1: %\documentclass[12pt,manuscript]{aastex}

2: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

3: \documentclass{emulateapj}

4: \usepackage{apjfonts}

5: 

6: \def\ltsima{$\; \buildrel < \over \sim \;$}

7: \def\simlt{\lower.5ex\hbox{\ltsima}}

8: \def\gtsima{$\; \buildrel > \over \sim \;$}

9: \def\simgt{\lower.5ex\hbox{\gtsima}}

10: 

11: \newcommand{\solarmass}{\mbox{${\rm M_{\odot}}$}}

12: \newcommand{\solarradius}{\mbox{${\rm R_{\odot}}$}}

13: \newcommand{\suzaku}{{\it Suzaku}}

14: \newcommand{\Suzaku}{{\it SUZAKU}}

15: \newcommand{\swsix}{{Swift J0601.9--8636}}

16: \newcommand{\Swsix}{{SWIFT J0601.9--8636}}

17: \newcommand{\swone}{{Swift J0138.6--4001}}

18: \newcommand{\Swone}{{SWIFT J0138.6--4001}}

19: \newcommand{\swift}{{\it Swift}}

20: \newcommand{\integral}{{\it INTEGRAL}}

21: \newcommand{\asca}{{\it ASCA}}

22: \newcommand{\rosat}{{\it ROSAT}}

23: \newcommand{\einstein}{{\it Einstein}}

24: \newcommand{\ginga}{{\it Ginga}}

25: \newcommand{\heao}{{\it HEAO1}}

26: \newcommand{\exosat}{{\it EXOSAT}}

27: \newcommand{\xrb}{X-ray Background}

28: \newcommand{\logn}{Log $N$ - Log $S$ relation}

29: \newcommand{\Logn}{Log $N$ - Log $S$ Relation}

30: \newcommand{\etal}{{\it et al.}}

31: \newcommand{\eg}{e.g.}

32: \newcommand{\ergs}{erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$}

33: \newcommand{\erg}{erg s$^{-1}$}

34: \newcommand{\de}{deg$^2$}

35: \newcommand{\nh}{$N_{\rm H}$}

36: \newcommand{\cosmo}{($H_0$, $\Omega_{\rm m}$, $\Omega_{\lambda}$)}

37: 

38: 

39: \lefthead{Ueda et al.}

40: \righthead{Suzaku Observations of Swift AGNs}

41: \begin{document}

42: 

43: \title{{\it Suzaku} Observations of Active Galactic Nuclei Detected in the

44: {\it Swift}/BAT Survey: \\

45: Discovery of ``New Type'' of Buried Supermassive Black Holes}

46: 

47: \author{

48: Yoshihiro Ueda\altaffilmark{1},

49: Satoshi Eguchi\altaffilmark{1},

50: Yuichi Terashima\altaffilmark{2},

51: Richard Mushotzky\altaffilmark{3},

52: Jack Tueller\altaffilmark{3},

53: Craig Markwardt\altaffilmark{3},

54: Neil Gehrels\altaffilmark{3},

55: Yasuhiro Hashimoto\altaffilmark{4},

56: Stephen Potter\altaffilmark{4}

57: }

58: 

59: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Astronomy, Kyoto University, Kyoto

60: 606-8502, Japan}

61: \altaffiltext{2}{Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Ehime

62: University, Matsuyama 790-8577, Japan}

63: \altaffiltext{3}{NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA}

64: \altaffiltext{4}{SAAO, P.O. Box 9, Observatory 7935, South Africa}

65: 

66: \begin{abstract}

67: 

68: We present the \suzaku\ broad band observations of two AGNs detected

69: by the \swift /BAT hard X-ray ($>$15 keV) survey that did not have

70: previous X-ray data, \swsix\ and \swone. The \suzaku\ spectra reveals

71: in both objects a heavily absorbed power law component with a column

72: density of \nh\ $\simeq 10^{23.5-24} {\rm cm}^{-2}$ that dominates

73: above 10 keV, and an intense reflection component with a solid angle

74: $\simgt 2\pi$ from a cold, optically thick medium. We find that these

75: AGNs have an extremely small fraction of scattered light from the

76: nucleus, $\simlt 0.5\%$ with respect to the intrinsic power law

77: component. This indicates that they are buried in a very

78: geometrically-thick torus with a small opening angle and/or have

79: unusually small amount of gas responsible for scattering. In the

80: former case, the geometry of \swsix\ should be nearly face-on as

81: inferred from the small absorption for the reflection component. The

82: discovery of two such objects in this small sample implies that there

83: must be a significant number of yet unrecognized, very Compton thick

84: AGNs viewed at larger inclination angles in the local universe, which

85: are difficult to detect even in the currently most sensitive optical

86: or hard X-ray surveys.

87: 

88: \end{abstract}

89: 

90: \keywords{galaxies: active --- gamma rays: observations --- X-rays:

91: galaxies --- X-rays: general}

92: 

93: \section{Introduction}

94: 

95: Many observations imply the presence of a large number of heavily obscured

96: Active Galactic Nuclei (AGNs) in the local universe

97: \citep[e.g.,][]{mai98,ris99}. The number density of AGNs subject to

98: absorption with a line-of-sight Hydrogen column density log \nh\

99: $\simgt$ 23.5 cm$^{-2}$ is a key parameter in understanding the

100: accretion history of the universe

101: \citep[e.g.,][]{set89,fab99}. According to synthesis models of the

102: X-ray background (XRB) \citep[e.g.,][]{ued03,gil07}, much of the

103: peak intensity of the XRB at 30 keV should be produced by these

104: objects. In spite of the potential importance of their contribution to

105: the growth of supermassive black holes \citep{mar04}, the nature of

106: this population of AGNs, even in the local universe, is only poorly

107: understood due to strong biases against detecting them. In these

108: objects, the direct emission in the UV, optical, and near IR bands as

109: well as at $E<10$ keV from the nucleus is almost completely blocked by

110: obscuring matter, making it difficult to probe the central engine.

111: 

112: Hard X-ray surveys at energies above 10--15 keV provide us with an

113: ideal opportunity to select this population of AGNs as long as the

114: column density is less than log \nh\ $\approx 24.5$ cm$^{-2}$. Recent

115: surveys performed with \swift /BAT (15--200 keV; \citealt{mar05}) and

116: \integral\ (10--100 keV; \citealt{bas06,bec06,saz07}), because of

117: their relative insensitivity to absorption, are providing one of the

118: most unbiased AGN samples in the local universe including Compton

119: thick AGNs, i.e., those with log \nh\ $>$ 24 cm$^{-2}$. In fact, these

120: surveys have started to detect hidden AGNs in the local universe

121: located in galaxies that were previously unrecognized to contain an

122: active nucleus at other wavelengths.

123: 

124: To unveil the nature of these new hard X-ray sources, follow-up

125: observations covering a broad energy band are crucial. In this paper,

126: we present the first results from follow-up observations with the

127: \suzaku\ observatory \citep{mit07} of the AGNs \swsix\ and \swone\

128: detected in the \swift /BAT survey. These targets are essentially

129: randomly selected from a bright \swift\ AGN sample for which soft

130: X-ray ($<$10 keV) spectroscopic observations had never been performed,

131: and are thus reasonable representatives of unknown AGN populations

132: selected by hard X-rays above 15 keV. In \S~3, we also present an

133: optical spectrum of \swsix\ taken at the South African Astronomical

134: Observatory (SAAO) 1.9-m telescope. The cosmological parameters

135: \cosmo\ = (70 km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$, 0.3, 0.7) \citep{spe03} are

136: adopted throughout the paper.

137: 

138: 

139: \section{The \Suzaku\ Observations and Results}

140: 

141: Table~1 summarizes our targets and observation log. \swsix\ is

142: optically identified as the galaxy ESO 005--G004 \citep{lau82} at

143: $z=0.0062$ with no previous firm evidence for AGN activity. The

144: optical counterpart of \swone\ is the galaxy ESO 297--G018

145: \citep{lau82} at $z=0.0252$, which was identified as a narrow line AGN

146: \citep{kir90}.

147: 

148: \suzaku, the 5th Japanese X-ray satellite, carries four sets of X-ray

149: mirrors each with a focal plane X-ray CCD camera, the X-ray Imaging

150: Spectrometer (XIS-0, XIS-1, XIS-2, and XIS-3; \citealt{koy07}), and a

151: non-imaging instrument called the Hard X-ray Detector (HXD;

152: \citealt{tak07}), which consists of the Si PIN photo-diodes and GSO

153: scintillation counters. The XIS and PIN simultaneously covers the

154: energy band of 0.2--12 keV and 10--70 keV, respectively. The unique

155: capabilities of \suzaku , high sensitivity in the 12--70 keV band and

156: broad band coverage with good spectral resolution, are critical for

157: studies of highly absorbed AGNs.

158: 

159: We observed \swsix\ and \swone\ with \suzaku\ on 2006 April 14 and

160: June 5 for a net exposure of 20 and 21 ksec (for the XIS),

161: respectively. Standard analysis was made on data products, which were

162: processed with the latest calibration (version 1.2). We detected both

163: sources at high significance with the XIS and PIN. The XIS

164: spectra were accumulated within a radius of 2 arcmin

165: around the detected position. The background was taken from a source

166: free region in the field of view. The spectra of three Front-side

167: Illuminated CCD (hereafter FI-XIS; XIS-0, 2, and 3) are summed

168: together, while that of Back-side Illuminated CCD (BI-XIS; XIS-1) is

169: treated separately in the spectral fit. Examining the spectra of

170: $^{55}$Fe calibration source, we verify that the energy scale and

171: resolution is accurate better than 10 eV and 60 eV levels,

172: respectively, at 5.9 keV. For the analysis of the PIN, we

173: utilized only data of Well units with the bias voltage set at 500 eV

174: (W0,1,2,3 for \swsix\ and W1,2,3 for \swone) with the best available

175: models of PIN background provided by the HXD team\footnote{ver1.2\_d

176: for \swsix\ and ver1.2\_w123 for \swone}.

177: 

178: \tabcolsep=2pt

179: \tablefontsize{\scriptsize}

180: \begin{deluxetable}{cccccc}

181: \tablenum{1}

182: \tablecaption{Targets and Observation Log\label{tbl-1}}

183:    \tablehead{\colhead{Swift} &\colhead{Optical ID} &\colhead{redshift}

184: &\colhead{Start Time (UT)} &\colhead{End Time}

185: &\colhead{Exposure\tablenotemark{a}}}

186: \startdata

187: J0601.9--8636 & ESO 005--G004 &0.0062&2006/04/13 16:24 & 04/14 01:52

188: & 19.8 ksec\\

189: J0138.6--4001 & ESO 297--G018 &0.0252&2006/06/04 18:13 & 06/05 05:00

190: & 21.2 ksec\\

191: \enddata

192: \tablenotetext{a}{Based on a good time interval for the XIS-0.}

193: \end{deluxetable}

194: 

195: To obtain the best constraint from the entire data, we perform a

196: simultaneous fit to the spectra of XIS (FI and BI), PIN, and the 

197: archival Swift BAT,

198: which covers the 0.2--200 keV band as a whole. The BAT spectra consist

199: of four energy bins over the 15--200 keV range and are useful to

200: constrain the power law index. Here we allow the relative flux

201: normalization between \suzaku\ and \swift\ (BAT) to be a free

202: parameter, considering possible time variability between the

203: observations. We fixed the normalization ratio between the FI-XIS and

204: the PIN based on the calibration result using the Crab Nebula. All the

205: absolute fluxes quoted in this paper refer to the flux calibration of

206: the FI-XIS. We find that the 10--50 keV PIN fluxes of \swsix\ and

207: \swone\ are $1\times10^{-11}$ and $4\times10^{-11}$ \ergs , indicating

208: time variability by a factor of 0.5 and 1.6, respectively, compared

209: with the averaged flux measured by the \swift /BAT over the past 9

210: months (Tueller \etal , in preparation).

211: 

212: Figure~1 shows the FI-XIS and PIN spectra unfolded for the detector

213: response (for clarity the BI-XIS and BAT spectra are not plotted). The

214: X-ray spectrum of \swsix\ below 10 keV is dominated by a hard

215: continuum with few photons below 2 keV, consistent with the previous

216: non-detection in soft X-rays (an upper limit of $1.3\times10^{-13}$

217: \ergs\ in the 0.1--2.4 keV band by the \rosat\ All Sky Survey;

218: \citealt{vog00}). We find that the broad band spectrum can be well

219: reproduced with a model consisting of a heavily absorbed power law

220: with log \nh\ $\simeq 24$ cm$^{-2}$, which dominates above 10 keV, and

221: a mildly absorbed reflection component from cold matter accompanied by

222: a narrow fluorescence iron-K line, which dominates below 10 keV. The

223: large column density is consistent with the observed equivalent width

224: (EW) of the iron-K line, $\approx$ 1 keV \citep{lev02}. \swone\ shows

225: a similar spectrum but with a smaller absorption of log \nh\ $=23.7$

226: cm$^{-2}$ for both transmitted and reflected components.

227: 

228: %\clearpage

229: \begin{figure}

230: \epsscale{1.0}

231: \plotone{fig1a.eps}

232: \plotone{fig1b.eps}

233: \caption{ The broad-band energy spectra of (a) \swsix\ and (b) \swone\

234: unfolded for the detector response in units of $E^2 F(E)$, where

235: $F(E)$ is the photon spectrum. For clarity, we only plot the summed

236: spectrum of the three FI-XIS (below 12 keV), and those of PIN

237: (above 12 keV), while the spectral fit is performed to the whole

238: XIS+PIN+BAT data including the BI-XIS. The crosses (black) represent the

239: data with $1\sigma$ statistical errors. The histograms show the

240: best-fit model with separate components. 

241: The upper solid line (red), dot-dashed line (light blue), lower

242: solid line (blue), and dotted line (magenta) correspond to the total,

243: iron-K emission line, reflection component, and scattered component,

244: respectively.

245: \label{fig1}}

246: \end{figure}

247: 

248: The spectral model is represented as

249: $$

250: F(E) = e^{-\sigma (E) N_{\rm H}^{\rm Gal}} [

251: f \; A E^{-\Gamma}

252: + e^{-\sigma (E) N_{\rm H}} A E^{-\Gamma}

253: + e^{-\sigma (E) N_{\rm H}^{\rm refl}} C(E)

254: + G(E) ]

255: ,

256: $$ where $N_{\rm H}^{\rm Gal}$ is the Galactic absorption column

257: density fixed at $2.0\times10^{20} {\rm cm}^{-2}$ for both targets

258: \citep{dic90}, $N_{\rm H}$ the local absorption column density at the

259: source redshift for the transmitted component, $N_{\rm H}^{\rm refl}$

260: that for the reflected component (assumed to be the same as $N_{\rm

261: H}$ for \swone ), and $\sigma (E)$ the cross section of photo-electric

262: absorption. The term $C(E)$ represents the reflection component,

263: calculated using the code in \citet{mag95}; we leave the solid angle $\Omega$

264: of the reflector as a free parameter by fixing the inclination angle

265: at 60$^{\circ}$ and cutoff energy at 300 keV, assuming Solar

266: abundances for all elements. $R(\equiv\Omega/2\pi) >1$ means 

267: the transmission efficiency should be $\simlt 1/R$ (see \S~4).

268: The term $G(E)$ is the narrow iron-K emission line modelled by a

269: Gaussian profile, where we fix the $1\sigma$ width at 50 eV to take

270: account of the response uncertainty (and hence, the line should be

271: considered to be unresolved). The best-fit parameters are summarized

272: in Table~2 with the intrinsic 2--10 keV luminosity, $L_{\rm 2-10}$, 

273: corrected for the absorption and transmission efficiency of $1/R$.

274: 

275: \tabcolsep=6pt

276: \tablefontsize{\footnotesize}

277: \begin{deluxetable}{cccc}

278: \tablenum{2}

279: \tablecaption{Best Fit Spectral Parameters\label{tbl-2}}

280: \tablehead{\colhead{} &\colhead{Swift} &\colhead{J0601.9--8636}

281: &\colhead{J0138.6--4001} }

282: \startdata

283: (1) & \nh\ ($10^{22} {\rm cm}^{-2}$) & $101^{+54}_{-38}$& $46\pm4$\\

284: (2) & $\Gamma$          & $1.95^{+0.36}_{-0.33}$ & $1.66^{+0.16}_{-0.04}$\\

285: (3) &$R$       & $1.7^{+3.5}_{-0.9}$ & $2.1^{+0.4}_{-1.2}$\\

286: (4) &$N_{\rm H}^{\rm refl}$ ($10^{22} {\rm cm}^{-2}$) & 

287: $2.9^{+5.3}_{-1.4}$& (= \nh ) \\

288: (5) &$f_{\rm scat}$ (\%) & $0.20\pm0.11$ & $0.23^{+0.23}_{-0.16}$\\

289: (6) &$E_{\rm cen}$ (keV)& $6.38\pm0.02$& $6.38\pm0.03$\\

290: (7) &E.W. (keV)& $1.06\pm0.16$& $0.20\pm0.05$\\

291: (8) &$F_{\rm 2-10} $ (\ergs ) & $1.1\times10^{-12}$&$3.3\times10^{-12}$\\

292: (9) &$F_{\rm 10-50}$ (\ergs ) & $9.8\times10^{-12}$&$3.9\times10^{-11}$\\

293: (10) &$L_{\rm 2-10} $ (\erg ) & $8.3\times10^{41}$&$3.9\times10^{43}$\\

294:       &$\chi^2$(dof) & 20.0 (27)& 101.3 (87)\\

295: \enddata

296: \tablecomments{

297: (1) The line-of-sight hydrogen column density for the transmitted 

298: component; (2) The power law photon index;

299: (3) The relative strength of the reflection component to the

300: transmitted one, defined as $R\equiv\Omega/2\pi$, where $\Omega$ is

301: the solid angle of the reflector viewed from the nucleus;

302: (4) The line-of-sight hydrogen column density for the refection 

303: component (assumed to be the same as \nh\ for \swone );

304: (5) The fraction of a scattered component relative to the intrinsic power

305: law corrected for the transmission efficiency of $1/R$ when $R>1$; (6)

306: The center energy of an iron-K emission line at rest frame. The

307: 1$\sigma$ line width is fixed at 50 eV; (7) The observed equivalent

308: width of the iron-K line with respect to the whole continuum; (8)(9)

309: Observed fluxes in the 2--10 keV and 10--50 keV band; (10) The 2--10

310: keV intrinsic luminosity corrected for the absorption and transmission

311: efficiency of $1/R$.\\

312: The errors are 90\% confidence limits for a single parameter.}

313: \end{deluxetable}

314: 

315: We confirm that these results are robust, within the statistical

316: error, given the systematic errors in the background estimation of the

317: PIN detector \citep{kok07}. In the case of \swone, where photon

318: statistics is dominated by the XIS data, we limit the allowed range of

319: photon index to $\Gamma=1.63-2.02$ in the simultaneous fit, being

320: constrained from the BAT spectrum. We have limited 

321: $R<2.5$ for this source to avoid physical

322: inconsistency between $R$ and the EW of an iron-K line; otherwise

323: (i.e., in more ``reflection-dominated'' spectra), we should expect a

324: larger EW than the observed value of $\approx$ 0.2 keV.

325: 

326: 

327: \section{Optical Spectrum of \Swsix }

328: 

329: We performed an optical spectroscopic observation of \swsix\ (ESO

330: 005--G004) during the night of 2007 March 16, using the SAAO 1.9-m

331: telescope with the Cassegrain spectrograph. Grating six, with a

332: spectral range of about 3500-5300 \AA\ at a resolution around 4 \AA,

333: was used with a 2 arcsec slit placed on the center of the galaxy for a

334: total integration time of 2400 s. To derive the sensitivity curve, we

335: fit the observed spectral energy distribution of standard stars with

336: low-order polynomial. The co-added, flux-calibrated spectrum in the

337: 4000-5500 \AA\ range is shown in Figure~2. It reveals a rather

338: featureless spectrum with no evidence for H$\beta$ or [O~III]

339: $\lambda$5007 emission lines, typical for this type of non-active

340: edge-on galaxy within this spectral range. The 90\% upper limit on the

341: [O~III] flux is conservatively estimated to be $3\times10^{-15}$ \ergs

342: , corresponding to a luminosity of $3\times10^{38}$ \erg . This yields

343: the ratio of the intrinsic 2--10 keV luminosity to the {\it observed}

344: [O~III] luminosity of $> 2800$. Although the (unknown) extinction

345: correction for [O~III] could reduce the value, the result is

346: consistent with \swsix\ having an intrinsically weak [O~III] emission

347: relative to hard X-rays compared with other Seyfert galaxies

348: \citep{bas99,hec05,net07}.  In particular, this object would not have

349: been selected to be an AGN on the basis of its [O~III] or H$\beta$

350: emission.

351: 

352: \begin{figure}

353: \epsscale{1.0}

354: \plotone{fig2.eps}

355: \caption{

356: The optical spectrum of the nucleus region of \swsix\

357:   (ESO 005--G004) in the 4000-5500 \AA\ wavelength range, taken with

358:   the SAAO 1.9-m telescope. The arrow denotes the position of the

359:   [O~III] $\lambda5007$ line.

360: \label{fig1}}

361: \end{figure}

362: 

363: \section{Discussion}

364: 

365: Both sources show an intense reflection component relative to the

366: transmitted one. Using the standard reflection model \citep{mag95}, we

367: find that the solid angle of the reflector $\Omega/2\pi$ viewed from

368: the nucleus exceeds unity, which is apparently unphysical if

369: attributed only to geometry. This implies that a part of the direct

370: emission is completely blocked by non-uniform material in the line

371: of sight even above 10 keV. The reflection-dominated nature of the

372: spectra of heavily obscured AGNs, if common, has an impact on the

373: population synthesis model of the XRB, where a much weaker reflection

374: is assumed for type 2 AGNs \citep{gil07}. Another possibility is that this

375: apparent very high reflection fraction is due to time

376: variability, that is, the decrease of the flux in the transmitted

377: light is echoed with a time delay corresponding to the difference in

378: light paths between the emitter, reflector, and observers.

379: 

380: It is remarkable that both \swsix\ and \swone\ have a very small

381: amount of soft X-ray scattered emission, less than 0.46\% of the

382: intrinsic power law component. (If we fix $N_{\rm H}^{\rm refl} = 0$

383: in the spectral fit of \swsix , then we obtain a photon index of

384: $1.80\pm0.29$ and no significant scattered component with a 90\% upper

385: limit of 0.47\%.) As far as we know these are amongst the lowest

386: scattered fractions ever seen from an absorbed AGN

387: \citep{tur97,cap06}. In optically selected Seyfert 2 galaxies, the

388: presence of prominent soft X-ray emission is common

389: \citep[e.g.,][]{gua05}. Such emission probably originates from the

390: same extended gas responsible for the optical [O~III] emission

391: \citep{bia06}. This type of emission from ``classical'' Seyfert 2

392: galaxies has always been seen in the spectra of objects well studied

393: so far. However, this sample is dominated by optically selected

394: Seyfert 2 galaxies, which require a scattered component to be selected.

395: 

396: The scattered fraction is proportional to both the solid angle of the

397: scattering region as viewed from the nucleus, $\Omega_{\rm scat}$, and

398: the scattering optical depth, $\tau_{\rm scat}$. Hence, the observed

399: small scattered fraction means small $\Omega_{\rm scat}$ and/or small

400: $\tau_{\rm scat}$ i.e., deficiency of gas in the circumnuclear

401: environment, for some unknown reason.

402: 

403: The first possibility, which we favor as a more plausible case,

404: indicates that these AGNs are buried in a very geometrically-thick

405: obscuring torus. Assuming that the typical scattering fraction of 3\%

406: corresponds to the effective torus half-opening angle (see

407: \citealt{lev02} for definition) $\theta$ of 45 degree, our results

408: ($<0.5\%$) indicate $\theta \simlt 20$ degree. In the case of \swsix ,

409: the small absorption for the reflection component, which probably comes

410: from the inner wall of the torus, suggests that we are seeing this

411: source in a rather face-on geometry. Indeed, applying the formalism of

412: \citet{lev02} to the observed EW of the iron-K line, we infer that the

413: inclination angle with respect to the axis of the disk, $i$, is smaller

414: than 40 degrees if $\theta < 20$ degree. For \swone , the presence of a

415: high column density for the reflection component implies a more edge-on

416: geometry than in \swsix. The observed EW of $0.20\pm0.05$ keV can be

417: explained if the torus is patchy or has a geometrical structure such

418: that the line-of-sight column density is much smaller than that in the

419: disk plane.

420: 

421: We infer that this type of buried AGNs is a significant fraction of the

422: whole AGN population, although an accurate estimate of this fraction is

423: difficult at present due to the small number statistics\footnote{We note

424: that a similar object has also been found by \citet{com07} with the

425: \suzaku\ follow-up of hard X-ray ($>10$ keV) selected AGNs.}. The

426: observed fraction of heavily obscured AGNs with log \nh\ $>23.5$ is

427: about 25\% among the hard X-ray ($E>$15 keV) selected AGNs

428: \citep{mar05}. The true number density of obscured AGNs could be much

429: larger, however. If we saw the same system of our targets at much larger

430: inclination angles ($i \gg 40$ degree), the observed flux of the

431: transmitted component would be much fainter even in hard X-rays due to

432: the effects of repeated Compton scatterings \citep{wil99}. Our results

433: imply that there must be a large number of yet unrecognized, Compton

434: thick AGNs in the local universe, which are likely to be missed even in

435: the \swift\ and \integral\ surveys.

436: 

437: The existence of AGNs with a geometrically thick torus was predicted by

438: \citet{fab98}, where the extreme obscuration was postulated to be caused

439: by a nuclear starburst. Using the $60 \mu$m and $100 \mu$m fluxes

440: measured by {\it Infrared Astronomical Satellite (IRAS)}, we obtain the

441: far infrared luminosity (defined by \citealt{dav92}) of $L_{\rm FIR} =

442: 4.4\times10^{43}$ \erg\ and $7.1\times10^{43}$ \erg , and hence the

443: ratio between the 2--10 keV to far infrared luminosities of $L_{\rm

444: 2-10}/L_{\rm FIR} \approx 0.02$ and $\approx 0.5$ for \swsix\ and \swone

445: , respectively. While the result of \swone\ is consistent with those of

446: the 2--10 keV selected AGNs in the local universe \citep{pic82} within

447: the scatter, the small $L_{\rm 2-10}/L_{\rm FIR}$ ratio of \swsix\

448: indicates a possibly significant starburst activity. However, this is

449: not supported by the optical spectrum of this object, which apparently

450: shows no evidence for a significant amount of star formation. The reason

451: behind the difference between the two sources is unclear.

452: 

453: By using the unique combination of the \swift\ BAT survey and the

454: \suzaku\ broad band spectral capabilities, we are discovering a new

455: type of AGN with an extremely small scattering fraction. This class of

456: object is most likely to contain a buried AGN in a very

457: geometrically-thick torus. This population was missed in previous

458: surveys, demonstrating the power of hard X-ray ($>$10 keV) surveys to

459: advance our global understanding of the whole AGN population. In

460: particular, we predict that the objects should have fainter [O~III]

461: emission luminosity relative to the hard X-ray luminosity compared

462: with classical Seyfert 2 galaxies because much less of the nuclear

463: flux ``leaks'' out to ionize the narrow line gas. As shown above, the

464: optical spectrum of \swsix\ is consistent with this prediction. This

465: study is particularly important since the existence of numerous such

466: objects would make surveys that rely on the [O~III] emission

467: incomplete by missing many of buried AGNs and incorrectly estimating

468: the true AGN luminosity.

469: 

470: \acknowledgments

471: 

472: We thank the members of the \suzaku\ team for calibration efforts of

473: the instruments, in particular Motohide Kokubun and Yasushi Fukazawa

474: for their useful advice regarding the background of the HXD. We would

475: also like to thank the anonymous referee for providing helpful

476: suggestions to improve this paper. Part of this work was financially

477: supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research 17740121 and

478: 17740124, and by the Grant-in-Aid for the 21st Century COE ``Center

479: for Diversity and Universality in Physics'' from the Ministry of

480: Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) of Japan.

481: 

482: \begin{thebibliography}{}

483: 

484: \bibitem[Bassani et al.(1999)]{bas99}

485: Bassani, L. et al.

486: 1999, \apjs, 121, 473

487: 

488: \bibitem[Bassani et al.(2006)]{bas06}

489: Bassani, L. et al.

490: 2006, \apj, 636, L65

491: 

492: \bibitem[Beckmann et al.(2006)]{bec06}

493: Beckmann, V., Gehrels, N., Shrader, C. R., Soldi, S.

494: 2006, \apj, 638, 642

495: 

496: \bibitem[Bianchi et al.(2006)Bianchi, Guainazzi, Chiaberge]{bia06}

497: Bianchi, S., Guainazzi, M., Chiaberge, M.

498: 2006, \aap, 448, 499

499: 

500: \bibitem[Cappi et al.(2006)]{cap06}

501: Cappi, M. et al.

502: 2006, \aap, 113, 459

503: 

504: \bibitem[Comastri et al.(2007)]{com07}

505: Comastri, A., Gilli, R., Vignali, C., Matt, G., Fiore, F., Iwasawa, K.

506: 2007, in proc.\ of ``The Extreme Universe in the Suzaku Era'',

507: Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement, in press (arXiv:0704.1253)

508: 

509: \bibitem[David et al.(1992)David, Jones, Forman]{dav92}

510: David, L. P., Jones, C., Forman, W.

511: 1992, \apj, 388, 82

512: 

513: \bibitem[Dickey \& Lockman(1990)]{dic90}

514: Dickey, J.M. \& Lockman F.J. 1990, \araa, 28, 215

515: 

516: \bibitem[Fabian et al.(1998)]{fab98}

517: Fabian, A. C., Barcons, X., Almaini, O., Iwasawa, K.

518: 1998, \mnras, 297, L11

519: 

520: \bibitem[Fabian (1999)]{fab99}

521: Fabian, A. C.

522: 1999, \mnras, 308, L39

523: 

524: \bibitem[Gilli et al.(2007)Gilli, Comastri, Hasinger]{gil07}

525: Gilli, R., Comastri, A., Hasinger, G.

526: 2007, \aap, 463, 79

527: 

528: \bibitem[Guainazzi et al.(2005)Guainazzi, Matt, Perola]{gua05}

529: Guainazzi, M., Matt, G., Perola, G. C.

530: 2005, \aap, 444, 119

531: 

532: \bibitem[Heckmann et al.(2005)]{hec05}

533: Heckman, T.M., Ptak, A., Hornschemeier, A., Kauffmann, G.

534: 2005, \apj, 634, 161

535: 

536: \bibitem[Kirhakos \& Steiner(1990)]{kir90}

537: Kirhakos, S. D. \& Steiner, J. E.

538: 1990, \aj, 99, 1722

539: 

540: \bibitem[Kokubun et al.(2007)]{kok07}

541: Kokubun, M. \etal\

542: 2007, \pasj, 59, 53

543: 

544: \bibitem[Koyama et al.(2007)]{koy07}

545: Koyama, K. \etal\

546: 2007, \pasj, 59, 23

547: 

548: \bibitem[Lauberts(1982)]{lau82}

549: Lauberts, A.

550: ``ESO/Uppsala survey of the ESO(B) atlas''

551: European Southern Observatory, Garching

552: 

553: \bibitem[Levenson et al.(2002)]{lev02}

554: Levenson, N. A., Krolik, J. H., Zycki, P. T., Heckman, T. M., Weaver,

555: K. A., Awaki, H., Terashima, Y.

556: 2002, \apj, 573, L81

557: 

558: \bibitem[Maiolino et al.(1998)]{mai98}

559: Maiolino, R. \etal\

560: 1998, \aap, 338, 781

561: 

562: \bibitem[Magdziarz \& Zdziarski(1995)]{mag95}

563: Magdziarz, P. \& Zdziarski, A. A.

564: 1995, \mnras, 273, 837

565: 

566: \bibitem[Marconi et al.(2004)]{mar04}

567: Marconi, A., Risaliti, G., Gilli, R., Hunt, L. K., Maiolino, R., Salvati, M.

568: 2004, \mnras, 351, 169

569: 

570: \bibitem[Markwardt et al.(2005)]{mar05} Markwardt, C. B., Tueller,

571: J., Skinner, G. K., Gehrels, N., Barthelmy, S. D., Mushotzky, R. F.

572: 2005, \apj, 633, L77

573: 

574: \bibitem[Mitsuda et al.(2007)]{mit07}

575: Mitsuda, K. \etal\

576: 2007, \pasj, 59, 1

577: 

578: \bibitem[Netzer et al.(2007)]{net07}

579: Netzer, H., Mainieri, V., Rosati, P., Trakhtenbrot, B.

580: 2007, \aap, 453, 525

581: 

582: \bibitem[Piccinotti et al.(1982)]{pic82}

583: Piccinotti, G., Mushotzky, R. F., Boldt, E. A., Holt, S. S., 

584: Marshall, F. E., Serlemitsos, P. J., Shafer, R. A.

585: 1982, \apj, 253, 485

586: 

587: \bibitem[Risaliti et al.(1999)Risaliti, Maiolino, Salvati]{ris99}

588: Risaliti, G., Maiolino, R., Salvati, M.

589: 1999, \apj, 522, 157

590: 

591: \bibitem[Sazonov et al.(2007)]{saz07}

592: Sazonov, S., Revnivtsev, M., Krivonos, R., Churazov, E., Sunyaev, R.

593: 2007, \aap, 462, 57

594: 

595: \bibitem[Setti \& Woltjer(1989)]{set89}

596: Setti, G. \& Woltjer, L.

597: 1989, \aap, 224, L21

598: 

599: \bibitem[Spergel et al.(2003)]{spe03}

600: Spergel, D. N.  \etal\

601: 2003, \apjs, 148, 175

602: 

603: \bibitem[Takahashi et al.(2007)]{tak07}

604: Takahashi, T. \etal\

605: 2007, \pasj, 59, 35

606: 

607: \bibitem[Turner et al.(1997)]{tur97}

608: Turner, T. J., George, I. M., Nandra, K., Mushotzky, R. F.

609: 1997, \apj, 446, 23

610: 

611: \bibitem[Ueda et al.(2003)]{ued03}

612: Ueda, Y., Akiyama, M., Ohta, K., Miyaji, T.

613: 2003, \apj, 598, 886

614: 

615: \bibitem[Voges et al.(2000)]{vog00}

616: Voges, W. \etal\

617: 2000, IAU Circular, 7432, 3

618: 

619: \bibitem[Wilman \& Fabian(1999)]{wil99}

620: Wilman, R. J., Fabian, A. C.

621: 1999, \mnras, 309, 862

622: 

623: \end{thebibliography}

624: 

625: \end{document}

626: