1: \documentclass[aps,preprint]{revtex4}%
2: \usepackage{amsfonts}
3: \usepackage{amsmath}
4: \usepackage{amssymb}
5: \usepackage{graphicx}%
6: \setcounter{MaxMatrixCols}{30}
7: %TCIDATA{OutputFilter=latex2.dll}
8: %TCIDATA{Version=5.50.0.2952}
9: %TCIDATA{CSTFile=revtex4.cst}
10: %TCIDATA{Created=Wednesday, February 07, 2007 12:36:17}
11: %TCIDATA{LastRevised=Monday, July 09, 2007 11:33:53}
12: %TCIDATA{<META NAME="GraphicsSave" CONTENT="32">}
13: %TCIDATA{<META NAME="SaveForMode" CONTENT="1">}
14: %TCIDATA{BibliographyScheme=Manual}
15: %TCIDATA{<META NAME="DocumentShell" CONTENT="Articles\SW\REVTeX 4">}
16: %BeginMSIPreambleData
17: \providecommand{\U}[1]{\protect\rule{.1in}{.1in}}
18: %EndMSIPreambleData
19: \newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}
20: \newtheorem{acknowledgement}[theorem]{Acknowledgement}
21: \newtheorem{algorithm}[theorem]{Algorithm}
22: \newtheorem{axiom}[theorem]{Axiom}
23: \newtheorem{claim}[theorem]{Claim}
24: \newtheorem{conclusion}[theorem]{Conclusion}
25: \newtheorem{condition}[theorem]{Condition}
26: \newtheorem{conjecture}[theorem]{Conjecture}
27: \newtheorem{corollary}[theorem]{Corollary}
28: \newtheorem{criterion}[theorem]{Criterion}
29: \newtheorem{definition}[theorem]{Definition}
30: \newtheorem{example}[theorem]{Example}
31: \newtheorem{exercise}[theorem]{Exercise}
32: \newtheorem{lemma}[theorem]{Lemma}
33: \newtheorem{notation}[theorem]{Notation}
34: \newtheorem{problem}[theorem]{Problem}
35: \newtheorem{proposition}[theorem]{Proposition}
36: \newtheorem{remark}[theorem]{Remark}
37: \newtheorem{solution}[theorem]{Solution}
38: \newtheorem{summary}[theorem]{Summary}
39: \newenvironment{proof}[1][Proof]{\noindent\textbf{#1.} }{\ \rule{0.5em}{0.5em}}
40: \begin{document}
41: \preprint{hep-th/0706.1603}
42: \title[Short title for running header]{Solutions of Bethe-Salpeter equation in QED$_{3}$}
43: \author{Yuichi Hoshino}
44: \affiliation{Kushiro National College of Technology,Otanohike Nishi 2-32-1,Kushiro
45: City,Hokkaido 084,Japan}
46: \keywords{B-S equation,superconductivity,Diquark condensate.}
47: \pacs{PACS number}
48:
49: \begin{abstract}
50: To understand the mechanism of the fermion pair and fermion-antifermion pair
51: condensation,the solutions of Bethe-Salpeter equation in QED$_{3}$ is
52: examined.In the ladder appoximation our solution for the axial-scalar is
53: consistent with Ward-Takahashi-identity for the axial vector currents.Since
54: the massless scalar-vector sector is described by a coupled integral
55: equation,it is difficult to solve explicitly.We approximate the equation for
56: large and small momentum region separately and convert them into differential
57: equations in position space.These equation can be solved easily.Boundary
58: condition at the origin leads the eigenvalue for dimensionless coupling
59: constant $\lambda=e^{2}/m$.There exists solutions for massless scalar-vector
60: fermion-antifermion (fa) system with discrete spectrum.In our approximation
61: massless-scalar-vector ff systemes does not seem to exist.
62:
63: \end{abstract}
64: \volumeyear{year}
65: \volumenumber{number}
66: \issuenumber{number}
67: \eid{identifier}
68: \date[Date text]{date}
69: \received[Received text]{date}
70:
71: \revised[Revised text]{date}
72:
73: \accepted[Accepted text]{date}
74:
75: \published[Published text]{date}
76:
77: \startpage{101}
78: \endpage{102}
79: \maketitle
80: \tableofcontents
81:
82:
83: \section{Introduction}
84:
85: In the theory of superconductivity and superfluidity BCS model is very
86: familiar and useful to analyse their properties[1].If we assume the
87: $\delta^{(3)}(x-y)$ function type intearction between fermions it is not
88: difficult to solve the gap equation and its dependence of the coupling
89: constant.However we have not been known the reason why the electron pair form
90: a bound state.On the other hand there exisists solutions of Bethe-Salpeter
91: equation in the ladder approximation for fermion-fermion pair with discrete
92: spectrum[2].Recently a bound state for quasi partices(exiton) are considered
93: in terms of approximate Bethe-Salpeter(BS) equation in QED$_{3}$ for phase
94: flucuating d-wave superconductor near the node to measure the resonant spin
95: response[3].The Schr\"{o}dinger type equation for particle-hole boundstate
96: with potential $1/r^{2}$ was derived and the eigenvalue condition emerged.Its
97: solution indicates the exsitence of strong coupling phase but seems to be not
98: normalizable.Therefore it is interesting to apply relativistic BS equation for
99: fermion pair in the same approximation in[2].We think that it is important to
100: solve the equation for the massless boundstate which signals the instability
101: of the vacuum under condensation of these bosons in field thoretical
102: model[4].In this work first we examine the existence of solutions for the
103: massless boundstates which are normalizable.Since scalar-vector sector is
104: written by coupled integral equation,it is difficult to solve the equation
105: explicitly.Therefore we approximate the equation for the large and small
106: momentum region separately.These equations are easily solved in position space
107: and we have a correct short and long-distance behaviour.For fa system the
108: baundary condition at the origin leads dimensionless coupling constant
109: $\sqrt{2}e^{2}/4\pi m=$ integer where $m$ a fermion mass.In section II we
110: introduce spinor-spinor BS equation and show their solutions in QED and
111: QED$_{3}$[2].In section III we compare the solutions of Dyson-Schwinger
112: equation for the fermion propagator with axialscalar solutions of BS
113: equation.In our approximation they obey the same equation and
114: Ward-Takahashi-identity for axial currents is satisfied.Section IV is devoted
115: for summary.
116:
117: \section{Spinor-Spinor BS equation}
118:
119: \subsection{Massless boson in QED}
120:
121: BS amplitude in four-dimension is defined[6,7,8]%
122: \begin{equation}
123: \chi(x_{1}x_{2}\text{:}B)\equiv\left\langle 0|T(\psi(x_{1})\overline{\psi
124: }(x_{2}))|B\right\rangle ,
125: \end{equation}
126: for the fermion-antifermion bound state $|B\rangle=|fa,P_{\mu}\rangle$ with
127: total four momentum $P_{\mu}$ or as%
128: \[
129: \chi(x_{1}x_{2}\text{:}B)\equiv\left\langle 0|T(\psi(x_{1})\overline{\psi}%
130: ^{C}(x_{2})|B\right\rangle
131: \]
132: for the fermion-fermion bound state $|B\rangle=|ff,P_{\mu}\rangle,$where
133: $\psi^{C}$ stands for the charge conjugated field of $\psi$.Homogeneous
134: Bethe-Salpeter equation for fermions in the ladder approximation is written in
135: the following form%
136: \begin{equation}
137: \chi(x_{1}x_{2}\text{:}B)=-e^{2}\int d^{4}x_{3}d^{4}x_{4}S_{F}(x_{1}%
138: -x_{3})\chi(x_{3}x_{4}\text{:}B)S_{F}(x_{2}-x_{4})\gamma_{\mu}D_{F}^{\mu\nu
139: }(x_{3}-x_{4})\gamma_{\nu}.
140: \end{equation}
141: We can also write the BS equation in a differential form by applying Dirac
142: operator;%
143: \begin{equation}
144: (i\overrightarrow{\partial_{1}}\cdot\gamma-m)\chi(x_{1}x_{2}\text{:}%
145: B)(i\overleftarrow{\partial_{2}}\cdot\gamma-m)=-e^{2}D_{F}^{\mu\nu}%
146: (x_{1}-x_{2})\gamma_{\mu}\chi(x_{1}x_{2}\text{:}B)\gamma_{\nu},
147: \end{equation}
148: where $m$ is a dynamical mass and $D_{F}$ is a photon propagator in the
149: covariant gauge%
150: \begin{equation}
151: D_{F}^{\mu\nu}(p)=\frac{g^{\mu\nu}}{p^{2}+i\epsilon}+(\xi-1)\frac{p_{\mu
152: }p_{\nu}}{p^{4}}.
153: \end{equation}
154: In momentum space we transform to center of mass and relative coordinate%
155: \begin{equation}
156: X=(x_{1}+x_{2})/2,x=x_{1}-x_{2},
157: \end{equation}%
158: \begin{equation}
159: P=p_{1}+p_{2},p=(p_{1}-p_{2})/2.
160: \end{equation}
161: Then we define $\chi(P,p)$,the Fourier transform of the Feynman amplitude,by%
162: \begin{equation}
163: \chi(x_{1}x_{2}\text{:}B)=\exp(iP\cdot X)\int d^{4}p\exp(ip\cdot x)\chi(P,p).
164: \end{equation}
165: The BS equation in momentum space assume the form%
166: \begin{equation}
167: ((\frac{P}{2}+p)\cdot\gamma-m)\chi(P,p)(-(\frac{P}{2}-p)\cdot\gamma
168: -m)=-\frac{e^{2}}{(2\pi)^{4}}\int d^{4}qD_{F}^{\mu\nu}(p-q)\gamma_{\mu}%
169: \chi(P,p)\gamma_{\nu}%
170: \end{equation}
171: for fa system.Since under charge conjugation vector particle is odd,$\lambda$
172: should be replaced by $-\lambda.$For scalar case the $\chi^{S}(P,p)$ is
173: written in general which corresponds to spin singlet $S(P,p)$ and triplet
174: $V(P,p)$ and tensor $T(P,p)$
175: \begin{equation}
176: \chi^{S}(P,p)=S(P,p)I+P\cdot\gamma V^{1}(P,p)+p\cdot\gamma V^{2}%
177: (P,p)+\sigma_{\mu\nu}T(P,p)(P_{\mu}p_{\nu}-P_{\nu}p_{\mu}).
178: \end{equation}
179: For total momentum $P_{\mu}=0$ case the BS amplitdes are decoupled to
180: scalar-vector and tensor and we have a coupled equation for
181: scalar-vector$[2,6,7,8].$If we substitute eq (9) to eq (8) we get a
182: scalar-vector equation for Euclidean momentum $p$%
183: \begin{equation}
184: (m^{2}-p^{2})S(p^{2})-2p^{2}V^{2}(p^{2})=\lambda^{S}\int d^{4}q\frac{S(q^{2}%
185: )}{(p-q)^{2}},
186: \end{equation}
187: and
188: \begin{equation}
189: (m^{2}-p^{2})p_{\mu}V^{2}(p^{2})+2p_{\mu}S(p^{2})=\lambda^{V}\int d^{4}%
190: q\frac{q_{\mu}V^{2}(q^{2})}{(p-q)^{2}}.
191: \end{equation}%
192: \begin{align}
193: \lambda^{S} & =(3-\xi)\lambda...\text{ for ff-system}\nonumber\\
194: & =-(3-\xi)\lambda..\text{ for fa-system},\\
195: \lambda^{V} & =2\xi\lambda..\text{for ff-system}\\
196: & =-2\xi\lambda..\text{for fa-system,}%
197: \end{align}
198: where $\lambda=e^{2}/(4\pi)^{2}.$In the Landau gauge ($\xi=0$) $\lambda^{V}$
199: vanishes.The solution is given in ref[2].Then eq (11) reduces to a algebraic
200: equation and $V^{2}(p^{2})$ is obtained
201: \begin{equation}
202: V^{2}(p^{2})=\frac{-2}{(m^{2}-p^{2})}S(p^{2}).
203: \end{equation}
204: From eq (10) and (15) we obtain
205: \begin{equation}
206: \frac{(m^{2}+p^{2})^{2}}{m^{2}-p^{2}}S(p^{2})=\lambda^{S}\int d^{4}%
207: q\frac{S(q^{2})}{(p-q)^{2}}.
208: \end{equation}
209: By using the formula(Klein-Gordon equation for photon)%
210: \begin{equation}
211: \square_{p}\frac{1}{(p-q)^{2}}=-4\pi^{2}\delta^{(4)}(p-q)
212: \end{equation}
213: we get a differential equation for $S(p^{2})$ from eq (16)%
214: \begin{equation}
215: (s\frac{d^{2}}{ds^{2}}+2\frac{d}{ds})[\frac{(m^{2}+s)^{2}}{m^{2}%
216: -s}S(s)]=-\lambda^{S}S(s),
217: \end{equation}
218: where $s=p^{2}.$The solution is characterized by hypergeometric function%
219: \begin{align}
220: S(s) & =\frac{m^{2}-s}{(s+m^{2})}(s+m^{2})^{-1-\gamma/2}F(\alpha
221: ,\beta,\gamma;\frac{m^{2}}{m^{2}+s}),\nonumber\\
222: \alpha & =\frac{2+\sqrt{1+4\lambda^{S}}-\sqrt{1+8\lambda^{S}}}{2},\beta
223: =\frac{2+\sqrt{1+4\lambda^{S}}+\sqrt{1+8\lambda^{S}}}{2},\nonumber\\
224: \gamma & =1+\sqrt{1+4\lambda^{S}},
225: \end{align}
226: which satisfy the boundary condition%
227: \begin{align}
228: \lim_{S\rightarrow\infty}(s\frac{d}{ds}+1)[\frac{(m^{2}+s)^{2}}{m^{2}-s}S(s)]
229: & =0,\nonumber\\
230: \lim_{S\rightarrow0}s^{2}\frac{d}{ds}[\frac{(m^{2}+s)^{2}}{m^{2}-s}S(s)] &
231: =0.
232: \end{align}
233: After angular integration eq (16) is rewritten%
234: \begin{equation}
235: \frac{(m^{2}+s)^{2}}{m^{2}-s}S(s)=\frac{\lambda_{S}}{2s}\int_{0}^{s}%
236: ds^{\prime}s^{\prime}S(s^{\prime})+\frac{\lambda_{S}}{2}\int_{s}^{\infty
237: }ds^{\prime}S(s^{\prime}).
238: \end{equation}
239: If we differentiate the above integral equation we get the boundary
240: conditions.In the case of $\alpha(\beta)=-n,F$ is a$\ n$-th degree of
241: hypergeometric series in $s.$We have a discrete set of spectrum if
242: $\lambda^{S}>0$(fermion-fermion system) and the eigenvalues are given%
243: \begin{equation}
244: \lambda_{n}^{S}=(n+1)[3(n+1)+\sqrt{8n^{2}+16n+9}],n=0,1,2...
245: \end{equation}
246: For the lowest eigenvalue $n=0$ $(\lambda_{0}=\lambda_{0}^{S}/3=2),$we have%
247: \begin{equation}
248: \chi_{0}(p)=\frac{m^{2}-p^{2}+2p\cdot\gamma}{(m^{2}+p^{2})^{5}}.
249: \end{equation}
250: For fermion-antifermion system there exists contineous spectrum for
251: $-1/8\leq\lambda<0$%
252: \begin{equation}
253: S(s)=\frac{m^{2}-s}{(s+m^{2})}(s+m^{2})^{-1-\gamma/2}F(\alpha,\beta
254: ;\alpha+\beta-\gamma+1;\frac{s}{s+m^{2}}).
255: \end{equation}
256: Here we show the profile of $\chi_{0}(x)$ in FIG1.Fourier transformation of
257: $\chi(p)$ is defined%
258: \[
259: \chi(x)=\frac{1}{4\pi^{2}}\int p^{3}dp\frac{J_{1}(px)}{px}\chi(p),
260: \]%
261: \begin{align}
262: \chi_{0S}(x) & =\frac{x^{3}}{768\pi^{2}}K_{1}(x),\nonumber\\
263: \chi_{0V}(x) & =\frac{x}{1536\pi^{2}}(4xK_{0}(x)+(x^{2}+8)K_{1}(x)),
264: \end{align}
265: for $m=1.$%
266: %TCIMACRO{\FRAME{ftbpFU}{2.8283in}{2.8283in}{0pt}{\Qcb{$4\pi^{2}\chi_{0}%
267: %^{S}(x)(\times),4\pi^{2}\chi_{0}^{V}(x)(\bigcirc)$ for $m=1$}}{\Qlb{f1}%
268: %}{f1.eps}{\special{ language "Scientific Word"; type "GRAPHIC";
269: %maintain-aspect-ratio TRUE; display "USEDEF"; valid_file "F";
270: %width 2.8283in; height 2.8283in; depth 0pt; original-width 5.3341in;
271: %original-height 5.3341in; cropleft "0"; croptop "1"; cropright "1";
272: %cropbottom "0"; filename 'f1.eps';file-properties "XNPEU";}}}%
273: %BeginExpansion
274: \begin{figure}
275: [ptb]
276: \begin{center}
277: \includegraphics[
278: height=2.8283in,
279: width=2.8283in
280: ]%
281: {f1.eps}%
282: \caption{$4\pi^{2}\chi_{0}^{S}(x)(\times),4\pi^{2}\chi_{0}^{V}(x)(\bigcirc)$
283: for $m=1$}%
284: \label{f1}%
285: \end{center}
286: \end{figure}
287: %EndExpansion
288: In ref[4] introducing auxiliriary field for comosite operator effective action
289: has been made.If we minimize it we can derive the Dyson-Schwinger equation for
290: fermion and Bethe-Salpeter equation for boundstate.However for the first
291: approximation to the lowest excitation,vector was neglected.Thus the BS
292: equation for scalar meson is not a coupled equation with vector meson as eq(10),(11).
293:
294: \subsection{\bigskip Massless boson in QED$_{3}$}
295:
296: In ref[3] three dimensional QED is considered as an effective model which
297: discribes the two dimensional superconductor,where gap has nodes and the
298: low-energy fermionic excitations have linear dispersion.The fluctuating phase
299: of superonductor is considered as Berry gauge fields which couples to spin
300: degree of freedom of exciton.For these systems we assume the validity of
301: relativistic treatment for fermion.For definiteness we use four-dmensional
302: representation of $\gamma$ matrix [5].In ref[3] following type of equation for
303: the eigenvalue $e_{n}(\left\vert p\right\vert ,m)$ and normalized
304: eigenfunction $\psi_{n}(r,\left\vert p\right\vert ,m)$ for electron-hole
305: system near the nodes were dicsussed%
306: \begin{equation}
307: \lbrack-\partial\cdot\partial-V_{eff}]\psi_{n}=e_{n}\psi_{n},
308: \end{equation}%
309: \begin{equation}
310: \chi(p)=\frac{1}{16}\int d^{3}r\exp(-ip\cdot r)\sum_{ij}\left\langle
311: \overline{\psi}_{i}(r)\psi_{i}(r)\overline{\psi}_{j}(0)\psi_{j}%
312: (0)\right\rangle ,
313: \end{equation}%
314: \begin{equation}
315: \chi(p)=N\sum_{n}\frac{\left\vert \psi_{n}(0,\left\vert p\right\vert
316: ,m)\right\vert ^{2}}{4e_{n}(\left\vert p\right\vert ,m)+p^{2}},
317: \end{equation}
318: where $V_{eff}$ is a potential by dressed gauge boson and has an invers-square
319: form for small $r$ and $\chi(p)$ is a sum of boundstate propagator with
320: residue $\left\vert \psi_{n}\right\vert ^{2}$of each pole$.$The conclusion is
321: that there are infinite numbers of negative energy.Here we simpliy notice the
322: results
323: \begin{align}
324: \lbrack-\partial\cdot\partial-\frac{\lambda}{16z^{2}}]\psi(z) & =-\frac{1}%
325: {4}\psi,\lambda=(2+\xi)g^{2},\\
326: \psi(z) & =\frac{K_{\sqrt{4-\lambda}/4}(z/2)}{\sqrt{z}}.
327: \end{align}
328: It is said that the continuum spectrum that is normalizable into a single
329: boundstate would be a so called conformal tower%
330: \begin{equation}
331: \psi_{0}(z)=\sqrt{\frac{\kappa^{3}}{2\pi}}\frac{K_{0}(\kappa\left\vert
332: z\right\vert )}{\sqrt{\kappa\left\vert z\right\vert }},
333: \end{equation}
334: where $-\kappa^{2}$ is the renormalized bound-state energy,and $K_{0}$ is the
335: modified Bessel function of the second kind.Apart from these realistic
336: application to condensed matter physics it is interesting to solve the
337: massless boundstate problems in three dimension.Now we return to relativistic
338: BS equation for fa system to study the same problems.For $P_{\mu}=0,T$ does
339: not couple to $S,V$.We consider the equation as (16) in the previous section.%
340: \begin{equation}
341: \frac{(m^{2}+p^{2})^{2}}{m^{2}-p^{2}}S(p^{2})=\lambda^{S}\int d^{3}%
342: q\frac{S(q^{2})}{(p-q)^{2}}.
343: \end{equation}
344: However we cannot solve the above equation as in four dimension since the
345: identity is%
346: \begin{equation}
347: \square_{p}\frac{1}{|p-q|}=-4\pi\delta^{(3)}(p-q)
348: \end{equation}
349: in this case.Therefore we expand the left hand side of the eq (32) in $p$ for
350: large and small cases.We get
351: \begin{align}
352: (-2m^{2}-p^{2})S(p) & =\lambda^{S}\int d^{3}q\frac{S(q^{2})}{(p-q)^{2}%
353: },(m^{2}\ll p^{2}),\\
354: (m^{2}+2p^{2})S(p) & =\lambda^{S}\int d^{3}q\frac{S(q^{2})}{(p-q)^{2}}%
355: ,(p^{2}\ll m^{2}),
356: \end{align}
357: where $\lambda^{S}=e^{2}/2\pi.$ We convert these equations in position space%
358: \begin{align}
359: (-2m^{2}+\square_{x})S_{S}(x) & =\lambda^{S}\frac{S(x)_{S}}{\left\vert
360: x\right\vert },(m\left\vert x\right\vert \ll1),\\
361: (m^{2}-2\square_{x})S_{L}(x) & =\lambda^{S}\frac{S(x)_{L}}{\left\vert
362: x\right\vert },(1\ll m\left\vert x\right\vert ).
363: \end{align}
364: First we solve the following equation for scalar-vector ff system $S(x)$
365: \begin{align}
366: (m^{2}-\square_{x})S(x) & =-\lambda^{S}\frac{S(x)}{\left\vert x\right\vert
367: },\lambda^{S}=\frac{e^{2}}{2\pi},\nonumber\\
368: \square_{x} & =\frac{d^{2}}{dr^{2}}+\frac{2}{r}\frac{d}{dr}+\frac
369: {l(l+1)}{r^{2}}.
370: \end{align}
371: The relation among $S(x),S_{S}(x),S_{L}(x)$ may be clear by scaling the mass
372: or coupling constant.For simplicity we set $m=1.$For the ground state $l=0,$we
373: have
374: \begin{equation}
375: \frac{d^{2}S}{d^{2}r}+\frac{2}{r}\frac{d^{2}S(r)}{d^{2}r}-S(r)-\frac
376: {\lambda^{S}}{r}S(r)=0.
377: \end{equation}
378: For large $r$ if we neglect terms which are proportional to $1/r,$we obtain%
379: \begin{equation}
380: \frac{d^{2}S(r)}{d^{2}r}=S(r),
381: \end{equation}
382: from this $S(r)$ behaves as $e^{-r}.$For small $r$
383: \[
384: S(r)=u(r)/r.
385: \]
386: then the eq (39) becomes
387: \begin{equation}
388: \frac{d^{2}u}{dr^{2}}+(-1-\frac{\lambda}{r})u=0.
389: \end{equation}
390: Solutions of this equation must not diverge faster than the finite power of
391: $r$ and finite at $r=0.$The solution which satisfies this latter condition is
392: derived by Whittaker equation
393: \begin{equation}
394: \frac{d^{2}W}{d^{2}z}+(-\frac{1}{4}-\frac{\lambda}{z}+\frac{1/4-\mu^{2}}%
395: {z^{2}})W(z)=0,
396: \end{equation}
397: for $\mu=1/2,$whose solution is expressed by linear combination of
398: $M_{\lambda,1/2}$ and $W_{\lambda,1/2}$
399: \begin{equation}
400: S(x)=C_{1}\frac{M_{-\lambda/2,1/2}(2\left\vert x\right\vert )}{\left\vert
401: x\right\vert }+C_{2}\frac{W_{-\lambda/2,1/2}(2\left\vert x\right\vert
402: )}{\left\vert x\right\vert }.
403: \end{equation}
404: $S(x)$ is expanded near origin
405: \begin{equation}
406: S(x)_{\left\vert x\right\vert \rightarrow0}=\frac{C_{2}}{\left\vert
407: x\right\vert \Gamma(1+\lambda/2)}+2C_{1}+..
408: \end{equation}
409: Therefore for normalizability of $S(x)$ it is sufficent that $1/\Gamma
410: (1+\lambda/2)$ vanishes.This condition is realized for
411: \begin{equation}
412: 1+\lambda/2=-n(n=0,1,2,..).
413: \end{equation}
414: This is an eigenvalue condition for the coupling constant $\lambda$.Thus
415: fermion-antifermion(fa) system has discrete spectrum($\lambda<0).$In the case
416: of positive copuling the function $M$ diverges as $\exp(x/2)[9].$Thus
417: fermion-antifermion(ff) system has no bound states($\lambda>0)$. Since the
418: coupling constant has a dimension of mass,the mass of the ground sate is
419: largest for fixed coupling $\lambda$.Here we return to $S_{S}(x)$ and
420: $S_{L}(x).$We have%
421: \begin{align}
422: S_{S}(x) & =\frac{C_{1}M_{-a,1/2}(2\sqrt{2}m\left\vert x\right\vert
423: )}{\left\vert x\right\vert }+\frac{C_{2}W_{-a,1/2}(2\sqrt{2}m\left\vert
424: x\right\vert )}{\left\vert x\right\vert },\\
425: S_{L}(x) & =\frac{D_{1}M_{a,1/2}(\sqrt{2}m\left\vert x\right\vert
426: )}{\left\vert x\right\vert }+\frac{D_{2}W_{a,1/2}(\sqrt{2}m\left\vert
427: x\right\vert )}{\left\vert x\right\vert },a=\frac{\sqrt{2}\lambda^{S}}{4m}.
428: \end{align}
429: Eigenvalues are given as
430: \[
431: \frac{\sqrt{2}\lambda^{S}}{4m}=-n(n=1,2....).
432: \]
433: For the large distance in the case of these negative $\lambda^{S},M_{a}%
434: ,_{1/2}(\sqrt{2}m\left\vert x\right\vert )$ blows up.Thus we choose $D_{1}%
435: =0.$Here we have an approximate solution of the integral equation for short
436: and long distance%
437: \begin{align}
438: S(x) & =\frac{C_{1}M_{-a,1/2}(2\sqrt{2}m\left\vert x\right\vert )}{\left\vert
439: x\right\vert }(m\left\vert x\right\vert \ll1)\\
440: & =\frac{D_{2}W_{a,1/2}(\sqrt{2}m\left\vert x\right\vert )}{\left\vert
441: x\right\vert }(1\ll m\left\vert x\right\vert ).
442: \end{align}
443: We choose $C_{1}=1/2$ for normalization of $S(x).$For small $n$ we have an
444: explicit form of $M,W$ in terms of $z=\sqrt{2}m\left\vert x\right\vert $
445: \begin{align}
446: M_{1,1/2}(z)/z & =\exp(-z)2,\nonumber\\
447: M_{2,1/2}(z)/z & =\exp(-z)2(1-z),(z\ll1).
448: \end{align}%
449: \begin{align*}
450: W_{-1},_{1/2}(z)/z & \simeq\exp(-z)/2z^{2},\\
451: W_{-2,1/2}(z)/z & \simeq\exp(-z)/z^{3},(1\ll z).
452: \end{align*}
453: Since at long distance the function $W$ strongly dumps,we cut-off long
454: distance and the solution may be approximated
455: \begin{equation}
456: S(z)_{n}=M_{\lambda,1/2}(2\left\vert z\right\vert )/2\left\vert z\right\vert
457: ,\lambda=n.
458: \end{equation}
459: If we transform into momentum space we get for $n=1,2,\sqrt{2}m=1$%
460: \begin{align}
461: \chi_{1}(p^{2}) & =\int x^{2}d\left\vert x\right\vert \frac{\sin(p\left\vert
462: x\right\vert )}{(p\left\vert x\right\vert )}S(\left\vert x\right\vert
463: )_{1}=\frac{1}{(p^{2}+1)^{2}}(1-\frac{2\gamma\cdot p}{1-p^{2}}),\nonumber\\
464: \chi_{2}(p^{2}) & =\frac{16\pi(-1+p^{2}+2p\cdot\gamma)}{(p^{2}+1)^{3}}.
465: \end{align}
466: Here we notice that the vector part of $\chi_{1}$ is not
467: normalizable,therefore we avoid $n=1$ case for scalar-vector fa systems.Thus
468: the ground state must be given by $n=2.$Correct solution in the whole region
469: may be evaluated by numerical analysis of integral equation (32) with angular
470: intergral
471: \begin{equation}
472: \frac{(m^{2}+p^{2})^{2}}{m^{2}-p^{2}}S(p)=\frac{\lambda}{(2\pi)^{2}p}\int
473: _{0}^{\infty}qdqS(q)\ln(\frac{p+q}{\left\vert p-q\right\vert }),\frac
474: {\lambda\sqrt{2}}{4m}=2,
475: \end{equation}
476: with an input of Fourier transform of eq (49)
477: \begin{equation}
478: S_{S}(p)=\frac{16(-2m^{2}+p^{2})}{(p^{2}+2m^{2})^{3}}%
479: \end{equation}
480: in the right hand side of eq (53).We see the profile of $\chi_{2}(x)$ in
481: FIG2.
482: %TCIMACRO{\FRAME{ftbpFU}{2.8283in}{2.8283in}{0pt}{\Qcb{$\chi_{2}^{S}%
483: %(x)(\times),\chi_{2}^{V}(x)(\square)$ for $m=1$}}{\Qlb{f2}}{f2.eps}%
484: %{\special{ language "Scientific Word"; type "GRAPHIC";
485: %maintain-aspect-ratio TRUE; display "USEDEF"; valid_file "F";
486: %width 2.8283in; height 2.8283in; depth 0pt; original-width 5.3341in;
487: %original-height 5.3341in; cropleft "0"; croptop "1"; cropright "1";
488: %cropbottom "0"; filename 'f2.eps';file-properties "XNPEU";}}}%
489: %BeginExpansion
490: \begin{figure}
491: [ptb]
492: \begin{center}
493: \includegraphics[
494: height=2.8283in,
495: width=2.8283in
496: ]%
497: {f2.eps}%
498: \caption{$\chi_{2}^{S}(x)(\times),\chi_{2}^{V}(x)(\square)$ for $m=1$}%
499: \label{f2}%
500: \end{center}
501: \end{figure}
502: %EndExpansion
503:
504:
505: \section{\bigskip Ward-Takahashi-identity for Axialvector currents}
506:
507: In this section we examine the Ward-Takahashi-identity for the axialvector
508: currents.In our approximation to BS equation fermion mass is assumed to be
509: dynamical.Therefore if we have a solution of the BS equation for psedoscalar
510: it must satisfy the Ward-Takahashi-identity for the conservation of
511: axialvector currents[13]
512: \begin{equation}
513: \lim_{q\rightarrow0}q_{\mu}S_{F}(p^{\prime})\Gamma_{5\mu}(p^{\prime}%
514: ,p)S_{F}(p)=\{S_{F}(p),\gamma_{5}\}\neq0,
515: \end{equation}
516: where $S_{F}(p)$ is a solution of \ the Dyson-Schwinger equation or
517: non-perturbative solution of the fermion propagator.The vertex function
518: $\Gamma_{5\mu}$ has a massless pole $q_{\mu}/q^{2}\chi^{P}(q),$where $\chi
519: ^{P}(q)$ is a BS amplitude of psedoscalar Goldstone boson as a consequence of
520: chiral symmetry breaking. Following the notation in ref[5],$U(2)$ chiral
521: symmetry is generated by \{$I,\gamma_{4},\gamma_{5},\gamma_{45}\}$ which is
522: broken by dynamical fermion mass to a $U(1)\times U(1)$ symmetry generated by
523: $\{I,\gamma_{45}\}$ for the degree of freedom of scalar and psedoscalar as
524: $\{\sigma,\pi\}$ $.$The set of $\gamma$ matrices is%
525: \begin{align}
526: \gamma_{0} & =\left(
527: \begin{array}
528: [c]{cc}%
529: \sigma_{3} & 0\\
530: 0 & -\sigma_{3}%
531: \end{array}
532: \right) ,\gamma_{1,2}=\left(
533: \begin{array}
534: [c]{cc}%
535: \sigma_{1,2} & 0\\
536: 0 & -\sigma_{1,2}%
537: \end{array}
538: \right) ,\gamma_{4}=\left(
539: \begin{array}
540: [c]{cc}%
541: 0 & I\\
542: -I & 0
543: \end{array}
544: \right) ,\gamma_{5}=\left(
545: \begin{array}
546: [c]{cc}%
547: 0 & -iI\\
548: iI & 0
549: \end{array}
550: \right) ,\nonumber\\
551: \gamma_{45} & =-i\gamma_{4}\gamma_{5},\{\gamma_{\mu},\gamma_{4}%
552: \}=0,\{\gamma_{\mu},\gamma_{5}\}=0
553: \end{align}
554: Currents $\{\gamma_{\mu4},\gamma_{\mu5}\}$ are a analog of axialvector
555: currents and have a doublet of Goldstone boson which is called axial-scalar,%
556:
557: \begin{equation}
558: \left(
559: \begin{array}
560: [c]{c}%
561: \chi^{(4)}(P,q)\\
562: \chi^{(5)}(P,q)
563: \end{array}
564: \right) ^{AS}=\left(
565: \begin{array}
566: [c]{c}%
567: \gamma_{4}\\
568: \gamma_{5}%
569: \end{array}
570: \right) S+\left(
571: \begin{array}
572: [c]{c}%
573: \gamma_{\mu4}\\
574: \gamma_{\mu5}%
575: \end{array}
576: \right) (V^{1}P_{\mu}+V^{2}q_{\mu})+\epsilon_{\mu\nu\rho}P^{\mu}q^{\nu
577: }\left(
578: \begin{array}
579: [c]{c}%
580: \gamma^{\rho5}\\
581: -\gamma^{\rho4}%
582: \end{array}
583: \right) T.
584: \end{equation}
585: Scalar-PS($\gamma_{45})$ BS amplitude is%
586: \begin{equation}
587: \chi^{S}(P,q)=S+\gamma\cdot qV^{2}+\gamma\cdot PV^{1}+\epsilon_{\mu\nu\rho
588: }P^{\mu}q^{\nu}\gamma^{\rho45}T.
589: \end{equation}%
590: \begin{equation}
591: \chi^{PS}(P,q)=S(P,q)\gamma_{45}+q^{\mu}\gamma_{\mu45}V^{2}+P^{\mu}\gamma
592: _{\mu45}V^{1}+\epsilon_{\mu\nu\rho}P^{\mu}q^{\nu}\gamma^{\rho}T.
593: \end{equation}
594: To check the Ward-Takahashi-identity we consider the equation for axial-scalar%
595: \begin{align}
596: (m^{2}+p^{2})\chi^{AS}(p) & =\frac{\lambda^{AS}}{(2\pi)^{3}}\int
597: d^{3}p^{\prime}\frac{\chi^{AS}(p^{\prime})}{(p-p^{\prime})^{2}},\\
598: (m^{2}-\square_{x})\chi^{AS}(x) & =\lambda^{AS}\frac{\chi^{AS}%
599: (x)}{\left\vert x\right\vert },\lambda^{AS}=\lambda.
600: \end{align}
601: for ff system.Sign of the coupling is opposite to the one in even
602: dimension.This is the same equation discussed in scalar-vector case and we
603: have solutions
604: \begin{align}
605: \chi^{AS}(x) & =\frac{M_{\lambda/2m,1/2}(2m\left\vert x\right\vert )}%
606: {|x|},\nonumber\\
607: \chi_{1}^{AS}(p) & =\frac{1}{(p^{2}+m^{2})^{2}}.
608: \end{align}
609: for $\lambda/2m=n(1,2...)$.Following the Ward-Takahashi-identity $\chi
610: ^{AS}(x)$ for fa is derived from the scalar part of the fermion
611: propagator.Dyson-Schwinger equation for fermion propagator is written%
612: \begin{align}
613: \Sigma(p) & =\frac{e^{2}}{(2\pi)^{3}}\int d^{3}k\gamma_{\mu}\frac
614: {k\cdot\gamma+M(k)}{k^{2}+m^{2}}\gamma_{\nu}\frac{g_{\mu\nu}-(p-k)_{\mu
615: }(p-k)_{\nu}/(p-k)^{2}}{(p-k)^{2}},\\
616: M(p) & =\frac{e^{2}}{4\pi^{2}}\int d^{3}k\frac{M(k)}{k^{2}+m^{2}}\frac
617: {1}{(p-k)^{2}}%
618: \end{align}
619: in the Landau gauge with linear approximation $m=M(0)$.We define $F(x)$ as the
620: Fourier transformation of $M(p)/(p^{2}+m^{2})$
621: \begin{align}
622: F(x) & =\int\frac{d^{3}p}{(2\pi)^{3}}\exp(ip\cdot x)\frac{M(p)}{p^{2}+m^{2}%
623: },\\
624: (-\square_{x}+m^{2})F(x) & =\frac{2e^{2}}{(2\pi)^{6}}\int d^{3}pe^{ip\cdot
625: x}\int d^{3}p^{\prime}\frac{M(p^{\prime})}{p^{\prime2}+m^{2}}\frac{1}{k^{2}%
626: }\nonumber\\
627: & =2e^{2}\int\frac{d^{3}p^{\prime}}{(2\pi)^{3}}e^{ip^{\prime}\cdot x}%
628: \frac{M(p^{\prime})}{p^{\prime2}+m^{2}}\int\frac{d^{3}k}{(2\pi)^{3}}%
629: \frac{e^{ik\cdot x}}{k^{2}}\nonumber\\
630: & =2e^{2}\frac{1}{4\pi\left\vert x\right\vert }F(x),
631: \end{align}
632: where $k=p^{\prime}-p$ and used that $\int d^{3}p=\int d^{3}k.$We arrive at a
633: Schr\"{o}dinger like equation for $F(x)$
634: \begin{equation}
635: (-\square_{x}+m^{2})F(x)=\lambda\frac{F(x)}{\left\vert x\right\vert }%
636: ,\lambda=\frac{e^{2}}{2\pi}.
637: \end{equation}
638: Its solution is given as the groudstate of hydrogen atom
639: \begin{equation}
640: F(x)=\frac{m^{2}}{8\pi}\exp(-m\left\vert x\right\vert ),F(p)=\frac{m^{3}%
641: }{(p^{2}+m^{2})^{2}}.
642: \end{equation}
643: In this case the ground state solution corresponds to $\lambda/2m=1(m=e^{2}%
644: /4\pi),$where mass is largest for fixed coupling[10].We also meet this
645: condition in the analysis of the fermion propagator based on low-energy
646: theorem[11,12].In fact we can determine a precise infrared behaviour of the
647: propagator in the above analysis but do not have a definite ultraviolet
648: behaviour.However if we demand the nonvanishment of the order parameter
649: $\left\langle \overline{\psi}\psi\right\rangle \neq0$ ,we obtain the condition
650: for the anomalous dimension of the wave function which must be unity.This
651: condition is approximately satisfied in the case of $1/N$ correction for
652: photon propagator with vanishing bare mass in the Landau gauge[12].This is
653: just the statement of Nambu-Goldstone theorem[14,15].
654:
655: \section{Summary}
656:
657: In this work we studied the solutions of spinor-spinor Bethe-Salpeter equation
658: for massless boson in QED$_{3}$ with ladder approximation in the Landau
659: gauge.It is not easy to solve this equation directly in three
660: dimension.However we use the approximate form of the integral equation for
661: large and small momentum respectively.These are converted to the differential
662: equation which are similar to the Schr\"{o}dinger type equation.In this case
663: an eigenvalue are determined by boundary condition at $x=0.$Thus we obtain
664: solutions for massless scalar-vector fa systems with discrete spectrum.In our
665: approximation massless scalar-vector ff system does not seem to exist in three
666: dimension.Finally it is shown that Ward-Takahashi-identity for axial currents
667: is satisfied with the Dyson-Schwinger equation for the fermion propagator in
668: the linear approximation to dynamical mass .
669:
670: \section{References}
671:
672: [1]J.R.Schrieffer,\textbf{Theory of Superconductivity};Westview press(1999).
673:
674: [2]K.Higashijima,Prog.Theor.Phys.\textbf{55}(1976)1591;
675:
676: \ \ \ A.Nishimura,K.Higashijima,Prog.Theor.Phys.\textbf{56}(1976)908.
677:
678: [3]Babak H.Seradjeh,Igor F.Herbut:EprintArXiv:cond-mat/0701724;
679:
680: \ \ \ I.F.Herbut,Physical Review Letters \textbf{94,}%
681: {\normalsize 237001(2005).}
682:
683: [4]T.Morozumi,H.So,Prog.Theor.Phys.\textbf{77}(1987)1434.
684:
685: [5]W.E.Allen,C.J.Burden,Phys.Rev.\textbf{D53},5482(1996).
686:
687: [6]K.Nishijima,\textbf{Fields and Particles};W.A.BENJAMIN.INC(1969).
688:
689: [7]N.Nakanishi,Prog.Theor.Phys.Pphys.Supplement,\textbf{43}(1969).
690:
691: [8]V A Miransky,DYNAMICAL SYMMETRY\ BREAKING IN QUANTUM FIELD
692:
693: \ \ \ THEORIES,World Scientific(1993).
694:
695: [9]M.Abramowitz,I.A.Stegun,HANDBOOK OF MATHEMATEICAL FUNCTIONS;
696:
697: \ \ \ DOVER\ PUBLICATIONS,INC.(1972).
698:
699: [10]M.Koopmans,DYNAMICAL MASS GENERATION IN QED$_{3},$
700:
701: \ \ \ \ Ph.D thesis in Groningen University(1990),
702:
703: \ \ \ \ K.Higashijima,Prog.Theor.Phys.Supplement,\textbf{104(}%
704: {\normalsize 1991)}.
705:
706: [11]Y.Hoshino,\textbf{JHEP}0409:048,2004.
707:
708: [12]Y.Hoshino,EprintArXive:hep-th/0610016.to be published in
709: Nucl.Phys\textbf{.A.}
710:
711: [13]T.Maskawa,H.Nakajima,Prog.Theor.Phys.\textbf{52}(1974)1326.
712:
713: [14]J.Goldstone,Nuov.Cim.\textbf{19}(1961)154.
714:
715: [15]Y.Nambu and G.Jona-lasinio,Phys.Rev.\textbf{122}(1961)345.
716: \end{document}