1: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
2: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
3:
4: \shorttitle{V471~Tau}
5: \shortauthors{Kami\'nski et al.}
6:
7: \begin{document}
8:
9: \title{MOST photometry and DDO spectroscopy of the \\
10: eclipsing (white dwarf + red dwarf) binary V471~Tau\footnote{Based
11: on data from the MOST satellite, a Canadian Space Agency mission
12: jointly operated by Dynacon Inc., the University of Toronto Institute for
13: Aerospace Studies and the University of British Columbia, with the
14: assistance of the University of Vienna, and on data obtained at the
15: David Dunlap Observatory, University of Toronto.}}
16:
17: \author{Krzysztof Z. Kami\'nski}
18: \affil{Astronomical Observatory, Adam Mickiewicz University \\
19: ul. S{\l}oneczna 36, 60-286 Pozna\'n, Poland}
20: \email{chrisk@amu.edu.pl}
21:
22: \author{Slavek M. Ruci\'nski}
23: \affil{David Dunlap Observatory, University of Toronto \\
24: P.O.~Box 360, Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4C~4Y6, Canada}
25: \email{rucinski@astro.utoronto.ca}
26:
27: \author{Jaymie M. Matthews, Rainer Kuschnig, Jason F. Rowe}
28: \affil{Department of Physics \& Astronomy, University of British Columbia \\
29: 6224 Agricultural Road, Vancouver, B.C., V6T~1Z1, Canada}
30: \email{(matthews,kuschnig,rowe)@astro.ubc.ca}
31:
32: \author{David B. Guenther}
33: \affil{Institute for Computational Astrophysics,
34: Department of Astronomy and Physics, \\ Saint Marys University,
35: Halifax, N.S., B3H~3C3, Canada}
36: \email{guenther@crux.stmarys.ca}
37:
38: \author{Anthony F. J. Moffat}
39: \affil{D\'{e}partment de Physique, Universit\'{e} de Montr\'{e}al \\ C.P.6128,
40: Succursale: Centre-Ville, Montr\'{e}al \\ QC, H3C~3J7,
41: Observatoire du Mont M\'egantic, Canada}
42: \email{moffat@astro.umontreal.ca}
43:
44: \author{Dimitar Sasselov}
45: \affil{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics \\ 60 Garden Street,
46: Cambridge, MA 02138}
47: \email{sasselov@cfa.harvard.edu}
48:
49: \author{Gordon A. H. Walker}
50: \affil{1234 Hewlett Place, Victoria, BC V8S 4P7, Canada}
51: \affil{Department of Physics \& Astronomy, University of British Columbia \\
52: 6224 Agricultural Road, Vancouver, B.C., V6T~1Z1, Canada}
53: \email{gordonwa@uvic.ca}
54:
55: \and
56:
57: \author{Werner W. Weiss}
58: \affil{Institut f\"{u}r Astronomie, Universit\"{a}t Wien\\
59: T\"{u}rkenschanzstrasse 17, A-1180 Wien, Austria}
60: \email{weiss@astro.univie.ac.at}
61:
62:
63: \begin{abstract}
64: The Hyades K2V+WD system 471~Tau is a prototype post-common
65: envelope system and a likely cataclysmic binary progenitor.
66: We present 10 days of nearly continuous optical photometry by
67: the MOST (Microvariability \& Oscillations of STars)
68: satellite and partly simultaneous optical spectroscopy
69: from DDO (David Dunlap Observatory) of the binary.
70: The photometric data indicate that the spot coverage of the
71: K dwarf component was less than observed in the past,
72: suggesting that we monitored the star close to a
73: minimum in its activity cycle. Despite the low spot activity,
74: we still detected seven flare-like events whose
75: estimated energies are among the highest ever observed
76: in V471~Tau and whose times of occurrence do
77: not correlate with the binary orbital phase.
78: A detailed $O-C$ analysis of the times of eclipse over the last
79: $\sim35$~years reveals timing variations which could
80: be explained in several ways, including perturbations by
81: an as-yet-undetected third body in the system or by
82: a small orbital eccentricity inducing slow apsidal motion.
83: The DDO spectra result in improved determinations
84: of the K dwarf projected rotation velocity, $V_K \sin i = 92$
85: km~s$^{-1}$, and the orbital amplitude, $K_K=150.5$ km~s$^{-1}$.
86: The spectra also allow us to measure changes in
87: $H\alpha$ emission strength and radial velocity (RV)
88: variations. We measure a larger $H\alpha$ velocity amplitude
89: than found previously suggesting that
90: the source of the emission in V471~Tau
91: was less concentrated around the sub-white-dwarf
92: point on the K star than had been observed in previous studies.
93: \end{abstract}
94:
95: \keywords{stars: close binaries -- stars: eclipsing
96: binaries -- stars: variable stars -- photometry: space based}
97:
98:
99: \section{INTRODUCTION}
100: \label{intro}
101:
102: V471~Tau is a close eclipsing binary star ($V \sim 9$)
103: consisting of a hot white dwarf and a red dwarf with
104: an orbital period of 0.521 d. It is a member of the Hyades
105: cluster \citep{werner97} and -- very likely -- a
106: cataclysmic binary progenitor \citep{still03}. V471~Tau
107: has been the subject of numerous investigations over
108: the past 35 years; cf.\ the main contributions by
109: \citet{skillman88}, \citet{clemens92}, \citet{obrien01},
110: \citet{ibanoglu05} and \citet{hussain06}.
111:
112: The V471~Tau system may be the prototype of a post-common
113: envelope binary with a white dwarf and a main sequence star.
114: The mass and radius of both components can be measured
115: with high accuracy, while the K dwarf which is spun up
116: to high rotation rates by tidal forces may be an analogue
117: for rapidly rotating pre-ZAMS stars like AB~Dor.
118: Simultaneous precise time-resolved photometry and
119: spectroscopy which cover phases of eclipse in the
120: V471~Tau system can sample the spot coverage of the
121: K dwarf. Eclipse timing can measure apsidal
122: motion in the binary and test whether the system is
123: actually a triple one with a third undetected component.
124: We therefore organized a coordinated campaign of spacebased
125: photometry from the MOST satellite and
126: groundbased spectroscopy from DDO.
127:
128: We present new MOST and DDO observations of V471~Tau
129: in Section~\ref{observations}. The MOST light curve and its
130: changes are discussed in Section~\ref{interpret-lc}
131: while Section~\ref{interpret-sp} gives a description
132: of the spectroscopic observations. Section~\ref{summary}
133: summarizes the combined results.
134:
135:
136:
137: \section{OBSERVATIONS OF V471 TAU}
138: \label{observations}
139:
140: \subsection{MOST photometry}
141: \label{photometry}
142:
143: The MOST (Microvariability \& Oscillations of STars)
144: space mission \citep{walker2003, matthews2004} was
145: designed to perform high-precision optical photometry
146: of bright stars with long time coverage and high
147: duty cycle. MOST is equipped with a 15-cm telescope and a
148: custom broadband filter (spectral transmission
149: peak $\sim 5500$~\AA\ and FWHM $\sim 3000$~\AA).
150: The polar Sun-synchronous orbit of the satellite
151: allows it to monitor stars in the anti-solar direction
152: for up to 60 days without interruption.
153:
154: MOST observed V471~Tau for 10.0 days during 4 -- 14 December 2005
155: (in Terrestial Time Julian Days:
156: 2,453,708.5117 -- 2,453,718.5122, see below in
157: Section~\ref{timing}), covering just over
158: 19 orbital periods of the binary system.
159: The photometry was obtained in MOST's Direct Imaging mode
160: \citep{rowe06}, with a slightly defocused stellar
161: image sampled in a CCD sub-raster. The exposure time was 6.52 s,
162: sampled at 10-s intervals. Two reference stars in the same field
163: (GSC~01252-00692, $V = 8.9$ and GSC~01252-00046, $V = 9.8$)
164: were observed simultaneously in the same way
165: to calibrate instrumental or satellite orbital artifacts.
166:
167: The MOST instrument focal plane can be illuminated by
168: scattered Earth light whose level is modulated by
169: the MOST orbital period of $P_M \simeq 101$ min.
170: The amplitude and complexity of the stray light
171: background variations depend on the season of observing,
172: the location of the target star relative to the
173: bright limb of the Earth and the orientation (roll) of the
174: spacecraft. In the case of the V471~Tau photometry,
175: the periodic fluctuations in background translated into
176: photometric uncertainties in the stellar signal ranging
177: from point-to-point scatter with $\sigma \simeq 0.003$
178: (about 3 mmag) at stray light minimum to a point-to-point
179: scatter of about $\sigma \geq 0.1$ at stray light maximum.
180:
181: The dark and flat field corrections were performed
182: by monitoring individual pixel responses during
183: test exposures on fields empty of stars bright enough
184: to rise above the background. Photometry was extracted
185: from the stellar images using a Moffat-profile
186: point spread function model \citep{moffat69}.
187: The correlation in the raw photometry
188: between the instrumental magnitude light
189: curve and the estimated sky background was removed
190: as described in \citet{rowe06}. About 29\%
191: of the total number of data points were rejected because of
192: pixel saturation during phases of the highest stray light
193: in the MOST orbit and high cosmic ray fluxes
194: when MOST passed through the South Atlantic Anomaly,
195: as indicated by the orbital model of the local magnetic
196: field strength. Additionally, about 6\% of data
197: points were rejected because of the relative uncertainty
198: exceeding $\sigma=0.015$ of the mean light level.
199:
200: The reduction and selection procedure left 56,383 measurements
201: containing gaps of variable
202: length spaced roughly by the MOST orbital period,
203: resulting in a net duty cycle of about 65\%.
204: (We later conducted a period search
205: after an even stricter selection of the data,
206: with a duty cycle of 59\%, as described in
207: Section~\ref{periodograms}.) The time sampling and duty
208: cycle provide excellent coverage in binary
209: orbital phase and during the eclipses of V471~Tau.
210: Note that the orbital period of the binary of close
211: to 1/2 day always created a phase-coverage problem for
212: ground based observations; the MOST data are entirely free of
213: this limitation.
214: The MOST photometry data (raw, and the reduced light curve
215: used for analysis in this paper) are available
216: in the MOST Public Data Archive on the Science page of the
217: MOST web site: www.astro.ubc.ca/MOST.
218:
219: %\placetable{tab1}
220:
221: \subsection{V471~Tau light curve}
222: \label{lc}
223:
224: The 19 orbital cycles of the binary monitored by MOST allowed
225: us to investigate changes in the light
226: curve from cycle to cycle, which is normally interpreted as
227: migration and evolution of spots on the
228: magnetically active K dwarf component \citep{ibanoglu78}.
229: The MOST data were divided into 1-day long subsets
230: and those subsets were phased with the known orbital period
231: of V471~Tau. Three of these subsets, from the beginning, middle
232: and end of the 10-day run, are overplotted in Figure~\ref{fig1}.
233: A subtle trend is visible in that the rising portion of the
234: light curve (in the phase interval 0.05 -- 0.25) moves
235: systematically later in phase with time, by a total of about
236: 0.04 over 10 days. There is some evidence of
237: this shift during the falling portion of the curve in the
238: phase interval 0.75 -- 0.95, but it is less pronounced.
239: No phase shift is seen in the phase range 0.3 -- 0.7,
240: within the photometric scatter.
241:
242: \placefigure{fig1}
243:
244: The changes seen in the MOST photometry resemble the
245: ``photometric wave migration'' first reported by
246: \citet{ibanoglu78} and discussed below in
247: Section~\ref{spot}. The average shift of the wave of
248: $\sim 0.002$~phase/day indicates that it would
249: take $500 \pm 250$~days for the wave to make a full
250: revolution ($P_{migr}$). This is somewhat longer than the
251: wave migration period found in previous studies
252: (from $\sim 180$ d by \citet{ibanoglu89} to $372$ d
253: by \citet{skillman88}), although our estimate of the
254: drift rate, based on only 19 orbital cycles, is necessarily crude.
255:
256: Seeing that the systematic changes in the light
257: curve during the 10-day span of our observations were
258: relatively small, with apparent shifts less than $0.01$
259: mag at a given orbital phase, we calculated a mean
260: light curve from the entire time series.
261: This is presented in Figure~\ref{fig2}.
262:
263: \placefigure{fig2}
264:
265: \subsection{DDO spectroscopy}
266: \label{spectroscopy}
267:
268: We obtained ground based spectroscopy of V471~Tau which
269: partially overlapped with the MOST photometric
270: run during 7 -- 19 December 2005 (see Table \ref{tab1}).
271: A total of 37 spectra at a dispersion of
272: 0.14~\AA/pixel were collected using the Cassegrain
273: spectrograph of the 1.88-m telescope at the David
274: Dunlap Observatory. Since we expected the K-type
275: dwarf in the system to dominate the flux at
276: optical wavelengths, the wavelength range of the spectra
277: was centered at $H\alpha$ line, covering a red spectral window between
278: 6425 and 6705~\AA,\ (Figure~\ref{fig3}).
279: This region contains a multitude of telluric lines which
280: were removed during standard reductions performed
281: using IRAF\footnote{IRAF is distributed by the National
282: Optical Astronomy Observatories, which are operated by
283: the Association of Universities for Research in
284: Astronomy, Inc., under cooperative agreement with the
285: National Science Foundation.} routines. The spectra
286: were taken with the integration times and at
287: intervals of about 30 minutes and could
288: not cover all orbital phases of the binary because of the
289: night/day breaks, commensurability of the binary period
290: with one day and interruptions due to weather. The long
291: integration times preclude any use of the spectroscopic
292: data for improvement of the eclipse timing described in
293: Section~\ref{timing}.
294:
295: \placefigure{fig3}
296:
297: \placetable{tab1}
298:
299:
300: \section{INTERPRETING THE LIGHT CURVE}
301: \label{interpret-lc}
302:
303: The phase diagram of the mean light curve presented in
304: Figure~\ref{fig2} was modeled using the
305: PHOEBE software package \citep{prsa05}, based on the
306: Wilson-Devinney model. The orbital and physical
307: parameters of both stars in the system were adopted
308: from \citet{obrien01}: $R_K=0.96 \,R_{\sun}$,
309: $T_K=5,040 \, K$, $R_{WD}=0.0107 \, R_{\sun}$,
310: $T_{WD}=34,500 \, K$, $a=3.30 \, R_{\sun}$,
311: $i=77.4^\circ$; the subscripts $K$ and $WD$
312: signify the K and white dwarf components, respectively.
313: The atmospheric parameters for the red
314: dwarf component were set to typical values for a
315: K dwarf; limb darkening = 0.52,
316: gravity darkening = 0.32 and albedo = 0.5.
317:
318: The resulting model reproduces the general nature
319: and amplitudes of the double-wave variability, and
320: the depth of the eclipse, seen in the MOST light curve,
321: as shown in Figure~\ref{fig2}.
322: It consists of the dominant smooth, wave-like
323: variability and a relatively shallow (0.022-mag
324: deep) total eclipse lasting 46.9 minutes, with steep shoulders
325: each approximately 50 sec long. The photometric
326: double wave is caused by ellipsoidal distortion of the
327: K dwarf, with a minor modification due to the
328: reflection effect. The asymmetry in the ellipsoidal distortion
329: variability is believed to be due to spots on the K dwarf.
330:
331: \subsection{Spot coverage}
332: \label{spot}
333:
334: In order to study the locations and extent of spots
335: on the surface of the K dwarf, we used the residuals
336: between the observed light curve and the modeled
337: light curve (Figure~\ref{fig4}) to estimate the required
338: changes of the spot filling factor with orbital phase.
339: Because of the orbital inclination of $77\degr$, it is only
340: possible to estimate changes in the mean spot coverage
341: on the K dwarf disk within the latitude range of
342: $-77\degr$ to $+77\degr$. Recent Doppler imaging observations
343: of \citet{hussain06} revealed that the K dwarf is rotating
344: rigidly; this is confirmed by our determination of
345: $V_{K} \sin i$ (Section~\ref{rotation}).
346: As our run duration was only 2.5 times longer than the
347: time span of the observation used by \citet{hussain06},
348: we expect any changes of filling factor at a given phase to reflect
349: spot rearrangement caused by the star activity rather than
350: the star differential rotation. Also, any spot interpretation
351: can address only the part of the spot coverage
352: which is longitudinally asymmetric.
353:
354: \placefigure{fig4}
355:
356: Our results indicate that the smallest spot coverage
357: occurred during the orbital phases $0.6 - 0.7$,
358: while the largest occurred during $0.2 - 0.3$. We seem
359: to have observed a totally different level of activity
360: in the K dwarf than seen during the Doppler
361: imaging observations by \citet{ramseyer95} and
362: \citet{hussain06}. Our estimate of the peak-to-peak amplitude
363: of the spot filling factor, $0.02 - 0.03$
364: (depending on the assumed spot temperature differential
365: values of $\Delta T = 2,000 - 1,000 \,K$, as shown
366: in Figure~\ref{fig4}), is many times smaller than the
367: changes of $\sim 0.15$ observed by \citet{hussain06}
368: in November 2002. Also, in our data, the maximum spot
369: coverage is inferred close to orbital phase 0.25,
370: while \citet{hussain06} found the maximum around phase 0.07.
371: The {\it evolution\/} of the spot coverage during
372: the 10-day MOST observing run was still smaller,
373: typically at a level of $\leq 0.01$, depending on the phase.
374:
375: \subsection{Eclipse timing}
376: \label{timing}
377:
378: The relatively slow 10-sec photometric sampling rate
379: (compared with the eclipse branch duration of 50 sec) and
380: the temporal gaps left after the data selection made it
381: impossible to measure times of individual eclipses
382: accurate to a few seconds. Instead, we calculated
383: the average eclipse time on the basis of a phased light
384: curve of the entire time series to compare with earlier
385: eclipse times in the literature. The phases were computed
386: with the linear ephemeris given by \citet{guinan01}.
387: Because previous eclipses have been observed over a long
388: time span ($\sim 35$~yr) and the orbital period of the
389: binary is short, we adopted a uniform time system of
390: Heliocentric Julian Date based on the Terrestrial Time (HJED),
391: as advocated by \citet{bastian2000}.
392:
393: The eclipse time was determined after correction
394: of the light curve for the local slope created by the
395: photometric wave. Since all contacts of the eclipse
396: are not well defined (see Figure~\ref{fig5})
397: we determined the intersections of the averaged eclipse
398: branches with horizontal line at the mid-depth level.
399: The mid-point of both intersections corresponds
400: to the mid-point of the eclipse.
401: With the ephemeris of \citet{guinan01},
402: our mean epoch corresponds to $E=25,135$. The shift in
403: the observed time of the mid-point of eclipse is large
404: compared to the predicted zero phase by \citet{guinan01}:
405: $O-C = +248 \pm 7$~seconds, or over 4~minutes
406: (see Figure~\ref{fig5}).
407: The MOST eclipse time determination is shown compared to
408: all available published data (as discussed by
409: \citet{ibanoglu05}) in Figure~\ref{fig6}.
410: The $O-C$ curve continues an upward trend seen for about
411: the last 10,000 orbital cycles. The implications of
412: the MOST timing point are explored below.
413:
414: \placefigure{fig5}
415:
416: \placefigure{fig6}
417:
418: \subsubsection{Third body}
419: \label{third}
420:
421: The V471 Tau period changes visible in the eclipse $O-C$
422: diagram have been interpreted previously by several
423: others as a light-travel-time effect caused by a
424: perturbing third star in a long-period orbit in the system
425: \citep{ibanoglu94,guinan01,ibanoglu05}. This explanation is
426: attractive because it could be reconciled with the
427: main features of the $O-C$ diagram. It is also exciting
428: because the mass of the hypothetical third body would
429: be sub-stellar for a large range of possible inclination angles.
430:
431: Our new eclipse timing measurement shows that the
432: long-anticipated downward bend in the $O-C$ diagram has
433: not yet happened. Moreover, it deviates substantially from
434: the most recent third-body model proposed
435: \citep{ibanoglu05} by 52 sec, which is 3.6 times larger
436: than $\sigma$ of the residuals for this model, as shown in
437: the lower panel of Figure~\ref{fig6}. Indeed, the MOST
438: point is the largest deviation from this model so far
439: observed.
440:
441: Therefore, we decided to recalculate the third-body model
442: utilizing the same formalism as in \citet{ibanoglu05}.
443: With the new data augmented by the MOST result, the
444: semi-amplitude of the $O-C$ variations, the third-body
445: orbital period and its mass function are all slightly larger
446: and longer than those given by \citet{ibanoglu05}; see
447: Table~\ref{tab2} for the full set of fitted parameters.
448: The third-body orbital fit, although formally appropriate,
449: remains uncertain because we still do not see the bend
450: in the $O-C$ curve. In fact, as is shown in Subsection~\ref{sudden}
451: below, it is reasonable to assume that the
452: period has been constant since $E \approx 15,000$,
453: i.e., over the last $\sim14$ years. However, if we continue
454: to see a straight line in future extensions of the
455: $O-C$ diagram, this will not necessarily exclude the
456: third-body hypothesis. Figure~\ref{fig6} includes a
457: fit to a third-body model whose orbit has an even longer
458: period which can still match the observations. Note
459: that the orbital inclination range necessary to preserve
460: the sub-stellar mass of the third body will decrease to
461: a very small range of angles if the current linear trend
462: in the $O-C$ deviations continues.
463:
464: The suggested parameters of the hypothetical third body
465: in the V471~Tau system indicate that this object may
466: be detectable with modern infrared telescopes
467: or interferometers. With a larger mass function and
468: a longer orbital period than in \citet{guinan01},
469: the separation and brightness
470: of the third body can be as large as 0.9 arc second and
471: K $\sim$ 13.3 mag; see Table~\ref{tab6} for predictions
472: of the third body parameters for its
473: different orbital inclinations.
474:
475: \placetable{tab2}
476:
477: \placetable{tab6}
478:
479: \subsubsection{Apsidal motion}
480: \label{apsidal}
481:
482: If the binary orbit is even slightly ellipsoidal, it
483: may show a motion of the line of apses. This explanation was
484: mentioned by \citet{herczeg75} and \citet{skillman88}, but
485: then dismissed as an unlikely cause for the changes
486: in eclipse times. We performed a least-squares fit of the $O-C$
487: curve with the first-order formula given by
488: \citet{todoran72} and found that a very narrow range
489: of eccentricity, $e = 0.0121 \pm 0.0006$ (with 98\%
490: confidence level), is required to explain the latest
491: $O-C$ results we have presented. See Table~\ref{tab3}
492: and Figure~\ref{fig7}. Although the orbit is expected
493: to circularize in a very close binary system like
494: V471~Tau, our fit to a slightly non-zero eccentricity is
495: surprisingly close to the one we find from our radial velocity
496: orbital measurements (see Section~\ref{rv} below).
497:
498: \placetable{tab3}
499:
500: \subsubsection{Sudden period changes}
501: \label{sudden}
502:
503: Without assuming anything about the actual nature of
504: the $O-C$ changes, it may be argued that the curve is
505: composed of a few straight-line segments, each corresponding
506: to a constant period, and of relatively short
507: intervals where abrupt period changes take place. The
508: portions of the $O-C$ diagram from epochs $E \approx
509: 2,500$ to $10,500$ and from $E \approx 15,000$ onwards appear to
510: be consistent with two different constant
511: periods. Least-squares linear fits to both segments of
512: the $O-C$ diagram yield periods of
513: $0.52118305(4)$ and $0.52118384(4)$ days,
514: respectively (the errors in parentheses are given in units
515: of the last decimal place), corresponding to a relative
516: period change of $\Delta P/P \simeq 1.5 \times 10^{-6}$.
517:
518: A sudden period change may be explained as a result
519: of mass transfer or mass loss in a binary.
520: For V471~Tau, we do not know if the possible donor,
521: the K~dwarf, is more massive than the mass recipient, the WD,
522: but this is the most probable \citep{obrien01}.
523: In that case, the favorable scenario of a recent period
524: increase is mass loss at the level of
525: $\sim 3.8 \times 10^{-7} M_{\sun} / yr$ \citep{hilditch01}.
526: Taking the masses of both components at the limits of the
527: \citet{obrien01} ranges we can also consider the case when
528: the donor is the less massive star. Such a situation would require
529: conservative mass transfer at a level of
530: $\sim 3.6 \times 10^{-6} M_{\sun} / yr$
531: to explain the recent period increase.
532: Both mass-loss rates appear to be large and unlikely for V471~Tau
533: as they would result in other detectable phenomena.
534: Moreover, both a period increase and a period decrease
535: have been observed for the system so the complete
536: picture would have to be even more complex.
537:
538: The latest period change took place over some $\Delta E \simeq 2500$
539: cycles so the inferred time scale, $T$, was
540: $T = (d\ln P/dt)^{-1} \simeq 2 \times 10^6$ years.
541: This is a relatively short time scale for any thermal
542: equilibrium adjustment in the K dwarf, but of course may
543: relate only to the outer layers of its envelope.
544:
545: The standard deviation
546: in the residuals of the second segment of
547: $\sigma$ = 22.7~s (Figure~\ref{fig7}) is slightly
548: larger than for any of the previous fits
549: (14.9~s for the third-body model and 16.6~s for
550: the apsidal motion model) but is still acceptable
551: if superimposed upon possible short-timescale variations
552: which are considered below.
553:
554: \placefigure{fig7}
555:
556: \subsubsection{Periodic residuals from eclipse timing models}
557: \label{residuals}
558:
559: Every one of the $O-C$ models we calculated generates
560: residuals with $\sigma$ larger than the accuracy of the
561: eclipse timings (typically a few seconds). We performed a
562: search for periodicities in the residuals and found that
563: regardless of the model used, there is evidence for a 10-year
564: period in the timing residuals.
565:
566: To investigate this further, we decided to employ a multi-harmonic
567: analysis of variance (MAOV) with 2 harmonics,
568: as described in \citet{alex96}. This method uses orthogonal
569: polynomials to model the data and the analysis of
570: variance statistics to evaluate the quality of the result.
571: The MAOV periodogram obeys Fisher's probability distribution
572: with $2N + 1$ and $K - 2N - 1$ degrees of freedom,
573: where $N$ is the number of harmonics used and $K$ is the
574: number of observations. The quantity $F(2N + 1, K - 2N - 1)$
575: shown in Figure~\ref{fig8} measures
576: the ratio of powers of the periodic signal and
577: residual, fully random noise.
578:
579: The amplitude of the variations we find in the $O-C$ residuals
580: is similar for all three models we adopted, at the
581: level of 20--25~s and indeed indicates a typical underlying
582: variation with a time scale of about 10 years. The
583: 5.5-yr period found by \citet{ibanoglu05} -- which was
584: connected with the ${\sim}5$-yr period in the mean
585: brightness variations of the system -- is also present,
586: but at a much lower significance level
587: (see Figure~\ref{fig8}).
588:
589: \placefigure{fig8}
590:
591: \subsection{Short-period oscillations}
592: \label{periodograms}
593:
594: Fluctuations with a period of 555 s were discovered in
595: soft X-ray flux from the V471~Tau system by the
596: EXOSAT satellite \citep{jensen86}. In 1991, 131 hours
597: of continuous U-band photometry of V471~Tau by the
598: Whole Earth Telescope (WET) \citep{clemens92} resulted
599: in the detection of three periods: 554.63, 561.59
600: and 277.319 s. The dominant 555-s variability
601: (with its 277s harmonic) was attributed directly to
602: the accreting magnetic polar caps on the white dwarf component
603: of the system, and the 562s signal to the
604: same radiation reprocessed by the K dwarf atmosphere.
605:
606: To search for short-period variations in the MOST photometry,
607: we first removed variations caused by the binary
608: revolution and rotation of the spotted component.
609: The data were ``rectified" by fitting the data with least-squares
610: low-order polynomials and then dividing by the
611: fitted function. The eclipses and flare events (see
612: Section \ref{flares} below), accounting for about 7\% of
613: the total time series, were excluded from the fit,
614: resulting in a net duty-cycle of 59\%. The
615: remaining 52,371 brightness measurements of the binary,
616: as well as corresponding measurements of both
617: reference stars, were used to calculate MAOV periodograms,
618: as described above in Subsection~\ref{residuals}.
619:
620: Analysis of the resulting periodogram revealed that none of
621: the three WET periods is present in the MOST data,
622: but their absence is easy to understand. While the white
623: dwarf contribution to the total brightness of the system
624: in the $U$ band is about 39\%, it is only 2.3\% in the
625: broad MOST photometric bandpass which includes
626: considerable red flux. Therefore, the relative amplitude of
627: the variations in MOST photometry is expected to be
628: about $17$ times smaller than in WET photometry. The
629: relative signal would be ${\sim}1.8 \times 10^{-4}$,
630: which is slightly below our estimated, one-sigma detection limit of
631: about $2 \times 10^{-4}$ in these data. This value was
632: calculated by folding the data with a period incommensurate
633: with any of the V471 Tau variations and MOST orbital harmonics.
634: The noise estimation was also confirmed with the photometric data
635: of both reference stars.
636:
637: Thus, the non-detection of the white dwarf pulsations
638: in the broad MOST passband is entirely predictable. We can
639: conclude only that the pulse amplitude (and presumably
640: the polar accretion rate) did not increase
641: significantly since the WET campaign in 1991.
642:
643: \subsection{Flare activity}
644: \label{flares}
645:
646: Several flare-like events have been reported in V471~Tau
647: by \citet{rucinski81}, \citet{tunca93}, \citet{ibanoglu05}
648: and others. \citet{young83} found that flares are most
649: likely to occur when the brightness of the system is near
650: its minimum, when the K dwarf was thought to have
651: its most spotted hemisphere facing Earth.
652:
653: In the MOST light curve, we identified seven events we
654: would consider flare-like, although two of them were only
655: partially recorded due to gaps in the data.
656: This is the first detection of white-light flares
657: by the MOST satellite and probably the largest homogeneous
658: set of V471 Tau flare-like events observed so far. The durations of
659: these events varied from about 10 to over 35 minutes,
660: but their shapes all share the same rapid rise and slower
661: decay characteristic of flares seen in visible light.
662: The candidate events are shown in Figure~\ref{fig9}.
663:
664: \placefigure{fig9}
665:
666: \placetable{tab4}
667:
668: In contrast to \citet{young83}, we did not find any correlation
669: of the flare events with the photometric wave minimum.
670: The flares occurred during phases of the lowest as well
671: as the highest spottedness of the K dwarf, with no apparent
672: concentration in phase. The symbols at the bottom of
673: Figure~\ref{fig4} mark the phases when the flares occurred.
674: Using luminosities of both components in the $V$ band given
675: by \citet{obrien01}, we estimated a lower limit to the
676: energy released during the whole duration of a typical
677: flare observed during the MOST run at about $10^{34}$~erg
678: (see Table~\ref{tab4}). The energies of each of the seven
679: flares we observed are comparable to the energy released by
680: the flare reported by \citet{ibanoglu05} and are at the
681: top of the range of energies released by all flare-like events
682: reported for V471 Tau.
683: Because the activity cycle of V471~Tau still remains to
684: be characterized in terms of its period and intensity,
685: we cannot relate the observed incidence of flares to
686: the phase in this cycle. We note only that
687: all the observed flares share the shape, duration and energy
688: with those reported for typical RS~CVn systems.
689:
690: The number of detected flare-like events corresponds
691: to a total number of about 10 such events during the 10-day span
692: of the MOST observations. Considering the limitations
693: of ground-based observations one would expect to be able to detect
694: a maximum of 4 flare-like events during the same period of time.
695:
696: \section{INTERPRETING THE SPECTRA}
697: \label{interpret-sp}
698:
699: The typical S/N of the DDO spectra of V471~Tau is about 30.
700: The contribution of the white dwarf component to the
701: total light in the observed wavelength range is less than 1\%,
702: so its contributions to the spectroscopic analyses
703: described below are negligible. Our discussion of the
704: spectroscopic results is limited to the K dwarf in the system.
705:
706: \subsection{Radial velocities}
707: \label{rv}
708:
709: To derive the radial velocities (RV) of the K dwarf, we
710: used the Broadening Function (BF) technique \citep{rucinski99}.
711: Spectra of four different K-type standard stars
712: (HD~62509, HD~65583, HD~3765, HD~103095) were adopted as
713: templates. The resulting broadening functions were fitted
714: by a rotational line-broadening profile, with a linear
715: limb-darkening coefficient of 0.52 (assumed to be typical
716: for a K-type dwarf in the observed wavelength range),
717: following \citet{vanhamme93}. The resulting RV measurements
718: are listed in Table~\ref{tab1}.
719:
720: We performed two independent least-squares fits to the
721: radial velocities, assuming first a circular and then an eccentric
722: orbit, at a fixed orbital period as given
723: by \citet{guinan01}, but with the time of conjunction taken from
724: the MOST light curve. The results of the fits and
725: their residuals are plotted in Figure~\ref{fig10}. The quality of
726: both fits, evaluated by calculating the standard
727: deviations of the residuals, is essentially identical for both types of
728: orbits, with ${\sigma} \simeq 1.25$~km~s$^{-1}$.
729: The fact that $\sigma$ is not reduced for a model with
730: more free parameters suggests that the eccentric orbit
731: solution is not necessary \citep{lucy71}, although obviously
732: this is not a proof for perfect circularity of the V471~Tau orbit.
733:
734: \placefigure{fig10}
735:
736: \placetable{tab5}
737:
738: All our orbital model parameters (Table~\ref{tab5})
739: agree very well with those obtained recently by
740: \citet{hussain06}, but they deviate slightly from those
741: obtained previously with the same DDO 1.88-m
742: telescope by \citet{bois88}. The amplitude we find is
743: larger by about $1.5 - 2$~km~s$^{-1}$, and the center-of-mass
744: radial velocity is about 2~km~s$^{-1}$ smaller.
745:
746: \subsection{Projected rotation velocity}
747: \label{rotation}
748:
749: A bonus of the BF analysis is the availability of the
750: projected rotation profile of the star onto radial velocity space
751: (Figure~\ref{fig11}). This shape
752: can be interpreted through a solid-body rotation to
753: estimate the projected equatorial velocity
754: $V_{K} \sin i$. In the BF determination, we used HD~3765 as a
755: standard star because its spectral type, K2V, is
756: identical to that of the V471~Tau K dwarf. An average of the
757: projected rotational velocities for all spectra is
758: $V_K \sin i = 91.9 \pm 2.5$~km~s$^{-1}$. The value is corrected
759: for the broadening introduced by the method, the
760: magnitude of which can be estimated by applying the BF
761: method to the template itself. The result is consistent
762: with previous estimates made by \citet{ramseyer95} and
763: \citet{hussain06} ($91 \pm 4$ and $91 \pm 2$ km~s$^{-1}$,
764: respectively) and all are consistent with synchronous
765: rotation of the K dwarf in V471~Tau.
766:
767: \placefigure{fig11}
768:
769: \subsection{$H\alpha$ emission}
770: \label{halpha}
771:
772: The $H\alpha$ line was detected in emission in V471~Tau
773: by \citet{lanning76}. Subsequent detailed studies
774: \citep{young88, bois91, rottler02} revealed orbital
775: phase-dependence of the emission as well as long-term
776: changes of its equivalent width.
777:
778: We extracted the $H\alpha$ emission from the absorption
779: profiles of our spectra by again using the standard
780: star HD~3765 as a template. HD~3765 has the same spectral
781: type as the V471~Tau K dwarf and rotates very slowly
782: at $V \sin i \simeq 1$~km~s$^{-1}$ \citep{soderblom85}.
783: We convolved the standard spectrum with the
784: rotational profile calculated for $V_K \sin i = 92$~km~s$^{-1}$
785: (our value for V471~Tau) and fitted the resulting
786: modified spectrum to each of our V471~Tau spectra in
787: two wavelength ranges: $6540 - 6555$~\AA\ and $6570
788: - 6585$~\AA\ (see Figures~\ref{fig3} and \ref{fig12}).
789: Subsequently, we used the net $H\alpha$
790: emission to derive the radial velocities and equivalent
791: widths of the emission line (Table~\ref{tab1}).
792: The extracted $H\alpha$ profiles were symmetrical
793: thus allowing us to use a Gaussian fit for measuring RV
794: and numerical integration for equivalent widths.
795: The radial velocity of the $H\alpha$ emission
796: (Figure~\ref{fig13}) follows the K dwarf orbital
797: variations, but with a smaller amplitude of about
798: 120~km~s$^{-1}$, as estimated from a sinusoidal fit. Such
799: behavior was observed during 1975 -- 1984 by
800: \citet{bois91}, but with a still much smaller amplitude of $\sim 75$~
801: km~s$^{-1}$. We observe that the $H\alpha$ equivalent
802: width changes symmetrically with respect to its
803: maximum at orbital phase 0.5 (Figure~\ref{fig13}),
804: in a very similar way to what was reported by \citet{bois91}.
805: The amplitude of the equivalent width variability in
806: our data is about 1.2~\AA\, with
807: the maximum emission of about $-0.5$~\AA\ at phase 0.5.
808:
809: \placefigure{fig12}
810:
811: \placefigure{fig13}
812:
813: Long-term changes of $H\alpha$ emission were detected
814: by \citet{bois91}, who showed that the emission
815: strength diminished between 1975 and 1983 and then grew
816: rapidly in 1984. More recent observations by
817: \citet{rottler02} have shown that since 1985, the emission
818: was dropping again, until it finally vanished in
819: 1992. This suggests that the long-term variation in
820: $H\alpha$ emission strength may be periodic, with a
821: period of roughly 9~years. Our measurements show
822: that in December 2005, the emission strength was
823: comparable to its average values in the past. This is
824: consistent with a 9-year periodicity, since our
825: DDO spectra were obtained about 2~years after the latest
826: expected emission maximum in such a cycle.
827:
828:
829: \section{SUMMARY}
830: \label{summary}
831:
832: The nearly continuous MOST spacebased photometry of
833: V471~Tau covering 10 days in December 2005,
834: combined with partly simultaneous DDO groundbased
835: spectroscopy, monitored a fairly quiescent stage
836: in the activity of the K dwarf in this close binary system.
837: This is apparent in the light curve which deviates
838: relatively little from the model
839: and almost does not change during the whole observing run.
840: Even during such a stable time, seven candidate
841: flare events were observed in 10 days, whose estimated
842: energies would be among the highest ever seen
843: in V471~Tau. There is no correlation between the times
844: of the flares and orbital phase.
845:
846: The main features of the orbital phase diagram of the
847: MOST photometry are well reproduced by our eclipsing
848: binary light curve synthesis model. The largest systematic
849: deviation in the double-wave light curve is only
850: about $0.02 - 0.03$ mag and is consistent with spots
851: on the K dwarf which is expected to rotate
852: synchronously with the orbit. The amount of spottedness
853: on the star did not change much during the MOST
854: observing run -- by no more than about 1\%. This supports the
855: claim that the K dwarf was observed close to a
856: minimum in its activity cycle. A half-orbital-period modulation
857: of the radial velocity residuals was reported
858: earlier by \citet{hussain06} and interpreted as an asymmetry in
859: spot distribution on the K star's surface. We
860: see no such residuals in our radial velocity measurements.
861: We note that the residuals seen by
862: \citet{hussain06}, the radial velocity curve we obtain, and
863: the $O-C$ variations in eclipse times observed over
864: the past 35 years, could all be interpreted as a small
865: non-zero eccentricity of the orbit of V471~Tau.
866:
867: Because of the broad bandpass of the MOST photometry
868: with substantial flux in the red, and the red
869: wavelength range of the DDO spectra, the white dwarf
870: contributes only about 2\% and 1\% of the total intensity of the
871: system, respectively. We were therefore unable to
872: constrain the properties of the hot white dwarf in
873: the system or confirm the oscillation frequencies detected by
874: WET \citep{clemens92}, since the relative
875: amplitudes in the custom-filter, broadband MOST photometry would
876: be about 17 times smaller than in the WET
877: $U$-band photometry. The positive aspect of this is that
878: our estimates of the K dwarf properties from MOST
879: photometry and DDO spectroscopy are not contaminated by
880: the white dwarf, but we can use the timing of
881: the white dwarf eclipses to investigate aspects of the
882: orbit of the V471~Tau system.
883:
884: Changes in the $O-C$ values of the times of eclipse of
885: the white dwarf can, however, be explained by at
886: least three entirely different models: (1)~There could have been at
887: least two abrupt period changes in the orbit
888: of the system in the last 35 years, although there is no
889: obvious mechanism for this. (2)~There could be
890: apsidal motion due to a slightly eccentric orbit.
891: (3)~The V471~Tau system might be a trinary, with a third
892: low-mass companion in a long-period orbit. The last two
893: periodic phenomena both predict that the $O-C$ eclipse timing
894: deviations must drop in the future (see Figure \ref{fig7}).
895: The small eccentricity which could
896: explain the $O-C$ diagram is also in agreement with the
897: formal solution of the radial velocity curve of the K
898: dwarf from our high-quality DDO spectra, but its value
899: is currently below the direct spectroscopic detection threshold.
900: Future accurate eclipse timing observations, such as performed
901: by the MOST satellite, are desired as they may resolve
902: the dilemma between those three models.
903:
904: The $O-C$ residuals do show a convincing residual periodic
905: variation with a period of about 10 years,
906: regardless of the model used to explain the longer-term changes.
907: This variation may be due to an activity
908: cycle in the K dwarf, but this is a highly speculative
909: explanation. We note that the $H\alpha$ emission
910: appears to change in intensity in a characteristic time
911: scale of about 9 years, perhaps coincident with the
912: periodicity in eclipse time variations at the frequency
913: resolution of the entire data sample at hand.
914: The 10-year period in the $O-C$ residuals may also be
915: related with the 5.5-year period in the system mean brightness variations
916: found by \citet{ibanoglu05} as its multiple. Nevertheless we think
917: that both periods are too uncertain to firmly connect them
918: at this stage of the study of V471 Tau.
919:
920: The DDO spectra yield a new radial velocity curve for the
921: orbit of the K dwarf, and an improved determination
922: of the projected rotation of the star, $V \sin i = 92$ km~s$^{-1}$
923: based on high-quality BF (broadening function)
924: profiles. The spectra also enabled us to measure the
925: $H\alpha$ emission velocities and changes in its
926: equivalent width. The $H\alpha$ emission of V471~Tau
927: showed the same orbital phase dependence as
928: observed before by \citet{bois91} and \citet{rottler02}
929: with maximum emission at phase ${\sim}0.5$. The
930: observed amplitude of equivalent width variations of
931: about 1.2~\AA\ was average for the system and
932: consistent with the 9-year period noted by previous
933: investigators. Unfortunately, the 13-year gap between
934: the most recent published $H\alpha$ emission observations
935: of V471~Tau and our new DDO observations
936: does not allow us to reliably verify the periodic character
937: of the mean emission strength variation.
938:
939: A new feature of the $H\alpha$ emission revealed by
940: our observations was its much larger amplitude of
941: radial velocity variation (120~km~s$^{-1}$)
942: compared to that reported by earlier observers
943: (75~km~s$^{-1}$ by \citet{bois91}).
944: This suggests that the source of the emission was less
945: concentrated around the sub-white-dwarf point on the
946: K star as had been seen in the previous data.
947:
948:
949: \acknowledgements
950:
951: The research of SMR, JMM, DBG, AFJM, DS and GAHW
952: was supported by grants from NSERC
953: (Natural Sciences and Engineering Council) Canada.
954: WWW is supported by the Aeronautics and Space Agency of FFG
955: and the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) P17580.
956: RK is supported by the Canadian Space Agency
957: through a contract with UBC.
958: AFJM is supported from FQRNT (Quebec).
959: KK appreciates the hospitality
960: and support of the local staff during his stay
961: at DDO. Special thanks are due to the DDO Telescope Operators,
962: Heide DeBond and Jim Thomson, for
963: help with the spectroscopic observations, and to MOST
964: Satellite Operators, Alex Beattie, Jamie Wells
965: and Ron Wessels.
966:
967:
968: \begin{thebibliography}{}
969:
970:
971: %\bibitem[Aslanov \& Khruzina(1988)]{aslanov88}
972: % Aslanov, A. A., Khruzina, T. S.
973: % 1988, \azh, 65, 194
974:
975: %\bibitem[Applegate(1992)]{applegate92}
976: % Applegate, J. H.
977: % 1992, \apj, 385, 621
978:
979: \bibitem[Bastian(2000)]{bastian2000}
980: Bastian, U.
981: 2000, Inf.\ Bull.\ Var.\ Stars, 4822
982:
983: %\bibitem[Beavers et al.(1979)]{beavers79}
984: % Beavers, W. I., Oesper, D. A., Pierce, J. R.
985: % 1979, \apj, 230, L187
986:
987: %\bibitem[Beavers et al.(1986)]{beavers86}
988: % Beavers, W. I., Herczeg T. J., Lui, A.
989: % 1986, \apj, 300, 785
990:
991: \bibitem[Bois et al.(1988)]{bois88}
992: Bois, B., Lanning, H. H., Mochnacki, S. W.
993: 1988, \aj, 96, 157
994:
995: \bibitem[Bois et al.(1991)]{bois91}
996: Bois, B., Lanning, H. H., Mochnacki, S. W.
997: 1991, \aj, 102, 6
998:
999: %\bibitem[Bond et al.(2001)]{bond01}
1000: % Bond, H. E., Mullan, D. J., O'Brien, M. S., Sion, E. M.
1001: % 2001, \apj, 560, 919
1002:
1003: %\bibitem[Bradley et al.(1992)]{bradley92}
1004: % Bradley, P. A., Winget, D. E., Wood, M. A.
1005: % 1992, \apjl, 391, L33
1006:
1007: %\bibitem[Cester \& Pucillo(1976)]{cester76}
1008: % Cester, B., Pucillo, M.
1009: % 1976, \aap, 46, 197
1010:
1011: \bibitem[Chabrier et al.(2000)]{chabrier02}
1012: Chabrier, G., Baraffe, I., Allard, F., Hauschildt, P.
1013: 2000, \apj, 542, 464
1014:
1015: \bibitem[Clemens et al.(1992)]{clemens92}
1016: Clemens, J. C., Nather, R. E., Winget, D. E., Robinson, E. L.,
1017: Wood, M. A., Claver, C. F., Provencal, J., Kleinman, S. J.,
1018: Bradley, P. A., Frueh, M. L., Grauer, A. D., Hine, B. P.,
1019: Fontaine, G., Achilleos, N., Wickramasinghe, D. T.,
1020: Marar, T. M. K., Seetha, S., Ashoka, B. N., O'Donoghue, D.,
1021: Warner, B., Kurtz, D. W., Martinez, P.,
1022: Vauclair, G., Chevreton, M., Barstow, M. A., Kanaan, A., Kepler, S. O.,
1023: Augusteijn, T., van Paradijs, J., Hansen, C. J.
1024: 1992, \apj, 391, 773
1025:
1026: %\bibitem[Evren te al.(1986)]{evren86}
1027: % Evren, S., Ibanoglu, C., Tunca, Z., Tumer, O.
1028: % 1986, \apss, 120, 97
1029:
1030: %\bibitem[Gillmozi \& Muldin(1983)]{gillmozi83}
1031: % Gillmozi, R., Muldin, P.
1032: % 1983, \mnras, 202, 587
1033:
1034: \bibitem[Guinan \& Ribas(2001)]{guinan01}
1035: Guinan, E. F., Ribas, I.
1036: 2001, \apj, 546, L43
1037:
1038: %\bibitem[Guinan \& Sion(1981)]{guinan81}
1039: % Guinan, E. F., Sion, E. M.
1040: % 1981, Inf.\ Bull.\ Var.\ Stars, No. 1922
1041:
1042: %\bibitem[Hamzaoglu(1981)]{hamzaoglu81}
1043: % Hamzaoglu, E.
1044: % 1981, \aap, 104, 65
1045:
1046: %\bibitem[Hazmaoglu \& Sabbadin(1982)]{hamzaoglu82}
1047: % Hamzaoglu, E., Sabbadin, F.
1048: % 1982, Inf.\ Bull.\ Var.\ Stars, No. 2092
1049:
1050: \bibitem[Herczeg(1975)]{herczeg75}
1051: Herczeg, T. J.
1052: 1975, Inf.\ Bull.\ Var.\ Stars, No. 1076
1053:
1054: \bibitem[Hilditch(2001)]{hilditch01}
1055: Hilditch, R. W.
1056: 2001, ``An Introduction to Close Binary Stars'',
1057: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
1058:
1059: \bibitem[Hussain et al.(2006)]{hussain06}
1060: Hussain, G. A. J., Allende Prieto, C., Saar, S. H., Still, M.
1061: 2006, \mnras, 367, 1699
1062:
1063: \bibitem[Ibanoglu(1978)]{ibanoglu78}
1064: Ibanoglu, C.
1065: 1978, \apss, 57, 219
1066:
1067: \bibitem[Ibanoglu(1989)]{ibanoglu89}
1068: Ibanoglu, C.
1069: 1989, \apss, 161, 221
1070:
1071: \bibitem[Ibanoglu et al.(1994)]{ibanoglu94}
1072: Ibanoglu, C., Keskin, V., Akan, M. C., Evren, S., Tunca, Z.
1073: 1994, \aap, 281, 811
1074:
1075: \bibitem[Ibanoglu et al.(2005)]{ibanoglu05}
1076: Ibanoglu, C., Evren, S., Tas, G., Cakirli, O.
1077: 2005, \mnras, 360, 1077
1078:
1079: \bibitem[Jensen et al.(1986)]{jensen86}
1080: Jensen, K. A., Swank, J. H., Petre, R., Guinan, E. F.,
1081: Sion, E. M., Shipman, H. L.
1082: 1986, \apj, 309, L27
1083:
1084: \bibitem[Lanning \& Etzel(1976)]{lanning76}
1085: Lanning, H. H., Etzel, P. B.
1086: 1976, Inf.\ Bull.\ Var.\ Stars, No. 1147
1087:
1088: %\bibitem[Lanning \& Pesch(1981)]{lanning81}
1089: % Lanning, H. H., Pesch, P.
1090: % 1981, \apj, 244, 280
1091:
1092: %\bibitem[Lanza et al.(1998)]{lanza98}
1093: % Lanza, A. F., Rodono, M., Rosner, R.
1094: % 1998, \mnras, 296, 893
1095:
1096: %\bibitem[Lanza(2005)]{lanza05}
1097: % Lanza, A. F.
1098: % 2005, \mnras, 364, 238
1099:
1100: \bibitem[Lucy \& Sweeney(1971)]{lucy71}
1101: Lucy, L.~B., Sweeney, M.~A.
1102: 1971, \aj, 76, 544
1103:
1104: \bibitem[Matthews et al.(2004)]{matthews2004}
1105: Matthews, J. M., Kuschnig, R., Guenther, D. B.,
1106: Walker, G. A. H., Moffat, A. F. J., Rucinski, S. M.,
1107: Sasselov, D., Weiss, W. W.
1108: 2004, Nature, 430, 921
1109:
1110: \bibitem[Moffat (1969)]{moffat69}
1111: Moffat, A. F. J.,
1112: 1969, \aap, 3, 455
1113:
1114: %\bibitem[Mullan et al.(1991)]{mullan91}
1115: % Mullan, D. J., Shipman, H. L., Sion, E. M., MacDonald, J.
1116: % 1991, \apj, 347, 707
1117:
1118: %\bibitem[Nelson \& Young(1976)]{nelson76}
1119: % Nelson, B., Young, A.
1120: % 1976, ``IAU Symp. 73: Structure and Evolution of
1121: % Close Binary Systems'', 141
1122:
1123: %\bibitem[Nelson \& Young(1970)]{nelson70}
1124: % Nelson, B., Young, A.
1125: % 1970, \pasp, 82, 699
1126:
1127: \bibitem[O'Brien et al.(2001)]{obrien01}
1128: O'Brien, M. S., Bond, H. E., Sion, E. M.
1129: 2001, \apj, 563, 971
1130:
1131: \bibitem[Pr\v{s}a \& Zwitter(2005)]{prsa05}
1132: Pr\v{s}a, A., Zwitter, T.
1133: 2005, \apj, 628, 426
1134:
1135: \bibitem[Ramseyer et al.(1995)]{ramseyer95}
1136: Ramseyer, T. F., Hatzes, A. P., Jablonski, F.
1137: 1995, \aj, 110, 3
1138:
1139: %\bibitem[Robinson et al.(1988)]{robinson88}
1140: % Robinson, E. L., Clemens, J. C., Hine, B. P.
1141: % 1988, \apj, 331, L29
1142:
1143: \bibitem[Rowe et al.(2006)]{rowe06}
1144: Rowe, J.~F., Matthews, J.~M., Seager, S., Kuschnig, R.,
1145: Guenther, D.~B., Moffat, A.~F.~J., Rucinski, S.~M., Sasselov, D.,
1146: Walker, G.~A.~H., Weiss, W.~W.
1147: 2006, \apj, 646, 1241
1148: %Memorie della Societa Astronomica Italiana, 77, 282
1149:
1150: \bibitem[Rottler et al.(2002)]{rottler02}
1151: Rottler, L., Batalha, C., Young, A., Vogt, S.
1152: 2002, \aap, 392, 535
1153:
1154: \bibitem[Rucinski(1981)]{rucinski81}
1155: Rucinski, S.~M.
1156: 1981, \actaa, 31, 37
1157:
1158: \bibitem[Rucinski(1999)]{rucinski99}
1159: Rucinski, S.~M.
1160: 1999, in ASP Conf. Ser. 185, Precise Stellar Radial Velocities,
1161: ed. J. B. Hearnshaw \& C. D. Scarfe (San Francisco: ASP), 82
1162:
1163: %\bibitem[Rucinski et al.(2004)]{rucinski04}
1164: % Rucinski, S.~M., Walker, G.~A.~H., Matthews, J.~M.,
1165: % Kuschnig, R., Shkolnik, E., Marchenko, S., Bohlender, D.~A.,
1166: % Guenther, D.~B., Moffat, A.~F.~J., Sasselov, D., Weiss, W.~W.
1167: % 2004, \pasp, 116, 1093
1168:
1169: \bibitem[Schwarzenberg-Czerny(1996)]{alex96}
1170: Schwarzenberg-Czerny, A.
1171: 1996, \apjl, 406, 107
1172:
1173: \bibitem[Skillman \& Patterson(1988)]{skillman88}
1174: Skillman, D. R., Patterson, J.
1175: 1988, \aj, 96, 976
1176:
1177: \bibitem[Soderblom(1985)]{soderblom85}
1178: Soderblom, D. R.
1179: 1985, \aj, 90, 10
1180:
1181: \bibitem[Still \& Hussain(2003)]{still03}
1182: Still, M., Hussain, G.
1183: 2003, \apj, 597, 1059
1184:
1185: \bibitem[Todoran(1972)]{todoran72}
1186: Todoran, I.
1187: 1972, \apss, 15, 229
1188:
1189: \bibitem[Tunca et al.(1993)]{tunca93}
1190: Tunca, Z., Keskin, V., Evren, S., Ibanoglu, C., Akan, M. C.
1191: 1993, \apss, 204, 297
1192:
1193: %\bibitem[Van Buren(1986)]{vanburen86}
1194: % Van Buren, D.
1195: % 1986, \aj, 306, 538
1196:
1197: \bibitem[van Hamme(1993)]{vanhamme93}
1198: van Hamme, W.
1199: 1993, \aj, 106, 2096
1200:
1201: \bibitem[Walker et al.(2003)]{walker2003}
1202: Walker, G., Matthews, J., Kuschnig, R., Johnson, R.,
1203: Rucinski, S., Pazder, J., Burley, G., Walker, A.,
1204: Skaret, K., Zee, R., Grocott, S., Carroll, K.,
1205: Sinclair, P., Sturgeon, D., Harron, J.
1206: 2003, \pasp, 115, 1023
1207:
1208: %\bibitem[Warner et al.(1971)]{warner71}
1209: % Warner, B., Robinson, E. L., Nather, R. E.
1210: % 1971, \mnras, 154, 455
1211:
1212: \bibitem[Werner \& Rauch(1997)]{werner97}
1213: Werner, K., Rauch, T.
1214: 1997, \aap, 324, L25
1215:
1216: %\bibitem[Wilson(1953)]{wilson53}
1217: % Wilson, R. E.
1218: % 1953, "General Catalogue of Stellar Radial Velocities",
1219: % carnegie Inst., Washington D.C, Publ.~601.
1220:
1221: %\bibitem[Young(1976)]{young76}
1222: % Young, A.
1223: % 1976, \apj, 205, 182
1224:
1225: \bibitem[Young et al.(1983)]{young83}
1226: Young, A., Klimke, A., Africano, J. L., Quigley, R.,
1227: Radick, R. R., Van Buren, D.
1228: 1983, \apj, 267, 655
1229:
1230: \bibitem[Young et al.(1988)]{young88}
1231: Young, A., Skumanich, A., Paylor, V.
1232: 1988, \apj, 334, 397
1233:
1234: %\bibitem[Young \& Capps(1971)]{young71}
1235: % Young, A., Capps, R. W.
1236: % 1971, \apj, 166, L81
1237:
1238: %\bibitem[Young \& Nelson(1972)]{young72}
1239: % Young, A., Nelson, B.
1240: % 1972, \apj, 173, 653
1241:
1242: \end{thebibliography}
1243:
1244:
1245:
1246:
1247: \clearpage
1248:
1249:
1250: % table 1 -----------------------------------------------------------------
1251:
1252: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccccc}
1253:
1254: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1255: %\tabletypesize{\small}
1256: %\tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
1257: \tablewidth{0pt}
1258:
1259: \tablecaption{Spectroscopic observations.
1260: \label{tab1}}
1261: \tablehead{
1262: \colhead{No.} &
1263: \colhead{$HJED - 2,453,700$} &
1264: \colhead{photometric} &
1265: \colhead{S/N} &
1266: \colhead{$V_{rad}$} &
1267: \colhead{$H\alpha$ EW} &
1268: \colhead{$v_{rad}$ of $H\alpha$} \\
1269: \colhead{} &
1270: \colhead{} &
1271: \colhead{phase} &
1272: \colhead{} &
1273: \colhead{(km~s$^{-1}$)} &
1274: \colhead{(\AA)} &
1275: \colhead{net emission (km~s$^{-1}$)}
1276: }
1277: \startdata
1278: 1 & 17.58275 & 0.5162 & 30 & 16.8 & -0.578 & 42 \\
1279: 2 & 17.71561 & 0.7717 & 30 & -113.2 & 0.183 & -77 \\
1280: 3 & 17.72632 & 0.7922 & 30 & -108.3 & 0.249 & -57 \\
1281: 4 & 17.73841 & 0.8154 & 30 & -101.1 & 0.361 & -77 \\
1282: 5 & 17.74935 & 0.8364 & 30 & -91.2 & 0.407 & -70 \\
1283: 6 & 17.76196 & 0.8606 & 30 & -78.8 & 0.493 & -22 \\
1284: 7 & 17.77283 & 0.8815 & 30 & -66.3 & 0.620 & -7 \\
1285: 8 & 17.78482 & 0.9045 & 12 & -50.3 & 0.801 & -11 \\
1286: 9 & 17.79554 & 0.9250 & 30 & -31.3 & 0.727 & -7 \\
1287: 10 & 17.80788 & 0.9487 & 30 & -12.4 & 0.789 & 36 \\
1288: 11 & 17.81871 & 0.9695 & 8 & 12.2 & 0.745 & 15 \\
1289: 12 & 17.83145 & 0.9939 & 8 & 31.0 & 0.538 & 57 \\
1290: 13 & 18.48312 & 0.2443 & 20 & 184.8 & 0.165 & 167 \\
1291: 14 & 18.49374 & 0.2647 & 30 & 184.2 & 0.103 & 186 \\
1292: 15 & 18.50572 & 0.2877 & 30 & 183.2 & 0.025 & 168 \\
1293: 16 & 18.51648 & 0.3083 & 30 & 176.1 & -0.050 & 166 \\
1294: 17 & 18.52928 & 0.3329 & 30 & 165.2 & -0.143 & 159 \\
1295: 18 & 18.54004 & 0.3535 & 30 & 157.4 & -0.207 & 141 \\
1296: 19 & 18.55221 & 0.3768 & 30 & 142.2 & -0.278 & 147 \\
1297: 20 & 18.56299 & 0.3975 & 30 & 127.6 & -0.375 & 129 \\
1298: 21 & 18.57489 & 0.4203 & 30 & 107.5 & -0.411 & 110 \\
1299: 22 & 18.58558 & 0.4409 & 30 & 91.8 & -0.485 & 92 \\
1300: 23 & 18.59955 & 0.4677 & 30 & 63.3 & -0.535 & 81 \\
1301: 24 & 18.61024 & 0.4882 & 30 & 44.4 & -0.544 & 62 \\
1302: 25 & 18.62229 & 0.5113 & 30 & 22.4 & -0.485 & 42 \\
1303: 26 & 18.63295 & 0.5318 & 30 & 4.8 & -0.520 & 26 \\
1304: 27 & 18.64494 & 0.5548 & 30 & -16.4 & -0.388 & 18 \\
1305: 28 & 18.65570 & 0.5754 & 30 & -34.7 & -0.319 & 3 \\
1306: 29 & 18.66658 & 0.5976 & 15 & -52.8 & -0.298 & -22 \\
1307: 30 & 18.67986 & 0.6218 & 30 & -70.3 & -0.135 & -25 \\
1308: 31 & 18.69057 & 0.6423 & 30 & -84.7 & -0.102 & -63 \\
1309: 32 & 18.70082 & 0.6635 & 30 & -92.5 & -0.121 & -42 \\
1310: 33 & 23.79578 & 0.4377 & 30 & 91.5 & -0.393 & 100 \\
1311: 34 & 23.80649 & 0.4583 & 30 & 75.0 & -0.447 & 90 \\
1312: 35 & 23.81862 & 0.4816 & 10 & 53.2 & -0.394 & 61 \\
1313: 36 & 23.82925 & 0.5020 & 10 & 32.9 & -0.440 & 55 \\
1314: 37 & 23.84138 & 0.5252 & 20 & 6.5 & -0.403 & 35 \\
1315: \enddata
1316: \end{deluxetable}
1317:
1318: % table 2 ---------------------------------------------------------------
1319:
1320: \begin{deluxetable}{ll}
1321:
1322: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1323: %\tabletypesize{\small}
1324: %\tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
1325: \tablewidth{0pt}
1326:
1327: \tablecaption{The best fit parameters for a third body model.
1328: \label{tab2}}
1329: \tablehead{
1330: \colhead{parameter} &
1331: \colhead{value}
1332: }
1333: \startdata
1334: $T_{0}$ (HJED) & $2440610.06446\: \pm \:0.00008$ \\ % wzgledem Ibanoglu 2005
1335: $P_{0}$ (d) & $0.521183449\: \pm \:0.000000008$ \\ %
1336: $P_{3}$ (yr) & $33.7\: \pm \:0.9$ \\ % wieksze o 1.3
1337: $a_{12} \sin(i_{3})$ (AU) & $0.32\: \pm \:0.02$ \\ % wieksze o 0.16
1338: semiamplitude (sec) & $159\: \pm \:6$ \\ % wieksze o 8
1339: $e$ & $0.28\: \pm \:0.09$ \\ % mniejsze o 0.02
1340: $\omega_{3}$ (degr) & $79\: \pm \:10$ \\ % wieksze o 6
1341: $f(M_{3})$ ($M_{\sun}$) & $(2.9 \pm 0.3) \cdot 10^{-5}$ \\ % wieksze o 0.2
1342: \enddata
1343: \tablecomments{The errors were estimated
1344: using the bootstrap sampling method for the 98\% confidence level;
1345: this is why they appear to be large when compared to other fits,
1346: for example by \citet{ibanoglu05}.}
1347:
1348: \end{deluxetable}
1349:
1350: % table 3 ----------------------------------------------------------------
1351:
1352: \begin{deluxetable}{ll}
1353:
1354: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1355: %\tabletypesize{\small}
1356: %\tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
1357: \tablewidth{0pt}
1358:
1359: \tablecaption{The best fit parameters for the orbital apsidal motion.
1360: \label{tab3}}
1361: \tablehead{
1362: \colhead{parameter} &
1363: \colhead{value}
1364: }
1365: \startdata
1366: $P$ (day) & $38.884\: \pm \:0.007$ \\
1367: semiamplitude (sec) & $173\: \pm \:9$ \\
1368: $e$ & $0.0121\: \pm \:0.0006$ \\
1369: $\omega_{0}$ (degr) & $174\: \pm \:3$ \\
1370: $\omega_{1}$ (degr/day) & $0.025348\: \pm \:0.000005$ \\
1371: \enddata
1372: \end{deluxetable}
1373:
1374: % table 4 --------------------------------------------------------------
1375:
1376: \begin{deluxetable}{cccccc}
1377:
1378: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1379: %\tabletypesize{\small}
1380: %\tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
1381: \tablewidth{0pt}
1382:
1383: \tablecaption{A list of flare-like events observed by MOST.
1384: %between December 4 and December 14, 2005.
1385: \label{tab4}}
1386: \tablehead{
1387: \colhead{nr} &
1388: \colhead{start time (HJED)} &
1389: \colhead{phase} &
1390: \colhead{duration (min)} &
1391: \colhead{$\Delta I_{max}$} &
1392: \colhead{$E_{min}$ (erg)}
1393: }
1394: \startdata
1395: 1 & 2453709.164 & 0.379 & 19 & 0.014 & $9.8\cdot 10^{33}$ \\
1396: 2 & 2453709.351 & 0.738 & 12 & 0.014 & $3.2\cdot 10^{33}$ \\
1397: 3* & 2453710.59 & 0.12 & $>16$ & $>0.016$ & $>1.8\cdot 10^{34}$ \\
1398: 4 & 2453711.345 & 0.564 & 13 & 0.011 & $1.0\cdot 10^{34}$ \\
1399: 5 & 2453714.770 & 0.135 & 36 & 0.018 & $2.9\cdot 10^{34}$ \\
1400: 6* & 2453717.01 & 0.43 & $>33$ & 0.018 & $>4.4\cdot 10^{34}$ \\
1401: 7 & 2453718.156 & 0.632 & 10 & 0.017 & $1.9\cdot 10^{34}$ \\
1402: \enddata
1403: \tablecomments{$E_{min}$ designates the lower limit for total energy
1404: released in the $V$ band. The flares marked with a star were
1405: observed only partially.}
1406: \end{deluxetable}
1407:
1408: % table 5 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
1409:
1410: \begin{deluxetable}{ccc}
1411:
1412: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1413: %\tabletypesize{\small}
1414: %\tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
1415: \tablewidth{0pt}
1416:
1417: \tablecaption{Parameters of spectroscopic orbits.
1418: \label{tab5}}
1419: \tablehead{
1420: \colhead{parameter} &
1421: \colhead{circular orbit} &
1422: \colhead{eccentric orbit}
1423: }
1424: \startdata
1425:
1426: $K_{K}$ (km~s$^{-1}$) & $150.5 \pm 0.4$ & $150.2 \pm 0.5$ \\
1427: $a \sin i$ ($R_{\sun}$) & $1.550 \pm 0.004$ & $1.547 \pm 0.005$ \\
1428: $e$ & -- & $0.012 \pm 0.003$ \\
1429: $\omega_{1}$ (degr) & -- & $75 \pm 18$ \\
1430: $V_0$ (km~s$^{-1}$) & $35.7 \pm 0.3$ & $35.2 \pm 0.3$ \\
1431: $\sigma$ (km~s$^{-1}$) & $1.25$ & $1.25$ \\
1432:
1433: \enddata
1434: \end{deluxetable}
1435:
1436:
1437: % table 6 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
1438:
1439: \begin{deluxetable}{cccccccc}
1440:
1441: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1442: %\tabletypesize{\small}
1443: %\tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
1444: \tablewidth{0pt}
1445:
1446: \tablecaption{Parameters of hypothetical third body in the V471 Tau system.
1447: \label{tab6}}
1448: \tablehead{
1449: \colhead{$i_{3}$ (degr)} &
1450: \colhead{$M_{3}$ ($M_{\sun}$)} &
1451: \colhead{$T_{eff}$ (K)} &
1452: \colhead{$log L/L_{\sun}$} &
1453: \colhead{$m_{V}$} &
1454: \colhead{$m_{K}$} &
1455: \colhead{$d_{max}$ (mas)} &
1456: \colhead{$T_{max}$ (year)}
1457: }
1458: \startdata
1459:
1460: $85$ & $0.045$ & $1540$ & $-4.3$ & $29.6$ & $15.4$ & $420$ & $2014.1$ \\
1461: $60$ & $0.052$ & $1730$ & $-4.1$ & $26.8$ & $15.0$ & $490$ & $2015.0$ \\
1462: $45$ & $0.064$ & $2060$ & $-3.8$ & $24.0$ & $14.4$ & $610$ & $2016.1$ \\
1463: $30$ & $0.090$ & $2660$ & $-3.2$ & $19.2$ & $13.3$ & $910$ & $2019.0$ \\
1464:
1465: \enddata
1466: \tablecomments{The physical parameters of the third body are based on nongray dusty models
1467: of \citet{chabrier02}, assuming the age of the system of 625 Myr and the dystance of 46.8 pc.
1468: $d_{max}$ designates maximum apparent separation between the V471 Tau binary
1469: and the third component. $T_{max}$ is the time of the nearest maximum separation.}
1470: \end{deluxetable}
1471:
1472: %-------------------------------------------------------------------
1473: %figures
1474: %-------------------------------------------------------------------
1475:
1476: \clearpage
1477:
1478: \begin{figure} % fig.1
1479: \epsscale{1.0}
1480: \plotone{f1.eps}
1481: \caption{The mean V471~Tau light curve,
1482: averaged in phase with 0.01 phase bins,
1483: for 3 selected days of the MOST observations
1484: at the beginning, middle and end of the run.
1485: A lack of obvious changes in the light curve during our
1486: observations beyond the global shifting at phases $\sim\ 0.75\ -\ 1.25$,
1487: can be interpreted as a relatively low activity
1488: in the spot re-arrangement. \label{fig1}
1489: }
1490: \end{figure}
1491:
1492: \begin{figure} % fig.2
1493: \epsscale{1.0}
1494: \plotone{f2.eps}
1495: \caption{The mean V471~Tau light curve averaged in phase with
1496: 0.001 phase bins (dots).
1497: The line shows the light curve calculated
1498: by the PHOEBE package \citep{prsa05},
1499: based on the published V471~Tau parameters.
1500: Deviations caused by the spots on the K~dwarf are not
1501: included in the model. \label{fig2}
1502: }
1503: \end{figure}
1504:
1505: \begin{figure} % fig.3
1506: \epsscale{0.85}
1507: \plotone{f3.eps}
1508: \caption{Comparison of the DDO spectra of V471~Tau.
1509: Top: The average of the 27 best quality spectra after
1510: correction shifts for the orbital motion. The $H\alpha$ line was omitted
1511: due to its variability (see Subsection~\ref{halpha}) Middle:
1512: The standard star HD~3765 spectrum after convolution
1513: with the broadening profile. Bottom: The HD~3765 spectrum as
1514: observed. \label{fig3}
1515: }
1516: \end{figure}
1517:
1518: \begin{figure} % fig.4
1519: \epsscale{1.0}
1520: \plotone{f4.eps}
1521: \caption{Relative changes of the spot-filling factor versus the
1522: orbital phase for different
1523: spot temperatures, as indicated on the right vertical axis.
1524: The curve was obtained by comparing
1525: observed light curve (averaged in phase with 0.001 phase bins)
1526: with the theoretical one calculated with the PHOEBE package,
1527: as described in the text.
1528: The crosses on the bottom axis mark the phases of seven detected
1529: flare-like events (see Subsection~\ref{flares}). \label{fig4}
1530: }
1531: \end{figure}
1532:
1533: \begin{figure} % fig.5
1534: \epsscale{1.0}
1535: \plotone{f5.eps}
1536: \caption{All observations used for the V471 Tau eclipse
1537: timing (small dots) are shown in the phase diagram together
1538: with the running average data (large dots).
1539: The phase shift of the mid-eclipse time relative
1540: to the \citet{guinan01} linear ephemeris is clearly visible.
1541: \label{fig5}
1542: }
1543: \end{figure}
1544:
1545: \begin{figure} % fig.6
1546: \epsscale{1.0}
1547: \plotone{f6.eps}
1548: \caption{The third-body model fits to eclipse timing observations
1549: of V471 Tau from the literature (filled circles).
1550: The open circle is the new timing from the MOST observations.
1551: A hypothetical, illustrative trend was created by adding a point of
1552: $O-C=0.004480$ at $E=28,000$, that would follow the curve growing trend.
1553: The bottom plot shows the residuals
1554: of all available data with respect to the model
1555: predictions of \citet{ibanoglu05}. \label{fig6}
1556: }
1557: \end{figure}
1558:
1559:
1560: \begin{figure} % fig.7
1561: \epsscale{1.0}
1562: \plotone{f7.eps}
1563: \caption{Comparison of the third body, apsidal motion and
1564: straight line model fits to the available eclipse time
1565: observations of V471 Tau. \label{fig7}
1566: }
1567: \end{figure}
1568:
1569: \begin{figure} % fig.8
1570: \epsscale{1.0}
1571: \plotone{f8.eps}
1572: \caption{Multiharmonic analysis of variance
1573: periodograms \citep{alex96}, with frequencies up to 2 cycles
1574: per year, for different model residuals, as discussed
1575: in Subsection~\ref{timing}. Horizontal lines show the
1576: levels of 0.001 (dashed line) and 0.01 (dotted line)
1577: probability of false detection.
1578: The most significant peaks appear around
1579: the same frequency $\sim 0.1$ c/y for all models
1580: (the top two periodograms also show its alias at $\sim 0.05$~c/y).
1581: Note that the 5.5~yr period (0.18~c/y) found by \citet{ibanoglu05}
1582: appears to be also present. \label{fig8}
1583: }
1584: \end{figure}
1585:
1586:
1587: \begin{figure} % fig.9
1588: \epsscale{1.0}
1589: \plotone{f9.eps}
1590: \caption{The seven flare-like events on V471 Tau
1591: which were detected during MOST observation period. \label{fig9}
1592: }
1593: \end{figure}
1594:
1595: \begin{figure} % fig.10
1596: \epsscale{0.85}
1597: \plotone{f10.eps}
1598: \caption{The radial velocity curve for the K dwarf component
1599: of V471~Tau binary. The bottom panels show residuals for the
1600: circular and elliptical models, respectively. \label{fig10}
1601: }
1602: \end{figure}
1603:
1604: \begin{figure} % fig.11
1605: \epsscale{0.85}
1606: \plotone{f11.eps}
1607: \caption{The average broadening function of V471~Tau
1608: spectra derived with
1609: the standard velocity star HD~3765 of the same spectral
1610: type (solid line). This BF profile was fitted by the rotational
1611: broadening profile to estimate the projected rotation
1612: velocity of the K dwarf component (dashed line).
1613: \label{fig11}
1614: }
1615: \end{figure}
1616:
1617: \begin{figure} % fig.12
1618: \epsscale{0.85}
1619: \plotone{f12.eps}
1620: \caption{A collection of representative spectra of V471 Tau
1621: taken at different phases.
1622: The variable strength and shifts in position of the $H\alpha$
1623: emission are clearly visible. \label{fig12}
1624: }
1625: \end{figure}
1626:
1627: \begin{figure} % fig.13
1628: \epsscale{0.85}
1629: \plotone{f13.eps}
1630: \caption{Variations of the $H\alpha$ emission line.
1631: Top: The radial velocity changes of the net emission
1632: with phase, compared with those of the K-dwarf itself (the
1633: absorption spectrum). Note the reduced amplitude of about 120~km~s$^{-1}$.
1634: Bottom: Changes of the $H\alpha$ line equivalent
1635: width. The strongest emission is visible when the K-dwarf
1636: component is seen in the upper conjunction (when the face illuminated
1637: by the WD is directed to the observer around the
1638: orbital phase of 0.5). The emission is practically
1639: undetectable during the opposite phases. \label{fig13}
1640: }
1641: \end{figure}
1642:
1643: \end{document}
1644:
1645:
1646:
1647: % the previous Table 1 ----------------------------------------------------
1648:
1649: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccc}
1650:
1651: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1652: %\tabletypesize{\small}
1653: %\tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
1654: \tablewidth{0pt}
1655:
1656: \tablecaption{Sample of the selected MOST photometry
1657: of V471 Tau as described in Section~\ref{photometry}.
1658: \label{tab1}}
1659: \tablehead{
1660: \colhead{nr} &
1661: \colhead{exp. start (HJED)} &
1662: \colhead{phase} &
1663: \colhead{relative brightness} &
1664: \colhead{$\sigma$}
1665: }
1666: \startdata
1667: 1 & 2453708.511667 & 0.12749 & 0.9956 & $3.2\cdot 10^{-3}$ \\
1668: 2 & 2453708.511783 & 0.12771 & 0.9930 & $3.2\cdot 10^{-3}$ \\
1669: 3 & 2453708.511899 & 0.12794 & 1.0029 & $3.2\cdot 10^{-3}$ \\
1670: 4 & 2453708.512015 & 0.12816 & 0.9958 & $3.2\cdot 10^{-3}$ \\
1671: 5 & 2453708.512130 & 0.12838 & 0.9958 & $3.2\cdot 10^{-3}$ \\
1672: 6 & 2453708.512246 & 0.12860 & 0.9960 & $3.2\cdot 10^{-3}$ \\
1673: 7 & 2453708.512362 & 0.12882 & 0.9933 & $3.2\cdot 10^{-3}$ \\
1674: 8 & 2453708.512478 & 0.12905 & 0.9964 & $3.2\cdot 10^{-3}$ \\
1675: 9 & 2453708.512593 & 0.12927 & 1.0013 & $3.2\cdot 10^{-3}$ \\
1676: 10 & 2453708.512709 & 0.12949 & 0.9981 & $3.2\cdot 10^{-3}$ \\
1677: \enddata
1678: \tablecomments{Phases are calculated with the ephemeris of \citet{guinan01}.
1679: The full set of MOST photometry data are available
1680: in the MOST Public Data Archive on the Science page
1681: of the MOST web site: {\sf www.astro.ubc.ca/MOST}.}
1682: \end{deluxetable}
1683:
1684: