PPl\,1 and the M9V dwarf J0334$-$49; we have adopted the Pleiades
421: distance for the former object \citep{an07} and the poorly constrained
422: spectroscopic distance estimate of \citet{phan-bao06} for the latter,
423: which result in relatively large uncertainties associated with the
424: derived $UVW$ velocities.
425:
426: With the only exceptions of PPl\,1 and J1728$+$39AB, the remaining
427: objects in our sample with known trigonometric parallax lie within
428: 20\,pc of the Sun. To carry out a reliable statistical study of the
429: kinematics of the least massive population in the solar neighborhood,
430: we have enlarged our sample of ultracool dwarfs with an additional set
431: of eight L-type objects of known trigonometric distance
432: ($d$\,$\le$\,20\,pc), proper motion and radial velocity
433: \citep{dahn02,mohanty03,bailer04,vrba04}. This additional set is shown
434: in Table~\ref{vgal_literature}, where we also provide our $UVW$
435: computations obtained in the manner previously
436: described. Hence, $UVW$ space velocities are finally available for
437: a total of 21 L and T dwarfs located at less than $\sim$20\,pc from
438: the Sun.
439:
440: \subsection{Star moving groups}
441:
442: For the following discussion, we will focus on the extended sample of
443: L and T dwarfs. Their Galactic motions are depicted in the $UV$ and
444: $VW$ planes in Fig.~\ref{uvw_planes}. As can be seen from the top
445: panels, the space velocities of most L and T dwarfs appear to be
446: rather scattered in these diagrams, and no preferred region (or
447: clustering) of high density and small velocity dispersion is
448: perceptible. \citet{leggett92} summarized the criteria used for
449: kinematically classifying old/young disk and halo stars as follows:
450: objects with $V$\,$<$\,$-$100\,\kms~or high eccentricity in the $UV$
451: plane are defined to be halo stars; objects with an eccentricity in
452: the $UV$ plane of $\sim$0.5 are defined to be old disk-halo stars;
453: objects with $-$50\,$<$\,$U$\,$<$\,$+$20, $-$30\,$<$\,$V$\,$<$\,0, and
454: $-$25\,$<$\,$W$\,$<$\,$+$10~\kms~(i.e., the ``young disk'' ellipsoid)
455: are defined to be young disk sources. Stars that lie outside this
456: ellipsoid are defined to be old disk or young-old disk objects
457: depending on their $W$ velocity. Employing these criteria and from the
458: inspection of the $UVW$ velocities, none of the L and T dwarfs in our
459: study seems to belong to the old-disk or halo kinematic categories;
460: all of them can actually be grouped into the young disk and young--old
461: disk kinematic classifications, suggesting that they are likely
462: objects with ages typical of the solar system and younger.
463:
464: To further develop this idea, we have superimposed in the bottom
465: panels of Fig.~\ref{uvw_planes} the location of known, nearby star
466: moving groups (streams of stars with common motion through the Milky
467: Way). The $UVW$ velocities and their associated 1-$\sigma$ velocity
468: dispersions used to depict the ellipsoids of the various moving groups
469: shown in Fig.~\ref{uvw_planes} are taken from the literature
470: \citep{eggen92,chen97,dehnen98,chereul99,montes01,zuckerman04,famaey05,zuckerman06}.
471: Ordered by increasing age, the $\beta$~Pictoris (10--30\,Myr), AB Dor
472: ($\sim$50\,Myr), Carina-near ($\sim$200\,Myr), Ursa Majoris
473: ($\sim$300\,Myr), and Hyades (0.4--2\,Gyr) moving groups have been
474: selected for the proximity of all their northern and southern stellar
475: members to the Sun (typically less than 55\,pc). The open star cluster
476: Hyades ($\sim$625~Myr) lies within the Hyades moving group. Other
477: young moving groups and star clusters of recent discovery are not
478: included in Fig.~\ref{uvw_planes} because they only contain southern
479: stars, like Tucana/Horologium and the TW Hydrae association, or are
480: located farther away, like $\eta$ Cha and the Pleiades moving group
481: \citep{zuckerman04}. The Hyades moving group is the oldest dynamical
482: stream considered in this work, with stellar ages (derived from A-F
483: stars) spanning the interval 400\,Myr to $\sim$2\,Gyr
484: \citep{chereul99}, but probably younger than the canonical age of the
485: solar system.
486:
487: From the bottom $UV$- and $WV$-planes of Fig.~\ref{uvw_planes}, it
488: becomes apparent that only three dwarfs in our sample, namely
489: J1624$+$00 (T6V), J1217$-$03 (T7V), and J0205$-$11AB (L7V), all have
490: space velocity components roughly consistent with the Hyades moving
491: group and fall inside the 1.5-$\sigma$ ellipsoid. These are labeled in
492: the bottom panels of Figure~\ref{uvw_planes}. We note that
493: J0205$-$11AB is an equal-mass binary separated by 9.2\,AU
494: \citep{koerner99}, and that the expected amplitude of the radial
495: velocity curve of each component is therefore less than 3\,\kms~for
496: masses below the substellar limit. This has very little impact on the
497: derived $UVW$ velocities of J0205$-$11AB.
498:
499: Our results for J1624$+$00, J1217$-$03, and J0205$-$11AB are in
500: agreement with the previous work by \citet{bannister07}. These authors
501: also found that J0036$+$18 (L3.5V/L4V) and J0825$+$21 (L7.5V) show
502: proper motion consistent with the Hyades moving group; our $UVW$
503: measurements lie close to the 2-$\sigma$
504: ellipsoid. \citet{bannister07} also commented on the fact that all
505: these five ultracool dwarfs sit on a very tight sequence in
506: color-magnitude diagrams (suggesting they are coeval objects)
507: consistent with evolutionary models of 500~Myr. Nevertheless, recent
508: works by \citet{famaey05} and \citet{simone04} caution against
509: assigning ages based solely on space motion and star moving group
510: memberships. On the contrary, membership in open star clusters
511: provides reliable age estimates. None of the L and T dwarfs in our
512: sample appears to be unambiguous members of the Hyades star
513: cluster. Recently, \citet{bihain06} found that the velocity (or proper
514: motion) dispersion of Pleiades brown dwarfs ($\sim$120\,Myr) is about
515: a factor of four times higher than that of solar-mass stars in the
516: cluster. In our sample, only J1217$-$03 has space velocities close to
517: the 4-$\sigma$ ellipsoid centered at $U$\,=\,$-$42, $V$\,=\,$-$19,
518: $W$\,=\,$-$1~\kms~\citep{bruijne01}, which corresponds to the
519: $\sim$625~Myr-old Hyades.
520:
521: Further study of the bottom $UV$- and $WV$-planes of
522: Fig.~\ref{uvw_planes} reveals that about 40\%~of the L and T dwarfs
523: lie near the Hyades moving group either within the 2-$\sigma$
524: ellipsoid or ``touching'' it (i.e., the error bars cross the
525: 2-$\sigma$ ellipsoid). To analyze the significance of such an apparent
526: concentration, we have collected accurate radial velocities, Hipparcos
527: distances and parallaxes of F-, G-, K- and M-type stars within 20\,pc
528: of the Sun from the catalog of \citet{kharchenko04}. A total of 10 F
529: stars, 25 solar-type stars, 58 K, and 52 early M (M0--M5) stars were
530: selected. Their Galactic $UVW$ motions were calculated as for our L--T
531: sample contained within the same spatial volume. The left panels of
532: Fig.~\ref{distributions} show the space velocities of these stars and
533: of our extended sample as a function of heliocentric distance.
534:
535: After inspection of the space velocity distribution of the G to early
536: M stars in the $UV$- and $WV$-planes, we found that only 10--12\%~of
537: the stars (very similar statistics for all three stellar spectral
538: types) lie within or in the ``surroundings'' of the Hyades moving
539: group, which contrasts with the higher value, 40\%, derived for the
540: ultracool dwarfs. Furthermore, under the assumption that the L--T
541: population follows a Poissonian distribution with the same object
542: density than the G to early-M stars, we have estimated the probability
543: of finding eight out of 21 ($\sim$40\%) ultracool dwarfs close to the
544: Hyades moving group to be lower than 1\%, indicating that this
545: concentration is significant to a confidence level of about 99\%.
546: This suggests that, on average, the L and T population is
547: kinematically younger than the majority of the stars in the solar
548: neighborhood.
549:
550:
551: \subsection{Galactic kinematics and age of the ultracool dwarfs}
552:
553: From the left panels of Fig.~\ref{distributions} it is evident that
554: the $UVW$ components of the L and T dwarfs overlap the range of space
555: velocities observed for the G, K, and early M stars, i.e., they are
556: neither larger nor dramatically smaller despite the reduced mass of
557: the L- and T-type objects. We can discuss this further by producing
558: the histograms shown in the middle panels of Fig.~\ref{distributions},
559: which depict the $UVW$ distributions for the three populations (K-type
560: stars, early M stars, and the L and T ultracool dwarfs). The
561: cumulative distributions are displayed in the right-most panels of
562: Fig.~\ref{distributions}. We can compare these distributions
563: quantitatively using the Kolmogorov--Smirnov test. Such comparison
564: globally shows that there is a probability of more than 15\%~that the
565: ultracool dwarfs and the K and M0--M5 stars are drawn from the same
566: kinematic population. While this holds for a comparison between the
567: $U$ and $W$ velocity dispersions of the L--T dwarfs and the K--M
568: stellar samples, the test suggests larger differences for the $V$
569: distributions (galactic rotation) of the K-type stars and the
570: ultracool dwarfs; however, these differences are not statistically
571: meaningful and we will not discuss them further.
572:
573: In addition, the width of the histograms of Fig.~\ref{distributions},
574: represented by the parameters $\sigma_U, \sigma_V, \sigma_W$, is
575: relevant for a complete kinematic analysis. It is well established
576: that all three velocity dispersions increase with age
577: \citep{spitzer51,mayor74,wielen77}. We have obtained $\sigma_U,
578: \sigma_V$, and $\sigma_W$ for each stellar and substellar populations
579: (see Table~\ref{sigmas}). The Galactic motion dispersions of the G- to
580: M5-type stars are in full agreement with the values obtained for the
581: thin disk of the Galaxy available in the literature
582: \citep{hawley96,bensby03}, even though all these works include a
583: larger number of stars and volumes in their studies. All the L and T
584: dwarfs in our sample have typical perpendicular distances to the
585: Galactic plane in the interval $\pm$15\,pc. Our $\sigma_U$ and
586: $\sigma_W$ derivations for the F-type stars also coincide with the
587: literature; however, the derived $\sigma_V$ value appears smaller than
588: the 20\,\kms~found for the thin disk A and F stars by
589: \citet{bensby03}. This could be explained as statistical noise due to
590: the relative small number (10) of F stars in our study.
591:
592: We have found that the Galactic velocity distributions corresponding
593: to the ultracool L--T dwarfs are narrower (i.e., lower dispersions in
594: all three space velocities) than those of G to M5 stars. However, our
595: derived $\sigma_U, \sigma_V$, and $\sigma_W$ for the L--T dwarfs are
596: remarkably similar to results obtained for M-type emission-line stars
597: \citep{hawley96} and very active M7-type stars \citep{west06}, which
598: are generally assigned ages of less than $\sim$3\,Gyr
599: \citep{reid02}. We also note that if the $\sim$40\%~of the L and T
600: dwarfs lying within and near the Hyades moving group in the $UVW$
601: planes is removed from the statistical analysis, the three parameters
602: $\sigma_U, \sigma_V$, and $\sigma_W$ will gently increase;
603: nevertheless, they remain smaller than the Galactic velocity
604: dispersions observed for solar to early-M stars. Interestingly, all
605: three $\sigma_{UVW}$ of L and T dwarfs resemble the velocity
606: dispersions of F-type stars (Table~\ref{sigmas}), suggesting that the
607: two populations (despite their very different mass) share similar ages
608: on average.
609:
610: There are various empirical calibrations of the relationship between
611: velocity dispersion, particularly $\sigma_W$, and age
612: \citep{mayor74,haywood97,nordstrom04} that we can use to estimate the
613: mean age for our kinematic samples. According to the $\sigma$-age
614: relations provided in Tables~2 (A and F stars) and~3 (G-K-M stars) by
615: \citet{mayor74}, the mean age of the 20-pc sample of F stars is about
616: 2\,Gyr, and that of the G to early M stars is about 5\,Gyr (i.e., the
617: age of the Sun). \citet{wielen77} published a mathematical relation
618: between age and the dispersion of the total Galactic velocity (see
619: also \citet{schmidt07}). We have computed the mean Galactic velocity,
620: $<v_{\rm tot}>$, and its associated dispersion, $\sigma_{v_{\rm
621: tot}}$, for all spectral types listed in Table~\ref{sigmas}. Galactic
622: velocities comprise the three components of the space velocities and
623: as such, may summarize the statistical effects seen in each velocity
624: component (unless they are canceled out). The kinematical ages derived
625: from \citet{wielen77} equation are also provided in the Table. The
626: L--T population shows a kinematical age in the range 0.5--2.3\,Gyr; it
627: thus appears to be a factor of two younger than the low-mass stars of
628: the solar neighborhood. From the analysis of the tangential velocities
629: of a sample of late M and L dwarfs, \citet{dahn02} and
630: \citet{schmidt07} also concluded that these objects have a mean age of
631: 2--4\,Gyr, consistent with our derivation. The fact that the late
632: M-type stars of the solar vicinity appear to be younger, on average,
633: than earlier-type stars was previously suggested in the literature
634: \citep{hawkins88,kirk94,reid94,reid02}. Here, we extend this result to
635: the coolest spectral types (L and T) including the brown dwarf
636: population.
637:
638: Finally, various groups have also pointed out that nearby, very
639: low-mass stars tend to have smaller space motions compared to the
640: earlier-type stars, although the difference is claimed to be of
641: marginal significance \citep{reid02,dahn02}. We provide in
642: Table~\ref{sigmas} the average proper motion, $<\mu>$, for the F, G,
643: K, M0--M5, L and T dwarf populations with known trigonometric
644: parallaxes considered in this work (1-$\sigma$ dispersions are given
645: in brackets). Nevertheless, the information on the mean distance and
646: the mean proper motion is better encapsulated in the mean tangential
647: velocity, $<v_{\rm t}>$, which we also provide in
648: Table~\ref{sigmas}. To complete the spectral sampling between the
649: early M stars and the ultracool dwarfs of our study we have collected
650: the $UVW$ data of 29 M6--M9 objects at less than 23\,pc of the Sun
651: from Table~5 of \citet{reid02}. These authors obtained accurate radial
652: velocities for these objects and combined them with astrometric proper
653: motions and photometric parallaxes to compute Galactic velocities. We
654: show in Table~\ref{sigmas} our derivation of $\sigma_U, \sigma_V,
655: \sigma_W$, and the mean Galactic velocity, proper motion, and
656: tangential velocity for the reduced sample of M6--M9 objects extracted
657: from \citet{reid02}.
658:
659: Figure~\ref{vgal_fig} illustrates the dependence of $<v_{\rm tot}>$,
660: $<v_{\rm t}>$ and their associated dispersions ($\sigma_{v_{\rm
661: tot}}$, $\sigma_{v_{\rm t}}$) on spectral type (or mass). We note that
662: the values corresponding to the F-type stars have less statistical
663: weight because they have been derived from a low number of
664: objects. After comparison with the literature values, the Galactic
665: velocity dispersion $\sigma_{v_{\rm tot}}$ of F stars shown in
666: Table~\ref{sigmas} is likely to be increased by a few \kms. The
667: diagrams of Fig.~\ref{vgal_fig} (which do not incorporate this
668: correction) cover a wide range of masses, from $\sim$2\,$M_{\odot}$
669: (F-type stars) down to $\sim$50\,\Mj~(or 0.05\,$M_{\odot}$,
670: T-types). Note that we have split our full sample of ultracool dwarfs
671: into the two L and T types. As seen in the right panels of
672: Fig.~\ref{vgal_fig}, K-type stars display the largest mean Galactic
673: and tangential velocities, while F stars and the ultracool dwarfs have
674: smaller values. We note that the mean velocities of M6--M9 stars are
675: comparable to those of the ultracool L and T dwarfs, in perfect
676: agreement with the results obtained for late-M and L-type objects by
677: \citet{schmidt07}.
678:
679: The $\sigma_{v_{\rm tot}}$- and $\sigma_{v_{\rm t}}$-spectral type
680: relations shown in the right panels of Fig.~\ref{vgal_fig} present
681: similar structure: an increasing trend from F to K stars to decrease
682: at cooler types; the L and T population displays the smallest velocity
683: dispersions. We ascribe this behavior to the likely younger
684: kinematical ages of the ultracool and very low-mass objects in the
685: solar neighborhood. There is a hint in our data suggesting that T
686: dwarfs are slightly younger than L dwarfs; further observations and
687: larger samples are required to confirm it. This result may be affected
688: by an observational bias in the way L and T dwarfs are
689: discovered. Since brown dwarfs cool down and grow fainter with age, it
690: is expected that magnitude-limited surveys would find younger objects
691: in general. However, according to state-of-the-art evolutionary model
692: predictions on substellar temperatures and luminosities and the fact
693: that our study is limited to a distance of 20--23\,pc, this bias is
694: not largely contaminating our sample of ultracool dwarfs. Any model
695: explaining the population of the Galaxy should account for the
696: relations shown in Fig.~\ref{vgal_fig} quantitatively, which may
697: provide a constraint on the field mass function and the
698: stellar/substellar formation rate.
699:
700:
701: \section{Conclusions}
702:
703: Radial velocities have been obtained for a sample of 18 M6.5--T8
704: dwarfs using high-resolution ($R$\,=\,17800--22700), near-infrared
705: (1.148--1.346\,$\mu$m) spectra collected with the NIRSPEC instrument
706: on the Keck\,II telescope. The sample comprises one M6.5 Pleiades
707: brown dwarf, two late-M field dwarfs, and 15 L and T likely brown
708: dwarfs of the solar neighborhood with masses in the range
709: 30--75\,\Mj. Our radial velocity measurements further confirm the
710: membership of PPl\,1 in the Pleiades cluster, and the true physical
711: companionship of the T7.5V/T8V Gl\,570\,D dwarf in the Gl\,570
712: multiple system. From five velocity measurements obtained for
713: 2MASS\,J05591914$-$1404488 (T4.5V) over 4.37\,yr and the observed
714: velocity dispersion of 0.5\,\kms, we discard the possible presence of
715: massive jovian planets near this brown dwarf with orbits of a few days
716: or around a year.
717:
718: All the L and T dwarfs in our sample lie $\le$\,24\,pc from the Sun,
719: and trigonometric parallaxes and proper motions are available for
720: nearly all of them from \citet{dahn02}, \citet{vrba04}, and
721: \citet{knapp04}. We have used our radial velocity determinations and
722: astrometric data from the literature to derive Galactic $UVW$
723: velocities. The total number of ultracool dwarfs within 20\,pc of the
724: Sun is augmented up to 21 with the addition of eight L dwarfs of known
725: trigonometric distance, proper motion and radial velocity available in
726: the literature. We have compared the Galactic and tangential
727: velocities of the ultracool dwarf population to those of F, G, K, and
728: M stars contained in the same volumen. The $UVW$ distributions of the
729: complete expanded L and T sample show a smaller dispersion than the G
730: to M stars and a comparable dispersion to the F-type stars. Similar
731: behavior is observed for the total Galactic velocity and tangential
732: velocity dispersions, suggesting that the least massive population,
733: which includes brown dwarfs, is kinematically younger. Furthermore, we
734: find that a significant fraction ($\sim$40\%) of the L and T dwarfs in
735: our sample lies near the location of the Hyades moving group in the
736: $UV$ and $VW$ planes in contrast to the low rate (10--12\%) observed
737: for stars. This, in addition to the lower dispersions observed in all
738: space velocities, suggests that our sample of L and T dwarfs (many are
739: brown dwarfs) is kinematically young with likely ages below 5\,Gyr.
740:
741:
742:
743:
744:
745:
746: \acknowledgements We thank the referee for useful comments. The data
747: were obtained at the W. M. Keck Observatory, which is operated as a
748: scientific partnership between the California Institute of Technology,
749: the University of California, and NASA. The Observatory was made
750: possible by the generous financial support of the W. M. Keck
751: Foundation. The authors extend special thanks to those of Hawaiian
752: ancestry on whose sacred mountain we are privileged to be guests. We
753: thank the Keck observing assistants and the staff in Waimea for their
754: kind support. This research has made use of the SIMBAD database,
755: operated at CDS, Strasbourg, France, and has been supported by a Keck
756: PI Data Analysis grant awarded to E. L. M. by Michelson Science
757: Center, and by the Spanish projects AYA2003-05355 and
758: AYA2006-12612. We thank Terry Mahoney for his careful reading of the
759: English language. We also thank I$.$ Ribas for early discussions on
760: this topic.
761:
762:
763:
764:
765:
766:
767:
768:
769: \begin{thebibliography}{}
770: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Allen}{2000}]{allen00}
771: Allen, W.\,B$.$ 2000, Allen's Astrophysical Quantities. Fourth edition,
772: ed$.$ Arthur N$.$ Cox, New York: Springer Verlag, p$.$ 151
773: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{An et al.}{2007}]{an07}
774: An, D., Terndrup, D. M., Pinsonneault, M. H., Paulson, D. B., Hanson,
775: R. B., \& Stauffer, J. R. 2007, \apj, 655, 233
776: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Bailer-Jones}{2004}]{bailer04}
777: Bailer-Jones, C. A. L. 2004, \aap, 419, 703
778: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Bannister \& Jameson}{2007}]{bannister07}
779: Bannister, N. P., \& Jameson, R. F. 2007, \mnras, tmp, L44
780: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Basri \& Reiners}{2006}]{basri_reiners06}
781: Basri, G., \& Reiners, A. 2006, \aj, 132, 663
782: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Bensby et al.}{2003}]{bensby03}
783: Bensby, T., Feltzing, S., \& Lundstr\"om, I. 2003, \aap, 410, 527
784: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Bihain et al.}{2006}]{bihain06}
785: Bihain, G., Rebolo, R., B\'ejar, V. J. S., Caballero, J. A., Bailer-Jones,
786: C. A. L., Mundt, R., Acosta-Pulido, J. A., \& Manchado Torres, A. 2006,
787: \aap, 458, 805
788: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Binney et al.}{2000}]{binney00}
789: Binney, J., Dehnen, W., \& Bertelli, G. 2000, \mnras, 318, 658
790: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Burgasser et al.}{2000}]{burgasser00}
791: Burgasser, A. J., Kirkpatrick, J. D., Cutri, R. M., et al. 2000, \apj,
792: 531, L57
793: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Burgasser et al.}{2002}]{burgasser02}
794: Burgasser, A. J., Adam, J., Kirkpatrick, J. D., et al. 2002, \apj,
795: 564, 421
796: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Burgasser et al.}{2006}]{burgasser06}
797: Burgasser, A. J., Geballe, T. R., Leggett, S. K., Kirkpatrick, J. D.,
798: \& Golimowski, D. A. \apj, 637, 1067
799: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{e.g., Burrows et al.}{1997}]{burrows97}
800: Burrows, A., Marley, M., Hubbard, W. B., et al. 1997, \apj, 491, 856
801: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Chabrier \& Baraffe}{2000}]{chabrier00}
802: Chabrier, G., \& Baraffe, I. 2000, \araa, 38, 337
803: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Chen et al.}{1997}]{chen97}
804: Chen, B., Asiain, R., Figueras, F., \& Torra, J. 1997, \aap, 318, 29
805: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Chereul et al.}{1999}]{chereul99}
806: Chereul, E., Cr\'ez\'e, M., \& Bienaym\'e, O. 1999, A\&ASS, 135, 5
807: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Dahn et al.}{2002}]{dahn02}
808: Dahn, C. C., et al. 2002, \aj, 124, 1170
809: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Dehnen}{1998}]{dehnen98}
810: Dehnen, W. 1998, \aj, 115, 2384
811: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Delfosse et al.}{1997}]{delfosse97}
812: Delfosse, X., Tinney, C. G., Forveille, T., et al. 1997, \aap, 327,
813: L25
814: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{velocity dispersion 0.3\,\kms, De Bruijne et al.}{2001}]{bruijne01}
815: De Bruijne, J. H. J., Hoogerwerf, R., \& De Zeeuw, P. T. 2001, \aap,
816: 367, 111
817: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{De Simone et al.}{2004}]{simone04}
818: De Simone, R., Wu, X., \& Tremaine, S. 2004, \mnras, 350, 627
819: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Eggen}{1992}]{eggen92}
820: Eggen, O. J. 1992, \aj, 104, 1482
821: %\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{e.g., Eggen}{1989}]{eggen89}
822: % Eggen, O. J. 1989, \pasp, 101, 54
823: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Famaey et al.}{2005}]{famaey05}
824: Famaey, B., Jorisse, A., Luri, X., Mayor, M., Udry, S., Dejonghe,
825: H., Turon, C. 2001, \aap, 430, 165
826: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Freed et al.}{2003}]{freed03}
827: Freed, M., Close, L. M., \& Siegler, N. 2003, \apj, 584, 453
828: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Geballe et al.}{2002}]{geballe02}
829: Geballe, T. R., Knapp, G.\,R., Leggett, S. K.,
830: et al. 2002, \apj, 564, 466
831: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Hawkins \& Bessell}{1988}]{hawkins88}
832: Hawkins, M. R. S., \& Bessell, M. S. 1988, \mnras, 234, 177
833: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{e.g., Hawley et al.}{1996}]{hawley96}
834: Hawley, S. L., Gizis, J. E., \& Reid, I. N. 1996, \aj, 112, 2799
835: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Haywood et al.}{1997}]{haywood97}
836: Haywood, M., Robin, A. C., Creze, M. 1997, \aap, 320, 428; 320, 440
837: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Johnson \& Soderblom}{1987}]{johnson87}
838: Johnson, D. R. H., \& Soderblom, D. R. 1987, \aj, 93, 864
839: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Kharchenko}{2004}]{kharchenko04}
840: Kharchenko, N. V. 2004, KFNT, 20, 366
841: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Kharchenko et al.}{2005}]{kharchenko05}
842: Kharchenko, N. V., Piskunov, A. E., R\"oser, S., Schilbach, E., \&
843: Scholz, R.-D. 2005, \aap, 438, 1163
844: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Kirkpatrick et al.}{1994}]{kirk94}
845: Kirkpatrick, J. D., McGraw, J. T., Hess, T. R., Liebert, J., \& McCarthy,
846: D. W. 1994, \apjs, 94, 749
847: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Kirkpatrick et al.}{1997}]{kirk97}
848: Kirkpatrick, J. D., Henry, T. J., \& Irwin, M. J. 1997, \aj, 113, 1421
849: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Kirkpatrick et al.}{1999}]{kirk99}
850: Kirkpatrick, J.\,D., Reid, I.\,N., Liebert, J., et al$.$
851: 1999, \apj, 519, 802
852: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Kirkpatrick et al.}{2000}]{kirk00}
853: Kirkpatrick, J. D., Reid, I. N., Liebert, J., et al. 2000, \aj, 120, 447
854: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Kirkpatrick et al.}{2001}]{kirk01}
855: Kirkpatrick, J. D., Dahn, C. C., Monet, D. G., Reid, I. N., Gizis, J. E.,
856: Liebert, J., \& Burgasser, A. J. 2001, \aj, 121, 3235
857: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{see review by Kirkpatrick}{2005}]{kirk05}
858: Kirkpatrick, J. D. 2005, \araa, 43, 195
859: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Knapp et al.}{2004}]{knapp04}
860: Knapp, G., et al. 2004, \aj, 127, 3553
861: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Koerner et al.}{1999}]{koerner99}
862: Koerner, D. W., Kirkpatrick, J. D., McElwain, M. W., \& Bonaventura,
863: N. R. 1999, \apj, 526, L25
864: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Leggett et al.}{2000}]{leggett00}
865: Leggett, S. K., Allard, F., Dahn, C., Hauschildt,
866: P. H., Kerr, T. H., \& Rayner, J. 2000, \apj, 535, 965
867: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{e.g., Leggett et al.}{2002}]{leggett02}
868: Leggett, S. K., Golimowski, D. A., Fan, X., et al. 2002, \apj, 564,
869: 452
870: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Leggett}{1992}]{leggett92}
871: Leggett, S. K. 1992, \apjs, 82, 351
872: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{e.g., Liu et al.}{1991}]{liu91}
873: Liu, T., Janes, K. A., \& Bania, T. M. 1991, \apj, 377, 141
874: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Liu et al.}{2002}]{liu02}
875: Liu, M. C., Fischer, D. A., Graham, J. R., Lloyd, J. P., Marcy, G. W.,
876: \& Butler, R. P. 2002, \apj, 571, 519
877: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{e.g., Marcy \& Benitz}{1989}]{marcy89}
878: Marcy, G. W., \& Benitz, K. J. 1989, \apj, 344, 441
879: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Mart\'\i n}{1999}]{martin99b}
880: Mart\'\i n, E. L. 1999, \mnras, 302, 59
881: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Mart\'\i n et al.}{1997}]{martin97}
882: Mart\'\i n, E. L., Basri, G., Delfosse, X., \& Forveille, T. 1997,
883: \aap, 327, L29
884: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Mart\'\i n et al.}{1998}]{martin98}
885: Mart\'\i n, E. L., Basri, G., Gallegos, J. E., Rebolo, R.,
886: Zapatero Osorio, M. R., \& B\'ejar, V. J. S. 1998, \apj, 499, L61
887: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Mart\'\i n et al.}{1999}]{martin99}
888: Mart\'\i n, E. L., Delfosse, X., Basri, G., Goldman,
889: B., Forveille, T., \& Zapatero Osorio, M. R. 1999,
890: \aj, 118, 2466
891: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Mart\'\i n et al.}{2006}]{martin06}
892: Mart\'\i n, E. L., G\"unther, E., Zapatero Osorio, M. R., Bouy,
893: H., \& Wainscoat, R. 2006, \apj, 644, L75
894: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Mayor}{1974}]{mayor74}
895: Mayor, M. 1974, \aap, 32, 321
896: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Metchev \& Hillenbrand}{2004}]{metchev04}
897: Metchev, S. A., \& Hillenbrand, L. A. 2004, \apj, 617, 1330
898: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Mohanty \& Basri}{2003}]{mohanty03}
899: Mohanty, S., \& Basri, G. 2003, \apj, 583, 451
900: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Montes et al.}{2001}]{montes01}
901: Montes, D., L\'opez-Santiago, J., Fern\'andez-Figueroa, M. J.,
902: \& G\'alvez, M. C. 2001, \aap, 379, 976
903: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{e.g., Nakajima et al.}{1995}]{nakajima95}
904: Nakajima, T., Oppenheimer, B. R., Kulkarni, S. R., Golimowski, D. A.,
905: Metthews, K., \& Durrance, S. T. 1995, \nat, 378, 463
906: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Nidever et al.}{2002}]{nidever02}
907: Nidever, D. K., Marcy, G. W., Butler, R. P., Fischer, D. A., \&
908: Vogt, S. S. 2002, \apjs, 141, 503
909: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{e.g., Nordstr\"om et al.}{2004,
910: and references therein}]{nordstrom04}
911: Nordstr\"om, B., Mayor, M., Andersen, J., et al. 2004, \aap, 418, 989
912: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Patten et al.}{2006}]{patten06}
913: Patten, B. M., Stauffer, J. R., Burrows, A., et al. 2006, \apj, 651,
914: 502
915: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Perryman et al.}{1997}]{perryman97}
916: Perryman, M. A. C., Lindegren, L., Kovalevsky, J. et al. 1997,
917: \aap, 323, L49
918: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Phan-Bao et al.}{2006}]{phan-bao06}
919: Phan-Bao, N., Bessell, M. S., Mart\'\i n, E. L., et al. 2006,
920: \mnras, 366, L40
921: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Pinfield et al.}{2003}]{pinfield03}
922: Pinfield, D. J., Dobbie, P. D., Jameson, R. F., Steele, I. A.,
923: Jones, H. R. A., \& Katsiyannis, A. C. 2003, \mnras, 342, 1241
924: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Potter et al. 2002}{2002}]{potter02}
925: Potter, D., Mart\'\i n, E. L., Cushing, M. C., Baudoz, P., Brandner,
926: W., Guyon, O., Neuh\"auser, R. 2002, \apj, 567, L133
927: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Rebolo et al.}{1998}]{rebolo98}
928: Rebolo, R., Zapatero Osorio, M. R., Madruga, S., B\'ejar, V. J. S.,
929: Arribas, S., Licandro, J. 1998, Science, 282, 1309
930: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Reid et al.}{1994}]{reid94}
931: Reid, I. N., Tinney, C. G., \& Mould, J. 1994, \aj, 108, 1456
932: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Reid et al.}{2002}]{reid02}
933: Reid, I. N., Kirkpatrick, J. D., Liebert, J., Gizis, J. E., Dahn,
934: C. C., \& Monet, D. G. 2002, \aj, 124, 519
935: %\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Robin et al.}{2003}]{robin03}
936: % Robin, A. C., Reyl\'e, C., Derri\`ere, S., \& Picaud, S. 2003,
937: % \aap, 409, 523
938: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Ruiz et al.}{1997}]{ruiz97}
939: Ruiz, M. T., Leggett, S. K., \& Allard, F. 1997, \apj, 491, L107
940: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Schmidt et al.}{2007}]{schmidt07}
941: Schmidt, S. J., Cruz, J. L., Bongiorno, B. J., Liebert, J., \& Reid, I. N.
942: 2007, \aj, 133, 2258
943: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Spitzer \& Schwarzschild}{1951}]{spitzer51}
944: Spitzer, L. Jr, \& Schwarzschild, M. 1951, \apj, 114, 385
945: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Stauffer et al.}{1998}]{stauffer98}
946: Stauffer, J. R., Schultz, G., \& Kirkpatrick, J. D. 1998, \apj, 499, L199
947: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Tinney \& Reid}{1998}]{tinney98}
948: Tinney, C. G., \& Reid, I. N. 1998, \mnras, 301, 1031
949: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Tinney et al.}{2003}]{tinney03}
950: Tinney, C. G., Burgasser, A. J., Kirkpatrick, J. D. 2003, \aj, 126, 975
951: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Vrba et al.}{2004}]{vrba04}
952: Vrba, F. J., Henden, A. A., Luginbuhl, C. B., et al. 2004, \aj, 127, 2948
953: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{West et al.}{2006}]{west06}
954: West, A. A., Bochanski, J. J., Hawley, S. L., Cruz, K. L., Covey, K. R.,
955: Silvestri, N. M., Reid, I. N., \& Liebert, J. 2006, \aj, 132, 2507
956: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Wielen}{1977}]{wielen77}
957: Wielen, R. 1977, \aap, 60, 263
958: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Zapatero Osorio et al.}{2006}]{osorio06}
959: Zapatero Osorio, M. R., Mart\'\i n, E. L., Bouy, H., Tata, R., Deshpande,
960: R., \& Wainscoat, R. J. 2006, \apj, 647, 1405
961: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Zuckerman \& Song}{2004}]{zuckerman04}
962: Zuckerman, B., \& Song, I. 2004, \araa, 42, 685
963: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Zuckerman et al.}{2006}]{zuckerman06}
964: Zuckerman, B., Bessell, M. S., Song, I., \& Kim, S. 2006, \apj, 649, L115
965: \end{thebibliography}
966:
967:
968:
969: \clearpage
970:
971: \begin{figure}
972: \epsscale{1.0}
973: \plottwo{f1a.ps}{f1b.ps}
974: \caption{NIRSPEC spectra of our sample centered at 1.23~$\mu$m. All
975: spectra are normalized to unity, offset by 1 on the vertical axis, and
976: shifted in velocity to vacuum wavelengths.
977: \label{spec_o05}}
978: \end{figure}
979:
980: %\clearpage
981:
982: \begin{figure}
983: \epsscale{1.0}
984: \plottwo{f2a.ps}{f2b.ps}
985: \caption{NIRSPEC spectra of our sample centered at 1.25~$\mu$m. The
986: most prominent features of the M and L dwarfs are due to K\,{\sc i}
987: absorption, which vanishes at late T types. All spectra are offset by
988: 1 on the vertical axis, and shifted in velocity to vacuum
989: wavelengths. Data are normalized to unity in the intervals
990: 1.2465--1.2475~$\mu$m (M6.5--T4.5) and 1.2468--1.2472~$\mu$m (T5--T8).
991: \label{spec_o06}}
992: \end{figure}
993:
994: %\clearpage
995:
996: \begin{figure}
997: \epsscale{1.0}
998: \plottwo{f3a.ps}{f3b.ps}
999: \caption{NIRSPEC spectra of our sample centered at 1.292~$\mu$m. All
1000: spectra are normalized to unity and shifted in velocity to vacuum
1001: wavelengths. The spectra of the left panel are offset by 1 on the
1002: vertical axis. Data in the right panel are offset by 1 (T2V--T6V
1003: dwarfs, top four spectra) and by 1.5 (T6.5V--T8V dwarfs, bottom five
1004: spectra).
1005: \label{spec_o08}}
1006: \end{figure}
1007:
1008: %\clearpage
1009:
1010: \begin{figure}
1011: \epsscale{1.0}
1012: \plottwo{f4a.eps}{f4b.eps}
1013: \caption{Cross-correlation functions of Gl\,570\,D against J0559$-$14
1014: (left panel, spectra centered at 1.292\,$\mu$m), and J0036$+$18 against
1015: vB\,10 (right panel, spectra centered at 1.230\,$\mu$m). The bottom
1016: panels show an enlargement around the maximum peak of the
1017: cross-correlation functions (thin line) and the best Gaussian fits to
1018: the core of the peak (thick dotted line).
1019: \label{gauss}}
1020: \end{figure}
1021:
1022:
1023: %\clearpage
1024:
1025: \begin{figure}
1026: \epsscale{1.0}
1027: \plotone{f5.ps}
1028: \caption{Detectability of substellar companions around the T4.5V dwarf
1029: J0559$-$14 using our NIRSPEC data. Companions with masses above the
1030: curves can be excluded with a confidence of 1-$\sigma$ (solid line)
1031: and 3-$\sigma$ (dashed line). As indicated in the text, the time
1032: coverage of our data allows us to study orbits with periods of a few
1033: days and a few years; orbits in between are not well sampled. To
1034: compute the detectability curves we have adopted circular orbits
1035: parallel to the line of sight, a mass of 0.06\,$M_{\odot}$ and a
1036: radial velocity amplitude of 0.5\,\kms~for the primary
1037: component. Known radial velocity planets around stars are plotted as
1038: open circles.
1039: \label{j0559}}
1040: \end{figure}
1041:
1042:
1043: %\clearpage
1044:
1045: \begin{figure}
1046: \epsscale{1.0}
1047: \plottwo{f6aa.ps}{f6ab.ps}
1048: \plottwo{f6ba.eps}{f6bb.eps}
1049: \caption{Space motions of our sample of ultracool dwarfs (filled
1050: circles) and the L dwarfs from the literature (open squares) with
1051: $d$\,$\le$\,20\,pc. The young Pleiades brown dwarf PPl\,1 is
1052: indicated in the top panels. An enlargement is shown in the bottom
1053: panels along with the position of various nearby star moving groups
1054: (ellipses, C-N stands for Carina-near). Solid line ellipses stand
1055: for the 1-$\sigma$ location of the moving groups, and the dotted
1056: ellipse represents the 2-$\sigma$ width of the Hyades moving
1057: group. The Pleiad PPl\,1 is not included in the bottom panels.
1058: \label{uvw_planes}}
1059: \end{figure}
1060:
1061:
1062:
1063: %\clearpage
1064:
1065: \begin{figure}
1066: \epsscale{0.32}
1067: \plotone{f7_1a.ps}
1068: \plotone{f7_1b.ps}
1069: \plotone{f7_1c.ps}
1070: \plotone{f7_2a.ps}
1071: \plotone{f7_2b.ps}
1072: \plotone{f7_2c.ps}
1073: \plotone{f7_3a.ps}
1074: \plotone{f7_3b.ps}
1075: \plotone{f7_3c.ps}
1076: \caption{{\sl (Left panels).} Space velocities of our sample of
1077: ultracool dwarfs (filled symbols), the extended sample (open squares),
1078: and the G, K, and M0--M5 stars (tiny circles). Only the error bars of
1079: the ultracool dwarfs are depicted for the clarity of the figure. {\sl
1080: (Middle panels).} $UVW$ distributions for the various populations (K
1081: stars --- dotted histogram; early-M stars --- dashed histogram; L and
1082: T dwarfs --- solid histogram). {\sl (Right panels).} Cumulative
1083: distributions of space velocities.
1084: \label{distributions}}
1085: \end{figure}
1086:
1087:
1088:
1089: %\clearpage
1090:
1091: \begin{figure}
1092: \epsscale{1.0}
1093: \plottwo{f8a.eps}{f8b.eps}
1094: \plottwo{f8c.eps}{f8d.eps}
1095: \caption{{\sl (Left panels)} Average Galactic velocity ($<v_{\rm
1096: tot}>$) and tangential velocity ($<v_{\rm t}>$) as a function of
1097: spectral type. {\sl (Right panels)} Dispersion of Galactic
1098: ($\sigma_{v_{\rm tot}}$) and tangential ($\sigma_{v_{\rm t}}$)
1099: velocities as a function of spectral type. The diagrams cover the mass
1100: interval 2--0.05\,$M_\odot$. Vertical uncertainties correspond to the
1101: error of the mean, while the horizontal error bars account for the
1102: spectral range covered by individual measurements. All data are
1103: volume-limited to $\sim$20\,pc. Note that we have split our sample of
1104: ultracool dwarfs into the L and T classifications (filled
1105: symbols). The open circle corresponds to the combined L and T
1106: data. The values of F-type stars may need some correction (see text).
1107: \label{vgal_fig}}
1108: \end{figure}
1109:
1110:
1111:
1112: \clearpage
1113:
1114:
1115: \begin{deluxetable}{lcllrrrrrccc}
1116: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1117: \rotate
1118: \tablecaption{Heliocentric velocities of our sample. \label{vh}}
1119: \tablewidth{0pt}
1120: \tablehead{
1121: \multicolumn{4}{c}{} & \multicolumn{5}{c}{Reference object} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{} \\
1122: \cline{5-9} \\
1123: \colhead{Object} & \colhead{SpT} & \colhead{Obs$.$ date} & \colhead{MJD} & \colhead{vB\,10\tablenotemark{a}} & \colhead{J2224$-$01\tablenotemark{a}} & \colhead{J0559$-$14\tablenotemark{a}} & \colhead{J1217$-$03\tablenotemark{a}} & \colhead{Other\tablenotemark{b}} & \colhead{$v_{\rm rot}$\,sin\,$i$\tablenotemark{c}} & Previous & Reference \\
1124: \colhead{ } & \colhead{ } & \colhead{ } & \colhead{($-$50000) } & \colhead{(km s$^{-1}$) } & \colhead{(km s$^{-1}$) } & \colhead{(km s$^{-1}$) } & \colhead{(km s$^{-1}$) } & \colhead{(km s$^{-1}$)} & \colhead{(km s$^{-1}$)} & \colhead{(km s$^{-1}$)} & \colhead{ } }
1125: \startdata
1126: %% Object SpT Date-obs MJD vB10 2M2224-01 2M0559-14 2M1217-03 Other v_sini % D(v_h)
1127: PPl\,1 & M6.5 & 2005 Oct 26 & 3669.51110 & $+$5.5$\pm$1.6 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & 20.7 & $+$15.4$\pm$1.6 & 1 \\ % \nodata \\
1128: & & 2005 Oct 28 & 3671.51447 & $+$5.3$\pm$1.9 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & $+$5.3$\pm$2.3 & & & \\ % $-$0.22 \\
1129: vB10 & M8V & 2001 Jun 15 & 2075.58951 &$+$35.0$\pm$1.5\tablenotemark{d}&\nodata& \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & 6.5\tablenotemark{e}& $+$35.0 & \\ % \nodata \\
1130: & & 2001 Nov 02 & 2215.20560 &$+$34.3$\pm$1.5\tablenotemark{d}&\nodata& \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & & $+$35.2$\pm$2.0 & 2 \\ % $-$0.73 \\
1131: DENIS-P\,J033411.39$-$495333.6& M9V & 2005 Oct 26 & 3669.48071 &$+$70.2$\pm$1.0 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & $\le$15 & & \\ % \nodata \\
1132: & & 2005 Oct 28 & 3671.48317 &$+$69.8$\pm$1.0 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & $+$69.8$\pm$1.0 & & & \\ % $-$0.35 \\
1133: 2MASS\,J00361617$+$1821104 & L3.5V/L4V & 2004 Dec 05 & 3344.31265 &$+$18.2$\pm$1.6 & $+$18.6$\pm$1.4 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & 36.0 & & \\ % \nodata \\
1134: & & 2005 Oct 28 & 3671.43118 & \nodata & $+$17.6$\pm$1.5 & \nodata & \nodata & $+$17.7$\pm$1.0 & & & \\ % $-$0.93 \\
1135: 2MASS\,J22244381$-$0158521 & L4.5V & 2001 Jun 15 & 2075.61089 &$-$37.8$\pm$1.0 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & 30.7 & $-$37.4$\pm$3.4 & 3 \\ % \nodata \\
1136: SDSS\,J053951.99$-$005902.0 & L5V & 2001 Nov 02 & 2215.45928 &$+$11.5$\pm$2.7 & $+$11.5$\pm$1.9 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & 33.2 & & \\ % \nodata \\
1137: & & 2005 Oct 27 & 3670.50549 & \nodata & $+$11.8$\pm$2.3 & \nodata & \nodata & $+$11.3$\pm$1.8 & & & \\ % $-$0.24 \\
1138: 2MASS\,J17281150$+$3948593AB & L7V & 2001 Jun 15 & 2075.54466 &$-$12.2$\pm$1.7 & $-$12.8$\pm$1.0 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & 24.1 & & \\ % \nodata \\
1139: 2MASS\,J16322911$+$1904407 & L8V/L7.5V/dL6 & 2001 Jun 15 & 2075.51675 & $-$5.5$\pm$3.7 & $-$5.9$\pm$2.2 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & 21.8 & $+$5: & 2 \\ % \nodata \\
1140: DENIS-P\,J0255.0$-$4700 & L9V/dL6 & 2005 Oct 27 & 3670.44084 &$+$17.9$\pm$3.6 & $+$17.5$\pm$2.8 & $+$16.0$\pm$3.8 & \nodata & \nodata & 41.0 & $+$13.0$\pm$2.0 & 2 \\ % \nodata \\
1141: SDSSp\,J125453.90$-$012247.4 & T2V & 2006 Jan 19 & 3754.61049 & \nodata & $-$0.1$\pm$5.4 & $+$0.9$\pm$2.2 & \nodata & \nodata & 28.4 & & \\ % \nodata \\
1142: 2MASS\,J05591914$-$1404488 & T4.5V & 2001 Nov 02 & 2075.41290 &$-$13.1$\pm$2.8 & $-$13.8$\pm$3.7 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & 22.8 & & \\ % \nodata \\
1143: & & 2004 Dec 05 & 3344.54854 & \nodata & $-$14.6$\pm$1.3 & \nodata & \nodata & $-$14.0$\pm$3.8 & & & \\ % $-$0.14 \\
1144: & & 2005 Oct 26 & 3669.57615 & \nodata & $-$13.7$\pm$1.6 & \nodata & \nodata & $-$13.6$\pm$1.6 & & & \\ % $+$0.27 \\
1145: & & 2005 Oct 27 & 3670.53068 & \nodata & $-$14.2$\pm$1.6 & \nodata & \nodata & $-$13.0$\pm$1.9 & & & \\ % $+$0.86 \\
1146: & & 2005 Oct 28 & 3671.54024 & \nodata & $-$14.3$\pm$1.9 & \nodata & \nodata & $-$13.8$\pm$1.0 & & & \\ % $+$0.07 \\
1147: 2MASS\,J15031961$+$2525196 & T5V & 2006 Jan 19 & 3754.66827 & \nodata & $-$40.1$\pm$5.8 & $-$39.9$\pm$2.6 & $-$40.5$\pm$2.1 & \nodata & 32.1 & & \\ % \nodata \\
1148: SDSS\,J162414.37$+$002915.6 & T6V & 2001 Jun 15 & 2075.44304 & \nodata & \nodata & $-$30.7$\pm$3.0 & \nodata & \nodata & 36.6 & & \\ % \nodata \\
1149: SDSS\,J134646.45$-$003150.4 & T6.5V & 2001 Jun 15 & 2075.34518 & \nodata & \nodata & $-$23.1$\pm$1.5 & \nodata & \nodata & $\le$15 & & \\ % \nodata \\
1150: 2MASS\,J15530228$+$1532369 & T7V & 2001 Jun 15 & 2075.41290 & \nodata & \nodata & $-$32.8$\pm$3.3 & $-$32.9$\pm$3.0 & \nodata & 29.4 & & \\ % \nodata \\
1151: 2MASS\,J12171110$-$0311131 & T7V/T8V & 2001 Jun 15 & 2075.25577 & \nodata & \nodata & $+$5.0$\pm$1.6 & \nodata & \nodata & 31.4 & & \\ % \nodata \\
1152: Gl\,570D & T7.5V/T8V & 2001 Jun 15 & 2075.38494 & \nodata & \nodata & $+$28.9$\pm$2.4 & $+$28.2$\pm$3.1 & \nodata & 30.7 & & \\ % \nodata \\
1153: 2MASS\,J04151954$-$0935066 & T8V & 2005 Oct 26 & 3669.55271 & \nodata & \nodata & $+$49.6$\pm$1.2 & $+$51.0$\pm$4.3 & \nodata & 33.5 & & \\ % \nodata \\
1154: \enddata
1155: \tablenotetext{a}{Heliocentric radial velocities (km\,s$^{-1}$) used in the cross-correlation:
1156: $-$35.0 (vB\,10), $-$37.8 (J2224$-$01), $-$13.8 (J0559$-$14), and $+$5.0 (J1217$-$03).}
1157: \tablenotetext{b}{The dwarf's earliest spectrum acts as the reference spectrum in the cross-correlation.}
1158: \tablenotetext{c}{Average rotational velocity from \citet{osorio06}.}
1159: \tablenotetext{d}{Heliocentric velocity obtained from the centroids of the K\,{\sc i} lines.}
1160: \tablenotetext{e}{Rotational velocity from \citet{mohanty03}.}
1161: \tablerefs{(1) \citet{martin98}; (2) \citet{mohanty03}; (3) \citet{bailer04}.}
1162: \end{deluxetable}
1163:
1164:
1165: %\clearpage
1166:
1167: \begin{deluxetable}{lccrc}
1168: \tablecaption{Mean heliocentric radial velocities. \label{meanv}}
1169: \tablewidth{0pt}
1170: \tablehead{
1171: \colhead{Object} & \colhead{SpT} & \colhead{$\Delta$t} & \colhead{$<v_h>$} & \colhead{$N$} \\
1172: \colhead{ } & \colhead{ } & \colhead{ } & \colhead{(\kms) } & \colhead{ } }
1173: \startdata
1174: PPl\,1 & M6.5 & 2.0 d & $+$5.4\,$\pm$\,1.7 & 2 \\
1175: J0334$-$49 & M9V & 2.0 d & $+$70.0\,$\pm$\,1.0 & 2 \\
1176: J0036$+$18 & L3.5V/L4V & 0.90 yr & $+$18.1\,$\pm$\,1.5 & 2 \\
1177: J0539$-$00 & L5V & 3.98 yr & $+$11.7\,$\pm$\,2.1 & 2 \\
1178: J0559$-$14 & T4.5V & 4.37 yr & $-$13.8\,$\pm$\,0.2\tablenotemark{a} & 5 \\
1179: \enddata
1180: \tablenotetext{a}{The associated velocity uncertainty corresponds to the error of the mean.}
1181: \end{deluxetable}
1182:
1183:
1184:
1185:
1186: %\clearpage
1187:
1188: \begin{deluxetable}{lcrrrrrr}
1189: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1190: \tablecaption{Galactic velocities of our sample. \label{vgal}}
1191: \tablewidth{0pt}
1192: \tablehead{
1193: \colhead{Object} & \colhead{SpT} & \colhead{$d$\tablenotemark{a}} & \colhead{$\mu_\alpha {\rm cos} \delta$\tablenotemark{a}} & \colhead{$\mu_\delta$\tablenotemark{a}} & \colhead{$U$} & \colhead{$V$} & \colhead{$W$} \\
1194: \colhead{ } & \colhead{ } & \colhead{(pc)} & \colhead{(mas\,yr$^{-1}$) } & \colhead{(mas\,yr$^{-1}$) } & \colhead{(km s$^{-1}$)} & \colhead{(km s$^{-1}$)} & \colhead{(km s$^{-1}$)} }
1195: \startdata
1196: %% Object SpT d (pc) mu_RA mu_DEC U V W
1197: PPl\,1\tablenotemark{b} & M6.5V & 133.8 & $+$19.7 & $-$44.8 & $-$6.4$\pm$2.3 & $-$27.6$\pm$5.0 & $-$14.0$\pm$4.7 \\
1198: vB\,10\tablenotemark{c} & M8V & 5.9 & $-$578.8 & $-$1331.6 & $+$52.6$\pm$0.8 & $-$8.1$\pm$0.7 & $-$5.1$\pm$0.2 \\
1199: J0334$-$49\tablenotemark{d} & M9V & 8.2 & $+$2350.0 & $+$470.0 & $-$66.2$\pm$18.7 & $-$95.7$\pm$25.0 & $-$5.8$\pm$21.7 \\
1200: J0036$+$18 & L3.5V/L4V & 8.8 & $+$899.1 & $+$120.0 & $-$40.0$\pm$0.8 & $-$4.8$\pm$1.5 & $-$11.5$\pm$1.7 \\
1201: J2224$-$01 & L4.5V & 11.5 & $+$463.8 & $-$865.8 & $-$10.6$\pm$0.6 & $-$64.5$\pm$0.9 & $-$6.4$\pm$0.8 \\
1202: J0539$-$00 & L5V & 13.1 & $+$164.4 & $+$315.9 & $-$20.0$\pm$1.8 & $+$4.3$\pm$1.0 & $+$14.4$\pm$0.7 \\
1203: J1728$+$39AB & L7V & 24.1 & $+$25.9 & $-$36.8 & $-$0.4$\pm$1.0 & $-$9.3$\pm$1.4 & $-$9.8$\pm$1.1 \\
1204: J1632$+$19 & L8V/L7.5V/dL6 & 15.4 & $+$294.5 & $-$56.6 & $+$5.3$\pm$1.4 & $+$8.3$\pm$1.3 & $-$20.4$\pm$1.6 \\
1205: J0255$-$47 & L9V/dL6 & 6.3 & $+$1036.6 & $-$598.5 & $-$5.4$\pm$5.0 & $-$39.2$\pm$5.1 & $+$3.5$\pm$4.0 \\
1206: J1254$-$01 & T2V & 11.8 & $-$478.7 & $+$130.1 & $-$25.6$\pm$0.8 & $-$9.7$\pm$0.9 & $+$4.6$\pm$1.9 \\
1207: J0559$-$14 & T4.5V & 10.3 & $+$562.1 & $-$342.4 & $+$22.8$\pm$1.1 & $-$15.8$\pm$1.0 & $+$21.3$\pm$0.6 \\
1208: %J1503$+$25 & T5V & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1209: J1624$+$00 & T6V & 11.2 & $-$378.6 & $-$2.5 & $-$31.0$\pm$2.5 & $-$19.3$\pm$0.8 & $-$2.3$\pm$1.7 \\
1210: J1346$-$00 & T6.5V & 13.7 & $-$473.1 & $-$132.3 & $-$29.3$\pm$1.8 & $-$20.0$\pm$1.6 & $-$17.4$\pm$1.4 \\
1211: %J1553$+$15AB & T7V & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1212: J1217$-$03 & T7V/T8V & 9.8 & $-$1057.8 & $+$91.6 & $-$44.0$\pm$3.6 & $-$23.1$\pm$2.2 & $-$0.2$\pm$1.5 \\
1213: Gl\,570D\tablenotemark{c} & T7.5V/T8V & 5.9 & $+$1034.1 & $-$1725.5 & $+$49.6$\pm$2.0 & $-$22.3$\pm$0.8 & $-$31.6$\pm$1.4 \\
1214: J0415$-$09 & T8V & 5.7 & $+$2192.8 & $+$527.3 & $-$64.2$\pm$0.9 & $-$43.3$\pm$0.7 & $+$15.1$\pm$1.0 \\
1215: \enddata
1216: \tablenotetext{a}{From \citet{perryman97,dahn02,vrba04,knapp04,an07}.}
1217: \tablenotetext{b}{Distance and proper motion of the Pleiades cluster.}
1218: \tablenotetext{c}{Distance and proper motion of the primary stars \citep{perryman97}.}
1219: \tablenotetext{d}{Spectroscopic parallax from \citet{phan-bao06}.}
1220: \end{deluxetable}
1221:
1222: %\clearpage
1223:
1224: \begin{deluxetable}{lcrrrcrrrl}
1225: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1226: \tablecaption{Galactic velocities of an additional set of L-type dwarfs. \label{vgal_literature}}
1227: \tablewidth{0pt}
1228: \tablehead{
1229: \colhead{Object} & \colhead{SpT} & \colhead{$d$} &
1230: \colhead{$\mu_\alpha {\rm cos} \delta$} &
1231: \colhead{$\mu_\delta$} & \colhead{$v_h$} &
1232: \colhead{$U$} & \colhead{$V$} & \colhead{$W$} &
1233: \colhead{Ref} \\
1234: \colhead{ } & \colhead{ } & \colhead{(pc)} & \colhead{(mas\,yr$^{-1}$) } & \colhead{(mas\,yr$^{-1}$) } & \colhead{(km s$^{-1}$)} & \colhead{(km s$^{-1}$)} & \colhead{(km s$^{-1}$)} & \colhead{(km s$^{-1}$)} & \colhead{} }
1235: \startdata
1236: %% Object SpT d (pc) mu_RA mu_DEC v_rad U V W Pop
1237: 2MASS\,J07464256$+$2000321 & L0.5V & 12.2 & $-$374.044 & $-$57.905 & $+$54 & $-$56.2$\pm$4.4 & $-$15.3$\pm$1.6 & $-$0.7$\pm$1.8 & 1, 3 \\ %& YOD
1238: 2MASS\,J14392836$+$1929149 & L1V & 14.4 & $-$1229.791 & $+$406.714 & $-$28 & $-$82.6$\pm$2.1 & $-$39.5$\pm$0.9 & $+$13.2$\pm$4.5 & 1, 2, 3 \\ %& YOD
1239: Kelu\,1AB & L2V & 18.7 & $-$284.790 & $+$10.941 & $+$17 & $-$12.8$\pm$1.2 & $-$24.6$\pm$1.4 & $+$12.4$\pm$1.2 & 2, 3\\ %& YOD
1240: DENIS-P\,J1058.7$-$1548 & L3V & 17.3 & $-$252.931 & $+$41.419 & $+$19 & $-$20.3$\pm$0.3 & $-$19.0$\pm$1.5 & $+$5.5$\pm$1.3 & 2, 3\\ %& YD
1241: DENIS-P\,J1228.2$-$1547AB & L5V & 20.2 & $+$133.868 & $-$179.598 & $+$2.5& $+$19.0$\pm$1.5 & $-$5.4$\pm$3.1 & $-$8.7$\pm$3.7 & 2, 3\\ %& YD
1242: 2MASS\,J15074769$-$1627386 & L5V & 7.3 & $-$161.476 & $-$888.547 & $-$39 & $-$25.3$\pm$3.9 & $-$17.0$\pm$1.1 & $-$39.8$\pm$2.9 & 1, 3\\ %& YOD
1243: DENIS-P\,J0205.4$-$1159AB & L7V & 19.8 & $+$434.348 & $+$54.871 & $+$7 & $-$34.8$\pm$2.1 & $-$21.8$\pm$0.8 & $+$6.4$\pm$4.6 & 2, 3\\ %& YD
1244: 2MASS\,J08251968$+$2115521 & L7.5V & 10.6 & $-$506.522 & $-$292.729 & $+$20 & $-$27.3$\pm$4.0 & $-$16.9$\pm$1.7 & $-$15.1$\pm$2.5 & 1, 3, 4\\ %& YD
1245: %2MASS\,J16322911$+$1904407 & L8V & 15.7 & $+$295.779 & $-$59.478 & $+$5 & $+$12.3$\pm$6.3 & $+$13.3$\pm$4.7 & $-$14.1$\pm$6.3 & 2, 4\\ %& YOD
1246: \enddata
1247: \tablerefs{Radial velocities from: (1) \citet{bailer04}; (2) \citet{mohanty03}. Distances and proper motions from: (3) \citet{dahn02}; (4) \citet{vrba04}.}
1248: \end{deluxetable}
1249:
1250:
1251:
1252: %\clearpage
1253:
1254: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccccccccl}
1255: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1256: \tablecaption{$UVW$, total Galactic and tangential velocity distributions of stars and brown dwarfs with $d$\,$\le$\,20~pc. \label{sigmas}}
1257: \tablewidth{0pt}
1258: \tablehead{
1259: \colhead{SpT} & \colhead{$N$} & \colhead{$<d>$\tablenotemark{a}} & \colhead{$<\mu>$\tablenotemark{a}} & \colhead{$\sigma_U$} & \colhead{$\sigma_V$} & \colhead{$\sigma_W$} & \colhead{$<v_{\rm tot}>$\tablenotemark{a}} & \colhead{$<v_{\rm t}>$\tablenotemark{a}} & \colhead{Age} & \colhead{Ref.} \\
1260: \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{(pc)} & \colhead{(\arcsec\,yr$^{-1}$)} & \colhead{(km\,s$^{-1}$)} & \colhead{(km\,s$^{-1}$)} & \colhead{(km\,s$^{-1}$)} & \colhead{(km\,s$^{-1}$)} & \colhead{(km\,s$^{-1}$)} & \colhead{(Gyr)} & \colhead{}
1261: }
1262: \startdata
1263: %%SpT & N & <d> std & mu std_mu & stdU & stdV & stdW & vgal std & v_t std & Ref \\
1264: F & 10 & 15.4 (3.4) & 0.44 (0.59) & 30.9 & 10.3 & 18.1 & 32.1 (22.9) & 27.0 (23.9) & 2.2$^{+3.0}_{-1.6}$ & 1, 5 \\
1265: G & 25 & 15.6 (3.9) & 0.68 (0.82) & 41.3 & 29.3 & 20.5 & 59.5 (35.9) & 48.0 (31.3) & 9.0$^{+6.7}_{-4.5}$ & 1, 5 \\
1266: K & 58 & 14.0 (3.4) & 0.78 (0.80) & 43.7 & 32.9 & 15.9 & 61.3 (33.9) & 51.0 (34.3) & 7.6$^{+3.4}_{-2.6}$ & 1, 5 \\
1267: M0--M5 & 52 & 10.3 (4.0) & 1.12 (1.38) & 47.1 & 30.7 & 19.5 & 55.1 (33.8) & 47.6 (32.4) & 7.5$^{+3.6}_{-2.7}$ & 1, 5 \\
1268: M6--M9 & 31\tablenotemark{b} & 17.4 (5.9) & 0.45 (0.45) & 36.5 & 20.6 & 15.7 & 44.0 (29.6) & 32.5 (30.0) & 3.8$^{+2.8}_{-1.9}$ & 2, 8 \\
1269: L and T\tablenotemark{c} & 13 & 10.3 (3.2) & 0.92 (0.64) & 30.0 & 19.9 & 15.2 & 43.8 (17.4) & 37.5 (14.3) & 0.9$^{+1.1}_{-0.6}$ & 2, 5--7 \\
1270: L and T\tablenotemark{d} & 21 & 12.2 (4.4) & 0.77 (0.57) & 30.2 & 16.5 & 15.8 & 44.2 (19.1) & 36.5 (17.6) & 1.2$^{+1.1}_{-0.7}$ & 2--7 \\
1271: \enddata
1272: \tablenotetext{a}{ Values in brackets correspond to the width of the distributions (or $\sigma$).}
1273: \tablenotetext{c}{ Includes the 29 objects extracted from \citet{reid02} and the two field M dwarfs in our sample.}
1274: \tablenotetext{c}{ Sample shown in Table~\ref{vgal}.}
1275: \tablenotetext{d}{ Extended sample.}
1276: \tablerefs{Radial velocities from (1) \citet{kharchenko04}; (2) this paper; (3) \citet{mohanty03}; (4) \citet{bailer04}. Distances and proper motions from (5) \citet{perryman97}; (6) \citet{dahn02}; (7) \citet{vrba04}; (8) \citet{reid02}.}
1277: \end{deluxetable}
1278:
1279:
1280:
1281: \end{document}
1282:
1283: