1: \documentclass[apj]{emulateapj}

2: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}

3: 

4: \usepackage{threeparttable}

5: 

6: 

7: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}

8: 

9: 

10: 

11: \shorttitle{Supernova Search at Super-Kamiokande}

12: \shortauthors{Ikeda et al. (Super-Kamiokande Collaboration)}

13: 

14: 

15: \begin{document}

16: 

17: 

18: 

19: \title{Search for Supernova Neutrino Bursts at Super-Kamiokande}

20: 

21: %\input{authorapjstyle}

22: \newcounter{foots}

23: \newcounter{notes}

24: \newcommand{\authoraticrr}{$^{1}$}

25: %\newcommand{\authoraticpp}{$^{2}$}

26: \newcommand{\authoratncen}{$^{2}$}

27: \newcommand{\authoratbu}{$^{3}$}

28: \newcommand{\authoratbupenn}{$^{3,\dagger}$}

29: \newcommand{\authoratbnl}{$^{4}$}

30: \newcommand{\authoratuci}{$^{5}$}

31: \newcommand{\authoratcsu}{$^{6}$}

32: \newcommand{\authoratcnu}{$^{7}$}

33: \newcommand{\authoratduke}{$^{8}$}

34: \newcommand{\authoratgmu}{$^{9}$}

35: \newcommand{\authoratgifu}{$^{10}$}

36: \newcommand{\authoratuh}{$^{11}$}

37: \newcommand{\authoratui}{$^{12}$}

38: \newcommand{\authoratkek}{$^{13}$}

39: \newcommand{\authoratkekicrr}{$^{13,1}$}

40: \newcommand{\authoratkekkashiwa}{$^{13,\ddagger}$}

41: \newcommand{\authoratkobe}{$^{14}$}

42: \newcommand{\authoratkyoto}{$^{15}$}

43: \newcommand{\authoratkyototriumf}{$^{15,\S}$}

44: \newcommand{\authoratlanluci}{$^{16,5}$}

45: \newcommand{\authoratlsu}{$^{17}$}

46: \newcommand{\authoratumd}{$^{18}$}

47: %\newcommand{\authoratmit}{$^{19}$}

48: \newcommand{\authoratduluth}{$^{19}$}

49: \newcommand{\authoratmiyagi}{$^{20}$}

50: \newcommand{\authoratnagoya}{$^{21}$}

51: \newcommand{\authoratsuny}{$^{22}$}

52: \newcommand{\authoratniigata}{$^{23}$}

53: \newcommand{\authoratokayama}{$^{24}$}

54: \newcommand{\authoratosaka}{$^{25}$}

55: \newcommand{\authoratseoul}{$^{26}$}

56: \newcommand{\authoratshizuoka}{$^{27}$}

57: \newcommand{\authoratshizuokaseika}{$^{28}$}

58: \newcommand{\authoratskku}{$^{29}$}

59: \newcommand{\authorattohoku}{$^{30}$}

60: \newcommand{\authorattokai}{$^{31}$}

61: \newcommand{\authorattit}{$^{32}$}

62: \newcommand{\authorattokyo}{$^{33}$}

63: \newcommand{\authorattsinghua}{$^{34}$}

64: \newcommand{\authoratwarsaw}{$^{35}$}

65: \newcommand{\authoratwarsawuci}{$^{35,5}$}

66: \newcommand{\authoratuw}{$^{36}$}

67: \newcommand{\authoratuwduluth}{$^{36,19}$}

68: \newcommand{\addressoficrr}[1]{$^{1}$ #1 }

69: \newcommand{\addressofncen}[1]{$^{2}$ #1 }

70: \newcommand{\addressofbu}[1]{$^{3}$ #1 }

71: \newcommand{\addressofbnl}[1]{$^{4}$ #1 }

72: \newcommand{\addressofuci}[1]{$^{5}$ #1 }

73: \newcommand{\addressofcsu}[1]{$^{6}$ #1 }

74: \newcommand{\addressofcnu}[1]{$^{7}$ #1 }

75: \newcommand{\addressofduke}[1]{$^{8}$ #1 }

76: \newcommand{\addressofgmu}[1]{$^{9}$ #1 }

77: \newcommand{\addressofgifu}[1]{$^{10}$ #1 }

78: \newcommand{\addressofuh}[1]{$^{11}$ #1 }

79: \newcommand{\addressofui}[1]{$^{12}$ #1 }

80: \newcommand{\addressofkek}[1]{$^{13}$ #1 }

81: \newcommand{\addressofkobe}[1]{$^{14}$ #1 }

82: \newcommand{\addressofkyoto}[1]{$^{15}$ #1 }

83: \newcommand{\addressoflanl}[1]{$^{16}$ #1 }

84: \newcommand{\addressoflsu}[1]{$^{17}$ #1 }

85: \newcommand{\addressofumd}[1]{$^{18}$ #1 }

86: %\newcommand{\addressofmit}[1]{$^{19}$ #1 }

87: \newcommand{\addressofduluth}[1]{$^{19}$ #1 }

88: \newcommand{\addressofmiyagi}[1]{$^{20}$ #1 }

89: \newcommand{\addressofnagoya}[1]{$^{21}$ #1 }

90: \newcommand{\addressofsuny}[1]{$^{22}$ #1 }

91: \newcommand{\addressofniigata}[1]{$^{23}$ #1 }

92: \newcommand{\addressofokayama}[1]{$^{24}$ #1 }

93: \newcommand{\addressofosaka}[1]{$^{25}$ #1 }

94: \newcommand{\addressofseoul}[1]{$^{26}$ #1 }

95: \newcommand{\addressofshizuoka}[1]{$^{27}$ #1 }

96: \newcommand{\addressofshizuokaseika}[1]{$^{28}$ #1 }

97: \newcommand{\addressofskku}[1]{$^{29}$ #1 }

98: \newcommand{\addressoftohoku}[1]{$^{30}$ #1 }

99: \newcommand{\addressoftokai}[1]{$^{31}$ #1 }

100: \newcommand{\addressoftit}[1]{$^{32}$ #1 }

101: \newcommand{\addressoftokyo}[1]{$^{33}$ #1 }

102: \newcommand{\addressoftsinghua}[1]{$^{34}$ #1 }

103: \newcommand{\addressofwarsaw}[1]{$^{35}$ #1 }

104: \newcommand{\addressofuw}[1]{$^{36}$ #1 }

105: 

106: \def\pennnow{$\dagger$}

107: \def\kashiwanow{$\ddagger$}

108: \def\triumfnow{\S}

109: \author{

110: {\bf The Super-Kamiokande Collaboration} \\

111: \vspace{0.2cm}

112: M.~Ikeda\authoratokayama,

113: A.~Takeda\authoraticrr,

114: Y.~Fukuda\authoratmiyagi,

115: M.R.~Vagins\authoratuci,

116: %Kamioka observatory

117: K.~Abe\authoraticrr,

118: %J.~Hosaka\authoraticrr,

119: T.~Iida\authoraticrr,

120: K.~Ishihara\authoraticrr,

121: J.~Kameda\authoraticrr,

122: Y.~Koshio\authoraticrr,

123: A.~Minamino\authoraticrr,

124: C.~Mitsuda\authoraticrr,

125: M.~Miura\authoraticrr,

126: S.~Moriyama\authoraticrr,

127: M.~Nakahata\authoraticrr,

128: Y.~Obayashi\authoraticrr,

129: H.~Ogawa\authoraticrr,

130: H.~Sekiya\authoraticrr,

131: M.~Shiozawa\authoraticrr,

132: Y.~Suzuki\authoraticrr,

133: %A.~Takeda\authoraticrr,

134: Y.~Takeuchi\authoraticrr,

135: K.~Ueshima\authoraticrr,

136: H.~Watanabe\authoraticrr,

137: S.~Yamada\authoraticrr,

138: %

139: %Research center for cosmic neutrinos

140: I.~Higuchi\authoratncen,

141: C.~Ishihara\authoratncen,

142: M.~Ishitsuka\authoratncen,

143: T.~Kajita\authoratncen,

144: K.~Kaneyuki\authoratncen,

145: G.~Mitsuka\authoratncen,

146: S.~Nakayama\authoratncen,

147: H.~Nishino\authoratncen,

148: %A.~Okada\authoratncen,

149: K.~Okumura\authoratncen,

150: C.~Saji\authoratncen,

151: Y.~Takenaga\authoratncen,

152: %

153: %Boston U

154: S.~Clark\authoratbu,

155: S.~Desai\authoratbupenn,

156: F.~Dufour\authoratbu,

157: E.~Kearns\authoratbu,

158: S.~Likhoded\authoratbu,

159: M.~Litos\authoratbu,

160: J.L.~Raaf\authoratbu,

161: J.L.~Stone\authoratbu,

162: L.R.~Sulak\authoratbu,

163: W.~Wang\authoratbu,

164: %

165: %BNL

166: M.~Goldhaber\authoratbnl,

167: %Irvine

168: D.~Casper\authoratuci,

169: J.P.~Cravens\authoratuci,

170: J.~Dunmore\authoratuci,

171: W.R.~Kropp\authoratuci,

172: D.W.~Liu\authoratuci,

173: S.~Mine\authoratuci,

174: C.~Regis\authoratuci,

175: M.B.~Smy\authoratuci,

176: H.W.~Sobel\authoratuci,

177: %

178: %CSU

179: K.S.~Ganezer\authoratcsu,

180: J.~Hill\authoratcsu,

181: W.E.~Keig\authoratcsu,

182: %

183: %Chonnam National University

184: J.S.~Jang\authoratcnu,

185: J.Y.~Kim\authoratcnu,

186: I.T.~Lim\authoratcnu,

187: %Duke

188: K.~Scholberg\authoratduke,

189: N.~Tanimoto\authoratduke,

190: C.W.~Walter\authoratduke,

191: R.~Wendell\authoratduke,

192: %George Mason U

193: R.W.~Ellsworth\authoratgmu,

194: %

195: %Gifu U

196: S.~Tasaka\authoratgifu,

197: %Hawaii U

198: G.~Guillian\authoratuh,

199: J.G.~Learned\authoratuh,

200: S.~Matsuno\authoratuh,

201: %

202: %Indiana University

203: M.D.~Messier\authoratui,

204: %KEK

205: Y.~Hayato\authoratkekicrr,

206: A.~K.~Ichikawa\authoratkek,

207: T.~Ishida\authoratkek,

208: T.~Ishii\authoratkek,

209: T.~Iwashita\authoratkek,

210: T.~Kobayashi\authoratkek,

211: T.~Nakadaira\authoratkek,

212: K.~Nakamura\authoratkek,

213: K.~Nitta\authoratkek,

214: Y.~Oyama\authoratkek,

215: Y.~Totsuka\authoratkekkashiwa,

216: %

217: %Kobe U

218: A.T.~Suzuki\authoratkobe,

219: %

220: %Kyoto

221: M.~Hasegawa\authoratkyoto,

222: K.~Hiraide\authoratkyoto,

223: I.~Kato\authoratkyototriumf,

224: H.~Maesaka\authoratkyoto,

225: T.~Nakaya\authoratkyoto,

226: K.~Nishikawa\authoratkyoto,

227: T.~Sasaki\authoratkyoto,

228: H.~Sato\authoratkyoto,

229: S.~Yamamoto\authoratkyoto,

230: M.~Yokoyama\authoratkyoto,

231: %Los Alamos

232: T.J.~Haines\authoratlanluci,

233: %

234: %LSU

235: S.~Dazeley\authoratlsu,

236: S.~Hatakeyama\authoratlsu,

237: R.~Svoboda\authoratlsu,

238: %

239: %Maryland U

240: G.W.~Sullivan\authoratumd,

241: D.~Turcan\authoratumd,

242: %

243: % MIT

244: %M.~Swanson\authoratmit,

245: %

246: %University of Minnesota, Duluth

247: %A.~Clough\authoratduluth,

248: A.~Habig\authoratduluth,

249: %Miyagi

250: %Y.~Fukuda\authoratmiyagi,

251: T.~Sato\authoratmiyagi,

252: %Nagoya

253: Y.~Itow\authoratnagoya,

254: T.~Koike\authoratnagoya,

255: T.~Tanaka\authoratnagoya,

256: %SUNY

257: C.K.~Jung\authoratsuny,

258: T.~Kato\authoratsuny,

259: K.~Kobayashi\authoratsuny,

260: M.~Malek\authoratsuny,

261: C.~McGrew\authoratsuny,

262: A.~Sarrat\authoratsuny,

263: R.~Terri\authoratsuny,

264: C.~Yanagisawa\authoratsuny,

265: %

266: %Niigata U

267: N.~Tamura\authoratniigata,

268: %

269: %Okayama U.

270: Y.~Idehara\authoratokayama,

271: M.~Sakuda\authoratokayama,

272: M.~Sugihara\authoratokayama,

273: %Osaka U.

274: Y.~Kuno\authoratosaka,

275: M.~Yoshida\authoratosaka,

276: %

277: %Seoul

278: S.B.~Kim\authoratseoul,

279: B.S.~Yang\authoratseoul,

280: J.~Yoo\authoratseoul,

281: %

282: %Shizuoka

283: T.~Ishizuka\authoratshizuoka,

284: %

285: %Shizuoka seika

286: H.~Okazawa\authoratshizuokaseika,

287: %

288: %Sungkyunkwan University

289: Y.~Choi\authoratskku,

290: H.K.~Seo\authoratskku,

291: %Tohoku U.

292: Y.~Gando\authorattohoku,

293: T.~Hasegawa\authorattohoku,

294: K.~Inoue\authorattohoku,

295: %Tokai U

296: Y.~Furuse\authorattokai,

297: H.~Ishii\authorattokai,

298: K.~Nishijima\authorattokai,

299: %

300: %

301: %TIT

302: H.~Ishino\authorattit,

303: Y.~Watanabe\authorattit,

304: %Tokyo U

305: M.~Koshiba\authorattokyo,

306: %Tsinghua U

307: S.~Chen\authorattsinghua,

308: Z.~Deng\authorattsinghua,

309: Y.~Liu\authorattsinghua,

310: %Warsaw U

311: D.~Kielczewska\authoratwarsawuci,

312: J.~Zalipska\authoratwarsaw,

313: %aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa   \newcommand{\authoratwarsaw}{$^{bb}$}

314: %U Washington

315: H.~Berns\authoratuw,

316: R.~Gran\authoratuwduluth,

317: K.K.~Shiraishi\authoratuw,

318: A.~Stachyra\authoratuw,

319: E.~Thrane\authoratuw,

320: K.~Washburn\authoratuw,

321: R.J.~Wilkes\authoratuw \\

322: \smallskip

323: \smallskip

324: \footnotesize

325: \it

326: \addressoficrr{Kamioka Observatory, Institute for Cosmic Ray Research, 

327: University of Tokyo, Kamioka, Gifu, 506-1205, Japan}\\

328: \addressofncen{Research Center for Cosmic Neutrinos, Institute for Cosmic 

329: Ray Research, University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8582, Japan}\\

330: \addressofbu{Department of Physics, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, 

331: USA}\\

332: \addressofbnl{Physics Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, 

333: NY 11973, USA}\\

334: \addressofuci{Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of 

335: California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697-4575, USA }\\

336: \addressofcsu{Department of Physics, California State University, 

337: Dominguez Hills, Carson, CA 90747, USA}\\

338: \addressofcnu{Department of Physics, Chonnam National University, Kwangju 

339: 500-757, Korea}\\

340: \addressofduke{Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, 

341: USA} \\

342: \addressofgmu{Department of Physics, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 

343: 22030, USA }\\

344: \addressofgifu{Department of Physics, Gifu University, Gifu, Gifu 

345: 501-1193, Japan}\\

346: \addressofuh{Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Hawaii, 

347: Honolulu, HI 96822, USA}\\

348: \addressofui{Department of Physics, Indiana University, Bloomington,

349:   IN 47405-7105, USA} \\

350: \addressofkek{High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), 

351: Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0801, Japan }\\

352: \addressofkobe{Department of Physics, Kobe University, Kobe, Hyogo 

353: 657-8501, Japan}\\

354: \addressofkyoto{Department of Physics, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, 

355: Japan}\\

356: \addressoflanl{Physics Division, P-23, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los 

357: Alamos, NM 87544, USA }\\

358: \addressoflsu{Department of Physics and Astronomy, Louisiana State 

359: University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA }\\

360: \addressofumd{Department of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, 

361: MD 20742, USA }\\

362: %\addressofmit{Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of 

363: %Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA}\\

364: \addressofduluth{Department of Physics, University of Minnesota, Duluth, 

365: MN 55812-2496, USA}\\

366: \addressofmiyagi{Department of Physics, Miyagi University of Education, 

367: Sendai, Miyagi 980-0845, Japan}\\

368: \addressofnagoya{Solar Terrestrial Environment Laboratory, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Aichi 

369: 464-8602, Japan}\\

370: \addressofsuny{Department of Physics and Astronomy, State University of 

371: New York, Stony Brook, NY 11794-3800, USA}\\

372: \addressofniigata{Department of Physics, Niigata University, Niigata, 

373: Niigata 950-2181, Japan }\\

374: \addressofokayama{Department of Physics, Okayama University, Okayama, 

375: Okayama 700-8530, Japan} \\

376: \addressofosaka{Department of Physics, Osaka University, Toyonaka, Osaka 

377: 560-0043, Japan}\\

378: \addressofseoul{Department of Physics, Seoul National University, Seoul 

379: 151-742, Korea}\\

380: \addressofshizuoka{Department of Systems Engineering, Shizuoka University, 

381: Hamamatsu, Shizuoka 432-8561, Japan}\\

382: \addressofshizuokaseika{Department of Informatics in Social Welfare, Shizuoka University 

383: of Welfare, Yaizu, Shizuoka, 425-8611, Japan}\\

384: \addressofskku{Department of Physics, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 

385: 440-746, Korea}\\

386: \addressoftohoku{Research Center for Neutrino Science, Tohoku University, 

387: Sendai, Miyagi 980-8578, Japan}\\

388: \addressoftokai{Department of Physics, Tokai University, Hiratsuka, 

389: Kanagawa 259-1292, Japan}\\

390: \addressoftit{Department of Physics, Tokyo Institute for Technology, 

391: Meguro, Tokyo 152-8551, Japan }\\

392: \addressoftokyo{The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan }\\

393: \addressoftsinghua{Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China}\\

394: \addressofwarsaw{Institute of Experimental Physics, Warsaw University, 

395: 00-681 Warsaw, Poland }\\

396: \addressofuw{Department of Physics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 

397: 98195-1560, USA}

398: %end authors

399: }

400: \altaffiltext{\pennnow}{Present address: Center for Gravitational Wave Physics, Pennsylvania State 

401: University, University Park, PA 16802, USA}

402: 

403: \begin{abstract}

404: The result of a search for neutrino bursts from supernova explosions 

405: using the Super-Kamiokande detector is reported.

406: Super-Kamiokande is sensitive to core-collapse supernova explosions

407: via observation of their neutrino emissions. 

408: The expected number of events comprising such a burst is $\sim 10^4$

409: and the average energy of the neutrinos is in few tens of MeV range

410: in the case of a core-collapse supernova explosion at the typical distance in our galaxy (10 kiloparsecs);

411: this large signal means that the detection efficiency anywhere within our galaxy and well

412: past the Magellanic Clouds is 100\%.  

413: We examined a data set which was taken from May, 1996 to July, 2001

414: and from December, 2002 to October, 2005 

415: corresponding to 2589.2 live days.

416: However, there is no evidence of such a supernova explosion during the data-taking period.

417: The 90\% C.L. upper limit on the rate of core-collapse supernova explosions out to distances of

418: 100 kiloparsecs is found to be 0.32 SN $\cdot $ year$^{-1}$. 

419: \end{abstract}

420: 

421: 

422: \keywords{galaxies: individual (our Galaxy,LMC,SMC) --- neutrinos --- supernovae: general}

423: 

424: 

425: \section{Introduction}

426: 	On the 23rd of February, 1987, the Kamiokande II,

427: IMB, and Baksan experiments observed the neutrino burst from SN1987A, which

428: was located in the Large Magellanic Cloud ~\cite{KAM,IMB,BKS}

429: \footnote{The LSD detector observed a cluster of 5 events about 5 hours earlier,

430: but the correlation between this signal and SN1987A is favored only by  

431: non-standard double-bang scenarios of stellar collapse \cite{LSD}.}.  

432: This was the first detection of a supernova's neutrino burst, 

433: and it introduced a new method of investigation: neutrino astronomy.

434: 	

435: 	Super-Kamiokande (Super-K, SK) is an imaging water Cherenkov detector

436: containing 50,000 tons of pure water; it is the

437: successor to the Kamiokande detector. Super-K is located 1000 meters

438: underground (2,700 meters of water equivalent) in the Kamioka zinc mine in

439: the Gifu prefecture of Japan, at 36.4$^{\circ}$N, 137.3$^{\circ}$E and

440: 25.8$^{\circ}$N geomagnetic latitude. The detector consists of a main

441: inner detector and an outer veto detector. Both detectors are contained within a

442: cylindrical stainless steel tank 39.3 m in diameter $\times$ 41.4 m in

443: height.  The usual fiducial mass for neutrino measurements is 22.5 ktons with

444: boundaries 2.0 m from the inner surface. The outer detector is also 

445: a water Cherenkov detector of 13,000 metric tons total mass.  It 

446: surrounds the inner detector as a 4$\pi$ solid-angle anti-detector to

447: detect any signals coming from outside of the detector and to shield

448: against external gamma-rays and neutrons.

449: 	 

450:         The data set for the analyses was taken during two periods.

451: The first period started on the

452: 1st of April, 1996, and terminated on the 15th of July, 2001. 

453: A total of 11,146 photo multipliers (PMT's) with 20-inch diameter  

454: photocathodes provided active light collection over 40\% of the 

455: entire surface of the inner detector. 

456: This phase of the project is now referred to as Super-Kamiokande-I (SK-I). 

457: The second phase, Super-Kamiokande-II (SK-II), started on 

458: the 10th of December, 2002, and terminated on the 6th of October, 2005.

459: A total of 5,182 20-inch PMT's, each protected by acrylic and fiber-reinforced plastic 

460: (FRP) cases, were mounted on the inner detector, providing 19\% photocathode coverage 

461: during this period.

462: In the outer detector, a total of 1,885 8-inch PMT's were installed during 

463: both periods. 

464: Due to rapid variations in the water transparency, the data before the 31st of May,

465: 1996 in SK-I, and the data before the 23rd of December, 2002 in SK-II

466: have not been used for analysis because of uncertainties in the energy calibration.

467: Having a well-defined energy response is necessary when searching for low 

468: multiplicity event clusters, as will be described in the later sections of this paper.  

469: 

470: 	Theoretical calculations predict the characteristics of 

471: neutrinos expected from a supernova. 

472: A typical core-collapse supernova explosion emits all types of neutrinos

473: and has a total energy output of $\sim3\times 10^{53}$ ergs which 

474: would generate about 10,000 SK events (9,000 events without neutrino oscillation) 

475: in the case of a supernova at a distance of 10 kpc from the earth.

476: %04/25/07%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

477: Neutrino oscillations enhance the

478: overall flux we observe by 10\% as higher-temperature 

479: $\nu_{\mu}(\overline{\nu}_{\mu})$ and $\nu_{\tau}(\overline{\nu}_{\tau})$

480: get fully mixed into the observable $\nu_{e}(\overline{\nu}_{e})$ signal.

481: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

482: 

483:         These supernova events will be detected via the following interactions in SK,

484: %and their fractions of the total number of events are shown in parethesis;

485: where the numbers in parentheses show the fractions of the total number of events 

486: with/without neutrino oscillations,

487: \begin{eqnarray}

488: &\overline{\nu}_e + p        \rightarrow  n + e^+ &(88\%/89\%)\:, \label{nebp}\\

489: &\nu_e +  e^-                \rightarrow  \nu_e + e^- &(1.5\%/1.5\%)\:,\label{nee}\\

490: &\overline{\nu}_e +  e^-     \rightarrow  \overline{\nu}_e + e^- &(<1\%/<1\%)\:,\\

491: &\nu_x +e^-                  \rightarrow  \nu_x + e^- &(1\%/1\%)\:,\\

492: &\nu_e +  ^{16}O             \rightarrow  e^{-} + ^{16}F  &(2.5\%/<1\%)\:,\label{cc1}\\

493: &\overline{\nu}_e +  ^{16}O  \rightarrow  e^{+} + ^{16}N &(1.5\%/1\%)\:,and \label{cc2}\\

494: &\nu_x +^{16}O               \rightarrow \nu_x +O^{*}/N^{*}+\gamma &(5\%/6\%)\:,\label{nc}

495: \end{eqnarray}

496: and $\nu_x$ means the total interactions of $\nu_{\mu}$,$\nu_{\tau}$, and

497: their anti-neutrinos. To obtain these fractions \cite{OSC}, a supernova neutrino burst using 

498: the Livermore model \cite{Totani} is assumed.

499: %04/25/07%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

500: To account for neutrino oscillations in Ref. (Takahashi et al.~2001),%\cite{OSC}, 

501: $\theta_{12}$ and $\Delta m_{12}^{2}$ are set 

502: to be in the favored solar neutrino LMA region, 

503: and $\theta_{23}$ and $\Delta m_{23}^{3}$ are determined from the best oscillation 

504: fit for the atmospheric neutrinos.

505: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

506: For the fraction of the neutral current interactions with oxygen

507: (Eq.~\ref{nc}),

508: we look to Ref.\cite{langanke} and obtain our number

509: by scaling their result to the numbers in Ref. \cite{OSC}.

510: At present, based on both data and models, many of these numbers

511: are uncertain up to a factor of two, especially the numbers of

512: interactions with oxygen. In particular, Eqs.\ref{cc1}, \ref{cc2}, and \ref{nc}

513: are very dependent on the neutrino temperatures and details of mixing

514: as discussed in the cited literature.

515: 

516:         Averaged energies of neutrinos from a standard delayed explosion supernova 

517: model are expected to be between 11 $\sim$ 26 MeV 

518: (Totani et al.~1998; Thompson et al.~2003; Sumiyoshi et al.~2005) 

519: %\cite{Totani};\cite{Burrows};\\\cite{Sumiyoshi}.

520: For example, the calculation performed by the Livermore group

521: shows  $\langle E_{\nu_e} \rangle \sim 11$ MeV,

522: $\langle E_{\overline{\nu}_e}  \rangle \sim 16$ MeV and 

523: $\langle E_{\nu_{\mu/\tau}} \rangle \sim25$ MeV ~\cite{Totani}.

524: The time profile of each type of neutrino has a unique shape. 

525: During the initial $\sim$10 milliseconds, electron neutrinos from the neutronization are

526: released with a total energy on the order of $10^{51}$ ergs. After the

527: neutronization, all flavors of neutrinos are produced by electron-positron

528: annihilation, and released with a total energy on the order of $10^{53}$ ergs

529: with a time scale of several tens of seconds. 

530: 

531: 	It still is not clear at present, however, whether or not the  

532: delayed explosion scenario is the correct picture, in which

533: a stalled shock wave will be reheated by energy deposition from neutrinos.

534: We expect that the observation of a galactic supernova

535: by the SK detector with high statistics will solve this long-standing 

536: question and, furthermore, shed light on other important questions

537: such as neutrino oscillations and neutrino mass ~\cite{Raffelt}.

538: 

539: In this paper, we have searched for supernova neutrino bursts using 

540: the SK detector, and we present  

541: an upper limit on the supernova explosion rate 

542: within 100 kpc of the earth (this volume contains our Galaxy, the LMC, and the SMC).

543: We also report the first result of search for neutronization bursts. 

544: Previously, AMANDA, Baksan, IMB, and MACRO have reported upper limits on 

545: the supernova explosion rate just within our Galaxy 

546: \cite{AMND,BKS_sn,IMB_sn,MCR}, while LVD and Kamiokande have reported 

547: preliminary results \cite{LVD,kam} of the same nature.

548:  

549: \section{Data analysis}

550: 

551: \subsection{Data set}

552: 

553: 	From the 31st of May, 1996, to the 15th of July, 2001,

554: and from the 24th of December, 2002, to the 5th of October, 2005, the 

555: livetimes of our detector for supernova searches were 1703.9 days for SK-I,

556: and 885.3 days for SK-II. Livetime efficiency as a

557: function of date is shown in Figure~\ref{livtim} --- over the course of

558: the entire data-taking period the average efficiency was about 89\%. 

559: The primary cause of lost supernova livetime was scheduled calibration work.

560: The large losses of livetime seen in Figure~\ref{livtim} around

561: July 1997, December 1998, June 1999, May 2001, March 2003, and September 2005

562: were due to LINAC energy calibration runs~\cite{LINAC}, though the biggest 

563: dip in 2003 was due to electronics problems which have since been corrected.

564: 

565:        Vertex and energy reconstruction techniques are the same as those used in

566: our solar neutrino analysis~\cite{SK}. Fiducial volume for the supernova

567: search is also 22.5 ktons, though the energy thresholds are 6.5~MeV (SK-I) 

568: and 7.0 MeV (SK-II) to avoid the higher background rates associated with 

569: the lower thresholds used in the solar neutrino analysis.

570: Data reduction steps are basically the same. The first reduction includes removing 

571: events due to electronics noise, events with a poor reconstruction

572: of the vertex position, and events with a vertex outside of the fiducial

573: volume. A spallation cut removes events which are produced by energetic

574: muons by using a likelihood method in which both the time difference

575: $\Delta T$ and distance $\Delta L$ between the parent muon and subsequent

576: events are considered~\cite{SK}. Mis-reconstructed events are also

577: removed. 

578: After these noise reductions, the remaining event rates 

579: are 180 events/day for SK-I, and 164 events/day for SK-II. 

580: \begin{figure}

581: \epsscale{1.0}

582: \plotone{f1.eps}

583: \caption{SK livetime efficiency as a function of time. 

584: Most of the big dips in efficiency were due to planned calibration runs such as LINAC

585: energy calibration, though the biggest dip in 2003 was due 

586: to electronics problems.\label{livtim}}

587: \end{figure}

588: 

589: \subsection{Analysis method}

590: 

591: 	In this section, we introduce our general method of 

592: supernova burst search. The procedure of data analysis is as follows:

593: \begin{enumerate}

594:  \item Scan event times in the data set using a sliding time-window.

595:  We define a ``cluster'' 

596:  if the number of events (the ``multiplicity'') within a time-window

597:  is greater or equal to a certain threshold. 

598:  \item Check each cluster found in the first step to determine if 

599:  it is a real signal from a supernova or the result of background events.

600: 

601: \end{enumerate}

602: 

603:          A background cluster consists of either time-correlated 

604: non-supernova events or a chance coincidence of uncorrelated low energy events.

605: There are two dominant background sources which produce time-correlated events.

606: One such source is flasher PMT's which act as sources of light, 

607: and the other is spallation product, radioactive isotopes 

608: made via interactions between energetic cosmic ray muons and oxygen nuclei.

609: In both cases, the reconstructed vertices of 

610: the resulting events are spatially concentrated.

611: On the other hand, events made by actual supernova neutrinos  

612: should be generated uniformly in the detector volume.

613: Therefore, to distinguish real signals from background clusters, 

614: clusters are checked by studying the correlation between the

615: multiplicity and the events' spatial distribution ($R_{mean}$).

616: $R_{mean}$ is defined by the

617: averaged spatial distance between each event as follows:

618: \begin{equation}

619:  R_{mean} = \frac{\displaystyle{\sum_{i = 1}^{M - 1}} \;

620:  \displaystyle{\sum_{j = i + 1}^{M}} \vert \vec{r_i} -

621: \vec{r_j} \vert}{_{M}C_2} .

622: \end{equation}

623: where $M$ is the multiplicity, $\vert \vec{r_i} - \vec{r_j} \vert$

624: is the distance between events $i$ and $j$, and $_{M}C_2$ is the

625: number of unique combinations.  In the case of a supernova

626: burst, $R_{mean}$ should have a larger value than that resulting from

627: spatially clustered events such as spallation events or flasher events.

628: 

629:           Figure~\ref{rmean_mc} shows $R_{mean}$

630: distributions of simulated supernova events for 

631: multiplicity 2, 3, 4, and 8, which are the 

632: multiplicity thresholds of various burst searches discussed

633: in later sections of this paper.

634: As shown in this figure, if the events in a cluster occur

635: uniformly in the detector, as in supernova, 

636: then the expected value of $R_{mean}$ tends to be

637: large, around 1,800 cm. The threshold of $R_{mean}$

638: for a cluster with multiplicity equal to 2 is set to 750 cm,

639: and for clusters  with multiplicity greater than 2 

640: the threshold is set to 1,000 cm.

641: The efficiencies for supernova events using these criteria

642: are 94\%, 96\%, 99\%, and 100\%, respectively.

643: 

644: \begin{figure}

645: \epsscale{1.0}

646: \plotone{f2.eps}

647: \caption{Expected $R_{mean}$ distributions of supernova events

648: obtained by Monte Carlo simulation 

649: for multiplicity equal to 2, 3, 4, and 8.\label{rmean_mc}}

650: \end{figure}

651: 

652: In the following sections, 

653: we obtain results from three kinds of burst searches

654: by changing the width of the time-window and the multiplicity threshold 

655: and setting additional criteria for respective searches.

656: The three burst searches are 

657: 1) distant supernova search, 2) supernova burst search with low energy threshold,

658: and 3) neutronization burst search.

659: 

660: \subsection{Distant supernova search}

661:  

662: 	In recent years, a lot of effort has been put into optical supernova searches,

663: with the result that the number of detected supernovae has increased substantially. 

664: The optical detection rate of supernovae suggests that theoretical

665: calculations of supernova rates might be

666: significantly underestimated. More specifically, nine core-collapse supernovae 

667: have been found in nearby galaxies between 2002 and 2005; 

668: this is three times higher than one theoretical estimate~\cite{ando}.

669:  

670: 	This motivates us to search for neutrinos 

671: from supernovae in nearby galaxies. 

672: Since the expected total number of events at SK from a supernova in the 

673: Andromeda galaxy ($\sim $700kpc) is around two events, 

674: for this search we set our criteria as a long time-window 

675: and low multiplicity threshold such as $\geq$ 2 events / 20 seconds. 

676: A lot of background clusters would be found in our usual 

677: solar neutrino data set~\cite{SK} with this criterion.

678: Therefore, we reduce those backgrounds by setting a higher energy threshold

679: because the average energy of the emitted positron from 

680: the interaction (Eq.\ref{nebp}) is higher than that of most low energy 

681: background events.

682: To find the best energy threshold, 

683: we calculate the detection probability of a supernova

684: and the number of chance coincidences of the low energy background events

685: as functions of energy threshold value. 

686: Then we take the value of energy threshold which gives us the maximum value of 

687: $ \frac{\text{Detection probability}}{\sqrt{\# \text{of chance coincidences}}}$

688: as an optimized energy threshold. The resulting value we set is 17 MeV,

689: where the single event rate with this energy threshold is 0.762 event/day for SK-I,

690: and 1.03 event/day for SK-II.

691: 

692: 	Figure~\ref{ltw} is a scatter plot of $R_{mean}$ versus the multiplicity

693: for each cluster which satisfies the criteria with an 

694: energy threshold of 17 MeV. Three candidate clusters exist that have $R_{mean}$ more than 

695: 1000 cm, 

696: but as shown in Table~\ref{time_table},

697: the event times of those candidates actually coincide with times of mine blasting.

698: Because of the physical vibration of PMT's due to blasting, 

699: huge electrical noise occurred, 

700: and those noises caused time-clustered 

701: a few hundreds events within a few seconds during or after blasting.

702: It was also confirmed that these events including the candidate cluster events

703: have a characteristic PMT hit pattern

704: naerly in the same area of the inner detector, and hence they should be 

705: eliminated as potential supernova events.

706: 

707: \begin{deluxetable}{cccc}

708: %\tablecolumns{6}

709: \tablewidth{0pc}

710: \tablecaption{Detection time of candidates in SK-I \label{time_table}}

711: \tablehead{\colhead{Candidate}    &  \colhead{Date and Time (JST)\tablenotemark{a}} &   \colhead{Rmean}   & \colhead{Multiplicity}}

712: \startdata

713:  No.1	&	Jul.13th 1999 19:00	&	1257.89	&	4\\

714:  No.2	&	May.12th 2000 11:06	&	1928.76	&	35\\

715:  No.3	&	Oct.12th 2000 19:03	&	1381.76 &	2\\

716: \enddata

717: \tablenotetext{a}{The blastings by Kamioka Mining and Smelting Company

718:  were scheduled at 11:00, 19:00, and 23:00, and shift takers reported

719:  that there were blastings at those times.}

720: \end{deluxetable}

721: 

722: The background clusters which have small $R_{mean}$ values in Fig.~\ref{ltw}

723: were mainly found around times of calibration work,

724: and more importantly the positions of these clusters were consistent with 

725: the positions of the calibration sources themselves.  That these clusters made it 

726: into our supposedly all non-calibration data sample is therefore judged to be 

727: the result of occasional operator error in assigning the proper run type during 

728: transitions between normal and calibration data taking.

729: (Note that such mis-labeled runs are excluded in our usual solar neutrino data analysis,

730: but in order to maximize supernova livetime a wider variety of runs were included 

731: in this supernova analysis.)

732: Therefore, no real supernova signal was observed during 

733: the data-taking periods in both SK-I and SK-II.  

734: 

735: \begin{figure}[h]

736: \epsscale{1.0}

737: \plotone{f3.eps}

738: \caption{Correlation between the multiplicity and $R_{mean}$

739: for obtained clusters from data (open circle: SK-I, closed circle: SK-II ).

740: There were 19 clusters observed in SK-I and 8 clusters 

741: in SK-II.\label{ltw}}

742: \end{figure}

743: 

744: \subsection{Supernova burst search \\ with low energy threshold}

745: 

746: 	In this section, we set various time-windows 

747: of 0.5, 2, and 10 seconds with a lower energy threshold of 

748: 6.5 MeV for SK-I and 7.0 MeV for SK-II

749: to search for signals from a supernova

750: in this lower energy region. 

751: In fact, the data of SN1987A imply $\langle E  \rangle = 7.5 $ MeV

752: at Kamiokande and 11.1 MeV at IMB \cite{Jegerlehner}

753: while $\langle E_{\overline{\nu}_e}  \rangle \sim 16$ MeV

754: to take the Livermore group model as an example \cite{Totani}.

755: 

756: 	Since a lot of background events due to spallation or flasher PMT's

757: still remain in the lower energy regions,

758: we set criteria of higher multiplicity for each time-window as 

759: $\geq$ 3 events / 0.5 seconds, $\geq$ 4 events / 2.0 seconds, 

760: and $\geq$ 8 events/ 10 seconds.

761: If a cluster satisfies the requirement $R_{mean}$,

762: we closely check data around the cluster --- 

763: for example all events within $\pm$20 seconds around the cluster --- 

764: so that we get information from as many supernova neutrinos as possible.  

765: 

766: 	Figure~\ref{ml_rm_data} shows the correlation between $R_{mean}$ 

767: and multiplicity for obtained clusters from SK-I and SK-II.

768: There were only three clusters which had large $R_{mean}$ values in SK-I.

769: As mentioned in the previous section, however, all three candidate clusters

770: consist of the same events as in the previous section which 

771: were found during periods of mine blasting.

772:  

773: 	The same criteria are applied to SK-II data, and the correlation of

774: the multiplicity and $R_{mean}$ of the candidate clusters was studied.

775: There was no cluster with $R_{mean} \geq $ 1000~cm,

776: but two candidate clusters had $R_{mean}$ just below 1000~cm. 

777: To make sure that those candidates were not real signals,

778: cosmic ray muon events around the cluster were studied, and

779: event displays of candidate events were checked.

780: As a result, one of the candidates was found to be an accidental coincidence of 

781: a low energy event with spallation events.

782: Although most spallation events have already been removed by the

783: spallation cut, a small fraction of spallation products are still present

784: at lower multiplicities. 

785: The other candidate cluster was comprised of false events caused by a flasher tube.

786: As in the previous search, it was confirmed that 

787: the background clusters with small $R_{mean}$

788: were mostly due to mislabeled calibration work. 

789: 

790: 	In conclusion, the remaining candidate clusters were all caused by

791: mine blasting, and so there is no clear evidence for any supernova

792: neutrino burst in the data obtained by SK-I as well as SK-II.

793: Therefore, we will present an upper limit at the 90\% confidence level for 

794: the rate of supernova explosions in Section 3.

795: \begin{figure}[h]

796: \epsscale{1.0}

797: \plotone{f4.eps}

798: \caption{Correlation between the multiplicity and $R_{mean}$

799: for obtained clusters from data (open circle: SK-I, closed circle: SK-II).

800: There are 121 and 53 clusters observed in SK-I 

801: and SK-II respectively. If a cluster satisfies more than one criterion,

802: the circle for the cluster represents the largest multiplicity, and

803: $R_{mean}$ for the cluster is calculated from the multiplicity of events.

804: \label{ml_rm_data}}

805: \end{figure}

806: 

807: \subsection{Neutronization burst search} 

808: 

809: 	We conducted another burst search with shorter time-windows

810: to investigate the short-lived 

811: neutronization burst of $\nu_e$ events from a supernova.

812: Prior to the core explosion, many $\nu_e$'s are emitted via the reaction 

813: $e^- + p \rightarrow \nu_e + n$ as the shock wave propagates into the exploding star's  

814: outer core. The shock wave dissociates nuclei into free nucleons

815: on which the cross section of electron capture is larger than that on nuclei; 

816: the resulting burst of $\nu_e$'s thus forms the so-called neutronization burst.

817: 

818: 	The duration of the neutronization burst is on the time scale of 

819: the shock wave propagation, which is less than 10 milliseconds. 

820: Hence, if such a short time window is set, the $\nu_e$'s can be dominant, 

821: and the expected number of neutronization burst neutrinos which will be observed at 

822: SK is between one and six (depending on neutrino oscillation models)

823: in the case of a supernova at a distance of 10 kpc from the earth~\cite{OSC}.

824: It should be mentioned that even if no supernova explosion is observed in the galaxy

825: during that period, it still might be possible to observe only the neutronization burst.

826: For example, if a black hole forms shortly after the neutronization stage,

827: then the main burst of supernova neutrinos might not be able to escape 

828: from the black hole~\cite{sumi}.

829: 

830: 	Based on the above theoretical expectations, 

831: we set time-windows of 1, 10, and 100 milliseconds. 

832: The multiplicity threshold is two events for each time window;

833: $\geq$ 2 events / 1 msec, $\geq$ 2 events / 10 msec, or $\geq$ 2 events / 100 msec.

834: Because recoil electrons will have lower 

835: energies from neutrino--electron scattering (Eq.\ref{nee})

836: which is the dominant interaction in this case,

837: we use the same sample as the SK-I solar neutrino analysis

838: \cite{SK}, whose energy threshold is 5 MeV and livetime is 1496 days,

839: and we use the same sample as in previous sections for SK-II.

840: 

841: 	Since the threshold of multiplicity for a candidate cluster is two 

842: events, a lot of backgrounds exist even after the $R_{mean}$ cut.

843: Therefore, we need another variable to reduce background.

844: In this case, the directional information 

845: of observed events is a strong tool because 

846: the recoil electrons have almost the same direction as the incident neutrinos,

847: which means that events from a real neutronization burst should have 

848: roughly the same reconstructed direction. To check the isotropy of events 

849: in a candidate cluster, a new variable is defined as follows:  

850: \begin{equation}

851: Sumdir=\frac{\left| \displaystyle{\sum_{i=1}^{M}} \vec{dir_i} \right| }{M}\quad .

852: \end{equation}

853: where $\vec{dir_i}$ is a reconstructed direction vector of events in a cluster,

854: and $M$ is the multiplicity of the cluster . 

855: By this definition, $Sumdir$ will be close to 1 in the case of a 

856: real supernova cluster. 

857: Figure~\ref{sumdir} shows the $Sumdir$ distributions of 

858: supernova Monte Carlo and background Monte Carlo.

859: We set the threshold of $Sumdir$ for a supernova candidate cluster 

860: to 0.75 as this is the point at which the signal-to-noise ratio exceeds unity; 

861: the efficiency for real supernova events is estimated to be 84\%.  

862: 

863: 	Table~\ref{tab:shtw} shows the number of observed candidates 

864: during the periods of SK-I and SK-II after $R_{mean}$ and $Sumdir$ cuts.

865: There is good agreement between the number of observed clusters

866: and the number of expected backgrounds which can be estimated by 

867: \begin{equation}

868: N_{bg} = \sum_{i=start}^{stop} \sum_{j=M_{thr}}^{\infty} R_i T_i

869:  \frac{e^{ - R_i \Delta T } \left[R_i \Delta T\right]^{j-1}}{(j-1)!} 

870: \end{equation}

871: where $M_{thr}$ is threshold of multiplicity, $R_i$ and $T_i$ are single event rate 

872: and live time of each data taking period (maximum 24 hours), 

873: and $\Delta T$ is the time-window for each case.

874: We can use a Poisson-based estimate for the background because, after the $R_{mean}$ cut,

875: most of the background clusters are due to chance coincidences of

876: low energy events such as solar neutrino events, 

877: flasher events, and spallation events in the data samples.

878: Since there were no candidates with stricter criteria:

879: $\geq$ 3 events / 1 msec, $\geq$ 3 events / 10 msec, or $\geq$ 3 events / 100 msec,

880: also in agreement with the expected background as shown in Table ~\ref{tab:shtw},

881: we conclude that no signal from a real neutronization burst

882: was observed during this period. 

883: 

884: \begin{figure}[h]

885: \epsscale{1.0}

886: \plotone{f5.eps}

887: \caption{The distribution of $Sumdir$.

888: The solid line shows the histogram of supernova Monte Carlo events 

889: where the incident electron neutrinos from a neutronization burst

890: have a fixed direction. The dashed line shows the histogram of

891: random direction events in the SK tank.\label{sumdir}}

892: \end{figure}

893: 

894: 

895: \section{Discussion and conclusions}

896: 

897: 	We have searched the SK-I and SK-II data

898: for neutrino burst signals from supernova explosions.

899: We conclude that no real signals of supernova bursts

900: occurred during the data taking periods between late May 1996 and early October 2005,

901: which corresponds to a total livetime of 2589.2 days

902: \footnote{Even during periods of calibration we found no clear galactic 

903: supernova neutrino bursts in the SK detector.}. 

904: Super-K also performed an all sky search for transient

905: astrophysical neutrinos in the GeV-TeV energy region and did not find

906: anything~\cite{astrnu}, so we can rule out the detection of high energy neutrinos from

907: any supernovae as well.

908:  

909: 	We can evaluate the performance of 

910: Super-K as a supernova watcher based on these results.

911: We simulate neutrino events in the tank to estimate detection probability 

912: of a supernova as a function of distance from the earth.

913: The incident neutrinos are assumed to be emitted by a supernova of 

914: the model used by the Livermore group ~\cite{Totani}.

915: The detection probability of a supernova at a certain distance is determined as 

916: a probability in which one simulated neutrino burst satisfies each criterion

917: given in previous sections after basic data reduction.

918: 

919: 	As shown in Figure ~\ref{dprb}, full detection probability is maintained

920: out to around 100 kpc. Therefore, the upper limit at 

921: 90\% C.L.  for the supernova explosion rate out to

922: 100~kpc --- within which our Galaxy, the LMC, and the SMC may be found ---  

923: is determined to be 0.32 per year by combining the results from SK-I and SK-II.

924: While the probability for the burst search with lower energy thresholds

925: goes down rapidly to almost 0.0 at 700 kpc --- the distance to the Andromeda 

926: Galaxy --- the probability of the distant supernova search

927: is still 0.075 at this distance, which demonstrates the 

928: benefit of conducting a long time-window search in addition to the 

929: usual burst search. 

930: 

931: 	We have also performed, for the first time, a systematic search for 

932: neutrinos from neutronization bursts.  These could occur in isolation in   

933: the case of early black hole formation following a core collapse. 

934: However there was no such signal observed in the data set

935: with a total livetime of 2,381.3 days.    

936: 

937: \section*{Acknowledgments}

938: 

939: 	The authors gratefully acknowledge the cooperation of the Kamioka Mining

940: and Smelting Company. Super-K has been built and operated from

941: funds provided by the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports,

942: Science and Technology, the U.S. Department of Energy, and the U.S.

943: National Science Foundation. This work was partially supported by the

944: Korean Research Foundation (BK21), the Korean Ministry of Science and

945: Technology, and the National Science Foundation of China.

946: 

947: \begin{figure}[h]

948: \epsscale{1.2}

949: \plotone{f6.eps}

950: \caption{The probability of detecting supernovae assuming

951: a specific supernova model at SK.

952: Full (100\%) detection probability is retained out to around 100 kpc.\label{dprb}}

953: \end{figure}

954: 

955: \begin{thebibliography}{99}

956: \bibitem[Abe et al.~2006]{astrnu} Abe,~K. {\em et al,,} 2006, Astrophys. J. {\bf 652}, 198.

957: \bibitem[Ahrens et al.~2002]{AMND} Ahrens,~J. {\em et al,,} 2002, Astropart. Phys. {\bf 16}, 345.

958: \bibitem[Alekseev et al.~1987]{BKS}  Alekseev,~E.~N. {\em et al.,} 1987, Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz {\bf 45}, 461. 

959:                                      [JETP Lett. {\bf 45}, 589 (1987)]

960: \bibitem[Alekseev et al.~2002]{BKS_sn}  Alekseev,~E.~N. {\em et al.,} 2002, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz {\bf 95}, 10. 

961:                                      [2002, J. Exp. Theor. Phys {\bf 95}, 10 ]

962: \bibitem[Ambrosio et al.~2004]{MCR} Ambrosio,~M. {\em et al.,} 2004, Eur. Phys. J. C {\bf 37}, 265.

963: \bibitem[Ando et al.~2005]{ando} Ando,~S. {\em et al.,} 2005, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 95}, 171101.

964: \bibitem[Bionta et al.~1987]{IMB}  Bionta,~R.~M. {\em et al.,} IMB collaboration, 1987, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 58}, 1494.

965: \bibitem[Dadykin et al.~1987]{LSD}  Dadykin,~V.~L. {\em et al.,} 1987, Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz {\bf 45}, 464. 

966:                                      [1987, JETP Lett. {\bf 45}, 593 ]

967: \bibitem[Dye et al.~1989]{IMB_sn} Dye,~S.~T. {\em et al.,} 1989, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 62}, 2069.

968: \bibitem[Hirata et al.~1987]{KAM} Hirata,~K.~S. {\em et al.,} 1987, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 58}, 1490.

969: \bibitem[Hosaka et al.~2006]{SK} Hosaka,~J. {\em et al.,} 2006, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 73}, 112001 

970: \bibitem[Jegerlehner et al.~1996]{Jegerlehner} Jegerlehner,~B. {\em et al.,} 1996, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 54}, 1194.

971: \bibitem[Langanke et al.~1996]{langanke} Langanke,~K. {\em et al.,} 1996, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 76}, 2629

972: \bibitem[LVD Coll~2003]{LVD}  LVD Coll, 2003, proc. 28th ICRC H.E 2.3.9, Tokyo. 

973: \bibitem[Nakahata et al.~1999]{LINAC} Nakahata,~M. {\em et al.,} 1999, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A 

974: {\bf 421}, 113.

975: \bibitem[Raffelt~2002]{Raffelt} Raffelt,~G.~G. Nucl. Phys. B (Pro. Suppl) 2002, {\bf 110}, 254.

976: \bibitem[Sumiyoshi et al.~2005]{Sumiyoshi} Sumiyoshi,~K. {\em et al.,} 2005, Astrophys. J. {\bf 629}, 922.

977: \bibitem[Sumiyoshi et al.~2006]{sumi} Sumiyoshi,~K. {\em et al.,} 2006, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 97}, 91101.

978: \bibitem[Suzuki~1993]{kam} Suzuki,~Y. 1993, {\em in Proc.of the International Symposium on Neutrino Astrophysics: 

979: Frontiers of Neutrino Astrophysics}, edited by Y.~Suzuki and K.~Nakamura, 

980: (Universal Academy Press Inc., Tokyo), number 5 in Frontier Science Series, p.61.

981: \bibitem[Thompson et al.~2003]{Burrows} Thompson,~T.~A. {\em et al.,} 2003, Astrophys. J. {\bf 592}, 434.

982: \bibitem[Totani et al.~1998]{Totani} Totani,~T. {\em et al.}, 1998, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 80}, 2039.

983: \bibitem[Takahashi et al.~2001]{OSC} Takahashi,~K. {\em et al.,} 2001, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 64}, 93004.

984: \end{thebibliography}

985: 

986: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccc}

987: %\tablecolumns{6}

988: \tablewidth{0pc}

989: \tablecaption{Number of candidates 

990: and backgrounds in neutronization burst search \label{tab:shtw}}

991: \tablehead{

992: \colhead{}    &  \multicolumn{2}{c}{SK-I} &\multicolumn{2}{c}{SK-II} \\

993: \cline{2-3} \cline{4-5} \\

994: \colhead{Criterion} & \colhead{Candidate} & \colhead{BG\tablenotemark{a}}  &

995: \colhead{Candidate}    & \colhead{BG\tablenotemark{a}} }

996: \startdata

997: \\[-5pt]

998:  $\geq$ 2events/1msec   & 1   & 2.10  &     0         & 0.125 \\

999:  $\geq$ 2events/10msec  & 19  & 19.1  &     0         & 1.25 \\

1000:  $\geq$ 2events/100msec & 194 & 191   &    10         & 12.5   \\

1001: \cline{1-5}

1002: \\[-5pt]

1003:  $\geq$ 3events/1msec   & 0   & 9.90$\times 10^{-6}$  &    0        &  1.65$\times 10^{-7}$ \\

1004:  $\geq$ 3events/10msec  & 0   & 9.78$\times 10^{-4}$  &    0        &  1.65$\times 10^{-5}$ \\

1005:  $\geq$ 3events/100msec & 0   & 9.78$\times 10^{-2}$  &    0        &  1.65$\times 10^{-3}$ 

1006: \enddata

1007: \tablenotetext{a}{The number of backgrounds was calculated from 

1008: the chance coincidence rate of non-supernova signals such as solar neutrino events, 

1009: flasher events, and spallation events in the data samples.}

1010: \end{deluxetable}

1011: 

1012: \end{document}

1013: