1: %% The command below calls the preprint style
2: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
3: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
4: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
5: %%
6: %%\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
7:
8: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
9:
10: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
11: \documentclass[preprint2]{emulateapj}
12:
13: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
14:
15: \bibliographystyle{apj}
16:
17: \usepackage{psfig}
18: \usepackage{apjfonts}
19:
20: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
21:
22: %% \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
23:
24: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
25: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
26: %% use the longabstract style option.
27:
28: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
29:
30: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
31: \newcommand{\myemail}{skywalker@galaxy.far.far.away}
32: \newcommand\msun {M$_{\odot}$}
33: \def\approxgt{\ifmmode \rlap{$>$}{}_{{}_{{}_{\textstyle\sim}}} \else%
34: $\rlap{$>$}{}_{{}_{{}_{\textstyle\sim}}}$\fi}
35: \def\approxlt{\ifmmode \rlap{$<$}{}_{{}_{{}_{\textstyle\sim}}} \else%
36: $\rlap{$<$}{}_{{}_{{}_{\textstyle\sim}}}$\fi}
37: \def\farcm{\hbox{$.\mkern-4mu^\prime$}}
38: \def\farcs{\hbox{$.\!\!^{\prime\prime}$}}
39: \def\degr{\hbox{$^\circ$}}
40: \def\arcmin{\hbox{$^\prime$}}
41: \def\arcsec{\hbox{$^{\prime\prime}$}}
42: \def\fdg{\hbox{$.\!\!^\circ$}}
43: \def\src{1H~1905+000}
44: \def\flx{erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$}
45: \def\lum{erg s$^{-1}$}
46:
47: \shorttitle{Upper limit on \src}
48: \shortauthors{Jonker et al.}
49:
50:
51: \begin{document}
52:
53:
54: \title{The cold neutron star in the soft X-ray transient \src}
55:
56:
57: \author{Peter G.~Jonker\altaffilmark{1,2}}
58: \affil{SRON, Netherlands Institute for Space Research, Sorbonnelaan 2, 3584~CA, Utrecht, The Netherlands}
59: \email{p.jonker@sron.nl}
60: \author{Daniel Steeghs\altaffilmark{3}}
61: \affil{Harvard--Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA~02138, Massachusetts,
62: U.S.A.}
63: \email{dsteeghs@cfa.harvard.edu}
64: \author{Deepto Chakrabarty}
65: \affil{Department of Physics and Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research, Massachusetts Institute
66: of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, U.S.A.}
67: \email{deepto@space.mit.edu}
68: \and
69: %\author{E.F.~Brown}
70: %\affil{Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, U.S.A.}
71: \author{Adrienne M.~Juett}
72: \affil{Department of Astronomy, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA~22903, U.S.A.}
73: \email{amj3r@astsun.astro.virginia.edu}
74:
75: \altaffiltext{1}{Harvard--Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA~02138, Massachusetts,
76: U.S.A.}
77: \altaffiltext{2}{Astronomical Institute, Utrecht University, P.O.Box 80000, 3508 TA, Utrecht, The Netherlands}
78: \altaffiltext{3}{Astronomy \& Astrophysics, Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry
79: CV4~7AL, U.K.}
80:
81: \begin{abstract}
82:
83: We report on our analysis of 300 ks of {\it Chandra} observations of the neutron
84: star soft X--ray transient \src\ in quiescence. We do not detect the source down
85: to a 95\% confidence unabsorbed flux upper limit of $2\times10^{-16}$ \flx\ in
86: the 0.5--10 keV energy range for an assumed $\Gamma=2$ power law spectral model.
87: A limit of $1.4\times10^{-16}$ \flx\ is derived if we assume that the spectrum
88: of \src\ in quiescence is described well with a black body of temperature of 0.2
89: keV. For the upper limit to the source distance of 10 kpc this yields a 0.5--10
90: keV luminosity limit of $2.4\times10^{30}$ \lum / $1.7\times10^{30}$ \lum\ for
91: the abovementioned power law or black body spectrum, respectively. This
92: luminosity limit is lower than the luminosity of A~0620--00, the weakest black
93: hole soft X--ray transient in quiescence reported so far. Together with the
94: uncertainties in relating the mass transfer and mass accretion rates we come to
95: the conclusion that the claim that there is evidence for the presence of a black
96: hole event horizon on the basis of a lower quiescent luminosity for black holes
97: than for neutron stars is unproven. We also briefly discuss the implications of
98: the low quiescent luminosity of \src\ for the neutron star equation of state.
99: Using deep Magellan images of the field of \src\ obtained at excellent observing
100: conditions we do not detect the quiescent counterpart of \src\ at the position
101: of the outburst optical counterpart down to a magnitude limit of $i'>25.3$. This
102: can be converted to a limit on the absolute magnitude of the counterpart of
103: $I>9.6$ which implies that the counterpart can only be a brown or a white dwarf.
104:
105: \end{abstract}
106:
107: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
108: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
109: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
110: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
111:
112: \keywords{stars: individual (\src) ---
113: accretion: accretion discs --- stars: binaries --- stars: neutron
114: --- X-rays: binaries}
115:
116:
117: \section{Introduction}
118:
119: Low--mass X--ray binaries (LMXBs) are binary systems in which a compact object,
120: either a neutron star or a black hole, accretes matter from a companion star
121: that has a mass of typically less than 1~M$_\odot$. Such systems are excellent
122: test beds for a range of astrophysical questions and probe fundamental physics.
123: Theories, such as Einstein's Theory of General Relativity, can be tested in the
124: strong field regime by comparing the observed black hole and neutron star
125: properties. The presence of an event horizon in the case of a black hole is such
126: a prediction. Observations of neutron star LMXBs can also help constrain the
127: equation of state of matter at supra-nuclear densities encountered in the
128: neutron star core.
129:
130: Observationally, it was found that in general the luminosity of quiescent black
131: hole LMXBs is lower than that of quiescent neutron star LMXBs
132: (e.g.~\citealt{2001ApJ...553L..47G}, \citealt{2002ApJ...570..277K} and
133: \citealt{2006MNRAS.368.1803J}). However, recent {\it Chandra} and XMM--{\it
134: Newton} observations of several transient neutron star LMXBs in quiescence have
135: shown that the luminosities of these sources span a much larger range extending
136: to lower luminosities than previously thought
137: (e.g.~\citealt{2005ApJ...635.1233T}, \citealt{2005ApJ...619..492W}).
138:
139: The neutron star transient with the lowest quiescent X--ray luminosity is \src.
140: Using a 25 ks long observation of \src\ with the {\it Chandra} satellite,
141: \citet{2006MNRAS.368.1803J} did not detect the source in quiescence down to a
142: luminosity of 1.8$\times10^{31}$ erg s$^{-1}$. This means that the neutron star
143: luminosity in this source is comparable to that of several quiescent black hole
144: LMXBs. For a recent introduction on \object{\src}, for a more detailed
145: introduction on the difference in quiescent luminosity between neutron star and
146: black hole LMXBs, and for an explanation why these transient neutron stars in
147: quiescence can provide information on the neutron star equation of state we
148: refer to \citet{2006MNRAS.368.1803J} (see also \citealt{2004ARA&A..42..169Y} and
149: \citealt{2006astro.ph.12232H} for the latter subject).
150:
151:
152: In this Letter, we present our analysis of a long {\it Chandra} and a deep
153: Magellan observation of \src\ obtained with the aim to detect the source or
154: provide a stringent limit on the source flux and the source luminosity in
155: quiescence.
156:
157: \section{Observations and analysis}
158:
159: \subsection{{\it Chandra} X--ray observations}
160:
161: We have observed 1H~1905+000 with the back--illuminated S3 CCD--chip of the
162: Advanced CCD Imaging Spectrometer (ACIS) detector on board the {\it Chandra}
163: satellite. A log of the observations is given in Table~\ref{log}. The data
164: telemetry mode was set to {\sl very faint} to allow for a thorough background
165: subtraction. A CCD frame time of 3.04104 s has been used. We have reprocessed
166: and analysed the data using the {\it CIAO 3.4} software developed by the Chandra
167: X--ray Center using CALDB version 3.3.0.1, to benefit from the latest
168: calibrations available early 2007 and to take full advantage of the {\sl very
169: faint} data mode. In our analysis we have selected events only if their energy
170: falls in the 0.3--7 keV range in order to reduce the background contamination
171: that occurs at high energies. The lower cut--off was chosen to avoid calibration
172: uncertainties below 0.3 keV. Since fluxes and luminosities are commonly provided
173: in the 0.5--10 keV range, we extrapolate our 0.3--7 keV event rate to model
174: fluxes over the 0.5--10 keV range in the remainder of this Letter. Data were
175: excluded for which the 0.3--7 keV background count rate is higher than 0.4
176: counts s$^{-1}$. The net on--source exposure time is 300.8 ks.
177:
178: In the observations presented in Table~\ref{log} one source
179: (CXOU~J190834.1+001139) is always detected (we will describe the properties of
180: detected sources unrelated to \src\ or to the presented analysis in a
181: forthcoming paper). The J2000.0 $\alpha$ and $\delta$ position of that source
182: was determined in \citet{2006MNRAS.368.1803J} to be $\alpha_{J2000.0}=19{\rm
183: ^h08^m34^s.108}\pm$0\farcs033, $\delta_{J2000.0}=
184: +00^\circ11'39$\farcs01$\pm$0\farcs032. We use this source to apply a boresight
185: correction to each of the observations separately (see Table~\ref{log}) before
186: combining them. In addition we applied a boresight correction of ($\alpha$,
187: $\delta$)=0\farcs090$\pm$0\farcs013,-0\farcs208$\pm$0\farcs014 to the final
188: combined image such that the coordinates for CXOU~J190834.1+001139 measured on
189: the combined image are, within errors, consistent with the optical coordinates.
190: The latter boresight correction accounts for the limited accuracy with which the
191: source position can be determined in the individual observations.
192:
193: %\input{tab1.tex}
194: \begin{deluxetable}{cccc}
195: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
196: \tablecaption{Log of the {\it Chandra} observations \label{log}}
197: \tablewidth{0pt}
198: \tablehead{
199: \colhead{ID} & \colhead{T$_0$} & \colhead{Exposure\tablenotemark{a}}
200: & \colhead{Boresight corr.} \\
201: \colhead{} & \colhead{({\sl UTC})} & \colhead{(ks)}
202: & \colhead{($\alpha$, $\delta$)} }
203: \startdata
204: 5549 & Febr.~25, 2005 & 24.84 & 0\farcs128$\pm$0\farcs044,-0\farcs074$\pm$0\farcs041 \\
205: 6649 & Sept.~17, 2006 & 151.92& 0\farcs314$\pm$0\farcs018,0\farcs611$\pm$0\farcs019 \\
206: 6650 & Sept.~20, 2006 & 40.63 & -1\farcs07$\pm$0\farcs030,0\farcs047$\pm$0\farcs039 \\
207: 8261 & Sept.~17, 2006 & 41.61 & -1\farcs08$\pm$0\farcs029,0\farcs539$\pm$0\farcs033 \\
208: 8262 & Sept.~22, 2006 & 38.65 & -0\farcs789$\pm$0\farcs025,0\farcs392$\pm$0\farcs030 \\
209: 8283 & Sept.~19, 2006 & 3.15 & -0\farcs820$\pm$0\farcs066,0\farcs758$\pm$0\farcs087 \\
210: \enddata
211: \tablenotetext{a}{After taking into account the CCD read--out time and after filtering for flares.}
212: \end{deluxetable}
213:
214:
215: The outburst position of \src\ is $\alpha_{J2000.0}=19{\rm
216: ^h08^m27^s.200}\pm$0\farcs084, $\delta_{J2000.0}=
217: +00^\circ10'09$\farcs10$\pm$0\farcs087 (\citealt{2006MNRAS.368.1803J}). The
218: largest off--axis angle that the source position was observed at was
219: $\theta=$0\farcm54 (see Table~\ref{log}). Using the analytical expression for the
220: 90\% encircled energy radius, R$_{90}$ (in \arcsec)= 0.881 + 0.107\,$\theta ^2$
221: ($\theta$ in arc minutes) as given in \citet{2005ApJSmurrayetal}, this leads to
222: a 90\% encircled energy radius of R$_{90}$=0$\farcs$91. Less than two photons
223: have been detected in the circular area spanned by R$_{90}$ (see
224: Figure~\ref{zoom1905}). From the number of photons detected in 300.8 ks we
225: calculate a 95\% confidence upper limit on the source count using both the
226: method explained in \citet{1986ApJ...303..336G} as well as the method explained
227: in the appendix of \citet{2007ApJ...657.1026W}. Even though the number of
228: photons falling inside this area is less than 2 we take 2 as the number of
229: detected photons in what follows, to account for the fact that we took the 90\%
230: encircled energy radius (not 100\%), and to account for the slight smearing that
231: will have occurred due to the alignment of the images introduced by the finite
232: accuracy at which the boresight correction can be determined. Following
233: \citet{2007ApJ...657.1026W} we calculate the probability that the background
234: contributes fewer than the 2 photons inside the 90\% encircled energy radius.
235: This probability is~effectively~0.
236:
237: \begin{figure}
238: \epsscale{.80}
239: \plotone{f1.eps}
240: \caption{Zoom--in on the position of the neutron star SXT \src\ in the
241: 0.3--7 keV 300 ks {\it Chandra} ACIS image. The circle has a radius of 0\farcs91.
242: \label{zoom1905}}
243: \end{figure}
244:
245:
246: From the method of \citet{1986ApJ...303..336G}, we derive a 95\% confidence upper
247: limit on the source count of 6.3 which given the exposure time corresponds to an
248: upper limit on the count rate of 2.1$\times 10^{-5}$ counts s$^{-1}$. In the
249: method of \citet{2007ApJ...657.1026W} m$_T$ and m$_R$ are defined, corresponding to
250: the number of X--ray photons detected in the Target and Reference apertures of
251: measure $\Omega_T$ and $\Omega_R$, respectively. For $\Omega_T$ we have taken a
252: circular region with radius of 1\arcsec~centered on the source position, as above
253: this gives $\approx$2 counts in the detection region. For $\Omega_R$ we have taken
254: an annulus with inner and outer radius of 4\farcs92 and 39\farcs36, respectively.
255: We have excluded a weak source from this background area. The size of the areas
256: $\Omega_T$ and $\Omega_R$ is 3.14 arcsec$^2$ and 4790.94 arcsec$^2$, respectively
257: (m$_T$ and m$_R$ are 2 and 2750, respectively). The expectation value on the number
258: of source counts for a confidence level of 95\% is $<$5 counts which corresponds to
259: an upper limit on the count rate of 1.7$\times 10^{-5}$ counts s$^{-1}$. In the
260: remainder of the Paper we conservatively use the slightly higher value from the
261: \citet{1986ApJ...303..336G} method.
262:
263:
264:
265:
266: We have used {\sl W3PIMMS}\footnote{available at
267: http://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/Tools/w3pimms.html} to estimate 95\% confidence
268: limits on the source flux and luminosity in different X--ray bands employing the
269: various models often found for neutron star soft X--ray transients (SXTs) in
270: quiescence. The obtained limits are listed in Table~\ref{limits}. We have
271: estimated the effective temperature at the surface of the neutron star,
272: T$_{eff}$, and as measured at infinity, T$_{eff}^\infty$, as follows: we have
273: used the flux limit obtained for a 0.2 keV black body model as limit for the
274: neutron star atmosphere model in {\sl xspec} version 11.3.2p (\citealt{ar1996};
275: \citealt{1996A&A...315..141Z}). Ideally, one would like to use a response and
276: auxiliary response matrix specific for the location of the source on the CCD.
277: However, for the combined observation this is not possible, hence, we have used
278: the standard response files for on--axis ACIS--S observations. Given the
279: distance of 10 kpc, assuming a 1.4~M$_\odot$ neutron star with radius of 10 km,
280: a pure Hydrogen, non--magnetic atmosphere, the limits on T$_{eff}$ and
281: T$_{eff}^\infty$ are 4.6$\times 10^5$ K and 3.5$\times 10^5$ K, respectively.
282:
283:
284:
285:
286: %\input{tab2.tex}
287: \begin{deluxetable}{cccc}
288: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
289: \tablecaption{Upper limits to the unabsorbed source flux\tablenotemark{a} and luminosity\tablenotemark{b}.\label{limits}}
290: \tablewidth{0pt}
291: \tablehead{
292: \colhead{Model} & \colhead{F${\rm _{0.5-10\,keV}}$ unabs.} & \colhead{F${\rm _{0.01-10\,keV}}$ unabs.} & \colhead{L${\rm _{0.5-10\,keV}}$} \\
293: \colhead{} & \colhead{erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$} & \colhead{erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$} & \colhead{${\rm (\frac{d}{10~kpc})^2}$ erg s$^{-1}$}\\
294: }
295: \startdata
296: PL\tablenotemark{c} $\Gamma$=2.0 & 2.0$\times 10^{-16}$& 4.5$\times 10^{-16}$ & 2.4$\times 10^{30}$\\
297: BB\tablenotemark{c} T=0.2 keV& 1.4$\times 10^{-16}$& 1.9$\times 10^{-16}$ & 1.6$\times 10^{30}$\\
298: BB\tablenotemark{c} T=0.1 keV& 2.2$\times 10^{-16}$& 8.8$\times 10^{-16}$ & 2.6$\times 10^{30}$\\
299:
300: \enddata
301: \tablenotetext{a}{Unabsorbed flux (F) is given in the 0.5--10 keV and 0.01--10 keV band. The used interstellar extinction is 2.1$\times 10^{21}$ cm$^{-2}$. }
302: \tablenotetext{b}{The luminosity (L) is given for 0.5--10 keV and a distance of 10 kpc.}
303: \tablenotetext{c}{PL stands for power law and BB for blackbody.}
304:
305: \end{deluxetable}
306:
307:
308:
309: Using the stringent limit on the source luminosity together with detections and
310: limits on the detection of the source obtained at other times we have
311: constructed the long term X--ray lightcurve of \src\ (see
312: Fig.~\ref{flux})\footnote{Data for Fig.~\ref{flux} was taken or derived from
313: \citet{1976MNRAS.175P..39S} (Ariel--V), \citet{1976MNRAS.177P..93L} (SAS--3),
314: \citet{1980AJ.....85.1062R} (HEAO--I), \citet{1997ApJS..109..177C} (Einstein),
315: \citet{1990A&A...228..115C} (EXOSAT, MJD~46316), \citet{1995A&AS..109....9G}
316: (EXOSAT, MJD~45982), \citet{1999A&Avogesetal} (ROSAT),
317: \citet{2005ApJ...627..926J} (Chandra1), \citet{2006MNRAS.368.1803J} (Chandra2),
318: and this work (Chandra 2+3)}. From Fig.~\ref{flux} it is clear that the source
319: underwent an outburst with a duration of at least 9.9 years (the time between
320: the first and last detection). Using the SAS--3 satellite several type I X--ray
321: bursts were detected (\citealt{1976IAUC.2983....1L} [multiple bursts],
322: \citealt{1976MNRAS.177P..93L} [5], \citealt{1976IAUC.2984....2L} [1]). However,
323: since the persistent flux level was in most cases not quoted only 1 SAS--3 point
324: appears in Fig.~\ref{flux}.
325:
326: \begin{figure} \epsscale{.80} \plotone{f2.eps} \caption{The unabsorbed 0.5--10
327: keV X--ray flux history of \src. The range in dates plotted for the HEAO--I
328: satellite indicates the time span over which the source was detected on multiple
329: occasions by that satellite. The upper limit indicated with "CHAN2+3" has been
330: derived using {\it Chandra} data from 2005 and 2006 (see Table~\ref{log}). In
331: order to convert fluxes given in the literature in other X--ray bands to the
332: 0.5--10 keV band we assume the spectrum to be well--represented by an absorbed
333: power law with index 2 (except for the ROSAT and {\it Chandra} upper limit which
334: were derived assuming a 0.3 and 0.2 keV black body, respectively). Arrows on the
335: data points indicate upper limits to the X--ray flux.\label{flux}} \end{figure}
336:
337:
338:
339: \subsection{Magellan optical observations}
340:
341: We obtained Sloan $i'$--band images using the Magellan Instant Camera (MagIC)
342: instrument mounted on the 6.5~m Magellan--Clay telescope at Las Campanas
343: Observatory. On June 23, 2006 (MJD 53909 UTC), three 300 second exposures were
344: collected between 5:02--5:19 UTC. The observing conditions were excellent with a
345: photometric sky and a seeing of 0\farcs4. MagIC delivers a 2.35\arcmin\ field of
346: view sampled at 0\farcs069/pixel. Frames were readout in quad amplifier mode, and
347: were debiased and then flatfielded using dithered twilight sky observations.
348:
349:
350: We astrometrically calibrated the median combined CCD image by matching the
351: positions of stars in the image against those of stars from images presented in
352: Jonker et al.~(2006). The latter images were calibrated with respect to the second
353: version of the USNO CCD Astrograph Catalog (\citealt{2004AJ....127.3043Z})
354: to provide a ICRS J2000.0 astrometric frame.
355:
356: Photometric calibration was performed using images obtained on June 25, 2006
357: with the 4-m Blanco telescope and its MOSAIC imager at CTIO. A 120s Sloan
358: $i'$--band image of the field surrounding \src\ was obtained under photometric
359: conditions together with observations of the standard star fields PG~1323 and
360: SA~107. These allowed us to perform an absolute magnitude calibration of stars
361: in the proximity of our target. Since we only observed the field of \src\ in one
362: filter no color terms have been calculated.
363:
364: Despite the excellent observing conditions at Magellan, the counterpart of \src\ in
365: quiescence is not detected down to a 5$\sigma$ magnitude limit of $i>25.3$. A high
366: resolution finder chart is presented in Fig.~\ref{sloani}.
367:
368: \begin{figure}
369: \epsscale{.80}
370: \plotone{f3.eps}
371: \caption{Deep, 3$\times$5 minutes integration, sloan $i$ filter Magellan
372: observation of the field of \src\ obtained with the MagIC instrument under a
373: seeing of 0\farcs4. The cross indicates the outburst source position. The "+" signs
374: labelled A and D are nearby field stars (labels follow those in Jonker et
375: al.~2006). The vertical bar has a length of 3\arcsec. North is up and East is left.
376: \label{sloani}}
377: \end{figure}
378:
379:
380:
381:
382: \section{Discussion}
383:
384: We have obtained a 300 ks--long {\it Chandra} observation of the field of \src.
385: Using this observation we do not detect the quiescent X--ray counterpart to this
386: neutron star soft X--ray transient. The limit on the source flux depends on the
387: assumed spectral model. For instance, a spectral model of an absorbed power law
388: with index of 2 as observed for weak quiescent neutron star transients and
389: quiescent black hole X-ray transients (\citealt{2004MNRAS.354..666J},
390: \citealt{2002ApJ...570..277K}), gives a 95\% confidence upper limit on the
391: 0.5--10 keV source flux of 2.0$\times 10^{-16}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$. Given
392: the upper limit on the source distance of 10 kpc (\citealt{1990A&A...228..115C},
393: \citealt{2004MNRAS.354..355J}) this converts to a 0.5--10 keV luminosity limit
394: of $2.4\times 10^{30} {\rm\,erg\,s^{-1}}$. This means that the luminosity of
395: this neutron star SXT is lower than that observed for the weakest black hole SXT
396: A~0620--00 which has for a distance of 1 kpc an unabsorbed quiescent 0.5--10 keV
397: luminosity of $3\times 10^{30}$ erg s$^{-1}$ (\citealt{2001ApJ...553L..47G},
398: \citealt{2002ApJ...570..277K}). Note that some black hole SXTs have not been
399: detected in quiescence, and whereas the present upper limit to the luminosity in
400: those cases is well above that derived for \src\ one cannot exclude that deeper
401: observations will reveal a lower luminosity than that derived for \src.
402: Nevertheless, from present data the claim that there is evidence for a black
403: hole event horizon from a lower quiescent luminosity in black holes than neutron
404: stars (e.g.~\citealt{2001ApJ...553L..47G}) is unproven and at least does not
405: hold universally.
406:
407: Scaling of the observed quiescent luminosity with the Eddington luminosity in order
408: to try to normalize the neutron star and black hole systems to the same mass
409: accretion rate is very uncertain. For instance, since an unknown amount of the
410: transfered mass might be lost from the system in the form of a disk wind
411: (e.g.~\citealt{2006Natur.441..953M}), the relation between the mass transfer and
412: mass accretion rate is not well constrained. This might be especially important for
413: neutron star systems in quiescence if a propellor regime exists
414: (\citealt{1975A&A....39..185I}). On the other hand, as shown for instance by
415: \citet{2001MNRAS.322...31F}, \citet{2003MNRAS.343L..99F} and
416: \citet{2006MNRAS.370.1351G}, black holes are producing more powerful jets
417: observable in radio. Matter could also be lost from these systems via these jets,
418: the amount depends on the unknown composition of the jets. Finally, it is unclear
419: whether accretion in low--tranfer states proceeds via an advection dominated
420: accretion flow (e.g.~ADAF; \citealt{1995ApJ...452..710N}) or via a disk
421: (e.g.~\citealt{2003ApJ...593..184L}).
422:
423: In deep optical Sloan $i$--band images obtained with the 6.5~m Magellan telescope
424: under excellent conditions (seeing 0\farcs4) we do not detect the optical
425: counterpart to \src. For a distance of 10 kpc the magnitude upper limit of $i>$25.3
426: converts into an upper limit on the absolute magnitude of $I=$9.6 (as in
427: \citealt{2006MNRAS.368.1803J} we converted the observed outburst N${\rm _H}$ from
428: \citealt{1997ApJS..109..177C} to a reddening A$_i=0.7$ in the sloan $i$ band using
429: the conversion factors given in \citealt{1985ApJ...288..618R} and
430: \citealt{scfida1998}). This limit implies that the companion star of \src\ has a
431: spectral type later than M5 or is a white dwarf as in ultra--compact X--ray
432: binaries. It strengthens the identification of \src\ as an ultra--compact X--ray
433: binary (\citealt{2006MNRAS.368.1803J}).
434:
435:
436: An absorbed thermal neutron star atmosphere spectral model for a distance of 10
437: kpc gives a limit to the effective temperature at the surface of the neutron
438: star of 4.6$\times 10^5$ K (for a neutron star mass and radius of 1.4 M$_\odot$
439: and 10 km, respectively and assuming a pure Hydrogen non--magnetic atmosphere).
440: For such a neutron star this implies an effective temperature of 3.5$\times
441: 10^5$ K at infinity.
442:
443: A factor in determining the limit on the source flux is the amount of interstellar
444: extinction that is assumed. We have taken the conservative value for the Hydrogen
445: column density of ${\rm N_H =2.1\times 10^{21}\,cm^{-2}}$ from the results of
446: \citet{1997ApJS..109..177C} who found ${\rm N_H =(1.9\pm0.2) \times
447: 10^{21}\,cm^{-2}}$. Those authors found that the Hydrogen column densities derived
448: for several LMXBs from their spectral fits to Einstein data agree with values found
449: using ROSAT spectra. Besides and related to the N${\rm _H}$, the bolometric
450: correction is important in the conversion of the 0.5--10 keV band limit to a
451: bolometric luminosity limit. E.g.~from the upper limit on the effective temperature
452: of a neutron star atmosphere an upper limit to the bolometric luminosity of
453: $10^{31}$ erg s$^{-1}$ is determined implying a bolometric correction of
454: $\approx$4--5. For a power law spectral model with index 2, the bolometric
455: correction would be $\approx$3 (here we have taken the 0.01--100 keV luminosity as
456: a good measure of the bolometric luminosity). In this we again have taken ${\rm N_H
457: =2.1\times 10^{21}\,cm^{-2}}$.
458:
459: The new deep limit on the quiescent thermal X--ray emission of \src\ implies that
460: the neutron star must cool faster than possible with modified URCA processes even
461: for time averaged mass accretion rates as low as 10$^{-13}$ M$_\odot$ year$^{-1}$
462: (\citealt{2006MNRAS.368.1803J}), unless the neutron star core is not in a steady
463: state. This would mean that \src\ had been in quiescence prior to the $\sim$10 year
464: long outburst for $\approx$10 thousand years since the core reaches steady state on
465: such timescales (\citealt{2001ApJ...548L.175C}, \citealt{2004ARA&A..42..169Y}). On
466: the other hand, here again one should keep in mind that the relation between the
467: mass transfer and mass accretion rate is not well known especially for quiescent
468: systems. So, it is possible that the time averaged mass transfer rate is larger
469: than 10$^{-13}$ M$_\odot$ year$^{-1}$ whereas the mass accretion rate onto the
470: neutron star is lower than this.
471:
472:
473: \acknowledgments
474:
475: PGJ acknowledges Ed Brown for useful discussions, support from NASA
476: grant G06-7032X and support from the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific
477: Research. DS acknowledges support through the NASA Guest Observer program as
478: well as a PPARC/STFC Advanced Fellowship. This paper includes data gathered with
479: the 6.5~m Magellan Telescopes located at Las Campanas Observatory, Chile. {\it
480: Facilities:} \facility{Magellan}, \facility{CXO (ACIS)}.
481:
482:
483: \begin{thebibliography}{35}
484: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi
485:
486: \bibitem[{{Arnaud}(1996)}]{ar1996}
487: {Arnaud}, K.~A. 1996, in ASP Conf. Ser. 101: Astronomical Data Analysis
488: Software and Systems V, Vol.~5, 17
489:
490: \bibitem[{{Chevalier} \& {Ilovaisky}(1990)}]{1990A&A...228..115C}
491: {Chevalier}, C. \& {Ilovaisky}, S.~A. 1990, \aap, 228, 115
492:
493: \bibitem[{{Christian} \& {Swank}(1997)}]{1997ApJS..109..177C}
494: {Christian}, D.~J. \& {Swank}, J.~H. 1997, \apjs, 109, 177
495:
496: \bibitem[{{Colpi} {et~al.}(2001){Colpi}, {Geppert}, {Page}, \&
497: {Possenti}}]{2001ApJ...548L.175C}
498: {Colpi}, M., {Geppert}, U., {Page}, D., \& {Possenti}, A. 2001, \apjl, 548,
499: L175
500:
501: \bibitem[{{Fender}(2001)}]{2001MNRAS.322...31F}
502: {Fender}, R.~P. 2001, \mnras, 322, 31
503:
504: \bibitem[{{Fender} {et~al.}(2003){Fender}, {Gallo}, \&
505: {Jonker}}]{2003MNRAS.343L..99F}
506: {Fender}, R.~P., {Gallo}, E., \& {Jonker}, P.~G. 2003, \mnras, 343, L99
507:
508: \bibitem[{{Gallo} {et~al.}(2006){Gallo}, {Fender}, {Miller-Jones}, {Merloni},
509: {Jonker}, {Heinz}, {Maccarone}, \& {van der Klis}}]{2006MNRAS.370.1351G}
510: {Gallo}, E., {Fender}, R.~P., {Miller-Jones}, J.~C.~A., {Merloni}, A.,
511: {Jonker}, P.~G., {Heinz}, S., {Maccarone}, T.~J., \& {van der Klis}, M. 2006,
512: \mnras, 370, 1351
513:
514: \bibitem[{{Garcia} {et~al.}(2001){Garcia}, {McClintock}, {Narayan}, {Callanan},
515: {Barret}, \& {Murray}}]{2001ApJ...553L..47G}
516: {Garcia}, M.~R., {McClintock}, J.~E., {Narayan}, R., {Callanan}, P., {Barret},
517: D., \& {Murray}, S.~S. 2001, \apjl, 553, L47
518:
519: \bibitem[{{Gehrels}(1986)}]{1986ApJ...303..336G}
520: {Gehrels}, N. 1986, \apj, 303, 336
521:
522: \bibitem[{{Gottwald} {et~al.}(1995){Gottwald}, {Parmar}, {Reynolds}, {White},
523: {Peacock}, \& {Taylor}}]{1995A&AS..109....9G}
524: {Gottwald}, M., {Parmar}, A.~N., {Reynolds}, A.~P., {White}, N.~E., {Peacock},
525: A., \& {Taylor}, B.~G. 1995, \aaps, 109, 9
526:
527: \bibitem[{{Heinke} {et~al.}(2006){Heinke}, {Jonker}, {Wijnands}, \&
528: {Taam}}]{2006astro.ph.12232H}
529: {Heinke}, C.~O., {Jonker}, P.~G., {Wijnands}, R., \& {Taam}, R.~E. 2006, ArXiv
530: Astrophysics e-prints
531:
532: \bibitem[{{Illarionov} \& {Sunyaev}(1975)}]{1975A&A....39..185I}
533: {Illarionov}, A.~F. \& {Sunyaev}, R.~A. 1975, \aap, 39, 185
534:
535: \bibitem[{{Jonker} {et~al.}(2006){Jonker}, {Bassa}, {Nelemans}, {Juett},
536: {Brown}, \& {Chakrabarty}}]{2006MNRAS.368.1803J}
537: {Jonker}, P.~G., {Bassa}, C.~G., {Nelemans}, G., {Juett}, A.~M., {Brown},
538: E.~F., \& {Chakrabarty}, D. 2006, \mnras, 368, 1803
539:
540: \bibitem[{{Jonker} {et~al.}(2004){Jonker}, {Galloway}, {McClintock}, {Buxton},
541: {Garcia}, \& {Murray}}]{2004MNRAS.354..666J}
542: {Jonker}, P.~G., {Galloway}, D.~K., {McClintock}, J.~E., {Buxton}, M.,
543: {Garcia}, M., \& {Murray}, S. 2004, \mnras, 354, 666
544:
545: \bibitem[{{Jonker} \& {Nelemans}(2004)}]{2004MNRAS.354..355J}
546: {Jonker}, P.~G. \& {Nelemans}, G. 2004, \mnras, 354, 355
547:
548: \bibitem[{{Juett} \& {Chakrabarty}(2005)}]{2005ApJ...627..926J}
549: {Juett}, A.~M. \& {Chakrabarty}, D. 2005, \apj, 627, 926
550:
551: \bibitem[{{Kong} {et~al.}(2002){Kong}, {McClintock}, {Garcia}, {Murray}, \&
552: {Barret}}]{2002ApJ...570..277K}
553: {Kong}, A.~K.~H., {McClintock}, J.~E., {Garcia}, M.~R., {Murray}, S.~S., \&
554: {Barret}, D. 2002, \apj, 570, 277
555:
556: \bibitem[{{Lewin} {et~al.}(1976{\natexlab{a}}){Lewin}, {Doty}, {Hoffman}, \&
557: {Li}}]{1976IAUC.2984....2L}
558: {Lewin}, W.~H.~G., {Doty}, J., {Hoffman}, J.~A., \& {Li}, F.~K.
559: 1976{\natexlab{a}}, \iaucirc, 2984, 2
560:
561: \bibitem[{{Lewin} {et~al.}(1976{\natexlab{b}}){Lewin}, {Li}, {Hoffman}, {Doty},
562: {Buff}, {Clark}, \& {Rappaport}}]{1976MNRAS.177P..93L}
563: {Lewin}, W.~H.~G., {Li}, F.~K., {Hoffman}, J.~A., {Doty}, J., {Buff}, J.,
564: {Clark}, G.~W., \& {Rappaport}, S. 1976{\natexlab{b}}, \mnras, 177, 93P
565:
566: \bibitem[{{Li} {et~al.}(1976){Li}, {Lewin}, \& {Doxsey}}]{1976IAUC.2983....1L}
567: {Li}, F., {Lewin}, W.~H.~G., \& {Doxsey}, R. 1976, \iaucirc, 2983, 1
568:
569: \bibitem[{{Livio} {et~al.}(2003){Livio}, {Pringle}, \&
570: {King}}]{2003ApJ...593..184L}
571: {Livio}, M., {Pringle}, J.~E., \& {King}, A.~R. 2003, \apj, 593, 184
572:
573: \bibitem[{{Miller} {et~al.}(2006){Miller}, {Raymond}, {Fabian}, {Steeghs},
574: {Homan}, {Reynolds}, {van der Klis}, \& {Wijnands}}]{2006Natur.441..953M}
575: {Miller}, J.~M., {Raymond}, J., {Fabian}, A., {Steeghs}, D., {Homan}, J.,
576: {Reynolds}, C., {van der Klis}, M., \& {Wijnands}, R. 2006, \nat, 441, 953
577:
578: \bibitem[{{Murray}(2005)}]{2005ApJSmurrayetal}
579: {Murray}, S.~S. e.~a. 2005, \apjs, 161, 1
580:
581: \bibitem[{{Narayan} \& {Yi}(1995)}]{1995ApJ...452..710N}
582: {Narayan}, R. \& {Yi}, I. 1995, \apj, 452, 710
583:
584: \bibitem[{{Reid} {et~al.}(1980){Reid}, {Johnston}, {Bradt}, {Doxsey},
585: {Griffiths}, \& {Schwartz}}]{1980AJ.....85.1062R}
586: {Reid}, C.~A., {Johnston}, M.~D., {Bradt}, H.~V., {Doxsey}, R.~E., {Griffiths},
587: R.~E., \& {Schwartz}, D.~A. 1980, \aj, 85, 1062
588:
589: \bibitem[{{Rieke} \& {Lebofsky}(1985)}]{1985ApJ...288..618R}
590: {Rieke}, G.~H. \& {Lebofsky}, M.~J. 1985, \apj, 288, 618
591:
592: \bibitem[{{Schlegel} {et~al.}(1998){Schlegel}, {Finkbeiner}, \&
593: {Davis}}]{scfida1998}
594: {Schlegel}, D.~J., {Finkbeiner}, D.~P., \& {Davis}, M. 1998, \apj, 500, 525
595:
596: \bibitem[{{Seward} {et~al.}(1976){Seward}, {Page}, {Turner}, \&
597: {Pounds}}]{1976MNRAS.175P..39S}
598: {Seward}, F.~D., {Page}, C.~G., {Turner}, M.~J.~L., \& {Pounds}, K.~A. 1976,
599: \mnras, 175, 39P
600:
601: \bibitem[{{Tomsick} {et~al.}(2005){Tomsick}, {Gelino}, \&
602: {Kaaret}}]{2005ApJ...635.1233T}
603: {Tomsick}, J.~A., {Gelino}, D.~M., \& {Kaaret}, P. 2005, \apj, 635, 1233
604:
605: \bibitem[{{Voges}(1999)}]{1999A&Avogesetal}
606: {Voges}, W.~e.~a. 1999, \aap, 349, 389
607:
608: \bibitem[{{Weisskopf} {et~al.}(2007){Weisskopf}, {Wu}, {Trimble}, {O'Dell},
609: {Elsner}, {Zavlin}, \& {Kouveliotou}}]{2007ApJ...657.1026W}
610: {Weisskopf}, M.~C., {Wu}, K., {Trimble}, V., {O'Dell}, S.~L., {Elsner}, R.~F.,
611: {Zavlin}, V.~E., \& {Kouveliotou}, C. 2007, \apj, 657, 1026
612:
613: \bibitem[{{Wijnands} {et~al.}(2005){Wijnands}, {Homan}, {Heinke}, {Miller}, \&
614: {Lewin}}]{2005ApJ...619..492W}
615: {Wijnands}, R., {Homan}, J., {Heinke}, C.~O., {Miller}, J.~M., \& {Lewin},
616: W.~H.~G. 2005, \apj, 619, 492
617:
618: \bibitem[{{Yakovlev} \& {Pethick}(2004)}]{2004ARA&A..42..169Y}
619: {Yakovlev}, D.~G. \& {Pethick}, C.~J. 2004, \araa, 42, 169
620:
621: \bibitem[{{Zacharias} {et~al.}(2004){Zacharias}, {Urban}, {Zacharias},
622: {Wycoff}, {Hall}, {Monet}, \& {Rafferty}}]{2004AJ....127.3043Z}
623: {Zacharias}, N., {Urban}, S.~E., {Zacharias}, M.~I., {Wycoff}, G.~L., {Hall},
624: D.~M., {Monet}, D.~G., \& {Rafferty}, T.~J. 2004, \aj, 127, 3043
625:
626: \bibitem[{{Zavlin} {et~al.}(1996){Zavlin}, {Pavlov}, \&
627: {Shibanov}}]{1996A&A...315..141Z}
628: {Zavlin}, V.~E., {Pavlov}, G.~G., \& {Shibanov}, Y.~A. 1996, \aap, 315, 141
629:
630: \end{thebibliography}
631:
632:
633:
634: \end{document}
635:
636: