1: %% *************************************************************************
2: %% cjaa.tex
3: %% CJAA Ver. 1.0, LaTeX class for Chinese Journal of Astronomy & Astrophysics
4: %% demonstration file
5: %% (C) Chin. J. Astron. Astrophys.
6: %% revised by Zhou Ai-Ying, 2001.08.28;2003.04.20
7: %%
8: %% Note: 1. The ChJAA macro class cjaa.cls for LaTeX2e was adapted from
9: %% aa.cls, the A&A's macro class (Ver.5.01). Manuscripts for
10: %% ChJAA can be prepared following this demo file using cjaa.cls.
11: %% 2. To include EPS/PS graphics, you may use one of the graphics macro packages:
12: %% graphicx.sty, epsf.sty or psfig.sty, or their mix. Please note the usage
13: %% of \input{*.sty} and \usepackage{*}, they have no difference.
14: %% 3. Pay close attention to the format of ChJAA's reference list and
15: %% other requirements. See Instructions for Authors (2001, ChJAA, Vol.1, No.1)
16: %% or visit ChJAA's web pages at http://www.chjaa.org
17: %% 4. Final publication layout will be produced with this LaTeX source file.
18: %%---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
19: %%
20: %\documentclass[referee]{cjaa} % referee version: for submission
21: \documentclass{cjaa} % preprint, the final version for publication
22: %if use preprint, please de-comment \volnopage{} too.
23:
24: \usepackage{graphicx} %for PS/EPS graphics inclusion, new
25: \input{epsf.sty} %for PS/EPS graphics inclusion, old
26: %\input{psfig.sty} %for PS/EPS graphics inclusion, old
27:
28: %\baselineskip=6mm %%preserved for Editor. DOn't remove!
29:
30:
31: \begin{document}
32:
33: \title{Distribution of $^{56}$Ni Yields of Type Ia Supernovae
34: and Implications for Progenitors}
35: %\,$^*$
36: %\footnotetext{$*$ Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China.}
37: % \subtitle{I. Place Your Subtitle Here}
38:
39: % \volnopage{Vol.0 (200x) No.0, 000--000} %%preserved for Editor. DOn't remove!
40: \setcounter{page}{1} %%starting page, preserved for Editor. DOn't remove!
41: % \baselineskip=5mm %%preserved for Editor. DOn't remove!
42:
43: \author{Bo Wang
44: \inst{1,2}\mailto{}
45: %% Please move "\mailto{}" to the corresponding author of the paper.
46: %% For single author or all the authors from an institute, use "\inst{}" only
47: %% Here is an example of three authors come from different institutes.
48: \and Xiang-Cun Meng
49: \inst{1,2}
50: \and Xiao-Feng Wang
51: \inst{3,4}
52: \and Zhan-Wen Han
53: \inst{1}
54: }
55: \offprints{B. Wang} %% is disabled in fact
56: \baselineskip=4.642mm %% preserved for Editor. DOn't remove!
57:
58: \institute{National Astronomical Observatories/Yunnan
59: Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650011\\
60: \email{wangbo@ynao.ac.cn}
61: %% Please give the E-mail address of the author, to whom future correspondence and
62: %% offprint requests will be sent. Note to pair \mailto{} with \email{}
63: \and
64: Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049\\
65: \and
66: Tsinghua Center for Astrophysics (THCA) and Department of
67: Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084\\
68: \and
69: Astronomy Department, University of California at
70: Berkeley, CA 94720, USA}
71:
72: \date{22~~June~~2007}
73:
74: \abstract{
75: The amount of $^{56}$Ni produced in type Ia supernova (SN Ia) explosion
76: is probably the most important physical parameter underlying the observed
77: correlation of SN Ia luminosities with their light curves. Based on an
78: empirical relation between the $^{56}$Ni mass and the light curve parameter
79: $\triangle m_{15}$, we obtained rough estimates of the $^{56}$Ni mass for a
80: large sample of nearby SNe Ia with the aim of exploring the diversity in SN Ia.
81: We found that the derived $^{56}$Ni masses for different SNe Ia could vary by
82: a factor of ten (e.g., $M_{\rm Ni}=0.1 - 1.3$\,$M_{\odot}$), which cannot
83: be explained in terms of the standard Chandrasekhar-mass model (with a $^{56}$Ni
84: mass production of 0.4 -- 0.8\,$M_{\odot}$). Different explosion and/or progenitor
85: models are clearly required for various SNe Ia, in particular, for those extremely
86: nickel-poor and nickel-rich producers. The nickel-rich (with $M_{\rm Ni}$ $>$
87: 0.8\,$M_{\odot}$) SNe Ia are very luminous and may have massive progenitors
88: exceeding the Chandrasekhar-mass limit since extra progenitor fuel is required
89: to produce more $^{56}$Ni to power the light curve. This is also consistent
90: with the finding that the intrinsically bright SNe Ia prefer to occur in
91: stellar environments of young and massive stars. For example, 75$\%$ SNe Ia
92: in spirals have $\Delta m_{15} < 1.2$ while this ratio is only 18$\%$ in E/S0
93: galaxies. On the other hand, the nickel-poor SNe Ia (with $M_{\rm Ni}$ $<$
94: 0.2\,$M_{\odot}$) may invoke the sub-Chandrasekhar model, as most of them
95: were found in early-type E/S0 galaxies dominated by the older and low-mass
96: stellar populations. This indicates that SNe Ia in spiral and E/S0 galaxies
97: have progenitors of different properties.
98: \keywords{stars: evolution --- supernovae : general --- white dwarfs}
99: }
100:
101: \authorrunning{B. Wang et al.} %author_head in even pages
102: \titlerunning{Distribution of $^{56}$Ni Yields} % title_head in odd pages
103:
104: \maketitle
105: %% The author head (on even pages) and the title head (on odd pages) will be
106: %% automatically extracted from \author{} and \title{}. Whenever the title is too long,
107: %% you will be asked to supply a shorter one by inserting either \authorrunning{} or
108: %% \titlerunning{} before \maketitle. Anyway, you can specify your own heads in advance.
109: %%
110: %%
111: %% Note: In the following text body of your manuscript, please note several differences from
112: %% other major journals:
113: %% (1) \subsection{Please Capitalize the First Letter of Each Notional Word in Subsection Title}
114: %% (2) Please Capitalize the First Letter of Each Notional Word in table's caption
115:
116: %
117: %________________________________________________ sections below
118: %
119:
120: \section{Introduction} %% first-level sections will be auto-capitalized
121: \label{sect:intro}
122: %\hspace{15pt} %% preserved for Editor
123: It is well known that Type Ia Supernovae (SNe Ia) are excellent
124: cosmological distance indicators due to their high luminosity and
125: remarkable uniformity. The results of the High-Z Supernova Search
126: Team (Riess et al. 1998) and the Supernova Cosmology Project
127: (Perlmutter et al. 1999) astonishingly showed that the expansion of
128: the universe is accelerating. Although SNe Ia are very important
129: objects in modern cosmology, several key issues related to the
130: nature of their progenitor systems (Hachisu et al. 1996, 1999; Li
131: $\&$ van den Heuvel 1997; Han $\&$ Podsiadlowski 2004; Meng et al.
132: 2006) and the physics of the explosion mechanisms (Hillebrandt $\&$
133: Niemeyer 2000; R\"{o}pke $\&$ Hillebrandt 2005a) are still not
134: understood.
135:
136: It is widely accepted that SNe Ia are thermonuclear explosions of
137: carbon-oxygen (C-O) white dwarfs (WDs) accreting matter from their
138: companions (for a review see Nomoto et al. 1997). The energy
139: released from the burning till nuclear statistical equilibrium (NSE)
140: completely destroys the C-O WD. The optical/IR light curves are
141: powered by the radioactive decay of $^{56}$Ni $\rightarrow$
142: $^{56}$Co $\rightarrow$ $^{56}$Fe (Colgate $\&$ Mckee 1969).
143:
144: Over the last decades, it has been found that there exists
145: spectroscopic diversity among SNe Ia. In an attempt to quantify the
146: rate of spectroscopically peculiar SNe Ia in the existing observed
147: sample, Branch et al. (1993) compiled a set of 84 SNe Ia and found
148: that about $83\% - 89\%$ of the sample are normal (or sometimes
149: ``Branch normals''). According to Li et al. (2001), however, only
150: $64\%\pm 12\%$ of observed SNe Ia are normal in a volume-limited
151: search. The total rate of peculiar SNe Ia could be as high as
152: $36\%\pm 9\%$. The rates are $16\%\pm 7\%$ and $20\%\pm 7\%$ for SN
153: 1991bg-like events and SN 1991T-like objects, respectively.
154: Moreover, some of the peculiar SNe Ia apparently deviate from the
155: relation between the light-curve shape parameter $\Delta m_{15}$ and
156: the luminosity (e.g., Wang et al. 2006), which probably suggests
157: that SN Ia luminosity is not a single parameter of the light curve
158: shape. Note that Wang et al. (2005) presented a single post-maximum
159: color parameter $\triangle C_{12}$ ($B - V$ color $\sim$\,12 days
160: after the $B$-band light maximum), which empirically describes
161: almost the full range of the observed SN Ia luminosities and gives
162: tighter correlations with SN Ia luminosities, but the underpinning
163: physics is still not understood. Stritzinger et al. (2006a) recently
164: noticed that no explosion model has been proposed yet to
165: successfully account for the factor of ten spanned by the range in
166: the observed bolometric luminosity.
167:
168: In this paper, we aim to understand the origin of the progenitors
169: and explosion models with a large well-observed sample of nearby SNe
170: Ia. According to a simple empirical relation between the $^{56}$Ni
171: mass ($M_{\rm Ni}$) and the decline rate parameter $\triangle
172: m_{15}$, we can estimate the mass of radioactive material $^{56}$Ni
173: synthesized in SN Ia explosions. By studying the distribution of
174: such a parameter for SNe Ia, we hope to obtain some clues to the SN
175: Ia diversities. Moreover, we also investigate the correlation of SNe
176: Ia distribution with their host galaxies, which might also set
177: constraints on the SN Ia progenitors.
178:
179: The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we provide a brief
180: description of the observational data examined in this study.
181: Section 3 shows the distribution of the decline rate parameter
182: $\triangle m_{15}$, the relative radial distance $r_{\rm SN}/R_{25}$
183: and the derived $^{56}$Ni mass. In particular, a simple empirical
184: method is introduced and used to estimate the $^{56}$Ni mass for a
185: large number of well-observed SNe Ia. A discussion and conclusions
186: are then given in Section 4.
187:
188: %% ChJAA editors DID NOT use \cite{} for citation, \ref and \label for
189: %% cross-references of Table/Figure in publication version.
190: %% ChJAA editors prefered you giving a citation as 'Michel et al. 1992', and
191: %% writting Table~1 or Fig.~1 and so forth. However, that will make authors
192: %% inconvenient in adjusting/adding/removing text, tables or figures. Anyway,
193: %% authors can use \cite, \citep and \citet as widely used in other journals.
194: %% ChJAA editors are moving to use a more flexible LaTeX source.
195:
196: \section{DATA}
197: \label{sect:data}
198: %\hspace{15pt}% %% preserved for Editor
199: In this paper, we consider a sample of 111 well-observed nearby SNe
200: Ia with $Z<0.1$, of these 109 were compiled by Wang et al. (2006)
201: (see tables 1 and 2 in their work), and SNe 2002cs and 2002dj are
202: from unpublished KAIT SN database. The sample (excepting SNe 1937C,
203: 1972E and 1974G) includes only SNe with CCD measurements and those
204: observed not later than 8 days after the \emph{B}-band light maximum
205: and with more than five photometric points. A large fraction of
206: these observations were obtained by the earlier Calan/Tololo SN
207: survey, the CfA I/II SN monitoring campaign, and the Las
208: Campanas/CTIO observing campaign.
209:
210: The sample contains two important parameters (i.e., $\triangle
211: m_{15}$ and $r_{\rm SN}/R_{25}$). The decline rate parameter
212: $\triangle m_{15}$ was defined by Phillips (1993) as the amount in
213: magnitudes that the \emph{B}-band light curve decays in the first 15
214: days after maximum light, and the decline rate was corrected for a
215: small reddening effect (Phillips et al. 1999). $r_{\rm SN}/R_{25}$
216: is the de-projected galactocentric distance of the SNe in their
217: respective host galaxies in units of the galaxy radius $R_{25}$,
218: where $r_{\rm SN}$ is the de-projected radial distance of the SN Ia
219: from the galactic center and $R_{25}$ is the apparent semimajor axes
220: of the SN host galaxy isophote having
221: $\mu_{B}=25.0\rm\,mag\,arcsec^{-2}$. The 111 well-observed sample
222: contains 90 spectroscopically normal SNe Ia, 13 SN 1991T-like
223: objects, six SN 1991bg-like events and two truly peculiar SNe Ia,
224: SNe 2001ay and 2002cx. The 111 sample can be divided into four
225: groups by the morphological type of their host galaxies: 77 are in
226: spiral galaxies, 28 in E/S0 galaxies, two (SNe 1972E and 2000fa) in
227: irregular galaxies, and four (SNe 1992bl, 1999aw, 1999ej and 2002cx)
228: in galaxies of uncertain or intermediate types. Again, the sample of
229: 111 contains 98 SNe Ia with relative radial distances while the
230: remainder are uncertain. Out of the 98 SNe Ia with known distances,
231: 26 are from E/S0 galaxies, 70 from spiral galaxies, one (SN 1992bl)
232: from a S0/a galaxy and one (SN 2000fa) from an irregular galaxy.
233:
234: \section{ANALYSIS AND RESULTS}
235: \label{sect:analysis}
236: %\hspace{15pt}% %% preserved for Editor
237: In this section we investigate the distributions of $\triangle
238: m_{15}$ and the derived $^{56}$Ni mass versus $r_{\rm SN}/R_{25}$.
239: In particular, we provide a short overview of the method to
240: estimate the $^{56}$Ni masses for a large number of well-observed
241: SNe Ia.
242:
243: \subsection{Distribution of $\triangle m_{15}$}
244: Using optical light curves of SNe Ia, Phillips (1993), Hamuy et al.
245: (1996a) and Phillips et al. (1999) established a relationship
246: between the absolute magnitude at \emph{B}-band light maximum and
247: the initial decline rate of the light curve. The characteristic
248: parameter is $\triangle m_{15}$. When $\triangle m_{15}$ is properly
249: corrected for, the SNe Ia prove to be a high precision distance
250: indicator, yielding relative distances with uncertainties $\sim$
251: 7$\%$ -- 10$\%$ (Hamuy et al. 1996b). Kasen $\&$ Woosley (2007)
252: confirmed that the brighter SNe Ia have broader $B$-band light
253: curves with smaller decline rates around optical maxima than the
254: dimmer SNe Ia. Moreover, the determination of the decline rate
255: parameter $\triangle m_{15}$ is available for a large number of
256: objects. By analyzing $\triangle m_{15}$, it is possible for us to
257: peer into some intrinsic properties of SNe Ia, because it is
258: basically independent of distance and reddening.
259:
260: Hamuy et al. (1995, 1996a) first noticed that brighter (also smaller
261: $\triangle m_{15}$) SNe Ia are preferentially located in late-type
262: galaxies for the nearby sample of SN Ia (see also Gallagher et al.
263: 2005). In Figure 1, we show the distribution of $\triangle m_{15}$
264: for spiral and E/S0 galaxies, where the mean error for $\triangle
265: m_{15}$ is 0.07. It is obvious that the distribution of $\triangle
266: m_{15}$ is different in spiral and E/S0 galaxies. A K-S test shows
267: that the probability of these two distributions coming from the same
268: population is as low as $P=3.3\times10^{-7}$ (see also Altavilla et
269: al. 2004; Della Valle et al. 2005 for similar argument). Although
270: both SNe Ia in spiral and E/S0 galaxies show a wide range of $\Delta
271: m_{15}$, the fraction with $\Delta m_{15} < 1.2$ is 75$\%$ in
272: spirals and only 18$\%$ in E/S0 galaxies. The fact that faster
273: decliners (i.e., fainter SNe Ia) dominate in E/S0 galaxies is
274: apparently related to the age of the progenitors since E/S0 galaxies
275: are believed to have older low-mass stars. Recently, Sullivan et al.
276: (2006) demonstrated that the stretch factor of SNe Ia (another form
277: of $\Delta m_{15}$) in low- and high-redshift spiral galaxies bears
278: the same distribution at a confidence level of $95\%$, while the
279: distributions in elliptical galaxies are different as the faster
280: decliners (also the fainter SNe Ia) are usually seldom observed at
281: high redshift probably due to the selection effect and/or the SN
282: evolution effect. Since the decline rate $\Delta m_{15}$ is tightly
283: correlated with the stretch factor s, this difference found in
284: elliptical galaxies holds true for $\Delta m_{15}$.
285:
286: Figure 2 shows the distribution of $\triangle m_{15}$ for different
287: types of SNe Ia. Compared with normal SNe Ia, SN 1991T-like events
288: have a flatter decline rate of 0.95$\pm$0.10 while SN 1991bg-like
289: objects have a much faster decline rate of 1.90$\pm$0.10. In the
290: figure SNe 2001ay and 2002cx are truly peculiar events. SN 2001ay
291: has the slowest decline rate in our sample, and Howell $\&$ Nugent
292: (2004) suggested that SN 2001ay is a SN Ia with the broadest light
293: curve. Li et al. (2003) noted that SN 2002cx has a pre-maximum
294: spectrum like SN 1991T (the classical hot SN Ia), a luminosity like
295: SN 1991bg (the classic subluminous event), a slow late-time decline,
296: and unidentified spectral lines (which is probably not a SN Ia as it
297: showed a spectroscopic feature extremely similar to those in some
298: faint type II-P SNe at nebular phase, private communication with Dr.
299: Weidong Li).
300:
301: \begin{figure}
302: % \vspace{1.5cm}
303: %--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Fig: 1
304: \begin{minipage}[t]{0.5\textwidth}
305: \centering
306: \includegraphics[width=3in]{fig1.eps}
307: \vspace{-5mm}
308: \caption{Distribution of $\triangle m_{15}$ for 28 SNe Ia in E/S0
309: galaxies (solid line) and 77 in spiral galaxies (dotted line).}
310: \label{Fig:fig1}
311: \end{minipage} %
312: %--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Fig: 2
313: \begin{minipage}[t]{0.5\textwidth}
314: \centering
315: \includegraphics[width=3in]{fig2.eps}
316: \vspace{-5mm}
317: \caption{Distribution of $\triangle m_{15}$ for different SN Ia types. The
318: dotted line shows the distribution of 90 normal SNe Ia. The cross-hatched
319: area and the simply shaded area are for 13 SN 1991T-like events and 6 SN
320: 1991bg-like objects, respectively. Moreover, the gray-colored area and the
321: black area show SNe 2001ay and 2002cx, respectively.}
322: \label{Fig:fig2}
323: \end{minipage} %
324: % \caption{}
325: \end{figure}
326:
327: \subsection{Distribution of $r_{\rm SN}/R_{25}$}
328: The distribution of SNe Ia in host galaxies can provide important
329: clues to their progenitors and give constraints on the explosion
330: models. In Figure 3, the decline rate $\triangle m_{15}$ is plotted
331: against the normalized radial distance $r_{\rm SN}/R_{25}$. The
332: filled circles mark the 26 SNe Ia in E/S0 galaxies, and the open
333: circles, the 70 SNe Ia in spirals, with the observational error bars
334: shown. In the figure SN 2002cs is a slow decliner (with $\triangle
335: m_{15}$=1.00) in the elliptical galaxy NGC 6702, and SN 2002dj is
336: another slow decliner (with $\triangle m_{15}$=1.05) in the
337: elliptical galaxy NGC 5018. Moreover, SN 1998es is a SN 1991T-like
338: object in a lenticular galaxy. Its host galaxy NGC 632 has a nuclear
339: starburst with a diameter of 18\,kpc, and the position of SN 1998es.
340:
341: Figure 4 shows the distribution of the normalized radial distance
342: $r_{\rm SN}/R_{25}$. Wang (2002) first noticed that SNe Ia might be
343: more centrally concentrated in spiral galaxies than in E/S0
344: galaxies. In our study, the fraction of SNe Ia in E/S0 galaxies
345: located in the $r_{\rm SN}/R_{25}>1.0$ region is about 23$\%$, while
346: this fraction is only 4$\%$ for the SNe Ia in spirals. In other
347: words, SNe Ia in spiral galaxies could be more concentrated towards
348: the optical $R_{25}$ radius of their host galaxies than in E/S0
349: galaxies. A K-S test shows there is only a 33$\%$ probability that
350: the ancestors of SNe Ia in the E/S0 and the spiral galaxies have the
351: same radial distribution. Furthermore, the plot displays a
352: deficiency of SNe Ia in the central $r_{\rm SN}/R_{25}\leq 0.2$
353: region. The data on the SNe Ia radial distribution closer to center
354: the galaxies can be affected by absorption (Windhorst et al. 2002).
355: Note that this effect on the SNe Ia distribution closer to the
356: center of the galaxies may be more serious in spiral galaxies with
357: abundant gas and dust. Therefore, SNe Ia in spiral galaxies may be
358: more centrally located than the above number suggests.
359:
360: \begin{figure}
361: % \vspace{1.5cm}
362: %--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Fig: 3
363: \begin{minipage}[t]{0.5\textwidth}
364: \centering
365: \includegraphics[width=3in]{fig3.eps}
366: \vspace{-5mm}
367: \caption{$\triangle m_{15}$ plotted against the relative radial
368: distance $r_{\rm SN}/R_{25}$. The filled circles show 26 SNe Ia
369: in E/S0 galaxies. The open circles represent 70 SNe Ia in spiral
370: galaxies.}
371: \label{Fig:fig3}
372: \end{minipage} %
373: %--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Fig: 4
374: \begin{minipage}[t]{0.5\textwidth}
375: \centering
376: \includegraphics[width=3in]{fig4.eps}
377: \vspace{-5mm}
378: \caption{Distribution of the normalized radial distance $r_{\rm SN}/R_{25}$
379: for SNe Ia in E/S0 galaxies (solid line) and in spiral galaxies (dotted line).}
380: \label{Fig:fig4}
381: \end{minipage} %
382: % \caption{}
383: \end{figure}
384:
385: \subsection{$M_{\rm Ni}$ -- $\triangle m_{15}$ Relation}
386: The mass of $^{56}$Ni produced during a SN Ia explosion is the
387: primary physical parameter determining the luminosity of the event.
388: One simple method to estimate the synthesized $^{56}$Ni mass is a
389: detailed calculation on the assumption that the maximum luminosity
390: of a SN Ia is proportional to the instantaneous rate of radioactive
391: decay (Arnett 1982; Arnett et al. 1985; Branch 1992). Thus the
392: implied bolometric luminosity at light maximum (the luminosity
393: integrated from ultraviolet to infrared) can be expressed as
394: \begin{equation}
395: L_{\rm bol}=\alpha\dot{S}(t_{\rm R})M_{\rm Ni},
396: \end{equation}
397: where $M_{\rm Ni}$ is the total mass of $^{56}$Ni produced in the
398: explosion, and $\alpha$ is the ratio of bolometric to radioactivity
399: luminosity. $\dot{S}(r_{\rm R})$ is the radioactivity luminosity per
400: solar mass of $^{56}$Ni from its decay to $^{56}$Co and the
401: subsequent decay to $^{56}$Fe (e.g., Nadyozhin 1994):
402: \begin{equation}
403: \dot{S}=6.45\times10^{43}e^{-t_{\rm R}/8.8}+1.45\times10^{43}e^{-t_{\rm
404: R}/111.3}\,{\textrm{erg}\ \textrm{s}^{-1}\,M^{-1}_{\odot}},
405: \end{equation}
406: where $t_{\rm R}$ is the rise time in days from the SN explosion to
407: the light maximum. A typical rise time of $19\pm2$ days is assumed
408: for SNe Ia in our analysis (e.g., Branch 1992).
409:
410: From the analytic solutions for the early-epoch SN Ia light curves,
411: Arnett (1982) found that $\alpha$ should be 1 exactly. On the other
412: hand, according to an early survey of SN Ia lightcurve calculations,
413: Branch (1992) found that $\alpha$ is slightly larger than unity. He
414: concluded $\alpha=1.2\pm0.2$ and noted that the value of $\alpha$ is
415: independent of the rise time. We assume $\alpha=1$ in our analysis
416: because the nickel produced above the photosphere may not make
417: significant contribution to the luminosity (e.g., Nugent et al.
418: 1995). Stritzinger $\&$ Leibundgut (2005) noted that light curves of
419: two 3-D SNe Ia explosion models recently synthesized by the MPA
420: group are consistent with $\alpha=1$. Using Arnett's rule
421: ($\alpha=1.0$) which states that the maximum luminosity of a SN Ia
422: is equal to the instantaneous energy deposition rate from the
423: radioactive decays within the expanding ejecta (Arnett 1982; Arnett
424: et al. 1985), and assuming a rise time to bolometric maximum of 19
425: days, one can derive from Equations (1) and (2) a simple formula for
426: the maximum luminosity of a SN Ia (e.g., Stritzinger $\&$ Leibundgut
427: 2005):
428: \begin{equation}
429: L_{\rm max}=(2.0\pm0.3)\times 10^{43}(\frac{M_{\rm Ni}}{M_{\odot}})\,\rm{erg\
430: s^{-1}}.
431: \end{equation}
432: The uncertainty of the derived $^{56}$Ni mass is primarily
433: determined by the errors in the adopted bolometric rise time and
434: the transformation efficiency of the trapped $\gamma$ energy.
435:
436: It is generally believed that the $^{56}$Ni mass can be better
437: measured by the bolometric light curves constructed from the light
438: curves in the ultraviolet, optical and infrared wavelengths.
439: However, only a few SNe Ia have good observations covering from $UV$
440: to $IR$, which could be used as a training sample for $^{56}$Ni mass
441: determination of other SNe Ia. In Figure~5, the $^{56}$Ni masses
442: derived from 22 well-observed SNe Ia with $UBVRI$ and infrared light
443: curves, are plotted vs. $\triangle m_{15}$. For consistency in the
444: $\Delta m_{15}$ determinations, the $\triangle m_{15}$ values of the
445: 22 training SNe Ia are taken from Table 1 in Wang et al. (2006). Of
446: the 22 SNe Ia with $^{56}$Ni estimates, 17 are from Table 2 in
447: Stritzinger et al. (2006b) and five (SNe 1995E, 1998aq, 1998de,
448: 1999ac and 1999dq) from Table 1 in Stritzinger et al. (2006a). To
449: derive the $^{56}$Ni masses Stritzinger et al. (2006 a, b) made use
450: of Equation (3). In Figure 5, the solid line corresponding to a
451: least squares fit of the data yields the following zero points and
452: dispersion:
453: \begin{equation}
454: M_{\rm Ni}=(-0.61\pm0.09)\triangle m_{15}+(1.30\pm0.11)\ \ \ \sigma=0.13\ \ \ N=22,
455: \end{equation}
456: where the quoted dispersion ``$\sigma$'' is the simple root mean
457: square (rms) deviation of the points about the fit. Our fitting
458: result is very similar to that of Mazzali et al. (2007). Note that
459: the least square fit line is similar to the Phillips
460: $M_{B}$--$\triangle m_{15}$ relation. A vertical deviation of
461: 0.13\,M$_\odot$ (dotted lines) about the solid line is also shown.
462: It is suggested that the maximum luminosity of a SN Ia ($\triangle
463: m_{15}$) could be a direct consequence of the $^{56}$Ni mass via
464: modelling the light curves of SNe Ia (Arnett 1982; Cappellaro et al.
465: 1997; Mazzali et al. 2001; Kasen 2006). The correlation between the
466: $^{56}$Ni mass and $\triangle m_{15}$ shown in Figure 5 may be taken
467: as observational evidence for this assumption.
468:
469: %--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Fig: 5
470: \begin{figure}
471: \begin{center}
472: \mbox{\epsfxsize=0.7\textwidth\epsfysize=0.7\textwidth\epsfbox{fig5.eps}}
473: \caption{$^{56}$Ni mass derived from maximum luminosity vs. $\triangle m_{15}$
474: for 22 well-observed SNe Ia. The solid line marks the least squares fit. The
475: dotted lines correspond to a vertical deviation of 0.13\,$M_\odot$ (i.e., a quoted
476: dispersion ``$\sigma$'') about the solid line. Note that the solid line in the panel
477: is similar to the relation obtained by Phillips. }
478: \label{Fig:fig5}
479: \end{center}
480: \end{figure}
481:
482: \subsection{Distribution of $^{56}$Ni Masses}
483: The amount of $^{56}$Ni synthesized from burning to nuclear
484: statistical equilibrium (NSE) in SN Ia explosions is probably the
485: most important physical parameter underlying the observed
486: correlation of SN Ia luminosities with their light curves. With
487: the $^{56}$Ni mass one can directly study the most sensitive part
488: of the explosion and provide constraints on the explosion
489: mechanisms (see the review Leibundgut 2000). Here, according to
490: the empirical relation between the $^{56}$Ni mass and $\triangle
491: m_{15}$, i.e., Equation (4), we can estimate the $^{56}$Ni masses
492: and give the distribution of the $^{56}$Ni mass for a large number
493: of SNe Ia (see Figs. 6 and 7).
494:
495: As shown in Figures 6 and 7, the $^{56}$Ni mass synthesized in SN Ia
496: explosions varies from 0.1 to 1.3\,$M_\odot$, with mean error
497: 0.17\,$M_\odot$. Figure~6 displays the distribution of the
498: $^{56}$Ni mass for SNe Ia in spiral and E/S0 galaxies, the black
499: area represents SN 2003fg. To produce SN 2003fg's unusual
500: luminosity, Howell et al. (2006) calculated, using Equation (1),
501: $^{56}$Ni mass, $M_{\rm Ni}=1.29\pm 0.07$\,$M_\odot$, a value that
502: was further confirmed by Jeffery et al. (2006). In Figure 7 we show
503: the distribution of the $^{56}$Ni mass for different SN Ia types,
504: and it is indicated that different SN Ia types (i.e., normal SNe Ia,
505: SN 1991bg-like events and SN 1991T-like objects) require the
506: existence of a range in the $^{56}$Ni masses in SN Ia explosions.
507:
508:
509: \begin{figure}
510: % \vspace{1.5cm}
511: %--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Fig: 6
512: \begin{minipage}[t]{0.5\textwidth}
513: \centering
514: \includegraphics[width=3in]{fig6.eps}
515: \vspace{-5mm}
516: \caption{Distribution of the $^{56}$Ni mass for 28 SNe Ia in E/S0 galaxies
517: (dotted line) and 76 in spiral galaxies (solid line) except for SN 2001ay
518: which is truly peculiar. The black area represents SN 2003fg.}
519: \label{Fig:fig6}
520: %--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Fig: 7
521: \end{minipage} %
522: \begin{minipage}[t]{0.5\textwidth}
523: \centering
524: \includegraphics[width=3in]{fig7.eps}
525: \vspace{-5mm}
526: \caption{Distribution of the $^{56}$Ni mass for different SN Ia types. The dotted
527: line shows the 90 normal SNe Ia. The gray-colored area and the single shaded area are
528: for 6 SN 1991bg-like events and 13 SN 1991T-like objects, respectively. The black area
529: represents SN 2003fg.}
530: \label{Fig:fig7}
531: \end{minipage} %
532: % \caption{}
533: \end{figure}
534:
535: \section{DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS}
536: \label{sect:discussion}
537: %\hspace{15pt}% %% preserved for Editor
538: As we know above (see Section 3.1), the brighter SNe Ia prefer to
539: occur in spiral galaxies and the fainter ones prefer to occur in
540: E/S0 galaxies. However, SNe 2002cs and 2002dj are slow decliners in
541: elliptical galaxies. This contradicts with previous conclusion that
542: elliptical galaxies produce only fainter SNe Ia. These two cases
543: probably suggest that the age may not be the exclusive factor
544: underlying SN Ia diversities. Moreover, SN 1998es is a slow decliner
545: in a nuclear starburst galaxy, which can probably be taken as an
546: instance of brighter events occurring in systems with ongoing star
547: formation (Sullivan et al. 2006). Figure 4 shows that SNe Ia might
548: be more concentrated towards the optical $R_{25}$ radius of their
549: host galaxies in spirals than in E/S0 galaxies. This suggests that
550: SNe Ia in spiral and E/S0 galaxies might have different progenitor
551: properties.
552:
553: There is increasing evidence that a single parameter ($\triangle
554: m_{15}$) cannot account for the diversity in SN Ia (e.g., Benetti et
555: al. 2004). As shown in Figure 5, there is a relatively large scatter
556: $\sim$ 0.13\,$M_{\odot}$ in the $^{56}$Ni mass--$\triangle m_{15}$
557: relation. The dispersion may be partly due to uncertainties in the
558: distance and reddening adopted in the calculations, but an intrinsic
559: dispersion cannot be ruled out. Although it is believed that the
560: $^{56}$Ni mass in SN Ia explosions is the dominant physical
561: parameter affecting both the brightness and light curve shape (or
562: $\triangle m_{15}$), Woosley et al. (2006) proposed that some
563: parameters other than $M_{\rm Ni}$ also affect the light curves to
564: some extent, such as the total burned mass, the stable iron mass and
565: the degree of direct $^{56}$Ni mixing. However, since the empirical
566: $M_{\rm Ni}$--$\triangle m_{15}$ relation is similar to the Phillips
567: $M_{B}$--$\triangle m_{15}$ relation and the larger sample used in
568: the analysis helps to reduce the effect of random error, it is
569: reliable to use the relation to roughly estimate the $^{56}$Ni mass.
570:
571: Based on the distribution of the $^{56}$Ni masses above, it is shown
572: that the $^{56}$Ni mass varies by at least a factor of ten (e.g.,
573: $M_{\rm Ni}=0.1-1.3$\,$M_{\odot}$). The explosions of SNe Ia might
574: produce a range in the amount of $^{56}$Ni synthesized from
575: $\sim$0.1\,$M_{\odot}$ associated with the subluminous objects to
576: $\sim$1.3\,$M_{\odot}$ for the most luminous events. The wide
577: distribution of the $^{56}$Ni masses raises the question as to what
578: physical mechanism(s) can account for this dispersion. During the
579: past years, a number of potential parameters in the
580: Chandrasekhar-mass deflagration scenario were investigated to answer
581: this question, e.g., C-O ratio, overall metallicity and central
582: density. However, 3D simulations by R\"{o}pke $\&$ Hillebrandt
583: (2004) indicated that different C-O ratios have a negligible effect
584: on the amount of $^{56}$Ni produced. Also R\"{o}pke et al. (2005b)
585: showed that there exits a $\sim20\%$ change in the resulting
586: $^{56}$Ni masses via altering the metallicity, which is consistent
587: with the analytic prediction of Timmes et al. (2003). Moreover, it
588: has been shown that changing the central density of the white dwarf
589: does influence the robustness of the explosion. Again, Stritzinger
590: et al. (2006a) suggested that it is unrealistic that any one of
591: these parameters, or even a combination of all three, can account
592: for a factor of ten range in the $^{56}$Ni mass.
593:
594: Besides these parameters, the explosion mechanism itself is more
595: likely to influence the $^{56}$Ni masses synthesized in SN Ia
596: explosions (see Stritzinger $\&$ Leibundgut 2005). The standard
597: Chandrasekhar-mass model is the most popular explosion scenario for
598: SNe Ia. However, different Chandrasekhar-mass models can produce
599: different amount of $^{56}$Ni which is usually in the range of 0.4
600: -- 0.8\,$M_{\odot}$ (e.g., Mazzali et al. 2001), thus it is an
601: observational fact that a single class of Chandrasekhar-mass model
602: cannot account for the explosion properties of all the SNe Ia.
603: Recently, Mazzali et al. (2007) accomplished a systematic spectral
604: analysis of a large sample of well-observed SNe Ia and mapped the
605: velocity distribution of the main products of nuclear burning in SN
606: Ia explosions. They indicated that a single explosion scenario,
607: possibly a delayed detonation (DD) of Chandrasekhar-mass model, may
608: explain most SNe Ia. From the distribution of the $^{56}$Ni mass
609: displayed above, one can find that the $^{56}$Ni mass fall mostly in
610: the range of 0.4 -- 0.8\,$M_{\odot}$, thus we suggest that a
611: Chandrasekhar-mass model might account for normal SNe Ia which have
612: the $^{56}$Ni masses from 0.4\,$M_\odot$ to 0.8\,$M_\odot$.
613: Moreover, Sub-Chandrasekhar WDs are plausible candidates for the
614: subluminous objects. We note that one appealing advantage offered by
615: sub-Chandrasekhar model is the ability to obtain the progenitor
616: statistics predicted by population synthesis calculations (Livio
617: 2000). In addition, the sub-Chandrasekhar model can easily explain
618: the observed diversity of SNe Ia by a one parameter sequence in
619: terms of the WD mass (Ruiz-Lapuente et al. 1995), and we also
620: suggested flexible progenitors for SN 1991bg-like events with
621: $M_{\rm Ni}$ $<$ 0.2\,$M_{\odot}$ (Cappellaro et al. 1997;
622: Stritzinger et al. 2006a, b). However, it must be noted that the
623: sub-Chandrasekhar model has difficulty in matching the observed
624: light curves and spectroscopy (e.g., H\"{o}flich $\&$ Khokhlov
625: 1996).
626:
627: As shown in Figure7, the $^{56}$Ni mass of SN 2003fg exceeds others
628: remarkably. Hillebrandt et al. (2007) argued that a lop-sided
629: explosion of a Chandrasekhar-mass WD could provide a better
630: explanation for SN 2003fg. They suggested that such objects must be
631: rare, since both a moderately high $^{56}$Ni mass
632: ($\geq0.9$\,$M_\odot$) and rather special viewing direction are
633: rare, since both a moderately high $^{56}$Ni mass
634: ($\geq0.9$\,$M_\odot$) and a rather special viewing direction are
635: rare. However, it is commonly believed that SN 2003fg could be from
636: a super-Chandrasekhar WD explosion (e.g., Uenishi et al. 2003; Yoon
637: $\&$ Langer 2005; Howell et al. 2006; Jeffery et al. 2006). It is
638: proposed that the influence of rotation of the accreting WDs may
639: cause the mass to exceed 1.4\,$M_\odot$. Mazzali et al. (2007) also
640: noted that some extremely luminous SNe Ia may come from very rapidly
641: rotating WDs whose mass exceeds Chandrasekhar mass, but these are
642: rare.
643:
644: In summary, the wide distribution of the $^{56}$Ni mass suggests
645: that there are probably multiple origins of SN Ia explosion and/or
646: progenitor systems. We argue that sub-Chandrasekhar WDs could be the
647: progenitors of some extremely nickel-poor SNe Ia (with $M_{\rm Ni}$
648: $<$ 0.2\,$M_{\odot}$), and that super-Chandrasekhar WDs the
649: progenitors of some rare nickel-rich SNe Ia (with $M_{\rm Ni}$ $>$
650: 0.8\,$M_{\odot}$). The Chandrasekhar-mass model remains the main
651: scenario for SN Ia explosions with a range in $^{56}$Ni masses from
652: 0.4\,$M_\odot$ to 0.8\,$M_\odot$. To set further constraints on SN
653: Ia explosion/progenitor models, large samples of SNe Ia with
654: well-observed light curves and spectroscopy in nearby galaxies are
655: required to establish the connection of SN Ia properties with the
656: stellar environments of their host galaxies.
657:
658: \begin{acknowledgements}
659: We acknowledge Dr. Weidong Li for SNe 2002cs and 2002dj parameters
660: before publications. We also thank the referee for careful reading
661: of the paper and valuable suggestions. This work is supported by the
662: National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 10433030,
663: 10521001 and 10673007), the Foundation of the Chinese Academy of
664: Sciences (No. KJCX2-SW-T06), and Basic Research Funding at Tsinghua
665: University (JCqn2005036).
666: \end{acknowledgements}
667:
668:
669: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
670: %% you can type \apj for ApJ, \aap for A&A, \apss for Ap&SS, etc. Please consult
671: %% the macro cjaa.cls. You can also find them in aasguide.tex (AASTeX for ApJ, AJ, PASP)
672: %% Please follow the format of ChJAA's reference list
673: \bibitem[2004]{alta04} Altavilla G., Fiorentino G., Marconi M. et al., 2004, MNRAS, 349, 1344
674: \bibitem[1982]{arne82} Arnett W. D., 1982, ApJ, 253, 785
675: \bibitem[1985]{arne85} Arnett W. D., Branch D., Wheeler J. C., 1985, Nature, 314, 337
676: \bibitem[2004]{bene04} Benetti S., Meikle P., Stehle M. et al., 2004, MNRAS, 348, 261
677: \bibitem[1992]{bran92} Branch D., 1992, ApJ, 392, 35
678: \bibitem[1993]{bran93} Branch D., Fisher A., Nugent P., 1993, AJ, 106, 2383
679: \bibitem[1997]{capp97} Cappellaro E., Mazzali P. A., Benetti S. et al., 1997, A$\&$A, 328, 203
680: \bibitem[1969]{colg69} Colgate S. A., Mckee C., 1969, ApJ, 157, 623
681: \bibitem[2005]{dell05} Della Valle M., Panagia N., Padovani P. et al., 2005, ApJ, 629, 750
682: \bibitem[2005]{gall05} Gallagher J. S., Garnavich P. M., Berlind P. et al., 2005, ApJ, 634, 210
683: \bibitem[1996]{hach96} Hachisu I., Kato M., Nomoto K., 1996, ApJ, 470, L97
684: \bibitem[1999]{hach99} Hachisu I., Kato M., Nomoto K., 1999, ApJ, 522, 487
685: \bibitem[1995]{hamu95} Hamuy M., Phillips M. M., Maza J. et al., 1995, AJ, 109, 1
686: \bibitem[1996a]{hamu96} Hamuy M., Phillips M. M., Suntzeff N. B. et al., 1996a, AJ, 112, 2391
687: \bibitem[1996b]{hamu96} Hamuy M., Phillips M. M., Suntzeff N. B. et al., 1996b, AJ, 112, 2398
688: \bibitem[2004]{han04} Han Z., Podsiadlowski Ph., 2004, MNRAS, 350, 1301
689: \bibitem[2000]{hill00} Hillebrandt W., Niemeyer J. C., 2000, ARA$\&$A, 38, 191
690: \bibitem[2007]{hill07} Hillebrandt W., Sim S. A., R\"{o}pke F. K., 2007, A$\&$A, 465, L17
691: \bibitem[1996]{hofl96} H\"{o}flich P., Khokhlov A., 1996, ApJ, 457, 500
692: \bibitem[2004]{howe04} Howell D. A., Nugent P., 2004, In: P. H\"{o}flich et al., eds., in Cosmic Explosions in Three Dimensions: Asymmetries in Supernovae and Gamma-Ray Bursts, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, P.151
693: \bibitem[2006]{howe06} Howell D. A., Sullivan M., Nugent P. E. et al., 2006, Nature, 443, 308
694: \bibitem[2006]{jeff06} Jeffery D. J., Branch D., Baron E., 2006, in press (astro-ph/0609804)
695: \bibitem[1998]{jha98} Jha S., Garnavich P., Challis P. et al., 1998, IAU Circ., 7054
696: \bibitem[2006]{kase06} Kasen D., 2006, ApJ, 649, 939
697: \bibitem[2007]{kase07} Kasen D., Woosley S. E., 2007, ApJ, 656, 661
698: \bibitem[2000]{leib90} Leibundgut B., 2000, A$\&$ARv, 10, 179
699: \bibitem[2001]{li01} Li W. D., Filippenko A. V., Treffers R. R. et al., 2001, ApJ, 546, 734
700: \bibitem[2003]{li03} Li W. D., Filippenko A. V., Chornock R. et al., 2003, PASP, 115, 453
701: \bibitem[1997]{li97} Li X. D., van den Heuvel E. P. J., 1997, A$\&$A, 322, L9
702: \bibitem[2000]{livi00} Livio M., 2000, in press (astro-ph/0005344)
703: \bibitem[2001]{mazz01} Mazzali P. A., Nomoto K., Cappellaro E. et al., 2001, ApJ, 547, 988
704: \bibitem[2007]{mazz07} Mazzali P. A., R\"{o}pke F. K., Benetti S. et al., 2007, Science, 315, 825
705: \bibitem[2006]{meng06} Meng X., Chen X., Tout C. A., Han Z., 2006, ChJAA, 6, 461
706: \bibitem[1994]{nady94} Nadyozhin D. K., 1994, ApJS, 92, 527
707: \bibitem[1997]{nomo97} Nomoto K., Iwamoto K., Kishimoto N., 1997, Science, 276, 1378
708: \bibitem[1995]{nuge95} Nugent P., Branch D., Baron E. et al., 1995, PhRvL, 75, 394
709: \bibitem[1999]{perl99} Perlmutter S., Aldering G., Goldhaber G. et al., 1999, ApJ, 517, 565
710: \bibitem[1993]{phil93} Phillips M. M., 1993, ApJ, 413, L105
711: \bibitem[1999]{phil99} Phillips M. M., Lira P., Suntzeff N. B. et al., 1999, AJ, 118, 1766
712: \bibitem[1998]{ries98} Riess A. G., Filippenko A. V., Challis P. et al., 1998, AJ, 116, 1009
713: \bibitem[2004]{ropk04} R\"{o}pke F. K., Hillebrandt W., 2004, A$\&$A, 420, L1
714: \bibitem[2005a]{ropk05} R\"{o}pke F. K., Hillebrandt W., 2005a, A$\&$A, 431, 635
715: \bibitem[2005b]{ropk05} R\"{o}pke F. K., Gieseler M., Hillebrandt W., 2005b, ASPC, 342, 397
716: \bibitem[1995]{ruiz95} Ruiz-Lapuente P., Burkert A., Canal R., 1995, ApJ, 447, L69
717: \bibitem[2005]{stri05} Stritzinger M., Leibundgut B., 2005, A$\&$A, 431, 423
718: \bibitem[2006a]{stri06} Stritzinger M., Leibundgut B., Walch S. et al., 2006a, A$\&$A, 450, 241
719: \bibitem[2006b]{stri06} Stritzinger M., Mazzali P. A., Sollerman J. et al., 2006b, A$\&$A, 460, 793
720: \bibitem[2006]{sull06} Sullivan M., Le Borgne D., Pritchet C. J. et al., 2006, ApJ, 648, 868
721: \bibitem[2003]{timm03} Timmes F. X., Brown E. F., Truran J. W., 2003, ApJ, 590, L83
722: \bibitem[2003]{ueni03} Uenishi T., Nomoto K., Hachisu I., 2003, ApJ, 595, 1094
723: \bibitem[2002]{wang02} Wang X. F., 2002, PhD Thesis, Beijing Normal University
724: \bibitem[2005]{wang05} Wang X. F., Wang L. F., Zhou X. et al., 2005, ApJ, 620, L87
725: \bibitem[2006]{wang06} Wang X. F., Wang L. F., Pain R. et al., 2006, ApJ, 645, 488
726: \bibitem[2002]{wind02} Windhorst R. A., Taylor V. A., Jansen R. A. et al., 2002, ApJS, 143, 113
727: \bibitem[2006]{woos06} Woosley S. E., Kasen D., Blinnikov S. et al., 2006, in press (astro-ph/0609562)
728: \bibitem[2006]{yoon06} Yoon S.-C., Langer N., 2005, A$\&$A, 435, 967
729: \end{thebibliography}
730:
731: \label{lastpage}
732: \end{document}
733: %%==^..^============== the END of cjaa.tex ===================^_^==
734: