1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %\usepackage{natbib}
3:
4: \shorttitle{Morphological Dependence of MIR Properties}
5: \shortauthors{Li et al.}
6:
7: \newcommand{\NIIHa}{\ion{N}{2}/H$\alpha$}
8: \newcommand{\OIIIHb}{\ion{O}{3}/H$\beta$}
9:
10: \begin{document}
11:
12: \title{Morphological Dependence of MIR Properties \\
13: of SDSS Galaxies in the {\it Spitzer} SWIRE Survey}
14:
15: \author{Hai-Ning Li\altaffilmark{1,2},
16: Hong Wu\altaffilmark{1,3}, Chen Cao\altaffilmark{1,2}, Yi-Nan
17: Zhu\altaffilmark{1,2}}
18:
19: \altaffiltext{1}{National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese
20: Academy of Sciences,
21: A20 Datun Road, Beijing 100012, P.R.China;
22: lhn@bao.ac.cn; hwu@bao.ac.cn}
23: \altaffiltext{2}{Graduate School of Chinese of Academy of Sciences,
24: Beijing 100039, P.R.China}
25: \altaffiltext{3}{Visiting Scholar, Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii,
26: 2680 Woodlawn Drive, Honolulu, HI 96822}
27: \received{\data}
28: \accepted{}
29:
30: \begin{abstract}
31:
32: We explore the correlation between morphological types and
33: mid-infrared (MIR) properties of an optically flux-limited sample of
34: 154 galaxies from the Forth Data Release (DR4) of Sloan Digital Sky
35: Survey (SDSS), cross-correlated with {\it Spitzer} SWIRE ({\it
36: Spitzer} Wide-Area InfraRed Extragalactic Survey) fields of
37: ELAIS-N1, ELAIS-N2 and Lockman Hole. Aperture photometry is
38: performed on the SDSS and {\it Spitzer} images to obtain optical and
39: MIR properties. The morphological classifications are given based on
40: both visual inspection and bulge-disk decomposition on SDSS $g-$ and
41: $r-$band images. The average bulge-to-total ratio ($B/T$) is a
42: smooth function over different morphological types. Both the $8\mu
43: m$(dust) and $24\mu m$(dust) luminosities and their relative
44: luminosity ratios to $3.6\mu m$ (MIR dust-to-star ratios) present
45: obvious correlations with both the Hubble $T$ type and $B/T$. The
46: early-type galaxies notably differ from the late-types in the MIR
47: properties, especially in the MIR dust-to-star ratios. It is
48: suggested that the MIR dust-to-star ratio of either $\nu
49: L_{\nu}[8\mu m(dust)]/\nu L_{\nu}[3.6\mu m]$ or $\nu L_{\nu}[24\mu
50: m(dust)]/\nu L_{\nu}[3.6\mu m]$ is an effective way to separate the
51: early-type galaxies from the late-type ones. Based on the tight
52: correlation between the stellar mass and the $3.6\mu m$ luminosity,
53: we have derived a formula to calculate the stellar mass from the
54: latter. We have also investigated the MIR properties of both edge-on
55: galaxies and barred galaxies in our sample. Since they present
56: similar MIR properties to the other sample galaxies, they do not
57: influence the MIR properties obtained for the entire sample.
58:
59: \end{abstract}
60:
61: \keywords{galaxies: morphology --- galaxies: formation --- infrared: galaxies
62: --- galaxies: statistics}
63:
64: % ===== section 1 : introduction =====
65:
66: \section{INTRODUCTION}\label{section:introduction}
67:
68: Ever since Hubble's famous paper outlined his classification system
69: \citep{Hubble1926,Hubble1936}, morphological classification in
70: conjunction with physical measurement has become an important tool
71: in extragalactic astrophysics. A number of quantitative classifiers
72: have been developed or extended over the years to probe the
73: structure of galaxies. There are parametric classifiers like radial
74: multi-Gaussian deconvolution \citep{Bendinelli1991}, bulge-disk
75: decomposition \citep{Byun1995}, etc., and the nonparametric ones such as
76: the C-A system \citep{Abraham1994,Abraham1996}, artificial neural
77: nets trained from visual classification sets \citep{Odewahn1996},
78: Gini Coefficient \citep{Lotz2004} and so on. As one of the main
79: quantitative criteria and a function of the Hubble classification,
80: the bulge-disk decomposition has now been widely used as an effective
81: method to examine galaxy structures and morphological properties,
82: \citep[e.g.,][etc]{deJong1996,Baggett1998,Tasca2005,Allen2006}.
83:
84: The variations of galaxy physical properties with morphology and
85: environment are crucial in our understanding of the evolution of
86: galaxies \citep{Kennicutt1998,Brinchmann2004}. Numbers of properties
87: such as the integrated birthrate variation \citep{Sandage1986}, the
88: optical and infrared photometric properties
89: \citep{Boselli2001,Shimasaku2001,Popescu2002a,Davoodi2006}, the star
90: formation properties of galaxies in clusters \citep{Yuan2005}, the
91: circumnuclear H$\alpha$ luminosity and bar structures
92: \citep{Shi2006}, etc, which have been investigated present
93: regularity or correlation along different morphological types.
94: Through substantial former investigations, it is known that as a
95: result of different stellar populations and the amount of dust and
96: gas for the environment of star-forming, the early-type galaxies
97: (ellipticals and lenticulars) exhibit rather different properties
98: compared with the late-type ones (spirals, irregulars and so on).
99:
100: As we know, averagely one third of the total luminosity from normal
101: galaxies is absorbed and re-radiated by dust
102: \citep{Mathis1990,Popescu2002b}, and even higher fraction from
103: galaxies with the most active star-forming activity \citep[e.g.
104: luminous infrared galaxies (LIGs),][]{Sanders1996,Wang2006}. Both
105: the Infrared Space Observatory \citep[ ISO - ][]{Kessler1996} and
106: {\it Spitzer} Space Telescope \citep{Werner2004} continued to
107: explore the importance of dust. Studies of dusty starburst galaxies
108: \citep{Poggianti2000,Flores2004} have shown that, most of the
109: activities (e.g., star-formation and/or AGN emission) in these
110: galaxies are hidden by dust, and the bolometric luminosities of the
111: active systems are mostly emitted in the infrared. This suggests
112: that the infrared emission is a sensitive tracer of the young
113: stellar population and star formation rates (SFRs), and suffers
114: weaker extinction. The MIR dust emissions mainly consist of
115: polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) emission and the continuum
116: emission feature of warm dust component. Both of these two
117: components have been investigated as reliable measures of the SFRs
118: of galaxies as a whole \citep{Peeters2004,Wu2005a}. Whereby studies
119: in the MIR properties will certainly improve our understanding of
120: the galaxies which have been well studied in the optical bands, and
121: give an insight into the details of their star formation histories.
122:
123: This work tries to explore the relationships between the morphology
124: and the MIR properties, for a flux-limited sample of normal galaxies
125: which were selected from the galaxies of SDSS-DR4
126: \citep{Adelman-McCarthy2006} cross-correlated with the {\it Spitzer}
127: SWIRE \citep{Lonsdale2003}. Considering that the {\it Spitzer} IRAC
128: (Fazio et al. 2004) $8\mu m$ band covers the strongest PAH feature
129: ($7.7\mu m$), and the MIPS (Rieke et al. 2004) $24\mu m$ band covers
130: the continuum emission of very small grains (VSGs) free of PAH
131: features, we tried to employ the IRAC bands and MIPS $24\mu m$ band
132: to investigate the MIR dust properties of entire galaxies. We
133: performed elliptical aperture photometric analysis in both the
134: optical and MIR bands. The $8\mu m$ dust and $24\mu m$ dust
135: luminosity and their dust-to-star ratios are used to quantitatively
136: investigate the MIR properties of our sample galaxies. Two ways to
137: classify the morphologies of the sample galaxies were adopted: the
138: $T$ type of the revised Hubble classification system
139: \citep{deVaucouleurs1976} by visual inspection, and the quantitative
140: parameter of $B/T$ by the bulge-disk decomposition.
141:
142: In \S 2, we describe the infrared and optical data, the sample
143: construction, and the elliptical aperture photometry. The
144: morphological classifications are presented in \S 3. In \S 4, we
145: analyze the optical and MIR colors, and give the statistical results
146: of the MIR dust properties against galaxy morphological types and
147: the corresponding discussions. The conclusions are presented in \S
148: 5. Throughout this paper, we assume a Hubble constant $H_{0} = 70
149: {\rm km s^{-1} Mpc^{-1}}$ and $\Omega_M=0.3$, $\Omega_\Lambda=0.7$
150: in calculating the distance and the luminosity.
151:
152: % ===== Section 2 : sample selection and photometry =====
153:
154: \section{DATA AND DATA REDUCTION}\label{sec:data.process}
155:
156: \subsection{The Sample}\label{subsec:sample}
157:
158: We used the IRAC $3.6, 4.5, 5.8, 8.0\mu m$ and the MIPS $24\mu m$
159: images from the northern SWIRE fields of Lockman Hole, ELAIS-N1, and
160: ELAIS-N2. The BCD (Basic Calibrated Data) images of the four IRAC
161: bands were obtained from {\it Spitzer} Science Center, which include
162: flat-field corrections, dark subtraction, linearity and flux
163: calibrations \citep{Fazio2004}. The IRAC images (in all four bands)
164: were mosaiced from the BCD images after pointing refinement,
165: distortion correction and cosmic-ray removal with the final pixel
166: scale of $0.6\arcsec$ as described by \citet{Huang2004} and
167: \citet{Wu2005a}; likewise the MIPS $24\mu m$ images were mosaiced in
168: the similar way with the final pixel scale of $1.225\arcsec$
169: \citep{Cao2007,Wen2007}. Sources detected by SExtractor
170: \citep{Bertin1996} in IRAC four bands and MIPS $24\mu m$ were
171: matched with the Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS) sources to
172: achieve astrometric uncertainties of around $0.1\arcsec$.
173:
174: The SDSS data provide full coverage of the SWIRE fields of Lockman
175: and ELAIS-N2 but cover only one third of ELAIS-N1 field. The $ugriz$
176: corrected frames of spectroscopically observed galaxies were taken
177: from the SDSS-DR4. The pixel scale of SDSS images is $0.4\arcsec$
178: \citep{Stoughton2002}. The SDSS-DR4 $ugriz$ spectrophotometric
179: catalogue was cross-correlated with SWIRE MIR catalogue measured by
180: SExtractor \citep{Bertin1996} by a radius of $2\arcsec$. The total
181: survey area of the three northern SWIRE fields is $\sim$24
182: deg$^{2}$, of which the overlap with SDSS is $\sim$15 deg$^{2}$.
183: %There are only 17 SDSS galaxies not having the corresponding MIR
184: %fluxes, due to the $2\arcsec$ match, providing a preliminary sample
185: %of 1925 galaxies.
186: To obtain the reliable morphological classification
187: \citep{Fukugita2004}, 163 bright galaxies with Petrosian magnitude
188: $r\leqslant15.9$ were selected. Only four SDSS galaxies were not
189: matched with SWIRE MIR sources by 2$\arcsec$, since the SDSS fiber
190: observations mistakenly pointed to the off-nucleus regions rather
191: than the nuclear regions of galaxies. This provides a preliminary
192: sample of 159 galaxies.
193:
194: We excluded further five galaxies in our magnitude limited sample of
195: 159 galaxies, because they failed in either the sky-background
196: subtraction or the bulge-disk decomposition, or were severely
197: contaminated by nearby bright stars. This led to a SDSS $r-$band
198: flux-limited final sample of 154 galaxies. 142 of this sample have
199: been imaged by IRAC four bands and 137 have been imaged by MIPS
200: 24$\mu$m band. Finally, a sub-sample of 125 galaxies has images in
201: all five MIR bands, and is used for further statistical discussion
202: in \S\ref{subsec:statistics}. All of theses objects are local, with
203: redshift less than 0.13. In our sample, six galaxies were with the
204: absolute B magnitude fainter than -18, and thus classified as dwarf
205: galaxies \citep{Mateo1998}. Here, the B magnitude can be obtained
206: from the SDSS $g-$ and $r-$ magnitudes \citep{Smith2002}. The
207: distributions of SDSS $r-$band Petrosian magnitudes, the redshift,
208: and B-band absolute magnitudes for the 154 sample galaxies as well
209: as those for the 125 sub-sample galaxies are plotted in
210: Figure~\ref{fig:properties}. All these distributions show that the
211: sub-sample can well represent the flux-limited sample.
212:
213: Among the 154 sample galaxies, 133 with emission line detections
214: could be classified with the traditional
215: $\log$(\OIIIHb)-$\log$(\NIIHa) diagnostic diagram
216: \citep{Baldwin1981,Veilleux1987}. The emission line fluxes were
217: derived from the catalogue of \citet{Tremonti2004}. The criteria
218: given by \citet{Kewley2001} was adopted to distinguish the potential
219: star-forming galaxies from AGNs, as is shown in
220: Figure~\ref{fig:BPT}.
221:
222: \subsection{Photometry}\label{subsec:photometry}
223: To obtain the accurate photometry, sky background fitting and
224: subtraction were done \citep{Zheng1999,Wu2002,Wu2005b} on both the
225: SDSS corrected frames and the {\it Spitzer} images. All objects
226: detected by SExtractor were masked to generate a background-only
227: image, and the fitting sky-background was then subtracted.
228: Photometry was performed on the background-subtracted images by IRAF
229: task ELLIPSE \citep{Jedrzejewski1987}. To embrace almost all the
230: flux of these extended sources in the different bands, an elliptical
231: isophote with the B-band surface brightness of 26 mag $arcsec^{-2}$
232: was adopted as the photometric aperture, based on the SDSS $g-$band
233: images. With such elliptical apertures, the total fluxes were
234: measured in all the wavelengths including the SDSS $ugriz$, the IRAC
235: four bands and the MIPS $24\mu m$ band (see sample apertures marked
236: in Figure~\ref{fig:sample}) with IRAF task POLYPHOT. Note that the
237: point source functions (PSFs) of MIPS $24\mu m$ are rather extended,
238: therefore further aperture corrections were performed on this band.
239: For objects with the equivalent radius of the elliptical apertures
240: smaller than $15\arcsec$, aperture corrections were applied to
241: calibrate the integrated flux to an equivalent radius of
242: $15\arcsec$. The photometric accuracies of these different bands are
243: quite small, less than 0.03 mag on average. Flux calibration
244: accuracies of the IRAC four bands \citep{Fazio2004} and MIPS $24\mu
245: m$ band \citep{Rieke2004} are less than $10\%$. The final errors
246: include both the above errors.
247:
248: The Galactic extinction in each SDSS filter from SDSS-DR4 catalogue
249: was adopted, and then intrinsic extinction was derived from the
250: Balmer decrement \citep{Calzetti2001}. The photometric
251: $K$-correction was calculated using the method of \citet[][{\rm
252: Kcorrect V4-1-4}]{Blanton2003}. No extinction correction has been
253: performed on photometric results in the MIR bands since extinction
254: effect is rather negligible in the infrared compared with optical
255: wavelength. Due to the fact that our sample are all low redshift
256: galaxies and, as of this work, there are no reliable $K$-correction
257: for these MIR spectral ranges available yet, we applied no
258: $K$-correction to the MIR photometry. All the measurements were
259: converted to AB magnitudes \citep{Oke1983}.
260:
261: Although PAH and VSG emissions dominate $8\mu m$ and $24\mu m$ bands
262: for the majority of our sample, there is still a stellar continuum
263: in these bands, especially for the early-type galaxies. Herewith a
264: subtraction of the stellar contribution using the $3.6\mu m$
265: luminosity was adopted, with a scale factor of 0.232 for the $8\mu
266: m$ band and 0.032 for the $24\mu m$ band \citep{Helou2004}.
267: Hereafter, we denoted the 8$\mu m$(dust) and 24$\mu m$(dust)
268: representing the dust emissions after subtracting the stellar
269: contribution \citep{Wu2005a}.
270:
271: % ===== Section 3 : morphology classification =====
272:
273:
274: \section{MORPHOLOGICAL CLASSIFICATION}\label{sec:mor.class}
275: We conducted the morphological classification by two methods:
276: visual inspection and bulge-disk decomposition with GIM2D
277: \citep[Galaxy IMage 2D:][]{Simard1998,Simard2002}.
278:
279: \subsection{GIM2D Fitting}\label{subsec:gim2d.fit}
280: GIM2D is a two-dimensional photometric decomposition fitting
281: algorithm which fits each image to a superposition of an bulge
282: component with a S\'{e}rsic profile, and a disk component with an
283: exponential profile \citep{Simard1998,Simard2002}. GIM2D was
284: employed to obtain the structural parameters of galaxies in our
285: sample. The bulge component of the model is a profile of S\'{e}rsic
286: form \citep{Sersic1968}:
287: \begin{equation}
288: \Sigma(r) = \Sigma_e\cdot exp\{-b[(r/r_e)^{1/n}-1]\}
289: \label{eqn:Sersic.profile}
290: \end{equation}
291: where $\Sigma(r)$ is the surface brightness at a radius $r$ and
292: $\Sigma_e$ is the characteristic value (i.e. the effective surface
293: brightness), defined as the brightness at the effective radius
294: $r_e$. Parameter $b$ is related to the S\'{e}rsic index $n$ and
295: chosen equal to $1.9992n-0.3271$ so that $r_e$ remains the projected
296: radius enclosing half of the light in this component
297: \citep{Ciotti1991}.
298:
299: The disk component is an exponential profile of the form:
300: \begin{equation}
301: \Sigma(r) = \Sigma_0\cdot exp(-r/r_d)
302: \label{eqn:Exponential.profile}
303: \end{equation}
304: where $\Sigma_0$ is the central surface brightness,
305: and $r_d$ is the disk scale length.
306:
307: Decomposition was performed based on this model, with a Gaussian
308: PSF. A total of twelve parameters were adjusted in fitting the
309: galaxy image and retrieved as output from our decomposition: the
310: total luminosity $L$, the bulge fraction $B/T$, the bulge effective
311: radius $r_e$, the bulge ellipticity $e$, the bulge position angle
312: $\phi_b$, the disk scale length $r_d$, the disk inclination angle
313: $i$, the disk position angle $\phi_d$, the centroiding offsets $dx$
314: and $dy$, the S$\acute{e}$rsic index $n$, and the residual sky
315: background level $db$. The $B/T$ which is defined as the fraction of
316: the total flux in the bulge component has been extracted as a
317: quantitative indicator of morphology. $B/T=1$ corresponds to a pure
318: bulge, while $B/T=0$ to a pure disk. With all the objects detected
319: by SExtractor flagged except the galaxy of interest, the $g-$band
320: mask images were adopted not only in $g-$band but also in $r-$band,
321: throughout the decomposition fitting with GIM2D.
322: Figure~\ref{fig:sample} shows example (science, mask, model, and
323: residual) images of different morphological types in GIM2D fitting.
324: The returned $\chi ^2$ values of $g-$ and $r-$band fitting have the
325: mean values of 1.14 and 1.18 with deviations of 0.26 and 0.33
326: respectively, representing rather convincing fitting results.
327:
328: To check the results obtained, we compared the parameters $B/T$ of
329: the 154 galaxies estimated from $g-$ and $r-$band in
330: Figure~\ref{fig:gim2d}. The $B/T$ values obtained from both bands
331: agree well with small amount of deviation. Among the three most
332: deviated sources, SDSS J161222.61+525827.9 is an early-type galaxy
333: with highly centralized surface brightness distribution in bluer
334: band. SDSS J151723.30+593517.0 is a peculiar galaxy and UGC5888 is
335: an irregular. We adopted $B/T$ values derived from $r-$band images
336: throughout the following investigation since the decomposition
337: results in the two SDSS bands hold quite good agreement.
338:
339: \subsection{Visual Classification}\label{subsec:visual.class}
340:
341: The morphological types of revised Hubble sequence
342: \citep{deVaucouleurs1964} of our sample galaxies were classified by
343: visual inspection based on features like bulge ratios, the presence
344: of spiral arms and/or bars, signs of interaction, multiple nuclei
345: etc. All galaxies in our sample were classified into six
346: morphological classes: $T=0$(E or S0), 1(Sa), 3(Sb), 5(Sc), 7(Sd),
347: and 9(Irr). Notice that we assigned an additional class 10
348: corresponding to galaxies with peculiar morphology possibly related
349: to galactic interactions, mergers, etc. We performed the visual
350: classification in both SDSS $g-$ and $r-$band images. The
351: classifications done independently by the four of us, agree in over
352: 90\% of the sample. The classifications were verified for 36 of
353: those galaxies whose morphological types were found in the NASA/IPAC
354: Extragalactic Database (NED)
355: %
356: \footnote{See http://nedwww.ipac.caltech.edu/index.html}
357: %
358: and were found to be accurate to $\Delta T=\pm1$.
359:
360: Considering the possible effects that inclinations and bar
361: structures may cause, we further divided sample galaxies into 3
362: types: barred galaxies, edge-on galaxies, and the rest defined as
363: general galaxies for further consideration. Note that when defining
364: edge-on galaxies, we adopted a standard of GIM2D fitted disk
365: inclination angle $i > 70$. Table~\ref{tab:mor.class} shows the
366: numbers and corresponding fractions of different morphological types
367: in our sample. In Table~\ref{tab:mor.spitzer}, we present the
368: numbers of galaxies observed by different MIR bands in each
369: morphological type. It can be drawn from Table 2 that the
370: morphological fractions E/S0: S(Sa-Sd): Irr of optical-$8\mu m$ and
371: optical-$24\mu m$ samples are 0.47: 0.51: 0.014 and 0.44: 0.54:
372: 0.016 respectively. Both are consistant with E(E/S0-S0): S(S0a-Sdm):
373: Im of 0.40: 0.57: 0.014 obtained from an optically selected sample
374: of SDSS galaxies \citep{Fukugita2007}.
375:
376: \subsection{Comparison}\label{subsec: gim2d.compare}
377: A comparison between Hubble $T$ type and the bulge-to-total ratio
378: $B/T$ has been carried out, as is shown in
379: Figure~\ref{fig:T.Bratio}. Except for the peculiar galaxies which
380: exhibit a diversity of $B/T$, there is a smooth inclination in $B/T$
381: along Hubble sequence from $T=9$ to $T=0$, i.e., for normal
382: galaxies, except the peculiar, the late-types exhibit lower $B/T$
383: than the early-type ones. Hence $B/T$ does act as a reliable measure
384: of morphological types for normal galaxies in our sample. In order
385: to statistically examine the properties of our sample, galaxies have
386: been divided into two morphological types: the early-type (E/S0)
387: with T=0, and the late-type (Sa, Sb, Sc, Sd, and Irr) with T from 1
388: to 9. Consequently, according to \citet{Simien1986}, such a
389: classification roughly corresponds to the division of $B/T=0.4$. 128
390: out of the 144 normal sample objects coincide with their
391: morphological types classified with $T$. The divisions are shown in
392: Figure~\ref{fig:T.Bratio}. Since as a whole, divisions with the two
393: methods agree with each other, we have adopted T type to divide the
394: sample galaxies into either the early-type or the late-type in the
395: following statistics.
396:
397: % ===== Section 4 : results and discussion =====
398:
399: \section{RESULT AND DISCUSSION}\label{sec:result}
400: % === colors ===
401: \subsection{Color-Color Diagram}
402: The optical-MIR color-color diagrams are shown in the left panels of
403: Figure~\ref{fig:color}, and there are anti-correlations between
404: optical and MIR colors, which is consistent with the result of
405: \citet{Hogg2005}. Such a trend can be explained rather naturally:
406: the optically blue color is related to the recent star formation,
407: indicating the existence of notable amount of dust, and the MIR dust
408: emissions can be shown in both $8\mu m$ and $24\mu m$ bands. On the
409: other hand, optically red galaxies are always too old to contain
410: plenty of dust, and hence present weak MIR dust emissions.
411:
412: The right panels of Figure~\ref{fig:color} show the relationship
413: between MIR colors. It can be detected that [3.6]-[4.5] colors in
414: our sample are quite blue, with an average of around -0.52,
415: indicating that there is no extremely active galactic nuclei (QSO
416: etc.) in our sample, because both the emissions of $3.6\mu m$ and
417: $4.5\mu m$ of normal galaxies are dominated by decreasing stellar
418: continuum of the old stellar population. Yet these two bands of very
419: active galaxies like quasars are dominated by the power law spectra
420: of quasars and consequently should exhibit redder [3.6]-[4.5]
421: colors. Both colors of [3.6]-[8] and [3.6]-[24] can roughly
422: characterize the relative strengths of the MIR dust emissions of
423: PAHs and VSGs. The stronger the dust emissions, the redder the
424: colors. Therefore, it is not surprised to find that most of the
425: peculiar galaxies of our sample at the redder part of these panels
426: because they contain large amount of dust for their violent star
427: formation \citep{Sanders1996}.
428:
429: % === stellar mass ===
430: \subsection{Estimation of the Stellar Mass}\label{subsec:I1.mass}
431: The luminosity of $3.6\mu m$ band is often treated as a tracer of
432: stellar component \citep[][etc]{Wu2005a,Davoodi2006} as well as a
433: test of validity of mass determination \citep{Hancock2007}.
434: Furthermore \citet{Hancock2007} has compared the mass of clumps in
435: Arp 82 derived from {\it R} band fluxes and broadband colors against
436: luminosities of $3.6\mu m$, and has found strong correlation between
437: them. Hereby the relationship between the stellar mass and the
438: $3.6\mu m$ luminosity of our sample galaxies is examined. Based on
439: the optical photometries as described in \S~\ref{subsec:photometry},
440: we calculated the stellar mass of our sample, following
441: \citet{Bell2003}:
442: \begin{equation}
443: \log(\frac{M_{\star}}{M_{\odot}}) = -0.4\times(M_{r,AB}-4.67) + [a_{r}+b_{r}\times (g-r)_{AB}+0.15]
444: \label{eqn:mass.Bell}
445: \end{equation}
446: where $M_{r,AB}$ is the $r-$band absolute magnitude, $(g-r)_{AB}$ is
447: the rest-frame color in the AB magnitude system. The coefficients
448: $a_r$ and $b_r$ come from Table 7 of \citet{Bell2003}. A
449: \citet{Salpeter1955} stellar mass initial function (IMF) has been
450: adopted with $\alpha = 2.35$ and $0.1M_{\odot} < M < 100M_{\odot}$.
451: The distribution of the stellar mass for our sample galaxies is
452: presented in Figure~\ref{fig:properties}, in a range between $10^{9}
453: M_{\odot}$ and $10^{12} M_{\odot}$, with the average mass around
454: $10^{11} M_{\odot}$, as intermediate mass galaxies.
455:
456: A tight correlation of the stellar mass against the luminosity of
457: $3.6\mu m$ is detected for our sample, as is shown in
458: Figure~\ref{fig:I1.mass}. Our result is consistent with that found
459: by \citet{Hancock2007} but with smaller scatters, thus it confirms
460: the capability of the $3.6\mu m$ luminosity as a measure of the
461: stellar mass of galaxies. Based on our 145 galaxies and 24 clumps in
462: Arp 82 \citep{Hancock2007}, we fit the relation between the stellar
463: mass and the $3.6\mu m$ luminosity, and obtain a nearly linear
464: correlation:
465: \begin{equation}
466: \log(\frac{M_{\star}}{M_{\odot}}) = (1.34\pm0.09) + \\
467: (1.00\pm0.01)\times \log(\frac{\nu L_{\nu}[3.6\mu m]}{L_{\odot}})
468: \label{eqn:I1.mass}
469: \end{equation}
470:
471: As is pointed out by \citet{Charlot1996} and \citet{Madau1998}, the
472: mass-to-infrared light ratio is relatively insensitive to the star
473: formation history, and remains very close to unity, independent of
474: either galaxy colors or Hubble types. This relation is probably due
475: to the fact that in the near-infrared, older stellar populations may
476: dominate both the galaxy luminosities and the stellar masses.
477: Therefore such a correlation provides a proxy way to estimate the
478: stellar mass of galaxies directly from the integrated $3.6\mu m$
479: luminosity.
480:
481: % === MIR.mor ===
482: \subsection{MIR Properties and Morphology}\label{subsec:MIR.mor}
483: Figure~\ref{fig:mor.lum} shows the $8\mu m$ and $24\mu m$ dust
484: luminosities as the function of different morphological types in our
485: sample. For normal galaxies, except the dwarfs, along either the
486: Hubble $T$ types or the $B/T$ ratios, there exist obvious
487: declinations of the MIR luminosities from the late-type to the
488: early-type galaxies, especially showing a steep change around the
489: division of the late-type and the early-type galaxies. All the
490: peculiar galaxies show relatively higher MIR luminosities,
491: independent of their $B/T$ ratios. The phenomenon could be
492: attributed to the fact that early-type galaxies are dominated by
493: older population and are deficient of dust, resulting in lower MIR
494: dust luminosities, while the late-type contain larger amount of
495: young stars and more dust thus present stronger MIR emissions.
496: Peculiar galaxies which are undergoing strong star forming
497: activities contain great amount of dust and thereby show averagely
498: high MIR luminosities. As \citet{Wu2005a} has pointed out, both the
499: $8\mu m$ and $24\mu m$ dust luminosities can be used as measures of
500: SFRs of entire galaxies; therefore, the correlations between the MIR
501: dust luminosities and morphological types reflect a consequent
502: relationship between the galactic SFRs and morphological types. This
503: also confirms the previous results of \citet{Sandage1986},
504: \citet{Kennicutt1998}, etc. As for the six dwarf galaxies, because
505: they all have low mass of around $10^9 M_{\odot}$ (from the previous
506: mass determination), so they contain less dust and thus show lower
507: MIR dust emissions \citep{Hogg2005}.
508:
509: The MIR dust-to-star ratios are also plotted against different
510: morphological types, in Figure~\ref{fig:mor.ratio}. The prominent
511: correlations are also detected between the MIR dust-to-star ratios
512: and both the Hubble $T$ types and the $B/T$ ratios. Furthermore,
513: such correlations seem to be more obvious than those between the MIR
514: luminosities and morphological types. Since both the $8\mu m$ and
515: $24\mu m$ dust luminosities possess correlations with SFRs for
516: normal galaxies, and the $3.6\mu m$ luminosity is a reliable tracer
517: of stellar component, such ratios can be treated as the dust-to-star
518: ratios. The correlations between the MIR dust-to-star ratios and the
519: morphological types could represent the distribution of SFRs per
520: unit stellar mass \citep{Wen2007} over different morphologies.
521: Contrary to the behavior in Figure~\ref{fig:mor.lum}, the dwarf
522: galaxies are roughly consistent with the other late-type galaxies
523: within the error bars, but still present a little lower dust-to-star
524: ratios. This could be explained with the fact that the gravitation
525: potentials of these low mass galaxies may not be strong enough to
526: retain as much dust and gas against the radiation fields as those of
527: the normal-mass galaxies, and hereby all the dwarf galaxies show
528: slightly lower MIR dust-to-star ratios. Almost all the peculiar
529: galaxies present higher MIR dust-to-star ratios.
530:
531: The ratio of the $8\mu m$ dust luminosity to the $24\mu m$ dust
532: luminosity is compared with different morphological types in
533: Figure~\ref{fig:mor.dust}. Considering the $8\mu m$ dust emissions
534: mainly represent emission of PAHs heated by B type stars while
535: $24\mu m$ dust emissions stand for emissions from hot dust mostly
536: heated by O type stars \citep{Peeters2004}, the ratio can be treated
537: as the estimation of ratio between these two components. In general,
538: $8\mu m$(dust)-to-$24\mu m$(dust) ratios remain constant on average
539: along the Hubble sequence, while the larger scatter in distribution
540: of the early-type probably arises from existence of nuclear AGNs
541: which destroy PAH emissions presumably due to photodestruction of
542: the PAH molecules by EUV/X-ray photons
543: \citep{Genzel1998,Siebenmorgen2004} or the outer diffuse PAH
544: emissions heated by the older stars \citep{Sauvage2005}. This can
545: also be seen in later discussion in Figure~\ref{fig:SF.AGN} where
546: AGNs present lower $8\mu m$(dust) luminosities. It should be noted
547: that the two dwarf irregular galaxies exhibit lower $8\mu
548: m$(dust)-to-$24\mu m$(dust) ratios than the most of the late-type
549: do, possibly due to their low metallicities
550: %
551: \footnote{with metallicity $12+\log(O/H)=8.55$ and $8.35$
552: respectively, about $3/4$ and $1/2$ the solar value
553: \citep{Asplund2004}.}
554: %
555: \citep{Engelbracht2005}.
556:
557: The above result indicates that for the normal galaxies except the
558: dwarfs, the ratio of these two dust components does not vary much
559: against morphology. Therefore the $8\mu m$(dust) luminosities are as
560: capable to trace the galaxy SFRs as the $24\mu m$(dust) luminosities
561: as \citet{Wu2005a} has pointed out.
562:
563: % === statistics ===
564: \subsection{Statistics of MIR Properties}\label{subsec:statistics}
565: In order to compare the statistical MIR properties of different
566: types of sample galaxies, we performed all the following statistics
567: on the sub-sample of 125 galaxies which have photometric information
568: for all the optical and MIR bands. Since from
569: Figure~\ref{fig:properties} and K-S test results this sub-sample
570: does not exhibit notable differences from the 154-galaxy sample, we
571: suggest that the following statistical discussions are
572: representative of all the sample galaxies.
573:
574: Distributions of the MIR luminosities and dust-to-star ratios for
575: both the early-type and the late-type galaxies in the sub-sample are
576: presented in Figure~\ref{fig:early.late}. It is clear that, in
577: general, the late-type galaxies exhibit quite different MIR
578: properties to early-type ones, presenting a distinct and
579: statistically higher MIR luminosities and dust-to-star ratios. The
580: Gaussian fitting is performed on each distribution, and the lines
581: crossing intersection points of the two Gaussian distributions are
582: presented as the division of the two morphological types. In Part A
583: of Table~\ref{tab:type}, the median values and the mean values
584: together with scatters of distributions of the early-type and the
585: late-type galaxies are listed. Probabilities that the distributions
586: of these two types can match are all smaller than $8.8\times
587: 10^{-5}$, indicating that they present quite distinct properties.
588: Therefore, both the MIR luminosities and dust-to-star ratios can be
589: used to separate the early-type galaxies from the late-type ones.
590: Table~\ref{tab:type.division} displays specific values of divisions
591: and the reliability of such classifications. We define the {\rm
592: reliability} of classification as the fraction of galaxies from the
593: subsample that are selected by Hubble $T$ types. For example, out of
594: the 117 normal galaxies which have images in all IRAC bands, the T
595: type criterion selects 64 late-type galaxies and 53 early-types. 47
596: of the 64 late-type galaxies have $\log\nu L_{\nu}(8\mu
597: m)/L_{\odot}\geqslant8.91$ and thus are consistently classified as
598: late-type, while 47 of the 53 early-types have $\log\nu L_{\nu}(8\mu
599: m)/L_{\odot}\leqslant8.91$ and thus are classified as early-type.
600: Therefore the $\log\nu L_{\nu}(8\mu m)/L_{\odot}=8.91$ maintains
601: reliability of 73\% for selecting late-type galaxies and 89\% for
602: early-types. Correspondingly, $\log\nu L_{\nu}(24\mu
603: m)/L_{\odot}=8.30$ gives a reliability of 70\% for the late-type and
604: 77\% for the early-type; $\log\nu L_{\nu}(8\mu m)/\nu L_{\nu}(3.6\mu
605: m)=-1.15$ can give a 88\% for the late-type and 83\% for the
606: early-type; and $\log\nu L_{\nu}(24\mu m)/\nu L_{\nu}(3.6\mu
607: m)=-1.45$ can give a 84\% for the late-type and 85\% for the
608: early-type; Hereby the MIR dust luminosities especially the MIR
609: dust-to-star ratios can be effective tools to divide the early-type
610: galaxies from the late-type ones.
611:
612: The comparisons between MIR properties of star-forming galaxies and
613: AGNs (see \S\ref{subsec:sample}) are shown in
614: Figure~\ref{fig:SF.AGN}. Generally, star-forming galaxies present
615: stronger MIR emissions than those possess AGN activities. From Part
616: B of Table~\ref{tab:type}, the star-forming galaxies and AGNs show
617: the probability of matching each other in $8\mu m$ and $24\mu m$
618: dust luminosites and dust-to-star ratios with less than $2.1\times
619: 10^{-3}$, indicating quite different MIR properties, although not so
620: distinct as these between the early-type and late-type ones.
621:
622: Some of the sample galaxies are edge-on galaxies and some are barred
623: galaxies. Will the galaxies in edge-on view or with bars present
624: different MIR properties? We compare the distributions of the MIR
625: dust luminosities and the MIR dust-to-star ratios between edge-on
626: galaxies, barred galaxies and normal galaxies in
627: Figure~\ref{fig:edge.on} and Figure~\ref{fig:bar}. The statistical
628: results are listed in Part C and D of Table~\ref{tab:type}, with the
629: probabilities in matching each by few to tenth percent, indicating
630: rather resembling distributions. Thus, neither galaxies in edge-on
631: view nor galaxies with bars present statistical differences from the
632: other normal galaxies in both MIR properties. Furthermore, although
633: based on limited data points, one can still find out in
634: Figure~\ref{fig:edge.on} that the edge-on galaxies can also be
635: classified into early-type and late-type ones with the division
636: criteria described in Table~\ref{tab:type.division}. Therefore, the
637: inclination of galaxies and the existence of bars do not affect our
638: previous results.
639:
640: We have also checked the distributions of total sample of 154
641: galaxies in the above parameters and type comparisons, and yielded
642: quite similar results, therefore the selection of this sub-sample
643: does not affect the reliability of our statistical results.
644:
645: \section{SUMMARY}\label{section:summary}
646: We investigated the correlations between the morphological types and
647: the MIR properties of a local optically flux-limited sample of
648: galaxies selected from the spectroscopic catalogue of galaxies in
649: SDSS-DR4, cross-correlated with the Lockman Hole, ELAIS-N1 and
650: ELAIS-N2 of {\it Spitzer} SWIRE survey. Aperture photometry has been
651: performed on all these galaxies in all optical and MIR bands.
652: Morphological classifications have been performed by both visual
653: inspection and the bulge-disk decomposition with GIM2D. Our major
654: results are as follows:
655:
656: {\noindent (1) The presented analysis clearly shows that the
657: bulge-to-total ratio $B/T$ obtained by the bulge-disk decomposition
658: is proved a qualified quantitative measure of the Hubble $T$ types.
659: Galaxies with earlier morphological types possess larger bulge
660: ratios while later type ones have more dominant disk structures. }
661:
662: {\noindent (2) The $3.6\mu m$ luminosity presents a tight
663: correlation with the stellar mass, and this provides us a new tool
664: to estimate the stellar mass. The empirical formula to calculate the
665: stellar mass by the $3.6\mu m$ luminosity is given in
666: Equation~\ref{eqn:I1.mass}. }
667:
668: {\noindent (3) Except for the dwarf galaxies and a few peculiar
669: objects, the MIR dust luminosities of $8\mu m$ and $24\mu m$ exhibit
670: correlations with either Hubble $T$ type or the bulge-to-total ratio
671: $B/T$. Such correlations are much more obvious if we used the MIR
672: dust-to-star ratios (either $\nu L_{\nu}[8\mu m (dust)]/\nu
673: L_{\nu}[3.6\mu m]$ or $\nu L_{\nu}[24\mu m (dust)]/\nu
674: L_{\nu}[3.6\mu m]$) instead of the MIR luminosities. }
675:
676: {\noindent (4) The MIR dust luminosity ratios of $\nu L_{\nu}[8\mu m
677: (dust)]/\nu L_{\nu}[24\mu m(dust)]$ turn to be roughly constant
678: against the morphological types, especially for the late-type
679: galaxies. Therefore, on average, the $8\mu m$(dust) luminosity can
680: as reliably measure the global SFRs of normal galaxies as the $24\mu
681: m$(dust) luminosity can, regardless of the morphological types. }
682:
683: {\noindent (5) Distributions of the MIR dust luminosities and the
684: MIR dust-to-star ratios of both the early-type and the late-type
685: galaxies are very different. The late-type galaxies present higher
686: MIR dust luminosities and MIR dust-to-star ratios than the
687: early-type galaxies. The MIR dust luminosities of $8\mu m$ and
688: $24\mu m$ and especially the MIR dust-to-star ratios of $\nu
689: L_{\nu}[8\mu m (dust)]/\nu L_{\nu}[3.6\mu m]$ and $\nu L_{\nu}[24\mu
690: m (dust)]/\nu L_{\nu}[3.6\mu m]$ can provide an effective tool to
691: distinguish the late-type galaxies from the early-types. }
692:
693: {\noindent (6) The star-forming galaxies and AGNs also present
694: different statistical MIR properties, with the former showing higher
695: MIR luminosities and MIR dust-to-star ratios. The statistical
696: results show that either galaxies in edge-on view or galaxies with
697: bars do not present quite different MIR properties from other sample
698: galaxies. }
699:
700: \acknowledgements
701:
702: The authors would like to appreciate the anonymous referee for
703: helpful comments and suggestions, and we are grateful for the help
704: of D.B. Sanders, S. Mao, Z.-L. Zhou, X.-Y. Xia, Z.-G. Deng, Z. Wang,
705: J.-S. Huang, C.-N. Hao, F.-S. Liu and J.-L. Wang. This project was
706: supported by the National Science Foundation of China through grants
707: 10273012, 10333060 and 10473013.
708:
709: This work is based in part on observations made with the Spitzer
710: Space Telescope, which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory,
711: California Institute of Technology under NASA contract 1407.
712:
713: Funding for the SDSS and SDSS-II has been provided by the Alfred P.
714: Sloan Foundation, the Participating Institutions, the National
715: Science Foundation, the U.S. Department of Energy, the National
716: Aeronautics and Space Administration, the Japanese Monbukagakusho,
717: the Max Planck Society, and the Higher Education Funding Council for
718: England. The SDSS is managed by the Astrophysical Research
719: Consortium for the Participating Institutions. The Participating
720: Institutions are the American Museum of Natural History,
721: Astrophysical Institute Potsdam, University of Basel, Cambridge
722: University, Case Western Reserve University, University of Chicago,
723: Drexel University, Fermilab, the Institute for Advanced Study, the
724: Japan Participation Group, Johns Hopkins University, the Joint
725: Institute for Nuclear Astrophysics, the Kavli Institute for Particle
726: Astrophysics and Cosmology, the Korean Scientist Group, the Chinese
727: Academy of Sciences (LAMOST), Los Alamos National Laboratory, the
728: Max-Planck-Institute for Astronomy (MPIA), the Max-Planck-Institute
729: for Astrophysics (MPA), New Mexico State University, Ohio State
730: University, University of Pittsburgh, University of Portsmouth,
731: Princeton University, the United States Naval Observatory, and the
732: University of Washington.
733:
734: \clearpage
735:
736: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
737:
738: \bibitem[Abraham et al.(1994)]{Abraham1994} Abraham, R.~G., Valdes,
739: F., Yee, H.~K.~C., \& van den Bergh, S.\ 1994, \apj, 432, 75
740: \bibitem[Abraham et al.(1996)]{Abraham1996} Abraham, R.~G., Tanvir,
741: N.~R., Santiago, B.~X., Ellis, R.~S., Glazebrook, K., \& van den
742: Bergh, S.\ 1996, \mnras, 279, L47
743: \bibitem[Adelman-McCarthy et al.(2006)]{Adelman-McCarthy2006}
744: Adelman-McCarthy, J.~K., et al.\ 2006, \apjs, 162, 38
745: \bibitem[Allen et al.(2006)]{Allen2006} Allen, P.~D., Driver,
746: S.~P., Graham, A.~W., Cameron, E., Liske, J., \& de Propris, R.\
747: 2006, \mnras, 371, 2
748: \bibitem[Asplund et al.(2004)]{Asplund2004} Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., Sauval,
749: A.~J.\ 2004, ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints, arXiv:astro-ph/0410214
750: \bibitem[Baggett et al.(1998)]{Baggett1998} Baggett, W.~E.,
751: Baggett, S.~M., \& Anderson, K.~S.~J.\ 1998, \aj, 116, 1626
752: \bibitem[Baldwin et al.(1981)]{Baldwin1981} Baldwin, J.~A.,
753: Phillips, M.~M., \& Terlevich, R.\ 1981, \pasp, 93, 5
754: \bibitem[Bell et al.(2003)]{Bell2003} Bell, E.~F., McIntosh,
755: D.~H., Katz, N., \& Weinberg, M.~D.\ 2003, \apjs, 149, 289
756: \bibitem[Bendinelli(1991)]{Bendinelli1991} Bendinelli, O.\ 1991, \apj,
757: 366, 599
758: \bibitem[Bertin \& Arnouts(1996)]{Bertin1996} Bertin, E., \&
759: Arnouts, S.\ 1996, \aaps, 117, 393
760: \bibitem[Blanton et al.(2003)]{Blanton2003} Blanton, M.~R., et al.\
761: 2003, \aj, 125, 2348
762: \bibitem[Boselli et al.(2001)]{Boselli2001} Boselli, A., Gavazzi,
763: G., Donas, J., \& Scodeggio, M.\ 2001, \aj, 121, 753
764: \bibitem[Brinchmann et al.(2004)]{Brinchmann2004} Brinchmann, J.,
765: Charlot, S., White, S.~D.~M., Tremonti, C., Kauffmann, G., Heckman, T., \&
766: Brinkmann, J.\ 2004, \mnras, 351, 1151
767: \bibitem[Byun \& Freeman(1995)]{Byun1995} Byun, Y.~I., \&
768: Freeman, K.~C.\ 1995, \apj, 448, 563
769: \bibitem[Calzetti(2001)]{Calzetti2001} Calzetti, D.\ 2001, \pasp,
770: 113, 1449
771: \bibitem[Cao \& Wu(2007)]{Cao2007} Cao, C., \& Wu, H.\ 2007,
772: \aj, 133, 1710
773: \bibitem[Charlot(1996)]{Charlot1996} Charlot, S.\ 1996, The
774: Universe at High-z, Large-Scale Structure and the Cosmic Microwave
775: Background, 470, 53
776: \bibitem[Ciotti(1991)]{Ciotti1991} Ciotti, L.\ 1991, \aap, 249, 99
777: \bibitem[Davoodi et al.(2006)]{Davoodi2006} Davoodi, P., et al.\
778: 2006, \mnras, 371, 1113
779: \bibitem[de Jong(1996)]{deJong1996} de Jong, R.~S.\ 1996, \aaps,
780: 118, 557
781: \bibitem[de Vaucouleurs \& de Vaucouleurs(1964)]{deVaucouleurs1964} de
782: Vaucouleurs, G., \& de Vaucouleurs, A.\ 1964, University of Texas
783: Monographs in Astronomy, Austin: University of Texas Press, |c1964,
784: \bibitem[de Vaucouleurs et al.(1976)]{deVaucouleurs1976} de Vaucouleurs,
785: G., de Vaucouleurs, A., \& Corwin, J.~R.\ 1976, Second reference
786: catalogue of bright galaxies, 1976, Austin: University of Texas
787: Press., 0
788: \bibitem[Engelbracht et al.(2005)]{Engelbracht2005} Engelbracht, C.~W.,
789: Gordon, K.~D., Rieke, G.~H., Werner, M.~W., Dale, D.~A., \& Latter,
790: W.~B.\ 2005, \apjl, 628, L29
791: \bibitem[Fazio et al.(2004)]{Fazio2004} Fazio, G.~G., et al.\
792: 2004, \apjs, 154, 10
793: \bibitem[Flores et al.(2004)]{Flores2004} Flores, H., Hammer, F.,
794: Elbaz, D., Cesarsky, C.~J., Liang, Y.~C., Fadda, D., \& Gruel, N.\
795: 2004, \aap, 415, 885
796: \bibitem[Fukugita et al.(2004)]{Fukugita2004} Fukugita, M.,
797: Nakamura, O., Turner, E.~L., Helmboldt, J., \& Nichol, R.~C.\ 2004,
798: \apjl, 601, L127
799: \bibitem[Fukugita et al.(2007)]{Fukugita2007} Fukugita, M., et al.\
800: 2007, ArXiv e-prints, 704, arXiv:0704.1743
801: \bibitem[Genzel et al.(1998)]{Genzel1998} Genzel, R., et al.\
802: 1998, \apj, 498, 579
803: \bibitem[Hancock et al.(2007)]{Hancock2007} Hancock, M., Smith,
804: B.~J., Struck, C., Giroux, M.~L., Appleton, P.~N., Charmandaris, V.,
805: \& Reach, W.~T.\ 2007, \aj, 133, 676
806: \bibitem[Helou et al.(2004)]{Helou2004} Helou, G., et al.\ 2004,
807: \apjs, 154, 253
808: \bibitem[Hogg et al.(2005)]{Hogg2005} Hogg, D.~W., Tremonti,
809: C.~A., Blanton, M.~R., Finkbeiner, D.~P., Padmanabhan, N., Quintero,
810: A.~D., Schlegel, D.~J., \& Wherry, N.\ 2005, \apj, 624, 162
811: \bibitem[Huang et al.(2004)]{Huang2004} Huang, J.-S., et al.\
812: 2004, \apjs, 154, 44
813: \bibitem[Hubble(1926)]{Hubble1926} Hubble, E.~P.\ 1926, \apj, 64,
814: 321
815: \bibitem[Hubble(1936)]{Hubble1936} Hubble, E.~P.\ 1936, Yale
816: University Press,
817: \bibitem[Jedrzejewski(1987)]{Jedrzejewski1987} Jedrzejewski, R.~I.\
818: 1987, \mnras, 226, 747
819: \bibitem[Kennicutt et al.(1994)]{Kennicutt1994} Kennicutt, R.~C.,
820: Jr., Tamblyn, P., \& Congdon, C.~E.\ 1994, \apj, 435, 22
821: \bibitem[Kennicutt(1998)]{Kennicutt1998} Kennicutt, R.~C., Jr.\ 1998,
822: \araa, 36, 189
823: \bibitem[Kessler et al.(1996)]{Kessler1996} Kessler, M.~F., et al.\
824: 1996, \aap, 315, L27
825: \bibitem[Kewley et al.(2001)]{Kewley2001} Kewley, L.~J., Dopita,
826: M.~A., Sutherland, R.~S., Heisler, C.~A., \& Trevena, J.\ 2001,
827: \apj, 556, 121
828: \bibitem[Lonsdale et al.(2003)]{Lonsdale2003} Lonsdale, C.~J., et
829: al.\ 2003, \pasp, 115, 897
830: \bibitem[Lotz et al.(2004)]{Lotz2004} Lotz, J.~M., Primack, J.,
831: \& Madau, P.\ 2004, \aj, 128, 163
832: \bibitem[Madau et al.(1998)]{Madau1998} Madau, P., Pozzetti, L.,
833: \& Dickinson, M.\ 1998, \apj, 498, 106
834: \bibitem[Mateo(1998)]{Mateo1998} Mateo, M.~L.\ 1998, \araa, 36, 435
835: \bibitem[Mathis(1990)]{Mathis1990} Mathis, J.~S.\ 1990, \araa, 28,
836: 37
837: \bibitem[Odewahn et al.(1996)]{Odewahn1996} Odewahn, S.~C.,
838: Windhorst, R.~A., Driver, S.~P., \& Keel, W.~C.\ 1996, \apjl, 472,
839: L13
840: \bibitem[Oke \& Gunn(1983)]{Oke1983} Oke, J.~B., \& Gunn,
841: J.~E.\ 1983, \apj, 266, 713
842: \bibitem[Peeters et al.(2004)]{Peeters2004} Peeters, E., Spoon,
843: H.~W.~W., \& Tielens, A.~G.~G.~M.\ 2004, \apj, 613, 986
844: \bibitem[Poggianti \& Wu(2000)]{Poggianti2000} Poggianti, B.~M., \&
845: Wu, H.\ 2000, \apj, 529, 157
846: \bibitem[Popescu et al.(2002)]{Popescu2002a} Popescu, C.~C., Tuffs,
847: R.~J., V{\"o}lk, H.~J., Pierini, D., \& Madore, B.~F.\ 2002, \apj, 567, 221
848: \bibitem[Popescu \& Tuffs(2002)]{Popescu2002b} Popescu, C.~C., \&
849: Tuffs, R.~J.\ 2002, \mnras, 335, L41
850: \bibitem[Rieke et al.(2004)]{Rieke2004} Rieke, G.~H., et al.\
851: 2004, \apjs, 154, 25
852: \bibitem[Salpeter(1955)]{Salpeter1955} Salpeter, E.~E.\ 1955, \apj,
853: 121, 161
854: \bibitem[Sandage(1986)]{Sandage1986} Sandage, A.\ 1986, \aap, 161,
855: 89
856: \bibitem[Sanders \& Mirabel(1996)]{Sanders1996} Sanders, D.~B., \&
857: Mirabel, I.~F.\ 1996, \araa, 34, 749
858: \bibitem[Sauvage et al.(2005)]{Sauvage2005} Sauvage, M., Tuffs,
859: R.~J., \& Popescu, C.~C.\ 2005, Space Science Reviews, 119, 313
860: \bibitem[S\'{e}rsic(1968)]{Sersic1968} S\'{e}rsic, J.~L.\ 1968, Cordoba,
861: Argentina: Observatorio Astronomico, 1968,
862: \bibitem[Shi et al.(2006)]{Shi2006} Shi, L., Gu, Q.~S., \&
863: Peng, Z.~X.\ 2006, \aap, 450, 15
864: \bibitem[Shimasaku et al.(2001)]{Shimasaku2001} Shimasaku, K., et
865: al.\ 2001, \aj, 122, 1238
866: \bibitem[Siebenmorgen et al.(2004)]{Siebenmorgen2004} Siebenmorgen, R.,
867: Kr{\"u}gel, E., \& Spoon, H.~W.~W.\ 2004, \aap, 414, 123
868: \bibitem[Simard(1998)]{Simard1998} Simard, L.\ 1998, ASP
869: Conf.~Ser.~145: Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems VII,
870: 145, 108
871: \bibitem[Simard et al.(2002)]{Simard2002} Simard, L., et al.\
872: 2002, \apjs, 142, 1
873: \bibitem[Simien \& de Vaucouleurs(1986)]{Simien1986} Simien, F.,
874: \& de Vaucouleurs, G.\ 1986, \apj, 302, 564
875: \bibitem[Smith et al.(2002)]{Smith2002} Smith, J.~A., et al.\
876: 2002, \aj, 123, 2121
877: \bibitem[Stoughton et al.(2002)]{Stoughton2002} Stoughton, C., et
878: al.\ 2002, \aj, 123, 485
879: \bibitem[Tasca \& White(2005)]{Tasca2005} Tasca, L.~A.~M., \&
880: White, S.~D.~M.\ 2005, ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints,
881: arXiv:astro-ph/0507249
882: \bibitem[Tremonti et al.(2004)]{Tremonti2004} Tremonti, C.~A., et
883: al.\ 2004, \apj, 613, 898
884: \bibitem[Veilleux \& Osterbrock(1987)]{Veilleux1987} Veilleux, S.,
885: \& Osterbrock, D.~E.\ 1987, \apjs, 63, 295
886: \bibitem[Wang et al.(2006)]{Wang2006} Wang, J.~L., Xia, X.~Y.,
887: Mao, S., Cao, C., Wu, H., \& Deng, Z.~G.\ 2006, \apj, 649, 722
888: \bibitem[Wen et al.(2007)]{Wen2007} Wen, X.-Q., Wu, H., Cao,
889: C., \& Xia, X.-Y.\ 2007, Chinese Journal of Astronomy and
890: Astrophysics, 7, 187
891: \bibitem[Werner et al.(2004)]{Werner2004} Werner, M.~W., et al.\
892: 2004, \apjs, 154, 1
893: \bibitem[Wu et al.(2002)]{Wu2002} Wu, H., et al.\ 2002, \aj,
894: 123, 1364
895: \bibitem[Wu et al.(2005a)]{Wu2005a} Wu, H., Cao, C., Hao, C.-N.,
896: Liu, F.-S., Wang, J.-L., Xia, X.-Y., Deng, Z.-G., \& Young,
897: C.~K.-S.\ 2005a, \apjl, 632, L79
898: \bibitem[Wu et al.(2005b)]{Wu2005b} Wu, H., Shao, Z., Mo, H.~J.,
899: Xia, X., \& Deng, Z.\ 2005b, \apj, 622, 244
900: \bibitem[Yuan et al.(2005)]{Yuan2005} Yuan, Q., Zhao, L., Yang,
901: Y., Wen, Z., \& Zhou, X.\ 2005, \aj, 130, 2559
902: \bibitem[Zheng et al.(1999)]{Zheng1999} Zheng, Z., et al.\ 1999,
903: \aj, 117, 2757
904:
905: \end{thebibliography}
906:
907: \clearpage
908:
909: \begin{figure}[t]
910: \epsscale{1.0} \plotone{f1.eps} \figcaption{Distribution of sample
911: galaxies' SDSS $r-$band Petrosian magnitudes, the redshifts, B-band
912: absolute magnitudes and the stellar mass (deduced from
913: \S~\ref{subsec:I1.mass}). Black histograms represent distribution of
914: all the 154 sample galaxies, while the red for the 125 sample
915: galaxies which have photometric information in all MIR bands.
916: \label{fig:properties} }
917: \end{figure}
918:
919: \clearpage
920:
921: \begin{figure}[t]
922: \epsscale{1.0} \plotone{f2.eps} \figcaption{BPT diagram plotted for
923: 134 sources with emission-line detections.
924: The solid curve illustrates the criteria based on the model of Kewley et al.(2001).
925: Star-forming galaxies are labeled with magenta circles and AGNs with green asterisks.
926: \label{fig:BPT}
927: }
928: \end{figure}
929:
930: \clearpage
931:
932: \begin{figure}[t]
933: \epsscale{0.9} \plotone{f3.eps} \figcaption{\footnotesize Examples
934: of the science, mask, model and residual SDSS $r-$band images
935: for our sample, from top to bottom for galaxies corresponding to our morphological types:
936: E/S0, Sa, Sb, Sc, Sd, and Irr. Elliptical isophotes for aperture photometry are overlaid
937: in the first column.
938: \label{fig:sample}
939: }
940: \end{figure}
941:
942: \begin{figure}[t]
943: \epsscale{1.0} \plotone{f4.eps} \figcaption{The bulge-to-total
944: ratios $B/T$ in the SDSS $r-$ and $g-$band are plotted
945: against each other for the 154 galaxies modeled
946: in both bands by fitting a S\'{e}rsic profile to the bulge and an
947: exponential to the disk. Error-bar representing $99\%$ confidence are plotted.
948: Note that different morphological types are plotted,
949: with red filled circles for peculiar galaxies, green for general,
950: blue and orchid representing edge-on and barred types respectively.
951: The diagonal is plotted for comparison.
952: \label{fig:gim2d} }
953: \end{figure}
954:
955: \clearpage
956:
957: \begin{figure}[t]
958: \epsscale{1.0} \plotone{f5.eps} \figcaption{This plot exhibits the
959: correlation between the bulge-to-total ratio $B/T$ and $T$-type.
960: Different colors of filled circles are defined as in Figure~\ref{fig:gim2d}.
961: The mean value of each type(including barred, edge-on, and general types)
962: are overlaid in black diamonds, with standard deviation shown.
963: Dwarf galaxies are overlaid with red diamonds.
964: Divisions of normal galaxies with early-type and late-type are plotted, by
965: $T$ and $B/T = 0.4$, with peculiar galaxies excluded.
966: The typical errors of sample galaxies are plotted in the upper right corner.
967: \label{fig:T.Bratio} }
968: \end{figure}
969:
970: \clearpage
971:
972: \begin{figure}[t]
973: \epsscale{1.0} \plotone{f6.eps} \figcaption{Color-color diagrams of
974: our sample.
975: The left panels show the derredened g-r color against MIR colors,
976: while the right for MIR color-color diagram.
977: Symbols are defined as in Figure~\ref{fig:T.Bratio}.
978: The typical errors are plotted in the lower right corners.
979: \label{fig:color} }
980: \end{figure}
981:
982: \clearpage
983:
984: \begin{figure}[t]
985: \epsscale{0.7}
986: \plotone{f7.eps}
987: \figcaption{Upper panel: the $3.6\mu m$ luminosity vs. the stellar mass of our sample.
988: Lower panel: the ratio between stellar mass and the $3.6\mu m$ luminosity vs. the $3.6\mu m$ luminosity.
989: Symbols are the same defined as in Figure~\ref{fig:T.Bratio}.
990: Open circles are from \citet{Hancock2007}, corresponding to mass clumps in Arp 82.
991: The typical random errors of $\log \nu L_{\nu}[3.6\mu m]$ luminosity and
992: $\log M_{\star}$ of these 169 data points are 0.09 and 0.01 respectively.
993: \label{fig:I1.mass} }
994: \end{figure}
995:
996: \clearpage
997:
998: \begin{figure}
999: \epsscale{1.1}
1000: \plotone{f8.eps}
1001: \figcaption{Distributions of photometric MIR luminosities for our sample,
1002: subdivided by different morphological types.
1003: Left panels: (upper)$8\mu m$ dust luminosity and (lower) $24\mu m$ dust luminosity vs. $T$;
1004: Right panels: (upper)$8\mu m$ dust luminosity and (lower) $24\mu m$ dust luminosity vs. $B/T$.
1005: Symbols represent the same definitions as in Figure~\ref{fig:T.Bratio}.
1006: The dot-dashed line represents the divisions of early-type and late-type.
1007: The typical errors are plotted in the lower right corners.
1008: \label{fig:mor.lum} }
1009: \end{figure}
1010:
1011: \clearpage
1012:
1013: \begin{figure}
1014: \epsscale{1.1}
1015: \plotone{f9.eps}
1016: \figcaption{Ratio of $8\mu m$ and $24\mu m$ dust-to-star ratios
1017: plotted against $T$ and $B/T$. Symbols are the same as defined in Figure~\ref{fig:T.Bratio}.
1018: The typical errors are plotted in the lower right corners.
1019: \label{fig:mor.ratio} }
1020: \end{figure}
1021:
1022: \clearpage
1023:
1024: \begin{figure}
1025: \epsscale{1.1}
1026: \plotone{f10.eps}
1027: \figcaption{Distribution of ratios between $8\mu m$ and $24\mu m$ dust luminosities
1028: subdivided with different morphological types.
1029: Symbols are defined the same as in Figure~\ref{fig:T.Bratio}.
1030: The typical errors are plotted in the lower right corners.
1031: \label{fig:mor.dust} }
1032: \end{figure}
1033:
1034: \clearpage
1035:
1036: \begin{figure}[t]
1037: \epsscale{1.0} \plotone{f11.eps} \figcaption{Distributions of MIR
1038: luminosities and dust-to-star ratios for early-type
1039: and late-type galaxies of the 125 sub-sample.
1040: A: distribution of $8\mu m$(dust) luminosities;
1041: B: $24\mu m$(dust) luminosities;
1042: C: $8\mu m$ dust-to-star ratios;
1043: D: $24\mu m$ dust-to-star ratios.
1044: The black histogram represents distribution of early-types,
1045: and the red for late-types.
1046: The fitted Gaussian of each distribution is overlaid, with dividing lines
1047: through intersection points of Gaussian marked.
1048: \label{fig:early.late}
1049: }
1050: \end{figure}
1051:
1052: \clearpage
1053:
1054: \begin{figure}[t]
1055: \epsscale{1.0} \plotone{f12.eps} \figcaption{Distributions of MIR
1056: luminosities and dust-to-star ratios in
1057: Star-forming galaxies and galaxies with AGN activities
1058: (as in Figure~\ref{fig:early.late}).
1059: The red histogram represents distribution of Star-forming galaxies,
1060: and the black for AGNs. Division lines are the same as in
1061: Figure~\ref{fig:early.late}.
1062: \label{fig:SF.AGN} }
1063: \end{figure}
1064:
1065: \clearpage
1066:
1067: \begin{figure}[t]
1068: \epsscale{1.0} \plotone{f13.eps} \figcaption{Distributions of MIR
1069: luminosities and dust-to-star ratios of edge-on and not edge-on
1070: galaxies (as in Figure~\ref{fig:early.late}).
1071: The black histogram represents distribution of not edge-on galaxies,
1072: and the red for the edge-on ones. Division lines are the same as in
1073: Figure~\ref{fig:early.late}.
1074: \label{fig:edge.on} }
1075: \end{figure}
1076:
1077: \clearpage
1078:
1079: \begin{figure}[t]
1080: \epsscale{1.0} \plotone{f14.eps} \figcaption{Distributions of MIR
1081: luminosities and dust-to-star ratios in
1082: barred and unbarred galaxies (as in Figure~\ref{fig:early.late}).
1083: The red histogram represents distribution of barred spirals,
1084: and the black for the unbarred. Division lines are the same as in
1085: Figure~\ref{fig:early.late}.
1086: \label{fig:bar} }
1087: \end{figure}
1088:
1089: \clearpage
1090:
1091: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccccc|c}
1092: \tablecolumns{9}
1093: %\noalign{\smallskip}
1094: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
1095: \tablewidth{0pt}
1096: %\rotate
1097: \tablecaption{The numbers of different morphological types of sample
1098: galaxies\label{tab:mor.class} } \tablehead{
1099: \colhead{} &
1100: \colhead{E/S0} &
1101: \colhead{Sa} &
1102: \colhead{Sb} &
1103: \colhead{Sc} &
1104: \colhead{Sd} &
1105: \colhead{Irr} &
1106: \colhead{Normal} &
1107: \colhead{Pec}
1108: }
1109: \startdata
1110: General & 53 & 13 & 13 & 11 & 1 & 2 & 93 & 7 \\
1111: Barred & 6 & 6 & 8 & 7 & 1 & 0 & 28 & 2 \\
1112: Edge-on & 7 & 6 & 5 & 4 & 1 & 0 & 23 & 1 \\
1113: Total & 66 & 25 & 26 & 22 & 3 & 2 & 144 & 10 \\
1114: %Fraction\% & 45.8 & 17.4 & 18.1 & 15.3 & 2.1 & 1.4 & 93.5 & 6.5 \\
1115: Fraction\% & 42.9 & 16.2 & 16.9 & 14.3 & 1.9 & 1.3 & 93.5 & 6.5 \\
1116: \enddata
1117: \tablecomments{Respective numbers and fractions of different morphological
1118: types and classes of 154 sample galaxies.
1119: Note that throughout the discussion in this paper,
1120: unless particularly stated, general, barred and edge-on types are referred
1121: to normal galaxies (from T=0 to T=9), while peculiar as an independent class.}
1122: \end{deluxetable}
1123:
1124: \clearpage
1125:
1126: \begin{deluxetable}{l|cccccccc}
1127: \tablecolumns{9}
1128: %\noalign{\smallskip}
1129: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
1130: \tablewidth{0pt}
1131: %\rotate
1132: \tablecaption{The numbers of different morphological types observed
1133: by each {\it Spitzer} MIR band\label{tab:mor.spitzer} } \tablehead{
1134: \colhead{Band} &
1135: \colhead{E/S0} &
1136: \colhead{Sa} &
1137: \colhead{Sb} &
1138: \colhead{Sc} &
1139: \colhead{Sd} &
1140: \colhead{Irr} &
1141: \colhead{Pec} &
1142: \colhead{Total}}
1143: \startdata
1144: 3.6$\mu$m & 61 & 22 & 26 & 21 & 3 & 2 & 10 & 145 \\
1145: 4.5$\mu$m & 66 & 24 & 25 & 21 & 2 & 2 & 10 & 150 \\
1146: 5.8$\mu$m & 61 & 22 & 26 & 21 & 3 & 2 & 10 & 145 \\
1147: 8.0$\mu$m & 66 & 24 & 25 & 21 & 2 & 2 & 10 & 150 \\
1148: 24$\mu$m & 57 & 22 & 23 & 22 & 3 & 2 & 8 & 137 \\
1149: all bands & 53 & 19 & 20 & 21 & 2 & 2 & 8 & 125 \\
1150: \enddata
1151: \tablecomments{The list shows respective numbers of different
1152: morphological types in each of the four IRAC bands and MIPS 24$\mu$m
1153: band, and also in the sub-sample whose 125 galaxies have images in
1154: all MIR bands.}
1155: \end{deluxetable}
1156:
1157: \clearpage
1158:
1159: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccccccc}
1160: \tablecolumns{9}
1161: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
1162: \tablewidth{0pt}
1163: \rotate
1164: \tablecaption{MIR Properties Distribution and Statistics\label{tab:type}
1165: }
1166: \tablehead{
1167: \colhead{Parameters} &
1168: \multicolumn{2}{c}{Median} &
1169: \multicolumn{2}{c}{Mean(scatter)} &
1170: \multicolumn{2}{c}{Number} &
1171: \colhead{D} &
1172: \colhead{P}\\
1173: \colhead{(1)} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{(2)} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{(3)} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{(4)} & \colhead{(5)} & \colhead{(6)}
1174: }
1175: \startdata
1176: $<Part A>$ & \colhead{$Early$} & \colhead{$Late$} & \colhead{$Early$} & \colhead{$Late$}
1177: & \colhead{$Early$} & \colhead{$Late$} & \colhead{} & \colhead{} \\
1178: \hline
1179: $\log \nu L_{\nu}(8\mu m)/L_{\odot}$ & 8.30 & 9.30 & 8.28(0.09) & 9.13(0.10) & 53 & 64 & 0.72 & $2.9\times10^{-6}$\\
1180: $\log \nu L_{\nu}(24\mu m)/L_{\odot}$ & 7.76 & 8.67 & 7.77(0.09) & 8.55(0.10) & 53 & 64 & 0.63 & $8.8\times10^{-5}$ \\
1181: $\log \nu L_{\nu}(8\mu m)/\nu L_{\nu}(3.6\mu m)$ & -1.55 &-0.22 & -1.49(0.07)&-0.33(0.07)&53&64&0.83& $4.7\times10^{-8}$ \\
1182: $\log \nu L_{\nu}(24\mu m)/\nu L_{\nu}(3.6\mu m)$&-2.06&-0.81&-2.00(0.08)&-0.92(0.07)&53&64&0.77&$6.9\times10^{-7}$ \\
1183: \hline
1184: $<Part B>$ & \colhead{\it Star-forming} & \colhead{$AGN$} & \colhead{\it Star-forming} & \colhead{$AGN$}
1185: & \colhead{\it Star-forming} & \colhead{$AGN$} & \colhead{} & \colhead{} \\
1186: \hline
1187: $\log \nu L_{\nu}(8\mu m)/L_{\odot}$ & 9.31 & 8.78 & 8.99(0.14) & 8.72(0.10) & 51 & 46 & 0.38 & $1.8\times10^{-3}$ \\
1188: $\log \nu L_{\nu}(24\mu m)/L_{\odot}$ & 8.75 & 8.27 & 8.49(0.13) & 8.16(0.10) & 51 & 46 & 0.38 & $2.1\times10^{-3}$ \\
1189: $\log \nu L_{\nu}(8\mu m)/\nu L_{\nu}(3.6\mu m)$ & -0.13 & -1.16 & -0.37(0.10) & -1.04(0.09) & 51 & 46 & 0.38 & $1.8\times10^{-3}$\\
1190: $\log \nu L_{\nu}(24\mu m)/\nu L_{\nu}(3.6\mu m)$ & -0.70 & -1.65 & -0.87(0.09)& -1.60(0.10) & 51 & 46 & 0.38 & $2.1\times10^{-3}$ \\
1191: \hline $<Part C>$ & \colhead{\it Edge-on} & \colhead{$Not$} &
1192: \colhead{\it Edge-on} & \colhead{$Not$}
1193: & \colhead{\it Edge-on} & \colhead{$Not$} & \colhead{} & \colhead{} \\
1194: \hline
1195: $\log \nu L_{\nu}(8\mu m)/L_{\odot}$ & 8.14 & 8.81 & 8.52(0.22) & 8.80(0.08) & 21 & 96 & 0.33 & 0.05 \\
1196: $\log \nu L_{\nu}(24\mu m)/L_{\odot}$ & 7.82 & 8.31 & 7.96(0.22) & 8.21(0.09) & 21 & 96 & 0.31 & 0.08 \\
1197: $\log \nu L_{\nu}(8\mu m)/\nu L_{\nu}(3.6\mu m)$ & -1.26 & -0.75 & -0.94(0.19) & -0.83(0.08) & 21 & 96 & 0.25 & 0.25 \\
1198: $\log \nu L_{\nu}(24\mu m)/\nu L_{\nu}(3.6\mu m)$ & -1.83 & -1.37 & -1.51(0.18) & -1.42(0.09) & 21 & 96 & 0.22 & 0.40 \\
1199: %without barred
1200: %$<Part C>$ & \colhead{\it Edge-on} & \colhead{$General$} &
1201: %\colhead{\it Edge-on} & \colhead{$General$}
1202: %& \colhead{\it Edge-on} & \colhead{$General$} & \colhead{} & \colhead{} \\
1203: %\hline
1204: %$\log \nu L_{\nu}(8\mu m)/L_{\odot}$ & 8.14 & 8.77 & 8.52(0.22) & 8.72(0.10) & 21 & 74 & 0.30 & 0.10 \\
1205: %$\log \nu L_{\nu}(24\mu m)/L_{\odot}$ & 7.82 & 8.23 & 7.96(0.22) & 8.12(0.11) & 21 & 74 & 0.28 & 0.16 \\
1206: %$\log \nu L_{\nu}(8\mu m)/\nu L_{\nu}(3.6\mu m)$ & -1.26 & -1.15 & -0.94(0.19) & -0.97(0.09) & 21 & 74 & 0.22 & 0.41 \\
1207: %$\log \nu L_{\nu}(24\mu m)/\nu L_{\nu}(3.6\mu m)$ & -1.83 & -1.59 & -1.51(0.18) & -1.57(0.10) & 21 & 74 & 0.19 & 0.61 \\
1208: \hline $<Part D>$ & \colhead{$Barred$} & \colhead{$Unbarred$} &
1209: \colhead{$Barred$} & \colhead{$Unbarred$}
1210: & \colhead{$Barred$} & \colhead{$Unbarred$} & \colhead{} & \colhead{} \\
1211: \hline
1212: $\log \nu L_{\nu}(8\mu m)/L_{\odot}$ & 9.30 & 9.44 & 9.12(0.16) & 9.26(0.15) & 19 & 31 & 0.24 & 0.51 \\
1213: $\log \nu L_{\nu}(24\mu m)/L_{\odot}$ & 8.66 & 8.78 & 8.54(0.16) & 8.67(0.14) & 19 & 31 & 0.17 & 0.86 \\
1214: $\log \nu L_{\nu}(8\mu m)/\nu L_{\nu}(3.6\mu m)$ & -0.15 & -0.22 & -0.26(0.12) & -0.27(0.09) & 19 & 31 & 0.16 & 0.91 \\
1215: $\log \nu L_{\nu}(24\mu m)/\nu L_{\nu}(3.6\mu m)$ & -0.73 & -0.81 & -0.84(0.14) & -0.86(0.08) & 19 & 31 & 0.21 & 0.68 \\
1216: \enddata
1217: \tablecomments{Col. (2) are median values of the two compared types
1218: of sample galaxies. Col.(3) are mean values with scatters. Col.(4)
1219: are the respective numbers in statistics. Col.(5) are K-S test
1220: D(discrepancy) with Col.(6) the P(probability) that the two
1221: distributions match. The four parts correspond to: Part A are
1222: early-type and late-type sample galaxies; Part B are Star-forming
1223: and AGN samples; Part C are edge-on and not edge-on samples; Part D
1224: are are barred and unbarred spirals.}
1225: \end{deluxetable}
1226:
1227: \clearpage
1228:
1229: \begin{deluxetable}{lccc}
1230: \tablecolumns{4}
1231: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
1232: \tablewidth{0pt}
1233: \tablecaption{Divisions of Early-type and Late-type Galaxies \label{tab:type.division}
1234: }
1235: \tablehead{
1236: \colhead{Parameters} &
1237: \colhead{Divisions} &
1238: \colhead{Reliability(L)} &
1239: \colhead{Reliability(E)}\\
1240: \colhead{(1)} & \colhead{(2)} & \colhead{(3)} & \colhead{(4)}
1241: }
1242: \startdata
1243: $\log \nu L_{\nu}(8\mu m)/L_{\odot}$ & 8.91 & 73\% & 89\% \\
1244: $\log \nu L_{\nu}(24\mu m)/L_{\odot}$ & 8.30 & 70\% & 77\% \\
1245: $\log \nu L_{\nu}(8\mu m)/\nu L_{\nu}(3.6\mu m)$ & -1.15 & 88\% & 83\% \\
1246: $\log \nu L_{\nu}(24\mu m)/\nu L_{\nu}(3.6\mu m)$ & -1.45 & 84\% & 85\% \\
1247: \enddata
1248: \tablecomments{Col.(2) are the values corresponding to the division of the two types.
1249: Col.(3) are the reliability for selecting late-type galaxies,
1250: while Col.(4) are the reliability for selecting early-types.}
1251: \end{deluxetable}
1252:
1253: \clearpage
1254:
1255: \end{document}
1256: