1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

2: %\usepackage{graphicx}

3: %\usepackage{caption2}

4: %\usepackage{amssymb}

5: %\usepackage{times}

6: %\usepackage{aasms4}

7: %\usepackage{emulateapj}

8: %\usepackage{psfig} 

9: %\usepackage{rotating}

10: 

11: \topmargin=1cm

12: 

13: \def\AaA{{\em Astr.~Astrophys.}}

14: \def\AaAS{{\em Astr.~Astrophys.~Suppl.}}

15: \def\AIPC{{\em Amer.~Inst.~Phys.~Conf.}}

16: \def\AJ{{\em Astr.~J.}}

17: \def\AN{{\em Astron.~Nachr.}}

18: \def\ApJ{{\em Astrophys.~J.}}

19: \def\ApJL{{\em Astrophys.~J.~Lett.}}

20: \def\ApJS{{\em Astrophys.~J.~Suppl.}}

21: \def\ARAA{{\em Ann.~Rev.~Astr.~Astrophys.}}

22: \def\AZ{{\em Astronom. Zhurnal}}

23: \def\BAAS{{\em Bull.~Amer.~Astron.~Soc.}}

24: \def\GeCoA{{\em Geo.~Cosm.~Acta}}

25: \def\MN{{\em Mon.~Not.~R.~astr.~Soc.}}

26: \def\Nat{{\em Nature}}

27: \def\NA{{\em New~Astr.}}

28: \def\PASJ{{\em Publ.~astr.~Soc.~Japan}}

29: \def\PASP{{\em Publ.~astr.~Soc.~Pacif.}}

30: \def\PhD{{\em PhD thesis}}

31: \def\PR{{\em Phys.~Reports}}

32: \def\Pre{Preprint}

33: \def\PS{{\em Phys.~Scr.}}

34: \def\RMP{{\em Rev.~Mod.~Phys.}}

35: \def\SAI{{\em Soc.~Astr.~Ital.~Mem.}}

36: \def\SSR{{\em Space Sci.~Rev.}}

37: \def\etal{{et al.\thinspace}}

38: \def\cf{{\em cf.\ }}

39: \def\eg{{\em e.g.\ }}

40: \def\etc{{\em etc.\ }}

41: \def\ie{{\em i.e.\ }}

42: \def\spose#1{\hbox to 0pt{#1\hss}}

43: 

44: \let\approxlt=\lesssim

45: \let\approxgt=\gtrsim

46: \def\multcent#1{\halign {\centerline{##}\cr #1}}

47: \def\multleft#1{\hbox to size{\vbox {\halign {\lft{##}\cr #1}}\hfill}\par}

48: \def\multright#1{\hbox to size{\vbox {\halign {\rt{##}\cr #1}}\hfill}\par}

49: \def\Mdot{\hbox{$\dot M$}}

50: \def\degmark{^\circ}

51: \def\boxit#1{\vbox{\hrule\hbox{\vrule\kern3pt\vbox{\kern3pt

52:           #1 \kern3pt}\kern3pt\vrule}\hrule}}

53: \font\big=cmr10 scaled\magstep2

54: \font\bigbf=cmbx10 scaled\magstep2

55: \font\bigit=cmti10 scaled\magstep2

56: 

57: %       Simple units

58: 

59: \def\cm{{\rm\thinspace cm}}

60: \def\dyn{{\rm\thinspace dyn}}

61: \def\erg{{\rm\thinspace erg}}

62: \def\eV{{\rm\thinspace eV}}

63: \def\g{{\rm\thinspace g}}

64: \def\ga{{\rm\thinspace gauss}}

65: \def\K{{\rm\thinspace K}}

66: \def\keV{{\rm\thinspace keV}}

67: \def\km{{\rm\thinspace km}}

68: \def\kpc{{\rm\thinspace kpc}}

69: \def\Lsun{\hbox{$\rm\thinspace L_{\odot}$}}

70: \def\m{{\rm\thinspace m}}

71: \def\Mpc{{\rm\thinspace Mpc}}

72: \def\Msun{\hbox{$\rm\thinspace M_{\odot}$}}

73: \def\pc{{\rm\thinspace pc}}

74: \def\ph{{\rm\thinspace ph}}

75: \def\s{{\rm\thinspace s}}

76: \def\ks{{\rm\thinspace ks}}

77: \def\yr{{\rm\thinspace yr}}

78: \def\sr{{\rm\thinspace sr}}

79: \def\Hz{{\rm\thinspace Hz}}

80: \def\chisq{\hbox{$\chi^2$}}

81: \def\delchi{\hbox{$\Delta\chi$}}

82: \def\cts{{\rm\thinspace cts}}

83: \def\bin{{\rm\thinspace bin}}

84: 

85: %       Compound units

86: 

87: \def\cmps{\hbox{$\cm\s^{-1}\,$}}

88: \def\cmsq{\hbox{$\cm^2\,$}}

89: \def\cmcu{\hbox{$\cm^3\,$}}

90: \def\pcmcu{\hbox{$\cm^{-3}\,$}}

91: \def\pcmcuK{\hbox{$\cm^{-3}\K\,$}}

92: \def\dynpcmsq{\hbox{$\dyn\cm^{-2}\,$}}

93: \def\ergcmcups{\hbox{$\erg\cm^3\ps\,$}}

94: \def\ergcmps{\hbox{$\erg\cm\s^{-1}\,$}}

95: \def\ergpcmps{\hbox{$\erg\cm^{-1}\s^{-1}\,$}}

96: \def\ergpcmsqps{\hbox{$\erg\cm^{-2}\s^{-1}\,$}}

97: \def\ergpcmsqpspA{\hbox{$\erg\cm^{-2}\s^{-1}$\AA$^{-1}\,$}}

98: \def\ergps{\hbox{$\erg\s^{-1}\,$}}

99: \def\gpcm{\hbox{$\g\cm^{-3}\,$}}

100: \def\gpcmps{\hbox{$\g\cm^{-3}\s^{-1}\,$}}

101: \def\gps{\hbox{$\g\s^{-1}\,$}}

102: \def\kmps{\hbox{$\km\s^{-1}\,$}}

103: \def\Lsunppc{\hbox{$\Lsun\pc^{-3}\,$}}

104: \def\Msunpc{\hbox{$\Msun\pc^{-3}\,$}}

105: \def\Msunpkpc{\hbox{$\Msun\kpc^{-1}\,$}}

106: \def\Msunppc{\hbox{$\Msun\pc^{-3}\,$}}

107: \def\Msunppcpyr{\hbox{$\Msun\pc^{-3}\yr^{-1}\,$}}

108: \def\Msunpyr{\hbox{$\Msun\yr^{-1}\,$}}

109: \def\pcm{\hbox{$\cm^{-3}\,$}}

110: \def\pcmsq{\hbox{$\cm^{-2}\,$}}

111: \def\pcmK{\hbox{$\cm^{-3}\K$}}

112: \def\phpcmsqps{\hbox{$\ph\cm^{-2}\s^{-1}\,$}}

113: \def\pHz{\hbox{$\Hz^{-1}\,$}}

114: \def\pmpc{\hbox{$\Mpc^{-1}\,$}}

115: \def\pmpccu{\hbox{$\Mpc^{-3}\,$}}

116: \def\ps{\hbox{$\s^{-1}\,$}}

117: \def\psqcm{\hbox{$\cm^{-2}\,$}}

118: \def\psr{\hbox{$\sr^{-1}\,$}}

119: \def\pyr{\hbox{$\yr^{-1}\,$}}

120: \def\kmpspMpc{\hbox{$\kmps\Mpc^{-1}$}}

121: \def\Msunpyrpkpc{\hbox{$\Msunpyr\kpc^{-1}$}}

122: \def\ctsps{\hbox{$\cts\s^{-1}$}}

123: \def\ctspb{\hbox{$\cts\bin^{-1}$}}

124: 

125: \makeatletter

126: 

127: % bib.sty

128: 

129: \let\@internalcite\cite

130: \def\cite{\@ifstar{\citey}{\citefull}}

131: \def\citefull{\def\astroncite##1##2{##1\ ##2}\@internalcite}

132: \def\citey{\def\astroncite##1##2{##1\ (##2)}\@internalcite}

133: \def\citeyear{\def\astroncite##1##2{##2}\@internalcite}

134: \def\citename{\def\astroncite##1##2{##1}\@internalcite}

135: \def\@citex[#1]#2{\if@filesw\immediate\write\@auxout{\string\citation{#2}}\fi

136:   \def\@citea{}\@cite{\@for\@citeb:=#2\do

137:     {\@citea\def\@citea{; }\@ifundefined

138:        {b@\@citeb}{{\bf ??}\@warning

139:        {Citation `\@citeb' on page \thepage \space undefined}}%

140: {\csname b@\@citeb\endcsname}}}{#1}}

141:  

142: \def\@cite#1#2{#1\if@tempswa #2\fi} 

143: \def\@biblabel#1{}

144:  

145: \def\astroncite#1#2{#1\ #2}

146: \makeatother

147: 

148: 

149: 

150: \begin{document}

151: 

152: \title{An X-ray Spectral Analysis of the Central Regions of NGC 4593}

153: 

154: \author{Laura~W.~Brenneman\altaffilmark{1}, 

155: Christopher~S.~Reynolds\altaffilmark{1},

156: J\"{o}rn~Wilms\altaffilmark{2}, and

157: Mary~Elizabeth~Kaiser\altaffilmark{3}}

158: 

159: 

160: \altaffiltext{1}{Dept. of Astronomy, University of Maryland, College

161: Park, College Park MD~20742}

162: \altaffiltext{2}{c/o Dr. Karl Remeis-Sternwarte, University of

163:   Erlangen-Nuremberg, Sternwartstr. 7, 96049 Bamberg, Germany}

164: \altaffiltext{3}{Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University, 

165: 3400 North Charles Street, Baltimore MD~21212}

166: 

167: 

168: \begin{abstract}

169: We present a detailed analysis of {\it XMM-Newton} EPIC-pn data for

170: the Seyfert-1 galaxy NGC~4593.  We discuss the X-ray spectral

171: properties of this source as well as its variations with time.  The

172: $0.5-10 \keV$ spectrum shows significant complexity beyond a simple

173: power-law form, with clear evidence existing for a ``soft excess'' as

174: well as absorption by highly ionized plasma (a warm absorber) within

175: the central engine of this active galactic nucleus.  We show that the

176: soft excess is best described as originating from thermal

177: Comptonization by plasma that is appreciably cooler than the primary

178: X-ray emitting plasma; we find that the form of the soft excess cannot

179: be reproduced adequately by reflection from an ionized accretion disk.

180: The only measurable deviation from the power-law continuum in the hard

181: spectrum comes from the presence of cold and ionized fluorescent iron

182: K$\alpha$ emission lines at $6.4$ and $6.97 \keV$, respectively.

183: While constraints on the ionized iron line are weak, the cold line is

184: found to be narrow at CCD-resolution with a flux that does not track

185: the temporal changes in the underlying continuum, implying an origin

186: in the outer radii of the accretion disk or the putative molecular

187: torus of Seyfert unification schemes.  The X-ray continuum itself

188: varies on all accessible time scales.  We detect a $\sim 230 \s$

189: time-lag between soft and hard EPIC-pn bands that, if interpreted as

190: scattering timescales within a Comptonizing disk corona, can be used

191: to constrain the physical size of the primary X-ray source to a

192: characteristic length scale of $\sim 2 r_{\rm g}$.  Taken together,

193: the small implied coronal size and the large implied iron line

194: emitting region indicate a departure from the current picture of a

195: ``typical'' AGN geometry.   

196: \end{abstract}

197: 

198: \keywords{accretion, accretion disks -- black holes -- galaxies:nuclei -- 

199: X-rays:spectra}

200: 

201: \section{Introduction}

202: \label{sec:intro}

203: 

204: It is thought that supermassive black holes are the central engines of

205: active galactic nuclei, and may inhabit the cores of most galaxies

206: (Salpeter 1964, Zel'Dovich 1965, Lynden-Bell 1969).  Accretion disks

207: around such objects provide some of the best natural laboratories for

208: examining the effects of an extreme gravity environment on infalling

209: material.  With the enhanced throughput and spectral resolution of

210: modern X-ray telescopes such as {\it Chandra}, {\it XMM-Newton} and

211: {\it Suzaku}, it has now become possible to observe these effects with

212: the precision necessary to make robust measurements of the innermost

213: properties and overall structures of accretion disks.  Evidence for

214: relativistic emission line broadening, spectral and temporal

215: variability over a wide range of time scales, and photoionized (warm)

216: absorption from outflowing highly-ionized gas along the line of sight

217: are only some of the interesting spectral detections being made in

218: many active galaxies.

219: 

220: In this paper, we present an X-ray spectral analysis of the central

221: regions of the canonical Seyfert-1 galaxy, NGC~4593.  Galaxies of this

222: type are of particular interest for the study of accretion onto

223: supermassive black holes since they are typically oriented such that

224: we can view the accreting black hole free of substantial obscuration

225: or absorption from surrounding circumnuclear material.  Furthermore,

226: we believe that significant amounts of the continuum radiation seen in

227: radio-quiet Sy-1 galaxies originate in the disk rather than, for example, a

228: relativistically beamed jet (as is the case for BL-Lac objects).

229: As such, we are better positioned to study the inner parts of the 

230: accretion disk in Sy-1 galaxies than in other systems.

231: 

232: NGC~4593 is a spiral galaxy with a central bar classified as Hubble

233: type SBb.  At a redshift of $z = 0.009$, it lies at a proper distance

234: of $37.9 \Mpc$ toward the constellation Virgo.  This corresponds to an

235: angular size distance of $37.6 \Mpc$, and a luminosity distance of

236: $38.3 \Mpc$ using $H_0 = 71 \kmpspMpc$, $\Omega_{\rm m} = 0.27$, and

237: $\Omega_{\Lambda} = 0.73$.\footnote{These values have been

238: obtained from Ned Wright's Cosmology Calculator web page:

239: http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/CosmoCalc.html.}  The galaxy has

240: an apparent visual magnitude of $11.67$ and an approximate angular

241: diameter of $3.9\times 2.9$ arcmin.  As already noted, it hosts an

242: active galactic nucleus (AGN) of a Sy-1 type (Lewis, MacAlpine \&

243: Koski 1978).  Previous studies of the source with {\it EXOSAT}

244: demonstrated a soft excess (Pounds \& Turner 1988), and {\it BeppoSAX}

245: data confirm a broad absorption dip of $15\%$ below $1 \keV$ which may

246: be attributable to the presence of a warm absorber along the line of

247: sight (Kaastra \& Steenbrugge 2001).  {\it ASCA} spectra display a

248: slightly broadened cold iron line at $6.4 \keV$, in addition to

249: evidence for a warm absorber within the system (Nandra \etal 1997;

250: Reynolds 1997).  The source also displays significant variability in

251: flux.  Between two {\it ASCA} observations $3.5$ years apart, the

252: $2-10 \keV$ flux of this source increased by $\sim 25\%$, though no

253: significant variability of the iron line was detected between the two

254: pointings (Weaver \etal 2001).  Within the {\it ASCA} observation,

255: Reynolds (1997) witnessed a count rate decrease of $\sim 60\%$ in $10

256: \ks$, with smaller flares and dips throughout the data set.  In terms

257: of the overall properties of the system, Reynolds (1997) calculated a

258: luminosity of $L_{\rm X} = 8.53 \times 10^{42} \ergps$ ($2-10 \keV$)

259: with {\it ASCA}, and more recently, McKernan \etal (2003) used {\it

260: Chandra} to derive a luminosity $L_{\rm X} = 5.37 \times 10^{42}

261: \ergps$ ($2-10 \keV$).  It should be noted that this change in $L_{\rm

262: X}$ is larger than the flux calibration uncertainty of the

263: observation, so this does appear to be a robust finding.

264: 

265: In this paper, we present a $76\ks$ exposure of NGC~4593 with the {\it

266: XMM-Newton}/EPIC-pn instrument from 2002 June 23/24.  We discuss our

267: observations of the time-averaged $2-10 \keV$ spectrum and cold iron

268: line in more detail in Reynolds \etal (2004; hereafter R04).  Here, we

269: will examine the spectral and temporal variability of NGC~4593, as

270: well as the soft X-ray spectrum.  \S2 discusses the method and

271: software employed for the reduction of the data referred to in this

272: work.  Spectral fitting analysis is detailed for the EPIC-pn

273: instrument in \S3, and variability studies are examined in \S4.  We

274: present our discussion in \S5, including a comparison of our results

275: with those published in earlier studies of NGC~4593 and a discussion

276: of the disparate spatial scales implied for the X-ray emitting region

277: and the iron fluorescence region.  We also draw our conclusions in

278: \S5.

279: 

280: 

281: \section{Data Reduction}

282: \label{sec:reduction}

283: 

284: In this paper, we use data taken with the European Photon Imaging

285: Camera pn (EPIC-pn) camera.  The data were obtained during revolution

286: 465 of {\it XMM-Newton}, during which the pn was operated in its

287: small-window mode to prevent photon pile up, using the medium filter

288: to avoid optical light contamination.  The EPIC MOS-1 camera took data

289: in the fast uncompressed timing mode, and the MOS-2 camera operated in

290: prime partial W2 imaging mode.  Although the MOS results will not be

291: discussed further here, they mirrored the EPIC-pn data within the

292: expected errors of calibration effects.  The average EPIC-pn count

293: rate for this source was $29.78 \ctsps$.  

294: 

295: Data were also collected during the observation by the Reflection

296: Grating Spectrometer (RGS).  These data were examined but were deemed

297: to be unhelpful for the analysis presented in this paper.  Firstly,

298: the RGS spectra have insufficient signal-to-noise to allow a detailed

299: study of the soft X-ray emission and absorption lines from the warm

300: absorber in this source.  They also contain insufficient counts to

301: allow variability analysis.  Finally, our examination of the RGS

302: spectra have demonstrated that problems with the {\it broad-band}

303: effective area calibration of the RGS (which is strongly affected by a

304: build-up of carbon on the CCDs) compromises any RGS-based results on

305: the shape of the soft excess.  For a detailed discussion of these

306: calibration uncertainties, see Kirsch \etal (2005).\footnote{See also

307: http://xmm.vilspa.esa.es/external/xmm\_sw\_cal/calib/index.shtml for a

308: thorough discussion of these cross-calibration issues.}  For these

309: reasons, will shall not consider RGS data further.

310:  

311: The pipeline data were reprocessed using the Science Analysis Software

312: and the corresponding calibration files, version 6.5.0.  From these,

313: we rebuilt the calibration index file using {\tt cifbuild}.  For the

314: EPIC-pn data the event files were mildly edited in spectral coverage

315: to observe the region from $0.2-15 \keV$, and bad pixels and cosmic

316: ray spikes were removed via narrow time filtering using the {\tt

317: evselect} task within the SAS.  No background flares were detected

318: during the observation.  Extraction of spectra followed the procedure

319: used by Wilms \etal (2001), in which source and background spectra

320: were generated using the {\tt xmmselect} task.  Response matrices and

321: ancillary response files were created using {\tt rmfgen} and {\tt

322: arfgen}, and the data were then grouped using the {\tt grppha} task

323: with a binning factor of $25 \ctspb$.  Binning is required in order to

324: get sufficient counts per bin to make $\chisq$ spectral fitting a

325: valid statistical process.  Spectral modeling and analysis from

326: $0.5-10 \keV$ was performed using the {\sc xspec} package version

327: 11.3.2. (Arnaud 1996).  Timing studies were performed using various

328: routines in the {\sc xronos} package (Stella \& Angelini 1991).

329: 

330: We have used the SAS {\tt epatplot} task to compute the fraction of single,

331: double, triple and quadruple events as a function of energy and compared

332: these fractions to their nominal values as measured from weak source

333: observations. For sources that are affected by pile up, these fractions

334: deviate from the nominal values due to the higher probability of wrong

335: pattern classification. No significant deviation from the nominal single

336: and double distributions was found, indicating that our EPIC-pn

337: observation of NGC~4593 is not affected by pile up.

338:  

339: 

340: \section{Spectral Analysis}

341: \label{sec:spectra}

342: 

343: As shown in R04, the 2--10\,keV EPIC-pn spectrum of NGC~4593 is very

344: well described by a power-law with the exception of two emission

345: features identified as the fluorescent K$\alpha$ emission line of cold

346: iron at 6.4\,keV and the Ly$\alpha$ recombination line of

347: hydrogen-like iron at 6.97\,keV (Fig.~1).  The cold iron line likely

348: arises from fluorescence on the surface layers of the outer accretion

349: disk, optically-thick optical broad emission line clouds, or the

350: putative ``molecular torus'' in response to hard X-ray irradiation

351: from a hot corona in the inner accretion disk (Basko 1978; Guilbert \&

352: Rees 1988; Lightman \& White 1988; George \& Fabian 1991; Matt \etal

353: 1991).  The ionized line, by contrast, could be formed either by

354: ionized disk irradiation or by radiative recombination in

355: highly-ionized outflowing material above the plane of the disk.

356: 

357: \begin{figure}

358: \centerline{ \includegraphics[scale=.6,angle=270]{f1.eps} }

359: \caption{The $2-10 \keV$ spectrum of NGC~4593 fit with a simple

360:   photoabsorbed power-law ({\tt phabs po}).  Note the residual

361:   iron features at $6.4$ and $6.97 \keV$.  $\chi^2/{\rm

362:     dof}=1879/1450 (1.30)$.}

363: \end{figure}

364: 

365: However, extrapolating below $2 \keV$ reveals a clear soft excess as

366: well as the effects of the warm absorber (Fig.~2; the ``notch'' in the

367: range 0.7--1.0\,keV signals the presence of the warm absorber).  Since

368: the basic origin of such soft excesses are still the subject of much

369: debate, it is interesting to characterize the soft excess in as much

370: detail as possible.  This necessitates, however, a detailed modeling

371: of the warm absorber.

372: 

373: We model the effect of the warm absorber using the {\sc xstar}

374: photoionization code (version 2.1kn3; originally developed by Kallman

375: \& Krolik 1995).  In detail, we construct grids of models describing

376: absorption by photoionized slabs of matter with column density $N_H$

377: and ionization parameter $\xi$, \begin{equation}

378: \xi=\frac{L_{\rm i}}{n_{\rm e}r^2},

379: \end{equation}

380: where $L_{\rm i}$ is the luminosity above the hydrogen Lyman limit,

381: $n_{\rm e}$ is the electron number density of the plasma and $r$ is

382: the distance from the (point) source is ionizing luminosity.  We have

383: constructed $20\times 20$ grids of models uniformly sampling the

384: $(\log\,N_{\rm H},\log\xi)$ plane in the range $N_{\rm

385: H}=10^{20}\rightarrow 10^{24}\pcmsq$ and $\xi=1\rightarrow

386: 10^4\ergpcmps$.  While these were made to be multiplicative absorption

387: models and hence can be applied to any emission spectrum, the

388: ionization balance was solved assuming a power-law ionizing spectrum

389: with a photon index of $\Gamma=2$, cut off at an energy $E_{\rm c}=20

390: \keV$.  This is a good approximation of the typical AGN continuum.

391: 

392: \begin{figure}

393: \centerline{

394: \includegraphics[scale=.6,angle=270]{f2.eps}

395: }

396: \caption{The $0.5-10.0 \keV$ spectrum of NGC~4593 fit with the

397:   photoabsorbed power-law from Fig.~1 and two Gaussians to model the

398:   iron lines.  Note the clear evidence for a soft excess, possibly

399:   complicated by absorption features from a ``warm absorber'' within

400:   NGC 4593.  For this fit, $\chi^2/{\rm dof}=11423/1736 (6.58)$.}

401: \end{figure}

402: 

403: As a first, purely phenomenalogical attempt to describe the soft

404: excess component, we have employed a single temperature thermal

405: bremsstrahlung emission model ({\tt zbremss}).  To adequately describe

406: the spectrum, we were required to include two warm absorbing zones as

407: well as an iron-L$_3$ edge from iron atoms in line-of-sight dust.  A

408: natural interpretation is that the WA has distinct components at

409: physically different distances from the central engine.  We note that

410: attempting to add a third zone into the model results in no

411: statistical improvement in fit.  Including this absorption structure

412: provides a good description of the data ($\chi^2=1813/1745$; Fig.~3

413: and Table~1).  We shall refer to this model as Model-1.  The best fit

414: value for the temperature characterizing this soft excess component is

415: $kT \approx 0.21^{+0.003}_{-0.005} \keV$ and it has a 0.5--10\,keV

416: flux of $2.01^{+0.33}_{-0.11} \times 10^{-14} \ergpcmsqps$.

417: 

418: \begin{figure}

419: %\centerline{

420: \includegraphics[scale=.5,angle=270]{f3a.eps}\\

421: \includegraphics[scale=.5,angle=270]{f3b.eps}

422: %}

423: \caption{(a) The best fit for Model~1, including a {\tt zbremss}

424:   component to represent the soft emission: $\chi^2/{\rm

425:   dof}=1813/1745 (1.04)$.  (b) The relative strength

426: of the model components for Model~1.  The $6.4$ and $6.97 \keV$

427: Gaussians are shown in red and green, respectively.  The {\tt zbremss}

428: soft emission is in dark blue, and the photoabsorbed power-law is in

429: light blue.  Other absorption components are indicated in black.}

430: \end{figure}

431: 

432: Of course, the description of the soft excess in Model-1 is purely

433: phenomenalogical in nature.  Ideally, we would like to describe the

434: soft excess with a model that has a direct physical interpretation.

435: Initially, we attempt to describe the soft excess as soft X-ray

436: reflection from a mildly-ionized accretion disk (see Brenneman \&

437: Reynolds 2006 for a successful application of this model to the

438: Seyfert galaxy MCG-6-30-15).  Operationally, we replace the thermal

439: bremsstrahlung component in Model~1 with the ionized disk model {\tt

440: reflion} created by Ross \& Fabian (2005).  Because the irradiated

441: matter is also responsible for producing the Fe-K$\alpha$ line in many

442: sources, this model has the potential advantage of self-consistently

443: describing the soft excess as well as the 6.4\,keV emission line

444: feature.  

445: 

446: Interestingly, we find that we {\it cannot} successfully describe both

447: the soft emission and the Fe-K$\alpha$ line with the disk reflection

448: model.  The resulting best fit is $\chi^2/{\rm dof}=2652/1745 (1.52)$,

449: and we found that significant residuals remained on the soft and hard

450: ends of the spectra.  Even adding the Gaussian component back to

451: explicitly model the $6.4 \keV$ iron line (and hence removing the

452: constraint that the disk reflection must describe this feature), the

453: disk reflection model was unable to adequately fit the form of the

454: soft excess.  We thus conclude that ionized disk reflection is not an

455: important process in shaping the soft X-ray spectrum of NGC~4593.

456: Given the relative narrowness of the Fe-K$\alpha$ line in this source

457: we believe it is not originating in the inner disk, and hence the

458: above is not a surprising conclusion.

459: 

460: Alternatively, we can postulate that the soft excess is due to thermal

461: Comptonization by plasma at a temperature between that of the disk and

462: the hard X-ray corona (possibly in a transition zone).  Operationally,

463: we use the {\tt comptt} model (Titarchuk 1994) to model the soft

464: excess.  Hereafter, we shall refer to this spectral model as Model~2.

465: This preserves the physical realism of the soft emission arising from

466: the accretion disk, but allows the iron line to be produced elsewhere,

467: perhaps farther away in the molecular torus where it would not be as

468: broad by nature.  Model~2 reaches a best fit of $\chi^2/{\rm

469: dof}=1759/1744 (1.01)$.  The best fit and model for Model~2 is shown

470: in Fig.~4.  Here we have frozen the seed photon temperature at $T_0=50

471: \eV$ and have kept a slab geometry for the corona.  The best fit

472: Comptonizing plasma temperature is $kT_{\rm c}=42\keV$ with an optical

473: depth of $\tau=0.12$, though both parameters were not very well

474: constrained by the fit.  This is not surprising, given that both are

475: equally involved in shaping the spectrum via the Compton-y parameter:

476: $y \propto \tau T_{\rm c}$.  We note that for Model~2 the equivalent

477: widths of the $6.4$ and $6.97 \keV$ Gaussians remain approximately

478: unchanged from their values in the Model~1 fit.

479: 

480: \begin{figure}

481: %\centerline{

482: \includegraphics[scale=.5,angle=270]{f4a.eps}\\

483: \includegraphics[scale=.5,angle=270]{f4b.eps}

484: %}

485: \caption{(a) The best fit for Model~2, including a {\tt comptt}

486:   component to represent the soft emission in place of the {\tt

487:     zbremss} component of Model~1.  $\chi^2/{\rm

488:   dof}=1808/1744$.  (b) The relative strength

489: of the model components for Model~2.  The color scheme is the same as

490: in Fig.~3b.}

491: \end{figure}

492: 

493: Table~1 reports the parameter values and goodness of fit for both the

494: final best fitting phenomenalogical model (Model~1, with {\tt zbremss}

495: and including all other components added in), and the more physical

496: model (Model~2, including {\tt comptt} and all other components).

497: Using the Model~2 fit from Table~1, the total $0.5-10 \keV$ flux is

498: $F_{\rm X}=6.74 \times 10^{-11} \ergpcmsqps$.  Assuming a flat

499: universe WMAP cosmology, this corresponds to a luminosity of $L_{\rm

500: X} = 1.21 \times 10^{43} \ergps$.  Considering only the energy range

501: from $2-10 \keV$, $L_{2-10}=7.40 \times 10^{42} \ergps$.  This is

502: roughly $21\%$ greater than the $2-10 \keV$ luminosity observed by

503: McKernan \etal (2003), but only about $86\%$ of the value from the

504: {\it ASCA} observation reported by Reynolds (1997).

505: 

506: The warm absorber modeled with our two created {\sc xstar} tables

507: suggests a multi-zone structure in column density and ionization, as

508: discussed above.  Though our model does not parameterize the covering

509: fraction of the absorbing gas, we can approximate this fraction by

510: representing the warm absorber with the O\,{\sc vii} and O\,{\sc viii}

511: edges at $0.74$ and $0.87 \keV$, respectively, as has been done by

512: many other authors examining warm absorbers

513: (e.g., Reynolds 1997; McKernan \etal 2003).  In so doing, we find that

514: to $90\%$ confidence, the O\,{\sc vii} edge has an optical depth of

515: $\tau=0.16^{+0.02}_{-0.01}$ whereas the

516: O\,{\sc viii} edge is much less prominent at $\tau<0.01$.  We therefore

517: chose to use the O\,{\sc vii} edge as a diagnostic for determining the

518: covering fraction of the absorbing gas in NGC~4593.  If the O\,{\sc

519:   vii} edge accounts for the absorption by this gas, the photons

520: absorbed should be reprocessed and radiated in emission as the O\,{\sc vii}

521: radiative recombination line at $0.574 \keV$.  Assuming that this line

522: will be narrow, we fit a Gaussian to the data.  Adding in this

523: component bettered the overall goodness-of-fit by

524: $\Delta\chi^2/\Delta{\rm dof}=-53/-1$ as compared to the two-edge

525: model for the warm absorber, showing that this line is statistically

526: robust.  The O\,{\sc vii} RRC line had an upper limit equivalent width

527: of $EW < 6.35 \eV$ and a flux of $2.82 \times 10^{-4} \phpcmsqps$, such

528: that the line contributed $\sim 7182$ total photons to the model over the total

529: observation time.  The O\,{\sc vii} edge, by contrast, contributed

530: $\sim 31991$ total photons.  Taking the ratio of the reprocessed photons to

531: the absorbed photons, we can estimate a covering fraction for the warm

532: absorber: $f \approx 0.23$.

533: 

534: 

535: \begin{table*}

536: \begin{center}

537: \caption{Best fit parameters for the EPIC-pn spectrum}

538: \begin{tabular} {|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|} 

539: \hline \hline

540: {\bf Model Component} & {\bf Parameter} & {\bf Model~1 Value} & {\bf

541:   Model~2 Value} \\

542: \hline \hline

543: {\tt phabs} & $N_{\rm H}$ ($\pcmsq$) & $1.97 \times 10^{20}$ & $1.97

544: \times 10^{20}$ \\

545: \hline

546: {\tt WA 1} & $N_{\rm H1}$ ($\pcmsq$) & $1.64^{+0.07}_{-0.09} \times

547: 10^{23}$ & $9.29^{+1.46}_{-9.15}

548: \times 10^{22}$ \\

549:               & {\rm log} $\xi_1$ ($\ergcmps$) & $2.54^{+0.03}_{-0.04}$ &

550:               $2.75^{+0.12}_{-0.32}$ \\

551: \hline

552: {\tt WA 2} & $N_{\rm H2}$ ($\pcmsq$) & $2.47^{+0.31}_{-0.73} \times

553: 10^{21}$ & $1.13^{+1.21}_{-0.94}

554: \times 10^{22}$ \\

555:            & {\rm log} $\xi_2$ ($\ergpcmps$) & $0.57^{+0.13}_{-0.17}$

556:            & $1.70^{+0.30}_{-0.59}$ \\

557: \hline 

558: {\tt Fe-L$_3$ edge} & {\rm log} $N_{\rm Fe} (\pcmsq)$ &

559: $16.81^{+0.02}_{-0.05}$ & $16.92^{+0.04}_{-0.08}$ \\

560: \hline

561: {\tt po} & $\Gamma$ & $1.87 \pm 0.004$ & $1.75^{+0.02}_{-0.03}$ \\

562:          & {\rm flux} ($\ergpcmsqps$) & $5.11^{+0.04}_{-0.02} \times 10^{-13}$

563:          & $4.44^{+0.41}_{-0.54} \times 10^{-13}$ \\

564: \hline

565: {\tt zgauss} & $E (\keV)$ & $6.4$ & $6.4$ \\

566:               & $\sigma (\keV)$ & $0.10 \pm 0.08$ & $0.10 \pm 0.01$ \\

567:               & {\rm flux} $(\ergpcmsqps)$ & $4.46 \pm 0.32 \times

568:               10^{-15}$ & $4.15^{+0.33}_{-0.34} \times 10^{-15}$ \\

569:               & $E (\keV)$ & $6.97$ & $6.97$ \\

570:               & $\sigma (\keV)$ & $0.10 \pm 0.02$ & $0.10 \pm 0.06$ \\

571:               & {\rm flux} $(\ergpcmsqps)$ & $9.47^{+2.00}_{-2.07} \times

572:               10^{-16}$ & $7.77^{+2.07}_{-2.37} \times 10^{-16}$ \\

573: \hline

574: {\tt zbremss}  & $kT (\keV)$ & $0.21^{+0.003}_{-0.005}$ & \\

575:                & {\rm flux} $(\ergpcmsqps)$ & $2.01^{+0.33}_{-0.11} \times 10^{-14}$ & \\

576: \hline

577: {\tt comptt}  & $T_0 (\keV)$ & & $0.05$ \\

578:               & $kT (\keV)$ & & $42.19^{+140.67}_{-40.19}$ \\

579:               & $\tau_{\rm p}$ & & $0.12^{+0.06}_{-0.11}$ \\

580:               & {\rm flux} ($\ergpcmsqps$) & & $6.46^{+0.90}_{-0.92} \times 10^{-14}$ \\

581: \hline

582: {\bf $\chi^2/{\rm dof}$} & & $1813/1745 (1.04)$ & $1759/1744 (1.01)$ \\

583: \hline \hline

584: \end{tabular}

585: \end{center}

586: \label{tab:tab1.tex}

587: \small{The energy range from $0.5-10.0 \keV$ is considered for the

588:   EPIC-pn.  Best fit Model~1 contains a {\tt zbremss} component to parameterize

589:   the soft excess below $\sim 2 \keV$, while best fit Model~2 represents this

590:   component with a {\tt comptt} model.  All quoted error bars are at

591:   the $90\%$ confidence level.  All redshifts used were frozen at the 

592:   cosmological value for NGC~4593: $z=0.009$.  }

593: \end{table*}

594: 

595: 

596: \section{Variable Nature of the Source}

597: \label{sec:variability}

598: 

599: NGC~4593 displays significant variability (over a factor of two in

600: $0.5-10 \keV$ flux) during the course of this observation.  In this

601: Section, we examine the detailed variability properties of this

602: source.

603: 

604: \subsection{Spectral Variability}

605: \label{sec:spec_var}

606: 

607: We have analyzed the spectral variability of the source as seen in the

608: EPIC-pn data.  As an initial assessment of spectral variability,

609: Fig.~5 plots the data-to-model ratios of consecutive $10 \ks$ segments

610: of the EPIC-pn data using the {\tt comptt} best fit spectrum model

611: discussed in \S3.  Experimentation suggested that intervals smaller

612: than $10 \ks$ contain insufficient counts to maintain the integrity of

613: the spectrum.  As well as the obvious variations in the normalization

614: of the spectrum, there are clear changes in slope between segments

615: (with the source becoming softer as it brightens).  There is also a

616: feature of variable equivalent width seen at $\sim 6.4 \keV$,

617: corresponding to the cold Fe-K$\alpha$ line.  Interestingly, though,

618: we see no variable discrete features in the soft X-ray spectrum

619: suggesting that there is no significant warm absorber variability

620: during our observations.

621: 

622: To examine variability of the iron lines in more detail, Fig.~6 plots

623: the renormalized interval data over the time-averaged data from $2-10

624: \keV$.  Direct spectral fitting of the the cold and ionized Fe-K lines

625: in each interval with Gaussian profiles illuminates the nature of

626: their variability (or lack thereof).  As can be seen in Table~2 and

627: Figs.~7, the cold line exhibits an approximately constant flux and a

628: variable equivalent width.  The constant equivalent width hypothesis

629: is rejected with greater than 99\% significance, whereas a constant

630: flux hypothesis is consistent with the data at the 20\% level.  Thus

631: the evidence suggests that the cold iron line flux does not appear to

632: respond to changes in the X-ray continuum.  Constraints on the ionized

633: line are not strong enough to rule out either a constant flux and

634: equivalent width, as is shown in Fig.~8 and Table~2.

635: 

636: \begin{figure}

637: \centerline{

638: \includegraphics[scale=.3,angle=270]{f5a.eps}

639: \includegraphics[scale=.3,angle=270]{f5b.eps}

640: }

641: \centerline{

642: \includegraphics[scale=.3,angle=270]{f5c.eps}

643: \includegraphics[scale=.3,angle=270]{f5d.eps}

644: }

645: \centerline{

646: \includegraphics[scale=.3,angle=270]{f5e.eps}

647: \includegraphics[scale=.3,angle=270]{f5f.eps}

648: }

649: \centerline{

650: \includegraphics[scale=.3,angle=270]{f5g.eps}

651: \includegraphics[scale=.3,angle=270]{f5h.eps}

652: }

653: \caption{Variation of the EPIC-pn time-averaged spectrum from the 

654: {\tt comptt} best fit model discussed in \S3. 

655: Time intervals are $10 \ks$ in length except for the last, which is

656: $\sim 6100 \ks$.  Segments a) - h) are shown in chronological order 

657: of the observation.}

658: \end{figure}   

659: 

660: \begin{figure}

661: \centerline{

662: \includegraphics[scale=.3,angle=270]{f6a.eps}

663: \includegraphics[scale=.3,angle=270]{f6b.eps}

664: }

665: \centerline{

666: \includegraphics[scale=.3,angle=270]{f6c.eps}

667: \includegraphics[scale=.3,angle=270]{f6d.eps}

668: }

669: \centerline{

670: \includegraphics[scale=.3,angle=270]{f6e.eps}

671: \includegraphics[scale=.3,angle=270]{f6f.eps}

672: }

673: \centerline{

674: \includegraphics[scale=.3,angle=270]{f6g.eps}

675: \includegraphics[scale=.3,angle=270]{f6h.eps}

676: }

677: \caption{The cold and ionized Fe-K$\alpha$ lines from the

678:   time-separated EPIC-pn spectrum.  Time intervals are $10 \ks$ each

679:   in length, as above in Fig.~5.  Lines are above a {\tt

680:   phabs po} continuum.  The time-averaged data appear in black squares,

681:   interval data in red triangles.}

682: \end{figure}

683: 

684: \begin{table*}

685: \begin{center}

686: \caption{The cold and ionized iron 

687: lines in the EPIC-pn spectrum of NGC~4593}  

688: 

689: \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline \hline

690: {\bf Line} & {\bf FWHM ($\kmps$)} & {\bf Flux ($\ergpcmsqps$)} & {\bf EW ($\eV$)} \\

691: \hline

692: Cold Fe-K$\alpha$ & $13245 \pm 2208$ & $7.41 \pm 0.86 \times 10^{-13}$ & $232 \pm 27$ \\

693: ($6.40 \keV$)     & $8831 \pm 2208$ & $4.98 \pm 0.89 \times 10^{-13}$ &$126 \pm 22$ \\

694:                   & $9934 \pm 2208$ & $5.76 \pm 0.85 \times 10^{-13}$ &$134 \pm 19.8$ \\

695:                   & $13246 \pm 3311$ & $7.26 \pm 1.04 \times 10^{-13}$& $153 \pm 21.8$ \\

696:                   & $8831 \pm 2208$ & $5.27 \pm 0.86 \times 10^{-13}$& $105 \pm 17.2$ \\

697:                   & $11038 \pm 4415$ & $4.08 \pm 0.93 \times 10^{-13}$& $88.5 \pm 20.2$ \\

698:                   & $8831 \pm 2208$ & $5.61 \pm 0.88 \times 10^{-13}$ & $137 \pm 21.5$ \\

699:                   & $11038 \pm 3311$ & $5.82 \pm 1.17 \times 10^{-13}$ & $124 \pm 24.9$ \\

700: \hline

701: Ionized Fe-K$\alpha$ & $7095 \pm 6081$ & $1.97 \pm 1.41 \times 10^{-13}$ & $64.3 \pm 46.0$ \\

702: ($6.97 \keV$)        & $50678 \pm 83111$ & $2.89 \pm 5.05 \times 10^{-13}$ & $80.3 \pm 140$ \\

703:                      & $6081 \pm 6081$ & $2.09 \pm 1.54 \times 10^{-13}$ & $51.9 \pm 38.3$ \\

704:                      & $14190 \pm 11149$ & $2.04 \pm 2.22 \times 10^{-13}$ & $45.6 \pm 49.6$ \\

705:                      & $9122 \pm 6081$ & $2.52 \pm 1.85 \times 10^{-13}$ & $53.7 \pm 39.4$ \\

706:                      & $18244 \pm 9122$ & $3.06 \pm 3.48 \times 10^{-13}$ & $71.3 \pm 57.8$ \\

707:                      & $24325 \pm 9122$ & $4.90 \pm 3.00 \times 10^{-13}$ & $132 \pm 80.9$ \\

708:                      & ------- & ------- & ------- \\

709: \hline \hline

710: \end{tabular}

711: \end{center}

712: \label{tab:tab2.tex}

713: Each row represents a time 

714: interval of $10 \ks$ in the observation.  Fits were done in {\sc xspec} 

715: using a {\tt phabs po} model for the continuum and two Gaussian lines 

716: with parameters fit to the data in each time interval.  Error bars are 

717: at $1\sigma$. The blank lines in the ionized

718: Fe-K$\alpha$ table represent time intervals for which a robust fit to

719: the data could not be achieved.

720: \end{table*}

721: 

722: \begin{figure}

723: %\centerline{

724: \includegraphics[scale=.5,angle=270]{f7a.eps}\\

725: \includegraphics[scale=.5,angle=270]{f7b.eps}

726: %}

727: \caption{Variation of the flux (a) and equivalent width (b) of the

728:   cold Fe-K$\alpha$ line ($6.4 \keV$) in $10 \ks$ intervals over the

729:   course of the $76 \ks$ observation.  A fit to the data with a

730:   constant flux model yields $\chi^2/{\rm dof}=10/7$ ($1.43$) implying

731:   a 20\% probability that the data are consistent with the constant

732:   flux model.  The constant equivalent width fit yields $\chi^2/{\rm

733:   dof}=22/7$ ($3.14$) allowing the constant equivalent width

734:   hypothesis to be rejected at more than the 99\% significance level.}

735: \end{figure}   

736: 

737: \begin{figure}

738: %\centerline{

739: \includegraphics[scale=.5,angle=270]{f8a.eps}\\

740: \includegraphics[scale=.5,angle=270]{f8b.eps}

741: %}

742: \caption{Variation of the flux (a) and equivalent width (b) of the ionized Fe-K$\alpha$

743:   line ($6.97 \keV$) over the course of the observation.  Here the

744:   uncertainty in the data is so great that a constant flux 

745:   cannot be ruled out: $\chi^2/{\rm dof}=3/7$ ($0.43$).  A constant equivalent

746:   width is similarly likely: $\chi^2/{\rm dof}=3/7$ ($0.43$).}

747: \end{figure}   

748: 

749: The simplest way to interpret the lack of continuum response of the

750: cold iron line is to suppose that it exists on spatial scales with

751: light travel times greater than the duration of our observation.  For

752: an observation time of $76 \ks$, as is the case here, the light would

753: travel approximately $150$ AU, or roughly $1.9\times 10^3\,r_g$ if NGC

754: 4593 harbors a $8.1\times 10^6 \Msun$ black hole at its core (see

755: discussion at the end of \S4.2).  The lack of response for the

756: iron line flux would suggest that this size is a lower limit for the

757: size of the line emitting source.  This would place the line emission

758: in the outer regions of the accretion disk or the putative molecular

759: torus of the Seyfert unification scheme.

760: 

761: 

762: \subsection{Continuum Power Spectrum and Spectral Lags}

763: \label{sec:temp_var}

764: 

765: The light curve for the full-band (0.5-10.0 \keV) data set is shown in

766: Fig.~9a.  The light curve is characterized by an

767: initial rapid drop up to $\sim 5\ks$, followed by a relatively

768: steady increase peaking at $\sim 45 \ks$, a drop until $\sim 65 \ks$,

769: and then a final increase that shows possible signs of tapering off

770: around the end of the observation at $76 \ks$.  There are indications

771: of smaller scale variability on time scales of $< 1000 \s$, with

772: slight flares and drops occurring throughout the data set.

773: 

774: Fig.~9b shows the Leahy normalized power spectrum of the $0.5-10 \keV$

775: EPIC-pn light curve.  The power spectrum demonstrates that the

776: variability of the source becomes dominated by Poisson statistics on

777: timescales of about $200 \s$ once it drops to a power of $\sim 2$, as

778: expected.  Before this point, the slope of the power spectrum for low

779: frequencies is $-2.63^{+0.66}_{-0.25}$.  This value for the PSD slope

780: is consistent with results from several other Sy-1 AGN such as NGC

781: 3783 (Markowitz 2005), MCG--6-30-15 (Papadakis \etal 2005; Vaughan

782: \etal 2003), NGC 4051 (at high frequencies; McHardy \etal 2004), and

783: Mrk 766 (also at high frequencies; Vaughan \& Fabian 2003). 

784: 

785: Given the range of X-ray energies available in this dataset, it is

786: also useful to study the continuum variability in different energy

787: bands.  Hardness ratios and time lags between different energy bands

788: in the continuum, in particular, can help constrain the emission

789: mechanisms of the source as well as the physical scale of the emitting

790: region(s).  We divide the X-ray spectrum into three energy bands,

791: each with an approximately equal number of counts ($\sim 5 \times

792: 10^5$).  The soft band ranges from $0.5-0.84 \keV$, the mid band

793: extends from $0.84-1.5 \keV$, and the hard band covers $1.5-10.0

794: \keV$.  The light curves for all three bands are represented in

795: Fig.~10.  In order to test whether a time lag exists between these

796: energy bands, we compute the cross-correlation function between the

797: three energy bands using the {\sc xronos} package (Stella \& Angelini

798: 1991) as well as the discrete correlation function (DCF; Edelson \&

799: Krolik 1988).  We measured the hard-to-soft band lag to be $230 \pm 50

800: \s$ (i.e., the hard band lags the soft band by this amount of time;

801: Fig.~11).

802: 

803: 

804: \begin{figure}

805: %\centerline{

806: \includegraphics[scale=.5,angle=270]{f9a.eps}\\

807: \includegraphics[scale=.5,angle=270]{f9b.eps}

808: %}

809: \caption{The light curve (a) and power spectrum (b) for the

810: time-averaged pn data from NGC~4593.  Variations on timescales as small

811: as hundreds of seconds appear visible in the source.  Note that the

812: frequency at which the power spectrum flattens into Poisson noise is

813: about $5 \times 10^{-3} \Hz$.  Inverting this means that the smallest

814: timescale of variability we can reliably observe from this source is

815: $\sim 200 \s$.  At low frequencies, the slope of the power spectral

816: density curve is $-2.63^{+0.66}_{-0.25}$.}

817: \end{figure}

818: 

819: \begin{figure}

820: \centerline{

821: \includegraphics[scale=.7,angle=270]{f10.eps}

822: }

823: \caption{Light curves for the different energy bands: the soft band

824: runs from $0.5-0.84 \keV$ (solid black), the mid band runs from $0.84-1.5

825: \keV$ (dashed red), and the hard band runs from $1.5-10.0 \keV$

826: (dotted green).}

827: \end{figure}

828: 

829: 

830: The most straightforward interpretation of these time delays envisions

831: them as representing the 

832: finite scattering time within the Comptonizing

833: disk-corona system that is thought to be responsible for the primary X-ray

834: production.  One should be cautioned, however, that this

835: interpretation invokes numerous underlying simplifications with regard

836: to the physical mechanism that produces these types of time lags between

837: energy bands.  See Pottschmidt \etal (2003) and Nowak \etal (1999,

838: 2002) for more detailed accounts of other factors that can be

839: responsible for or affect the observed time lag between the hard and

840: soft energy bands.  We assume here that both the hard and soft X-ray

841: photons originate from seed UV photons from the disk, which are then

842: Comptonized by a corona of relativistic electrons surrounding the

843: disk.  The energy of a given photon in our simplified scheme will

844: thus depend on the number of scatterings it undergoes with the

845: electrons, and one may therefore infer that the more energetic photons

846: have experienced more interactions.  It is thus possible to estimate

847: the size of the coronal region by measuring the time lag between the

848: peaks of the hard and soft photon light curves of the source, as we

849: have done, and making the simplified assumption that the corona

850: possesses a slab or spherical geometry.  With each scattering, a seed

851: photon gains on average a fractional energy $\Delta E/E \approx

852: 4k_BT/m_ec^2$, where $T$ is the temperature of the electrons in the

853: corona.  So the energy of a Comptonized photon after a given number of

854: scatterings 

855: will be:

856: \begin{equation}

857: E \approx E_0 \left(1 + \frac{4k_BT}{m_ec^2}\right)^n

858: \end{equation}

859: where $E_0$ is the initial seed photon energy and $n$ is the number of

860: scatterings (Rybicki \& Lightman 1979; Chiang et al. 2000).  The time

861: delay of this photon relative to the seed photon source will be

862: roughly proportional to the number of scatterings, $t \approx nt_0$.

863: Here $t_0 \sim l_T/c$ where $l_T$ is the mean free path for Thomson

864: scattering in an optically-thick corona or, if the corona is

865: optically-thin, simply the size of the corona.  We take the effective 

866: photon energy in the soft

867: range ($0.5-0.84 \keV$) to be $0.67 \keV$.  For the hard range

868: ($1.5-10 \keV$) we calculate the effective photon energy to be $2.17

869: \keV$.  Both estimates are based on taking weighted averages (based on

870: flux) of the

871: energies in the soft and hard ranges, and accounting for the

872: energy-dependent effective area of the pn.  Assuming that the energy of the coronal

873: electrons ranges from $50-100 \keV$, our measured soft-hard

874: time lag of $\sim 226 \s$ suggests that the corona occupies a region around

875: the disk $1.91-3.34 \times 10^{12} \cm$ in size.  This is derived assuming

876: the size of the corona is given by

877: \begin{equation}

878: r \approx tc  \frac{\log \left(1 + \frac{4k_{\rm B} T}{m_{\rm e} c^2}

879:   \right)}{\log \frac{E}{E_{\rm 0}}}

880: \end{equation}

881: We will assume that the central black hole in NGC~4593 has a mass of

882: $8.1 \times 10^6 \Msun$ based on reverberation mapping (Nelson \&

883: Whittle 1995; Gebhardt et al. 2000).  Using this mass for the NGC~4593 

884: black hole, the characteristic length scale of the corona would

885: be in the range of $1.6-2.8 r_{\rm g}$.

886: 

887: \begin{figure}

888: \centerline{

889: \includegraphics[scale=.7,angle=270]{f11.eps}

890: }

891: \caption{The cross-correlation function for the soft-to-hard energy

892:   bands in NGC~4593 in red (with data points), plotted with the best

893:   fit curve in solid black.  The vertical line represents a zero time

894:   delay between the two bands; the off-centeredness of the curve peak

895:   indicates that the hard band lags the soft band by $226 \pm 53 \s$

896:   at $90\%$ confidence.}

897: \end{figure}

898: 

899: 

900: \section{Discussion and Conclusions}

901: \label{sec:disc}

902: 

903: \subsection{Summary of Results}

904: \label{sec:summ}

905: 

906: We have obtained a $76 \ks$ {\it XMM-Newton} observation of the Sy-1

907: galaxy NGC~4593.  An examination of the best fitting EPIC-pn spectrum

908: shows that the continuum is well modeled by a photoabsorbed power-law

909: with $N_{\rm H} = 1.97 \times 10^{20} \pcmsq$, $\Gamma = 1.75$, and a

910: flux of $4.44 \times 10^{-13} \ergpcmsqps$.  The best fit to the hard

911: spectrum can be achieved by including two Gaussian emission lines

912: representing cold and ionized fluorescent iron at $6.4$ and $6.97

913: \keV$, respectively.

914: 

915: We see clear evidence for a complex warm absorber in the EPIC-pn

916: spectrum.  Fitting a grid of photoionization models computed using the

917: {\sc xstar} code, we infer a warm absorber with two physically and

918: kinematically distinct zones: one with a column density of $N_{\rm

919: H}=9.29 \times 10^{22}\pcmsq$ and an ionization parameter of

920: $\log\xi=2.75$, the other with $N_{\rm H}=1.13 \times 10^{22} \pcmsq$

921: and $\log\xi=1.70$, which is likely more distant from the central

922: engine.  We robustly detect the L$_3$ edge of neutral iron presumed to

923: exist in the form of dust grains along the line-of-sight to the

924: central engine, as cited by McKernan \etal (2003).  This edge has a

925: column density of $N_{\rm Fe}=8.32 \times 10^{16} \pcmsq$.

926: 

927: A soft excess below $\sim 2 \keV$ is also seen in the data, and can be

928: accounted for either phenomenalogically by a redshifted bremsstrahlung

929: component (Model~1) or, more effectively and physically, a component

930: of Comptonized emission from an accretion disk of seed photons

931: upscattered by a plasma of relativistic electrons existing in either a

932: corona or the base of a jet near the disk in some geometry (Model~2).

933: The latter scenario yields the best statistical fit to the data, with

934: a seed photon temperature of $T_{\rm 0}=50 \eV$, an electron

935: temperature of $kT=42 \keV$, a plasma optical depth of $\tau_{\rm

936: p}=0.12$ and a flux of $6.46 \times 10^{-14} \ergpcmsqps$.

937: 

938: Lastly, cold and ionized Fe-K emission lines were wanted by the fit at

939: $6.4$ and $6.97 \keV$, respectively.  The cold line Gaussian had a

940: time-averaged equivalent width of $EW=131 \eV$, while the ionized

941: component had an $EW=45 \eV$.  Although the continuum varied with time

942: over the course of our observation, the flux of the cold Fe-K$\alpha$

943: showed marginal evidence for variability between successive $10 \ks$

944: intervals.  The equivalent width of this line, on the other hand, is

945: shown to vary significantly.  The simplest interpretation of this

946: result is to suppose that the cold line originates from a region with

947: a light-crossing time larger that the length of our observation.  For

948: a black hole mass of $8.1 \times 10^6 \Msun$, this places the cold

949: line emitting region beyond about $2000 r_g$ from the black hole,

950: i.e., in the outer accretion disk or the putative molecular torus of

951: Seyfert unification schemes.  Our statistics on the ionized Fe-K line

952: are insufficient to constrain its variability properties --- these

953: data are consistent with both constant flux and constant equivalent

954: width.

955: 

956: We have detected a $226 \s$ time-lag between the hard and soft EPIC-pn

957: bands, with the hard band lagging the soft.  In a simple model in

958: which this corresponds to scattering times within a Comptonizing

959: corona, we conclude that the corona can only possess a size of $\sim

960: 1.6-2.8 r_{\rm g}$.

961: 

962: 

963: \subsection{Implications for the X-ray Emission Region}

964: 

965: The narrowness of the fluorescent iron line together with the lack of

966: response of this line to changes in the hard X-ray continuum suggest

967: an absence of a cold, optically-thick matter within the central $\sim

968: 10^3 r_g$ of the accretion disk.  The standard framework for

969: accommodating such a result is to postulate that the inner regions ($r

970: \approxlt 10^3 r_{\rm g}$) of the accretion flow have entered into a

971: radiatively-inefficient mode which is extremely hot (electron

972: temperatures of $T \sim 10^{10} \K$), optically-thin, and

973: geometrically-thick (e.g., Rees 1982; Narayan \& Yi 1994).  Within

974: this framework, the hard X-ray source is identified as thermal

975: bremsstrahlung or Comptonization from this structure.  However, the

976: variability of the X-ray continuum is inconsistent with X-ray emission

977: from a structure which is $\sim 1000 r_{\rm g}$ in extent.  The rapid

978: continuum variability and the short time lag between the hard and soft

979: X-ray photons dictate that, at any given time, the X-ray emission

980: region is only $\sim 1-3 r_{\rm g}$ in extent.

981: 

982: We are therefore led to consider alternative geometries and/or origins

983: for the X-ray source.  We consider three possibilities.  Firstly, the

984: inner accretion flow may indeed be radiatively-inefficient, but the 

985: observed X-ray emission may come

986: from the compact base of a relativistic jet powered by black hole

987: spin.  Secondly, the X-ray emission may indeed originate from the body

988: of the radiately-inefficient flow but, at any given instant in time,

989: be dominated by very compact emission regions within the flow.  Such

990: emission regions may be arise naturally from the turbulent flow or,

991: instead, may be related to a magnetic interaction between the inner

992: parts of the flow and the central spinning black hole (Wilms et

993: al. 2001; Ye et al. 2007).  In this case the iron line could still

994: plausibly originate at a distance of thousands of $r_{\rm g}$ and thus

995: be quite narrow.  Finally, it is possible that the accretion disk is

996: radiatively-{\it efficient} (and hence optically-thick and

997: geometrically-thin) close to the black hole and supports a compact

998: accretion disk corona.  Of course, an immediate objection to this

999: scenario is the lack of a broadened iron line.  However, as

1000: demonstrated in R04, it is possible the iron line is so broad that it

1001: is buried in the noise of the continuum.  Alternatively, the accretion

1002: disk surface may have an ionization state such that iron line photons

1003: are effectively trapped by resonant scattering and destroyed by the

1004: Auger effect.  Longer observations with better spectral and timing

1005: resolution will be necessary in order to confirm our results and

1006: differentiate between these different possible scenarios.

1007: 

1008: 

1009: 

1010: \subsection{Conclusions}

1011: \label{sec:conclusions}

1012: 

1013: We have shown that the Sy-1 galaxy NGC~4593 has a continuum spectrum

1014: that is fit remarkably well by a simple photoabsorbed power-law above

1015: $\sim 2 \keV$.  Below this energy, we see evidence for spectral

1016: complexity that can be attributed to the presence of a possible

1017: multi-zone layer of absorbing material intrinsic to the source, as

1018: well as a soft excess that cannot be explained by a reflection model

1019: from an ionized disk.  Also arguing against a

1020: disk-reflection-dominated source is that

1021: unlike other sources of its kind (e.g., MCG--6-30-15), NGC~4593 has

1022: relatively narrow cold and ionized Fe-K$\alpha$ line features at $6.4$

1023: and $6.97 \keV$, respectively.  See R04 for a more 

1024: thorough discussion of these lines and their

1025: possible physical interpretations.  We can say that the cold line is

1026: most likely formed either quite far out in the accretion disk, or

1027: possibly in the putative dusty torus region surrounding the central

1028: engine, based on their narrowness and lack of significant variability

1029: over the $76 \ks$ duration of our observation.  We find no evidence

1030: for reflection features from the inner accretion disk (e.g., a ``broad

1031: iron line'') in the spectrum.

1032: 

1033: Based on the time lag between the soft and hard spectral bands, we

1034: estimate that the corona occupies the a region around the central

1035: source on the order of $\sim 1.6-2.8 r_{\rm g}$, assuming that

1036: NGC~4593 harbors a $8.1 \times 10^6 \Msun$ black hole at its core and that

1037: the energies of the electrons in the corona range from $\sim 50-100

1038: \keV$.  This estimate for the coronal size is reinforced by our

1039: measurements of continuum variability on timescales as small as $\sim

1040: 200 \s$, equivalent to a light travel time of $\sim 4 r_{\rm g}$ for

1041: the black hole mass in question.

1042: 

1043: Taken together, the implications of a narrow iron line emitted far out

1044: in the disk or torus and the small coronal size in NGC~4593 present an

1045: atypical picture of an AGN.  We postulate that the primary X-ray

1046: source is associated with the compact base of a jet or compact

1047: emission regions within a much larger optically-thin accretion

1048: flow.  Alternatively, the accretion disk may be radiatively-efficient

1049: with a compact corona but not display a broad iron line due to the

1050: effects of extreme broadening or disk ionization.

1051: 

1052: 

1053: \section*{Acknowledgments}

1054: 

1055: We thank Andrew Young for numerous helpful conversations throughout

1056: the course of this work.  Julia Lee provided several {\sc xstar} models we

1057: used in attempting to parameterize the spectrum from $0.3-2 \keV$.  Barry

1058: McKernan's expertise on the spectrum of NGC~4593 as seen by {\it

1059:   Chandra} has also proven invaluable.  We acknowledge support from

1060: the NASA/{\it XMM-Newton} Guest Observer Program under grant NAG5-10083, and the

1061: National Science Foundation under grant AST0205990.

1062: 

1063: 

1064: 

1065: \begin{references}

1066: \reference{}Anders E. \& Grevesse, N., 1989, \GeCoA, 53, 197.

1067: \reference{}Arnaud K.A., 1996, {\it ASP Conf. Series}, 101, 17.

1068: \reference{}Awaki H. \etal, 2005, \ApJ, 632, 793.

1069: \reference{}Balucinska-Church M. \& McCammon D., 1992, \ApJ, 400, 699.

1070: \reference{}Basko M.M., 1978, \ApJ, 223, 268.

1071: \reference{}Chiang J. \etal, 2000, \ApJ, 528, 292. 

1072: \reference{}Edelson R.A. \& Krolik J.H., 1988, \ApJ, 333, 646.

1073: \reference{}Elvis M., Wilkes B.J., \& Lockman F.J., 1989, \AJ, 97, 777.

1074: \reference{}Fabian A.C. \etal, 1989, \MN, 238, 729.

1075: \reference{}Ferrarese L. \& Merritt, D., 2000, \ApJ, 539, L9.

1076: \reference{}Gebhardt K. \etal, 2000, \ApJ, 543, L5. 

1077: \reference{}George I.M. \& Fabian A.C., 1991, \MN, 249, 352.

1078: \reference{}Guilbert P.W. \& Rees M.J., 1988, \MN, 233, 475.

1079: \reference{}Halpern J.P., 1984, \ApJ, 281, 90.

1080: \reference{}Kaastra J.S., Steenbrugge K.C., 2001, JHU/LHEA Workshop.

1081: \reference{}Kallman T.R. \& Krolik J.H., 1995, {\it XSTAR Manual},

1082: available at legacy.gsfc.nasa.gov.

1083: \reference{}Kirsch M.G. \etal, 2005, {\it SPIE}, 5898, 22.

1084: \reference{}Laor A., 1991, \ApJ, 376, 90.

1085: \reference{}Lewis D.W., MacAlpine G.M., \& Koski A.T.  1978, \BAAS, 10, 388.

1086: \reference{}Lightman A.P. \& White T.R., 1988, \ApJ, 335, 57.

1087: \reference{}Lynden-Bell D., 1969, \Nat, 223, 690.

1088: \reference{}Markowitz A., 2005, \ApJ, 635, 180.

1089: \reference{}Matt G., Perola G.C., Piro L., 1991, \AaA, 245, 63. 

1090: \reference{}McHardy I.M. \etal, 2004, \MN, 348, 783.

1091: \reference{}McKernan B. \etal, 2003, \ApJ, 593, 142.

1092: \reference{}Nandra K. \etal, 1997a, \ApJ, 477, 602.

1093: \reference{}Narayan R. \& Yi I., 1994, \ApJ, 428L, 13.

1094: \reference{}Nelson C. \& Whittle, M., 1995, \ApJS, 99, 67.

1095: \reference{}Nowak M.A. \etal, 1999, \ApJ, 515, 726.

1096: \reference{}Nowak M.A. \etal, 2002, \MN, 332, 856.

1097: \reference{}Papadakis I.E., Kazanas D. \& Akylas A., 2005, \ApJ, 631, 727.

1098: \reference{}Pottschmidt K. \etal, 2003, \AaA, 407, 1039.

1099: \reference{}Pounds K.A. \& Turner, T.J., 1988, \SAI, 59, 261.

1100: \reference{}Rees M.J., 1982, \AIPC, 83, 166.

1101: \reference{}Reynolds C.S., 1997, \MN, 286, 513.

1102: \reference{}Reynolds C.S., 2000, \ApJ, 533, 811.

1103: \reference{}Reynolss C.S. \etal, 2004, \MN, 352, 205.

1104: \reference{}Reynolds C.S., Nowak M.A., 2003, \PR, 377, 389.

1105: \reference{}Reynolds C.S., Wilms J., 2004, \MN, 349, 1153.

1106: \reference{}Ross R.R. \& Fabian A.C., 2005, \MN, 358, 211.

1107: \reference{}Rybicki G.B. \& Lightman, A.P., 1979, {\it Radiative

1108:   Processes in Astrophysics} (New York: Wiley).

1109: \reference{}Salpeter E.E., 1964, \ApJ, 140, 796.

1110: \reference{}Stella L. \& Angelini L., 1991, {\it ASP Conf. Series}, 35, 103.

1111: \reference{}Vaughan S. \& Fabian A.C., 2003, \MN, 341, 496.

1112: \reference{}Vaughan S., Fabian A.C. \& Nandra K., 2003, \MN, 339, 1237.

1113: \reference{}Weaver K.A., Gelbord J., \& Yaqoob T.  2001, \ApJ, 550, 261.

1114: \reference{}Wilms J. \etal, 2001, \MN, 328, L27.

1115: \reference{}Ye Y.C., Wang D.X. \& Ma R.Y., 2007, \NA, in press (astroph/0701802).

1116: \reference{}Zel'Dovich Y.B., 1965, \AZ, 42, 283.

1117: 

1118: \end{references}

1119: 

1120: \end{document}

1121: 

1122: 

1123: 

1124: