1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %\documentclass[]{aastex}
3:
4: %\usepackage{emulateapj5}
5: %\usepackage{onecolfloat}
6: \usepackage{graphicx}
7: %\usepackage{fancyheadings}
8: %\usepackage{amstex}
9: %\usepackage{ulem}
10: %\usepackage{rotating}
11: %\usepackage{lscape}
12:
13: \def\arcmin{\hbox{$^\prime$}}
14: \def\arcsec{\hbox{$^{\prime\prime}$}}
15: \def\arcdeg{\mbox{$^\circ$}}%
16: \def\fd{\hbox{$~\!\!^{\rm d}$}}
17: \def\fh{\hbox{$~\!\!^{\rm h}$}}
18: \def\fm{\hbox{$~\!\!^{\rm m}$}}
19: \def\fs{\hbox{$~\!\!^{\rm s}$}}
20:
21: \newcommand{\apg}{\gtrsim}
22: \newcommand{\apl}{\lesssim}
23: \newcommand{\cmjj}{\mbox{${\rm cm^{-2}}$}}
24: \newcommand{\etal}{et al.}
25: \newcommand{\hI}{\mbox{${\rm H\,I}$}}
26: \newcommand{\nI}{\mbox{${\rm N\,I}$}}
27: \newcommand{\kms}{\mbox{km\ s${^{-1}}$}}
28: \newcommand{\lya}{\mbox{${\rm Ly}\alpha$}}
29: \newcommand{\lyb}{\mbox{${\rm Ly}\beta$}}
30: \newcommand{\civ}{\mbox{${\rm C\ IV}$}}
31: \newcommand{\cii}{\mbox{${\rm C\ II}$}}
32: \newcommand{\oi}{\mbox{${\rm O\ I}$}}
33: \newcommand{\ovi}{\mbox{${\rm O\ VI}$}}
34: \newcommand{\nii}{\mbox{${\rm N\ II}$}}
35: \newcommand{\nv}{\mbox{${\rm N\ V}$}}
36: \newcommand{\siiv}{\mbox{${\rm Si\ IV}$}}
37: \newcommand{\siii}{\mbox{${\rm Si\ II}$}}
38: \newcommand{\siiii}{\mbox{${\rm Si\ III}$}}
39: \newcommand{\feiii}{\mbox{${\rm Fe\ III}$}}
40: \def\N#1{{N({\rm #1})}}
41: \def\cm#1{\, {\rm cm^{#1}}}
42: \newcommand{\ibid}{\underline{\makebox[0.5in]{}}.}
43:
44: \special{papersize=8.5in,11in}
45:
46: \begin{document}
47:
48: %\twocolumn[%
49: \lefthead{Chen \etal}
50: \righthead{}
51:
52: \slugcomment{Accepted for Publication in the Astrophysical Journal}
53:
54: \title{SUPER STAR CLUSTER NGC\,1705-1: A LOCAL ANALOGUE TO THE BIRTHSITE OF
55: LONG-DURATION $\gamma$-RAY BURSTS}
56: \author{
57: HSIAO-WEN CHEN\altaffilmark{1},
58: JASON X.\ PROCHASKA\altaffilmark{2}, and
59: JOSHUA S.\ BLOOM\altaffilmark{3,4}
60: %Jay Ghallagher\altaffilmark{4}
61: }
62:
63: %\newpage
64:
65: \begin{abstract}
66:
67: Recent observations suggest that global properties of the host
68: galaxies for long-duration $\gamma$-ray bursts (GRBs) are particularly
69: well-suited for creating the massive star progenitors of these GRBs.
70: Motivated by the hypothesis that massive young star clusters located
71: in metal-poor, low-metallicity galaxies are a natural birthsite for
72: GRB progenitors, we present a comparison study of the ISM properties
73: along the sightline toward the super star cluster, NGC\,1705-1, and
74: those in distant GRB hosts. Using the same set of metal transitions
75: in the UV and applying known ISM structures in NGC\,1705, we find that
76: NGC\,1705-1 resembles distant GRB host galaxies in its high neutral
77: gas column, low molecular gas fraction, low metallicity,
78: $\alpha$-element enhancement,and low dust depletion. The lack of
79: molecular gas is due to the enhanced UV radiation field in the
80: starburst environment, consistent with the expectations for GRB
81: progenitors. In addition, the known presence of dense neutral gas
82: clouds at $r\apl 500$ pc from NGC\,1705-1 provides a natural reservoir
83: of C$^+$, Si$^+$, and Fe$^+$ ions that may be subsequently excited by
84: the afterglow UV radiation field to produce excited lines commonly
85: seen in GRB host ISM. We further argue that the apparent offset in
86: the velocity profiles of low- and high-ionization transitions from
87: absorption-line observations alone already offers important clues for
88: related starburst episodes in GRB host galaxies. Our study shows that
89: a statistical comparison between the ISM around star clusters and
90: high-redshift GRB progenitors is important for identifying the key
91: physical parameters that facilitate the formation of GRBs.
92:
93:
94: \end{abstract}
95:
96: \keywords{gamma rays: bursts---ISM: abundances---ISM: kinematics---intergalactic medium}
97: %]
98: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Astronomy \& Astrophysics, University of
99: Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, {\tt hchen@oddjob.uchicago.edu}}
100:
101: \altaffiltext{2}{UCO/Lick Observatory; University of California, Santa
102: Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, {\tt xavier@ucolick.org}}
103:
104: \altaffiltext{3}{Department of Astronomy, 601 Campbell Hall, University of
105: California, Berkeley, CA 94720 {\tt jbloom@astron.berkeley.edu}}
106:
107: \altaffiltext{4}{Sloan Research Fellow}
108:
109: %\newpage
110:
111: \section{INTRODUCTION}
112:
113: %\renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\fnsymbol{footnote}}
114: \setcounter{footnote}{0}
115:
116: Mounting evidence has lent strong support for the origin of
117: long-duration gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) in the death of massive stars
118: (see Woosley \& Bloom 2006 for a review; but also see Fynbo \etal\
119: 2006a, Gal-Yam \etal\ 2006, \& Della Valle \etal\ 2006 for recent
120: discoveries). Specifically, a direct association between GRBs and
121: Type Ib/c supernovae (SNe) is established for GRBs 980425, 030329, and
122: 031203 (Patat \etal\ 2001; Hjorth \etal\ 2003; Stanek \etal\ 2003;
123: Malesani \etal\ 2004). These SNe of Type Ic show no hydrogen or
124: strong SiII transitions in their spectra, and have never been seen in
125: elliptical galaxies (Filippenko 1997). While it is conceivable that
126: all long-duration GRBs occur contemporaneously with a Type Ic SN,
127: their low event rate indicates that only a small fraction ($< 0.1$\%)
128: of Type Ic SNe are accompanied by a GRB phase (van Putten 2004;
129: Podsiadlowski \etal\ 2004; Soderberg \etal\ 2006). For stars to lose
130: their hydrogen envelope prior to the core collapse and form a GRB,
131: current theoretical models have homed in on progenitors with initial
132: stellar mass of $M=25-30\ M_\odot$, fast rotation speed, and low
133: metallicity $Z\apl 10\%\ Z_\odot$ (Woosley \& Heger 2007).
134:
135: These GRBs are therefore expected to originate preferentially in
136: metal-poor environment and/or underluminous galaxies. Observations of
137: five nearby ($z_{\rm GRB}<0.17$) host galaxies indeed show that the
138: host galaxies tend to be underluminous and that two of these galaxies
139: also have an integrated H\,II-region abundance below what is expected
140: from a nominal luminosity-metallicity relation of field galaxies
141: (e.g.\ Prochaska \etal\ 2004; Modjaz \etal\ 2006). At the same time,
142: chemical abundance studies of high-redshift ($z>1$) hosts have been
143: carried out based on absorption lines identified in early-time
144: afterglow spectra (e.g.\ Fynbo \etal\ 2006b; Savaglio 2006; Prochaska
145: \etal\ 2007), where the emission lines of an H\,II region become too
146: faint to be detected. Abundance measurements of the cold interstellar
147: medium (ISM) based on absorption-line studies, despite representing
148: only a small volume along a pencil beam from the afterglow, are less
149: subject to uncertainties in the ionization fraction or temperature of
150: the gas, and therefore offer a more accurate assessment of the
151: metallicity. Comprehensive studies of afterglow absorption-line
152: spectra have also allowed us to resolve gas at $\sim 100$ pc from the
153: progenitor stars, providing direct constraints on the ISM properties
154: of the progenitor environment (e.g.\ Prochaska, Chen, \& Bloom 2006;
155: Chen \etal\ 2007; Vreeswijk \etal\ 2007).
156:
157: However, our understanding of the progenitor environment is far from
158: clear. For example, roughly 50\% of GRB afterglows are located behind
159: a large column of neutral gas with $\log\,N(\hI)=21.5-22.5$ (Jakobsson
160: \etal\ 2006) but no trace of molecular gas to very low limits $f_{\rm
161: H_2} = 2\,N({\rm H_2})/[N(\hI)+2\,N({\rm H_2})]\apl 10^{-6}$
162: (Tumlinson \etal\ 2007). Using a sample of 16 afterglow spectra,
163: Prochaska \etal\ (2007) showed that GRB hosts have sub-solar chemical
164: abundances and an $\alpha$-element enhancement relative to Fe in the
165: ISM, but also that a non-negligible fraction exhibit $>10$\% solar
166: abundances. In addition, these authors also showed that even with a
167: large neutral gas column, there can be little dust extinction along
168: the sightlines in the host ISM toward the afterglows (see also
169: Starling \etal\ 2007). The lack of H$_2$ can, in principle, be
170: explained by a high destruction rate due to the enhanced
171: photo-ionization radiation field in the star-forming cloud that hosts
172: the GRB progenitor and by a low formation rate inferred from the
173: observed low metallicity. But at high enough gas density ($n_{\rm
174: H}>10^3$ cm$^{-3}$), self-shielding is expected to be effective and
175: will promote H$_2$ survival (e.g.\ Tumlinson \etal\ 2007).
176:
177: Super star clusters provide an interesting local analogue for
178: understanding the formation of GRBs for two main reasons. First,
179: Wolf-Rayet stars, a popular candidate for GRB progenitors (e.g.\
180: Woosely \& Bloom 2006), are often found in young star clusters (see
181: Crowther 2006 for references). Second, star clusters contain a large
182: number of massive stars in a small volume and are expected to have on
183: average a higher rate of stellar collision and mass transfer between
184: individual stars for nurturing the formation of a GRB. Various
185: authors have proposed that dense stellar environments facilitate
186: stellar coalescence for forming blackholes that power the GRBs (e.g.\
187: Hansen \& Murali 1998; Efremov 2001). In addition, GRBs have been
188: considered as a possible source for powering giant HI supperbubble
189: shells found in nearby galaxies (Efremov, Elmegreen, \& Hodge 1998;
190: Loeb \& Perna 1998) A direct comparison between absorption-line
191: properties in the ISM surrounding super star clusters and those
192: identified in GRB host galaxies may therefore provide important
193: calibrations for interpreting afterglow absorption-line observations.
194:
195: To gain further insights for interpreting the afterglow
196: absorption-line spectra of high-redshift GRBs, we have searched for
197: ultraviolet echelle spectra of nearby super star clusters in the
198: Hubble Space Telescope (HST) Data Archive. NGC\,1705-1, a super star
199: cluster sitting at the center of a blue compact dwarf galaxy NGC\,1705
200: at redshift $z=0.002$, is the only star cluster with high quality
201: echelle spectra from the Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph (STIS).
202: The galaxy is a well known starburst galaxy that exhibits evidence of
203: galactic scale gas outflows. It has a total luminosity of $\sim 0.01\
204: L_*$ and an H\,II region abundance of $\approx$ 35\% solar (e.g.\ Lee
205: \& Skillman 2004). A comparison between the on-going star formation
206: rate and $B$-band luminosity indicates a formation time scale that is
207: much shorter than normal irregular galaxies and comparable to what is
208: known for GRB host galaxies at high redshift (e.g.\ Christensen,
209: Hjorth, \& Gorosabel 2004). The spectra of the super star cluster
210: were originally taken for studying the physical conditions of the
211: galactic winds driven by starburst outflows (see e.g.\ V\'azquez
212: \etal\ 2004). Here we re-visit this data set and present new column
213: density measurements of various low-ionization species. We compare
214: the ISM properties of the dense star cluster with those of
215: high-redshift GRB host galaxies.
216:
217: This paper is organized as the following. In Section 2, we review
218: known ISM properties integrated over the entire galaxy NGC\,1705 and
219: ISM properties that are local to the super star cluster NGC\,1705-1.
220: In Section 3, we present our absorption-line measurements of the cold
221: gas along the line of sight toward NGC\,1705-1. In Section 4, we
222: compare the ISM properties of NGC\,1705-1 with measurements for
223: high-redshift GRB hosts. We describe the value of collecting echelle
224: spectra of nearby supper star clusters using future space UV
225: facilities such as the Cosmic Origin Spectrograph, for understanding
226: the GRB progenitor environment at high redshift.
227:
228:
229: \section{REVIEW OF NGC\,1705}
230:
231: NGC\,1705 is a well-known starburst galaxy at $z=0.00209$ that has
232: been studied extensively over a broad spectral window, from
233: ultraviolet through radio frequencies (e.g.\ Lamb \etal\ 1985;
234: Calzetti \etal\ 1994; Meurer \etal\ 1998; Lee \& Skillman 2004). This
235: blue irregular galaxy hosts a super star cluster, NGC\,1705-1 (Figure
236: 1), that is among the brightest star clusters in the local universe
237: and contributes roughly 40\% of the total UV light of the galaxy
238: (Meurer \etal\ 1992). Spatially resolved strong emission lines
239: indicate that the warm ISM in the H\,II region can be charaterized
240: with an electron temperature of $T_e=(1.1-2)\times 10^4$ K (Lee \&
241: Skillman 2004). One of the most notable features in the ISM of
242: NGC\,1705 is the multiple super bubble shells, indicating gas outflow
243: driven by the last episode of starburst roughly $10^7$ years ago that
244: also formed most of the stars ($\sim\,10^5\ M_\odot$) seen today in
245: NGC\,1705-1 (Meurer \etal\ 1992). The galaxy also exhibits very
246: little intrinsic reddening (Calzetti \etal\ 1994) and shows no sign of
247: molecular gas to very sensitive levels (Greve \etal\ 1996; Hoopes
248: \etal\ 2004).
249:
250: Moderate-to-high resolution UV spectra of NGC\,1705-1 from different
251: space facilities are published in the literature. While most of the
252: absorption lines identified in the spectra are of ISM origin (York
253: \etal\ 1990), detailed stellar population analysis based on a few
254: stellar photospheric lines have placed strong constraints on the age,
255: metallicity, and IMF of the cluster (V\'azquez \etal\ 2004). The ISM
256: absorption lines exhibit two strong components with respective
257: blue-shifted velocity of $v\approx -43$ and $v\approx -77$ \kms\
258: (Heckman \etal\ 2001; V\'azquez \etal\ 2004). The low velocity
259: component is believed to trace the cold, neutral ISM, while the
260: high-velocity component is interpreted to originate in a gas outflow.
261: Abundance measurements based on low ions such as N$^0$, S$^+$ and
262: Fe$^+$ support the scenario that the cold neutral ISM has been
263: enriched primarily by Type II SNe that occurred in the star cluster
264: roughly $10^7$ yr ago (Sahu \& Blades 1997; Sahu 1998). In addition,
265: the observed kinematic profile and the absorption strength of the
266: O\,VI doublet are consistent with the expectations of superwinds
267: undergoing radiative cooling (Heckman \etal\ 2001).
268:
269: A summary of known properties of galaxy NGC\,1705 and the super star
270: cluster NGC\,1705-1 is presented in Table 1. We note that ISM
271: absorption-line measurements in the table are based primarily on
272: previous FUSE observations (e.g.\ Heckman \etal\ 2001; Hoopes \etal\ 2004).
273:
274: \section{ISM PROPERTIES OF NGC\,1705-1}
275:
276: \subsection{STIS Echelle Spectra}
277:
278: We have retrieved all available STIS echelle spectra of NGC\,1705-1
279: in the HST Data Archive. The observations were carried out using a
280: $0.2\arcsec\times 0.2\arcsec$ slit and three different grating set-ups
281: for a total exposure time of 28,569 s (PID=8297). Individual echelle
282: spectra were reduced, extracted, and calibrated using standard
283: pipeline techniques. To form a final spectrum for absorption line
284: studies, we calculated a weighted average of individual spectra and
285: the corresponding 1-$\sigma$ error array per grating set-up with the
286: weighting factor determined by the inverse variance. We normalized
287: the mean spectrum with a best-fit, low-order polynomial continuum.
288: The combined and normalized spectra have a spectral resolution of
289: ${\rm FWHM}\approx 7$ \kms, covering wavelength ranges of
290: $\lambda=1150-1708$ \AA\ with the E140M grating at signal-to-noise
291: ratio ${\rm S/N}\approx 12$ and $\lambda=1700-3060$ \AA\ with the
292: E230M grating at ${\rm S/N}\approx 7$ per resolution element.
293:
294: \subsection{Column Density Measurements}
295:
296: Absorption lines of heavy ions identified in the ISM of NGC\,1705
297: exhibit complex absorption profiles. In Figure 2, we present in the
298: three left panels low ionization species, and in the right column
299: high-ionization species. The zero relative velocity ($v=0$)
300: corresponds to the systematic redshift of NGC\,1705 $z=0.00209$,
301: measured in H\,I 21cm (Meurer \etal\ 1992) and in stellar photospheric
302: transitions (V\'azquez \etal\ 2004). The spectra include absorption
303: features from the Milky Way and a foreground high-velocity cloud (Sahu
304: \& Blades 1997) which occasionally blend with features from NGC\,1705.
305: These `contaminating' features have been identified and are indicated
306: with dotted lines in the panels. In addition, stellar photospheric
307: features are apparent in transitions such as C\,IV and Si\,IV, as a
308: broad, shallow component extending from $v=-500$\kms\ through $v=+300$
309: \kms.
310:
311: The low- and high-ionization species in the ISM of NGC\,1705 exhibit
312: distinct kinematic signatures. The low-ion resonance lines, (which
313: excludes excited C$^+$ transition, C\,II* 1335), show two narrow
314: components at $v=-20$ and $-40$ \kms, while the high-ionization
315: elements are broad and show velocity centroids systematically
316: blue-shifted to $v=-70$ \kms. These high ions share the same
317: kinematic feature as the O\,VI absorption doublet discussed in Heckman
318: \etal\ (2001).
319:
320: We measure the column density of each ion using the apparent optical
321: depth method (Savage \& Sembach 1991) over a velocity interval of
322: $v=-100$ to $+40$ \kms\ for low-ionization transitions and
323: $v=-250$ to $+100$ \kms\ for high-ionization transitions. One
324: exception is for the S\,II 1259 transition, where the line is
325: contaminated by the Si\,II 1260 transition from the foreground
326: high-velocity cloud. We determine $N({\rm S\,II})$ using the VPFIT
327: software package, including multiple components. The measurements are
328: summarized in Table 2.
329:
330: The H\,I \lya\ transition of NGC\,1705 is present in the STIS
331: spectrum. It is saturated and blended with absorption from the Milky
332: Way (Figure 3). We note, however, that the $N(\hI)$ value of
333: NGC\,1705 is well constrained by the red damping wing. We have
334: performed a Voigt profile analysis and found $\log\,N(\hI)=20.05\pm
335: 0.15$ for NGC\,1705 and $\log\,N(\hI)=19.7$ for the Milky Way. This is
336: consistent with the finding of Sahu (1998) and Heckman \etal\ (2001)
337: based on HST GHRS and FUSE observations, respectively. The best-fit
338: model profile combining absorption from the Milky Way and NGC\,1705 is
339: presented as the red curve in Figure 3. The total H\,I gas column
340: density observed along the sightline toward NGC\,1705-1 is only about
341: 10\% of what is observed in H\,I 21 cm emission (Meurer \etal\ 1992),
342: indicating that the super cluster is located near the front edge of
343: the galaxy and the sightline only probes a fraction of the (presumably
344: outer) gaseous disk.
345: %Presmuably, this also explains they this star
346: %cluster is amongst the brightest extragalactic UV sources on the sky.
347: %On the other hand, assuming a metallicity of $1/3$ solar for the
348: %galaxy and a Galactic extinction curve, the predicted reddening for
349: %the full disk is modest ($A_{1200} \approx $? mag).
350: %JXP -- We should think a bit more about what this kind of dust bias
351: % means for this and future studies on star clusters.
352:
353: \subsection{Chemical Composition of the Cold ISM}
354:
355: Based on the column density measurements presented in Table 2, we
356: derive an iron abundance of $[{\rm Fe}/{\rm H}]=-1.1 \pm 0.2$ and
357: $[{\rm S}/{\rm H}]=-0.6 \pm 0.1$ with respect to the solar values from
358: Asplund, Grevesse, \& Sauval (2005). The sulfer abundance in the cold
359: neutral medium is consistent with the oxygen abundance determined for
360: the H\,II region, $[{\rm O}/{\rm H}]=-0.5\pm 0.05$ (Table
361: 1)\footnote{We note the low oxygen abundance $[{\rm O}/{\rm H}]$
362: determined by Heckman \etal\ (2001) based on O\,I absorption lines
363: observed in FUSE spectra. Given the observed column density, however,
364: we expect the line to be saturated. Therefore, the reported value
365: should be treated as a lower limit.}.
366:
367: The large ratio of $[{\rm S}/{\rm Fe}]=+0.5 \pm 0.2$ indicates a an
368: $\alpha$-element enhancement, which is qualitatively consistent with a
369: chemical enrichment history dominated by Type II supernovae and
370: little/no reddening observed for the ISM of NGC\,1705 (Calzetti \etal\
371: 1994). Although dust depletion can be substantial even when reddening
372: is negligible (e.g.\ Savaglio 2006; Prochaska \etal\ 2007), the
373: significant underabundance of nitrogen, $[{\rm N}/{\rm H}]=-2.1 \pm
374: 0.1$, from Heckman \etal\ (2001) indicates that more evolved,
375: intermediate-mass stars have not formed to produce abundant nitrogen
376: and is consistent with a chemical enrichment history dominated by Type
377: II supernovae (e.g.\ Henry et al.\ 2000).
378:
379: In contrast with the GRB host environment observed at high redshift,
380: we do not observe excited ions (e.g.\ strong C\,II* 1335 transition)
381: for the neutral gas in the ISM toward NGC\,1705-1. Instead, the
382: observed C\,II* 1335 transition is blueshifted by $\approx 30$ \kms\
383: from the neutral species (see discussion in the following section).
384: The lack of excited C$^+$ in the neutral gas implies a warm neutral
385: medium and/or low dust content (Wolfe, Prochaska, \& Gawiser 2003).
386:
387: \subsection{Gas Density and Temperature of the Ionized Gas}
388:
389: As noted earlier, high-ionization transitions such as C\,IV 1548,
390: 1550, Si\,III 1206, Si\,IV 1393, 1402, and Al\,II 1854, 1862 are
391: observed to be blue-shifted at $v\approx -77$ \kms\ in the STIS
392: echelle spectra (Figure 2). These coincide in velocity space with the
393: O\,VI absorption doublet reported by Heckman \etal\ (2001). In
394: particular, we note the presence of strong C\,II* at the same velocity
395: offset, where little Fe\,II absorption has been detected. This is
396: similar to what is observed in the ISM toward HD\,192639
397: (Sonnentrucker \etal\ 2002), whose origin is interpreted to be in
398: shocks produced by expanding supperbubble shells or stellar winds.
399:
400: The broad line widths seen in unsaturated lines such as C\,II* 1335
401: and Al\,III 1854 are suggestive of a collisional ionization origin.
402: Adopting the observed S\,III and S\,IV transitions that share the same
403: kinematic features with the O\,VI absorber (Heckman \etal\ 2001), we
404: find $\log\,N({\rm S\,III})-\log\,N({\rm S\,IV})<0.57$ and constrain
405: the gas temperature at $T> 6\times 10^4$ K under a collisional
406: ionization equilibrium. Further constraints for the gas temperature
407: can be obtained by comparing the line width of C\,II* 1335 and Al\,III
408: 1854. We measure a Doppler parameter of $b_{\rm C\,II*}=22.5\pm 1.2$
409: \kms\ for C$^+$ and $b_{\rm Al\,III}=17.73\pm 5.4$ \kms\ for
410: Al$^{2+}$ from the STIS spectra. Assuming that these ions originate at
411: the same location, we further infer a gas temperature of $T\approx
412: 2.5\times 10^5$ K and a turbulent velocity of $b_0\approx 12.6$ \kms.
413:
414: Under a collisional excitation scenario, we can also constrain the
415: density of ionized gas based on the relative strengths between
416: resonance absorption and absorption from excited states. Given that
417: the C\,II 1334 transition is fully saturated, we obtain the contraint
418: using the relative abundance between excited Si$^+$ and ground-state
419: Si$^+$. The high-velocity component at $v=-77$ \kms\ is moderately
420: resolved from the warm and cold gas components. We perform a
421: multiple-component Voigt profie analysis and measure $\log\,N({\rm
422: Si\,II})=13.8\pm 0.1$ and $b=8.7\pm 0.9$ \kms\ for the high-velocity
423: component. The lack of Si\,II* yields $N({\rm Si\,II*})/N({\rm
424: Si\,II}) < 0.04$, leading to an electron density $n_e\apl 50$
425: cm$^{-3}$ for $T_e \sim 10^5$ K.
426:
427: \section{DISCUSSION}
428:
429: Recent observations of GRB host environments have yielded two main
430: results. First, the ISM of long-duration GRBs appear to be
431: essentially devoid of molecular gas, despite exhibiting strong
432: neutral-hydrogen absorption columns. Second, these GRBs occur
433: preferentially in metal-poor, low-metallicity, low-luminosity,
434: actively star forming galaxies. Together these suggest that global
435: properties of the hosts are particularly well-suited for the creation
436: of the massive star progenitors thought to give rise to GRBs. If
437: true, the study of local analogues of the sorts of environments
438: amenable to GRB progenitor birth should help in understanding the
439: nature of distant GRB birthsites.
440:
441: NGC\,1705 is a well known starburst galaxy in the nearby universe,
442: with special interest because of the clear presence of substantial
443: O$^{5+}$ in a starburst-driven outflow. We have re-visited and
444: presented new measurements of the ISM properties along the line of
445: sight toward the super star cluster, NGC\,1705-1, using archived by
446: unanalyzed STIS echelle spectra. The study is motivated by the
447: hypothesis that massive young star clusters offer a birthsite for the
448: progenitor stars of high-redshift GRBs, because of the dense stellar
449: environment (e.g.\ Hansen \& Murali 1998; Efremov 2001). The
450: available STIS UV echelle spectra of the cluster show numerous ionic
451: transitions with a complex velocity structure, and allow us to use the
452: same set of metal absorption lines for a direct comparison between
453: known properties of the ISM near the progenitors of high-redshift GRBs
454: and the ISM properties around NGC\,1705-1. Here we discuss the
455: insights we gain from the UV echelle spectra of nearby super star
456: clusters for interpreting the afterglow absorption-line studies of
457: distant GRB hosts.
458:
459: \subsection{Gaseous Structures of the ISM near NGC\,1705-1}
460:
461: The complex velocity structure displayed in the absorption-line
462: profiles of different ionization species indicate a multi-phase ISM
463: near the super star cluster NGC\,1705-1. Based on FUSE observations
464: of the starburst, Heckman \etal\ (2001) presented a comprehensive
465: study of the thermal state of the ISM. These authors identified (1) a
466: neutral medium as demonstrated by H\,I, O\,I, Si\,II, and Fe\,II
467: absorption, (2) a warm photoionized phase as demonstrated by the
468: H$\alpha$ emission nebula (Meurer \etal\ 1992; Marlowe \etal\ 1995)
469: and N\,II and S\,III absorption, and (3) coronal gas as demonstrated
470: by the O\,VI absorption doublet. These results are well supported by
471: our analysis of the STIS echelle observations.
472:
473: Given the small velocity offset of the neutral gas ($v\approx 43$
474: \kms) with respect to the nebular lines, Heckman \etal\ propose that
475: the neutral gaseous clouds represent neutral ISM that has been
476: engulfed by the expanding superbubble. Under this scenario, the
477: distance of the neutral gas must be $d_{\rm neutral} \apl 500$ pc, the
478: observed size of the superbubble, and the gas density is required to
479: be $n_{\rm neutral} \apg 8\ {\rm cm}^{-3}$ for effective self-shieding
480: from the ionizing radiation of the star cluster. Together these
481: constrain the cloud to be $\sim 10$ pc for producing the observed H\,I
482: column density.
483:
484: Given the large observed column density of O$^{+5}$ at $v\approx 77$ \kms,
485: Heckman \etal\ also concluded that the coronal gas cannot originate
486: from behind the shocks induced by the expanding superbubble, but
487: rather blowout gas (super winds) that are undergoing radiative cooling
488: between photo-ionized fragments of the shells. In this picture, the
489: ISM around NGC\,1705-1 has been heated by both the expansion of super
490: bubbles and the UV radiation of the central star cluster. The STIS
491: echelle observations allow us to constrain the gas temperature at
492: $T_{\rm coronal} \sim 10^5$ K and a bulk motion of of $b_0\approx
493: 12.6$ \kms.
494:
495: \subsection{Comparisons with the ISM Properties of High-redshift GRB Hosts}
496:
497: The primary objectives of the present study are (1) to explore an
498: alternative scenario in which young super star clusters provide a
499: likely birthsite for long-duration GRBs, and (2) to examine whether
500: available UV echelle spectra of a nearby super star clusters offer
501: additional insights for interpreting afterglow absorption-line studies
502: of high-redshift bursts. Our current understanding of the host ISM
503: around high-redshift bursts can be summarized as the following.
504:
505: First, Prochaska, Chen, \& Bloom (2006) argued that the large
506: neutral gas column observed along an afterglow sightline is located at
507: $r=100-1000$ pc from the GRB progenitor star, in order for Mg$^0$ to
508: survive the intense UV radiation field. The associated heavy ions
509: such as C$^+$, Si$^+$, and Fe$^+$ in the neutral gas clouds would be
510: subsequently excited by the afterglow UV photons for producing the
511: observed absorption features from their excited states (confirmed by
512: Vreeswijk \etal 2007 for GRB\,060418). The neutral gas clouds in the
513: ISM model of NGC\,1705-1 from Heckman \etal\ (2001) offers a natural
514: candidate for the presence of dense neutral clouds in the vicinity of
515: a GRB progenitor at high redshift\footnote{We note that the STIS
516: echelle spectra presented in this paper were obtained using a small
517: aperture $0.2\arcsec\times 0.2\arcsec$ that was centered on
518: NGC\,1705-1, in contrast to the $30\arcsec$ aperture available for the
519: FUSE observations. The agreement between our respective $N(\hI)$ and
520: $N({\rm Fe\,II})$ measurements, therefore, confirms that the neutral
521: gas close to the super star cluster dominates the absorption column
522: observed in FUSE.}. Note that the observed $N(\hI)$ along the
523: sightline toward NGC\,1705-1 is more similar to strong Lyman limit
524: systems of $N(\hI)=19-20$ observed in the hosts of GRBs\,021004,
525: 050908, and 060526 (Jakobsson \etal\ 2006). Higher column density
526: absorbers would imply either a smaller cloud size or higher neutral
527: gas density. Nonetheless, should a GRB occur in NGC\,1705-1, the
528: neutral gas at $r\sim 500$ pc would still remain neutral under the
529: afterglow radiation field, but would be excited to produce the
530: commonly observed transitions from excited ions.
531:
532: In addition, the ISM of NGC\,1705 exhibits little/no trace of
533: molecular gas, neither CO nor H$_2$, despite the recent starburst
534: episode $\sim\,10$ Myr ago and on-going star formation $\sim
535: 0.06\,M_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$. NGC\,1705 resembles the Small Magellanic
536: Cloud both in size and in the total metal content, but has on average
537: a substantially smaller molecular fraction: $f_{\rm H_2}<5.2\times
538: 10^{-7}$ for NGC\,1705-1 (Table 1) versus $\langle f_{\rm H_2} \rangle
539: \lesssim 0.01$ near star-forming regions in SMC (Tumlinson \etal\
540: 2002). The super star cluster NGC\,1705-1 near the center of
541: NGC\,1705 is among the brightest star clusters in the local universe
542: (Meurer \etal\ 1995), containing massive stars of $> 30\ M_\odot$ and
543: $\sim 10$ Myr old.
544: %The UV radiation field is expected to be strong
545: %for moderate $N(\hI)$ in the starburst environment.
546:
547: The lack of molecules in the ISM around NGC\,1705-1 is reminiscent
548: of what is observed in the high column density clouds surrounding GRB
549: progenitors (Hatsukade \etal\ 2007; Tumlinson \etal\ 2007). The low
550: molecular fraction and dust extinction for moderately enriched ISM and
551: high gas density appear to be remarkably similar, implying that the
552: lack of molecules and dust may be due to the enhanced UV radiation
553: from massive stars in the star-forming region that hosts the GRB
554: progenitor (e.g.\ Hoopes \etal\ 2004; Tumlinson \etal\ 2007).
555:
556: We further note that similar to what is observed in the afterglow
557: spectra of high-redshift GRBs, low-ionization species in NGC\,1705-1
558: are more confined in a narrow veolicty interval whereas
559: high-ionization transitions exhibit larger velocity spread. The
560: apparent offset in the velocity profiles of low-ionization (such as
561: Fe\,II) and high-ionization transitions (such as C\,IV and Si\,IV)
562: observed toward NGC\,1705-1 (Figure 2) is now understood as due to
563: starburst driven outflows, based on extensive imaging and spectroscopy
564: studies. It suggests that important clues for possible starburst
565: nature in GRB host galaxies may already be learned based on afterlow
566: spectra alone. The is particularly valuable because the host galaxies
567: of distant GRBs are faint and challenging to be found in emission. Of
568: the six GRB host studied in Chen \etal\ (2007), we identify velocity
569: offsets between Si\,II and C\,IV/Si\,IV over the range from $v=-65$ to
570: $v=-200$ \kms, along the sightlines toward GRBs\,021004, 050730,
571: 050908, and 060418.
572:
573: Finally, we present in Table 3 a direct comparison of different ISM
574: properties between NGC\,1705-1 and GRB hosts. The table shows that
575: the two sources occupy a comparable parameter space. In particular,
576: absorption-line studies of GRB host galaxies show that the host ISM of
577: high-redshift GRBs exhibits clear $\alpha$-element enhancement with
578: little dust extinction/depletion along the sightlines toward the
579: afterglows.
580:
581: The similarity in the ISM properties shows that this scenario for
582: long-duration GRBs to originate in massive star clusters is at least
583: viable. The relatively low nitrogen abundance also signifies the
584: young age of the progenitor star clusters, because nitrogen is
585: produced primarily in intermediate-mass AGB stars (e.g.\ Prochaska
586: \etal\ 2007). NGC\,1705-1 is unique among known super star clusters
587: locally, because of its young age and massive stellar content.
588: Conclusive evidence requires a large UV spectroscopic sample of nearby
589: super star clusters. These data are necessary for a complete
590: statistical analysis of their ISM properties to be compared with
591: afterglow absorption-line studies. For example, a comparison of the
592: $N(\hI)$ distribution and the size distribution of neutral clouds in
593: the vicinity of young star clusters may offer important support, or
594: otherwise, for the star cluster origin of long-duration GRBs. We
595: expect that a direct comparison with known statistical properties of
596: high-redshift GRB hosts will allow us to identify the key physical
597: parameters that facilitate the formation of GRBs. It is worthwhile to
598: note also the direct evidence of inflow gas around NGC\,1705, as
599: evidenced by the redshifted components seen in C\,IV and Si\,IV. A
600: larger sample may be useful for studying gas acretion around galaxies.
601: Future spectroscopic observations of nearby super star clusters using
602: the Cosmic Origin Spectrograph to be installed on the HST are
603: necessary.
604:
605:
606: \acknowledgments
607:
608: We thank J. Gallagher for a coffee discussion that sparked this
609: analysis and D.\ Welty for his valuable input on HD\,192639. This
610: research has made use of the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED)
611: which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California
612: Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics
613: and Space Administration. H.-W.C., JXP, and JSB acknowledge support
614: from NASA grant NNG05GF55G. H.-W.C. acknowledges partial support from
615: an NSF grant AST-0607510.
616:
617:
618: %\newpage
619:
620: \begin{references}
621:
622: \vskip 0.2in
623:
624: \reference{} Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., \& Sauval, A. J. 2005, in ASP
625: Conf. Ser., Cosmic Abundances as Records of Stellar Evolution and Nucleosynthesis, ed. F. N. Bash \& T. G. Barnes (San Francisco: ASP), p. 25
626:
627: \reference{} Calzetti, D., Kinney, A.~L., \& Storchi-Bergmann, T. 1994, ApJ, 429, 582
628:
629: \reference{} Chen, H.-W. \etal\ 2007, ApJ in press (astro-ph/0611079)
630:
631: \reference{} Christensen, L., Hjorth, J., \& Gorosabel, J. 2004, A\&A, 425, 913
632:
633: \reference{} Crowther, P. 2007, ARA\&A in press (astro-ph/0610356)
634:
635: \reference{} Della Valle, M. \etal\ 2006, Nature, 444, 1050
636:
637: \reference{} Efremov, Y. N., Ehlerova, S., \& Palous, J. 1999, A\&A, 350, 468
638:
639: \reference{} Efremov, Y.~N. 2001, in the ``Gamma-Ray Bursts in the Afterglow Era''. Edited by E. Costa, F. Frontera, and J. Hjorth. Springer-Verlag, 2001, p. 243
640:
641: \reference{} Filippenko, A.~V. \etal\ 1997, ARA\&A, 35, 309
642:
643: \reference{} Fynbo, J.~.P.~U. \etal\ 2006a, Nature, 444, 1047
644:
645: \reference{} Fynbo, J.~P.~U. \etal\ 2006b, A\&A, 451, L47
646:
647: \reference{} Gal-Yam, A. \etal\ 2006, Nature, 444, 1053
648:
649: \reference{} Greve, A., Becker, R., Johansson, L.~E.~B., \& McKeith, C.~D. 1996, A\&A, 312, 391
650:
651: \reference{} Hansen, B.~M.~S. \& Murali, C. 1998, ApJ, 505, L15
652:
653: \reference{} Hatsukade, B. \etal\ 2007, PASJ, 59, 67
654:
655: \reference{} Heckman, T. M., Sembach, K. R., Meurer, G. R., Strickland, D. K., Martin, C. L., Calzetti, D., \& Leitherer, C. 2001b, ApJ, 554, 1021
656:
657: \reference{} Hjorth, J. \etal\ 2003, Nature, 423, 847
658:
659: \reference{} Hoopes, C. \etal\ 2004, ApJ, 612, 825
660:
661: \reference{} Jakobsson, P., et al. 2006, A\&A, 460, L13
662:
663: \reference{} Lamb, S.~A., Hjellming, M.~S., Gallagher, J.~S., III, \& Hunter, D.~A. 1985, ApJ, 291, L63
664:
665: \reference{} Lee, H. \& Skillman, E.~D. 2004, ApJ, 614, 698
666:
667: \reference{} Loeb, A., \& Perna, R. 1998, ApJ, 503, L35
668:
669: \reference{} Malesani, D. \etal\ 2004, ApJ, 609, L5
670:
671: \reference{} Marlowe, A.~T., Meirer, G.~R., \& Heckman, T.~M. 1999, ApJ, 522, 183
672:
673: \reference{} Meurer, G. R., Freeman, K. C., Dopita, M. A., \& Cacciari, C. 1992, AJ, 103, 60
674:
675: \reference{} Meurer, G. R., Heckman, T. M., Leitherer, C., Kinney, A., Robert, C., \& Garnett, D. R. 1995, AJ, 110, 2665
676:
677: \reference{} Meurer, G. R., Staveley-Smith, L., \& Killeen, N. E. B. 1998, MNRAS, 300, 705
678:
679: \reference{} Modjaz, M. \etal\ 2007, ApJ submitted (astro-ph/0701246)
680:
681: \reference{} Patat, F. \etal\ 2001, ApJ, 555, 900
682:
683: \reference{} Podsiadlowski, P., Mazzali, P. A., Nomoto, K., Lazzati, D., \& Cappellaro, E. 2004, ApJ, 607, L17
684:
685: \reference{} Prochaska, J.~X. \etal\ 2004, ApJ, 611, 200
686:
687: \reference{} Prochaska, J. X., Chen, H.-W., \& Bloom, J. S. 2006, ApJ, 648, 95
688:
689: \reference{} Prochaska, J.~X., Chen, H.-W., Dessauges-Zavadsky, M., \& Bloom, J.~S. 2007, ApJ submitted (astro-ph/0703665)
690:
691: \reference{} Sahu, M.~S. \& Blades, J.~S. 1997, ApJ, 484, L125
692:
693: \reference{} Sahu, M.~S. 1998, AJ, 116, 1205
694:
695: \reference{} Savage, B.~D. \& Sembach, K.~R. 1991, ApJ, 379, 245
696:
697: \reference{} Savaglio, S. 2006, New Journal of Physics, 8, 195
698:
699: \reference{} Smith, L.~J. \& Gallagher, J.~S., III 2001, MNRAS, 326, 1027
700:
701: \reference{} Soderberg, A. ~M., Nakar, E., Berger, E., \& Kulkarni, S.~R. 2006, ApJ, 638, 930
702:
703: \reference{} Sonnentrucker, P., Friedman, S.~D., Welty, D.~E., York, D.~G., \& Snow, T.~P. 2002, ApJ, 576, 241
704:
705: \reference{} Stanek, K.~Z. \etal\ 2003, ApJ, 591, L17
706:
707: \reference{} Starling, R.~L.~C. \etal\ 2007, ApJ in press (astro-ph/0610899)
708:
709: \reference{} Tosi, M., Sabbi, E., Bellazzini, M., Aloisi, A., Greggio, L., Leitherer, C., \& Montegriffo, P. 2001, AJ, 122, 1271
710:
711: \reference{} Tumlinson, J. \etal\ 2002, ApJ, 566, 857
712:
713: \reference{} Tumlinson, J., Prochaska, J.~X., Chen, H.-W., Dessauges-Zavadsky, M., \& Bloom, J. S. 2007, ApJ submitted (astro-ph/0703666)
714:
715: \reference{} van Putten, M.~.H.~.P.~M. 2004, ApJ, 611, L81
716:
717: \reference{} V\'azquez, G.~A. \etal\ 2004, ApJ, 600, 162
718:
719: \reference{} Vreeswijk, P. M. \etal\ 2007, ApJ submitted (astro-ph/0611690)
720:
721: \reference{} Woosley, S.~E. \& Bloom, J.~S. 2006, ARA\&A, 44, 507
722:
723: \reference{} Woosley, S.~E. \& Heger, A. 2006, ApJ, 637, 914
724:
725: \reference{} York, D.~G., Gaulet, A., Rybski, P., Gallagher, J., Blades, J.~C., Morton, D.~C., \& Wamsteker, W. 1990, ApJ, 351, 412
726:
727:
728: \end{references}
729:
730: \begin{figure}
731: \begin{center}
732: \includegraphics[scale=0.7, angle=0]{f1t}
733: \caption{HST image of NGC\,1705 obtained using ACS/HRC with the F330W
734: (blue), F555W (green), and F814W (red) filters. Individual exposures
735: were downloaded from the HST data archive (PID=9989) and processed
736: using standard pipeline techniques. The processed frames were stacked
737: using our own software. The super star cluster, made of primarily
738: young blue stars, appears as a compact core near the center.}
739: \end{center}
740: \end{figure}
741:
742: \begin{figure}
743: \begin{center}
744: \includegraphics[scale=0.7,angle=270]{f2}
745: \caption{Complex absorption profiles of heavy ions identified at the
746: velocity of NGC\,1705 in the HST/STIS echelle spectrum. The three left
747: columns show low ionization species, and the right column shows
748: high-ionization species. The zero relative velocity ($v=0$)
749: corresponds to $z=0.00209$. Contaminating features are dotted out.
750: Stellar photospheric features are present in transitions such as C\,IV
751: and Si\,IV, as a broad, shallow component extending from
752: $v=-500$ \kms\ through $v=+300$ \kms. While strong
753: low-ionization transitions such as C\,II 1334 and Si\,II 1260 are
754: saturated, weaker transitions such as N\,I, S\,II 1259, and Fe\,II
755: 1608 clearly exhibit two narrow components in the neutral ISM at
756: $v=-15$ and $-45$ \kms. High ionization transitions such as
757: Al\,III, CIV, and Si\,IV exhibit a dominant component that is
758: systematically shifted to $v=-70$ \kms, coincident with the
759: kinematic signatures of the O\,VI absorption doublet discussed in
760: Heckman \etal\ (2001). We also note a weak contribution from highly
761: ionized gas at $v > 0$ \kms, presumably from photospheric absorption. }
762:
763: \end{center}
764: \end{figure}
765:
766: \begin{figure}
767: \begin{center}
768: \includegraphics[scale=0.6, angle=90]{f3}
769: \caption{Absorption profile of the hydrogen \lya\ transition toward
770: NGC\,1705-1. The black histogram represents the echelle spectrum and
771: the thin curve at the bottom represents the corresponding 1-$\sigma$
772: array. A Voigt profile analysis that includes two H\,I components at
773: $z=0.00209$ (the position of the vertical dashed line) and $z=0$ (the
774: emission feature) yield $\log\,N(\hI)=20.05\pm 0.15$ for NGC\,1705 and
775: $\log\,N(\hI)=19.7$ for the Milky Way. The best-fit model is
776: represented by the red curve with the yellow band marking the
777: 1-$\sigma$ uncertainties in the NGC~1705 \lya\ profile. The error is
778: dominated by systematic uncertainty due to continuum placement which
779: is described by the nearly horizontal dashed line. Although the
780: absorption feature is blended with the H\,I \lya\ absorption from the
781: Milky Way, the total neutral hydrogen absorption column density
782: $N(\hI)$ is well constrained by the red damping wind. Our $N(\hI)$
783: measurements agree very well with previous measurements by Sahu (1998)
784: and Heckman \etal\ (2001) based on HST GHRS and FUSE observations,
785: respectively. We note that the absorption features at $\lambda <
786: 1210$ \AA\ are due to Si\,III 1206 transitions at $z\le 0.00209$.}
787: \end{center}
788: \end{figure}
789:
790: \begin{deluxetable}{p{3in}cl}
791: \tabletypesize{\normalsize}
792: %\rotate
793: \tablewidth{0pt}
794: \tablecaption{Summary of Previously Derived Stellar and ISM Properties}
795: \tablehead{\colhead{Property} & \colhead{Measurement} & \colhead{References}}
796: \startdata
797: %\hline
798: \multicolumn{3}{c}{Galaxy NGC\,1705} \nl
799: \hline
800: Distance (Mpc) \dotfill & $5.1\pm 0.6$ & Tosi \etal\ (2001) \nl
801: $M_B$ \dotfill & $-15.6\pm 0.2$ & Marlowe \etal\ (1999) \nl
802: Star formation rate ($M_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$) \dotfill & 0.06 & Lee \& Skillman (2004) \nl
803: Formation time scale ($\tau=L_B/{\rm SFR}$ Gyr) \dotfill & $4.3$ & Lee \& Skillman (2004) \nl
804: \hline
805: \multicolumn{3}{c}{The Star Cluster, NGC\,1705-1} \nl
806: \hline
807: Stellar Mass ($10^5\,M_\odot$) \dotfill & $(4.8\pm 1.2)$ & Smith \& Gallagher (2001) \nl
808: Effective Radius (pc) \dotfill & $1.6\pm 0.4$ & Smith \& Gallagher (2001) \nl
809: Age (Myr) \dotfill & $12^{+3}_{-1}$ & V\'azquez \etal\ (2004) \nl
810: H\,II region $12+\log ({\rm O}/{\rm H})$ \dotfill & $8.21\pm 0.05$ & Lee \& Skillman (2004) \nl
811: H\,II region $12+\log ({\rm N}/{\rm H})$ \dotfill & $6.46\pm 0.08$ & Lee \& Skillman (2004) \nl
812: $T_e$ ($10^4$ K) \dotfill & 1.1--2 & Lee \& Skillman (2004) \nl
813: $E(B-V)$ \dotfill & $\apl\, 0.02$ mag & Calzetti \etal\ (1994) \nl
814: \hline
815: \multicolumn{3}{c}{The Neutral ISM} \nl
816: \hline
817: $v$ (\kms) \dotfill & $-43$ & V\'azquez \etal\ (2004) \nl
818: $N({\rm H}_2)$ (cm$^{-2}$) \dotfill & $<\,3.9\times 10^{14}$ & Hoopes \etal\ (2004) \nl
819: $N(\hI)$ (cm$^{-2}$) (21\,cm) \dotfill & $(1-2)\times 10^{21}$ & Meurer \etal\ (1998) \nl
820: $\log\,N(\hI)$ (\lyb\ absorption) \dotfill & $20.2\pm 0.2$ & Heckman \etal\ (2001) \nl
821: $\log\,N({\rm O\,I})$ \dotfill & $15.63\pm 0.08$ & Heckman \etal\ (2001)\tablenotemark{a} \nl
822: $\log\,N(\nI)$ \dotfill & $13.97\pm 0.08$ & Heckman \etal\ (2001) \nl
823: $\log\,N({\rm Si\,II})$ \dotfill & $14.61\pm 0.14$ & Heckman \etal\ (2001) \nl
824: $\log\,N({\rm Fe\,II})$ \dotfill & $14.54\pm 0.10$ & Heckman \etal\ (2001) \nl
825: %$[{\rm Si}/{\rm Fe}]$ \dotfill & $0.0 \pm 0.2$ & Heckman \etal\ (2001) \nl
826: %$[{\rm Si}/{\rm Fe}]$ \dotfill & $0.0 \pm 0.2$ & Heckman \etal\ (2001) \nl
827: \hline
828: \multicolumn{3}{c}{The Warm Photo-ionized ISM} \nl
829: \hline
830: $v$(\kms) \dotfill & $-77$ & V\'azquez \etal\ (2004) \nl
831: $\log\,N({\rm N\,II})$ \dotfill & $14.70\pm 0.15$ & Heckman \etal\ (2001) \nl
832: $\log\,N({\rm O\,VI})$ \dotfill & $14.26\pm 0.08$ & Heckman \etal\ (2001) \nl
833: \hline
834: \enddata
835: \tablenotetext{a}{Given the observed column density, we expect the
836: line to be saturated. The reported value should therefore be treated
837: as a lower limit.}
838:
839: \end{deluxetable}
840:
841: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccccccc}
842: \tablewidth{0pc} \tablecaption{IONIC COLUMN DENSITIES FROM STIS OBSERVATIONS
843: \label{tab:colm}} \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
844: \tablehead{\colhead{Ion} & \colhead{$J^a$} & \colhead{$E_{J}$} &
845: \colhead{$\lambda$} & \colhead{$\log f$} & \colhead{$v_{int}^b$} &
846: \colhead{$W_\lambda^c$} & \colhead{$\log N$} & \colhead{$\log
847: N_{adopt}$} \\
848: & & (cm$^{-1}$) & (\AA) & & (\kms) & (m\AA) }
849: \startdata
850: \ion{C}{1}\\ &0 & 0.00 & 1277.2450 &$ -0.8816$&$[-100,
851: 40]$&$< 18.4$&$<13.17$&$< 13.17$ \\
852: &0 & 0.00 & 1560.3092 &$-0.8808$&$[-100, 40]$&$< 39.6$&$<13.51$&\\
853: &0 & 0.00 & 1656.9283 &$-0.8273$&$[-100, 40]$&$< 58.7$&$<13.44$&\\
854: \ion{C}{2}\\
855: &1/2 & 0.00 & 1334.5323 &$ -0.8935$&$[-100, 40]$&$ 625.4 \pm 4.4$&$>15.13$&$> 15.13$\\
856: &3/2 & 63.40 & 1335.7077 &$ -0.9397$&$[-100, 40]$&$ 276.8 \pm 7.6$&$14.39 \pm 0.02$&$ 14.39 \pm 0.02$\\
857: \ion{C}{4}\\
858: & & 0.00 & 1548.1950 &$ -0.7194$&$[-250, 100]$&$1139.5 \pm 22.1$&$>14.85$&$> 14.88$\\
859: & & 0.00 & 1550.7700 &$ -1.0213$&$[-250, 100]$&$ 698.1 \pm 24.0$&$>14.88$&\\
860: \ion{O}{1}\\ &2 & 0.00 & 1302.1685 &$ -1.3110$&$[-60, 40]$&$ 366.0 \pm 4.8$&$>15.24$&$> 15.24$\\
861: &1 & 158.26 & 1304.8576 &$ -1.3118$&$[-100, 40]$&$ 55.2 \pm 8.8$&$14.05 \pm 0.06$&$14.05 \pm 0.06$\\
862: \ion{Mg}{1}\\
863: & & 0.00 & 2852.9642 &$0.2577$&$[-100, 40]$&$ 349.3 \pm 64.3$&$12.54 \pm 0.09$&$ 12.54 \pm 0.09$\\
864: \ion{Mg}{2}\\ & & 0.00 & 2796.3520 &$ -0.2130$&$[-100,40]$&$1269.5 \pm 34.3$&$>13.97$&$> 14.14$\\
865: & & 0.00 & 2803.5310 &$-0.5151$&$[-100, 40]$&$1146.5 \pm 49.3$&$>14.14$&\\
866: \ion{Al}{2}\\
867: & & 0.00 & 1670.7874 &$ 0.2742$&$[-100, 40]$&$ 585.8 \pm 23.0$&$>13.49$&$>13.49$\\
868: \ion{Al}{3}\\
869: & & 0.00 & 1854.7164 &$ -0.2684$&$[-100, 40]$&$274.4 \pm 52.1$&$13.39 \pm 0.10$&$ 13.43 \pm 0.08$\\
870: & & 0.00 &1862.7895 &$ -0.5719$&$[-100, 40]$&$ 200.1 \pm 54.4$&$13.53 \pm 0.13$&\\
871: \ion{Si}{2}\\
872: &1/2 & 0.00 & 1260.4221 &$ 0.0030$&$[-100,40]$&$ 583.6 \pm 5.6$&$>14.21$&$> 14.83$\\
873: &1/2 & 0.00 & 1304.3702 &$-1.0269$&$[-100, 40]$&$ 401.8 \pm 6.6$&$>14.81$&\\
874: &1/2 & 0.00 &1526.7066 &$ -0.8962$&$[-100, 40]$&$ 574.5 \pm 11.0$&$>14.83$&\\
875: &3/2 & 287.24 & 1264.7377 &$ -0.0441$&$[-100, 40]$&$< 19.9$&$<12.39$&$< 12.39$\\
876: \ion{S}{2}\tablenotemark{d}
877: \\ & & 0.00 & 1259.519 & $-1.7894$ & ... & ... & $14.67\pm 0.10$ & $14.65\pm 0.09$ \\
878: \ion{Cr}{2}\\
879: & & 0.00 & 2056.2539 &$ -0.9788$&$[-100, 40]$&$<65.0$&$<13.42$&$< 13.42$\\
880: \ion{Fe}{2}\\
881: &9/2 & 0.00 & 1608.4511 &$-1.2366$&$[-100, 40]$&$ 307.6 \pm 19.0$&$14.64 \pm 0.06$&$ 14.64 \pm 0.06$\\
882: &9/2 & 0.00 & 1611.2005 &$ -2.8665$&$[-100, 40]$&$< 50.8$&$<15.60$&\\
883: &9/2 & 0.00 & 2260.7805 &$ -2.6126$&$[-100, 40]$&$< 55.5$&$<14.91$&\\
884: &9/2 & 0.00 & 2344.2140 &$ -0.9431$&$[-100, 40]$&$575.9 \pm 24.8$&$>14.33$&\\
885: &9/2 & 0.00 & 2374.4612 &$-1.5045$&$[-100, 40]$&$ 379.8 \pm 39.5$&$>14.65$&\\
886: &9/2 & 0.00 &2382.7650 &$ -0.4949$&$[-100, 40]$&$ 737.3 \pm 37.7$&$>14.08$&\\
887: \ion{Ni}{2}\\
888: & & 0.00 & 1370.1310 &$ -1.2306$&$[-100, 40]$&$<21.6$&$<13.53$&$< 13.53$\\
889: \ion{Zn}{2}\\
890: & & 0.00 & 2026.1360 &$-0.3107$&$[-100, 40]$&$< 85.7$&$<12.90$&$< 12.90$\\
891: \enddata
892: \tablenotetext{a}{Total angular momentum of the electron spin and
893: orbital angular moment. $E_{J}$ is the energy above the ground
894: state.}
895: \tablenotetext{b}{Velocity interval over which the equivalent
896: width and column density are measured.}
897: \tablenotetext{c}{Rest equivalent width.}
898: \tablenotetext{d}{The S\,II 1259 transition is
899: contaminated by the Si\,II 1260 transition from a foreground
900: high-velocity cloud along the sightline. We determine $N({\rm
901: S\,II})$ using the VPFIT software package, including multiple
902: components. Here we present the sum of the two narrow components at
903: $\Delta\,v=-45$ and $-15$ \kms\ (see Figure 1).}
904: \end{deluxetable}
905:
906: \begin{deluxetable}{p{1.5in}cc}
907: \tabletypesize{\normalsize}
908: %\rotate
909: \tablewidth{0pt}
910: \tablecaption{Comparison of ISM Properties}
911: \tablehead{\colhead{Property} & \colhead{NGC\,1705-1} & \colhead{GRB Hosts}}
912: \startdata
913: $\log\,N(\hI)$ \dotfill & $[20.1,21.2]$ & $[19,8,22.5]$ \nl
914: $[{\rm Z}/{\rm H}]$\tablenotemark{a} \dotfill & $-0.6\pm 0.1$ & $[-2.2,-0.2]$ \nl
915: $[{\rm \alpha}/{\rm Fe}]$\tablenotemark{a} \dotfill & $+0.5\pm 0.2$ & $[+0.4,+0.9]$ \nl
916: $[{\rm N}/{\rm \alpha}]$ \tablenotemark{a}\dotfill & $-1.5\pm 0.2$ & $[-2.0,-0.5]$ \nl
917: $f_{\rm H_2}$\tablenotemark{b} \dotfill & $< 5.2\times 10^{-7}$ & $< 3\times 10^{-7}$ \nl
918: $A_V$\tablenotemark{a} \dotfill & $\sim 0.0$ & $[0.0,0.2]$ \nl
919: $d_{\rm neutral}$ (pc) \dotfill & $\apl 500$ & 100--1000 \nl
920: \enddata
921: \tablenotetext{a}{Measurements for the ISM of GRB hosts are from Prochaska \etal\ (2007). }
922: \tablenotetext{b}{Measurements for GRB hosts are from Tumlinson \etal\ (2007). }
923: \end{deluxetable}
924:
925: \end{document}
926:
927: