0706.1260/bfo.tex
1: %Version last modified 10/28/2007
2: %\documentclass[preprint,prl,superscriptaddress,amsmath,amssymb,letterpaper]{revtex4}
3: \documentclass[twocolumn,prl,superscriptaddress,amsmath,amssymb,letterpaper]{revtex4}
4: \usepackage{graphicx}% Include figure files
5: \usepackage{bm}% bold math
6: 
7: \def\beq{\begin{equation}}
8: \def\eeq{\end{equation}}
9: \def\beqn{\begin{eqnarray}}
10: \def\eeqn{\end{eqnarray}}
11: \DeclareMathOperator{\Tr}{Tr} 
12: \DeclareMathOperator{\sinc}{sinc} 
13: \DeclareMathOperator{\Ai}{Ai}
14: \DeclareMathOperator{\Max}{Max}
15: \DeclareMathOperator{\Min}{Min}
16: \DeclareMathOperator{\diag}{diag}
17: \DeclareMathOperator{\Real}{Re}
18: \DeclareMathOperator{\si}{si}
19: \DeclareMathOperator{\ci}{ci}
20: 
21: \begin{document}
22: %\draft
23: %\tighten
24: %\onecolumn
25: %\twocolumn[\hsize\textwidth\columnwidth\hsize\csname
26: %@twocolumnfalse\endcsname
27: 
28: \title{Optical coupling to spin waves in the cycloidal multiferroic BiFeO$_3$}
29: \author{Rogerio de Sousa}
30: \affiliation{Department of Physics, University of California,
31: Berkeley, CA 94720}
32: \author{Joel E. Moore}
33: \affiliation{Department of Physics, University of California,
34: Berkeley, CA 94720} \affiliation{Materials Sciences Division,
35: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720}
36: \date{\today}
37: 
38: \begin{abstract}
39:   The magnon and optical phonon spectrum of an incommensurate
40:   multiferroic such as BiFeO$_3$ is considered in the framework of a
41:   phenomenological Landau theory. The resulting spin wave spectrum is
42:   quite distinct from commensurate substances due to soft mode
43:   anisotropy and magnon zone folding. The former allows electrical
44:   control of spin wave propagation via reorientation of the
45:   spontaneous ferroelectric moment. The latter gives rise to multiple
46:   magneto-dielectric resonances due to the coupling of optical phonons
47:   at zero wavevector to magnons at integer multiples of the cycloid
48:   wavevector.  These results show that the optical response of a
49:   multiferroic reveals much more about its magnetic excitations than
50:   previously anticipated on the basis of simpler models.
51: \end{abstract}
52: \pacs{
53: %Magnetomechanical and magnetoelectric effects, magnetostriction
54: 75.80.+q,
55: %Spin waves in magnetically ordered materials
56: 75.30.Ds,
57: %Magnetooptical effects
58: 78.20.Ls.}
59: %Infrared and Raman spectra (condensed matter) 
60: %78.30.-j.}
61: %
62: \maketitle
63: %\vskip2pc]
64: %\narrowtext
65: %
66: 
67: The coupling between different types of correlated electron order in
68: ``multiferroic'' materials possessing simultaneous magnetism and
69: ferroelectricity gives rise to several interesting phenomena
70: \cite{wang03,kimura03,pimenov06,sushkov07}.  This coupling leads to
71: rather complex broken-symmetry phases~\cite{harris06} and excitation
72: spectra.  Recent examples are the magnetically induced
73: ferroelectricity in TbMnO$_3$\cite{kimura03} and the switching of the
74: magnetic state by an electrical probe observed in
75: BiFeO$_3$~\cite{zhao06}.  Crystals of these two materials show
76: incommensurate magnetic order: in TbMnO$_3$, the incommensurate order
77: established at 41 K is believed to generate the spontaneous
78: polarization observed at 28 K, while in BiFeO$_3$, the cycloidal
79: antiferromagnetic order is established at 650 K, well below the
80: ferroelectric transition at 1120 K.  The cycloid disappears in
81: a strong (18 T) magnetic field~\cite{ruette04} or in thin films~\cite{bai05}.
82: 
83: This paper studies the excitations and electromagnetic response in a
84: cycloidal multiferroic such as bulk BiFeO$_3$.  The combination of
85: incommensurate order and magnetoelectric coupling is found to give a
86: strong coupling between a long-wavelength electric field and spin
87: waves at multiples of the cycloid wavevector.  This leads to a series
88: of resonances in the dielectric constant at integer and irrational
89: multiples of a fundamental frequency determined by the magnon energy
90: at the cycloid wavevector.  The lowest-lying resonances created by
91: this effect should be visible in standard transmission and
92: reflectivity measurements at room temperature in the far infrared
93: frequency range (below the lowest optical phonon at 2~THz).  Recent
94: Raman and optical reflectivity spectroscopy studies of bulk BiFeO$_3$
95: \cite{haumont06} focused on the optical phonon resonances, without any
96: interpretation of the far IR region.  The optical phonon spectra seem
97: to be well understood from first principles calculations
98: \cite{hermet07}.  Nevertheless, the latter completely ignores the
99: underlying cycloidal magnetic structure and its magnetoelectric
100: character. Our work reveals a rich sub-phonon dielectric response not
101: yet explored by optical experiments or first principle calculations.
102: Aside from allowing a direct observation of the basic physics of
103: multiferroic coupling in BiFeO$_3$ and related materials, this effect
104: could be used in devices based on electronic excitation of spin waves
105: \cite{khitun05}, or the development of fast magnetic probes for
106: magnetic domain switching.
107: 
108: It has been known for many years that magnetoelectric coupling in
109: uniformly ordered materials mixes spin waves (magnons) and
110: polarization waves (optical phonons) \cite{baryakhtar69,tilley82}.
111: This gives rise to low-frequency magneto-optical resonances in the
112: dielectric susceptibility, the so-called electromagnon excitations,
113: that may be visible in infrared experiments
114: \cite{pimenov06,sushkov07}.  However, the resonance frequencies are
115: primarily determined by the zero-wavevector magnon frequencies.  The
116: mixing with finite-wavevector magnons found here results specifically
117: from the {\it incommensurate} magnetic order; while such
118: incommensurate order complicates the calculation of excitation spectra
119: because a finite-wavevector analysis is now necessary, incommensurate
120: order is a common feature of many of the most studied multiferroic
121: materials.  Although recent theoretical work has clarified the
122: relationship between ferroelectricity and spiral ferromagnetic order
123: \cite{mostovoy06,katsura05}, the characteristic features of
124: electromagnon excitations in incommensurate magnets seem not to have
125: been studied before.
126: 
127: This paper assumes that the ground state consists of a uniform
128: polarization and an incommensurate magnetic structure, as in many
129: important multiferroic materials; an interesting effect when the
130: polarization and magnetization are both periodic and commensurate with
131: each other has recently been discussed \cite{betouras07}.
132: 
133: Our calculation is based on a dynamical Ginzburg-Landau treatment of
134: the coupled ferromagnetic, antiferromagnetic, and polarization orders,
135: in a cycloidal ground state and an applied AC electrical field.  It is
136: assumed that the system is far below its critical temperature so that
137: thermal fluctuations can be ignored in the dynamics.  The long-period
138: incommensurate cycloid is produced in our model by a Lifshitz term in
139: the effective Ginzburg-Landau free energy; the existence of such a
140: term was previously
141: argued~\cite{sparavigna94,sosnowska82,zalesski00,ruette04} as the
142: unique symmetry-allowed explanation for the observed order.  The model
143: free energy is
144: \begin{eqnarray}
145: F &=& {G L^4 \over 4} + {A L^2 \over 2} + {c \sum_i
146:   (\nabla L_i)^2 \over 2} \cr
147: && -\alpha \bm{P} \cdot \left[{\bf L} (\nabla \cdot {\bf L}) + {\bf L} \times
148: (\nabla \times {\bf L})\right] -\bm{P}\cdot \bm{E} \nonumber\\
149: &&+{r M^2\over 2}+ {a {P_z}^{2}\over 2}+{u{P_z}^{4}\over 4} + {a_\perp ({P_x}^2+{P_y}^2) \over 2} .
150: \end{eqnarray} 
151: Here $L=|\bm{M}_1-\bm{M}_2|$ is a N\'{e}el vector describing the
152: staggered sublattice magnetization, $M=|\bm{M}_1+\bm{M}_2|$ is the
153: total magnetization of the material, and $P_z$ is the magnitude of the
154: ferroelectric polarization along ${\bf \hat z}$ [the cubic (111) and
155: equivalent directions in BiFeO$_3$].  Many possible terms have been
156: omitted from the free energy as absent or unimportant in BiFeO$_3$.
157: Note that in the absence of the Lifshitz term, the AFM and FE orders
158: are decoupled, and the ground state is a commensurate, isotropic
159: Heisenberg antiferromagnet with $|{\bf L}_0|^{2}= {- A \over G}$ and
160: an easy-axis ferroelectric with uniform polarization given by
161: $\bm{P}_0=P_0 {\bf \hat{z}}$, $P_{0}^{2}= -a/u$.  Clearly $A < 0$ and
162: $r>0$ for an antiferromagnetic ground state, while $a<0$ and
163: $a_{\perp}>0$ for a ferroelectric ground state.  
164: %
165: %RdS: Removed.
166: %
167: %A $(\nabla {\bf
168: %  P})^2$ term has been omitted because the corresponding velocity is
169: %negligible compared to the spin-wave velocity, and the only source of
170: %antiferromagnetic anisotropy is the crystal distortion represented by
171: %${\bf P}$.
172: 
173: \begin{figure}
174:   \includegraphics[width=3in]{cycloid}
175: \caption{(color online). Antiferromagnetic lattice with harmonic cycloid order. 
176:   The cycloid plane is pinned by the polarization $\bm{P}_0$, with
177:   arbitrary propagation direction ${\bf \hat{q}}$ in the plane
178:   perpendicular to $\bm{P}_0$. We also depict the tangent vector ${\bf
179:     \hat{D}}$ related to phase fluctuations of the cycloid.}
180:   \label{fig1} \end{figure} 
181: 
182: The Lifshitz term induces an incommensurate cycloidal
183: order in which the antiferromagnetic moment rotates in an arbitrary
184: plane including ${\bf \hat z}$.  It also increases the magnitude of
185: $L_0$ and $P_0$.  Our reference ground state is a
186: cycloid with 
187: \begin{equation} 
188: {\bf L}_0(x) = L_0 \left[\cos(q x) {\bf \hat z}
189:   + \sin(qx) {\bf \hat x}\right].  
190: \label{l0}
191: \end{equation} 
192: Here the cycloid direction has been chosen along ${\bf \hat x}$.  The
193: pitch is $q = \alpha P_0 / c$ and the magnitudes of antiferromagnetic
194: and polar order are 
195: $L_{0}^{2} = (-A+\alpha^2 P_{0}^{2}/c)/G$,
196: $P_{0}^{2}=(-a+\alpha^2 L_{0}^{2}/c)/u$.  A check on the above is that
197: there are two zero-energy symmetry actions for fixed ${\bf P}$:
198: changing the cycloid phase and rotating the cycloid direction
199: in the $xy$ plane.  The displacement for the phase change from the
200: transformation $qx\rightarrow qx + \phi/L_0$ is
201: \begin{equation}
202: \delta \bm{L}=\phi \left[\cos(qx){\bf \hat{x}} -\sin(qx){\bf \hat{z}}\right].
203: \end{equation}
204: We can use the shorthand ${\bf \hat D}(x)$ for this spin vector
205: direction transverse to the local ground-state spin direction, and
206: write $\delta {\bf L} = \phi {\bf \hat D}(x)$ for the phase change.
207: The displacement for the cycloid direction change due to an
208: infinitesimal rotation $q{\bf \hat{x}}\rightarrow q({\bf \hat{x}}+\eta
209: {\bf \hat{y}})$ is 
210: $\delta {\bf L} = \eta L_0 q y {\bf
211:   \hat D}(x) + \eta L_0 \sin (q x) {\bf \hat y}$. This cycloid
212: direction symmetry is similar to the one found in smectic liquid
213: crystals in that it requires large displacements relative to the
214: original state at some point in the crystal.  
215: 
216: The linearized equations of motion for the ferroelectric and
217: antiferromagnetic order parameters are
218: \begin{subequations}
219: \begin{eqnarray}
220: \frac{\partial^{2} \bm{L}}{\partial t^{2}}
221: %&=& 
222: %r(\gamma L_0)^{2}{\bf \hat{L}}_{0}\times
223: %\left({\bf \hat{L}}_{0}\times \frac{\delta F}{\delta \bm{L}}
224: %\right)\cr
225: &=&-r(\gamma L_0)^2 \left[\frac{\delta F}{\delta \bm{L}}-\left(
226: {\bf \hat{L}}_{0}\cdot 
227: \frac{\delta F}{\delta \bm{L}}
228: \right)
229: {\bf\hat{L}}_{0}
230: \right],\label{ll}\\
231: \frac{\partial^{2} \bm{P}}{\partial t^{2}}&=&-f \frac{\delta F}{\delta \bm{P}}.\label{debye}
232: \end{eqnarray}
233: \end{subequations}
234: Here $\gamma$ is a gyromagnetic ratio with dimensions of (sG)$^{-1}$,
235: while $f$ has dimensions of s$^{-2}$ and plays a similar role in the
236: ferroelectric equation of motion. In the above polarization equation, we have
237: ignored damping and the possible Poisson-bracket term between ${\bf P}$ and
238: ${\bf M}$~\cite{bakerjarvis01}. The coupled spin and polarization equations are solved in terms of the parametrization
239: \begin{subequations}
240: \begin{eqnarray}
241: \delta \bm{L}&=& \phi(\bm{r}) \textrm{e}^{-i\omega t}{\bf \hat{D}}(x) 
242: +\psi(\bm{r}) \textrm{e}^{-i\omega t} {\bf \hat{y}},\\
243: \delta \bm{P}&=& \delta \bm{p}(\bm{r}) \textrm{e}^{-i\omega t}.
244: \end{eqnarray}
245: \end{subequations}
246: The field $\phi(\bm{r})$ denotes phase fluctuations of the cycloid
247: ground state, while $\psi(\bm{r})$ refers to spin fluctuations out of
248: the cycloid ($xz$) plane. The field
249: $\delta\bm{p}(\bm{r})=\bm{P}-\bm{P}_0$ denotes optical phonon
250: fluctuations related to longitudinal and transverse vibrations of the
251: ferroelectric moment $\bm{P}$ \footnote{While there are many optical
252:   phonons in a ferroelectric, this field $\bm{P}$ should be thought of
253:   as describing the particular polar phonon that goes soft at the
254:   ferroelectric transition.}.
255: 
256: %The required derivative of the free energy, to linear order in the
257: %displacements, is 
258: %\begin{eqnarray}
259: %\frac{\delta F}{\delta \bm{L}} &=& -c\nabla^2 \phi {\bf \hat{D}}-2cq(\partial_y \psi) {\bf \hat{z}}
260: %+\left[\left(cq^2 -c\nabla^2\right)\psi -2cq\sin(qx)(\partial_y\phi)\right]{\bf \hat{y}} \nonumber\\
261: %&&-\alpha L_0 \left[2q\cos(qx)(\delta \bm{p}_y) - {\bf \hat{L}}_0 \times \left(\nabla \times \delta \bm{p}\right)
262: %\right]+(\cdots){\bf \hat{L}}_0.\label{dfdl}
263: %\end{eqnarray}
264: \begin{widetext}
265: Calculating $\delta F/\delta \bm{L}$ to linear order in the
266: displacements, and inserting into Eq.~(\ref{ll}) leads to
267: \begin{subequations}
268: \begin{eqnarray}
269: \left[\omega'^2+c\nabla^2\right]\phi&=&2cq\sin(qx)(\partial_y \psi)
270: -\alpha L_0 \left(\nabla\times \delta\bm{p}\right)
271: \cdot{\bf \hat{y}},
272: \label{phieqn}\\
273: \left[\omega'^2-cq^2+c\nabla^2\right]\psi&=&
274: -2cq\sin(qx) (\partial_y\phi)
275: -\alpha L_0 \left[
276: 2q\cos(qx)(\delta p_y) -\left(\nabla\times \delta\bm{p}\right)\cdot {\bf \hat{D}}
277: \right],\label{psieqn}
278: \end{eqnarray}
279: with $\omega'=\omega /(\gamma L_0 \sqrt{r})$ defining the frequency in
280: units of $\sim 10^{12}$~rad/s.  The equation of motion for the
281: polarization becomes
282: \begin{equation}
283: \xi \omega'^2 (\delta\bm{p})=\frac{\delta F}{\delta \bm{P}}=
284: a_{\parallel}(\delta\bm{p}_z) +a_{\perp}(\delta\bm{p}_{\perp})
285: -\alpha L_0 \left[
286: q\cos(qx)(\psi) {\bf \hat{y}} +(\bm{\nabla} \phi) \times {\bf \hat{y}}-(\bm{\nabla}\psi) \times {\bf \hat{D}}
287: \right]-\bm{E},\label{dpeqn}
288: \end{equation}
289: \end{subequations}
290: where we define $\xi = r(\gamma L_0)^2/f$  ($\sim 10$ in BiFeO$_3$),
291: $a_{\parallel}=-2a+3\alpha^2L_{0}^{2}/c$, and the AC electric field is
292: $\bm{E}\textrm{e}^{-i\omega t}$.
293: \end{widetext}
294: 
295: Some intuition for Eqs.~(\ref{phieqn})-(\ref{dpeqn}) may be gained by
296: considering their invariance
297: under rotations of the cycloid in the $xy$ plane. Consider the
298: $\omega=0$ symmetry operation $\phi\rightarrow \eta q y $, $\psi
299: \rightarrow \eta \sin(qx)$, with $\delta\bm{p}$ left unchanged.  This
300: creates no terms in both sides of Eq.~(\ref{phieqn}). In
301: Eq.~(\ref{psieqn}), the left hand side becomes $-2cq^2\eta \sin(qx)$,
302: which cancels the term generated in the right hand side due to
303: the $y$-dependence in $\phi$.  For the square brackets in
304: Eq.~(\ref{dpeqn}), the first term adds $q\cos(qx)[\eta\sin(qx)]{\bf
305:   \hat{y}}$, with the third term $-\bm{\nabla}[\eta\sin(qx)]\times{\bf
306:   \hat{D}}$ giving the desired cancellation.
307: 
308: In the commensurate limit, $\alpha,q \rightarrow 0$ and we recover two
309: transverse AFM fluctuation modes with $\omega'^2=ck^2$.  There are two
310: dispersionless polarization wave modes transverse to $\bm{P}_0$ with
311: frequency $\omega'^2=a_{\perp}/\xi$, and one longitudinal mode with
312: frequency $\omega'^2=a_{\parallel}/\xi$.  The combination orthogonal
313: to $\phi{\bf \hat{D}}$, and $\psi {\bf \hat{y}}$, $S = {\bf \hat{L}}_0
314: \cdot {\delta \bm{L}}$, is constant in time in the equation of motion
315: above but decays dissipatively if non-Poisson bracket terms are kept.
316: It is not expected to modify the above propagating modes.  For $k
317: \rightarrow 0$ in the $\phi$ mode, we obtain a symmetry (the phase
318: shift) which should be nondissipative.  For $k \rightarrow 0$ in the
319: $\psi$ mode, there should be some finite dissipation.
320: 
321: We solve the system Eqs.~(\ref{phieqn})-(\ref{dpeqn}) using the ansatz
322: \begin{equation}
323: [\phi(\bm{r}),\psi(\bm{r}),\delta\bm{p}(\bm{r})]= 
324: \sum_{n} [\phi_n,\psi_n,(\bm{p})_n] \textrm{e}^{inqx}\textrm{e}^{i\bm{k}\cdot \rm{r}},
325: \end{equation}
326: %\begin{subequations}
327: %\begin{eqnarray}
328: %\phi(\bm{r})&=& \sum_{n} \phi_n \textrm{e}^{inqx}\textrm{e}^{i\bm{k}\cdot \rm{r}},\\
329: %\psi(\bm{r})&=& \sum_{n} \psi_n \textrm{e}^{inqx}\textrm{e}^{i\bm{k}\cdot \rm{r}},\\
330: %\delta \bm{p}(\bm{r})&=& \sum_{n} (\bm{p})_n \textrm{e}^{inqx}
331: %\textrm{e}^{i\bm{k}\cdot \rm{r}},
332: %\end{eqnarray}
333: %\end{subequations}
334: with $n$ an integer running from $-\infty$ to $\infty$ and the
335: restriction $|k_x|<q/2$. The complex numbers $\phi_n$, $\psi_n$, $(p_i)_n$ are
336: independent of $\bm{r}$ but have a $\bm{k}$ dependence.
337: Substitution of this ansatz into Eqs.~(\ref{phieqn})-(\ref{dpeqn}) yields a
338: linear system of equations whose characteristic polynomial determines
339: the resonance frequencies. 
340: 
341: Consider the unmixed spin waves in the limit
342: $(\bm{p})_n\rightarrow 0$. Substitution of the ansatz into
343: Eqs.~(\ref{phieqn}),~(\ref{psieqn}) gives
344: \begin{subequations}
345: \begin{eqnarray}
346: \left[ \omega'^2-c\tilde{k}^2\right]& \phi_n & - c k_y\left(\psi_{n-1}-\psi_{n+1}\right)=0,
347: \label{phin}\\
348: \left[\omega'^2 -c(\tilde{k}^2+q^2)\right] &\psi_n & + c k_y\left(\phi_{n-1}-\phi_{n+1}\right)=0,
349: \label{psin}
350: \end{eqnarray}
351: \end{subequations}
352: with $\tilde{k}^2=(k_x+nq)^2+k_{y}^{2}+k_{z}^{2}$.  We see that modes
353: propagating along the cycloid plane (with $k_y=0$) are simple plane
354: waves with cyclon ($\phi$) and out of plane ($\psi$) dispersions given
355: by $\omega'^2=c\tilde{k}^2$ and $\omega'^2=c(\tilde{k}^2+q^2)$
356: respectively. As expected from symmetry, the cyclon mode remains soft,
357: but the out of plane mode $\psi$ acquires a gap due to the pinning of
358: the cycloid plane by the ferroelectric moment. Note that the $\psi_0$
359: gap equals the cyclon energy at $n=\pm 1$. At $\bm{k}=0$, the AFM
360: resonance modes are simply $\omega'_{n}=\sqrt{c}q|n|$ and
361: $\omega'_{n}=\sqrt{c}q\sqrt{n^2+1}$ for the cyclon and out of plane
362: excitations respectively.  For BiFeO$_3$, $cq^2\sim 1$
363: \cite{sosnowska82,zalesski00}, and the modes are equally spaced by approximately
364: $10^{12}$~rad/s intervals ($0.16$~THz or $10$~K).
365: 
366: If the propagation vector has a small projection along the $k_y$
367: direction, the dispersion curves in the cycloid plane will repel each
368: other whenever they intersect. This leads to a series of small gaps
369: (anticrossings) in the propagation frequency as a function of the
370: reduced $k_x$, similar to the effect discussed by Bar'yakhtar in an
371: helical ferromagnet \cite{baryakhtar70}. Apart from these small gaps,
372: the high-frequency dispersion curves are nearly unaffected by the
373: incommensurate order.  A very different situation is found for the
374: low-frequency modes along the non-trivial $y$ direction. Consider for
375: example the lowest frequency mode $\phi_0$. Solving
376: Eqs.~(\ref{phin}),~(\ref{psin}) within ${\cal O}(k^{6})$ leads to
377: \begin{equation}
378: \omega'^2\approx c\left[k_{x}^{2}+k_{z}^{2}+\frac{3}{8}\frac{k_{y}^{4}}{q^2}
379: -\frac{k_{x}^{2}k_{y}^{2}}{q^2}\right].
380: \end{equation}
381: This soft mode dispersion is strongly anisotropic, and may be useful
382: for electrical control of the spin wave group velocity via
383: switching of the $\bm{P}_0$ direction. A similar effect is found for
384: phase fluctuations in smectic liquid crystals, and in an helical
385: ferromagnet such as MnSi \cite{kirkpatrick05}. The anisotropy is
386: related to the $\bm{q}$ rotation symmetry discussed above, which
387: forbids a $k_{y}^{2}$ term in the dispersion.
388: 
389: \begin{figure}
390:   \includegraphics[width=3in]{spectra} \caption{(color online). Spin
391:     wave spectra for a cycloidal multiferroic including one optical
392:     phonon mode (not shown).  The solid lines are for propagation along the
393:     non-trivial direction perpendicular to the cycloid plane ($y$ in
394:     Fig.~1). The dashed lines are the spectra for propagation along
395:     $z$, including zone folding.  The magnon modes at $nq$ are
396:     labelled by $\phi_n$ (cyclon) and $\psi_n$ (out of plane).}
397:   \label{fig2} \end{figure} 
398: 
399: A full numerical solution for propagation along $y$ is shown in
400: Fig.~\ref{fig2}. Note that in addition to the soft mode anisotropy
401: effect, $k_y\neq 0$ admixes the modes at $nq$ and $-nq$, splitting
402: their dispersions. Moreover, the second lowest frequency mode
403: (connected to $\phi_{\pm 1}$) acquires a negative group velocity.
404: 
405: The full solution of Eqs.~(\ref{phieqn})-(\ref{dpeqn}) with
406: $(\delta\bm{p})\neq 0$ shows avoided crossings between the optical phonon dispersion
407: and magnon branches at finite $k$. At these
408: anticrossings the spin wave excitations are highly mixed with the
409: polarization wave. However, an optical experiment only probes modes at
410: $\bm{k} \approx 0$ due to the large value of the velocity of light when
411: compared to the magnon velocity ($\sim 10^{6}$~cm/s). One can ask
412: whether any $n>0$ mode responds to optical excitation
413: with wavelength much larger than $2\pi/q\approx 600$~\AA. The answer
414: is affirmative as now shown by calculation of
415: the AC electric susceptibility.
416: 
417: An AC electric excitation $\bm{E}\textrm{e}^{-i\omega t}$ may excite
418: spin waves due to the appearence of magnetoelectric fields
419: such as $2q \cos{(qx)}(\delta p_y)$ 
420: on the right hand side
421: of Eq.~(\ref{psieqn}). This couples $\psi$ to an optical phonon at $k=0$.
422: %There are five coupled equations of motion for spin and polarization
423: %waves with an AC electric excitation $\bm{E}\textrm{e}^{-i\omega t}$.
424: %One equation couples $\psi$ to the polarization; at $\bm{k}=0$,
425: %\begin{eqnarray}
426: %%\left(\omega'^2-cq^2n^2\right)\phi_n&=&i\alpha qL_0n(p_z)_n,\\
427: %\left[\omega'^2-cq^2(n^2+1)\right]\psi_n&=&-\frac{\alpha q L_0}{2}\left[(n+1)(p_y)_{n-1}\right.\nonumber\\
428: %&&\left.-(n-1)(p_y)_{n+1}\right].
429: %%\left(\xi \omega'^2-a_{\perp}\right)(p_x)_n&=&-E_x \delta_{n0},\\
430: %%\left(\xi \omega'^2-a_{\perp}\right)(p_y)_n&=&-E_y \delta_{n0}-\frac{\alpha q L_0}{2}\left[
431: %%(n+2)\psi_{n+1}\right.\nonumber\\&&\left.-(n-2)\psi_{n-1}\right],\\
432: %%\left(\xi \omega'^2-a_{\parallel}\right)(p_z)_n&=&-E_z \delta_{n0}-i\alpha q L_o n\phi_n.
433: %\end{eqnarray}
434: %The AC electrical susceptibility tensor is defined as
435: %$(p_i)_0=\chi_{ij}E_{j}$. 
436: Solving the system of equations shows that the AC electrical susceptibility tensor 
437: $(p_i)_0=\chi_{ij}E_{j}$ is diagonal for our model, with $\chi_{xx}=-1/(\xi
438: \omega'^2-a_{\perp})$, $\chi_{zz}=-1/(\xi \omega'^2-a_{\parallel})$.
439: Therefore the optical response with light polarized within the cycloid
440: plane contains no magnetic anomaly but only simple poles at the bare
441: optical phonon frequencies. However, if the light is polarized along
442: the direction perpendicular to the cycloid plane, the situation is quite different,
443: \begin{equation}
444: \chi_{yy}(\omega)=
445: %\frac{-1}{(\xi \omega'^2-a_{\perp})-\frac{2(\alpha q L_0)^2}{(\omega'^2-2cq^2)}}=
446: \frac{-(\omega'^2-2cq^2)}{
447: (\omega'^{2}-\Omega'^{2}_{{\rm PH}})
448: (\omega'^{2}-\Omega'^{2}_{{\rm AFM}})}.
449: \end{equation}
450: This AC susceptibility has two poles at the following shifted phonon
451: and AFM ($\psi_{\pm1}$ mode) frequencies:
452: $\Omega'^{2}_{{\rm PH}}= a_{\perp}/\xi+2cq^2$,
453: $\Omega'^{2}_{{\rm AFM}}= 2cq^2-2(\alpha q L_0)^2/a_{\perp}$.
454: %where contributions of order ${\cal O}
455: %\left(\xi cq^2/a_{\perp}\right)^{2}$ were dropped.
456: 
457: Hence we conclude that the simplest model for BiFeO$_3$ already
458: contains a low-frequency magneto-optical resonance. Note the prominent
459: importance of magnon zone folding: Even though the AC electric field
460: is a zero wavevector excitation, it couples to a magnon at wavevector
461: $\pm q$. This is a special feature of electromagnetic excitations in
462: an incommensurate multiferroic material. 
463: 
464: The magnon excitations of a cycloid with wavevector $q$ may violate
465: momentum conservation by a multiple of $q$ (a reciprocal lattice
466: vector for the cycloid). In the case of a multiferroic material with
467: incommensurate magnetic order, this allows the possibility of
468: observing additional magneto-dielectric resonances due to the coupling
469: of a zero-wavevector phonon to magnon modes at other multiples of
470: $q$.    To see this effect, consider a contribution to the free energy in the
471: form of an easy-plane anisotropy
472: $\frac{\lambda}{2}\left(\bm{P}\cdot \bm{L}\right)^2$,
473: which is known to add anharmonicity to the cycloid order
474: \cite{sparavigna94}. To first order in $\lambda$, this term adds a third
475: harmonic to Eq.~(\ref{l0}). This gives an additional magnetoelectric
476: contribution to the right side of the equation determining the
477: cyclon field $\phi$ [Eq.~(\ref{phieqn})]:
478: $\lambda P_0 L_0/2 \left[\cos{(2qx)}(\delta p_x) - \sin{(2qx)}(\delta p_z)\right]$.
479: %\begin{equation}
480: %\frac{\lambda P_0 L_0}{2} \left[\cos{(2qx)}(\delta p_x) - \sin{(2qx)}(\delta p_z)\right].
481: %\end{equation}
482: As a result, the AC electric susceptibilities $\chi_{xx},\chi_{zz}$
483: develop poles at the magnon modes $\phi_{\pm 2}$. Similarly, the out
484: of plane field $\psi$ is excited by a term of the form $\cos{(3qx)}
485: (\delta p_y)$, showing that $\chi_{yy}$ has an additional
486: electromagnon pole at the mode $\psi_{\pm 3}$.  Considering additional
487: powers of $\lambda$ (higher harmonics of the cycloid) shows that
488: higher frequency resonances at $nq$ 
489: are present, with strength falling off as
490: higher powers of $\lambda$.
491: 
492: In conclusion, we determined the electromagnon spectra for a class of
493: cycloidal multiferroics including bulk BiFeO$_3$.  A simple
494: Landau-Ginzburg model shows that a low-frequency optical probe will
495: couple to magnons at multiples of the cycloid wave vector, leading to
496: a series of magneto-dielectric resonances at integer $n$ and
497: irrational $\sqrt{1+n^2}$ multiples of a fundamental cyclon frequency
498: ($\phi_n$ and $\psi_n$ magnons respectively).  Interestingly, only one
499: mode ($\psi_{\pm 1}$) becomes electric dipole active due to the strong
500: linear magnetoelectric effect driving the harmonic cycloid order. The
501: remaining modes acquire a small electric dipole character due to
502: weaker quadratic magnetoelectric effects and anharmonicity in the
503: cycloid order. As a result, optical experiments such as
504: transmittivity, reflectivity, and Raman spectroscopy will reveal much
505: more about the magnetic order of multiferroics than previously
506: expected on the basis of homogeneous models.  For example, the
507: direction dependence and intensity of higher resonances is directly
508: related to anharmonicity in the magnetic order.  Other incommensurate
509: multiferroics may show similar phenomena even if the details of the
510: multiferroic coupling are different.
511: 
512: The authors acknowledge useful conversations with S. Mukerjee, J.
513: Orenstein, R. Ramesh, I. Souza, N. Spaldin, and A. Vishwanath. This
514: work was supported by WIN (RdS) and by NSF DMR-0238760 (JEM).
515: 
516: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
517: 
518: %Giant magnetoelectric effect in BiFeO3 heterostructures
519: \bibitem{wang03} J. Wang {\it et al.}, Science {\bf 299}, 1719 (2003).
520: 
521: %Experiment claiming magnetic control of ferroelectricity in RMnO_3
522: \bibitem{kimura03} T. Kimura {\it et al.}, Nature {\bf 426}, 55 (2003).
523: 
524: %Optical experiments in RMnO_3 (low temperature electromagnon)
525: \bibitem{pimenov06} A. Pimenov {\it et al.}, Nature Physics {\bf 2}, 97 (2006).
526: 
527: %Optical experiments in RMnO_5 (low temperature electromagnon)
528: \bibitem{sushkov07} A.B. Sushkov {\it et al.}, \prl {\bf 98}, 027202 (2007). 
529: 
530: %Landau-Ginzburg for multiferroics
531: \bibitem{harris06} A. B. Harris, \prb {\bf 76}, 054447 (2007).
532: 
533: %Electrical control of magnetic order in BiFeO3
534: \bibitem{zhao06}  T. Zhao {\it et al.}, Nature Materials  {\bf 5}, 823 (2006).
535: 
536: %ESR experiment confirming the cycloid to homogeneous phase transition at high B
537: \bibitem{ruette04} B. Ruette {\it et al.}, \prb {\bf 69}, 064114 (2004).
538: 
539: %RdS: Added additional reference for film, very useful paper. 
540: %Destruction of Cycloid in (111) thin films.
541: \bibitem{bai05} F. Bai {\it et al.}, Appl. Phys. Lett. {\bf 86},
542:   032511 (2005);  H. B\'{e}a {\it et al.}, Phil. Mag. Lett. {\bf 87},
543:   165 (2007).
544: 
545: % Raman and reflectivity experiments in THz region for bulk BFO
546: \bibitem{haumont06} R. Haumont, J. Kreisel, P. Bouvier, and F.
547:   Hippert, \prb {\bf 73}, 132101 (2006); S. Kamba {\it et al.}, \prb
548:   {\bf 75}, 024403 (2007).
549: 
550: % spin-wave devices
551: \bibitem{khitun05} A. Khitun and K. L. Wang, Superlattices and
552:   Microstructures {\bf 38}, 184 (2005).
553: 
554: %Theory of optical phonons in bulk BFO
555: \bibitem{hermet07} P. Hermet, M. Goffinet, J. Kreisel, and Ph. Ghosez,
556:   \prb {\bf 75}, 220102(R) (2007).
557: 
558: %Original work on electromagnons
559: \bibitem{baryakhtar69} V.G. Bar'yakhtar and I.E. Chupis, Sov. Phys.
560:   Solid State {\bf 10}, 2818 (1969); {\it ibid} {\bf 11}, 2628 (1970).
561: 
562: %AC susceptibilities in magnetoelectric BaMnF_4
563: \bibitem{tilley82} D.R. Tilley and J.F. Scott, \prb {\bf 25}, 3251
564:   (1982); G.A. Maugin, \prb {\bf 23}, 4608 (1981).
565: 
566: %Landau theory for spiral induced ferroelectricity
567: \bibitem{mostovoy06} M. Mostovoy, \prl {\bf 96}, 067601 (2006).
568: 
569: %Microscopic mechanism for spiral induced ferroelectricity; 
570: %Spin waves inducing ferroelectricity in RMnO_3
571: \bibitem{katsura05} H. Katsura, N. Nagaosa, A.V. Balatsky, \prl {\bf 95}, 057205 (2005);
572: {\it ibid.} {\bf 98}, 027203 (2007).
573: 
574: \bibitem{betouras07} J.J. Betouras, G. Giovannetti, and J. van den
575:   Brink, \prl {\bf 98}, 257602 (2007).
576: 
577: %Theory for the cycloid
578: \bibitem{sparavigna94} A. Sparavigna, A. Strigazzi, and A. Zvezdin, \prb {\bf 50}, 2953 (1994).
579: 
580: %Original neutron scattering experiment reporting a cycloid order in BiFeO3 
581: \bibitem{sosnowska82} I. Sosnowska, T. Peterlin-Neumaier, and E.
582:   Steichele, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. {\bf 15}, 4835 (1982).
583: 
584: %NMR reporting cycloid anharmonicity as a function of temperature
585: \bibitem{zalesski00} A.V. Zalesski\u{i}, A. K. Zvezdin, A.A. Frolov, and A.A. Bush, JETP Lett.
586:   {\bf 71}, 465 (2000).
587: 
588: %Poisson brackets between P and M
589: \bibitem{bakerjarvis01} J. Baker-Jarvis and P. Kabos, \pre {\bf 64}, 056127 (2001).
590: 
591: %Original spin wave work on a spiral ferromagnet (no magnetoelectric coupling!)
592: \bibitem{baryakhtar70} V.G. Bar'yakhtar and E.P. Stefanovskii, Sov. Phys. Solid State {\bf 11}, 1566 (1970).
593: 
594: %Soft mode anisotropy in a spiral ferromagnet in the context of observed non-Fermi liquid behavior in MnSi
595: \bibitem{kirkpatrick05} T. R. Kirkpatrick and D. Belitz, \prb {\bf 72}, 180402(R) (2005).
596: 
597: \end{thebibliography} 
598: 
599: \end{document}