1: %\documentclass{emulateapj}
2: \documentclass[preprint]{aastex}
3: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
4: \shorttitle{}
5: \shortauthors{}
6: \begin{document}
7:
8: \title{Swift-XRT observation of 34 new INTEGRAL/IBIS AGNs: discovery of Compton thick
9: and other peculiar sources.}
10:
11:
12:
13: \author{A.~Malizia\altaffilmark{1},
14: R.~Landi\altaffilmark{1}, L.~Bassani\altaffilmark{1},A.~J.~Bird\altaffilmark{2}, M.~Molina\altaffilmark{2},
15: A.~De Rosa\altaffilmark{3}, M.~Fiocchi\altaffilmark{3},
16: N.~Gehrels\altaffilmark{4}, J.~Kennea\altaffilmark{5}, M.~Perri\altaffilmark{6}}
17:
18: \altaffiltext{1}{IASF--Bologna/INAF, via P. Gobetti 101, 40129 Bologna, Italy}
19: \altaffiltext{2}{School of Physics and Astronomy, University of
20: Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK}
21: \altaffiltext{3}{IASF--Roma/INAF, via del Fosso del Cavaliere 100, 00133
22: Roma, Italy}
23: \altaffiltext{4}{NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA}
24: \altaffiltext{5}{Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA}
25: \altaffiltext{6}{ASI Science Data Center, via G. Galilei, 00044 Frascati, Italy}
26:
27:
28: \begin{abstract}
29: For a significant number of the sources detected at high energies ($>$10 keV) by the INTEGRAL/IBIS and Swift/BAT instruments
30: there is either a lack information about them in the 2-10 keV range or they are totally unidentified.
31: Herein, we report on a sample of 34 IBIS AGN
32: or AGN candidate objects for which there is X-ray data in the Swift/XRT archive.
33: Thanks to these X-ray follow up observations,
34: the identification of the gamma ray emitters has been possible and
35: the spectral shape in terms of photon index and absorption has been evaluated for the first time
36: for the majority of our sample sources.
37: The sample, enlarged to include 4 more AGN already discussed in the literature,
38: has been used to provide photon index and column density distribution.
39: We obtain a mean value of 1.88 with a dispersion of 0.12, i.e. typical of an AGN sample.
40: Sixteen objects (47\%) have column densities in excess of 10$^{22}$
41: cm$^{-2}$ and, as expected, a large fraction of the absorbed sources
42: are within the Sey 2 sample. We have provided a new diagnostic tool
43: (N$_{H}$ versus F$_{(2-10)keV}$/F$_{(20-100) keV}$ softness ratio) to
44: isolate peculiar objects; we find at least one absorbed Sey 1 galaxy, 3 Compton thick AGN candidates;
45: and one secure example of a "true" type 2 AGN.
46: Within the sample of 10 still unidentified objects, 3 are almost
47: certainly AGN of type 2; 3 to 4 have spectral slopes typical of AGN;
48: and two are located high on the galactic plane and are strong enough radio emitters so that can
49: be considered good AGN candidates.
50: \end{abstract}
51:
52: \keywords{X-ray sources: general -- Galaxies: Seyfert}
53:
54: \section{Introduction}
55: In the last few years, our knowledge of the hard X-ray sky ($>$10 keV)
56: has improved greatly thanks to the observations made by IBIS (Ubertini et al. 2003)
57: on board INTEGRAL (Winkler et al. 2003) and
58: BAT (Barthelmy et al. 2005) on board Swift (Gehrels et al. 2004); both telescopes operate in similar wavebands
59: (around 20-200 keV)
60: with a sensitivity of about a mCrab and a point source location accuracy of the order of a
61: few arcminutes. These instruments have so far been used to survey the high energy sky in
62: a complementary way, as the first concentrates mainly on mapping the
63: galactic plane while the second mainly covers the high galactic latitude sky
64: so that together they will provide the best yet sample of objects
65: selected in the soft gamma-ray band.
66: For a significant number of the sources detected by these two satellites there is either a
67: lack of information about them in the 2-10 keV range or they are totally unidentified.
68: For example, the third INTEGRAL/IBIS survey (Bird et al. 2007) contains 421 hard X-ray
69: (17-100 keV) emitters of which 113 are unidentified objects (26\% of the entire sample);
70: around 140 sources are AGN or AGN candidates and for almost half of these there is no information below 10 keV.
71: For all these objects, improved localization, as is now possible
72: with the current generation of focusing X-ray telescopes, is necessary in order
73: to pinpoint the optical counterpart and to definitely resolve their
74: nature/class. Equally, spectral information in the
75: X-ray band is necessary to characterize the source spectral shape.
76: For these reasons, a program
77: of X-ray follow up observations of INTEGRAL/IBIS sources has recently
78: been initiated with the Swift satellite using the XRT instrument (0.2-10 keV, Burrows et al. 2006).
79: Herein we report on a sample of 34 AGN or AGN candidates for which there is
80: X-ray data in the Swift/XRT archive up to the end of February 2007.
81: For the majority of these sources the X-ray spectra are presented for the first time.
82: Previously for a third of the sample only an estimate of the column densities have been reported by Sazonov et al. 2007;
83: our results are in good agreement with theirs.
84: XRT follow up measurements allow in all cases an arcsecond positioning of the X-ray counterpart and in most
85: objects a definition of the X-ray spectral shape, in terms of photon index and
86: column density estimates.
87: In particular, the study of the column density distribution in a sample of AGN selected above 10 keV is important so as
88: to quantify the fraction of objects missed by lower energy surveys, to find new Compton thick AGN or peculiar
89: sources and as an input parameter for synthesis models of the cosmic X-ray background.
90: All our sources have redshifts $z<$0.08 and so our results refer to the local Universe.
91:
92: \section{Swift-XRT image analysis}
93: Due to the pointing strategy of Swift, short (a few ksec) repeated (up
94: to 5 times) measurements are typically performed for each target. Table 1
95: lists for each INTEGRAL/IBIS source, the XRT position and the 90\% error box of the X-ray counterpart,
96: the number of pointings$\footnote{In a few cases some observations have not been
97: considered due to their poor quality and/or short duration ($<$ 1
98: Ksec)}$, the total exposure time available, the mean count rates (i.e.
99: related to the sum of all available observations) of the detected
100: X-ray counterpart in the best energy range (see section 3) and, finally,
101: its class and redshift (from NED unless otherwise stated).\\
102: XRT data reduction was performed using the XRTDAS v. 2.0.1 standard data
103: pipeline package ({\sc xrtpipeline} v. 0.10.6), in order to produce
104: screened event files. All data are extracted only in the Photon
105: Counting (PC) mode (Hill et al. 2004), adopting the standard grade
106: filtering (0--12 for PC) according to the XRT nomenclature. Images
107: have been extracted in the 0.3--10 keV band and searched for
108: significant excesses falling within the INTEGRAL/IBIS 90\% confidence
109: circle as reported in Bird et al. (2007); in all cases a single X-ray
110: source was detected either inside this uncertainty circle or just at its
111: border. All sources are detected above 3$\sigma$ significance level
112: and in most cases are quite bright at X-ray energies, so that even a
113: short exposure can provide useful information. \\
114: The overall sample consists of 11 Seyferts of type 2 (Sey 2), 13 Seyferts of type 1 (Sey 1)
115: (i.e. type in the range 1-1.5) including two Narrow Line
116: Seyfert 1s.\\
117: 10 sources are still optically unclassified and their
118: extragalactic nature is inferred by indirect arguments. 3 objects
119: (IGR J14492-5535, IGR J15539-6142 and IGR J20186+4043) are associated
120: with galaxies (2MASX J14491283-5536194, ESO 136-G006 and 2MASX J20183871+4041003 respectively)
121: in which the nuclear activity was unknown before X/gamma-ray measurements;
122: their AGN class is still uncertain but the presence of strong absorption in the X-ray spectra
123: implies a type 2 nature
124: (see also section 3). Three other objects (SWIFT J0216.3+5128, IGR
125: J13109-5552 and SWIFT J16563-3302) are located 6 degrees above the
126: galactic plane and are all radio emitting objects besides being strong
127: high energy emitters; in particular IGR J13109-5552 and SWIFT J16563-3302,
128: associated with PMN J1310-5552 and NVSS J165616-330211 respectively,
129: are quite strong at radio frequencies (353 mJy at 4.85 MHz for the former
130: and 410 mJy at 20 cm for the latter). Historically AGN were discovered by
131: radio observations, i.e. radio selection is often a way in which to
132: recognize active galaxies, except at lower luminosities where also
133: starburst galaxies emit at radio frequencies. Therefore for bright
134: objects located away from the galactic plane, mere detection in radio
135: provides support for the presence of an active nucleus. Contamination
136: from galactic sources may come from pulsars, microquasars and
137: supernova remnants (Molina 2004) so that it is less easy to claim an
138: AGN association for radio objects on the galactic plane such as IGR
139: J14003-6362, IGR J18259-0706, IGR J19443+2117 and IGR J21178+5139.
140: However, IGR J19443+2117 is a flat spectrum radio
141: source according to NED while IGR J21178+5139 is also a 2MASS extended
142: object although not recognized as a galaxy (typically the most likely
143: association in this catalogue). Clearly all these sources must await
144: optical (or even infrared) spectroscopy in order to be definitely confirmed as
145: AGN.
146: In the meantime X-ray spectroscopy can shed light on their extragalactic nature.\\
147:
148:
149: \section{Swift-XRT spectral analysis}
150: Events for spectral analysis were extracted within a circular region of radius 20$^{\prime \prime}$,
151: which encloses about 90\% of the PSF at 1.5 keV (Moretti et al. 2004)
152: centered on the source position.
153: The background was extracted from various source-free regions close to the
154: X-ray source of interest using both circular/annular regions of various
155: radii, in order to ensure an evenly sampled background. In all
156: cases, the spectra were extracted from the corresponding event files using
157: {\sc XSELECT} software and binned using {\sc grppha} so that the $\chi^{2}$
158: statistic could reliably be used. We used the
159: latest version (v.008) of the response matrices and created individual
160: ancillary response files (ARF) using {\sc xrtmkarf}. Spectral analyses
161: have been performed using XSPEC version 12.2.1.
162: For those sources with more than one pointing, we performed the spectral
163: analysis of each observation and then of the combined spectra, in order to improve the statistical
164: quality of the data; in most cases spectra from the individual pointings were compatible with each other within the
165: respective uncertainties, thus justifying a combined analysis.
166: Only in 5 cases (see sources labeled with 'v' in table 2), do we find evidence for
167: variability between measurements but always in flux
168: and not in spectral shape; clearly for these five sources the reported 2-10 keV flux is an average
169: over a number of observations.
170: Due to the low statistics available, we have identified for each source the best energy range
171: for the spectral analysis and
172: have employed a simple power law absorbed by both a Galactic
173: and an intrinsic column density as our baseline model.
174: The results of the analysis of the combined observations are
175: reported in table 2 where we list the energy band used for the
176: spectral fit, the Galactic absorption according to Dickey \& Lockman
177: (1990), the photon index, the column density in excess to the Galactic value, if any,
178: the 2--10 keV flux and the reduced $\chi^{2}$ of the fit.
179: In the last column of table 2 we also list the IBIS 20--100 keV flux as reported by Bird et al.(2007).
180: In a few cases the photon index was fixed to the
181: canonical AGN value ($\Gamma=1.8$) so as to allow a measurement of the intrinsic column density;
182: in the particular case of IGR J14175-4641
183: only a rough estimate of the 2-10 keV flux was allowed by the data.
184: The presence of the iron line around 6.4 keV, a typical feature of an AGN spectrum,
185: is not statistically required in any of the spectra analyzed but this is definitely due to the instrument
186: sensitivity and lack of good coverage at these energies.
187: For those sources where there is coverage at low energies ($<$1 keV) we have checked for the presence of possible soft excess component.
188: In only one case, the Seyfert 1 galaxy ESO 323-G077, do we find significant
189: evidence for this extra component which could be equally well fitted with an unabsorbed power law having the same photon index of the primary continuum
190: or a black body model with kT $\sim$ 0.2 keV (see table 2).
191: All quoted errors correspond to 90$\%$ confidence level for a single
192: parameter of interest ($\Delta\chi^{2}=2.71$).
193:
194:
195:
196: \section{Photon index and column density distributions}
197: Despite the short exposures available,
198: it is still possible to obtain information on the spectral shape of the objects analyzed. In
199: particular, we concentrate here on the photon index distribution and
200: on the absorption properties. To enlarge the
201: sample, we have included four more XRT/IBIS AGNs: SWIFT J0601.9-8636
202: (Sey 2, z=0.006), SWIFT J1009.3-4250 (Sey 2, z=0.033), SWIFT
203: J1038.8-4942 (Sey 1.5, z=0.060) and SWIFT J1238.9-2720 (Sey 2,
204: z=0.024), already discussed by Landi et al. (2007). Their spectral
205: data have been re-analyzed in the same way as for the other sources
206: presented in
207: this work and the results are included in the following discussion.\\
208: The distribution of photon indices for those AGN with optical
209: classification is shown in figure 1; sources where $\Gamma$ was not
210: constrained by the data were not considered. It is well known that
211: the distribution of X-ray spectral slopes of AGN peaks around 1.9 and
212: has a non-negligible dispersion (0.2-0.3, see for example Mateos et
213: al. 2005 and references therein). We obtain
214: a mean $\Gamma$ value of 1.88 with a dispersion
215: of 0.12, i.e. most of our objects have spectra close to the canonical AGN value.
216: Flat ($\Gamma<$1.5) spectra are far less common, especially in
217: view of the large uncertainties associated with the XRT spectra;
218: nevertheless they exist for some sources, such as IGR J21247+5058 as has been
219: confirmed by a recent XMM observation (Molina et al. in preparation).
220: The photon index distribution can also be used to characterize unclassified objects:
221: SWIFT J0216.3+5128, IGR J14003-6326 and IGR J19443+2117 and
222: possibly IGR J21178+5139 have spectral slopes typical of AGN
223: supporting their extragalactic nature. Others have flat spectra
224: (1.1-1.5) which are unusual, but still compatible with an AGN association.
225:
226:
227:
228: \begin{figure}
229: \plotone{f1.eps}
230: \caption{Distribution of the photon index of the AGN with
231: optical identifications.}
232: \label{Fig1}
233: \end{figure}
234:
235: The column density distribution for each class of objects (type 1, type
236: 2 and unclassified), are shown in figures 2, 3 and 4 respectively. As
237: we can see from table 2, various sources of the sample (8 Sey 1, 3 Sey
238: 2 and 1 unclassified) do not show intrinsic absorption and therefore
239: their Galactic column density has been taken as an upper limit to the
240: value of N$_{H}$; these sources are reported in the histograms as
241: shaded areas. Absorption in excess of the galactic value has been
242: measured in 25 objects (around 66\% of the sample), but only 16 (47\%)
243: have a column density in excess of 10$^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$ (typically
244: taken as the dividing line between absorbed and unabsorbed objects
245: $\footnote{This N$_{H}$ value represents the amount of absorbing neutral
246: gas needed to hide the broad emission-line region (BLR), assuming a
247: Milky Way gas-to-dust ratio.}$. Absorption was found in 15\% of
248: type 1 AGN, in 73\% of type 2 AGN and in 60\% of unclassified objects.
249: Indeed the column density distribution of type 1 and type 2 AGN is
250: significantly different: while type 1 objects cluster in the
251: 10$^{21}$-- 10$^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$ range, type 2 sources have a much wider
252: distribution. The distribution of unclassified objects resembles that
253: of Sey 2s suggesting that many of these sources could be of this type.
254:
255: \begin{figure}
256: \plotone{f2.eps}
257: \caption{Column density distribution of the type 1 Seyferts of our sample, shaded areas
258: are for upper limits.}
259: \label{Fig1}
260: \end{figure}
261:
262: \begin{figure}
263: \plotone{f3.eps}
264: \caption{Column density distribution of the type 2 Seyferts of our sample, shaded areas
265: are for upper limits.}
266: \label{Fig1}
267: \end{figure}
268:
269:
270: \begin{figure}
271: \plotone{f4.eps}
272: \caption{Column density distribution of the still unclassified subset of objects, shaded areas
273: are for upper limits.}
274: \label{Fig1}
275: \end{figure}
276:
277:
278:
279: \section{Discussion}
280: The basic hypothesis of the unified theory of AGN is that the X-ray
281: absorption and optical obscuration are heavily related: absorbed AGN
282: should be classified as type 2 in optical (with the Broad Line Region
283: hidden) while unabsorbed ones are expected to be of type 1 (with the
284: Broad Line Region visible). This relationship is not always
285: respected as is evident in our sample where we find absorption in
286: two Sey 1s (ESO 323-G077 and IGR J21247+5058) and lack of it in a
287: number of Sey 2s. While IGR J21247+5058 is located on the Galactic
288: plane so that the excess absorption may be due to extra material along
289: the line of sight, ESO 323-G077 is high in galactic latitude and so
290: likely to be intrinsically absorbed.
291: Evidence of heavly absorption was first reported by Sazonov and Revnivtsev (2004)
292: in the RXTE survey, also this AGN is peculiar for
293: being one of the rare cases of a high scattering polarization Sey 1
294: (Schmidt et al. 2004). Within the standard model of Seyfert nuclei,
295: both peculiarities of ESO323-G077 can be well understood by assuming that
296: this AGN is observed at an inclination angle where the nucleus is
297: partially obscured by the torus (hence the high absorption measured in
298: X-rays) and is seen mainly indirectly in the light scattered by dust
299: clouds within or above the torus (hence the high linear polarization
300: observed). Further X-ray observations of this object are clearly
301: desirable because of the constraints that can be derived on the
302: geometric properties of the absorbing region. Contrary to unified
303: models, we have also found 5 Sey 2 with no clear evidence of
304: absorption in their X-ray spectra. Several authors have reported
305: similar examples of AGN with no broad emission lines and low N$_{H}$
306: (Panessa and Bassani 2002, Corral et al 2005).
307: There are various explanations for this discrepancy including the low statistical
308: quality of the X-ray spectra and the non simultaneity of the optical
309: and X-ray observations.
310: The low X-ray exposures available are clearly the most important
311: source of uncertainty.
312: Alternatively, it is possible that these Sey 2 are either Compton thick type 2 AGN or
313: "true" Sey 2, i.e. objects where the Broad Line Region is not hidden but
314: likely not to be present.
315: If the source is Compton thick, the 2--10 keV emission is completely blocked and could
316: be seen as reflected/scattered radiation with no apparent absorption.
317: On the other hand the soft gamma-ray photons are unaffected by
318: absorption as long as logN$_{H}$ is below 24.5; for higher column
319: densities, even emission above 20 keV is blocked and can only be seen
320: indirectly. Generally indirect arguments allow discrimination between the
321: Compton thick and Compton thin nature of type 2 AGN, such as the
322: equivalent width of the iron line and the ratio of isotropic versus
323: anisotropic luminosities typically L$_{X}$/L$_{[OIII]}$ $\footnote{where the
324: L$_{[OIII]}$ is corrected for reddening in the host galaxy by means
325: of the H$_{\alpha}$/H$_{\beta}$ Balmer decrement}$ (Bassani et al. 1999
326: and Panessa and Bassani 2002). Unfortunately, we do not have such
327: information for most of our sources and so we have to rely on a new
328: diagnostic diagram. Figure 5 is a plot of the absorption versus the
329: flux softness ratio (F$_{(2-10) keV}$/F$_{(20-100) keV}$): a clear trend
330: of decreasing softness ratio as the absorption increases is visible as
331: expected if the 2-10 keV flux is progressively depressed as the
332: absorption becomes stronger. Open symbols in the figure represent
333: upper limits on the column density, while lines represent the expected
334: values for an absorbed power law with photon index of 1.5 and
335: 1.9. As anticipated, most of our sources follow the expected
336: trend except for a few objects which have a too low softness ratio for
337: the observed column density, suggesting a Compton thick nature.
338: Indeed if we take the Swift/XRT observation of MKN 3, a confirmed Compton
339: thick Sey 2, and treat it as one of our sources,
340: we find that it is located in the same region, while the true column density
341: of this source is 1.3 $\times$ 10$^{24}$ (Cappi et al. 1999).\\
342: We therefore suggest that IGR J14175-4641, IGR J16351-5806 and SWIFT
343: J0601.9-8636 are new Compton thick AGN candidates where further, more
344: sensitive X-ray observations, particularly around the iron line could
345: help in confirming these results. Similarly IGR J07565-4139 and IGR
346: J18259-0706 are outside the expected trend, although their softness
347: ratio is not so dramatically low and could be explained by the
348: uncertainties associated with the flux estimates as well as by
349: variability in the source since the X-ray and soft gamma-ray fluxes
350: are not taken simultaneously. While for IGR J18259-0706 we must await
351: the source classification to confirm its extragalactic nature and
352: therefore the presence of any peculiarity, IGR J07565-4139 is
353: intriguing as the soft X-ray emission is unlike any other seen in a small
354: sample of absorbed AGN (De Rosa et al. in preparation).
355: Two more unabsorbed Sey 2, IGR J12415-5750 and IGR J14515-5542, are also
356: anomalous but are unlikely to be Compton thick objects as their location
357: is well within the expected region of N$_{H}$ versus F$_{(2-10) keV}$/F$_{(20-100) keV}$;
358: while IGR J12415-5750 may have been
359: misclassified in optical (see http://www.astro.umd.edu/$\sim$lwinter/research/BAT/xray.html),
360: IGR J14515-5542 shows a true Sey 2 spectrum and furthermore has a
361: L$_{X}$/L$_{[OIII]}$ ratio typical of unabsorbed type 1 sources
362: (Masetti et al. 2006) and so qualifies as a "true" Sey 2 nucleus;
363: indeed the observed column density barely explains the occultation of
364: its Broad Line Region.
365:
366: \section{Conclusions}
367: Swift-XRT follow-up X-ray observations of 34 INTEGRAL/IBIS AGN and AGN
368: candidates have pinpointed their X-ray counterparts allowing the
369: unambiguous identification of the soft gamma-ray source and the
370: determination of the AGN class in most cases. Furthermore, for most
371: objects in the sample, the photon index and absorption have been measured.
372: When this sample is enlarged to include 4 more AGN already discussed in the literature,
373: we find a mean photon index of 1.88 with a dispersion of 0.12.
374: 47\% of the objects have column densities in excess of 10$^{22}$
375: cm$^{-2}$ and, as expected, a large fraction of the absorbed sources
376: are within the Sey 2 sample. We have provided a new diagnostic tool
377: (N$_{H}$ versus F$_{(2-10) keV}$/F$_{(20-100) keV}$ softness ratio) with which to
378: isolate or find a few peculiar objects: a) 2 absorbed Sey 1 galaxies (ESO
379: 323-G077 and IGR J21247+5058); b) 3 Compton thick AGN candidates
380: (SWIFT J0601.98636, IGR J14175-4841 and IGR J16351-5806); and c) at
381: least one secure example (IGR J14415-5542) of a "true" type 2 AGN,
382: i.e. one where the Broad Line Region is not hidden but likely not to be
383: present. Within the sample of 10 still unidentified objects, 3 (IGR
384: J14492-5535, IGR J15539-6142 and IGR J20186+4043) are almost
385: certainly AGN of type 2; 3 to 4 more (SWIFT J0216.3+5128, IGR
386: J14003-6326 and IGR J19443+2117 and possibly IGR J21178+5139) have
387: spectral slopes typical of AGN (with the first two likely to be of
388: type 2 because of the measured absorption). Two objects (IGR
389: J13109-5552 and SWIFT J16563-3302) are located high enough off the
390: galactic plane and are strong radio emitters and are therefore good AGN
391: candidates; only IGR J18259-0706 has a doubtful AGN association
392: despite being a radio source.
393:
394:
395:
396:
397: \acknowledgments
398: We acknowledge the Italian Space Agency financial and programmatic support via
399: contracts I/R/046/04 and I/023/05/0.\\
400: A.M. thanks J. B. Stephen for a careful reading of the manuscript.
401:
402:
403:
404: \begin{figure}
405: \plotone{f5.eps}
406: \caption{F$_{2-10 keV}$/ F$_{20-100 keV}$ flux ratio of our enlarged sample. Open symbols
407: represent upper limit values of the column densities and lines correspond to expected values for an absorbed power law
408: with photon index 1.5 (dot) and 1.9 (dash).}
409: \label{Fig2}
410: \end{figure}
411:
412:
413:
414:
415:
416:
417: \clearpage
418:
419: \begin{table}
420: \begin{center}
421: \footnotesize
422: \caption{\emph{Swift}/XRT positions}
423: \begin{tabular}{lccccrcll}
424: \tableline
425: \tableline
426:
427: Source & RA & Dec & error & Obs. & Expo.& count rate & class & redshift \\
428: & & & $\it{arcsec}$& & sec & cts/s & \\
429: \tableline
430: IGR J02097+5222 & 02 09 37.68 & +52 26 43.56 & 3.54 & 2 & 8034 & 0.366$\pm$0.0067 & Sey 1 & 0.049 \\
431: SWIFT J0216.3+5128 & 02 16 27.01 & +51 25 25.50 & 3.56 & 3 & 16401 & 0.169$\pm$0.0032 & ?? & \nodata \\
432: NGC 1142 & 02 55 12.19 & -00 11 02.31 & 3.80 & 4 & 18807 & 0.034$\pm$0.0013 & Sey 2 & 0.029 \\
433: 1H 0323+342 & 03 24 41.04 & +34 10 45.49 & 3.53 & 3 & 19510 & 0.368$\pm$0.0043 & Sey 1 & 0.061 \\
434: LEDA 168563 & 04 52 04.85 & +49 32 43.72 & 3.59 & 1 & 1111 & 0.297$\pm$0.0016 & Sey 1 & 0.029 \\
435: IGR J07565-4139 & 07 56 19.71 & -41 37 41.62 & 3.75 & 1 & 14750 & 0.020$\pm$0.0012 & Sey 2$^{a}$ & 0.021 \\
436: IGR J07597-3842 & 07 59 41.66 & -38 43 57.35 & 3.52 & 4 & 19753 & 0.383$\pm$0.0044 & Sey 1.2$^{a}$& 0.040 \\
437: SWIFT J0917.2-6221 & 09 16 09.01 & -62 19 29.04 & 3.56 & 2 & 12893 & 0.202$\pm$0.0039 & Sey 1 & 0.057 \\
438: IGR J10404-4625 & 10 40 22.27 & -46 25 24.69 & 3.61 & 4 & 19561 & 0.064$\pm$0.0018 & Sey 2$^{b}$ & 0.024 \\
439: IGR J12391-1612 & 12 39 05.98 & -16 10 48.14 & 3.62 & 1 & 6625 & 0.106$\pm$0.0046 & Sey 2 & 0.037 \\
440: IGR J12415-5750 & 12 41 25.36 & -57 50 03.97 & 3.57 & 2 & 12843 & 0.137$\pm$0.0033 & Sey 2 & 0.024 \\
441: ESO 323-G077 & 13 06 26.13 & -40 24 53.22 & 3.72 & 2 & 7953 & 0.018$\pm$0.0015 & Sey 1.2 & 0.015 \\
442: IGR J13109-5552 & 13 10 43.08 & -55 52 11.66 & 3.73 & 2 & 6563 & 0.092$\pm$0.0037 & ?? & \nodata \\
443: IGR J14003-6326 & 14 00 45.35 & -63 25 41.17 & 3.77 & 2 & 5010 & 0.174$\pm$0.0071 & ?? & \nodata \\
444: IGR J14175-4641 & 14 17 03.94 & -46 41 39.06 & 5.70 & 1 & 5541 & 0.009$\pm$0.0007 & Sey 2$^{a}$ & 0.076 \\
445: IGR J14471-6319 & 14 47 14.69 & -63 17 19.56 & 4.03 & 1 & 3911 & 0.033$\pm$0.0029 & Sey 2$^{c}$ & 0.038 \\
446: IGR J14492-5535 & 14 49 12.67 & -55 36 20.32 & 3.77 & 1 & 3606 & 0.016$\pm$0.0022 & ?? & \nodata \\
447: IGR J14515-5542 & 14 51 33.43 & -55 40 39.41 & 3.60 & 3 & 12515 & 0.096$\pm$0.0028 & Sey 2$^{a}$ & 0.018 \\
448: IGR J14552-5133 & 14 55 17.36 & -51 34 15.68 & 3.61 & 2 & 8423 & 0.216$\pm$0.0051 & NLSey1$^{a}$ & 0.016 \\
449: IGR J15539-6142 & 15 53 35.22 & -61 40 55.40 & 4.71 & 1 & 4840 & 0.006$\pm$0.0013 & ?? & 0.015 \\
450: IGR J16351-5806 & 16 35 13.42 & -58 04 49.69 & 5.08 & 2 & 6233 & 0.006$\pm$0.0009 & Sey 2 & 0.009 \\
451: IGR J16482-3036 & 16 48 14.94 & -30 35 06.06 & 3.54 & 1 & 9205 & 0.209$\pm$0.0048 & Sey 1 & 0.031 \\
452: IGR J16558-5203 & 16 56 05.73 & -52 03 41.18 & 3.52 & 1 & 12850 & 0.438$\pm$0.0060 & Sey 1.2$^{a}$& 0.054 \\
453: SWIFT J1656.3-3302 & 16 56 16.83 & -33 02 12.18 & 3.73 & 2 & 9152 & 0.071$\pm$0.0028 & ?? & \nodata \\
454: IGR J17488-3253 & 17 48 54.82 & -32 54 47.83 & 3.53 & 1 & 16780 & 0.196$\pm$0.0035 & Sey 1$^{a}$ & 0.020 \\
455: IGR J18244-5622 & 18 24 19.49 & -56 22 08.72 & 4.39 & 1 & 1631 & 0.047$\pm$0.0054 & Sey 2$^{a}$ & 0.017 \\
456: IGR J18259-0706 & 18 25 57.25 & -07 10 24.54 & 3.71 & 1 & 4260 & 0.055$\pm$0.0036 & ?? & \nodata \\
457: IGR J19443+2117 & 19 43 56.20 & +21 18 22.95 & 3.53 & 1 & 11080 & 0.267$\pm$0.0049 & ?? & \nodata \\
458: IGR J20186+4043 & 20 18 38.46 & +40 40 59.16 & 4.81 & 1 & 2439 & 0.008$\pm$0.0019 & ?? & \nodata \\
459: IGR J20286+2544 & 20 28 35.05 & +25 44 01.57 & 4.61 & 1 & 45385 & 0.012$\pm$0.0016 & Sey 2$^{d}$ & 0.014 \\
460: IGR J21178+5139 & 21 17 47.24 & +51 38 53.62 & 10.0 & 2 & 5362 & 0.016$\pm$0.0018 & ?? & \nodata \\
461: IGR J21247+5058 & 21 24 39.44 & +50 58 24.41 & 3.52 & 2 & 10190 & 0.428$\pm$0.0065 & Sey 1 & 0.020 \\
462: SWIFT J2127.4+5654 & 21 27 45.58 & +56 56 35.64 & 3.53 & 2 & 10130 & 0.374$\pm$0.0061 & NLSey1$^{e}$ & 0.014 \\
463: NGC 7603 & 23 18 56.69 & +00 14 38.22 & 3.51 & 3 & 22860 & 0.494$\pm$0.0047 & Sey 1.5 & 0.029 \\
464: \tableline
465: \end{tabular}
466: Notes: a) Masetti et al. 2007; b) Masetti et al. 2006; c) Masetti et al. 2006b; d) Masetti et al. 2006a;
467: e) Halpern Atel 847.
468: \end{center}
469: \end{table}
470:
471:
472:
473: \begin{table}
474: \begin{center}
475: \footnotesize
476: \caption{\emph{Swift}/XRT spectra}
477: \begin{tabular}{lccccclc}
478: \tableline
479: \tableline
480: Source & band & N$_{HGal}^{\dagger}$ & $\Gamma$ & N$_{H}^{\dagger}$ & F$_{(2-10) keV}^{\ddagger}$ & $\chi^{2}$/d.o.f & F$_{(20-100) keV}^{\ddagger}$ \\
481: & keV & $\times$ 10$^{21}$ & & $\times$ 10$^{22}$ & $\times$ 10$^{-11}$ & & $\times$ 10$^{-11}$ \\
482: \hline
483: \hline
484: IGR J02097+5222 & 0.5-7.0 & 1.69 & 1.88$^{+0.06}_{-0.06}$ & \nodata & 1.30 & 107.5/129 & 2.90 \\
485: SWIFT J0216.3+5128 & 1.0-8.0 & 1.58 & 1.91$^{+0.13}_{-0.13}$ & 1.27$^{+0.16}_{-0.14}$ & 1.27 & 106.9/117 & 3.79 \\
486: NGC 1142 & 1.0-7.0 & 0.64 & 1.8 (fixed) & 44.9$^{+4.3}_{-4.0}$ & 0.96 & 33.7/26 & 5.33 \\
487: 1H 0323+342 & 0.2-7.0 & 1.44 & 2.13$^{+0.03}_{-0.04}$ & \nodata & 0.94 & 179.7/185 & 4.21 \\
488: LEDA 168563 & 0.8-7.0 & 5.42 & 2.06$^{+0.18}_{-0.17}$ & \nodata & 4.54 & 10.2/16 & 6.31 \\
489: IGR J07565-4139 & 1.0-6.0 & 4.73 & 1.73$^{+0.43}_{-0.47}$ & 0.59$^{+0.45}_{-0.42}$ & 0.15 & 27.6/27 & 1.78 \\
490: IGR J07597-3842$^{v}$ & 1.0-7.2 & 6.04 & 1.80$^{+0.04}_{-0.04}$ & \nodata & 2.37 & 241.5/259 & 3.89 \\
491: SWIFT J0917.2-6221 & 1.0-7.0 & 1.91 & 1.57$^{+0.16}_{-0.14}$ & 0.47$^{+0.15}_{-0.13}$ & 1.44 & 180.1/121 & 2.20 \\
492: IGR J10404-4625$^{v}$ & 1.0-7.0 & 1.36 & 1.47$^{+0.30}_{-0.27}$ & 2.67$^{+0.65}_{-0.54}$ & 0.72 & 90.0/80 & 3.27 \\
493: IGR J12391-1612 & 1.0-8.5 & 0.37 & 1.72$^{+0.36}_{-0.32}$ & 3.08$^{+0.84}_{-0.67}$ & 1.11 & 33.7/43 & 6.26 \\
494: IGR J12415-5750 & 1.0-6.0 & 3.45 & 1.63$^{+0.08}_{-0.07}$ & \nodata & 0.77 & 69.6/79 & 2.32 \\
495: ESO 323-G077$^{v,\blacktriangle}$ & 0.5-6.0 & 0.70 & 2.40$^{+0.44}_{-0.44}$ & 6.61$^{+1.24}_{-1.18}$ & 1.03 & 41.5/50 & 2.94 \\
496: IGR J13109-5552 & 0.5-7.0 & 2.76 & 1.50$^{+0.12}_{-0.12}$ & \nodata & 0.51 & 40.9/54 & 2.46 \\
497: IGR J14003-6326 & 1.0-6.0 & 15.0 & 2.21$^{+0.39}_{-0.38}$ & 1.28$^{+0.64}_{-0.62}$ & 1.43 & 34.3/40 & 1.51 \\
498: IGR J14175-4641$^{\star}$ & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & 0.006 & \nodata & 1.41 \\
499: IGR J14471-6319 & 1.0-7.0 & 58.0 & 1.70$^{+1.04}_{-1.03}$ & 2.44$^{+2.06}_{-1.76}$ & 0.39 & 5.8/10 & 1.47 \\
500: IGR J14492-5535 & 2.0-8.5 & 4.99 & 1.8 (fixed) & 9.3$^{+6.0}_{-4.8}$ & 0.42 & 19.0/24 & 1.58 \\
501: IGR J14515-5542 & 1.0-6.0 & 5.31 & 1.37$^{+0.20}_{-0.20}$ & 0.39$^{+0.18}_{-0.16}$ & 0.71 & 42.0/54 & 1.65 \\
502: IGR J14552-5133 & 0.5-6.0 & 3.37 & 1.93$^{+0.07}_{-0.07}$ & \nodata & 0.89 & 73.1/81 & 1.17 \\
503: IGR J15539-6142 & 0.7-7.0 & 3.01 & 1.8 (fixed) & 17.6$^{+32.8}_{-13.0}$ & 0.073& 10.6/11 & 2.13 \\
504: IGR J16351-5806 & 1.0-6.0 & 2.47 & 1.61$^{+0.75}_{-0.68}$ & \nodata & 0.031& 4.4/5 & 1.98 \\
505: IGR J16482-3036 & 0.5-8.3 & 1.76 & 1.71$^{+0.11}_{-0.12}$ & 0.13$^{+0.5}_{-0.06}$ & 1.13 & 80.8/96 & 3.12 \\
506: IGR J16558-5203 & 0.4-8.6 & 3.04 & 1.85$^{+0.06}_{-0.04}$ & \nodata & 1.77 & 221.0/217 & 3.39 \\
507: SWIFT J1656.3-3302 & 0.7-7.0 & 2.22 & 1.36$^{+0.23}_{-0.22}$ & 0.17$^{+0.15}_{-0.14}$ & 0.49 & 50.5/61 & 2.36 \\
508: IGR J17488-3253 & 0.5-7.7 & 5.30 & 1.60$^{+0.12}_{-0.10}$ & 0.21$^{+0.08}_{-0.07}$ & 1.40 & 133.1/137 & 4.03 \\
509: IGR J18244-5622 & 2.0-8.0 & 0.75 & 1.94$^{+1.86}_{-1.39}$ & 14.1$^{+15.4}_{-7.9}$ & 0.67 & 12.0/13 & 2.54 \\
510: IGR J18259-0706 & 1.0-7.0 & 7.10 & 1.40$^{+0.51}_{-0.47}$ & 0.62$^{+0.40}_{-0.33}$ & 0.54 & 13.2/21 & 1.60 \\
511: IGR J19443+2117 & 0.5-8.2 & 8.28 & 1.96$^{+0.12}_{-0.11}$ & 0.34$^{+0.13}_{-0.11}$ & 1.85 & 139.0/127 & 1.93 \\
512: IGR J20186+4043 & 1.0-8.0 & 12.0 & 1.8 (fixed) & 20.0$^{+20.2}_{-12.3}$ & 0.17 & 2.8/6 & 2.24 \\
513: IGR J20286+2544 & 1.0-7.0 & 2.62 & 1.8 (fixed) & 42.3$^{+20.8}_{-19.5}$ & 2.35 & 12.4/14 & 5.64 \\
514: IGR J21178+5139 & 1.0-6.2 & 14.3 & 1.8 (fixed) & 2.11$^{+1.52}_{-1.03}$ & 0.21 & 21.4/27 & 2.26 \\
515: IGR J21247+5058$^{v}$ & 1.0-8.5 & 11.1 & 1.44$^{+0.12}_{-0.12}$ & 1.15$^{+0.27}_{-0.25}$ & 5.20 & 196.2/175 & 11.02 \\
516: SWIFT J2127.4+5654 & 0.8-7.0 & 7.87 & 1.88$^{+0.05}_{-0.05}$ & \nodata & 2.20 & 187.2/181 & 2.71 \\
517: NGC 7603$^{v}$ & 0.2-7.5 & 0.41 & 2.05$^{+0.03}_{-0.04}$ & \nodata & 2.40 & 375.4/231 & 4.10 \\
518: \tableline
519: SWIFT J0601.9-8636 & 0.5-5.0 & 1.10 & 1.08$^{+2.30}_{-1.08}$ & \nodata & 0.011 & 3.5/2 & 3.23\\
520: SWIFT J1009.3-4250 & 0.3-6.0 & 1.09 & 2.51$^{+0.69}_{-0.20}$ & 29.5$^{+9.60}_{-6.60}$ & 0.22 & 12.2/9 & 2.87 \\
521: SWIFT J1038.8-4942 & 0.5-6.8 & 0.27 & 1.11$^{+0.13}_{-0.12}$ & 0.62$^{+0.12}_{-0.10}$ & 1.45 & 109.2/108 & 1.45 \\
522: SWIFT J1238.9-2720 & 2.0-7.5 & 0.67 & 1.71$^{+0.70}_{-0.60}$ & 59.2$^{+25.5}_{-20.2}$ & 0.53 & 28.5/30 & 3.92 \\
523: \tableline
524: \end{tabular}
525: Notes: $\dagger$: cm$^{-2}$; $\ddagger$: erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$, if the source has a flux variability this is a mean flux;\\
526: $\blacktriangle$: source fitted with a model consisting of two power laws (only one intrinsically absorbed) having the same photon index
527: and relative normalization one 0.6\% of the other;
528: an equally good fit is obtained with the unabsorbed power law component substituted by a black body model with kT $\sim$ 0.2 keV and
529: a luminosity of $\sim$ 10$^{41}$ erg s$^{-1}$.
530:
531: \end{center}
532: \end{table}
533:
534:
535:
536: \normalsize
537: \begin{thebibliography}{}
538: \bibitem{} Barthelmy, S. D., Barbieri, L., M., Cummings, J., R., et
539: al. 2005, Spece Science Review, 120, 143
540: \bibitem{} Bassani, L., Dadina, M., Maiolino, R., et al. 1999, ApJS,
541: 121, 473
542: \bibitem{} Bird, A. J., Malizia, A., Bazzano, A., et al. 2007, ApJ, in press
543: \bibitem{} Burrows, D. N., Hill, J. E., Nousek, J. A., et al. 2005,
544: Space Science Review, 120, 165
545: \bibitem{} Cappi, M., Bassani, L., Comastri, A., et al. 1999, A\&A,
546: 344, 857
547: \bibitem{} Cappi, M., Panessa, F., Bassani, L., et al. 2006, A\&A, 446, 459
548: \bibitem{} Corral, A, Barsons, X, Carrera, F. J., Ceballos, M. T., Mateos, S. 2005, A\&A, 431, 97
549: \bibitem{} Dickey, J. M., \& Lockman, F. J. 1990, IRA\&A, 28, 215
550: \bibitem{} Gehrels, N., Chincarini, G., Giommi, P., et al. 2004, ApJ, 611, 1005
551: \bibitem{} Hill, J. E., Burrows, D. N., Nousek, J. A., et al. 2004,
552: Proc. SPIE, 5165, 21
553: \bibitem{} Landi, R., Masetti, N., Morelli, L., et al., ApJ, submitted
554: \bibitem{} Masetti, N., Pretorius, M. L., Palazzi, E., Bassani, L., Bazzano, A., et al. 2006, A\&A, 449, 1139
555: \bibitem{} Masetti, N., Bassani, L., Bazzano, A., Bird, A.J., Dean,
556: A.J., et al. 2006a, A\&A, 455, 11
557: \bibitem{} Masetti, N., Morelli, L., Palazzi, E., Galaz, G., Bassani, L., et al. 2006b, A\&A, 459, 21
558: \bibitem{} Mateos, S., Barcons, X., Carrera, F. J., et al. 2005, A\&A, 444, 79
559: \bibitem{} Molina, M. 2004, Thesis of Laurea, Bologna University
560: \bibitem{} Moretti, A., Campana, S., Tagliaferri, G. et al., 2004, Proc. SPIE 5165, 232
561: \bibitem{} Panessa, F., \& Bassani, L., 2002, A\&A, 394, 435
562: \bibitem{} Sazonov, S., and Revnivtsev, M. G., 2004, A\&A, 423, 469
563: \bibitem{} Sazonov, S., Revnivtsev, M. G., Krivonov, R., Churazov, E., Sunyaev, R., 2007, A\&A, 462, 57
564: \bibitem{} Smith, J. E.; Robinson, A.; Alexander, et al. 2004, MNRAS, 350, 140
565: \bibitem{} Ubertini, P., Lebrun, F., Di Cocco, G., et al. 2003, A\&A, 411, L131
566: \bibitem{} Winkler, C., Courvoisier, T. J., Di Cocco, G., et al. 2003,
567: A\&A, 411, L1
568: \end{thebibliography}
569:
570:
571: \end{document}