1: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
2: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
3: %%
4: %% fdraft: rtr dsb tmb 9 march 2007 whoopie
5: %% draft8: rtr new latex macros etc
6: %% draft7: tmb rtr dsb 8 March 2007: final version?
7: %% draft6: tmb rtr dsb 7 March 2007
8: %% draft5: tmb Mar 2007 mostly language and typos
9: %% draft4: dsb Nov 2006
10: %% draft3: tmb 2 august 2006
11: %% draft2: dsb ca. 2003
12: %% draft1: dsb
13: %
14: % Author-defined commands
15: %----------------------------------------------------------------------
16: % ----- define organization
17: \newcommand{\nraoblurb}{The National Radio Astronomy Observatory is
18: a facility of the National Science Foundation operated under cooperative
19: agreement by Associated Universities, Inc.}
20: % ----- units --------------
21: % \arcdeg !!!! use AASLaTeX macro!!!!
22: \newcommand{\degree}{\ensuremath{\,^\circ}}
23: \newcommand{\degper}{\rlap.{^{\circ}}}
24: \newcommand{\arcmper}{\rlap.{^{\prime}}}
25: \newcommand{\arcsper}{\rlap.{^{\prime\prime}}}
26: %
27: \newcommand{\rgal}{\ensuremath{{R_{\rm gal}}}}
28: \newcommand{\gyr}{\ensuremath{\,{\rm Gyr}}}
29: \newcommand{\mhz}{\ensuremath{\,{\rm MHz}}}
30: \newcommand{\ghz}{\ensuremath{\,{\rm GHz}}}
31: \newcommand{\kel}{\ensuremath{\,{\rm K}}}
32: \newcommand{\K}{\ensuremath{\,{\rm K}}}
33: \newcommand{\mk}{\ensuremath{\,{\rm milliK}}}
34: \newcommand{\m}{\ensuremath{\,{\rm m}}}
35: \newcommand{\cm}{\ensuremath{\,{\rm cm}}}
36: \newcommand{\percc}{\ensuremath{\,{\rm cm^{-3}}}}
37: \newcommand{\kpc}{\ensuremath{\,{\rm kpc}}}
38: \newcommand{\pc}{\ensuremath{\,{\rm pc}}}
39: \newcommand{\kms}{\ensuremath{\,{\rm km\, sec^{-1}}}}
40: \newcommand{\msun}{\ensuremath\,M_\odot}
41: \newcommand{\s}{\,s}
42: \newcommand{\microns}{\ensuremath{\, \mu {\rm m}}}
43: \newcommand{\ev}{\,ev}
44: \newcommand{\jy}{\,Jy}
45: \newcommand{\jyb}{\ensuremath{\rm \,Jy\,beam^{-1}}}
46: \newcommand{\mjy}{\,mJy}
47: \newcommand{\mjyb}{\ensuremath{\rm \,mJy\,beam^{-1}}}
48: \newcommand{\microjy}{\,\ensuremath{\mu}Jy}
49: \newcommand{\microjyb}{\ensuremath{\rm \,\mu Jy\,beam^{-1}}}
50: %
51: \newcommand{\kmsp}{\ensuremath{{\,{\rm km\, sec^{-1}\, pc^{-1}}}}}
52: \newcommand{\EM}{\ensuremath{{\,{\rm pc}\,{\rm cm}^{-6}}}}
53: \newcommand{\kapi}{\ensuremath{\kappa_i}}
54: % ----- chemical symbols
55: \newcommand{\hp}{\ensuremath{{\rm H}^+}}
56: \newcommand{\he}[1]{\ensuremath{^#1{\rm He}}}
57: \newcommand{\heo}[1]{\ensuremath{^#1{\rm He}^{\rm o}}}
58: \newcommand{\hep}[1]{\ensuremath{^#1{\rm He}^+}}
59: \newcommand{\hepp}[1]{\ensuremath{^#1{\rm He}^{++}}}
60: \newcommand{\her}[1]{\ensuremath{^#1{\rm He}/{\rm H}}}
61: \newcommand{\hepr}[1]{\ensuremath{^#1{\rm He}^{+}/{\rm H}^+}}
62: \newcommand{\heppr}[1]{\ensuremath{^#1{\rm He}^{++}/{\rm H}^+}}
63: % ----- he-3 commands
64: \newcommand{\hethree}{\ensuremath{{}^3{\rm He}}}
65: \newcommand{\hefour}{\ensuremath{{}^4{\rm He}}}
66: \newcommand{\hepthree}{\ensuremath{{}^3{\rm He}^+}}
67: \newcommand{\lir}[1]{\ensuremath{^{#1}{\rm Li}/{\rm H}}}
68: % ----- recomb lines
69: \newcommand{\hal}{\ensuremath{{\rm H}91\alpha}}
70: \newcommand{\hbet}{\ensuremath{{\rm H}114\beta}}
71: \newcommand{\hgam}{\ensuremath{{\rm H}130\gamma}}
72: \newcommand{\heal}{\ensuremath{{\rm He}91\alpha}}
73: \newcommand{\hebet}{\ensuremath{{\rm He}114\beta}}
74: \newcommand{\hegam}{\ensuremath{{\rm He}120\gamma}}
75: \newcommand{\calx}{\ensuremath{{\rm C}91\alpha}}
76: \newcommand{\cbet}{\ensuremath{{\rm C}114\beta}}
77: \newcommand{\cgam}{\ensuremath{{\rm C}130\gamma}}
78: %
79: \newcommand{\halk}{\ensuremath{{\rm H}70\alpha}}
80: \newcommand{\hbetk}{\ensuremath{{\rm H}88\beta}}
81: \newcommand{\healk}{\ensuremath{{\rm He}70\alpha}}
82: \newcommand{\hebetk}{\ensuremath{{\rm He}88\beta}}
83: \newcommand{\calk}{\ensuremath{{\rm C}70\alpha}}
84: \newcommand{\cbetk}{\ensuremath{{\rm C}88\beta}}
85: % ----- misc
86: \newcommand{\expo}[1]{${10^{#1}}$}
87: \newcommand{\nexpo}[2]{\ensuremath{#1 \times 10^{#2}}}
88: \newcommand{\hi}{H~{\sc i}}
89: \newcommand{\hei}{He~{\sc i}}
90: \newcommand{\hii}{H~{\sc ii}}
91: \newcommand{\heii}{He~{\sc ii}}
92: \newcommand{\y}[1]{\ensuremath{y_{#1}}}
93: \newcommand{\yp}[1]{\ensuremath{y_{#1}^{+}}}
94: \newcommand{\ypp}[1]{\ensuremath{y_{#1}^{++}}}
95: \newcommand{\ngc}[1]{NGC~#1}
96: \newcommand{\sgr}[1]{Sgr\thinspace #1}
97: %
98: % Define \lsim and \gsim per AAS LaTeX macros
99: %
100: \newcommand{\gsim}{\ensuremath{\gtrsim}}
101: \newcommand{\lsim}{\ensuremath{\lesssim}}
102: %
103: \def\rtrcom#1{{\bf RTR: #1}}
104: \def\tmbcom#1{{\bf TMB: #1}}
105: \def\dsbcom#1{{\bf DSB: #1}}
106: %-------------------------------------------------------------------
107:
108: \begin{document}
109:
110: %\slugcomment{draft7 tmb+rtr+dsb: \today}
111: \shorttitle{$^{3}$He in the Milky Way}
112: \shortauthors{Bania et al.}
113:
114: \title{$^{\bf 3}$He in the Milky Way Interstellar Medium: Ionization Structure}
115:
116: \author{T. M. Bania\altaffilmark{1}, Dana S. Balser\altaffilmark{2},
117: Robert T. Rood\altaffilmark{3}, T. L. Wilson\altaffilmark{4}, \&
118: Jennifer M. LaRocque\altaffilmark{5}}
119:
120: \altaffiltext{1}{Institute for Astrophysical Research, Department of Astronomy,
121: Boston University, 725 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston MA 02215, USA.
122: (bania@bu.edu)}
123: \altaffiltext{2}{National Radio Astronomy Observatory, 520 Edgemont Rd.,
124: Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA.}
125: \altaffiltext{3}{ P.O. Box 400325, Astronomy Department, University of Virginia,
126: Charlottesville VA 22904-4325, USA.}
127: \altaffiltext{4}{ESO Room 422, Karl-Schwarzschild-Str. 2, 85748
128: Garching, Germany}
129: \altaffiltext{5}{Saint Michael's College, Colchester VT 05439}
130:
131: \received{}
132: \revised{}
133: \accepted{}
134: \cpright{AAS}{2007}
135:
136: \begin{abstract}
137: The cosmic abundance of the \he3\ isotope has important implications
138: for many fields of astrophysics. We are using the 8.665\ghz\
139: hyperfine transition of \hep3\ to determine the \her3\ abundance in
140: Milky Way \hii\ regions and planetary nebulae. This is one in a
141: series of papers in which we discuss issues involved in deriving
142: accurate \her3\ abundance ratios from the available measurements.
143: Here we describe the ionization correction we use to convert the
144: \hepr3\ abundance, \yp3, to the \her3\ abundance, \y3. In principle
145: the nebular ionization structure can significantly influence the \y3\
146: derived for individual sources. We find that in general there is
147: insufficient information available to make a detailed ionization
148: correction. Here we make a simple correction and assess its validity.
149: The correction is based on radio recombination line measurements of
150: \hp\ and \hep4, together with simple core-halo source models. We use
151: these models to establish criteria that allow us to identify sources
152: that can be accurately corrected for ionization and those that
153: cannot. We argue that this effect cannot be very large for most of the
154: sources in our observational sample. For a wide range of models of
155: nebular ionization structure we find that the ionization correction
156: factor varies from 1 to 1.8. Although larger corrections are
157: possible, there would have to be a conspiracy between the density and
158: ionization structure for us to underestimate the ionization correction
159: by a substantial amount.
160: \end{abstract}
161:
162: \keywords{\hii\ regions --- ISM: abundances --- radio lines: ISM}
163:
164: \section{INTRODUCTION}
165:
166: \subsection{The $^{\bf 3}$He Experiment}\label{sec:he3}
167:
168: The abundance of the light isotope of helium, \he3, is astrophysically
169: important. Knowing the \her3\ abundance ratio can be used to test the
170: theory of stellar nucleosynthesis; it gives important information
171: needed to evaluate models of Galactic chemical evolution; it can help
172: constrain Big Bang Nucleosynthesis. For over two decades we have used
173: the 8.665\ghz\ hyperfine transition of \hep3\ to derive the \her3\
174: abundance in the interstellar medium (ISM) of the Milky Way. Our
175: \he3\ sources, planetary nebulae and \hii\ regions, are distributed
176: throughout the Milky Way's disk, from the Galactic Center to the
177: outermost regions. There is no other \he3\ spectral transition
178: available that can be used to probe transgalactic paths with the
179: sensitivity and accuracy of the \hep3\ hyperfine line.
180:
181: We observed \hep3\ using the Max-Planck-Institut f\"{u}r Radioastronomie
182: (MPIfR) 100\m\ telescope and the National Radio Astronomy Observatory
183: (NRAO)\footnotemark[1] 140\,Foot telescope and Very Large Array (VLA).
184: \footnotetext[1]{\nraoblurb} With the 100\m\ and VLA we primarily studied
185: planetary nebulae \citep{BBRW97, balser06} whereas the 140\,Foot was used mostly
186: for \hii\ regions \citep[hereafter Paper I]{BBRWW97}.
187: \defcitealias{BBRWW97}{Paper I}
188: %
189: In addition to the \hep3\ observations, measurements were also made of
190: a variety of radio recombination line transitions (RRLs) of H, \he4,
191: and C, as well as of the thermal continuum emission from the nebulae.
192: Paper I discussed the observations and the measurement errors. It is
193: a summary of the status of the observations as of 1996 March. We
194: continued the \hep3\ program on the 140\,Foot until it was
195: decommissioned in 1999 July. (The last scientific spectrum observed
196: at the 140\,Foot telescope was the \hep3\ scan that finished at
197: 08:12:20 EDT 19 July 1999.) The final paper in this series
198: \citep[Paper IV]{RBB04} summarizes the results of the \hep3\
199: experiment for all the sources observed with the NRAO 140\,Foot
200: telescope during the period 1982--1999. Paper IV compiles the
201: observed properties of the \hep3\ emission and gives the final \her3\
202: abundances derived for the NRAO 140\,Foot sample of
203: \hep3\ \hii\ regions.
204:
205: The quantity of astrophysical interest is the \her3\ abundance ratio by
206: number which we define as \y3. This ratio provides information about
207: both stellar \citep{Charbonnel98} and Galactic chemical evolution
208: \citep{Romano03} and constrains cosmological models during the era of
209: primordial nucleosynthesis \citep{Yang84, BRB02}. The species directly
210: accessible to observation, however, are \hep3\ and \hp. The
211: collisionally excited \hep3\ hyperfine transition directly measures the
212: total column density of \hep3\ atoms along the line-of-sight within the
213: telescope's beam. To determine the column density of \hp, either radio
214: continuum or hydrogen RRLs can be used. At 8.7\ghz\ the radio continuum
215: emission in \hii\ regions and planetary nebulae is primarily due to
216: thermal free-free emission which is proportional to the emission
217: measure, $EM = \int \, n_{e}^{2} \, d\ell$, where $n_{e}$
218: is the electron density and $d\ell$ is the differential path length
219: through the ionized nebula. The H RRL emission is also proportional to
220: the emission measure. Thus neither the RRL nor the radio continuum data
221: for H$^{+}$ are probing the total proton column density (or mass) in a
222: straightforward manner. {\it In order to determine the \hepr3\
223: abundance ratio, it is therefore necessary to model the nebula's density
224: structure.\/} Models are required because in most cases detailed
225: information on nebular density structure is not observationally
226: accessible. Nebular density models and the \hepr3\ abundance ratios
227: derived from them are discussed by \citet[hereafter Paper II]{BBRW99}.
228: \defcitealias{BBRW99}{Paper II}
229: %
230: In particular, Table 5 of Paper II lists the adopted \hepr3\ abundance
231: ratios for the 21 \hii\ regions discussed in Paper I.
232:
233: Using the observables, \hep3\ and \hp, to derive a \her3\ abundance
234: ratio, \y3, is, however, a two step process. The first step is to
235: determine the source density structure and calculate \hepr3\ (Paper
236: II). The next step, the topic of this paper, is to determine the
237: source ionization structure and to use this information to convert
238: \hepr3\ into \her3. This requires an understanding of the ionization
239: properties of each ionized nebula. Specifically, one needs to know
240: the ionization structure of both the He and H throughout each nebula.
241: Because the first ionization potentials of H (13.6 eV) and He (24.6
242: eV) are nearly a factor of two different, in principle ionization can
243: significantly influence \y3\ for individual sources. We find that in
244: general there is insufficient information available to make a detailed
245: ionization correction. Here we make a simple correction and assess
246: its validity.
247:
248: \subsection{Helium Ionization Structure in H\,{\bf\small II} Regions}
249: \label{sec:struc}
250:
251: Several diagnostics are commonly used to study the helium ionization
252: structure in \hii\ regions. The most direct is to measure the
253: fraction of \heo4, \hep4, and \hepp4\ within the \hii\ (${\rm H}^{+}$)
254: region. Since both \he4\ and \he3\ have essentially the same
255: ionization potential the \hep3\ and \hep4\ emission should come from
256: identical zones within the nebula. The \hep4\ and \hepp4\ emission
257: can be measured using recombination lines. Unfortunately there is no
258: direct way of measuring the amount of neutral helium within the \hii\
259: region. In some cases the spectral types of the ionizing OB stars can
260: be identified from optical photometry and spectroscopy. The helium
261: ionization properties are then derived using stellar atmosphere models
262: to calculate the expected escaping flux \citep[e.g.,][]{Vacca96},
263: together with photoionization models of the nebula to determine the He
264: ionization structure \citep[e.g.,][]{Rubin84}. At optical wavelengths
265: spectral transitions of several other atomic species are also observed
266: to help constrain these models. The most detailed analyzes have been
267: made for the Orion nebula in order to determine the total \her4\
268: abundance ratio \citep{Mathis91, Baldwin91, Rubin91, Pogge92,
269: Esteban98, Blagrave06}. Nevertheless, the limiting factor in
270: determining accurate total helium abundances in Orion is in converting
271: \hepr4\ to \her4.
272:
273: Most \hii\ regions are ionized by several stars and may thus have a
274: complex geometry. Because of this little direct information may be
275: known about the radiation field. A variety of diagnostics have been
276: developed to probe the ionization structure. \citet{Vilchez88}
277: developed a radiation softness parameter based on the fine structure
278: lines of O and S ions that is not very sensitive to chemical
279: composition \citep[see also][]{Shields78, Mathis82,
280: Mathis85}. \citet{Armour99} use infrared transitions of Ne and Ar ions
281: to determine the ionization structure. In general \hii\ regions
282: ionized by a hard radiation field produce the most accurate \her4\
283: abundance ratios since all of the helium within the \hii\ regions will
284: be ionized. For example, metal poor blue compact galaxies with \hii\
285: regions ionized by hard radiation fields are used to measure
286: primordial \her4. The ionization structure of these objects has been
287: extensively studied \citep{Ballantyne00, Viegas00, Gruenwald02,
288: Sauer02, Peimbert02a, Izotov07}. In some cases the total \her4\
289: abundance ratio will be less than \hepr4\ by a few percent,
290: significant for cosmological implications, since the \heii\ zone is
291: larger than the \hii\ zone. If clumping exits in these \hii\ regions,
292: however, the determined \y4\ values will be underestimated by a few
293: percent \citep{Mathis05}. In the Galaxy the high excitation \hii\
294: regions M17 and S206 have been used instead of Orion to determine the
295: total \her4\ abundance ratio
296: \citep{Peimbert93, Esteban99, Deharveng00, Balser06}.
297:
298: Many of our sources are located throughout the Galactic disk and are
299: totally obscured at optical wavelengths by dust. Furthermore, most of
300: the optically visible \hii\ regions in our sample are low emission
301: measure \hii\ regions in the outer Galaxy. The low EM renders useless
302: the Orion-type detailed models since the spectral diagnostics used to
303: constrain them are not available. Fortunately, unlike many of the
304: light elements, \her3\ abundances accurate to $\sim$\,10\% can yield
305: important astrophysical conclusions \citep{Wilson94} . Because of
306: this we adopt here a simple ionization structure model that is
307: constrained primarily by H and \he4\ radio recombination line
308: observations. We then use numerical models to assess the accuracy of
309: this approach for the \hii\ regions in our sample. Our goal is to
310: identify a subset of sources in our nebular sample wherein we can
311: derive \her3\ abundances accurate to $\sim$\,10\%.
312:
313: \subsection{${\bf {}^{\bf 3}He}$ Ionization Correction}
314: \label{sec:defkap}
315:
316: We seek an ionization correction factor to derive the \her3\ abundance
317: from the \hepr3\ abundance gotten from the \hep3\ observations. We
318: define the ionization correction factor, \kapi, to be
319: $y_{3} \equiv \kappa_{i}\,y_{3}^{+}$, where $y$ is the He/H
320: abundance ratio by number, the subscript denotes the isotope, and the
321: superscript is the ionization state.\footnotemark[2]
322: %
323: \footnotetext[2]{Thus the notation used throughout is: \y3\ = \her3;
324: \yp3\ = \hepr3; \y4\ = \her4; and \yp4\ = \hepr4.}
325: %
326: The ionization correction factor is determined by using the H and
327: \he4\ radio recombination line observations. We assume that the \hep3\
328: emission traces the \hep4\ emission, that the amount of neutral and
329: doubly ionized helium is negligible, and a canonical value for the
330: total \her4\ abundance, \y4. The \her3\ abundance ratio is then given by
331: %
332: \begin{equation}\label{eq:defkap}
333: {
334: y_{3} = \biggl(\frac{y_{4}}{y_{4}^{+}}\biggr)\,y_{3}^{+}
335: = \kappa_{i}\,y_{3}^{+}\,\biggl(\frac{y_{\rm 4GAL}}{0.10}}\biggr).
336: \end{equation}
337: %
338: Here $y_{\rm 4GAL}$ is the actual \he4/H abundance by number in the
339: Milky Way. There are, of course, some problems with this simple
340: model. \hep3\ and \hep4\ are measured using transitions that are
341: sensitive in different ways to density structure within the nebula.
342: The \hep3\ is observed using a collisionally excited hyperfine
343: transition that is sensitive to the column density and thus
344: proportional to the electron density, $n_{e}$. The \hep4\ is observed
345: using recombination transitions that are proportional to the emission
346: measure or $n_{e}^{2}$. Thus if the \hii\ region has large density
347: fluctuations the different transitions may probe significantly
348: different material. For example, consider a simple two-component
349: nebula with a small, very dense core and a larger, diffuse halo.
350: Under certain physical conditions the halo will dominate the \hep3\
351: emission while the core will dominate the \hep4\ emission. If this is
352: coupled with ionization structure between the core and halo then the
353: simple formula in equation (1) will be incorrect.
354:
355: It has also proven difficult to measure accurately the \her4\
356: abundance, \y4, in the Galaxy. \he4\ cannot be directly measured in
357: the Sun and must be inferred from theoretical stellar evolution models
358: and helioseismology. Measurements of \he4\ in \hii\ regions using
359: recombination lines require an ionization correction as discussed
360: above. A canonical value of $\y4 = y_{\rm 4GAL} = 0.1$ is adopted
361: here although there is evidence that this often cited value may be too
362: high (see \S\ref{sec:discuss}). For this reason we have parameterized
363: equation (1) with the $y_{\rm 4GAL}$ factor so that our ionization
364: corrections can be easily scaled should an accurate Milky Way \y4\
365: value be derived in the future.
366:
367: \subsection{Radio Recombination Line Observations}\label{sec:rrl}
368:
369: Here we use high signal-to-noise ratio recombination line spectra
370: taken at two different spatial resolutions to probe for any
371: significant ionization structure. For our \hii\ region sample we have
372: obtained H and \he4\ RRL data simultaneously for several different
373: transitions near 8\ghz\ with a spatial resolution of 3\farcm5 (see
374: Paper I). These observations are briefly reviewed here in
375: \S\,\ref{sec:Xband}. Because they sample the same \hii\ region
376: zone as the \hep3\ spectra, these data are primarily used to determine
377: \yp4\ in equation (1). Most \he4\ RRL data are from single-dish
378: telescopes which typically have spatial resolutions \gsim\ 1\arcmin.
379: Measuring accurate \yp4\ abundance ratios with single-dish telescopes
380: is difficult because non-random frequency structure is produced in the
381: instrumental baselines owing to reflections from various parts of the
382: telescope structure \citep[see][]{Lockman82}. Improvements in
383: receiver technology have provided better stability and enhanced
384: signal-to-noise. This, together with a better understanding of the
385: instrumental effects, has enabled more accurate measurements of \yp4\
386: (Peimbert et al. 1992a; Paper I).
387:
388: Using these improved techniques we made additional observations at
389: 18\ghz\ with a spatial resolution of 1\farcm5 for a subset of our \hii\
390: region sample (\S\,\ref{Kband}). The smaller beam of the 18\ghz\ RRLs
391: typically probes the more compact, dense components, whereas the larger
392: 3\farcm5 beam of the 8\ghz\ RRLs is more sensitive to the extended,
393: diffuse material. Radio interferometers can measure the \hep4\
394: distribution within \hii\ regions at spatial resolutions \lsim\
395: 1\arcmin. Although interferometers do not detect the diffuse emission
396: because of the zero-spacing flux problem, this information can be
397: provided by single-dish measurements. To our knowledge only five \hii\
398: regions in our sample have been observed in H and \he4\ RRL emission
399: with radio interferometers: W3, \sgr{B2}, W43, W49, and W51.
400:
401: Since the entire nebula can be imaged, the best optical data for this
402: study are observations made with Fabry-Perot spectrophotometers.
403: \citet{Caplan00} derived oxygen and helium abundances for 34 \hii\
404: regions using the ESOP Fabry-Perot instrument. For many objects the
405: entire nebula was probed (the largest diaphragm was 4\arcmin\
406: 27\arcsec). The \he4\ abundances from this survey are discussed by
407: \citet{Deharveng00}. There are four \hii\ regions that are in our sample:
408: S206, S209, S212, and S252.
409:
410: Although the 8\ghz\ RRLs are primarily used to determine \yp4\ the other
411: radio and optical \hep4\ data can not only provide an independent
412: confirmation of the \hepr4\ abundance, but also indicate whether the
413: assumptions in equation (1) are valid. In \S\,\ref{sec:models}
414: numerical models are used to explore the physical conditions under which
415: the assumptions in equation (1) begin to fail. This information is then
416: used in \S\,\ref{sec:kappa} to determine a value for the ionization
417: correction factor, \kapi, for each source. A discussion of the results
418: is in \S\,\ref{sec:discuss} and a summary of the paper in
419: \S\,\ref{sec:summary}.
420:
421: \section{$^{\bf 4}$He$^{\bf +}$ OBSERVATIONS}\label{sec:data}
422:
423: \subsection{X-band (8\,GHz) Radio Recombination Lines}
424: \label{sec:Xband}
425:
426: The X-band RRL observations are discussed in \S{2} of Paper I. The
427: \hal\ and \heal\ transitions were observed in every \hii\ region.
428: Additional, higher order, transitions were also observed at nearby
429: frequencies with essentially the same spatial resolution (3\farcm5).
430: These data were used to constrain the nebular models in Paper II.
431: Here we only use the higher quality 91$\alpha$ and 114$\beta$
432: transitions of H and \he4.
433:
434: Calibration details are discussed in \S{2.1} of Paper I. We used the
435: planetary nebula \ngc{7027} to calibrate the flux density scale for
436: each observing epoch. The absolute calibration is judged to be within
437: $\sim$\,10\%; the internal consistency is $\sim$\,5\%. From these
438: observations we use only the ratios of the line areas to calculate
439: \hepr4; the calibration is therefore not a significant source of
440: uncertainty.
441:
442: A much larger source of uncertainty are the standing waves produced by
443: reflections from various parts of the telescope structure (see \S{2.2}
444: in Paper I and references therein). To minimize the amplitude of
445: these standing waves, observations are made with focus offsets
446: alternating between $\pm \lambda_0/8$ every 60\s. Cancellation of the
447: standing waves is, however, not perfect and the spectral baselines
448: must be modeled. A 12$^{\rm th}$ order polynomial baseline is
449: used to model this non-random frequency structure. The necessity for
450: using a high-order baseline and the selection of the appropriate order
451: to be used is discussed in \citet{Balser94} and Paper I. The
452: results of Gaussian fits to each transition are given in Table 4 of
453: Paper I.
454:
455: \subsection{K-band (18~GHz) Radio Recombination Lines}
456: \label{Kband}
457:
458: Observations of H and \he4\ RRLs at K-band were made with the NRAO 140
459: Foot telescope during the periods: 1995 November, 1995 December, and
460: 1996 January. The 140 Foot telescope has a half-power beam-width of
461: 1\farcm5 at 18\ghz. The radiometer consisted of a dual circularly
462: polarized HEMT receiver located at the Cassegrain focus of the 140 Foot
463: telescope. The system temperature on cold sky under good weather
464: conditions was $\sim 50$\kel. The spectrometer consisted of the NRAO
465: model IV 1024 channel autocorrelator (AC). The AC sampled four
466: independent 20\mhz\ wide frequency bands (``quadrants'') of 256 channels
467: each. The velocity resolution at 18\ghz\ is 1.3\kms. The 20\mhz\
468: bandwidth allowed both the H and \he4\ transitions to be observed
469: simultaneously within each quadrant. For most of the observing the AC
470: was configured with the \halk/\healk\ and the \hbetk/\hebetk\ RRLs in
471: two quadrants each, simultaneously sampling orthogonal polarizations in
472: order to maximize our spectral sensitivity. In some of the brighter
473: objects the 100$\gamma$ and 110$\delta$ transitions of H and \he4\
474: were observed.
475:
476: Spectra were taken using the total power observing mode. First a
477: reference spectrum (OFF) was taken at a position offset 6 minutes in
478: right ascension from the nebula and then the nebula itself (ON) was
479: observed. Each position had an integration time of 6 minutes. Local
480: pointing corrections were determined every hour. After each pointing
481: a continuum cross scan, in right ascension and declination, was made
482: on the \hii\ region to measure the radio continuum emission.
483:
484: The radiometer system temperature was measured using noise tubes
485: calibrated by connecting the receiver to matched hot and cold loads.
486: An ambient temperature absorber was used for the hot load and the
487: zenith sky for the cold load. Since this procedure has many
488: uncertainties and is not always performed before each observing
489: session we have re-calibrated the system temperature by using the
490: observed continuum intensity of the unresolved planetary nebula
491: \ngc{7027}. \ngc{7027} was observed several times during each
492: observing session during good weather near transit; it has a flux
493: density of 6\jy\ at 18\ghz\ \citep{Peng00}.
494:
495: There are two effects that can modify the calibration as a function of
496: time. First, at these frequencies the aperture efficiency of the 140
497: Foot telescope changes with elevation as gravity distorts the primary
498: reflector; an elevation gain correction must therefore be made. We
499: measured the \hii\ region continuum intensity every hour for each
500: source in order to determine the appropriate gain correction. Second,
501: the atmospheric opacity is significant and depends on the water vapor
502: content. We made a tipping scan several times during each observing
503: period to measure the opacity. Since we are interested in calculating
504: the \hepr4\ abundance ratio, which depends on the ratio of the line
505: intensities, the calibration effectively cancels. All intensities
506: quoted here are therefore antenna temperatures calibrated using only
507: the \ngc{7027} data.
508:
509: We used the techniques discussed in \S{2.2} of Paper I to model the
510: K-band spectral baselines, except that a 6$^{\rm th}$ order polynomial
511: was used instead of a 12$^{\rm th}$ order. Although the AC
512: configuration was the same, yielding a 20\mhz\ bandwidth with 256
513: channels, only $\sim 12$\mhz\ is required to cover the frequency range
514: between the H and \he4\ lines. We have therefore reduced the total
515: number of terms in the polynomial baseline model.
516:
517: \subsection{The ${\bf {}^{\bf 4}He^{\bf +}\,/\,H^{\bf +}}$ Abundance Ratio}
518: \label{Yplus}
519:
520: Example RRL spectra are shown in Figure~\ref{fig:h90h70}. Only 10
521: objects from the original sample of 21 were observed at K-band. The
522: data were smoothed to a velocity resolution of 8.1\kms. The vertical
523: lines flag the expected locations of the H, He, and C lines for the
524: specified RRL transition (91$\alpha$ or 70$\alpha$).
525: Table~\ref{tab:data} summarizes the results of Gaussian fits to the
526: K-band spectra. Listed are the source name, the RRL transition, the peak
527: intensity and full-width half-maximum (FWHM) line-width together with
528: their associated errors, the total integration time, the resulting
529: r.m.s. noise of the spectral baseline, and the quality factor of the
530: line. The quality factor is determined using the same criteria as in
531: Paper I. These include the signal-to-noise ratio, the structure of the
532: baseline, and the crowding of spectral lines. We do not include any
533: calibration error in assessing the quality factor since we only use line
534: ratios in this paper.
535:
536: The \hepr4\,, \yp4, abundance ratios calculated from the RRL data using
537: the line areas are summarized in Figure~\ref{fig:QMn} which plots the
538: \yp4\ abundance ratio as a function of the principal quantum number,
539: $n$, of the RRL transition. The 70$\alpha$, 88$\beta$, 91$\alpha$, and
540: 114$\beta$ transitions are shown. The Gaussian line parameters in Table
541: 4 of Paper I and in Table 1 here are used for the X-band and K-band
542: transitions, respectively. The errors are determined by propagating the
543: uncertainties in the Gaussian fit to the line intensity and width.
544:
545: For some nebulae there are real differences among the \yp4\ ratios
546: derived from the various RRL transitions. This is to be expected, of
547: course, since the K-band spectra probe, on average, the denser, more
548: compact nebular interior whereas the X-band spectra measure a much
549: larger region, perhaps including a low density halo. These
550: statistically significant differences are clearly seen in
551: Figure~\ref{fig:yplus} which compares in various ways the \yp4\ ratios
552: derived from the \hal\,(diamonds) and \halk\,(circles) spectra for the
553: 10 K-band sources (see \S\,\ref{sec:discuss}).
554:
555: \section{SYNTHETIC NEBULAR MODELS}\label{sec:models}
556:
557: We use the formalism defined in \S\ref{sec:defkap} together with
558: numerical models for the nebulae to explore the range of validity of
559: this approach to the ionization correction. The \hii\ regions in our
560: sample span a wide range of physical conditions. At one extreme there
561: are large, complex \hii\ regions such as W49 that are ionized by many
562: OB-type stars and have multiple compact components in their density
563: structure. At the other extreme are \hii\ regions such as S206, which
564: are smaller, much less complex sources, that are probably ionized by a
565: single OB-type star. The simple ionization structure correction model
566: discussed in \S\,\ref{sec:defkap} could well not be very accurate for
567: sources like W49. It is important, however, to understand under what
568: conditions this model breaks down and what impact this has on deriving
569: \her3\ abundance ratios.
570:
571: Paper II explored the effect of source density structure on the
572: derivation of the \her3\ abundance. We used RRL and continuum data to
573: constrain the models. Both RRL and continuum emission intensities are
574: proportional to $n_{e}^2$ and so they trace the densest components
575: of the nebulae. We found that our sources could be grouped into two
576: broad categories. In one class were ``complex,'' W49-like sources
577: that required models with complex density structure and non-LTE
578: radiative transfer in order to reproduce the observations. In the
579: other class were ``simple,'' S206-like sources whose observations
580: could be reproduced by models with LTE radiative transfer and
581: homogeneous density structure.
582:
583: We adopt a simple core-halo model for the nebular density and ionization
584: structure. From the models we calculate simulated observations and
585: assess the effect of the model structure on our ability to recover
586: accurately the \her3\ abundance using our simple ionization structure
587: correction. We use a computer program called NEBULA to model the \hii\
588: region (see Balser 1995 and Paper II for details about NEBULA). The
589: model nebula can have arbitrary density, temperature, and ionization
590: structure. The gas consists of only hydrogen and helium. We calculate
591: the radiative transfer through the model nebula for the radio continuum,
592: recombination line, and \hep3\ hyperfine line emission. Since we shall
593: be comparing these synthetic spectral lines to the \S\,\ref{sec:data}
594: data taken at 8 and 18\ghz, we calculate the model antenna temperature
595: for each species by convolving the model sky brightness temperature
596: distribution with the telescope beam and multiplying by the telescope
597: main beam efficiency. The telescope beam is assumed to be a Gaussian
598: with a half-power beam-width (HPBW) of 1\farcm5 or 3\farcm5. These are
599: the HPBW sizes of the 140\,Foot telescope beam at 18\ghz\ and 8\ghz,
600: respectively.
601:
602: All model nebulae are located at a distance of 8\kpc\ which is roughly
603: the average distance to our \he3\ sources. The models are comprised
604: of nested, spherical, homogeneous, isothermal components. For
605: simplicity, all model components have a fixed, 8,000\K\,, electron
606: temperature that is typical for Galactic \hii\ regions. For all
607: models it is assumed that the total abundance ratios are
608: $\y3 \equiv \nexpo{1}{-5}$ and $\y4 \equiv 0.10$.
609: Table~\ref{tab:NEBULA} summarizes the model parameters used as input
610: for the NEBULA program.
611:
612: Model A is a one-component, low density, $n_e = 100\percc$, nebula
613: with an angular size of 3\farcm5 (8.14\pc). All other models are
614: two-component (core-halo) nebulae which consist of a 1\farcm5
615: (3.49\pc) core embedded in a larger 3\farcm5 nebula. Listed for each
616: component is the angular size, the electron density, the fraction of
617: the component \hii\ mass relative to the total mass, the \yp3\
618: abundance ratio, and the \yp4\ abundance ratio. Altogether, the
619: models span a core-halo density contrast ratio from 1:1 to 5:1, and a
620: core mass fraction from 8\% to 30\%. That is, all models have
621: halos that contain more mass than the cores by a factor of either
622: $\sim 2$ or $\sim 10$. These parameters span the range of the
623: Galactic \hii\ region physical properties derived from single-dish RRL
624: observations \citep[e.g., ][]{Quireza06,Quireza07}.
625:
626: The NEBULA code calculates the following observable quantities: the
627: continuum antenna temperature at 8.665\ghz\ and the antenna
628: temperatures of the \hep3, \hal, \heal, \halk, and \healk\
629: transitions. Properties of the synthetic observations that result
630: from the Table~\ref{tab:NEBULA} models are summarized in
631: Table~\ref{tab:models}. Listed are the continuum and line antenna
632: temperature for the \hep3\ transition, the \yp3\ (\hepr3) abundance
633: ratio, the \yp4\ (\hepr4) abundance ratio and the values of \kapi\ and
634: \y3\ calculated using the equation (\ref{eq:defkap}) Ansatz. All of
635: these quantities are determined for X-band (8\ghz). The last column
636: lists the \yp4\ model values at K-band (18\ghz). The \yp4\ values are
637: calculated from the H and \he4\ line parameters produced by NEBULA;
638: they are the ratio of the line areas.
639: %
640: The \yp3\ value is derived from the NEBULA models assuming a single,
641: homogeneous, fully ionized sphere where ${y}_{3}^{+} \propto
642: T_{\rm L}\,\Delta{v}/T_{\rm C}^{1/2}$. This analytical expression
643: approximates the numerical calculation to within a few percent
644: \citep[see][]{Balser95}. This is our standard way of
645: deriving the \her3\ abundance ratio (Paper II). Here we apply this
646: analysis to the Table~\ref{tab:NEBULA} nebular models and use the
647: formalism developed in \S\ref{sec:defkap} to derive the ionization
648: correction factor, \kapi.
649:
650: Model A1 is a uniform nebula with no density or ionization structure.
651: The NEBULA model abundances in Table~\ref{tab:models}, \yp3\ and \yp4,
652: exactly match the input abundances, \y3\ = \nexpo{1}{-5} and \y4\ =
653: 0.10. This of course must be the case since Model A1 is constructed
654: to match our analysis assumptions. It is a single, homogeneous, fully
655: ionized sphere and the NEBULA Model A1 gives an ionization correction of
656: $\kapi = 1$ as it should.
657:
658: In Model A2 we simulate a one-component nebula that has 30\% of all
659: the helium neutral. For this model the NEBULA \he4\ RRL synthetic
660: spectra together with equation (\ref{eq:defkap}) give an ionization
661: correction of $\kappa_i = 1.4$ which in turn produces \y3\ =
662: \nexpo{1.0}{-5}, the model input abundance. Thus, for a one-component
663: model nebula the observables are sufficient to derive ionization
664: corrections that can accurately recover the input structure.
665:
666: Model B has a core-halo density structure where the core component has
667: a higher density by a factor of 5, but the halo has a factor of
668: $\sim 2.3$ times more mass. Both core and halo are fully ionized:
669: Model B has no ionization structure so we cannot derive any correction
670: factor. The NEBULA Model B \yp3\ abundance thus underestimates the
671: true \yp3\ abundance by a factor of 1.3. In Paper II we discuss
672: density structure corrections for the \hepr3\ abundance ratio
673: derivation. There we model nebular density structure and estimate the
674: density correction factor for each \hii\ region in our sample.
675: Applying these techniques to Model B recovers, as expected, the input
676: \yp3\ abundance.
677:
678: Models C and D are constant density nebulae with core-halo ionization
679: structure. The halo mass in both models is $\sim 11.5$ times that of
680: the core. Model C has a fully ionized core and a halo that is
681: under-ionized by 50\%. Model D reverses this ionization structure.
682: That these models have ionization structure is revealed by the
683: different NEBULA values for the X and K-band \yp4\ abundance ratios
684: (see Table~\ref{tab:models}). Since most of the mass resides in these
685: halos the NEBULA \hepr3\ abundance ratio is much less for Model C with
686: its under-ionized halo (\yp3\ = 0.57) than for model D (\yp3\ = 0.96).
687: The NEBULA results give ionization corrections of \kapi = 1.82 and
688: 1.05 for models C and D, respectively. In both cases
689: Equation~\ref{eq:defkap} yields \y3\ = \nexpo{1.0}{-5}, the model
690: input value. For these two models our simple ionization correction
691: reproduces the correct \her3\ abundance ratio.
692:
693: Models E and F combine both density and ionization structure in a
694: core/halo geometry. Both have high density cores (5:1 density
695: contrast) and halo masses that are $\sim2.3$ times that of the
696: cores. Model E has a fully ionized core and a halo that is
697: under-ionized by 50\%. Model F reverses this ionization structure.
698: Once again the different NEBULA values for the X and K-band \yp4\
699: abundance ratios reveal the presence of nebular ionization structure.
700: For model E the NEBULA \yp3\ value is 0.53, roughly a factor of two
701: too low. Yet the NEBULA \yp4\ abundance ratio implies only a small
702: ionization correction factor, \kapi\ = 1.18, which gives a corrected
703: \y3\ abundance of only \nexpo{6.2}{-6}, 62\% of the input value.
704: The situation is much better for Model F with its fully ionized halo.
705: The NEBULA values for \yp4\ and \yp3\ together give an ionization
706: correction factor of \kapi\ = 1.56 and a \y3\ abundance that is within
707: 2\% of the input value.
708: %
709:
710: These models show that the simple ionization correction given in
711: Equation~\ref{eq:defkap} will be reasonably accurate for nebulae with
712: core/halo geometries. Our correction begins to break down whenever the
713: low density component contains most of the mass and is under-ionized.
714: This is because the \hep3\ and RRL emission arises from gas located in
715: different zones of the nebula and these regions do not have the same He
716: ionization structure.
717:
718: In sum, the simple ionization correction given by equation
719: (\ref{eq:defkap}) provides a reasonable value for the total \y3\
720: abundance ratio except for the Model E \hii\ region that has an
721: under-ionized halo containing a significant fraction of the total
722: mass. Clearly more complicated density and ionization structures
723: exist in real \hii\ regions. The simple models discussed here
724: nevertheless illustrate the main issues. The simple ionization
725: correction breaks down when ionization structure exists between
726: significantly different density components. True variations of \y4\
727: and \y3\ structure within the \hii\ region will complicate the
728: analysis. Nonetheless, because of our large X-band beam that in many
729: cases covers the entire nebula, emission from dense, compact
730: components tends to be diluted. We thus derive an average value of
731: \y3\ for each object.
732:
733: \section{IONIZATION CORRECTION FACTOR}\label{sec:kappa}
734:
735: Here we assess the ionization structure correction for our \he3\
736: sample of 21 Galactic \hii\ regions. In Paper II we classify nebulae
737: into two categories: (i)``simple'' \hii\ regions dominated by
738: low-density, extended structure that is well fit by a single-component
739: uniform density sphere model; and (ii) ``complex'' \hii\
740: regions that have multiple high density components and thus require a
741: more sophisticated model. The simple \hii\ regions are: G133.8, S206,
742: S209, S212, S228, S235, S252, S311, S76, S90, S156, \ngc{7538}, and
743: S162; the complex \hii\ regions are: W3, \sgr{B2}, G1.1, M17S, M17N,
744: W43, W49, and W51. Simple \hii\ regions characteristically have low
745: emission measure. For complex \hii\ regions that have significant
746: ionization structure we will underestimate \kapi\ as discussed in
747: \S\ref{sec:models}. We therefore can only derive a lower limit
748: to the \her3\ abundance for these nebulae.
749:
750: We used various techniques to assess the excitation state of the
751: nebulae. Table~\ref{tab:excitation} summarizes the excitation
752: properties for our \hii\ region sample. Listed for the radio data are
753: the \hepr4\ abundance ratio, \yp4, derived using only the \hal\ and
754: \heal\ RRLs, the H-ionizing luminosity, $N_{\rm L}$, determined from the radio
755: continuum data in Paper I, and the spectral type of a single ZAMS star
756: that can produce the observed luminosity. Spectral types are derived
757: from stellar atmosphere models: both the \citet{Vacca96} and \citet[in
758: parentheses]{Panagia73} models are listed. Similar results from optical
759: data are taken from the literature. The spectral types are based on
760: photometry and spectroscopy; the earliest type star thought to ionize
761: each nebula is listed in Table~\ref{tab:excitation}. Overall, the radio
762: and optical spectral classifications are in good agreement.
763:
764: We plot the ionization state, \yp4, of the 14 nebulae for which we
765: have sufficient information as a function of the log of the H-ionizing
766: luminosity, $N_{\rm L}$, in Figure~\ref{fig:Nlc}. There is no discernible
767: trend connecting \yp4\ and $N_{\rm L}$. Except for their systematically
768: lower $N_{\rm L}$ values (recall they are low emission measure nebulae), the
769: simple sources span the same \yp4\ range as do the complex nebulae.
770: Values of $N_{\rm L}$ determined from the radio continuum include the
771: contribution of H-ionizing photons from all of the early-type stars
772: within the \hii\ region complex. Therefore low emission measure does
773: not necessarily imply that the radiation field is soft. For example
774: the radiation field of the low emission measure Rosette nebula is
775: dominated by O4 stars compared to the rather weak ionization field of
776: the high emission measure Orion nebula.
777:
778: Below we discuss each \hii\ region separately in more detail. An
779: ionization correction factor, \kapi, is determined for each object.
780: For consistency we only use data as of 1996 March (cf., Papers I and
781: II). The \kapi\ values can be multiplied by the \hepr3\ abundance
782: ratios in Table 5 of Paper II to yield the \her3\ abundance.
783: \citet{RBB04} derive \her3\ abundances for all the \he3\ nebulae using
784: the entire 1982--1999 140 Foot dataset.
785:
786: {\it W3 ---} Although W3 is optically obscured it has been extensively
787: studied at radio wavelengths. Our higher spatial resolution K-band data
788: give \yp4\ = 0.081 whereas the X-band data yield \yp4\ = 0.076.
789: Both data sets are of very high quality. One interpretation of these
790: results is that the more compact components of W3---in particular
791: W3A---have a higher excitation than the outer regions probed by the
792: larger X-band beam. This is sometimes called the geometric effect where
793: \yp4\ ratios increase with higher resolution observations.
794:
795: Interferometers can probe the RRL emission of the nebular gas at high
796: spatial resolution. Extant observations include: 76$\alpha$ and
797: 110$\alpha$ data from the Very Large Array (VLA) and the Westerbork
798: Synthesis Radio Telescope (WSRT) \citep{Roelfsema91} and 92$\alpha$ from
799: the VLA \citep{Roelfsema92, Adler96}. The \hepr4\ abundance ratio
800: varies considerably among the different components ($0.06 \le $ \yp4\ $
801: \le 0.20$). Values of \yp4\ higher than 0.10 are thought to be due to
802: local enrichment from a nearby evolved object. Alternatively, radiative
803: transfer effects may cause one to overestimate the true \y4\ abundance
804: \citep{Gulyaev97}. High \yp4\ values in other \hii\ regions are
805: associated with evolved early-type objects \citep[e.g.,][]{Balser01}.
806: W3 is rather unusual in our sample since the total mass of ionized
807: gas is small (20$\msun$; paper I) and therefore mass loss from local
808: objects can significantly pollute the surrounding material. We
809: nevertheless adopt $\yp4 = 0.076$ as a reasonable value for most of the
810: mass in W3. Because W3 has complex density structure and there is
811: uncertainty about the ionization structure, we adopt an ionization
812: correction of $\kappa_i \ge 1.32$.
813:
814: {\it G133.8 ---} Also known as W3N, G133.8 is the northern most region
815: of the W3/W4 complex and has a slightly more negative velocity (by 7
816: \kms) than the other components of W3. Infrared and radio continuum
817: observations of G133.8 indicate that this region is ionized by a
818: luminosity equivalent to an O7 star
819: \citep[Table~\ref{tab:excitation};][]{Schraml69, Thronson84, Carpenter00}.
820: The X-band RRLs measure \yp4\ = 0.082, roughly consistent with the
821: ionization properties predicted from the continuum observations. We
822: adopt an ionization correction of $\kappa_i = 1.22$.
823:
824: {\it S206 ---} This outer Galaxy \hii\ region is thought to be ionized
825: by a single star with spectral type O4--O6. Fabry-Perot
826: spectrophotometer data show that S206 contains essentially no neutral
827: helium with \yp4\ = 0.10 \citep{Deharveng00}. Our X-band measurements
828: give a slightly lower value of \yp4\ = 0.092. Recent high sensitivity
829: RRL data with the Green Bank Telescope yield \yp4\ = 0.085 \citep{Balser06}.
830: Since we are correcting 140 Foot \he3\ data, however, we adopt
831: $\kappa_i = 1.09$.
832:
833: {\it S209 ---} This \hii\ region has the largest Galactocentric
834: distance, $\rgal = 16.9$\kpc, in our entire sample and thus is an
835: important object. Spectrophotometry reveals an O9 and two B1 stars
836: exciting S209 \citep{Chini84}; this suggests that S209 might contain
837: some neutral helium. Optical \he4\ observations show that \yp4\
838: ranges from 0.084 \citep{Vilchez96} to 0.12 \citep{Deharveng00}. The
839: \heal\ transition gives \yp4\ = 0.083. We adopt \yp4\ = 0.083
840: producing an ionization correction of $\kappa_i = 1.20$.
841:
842: {\it S212 ---} \hep3\ was not detected toward S212 and the \he4\ data
843: are of poor quality. S212 is nonetheless a potentially important
844: object with $\rgal = 14.2$\kpc. The nebula is ionized by an
845: early-type star, O5.5--O8. Optical observations measure $\yp4 =
846: 0.088$--0.10; most of the helium should be ionized. We adopt $\yp4 =
847: 0.088$ which gives an ionization correction of $\kappa_i = 1.14$.
848:
849: {\it S228 ---} \hep3\ was not detected toward S228 and the \heal\ line
850: is only a probable detection. As is the case for S212, this outer
851: Galaxy nebula is potentially a good \he3\ candidate. Based on both
852: radio and optical data, however, this region is ionized by a late-type
853: O-star; the helium is probably not fully ionized within the \hii\
854: region. Because \hep3\ and \hep4\ have not been detected we have a
855: direct measure of neither the \her3\ abundance nor the ionization
856: correction.
857:
858: {\it S235, S76, S90 ---} These physically small, shell-like nebulae were
859: observed because they have a morphology that is similar to that of
860: W3\,A. The anomalously high \her4\ abundance ratio in W3A might be
861: caused by local enrichment from nearby, evolved objects. This might
862: also explain the high W3 \her3\ abundance ratio \citep{Olive95}.
863:
864: \hep3\ was not detected in either S235 or S76. Although we do not
865: have good quality \hep4\ data it is clear that the helium in these
866: nebulae is significantly under-ionized (Paper I). Both radio and
867: optical data show that these two \hii\ regions are ionized by late
868: O-type or early B-type stars. Given these soft radiation fields even
869: a high \her3\ abundance ratio would be difficult to detect.
870:
871: In S90, both \hep3\ and \hep4\ are detected. Although an O9.5 star is
872: optically identified near S90, \citet{Crampton78} argue that this star
873: does not excite the nebula. The radio continuum data suggest an earlier
874: type object, O8--O6.5, roughly consistent with the observed value of
875: $\yp4 = 0.070$. We adopt an ionization correction factor of $\kapi =
876: 1.43$.
877:
878: {\it S252 ---} Also known as \ngc{2175} or W13, this diffuse \hii\
879: region extends over 25\,\arcmin\ on the sky and contains several
880: compact components. The nebula is ionized mainly by an O6--O6.5 star
881: centered on the \hii\ region \citep{Haikala95}. Our observed position
882: lies on a bright rim located at the western edge of the nebula
883: \citep{Felli77}. Because of the low emission measures in S252 there
884: is only a probable detection of \heal\ (Paper I). \hep4\ is, however,
885: detected at optical wavelengths. \citet{Shaver83} measured $\yp4 =
886: 0.051$ near our position. Towards the center of the \hii\ region this
887: value increases with $\yp4 = 0.091$--0.10 \citep{Shaver83,
888: Deharveng00}. We adopt an ionization correction factor of $\kappa_i =
889: 1.96$.
890:
891: {\it S311 ---} S311 is thought to be ionized by an O6--O6.5 star
892: located north of the radio emission peak \citep{Persi87}. The
893: asymmetric density distribution suggests a blister type geometry
894: \citep{Albert86}. \heal\ emission is detected: $\yp4 = 0.071$. We
895: adopt an ionization correction factor of $\kappa_i = 1.41$.
896:
897: {\it \sgr{B2} ---} \sgr{B2} is the most complex source in our sample.
898: It is important because it is located near the Galactic Center (GC).
899: The ionized gas is observed at high spatial resolution with radio
900: interferometers \citep[e.g.,][]{Martin72, Benson84, Gaume90, Gaume95}.
901: There are at least 57 separate, compact components associated with
902: \sgr{B2} \citep{DePree96}.
903:
904: The \hepr4\ abundance in \sgr{B2} is known to be anomalous
905: \citep[see][and references within]{Lockman82}. The radio continuum
906: emission implies a very high excitation but the \hepr4\ ratio is at
907: times reported to be below 0.06 (e.g., Table~\ref{tab:excitation}). In
908: the literature the \sgr{B2} \her4\ abundance is reported as
909: underabundant, overabundant, or normal, depending on various effects
910: such as the geometric effect, selective photo-absorption by dust, or the
911: external maser effect. These uncertainties are compounded by complex
912: spectral baselines produced by reflections from the telescope structure
913: for the single-dish observations.
914:
915: Some insight can, however, be gleaned from high resolution
916: interferometric observations of RRL emission. \sgr{B2} was observed
917: with the VLA in 76$\alpha$ emission \citep{Roelfsema87}; 110$\alpha$
918: emission \citep{Mehringer93}; and 66$\alpha$ emission \citep{DePree95,
919: DePree96}. The \hepr4\ ratio varies from 0.05 to 0.17 among the various
920: compact components; the average value is 0.10 \citep{Roelfsema87,
921: DePree96}. The component F bright cluster of sources is the sole
922: extremely low \hepr4\ ratio, $\yp4 \le 0.05$, component
923: \citep{DePree96}.
924:
925: Most of the radio continuum flux density at X-band arises from the
926: compact components towards \sgr{B2} \citep{Balser95a}. The \sgr{B2} F
927: components have the highest peak emission measures. Since the RRL
928: emission is proportional to emission measure, the \hep4\ RRL emission is
929: strongly influenced by the F components. It is therefore not surprising
930: that, depending on frequency and spatial resolution, different \yp4\
931: values are measured in \sgr{B2}.
932: %
933: Because toward \sgr{B2} there is ionization structure coupled with very
934: complex density structure within the 3\farcm5 beam of the 140 Foot
935: telescope, using equation (1) is inappropriate. For this source we can
936: only adopt a limit to the \her3\ abundance ratio.
937:
938: {\it G1.1 ---} Better known as \sgr{D}, this \hii\ region is located
939: only 1\arcdeg\ from the GC but is much less complex than \sgr{B2}.
940: Although we have placed its location at the GC there is evidence
941: suggesting that it might be located outside the molecular nuclear disk
942: \citep{Lis91, Mehringer98, Blum99a}. High resolution radio continuum
943: images reveal several compact components within a diffuse, extended
944: halo \citep{Liszt92, Mehringer98}. A single O7 star can ionize the
945: core \citep{Liszt92}. This is consistent with narrow band imaging at
946: 2.17\micron, Br$\gamma$, and 2.06\micron, and \hei\
947: \citep{Blum99}. If the diffuse gas is included in the analysis an O4
948: star is required to account for the excitation
949: (Table~\ref{tab:excitation}). The \hepr4\ ratio of 0.064 implies the
950: presence of some neutral helium in the nebula. This is also
951: consistent with the infrared observations of \citet{Blum99}.
952: Initially G1.1 was classified as complex because of scant data;
953: additional RRL data supports a simple homogeneous model. We therefore
954: adopt the ionization correction factor of $\kappa_ i = 1.56$.
955:
956: {\it M17 ---} The Omega nebula, also known as M17, S45, \ngc{6618}, and
957: W28, is a well studied inner Galaxy \hii\ region. The nebula spans over
958: 10\,\arcmin\ in angular size and consists of two main components: M17
959: north (M17N) and M17 south (M17S). The Omega nebula is complex: high
960: resolution radio continuum images reveal this density structure directly
961: \citep{Felli84}. We were unable to model the density structure in Paper
962: II. The complex velocity field produces non-Gaussian profiles in both
963: M17N and M17S (Paper I; also see Joncas \& Roy 1986).
964:
965: It is nonetheless clear that most of the helium is ionized. High
966: extinction makes optical identification of the ionizing stars difficult,
967: but infrared spectrophotometry shows at least five O3-O6 stars
968: \citep{Hanson95}. The large number of early O-type stars and the high
969: \hepr4\ abundance ratios observed at both radio and optical wavelengths
970: suggest that $\kappa_i \approx 1$. Using the \heal\ transitions we
971: adopt an ionization correction factor of $\kapi = 1.09$ and 1.06 for
972: M17S and M17N, respectively.
973:
974: {\it W43 ---} W43 is a large, optically obscured \hii\ region located
975: only 4.6\kpc\ from the GC. Because \hii\ regions are sparse between
976: the GC and 4.5\kpc\ \citep{Lockman96}, W43 probes the \her3\ abundance
977: near the outer edge of this \hii\ region desert. W43 contains low
978: density, diffuse gas and many compact components
979: \citep[e.g.,][]{Subrahmanyan96, Balser01}. Near infrared observations
980: show a star cluster at the center of the \hii\ region consisting of a
981: WN7 star and two O-type stars \citep{Blum99}. The total H-ionizing
982: luminosity is considerable, requiring at least an O4 star for the
983: entire region (Table~\ref{tab:excitation}).
984:
985: We studied the helium ionization properties of both the diffuse and
986: compact gas in W43 using the 140 Foot telescope and the VLA
987: \citep{Balser01}. Using RRL emission we imaged the \hepr4\ abundance
988: ratio for both the compact and diffuse components. The average
989: \hepr4\ ratio of the entire dataset is $\langle\yp4\rangle = 0.077 \pm
990: 0.01$. We find no significant variations of the \hepr4\ abundance,
991: even for positions observed at the edge of the nebula with the 140
992: Foot. Thus although W43 is a complex nebula, the ionization
993: properties do not appear to vary within this object so we can derive
994: an accurate ionization correction factor. We adopt $\kappa_i = 1.30$
995: based on the average \yp4\ abundance.
996:
997: {\it W49 ---} W49 is one of the most luminous \hii\ regions in the
998: Galaxy, consisting of a ring of ultra compact \hii\ regions (UC \hii\
999: regions), each containing at least one O-type star
1000: \citep[e.g.,][]{Welch87}. These UC \hii\ regions make up only
1001: one-third of the total H-ionizing luminosity observed \citep{Conti02}.
1002: %
1003: The \heal\ RRL gives a \hepr4\ abundance ratio of $0.079 \pm 0.0052$,
1004: consistent with the K-band data. Higher resolution VLA H and He RRL
1005: images find \yp4\ ranging from $0.05 \pm 0.02$ to $0.18 \pm 0.06$ in
1006: 13 objects with an average of $\langle\yp4\rangle = 0.11 \pm 0.01$
1007: \citep{DePree97}. This significant ionization structure combined with
1008: considerable density structure makes any equation (\ref{eq:defkap})
1009: type ionization correction inappropriate. We therefore adopt
1010: $\kappa_i \ge\ 1$.
1011:
1012: {\it W51 ---} W51 is a bright, complex \hii\ region with an angular
1013: extent of 2\,\arcdeg\ on the sky. Radio continuum observations reveal
1014: several O4--O6 stars associated with the main components
1015: \citep{Mehringer94}. Mid-infrared imaging and spectroscopy suggests
1016: stars with spectral types $\sim$\,O9 \citep{Okamoto01}. The X-band
1017: \hep4\ RRL data give a \yp4\ abundance of $0.079 \pm 0.0024$. The
1018: \healk\ transition appears to be slightly lower with \yp4\ $\sim
1019: 0.07$. High resolution VLA observations of 92$\alpha$ RRLs yield
1020: \yp4\ values ranging from $0.08 \pm 0.02$ to $0.14 \pm 0.06$ with
1021: an average of $\langle\yp4\rangle = 0.096 \pm 0.015$ \citep{Mehringer94}.
1022: Although most of the helium appears to be ionized, given the
1023: complexity of this object we adopt an ionization correction factor of
1024: $\kappa_i \ge\ 1$.
1025:
1026: {\it S156 ---} S156 is a compact \hii\ region excited by an O6.5-type
1027: star. We have only an upper limit for the \hepr3\ abundance. Although
1028: we have detected \hep4\ at X-band the accuracy is not very good.
1029: Optical observations yield $\yp4 = 0.081$ \citep{Deharveng00}. We adopt
1030: an ionization correction factor of $\kappa_i = 1.23$.
1031:
1032: {\it \ngc{7538} ---} Also known as S158, \ngc{7538} is centrally diffuse
1033: with a bright rim to the west \citep{Israel77}. An O7 star located at
1034: the center of the nebula is responsible for the excitation
1035: \citep{Deharveng79}. Optical data yield $\yp4 = 0.10$ \citep{Lynds86}, a
1036: value higher than our RRL results. Both the X-band and K-band data give
1037: \yp4\ $\sim 0.08$, although the \hebet\ transition produces a slightly
1038: higher value of 0.10. We adopt an ionization correction factor based
1039: on the X-band data of $\kappa_i = 1.19$.
1040:
1041: {\it S162 ---} Sometimes called the Bubble nebula, S162 consists of a
1042: circularly shaped shell with bright emission to the north observed in
1043: H$\alpha$ and the radio continuum \citep[Paper I]{Barlow76, Israel73}.
1044: The exciting star has been classified as an O6.5-type, consistent with
1045: the radio continuum estimates. We do not detect \hep3\ emission.
1046: Although we do detect the \heal\ RRL, the quality factor is poor. We
1047: cannot make an ionization correction so therefore adopt $\kappa_i \ge
1048: 1$.
1049:
1050: \section{DISCUSSION}\label{sec:discuss}
1051:
1052: Our nebular ionization correction, \kapi\,, is the simplest possible
1053: approach to the problem. It makes several key assumptions: (1) the
1054: \he4\ abundance is \her4\ $\equiv 0.10$ for all Galactic \hii\ regions;
1055: (2) all the He is singly ionized---there is neither neutral nor doubly
1056: ionized He within the nebulae; and (3) the \hep3\ and \hep4\ ions
1057: occupy identical volumes within the nebulae. Measuring the total
1058: helium abundance is difficult since there is no direct way to observe
1059: neutral helium. We do not expect any significant doubly ionized
1060: helium since the radiation field from Galactic O-type stars is not
1061: hard enough. For example, M17 is ionized by several stars classified
1062: between O3--O6 \citep{Hanson95} and is one of the Galactic \hii\
1063: regions with the highest degree of ionization. Yet only a very low
1064: upper limit, $^3{\rm He}^{++}/{\rm H}^+ < 8 \times 10^{-5}$, is measured for
1065: \hepp4\ in M17 \citep{Peimbert92b}. In fact, to our knowledge \hepp4\
1066: has never been detected in any Galactic \hii\ region.
1067:
1068: A canonical value for the Galactic \he4\ abundance of $\y4 = 0.1$ is
1069: typically used in the literature. Most of the \he4\ was produced
1070: during the era of primordial nucleosynthesis. Therefore the variation
1071: of \he4\ in the Galaxy, caused by stellar and Galactic evolution, is
1072: expected to be small because $\Delta Y / \Delta Z \sim 1$, where $Y$
1073: and $Z$ are the helium and metal abundances by mass
1074: \citep[e.g.,][]{Chiappini02}. Direct measurement of the total \her4\
1075: abundance ratio in the Galaxy is difficult. The \he4\ abundance cannot
1076: be determined using either the Solar photosphere or in meteorites.
1077: Measurements of \he4\ in Galactic \hii\ regions have to correct for
1078: ionization structure just as we are trying to do here for \he3.
1079:
1080: Solar \he4\ abundances are determined from theoretical stellar
1081: evolution models with \y4\ $\sim 0.1$ \citep[e.g.,][]{Anders89}.
1082: \citet{Peimbert93} suggested that the high excitation \hii\ region M17
1083: was the best object to measure \he4\ directly and they also determined
1084: $\y4 \sim 0.1$. There is mounting evidence, however, that \y4\ is
1085: less than 0.1 in the Galaxy. More recent calibration of the \he4\
1086: Solar abundances yield \y4\ values lower by as much as 10\%
1087: \citep{Grevesse96, Grevesse98, Basu04, Asplund05}. Recent estimates
1088: of \y4\ in M17 that include temperature fluctuations reduce \y4\ by
1089: about 5\%, consistent with improved RRL data \citep{Peimbert02,
1090: Quireza06}. Furthermore, RRL observations of the lower metallicity
1091: Galactic \hii\ region S206, which is also expected to contain little
1092: or no neutral helium, give \y4 = 0.085 \citep{Balser06}.
1093:
1094: Nevertheless, we adopt $\y4 \equiv y_{\rm 4GAL} = 0.1$ in equation (1)
1095: for our ionization correction factor analysis. We judge that for our
1096: simple sources the ionization correction should be good to about 10\%.
1097: At this level of accuracy all of the additional ionization effects
1098: considered by \he4\ abundance analyses \citep[e.g.,][]{Izotov07}
1099: can be neglected.
1100:
1101: \section{SUMMARY}\label{sec:summary}
1102:
1103: The significance of our results for both primordial \he3\ and chemical
1104: evolution of \he3\ lies in the fact that the abundances we find are
1105: quite low. Hence we have paid particular attention to factors that
1106: might lead us to measure a lower abundance than that which is actually
1107: present. In this paper we conclude that it is unlikely that large
1108: ionization corrections are required for our high excitation state
1109: \he3\ nebulae. We use the \yp4\ abundance to select for high
1110: excitation \hii\ regions. We determined an ionization correction
1111: factor for the Paper I nebular sample. There would have to be a
1112: conspiracy between the density and ionization structure for these
1113: ionization corrections to be underestimated by a substantial amount.
1114: %
1115: Our synthetic nebular models (\S\ref{sec:models}) do show that large
1116: ionization corrections are possible. Such models, however, require
1117: that there be rather specific density and ionization structure
1118: configurations. Our simple ionization correction fails when \yp4\
1119: changes significantly between the low density gas where \hep3\
1120: dominates the emission and the high density gas where \hep4\
1121: dominates. The more complex the source the larger our potential error
1122: in determining the ionization correction. We find both numerically
1123: and observationally that the simple sources give the best ionization
1124: corrections (\S\ref{sec:kappa}).
1125:
1126: For the sources that we classify as simple and which also have well
1127: determined line parameters, the ionization correction given in
1128: \S\ref{sec:kappa} should be accurate. Indeed, the major uncertainty is
1129: likely to be the value adopted for $y_{\rm 4GAL}$. Even for more complex
1130: sources our simple ionization correction should be reasonable for any
1131: nebula that does not have large fluctuations in excitation. We have
1132: shown this to be the case for the complex nebula W43 where we have
1133: single-dish and interferometry data for both radio recombination line
1134: and continuum emission (\S\ref{sec:kappa}).
1135:
1136: For a subset of our \he3\ sources, we use both 8\,GHz and 18\,GHz RRL
1137: data to derive \yp4. The two sets of observations probe different
1138: regions of the nebula, yet we in general find very similar values for
1139: \yp4. This is consistent with the notion that for our sources
1140: selected for high excitation there are not large ionization
1141: corrections.
1142:
1143: We can use this simple ionization correction analysis because unlike
1144: many of the light elements \her3\ abundances accurate to $\sim 10\%$
1145: can yield important conclusions for both the primordial \he3\ and the
1146: chemical evolution of \he3\ \citep{Wilson94}. This is in stark
1147: contrast to the situation for \he4\ where the \her4\ abundance needs
1148: to be determined to an accuracy of $\lsim 1$\% if one is to draw
1149: cosmologically significant inferences \citep[e.g.,][]{Izotov07}.
1150: Furthermore, because the majority of our \he3\ nebulae are not
1151: optically visible it is not likely that we will ever have sufficiently
1152: detailed information about their physical properties to make a
1153: significally better correction.
1154:
1155: \acknowledgments{We thank the staff of NRAO Green Bank for their help,
1156: support, and friendship. The \he3\ research has been sporadically
1157: supported by the National Science Foundation (AST 97-31484; AST
1158: 00-98047; AST 00-98449). This research has made use of NASA's
1159: Astrophysics Data System and the SIMBAD database, operated at CDS,
1160: Strasbourg, France.}
1161:
1162: %\clearpage
1163:
1164: \begin{thebibliography}{}
1165:
1166: \bibitem[Adler et al.(1996)]{Adler96}
1167: Adler, D. S., Wood, D. O. S., \& Goss, W. M. 1996, \apj,
1168: 471, 871
1169:
1170: \bibitem[Albert et al.(1986)]{Albert86}
1171: Albert, C.~E., Schwartz, P.~R., Bowers, P.~F., \&
1172: Rickard, L.~J. 1986, \aj, 92, 75
1173:
1174: \bibitem[Anders \& Grevesse (1989)] {Anders89}
1175: Anders, E., \& Grevesse, N. 1989, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 53, 197
1176:
1177: \bibitem[Armour et al.(1999)] {Armour99}
1178: Armour, M., Ballantyne, D.~R., Ferland, G.~J., Karr, J., \& Marin,
1179: P.~G. 1999, \pasp, 111, 1251
1180:
1181: \bibitem[Asplund et al.(2005)] {Asplund05}
1182: Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., \& Sauval, A.~J. 2005, in ASP Conf. Ser.
1183: 336, Cosmic Abundances as Records of Stellar Evolution and Nucleosynthesis,
1184: ed. T.~G. Barnes III \& F.~N. Bash (San Francisco: ASP) 25
1185:
1186: \bibitem[Baldwin et al.(1991)]{Baldwin91}
1187: Baldwin, J.~A., Ferland, G.~J., Martin, P.~G., Corbin, M.~R.,
1188: Cota, S.~A., Peterson, B.~M., \& Slettebak, A.\ 1991, \apj, 374, 580
1189:
1190: \bibitem[Ballantyne et al.(2000)] {Ballantyne00}
1191: Ballantyne, D.~R., Ferland, G.~J., \& Martin, P.~G. 2000, \apj, 536, 773
1192:
1193: \bibitem[Balser(1995)]{Balser95}
1194: Balser, D.~S.\ 1995, PhD dissertation, Boston University
1195:
1196: \bibitem[Balser(2006)] {Balser06}
1197: Balser, D.~S. 2006, \aj, 132, 2326
1198:
1199: \bibitem[Balser et al.(1994)]{Balser94}
1200: Balser, D.~S., Bania, T.~M., Brockway, C.~J., Rood, R.~T.,
1201: \& Wilson, T.~L. 1994, \apj, 430, 667
1202:
1203: \bibitem[Balser et al.(1995)]{Balser95a}
1204: Balser, D. S., Bania, T. M., Rood, R. T., \& Wilson, T. L.
1205: 1995, \apjs, 100, 371
1206:
1207: \bibitem[Balser et al.(1997)]{BBRW97}
1208: Balser, D.~S., Bania, T.~M., Rood, R.~T., \& Wilson, T.~L.\ 1997,
1209: \apj, 483, 320
1210:
1211: \bibitem[Balser et al.(1999)]{BBRW99}
1212: Balser, D.~S., Bania, T.~M., Rood, R.~T., \& Wilson, T.~L.\ 1999,
1213: \apj, 510, 759 (Paper II)
1214:
1215: \bibitem[Balser et al.(2006)]{balser06}
1216: Balser, D.~S., Goss, W.~M., Bania, T.~M, \& Rood, R.~T. 2006, \apj,
1217: 640, 360
1218:
1219: \bibitem[Balser et al.(2001)]{Balser01}
1220: Balser, D.~S., Goss, W. M., \& De Pree, C. G. 2001, \apj, 121, 371
1221:
1222: \bibitem[Bania et al.(1997)]{BBRWW97} Bania, T.~M., Balser, D.~S., Rood, R.~T.,
1223: Wilson, T.~L., \& Wilson, T.~J.\ 1997, \apjs, 113, 353 (Paper I)
1224:
1225: \bibitem[Bania et al.(2002)]{BRB02} Bania, T.~M., Rood, R.~T.,
1226: \& Balser, D.~S.\ 2002, \nat, 415, 54
1227:
1228: \bibitem[Barlow et al.(1976)]{Barlow76}
1229: Barlow, M.~J., Cohen, M., Gull, T.~R. 1976, \mnras, 176, 359
1230:
1231: \bibitem[Benson \& Johnston(1984)]{Benson84}
1232: Benson, J.~M., \& Johnston, K.~J. 1984, \apj, 277, 181
1233:
1234: \bibitem[Basu \& Anita (2004)] {Basu04}
1235: Basu, S., \& Anita, H. M. 2004, \apj, 606, L85
1236:
1237: \bibitem[Blagrave et al.(2007)] {Blagrave06}
1238: Blagrave, K.~P.~M., Martin, P.~G., Rubin, R.~J., Dufour, R.~J.,
1239: Baldwin, J.~A., Hester, J.~J., \& Walter, D.~K. 2007, \apj, 655, 299
1240:
1241: \bibitem[Blum \& Damineli(1999)]{Blum99a}
1242: Blum, R.~D., \& Damineli, A. 1999, \apj, 512, 237
1243:
1244: \bibitem[Blum et al.(1999)]{Blum99}
1245: Blum, R.~D., Damineli, A., \& Conti, P.~S. 1999, \aj,
1246: 117, 1392
1247:
1248: \bibitem[Caplan et al.(2000)]{Caplan00}
1249: Caplan, J., Deharveng, L., Pe$\tilde{\rm n}$a, M., Costero,
1250: R., \& Blondel, C. 2000, \mnras, 311, 317
1251:
1252: \bibitem[Carpenter et al.(2000)]{Carpenter00}
1253: Carpenter, J.~M., Heyer, M.~H., \& Snell, R.~L. 2000, \apjs, 130, 381
1254:
1255: \bibitem[Charbonnel(1998)]{Charbonnel98}
1256: Charbonnel, C.\ 1998, Space Science Reviews, 84, 199
1257:
1258: \bibitem[Chiappini et al. (2002)] {Chiappini02}
1259: Chiappini, C., Renda, A., \& Matteucci, F. 2002, \aap, 395, 789
1260:
1261: \bibitem[Chini \& Wink(1984)]{Chini84}
1262: Chini, R., \& Wink, J.~E. 1984, \aap, 139, L5
1263:
1264: \bibitem[Conti \& Alschuler(1971)]{Conti71}
1265: Conti, P.~S., \& Alschuler, W.~R. 1971, \apj, 170, 325
1266:
1267: \bibitem[Conti \& Leep(1974)]{Conti74}
1268: Conti, P.~S., \& Leep, E.~M. 1974, \apj, 193, 113
1269:
1270: \bibitem[Conti \& Blum(2002)]{Conti02}
1271: Conti, P.~S., \& Blum, R.~D. 2002, \apj, 564, 827
1272:
1273: \bibitem[Crampton(1971)]{Crampton71}
1274: Crampton, D. 1971, \aj, 76, 260
1275:
1276: \bibitem[Crampton et al.(1978)]{Crampton78}
1277: Crampton, D., Georgelin, Y.~M., \& Georgelin, Y.~P. 1978,
1278: \aap, 66, 1
1279:
1280: \bibitem[Deharveng et al.(1979)]{Deharveng79}
1281: Deharveng, L., Lortet, M.~C., \& Testor, G. 1979, \aap,
1282: 71, 151
1283:
1284: \bibitem[Deharveng et al.(2000)]{Deharveng00}
1285: Deharveng, L., Pe$\tilde{\rm n}$a, M., Caplan, J., \& Costero,
1286: R. 2000, \mnras, 311, 329
1287:
1288: \bibitem[DePree et al.(1995)]{DePree95}
1289: De Pree, C.~G., Gaume, R.~A., Goss, W.~M., \& Claussen,
1290: M.~J. 1995, \apj, 451, 284
1291:
1292: \bibitem[DePree et al.(1996)]{DePree96}
1293: De Pree, C.~G., Gaume, R.~A., Goss, W.~M., \& Claussen,
1294: M.~J. 1996, \apj, 464, 788
1295:
1296: \bibitem[DePree et al.(1997)]{DePree97}
1297: De Pree, C.~G., Mehringer, D.~M., Goss, W.~M 1997, \apj, 482, 307
1298:
1299: \bibitem[Esteban et al. (1998)] {Esteban98}
1300: Esteban, C., Peimbert, M., Torres-Peimbert, S., \&
1301: Escalante, V. 1998, \mnras, 295, 401
1302:
1303: \bibitem[Esteban et al.(1999)]{Esteban99}
1304: Esteban, C., Peimbert, M., Torres-Piembert, S., \&
1305: Garc\'{i}a-Rojas 1999, Rev. Mexicana de Astron. y Astrofis., 35, 65
1306:
1307: \bibitem[Feinstein \& V\'{a}zquez(1989)]{Feinstein89}
1308: Feinstein, A. \& V\'{a}zquez, R.~A. 1989, A\&AS, 77, 321
1309:
1310: \bibitem[Felli et al.(1977)]{Felli77}
1311: Felli, M., Habing, H.~J., \& Israel, F.~P. 1977, \aap, 59, 43
1312:
1313: \bibitem[Felli et al.(1984)] {Felli84}
1314: Felli, M., Massi, M., \& Churchwell, E. 1984, \aap, 136, 53
1315:
1316: \bibitem[Fich \& Silkey(1991)]{Fich91}
1317: Fich, M., \& Silkey, M. 1991, \apj, 366, 107
1318:
1319: \bibitem[Gaume \& Claussen(1990)]{Gaume90}
1320: Gaume, R.~A., \& Claussen, M.~J. 1990, \apj, 351, 538
1321:
1322: \bibitem[Gaume et al.(1995)]{Gaume95}
1323: Gaume, R.~A., Claussen, M.~J., De Pree, C.~G., Goss,
1324: W.~M., \& Mehringer, D.~M. 1995, \apj, 449, 663
1325:
1326: \bibitem[Georgelin(1975)]{Georgelin75}
1327: Georgelin, Y.~M. 1975, Th\`{e}se d$^\prime$\'{E}tat,
1328: Univ. de Provence (Univ. d$^\prime$Aix-Marseille I)
1329:
1330: \bibitem[Georgelin et al.(1973)]{Georgelin73}
1331: Georgelin, Y. M., Georgelin, Y. P., \& Roux, S. 1973,
1332: \aap, 25, 337
1333:
1334: \bibitem[Grevesse et al.(1996)] {Grevesse96}
1335: Grevesse, N., Noels, A., \& Sauval, A.~J. 1996, in ASP Conf. Ser. 99,
1336: Cosmic Abundances, ed. S. S. Holt \& G. Sonneborn (San Francisco: ASP),
1337: 117
1338:
1339: \bibitem[Grevesse et al.(1998)] {Grevesse98}
1340: Grevesse, N., Sauval, A.~J. 1998, Space Sci. Rev., 85, 161
1341:
1342: \bibitem[Gruenwald et al.(2002)] {Gruenwald02}
1343: Gruenwald. R., Steigman, G., \& Viegas, S.~M 2002, \apj, 567, 931
1344:
1345: \bibitem[Goy(1980)]{Goy80}
1346: Goy, G. 1980, A\&AS, 1980, 42, 91
1347:
1348: \bibitem[Gulyaev et al.(1997)] {Gulyaev97}
1349: Gulyaev, S. A., Sorochenko R. L., \& Tsivilev, A. P. 1997,
1350: Astronomy Letters, 23, 165
1351:
1352: \bibitem[Haikala(1995)]{Haikala95}
1353: Haikala, L.~K. 1995, \aap, 294, 89
1354:
1355: \bibitem[Hanson \& Conti(1995)]{Hanson95}
1356: Hanson, M.~M., \& Conti, P.~S. 1995, \apj, 448, L45
1357:
1358: \bibitem[Hunter \& Massey(1990)]{Hunter90}
1359: Hunter, D.~A., \& Massey, P. 1990, \aj, 99, 846
1360:
1361: \bibitem[Israel(1977)]{Israel77}
1362: Israel, F.~P. 1977, \aap, 59, 27
1363:
1364: \bibitem[Israel et al.(1973)]{Israel73}
1365: Israel, F.~P., Habing, H.~J., \& de Jong, T. 1973, \aap, 27, 143
1366:
1367: \bibitem[Izotov et al.(2007)]{Izotov07}
1368: Izotoz, Y.~I., Thuan, T.~X., \& Stasi\'nska, G. 2007,
1369: astro-ph/0702072
1370:
1371: \bibitem[Joncas \& Roy(1986)] {Joncas86}
1372: Joncas, G., \& Roy, J.-R. 1986, \apj, 307, 649
1373:
1374: \bibitem[Lockman \& Brown(1982)]{Lockman82}
1375: Lockman, F.~J., \& Brown, R.~L. 1982, \apj, 259, 595
1376:
1377: \bibitem[Lockman et al.(1996)]{Lockman96}
1378: Lockman, F.~J., Pisano, D.~J., \& Howard, G.~J. 1996,
1379: \apj, 472, 173
1380:
1381: \bibitem[Lis(1991)]{Lis91}
1382: Lis, D.~C. 1991, \apj, 379, L53
1383:
1384: \bibitem[Liszt(1992)]{Liszt92}
1385: Liszt, H.~S. 1992, \apjs, 82, 495
1386:
1387: \bibitem[Lynds \& O'Neil, Jr.(1986)]{Lynds86}
1388: Lynds, B.~T., \& O'Neil Jr., E.~J. 1986, \apj, 306, 532
1389:
1390: \bibitem[Martin \& Downes(1972)]{Martin72}
1391: Martin, A.~H.~M., \& Downes, D. 1972, Astrophysical Letters, 11, 219
1392:
1393: \bibitem[Mathis (1982)] {Mathis82}
1394: Mathis, J.~S. 1982, \apj, 261, 195
1395:
1396: \bibitem[Mathis (1985)] {Mathis85}
1397: Mathis, J.~S. 1985, \apj, 291, 247
1398:
1399: \bibitem[Mathis \& Rose(1991)]{Mathis91}
1400: Mathis, J.~S., \& Rosa, M.~R.\ 1991, \aap, 245, 625
1401:
1402: \bibitem[Mathis \& Wood(2005)] {Mathis05}
1403: Mathis, J.~S., \& Wood, K. 2005, \mnras, 360, 227
1404:
1405: \bibitem[Mehringer(1994)]{Mehringer94}
1406: Mehringer, D.~M. 1994, \apjs, 91, 713
1407:
1408: \bibitem[Mehringer et al.(1993)]{Mehringer93}
1409: Mehringer, D.~M., Palmer, P., Goss, W.~M., \&
1410: Yusef-Zadeh, F. 1993, \apj, 412, 684
1411:
1412: \bibitem[Mehringer et al.(1998)]{Mehringer98}
1413: Mehringer, D.~M., Goss, W.~M, Lis, D.~C., Palmer, P., \&
1414: Menten, K.~M. 1998, \apj, 493, 274
1415:
1416: \bibitem[Miller(1968)]{Miller68}
1417: Miller, J.~S., 1968, \apj, 151, 473
1418:
1419: \bibitem[Moffat et al.(1979)]{Moffat79}
1420: Moffat, A.~F.~J., Fitzgerald, M.~P., \& Jackson,
1421: P.~D. 1979, \aaps, 38, 197
1422:
1423: \bibitem[Moreno \& Chavarr\'{i}a-K.(1986)]{Moreno86}
1424: Moreno, M.~A., \& Chavarr\'{i}a-K., C. 1986, \aap, 161, 130
1425:
1426: \bibitem[Okamoto et al.(2001)]{Okamoto01}
1427: Okamoto, Y.~K., Kataza, H., Yamashita, T., Miyata, T.,
1428: \& Onaka, T. 2001, \apj, 553, 254
1429:
1430: \bibitem[Olive et al.(1995)]{Olive95}
1431: Olive, K.~A., Rood, R.~T., Schramm, D.~N., Truran, J.,
1432: \& Vangioni-Flam, E. 1995, \apj, 444, 680
1433:
1434: \bibitem[Panagia(1973)]{Panagia73}
1435: Panagia, N. 1973, \aj, 78, 929
1436:
1437: \bibitem[Peimbert(1993)] {Peimbert93}
1438: Peimbert, M. 1993, Rev. Mexicana Astron. Astrofis., 27, 9
1439:
1440: \bibitem[Peimbert \& Peimbert(2002)]{Peimbert02}
1441: Peimbert, M., \& Peimbert, A. 2002, Rev. Mexicana
1442: Astron. Astrofis. Ser. Conf., 14, 47
1443:
1444: \bibitem[Peimbert et al.(2002)]{Peimbert02a}
1445: Peimbert, A., Peimbert, M. \& Luridiana, V. 2002, \apj, 565, 668
1446:
1447: \bibitem[Peimbert et al.(1992a]{Peimbert92a}
1448: Peimbert, M., Rodr\'{i}guez, L. F., Bania, T.~M., Rood,
1449: R.~T., \& Wilson, T.~L. 1992a, \apj, 395, 484
1450:
1451: \bibitem[Peimbert et al.(1992b)]{Peimbert92b}
1452: Peimbert, M., Torres-Piembert, S., \& Ruiz, M.~T. 1992b,
1453: Rev. Mexicana Astron. Astrofis., 24, 155
1454:
1455: \bibitem[Peng et al. (2000)] {Peng00}
1456: Peng, B., Kraus, A., Krichbaum, T. P., \& Witzel, A. 2000, A\&AS, 145,
1457: 1
1458: \bibitem[Persi et al.(1987)]{Persi87}
1459: Persi, P., Ferrari-Toniolo, Shivanandan, K., \&
1460: Spinoglio, L. 1987, A\&AS, 70, 437
1461:
1462: \bibitem[Pogge et al. (1992)] {Pogge92}
1463: Pogge, R. W., Owen, J. M., \& Atwood, B. 1992, \apj, 399, 147
1464:
1465: \bibitem[Quireza et al.(2006a)]{Quireza06}
1466: Quireza, C., Rood, R.~T., Balser, D.~S., \& Bania, T.~M., 2006a, \apjs,
1467: 165, 338
1468:
1469: \bibitem[Quireza et al.(2006b)]{Quireza07}
1470: Quireza, C., Rood, R.~T., Bania, T.~M., Balser, D.~S. \&
1471: Maciel, W.~J., 2006b, 653, 1226
1472:
1473: \bibitem[Roelfsema et al.(1987)]{Roelfsema87}
1474: Roelfsema, P.~R., Goss, W.~M., Whiteoak, J.~B., Gardner,
1475: F.~F., \& Pankonin, V. 1987, \aap, 175, 219
1476:
1477: \bibitem[Roelfsema \& Goss(1991)]{Roelfsema91}
1478: Roelfsema, P.~R., \& Goss, W.~M. 1991, A\&AS, 87, 177
1479:
1480: \bibitem[Roelfsema et al.(1992)]{Roelfsema92}
1481: Roelfsema, P.~R., Goss, W.~M., \& Mallik, D.~C.~V. 1992,
1482: \apj, 394, 188
1483:
1484: \bibitem[Romano et al.(2003)]{Romano03}
1485: Romano, D., Tosi, M., Matteucci, F., \& Chiappini, C.\ 2003,
1486: \mnras, 346, 295
1487:
1488: \bibitem[Rood et al.(2007)]{RBB04}
1489: Rood, R.~T., Bania, T.~M., Balser, D.~S., \& Wilson, T.~L.\
1490: 2007, \apj, in preparation (Paper IV)
1491:
1492: \bibitem[Rubin(1984)]{Rubin84}
1493: Rubin, R.~H.\ 1984, \apj, 287, 653
1494:
1495: \bibitem[Rubin et al. (1991)] {Rubin91}
1496: Rubin, R. H., Simpson, J. P., Haas, M. R., Erickson, E. F.
1497: 1991, \apj, 374, 564
1498:
1499: \bibitem[Sauer \& Jedamzik (2002)] {Sauer02}
1500: Sauer, D., \& Jedamzik, K. 2002, \aap, 381, 361
1501:
1502: \bibitem[Schraml \& Mezger(1969)]{Schraml69}
1503: Schraml, J, \& Mezger, P.~G. 1969, \apj, 156, 269
1504:
1505: \bibitem[Shaver et al.(1983)]{Shaver83}
1506: Shaver, P.~A., McGee, R.~X., Newton, L.~M., Danks, A.~C., \&
1507: Pottasch, S.~R. 1983, MNRAS, 204, 53
1508:
1509: \bibitem[Shields \& Searle (1978)] {Shields78}
1510: Shields, G.~A., \& Searle, L. 1978, \apj, 222, 821
1511:
1512: \bibitem[Subrahmanyan \& Goss(1996)]{Subrahmanyan96}
1513: Subrahmanyan, R. \& Goss, W.~M. 1996, \mnras, 281, 239
1514:
1515: \bibitem[Thronson et al.(1984)]{Thronson84}
1516: Thronson, Jr., H.~A., Schwartz, P.~R., Smith, H.~A.,
1517: Lada, C.~J., Glaccum, W., Harper, D.~A. 1984, \apj, 284, 597
1518:
1519: \bibitem[Vacca et al.(1996)]{Vacca96}
1520: Vacca, W.~D., Garmany, C.~D., \& Shull, J.~M.\ 1996, \apj, 460, 914
1521:
1522: \bibitem[Viegas et al.(2000)] {Viegas00}
1523: Viegas, S.~M., Gruenwald, R., \& Steigman, G. 2000, \apj, 531, 813
1524:
1525: \bibitem[V\'{i}lchez \& Esteban(1996)]{Vilchez96}
1526: V\'{i}lchez, J.~M., \& Esteban, C. 1996, \mnras, 280, 720
1527:
1528: \bibitem[V\'{i}lchez \& Pagel(1988)]{Vilchez88}
1529: V\'{i}lchez, J.~M., \& Pagel, B.~E.~J. 1988, \mnras, 231, 257
1530:
1531: \bibitem[Wilson \& Rood(1994)]{Wilson94}
1532: Wilson, T.~L., \& Rood, R.~T. 1994,\ \araa, 32, 191
1533:
1534: \bibitem[Welch et al.(1987)]{Welch87}
1535: Welch, W.~J., Dreher, J.~M., Jackson, J.~M., Terebey, S., \&
1536: Vogel, S.~N. 1987, Science, 238, 1550
1537:
1538: \bibitem[Yang et al.(1984)]{Yang84}
1539: Yang, J., Turner, M.~S., Steigman, G., Schramm, D.~N., \&
1540: Olive, K.~A. 1984, \apj, 281, 493
1541:
1542: \end{thebibliography}
1543:
1544: \clearpage
1545:
1546: %
1547: % Include tables
1548: %
1549: \begin{deluxetable}{llrrrcrcc}
1550: \tablecolumns{9}
1551: \tablecaption{K-band (18\ghz) Radio Recombination Line Parmeters
1552: \label{tab:data}}
1553: \tablehead{
1554: \colhead{} & \colhead{} &
1555: \colhead{$T_{\rm L}$} & \colhead{$\sigma(T_{\rm L})$} &
1556: \colhead{$\Delta v$} & \colhead{$\sigma(\Delta v)$} &
1557: \colhead{$t_{\rm intg}$} & \colhead{$RMS$} & Quality \\
1558: \colhead{Source} & \colhead{Transition} &
1559: \colhead{(mK)} & \colhead{(mK)} &
1560: \colhead{(${\rm km}\,{\rm s}^{-1}$)} & \colhead{(${\rm km}\,{\rm s}^{-1}$)} &
1561: \colhead{(hr)} & \colhead{(mK)} & Factor
1562: }
1563: \startdata
1564:
1565: W3.....
1566: & \halk\ & 579.63 & 0.76 & 27.44 & 0.04 & 11.4 & 0.97 & A \\
1567: & \healk\ & 60.85 & 0.88 & 20.94 & 0.36 & 11.4 & 0.97 & B \\
1568: & \hbetk\ & 160.73 & 0.31 & 27.80 & 0.06 & 13.0 & 0.61 & A \\
1569: & \hebetk\ & 17.30 & 0.36 & 21.21 & 0.53 & 13.0 & 0.61 & B \\
1570:
1571: G133.8.....
1572: & \halk\ & 64.99 & 0.47 & 30.06 & 0.25 & 23.6 & 0.48 & B \\
1573: & \healk\ & 6.04 & 0.55 & 22.94 & 2.56 & 23.6 & 0.48 & C \\
1574: & \hbetk\ & 19.63 & 0.24 & 30.14 & 0.42 & 22.2 & 0.51 & C \\
1575: & \hebetk\ & 1.41 & 0.36 & 13.01 & 4.05 & 22.2 & 0.51 & D \\
1576:
1577: S206.....
1578: & \halk\ & 29.24 & 0.15 & 27.32 & 0.16 & 26.0 & 0.50 & B \\
1579: & \healk\ & 3.19 & 0.16 & 21.89 & 1.33 & 26.0 & 0.50 & C \\
1580: & \hbetk\ & 8.29 & 0.10 & 26.61 & 0.38 & 26.0 & 0.43 & C \\
1581:
1582: S209.....
1583: & \halk\ & 22.24 & 0.15 & 29.70 & 0.23 & 30.8 & 0.39 & B \\
1584: & \healk\ & 1.74 & 0.17 & 23.07 & 2.71 & 30.8 & 0.39 & D \\
1585: & \hbetk\ & 7.20 & 0.14 & 29.22 & 0.67 & 30.4 & 0.41 & C \\
1586:
1587: M17N.....
1588: & \halk\ & 387.81 & 3.28 & 33.11 & 0.32 & 8.0 & 1.97 & A \\
1589: & \healk\ & 39.74 & 3.60 & 27.69 & 2.94 & 8.0 & 1.97 & B \\
1590: & \hbetk\ & 111.53 & 1.04 & 33.27 & 0.36 & 8.0 & 0.89 & A \\
1591: & \hebetk\ & 11.93 & 1.21 & 25.32 & 3.16 & 8.0 & 0.89 & B \\
1592:
1593: M17S.....
1594: & \halk\ & 835.20 & 5.25 & 35.29 & 0.26 & 4.8 & 2.16 & A \\
1595: & \healk\ & 77.02 & 5.41 & 34.25 & 2.98 & 4.8 & 2.16 & B \\
1596: & \hbetk\ & 245.60 & 1.46 & 35.91 & 0.25 & 4.8 & 1.57 & A \\
1597: & \hebetk\ & 22.27 & 1.51 & 34.97 & 2.96 & 4.8 & 1.57 & B \\
1598:
1599: W43.....
1600: & \halk\ & 241.82 & 0.45 & 33.34 & 0.07 & 21.0 & 0.94 & A \\
1601: & \healk\ & 19.37 & 0.47 & 31.37 & 0.98 & 21.0 & 0.94 & B \\
1602: & \hbetk\ & 71.83 & 0.19 & 32.55 & 0.10 & 21.0 & 0.73 & A \\
1603: & \hebetk\ & 6.34 & 0.21 & 26.81 & 1.09 & 21.0 & 0.73 & C \\
1604:
1605: W49.....
1606: & \halk\ & 417.38 & 0.60 & 29.69 & 0.05 & 20.2 & 0.85 & A \\
1607: & \healk\ & 41.31 & 0.69 & 23.94 & 0.65 & 20.2 & 0.85 & B \\
1608: & \hbetk\ & 107.21 & 0.28 & 29.55 & 0.09 & 20.2 & 0.76 & A \\
1609: & \hebetk\ & 10.67 & 0.34 & 21.55 & 1.29 & 20.2 & 0.76 & B \\
1610:
1611: W51.....
1612: & \halk\ & 971.22 & 0.58 & 29.53 & 0.02 & 8.4 & 2.80 & A \\
1613: & \healk\ & 87.97 & 0.66 & 23.44 & 0.21 & 8.4 & 2.80 & A \\
1614: & \hbetk\ & 248.53 & 0.32 & 29.77 & 0.04 & 8.4 & 1.15 & A \\
1615: & \hebetk\ & 23.75 & 0.36 & 25.65 & 0.86 & 8.4 & 1.15 & B \\
1616:
1617: NGC7538.....
1618: & \halk\ & 126.41 & 0.23 & 27.59 & 0.06 & 25.2 & 0.52 & A \\
1619: & \healk\ & 13.17 & 0.26 & 21.90 & 0.53 & 25.2 & 0.52 & B \\
1620: & \hbetk\ & 37.87 & 0.14 & 28.22 & 0.12 & 24.4 & 0.45 & B \\
1621: & \hebetk\ & 3.49 & 0.17 & 20.59 & 1.35 & 24.4 & 0.45 & C \\
1622:
1623:
1624: \enddata
1625: %\tablenotetext{a}{}
1626: \end{deluxetable}
1627:
1628:
1629: \clearpage
1630:
1631: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccccccccc}
1632: %\tablewidth{16cm}
1633: \tablecolumns{11}
1634: \tablecaption{NEBULA Model Parameters$^{\rm a}$\label{tab:NEBULA}}
1635: \tablehead{
1636: \colhead{} &
1637: \multicolumn{5}{c}{\underline{~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Component 1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~}} &
1638: \multicolumn{5}{c}{\underline{~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Component 2~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~}} \\
1639: \colhead{Model} & \colhead{$\theta_s$} & \colhead{$n_e$} & \colhead{$M_f$} &
1640: \colhead{\yp3} & \colhead{\yp4} & \colhead{$\theta_s$} &
1641: \colhead{$n_e$} & \colhead{$M_f$} & \colhead{\yp3} & \colhead{\yp4} \\
1642: \colhead{} & \colhead{(\arcmin)} & \colhead{(cm$^{-3}$)} & \colhead{} &
1643: \colhead{(10$^{-5}$)} & \colhead{} & \colhead{(\arcmin)} &
1644: \colhead{(cm$^{-3}$)} & \colhead{} & \colhead{(10$^{-5}$)} & \colhead{}
1645: }
1646: \startdata
1647:
1648: A1 & 3.5 & 100 & 1.00 & 1.0 & 0.10 &
1649: \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1650: A2 & 3.5 & 100 & 1.00 & 0.7 & 0.07 &
1651: \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1652: B & 1.5 & 500 & 0.30 & 1.0 & 0.10 & 3.5 & 100 & 0.70 & 1.0 & 0.10 \\
1653: C & 1.5 & 100 & 0.08 & 1.0 & 0.10 & 3.5 & 100 & 0.92 & 0.5 & 0.05 \\
1654: D & 1.5 & 100 & 0.08 & 0.5 & 0.05 & 3.5 & 100 & 0.92 & 1.0 & 0.10 \\
1655: E & 1.5 & 500 & 0.30 & 1.0 & 0.10 & 3.5 & 100 & 0.70 & 0.5 & 0.05 \\
1656: F & 1.5 & 500 & 0.30 & 0.5 & 0.05 & 3.5 & 100 & 0.70 & 1.0 & 0.10 \\
1657: \enddata
1658: \tablenotetext{a}{The distance to all model nebulae is 8\kpc.}
1659: \end{deluxetable}
1660:
1661:
1662: \clearpage
1663:
1664: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccccc}
1665: \tablecolumns{8}
1666: \tablewidth{0pt}
1667: \tablecaption{NEBULA Model Results\label{tab:models}}
1668: \tablehead{
1669: \colhead{} &
1670: \multicolumn{6}{c}{\underline{~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~X-band$^{\rm a}$~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~}} &
1671: \multicolumn{1}{c}{\underline{K-band$^{\rm b}$}} \\
1672: \colhead{Model} & \colhead{$T_C$} & \colhead{$T_{\rm L}$} & \colhead{\yp3} &
1673: \colhead{\yp4} & \colhead{$\kappa_i$} & \colhead{\y3} & \colhead{\yp4} \\
1674: \colhead{} & \colhead{(K)} & \colhead{(mK)} & \colhead{(10$^{-5}$)} &
1675: \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{(10$^{-5}$)} &\colhead{}
1676: }
1677: \startdata
1678:
1679: A1 & 0.93 & 1.10 & 1.00 & 0.100 & 1.00 & 1.00 & 0.100 \\
1680: A2 & 0.93 & 0.81 & 0.72 & 0.070 & 1.43 & 1.03 & 0.070 \\
1681: B & 3.00 & 1.50 & 0.77 & 0.100 & 1.00 & 0.77 & 0.100 \\
1682: C & 0.93 & 0.64 & 0.57 & 0.055 & 1.82 & 1.04 & 0.067 \\
1683: D & 0.93 & 1.10 & 0.96 & 0.095 & 1.05 & 1.01 & 0.082 \\
1684: E & 3.00 & 1.10 & 0.53 & 0.085 & 1.18 & 0.62 & 0.096 \\
1685: F & 3.00 & 1.30 & 0.65 & 0.064 & 1.56 & 1.01 & 0.053 \\
1686:
1687: \enddata
1688: \tablenotetext{a}{$\nu = 8$\ghz; HPBW = 3$\arcmper$5.}
1689: \tablenotetext{b}{$\nu = 18$\ghz; HPBW = 1$\arcmper$5.}
1690: \end{deluxetable}
1691:
1692:
1693: \clearpage
1694:
1695: %\begin{deluxetable}{lcccccc}
1696: %\tablecolumns{7}
1697: %\tablewidth{15cm}
1698: %\tablecaption{H\,II Region $^{3}$He/H Abundances\tablenotemark{a}
1699: %\label{tab:abundances}}
1700: %\tablehead{
1701: %\colhead{Source} &
1702: %\colhead{LTE U$\rho$S\tablenotemark{b}} &
1703: %\colhead{$\kappa_s$\tablenotemark{c}} &
1704: %\colhead{$\sigma_t$\tablenotemark{d}} &
1705: %\colhead{$\kappa_i$\tablenotemark{e}} &
1706: %\colhead{$\sigma_i$\tablenotemark{f}} &
1707: %\colhead{\y3\ Abundance\tablenotemark{g}}
1708: %}
1709: %\startdata
1710: %
1711: %W3 & 2.3 & 3.43 & 28 & $\ge 1.32$ & \nodata & $\ge 10.$ \\
1712: %G133.8 & 1.7 & 1.18 & 15 & 1.22 & 9.1 & $2.4 \pm 0.42$ \\
1713: %S206 & 1.9 & 1.25 & 20 & 1.04 & 3.2 & $2.5 \pm 0.51$ \\
1714: %S209 & 0.90 & 1.21 & 18 & 1.20 & 4.5 & $1.3 \pm 0.24$ \\
1715: %S212 & $< 0.89$ & \gsim\ 1 & \nodata & 1.20 & \nodata & \nodata \\
1716: %S228 & $< 2.2$ & \gsim\ 1 & \nodata & $\ge 1$ & \nodata & \nodata \\
1717: %S235 & $< 1.4$ & \gsim\ 1 & \nodata & $\ge 1$ & \nodata & \nodata \\
1718: %S252 & 0.98 & \gsim\ 1 & 12 & 1.96 & \nodata & \gsim \,1.9 \\
1719: %S311 & 1.8 & \gsim\ 1 & 22 & 1.41 & \nodata & \gsim \,2.5 \\
1720: %\sgr{B2} & 1.1 & 1.74 & 21 & $\ge 1$ & \nodata & $\ge 1.9$ \\
1721: %G1.1 & 0.78 & \gsim\ 1 & 16 & 1.56 & \nodata & \gsim \,1.2 \\
1722: %M17S & 1.3 & $\ge 1$ & 15 & 1.09 & \nodata & $\ge 1.4$ \\
1723: %M17N & $< 0.37$ & $\ge 1$ & \nodata & 1.06 & \nodata & \nodata \\
1724: %W43 & 0.69 & 1.57 & 21 & 1.30 & 7.7 & $1.4 \pm 0.31$ \\
1725: %S76 & $< 4.0$ & \gsim\ 1 & \nodata & $\ge 1$ & \nodata & \nodata \\
1726: %W49 & 0.43 & 2.86 & 31 & $\ge 1$ & \nodata & $\ge 1.2$ \\
1727: %W51 & 1.6 & 1.50 & 16 & $\ge 1$ & \nodata & $\ge 2.4$ \\
1728: %S90 & 1.5 & \gsim\ 1 & 16 & 1.43 & \nodata & \gsim \,2.1 \\
1729: %S156 & $< 7.9$ & \gsim\ 1 & \nodata & 1.23 & \nodata & \nodata \\
1730: %\ngc{7538} & 1.3 & 1.20 & 15 & 1.19 & 4.0 & $1.9 \pm 0.29$ \\
1731: %S162 & $< 0.91$ & 1.21 & \nodata & $\ge 1$ & \nodata & \nodata \\
1732: %\enddata
1733: %
1734: %\tablenotetext{a}{All abundances are \expo{-5} by number.}
1735: %\tablenotetext{b}{Uniform density sphere LTE model (U$\rho$S) \her3\
1736: %abundance from Paper II.}
1737: %\tablenotetext{c}{Density structure correction factor from Paper II.}
1738: %\tablenotetext{d}{Total percent uncertainty from \he3\ observables and
1739: %the uncertainty in $\kappa_s$ (see Paper II).}
1740: %\tablenotetext{e}{Ionization structure correction factor
1741: %(see text).}
1742: %\tablenotetext{f}{Ionization correction uncertainty percent error;
1743: %includes errors in the Gaussian fits to the observed H and \he4\ RRL
1744: %parameters.}
1745: %\tablenotetext{g}{\y3\,=\,$\kappa_s\,\times\,\kappa_i\,\times$\,LTE (U$\rho$S).
1746: %The percent uncertainty is $(\sigma_t^2 + \sigma_i^2)^{1/2}$.}
1747: %\end{deluxetable}
1748:
1749:
1750: %\clearpage
1751:
1752: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccc}
1753: \tablecolumns{6}
1754: %\tablewidth{16cm}
1755: \tablecaption{\hii\ Region Excitation Properties\label{tab:excitation}}
1756: \tablehead{
1757: \colhead{} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{\underline{~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Radio\tablenotemark{a}~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~}} &
1758: \multicolumn{2}{c}{\underline{~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Optical\tablenotemark{b}~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~}} \\
1759: \colhead{Source} & \colhead{\hepr4} & \colhead{$N_{\rm L}$} &
1760: \colhead{Spectral} & \colhead{\hepr4} & \colhead{Spectral} \\
1761: \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{ (s$^{-1}$)} &
1762: \colhead{Type} & \colhead{} & \colhead{Type} }
1763: \startdata
1764:
1765: W3 & $0.076 \pm\ 0.0033$ & 49.28 & O6.5 (O5.5) & \nodata & \nodata \\
1766: G133.8 & $0.082 \pm\ 0.0075$ & 48.96 & O7.5 (O6) & \nodata & \nodata \\
1767: S206 & $0.092 \pm\ 0.0029$ & 48.95 & O7.5 (O6.5) & 0.10 & O4--O6 \\
1768: \nodata & \nodata &\nodata & \nodata & (8) & (7,8,13,17,20) \\
1769: S209 & $0.083 \pm\ 0.0037$ & 49.82 & O3 (O4) & 0.084--0.12 & O9 \\
1770: \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & (8,25) & (3) \\
1771: S212 & \nodata & 48.67 & O8.5 (O7) & 0.088--0.10 & O5.5--O7 \\
1772: \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & (8,11,25) & (3,17,20) \\
1773: S228 & \nodata & 47.95 & B0.5 (O9.5) & \nodata & O8--B0 \\
1774: \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & (3,17) \\
1775: S235 & \nodata & 47.86 & B0.5 (O9.5) & \nodata & O9.5--B0 \\
1776: \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & (13,17) \\
1777: S252 & \nodata & 48.67 & O8.5 (O7) & 0.051 & O6--O6.5 \\
1778: \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & (24) & (5,12,14,15,19) \\
1779: S311 & $0.071 \pm\ 0.0038$ & 48.93 & O8 (O6.5) & \nodata & O6--O6.5 \\
1780: \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & (6,10,14,23) \\
1781: \sgr{B2} & $0.059 \pm\ 0.0182$ & 50.57 & $<$ O3 ($<$ O4) & \nodata & \nodata \\
1782: G1.1 & $0.064 \pm\ 0.0066$ & 49.91 & O3 (O4) & \nodata & \nodata \\
1783: M17S & $0.092 \pm\ 0.0110$ & 50.46 & $<$ O3 ($<$ O4) & \nodata & O3--O6 \\
1784: \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & (16) \\
1785: M17N & $0.094 \pm\ 0.0089$ & 49.75 & O4 (O5) & 0.10 & O3--O6 \\
1786: \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & (9,22) & (16) \\
1787: W43 & $0.068 \pm\ 0.0052$ & 50.42 & $<$ O3 ($<$ O4) & \nodata & WN7 \\
1788: \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & (2) \\
1789: S76 & \nodata & 47.76 & $>$ B0.5 (O9.5) & \nodata & \nodata \\
1790: W49 & $0.079 \pm\ 0.0052$ & 50.87 & $<$ O3 ($<$ O4) & \nodata & \nodata \\
1791: W51 & $0.079 \pm\ 0.0024$ & 50.47 & $<$ O3 ($<$ O4) & \nodata & \nodata \\
1792: S90 & $0.070 \pm\ 0.0067$ & 48.87 & O8 (O6.5) & \nodata & O9.5 \\
1793: \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & (13,14) \\
1794: S156 & \nodata & 48.91 & O8 (O6.5) & 0.081 & O6.5--O7 \\
1795: \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & (8) & (1,12,17) \\
1796: \ngc{7538} & $0.084 \pm\ 0.0034$ & 49.25 & O6.5 (O5.5) & 0.10 & O7 \\
1797: \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & (18) & (13,21) \\
1798: S162 & \nodata & 48.79 & O8 (O6.5) & \nodata & O6.5 \\
1799: \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & (4) \\
1800: \enddata
1801:
1802: \tablenotetext{a}{Based on the Paper I X-band radio data that are
1803: appropriate for the \hep3\ ionization correction. The
1804: \hepr4\ abundance ratio is determined using the \hal\ and \heal\
1805: RRLs (only quality factors A and B are considered). The H-ionizing
1806: luminosity, $N_{\rm L}$, is calculated from the radio continuum
1807: emission. The spectral type is determined from $N_{\rm L}$ and a
1808: single star ZAMS model (Vacca et al. 1996; Panagia 1973, in
1809: parentheses).}
1810: \tablenotetext{b}{Based on optical data from the literature. The
1811: references are listed in parentheses.}
1812: \tablerefs{
1813: (1) Barlow et al. (1976);
1814: (2) Blum et al. (1999);
1815: (3) Chini \& Wink (1984);
1816: (4) Conti \& Alschuler (1971);
1817: (5) Conti \& Leep (1974);
1818: (6) Crampton (1971);
1819: (7) Crampton et al. (1978);
1820: (8) Deharveng et al. (2000);
1821: (9) Esteban et al. (1999);
1822: (10) Feinstein \& V\'{a}zquez (1989);
1823: (11) Fich \& Silkey (1991);
1824: (12) Georgelin (1975);
1825: (13) Georgelin et al. (1973);
1826: (14) Goy (1980);
1827: (15) Haikala (1995)
1828: (16) Hanson \& Conti (1995);
1829: (17) Hunter \& Massey (1990);
1830: (18) Lynds \& O'Neil Jr. (1986);
1831: (19) Miller (1968);
1832: (20) Moffat et al. (1979);
1833: (21) Moreno \& Charvarr\'{i}a-K. (1986)
1834: (22) Peimbert et al. (1992b);
1835: (23) Persi et al. (1987);
1836: (24) Shaver et al. (1983);
1837: (25) V\'{i}lchez \& Esteban (1996).
1838: }
1839:
1840:
1841: \end{deluxetable}
1842:
1843:
1844: \clearpage
1845:
1846: \begin{figure}
1847: \includegraphics[angle=-90,scale=0.65]{f1a.ps}
1848: \includegraphics[angle=-90,scale=0.65]{f1b.ps}
1849: \caption{Spectra of the 91$\alpha$ X-band (8\ghz) and the
1850: 70$\alpha$ K-band (18\ghz) radio recombination line emission for the
1851: \hii\ regions \ngc{7538} and W43. The vertical lines flag from
1852: left to right the C, He, and H transitions. (The additional flag in
1853: the 91$\alpha$ spectra is the H\,154$\epsilon$ transition.) The
1854: intensity scale is in units of milliKelvins. The LSR velocity
1855: increases from left to right at 1.3\kms\ per channel.
1856: \label{fig:h90h70}}
1857: \end{figure}
1858:
1859: \clearpage
1860:
1861: \begin{figure}
1862: \includegraphics[angle=-90,scale=0.60]{f2.ps}
1863: \caption{The \hepr4, \yp4, abundance ratio plotted as a function of the
1864: principal quantum number, $n$, of the RRL transition. The 70$\alpha$,
1865: 88$\beta$, 91$\alpha$, and 114$\beta$ transitions are shown.
1866: Abundances are plotted only for transitions that have a quality
1867: factor of A or B (see Table I and Paper I).
1868: \label{fig:QMn}}
1869: \end{figure}
1870:
1871: \clearpage
1872:
1873: \begin{figure}
1874: \includegraphics[angle=-90,scale=0.60]{f3.ps}
1875: \caption{Comparison of the \yp4\ ratios derived from the \hal\
1876: and \halk\ spectra for the 10 K-band sources in the order listed in
1877: Table~\ref{tab:data}. Only abundances for quality factor A or B are
1878: plotted. {\it Top Left:\/} The
1879: \hal\,(circles) and \halk\,(diamonds) \yp4\ ratios for each nebula.
1880: {\it Top Right:\/} The \yp4\,(\hal)\,$-$\,\yp4\,(\halk) difference.
1881: {\it Bottom Left:\/} The fractional \yp4\ deviation:
1882: (\yp4\,(\hal)\,$-$\,\yp4\,(\halk))\,/\,\yp4\,(\hal). {\it Bottom
1883: Right:\/} The \yp4\,(\hal)\,/\,\yp4\,(\halk) ratio.
1884: \label{fig:yplus}}
1885: \end{figure}
1886:
1887: \clearpage
1888:
1889: \begin{figure}
1890: \includegraphics[angle=-90,scale=0.70]{f4.ps} \caption{The
1891: \hepr4, \yp4, abundance ratio plotted as a function of the H-ionizing
1892: luminosity, $N_{\rm L}$. The \yp4\ values are calculated using only the \hal\
1893: and \heal\ transitions. Only transitions that have a quality factor of
1894: A or B (see Paper I) are shown. Circles denote simple sources;
1895: triangles identify complex sources (see text).
1896: \label{fig:Nlc}}
1897: \end{figure}
1898:
1899:
1900:
1901:
1902:
1903: \end{document}
1904: