1: \documentclass[preprint,12pt]{aastex}
2:
3: \shorttitle{Time-Distance Far-Side Imaging}
4: \shortauthors{Zhao}
5:
6: \begin{document}
7: \title{Time-Distance Imaging of Solar Far-Side Active Regions}
8: \author{Junwei Zhao}
9: \affil{W.~W.~Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Stanford University,
10: Stanford, CA94305-4085}
11:
12: \begin{abstract}
13: It is of great importance to monitor large solar active regions
14: in the far-side of the Sun for space weather forecast, in particular,
15: to predict their appearance before they rotate into our view from
16: the solar east limb. Local helioseismology techniques, including
17: helioseismic holography and time-distance, have successfully imaged
18: solar far-side active regions. In this Letter, we further explore
19: the possibility of imaging and improving the image quality of
20: solar far-side active regions by use of time-distance helioseismology.
21: In addition to the previously used scheme with four acoustic signal
22: skips, a five-skip scheme is also included in this newly developed
23: technique. The combination of both four- and five-skip far-side
24: images significantly enhances the signal-to-noise ratio in the far-side
25: images, and reduces spurious signals. The accuracy of the far-side
26: active region imaging is also assessed using one whole year's solar
27: observation.
28: \end{abstract}
29:
30: \keywords{Sun: helioseismology --- Sun: oscillations --- sunspots}
31:
32: \section{INTRODUCTION}
33: Being able to detect a large solar active region before it rotates into
34: our view from the Sun's far-side, and monitor a large active region
35: after it rotates out of our view into the far-side from the Sun's
36: west limb, is of great importance for the space weather forecast
37: \citep{sch03}. Using helioseismic holography technique \citep[for
38: a review, see][]{lin00a}, \citet{lin00b} mapped the central
39: region of the far-side Sun by utilizing double-skip solar acoustic
40: signals visible in the near-side of the Sun but originated from
41: or arriving into the targeted far-side area. Then, \citet{bra01}
42: developed furthermore this technique to map the near-limb and polar
43: areas of the solar far-side by combining acoustic signals visible
44: in the near-side after single and triple skips on either side of
45: the targeted far-side area. These efforts have made monitoring
46: active regions of the whole back side of the Sun possible, and daily
47: solar far-side images have become available using {\it Solar
48: and Heliospheric Observatory}/Michelson Doppler Imager
49: \citep[{\it SOHO}/MDI;][]{sch95} and Global Oscillation Network Group
50: \citep[GONG;][]{har96} observations\footnote{See
51: http://soi.stanford.edu/data/farside/ for MDI results, and see
52: http://gong.nso.edu/data/farside/ for GONG results}. That the far-side
53: active regions are detectable by phase-sensitive holography \citep{bra00} is
54: mainly because low- and medium-$l$ ($l$ is spherical harmonic degree)
55: acoustic waves manifest apparent travel time deficit in solar active
56: regions, and it is these travel time anomalies that far-side maps
57: image, although it is still quite uncertain whether such anomalies
58: are due to the near-surface perturbation in solar magnetic regions
59: \citep{fan95, lin05}, or caused by faster sound speed structures in the
60: interior of those active regions \citep[e.g.,][]{kos00, zha06}.
61:
62: Time-distance helioseismology is another local helioseismological tool
63: that is capable of mapping the solar far-side active regions. It was
64: demonstrated that time-distance helioseismology could map the central
65: areas of the far-side Sun in a similar way as \citet{lin00b} had done
66: \citep{duv00, duv01}, however, no studies have been carried out to
67: extend the mapping area into the whole far-side. In this Letter,
68: utilizing the time-distance helioseismology technique, I explore
69: both the previously used four-skip scheme and a new five-skip scheme
70: and image two whole far-side maps using four-skip and five-skip
71: acoustic signals separately. Combining both maps gives us solar
72: far-side images with better signal-to-noise ratio and more reliable
73: maps of active regions on the far-side. This provides another solar
74: far-side imaging tool in addition to the existing holography technique,
75: hence gives a possibility to cross-check the active regions seen in
76: both techniques, and enhances the accuracy of monitoring solar
77: far-side active regions.
78:
79: \section{DATA AND TECHNIQUE}
80: The medium-$l$ program of {\it SOHO}/MDI provides nearly continuous
81: observations of solar oscillation modes with $l$ from $0$ to $\sim$300.
82: The medium-$l$ data are acquired with one minute cadence and a
83: spatial sampling of 10 arcsec (0.6 heliographic degrees per pixel)
84: after some averaging onboard the spacecraft and ground pipeline processing
85: \citep{kos97}. The oscillation modes that this program observes and the
86: continuity of such observations make the medium-$l$ data ideal to be
87: used in solar far-side imaging.
88:
89: The acoustic wave signals that originate from and then return to
90: the solar front side after traveling to the back side and
91: experiencing four and five bounces are to be used in the
92: time-distance far-side analysis. It is natural and often useful
93: to first examine whether such acoustic signals are detectable by
94: the time-distance technique. A 1024-min MDI medium-$l$ data set
95: with a spatial size of $120\degr\times120\degr$ is used for such
96: an examination after the region is tracked with Carrington rotation
97: rate and is remapped using Postel's projection with the solar disk
98: center as its remapping center. The $l-\nu$ power spectrum
99: diagram of this data set is shown in Figure~\ref{fg1}$a$. The
100: time-distance diagram computed using all oscillation modes
101: (Figure~\ref{fg1}$b$) clearly shows acoustic bounces of
102: up to seven times in the front side, and at the locations of the
103: expected signals traveling back to the front side
104: after four and five bounces, there are some not-very-clear but existing
105: signals. Since the acoustic signals that are needed for the far-side
106: analysis should have a fairly long single-skip travel distance, thus
107: corresponding to low-$l$ modes, it is helpful to filter out all other
108: acoustic modes and keep only those signals that are corresponding to
109: the required travel distances. Such a filtering should help to improve
110: the signal-to-noise ratio of time-distance signals at the desired
111: distances. However, such a filtering is applied to the data
112: after Postel's projection, thus it only works best where the
113: geometry is least distorted. The white quadrangle in Figure~\ref{fg1}$a$
114: delimits the acoustic modes that are used in both four- and five-skip
115: analyses (note that when computing far-side images, both four- and
116: five-skip analyses use only part of the acoustic modes shown in the
117: white quadrangle), covering a frequency range of $2.5 - 4.5$ mHz and
118: $l$ of $3 - 50$, and the time-distance diagram made using only these
119: modes (Figure~\ref{fg1}$c$) shows clearly the four- and five-skip
120: time-distance signals. Considering that the time-distance group travel
121: time is a bit off from the ray approximated time, as was pointed out
122: by \citet{kos96} and \citet{duv97}, it is understandable that theoretical
123: travel time is a few minutes off from the time-distance group travel
124: time after four and five bounces.
125:
126: In order to keep good signal-to-noise ratio as well as reasonable
127: computational burden, not all acoustic signals that come
128: back from the far-side after four or five skips are used. The white
129: boxes in Figure~\ref{fg1}$c$ indicate the distances that are utilized
130: for far-side imaging. Namely, as sketched in Figure~\ref{fg2}, for
131: the four-skip scheme, the time-distance annulus radii are $133\fdg8 -
132: 170\fdg0$ from the target point for the double-double skip combination
133: that is used to map the far-side central area, and $66\fdg9 - 85\fdg0$
134: for the single-skip and $200\fdg7 - 255\fdg0$ for the triple-skip in
135: the single-triple combination that is used to map the areas that are close
136: to the far-side limb and polar regions; such a combination covers a
137: total of $190\degr$ in longitude (at the equator, $5\degr$ past the limb
138: to the front side near both limbs). For the five-skip scheme, the annulus
139: radii are $111\fdg6 - 174\fdg0$ from the target point for
140: the double-skip and $167\fdg4 - 261\fdg0$ for the triple-skip; this
141: scheme covers a total of $160\degr$ in longitude, less than the
142: whole far-side. Unlike in \citet{bra01} where far-side polar areas
143: were also included in the imaging, to reduce unnecessary computations
144: only areas lower than the latitude of $48\degr$, where nearly all
145: active regions are located, are included in the time-distance far-side
146: imaging computations reported here.
147:
148: The computation procedure is as follows. A 2048-min long MDI medium-$l$
149: data set is tracked with Carrington rotation rate, and remapped
150: to Postel's coordinates centered on the solar disk as observed at
151: the mid-point of the dataset, with a spatial sampling of $0\fdg6$
152: pixel$^{-1}$, covering a span of $120\degr$ along the equator as
153: well as the central meridian. This data set is
154: then filtered in the Fourier domain to keep only the oscillation
155: modes that have travel distances in agreement with the distances
156: listed above. Corresponding pixels in the annuli on both sides
157: of the target point are selected, and the cross-covariances with
158: both positive and negative travel time lags are computed. Such
159: computations for all distances shown in the white boxes of
160: Figure~\ref{fg1}$c$ are repeated. Then, both time lags are
161: combined and all cross-covariances obtained from different
162: distances after appropriate shifts in time that are obtained from
163: theoretical estimates
164: are also combined. The final cross-covariance is fitted with a
165: Gabor wavelet function \citep{kos96}, and an acoustic phase travel
166: time is obtained. This procedure is repeated for the double-double
167: and single-triple combinations in the four-skip scheme, and for
168: the double-triple combination for total distances both shorter and longer
169: than $360\degr$ in the five-skip scheme, separately. The far-side image is
170: a display of the measured acoustic travel times after a Gaussian
171: smoothing with FWHM of $2\fdg0$.
172:
173: \section{RESULTS}
174: NOAA AR0484, AR0486 and AR0488 are selected to test this time-distance
175: far-side imaging technique. Figure~\ref{fg3} shows the MDI synoptic
176: magnetic field chart when these active regions were on the near-side
177: of the Sun before they rotated into the far-side. AR0488
178: was still growing when the magnetic field data to make this synoptic
179: map were taken.
180:
181: Selected far-side images of these three active regions, obtained from
182: separate four- and five-skip measurement schemes, and a combination
183: of both measurements, are shown in the top three rows of Figure~\ref{fg4}.
184: In each image, the near-side magnetic field map is combined with
185: the far-side acoustic travel time map, and the combined map is
186: displayed based on Carrington longitudes. Standard deviations, $\sigma$,
187: are 4.1 sec and 4.5 sec for four-skip and five-skip far-side maps,
188: respectively, and after combination of both measurement schemes,
189: $\sigma$ falls to 3.3 sec. In these maps, the three interested active
190: regions are mostly visible in all four-skip, five-skip and combined
191: results, except when the regions fall into the uncovered areas of
192: five-skip measurement.
193:
194: The bottom row of Figure~\ref{fg4} presents the same map as the third
195: row but highlighting active regions by Gaussian smoothing the unsigned
196: near-side magnetic field, and displaying the far-side travel time map with
197: a threshold of $-3.5\sigma$ to $-2.0\sigma$, i.e., $-11.5$ to $-6.5$ sec.
198: It is clear that the images combining four- and five-skip results
199: are quite clean of spurious signals, although unidentified
200: features still exist. It is also noteworthy that the far-side
201: images clearly show these active regions when part of the regions were in
202: the far-side and part in the near-side, like AR0486 and AR0488 in
203: the fourth row and third column of Figure~\ref{fg4}.
204:
205: Both four- and five-skip far-side acoustic travel times are displayed
206: after a mean travel time background is removed. It turns out that
207: the background mean travel time depends on its angular distance
208: from the antipode of the solar disk center. Figure~\ref{fg5} presents
209: the variation of background mean travel times at different locations for
210: both measurement schemes after the mean value of the background
211: is removed. Basically,
212: the mean acoustic travel times vary with a magnitude of $\sim$4 sec
213: for four-skip measurement, and a magnitude of $\sim$9 sec for five-skip
214: measurement. The measured mean acoustic travel times are shorter for
215: the four-skip scheme, but longer for the five-skip scheme when the
216: targeted areas are near the limb and near the antipode of the solar
217: disk center. These variations are unlikely physical, yet it is unclear
218: why there are such variations in the measurement. The rms of travel
219: times can be used to assess the quality of far-side images. Also shown
220: in Figure~\ref{fg5} is travel time rms variation with distance to
221: the far-side center. It shows that double-double scheme
222: has the lowest rms near the far-side center, while the single-triple
223: scheme has the lowest rms near the far-side limb. For the five-skip
224: measurement, it has the lowest rms when at and roughly $30\degr$ from
225: the far-side center, and the rms increases substantially close to the limb.
226:
227: It is interesting to make a statistical study investigating how
228: accurate the far-side active region imaging is. Since sometimes
229: active regions change fast, grow or decay unexpectedly, it
230: is quite impossible to make a precise assessment on the accuracy of
231: far-side imaging. Therefore, the results given below can only be
232: regarded as a reference. The far-side images of the whole year of
233: 2001 were computed at 12-hour intervals, and a total of 730 images
234: were obtained and displayed in the same way as the bottom row of
235: Figure~\ref{fg4}. Typically, a solar area is located on the far-side
236: of the Sun for about 13.5 days, or 27 far-side images. Far-side
237: images are often noisy, and even for a large active region,
238: it is quite unlikely for it to be unambiguously visible in each of
239: 27 images. Also, active regions on the far-side grow and decay as well.
240: For these reasons, if an area is visible as dark in our figures 6 times
241: (or on 3 days) on the other side, where 6 is an arbitrary number, that
242: area is regarded as an active region. Based on this assumption, it is found
243: that for 59 active regions that rotate into the near-side from the east limb,
244: 53 (or $89.8\%$) are able to be detected far-side, and for 63 active
245: regions that rotate into the far-side from the west limb, 56 (or
246: $89.0\%$) are detectable on the far-side. Among these regions,
247: 33 are actually detected both before and after the near-side appearance.
248: And, from the other perspective, for 61 regions that are detected by
249: far-side imaging rotating into the far-side from the west limb, 55 (or
250: $90.1\%$) are visible near the west limb of the near-side; for
251: 53 active regions that are detected by far-side imaging rotating out
252: of the far-side into the near-side, 49 (or $92.4\%$) are visible near
253: the east limb of the near-side. Among these regions, 28 are visible on
254: the near-side before and after the region is located in the far-side.
255: These statistics do not count all active regions that appeared in that
256: year, but only those that have a diameter roughly larger than $8\fdg0$
257: after projected into a spatial resolution of solar disk center and
258: viewed in a figure like the fourth row of Figure~\ref{fg4}, when these
259: regions are near either limb of of the Sun.
260:
261: \section{DISCUSSION}
262: By combining four-skip and five-skip measurement schemes, I have
263: successfully made time-distance far-side
264: images of the Sun with a fast computation speed. The combination
265: significantly enhances the signal-to-noise ratio of far-side acoustic
266: travel times over either four- or five-skip measurement, thus making
267: the composite far-side active region map much cleaner. It helps to remove
268: most, but not all of the spurious features that signify active
269: regions. On the other hand, the combination of both maps
270: also remove some small active regions that can otherwise be seen
271: in one map or the other.
272:
273: Time-distance far-side imaging provides another whole far-side imaging
274: tool in addition to the existing helioseismic holography technique.
275: It gives results that are in reasonable agreement with the holography
276: results, which can be seen at {\it SOHO}/MDI website, by visual
277: comparison, yet detailed comparisons are not done. It is intriguing
278: to calibrate the measured far-side acoustic travel times into
279: magnetic field strength, and some efforts have been taken using
280: holography results \citep{gon07}. However, there are some apparent
281: difficulties to carry out the calibration, because the far-side images of
282: active regions are often relatively noisy, and sizes and shapes
283: of those regions change from image to image. In addition, the magnetic
284: field strengths of the far-side active regions are also unknown,
285: although the full sphere magnetic field made by use of flux
286: dispersal model \citep{sch03} may help in this. Perhaps eventually,
287: a numerical simulation of solar oscillations in the whole Sun is
288: needed to determine a satisfactory calibration.
289:
290: It is notable that the five-skip measurement scheme has a large fraction
291: of overlapping areas as the four-skip measurement in the annulus of one side,
292: and has one more skip on the other side (see Figure~\ref{fg2}), but
293: results from both measurement schemes have quite uncorrelated noises
294: (see Figure~\ref{fg4}). It is unlikely that the noise differences of
295: two schemes are caused while waves travel merely one more skip, $1/5$
296: of the total distance, however, it may imply noises come from data
297: or the filtering of geometrically distorted data.
298:
299: The holography far-side images show strong acoustic travel time variation
300: from the far-side center to limb, with an order of 70 sec or so in
301: their four-skip measurement scheme (P. Scherrer, private communication),
302: and this is believed (C. Lindsey, private communication) to be connected
303: with the ``ghost signature'' described by \citet{lin04}. Although such a
304: travel time variation trend also exists in time-distance far-side
305: images, the variation magnitude is merely 4 sec in four-skip scheme,
306: substantially smaller than the holography trend. The variation in the
307: five-skip scheme measurement is about twice of that in the four-skip
308: scheme. What causes such travel time variations in our measurement,
309: though small, is worth further investigation.
310:
311: With the availability of both time-distance and helioseismic holography
312: far-side images, it is more robust to monitor activities on the
313: far-side of the Sun, and we can forecast the appearance of large
314: active regions rotating into our view from the far-side with more
315: confidence. Furthermore, the success in far-side imaging provides
316: us some experiences and confidence in analyzing low- and medium-$l$
317: mode oscillations by use of local helioseismology techniques, and
318: this will greatly help us in analyzing solar deeper interiors and
319: polar areas by use of these techniques.
320:
321: \acknowledgments
322: I thank Tom Duvall and Sasha Kosovichev for reading through the
323: manuscript and giving valuable comments to improve this paper,
324: as well as their suggestions while developing the code. I am deeply
325: indebted to Charlie Lindsey and the referee, Doug Braun, for
326: thoroughly studying my manuscript and giving numerous constructive
327: comments. I also thank Phil Scherrer for encouraging me to
328: carry out this work. {\it SOHO} is a project of international
329: cooperation between ESA and NASA.
330:
331: \begin{thebibliography}{}
332:
333: \bibitem[Braun \& Lindsey(2000)]{bra00} Braun, D. C., \& Lindsey,
334: C. 2000, \solphys, 192, 307
335:
336: \bibitem[Braun \& Lindsey(2001)]{bra01} Braun, D. C., \& Lindsey,
337: C. 2001, \apjl, 560, L189
338:
339: \bibitem[Duvall \& Kosovichev(2001)]{duv01} Duvall, T. L., Jr., \&
340: Kosovichev, A. G. 2001, in IAU Symp. 203, Recent Insights into
341: the Physics of the Sun and Heliosphere: Highlights from {\it SOHO}
342: and Other Space Missions, ed. P. Brekke, B. Fleck, \& J. B. Gurman
343: (San Francisco: ASP), 159
344:
345: \bibitem[Duvall et al.(2000)]{duv00} Duvall, T. L., Jr., Kosovichev, A. G.,
346: \& Scherrer, P. H. 2000, Bull. Am. Astr. Soc. 32, 837
347:
348: \bibitem[Duvall et al.(1997)]{duv97} Duvall, T. L., Jr., et al. 1997,
349: \solphys, 170, 63
350:
351: \bibitem[Fan et al.(1995)]{fan95} Fan, Y., Braun, D. C., \& Chou, D.-Y.
352: 1995, \apj, 451, 877
353:
354: \bibitem[Gonz\'{a}lez Hern\'{a}ndez et al.(2007)]{gon07} Gonz\'{a}lez
355: Hern\'{a}ndez, I., Hill, F., \& Lindsey, C. 2007, \apj, submitted
356:
357: \bibitem[Harvey et al.(1996)]{har96} Harvey, J. W., et al. 1996,
358: Science, 272, 1284
359:
360: \bibitem[Kosovichev \& Duvall(1996)]{kos96} Kosovichev, A. G., \&
361: Duvall, T. L., Jr. 1996, in {\sl Proceedings of SCORe'96 Workshop:
362: Solar Convection and Oscillations and Their Relationship}, ed.
363: F. P. Pijpers, J. Christensen-Dalsgaard \& C. S. Rosenthal (Dordrecht:
364: Kluwer), 241
365:
366: \bibitem[Kosovichev et al.(2000)]{kos00} Kosovichev, A. G.,
367: Duvall, T. L., Jr., \& Scherrer, P. H. 2000, \solphys, 192, 159
368:
369: \bibitem[Kosovichev et al.(1997)]{kos97} Kosovichev, A. G., et al.
370: 1997, \solphys, 170, 43
371:
372: \bibitem[Lindsey \& Braun(2000b)]{lin00b} Lindsey, C., \& Braun, D. C.
373: 2000b, Science, 287, 1799
374:
375: \bibitem[Lindsey \& Braun(2000a)]{lin00a} Lindsey, C., \& Braun, D. C.
376: 2000a, \solphys, 192, 261
377:
378: \bibitem[Lindsey \& Braun(2004)]{lin04} Lindsey, C., \& Braun, D. C.
379: 2004, \apjs, 155, 209
380:
381: \bibitem[Lindsey \& Braun(2005)]{lin05} Lindsey, C., \& Braun, D. C.
382: 2005, \apj, 620, 1107
383:
384: \bibitem[Scherrer et al.(1995)]{sch95} Scherrer, P. H., et al.
385: 1995, \solphys, 162, 129
386:
387: \bibitem[Schrijver \& DeRosa(2003)]{sch03} Schrijver, C. J., \& DeRosa, M. L.
388: 2003, \solphys, 212, 165
389:
390: \bibitem[Zhao \& Kosovichev(2006)]{zha06} Zhao, J., \& Kosovichev,
391: A. G. 2006, \apj, 643, 1317
392:
393: \end{thebibliography}
394:
395: \clearpage
396:
397: \begin{figure}
398: \plotone{f1.eps}
399: \caption{Power spectrum diagram ($a$) computed from a 1024-min MDI
400: medium-$l$ data set, time-distance diagram ($b$) computed using the whole
401: power spectrum of the same data set, and time-distance diagram ($c$)
402: computed using only the oscillations that have frequency and $l$
403: included in the white quadrangle as indicated in ($a$). The white
404: dashed lines in both ($b$) and ($c$) are theoretical time-distance
405: relationships based on acoustic ray approximation, with the lower
406: `$<$'-like curve as the fourth-skip, and the upper `$<$'-like
407: curve as the fifth-skip. The lower and upper branch of each
408: `$<$'-like curve represents acoustic wave propagation distance
409: shorter and longer than $360\degr$, respectively. The white boxes
410: in ($c$) delimit the acoustic travel distances and times used for
411: far-side imaging.}
412: \label{fg1}
413: \end{figure}
414:
415:
416: \clearpage
417:
418: \begin{figure}
419: \plotone{f2.eps}
420: \caption{Sketches for four-skip measurement schemes, which includes
421: ($a$) double-double skip combination when the target point is near
422: the central area of the far-side and two sets of double-skip rays
423: are located on both sides of the target point, and ($b$) single-triple
424: skip combination when the target point is near the limb or polar area
425: of the far-side and one set of single-skip and one set of triple-skip
426: rays are located on either side of the target; and, five-skip measurement
427: schemes ($c$) when one set of double-skip and one set of triple-skip
428: rays are located on the either side of the target point. }
429: \label{fg2}
430: \end{figure}
431:
432: \clearpage
433:
434: \begin{figure}
435: \epsscale{0.7}
436: \plotone{f3.eps}
437: \caption{MDI magnetic field synoptic chart for Carrington rotation 2009,
438: taken from October 23 to November 19, 2003, and made by use of
439: observations near the central meridian only. Note that AR0484 is
440: divided at the longitude of $0\degr$ and $360\degr$. }
441: \label{fg3}
442: \end{figure}
443:
444: \clearpage
445:
446: \begin{figure}
447: \epsscale{1.0}
448: \plotone{f4.eps}
449: \caption{Results of time-distance far-side active region imaging, obtained
450: from four-skip ({\it first row}), five-skip ({\it second row}), and
451: combination of four- and five-skip measurements ({\it third and bottom
452: row}). From the left to the right column, images were obtained at 00:00UT of
453: November 6, 12:00UT of November 13, and 12:00UT of November 18, 2003,
454: respectively. The given observation time for far-side image is the
455: middle time of its 2048-min observational period. Each black and white
456: image displays a combination of the near-side MDI magnetic field map
457: and a time-distance far-side acoustic travel time map. The boundaries
458: between the far-side and near-side are not vertical because of the solar
459: B-angle adjustment. Magnetic field is displayed with a range of $-150$
460: to 150 Gs, and the acoustic travel time ranging from $-12$ to 12 sec.
461: Blank regions in five-skip images indicate areas that cannot be covered
462: by this measurement. Color images display the near-side map with
463: a range of 40 to 150 Gs after a Gaussian smoothing of unsigned magnetic
464: field with a same FWHM that is applied to travel time maps, and
465: display the far-side map with a range of $-3.5\sigma$ to $-2.0\sigma$
466: in order to highlight the far-side active regions that are of our
467: interest. To better distinguish far-side and near-side images, different
468: color contrast is used. }
469: \label{fg4}
470: \end{figure}
471:
472: \clearpage
473:
474: \begin{figure}
475: \epsscale{0.7}
476: \plotone{f5.eps}
477: \caption{Background travel time variations ({\it black curves}) and travel
478: time rms variations ({\it grey curves}) as functions of angular distance
479: from the antipode of solar disk center for different combinations of
480: acoustic wave bounces. Scales for grey curves are marked on the right
481: hand side of the figure.}
482: \label{fg5}
483: \end{figure}
484:
485: \end{document}
486: