1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2:
3: \shorttitle{HSA Observations of the $z=4.4$ QSO BRI~1335--0417}
4: \shortauthors{Momjian et al.}
5:
6: \begin{document}
7:
8: \title{High Sensitivity Array Observations of the $z = 4.4$ QSO BRI~1335--0417}
9:
10: \author{Emmanuel Momjian}
11: \affil{NAIC, Arecibo Observatory, HC 3, Box 53995, Arecibo, PR 00612, USA}
12: \email{emomjian@naic.edu}
13:
14: \author{Christopher L. Carilli}
15: \affil{National Radio Astronomy Observatory, P. O. Box O, Socorro, NM, 87801, USA}
16: \email{ccarilli@nrao.edu}
17:
18: \author{Dominik A. Riechers}
19: \affil{Max-Planck-Institut f\"{u}r Astronomie, K\"{o}nigstuhl 17, D-69117
20: Heidelberg, Germany}
21: \email{riechers@mpia.de}
22:
23: \author{Fabian Walter}
24: \affil{Max-Planck-Institut f\"{u}r Astronomie, K\"{o}nigstuhl 17, D-69117
25: Heidelberg, Germany}
26: \email{walter@mpia.de}
27:
28:
29:
30: \begin{abstract}
31:
32: We present sensitive phase-referenced VLBI results on the radio continuum
33: emission from the $z=4.4$ QSO BRI~1335--0417. The observations were carried
34: out at 1.4 GHz using the High Sensitivity Array (HSA).
35: Our sensitive VLBI image at $189 \times 113$~mas ($1.25 \times 0.75$~kpc)
36: resolution shows continuum emission in BRI~1335--0417 with a total flux
37: density of $208 \pm 46~\mu$Jy, consistent with the flux density measured
38: with the VLA. The size of the source at FWHM is
39: $255 \times 138$~mas ($1.7 \times
40: 0.9$~kpc) and the derived intrinsic brightness temperature
41: is $\sim 3.5\times 10^4$~K. No continuum emission is
42: detected at the full VLBI resolution ($32 \times 7$ mas, $211 \times 46$~pc),
43: with a 4$\sigma$
44: point source upper limit of 34~$\mu$Jy~beam$^{-1}$, or an upper limit to the
45: intrinsic brightness temperature of $5.6\times 10^5$ K. The highest angular
46: resolution with at least a 4.5$\sigma$ detection of the radio
47: continuum emission is $53 \times 27$~mas ($0.35 \times 0.18$~kpc). At this
48: resolution, the image shows a continuum feature in BRI~1335--0417
49: with a size of $64 \times 35$~mas ($0.42 \times 0.23$~kpc) at FWHM,
50: and intrinsic brightness temperature of $\sim 2\times 10^5$~K.
51: The extent of the observed continuum sources at 1.4~GHz and the derived
52: brightness temperatures show that the radio emission (and thus presumably the far-infrared
53: emission) in BRI~1335--0417 is powered by a major starburst, with a massive star formation
54: rate of order a few thousand $M_{\odot}~{\rm yr}^{-1}$. Moreover, the
55: absence of any compact high-brightness temperature source suggests that there
56: is no radio-loud AGN in this $z=4.4$ QSO.
57:
58:
59: \end{abstract}
60:
61: \keywords{galaxies: individual (BRI~1335--0417) --- galaxies: active ---
62: galaxies: high-redshift --- radio continuum: galaxies --- techniques: interferometric}
63:
64: \section{INTRODUCTION}
65:
66: Optical surveys such as the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS; York et al.~2000)
67: and the Digitized Palomar Sky Survey \citep{DJO99} have revealed large samples
68: of quasi-stellar objects out to $z \sim 6$. Studies by \citet{FAN02} and \citet{FCK06} have shown that at such a high redshift we are approaching the epoch of
69: reionization, the edge of the ``dark ages'', when the first stars and massive
70: black holes were formed.
71:
72: Observations of high redshift QSOs at mm and sub-mm wavelengths have shown that
73: a significant fraction ($\sim 30\%$) of the sources are strong emitters of
74: far-infrared (FIR) radiation, which is thermal emission from warm dust.
75: These sources have luminosities $L_{\rm FIR} > 10^{12}~L_{\odot}$, and
76: molecular gas masses greater than $10^{10}~M_{\odot}$ \citep{SV05,RD06}.
77: Moreover, the large reservoirs of warm gas and dust in these objects have led to the
78: hypothesis that these are starburst galaxies with massive star formation rates
79: on the order of 1000~$M_{\odot}~{\rm yr}^{-1}$ \citep{BER03,BEE06,CAR04,WAL03}.
80:
81: An important question regarding these high-$z$ QSOs is whether the dust
82: heating mechanism is dominated by a central AGN, or starburst activity in
83: the QSO host galaxies. The high resolution of Very Long
84: Baseline Interferometry (VLBI) observations permits a detailed look at the
85: physical structures in the most distant cosmic sources. Also, sensitive VLBI
86: continuum observations can be used to determine the nature of the energy
87: source(s) in these galaxies at radio frequencies.
88:
89: To date, several high redshift QSOs have been imaged at milliarcsecond
90: resolution \citep{FRE97,FRE03,MOM04,BEE04,MOM05}. These are the highest resolution
91: studies of such distant QSOs by far. In this paper, we present sensitive VLBI
92: observations of the $z=4.4$ QSO BRI~1335--0417.
93:
94: The source BRI~1335--0417, which has an optical redshift of $4.396 \pm 0.026$,
95: was identified in the Automatic Plate Measuring (APM) survey \citep{IMH91,STO96}.
96: This QSO is the second brightest source at millimeter wavelengths with redshifts
97: $z > 4$, with the brightest being the $z=4.7$ QSO BRI~1202--0725 \citep{OMO96}.
98: The implied FIR luminosity of BRI~1335--0417 is
99: $L_{\rm FIR}=3.1 \times 10^{13}~{L}_{\odot}$. Thus far, there is no evidence for
100: multiple imaging in BRI~1335--0417 due to strong gravitational lensing \citep{CMY99}.
101:
102: The optical spectrum of the QSO BRI~1335--0417 shows a strong absorption by Ly$\alpha$
103: and metal lines at the source redshift \citep{STO96}. Its CO~$(5-4)$ line emission was detected
104: at $z=4.4074 \pm 0.0015$ \citep{GUI97}.
105: The CO~$(2-1)$ emission studies on this source by \citet{CMY99} suggested optically thick emission
106: from warm ($>$~30~K) molecular gas. The derived total molecular gas mass is $M_{\rm
107: H2}=(1.5 \pm 0.3) \times 10^{11}\,M_{\odot}$, making BRI~1335--0417 one
108: of the most massive molecular gas reservoirs known at high redshifts.
109:
110: The source BRI~1335--0417 is also detected in the radio continuum at 1.4 and 4.9~GHz with
111: the Very Large Array (VLA) in C-configuration, with
112: flux densities of $220 \pm 43$ and $76 \pm 11~\mu$Jy, respectively \citep{CMY99,YUN00}.
113: The source appears unresolved at the resolution of these VLA observations, which is on the order of
114: several arcseconds.
115:
116: Throughout this paper, we assume a flat cosmological model with
117: $\Omega_{m}=0.3$, $\Omega_\Lambda=0.7$, and
118: ${H_{0}=71}$~km~s$^{-1}$~Mpc$^{-1}$. In this model, at the distance of BRI
119: 1335--0417, 1~milliarcsecond (mas) corresponds to 6.6~pc.
120:
121: \section{OBSERVATIONS AND DATA REDUCTION}
122:
123: The VLBI observations of BRI~1335--0417 were carried out at 1.4~GHz on 2005 December 31 and
124: 2006 January 7, using the High Sensitivity Array (HSA), which included
125: the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), the phased Very Large Array (VLA), and the
126: Green Bank Telescope (GBT) of the NRAO\footnote{The National Radio Astronomy
127: Observatory is a facility of the National Science Foundation operated under
128: cooperative agreement by Associated Universities, Inc.}. Four adjacent 8~MHz
129: baseband channel pairs were used in the observations, both with right and
130: left-hand circular polarizations, and sampled at two bits. The data were
131: correlated at the VLBA correlator in Socorro, NM, with 2~s correlator
132: integration time. The total observing time was
133: 14~hr.
134: In these observations, the shortest baseline is between the phased VLA and the VLBA antenna in
135: Pie Town, NM, which is 52~km. This short-spacing limit filters out all spatial structure
136: larger than about $0\rlap{.}^{''}42$. Table~1 summarizes the parameters of these observations.
137:
138: The observations employed nodding-style phase referencing, using the calibrator
139: J1335--0511 ($S_{\rm 1.4~GHz}=0.4$~Jy), with a cycle time of 4~min, 3~min on the
140: target source and 1~min
141: on the calibrator. A number of test cycles were also included to monitor the
142: coherence of the phase referencing. These tests involved switching between two
143: calibrators, the phase calibrator J1335--0511 and the phase-check calibrator
144: J1332--0509 ($S_{\rm 1.4~GHz}=0.3$~Jy), using a similar cycle time to that used for
145: the target source.
146:
147: The accuracy of the phase calibrator position is important in phase-referencing
148: observations \citep {WAL99}, as this determines the accuracy of the absolute
149: position of the target source and any associated components. Phase referencing,
150: as used here, is known to preserve absolute astrometric positions to better
151: than $\pm 0\rlap{.}^{''}01$ \citep{FOM99}.
152:
153: Data reduction and analysis were performed using the Astronomical Image
154: Processing System (AIPS) and Astronomical Information Processing System
155: (AIPS$++$) of the NRAO. After applying {\it a priori} flagging, amplitude
156: calibration was performed using measurements of the antenna gain and system
157: temperature for each station. Ionospheric corrections were applied using the
158: AIPS task ``TECOR''. The phase calibrator J1335--0511 was self-calibrated in
159: both phase and amplitude and imaged in an iterative cycle.
160:
161: Images of the phase-check calibrator, J1332--0509, were deconvolved using two
162: different approaches: (a) by applying the phase and the amplitude
163: self-calibration solutions of the phase reference source J1335--0511
164: (Figure~1{\it{a}}), and (b) by self calibrating J1332--0509 itself, in both
165: phase and amplitude (Figure~1{\it{b}}). The peak surface brightness ratio of
166: the final images from the two approaches gives a measure of the effect of
167: residual phase errors after phase referencing (i.e. `the coherence' due to
168: phase referencing). At all times, the coherence was found to be better than
169: 98\%.
170:
171: The self-calibration solutions of the phase calibrator, J1335--0511, were
172: applied on the target source, BRI~1335--0417, which was then deconvolved and imaged at
173: various spatial resolutions by tapering the visibility data.
174:
175: \section{RESULTS \& ANALYSIS}
176:
177: Imaging the target source at the full resolution of the VLBI array, which is
178: $32 \times 7$~mas ($211 \times 46$~pc, PA=$-7^{\circ}$), achieved an rms noise level of
179: $8.5~\mu$Jy~beam$^{-1}$, but did not reveal any continuum component
180: in the field of BRI~1335--0417. This indicates the absence of any compact radio
181: continuum emission with flux densities of $\geq 4\sigma \simeq
182: 34~\mu$Jy~beam$^{-1}$, which in turn implies an upper limit to the intrinsic brightness
183: temperature (corresponding to a rest frequency of $\sim$8~GHz)
184: of $5.6 \times 10^5$~K for any compact radio source in
185: BRI~1335--0417. Our coherence tests during these
186: observations using two VLBI calibrators show that the lack of a strong point
187: source in BRI~1335--0417 at the full resolution of the array cannot be due to
188: the phase referencing procedure. The 4$\sigma$
189: flux limit reported above is almost an order of magnitude lower than the flux measured by
190: the VLA ($220 \pm 43~\mu$Jy) at 1.4 GHz \citep{CMY99}.
191: This immediately implies that more than $\sim$80\%
192: of the radio continuum emission in BRI~1335--0417 is extended and not
193: confined to the central AGN.
194:
195: In the following, we will assess if our HSA observations can recover the flux
196: seen by the VLA. To do so, we applied a two-dimensional Gaussian taper falling to
197: 30\% at 1~M$\lambda$ to the visibility data in both the {\it u}- and {\it v}-directions.
198: This gives a beam size of $189 \times 113$~mas
199: ($1.25 \times 0.75$~kpc, P.~A.= $-48^{\circ}$), and the resulting image is shown in Figure~2.
200: The rms noise level in this naturally weighted image is $28~\mu$Jy~beam$^{-1}$. The
201: peak flux density of the detected continuum source is $126 \pm 28~\mu$Jy~beam$^{-1}$, and the total
202: flux density is $208 \pm 46~\mu$Jy, which agrees
203: well with the flux density measured with the VLA at 1.4~GHz \citep{CMY99}.
204: The size of the source at full width half maximum (FWHM) is $255 \times 138$~mas
205: ($1.7 \times 0.9$~kpc), and the derived intrinsic brightness temperature is
206: $(3.6 \pm 0.9) \times 10^4$~K.
207:
208: Figure 3 shows the continuum emission in BRI~1335--0417 at the highest angular
209: resolutions for which there is at least 4.5$\sigma$ detection ($\sigma=19~\mu$Jy~beam$^{-1}$).
210: This corresponds to a resolution of $53 \times 27$~mas ($0.35 \times 0.18$~kpc) in
211: position angle $-6^{\circ}$. This image was obtained by
212: applying a two-dimensional Gaussian taper falling to 30\% at 5~M$\lambda$
213: in both the {\it u}- and {\it v}-directions of the visibility
214: data. The peak flux density of the continuum source detected at this resolution is
215: $87 \pm 19~\mu$Jy~beam$^{-1}$, and the total flux density is $131 \pm 30~\mu$Jy.
216: The size of the source is $64 \times 35$~mas ($0.42 \times 0.23$~kpc) at FWHM,
217: and its intrinsic brightness temperature is
218: $(2.2 \pm 0.5) \times 10^5$~K. The results obtained at this resolution imply that about
219: two thirds of the total radio emission emerges from the central $\sim$0.3~kpc of
220: BRI~1335--0417, and, likewise, one third arises from more extended scales ($\sim$1.3~kpc).
221:
222: \section{DISCUSSION}
223:
224: We have detected 1.4~GHz emission from BRI~1335--00417 (corresponding to a rest frame
225: frequency of $\sim$8~GHz) using the HSA. At a moderate resolution ($189 \times 113$~mas; Figure 2)
226: the intrinsic brightness temperature value of the detected continuum structure is
227: $\sim 3.5\times 10^4$~K. The measured flux density at this resolution
228: is consistent with the VLA flux density of this source \citep{CMY99}.
229: This implies that the radio continuum emission at
230: 1.4~GHz is confined to the extent of the structure seen in the VLBI
231: image (Figure~2), which is $1.7 \times 0.9$~kpc at FWHM. Furthermore, the highest
232: resolution image
233: with continuum detection (Figure~3) shows that almost two thirds of the total
234: radio continuum emission at 1.4~GHz is arising from the central $\sim$0.3~kpc.
235:
236: At the full resolution of our array ($32 \times 7$~mas), the radio emission from
237: BRI~1335--0417 is resolved out and does not show any single dominant source of
238: very high brightness temperature ($< 5.6\times 10^5$ K).
239: This is in contrast to
240: the results obtained by \citet{MOM04} on a sample of three high-$z$ radio-loud
241: quasars which were imaged with the VLBA, namely J1053-0016 ($z=4.29$), J1235-0003 ($z=4.69$),
242: and J0913+5919 ($z=5.11$). In each of these $z>4$ quasars, a
243: radio-loud AGN dominates the emission at 1.4~GHz on a few mas size scale, with
244: intrinsic brightness temperatures in excess of $10^9$~K.
245:
246: \citet{CON91} have derived an empirical upper limit to the brightness
247: temperature for nuclear starbursts of $\sim 10^5$~K at 8~GHz (our rest frequency),
248: while typical
249: radio-loud AGN have brightness temperatures exceeding this value by at least
250: two orders of magnitude. These authors also present a possible physical model
251: for this limit involving a mixed non-thermal and thermal radio emitting (and
252: absorbing) plasma, constrained by the radio-to-FIR correlation for star-forming
253: galaxies.
254:
255: For BRI~1335--0417, the derived intrinsic brightness
256: temperatures from our VLBI observations are typical of starburst galaxies.
257: Also, the linear extent of the radio continuum emission region in
258: BRI~1335--0417 is typical of local starburst powered Ultra-Luminous IR galaxies
259: (ULIRGs; Sanders \& Mirabel 1996), such as Arp~220, Mrk~273, and
260: IRAS~17208--0014 \citep{SMI98,CAR00,MOM03}.
261:
262: Another argument in favor of a massive starburst origin for the radio continuum
263: emission from BRI~1335--0417 is that this source follows the radio-FIR correlation for
264: star forming galaxies, although the massive star formation rate is extreme, of order a few
265: thousand $M_{\odot}~{\rm yr}^{-1}$ \citep{CMY99}.
266:
267: The physical characteristics of the QSO BRI~1335--0417 are similar to two other
268: high-$z$ luminous IR sources; the brightest mm source in the \citet{OMO03} sample of QSOs with
269: redshifts between $1.8 < z < 2.8$, namely J1409+5628 at $z=2.58$, and the brightest mm
270: source in the \citet{OMO96}
271: sample of QSOs at redshifts $z > 4$, namely BRI~1202--0725 at $z=4.7$.
272: High angular resolution observations of J1409+5628 and BRI~1202--0725 at 1.4~GHz
273: \citep{BEE04,CAR02} showed
274: that the radio continuum emission in these optically very bright QSOs is dominated by
275: extreme nuclear starbursts, with massive star formation rates on the order of
276: $10^{3}~M_{\odot}~{\rm yr}^{-1}$. Moreover, sensitive, tapered VLBI images of BRI~1202--0725
277: at 1.4~GHz \citep{MOM05} revealed the starburst regions in each of its two components that are separated by $4\arcsec$, with
278: sizes and brightness temperatures comparable to that seen in BRI~1335--0417.
279:
280: The measured 1.4~GHz radio flux density in BRI~1335--0417 is consistent
281: with extreme nuclear starburst activity, with the radio continuum being the sum of
282: supernovae (SNe), supernova remnants, and residual relativistic electrons in the interstellar
283: medium, as shown in the model presented by \citet{CON91}. However, detecting
284: individual SNe at $z =4.4$ is unlikely.
285: \citet{SMI98} reported the detection of several luminous radio SNe in the
286: prototype ULIRG Arp~220 with flux densities between 0.2 and 1.17 mJy and
287: angular sizes on the order of 0.25~mas. At the distance of BRI~1335--0417, the
288: flux densities of such luminous radio SNe would be between $ (0.8-4.5) \times
289: 10^{-3}~\mu$Jy. These values are three to four orders of magnitude lower that the
290: rms noise levels achieved in our VLBI observations.
291:
292: \section{ACKNOWLEDGMENTS}
293:
294: This research has made use of the NASA/IPAC
295: Extragalactic Database (NED) which is operated by the Jet Propulsion
296: Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract with the
297: National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The Arecibo Observatory is part
298: of the National Astronomy and Ionosphere Center, which is operated by Cornell
299: University under a cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation.
300: C.~L.~C. acknowledges support from the Max-Planck Society
301: and the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation through the Max-Planck
302: Forshungspreise 2005.
303: D.~A.~R. acknowledges support from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)
304: Priority Programme 1177.
305:
306: \clearpage
307: \begin{thebibliography}{}
308: \bibitem[Beelen et al.(2004)]{BEE04}Beelen, A., Cox, P., Pety, J., Carilli, C.
309: L., Bertoldi, F., Momjian, E., Omont, A., Petitjean, P., Petric, A. O.,~2004,
310: \aap, 423, 441
311: \bibitem[Beelen et al.(2006)]{BEE06}Beelen, A., Cox, P., Benford, D. J., Dowell,
312: C. D., Kovacs, A., Bertoldi, F., Omont, A., Carilli, C. L. 2006. \apj, 642, 694
313: \bibitem[Bertoldi et al.(2003)]{BER03}Bertoldi, F., Carilli, C. L., Cox, P.,
314: Fan, X., Strauss, M. A., Beelen, A., Omont, A., \& Zylka, R. 2003, \aap, 406, 55
315: \bibitem[Carilli et al.(1999)]{CMY99}Carilli, C. L., Menten, K. M., \& Yun
316: M. S. 1999, \apj, 521, L25
317: \bibitem[Carilli \& Taylor(2000)]{CAR00}Carilli, C. L., \& Taylor, G. B. 2000,
318: \apj, 532, L95
319: \bibitem[Carilli et al.(2002)]{CAR02}Carilli, C. L., Kohno, K., Kawabe, R., Ohta, K., Henkel, C., Menten, K. M., Yun, M. S.; Petric, A., Tutui, Y. 2002, \aj, 123, 1838
320: \bibitem[Carilli et al.(2004)]{CAR04}Carilli, C. L., et al. 2004, \aj 128, 997
321: \bibitem[Condon et al.(1991)]{CON91}Condon, J. J., Huang, Z. -P., Yin, Q. F., \&
322: Thuan, T. X. 1991, \apj, 378, 65
323: \bibitem[Djorgovski et al.(1999)]{DJO99}Djorgovski, S.G. et al. 1999, in {\sl
324: Wide Field Surveys in Cosmology}, ed. S. Colombi \& Y. Mellier, (Paris:
325: Editions Frontiers), 89
326: \bibitem[Fan et al.(2002)]{FAN02}Fan, X., Narayanan, V. K., Strauss, M. A.,
327: White, R. L., Becker, R.H., Penericci, L., \& Rix, H.-W. 2002, \aj, 123, 1247
328: \bibitem[Fan et al.(2006)]{FCK06}Fan, X., Carilli, C. L., \&
329: Keating, B. 2006, \araa, 44, 415
330: \bibitem[Fomalont(1999)]{FOM99}Fomalont, E. B. 1999, in Synthesis Imaging in
331: Radio Astronomy II, ed. G.B. Taylor, C. L. Carilli, \& R. A. Perley (San
332: Francisco: ASP), 301
333: \bibitem[Frey et al.(1997)]{FRE97}Frey, S., Gurvits, L. I., Kellermann, K. I.,
334: Schilizzi, R. T., \& Pauliny-Toth, I. I. K. 1997, \aap, 325, 511
335: \bibitem[Frey et al.(2003)]{FRE03}Frey, S., Mosoni, L., Paragi, Z., \& Gurvits,
336: L. I. 2003,
337: \mnras, 343, L20
338: \bibitem[Guilloteau et al.(1997)]{GUI97}Guilloteau, S., Omont, A., McMahon, R.
339: G., Cox, P., \& Petitjean, P. 1997, \aap, 328, L1
340: \bibitem[Irwin et al.(1991)]{IMH91}Irwin, M. J., McMahon, R. G., \&
341: Hazard, C. 1991, in The Space Distribution of Quasars, edited by D. Crampton,
342: Astron. Soc. of the Pacific Conf. Ser.,21, 117
343: \bibitem[Momjian et al.(2003)]{MOM03}Momjian, E., Romney, J. D., Carilli, C. L.,
344: Troland, T. H., \& Taylor, G. B. 2003, \apj, 587, 160
345: \bibitem[Momjian et al.(2004)]{MOM04}Momjian, E., Petric, A. O., \&
346: Carilli, C. L. 2004, \aj, 127, 587
347: \bibitem[Momjian et al.(2005)]{MOM05}Momjian, E., Carilli, C. L.,
348: Petric, A. O. 2005, \aj, 129, 1809
349: \bibitem[Omont et al.(1996)]{OMO96}Omont, A., McMahon, R. G., Cox, P., Kreysa,
350: E., Bergeron, J., Pajot, F., \& Storrie-Lombardi, L. J. 1996a, \aap, 315, 1
351: \bibitem[Omont et al.(2003)]{OMO03}Omont, A., Beelen, A., Bertoldi, F., Cox, P.,
352: Carilli, C. L., Priddey, R. S., McMahon, R. G., \& Isaak, K. G. 2003, \aap, 398, 857
353: \bibitem[Riechers et al.(2006)]{RD06}Riechers, D. A., Walter, F., Carilli, C. L.,
354: Knudsen, K. k., Lo, K. Y., Benford. D. J., Staguhn, J. G., Hunter, T. R.,
355: Bertoldi, F., Henkel, C., Menten, K. M., Weiss, A., Yun, M. S., Scoville, N. Z. 2006,
356: \apj, 650, 604
357: \bibitem[Sanders \& Mirabel(1996)]{SM96}Sanders, D. B., \& Mirabel, I. F. 1996,
358: \araa, 34, 749
359: \bibitem[Smith et al.(1998)]{SMI98}Smith, H. E., Lonsdale, C. J., Lonsdale, C.
360: J., \& Diamond, P. J. 1998, \apj, 493, L17
361: \bibitem[Solomon \& Vanden Bout(2005)]{SV05}Solomon, P. M., Vanden Bout, P. A.
362: 2005, \araa, 43, 677
363: \bibitem[Storrie-Lombardi et al.(1996)]{STO96}Storrie-Lombardi, L. J., McMahon,
364: R. G. Irwin, M. J., \& Hazard, C. 1996, \apj, 468, 121.
365: \bibitem[Walker(1999)]{WAL99}Walker, C. R. 1999, in Synthesis Imaging in Radio
366: Astronomy II, ed. G.B. Taylor, C. L. Carilli, \& R. A. Perley (San Francisco:
367: ASP), 433
368: \bibitem[Walter et al.(2003)]{WAL03}Walter, F., et al. 2003, \nat, 424, 406
369: \bibitem[York et al.(2000)]{YOR00}York, D. G., et al. 2000, \aj, 120, 1579
370: \bibitem[Yun et al.(2000)]{YUN00}Yun, M. S., Carilli, C. L., Kawabe, R., Tutui,
371: Y., Kohno, K., \& Ohta, K. 2000, \apj, 528, 171
372: \end{thebibliography}
373:
374:
375: \begin{figure}
376: \epsscale{0.70}
377: \plotone{fig1.eps}
378: \figcaption{Continuum images of the phase-check
379: calibrator J1332--0509 at 1.4~GHz: a) obtained by applying the phase
380: and the amplitude self-calibration solutions of the phase reference
381: source J1335--0511, b) obtained by self calibrating J1332--0509
382: itself, in both phase and amplitude. The restoring beam size in both
383: images is $27.9 \times 6.5$~mas in position angle $-5^{\circ}$. The
384: contour levels are at $-3$, 3, 6, 12, 24, 48 times the rms
385: noise level in the phase-referenced image (top), which is
386: 3.2~mJy~beam$^{-1}$. The gray-scale range is indicated by the step
387: wedge at the right side of each image.
388: \label{f1}}
389: \end{figure}
390:
391: \clearpage
392: \begin{figure}
393: \epsscale{0.8}
394: \plotone{fig2.eps}
395: \figcaption{Naturally weighted 1.4~GHz continuum
396: image of BRI~1335--0417 at $189 \times
397: 113$~mas resolution (P.~A.=$-48^{\circ}$). The peak flux density is
398: 126~$\mu$Jy~beam$^{-1}$, and the contour levels are at $-2$, 2, 3, 4
399: times the rms noise level, which is
400: 28~$\mu$Jy~beam$^{-1}$. The gray-scale range is indicated by the
401: step wedge at the right side of the image. The reference point (0, 0)
402: is $\alpha(\rm{J2000.0})= 13^{\rm h}38^{\rm m}03\rlap{.}^{\rm s}4034$,
403: $\delta(\rm{J2000.0})=-04^{\circ}32^{'}35\rlap{.}^{''}271$. A two
404: dimensional Gaussian taper falling to 30\% at 1~M$\lambda$ was
405: applied. \label{f2}}
406: \end{figure}
407:
408: \clearpage
409: \begin{figure}
410: \epsscale{0.8}
411: \plotone{fig3.eps}
412: \figcaption{Naturally weighted 1.4~GHz continuum
413: image of BRI~1335--0417 at $53 \times
414: 27$~mas resolution (P.~A.=$-6^{\circ}$). The peak flux density is
415: 87~$\mu$Jy~beam$^{-1}$, and the contour levels are at $-2$, 2, 3, 4
416: times the rms noise level, which is 19~$\mu$Jy~beam$^{-1}$. The
417: gray-scale range is indicated by the step wedge at the right side of
418: the image. The reference point (0, 0) is $\alpha(\rm{J2000.0})=
419: 13^{\rm h}38^{\rm m}03\rlap{.}^{\rm s}4034$,
420: $\delta(\rm{J2000.0})=-04^{\circ}32^{'}35\rlap{.}^{''}271$. A two
421: dimensional Gaussian taper falling to 30\% at 5~M$\lambda$ was
422: applied. \label{f3}}
423: \end{figure}
424:
425:
426:
427:
428: \clearpage
429: \oddsidemargin=-1cm
430: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
431:
432:
433: \begin{deluxetable}{lc}
434: \tablenum{1}
435: \tablecolumns{6}\tablewidth{0pc}
436: \tablecaption{P{\footnotesize ARAMETERS} {\footnotesize OF THE} VLBI
437: O{\footnotesize BSERVATIONS} {\footnotesize OF} BRI~1335--0417}
438: \tablehead{\colhead{Parameters} & \colhead{Values}}
439: \startdata
440: Observing Dates \dotfill & 2005 Dec. 31 \& 2006 Jan. 7 \\
441: Total observing time (hr)\dotfill & 14 \\
442: Phase calibrator\dotfill & J1335--0511 \\
443: Phase-referencing cycle time (min)\dotfill & 4 \\
444: Frequency (GHz)\dotfill & 1.4 \\
445: Total bandwidth (MHz)\dotfill & 32\\
446: \enddata
447: \end{deluxetable}
448:
449: \end{document}
450:
451: