1: %%
2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
3: %%
4: %% Modified 2005 December 5
5: %%
6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
8:
9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
11: %% any data that comes before this command.
12:
13: %% The command below calls the preprint style
14: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
15: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
16: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
17: %%
18:
19: %%\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
20:
21: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
22:
23: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
24:
25: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
26:
27: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
28: \documentclass{emulateapj}
29: \usepackage{apjfonts}
30:
31: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
32: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
33: %% use the longabstract style option.
34:
35: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
36:
37: \newcommand{\lsi} {\object{LS~I~+61~303}}
38: \newcommand{\lsif} {LS~I~+61~303}
39:
40: %\slugcomment{Submitted to ApJ {\it Letters}}
41:
42: \shorttitle{X-ray structure in \lsi}
43: \shortauthors{Paredes et al.}
44:
45: \begin{document}
46:
47: \title{{\it Chandra} Observations of the Gamma-ray Binary \lsi: Extended X-ray Structure?}
48: %\title{Hints of X-ray structure in the gamma-ray binary \lsi}
49:
50:
51: %\author{Josep M. Paredes\altaffilmark{1}}
52: \author{
53: Josep M. Paredes,\altaffilmark{1}
54: Marc Rib\'o,\altaffilmark{1}
55: Valent\'{\i} Bosch-Ramon,\altaffilmark{2}\\
56: Jennifer R. West,\altaffilmark{3}
57: Yousaf M. Butt,\altaffilmark{3}
58: Diego F. Torres,\altaffilmark{4}
59: Josep Mart\'{\i}\altaffilmark{5}
60: }
61: \altaffiltext{1}{Departament d'Astronomia i Meteorologia, Facultat de F\'{\i}sica, Universitat de Barcelona, Mart\'{\i} i Franqu\`es 1, E-08028 Barcelona, Spain; jmparedes@ub.edu, mribo@am.ub.es.}
62: \altaffiltext{2}{Max Planck Institut f\"ur Kernphysik, D-69117 Heidelberg, Germany; vbosch@mpi-hd.mpg.de.}
63: \altaffiltext{3}{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138; jennifer@head.cfa.harvard.edu, ybutt@head.cfa.harvard.edu.}
64: \altaffiltext{4}{Instituci\'o Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avan\c cats (ICREA) \& Institut de Ci\`encies de l'Espai (IEEC-CSIC) Campus UAB, Fac. de Ci\`encies, Torre C5, parell, 2a planta, E-08193 Barcelona, Spain;
65: dtorres@aliga.ieec.uab.es.}
66: \altaffiltext{5}{Departamento de F\'{\i}sica, Escuela Polit\'ecnica Superior, Universidad de Ja\'en, Las Lagunillas s/n, Edificio A3, 23071 Ja\'en, Spain; jmarti@ujaen.es.}
67:
68:
69: \begin{abstract}
70:
71: We present a 50~ks observation of the gamma-ray binary \lsi\ carried out with
72: the ACIS-I array aboard the {\it Chandra} X-ray Observatory. This is the
73: highest resolution X-ray observation of the source conducted so far. Possible
74: evidence of an extended structure at a distance between 5\arcsec\ and
75: 12\arcsec\ towards the North of \lsi\ have been found at a significance level
76: of 3.2$\sigma$. The asymmetry of the extended emission excludes an
77: interpretation in the context of a dust-scattered halo, suggesting an intrinsic
78: nature. On the other hand, while the obtained source flux, of $F_{\rm
79: 0.3-10~keV}=7.1^{+1.8}_{-1.4}\times 10^{-12}$~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$, and
80: hydrogen column density, $N_{\rm H}=0.70\pm 0.06\times 10^{22}$~cm$^{-2}$, are
81: compatible with previous results, the photon index $\Gamma=1.25\pm 0.09$ is the
82: hardest ever found. In light of these new results, we briefly discuss the
83: physics behind the X-ray emission, the location of the emitter, and the
84: possible origin of the extended emission $\sim$0.1~pc away from \lsi.
85:
86: \end{abstract}
87:
88: \keywords{
89: %radio continuum: stars ---
90: %radio continuum: ISM ---
91: %gamma rays: observations ---
92: %X-rays: stars ---
93: %binaries: general ---
94: stars: emission line, Be ---
95: stars: individual: LS~I~+61~303 ---
96: X-rays: binaries ---
97: X-rays: general ---
98: X-rays: individual: \lsi\ ---
99: X-rays: ISM
100: }
101:
102: \section{Introduction}
103:
104: \lsi\ is a high mass X-ray binary associated with the galactic plane variable
105: radio source \object{GT~0236+610} \citep{gregory78} which shows periodic
106: non-thermal outbursts on average every $P_{\rm orb}$=26.4960$\pm$0.0028~d
107: \citep{taylor82,gregory02}. Optical spectroscopic observations show that the
108: system is composed of a rapidly rotating early type B0\,Ve star with a stable
109: equatorial decretion disk and mass loss, and a compact object with a mass
110: between 1 and 4 $M_{\odot}$ orbiting it every $\sim$26.5~d
111: \citep{hutchings81,casares05,grundstrom07}. Spectral line radio observations
112: give a distance of 2.0$\pm$0.2~kpc \citep{frail91}. \cite{massi01,massi04}
113: reported the discovery of an extended jet-like and apparently precessing radio
114: emitting structure at angular extensions of 10--50~milliarcseconds. Due to the
115: presence of (apparently relativistic) radio emitting jets, \lsi\ was proposed
116: to be a microquasar. However, recent VLBA images obtained during a full orbital
117: cycle show a rotating elongated morphology \citep{dhawan06}, which may be
118: consistent with a model based on the interaction between the relativistic wind
119: of a non-accreting pulsar and the wind of the stellar companion
120: \citep{dubus06}. The MAGIC Cerenkov telescope has recently detected \lsi\ at
121: very high energy gamma rays ($\gtrsim$100~GeV; \citealt{albert06}). \lsi\ and
122: \object{LS~5039} \citep{paredes00,aharonian05} share the quality of being the
123: only two known X-ray binaries that are also GeV emitters. Therefore, they can
124: be called gamma-ray binaries.
125:
126: \lsi\ has been observed with different X-ray satellites: {\it Einstein}
127: \citep{bignami81}, {\it ROSAT} \citep{goldoni95,taylor96}, {\it ASCA}
128: \citep{leahy97}, {\it RXTE} \citep{harrison00}, {\it BeppoSAX}, {\it
129: XMM-Newton}, and {\it INTEGRAL} \citep{sidoli06,chernyakova06}. The spectrum
130: could always be fitted with an absorbed power-law with values in the ranges
131: $N_{\rm H}$=0.45--0.65$\times10^{22}$~cm$^{-2}$ and $\Gamma$=1.5--1.9. The
132: 2--10~keV X-ray flux shows orbital variability \citep{paredes97}, with values
133: ranging from about 5 to 20$\times10^{-12}$~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$, the maximum
134: occurring at orbital phase $\sim$0.5 (assuming $T_0$=JD 2,443,366.775). No
135: spectral lines nor extended X-ray emission have ever been reported. Here we
136: present, for the first time, {\it Chandra} X-ray observations of \lsi, aimed at
137: detecting small-scale extended X-ray emission.
138:
139:
140: \section{{\it Chandra} observations and results}
141:
142: We observed LS~I~+61~303 with {\it Chandra} using the standard ACIS-I setup in
143: VF mode and 3.24~s time frame during a total of 49.9~ks from 2006 April 7
144: 22:30~UT to April 8 12:22~UT (MJD~53832.9375--53833.5153). This corresponds to
145: orbital phases 0.028--0.050, when a relatively low flux is expected, thus
146: minimizing possible pileup effects.
147:
148: The {\it Chandra} Interactive Analysis of Observations software package
149: (CIAO~3.3.0.1) and the CALDB 3.2.2 version have been used to perform the
150: reduction of the level 1 event files as well as for the spectrum and lightcurve
151: subtraction. The reprocessed level 2 event files have been created to account
152: for readout effects. The position angle of the readout direction of the
153: ACIS-I chip was $-62$\degr\ (positive from North to East).
154:
155: We have reduced the data using standard procedures given in the {\it Chandra}
156: analysis threads. The source region has been defined as a 20 pixel
157: ($\sim$10\arcsec) radius circle around the source center. For the background,
158: we took a nearby circular region of 80 pixel ($\sim$40\arcsec) radius, away
159: from the source and the CCD junction. To avoid the presence of possible (very
160: faint) sources in the background, the tool {\it celldetect} was applied. The
161: {\it mkacisrmf} and {\it mkarf} tools were used to generate the RMF and ARF
162: files respectively. The tool {\it dmextract} was used to generate the source
163: and the background lightcurves and spectra. The spectrum was grouped with the
164: tool {\it dmgroup} to 30 counts per energy bin.
165:
166: \lsi\ showed a moderate level of activity, with an average count rate of
167: 0.15~counts~s$^{-1}$ (see Fig.~\ref{fig:lc}), and the data was affected by
168: pileup at the $\sim$14\% level (see below). The background was very low and
169: estimated to be about 1\% of the source count rate within the source region.
170: The position of the X-ray source, determined by using the CIAO package tool
171: {\it celldetect}, is $\alpha=02^{\rm h} 40^{\rm m} 31\fs63\pm0\fs02$,
172: $\delta=61\degr 13\arcmin 45\farcs70\pm0\farcs3$ (J2000). The errors, as in the
173: rest of this work, are 1$\sigma$. The X-ray position is consistent with the
174: radio and optical positions.
175:
176:
177: \subsection{Lightcurve}
178:
179: The background subtracted lightcurve of \lsi\ in the 0.3--10~keV band is
180: plotted at the bottom of Fig.~\ref{fig:lc}. Each point represents 324~s of data
181: and the error bars represent the square root of the total number of counts in
182: each bin divided by 324~s. We have also computed the hardness ratio (HR) by
183: dividing the count rate in the 1.7--10~keV energy range by the corresponding
184: one in the 0.3--1.7~keV range. We show at the top of Fig.~\ref{fig:lc} the HR
185: as a function of time, but with a larger bin time of 1024~s to have relatively
186: small error bars. The count rate is moderately variable on timescales from
187: several minutes to hours, with an average of 0.144$\pm$0.029~counts~s$^{-1}$
188: ($\chi^2_{\rm red}$=1.84). The count rate increases during the observation, and
189: a linear fit yields a 30\% increase at the end with respect to the beginning.
190: Superimposed on this trend is a miniflare 32~ks after the start of the
191: observation, when the count rate increases by a factor of $\sim$2 over a
192: timescale of $\sim$1000~s, with a total duration of $\sim$3~ks. This miniflare
193: is accompanied by an increase of the HR. This kind of moderate variability was
194: first observed with {\it ASCA}, which detected source variations of about a
195: 50\% on timescales of half an hour \citep{harrison00}. Archival {\it BeppoSAX}
196: observations carried out in 1997 have also shown short-term variability
197: \citep{sidoli06}. It is interesting to note that small amplitude ($<$10\%)
198: radio flares were detected in \lsi\, with a recurrence period of about 5~ks
199: \citep{peracaula97}. The presence of hour timescale X-ray miniflares has also
200: been reported in the case of \object{LS~5039} \citep{bosch05}. A hardness vs.
201: intensity diagram for the whole {\it Chandra} observation of \lsi\ reveals a
202: positive trend, the source is harder when it is brighter, but with a low
203: significant correlation coefficient of $r$=0.44. This is in contrast to the
204: clear correlation found in previous {\it XMM} observations by \cite{sidoli06}.
205:
206: \begin{figure}
207: \resizebox{1.0\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics[angle=0]{f1.eps}}
208: \caption{
209: {\it Bottom}: Background subtracted lightcurve of \lsif\ obtained with {\it
210: Chandra}. The binning time is 324~s and the error bars are at the 1$\sigma$
211: level. Time origin corresponds to 2006 April 7 at 22:33:17 UT (MJD~53832.9398),
212: and the observation length is 50~ks. Total count rate variations of a factor of
213: two on timescales of a few hours are clearly seen.
214: {\it Top}: Hardness ratio (HR) between 1.7--10 and 0.3--1.7~keV energy ranges.
215: The binning time has been increased to 1024~s to reduce the size of the error
216: bars. The HR is not significantly variable and it is poorly correlated with the
217: count rate (except during the miniflare).
218: \label{fig:lc}}
219: \end{figure}
220:
221:
222: \subsection{X-ray spectrum}
223:
224: Since the HR is not significantly variable ($\chi^2_{\rm red}$=1.78), we
225: considered the whole data set for the spectral analysis. To perform the
226: spectral fits we restricted the energy range between 0.3 and 10~keV. A fit to
227: the data with a Bremsstrahlung model provided $\chi^2_{\rm red}$=1.6, and no
228: lines nor a multicolor blackbody were required to fit the data. An absorbed
229: power-law fit yielded $\chi^2_{\rm red}$=1.14, but a significant excess above
230: 7~keV was apparent in the residuals. Due to the count rate and time frame used,
231: this is probably due to pileup. The addition of the pileup model implemented in
232: {\it Sherpa} \citep{davis01} to the absorbed power law yielded different sets
233: of possible spectral parameter values, all of them equally compatible from a
234: statistical point of view. Nevertheless, for some of them the derived fluxes
235: were a factor $\ga$5 higher than previous measurements at similar orbital
236: phases. We found that reasonable results were obtained when fixing the event
237: pileup fraction parameter $f$ to 0.95: $\chi^2_{\rm red}$=0.83, grade migration
238: parameter $\alpha=0.33\pm 0.09$, $N_{\rm H}=0.70\pm 0.06\times
239: 10^{22}$~cm$^{-2}$, $\Gamma=1.25\pm 0.09$, pileup fraction 14\%, and $F_{\rm
240: 0.3-10~keV}=7.1^{+1.8}_{-1.4}\times 10^{-12}$~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$. The
241: significance of adding a pileup component to the absorbed powerlaw fit was
242: estimated via an F-test: the probability that this improvement happens by
243: chance is 0.8\%.
244:
245: To check the robustness of the results obtained with the spectral fitting with
246: the pileup model we have conducted two additional tests. First of all we have
247: obtained the spectrum of the readout streak, which is not affected by pileup,
248: after excluding the 5 pixel diameter region around the source. Since it only
249: contains 287~counts, we have fitted the spectrum using low count number
250: statistical weights. Fixing $N_{\rm H}$ to $0.7\times 10^{22}$~cm$^{-2}$ we
251: have obtained $\Gamma=1.21\pm 0.14$, which is consistent within errors to the
252: value given above. An additional test has been conducted by fitting the
253: spectrum of the source wings, which are not affected by pileup. We have built a
254: spectrum with data beyond a radius of 1.5\arcsec\ from the source center (i.e.,
255: excluding the inner $3\times3$ pixels, those most affected by pileup) and
256: fitted it with and without fixing $N_{\rm H}$, obtaining in both cases a photon
257: index harder than the one obtained with the pileup model. A similar test with
258: data beyond 2.0\arcsec\ has provided similar results. These tests clearly
259: suggest that the photon index value obtained with the pileup model is reliable,
260: and that the source was intrinsically hard during this observation. Moreover,
261: the estimate of the total source flux using the fitted flux of the source wings
262: and the fraction of the simulated PSF (see next section) counts contained in
263: the wings is compatible for $f$=0.95. This is not the case for the lower values
264: of $f$ that implied the much higher source fluxes discussed in the previous
265: paragraph. These results give us confidence on the results obtained with the
266: pileup model.
267:
268: \begin{figure*}
269: \begin{center}
270: \resizebox{1.0\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics[angle=0]{f2.eps}}
271: \caption{
272: {\it Left}: Image of \lsif\ obtained with {\it Chandra} in the 0.3--10 keV
273: energy range. The image size is $24\farcs5\times24\farcs5$ (the pixel size is
274: $0\farcs49\times0\farcs49$). A Gaussian kernel of three pixels in radius has
275: been used to smooth the image. The intensity scales logarithmically. The
276: contours correspond to seven logarithmic steps in the range
277: 0.2--300~counts~pixel$^{-1}$. Extended X-ray emission is probably present at a
278: distance of 5--12\arcsec\ from the center.
279: {\it Middle}: Same as before but for the PSF.
280: {\it Right}: Same as before but for the residuals obtained after subtracting
281: the PSF image to the source one. The intensity scales here via a histogram
282: equalization. The extended emission at distances beyond 5\arcsec, in the
283: form of several spots towards the North-East, is apparent. The central
284: residuals at $\sim$2\arcsec\ radius occur within the core of the PSF, and no
285: conclusion can be drawn because of pileup.
286: \label{fig:images}}
287: \end{center}
288: \end{figure*}
289:
290:
291: Regarding the emission of \lsi\ itself, the flux we report here, $F_{\rm
292: 0.3-10~keV}=7.1^{+1.8}_{-1.4}\times 10^{-12}$~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$, is compatible
293: within errors to that obtained during a short {\it XMM} observation also around
294: phase 0 \citep{chernyakova06}. However, the photon index $\Gamma=1.25\pm 0.09$
295: found in the {\it Chandra} data is the hardest ever found, only compatible with
296: any previous value at the $3\sigma$ level and harder, at a $\sim$5$\sigma$
297: level, than the {\it XMM} one at the same phase ($\Gamma=1.78\pm 0.04$). It is
298: outside the scope of this work to put forward a physical model for the spectral
299: state of the source. We will just point out that the X-ray photon index can be
300: harder than the canonical value of 1.5, which corresponds to a electron
301: population with power-law index of 2. This can occur for different reasons, for
302: example a Klein-Nishina dominated steady particle population (see
303: \citealt{derishev06} for an extended discussion). A very hard spectral
304: component (e.g. inverse Compton or Bremsstrahlung), produced by the lower
305: energy part of the particle spectrum with a high low-energy cutoff, may also
306: harden the synchrotron spectrum. The lack of simultaneous data at higher
307: energies does not allow us to distinguish between the two hypotheses.
308:
309: We finally selected the data corresponding to the miniflare and obtained a
310: spectrum for it, which had poor statistics and was especially affected by
311: pileup. A fit to this spectrum yielded a photon index compatible within (large)
312: errors to that of the whole observation spectrum.
313:
314:
315: \subsection{Imaging}
316:
317: A preliminary visual inspection of the source image reveals the possible
318: existence of extended emission. To better study this issue we have used {\it
319: ChaRT} and {\it MARX} to simulate the point spread function (PSF) accounting
320: for pileup effects. This PSF has the same counts as the source, which are
321: distributed in energy according to the source spectrum including pileup, being
322: spatially distributed in the image considering pileup as well\footnote{We note
323: that, while the pileup model included in {\it MARX} is valid for qualitative
324: predictions of the effects of pileup on the PSF, it has not been verified for
325: image reconstruction (section 7.3 of the {\it MARX} 4.0 Technical Manual).}. We
326: show in Fig.~\ref{fig:images} the images corresponding to the source, the PSF,
327: and the residuals obtained after subtracting the PSF from the source, all of
328: them smoothed with a Gaussian kernel of three pixels in radius to enhance the
329: faint emission. As can be seen in Fig.~\ref{fig:images}-left, there appears to
330: be extended X-ray emission around \lsi\ at distances between 5\arcsec\ and
331: 12\arcsec\ from the source center. The subtraction of the nearly circular PSF,
332: shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:images}-middle, from the source image yields the
333: residuals shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:images}-right. There seems to be a region with
334: an excess of counts at several arcseconds from the image core and nearly
335: half-surrounding it. This excess region, already apparent in the source image,
336: presents some spots and extends mainly towards the North-East.
337:
338: \begin{figure}
339: \resizebox{1.0\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics[angle=0]{f3.eps}}
340: \caption{Surface brightness distribution of \lsif\ (red filled circles) compared to the PSF (dashed blue line). The excess above $\sim$5\arcsec\ is apparent in this radial profile, even if the extended emission is asymmetric.
341: \label{fig:radial}}
342: \end{figure}
343:
344: To check the reliability of the 5--12\arcsec\ excess we have created radial
345: profiles of the surface brightness for the source and the simulated PSF with
346: the tools {\it dmextract} and {\it dmtcalc}. We show the radial profiles with
347: bins of 1\arcsec\ in Fig.~\ref{fig:radial}, where hints of excess are seen in
348: the region 5--12\arcsec\ away from the center. Moreover, we note that a
349: comparison with the unscattered point-like blazar source
350: \object{PKS~2155$-$304} located at high-galactic latitude (following the
351: procedure described in \citealt{gallo02}) provided an even clearer departure of
352: \lsi\ from a point-like source. Nevertheless, we prefer to show here the most
353: conservative results obtained with the PSF, simulated at the chip position and
354: with the observed spectrum of \lsi\ including pileup effects. Next we computed
355: the excess of source counts over the PSF in an annulus with inner and outer
356: radii of 5\arcsec\ and 12\farcs5, and obtained 58$\pm$18 counts (3.2$\sigma$,
357: or single trial probability of $1.4\times10^{-3}$). We have looked for excesses
358: in a circle with radius 20\arcsec\ centered on the source, without considering
359: the central 5\arcsec\ radius circle, thus yielding an area of
360: $\pi(20^2-5^2)$\arcsec$^2$. Dividing this by the area of the annulus where we
361: obtained the 3.2$\sigma$ excess we find that the number of trials is 2.9,
362: yielding a probability of $4.1\times10^{-3}$, which corresponds to 2.9$\sigma$.
363: However, since the extended emission appears to be asymmetric, we have computed
364: the excess dividing the 5--12\farcs5 annulus in four quadrants. Although there
365: is no excess towards the West and South directions, the excess is of about
366: 1.5$\sigma$ to the East, and reaches 3.8$\sigma$ to the North (or single trial
367: probability of $1.4\times10^{-4}$). We note that this excess is not located in
368: the path of the readout streak. The number of trials is now 11.6, providing a
369: post-trial probability of $1.6\times10^{-3}$ or a 3.2$\sigma$ detection. The
370: excess in the Northern quadrant of the 5--12\farcs5 annulus, with a projected
371: distance of 0.05--0.12~pc from the center of \lsi, represents 0.5\% of the
372: source counts, implying (with $\Gamma$=1.25) a flux of
373: $\sim$4$\times10^{-14}$~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$ and $L_{\rm
374: X}\sim$2$\times10^{31}$~ergs~s$^{-1}$.
375:
376:
377: \section{Discussion}
378:
379: The Chandra observations reported here show that \lsi\ presented moderate
380: fluxes of $F_{\rm 0.3-10~keV}=7.1^{+1.8}_{-1.4}\times
381: 10^{-12}$~ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$, as expected around orbital phase $\sim 0$
382: (\cite{sidoli06}). The source appeared to be moderately variable on timescales
383: of $\sim$1000~s. The hydrogen column density was $N_{\rm H}=0.70\pm 0.06\times
384: 10^{22}$~cm$^{-2}$, similar to the values found in the past. The photon index
385: was $1.25\pm0.09$, harder than the previously measured values in the range
386: 1.5--1.9. Finally, an excess between 5 and 12\farcs5 towards the North of \lsi\
387: has been detected at the 3.2$\sigma$ level (post-trial).
388:
389: {\it Chandra} observations of X-ray binaries have provided the most detailed
390: X-ray images of these sources. Extended circular emission, produced by ISM dust
391: grains along the line of sight that scatter mainly the soft X-rays
392: \citep{predehl95}, has been found in most cases \citep{xiang05}. However, the
393: possible extended structure around \lsi\ we report here is asymmetric, suggesting its
394: intrinsic nature. Plausible explanations of this diffuse radiation could be
395: thermal Bremsstrahlung produced by hot and dense ISM close to the source,
396: perhaps heated and compressed by a large-scale outflow originated in \lsi, and
397: synchrotron or inverse Compton emission produced by non-thermal particles
398: accelerated at the termination region of the aforementioned outflow. The first
399: possibility would require a medium with densities significantly higher than
400: those inferred from the ISM absorption towards \lsi. If non-thermal, the
401: extended emission would more likely be of synchrotron origin due to its shorter
402: timescales to radiate at a few keV than those of inverse Compton or
403: relativistic Bremsstrahlung. In any case, the asymmetric distribution of counts
404: could be related to the main direction of the outflow and/or to ISM
405: inhomogeneities. Regardless of the morphology, we can say that efficient energy
406: transport is probably taking place up to distances of at least $\sim$0.1~pc in
407: \lsi. However, only deeper high-resolution observations can help to better
408: detect the excess (currently at a 3.8$\sigma$ level, 3.2$\sigma$ post-trial)
409: and determine the precise morphology and underlying physics.
410:
411: A final comment on the hydrogen column density appears necessary. The $N_{\rm
412: H}$ value inferred from spectral fits to all available X-ray observations is in
413: the range 0.45--0.70$\times 10^{22}$~cm$^{-2}$, while the $N_{\rm H}$ value of
414: the ISM inferred from UV/optical absorption is in the range 0.45--0.60$\times
415: 10^{22}$~cm$^{-2}$. Therefore, the detected X-rays suffer small intrinsic
416: absorption, if any. Moreover no significant $N_{\rm H}$ orbital variations have
417: ever been detected (as pointed out previously by \citealt{leahy97} after {\it
418: ASCA} observations). In conclusion, the apparent lack of significant soft X-ray
419: absorption and the constancy of $N_{\rm H}$ along the orbit are difficult to be
420: explained considering the slow and dense material expelled from the companion
421: star. The X-ray emitter should be placed away from the binary system to produce
422: such observational results, in contrast with the expectations from classical
423: colliding wind and microquasar scenarios. This issue certainly requires further
424: investigation.\\
425:
426:
427: \acknowledgments
428:
429: We thank Mike Nowak for helpful discussions on the analysis of the {\it Chandra} data.
430: %We acknowledge useful comments and suggestions from an anonymous referee.
431: J.M.P., M.R., V.B-R. and J.M. acknowledge support by DGI of the Spanish Ministerio de Educaci\'on y Ciencia (MEC) under grants AYA2004-07171-C02-01 and
432: AYA2004-07171-C02-02 and FEDER funds.
433: M.R. acknowledges financial support from MEC through a \emph{Juan de la Cierva} fellowship.
434: V.B-R. thanks the Max-Planck-Institut f\"ur Kernphysik for its support and kind
435: hospitality.
436: J.R.W. was supported by Cycle~7 Chandra Grant GO6-7025X.
437: D.F.T. has been supported by MEC under grant AYA-2006-00530, and the Guggenheim Foundation.
438: J.M. is also supported by PAI
439: %Plan Andaluz de Investigaci\'on
440: of Junta de Andaluc\'{\i}a as research group FQM322.
441:
442: \facility{{\it Chandra}}
443:
444:
445: \begin{thebibliography}{}
446:
447: \bibitem[Aharonian et al.(2005)]{aharonian05}
448: Aharonian, F., et al.\
449: 2005, Science, 309, 746
450:
451: \bibitem[Albert et al.(2006)]{albert06}
452: Albert, J., et al.\
453: 2006, Science, 312, 1771
454:
455: \bibitem[Bignami et al.(1981)]{bignami81}
456: Bignami, G.~F., Caraveo, P.~A., Lamb, R.~C., Markert, T.~H., \& Paul, J.~A.\ 1981, ApJ, 247, L85
457:
458: \bibitem[Bosch-Ramon et al.(2005)]{bosch05}
459: Bosch-Ramon, V., Paredes, J.~M., Rib\'o, M., Miller, J.~M., Reig, P., \& Mart\'{\i}, J.\
460: 2005, ApJ, 628, 388
461:
462: \bibitem[Casares et al.(2005)]{casares05}
463: Casares, J., Ribas, I., Paredes, J.~M., Mart\'{\i}, J., \& Allende Prieto, C.\
464: 2005, MNRAS, 360, 1105
465:
466: \bibitem[Chernyakova et al.(2006)]{chernyakova06}
467: Chernyakova, M., Neronov, A., \& Walter, R.\
468: 2006, MNRAS, 372, 1585
469:
470: \bibitem[Davis(2001)]{davis01}
471: Davis, J.~E.\
472: 2001, ApJ, 562, 575
473:
474: \bibitem[Derishev(2006)]{derishev06}
475: Derishev, E.~V.\
476: 2006, Ap\&SS, in press, preprint (astro-ph/0611260)
477:
478: \bibitem[Dhawan et al.(2006)]{dhawan06}
479: Dhawan, V., Mioduszewski, A., \& Rupen, M.\
480: 2006, PoS, Proceedings of the VI Microquasar Workshop, ed. T.~Belloni, p.52.1
481:
482: \bibitem[Dubus(2006)]{dubus06}
483: Dubus, G.\
484: 2006, A\&A, 456, 801
485:
486: \bibitem[Frail \& Hjellming(1991)]{frail91}
487: Frail, D.~A., \& Hjellming, R.~M.\
488: 1991, AJ, 101, 2126
489:
490: \bibitem[Gallo \& Fender(2002)]{gallo02}
491: Gallo, E., \& Fender, R.~P.\
492: 2002, MNRAS, 337, 869
493:
494: \bibitem[Goldoni \& Mereghetti(1995)]{goldoni95}
495: Goldoni, P., \& Mereghetti, S.\
496: 1995, A\&A, 299, 751
497:
498: \bibitem[Gregory \& Taylor(1978)]{gregory78}
499: Gregory, P.~C., \& Taylor, A.~R.\
500: 1978, Nature, 272, 704
501:
502: \bibitem[Gregory(2002)]{gregory02}
503: Gregory, P.~C.\
504: 2002, ApJ, 575, 427
505:
506: \bibitem[Grundstrom et al.(2007)]{grundstrom07}
507: Grundstrom, E.~D., et al.\
508: 2007, ApJ, 656, 437
509:
510: \bibitem[Harrison et al.(2000)]{harrison00}
511: Harrison, F.~A., Ray, P.~S., Leahy, D.~A., Waltman, E.~B., \& Pooley, G.~G.\
512: 2000, ApJ, 528, 454
513:
514: \bibitem[Hutchings \& Crampton(1981)]{hutchings81}
515: Hutchings, J.~B., \& Crampton, D.\
516: 1981, PASP, 93, 486
517:
518: \bibitem[Leahy et al.(1997)]{leahy97}
519: Leahy, D.~A., Harrison, F.~A., \& Yoshida, A.\
520: 1997, ApJ, 475, 823
521:
522: \bibitem[Massi et al.(2001)]{massi01}
523: Massi, M., Rib\'o, M., Paredes, J.~M., Peracaula, M., \& Estalella, R.\
524: 2001, A\&A, 376, 217
525:
526: \bibitem[Massi et al.(2004)]{massi04}
527: Massi, M., Rib\'o, M., Paredes, J.~M., Garrington, S.~T., Peracaula, M., Mart\'{\i}, J.\
528: 2004, A\&A, 414, L1
529:
530: \bibitem[Paredes et al.(1997)]{paredes97}
531: Paredes, J.~M., Mart\'{\i}, J., Peracaula, M., \& Rib\'o, M.\
532: 1997, A\&A, 320, L25
533:
534: \bibitem[Paredes et al.(2000)]{paredes00}
535: Paredes, J.~M., Mart\'{\i}, J., Rib\'o, M., \& Massi, M.\
536: 2000, Science, 288, 2340
537:
538: \bibitem[Peracaula et al.(1997)]{peracaula97}
539: Peracaula, M., Mart\'{\i}, J., \& Paredes, J.~M.\
540: 1997, A\&A, 328, 283
541:
542: \bibitem[Predehl \& Schmitt(1995)]{predehl95}
543: Predehl, P., \& Schmitt, J.~H.~M.~M.\
544: 1995, A\&A, 293, 889
545:
546: \bibitem[Sidoli et al.(2006)]{sidoli06}
547: Sidoli, L., Pellizzoni, A., Vercellone, S., Moroni, M., Mereghetti, S., \& Tavani, M.\
548: 2006, A\&A, 459, 901
549:
550: \bibitem[Taylor \& Gregory(1982)]{taylor82}
551: Taylor, A.~R., \& Gregory, P.~C.\
552: 1982, ApJ, 255, 210
553:
554: \bibitem[Taylor et al.(1996)]{taylor96}
555: Taylor, A.~R., Young, G., Peracaula, M., Kenny, H.~T., \& Gregory, P.~C.\
556: 1996, A\&A, 305, 817
557:
558: \bibitem[Xiang et al.(2005)]{xiang05}
559: Xiang, J., Zhang, S.~N., \& Yao, Y.\
560: 2005, ApJ, 628, 769
561:
562: \end{thebibliography}
563:
564: \end{document}
565: