1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %\documentstyle[emulateapj,psfig]{article}
3: \def\lsim{\lower.5ex\hbox{$\; \buildrel < \over \sim \;$}}
4: \def\gsim{\lower.5ex\hbox{$\; \buildrel > \over \sim \;$}}
5: \lefthead{}
6: \righthead{ }
7:
8: \def\lsim{\lower.5ex\hbox{$\; \buildrel < \over \sim \;$}}
9: \def\gsim{\lower.5ex\hbox{$\; \buildrel > \over \sim \;$}}
10:
11: %%\received{2002 September 8}
12: \begin{document}
13:
14: \title{Generalized pseudo-Newtonian potential for studying
15: accretion disk dynamics in off-equatorial planes
16: around rotating black holes: Description of a vector potential}
17:
18:
19: \author{Shubhrangshu Ghosh\altaffilmark{1} and Banibrata Mukhopadhyay\altaffilmark{1}}
20: %\altaffiltext{1}{kanak@physics.iisc.ernet.in}
21: %\altaffiltext{2}{bm@physics.iisc.ernet.in}
22: \altaffiltext{1}{Astronomy and Astrophysics Program, Department of Physics,
23: Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India; bm@physics.iisc.ernet.in}
24:
25: \begin{abstract}
26:
27: We prescribe a pseudo-Newtonian vector potential for studying
28: accretion disks around Kerr black holes. The potential is useful to study
29: the inner properties of disk not confined to the equatorial plane
30: where general relativistic effect is indispensable.
31: %The disk is expected to be thickened up at the inner region and the launching of highly collimated
32: %jet is governed by dynamics of the inner edge of accretion disk around a spinning black hole,
33: %where general relativistic effect is indispensable.
34: Therefore, we incorporate the essential properties of the metric at the inner radii through the pseudo-Newtonian potential derived from the general Kerr spacetime. The potential, reproducing most of the salient features of the general-relativity, is valid for entire regime of Kerr parameter. It reproduces the last stable circular orbit exactly
35: as that in the Kerr geometry. It also reproduces last bound orbit and energy
36: at last stable circular orbit with a maximum error $\sim 7\%$ and $\sim 15\%$ respectively
37: upto an orbital inclination $30^{\circ}$.
38:
39: \end{abstract}
40:
41: \keywords {accretion, accretion disk --- black hole physics --- gravitation --- relativity}
42:
43: \section{Introduction}
44:
45: The standard model of the accretion disk
46: proposed by Shakura \& Sunyaev (1973) explains the dynamics of a thin disk by the Newtonian potential, not taking into account of the essential general-relativistic effects of the
47: black hole. The only notion it hires from general relativity (hereinafter GR) is that the inner most edge of the disk truncates at the last stable circular orbit of the Schwarzschild geometry.
48: Complete general relativistic description of the thin Keplerian disk was developed by Novikov \& Thorne (1973).
49: Owing to the complicated and cumbersome nature of underlying general relativistic equations, especially
50: to study the full scale dynamics of the disk, it would be worthy enough to study in Newtonian
51: framework using a modified Newtonian
52: potential, namely pseudo-Newtonian potential (hereinafter PNP), having all the essence of a black hole
53: geometry. Such a potential was first
54: proposed by Paczy\'nski \& Wiita (1980; hereinafter PW) for modeling a thick/thin accretion disk
55: around a nonrotating black hole. The potential exactly reproduces marginally stable orbit $(r_s)$
56: and marginally bound orbit $(r_b)$ of that in full GR and the efficiency per unit mass at the last
57: stable circular orbit $(E_s)$ agrees with at most $10 \%$ error.
58: %Not only the relativistic fluid
59: %dynamics of an accretion disk can be studied with this PNP,
60: %the other properties of the disk, like the spectral properties, can also be accomplished with it by
61: %suitably using in the hydrodynamic equation.
62: Nowak \& Wagoner (1991) and Mukhopadhyay \& Misra (2003) proposed other potentials for an accretion
63: disk to describe epicyclic frequency which mimic most of the properties of the disk governed by the
64: Schwarzschild and Kerr geometry respectively.
65:
66: PNPs to describe the fluid dynamics of
67: accretion disk around a rotating black hole in equatorial plane were also
68: proposed by Chakrabarti \& Khanna (1992) and Artemova et al. (1996) which, however, were not valid for
69: entire range of Kerr parameter. Later,
70: a twodimensional potential was described by Mukhopadhyay (2002; hereinafter M02) which
71: is valid for the entire range and reproduces $r_s$ exactly, $r_b$ with a
72: maximum error $\sim 5\%$ and $E_s$ with a maximum possible error $\sim 10\%$
73: compared to that in the Kerr geometry.
74: The more interesting fact, however, lies in the methodology adopted by
75: M02 in deriving the potential which can be used to formulate
76: the PNP for any metric according to the physics concern. Based on the
77: procedure, several authors have developed PNPs at the equatorial plane for other metric, e.g
78: Hartle-Thorne metric by Ghosh (2004), Kerr-Newman metric by Ivanov \& Prodanov (2005). We plan to
79: follow the procedure outlined by M02 to derive a PNP for general Kerr geometry (particle motion not
80: confined to the equatorial plane) which can be applied to study the generalized axisymmetric
81: accretion disk dynamics. Naturally, the aim is to furnish a pseudo-Newtonian vector potential
82: rather than a scalar potential with radial and vertical component in cylindrical coordinate
83: system suitable for studying a thick accretion disk.
84:
85: While some authors focus on to propose an ad-hoc and a mathematically simpler form of PNP,
86: we derive it from the spacetime metric directly. Therefore, we do not need to worry about its
87: final form strictly determined by our procedure for any spacetime metric
88: unlike the other PNPs. Problem with an ad-hoc PNP is that there is no easy one to one correspondence
89: between spacetime metric and PNP.
90:
91: Most of the cosmic objects in our nature are rotating (see e.g. Iwasawa et al. 1996; Wilms et al.
92: 2001; Miniutti et al. 2004; Miller et al. 2004; Genzel et al. 2003). Recently, it has also been
93: argued (McClintock et al. 2006) that the source GRS~1915+105 is a rapidly rotating black hole
94: with spin parameter $a>0.98$. Thus, the predictions of
95: the inner disk properties will be incorrect if the pseudo-Newtonian modeling fails to include
96: the spin parameter of the black hole.
97: The potential proposed by M02 has already been used to study the hydrodynamics of the disk around Kerr black holes, which shows a dramatic change of the valid parameter space region; any shock location
98: and other fluid properties change for different rotation parameters of the black hole
99: (Mukhopadhyay 2003). Recently Chan et al. (2005, 2006) have used this potential for time dependent
100: studies of accretion flow for twodimensional viscous hydrodynamic disk and for threedimensional
101: self-gravitating magnetohydrodynamic disk around rotating black holes using spectral method.
102:
103: Our aim in the present paper is to develop a potential for the general Kerr geometry which can be
104: used to mimic the general relativistic effects of the spacetime, enabling us to suitably use it to
105: study the accretion dynamics, especially of a thick
106: disk with the inclusion of vertical outflow. Thus we goal for a generalized potential which
107: is a function of $r$ and $\theta$ both and having two components, in radial and vertical direction,
108: in cylindrical coordinate system, hence a vector potential.
109: This is useful for both quasi-numerical analyzes and
110: time dependent simulations, avoiding the use of complicated relativistic equations, yet capturing
111: the essential physics of spacetime outside of a Kerr black hole. In early, some attempt was made to
112: describe PNP in generalized Kerr geometry by, e.g.,
113: Dadhich (1985), Semer\'ak \& Karas (1999), Chakrabarti \& Mondal (2006). The PNPs described
114: in first two works, while aim to furnish frame-dragging effects in the Newtonian framework, do
115: not reproduce marginally stable and bound circular orbits and specific energy close to the black hole
116: and hence may not be suitable for the hydrodynamical analysis of
117: a Keplerian accretion disk, particularly, when aim is to study inner disk
118: properties. The third one is the modification of Chakrabarti \& Khanna (1992) potential to mimic
119: approximately the general relativistic effects in accretion disks
120: for $-1 \leq a \leq 0.8$. The potential is a prescription
121: with which the authors maintain the ad-hoc-ness of PW potential and may be used to study
122: accretion disk having particle orbits of small inclination angle at a certain parameter window.
123: Our goal here, however, is to extend the procedure initiated by
124: M02 which can be used to describe a PNP for the general Kerr spacetime;
125: particle motion not confined to the equatorial plane. The potential given by M02 is more
126: useful to study the dynamics of a vertically averaged thin disk at equatorial plane. Henceforth, we wish
127: to derive a generalized potential applicable for off-equatorial planes
128: following the procedure of M02 which reproduces exactly or in good
129: agreement all the (inner) accretion disk properties (unlike the previous works) for a general case in
130: Kerr geometry. This will be useful to study the thick accretion disk dynamics
131: with the inclusion of vertical outflow and wind. The potential should reproduce those features of a
132: rotating black hole geometry which have been reproduced by that of M02 at equatorial plane and that of
133: PW for a nonrotating black hole. We formulate our PNP from the Kerr metric. As the metric is involved
134: directly to our calculation, many of the features of Kerr geometry are inherent in our potential.
135: The axisymmetric PNP we plan to establish here for a general Kerr metric is more useful for
136: quasi-analytical studies and time dependent simulations of accretion and wind and related
137: physics as that studied by Chan et al. (2005, 2006), Lipunov \& Gorbovskoy (2007), Shafee et al. (2007)
138: using M02, without loss of any generality.
139:
140: We arrange the paper in the following manner. In the next section, we present the basic equations and derive the PNP. In \S 3, we compare the various features of dynamics of accreting particles obtained by our potential with that in Kerr geometry. Finally \S 4 presents a discussion with summary.
141:
142: \section{Formulation of the generalized pseudo-Newtonian potential}
143:
144: Here we furnish the derivation of our said potential. It is condensed
145: in three subsections, where we have elucidated the description of the potential starting
146: from the Kerr metric.
147:
148: \subsection{Integrals of motion of a test particle in the Kerr geometry}
149:
150: The Kerr spacetime in the Boyer-Lindquist coordinate system in geometrized units $G = c = 1$ is given by
151: \begin{eqnarray}
152: \nonumber
153: ds^2=-\left(1-\frac{2Mr}{\Sigma}\right)dt^2-\frac{4aMr \sin^2 \theta}{\Sigma}{dt} {d\phi}
154: +\frac{\Sigma}{\Delta}dr^2\\+\Sigma d\theta^2+\left(r^2+a^2+
155: \frac{2Mra^2 \sin^2 \theta}{\Sigma}\right) \sin^2 \theta \, d\phi^2,
156: \label{sag2}
157: \end{eqnarray}
158: where $\Delta=r^2+a^2-2Mr$, $\Sigma=r^2+a^2 \cos^2 \theta$ and $a=\frac{J}{M}$
159: which is specific angular momentum of the black hole named Kerr parameter. The Lagrangian density of the particle of mass $m$ in the Kerr spacetime
160: is given by
161: %\begin{eqnarray}
162: %{\cal L} = \frac{1}{2} g_{\mu\nu} \frac{dx^\mu}{d\tau} \frac{dx^\nu}{d\tau}
163: %\label{sag}
164: %\end{eqnarray}
165: %which is explicitly written as
166: \begin{eqnarray}
167: 2 {\cal L}=-\left(1-\frac{2Mr}{\Sigma}\right){\dot t}^2-\frac{4aMr \sin^2 \theta}{\Sigma}{\dot t} {\dot \phi}
168: +\frac{\Sigma}{\Delta}{\dot r}^2 \nonumber \\+\Sigma {\dot \theta}^2+\left(r^2+a^2+
169: \frac{2Mra^2 \sin^2 \theta}{\Sigma}\right)\sin^2\theta {\dot \phi}^2,
170: \label{sag4}
171: \end{eqnarray}
172: where over-dots denote the derivative with respect to proper-time $\tau$ along the curve.
173: %It is possible to obtain the equations of motion of a test particle from the above Lagrangian.
174: From the symmetries, we obtain two constants of
175: motion corresponding to two ignorable coordinates $t$ and $\phi$ given by
176: \begin{eqnarray}
177: p_t=\frac{\partial \cal L}{\partial \dot t} = -\left(1-\frac{2Mr}{\Sigma}\right) \dot t-
178: \frac{2aMr \sin^2 \theta}{\Sigma} \dot \phi ={\rm constant}=-E
179: \label{12}
180: \end{eqnarray}
181: and
182: \begin{eqnarray}
183: p_\phi=\frac{\partial \cal L}{\partial \dot \phi}=-\frac{2aMr \sin^2 \theta}{\Sigma} \dot t +\left(r^2+a^2+
184: \frac{2Mra^2 \sin^2 \theta}{\Sigma}\right)\sin^2\theta \dot \phi={\rm constant}=\lambda_z,
185: \label{13}
186: \end{eqnarray}
187: where $\lambda_z$ is the component of angular momentum of the orbiting particle
188: along spin axis of the black hole (i.e. parallel to the symmetry axis).
189: %To obtain the Hamiltonian of the system, we need to have generalized momenta given by
190: %\begin{eqnarray}
191: %p_\mu=g_{\mu\nu} \dot x^{\nu},
192: %\label{14}
193: %\end{eqnarray}
194: %and thus t
195: The Hamiltonian of the system can also be written as
196: \begin{eqnarray}
197: {\cal H} =\frac{1}{2} g^{\mu\nu} p_{\mu} p_{\nu}.
198: \label{15}
199: \end{eqnarray}
200: The Hamiltonian is itself a constant of motion and by usual setting $g_{\mu\nu} p^{\mu} p^{\nu}=-m^2$
201: for a particle with nonzero rest mass, we obtain the third constant of motion (integral of motion) as
202: \begin{eqnarray}
203: {\cal H} = \frac{1}{2} m^2={\cal L}=\rm{constant}.
204: \label{16}
205: \end{eqnarray}
206: The Lagrangian and the Hamiltonian of the geodesic with the above condition are exactly same. The three
207: integrals of motion obtained above are sufficient to determine the geodesic equations under
208: restrictive condition like the motion of a test particle confined to an
209: equatorial plane $(\dot \theta=0, \theta=\pi/2)$ (e.g. Shapiro \& Teukolsky 1983). To describe the motion of a particle for a generic case around the Kerr black hole, with dependency on $\theta$, a fourth integral of motion is needed which does not come from the symmetries of the metric. It was
210: discovered by Carter (1968) that such an integral of motion can be obtained explicitly by separability
211: of the Hamilton-Jacobi equation (hereinafter HJE) (also see Chandrasekhar 1983) given by
212: \begin{eqnarray}
213: Q = p^{2}_\theta + \cos^2\theta\,[a^2(m^2 - E^2) + \frac{\lambda^{2}_z}{\sin^{2} \theta}].
214: \label{23}
215: \end{eqnarray}
216: $Q$ is called the Carter constant (Carter 1968). The above equation together with eqns. (\ref{12})
217: and (\ref{13}) provides a complete set of integrals of motion for the geodesic of a test particle in
218: the Kerr geometry where $Q$, $E$ and $\lambda_z$ are three constants motion.
219: %For a particular orbital trajectory, the preceding parameters are conserved quantities.
220: It can be seen
221: from the above equation that for a particle always confined to the equatorial plane (i.e., $\dot \theta = 0$
222: and $\theta = \pi/2$), the Carter constant $Q$ is zero.
223: %Any orbit which crosses the equatorial
224: %plane must have $Q > 0$. For $Q < 0$, the orbits are always unbound (Wilkins 1972).
225: For $a=0$, $Q + \lambda^{2}_z=\lambda^2$ is square of the total angular
226: momentum of a particle's orbital motion.
227: It is to be noted that the information about $\theta$ and $\dot \theta$ for an orbital trajectory
228: is consolidated into a single parameter $Q$, which is a conserved quantity. Now
229: using eqns. (\ref{sag4}), (\ref{12}), (\ref{13}), (\ref{16}) and (\ref{23}),
230: we obtain the most general equations of motion governing the orbital trajectory of a test particle in the Kerr geometry
231: (Bardeen 1972; Wilkins 1972) given by
232: \begin{eqnarray}
233: \Sigma \frac{dr}{d \tau}=\pm \sqrt{R},
234: \label{24}
235: \end{eqnarray}
236: \begin{eqnarray}
237: \Sigma \frac{d \theta}{d \tau}=\pm \sqrt{\Theta},
238: \label{25}
239: \end{eqnarray}
240: \begin{eqnarray}
241: \Sigma \frac{d \phi}{d \tau}=- a E + \frac{\lambda_z}{\sin^2 \theta}
242: + \frac{a}{\Delta}[E(r^2+a^2) - \lambda_z a],
243: \label{26}
244: \end{eqnarray}
245: \begin{eqnarray}
246: \Sigma \frac{dt}{d \tau}=- a^2 E \sin^2 \theta + a \lambda_z +
247: \frac{r^2 + a^2}{\Delta} [E(r^2 + a^2)-\lambda_z a],
248: \label{27}
249: \end{eqnarray}
250: where
251: \begin{eqnarray}
252: R=[ E(r^2 + a^2) - \lambda_z a]^2 - \Delta \, [m^2 r^2 + (\lambda_z - a E)^2 + Q],
253: \label{28a}
254: \end{eqnarray}
255: \begin{eqnarray}
256: \Theta=Q - \cos^2\theta\,[a^2(m^2 - E^2) + \frac{\lambda^{2}_z}{\sin^{2} \theta}].
257: \label{28}
258: \end{eqnarray}
259:
260: \subsection{Effective potentials and prescription of orbital inclination}
261:
262: $R$ and $\Theta$ are in general called the effective potentials describing the particle motion
263: in a generalized Kerr spacetime.
264: %It is to be noted that $R$ and $\Theta$ are functions of
265: %only $r$ and $\theta$ respectively.
266: For a particle moving perpetually at the equatorial plane,
267: %$(Q=0, \theta = \pi/2, \dot \theta = 0)$, the $\theta$ motion becomes irrelevant and
268: % the trajectory evolves only due to $r$ motion. In this case
269: the only effective potential that governs the
270: particle motion is $R$ with $Q$ equals to zero. In order to understand the generic orbit, both potentials should be accounted for. To have an insight of the nature of
271: orbits in threedimensional Kerr geometry, we recall that for bound geodesics $(Q \geq 0)$ orbits
272: either remain perpetually at the equatorial plane $(Q=0)$ or cross it repeatedly $(Q > 0)$.
273: More precisely, orbits with $Q > 0$ (more general case), also called the off-equatorial orbits, are inclined to the equatorial orbital plane. Figure \ref{fig1} shows that the orbital plane of an off-equatorial orbit is inclined at an angle $i$ to the equatorial plane, which also means that the
274: orbital plane makes an inclination $i$ with the spin axis of the hole (symmetry axis). For a particular
275: orbit, the inclination angle $i$ is a constant of motion.
276: However, in general, the plane of an off-equatorial orbit precesses with an angular frequency $2 a/r^3$ called Lense-Thirring precession (Lense \& Thirring 1918). Owing to this fact, the plane of the orbit neither remains fixed, nor crosses the equatorial plane
277: with constant inclination $i$, but rather at a different angle. Looking meticulously, we find that
278: the information
279: of entire $\theta$ motion (as for a particular off-equatorial orbit, $\theta$ has
280: all arbitrary values and it changes constantly) is glued up into
281: one single inclination parameter $i$. Thus the motion of the bound orbit in the
282: Kerr geometry is now governed by four parameters $r$, $i$, $\phi$ and $t$.
283:
284: As our intention is to derive a generalized PNP for particle orbits not confined to the
285: equatorial plane, which itself is an approximate quantity, we restrict ourselves to an ideal case of
286: circular orbits. In general, due to plane precession, the orbit never remains circular, but have eccentricity. The study
287: of generic orbits (inclined and eccentric) for our particular case is deferred for future. The circular
288: orbits satisfy $R=dR/dr=0$.
289: %The first condition reflects that $\frac{dr}{d\tau} = 0$, so that the
290: %radius remains constant. The 2nd condition contented the eternity of the orbit at a turning point
291: %of its radial motion.
292: Hence to analyze the orbital motion for circular case, the radial effective potential $R$ is necessary and sufficient.
293:
294: Our next objective is to describe the inclination parameter $i$ with known quantities. As stated earlier, the constant inclination
295: angle $i$ (without considering plane precession) is the angle between the plane of the orbit and the
296: spin axis of the hole.
297: As $\lambda^2=Q+\lambda_z^2$ for $a=0$ stated in the preceding subsection,
298: we identify in the Cartesian coordinate system
299: $Q \sim \lambda^{2}_x + \lambda^{2}_y$ approximately.
300: Hence $Q$ can be treated as the component of square of the total angular momentum in
301: perpendicular to the symmetry axis or to the spin axis ($\lambda_\perp$)
302: of the black hole or precisely the
303: component projected into the equatorial plane.
304: However, even
305: for a maximally spinning hole the error is found to be less than a few percent (Glampedakis et al. 2002). With this conjecture, the inclination parameter $i$ can be defined as (Ryan 1995; Shapiro 1996; Hughes 2000)
306: \begin{eqnarray}
307: \cos i = \frac{\lambda_z}{\sqrt{Q+\lambda^{2}_z}}.
308: \label{sa1}
309: \end{eqnarray}
310: Taking all these into account, our radial effective potential $R$ in eqn. (\ref{28a})
311: with further simplification eventually reduces to
312: \begin{eqnarray}
313: R=r(r^3+ra^2+2Ma^2)E^2 - r(r-2M)\lambda^{2}_z - 4aMr\lambda_{z} E
314: - \Delta\, m^2r^2 - \Delta\, \lambda^{2}_z \tan^{2} i.
315: \label{shuR}
316: \end{eqnarray}
317: Thus the effective potential is a function of $r$ and $i$ (which is a conserved quantity for a particular orbit). If we consider the effect of Lense-Thirring precession on the orbital plane, then
318: we need to amend a minor correction with the above definition of inclination angle.
319: Now if you specify for circular orbits, then the effective potential further reduces as
320: \begin{eqnarray}
321: \nonumber
322: V_{\rm{eff}}= \frac{2aM\lambda_z + \biggl[\lambda_z^2\{r^2 + \frac{\tan^2 i}{r} (r^3 + ra^2 + 2Ma^2)\}
323: \Delta + m^2 r(r^3 + ra^2 + 2Ma^2)\Delta \,\sec^2 i \biggr]^{1/2}}{(r^3 + ra^2 + 2Ma^2)\sec i}\\
324: \label{shu6}
325: \end{eqnarray}
326: which is essentially the solution for $E$ of $R=0$.
327:
328:
329:
330:
331:
332:
333:
334: \subsection{Description of pseudo-Newtonian force}
335:
336: The conditions for a circular orbit are
337: \begin{eqnarray}
338: R=0, \hskip1.cm\frac{dR}{dr}=0.
339: \label{sa2}
340: \end{eqnarray}
341: Solving for $E$ and $\lambda_z$ from eqn. (\ref{sa2}) we obtain
342: \begin{eqnarray}
343: \tilde{E}=\frac{E}{m}=F_1 (r, a, i) \, \, \, {\rm{and}}\, \, \, {\tilde{\lambda}}_z=\frac{\lambda_z}{m}=F_2 (r, a, i).
344: \label{sa3}
345: \end{eqnarray}
346: %and
347: %\begin{eqnarray}
348: %\tilde{\lambda_z}=\frac{\lambda_z}{m}=F_2 (r, a, i).
349: %\label{sa4}
350: %\end{eqnarray}
351: $\tilde{E}$ and ${\tilde{\lambda}}_z$ are specific energy and
352: specific angular momentum parallel to the symmetry axis
353: respectively, and $r$ is the radius of the circular
354: inclined orbit. We do not represent the functions $F_1$ and $F_2$ explicitly as they are cumbersome.
355: It can be easily verified that $\lambda_z \sec i=\lambda$ is
356: the total angular momentum of the orbital plane with
357: inclination angle $i$ and its direction is perpendicular to
358: the plane of the orbit. The relativistic specific angular
359: momentum of the matter is defined by the
360: relation $\ell=- u_{\phi}/u_t= \lambda_z/E$ (Kozlowski et al. 1978). Following
361: M02 and as standard practice, we can define the Keplerian
362: angular momentum distribution $\lambda_K=\ell \sec i$. Therefore, corresponding
363: centrifugal force in the Kerr geometry can be written as
364: \begin{eqnarray}
365: \frac{{\lambda_K}^2}{r^3} & = & \frac{2M{\cal A}^2 \sec^2 {i}}{\biggl[a\sqrt{2} \sqrt{M} r^{3/2}\{\Delta+2r(r-M)\}+
366: r\Delta\, \Bigl\{[{\cal A}+r^4-a^2(\Delta+r^2-3Mr)]\cos {2i} \sec^2 {i}\Bigr\}^{1/2}\biggr]^2} \nonumber \\
367: & = & F_G =F_{Kr}
368: \label{sa5}
369: \end{eqnarray}
370: where ${\cal A}=a^4 + r^4 + 2a^2r(r-2M)$. Thus from above, $F_{Kr}$ can be
371: identified as the generalized gravitational force of the Kerr black hole at the Keplerian
372: orbit. The subscript $K$ represents a Keplerian orbit and
373: subscript $r$ represents force in the radial direction.
374: The above expression reduces to that of M02 at an inclination angle $i=0$, i.e. particle
375: motion confined to the equatorial plane, and that of PW for $a=i=0$. Thus
376: we can say that above eqn. (\ref{sa5}) is the most general form
377: of force corresponding to the PNP for a generalized
378: accretion disk around a rotating black hole. One may be confused with the mathematical form of $F_{Kr}$
379: in eqn. (\ref{sa5}) which appears complicated compared to that of PW and thus the PNP
380: approach with $F_{Kr}$ appears to be
381: lacking the main motivation and advantage in comparison with full framework of GR.
382: However, one should also remember that mathematical complexity of accretion disk dynamics in
383: full Kerr geometry is beyond comparison with that in much simpler Schwarzschild geometry. Therefore,
384: the apparent complex form of $F_{Kr}$ above is nothing compared to the complications exist
385: in the set of actual equations in the Kerr geometry. Therefore, $F_{Kr}$ must be acceptable
386: if it exhibits the essential features of the Kerr geometry what we examine in \S3.
387:
388: The general form of corresponding PNP is
389: \begin{eqnarray}
390: V_{PK}=\int F_{Kr} dr.
391: \label{3dpotk}
392: \end{eqnarray}
393: Therefore, $V_{PK}$ is a generalized axisymmetric potential mimicking the geometry of
394: the general Kerr spacetime. The above potential can be
395: attributed to the threedimensional free-fall acceleration
396: of a test particle around a Kerr black hole. In Fig. \ref{fig2} we show the
397: evolution of the pseudo-Newtonian potential as a function of $r$ and $i$ for
398: extremally rotating black holes. As the unstable region including unbound orbits with small
399: inclination is broader for a counter rotating black hole (described in detail in \S 3 with
400: Tables 1 and 2), $V_{PK}$ increases and tends
401: to diverge at a larger radius than that of the corotating one. For the corotating case,
402: $V_{PK}$ tends to diverge at a very inner region in the vicinity of the black hole only.
403: Figure \ref{fig3} describes the corresponding contours of constant $V_{PK}$.
404: It is found that the entire family of contour is shifted towards smaller $r$ for
405: the corotating case compared to the counter rotating one. Above qualitative features are
406: same for other Kerr parameters.
407:
408: Now we write the Keplerian force components in the radial and vertical direction in cylindrical
409: coordinate system $(\rho,\phi,z)$ from eqn. (\ref{sa5}) as
410: {\small
411: \begin{eqnarray}
412: \hskip-1.5cm
413: F_{K\rho} = \frac{2M{\cal A}^2 {\cal B}^{-1/2}}{\left[a\sqrt{2M} \rho^{3/2} {\cal B}^{1/4}\{\Delta+
414: 2\rho {\cal B}^{1/2}(\rho {\cal B}^{1/2}-M)\}+
415: \Delta \sqrt{\rho^2-z^2} \left\{{\cal A}+\rho^4 {\cal B}^2 -a^2(\Delta+
416: \rho^2 {\cal B} -3M\rho {\cal B}^{1/2})\right\}^{1/2}\right]^2} \nonumber \\
417: \label{sa8}
418: \end{eqnarray}
419: }
420: and
421: {\small
422: \begin{eqnarray}
423: \hskip-1.5cm
424: \nonumber
425: F_{Kz}=\frac{2M{\cal A}^2 {\cal B}^{-1/2}z}{\left[a\sqrt{2M} \rho^{2} {\cal B}^{1/4}\{\Delta+
426: 2\rho {\cal B}^{1/2}(\rho {\cal B}^{1/2}-M)\}+\Delta \rho^{1/2}\sqrt{\rho^2-z^2} \left\{{\cal A}+
427: \rho^4 {\cal B}^2 -a^2(\Delta+\rho^2 {\cal B} -3M\rho {\cal B}^{1/2})\right\}^{1/2}\right]^2}\\
428: %\nonumber
429: \label{sa9}
430: \end{eqnarray}
431: }
432: respectively, where ${\cal B}= 1+z^{2}/\rho^2$, $\Delta=\rho^2{\cal B}-2M\rho{\cal B}^{1/2}+a^2$,
433: ${\cal A}=a^4+\rho^4{\cal B}^2+2a^2\rho{\cal B}^{1/2}(\rho{\cal B}^{1/2}-2M)$.
434: $F_{K\rho}$ and $F_{Kz}$ are the components of force corresponding to the pseudo-Newtonian
435: vector potential components in cylindrical geometry.
436:
437: Once we have the pseudo-Newtonian potential (and force), we
438: examine the corresponding density distribution $d$ from the Poisson's equation
439: \begin{eqnarray}
440: -4\pi d =\frac{1}{\rho}\frac{\partial}{\partial \rho}\left(\rho F_{K\rho}\right)
441: +\frac{\partial}{\partial z} F_{Kz}
442: \label{hypden}
443: \end{eqnarray}
444: shown in Fig. \ref{fig4} for extremally rotating black holes. It is found that the
445: hypothetical density distribution $d$ is Gaussian along $z$ axis for both corotating
446: and counterrotating black holes. Like $V_{PK}$, $d$ increases much faster at an outer radius
447: for the counterrotating black hole than the corotating one. $d$ for the corotating case
448: increases significantly only at very close to the black hole event horizon.
449:
450: %It is worth mentioning that here we are studying the whole phenomenon for spherical polar coordinate system. Nevertheless, for particle motion confined only to equatorial plane, cylindrical coordinate distribution and
451: % spherical polar coordinate distribution are analogous. Thus the radial coordinate for the geodesic at equatorial
452: %plane is same for both the above coordinate systems. But for general orbital motion (3D) in Kerr field, representation
453: %of gravitational force $F_{Kr} \hat{e_r}$ in cylidrical coordinate system needs exact coordinate transformation, which we
454: %will show in the subsequent subsection.
455:
456:
457: %In the Appendix we show how in real situation with the general disk equations the above PNP can
458: %be used.
459:
460:
461:
462:
463: \section{Comparison of the essential features for the Kerr geometry and pseudo-Kerr}
464:
465: To check the validity of the potential derived in the preceding
466: section, we follow the procedure considered in M02 and Mukhopadhyay \& Misra (2003).
467: We make a comparison to show how far the
468: potential $V_{PK}$ reproduces the values of $r_s$, $r_b$ and
469: $E_s$ as that in Kerr geometry. We do not repeat the corresponding
470: equations to calculate the parameters in Kerr geometry as
471: they are established well in literature (see e.g. Shapiro \& Teukolsky).
472: However, for completeness, we show them for the pseudo-Kerr case.
473: Stability of an orbit requires (PW)
474: \begin{eqnarray}
475: \frac{d}{dr} (\lambda_K) \geq 0.
476: \label{shu2}
477: \end{eqnarray}
478: Therefore, we obtain marginally stable orbit $(r_s)$ by
479: solving eqn. (\ref{shu2}) for $r$ with ``equals to" sign.
480: %The marginally stable orbit $(r_s)$ and the angular momentum at the marginally stable orbit $(l_s)$ as usual, are obtained from equations
481: %\begin{eqnarray}
482: %\frac{dV_{PK}}{dr} \vert_{r_s}=0 \, \, \textrm{and } \, \, \frac{d^2 V_{PK}}{dr^2} \vert_{r_s}=0.
483: %\label{shu2}
484: %\end{eqnarray}
485: %Using eqns. (\ref{shu2}) and (\ref{sa7}), the condition for $(r_s)$ naturally gets reduce to $\frac{d}{dr} (\lambda/E)=0$ (Paczy\'nski \& Witta 1980; Mukhopadhyay 2002 for inclination parameter $i=0$). Recalling \S 2.3 and eqn (\ref{sa5}), we at once identifies $\lambda/E$ as some form of Keplerian angular momentum distribution $\lambda_K$ without incorporating the Lense-Thirring drag. This signifies that the basic equation to calculate $(r_s)$ remains indifferent with or without the inclusion of Lens-Thirring term, as a consequence $(r_s)$ itself remains the same. This does not mean that Lens-Thirring coupling has no impact on the particle motion around the Kerr field, but rather, the angular momentum gets distributed between gravitational force and the force arises due to Lense-Thirring effect in such a way, which creates an apparent ceasation of this effect. This is exactly the reason for which this dragging term has not been explicitly shown in M02. The entire physics !
486: % becomes similar if we just add Coriolis force in the fluid equations for an accretion disk around a Kerr blackhole.
487:
488: %The marginally bound orbit $(r_b)$ can be accounted from equations
489: %\begin{eqnarray}
490: %\frac{dV_{PK}}{dr} \vert_{r_b}=0 \, \, \textrm{and } \, \, V_{PK} \vert_{r_b}=0.
491: %\label{shu3}
492: %\end{eqnarray}
493: %With the help of the above equation, the condition for $(r_b)$ reduces to
494:
495: The energy of a particle in the Kerr geometry according to $V_{PK}$ is given by
496: \begin{eqnarray}
497: E=\frac{r}{2} \frac{dV_{PK}}{dr} + V_{PK}.
498: \label{shu4}
499: \end{eqnarray}
500: Therefore marginally bound orbit ($r_b$) can be accounted for by solving the equation
501: \begin{eqnarray}
502: E\vert_{r_b}=0
503: \label{shu5}
504: \end{eqnarray}
505: for $r_b$.
506: In addition, once we know $r_s$, we can compute $E\vert_{r_s}=E_S$,
507: the energy at last stable circular orbit.
508: %where, $V$, here is pseudo-Newtonian potential without the inclusion of Lense-Thirring term i.e., $V=\int \frac{1}{r^3} (\lambda/E)^2 dr$. In a similar way the above argument remains valid for this case. We use eqn (\ref{shu4}) to calculate $E_s$.
509: %Before enlisting our results in the tabular form, we present the
510: %effective potential explicitly in Kerr geometry for
511: %particle motion in circular orbits, given by
512: We enlist the comparison of $r_s$, $r_b$ and $E_s$ between the Kerr
513: and pseudo-Kerr geometry with percentage error for a few inclination
514: parameters $i$ in the Tables 1,2,3. We present the values of above
515: parameters upto the orbital inclination $i=30^\circ$, as we believe that realistically
516: the disk thickness does not exceed beyond the
517: height corresponding to inclination parameter $i \sim 30^\circ$.
518: %From Table 1
519: It is exciting to note that $r_s$ computed from pseudo-Kerr
520: geometry exactly matches to that in Kerr geometry for all
521: values of $a$ and $i$. To best of our knowledge, none of the existing pseudo-Newtonian potentials
522: proposed for threedimensional Kerr geometry reproduces $r_s$ exactly.
523: Table 1 shows that values of $r_b$ obtained from $V_{PK}$ match with that
524: from exact Kerr geometry in very good agreement; with a
525: maximum error $\sim 7\%$ at high inclination angle $30^{\circ}$.
526: With the increase of $a$ upto certain value, error increases to a maximum
527: (obtained in the range $0.998\ge a \ge 0.9$) and then decreases to $0$ at $a=1$.
528: It is to be noted that values of $r_s$ and $r_b$ are independent of $i$ at $a=1$ which
529: coincide with the event horizon as the case for $i=0$.
530: The energy of an accreting particle at marginally stable
531: orbit is also being reproduced by our PNP in very
532: good agreement with that in exact Kerr
533: geometry for $i \lesssim 20^{\circ}$, as understood from Table 2.
534: Although the error increases with the increase of $i$ beyond $20^\circ$, except for $a=1$ which is
535: a special case, it is still within $20\%$ for any realistic disk.
536: %The error in $E_s$ is very small for an orbital inclination $\sim 15^\circ$. The
537: %maximum error at $15^\circ$ is seen to be $\sim 4.6\%$, which
538: %we do not report here.
539: For counter-rotating black holes the
540: errors are less than that for co-rotating ones. However, it is
541: to be noted that for very high inclination angle this
542: trend reverses in $E_s$ as shown in Fig. \ref{fig5} and Table 2. In both the cases of Kerr and
543: pseudo-Kerr geometry, the orbits recede with the
544: increase of inclination parameter $i$ for prograde black holes,
545: and for retrograde black holes this dynamics is opposite. We compare the
546: variation of specific energy for circular Keplerian orbit with
547: the radial distance in Fig. \ref{fig5} computed for exact Kerr geometry
548: and our PNP for both prograde and retrograde holes at
549: orbital inclination $10^{\circ}$ and $30^{\circ}$.
550:
551: The pseudo-Newtonian potential described by Semer\'ak \& Karas (1999),
552: while tries to capture frame-dragging effects, can not reproduce other general relativistic
553: properties e.g. radii of marginally stable and bound orbit, energy at marginally stable
554: orbit. These are very important for the purpose of accretion disk producing jet,
555: expected to be launched from inner edge of the disk. On the other hand, our
556: potential is derived directly from the spacetime metric, more precisely from the
557: effective potential of the threedimensional Kerr geometry given by eqns. (\ref{shuR}) and (\ref{shu6}).
558: Either of the equations inherently carries information of
559: frame-dragging effects with the term proportional to $a\lambda_z$. Therefore, the
560: frame-dragging effects are expected to be guaranteed by our potential.
561: While the ad-hoc potential given by Chakrabarti \& Mondal (2006) tries to mimic frame-dragging
562: as well as inner disk properties both, it is not valid for entire parameter regime.
563: It also does not reproduce the radii of marginally stable orbit exactly as ours does.
564: While their potential is a function of $r$ and $\theta$ both, they discuss most of the results at
565: equatorial plane ($\theta=\pi/2$) and thus it is not clear how effective their potential is in
566: a real system. Therefore, our potential is expected to be most selfcontained
567: and useful to study generalized accretion disk including jet, particularly for the
568: hydrodynamical/magnetohydrodynamical analysis.
569:
570: Thus, for a realistic accretion disk, our PNP,
571: although approximate in nature, should reproduce the essential features
572: of the spacetime in very good agreement. The potential is
573: effectively useful to study the detailed hydrodynamics of
574: the realistic disk with the inclusion of vertical outflow using
575: Newtonian MHD equations, especially in the inner region, where
576: general relativistic effects are very important. Thus
577: the potential satisfies all the criteria to be claimed as
578: good pseudo-Newtonian vector potential for a general Kerr metric.
579:
580:
581:
582:
583: %\begin{figure*}[htbp]
584: %\centerline{\psfig{file=f1.eps,width=14cm,height=14.0cm}}
585: %\figcaption{Variation of specific energy for circular orbits
586: %as a fucntion of radial coordinate $r$ with the increase of inclination
587: %parameter for various values of ($a$), which are indicated at each set.
588: %For each set, dash and dotted dash curves
589: %show results of general relativity for inclinaion angle $i=10^{\circ}$
590: %and $i=30^{\circ}$ respectively. Solid and dotted curves show results of our
591: %potential for $i=10^{\circ}$ and $i=30^{\circ}$ respectively.
592: %\label{Fig.2}
593: %\end{figure*}
594:
595:
596:
597: %\begin{figure*}[htbp]
598: %\centerline{\psfig{file=f2.eps,width=14cm,height=14.0cm}}
599: %\figcaption{Variation of Mach number and density as a fucntion of radial
600: %coordinate $r$ at different inclination angle $i$ indicated in figure for various values of $a$.
601: %For each set, dash and dotted dash curves
602: %show results of general relativity for $a=0.5$ and $a=0.998$ respectively. Solid and dotted
603: %curves show results of our potential for $a=0.5$ and $a=0.998$ respectively.
604: %\label{Fig.3}
605: %\end{figure*}
606:
607:
608:
609:
610:
611:
612:
613:
614:
615:
616:
617:
618:
619:
620:
621:
622:
623:
624:
625:
626:
627:
628:
629:
630:
631:
632:
633:
634:
635:
636:
637:
638: \section{Discussion}
639:
640: In this paper, we have prescribed a most generalized
641: gravitational potential, pseudo-Newtonian vector potential, for the modeling of
642: thick accretion disks around rotating
643: black holes. As this potential is derived from the
644: spacetime metric directly, it naturally carries
645: several essential general relativistic properties.
646: %We exploit the simplicity of the well defined method used in M02 for our task.
647: Our potential is valid for co-rotating as well as counter-rotating black holes with
648: all realistic values of orbital inclination. The inherent
649: nature of reproducing exact values of $r_s$ for the entire
650: regime of Kerr parameter and for all inclination angle
651: by our PNP makes it an efficient choice. The prescribed PNP
652: also reproduces $r_b$ in exact Kerr geometry with a
653: maximum error $\sim 7\%$ for a high inclination $\sim 30^{\circ}$.
654: However, it can be noted that the potential may not be a good approximation for the angular and
655: epicyclic frequencies for less than $20$ Schwarzschild radii.
656:
657: The full scale disk dynamics is very complicated and there is no virtue
658: to assume that the accretion disk around black holes is
659: fully Keplerian in nature. Moreover, the vertical outflow and
660: wind in the form of relativistic jet, which are believed to be
661: present almost in all quasars and microquasars, are predicted to
662: be emanating from a very inner region of a puffed up disk or from a
663: coronal transition region (Liu et al. 1999; Meyer et al. 2000). In addition,
664: various inner fluid dynamical properties and also the powering of jet
665: depend on spin parameter of the black hole. Thus evidently the realistic
666: accretion physics (especially the accretion dynamics) around black
667: holes can be studied with our prescribed axisymmetric generalized PNP, capturing the
668: essential physics of GR.
669:
670: The general relativistic study of full scale dynamics of a realistic accretion disk
671: for a highly turbulent viscous medium with the inclusion of jet
672: and magnetic field is beyond the scope with the present physical
673: and mathematical tools available to us. Most of the numerical studies
674: of general relativistic flows have been performed with simplifying
675: assumptions and remained confine to certain regions.
676: Such simulations do not explicitly disclose the underlying
677: microphysics of the structure and dynamics of disks and jets. In order to
678: avoid complexities in full GR frameworks and with a notion to understand the underlying
679: physics of the symbiotic connection of disk and jet, our
680: PNP is highly recommended. Even if the results using our PNP deviate
681: quantitatively by a few percent from that of the actual Kerr geometry, the
682: accurate physical interpretation of the activities around black holes
683: is possible. Our generalized PNP can be used to perform
684: quasi-analytical studies and time-dependent simulations of accretion and
685: wind and related physics like that done by Chan et al. (2005, 2007), Lipunov \& Gorbovskoy (2007),
686: Shafee et al. (2007) for more realistic situations.
687:
688: Next, out of several plans, we would like to use our very approach to understand
689: the physics of the symbiotic connection of disk and jet around black holes which, in
690: the astrophysical context, is called by jet-disk symbiosis. In this context, one can
691: extend the qualitative picture of the jet-disk symbiosis developed earlier (Falcke \& Biermann 1995,
692: Donea \& Biermann 1996) to a full scale threedimensional MHD in the Newtonian framework with
693: the inclusion of our PNP. The structure of the disk is highly
694: modified in presence of the jet. Thus, we plan to describe the
695: disk including all the above mentioned effects
696: in a realistic situation, and to develop a tool to test with observation, both
697: of the disk and the jet (from radio to TEV photons).
698:
699: \acknowledgements
700: The authors thank the referee for his/her very useful and constructive suggestions which helped
701: to improve the presentation of the paper. They also thank Paul J. Wiita for his comments
702: in preparing the final version of the manuscript.
703:
704:
705:
706: \begin{thebibliography}{}
707:
708: \bibitem[]{854} Artemova, I. V., Bj\"ornsson, G., \& Novikov, I. D. 1996, ApJ, 461, 565.
709: \bibitem[]{855} Bardeen, J. M., Press, W. H., \& Teukolsky, S. A. 1972, ApJ, 178, 347.
710: \bibitem[]{856} Bondi, H. 1952, MNRAS, 112, 195.
711: \bibitem[]{857} Carter, B. 1968, Phys. Rev, 174, 1559.
712: \bibitem[]{858} Chakrabarti, S. K., \& Khanna, R. 1992, MNRAS, 256, 300.
713: \bibitem[]{859} Chakrabarti, S. K., \& Mondal, S. 2006, MNRAS, 369, 976.
714: \bibitem[]{860} Chan, C., Psaltis, D., \& \"Ozel, F. 2005, ApJ, 628, 353.
715: \bibitem[]{861} Chan, C., Psaltis, D., \& \"Ozel, F. 2007, ApJ Submitted, arXiv:astro-ph/0612742.
716: \bibitem[]{862} Chandrasekhar, S. 1983, The Mathematical theory of black holes. (Clarendon press. Oxford)
717: \bibitem[]{862b} Dadhich, N. 1985, in A Random Walk in Relativity and Cosmology, eds.
718: N. Dadhich \& C. V. Vishveshwara (New Delhi: Wiley Eastern), 72.
719: \bibitem[]{863} Donea, A.-C., \& Biermann, P. 1996, A\&A, 316, 43.
720: \bibitem[]{864} Falcke, H., \& Biermann, P. 1995, A\&A, 293, 665.
721: \bibitem[]{865} Genzel, R., Sch\"odel, T. Ott., Eckart, A., Alexander, T., Lacombe, F., Rouan, D., \& Aschenbach, B. 2003, Nature, 425, 934.
722: \bibitem[]{866} Ghosh, S. 2004, A\&A, 418, 795.
723: \bibitem[]{867} Glampedakis, K., Hughes, S. A., Kennefick, D. 2002, Phys. Rev. D, 66, 064005.
724: %\bibitem[]{868} Goldstein, H. 1950, Classical Mechanics, 2nd edn. (Addison-Wesley publishing company, Inc., USA).
725: \bibitem[]{869} Hughes, S. A. 2000, Phys. Rev. D, 61, 084004.
726: \bibitem[]{870} Ivanov, R. I., Prodanov, E. M., 2005, Phys. Lett. B, 611, 34
727: \bibitem[]{871} Iwasawa, K., Fabian, A. C., Reynolds, C. S., Nandra, K., Otani, C., Inoue, H.,
728: Hayashida, K., Brandt, W. N., Dotani, T., Kunieda, H., Matsuoka, M., \& Tanaka, Y. 1996, MNRAS, 282, 1038.
729: \bibitem[]{873} Kozlowski, M., Jaroszy\'nski, M., \& Abramowicz, M. A. 1978, A\&A, 63, 209.
730: \bibitem[]{874} Lens, J., \& Thirring, H., 1918, Phys. Z. 19, 156.
731: \bibitem[]{874b} Lipunov, V., \& Gorbovskoy, E. 2007, ApJ Submitted, arXiv:0705.1648.
732: \bibitem[]{875} Liu, B. F., Yuan, W., Meyer, F., Meyer-Hofmeister, E., \& Xie, G. Z. 1999, ApJ, 527, L17.
733: \bibitem[]{876} Lovas, T. 1998, IJMPD, 7, 471.
734: \bibitem[]{877} McClintock, J. E., Shafee, R., Narayan, R., Remillard, R. A., Davis, S. W.,
735: \& Li, L.-X. 2006, ApJ, 652, 518.
736: \bibitem[]{879} Meyer, F., Liu, B. F., \& Meyer-Hofmeister, E. 2000, A\&A, 361, 175.
737: \bibitem[]{880} Michel, F. Curtis. 1972, Ap\&SS, 15, 153.
738: \bibitem[]{881} Miller, J. M. et al. 2004, ApJ, 601, 450.
739: \bibitem[]{882} Miniutti, G., Fabian, A. C., \& Miller, J. M. 2004, MNRAS, 351, 466.
740: \bibitem[]{883} Mukhopadhyay, B. 2002, ApJ, 581, 427; M02.
741: \bibitem[]{884} Mukhopadhyay, B., Misra, R. 2003, ApJ, 582, 347.
742: \bibitem[]{885} Mukhopadhyay, B. 2003, ApJ, 586, 1268.
743: \bibitem[]{886} Novikov, I. D., \& Thorne, K. S. 1973, in Black Holes, Les Houches 1972
744: (France), ed. B. \& C. DeWitt (New York: Gordon \& Breach), 343.
745: \bibitem[]{888} Nowak, A. M., \& Wagoner, R. V. 1991, ApJ, 378, 656.
746: \bibitem[]{889} Paczy\'nski, B., \& Wiita, P. J. 1980, A\&A, 88, 23; PW.
747: \bibitem[]{890} Semer\'ak, O., \& Karas, V. 1999, A\&A, 343, 325.
748: \bibitem[]{890b} Shafee, R., \& Narayan, R., \& McClintock, J. E. 2007, ApJ Submitted, arXiv:0705.2244.
749: \bibitem[]{891} Shakura, N., \& Sunyaev, R. 1973, A\&A, 24, 337.
750: \bibitem[]{892} Shapiro, S. L. 1996, Phys. Rev. L, 77, 4487.
751: \bibitem[]{5} Shapiro, S. L., \& Teukolsky, S. A. 1983, Black Holes, White Dwarfs, and Neutron Stars: Physics of Compact Objects (New York: John Wiley \& Sons.).
752: \bibitem[]{894} Ryan, F. D. 1995, Phys. Rev. D, 52, 315.
753: \bibitem[]{895} Wilkins, D. C. 1972, Phys. Rev. D, 5, 814.
754: \bibitem[]{896} Wilms, J., Reynolds, C. S., Begelman, M. C., Reeves, J., Molendi, S., Staubert, R., \& Kendziorra, E. 2001, MNRAS, 328, 27.
755:
756: \end{thebibliography}{}
757:
758: %\begin{acknowledgements}
759: %SG like to thanks the hospitality of Indian Insititute of science, where the work was carried out
760: %\end{acknowledgements}
761:
762: %\clearpage
763: %\begin{table*}[htbp]
764: %\caption{Values of $r_s$}
765: %\begin{tabular}{ccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc}
766: %\hline
767: %\hline
768: %%$ $ & $ $& $ $ &K&$ $ & $ $&K&$ $ & $ $&K&$ $ & $ $&K&$ $ & $ $ \\
769: %$a$ & $ $ & $i$&K,\,PK& $ $ & $i$&K,\,PK & $ $ & $i$&K,\,PK & $ $&$i$&K,\,PK \\
770: %%$ $ & $ $& $ $&PK&$ $ & $ $&PK&$ $ & $ $&PK&$ $ & $ $&PK&$ $ & $ $ \\
771: %\hline
772: %\hline
773: %\\
774: %$1.0$ & $ $ & $0$ & $1.0$ & $ $ & $10$ & $1.0$ & $ $ & $20$ & $1.0$ & $ $ & $30$ &
775: %$1.0$
776: %\\
777: %$0.998$ & $ $ & $0$ & $1.2370$ & $ $ & $10$ & $1.2464$ & $ $ & $20$ & $1.2860$ & $ $ & $30$ &
778: %$1.4304$ \\
779: %$0.9$ & $ $ & $0$ & $2.3209$ & $ $ & $10$ & $2.3493$ & $ $ & $20$ & $2.4403$ & $ $ & $30$ & $2.6095$
780: %\\
781: %$0.7$ & $ $ & $0$ & $3.3931$ & $ $ & $10$ & $3.4215$ & $ $ & $20$ & $3.5078$ & $ $ & $30$ & $3.6545$
782: %\\
783: %$0.5$ & $ $ & $0$ & $4.2330$ & $ $ & $10$ & $4.2553$ & $ $ & $20$ & $4.3221$ & $ $ & $30$ & $4.4330$
784: %\\
785: %$0.3$ & $ $ & $0$ & $4.9786$ & $ $ & $10$ & $4.9928$ & $ $ & $20$ & $5.0349$ & $ $ & $30$ & $5.1040$
786: %\\
787: %$0.1$ & $ $ & $0$ & $5.6693$ & $ $ & $10$ & $5.6742$ & $ $ & $20$ & $5.6887$ & $ $ & $30$ & $5.7125$
788: %\\
789: %$0$ & $ $ & $0$ & $6$ & $ $ & $10$ & $6$ & $ $ & $20$ & $6$ & $ $ & $30$ & $6$
790: %\\
791: %$-0.1$ & $ $ & $0$ & $6.3229$ & $ $ & $10$ & $6.3179$ & $ $ & $20$ & $6.3030$ & $ $ & $30$ & $6.2786$
792: %\\
793: %$-0.3$ & $ $ & $0$ & $6.9493$ & $ $ & $10$ & $6.9339$ & $ $ & $20$ & $6.8882$ & $ $ & $30$ & $6.8136$
794: %\\
795: %$-0.5$ & $ $ & $0$ & $7.5546$ & $ $ & $10$ & $7.5285$ & $ $ & $20$ & $7.4510$ & $ $ & $30$ & $7.3244$
796: %\\
797: %$-0.7$ & $ $ & $0$ & $8.1430$ & $ $ & $10$ & $8.1059$ & $ $ & $20$ & $7.9958$ & $ $ & $30$ & $7.8157$
798: %\\
799: %$-0.9$ & $ $ & $0$ & $8.7174$ & $ $ & $10$ & $8.6692$ & $ $ & $20$ & $8.5258$ & $ $ & $30$ &
800: %$8.2908$ \\
801: %$-0.998$ & $ $ & $0$ & $8.9947$ & $ $ & $10$ & $8.9407$ & $ $ & $20$ & $8.7808$ & $ $ & $30$ &
802: %$8.5185$ \\
803: %$-1.0$ & $ $ & $0$ & $9.0$ & $ $ & $10$ & $8.9462$ & $ $ & $20$ & $8.7860$ & $ $ & $30$ &
804: %$8.5231$ \\
805: %\\
806: %\hline
807: %\end{tabular}
808: %\tablecomments{Inclination angle $i$ expressed in degrees,
809: %K and PK denote Kerr and pseudo-Newtonian result respectively.}
810: %\end{table*}
811:
812: \clearpage
813: \begin{table*}[htbp]
814: \scriptsize
815: \caption{Values of $r_b$}
816: \begin{tabular}{ccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc}
817: \hline
818: \hline
819: $ $ & $ $&K&$ $ & $ $&$ $&K&$ $ & $ $&$ $&K&$ $ & $ $&$ $&K&$ $ & $ $ \\
820: $a$ & $i$&$ $& Er & $ $ &$i$&$ $& Er & $ $ &$i$&$ $& Er & $ $ &$i$&$ $&Er \\
821: $ $ & $ $&PK&$ $ & $ $&$ $&PK&$ $ & $ $&$ $&PK&$ $ & $ $&$ $&PK&$ $ & $ $ \\
822: \hline
823: \hline
824: $ $ & $ $ & $1.0$ &$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$1.0$ &$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$1.0$ &$ $ & $ $ & $ $
825: &$1.0$ \\
826: $1.0$ & $0$&$ $&$0.0$&$ $ &$10$ & $ $&$0.0$ &$ $ &$20$ & $ $&$0.0$ &$ $ &$30$ & $
827: $&$0.0$ \\
828: $ $ & $ $ & $1.0$&$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$1.0$&$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$1.0$ &$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$1.0$
829: \\
830: \hline
831: $ $ & $ $ & $1.0914$ &$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$1.0942$ &$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$1.1048$ &$ $ & $ $ & $ $
832: &$1.1369$ \\
833: $0.998$ & $0$&$ $&$5.0119$&$ $ &$10$ & $ $&$5.1088$ &$ $ &$20$ & $ $&$5.4671$ &$ $ &$30$ & $
834: $&$6.6233$ \\
835: $ $ & $ $ & $1.0367$&$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$1.0383$&$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$1.0444$ &$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$1.0616$
836: \\
837: \hline
838: $ $ & $ $ & $1.7325$ &$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$1.7459$ &$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$1.7890$ &$ $ & $ $ & $ $
839: &$1.8706$ \\
840: $0.9$ & $0$&$ $&$4.6118$&$ $ &$10$ & $ $&$4.5535$ &$ $ &$20$ & $ $&$4.3823$ &$ $ &$30$ & $
841: $&$4.0468$ \\
842: $ $ & $ $ & $1.6526$&$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$1.6664$&$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$1.7106$ &$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$1.7949$
843: \\
844: \hline
845: $ $ & $ $ & $2.3955$ &$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$2.4106$ &$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$2.457$ &$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$2.5369$
846: \\
847: $0.7$ & $0$&$ $&$2.5924$&$ $ &$10$ & $ $&$2.5429$ &$ $ &$20$ & $ $&$2.4217$ &$ $ &$30$ & $
848: $&$2.1838$ \\
849: $ $ & $ $ & $2.3334$&$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$2.3493$&$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$2.3975$ &$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$2.4815$
850: \\
851: \hline
852: $ $ & $ $ & $2.9142$ &$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$2.9268$ &$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$2.9648$ &$ $ & $ $ & $ $
853: &$3.0281$ \\
854: $0.5$ & $0$&$ $&$1.5064$&$ $ &$10$ & $ $&$1.4760$ &$ $ &$20$ & $ $&$1.3964$ &$ $ &$30$ & $
855: $&$1.2615$ \\
856: $ $ & $ $ & $2.8703$&$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$2.8836$&$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$2.9234$ &$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$2.9899$
857: \\
858: \hline
859: $ $ & $ $ & $3.3733$ &$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$3.3816$ &$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$3.4064$ &$ $ & $ $ & $ $
860: &$3.4473$ \\
861: $0.3$ & $0$&$ $&$0.7826$&$ $ &$10$ & $ $&$0.7541$ &$ $ &$20$ & $ $&$0.7134$ &$ $ &$30$ & $
862: $&$0.6469$ \\
863: $ $ & $ $ & $3.3469$&$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$3.3561$&$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$3.3821$ &$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$3.4250$
864: \\
865: \hline
866: $ $ & $ $ & $3.7974$ &$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$3.8003$ &$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$3.8091$ &$ $ & $ $ & $ $
867: &$3.8235$ \\
868: $0.1$ & $0$&$ $&$0.2317$&$ $ &$10$ & $ $&$0.2079$ &$ $ &$20$ & $ $&$0.1969$ &$ $ &$30$ & $
869: $&$0.1805$ \\
870: $ $ & $ $ & $3.7886$&$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$3.7924$&$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$3.8016$ &$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$3.8166$
871: \\
872: \hline
873: $ $ & $ $ & $4$ &$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$4$ &$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$4$ &$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$4$ \\
874: $0$ & $0$&$ $&$0$&$ $ &$10$ & $ $&$0$ &$ $ &$20$ & $ $&$0$ &$ $ &$30$ & $ $&$0$ \\
875: $ $ & $ $ & $4$&$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$4$&$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$4$ &$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$4$ \\
876: \hline
877: $ $ & $ $ & $4.1976$ &$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$4.1945$ &$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$4.1853$ &$ $ & $ $ & $ $
878: &$4.1702$ \\
879: $-0.1$ & $0$&$ $&$0.2311$&$ $ &$10$ & $ $&$0.2265$ &$ $ &$20$ & $ $&$0.2150$ &$ $ &$30$ & $
880: $&$0.2038$ \\
881: $ $ & $ $ & $4.2073$&$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$4.2040$&$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$4.1943$ &$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$4.1787$
882: \\
883: \hline
884: $ $ & $ $ & $4.5804$ &$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$4.5706$ &$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$4.5418$ &$ $ & $ $ & $ $
885: &$4.4949$ \\
886: $-0.3$ & $0$&$ $&$0.5960$&$ $ &$10$ & $ $&$0.5907$ &$ $ &$20$ & $ $&$0.5681$ &$ $ &$30$ & $
887: $&$0.5273$ \\
888: $ $ & $ $ & $4.6077$&$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$4.5976$&$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$4.5676$ &$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$4.5186$
889: \\
890: \hline
891: $ $ & $ $ & $4.9495$ &$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$4.9328$ &$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$4.8831$ &$ $ & $ $ & $ $
892: &$4.8022$ \\
893: $-0.5$ & $0$&$ $&$0.9072$&$ $ &$10$ & $ $&$0.8981$ &$ $ &$20$ & $ $&$0.8683$ &$ $ &$30$ & $
894: $&$0.8142$ \\
895: $ $ & $ $ & $4.9944$&$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$4.9771$&$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$4.9255$ &$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$4.8413$
896: \\
897: \hline
898: $ $ & $ $ & $5.3077$ &$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$5.2836$ &$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$5.2121$ &$ $ & $ $ & $ $
899: &$5.0953$ \\
900: $-0.7$ & $0$&$ $&$1.1775$&$ $ &$10$ & $ $&$1.1659$ &$ $ &$20$ & $ $&$1.1320$ &$ $ &$30$ & $
901: $&$1.0716$ \\
902: $ $ & $ $ & $5.3702$&$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$5.3452$&$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$5.2711$ &$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$5.1499$
903: \\
904: \hline
905: $ $ & $ $ & $5.6568$ &$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$5.6251$ &$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$5.5308$ &$ $ & $ $ & $ $
906: &$5.3765$ \\
907: $-0.9$ & $0$&$ $&$1.4160$&$ $ &$10$ & $ $&$1.4044$ &$ $ &$20$ & $ $&$1.3687$ &$ $ &$30$ & $
908: $&$1.3038$ \\
909: $ $ & $ $ & $5.7369$&$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$5.7041$&$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$5.6065$ &$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$5.4466$
910: \\
911: \hline
912: $ $ & $ $ & $5.8250$ &$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$5.7895$ &$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$5.6837$ &$ $ & $ $ & $ $
913: &$5.5104$ \\
914: $-0.998$ & $0$&$ $&$1.5227$&$ $ &$10$ & $ $&$1.5096$ &$ $ &$20$ & $ $&$1.4762$ &$ $ &$30$ & $
915: $&$1.4137$ \\
916: $ $ & $ $ & $5.9137$&$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$5.8769$&$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$5.7676$ &$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$5.5883$
917: \\
918: \hline
919: $ $ & $ $ & $5.8284$ &$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$5.7928$ &$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$5.6868$ &$ $ & $ $ & $ $
920: &$5.5131$ \\
921: $-1.0$ & $0$&$ $&$1.4927$&$ $ &$10$ & $ $&$1.4794$ &$ $ &$20$ & $ $&$1.4419$ &$ $ &$30$ & $
922: $&$1.3731$ \\
923: $ $ & $ $ & $5.9154$&$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$5.8785$&$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$5.7688$ &$ $ & $ $ & $ $ &$5.5888$
924: \\
925: \hline
926: \hline
927: \end{tabular}
928: \tablecomments{Percentage error=Er. Inclination angle $i$ expressed in degrees,
929: K and PK denote Kerr and pseudo-Newtonian result respectively.}
930: \end{table*}
931:
932: \clearpage
933: \begin{table*}[htbp]
934: \scriptsize
935: \caption{Values of $E_s$}
936: \begin{tabular}{ccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc}
937: \hline
938: \hline
939: $ $ & $ $&K&$ $ & $ $&K&$ $ & $ $&K&$ $ & $ $&K&$ $ &$ $ \\
940: $a$ & $i$&$ $& Er & $i$&$ $& Er & $i$&$ $& Er & $i$&$ $&Er \\
941: $ $ & $ $&PK&$ $ & $ $&PK&$ $ & $ $&PK&$ $ & $ $&PK&$ $ & $ $ \\
942: \hline
943: \hline
944: $ $ & $ $ & $0.0$&$ $&$ $&$0.0$&$ $&$ $&$0.0$&$ $&$ $&$0.0$ \\
945: $1.0$ & $0$&$ $&$0.0$&$10$ & $ $&$0.0$ &$20$ & $ $&$0.0$ &$30$ & $ $&$0.0$ \\
946: $ $ & $ $ & $0.0$&$ $ & $ $ & $0.0$&$ $ & $ $ &$0.0$ &$ $ &$ $ & $0.0$ \\
947: \hline
948: $ $ & $ $ & $-0.3210$&$ $&$ $&$-0.3118$&$ $&$ $&$-0.2816$&$ $&$ $&$-0.2264$ \\
949: $0.998$ & $0$&$ $&$10.0623$&$10$ & $ $&$6.8954$ &$20$ & $ $&$2.1307$ &$30$ & $ $&$15.7243$ \\
950: $ $ & $ $ & $-0.3533$&$ $ & $ $ & $-0.3333$&$ $ & $ $ &$-0.2756$ &$ $ &$ $ & $-0.1908$ \\
951: \hline
952: $ $ & $ $ & $-0.1558$&$ $&$ $ &$-0.1530$ &$ $ & $ $ &$-0.1450$ &$ $ & $ $ &$-0.1327$ \\
953: $0.9$ & $0$&$ $&$12.1951$&$10$ & $ $&$8.8235$ &$20$ & $ $&$0.8966$ &$30$ & $ $&$15.9005$ \\
954: $ $ & $ $ & $-0.1748$&$ $ & $ $ &$-0.1665$&$ $ & $ $ &$-0.1437$ &$ $ & $ $ &$-0.1116$ \\
955: \hline
956: $ $ & $ $ & $-0.1036$ &$ $ & $ $ &$-0.1026$ &$ $ & $ $ &$-0.0995$ &$ $ & $ $ &$-0.0949$ \\
957: $0.7$ & $0$&$ $&$10.8108$&$10$ & $ $&$7.4074$&$20$ & $ $&$2.1106$ &$30$ & $ $&$15.9652$ \\
958: $ $ & $ $ & $-0.1148$&$ $ & $ $ &$-0.1102$&$ $ & $ $ &$-0.0974$ &$ $ & $ $ &$-0.0788$ \\
959: \hline
960: $ $ & $ $ & $-0.0821$ & $ $ & $ $ &$-0.0816$ & $ $ & $ $ &$-0.0802$ & $ $ & $ $ &$-0.0780$ \\
961: $0.5$ & $0$&$ $&$9.9757$&$10$ & $ $&$6.7402$&$20$ & $ $&$2.8678$ &$30$ & $ $&$17.5641$ \\
962: $ $ & $ $ & $-0.0904$&$ $ & $ $ &$-0.0871$&$ $ & $ $ &$-0.0779$ & $ $ & $ $ &$-0.0643$ \\
963: \hline
964: $ $ & $ $ & $-0.0694$ &$ $ & $ $ &$-0.0691$ &$ $ & $ $ &$-0.0685$ &$ $ & $ $ &$-0.0675$ \\
965: $0.3$ & $0$&$ $&$9.5101$&$10$ & $ $&$6.3676$ &$20$ & $ $&$3.2117$ &$30$ & $ $&$17.7778$ \\
966: $ $ & $ $ & $-0.0760$&$ $ & $ $ &$-0.0735$&$ $ & $ $ &$-0.0663$ &$ $ & $ $ &$-0.0555$ \\
967: \hline
968: $ $ & $ $ & $-0.0606$ &$ $ & $ $ &$-0.0606$ &$ $ & $ $ &$-0.0604$ &$ $ & $ $ &$-0.0602$ \\
969: $0.1$ & $0$&$ $&$9.2409$&$10$ & $ $&$5.9406$ &$20$ & $ $&$3.4768$ &$30$ & $ $&$18.1063$ \\
970: $ $ & $ $ & $-0.0662$&$ $ & $ $ &$-0.0642$&$ $ & $ $ &$-0.0583$ &$ $ & $ $ &$-0.0493$ \\
971: \hline
972: $ $ & $ $ & $-0.0572$ &$ $ & $ $ &$-0.0572$ &$ $ & $ $ &$-0.0572$ & $ $ & $ $ &$-0.0572$ \\
973: $0$ & $0$&$ $&$9.0909$&$10$ & $ $&$5.9441$&$20$ & $ $&$3.4965$ &$30$ & $ $&$18.1818$ \\
974: $ $ & $ $ & $-0.0624$&$ $ & $ $ &$-0.0606$&$ $ & $ $ &$-0.0552$ &$ $ & $ $ &$-0.0468$ \\
975: \hline
976: $ $ & $ $ & $-0.0542$ &$ $ & $ $ &$-0.0542$ &$ $ & $ $ &$-0.0544$ &$ $ & $ $ &$-0.0546$ \\
977: $-0.1$ & $0$&$ $&$9.0406$&$10$ & $ $&$5.7196$ &$20$ & $ $&$3.8603$ &$30$ & $ $&$18.3150$ \\
978: $ $ & $ $ & $-0.0591$&$ $ & $ $ &$-0.0573$&$ $ & $ $ &$-0.0523$ &$ $ & $ $ &$-0.0446$ \\
979: \hline
980: $ $ & $ $ & $-0.0492$ &$ $ & $ $ &$-0.0493$ &$ $ & $ $ &$-0.0496$ &$ $ & $ $ &$-0.0502$ \\
981: $-0.3$ & $0$&$ $&$8.7398$&$10$ & $ $&$5.4767$ &$20$ & $ $&$3.8306$ &$30$ & $ $&$18.5259$ \\
982: $ $ & $ $ & $-0.0535$&$ $ & $ $ &$-0.0520$&$ $ & $ $ &$-0.0477$ &$ $ & $ $ &$-0.0409$ \\
983: \hline
984: $ $ & $ $ & $-0.0451$ &$ $ & $ $ &$-0.0453$ &$ $ & $ $ &$-0.0458$ &$ $ & $ $ &$-0.0465$ \\
985: $-0.5$ & $0$&$ $&$8.8647$&$10$ & $ $&$5.2980$ &$20$ & $ $&$4.1485$ &$30$ & $ $&$18.4946$ \\
986: $ $ & $ $ & $-0.0490$&$ $ & $ $ &$-0.0477$&$ $ & $ $ &$-0.0439$ &$ $ & $ $ &$-0.0379$ \\
987: \hline
988: $ $ & $ $ & $-0.0418$ &$ $ & $ $ &$-0.0420$ &$ $ & $ $ &$-0.0426$ &$ $ & $ $ &$-0.0435$ \\
989: $-0.7$ & $0$&$ $&$8.3732$&$10$ & $ $&$5.2381$ &$20$ & $ $&$4.2254$ &$30$ & $ $&$18.6207$ \\
990: $ $ & $ $ & $-0.0453$&$ $ & $ $ &$-0.0442$&$ $ & $ $ &$-0.0408$ &$ $ & $ $ &$-0.0354$ \\
991: \hline
992: $ $ & $ $ & $-0.0390$ &$ $ & $ $ &$-0.0392$ &$ $ & $ $ &$-0.0398$ &$ $ & $ $ &$-0.0409$ \\
993: $-0.9$ & $0$&$ $&$8.2051$&$10$ & $ $&$5.1020$ &$20$ & $ $&$4.2714$ &$30$ & $ $&$18.5819$ \\
994: $ $ & $ $ & $-0.0422$&$ $ & $ $ &$-0.0412$&$ $ & $ $ &$-0.0381$ &$ $ & $ $ &$-0.0333$ \\
995: \hline
996: $ $ & $ $ & $-0.0378$ &$ $ & $ $ &$-0.0380$ &$ $ & $ $ &$-0.0387$ &$ $ & $ $ &$-0.0398$ \\
997: $-0.998$ & $0$&$ $&$8.4656$&$10$ & $ $&$5.2632$ &$20$ & $ $&$3.8760$ &$30$ & $ $&$17.8392$ \\
998: $ $ & $ $ & $-0.0410$&$ $ & $ $ &$-0.0400$&$ $ & $ $ &$-0.0372$ &$ $ & $ $ &$-0.0327$ \\
999: \hline
1000: \hline
1001: $ $ & $ $ & $-0.0377$ &$ $ & $ $ &$-0.0380$ &$ $ & $ $ &$-0.0386$ &$ $ & $ $ &$-0.0398$ \\
1002: $-1.0$ & $0$&$ $&$8.7533$&$10$ & $ $&$5.2632$ &$20$ & $ $&$3.8860$ &$30$ & $ $&$17.8392$ \\
1003: $ $ & $ $ & $-0.0410$&$ $ & $ $ &$-0.0400$&$ $ & $ $ &$-0.0371$ &$ $ & $ $ &$-0.0327$ \\
1004: \hline
1005: \end{tabular}
1006: \tablecomments{Percentage error=Er. Inclination angle $i$ expressed in degrees,
1007: K and PK denote Kerr and pseudo-Newtonian result respectively.}
1008: \end{table*}
1009:
1010:
1011:
1012: \clearpage
1013:
1014: \begin{figure}
1015: \epsscale{0.8}
1016: \hskip-5cm
1017: \plotone{f1.eps}
1018: \caption{ \label{fig1}
1019: Schematic diagram showing how an orbit of the
1020: accreting particle inclines to the equatorial
1021: plane. The orbit, inclined at an angle $i$,
1022: represents a generalized accretion.
1023: $\lambda$ represents the total angular momentum of the
1024: orbiting particle, $a$ is the spin parameter of the
1025: black hole and $z$ axis is the symmetry axis of the system.
1026: }
1027: \end{figure}
1028:
1029: \clearpage
1030:
1031: \begin{figure}
1032: \epsscale{1.2}
1033: %\plotone{f2.eps}
1034: \hskip-1.0cm
1035: \includegraphics[width=1.2\columnwidth,angle=270]{f2.eps}
1036: \caption{ \label{fig2}
1037: Variation of generalized pseudo-Newtonian potential $V_{PK}$
1038: as a function of $r$ (in units of $GM/c^2$) and $i$ (in radian)
1039: for (a) $a=1$, (b) $a=-1$.
1040: }
1041: \end{figure}
1042:
1043: \clearpage
1044:
1045: \begin{figure}
1046: \epsscale{0.8}
1047: \plotone{f3.eps}
1048: \caption{ \label{fig3}
1049: Contours of constant $V_{PK}$ for
1050: (a) $a=1$, when solid lines correspond to $V_{PK}=0.045,0.06,0.075,......,0.15$,
1051: dotted lines to $0.2,0.4,0.6,......,1$, and
1052: dashed lines to $1.5,2$,
1053: (b) $a=-1$, when solid lines correspond to $V_{PK}=0.045,0.06,0.075,......,0.15$,
1054: dotted lines to $0.2,0.4,0.6,......,1$, and
1055: dashed lines to $2,4,6,......,10$.
1056: }
1057: \end{figure}
1058:
1059: \clearpage
1060:
1061: \begin{figure}
1062: \epsscale{1.2}
1063: %\plotone{f4.eps}
1064: \hskip-1.0cm
1065: \includegraphics[width=1.2\columnwidth,angle=270]{f4.eps}
1066: \caption{ \label{fig4}
1067: Variation of density distribution generating $V_{PK}$
1068: as a function of $r$ and $z$ (in units of $GM/c^2$) for (a) $a=1$, (b) $a=-1$.
1069: }
1070: \end{figure}
1071:
1072: \clearpage
1073:
1074: \begin{figure}
1075: \epsscale{0.8}
1076: \plotone{f5.eps}
1077: \caption{ \label{fig5}
1078: Variation of specific energy for circular orbits as a function of radial coordinate at
1079: various Kerr parameters.
1080: The solid and dotted curves are for our pseudo-Newtonian potential with $i=10^\circ$ and $30^\circ$
1081: respectively and the dashed and dot-dashed curves are for Kerr geometry with $i=10^\circ$ and $30^\circ$
1082: respectively at each panel.
1083: }
1084: \end{figure}
1085:
1086:
1087: \end{document}
1088:
1089: