1: %\documentclass{emulateapj}
2: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
3:
4: %\usepackage{natbib}
5:
6: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
7: \newcommand{\myemail}{rhee@astro.ucla.edu}
8:
9: %\slugcomment{To appear in ApJ, 2007}
10:
11: \shortauthors{Rhee et al.}
12:
13: \begin{document}
14:
15:
16: \title{EF~Cha: Warm Dust Orbiting a Nearby 10 Myr Old Star}
17:
18:
19: \author{Joseph H. Rhee\altaffilmark{1}, Inseok Song\altaffilmark{2},
20: B. Zuckerman\altaffilmark{3}}
21:
22: \altaffiltext{1}{Gemini Observatory, 670 North A'ohoku Place, Hilo, HI
23: 96720; current address (Department of Physics and Astronomy, Box 951547,
24: University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1562; rhee@astro.ucla.edu)}
25: \altaffiltext{2}{Gemini Observatory, 670 North A'ohoku Place, Hilo, HI
26: 96720}
27: \altaffiltext{3}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, Box 951547,
28: University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1562; NASA Astrobiology
29: Institute}
30:
31: \begin{abstract}
32: Most Vega-like stars have far-infrared excess (60\,$\micron$ or
33: longward in {\it IRAS, ISO, or Spitzer MIPS} bands) and contain cold
34: dust ($\lesssim$150\,K) analogous to the Sun's Kuiper-Belt region.
35: However, dust in a region more akin to our asteroid belt and thus relevant
36: to the terrestrial planet building process is warm and produces excess
37: emission in mid-infrared wavelengths. By cross-correlating Hipparcos
38: dwarfs with the MSX catalog, we found that EF~Cha, a member of the
39: recently identified, $\sim$10\,Myr old, ``Cha-Near'' Moving Group,
40: possesses prominent mid-infrared excess. N-band spectroscopy reveals
41: a strong emission feature characterized by a mixture of small, warm,
42: amorphous and possibly crystalline silicate grains. Survival time of
43: warm dust grains around this A9 star is $\lesssim 10^{5}$ yrs, much
44: less than the age of the star. Thus, grains in this extra-solar terrestrial
45: planetary zone must be of "second generation" and not a remnant of
46: primodial dust and are suggestive of substantial planet formation
47: activity. Such second generation warm excess occurs around $\sim$
48: 13\% of the early-type stars in nearby young stellar associations.
49: \end{abstract}
50:
51: \keywords{circumstellar matter --- infrared: stars --- planetary
52: systems: protoplanetary disks --- stars: individual (EF~Cha)}
53:
54: \section{Introduction}
55: In our Solar System, zodiacal dust grains are warm ($\gtrsim$150\,K) and
56: found within $\sim$3\,AU of the Sun. Slow but persistent collisions
57: between asteroids complemented by material released from comets now
58: replenish these particles. Similar warm dust particles around other
59: stars are also expected and would be manifested as excess mid-infrared
60: emission.
61:
62: The implication of ``warm'' excess stars for the terrestrial planet-building
63: process has prompted many searches including several pointed observing
64: campaigns with {\it Spitzer}
65: \citep{gor04,rie05,low05,bei05,bei06,bry06,hin06,gor06,smi06}.
66: However, a lack of consensus of what constitutes a ``warm excess''
67: has resulted in ambiguity and some confusion in the field. For example,
68: Spitzer surveys with MIPS revealed a number of stars with excess
69: emission in the 24\,$\micron$ band. However, very few of these may
70: turn out as genuine ``warm excess'' stars because the detected
71: 24\,$\micron$ emission is mostly the Wien tail of emission from cold
72: (T $<$ 150\,K) dust grains \citep{rhe07a}.
73:
74: For black-body grains,
75: $T_{dust}$ = T$_{*}$(R$_{*}$/(2R$_{dust})$)$^{1/2}$, where R$_{dust}$
76: is the distance of a grain from a star of radius R$_{*}$ and temperature
77: T$_{*}$. Due to the dependence of
78: $T_{dust}$ on T$_{*}$ and R$_{*}$, the terrestrial planetary zone
79: (TPZ) around high mass stars extends further out than that around
80: low mass stars. Therefore, R$_{dust}$ is not a good way to
81: define the TPZ while dust equilibrium temperature is equally
82: applicable to all main-sequence stars. In our Solar system, T$_{dust}$
83: is 150K near the outer boundary of the asteroid belt ($\sim$3.5\,AU),
84: and the zodiacal dust particles are sufficiently large
85: ($\sim$30\,$\micron$) that they do radiate like blackbodies. To
86: specify a TPZ independent of the mass of the central star, we
87: define the TPZ to be the region where T$_{dust} \gtrsim$ 150\,K.
88: Then an A0 star has 25\,AU and an M0 star has 0.9\,AU as the outer
89: boundary of their TPZ. Because of the way it is defined, TPZ applies
90: only to the location of grains that radiate like a blackbody.
91:
92: According to the Spitzer surveys listed above, the presence of dust
93: in the TPZ characterized by excess in the mid-IR is quite rare for
94: stars $\gtrsim$10\,Myrs old. For ages in the range of $8-30$\,Myr, a
95: posited period of the terrestrial planet formation in our Solar System,
96: only a few stars appear to possess warm dust according to our
97: analysis (see $\S$ 5 and Table 1): $\eta$~Cha,
98: a B8 member of 8 Myr old $\eta$ Cha cluster \citep{mam99}, $\eta$~Tel
99: \& HD~172555, A0- and A7- type members of the 12 Myr old $\beta$ Pic
100: moving group \citep{zuc04}, HD~3003, an A0 member of the 30 Myr old
101: Tucana/Horologium moving group \citep{zsw01}, and HD~113766, an F3
102: binary star (1.2$\arcsec$ separation, \citealt{dom94}), in the Lower
103: Centaurus Crux (LCC) Association \citep{che05}.
104:
105: In this paper, we present the A9 star EF Cha, another example of this
106: rare group of stars with warm dust at the epoch of terrestrial planet
107: formation.
108:
109: \section{MSX Search for Mid-IR Excess Stars}
110:
111: Hipparcos, 2MASS and Mid Course Experiment (MSX, \citealt{ega03}) sources
112: were cross-correlated to identify main-sequence stars with excess
113: emission at mid-IR wavelengths. Out of $\sim$68,000 Hipparcos dwarfs with
114: $M_{V}$ $\geqq$ 6.0(\bv) - 2.0 (see \citealt{rhe07a} for an explanation
115: of this $M_{V}$ constraint) in a search radius of 10$\arcsec$, $\sim$1000
116: stars within 120 pc of Earth were identified with potential MSX
117: counterparts.
118:
119: Spectral Energy Distributions (SED) were created for all $\sim$1,000
120: MSX identified Hipparcos dwarfs. Observed fluxes from Tycho-2 $B_{T}$
121: and $V_{T}$ and 2MASS $J$, $H$, and $K_{s}$, were fit to a stellar
122: atmospheric model \citep{hau99} via a \(\chi\)$^{2}$ minimization method
123: (see \citealt{rhe07a}, for detailed description of SED fitting). From
124: these SED fits, about 100 Hipparcos dwarfs were retained that
125: showed apparent excess emission in the MSX 8\,$\micron$ band (that is,
126: the ratio {[MSX flux - photosphere flux] / MSX flux uncertainty} must
127: be $>$ 3.0). Since a typical positional 3$\sigma$ uncertainty of MSX
128: is $\sim$6\,$\arcsec$ \citep{cla05} and MSX surveyed the
129: Galactic plane, a careful background check is required to eliminate
130: contamination sources. By over-plotting the 2MASS sources on the Digital
131: Sky Survey (DSS) images, we eliminated more than half of the apparent
132: excess stars that included any dubious object (i.e., extended objects,
133: extremely red objects, etc.) within a 10$\arcsec$ radius from the star.
134: Among the stars that passed this visual check, EF~Cha was selected for
135: follow-up observations at the Gemini South Telescope. Independent IRAS
136: detections at 12 and 25\,$\micron$ made EF~Cha one of the best candidates
137: for further investigation.
138:
139: \section{Ground-based Follow-up Observations \& MIPS Photometry}
140:
141: An N-band image and a spectrum of EF~Cha were obtained using the
142: Thermal-Region Camera Spectrograph (T-ReCS) at the Gemini South Telescope
143: in March and July of 2006 (GS-2006A-Q-10), respectively. Thanks to the
144: queue observing mode at Gemini Observatory, the data were obtained under
145: good seeing and photometric conditions. The standard ``beam switching''
146: mode was used in all observations in order to suppress sky emission and
147: radiation from the telescope. Data were obtained chopping the secondary
148: at a frequency of 2.7 Hz and noddding the telescope every $\sim$30\,sec.
149: Chopping and nodding were set to the same direction, parallel to the slit
150: for spectroscopy.
151:
152: Standard data reduction procedures were carried out to reduce the
153: image and the spectrum of EF~Cha at N-band. Raw images were first
154: sky-subtracted using the sky frame from each chop pair. Bad pixels were
155: replaced by the median of their neighboring pixels. Aperture photometry
156: was performed with a radius of 9 pixels (0.9\,$\arcsec$) and sky annuli
157: of 14 to 20 pixels. The spectrum of a standard star (HD 129078) was
158: divided by a Planck function with the star's effective temperature
159: (4500K) and this ratioed spectrum was then divided into the spectrum
160: of EF~Cha to remove telluric and instrumental features. The wavelength
161: calibration was performed using atmospheric transition lines from an
162: unchopped raw frame. The 1-D spectrum was extracted by weighted
163: averaging of 17 rows.
164:
165: For the N-band imaging photometry, the on-source integration time of
166: 130 seconds produced S/N $>$ 30 with FWHM $\sim$0.54\,$\arcsec$. For
167: the N-band spectrum, a 886 second on-source exposure resulted in S/N
168: $>$ 20. A standard star, HIP 57092, was observed close in time and
169: position to our target and was used for flux calibration of the N-band
170: image of EF~Cha. For spectroscopy, HD 129078, a KIII 2.5 star, was
171: observed after EF~Cha at a similar airmass and served as a telluric
172: standard.
173:
174: While our paper was being reviewed, Spitzer Multiband Imaging Photometer
175: for Spitzer (MIPS) archival images of EF~Cha at 24 and 70\,$\micron$ were
176: released from the Gould's Belt Legacy program led by Lori Allen.
177: EF~Cha was detected at MIPS 24\,$\micron$ band but not at MIPS
178: 70\,$\micron$ band. We performed aperture photometry for EF~Cha at
179: 24\,$\micron$ on the post-BCD image produced by Spitzer Science Center MIPS
180: pipeline. We used aperture correction of 1.167 for the 24\,$\micron$ image
181: given at the SSC MIPS website (http://ssc.spitzer.caltech.edu/mips/apercorr/)
182: with aperture radius of 13\arcsec and sky inner and outer annuli of 20\arcsec
183: and 32\arcsec, respectively. For MIPS 70\,$\micron$ data, we estimated
184: 3~$\sigma$ upper limits to the non-detection on the mosaic image that we
185: produced using MOPEX software on BCD images.
186:
187: \section{Results}
188: Table~2 lists the mid-IR measurements of EF~Cha from MSX, IRAS, MIPS,
189: and Gemini T-ReCS observations. The T-ReCS N-band image (FOV of
190: 28.8$\arcsec$ $\times$ 21.6 $\arcsec$) confirmed that no other mid-IR
191: source appears in the vicinity of EF~Cha and that the mid-IR excess
192: detected by the space observatories (IRAS \& MSX) originates solely
193: from EF~Cha. A strong silicate emission feature in the N-band spectrum
194: (Figure 1) indicates the presence of warm, small ($a$ $\lesssim$ 5$\micron$,
195: see Figure 6 in \citealt{rhe06}) dust particles. Amorphous silicate
196: grains dominate the observed emission feature. However, crystalline
197: silicate structure, probably forsterite, appears as a small bump near
198: 11.3\,$\micron$ \citep{kes06}. Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon
199: (PAH) particles can also produce an emission feature at 11.3\,$\micron$.
200: However, absence of other strong PAH emission features at 7.7 and
201: 8.6\,$\micron$ indicates that the weak 11.3\,$\micron$ feature does not
202: arise from PAHs. Furthermore, although PAH particles do appear in
203: some very young stellar systems, they have not been detected around
204: stars as old as 10 Myr. In contrast, crystalline silicates
205: such as olivine, forsterite, etc. are seen in a few such stellar systems
206: \citep{son05,sch05,bei06,lis07}.
207:
208: The dust continuum excess of EF~Cha was fit with a single temperature
209: blackbody curve at 240\,K by matching the flux density at 13\,$\micron$
210: and the MIPS 70\,$\micron$ upper limit (Figure 1). The 3~$\sigma$ upper limit
211: at MIPS 70\,$\micron$ band indicates that the dust temperature should not
212: be colder than 240K. Figure 1 shows that MIPS 24\,$\micron$ flux is
213: $\sim$30\,mJy lower than IRAS 25\,$\micron$ flux. Due to the small MIPS
214: aperture size compared with IRAS, MIPS 24\,$\micron$ flux often comes out
215: smaller when nearby contaminating sources are included in the large IRAS
216: beam. The ground-based T-ReCS (28.8\arcsec$\times$21.6\arcsec) image
217: of EF~Cha at N-band, however, shows no contaminating source in the vicinity
218: of EF~Cha. Thus, the higher flux density at IRAS 25\,$\micron$ perhaps
219: indicates the presence of a significant silicate emission feature near
220: 18\,$\micron$ included in the wide passband of the IRAS 25\,$\micron$ filter
221: (18.5 $-$ 29.8\,$\micron$). A recent Spitzer IRS observation of another
222: warm excess star, BD+20 307 \citep{son05}, shows a similar discrepancy
223: between the IRAS 25\,$\micron$ flux and MIPS 24\,$\micron$ flux in the presence of a
224: significant silicate emission feature at $\sim$18\,$\micron$ (Weinberger et
225: al.\, 2007 in preparation), consistent with our interpretation.
226: MIPS 24\,$\micron$ flux is slightly above our 240\,K dust continuum fit.
227: The wide red wing of an 18\,$\micron$ silicate emission feature could
228: contribute to a slight increase in MIPS 24\,$\micron$ flux.
229:
230: \section{Discussion}
231: \subsection{Debris Disk Characteristics of EF~Cha}
232: EF~Cha was detected in the ROSAT X-ray All Sky Survey with $L_{x}/L_{bol}
233: = 10^{-4.68}$ which suggests a very young age for an A9 star (see Figure
234: 4 in \citealt{zuc04}). On the basis of this X-ray measurement, Hipparcos
235: distance (106 pc), location in the sky (RA = 12$^\circ$07$^\prime$, Dec=
236: -79$^\circ$), and proper motion (pmRA = -40.2$\pm$1.2 \& pmDE =
237: -8.4$\pm$1.3 in mas/yr), EF~Cha is believed to be a member of the
238: ``Cha-Near'' moving group (avg. RA = 12$^\circ$00$^\prime$ \& avg. DEC =
239: -79$^\circ$, avg. pmRA = -41.13$\pm$1.3 \& avg. pmDEC = -3.32$\pm$0.86
240: in mas/yr, \citealt{zuc04,zuc07}), which is $\sim$10 Myr old and typically
241: $\sim$90pc from Earth.
242:
243: Large blackbody grains in thermal equilibrium at 240\,K, would be located
244: $\sim$4.3\,AU from EF Cha while small grains, especially those
245: responsible for the silicate emission features in our N-band spectrum,
246: radiate less efficiently and could be located at $>$4.3\,AU. Recent Spitzer
247: MIPS observations confirmed that all aforementioned ($\S$ 1) warm excess
248: stars do not have a cold dust population, indicating few large grains at
249: large distances \citep{che06,smi06}. Lack of cold large grains, in turn,
250: suggests local origin of the small grains seen in these warm excess stars.
251: Without cold excess from Spitzer MIPS 70\,$\micron$ data, small grains in
252: EF~Cha should originate in the TPZ, probably by the breakup of large grains
253: in the TPZ, rather than inward migration from an outer disk. Even in the
254: unlikely event that silicate emission comes from small grains in an
255: outer disk that were blown away by radiation pressure as in Vega \citep{su05},
256: the dominant carrier of 240\,K continuum emission would still be large grains
257: (Aigen Li 2007, private communication).
258:
259: The fraction of the stellar luminosity reradiated by dust, $\tau$, is
260: $\sim 10^{-3}$, which was obtained by dividing the infrared excess
261: between 7\,$\micron$ and 60\,$\micron$ by the bolometric stellar luminosity.
262: This $\tau$ is $\sim$10,000 times larger than that of the current Sun's
263: zodiacal cloud ($\sim 10^{-7}$) but appears to be moderate for known
264: debris disk systems at similar ages (see Figure 4 in \citealt{rhe07a}).
265: \citet{rhe07a} show that the ratio of dust mass to $\tau$ of a debris
266: system is proportional to the inverse-square of dust particle semimajor
267: axis for semimajor axes between $\sim$9\,AU and $\sim$100\,AU. For systems
268: with dust radius $<$\,9\,AU, this relationship overestimates the dust mass.
269: Instead, we calculate the mass of a debris ring around EF~Cha using
270: \begin{equation}
271: M_{dust} \geq \frac{16}{3} \pi \frac{L_{IR}}{L_{*}} \rho_{s} R_{dust}^{2} <a>
272: \end{equation}
273: (eqn. 4 in \citealt{che01}), where $\rho_{s}$ is the density of an
274: individual grain, $L_{IR}$ is the dust luminosity, and $<a>$ is the
275: average grain radius. Because \citet{che01} analyzed $\zeta$~Lep, a
276: star of similar spectral type to EF~Cha, we adopt their model for grain
277: size distribution. Assuming R$_{dust}$ = 4.3\,AU, $\rho_{s}$ = 2.5
278: g~$cm^{-3}$, and $<a>$ = 3\,$\micron$, the dust mass is $4.8 \times
279: 10^{22}$ g ($\sim$10$^{-5}$ $M_{\earth}$). Grains with $a$ $=$
280: 3\,$\micron$ will radiate approximately as blackbodies at wavelengths
281: shorter than $\sim$2$\pi$$a$ ($\sim$20\,$\micron$). As may be seen
282: from Figure 1, most of the excess IR emission at EF~Cha appears at
283: wavelengths $\lesssim$20\,$\micron$.
284:
285: For blackbody grains at $\sim$4.3\,AU with, for example, radius
286: $a$ $=$ 3\,$\micron$, the Poynting Robertson (P-R) drag time scale
287: \footnote{In the calculation of P-R timescale, 9.7 $L_{\sun}$ was used
288: for the stellar luminosity of EF~Cha with a bolometric correction of
289: -0.102 \citep{cox00}. Absolute visual
290: magnitude of EF~Cha is 2.35 based on the Hipparcos distance of 106 pc. }
291: is only $8\times10^{3}$ years, much less than
292: 10 Myrs. Yet smaller grains with $a <$ 1.3\,$\micron$ would be easily
293: blown away by radiation pressure on a much shorter time-scale.
294: Successive collisions among grains can effectively remove dust
295: particles by grinding down large bodies into smaller grains, which then
296: can be blown out. The characteristic collision time (orbital
297: period/$\tau$) of dust grains at 4.3\,AU from this A9 star is $\sim 10^{4}$
298: years. Both PR time and collision time were derived assuming no gas was
299: present in the disk. While gas has not been actively searched for in
300: EF~Cha, few debris disk systems at $\gtrsim$ 10 Myr show presence of gas,
301: indicating early dispersal of gas \citep{pas06}. A possibility of an
302: optically thin gas disk surviving around a $\sim$10 Myr system
303: was investigated by \citet{tak01}. However their model of gas disk
304: is pertinent to cool dust at large distances ($\gtrsim$ 120 AU), but
305: not to warm dust close to the central star as in EF~Cha. In addition,
306: a recent study of OB associations shows that the lifetime of a primordial
307: inner disk is $\lesssim$ 3\,Myr for Herbig Ae/Be stars \citep{her05}.
308: Based on the very short time scales of dust grain removal, essentially
309: all grains responsible for significant excess emission at EF~Cha in the
310: mid-IR are, therefore, likely to be second generation, not a remnant of
311: primordial dust.
312:
313: \subsection{Debris Disk Systems in the TPZ during the Epoch of Planet
314: Formation}
315:
316: The presence of hot dust has been recognized around other $\sim$10\,Myr
317: stars, for example, TW~Hya, HD~98800, \& Hen~3-600 in the TW Hydrae
318: Association. Interesting characteristics of these systems are their large
319: $\tau$ ($\gtrsim10^{-2}$) and late-K and M spectral types. TW~Hya and
320: Hen~3-600 show flat IR SED up to 160\,$\micron$ consistent with active
321: accretion in their disks \citep{low05}. Combined with the presence of
322: substantial gas emission lines from TW~Hya, the observed infrared excess
323: emission, at least for these two stars, appears to arise from gaseous dusty
324: disks left over from the protostellar environment. On the other hand, a
325: lack of gas emission (\citealt{den05}) and the quadruple nature of the HD
326: 98800 system has invoked a flared debris disk as an alternative
327: explanation for its large infrared excess emission \citep{fur07}. Many
328: young stars come in multiple systems. However, they hardly display such
329: a high $\tau$ as that of HD~98800. Thus, the dust disk around HD~98800
330: might be an unusual transient pheonomeon such that it still contains a
331: dust population composed of a mixture of promordial grains and replenished
332: debris. Some stars display a mixture of warm and cold grains where the
333: overall infrared excess emissions is dominated by the cold dust.
334: Table~1 summarizes the currently known disk systems with warm dust
335: regardless of spectral type and the presence of cold excess or remnant
336: primordial dust at $\sim 8-30$\,Myr.
337:
338: What separates EF~Cha from the stars described in the previous paragraph
339: is that most of the infrared excess emission, if not all, arises from
340: warm dust in the TPZ, and as described in $\S$\,5.1, these grains are,
341: clearly, not a remnant of the protostellar disk. Recent Spitzer MIPS
342: observation shows null detection of EF Cha at 70\,$\micron$ band, leaving
343: the presence of substantial cold dust unlikely (See Figure~1). This result
344: is consistent with the recent Spitzer observations of other similar Table~1
345: early-type warm excess systems ($\eta$~Tel, HD~3003, HD~172555 and HD~113766)
346: in which cold dust from a region analogous to the Sun's Kuiper belt
347: objects is missing \citep{che06,smi06}. In the following discussion,
348: we characterize warm excess stars as those with warm dust in the TPZ
349: only and without cold excess (i.e., we exclude stars like $\beta$ Pictoris).
350:
351: The fact that all currently known warm excess stars at ages between
352: $8-30$ Myr belong to nearby stellar moving groups offers
353: an excellent opportunity to address how frequently warm excess emission
354: appears among young stars in the solar neighborhood. \citet{zuc04}
355: list suggested members of stellar moving groups and
356: clusters (i.e., $\eta$~Cha cluster, TW Hydra Association, $\beta$~Pictoris
357: Moving Group, Cha-Near Moving Group, and Tucana/Horologium Association)
358: at ages $8-30$ Myr, within 100 pc of Earth. Currently Spitzer MIPS
359: archive data are available for all 18 members of the $\eta$ Cha cluster,
360: all 24 members of TWA, all 52 members of Tucana/Horologium, 25 out of
361: 27 $\beta$ Pic Moving Group, and 9 out of 19 members of Cha-Near Moving
362: Group. Multiple systems were counted as one object unless resolved by
363: Spitzer. For example, in the $\beta$ Pictoris Moving Group, HD~155555A,
364: HD~155555B \& HD~155555C were counted as a single object; however,
365: HIP~10679 \& HIP~10680 were counted as two objects.
366:
367: Table 1 shows that the characteristics of dust grains depend on the
368: spectral type of the central star. All six warm debris disks considered
369: in this paper harbor early-type central stars (earlier than F3).
370: However, late-type stars in Table 1 (for example, PDS 66, a
371: K1V star from LCC) sometimes show characteristics of T~Tauri-like
372: disk excess (i.g., $\tau >10^{-2}$, flat IR SED, etc.) even at
373: $\gtrsim$10 Myr \citep{sil06}. Such apparent spectral dependency
374: perhaps arises from the relatively young ages ($\sim$10\,Myr) of
375: these systems in which late-type stars still possess grains mixed with
376: primordial dust due to a longer dust removal time scale \citep{her05}.
377: In the above-mentioned five nearby stellar moving groups, 38 out of
378: 129\footnote{128 stars with Spitzer data plus EF~Cha. EF~Cha, which appeared
379: in \citet{mam00}, was inadvertently omitted from the suggested members of
380: Cha-Near Moving Group by \citet{zuc04}, but its membership is included in
381: Zuckerman et al. (2007, in prep.). Since the warm excess in EF~Cha was
382: found by MSX \& IRAS surveys less-sensitive than {\it Spitzer} MIPS, the
383: addition of EF~Cha to the homogenious pool of MIPS surveyed stars
384: does not increase the warm excess occurrence rate inappropriately because
385: MIPS would have easily detected it. In the near future, even if new
386: members are added to these nearby stellar associations, we believe
387: the overall occurrence rate would remain similar to the current estimate
388: because most A- through early-M type members of these stellar associations,
389: excepting perhaps the Cha-Near Moving Group, are already well established
390: through extensive searches and almost all the members are already
391: surveyed by {\it Spitzer} MIPS.} stars with Spitzer MIPS measurements have spectral types earlier
392: than G0. Therefore, we find $\sim$13\% (5/38) occurrence rate for
393: the warm excess phenomenon among the stars with spectral types earlier
394: than G0 in the nearby stellar groups at $8-30$ Myr. (Beta Pic is the only
395: early-type star among the remaing 33 which has both warm and cold dust.)
396: For LCC, at least one (HD~113766) out of 20 early-type members is a warm
397: excess star giving 5\% frequency (see Table 1 \& 2 in \citealt{che05}).
398: This rate can reach a maximum of 30\% when we take into account five
399: early-type LCC members that show excess emission at 24\,$\micron$ but
400: have only upper-limit measurements at MIPS 70\,$\micron$ band. G0 type
401: was chosen to separate the two apparently different populations because
402: no G-type star except T~Cha appears in Table 1. Furthermore, the spectral
403: type of T~Cha is not well established (G2-G8) and it may be a K-type star
404: like other K/M stars in Table 1. Rhee et al.\ (2007, in preparation)
405: analyze all spectral types in the young nearby moving groups and conclude
406: that the warm excess phenomenon with $\tau \gtrsim 10^{-4}$ occurs for
407: between 4 and 7\%; this uncertainty arises because some stars have only
408: upper limits to their 70\,$\micron$ fluxes.
409:
410:
411: %-----------------------------------------------------------------
412: \acknowledgments
413:
414: We thank Aigen Li for helpful advice and the referee for constructive
415: comments that improved the paper.
416: This research was supported by NASA grant NAG5-13067 to Gemini
417: Observatory, a NASA grant to UCLA, and Spitzer GO program \#3600.
418: Based on observations obtained at the Gemini Observatory, which is
419: operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy,
420: Inc., under a cooperative agreement with the NSF on behalf of the
421: Gemini partnership: the National Science Foundation (United States),
422: the Particle Physics and Astronomy Research Council (United Kingdom),
423: the National Research Council (Canada), CONICYT (Chile), the Australian
424: Research Council (Australia), CNPq (Brazil) and CONICET (Argentina).
425: This research has made use of the VizieR catalogue
426: access tool, CDS, Strasbourg, France and of data products from the Two
427: Micron All Sky Survey (The latter is a joint project of the University
428: of Massachusetts and the Infrared Processing and Analysis
429: Center/California Institute of Technology, funded by the National
430: Aeronautics and Space Administration and the National Science Foundation).
431:
432: %-----------------------------------------------------------------
433: \begin{thebibliography}{}
434: \bibitem[Acke \& van den Ancker(2004)]{ack04} Acke, B., \& van den
435: Ancker, M.~E.\ 2004, \aap, 426, 151
436: \bibitem[Beichman et al.(2005)]{bei05} Beichman, C.~A., et
437: al.\ 2005, \apj, 626, 1061
438: \bibitem[Beichman et al.(2006)]{bei06} Beichman, C.~A., et
439: al.\ 2006, \apj, 639, 1166
440: \bibitem[Bryden et al.(2006)]{bry06} Bryden, G. et al. 2006, ApJ,
441: 636, 1098
442: \bibitem[Chen \& Jura(2001)]{che01} Chen, C.~H., \& Jura, M.\
443: 2001, \apjl, 560, L171
444: \bibitem[Chen et al.(2005)]{che05} Chen, C.~H., Jura, M., Gordon,
445: K.~D., \& Blaylock, M.\ 2005, \apj, 623, 493
446: \bibitem[Chen et al.(2006)]{che06} Chen, C.~H., et al.\ 2006, \apjs,
447: 166, 351
448: \bibitem[Clarke et al.(2005)]{cla05} Clarke, A.~J.,
449: Oudmaijer, R.~D., \& Lumsden, S.~L.\ 2005, \mnras, 363, 1111
450: \bibitem[Cox(2000)]{cox00} Cox, A.~N.\ 2000, Allen's
451: Astrophysical Quantities, 4th ed.~Edited by Arthur N.~Cox.~Publisher:
452: New York: AIP Press; Springer, 2000.~ISBN: 0387987460
453: \bibitem[Dent et al.(2005)]{den05} Dent, W.~R.~F., Greaves,
454: J.~S., \& Coulson, I.~M.\ 2005, \mnras, 359, 663
455: \bibitem[Dommanget \& Nys(1994)]{dom94} Dommanget, J., \& Nys, O.\
456: 1994, Communications de l'Observatoire Royal de Belgique, 115, 1
457: \bibitem[Egan et al.(2003)]{ega03} Egan, M.~P., et al.\ 2003,
458: VizieR Online Data Catalog, 5114, 0
459: \bibitem[Furland et al.(2007)]{fur07} Furland et al. 2007, ApJ in
460: press, Astro-ph/07050380.
461: \bibitem[Gorlova et al.(2004)]{gor04} Gorlova N., et al. 2004, ApJS,
462: 154, 448
463: \bibitem[Gorlova et al.(2006)]{gor06} Gorlova, N., Rieke, G.~H.,
464: Muzerolle, J., Stauffer, J.~R., Siegler, N., Young, E.~T., \&
465: Stansberry, J.~H.\ 2006, \apj, 649, 1028
466: \bibitem[Hauschildt et al.(1999)]{hau99} Hauschildt, P.~H.,
467: Allard, F., \& Baron, E.\ 1999, \apj, 512, 377
468: \bibitem[Hern{\'a}ndez et al.(2005)]{her05} Hern{\'a}ndez, J., Calvet,
469: N., Hartmann, L., Brice{\~n}o, C., Sicilia-Aguilar, A., \& Berlind,
470: P.\ 2005, \aj, 129, 856
471: \bibitem[Hines et al.(2006)]{hin06} Hines, D. C. et al. 2006, \apj,
472: 638, 1070
473: \bibitem[Kessler-Silacci et al.(2006)]{kes06} Kessler-Silacci, J.,
474: et al.\ 2006, \apj, 639, 275
475: \bibitem[Lisse et al.(2006)]{lis07} Lisse, C. M., Beichman, C. A.,
476: Bryden, G., \& Wyatt, M. C. 2007, \apj, 658, 584
477: \bibitem[Low et al.(2005)]{low05} Low, F., Smith, P. S., Werner, M.,
478: Chen, C., Krause, V., Jura, M., \& Hines, D. C. 2005, ApJ 631, 1170
479: \bibitem[Luhman \& Steeghs(2004)]{luh04} Luhman, K.~L., \&
480: Steeghs, D.\ 2004, \apj, 609, 917
481: \bibitem[Mamajek et al.(1999)]{mam99} Mamajek, E. M, Lawson, W. A.,
482: \& Feigelson, E. D. 1999, \apj, 516, L77
483: \bibitem[Mamajek et al.(2000)]{mam00} Mamajek, E.~E., Lawson, W.~A.,
484: \& Feigelson, E.~D.\ 2000, \apj, 544, 356
485: \bibitem[Mamajek et al.(2002)]{mam02} Mamajek, E.~E., Meyer,
486: M.~R., \& Liebert, J.\ 2002, \aj, 124, 1670
487: \bibitem[Megeath et al.(2005)]{meg05} Megeath, S.~T.,
488: Hartmann, L., Luhman, K.~L., \& Fazio, G.~G.\ 2005, \apjl, 634, L113
489: \bibitem[Pascucci et al.(2006)]{pas06} Pascucci, I., et al.\
490: 2006, \apj, 651, 1177
491: \bibitem[Rhee \& Larkin(2006)]{rhe06} Rhee, J.~H., \& Larkin, J.~E.\
492: 2006, \apj, 640, 625
493: \bibitem[Rhee et al.(2007)]{rhe07a} Rhee, J. H., Song, I., Zuckerman, B.,
494: \& McElwain, M. 2007, \apj, 660, 1556
495: \bibitem[Rieke et al.(2005)]{rie05} Rieke, G.~H., et al.\
496: 2005, \apj, 620, 1010
497: \bibitem[Schuetz et al.(2005)]{sch05} Schuetz, O., Meeus, G., \& Sterzik,
498: M. F. 2005, \aap, 431, 175
499: \bibitem[Silverstone et al.(2006)]{sil06} Silverstone, M. D. et al. 2006,
500: \apj, 639, 1138
501: \bibitem[Smith et al.(2006)]{smi06} Smith, P.~S., Hines,
502: D.~C., Low, F.~J., Gehrz, R.~D., Polomski, E.~F., \& Woodward, C.~E.\ 2006,
503: \apjl, 644, L125
504: \bibitem[Song et al.(2005)]{son05} Song, I., Zuckerman, B., Weinberger,
505: A. J., Becklin, E. E. 2005, Nature, 436, 363
506: \bibitem[Song et al.(2007)]{son07} Song, I., Zuckerman, B., Bessell, M.
507: 2007, submitted to ApJ.
508: \bibitem[Su et al.(2005)]{su05} Su, K.~Y.~L., et al.\ 2005, \apj, 628, 487
509: \bibitem[Takeuchi \& Artymowicz(2001)]{tak01} Takeuchi, T., \&
510: Artymowicz, P.\ 2001, \apj, 557, 990
511: \bibitem[Wyatt et al.(2007)]{wya07} Wyatt, M.~C., Smith, R., Greaves,
512: J.~S., Beichman, C.~A., Bryden, G., \& Lisse, C.~M.\ 2007, \apj,
513: 658, 569
514: \bibitem[Zuckerman et al.(2001)]{zuc01} Zuckerman, B., Song,
515: I., Bessell, M.~S., \& Webb, R.~A.\ 2001, \apjl, 562, L87
516: \bibitem[Zuckerman et al.(2001)]{zsw01} Zuckerman, B., Song,
517: I., \& Webb, R.~A.\ 2001, \apj, 559, 388
518: \bibitem[Zuckerman \& Song(2004)]{zuc04} Zuckerman, B., \&
519: Song, I.\ 2004, \araa, 42, 685
520: \bibitem[Zuckerman et al.(2007)]{zuc07} Zuckerman, B., Song, I.,
521: Weinberger, A., Bessell, M. 2007 ApJ Letter in preparation.
522: \end{thebibliography}
523:
524: \clearpage
525:
526: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccccccccccccccc}
527: \tabletypesize{\tiny}
528: \setlength{\tabcolsep}{0.025in}
529: \tablecaption{Debris systems in the terrestrial planetary zone in the epoch of terrestrial planet formation}
530: \tablewidth{0pt}
531: \tablehead{
532: \colhead{} &\colhead{} &
533: \colhead{V} &\colhead{D} &\colhead{$R_{star}$\tablenotemark{a}} &
534: \colhead{$T_{star}$} &\colhead{$T_{dust}$} &
535: \colhead{$\tau$} &\colhead{age} &\colhead{Warm excess} &
536: \colhead{Disk} &\colhead{} &\colhead{} \\
537: \colhead{Star} &\colhead{Sp. Type} &
538: \colhead{(mag)} &\colhead{(pc)} &\colhead{($R_\odot$)} &
539: \colhead{(K)} &\colhead{(K)} &
540: \colhead{($\times10^{-4}$)} &\colhead{(Myr)} &\colhead{Only} &
541: \colhead{Characteristics} &\colhead{Membership} &\colhead{References} \\
542: \colhead{(1)} &\colhead{(2)} &
543: \colhead{(3)} &\colhead{(4)} &\colhead{(5)} &
544: \colhead{(6)} &\colhead{(7)} &
545: \colhead{(9)} &\colhead{(10)} &\colhead{(11)} &
546: \colhead{(12)} &\colhead{(13)} &\colhead{(14)} \\
547: }
548: \startdata
549: $\eta$ Cha & B8\tablenotemark{b} & 5.5 & 97 & 2.37 & 11000 & 320 & 1.5 & 8 & Yes & Debris & $\eta$ Cha & 1 \\
550: EF Cha & A9 & 7.5 & 106 & 1.92 & 7400 & 240 & 10 & 10 & Yes & Debris & Cha-Near & 2\\
551: HD 113766 & F3V & 7.5 & 131 & ...\tablenotemark{c} & 7000 & 350 & 150 & 10\tablenotemark{d} & Yes & Debris & LCC & 3,5,6\\
552: HD 172555 & A7V & 4.8 & 29 & 1.52 & 8000 & 320 & 8.1 & 12 & Yes & Debris & $\beta$ Pic & 3,4,6\\
553: $\eta$ Tel & A0V & 5.0 & 48 & 1.61 & 9600 & 150 & 2.1 & 12 & Yes & Debris & $\beta$ Pic & 3,6 \\
554: HD 3003 & A0V & 5.1 & 46 & 1.59 & 9600 & 200 & 0.92 & 30 & Yes & Debris & Tucana/Horologium & 7,8\\
555: \\
556: $\beta$ Pic & A5V & 3.9 & 19 & 1.37 & 8600 & 110\tablenotemark{e} & 26 & 12 & No & Debris & $\beta$ Pic & 4 \\
557: HD 98800 & K5Ve & 9.1 & 47 & ...\tablenotemark{c} & 4200 & 160 & 1100 & 8 & No & Primordial/Debris & TWA & 2,7\\
558: TW Hya & K8Ve & 11.1 & 56 & 1.11 & 4000 & 150? & $>$2200 & 8 & No & Primordial/Debris & TWA & 2,7\\
559: Hen 3-600 & M3 & 12.1 & 42\tablenotemark{f} & ...\tablenotemark{c} & 3200 & 250 & 1000 & 8 & No & Primordial/Debris & TWA & 2,7\\
560: EP Cha & K5.5\tablenotemark{b} & 11.2 & 97 & 1.39 & 4200\tablenotemark{b} & ...\tablenotemark{g} & $>$1300\tablenotemark{g} & 8 & No & Primordial/Debris & $\eta$ Cha & 10,11\\
561: ECHA J0843.3-7905 & M3.25\tablenotemark{b} & 14.0 & 97 & 0.87 & 3400\tablenotemark{b} & ...\tablenotemark{g} & $>$2000\tablenotemark{g} & 8 & No & Primordial/Debris & $\eta$ Cha & 10,11\\
562: EK Cha & M4\tablenotemark{b} & 15.2 & 97 & 0.79 & 3300\tablenotemark{b} & ...\tablenotemark{g} & $>$590\tablenotemark{g} & 8 & No & Primordial/Debris & $\eta$ Cha & 10,11\\
563: EN Cha & M4.5\tablenotemark{b} & 15.0 & 97 & ...\tablenotemark{c} & 3200\tablenotemark{b} & ...\tablenotemark{g} & $>$480\tablenotemark{g} & 8 & No & Primordial/Debris & $\eta$ Cha & 10,11\\
564: ECHA J0841.5-7853 & M4.75\tablenotemark{b} & 14.4 & 97 & 0.51 & 3200\tablenotemark{b} & ...\tablenotemark{g} & $>$480\tablenotemark{g} & 8 & No & Primordial/Debris & $\eta$ Cha & 10,11\\
565: ECHA J0844.2-7833 & M5.75\tablenotemark{b} & 18.4 & 97 & 0.40 & 3000\tablenotemark{b} & ...\tablenotemark{g} & $>$400\tablenotemark{g} & 8 & No & Primordial/Debris & $\eta$ Cha & 10,11\\
566: T Cha & G2-G8 & 11.9 & 66 & ...\tablenotemark{h} & ...\tablenotemark{h} & ...\tablenotemark{h} & ...\tablenotemark{h} & 10 & No & Primordial/Debris & Cha-Near & 7,12 \\
567: PDS 66 & K1Ve & 10.3 &$\sim$85 & 1.35\tablenotemark{i} & 4400 & ...\tablenotemark{g} & $>$2200\tablenotemark{g}& 10\tablenotemark{d} & No & Primordial/Debris & LCC & 6,9 \\
568: \enddata
569: \tablenotetext{a}{Estimated using a total integrated flux for a given distance (col. 4) assuming that each star is a single object.}
570: \tablenotetext{b}{From \citet{luh04}}
571: \tablenotetext{c}{Multiple systems: HD 113766 (binary), HD 98800 (quadruple), Hen 3-600 (triple), \& EN Cha (binary) from \citet{zuc04}.}
572: \tablenotetext{d}{\citet{mam02} estimate the age of LCC at $\sim$16 Myr. However, \citet{son07} report a younger age of $\sim$10 Myr.}
573: \tablenotetext{e}{Based on the single temperature blackbody fit to the dominant cold excess.
574: However, additional warm excess emission exists above the 110K model fit, indicating the presence
575: of warm disk in terrestrial planetary zone.}
576: \tablenotetext{f}{Estimated photometric distance from \citet{zuc04}}
577: \tablenotetext{g}{This lower limit $\tau$ is estimated from our two-temperature dust component fit to the infrared excess emission.
578: No dust temperature is given because its IR excess emission cannot be fit
579: with a single temperature blackbody. However, a significant excess emission at mid-IR
580: wavelengths exists which is not the Wien tail of emission from cold dust grains.}
581: \tablenotetext{h}{No SED fitting was attempted to estimate stellar radius \& temperature as well as dust parameters.}
582: \tablenotetext{i}{Based on the distance of 85 pc \citep{sil06} from Earth}
583: \tablecomments{$R_{star}$ and $T_{star}$ were obtained by fitting the observed
584: optical and near-IR measurements with NextGen stellar atmosphere model \citep{hau99}.
585: $T_{dust}$ and $\tau$ were estimated by fitting blackbody curves to the infrared excess emission. \\
586: Refereces:
587: 1. \citet{mam99}
588: 2. \citet{zuc07}
589: 3. \citet{sch05}
590: 4. \citet{zuc01}
591: 5. \citet{che05}
592: 6. \citet{che06}
593: 7. \citet{zuc04}
594: 8. \citet{smi06}
595: 9. \citet{sil06}
596: 10. \citet{mam02}
597: 11. \citet{meg05}
598: 12. \citet{kes06}}
599: \end{deluxetable}
600:
601: \clearpage
602:
603: \begin{deluxetable}{cccccccc}
604: \tablecolumns{8}
605: \tablecaption{Mid-IR measurements of EF~Cha \label{tbl-1}}
606: \tabletypesize{\small}
607: \tablewidth{0pc}
608: \tablehead{
609: \colhead{} &\colhead{Central} &
610: \colhead{} &\colhead{Adopted Photospheric} &
611: \colhead{Excess} &\colhead{} \\
612: \colhead{} &\colhead{Wavelength} &
613: \colhead{Flux Density} &\colhead{Flux Density} &
614: \colhead{Flux Density} &\colhead{} \\
615: \colhead{Band} &\colhead{($\micron$)} &
616: \colhead{(mJy)} &\colhead{(mJy)} &
617: \colhead{(mJy)} &\colhead{Instrument}
618: }
619: \startdata
620: 8$\micron$ & 8.28 & 167 $\pm$9 & 119 & 48 & MSX \\
621: N & 10.4 & 164 $\pm$14 & 84 & 80 & Gemini/TReCS \\
622: N & 7.7-12.97 & -- & -- & -- & TReCS, $\lambda$/$\Delta\lambda \approx$ 100 spectrum \\
623: 12$\micron$ & 11.5 & 152 $\pm$32 & 58 & 94 & IRAS \\
624: 24$\micron$ & 24.0 & 80 $\pm$4 & 14 & 66 & MIPS \\
625: 25$\micron$ & 23.7 & 110 $\pm$21 & 14 & 96 & IRAS \\
626: 70$\micron$ & 70.0 & $<$ 22.4\tablenotemark{a} & 1.7 & $<$ 20.7 & MIPS \\
627: \enddata
628: \tablenotetext{a}{3~$\sigma$ upper limit to the non-detection.}
629: \tablecomments{Both MSX and IRAS flux densities were color-corrected
630: using the method described in \citet{rhe07a}.}
631: \end{deluxetable}
632:
633: \clearpage
634:
635: \begin{figure}
636: \plotone{f1.eps}
637: \caption{Spectral energy distribution of EF~Cha created
638: by fitting existing optical and near-IR measurements with a 7400K stellar
639: atmosphere model. After subtracting the stellar photosphere as well as
640: the silicate emission feature near 10\,$\micron$, the infrared excess
641: continuum emission was fit with a single temperature blackbody model of
642: 240\,K. For each measurement, the horizontal bars indicate the passband
643: of the filter used and the vertical bars depict the flux uncertainties.
644: Flux density values for the plotted mid-IR points are given in Table 2.}
645: \label{SED}
646: \end{figure}
647:
648: \end{document}
649:
650: