1: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: \documentclass{emulateapj}
3:
4:
5: \usepackage{apjfonts}
6: \usepackage{natbib}
7:
8:
9: \newcommand{\del}[2]%
10: {\frac{\mathrm{d}{#2}}{\mathrm{d}{#1}}}
11: \newcommand{\Del}[2]%
12: {\frac{\mathrm{D}{#2}}{\mathrm{D}{#1}}}
13: \newcommand{\ddel}[2]%
14: {\frac{\mathrm{d}^2{#2}}{\mathrm{d}{#1}^2}}
15:
16: \newcommand{\pdel}[2]%
17: {\frac{\partial{#2}}{\partial{#1}}}
18: \newcommand{\pddel}[2]%
19: {\frac{\partial^2{#2}}{\partial{#1}^2}}
20: \newcommand{\udel}[1]{\partial_{#1}}
21: \newcommand{\tdel}[1]{\partial^{#1}}
22: \newcommand{\grad}{\nabla}
23: \renewcommand{\div}{\nabla\cdot}
24: \newcommand{\rot}{\nabla\times}
25: \newcommand{\laplace}{\bigtriangleup}
26: \renewcommand{\vec}[1]{\mathbf{#1}}
27: \newcommand{\cm}{\mathrm{cm}}
28: \newcommand{\gauss}{\mathrm{G}}
29: \newcommand{\simgt}{\lower.5ex\hbox{$\; \buildrel > \over \sim \;$}}
30: \newcommand{\simlt}{\lower.5ex\hbox{$\; \buildrel < \over \sim \;$}}
31: \newcommand{\bpar}[1]{\biggl({#1}\biggr)}
32:
33: \newcommand{\redfont}[1]{\color[named]{Red}{#1}\normalcolor}
34:
35: \def\i{\mathrm{i}}
36: \def\e{\mathrm{e}}
37: \def\d{\mathrm{d}}
38:
39: %roman Number
40: \def\Rnum#1{\uppercase\expandafter{\romannumeral #1}}
41: \def\rnum#1{\expandafter{\romannumeral #1}}
42:
43: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
44: \newcommand{\myemail}{suwa@utap.phys.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp}
45:
46:
47: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
48: %% About layout
49: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
50: %\setlength{\textwidth}{30zw}
51: %\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{0cm}
52: %\setlength{\textheight}{44\baselineskip}
53: %\addtolength{\textheight}{\topskip}
54: %\setlength{\voffset}{-1cm}
55: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
56:
57: \slugcomment{Draft version \today}
58:
59: \shorttitle{Gravitational Wave Background from Pop III Stars}
60: \shortauthors{Suwa et al.}
61:
62:
63: \begin{document}
64:
65: \title{Gravitational Wave Background from Population III Stars}
66:
67: \author{
68: Yudai Suwa\altaffilmark{1},
69: Tomoya Takiwaki\altaffilmark{1},
70: Kei Kotake\altaffilmark{2,3},
71: and Katsuhiko Sato\altaffilmark{1,4}
72: }
73: \altaffiltext{1}{
74: Department of Physics,School of Science, the University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo,
75: Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan}
76: \altaffiltext{2}{
77: Division of Theoretical Astronomy, National Astronomical Observatory of Japan,
78: Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan}
79: \altaffiltext{3}{Max-Planck-Institut f\"{u}r Astrophysik, Karl-Schwarzshild-Str.
80: 1, D-85741, Garching, Germany}
81: \altaffiltext{4}{Research Center for the Early Universe,
82: School of Science, the University of Tokyo,7-3-1 Hongo,
83: Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan}
84: \email{suwa@utap.phys.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp}
85:
86: \begin{abstract}
87: We estimate the gravitational wave (GW) background from Population III (Pop III) stars
88: using the results from our hydrodynamic simulations (Suwa et al. 2007).
89: We calculate gravitational waveforms from
90: matter motions and anisotropic neutrino emissions for single Pop III
91: stars.
92: We find that the GW amplitudes from matter motions are dominant until
93: just after bounce,
94: but those from neutrinos dominate later
95: on at frequencies below $\sim 10$ Hz in the GW spectrum.
96: Computing the overall signal produced by the ensemble of such
97: Pop III stars, we find that the resultant density parameter of the GW
98: background peaks at the amplitude of $\Omega_\mathrm{GW}\sim 10^{-10}$ in the
99: frequency interval $\sim 1-10$ Hz. We show that such signals,
100: depending on the formation rate of Pop III stars,
101: can be within the detection limits
102: of future planned interferometers such as
103: DECIGO and BBO in the frequency interval of $\sim 0.1-1$ Hz.
104: Our results suggest that the detection of the GW background from Pop III stars can
105: be an important tool to supply
106: the information about the star formation history in the early universe.
107: \end{abstract}
108:
109: \keywords{gravitational waves --- supernovae: general --- black hole physics --- neutrinos
110: --- methods: numerical --- hydrodynamics }
111:
112: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
113: \section{Introduction}
114:
115:
116: %%%%% GW detector
117: The observation of gravitational waves (GWs) is one of the most important tasks
118: for exploring the less well known parts of the Universe.
119: Already several ground-based laser interferometers (TAMA300, LIGO, and GEO600) are
120: now operating and taking data
121: in the frequency range of 10 Hz - 10 kHz,
122: where rapidly-collapsing stellar objects accompanied with strong gravity
123: such as neutron stars (NSs) and black holes (BHs),
124: are one of the most promising sources of GWs
125: \cite[see, e.g.,][for reviews]{new03,kotarev}.
126: The Laser Interferometer Space Anntena (LISA), covering $10^{-4}-10^{-2}$ Hz,
127: will be launched in the near future,
128: and, moreover, future space missions such as DECIGO \citep{seto01} and BBO \citep{unga05},
129: targeting the $\sim$ 0.1 Hz regime, are being planned.
130: Possible targets of these experiments in the low frequency region are gravitational
131: wave backgrounds (GWBs) from both astrophysical and cosmological origins.
132: In particular the low-frequency window is thought to be indispensable
133: for the detection of the primordial GWB generated during the inflationary epoch
134: \citep{magg00}.
135:
136: %%%%% Astrophysical sources
137: In addition, various possible astrophysical sources of GWBs have been investigated.
138: Among them are core-collapse supernovae \citep{arau04},
139: inspiral and coalescence of compact binaries
140: \citep{farm03}, rotating NSs with non-axisymmetric deformations \citep{ferr99b}, gamma-ray bursts \citep{hira05},
141: and NSs with phase transitions
142: \citep{sigl06} (see references therein).
143: Recently, \citet{buon05} pointed out that the contribution from Population III
144: (hereafter Pop III) stars is most important because it could be
145: as large as the inflationary GWB around
146: 0.1 Hz where DECIGO and BBO are most sensitive
147: \cite[see also][]{sand06}.
148:
149: %%%%% Pop III
150: Here, Pop III stars are the first stars, which formed out
151: of a pristine, metal free gas produced by the big bang \cite[for reviews, see, e.g.][]
152: {brom04, glov05}.
153: Recent simulations indicate that the initial mass function (IMF) of Pop III stars is expected
154: to have been dominated by very massive stars with mass $\simgt 100M_\odot$
155: \citep{naka01,abel02,brom02b,omuk03}.
156: These very massive stars encounter the electron-positron pair creation
157: instability after central carbon burning, which reduces
158: the thermal energy and induces gravitational collapse.
159: For stellar mass of less than $\sim 260 M_\odot$, rapid nuclear burning releases large
160: energy sufficient to entirely disrupt the star as pair-instability supernova.
161: More massive stars, which also encounter pair-instability, are so tightly bound that the
162: fusion of oxygen is unable to reverse infall.
163: Such stars are thought to collapse to BHs \citep{bond84,fryer01},
164: which we pay attention to in this letter.
165: So far, there have been only a few hydrodynamic simulations studying
166: the gravitational collapse of the BH forming Pop III stars
167: \citep{fryer01, naka06, suwa07a,liu07}.
168:
169: %%%%% explanation of Buonanno
170: Due to the lack of Pop III star collapse simulations, \citet{buon05}
171: had to calculate the GWB with an assumption that the GW spectrum
172: of a single Pop III star has the same shape as the one from an ordinary
173: core-collapse supernova. They employed the result of \citet{muel04} as the template.
174: In order to determine the normalization of the GW amplitudes,
175: they simply amplified the GW amplitudes of the supernova by a factor
176: of $\sim 1000$, relying on the results by \citet{fryer01}.
177: Needless to say, these assumptions and treatments can be validated by
178: a consistent treatment, namely by hydrodynamic collapse simulations of Pop
179: III star with the analysis of the GW waveforms.
180: As for the mass and formation history of Pop III stars, \citet{buon05}
181: assumed that
182: all stars formed with the same mass of $300 M_\odot$ and at the same redshift as
183: $z \sim 15$.
184: This assumption is improved by \citet{sand06}, who calculated GWB from Pop III stars
185: with the cosmic star formation history in the framework of hierarchical structure
186: formation.
187: However, \citet{sand06} also employed the same spectrum of a single Pop III star
188: as \citet{buon05}.
189:
190:
191: %%%%% explanation of letter
192: The purpose of this letter is to give an estimate of the GWB spectrum from
193: Pop III stars by calculating
194: the GW waveforms based on the results of hydrodynamical
195: core-collapse simulations of Pop III stars.
196: This letter is organized as follows:
197: In the next section the numerical model is briefly described.
198: In \S3, we calculate the gravitational wave signal and its spectrum of a single
199: Pop III star collapse.
200: In \S4, we present the numerical result of the gravitational wave background from
201: Pop III stars.
202: \S 5 is devoted to summary and discussion.
203:
204:
205: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
206: \section{Method}
207: %%%%% numerics
208: The numerical methods are basically the same as
209: the ones in our previous paper \citep{suwa07a}.
210: With the ZEUS-2D code \citep{ston92} as a base for the hydro
211: solver, we employ a realistic equation of state based on
212: relativistic mean field theory \citep{shen98} (see \citealt{kota03} for
213: the implementation) and treat the neutrino
214: cooling by a multiflavour leakage scheme, in which 6 species of neutrinos
215: with pair, photo, and plasma processes by \cite{itoh89} in addition
216: to the standard charged current neutrino cooling reactions
217: are included.
218: Spherical coordinates $(r,\theta)$ with logarithmic zoning in
219: the radial direction and regular zoning in $\theta$ are used.
220: One quadrant of the meridian section is covered with 300 ($r$)$\times$ 30
221: ($\theta$) mesh points.
222: In our 2D calculations, axial symmetry and reflection symmetry across the
223: equatorial plane are assumed.
224: We also calculated some models with 60 angular mesh points,
225: but found no significant differences.
226: Therefore, we will report in the following the results obtained from the models
227: with 30 angular mesh points.
228:
229: %%%%% initial condition
230: The initial condition is provided in the same manner of
231: \citet{suwa07a}. We produced hydrostatic cores of 300, 500, 700, and 900 $M_\odot$,
232: with the assumption of isentropic, whose values of entropy are taken
233: from \citet{bond84}, and with the constant electron fraction of $Y_\mathrm{e}=0.5$.
234: The supposed rotation law is cylindrical rotation, with the strength
235: of rotational energy taken to be 0.5\% of the gravitational energy in all models.
236:
237: %%%%% gravitational wave
238: In this study, we estimate the gravitational wave emission from aspherical
239: mass motions via the Newtonian quadrupole formula of \citet{moen91}.
240: In addition, we compute the gravitational wave
241: strain from anisotropic neutrino emission employing the
242: formalism introduced by \citet{epst78}
243: and developed by \citet{muel97} and \citet{kota07}.
244: The GW emission from neutrinos is given as
245: \begin{equation}
246: \label{amplitude}
247: D h^{TT}(t)=\frac{2G}{c^4}\int^t_{-\infty}\alpha(t')L_\nu(t')dt',
248: \end{equation}
249: where $D$ is the distance to the source, $h^{TT}$ is the transverse-traceless
250: and dimensionless metric strain, $G$ is the gravitational constant, $c$ is the
251: speed of light, $\alpha(t)$ is the time-dependent
252: neutrino-anisotropy parameter, and $L_\nu(t)$ is the total neutrino luminosity.
253: For the estimation of $\alpha$, neutrinos are assumed to be emitted radially in
254: each angular bin.
255:
256: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
257: \section{Gravitational Wave of a single Pop III star collapse}
258: In this section, we discuss the GW emission from a single 300$M_\odot$
259: Pop III star collapse.
260: %
261: %%%%%%% Figure 1
262: Figure \ref{time_ev} depicts the strain versus time after bounce for a $300M_\odot$ star.
263: The matter contribution dominates $h^{TT}$ during first 10 ms after bounce.
264: Afterward, the neutrino part begins to contribute because
265: the thermal shock occurs and the neutrino luminosity increases
266: in the hot region behind the shock wave.
267: At about 70 msec after bounce, the neutrino contribution
268: converges to a constant value and the matter contribution goes to zero.
269: This represents the epoch of the BH formation.
270: After BH formation, we do not calculate the GW emission from matter but dump
271: with the timescale of
272: light crossing time $\sim O(R_\mathrm{BH}/c)$, where $R_\mathrm{BH}$ is the radius of
273: the BH.
274: This procedure does not affect the discussion of the following section
275: because the matter contribution of total GW is only in the high frequency region,
276: which is not the main point of this letter.
277: The total energy emitted in gravitational waves is $\sim
278: 2\times10^{50}$ erg, which is smaller than the result of \citet{fryer01}
279: by a factor of 10.
280: The discrepancy seems to come from the difference of initial angular momentum distribution.
281:
282:
283: \begin{figure}[tbp]
284: \plotone{f1.eps}
285: \caption{The gravitational wave strain, $h^{TT}$, times the distance to the Pop III star, $D$,
286: versus time after bounce (in seconds).
287: Shown are the neutrino (blue dotted) and matter motion (green dashed) components along
288: with their sum (red solid).
289: }
290: \label{time_ev}
291: \end{figure}
292:
293: %%%%%%% Figure 2
294: % spectrum
295: Now we move on to discuss the features of the waveforms by the spectral analysis.
296: From Figure \ref{fourier}, one can see the dominance of the neutrino-oriented gravitational
297: waves at frequencies below $\sim$ 10 Hz.
298: This is because the waveform from neutrinos shows the slower time-variability in comparison with the one from matter motion
299: (see Figure \ref{time_ev}).
300: On the other hand, the contribution of matter motion dominates the
301: spectrum in the higher frequency region.
302: The peak amplitudes from matter motion and the
303: frequencies of 10s of Hz are roughly at the same characteristic
304: amplitude and frequency produced by the collapse of the star to form a BH, which are
305: evaluated in \citet{thor87}, with the remnant mass of $\sim 100M_\odot$.
306:
307: %%% hydro
308: For comparison, in Figure \ref{fourier} we also plot the spectrum assumed in previous works
309: (dot-dashed; \citealt{buon05,sand06}).
310: The result of our calculation is very different from their spectrum.
311: This is due to consideration of hydrodynamical features.
312: Pop III stars have higher temperature prior to collapse, which leads
313: core-bounce by the (gradient of the) thermal pressure and not by the nuclear forces
314: as in ordinary supernovae \citep{fryer01,suwa07a}.
315: Such thermal bounce makes the central density lower at the time of bounce
316: ($O(10^{12})$g~cm$^{-3}$) so that
317: the dynamical timescale
318: ($\propto \rho^{-1/2}$)
319: becomes longer, leading to the smaller time-variability in the
320: waveforms and the smaller typical frequencies (a few 10 Hz) where
321: the matter contribution peaks, which are in the 1 kHz regime for ordinary supernovae.
322:
323: %%% zero-frequency limit
324: It should be noted that current numerical simulations
325: only encompass a few seconds at most and
326: do not cover the strain spectrum below a fraction of a Hertz.
327: For such a low frequency region, we apply the zero-frequency
328: limit \citep{smar77,epst78} to extract the GW waveforms as done in \cite{buon05}.
329:
330:
331: \begin{figure}[tbp]
332: \plotone{f2.eps}
333: \caption{
334: Spectral distributions of the gravitational waves from anisotropic neutrino emissions
335: (blue dotted line), matter motions (green dashed line), and total (red solid line).
336: Due to phase cancellations between the matter and neutrino components, the amplitude of
337: the combined spectrum is smaller than the dominant components in certain frequency regions.
338: The dominance of the neutrino-oriented gravitational wave component at frequencies below
339: $\sim 10$ Hz is clearly seen.
340: The dot-dashed line represents the spectrum employed in previous works \citep{buon05,sand06}.
341: }
342: \label{fourier}
343: \end{figure}
344:
345:
346:
347: %%%%% Table 1
348: Finally, we discuss the GW emission from stars with different mass models.
349: It is noted that the qualitative features are common to all models.
350: In Table \ref{tab:gw}, we show the characteristic values of GW spectra.
351: It can be seen that the peak amplitude, $\tilde h_\mathrm{max}$, increases
352: with the mass of the star, while
353: the peak frequency, $f_\mathrm{max}$, remains roughly the same.
354: The frequency where the neutrino and matter contributions become equal,$f_\mathrm{eq}$,
355: decreases with increasing mass.
356: The GW amplitudes for the zero frequency limit,
357: $Df|\tilde h|(f\rightarrow0)$,
358: increases with the mass since the
359: luminosity of neutrinos becomes larger.
360:
361:
362: \begin{table}[htbp]
363: \begin{center}
364: \caption{Characteristic Quantities of Gravitational Wave}
365: \label{tab:gw}
366: \begin{tabular}{ccccc}
367: \hline
368: \hline
369: Mass~~ & $D\tilde h_\mathrm{max}$~~ & $f_\mathrm{max}$~~ &
370: $f_\mathrm{eq}$~~ & $Df|\tilde h|(f\rightarrow0)$ \\
371: ($M_\odot$) & (km) & (Hz) & (Hz) & (km)\\
372: \tableline
373: 300 & 0.66 & 21 & 7.8 & 0.30 \\
374: 500 & 0.88 & 19 & 6.0 & 0.46 \\
375: 700 & 0.86 & 23 & 4.4 & 0.38 \\
376: 900 & 0.99 & 18 & 4.0 & 0.54 \\
377: \tableline
378: \end{tabular}
379: \end{center}
380: \end{table}
381:
382:
383: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
384: \section{Gravitational Wave Background from Pop III Stars}
385:
386: We are now in a position to discuss the contribution of GWs from Pop III
387: stars to the background radiation.
388: According to \cite{phin01}, the sum of the energy densities radiated by a large
389: number of independent Pop III stars at each redshift is given by the density
390: parameter $\Omega_\mathrm{GW}(f)\equiv\rho_c^{-1}(d\rho_\mathrm{GW}/d\log f)$ as
391: \begin{equation}
392: \label{eq:omega}
393: \Omega_\mathrm{GW}(f)=\frac{16\pi^2c}{15G\rho_c}\int\frac{dz}{1+z}
394: \left|\frac{dt}{dz}\right|\psi(z)\int dm\ \phi(m)D^2f'^3|\tilde h(f')|^2,
395: \end{equation}
396: where $\rho_c$ is the critical density ($3H_0^2/(8\pi G)$),
397: $\psi(z)$ is the star formation rate (SFR),
398: $\phi(m)$ is the initial mass function (IMF) of Pop III stars,
399: and $f'$ is the red shifted frequency, $(1+z)f$.
400: We employ model 2b of \citet{sand06} for the SFR,
401: which is appropriate for very massive stars, from $270M_\odot$ to $500M_\odot$.
402: As for the IMF, we employ the same parameterization as \citet{sand06},
403: $\phi(m)\propto m^{-2.3}$,
404: which is normalized by $\int dm\phi(m)=1$.
405: The cosmological model enters with $|dt/dz|=[(1+z)H(z)]^{-1}$ and, for a flat geometry,
406: %\begin{equation}
407: $H(z)=H_0[\Omega_\Lambda+\Omega_m(1+z)^3]^{1/2}$.
408: %\end{equation}
409: We use the parameters $\Omega_\Lambda=0.73, \Omega_m=0.27$, and $H_0=100\ h_0
410: $km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$ with $h_0=0.71$ \citep{sper07}.
411:
412: % Figure 3
413: In Figure \ref{omega}, the calculated $\Omega_\mathrm{GW}$ is plotted with the sensitivity
414: curves of future detectors.
415: The upper edge of the red shaded region is obtained by our calculation
416: with model 2b of \citet{sand06}.
417: This corresponds to almost the
418: upper limit of the SFR because the stars with the mass range considered
419: in this model entirely collapse to BHs and do not contribute to the
420: chemical evolution of their environment.
421: In this way, a high SFR is obtained without metal overproduction.
422: Meanwhile, the lower limit is the same shifted downwards
423: by a factor 7000, which corresponds to the baryon fraction of Pop III stars of $10^{-5}$,
424: suggested by Pop III star formation theory (Omukai, private communication).
425: It can be seen that the contributions from neutrinos,
426: which dominates in low frequency region ($\sim 1$ Hz),
427: are within the detection limit of the planned
428: detectors DECIGO and BBO.
429: In contrast, detection by LIGO III, which is a ground based detector,
430: may prove difficult
431: because the amplitude in the high frequency region is smaller than the
432: current estimated detection limit.
433: Even if the SFR of Pop III stars is as small as in the case of a
434: baryon fraction of $\sim 10^{-5}$,
435: the GWB from Pop III stars might be within the detection limit of ultimate-DECIGO.
436: The GWB spectrum predicted in this letter is larger than previous works
437: by a factor of 40
438: in the low frequency region
439: (see Figure 8 of \citealt{sand06},
440: which represents larger amplitude than \citealt{buon05}).
441: This is due to the difference of a GW spectrum of a single Pop III star collapse
442: as already mentioned in \S3.
443: Depending on the baryon fraction of Pop III stars,
444: the GWB from Pop III stars might give a strong contribution, masking the
445: GWB generated in the inflationary epoch
446: (the horizontal dashed line).
447: We furthermore point out that
448: the amplitude of the GWB is highly dependent on the SFR but less sensitive
449: to the index of IMF because the GW emission of different mass Pop III stars is similar
450: in the mass range focused on in this letter.
451:
452:
453: \begin{figure}[t]
454: \plotone{f3.eps}
455: \caption{
456: The energy density parameter of gravitational wave background (GWB).
457: The upper line of the shaded region is the result of our calculation.
458: The lower line is for the renormalized SFR of $f_{III}\sim10^{-5}$.
459: In low frequency region ($f \simlt $0.1Hz), $\Omega_\mathrm{GW}\propto f$ because
460: $f |\tilde h|$ is constant (see Figure 2) and
461: the integrand of Eq. (2) is $f^3 |\tilde h|^2 \propto f$ in this region.
462: The horizontal dashed line shows the GWB produced during slow-roll inflation assuming
463: $T/S=0.3$ for the ratio of the tensorial and scalar contributions to the cosmic
464: microwave background radiation anisotropy and no running of the tensorial
465: power-law index, which is evaluated from Eq. (6) of
466: \citet{turn97}.
467: The sensitivity curves of space- and (correlated) ground-based detectors
468: are taken from \citet{kudo06} and \citet{buon03}.
469: }
470: \label{omega}
471: \end{figure}
472:
473:
474: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
475: \section{Summary and Discussion}
476: % Sum
477: In this letter, we have presented the GWB spectrum from Pop III stars
478: based on the hydrodynamic core-collapse simulations of Pop III stars
479: \citep{suwa07a}. Extracting the GWs contributed from mass motions
480: and anisotropic neutrino radiation,
481: we have found that the GW emission from neutrinos is dominant over the ones from
482: matter at low frequencies. Using the spectrum of single Pop III
483: stars, we have calculated the GWB
484: spectrum by summing up the contribution from individual stars.
485: We have shown that the amplitudes from Pop III stars
486: might be large enough to be detected by interferometers such as DECIGO
487: and BBO.
488:
489: % WD binary and LISA
490: The predicted GWB is in the sensitivity range of future planned
491: detectors so that the Pop III stars might limit the sensitivity
492: of such detectors.
493: This is analogous to the discussion about the the Galactic population of
494: close white dwarf binaries, which could produce a confusion-limited
495: GW signal at the lower end of the sensitivity band of LISA \citep{hils90}.
496:
497: % GR
498: It is noted that the Newtonian simulation in the paper
499: \citep{suwa07a} is nothing
500: but an idealized study to describe the dynamics with BH
501: formation. It is by no
502: means definitive. To explore these phenomena in more detail will
503: require fully general relativistic simulations and much more better
504: neutrino transfer.
505: However, in comparison with the forgoing GWB studies
506: simply using the GW waveform of ordinary core-collapse supernovae
507: as a template,
508: we have found significant differences in the properties of the
509: waveforms, which made it possible to realize the potential importance
510: of Pop III stars as a contribution to the GWB.
511: As mentioned, our results show
512: enhancements in the GWB amplitudes from
513: 0.1 to 1 Hz compared to earlier works,
514: where the currently planned detectors are most sensitive.
515:
516: Finally, we shall briefly discuss the uncertainties of our models.
517: % Rotation
518: Since little is known about the angular momentum distributions of Pop III stars,
519: we took the initial rotation rate of extremely rapidly rotating cores of
520: massive stars \citet{hege00}
521: as a reference suggested by the study that Pop III stars could rotate
522: rapidly due to the
523: insufficient mass-loss in the main sequence stage
524: \citep{hege03a}.
525: Obviously more systematic
526: studies changing the initial rotation rates and profiles are required.
527: % IMF
528: Next, the IMF of Pop III stars is also uncertain.
529: It is true that the mass range employed here ($300 - 1000 M_\odot $) is preferred by
530: recent studies of Pop III star formation, but that the possible
531: modification of the IMF leads to large changes of the predicated GWB spectrum
532: \citep[see, e.g,][]{schn00,arau02}.
533: This means that the GWB could be a powerful tool to investigate the
534: IMF.
535: % SFR
536: Although the baryon fraction of Pop III stars taken here is indeed not too
537: large for the explanation of the infrared
538: background excess by the UV photons from Pop III stars
539: \citep{sant02,dwek05}, there still remains large uncertainty.
540: The last uncertainty is the redshift where the SFR
541: becomes maximum. It should be mentioned that the frequencies where
542: the GWB from Pop III stars peaks are sharply dependent on this
543: redshift. Better correlation analysis between multiple
544: spaced-based interferometers should be very helpful, because this can improve
545: the sensitivity of GWB detection \citep{kudo06}.
546: All these results suggest that
547: detections of GW background from Pop III stars can be an important
548: tool to supply information about the
549: formation history of Pop III stars.
550:
551:
552: \acknowledgments
553: Y.S. would like to thank T. Hiramatsu, S. Kinoshita,
554: K. Omukai, E. Reese, S. Saito, M. Shibata and A. Taruya
555: for helpful discussion.
556: Numerical computations were in part carried on VPP5000
557: and general common use computer system at the center for
558: Computational Astrophysics, CfCA, the National
559: Astronomical Observatory of Japan.
560: This study was supported in part by the Japan Society for
561: Promotion of Science (JSPS) Research Fellowships,
562: Grants-in-Aid for the Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education,
563: Science and Culture of Japan (No.S19104006).
564:
565:
566:
567: \begin{thebibliography}{47}
568: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi
569:
570: \bibitem[{Abel {et~al.}(2002)Abel, Bryan, \& Norman}]{abel02}
571: Abel, T., Bryan, G.~L., \& Norman, M.~L. 2002, Science, 295, 93
572:
573: \bibitem[{Bond {et~al.}(1984)Bond, Arnett, \& Carr}]{bond84}
574: Bond, J.~R., Arnett, W.~D., \& Carr, B.~J. 1984, \apj, 280, 825
575:
576: \bibitem[{Bromm {et~al.}(2002)Bromm, Coppi, \& Larson}]{brom02b}
577: Bromm, V., Coppi, P.~S., \& Larson, R.~B. 2002, \apj, 564, 23
578:
579: \bibitem[{{Bromm} \& {Larson}(2004)}]{brom04}
580: {Bromm}, V. \& {Larson}, R.~B. 2004, \araa, 42, 79
581:
582: \bibitem[{{Buonanno}(2003)}]{buon03}
583: {Buonanno}, A. 2003, ArXiv:gr-qc/0303085
584:
585: \bibitem[{{Buonanno} {et~al.}(2005){Buonanno}, {Sigl}, {Raffelt}, {Janka}, \&
586: {M{\"u}ller}}]{buon05}
587: {Buonanno}, A., {Sigl}, G., {Raffelt}, G.~G., {Janka}, H.-T., \& {M{\"u}ller},
588: E. 2005, \prd, 72, 084001
589:
590: \bibitem[{{de Araujo} {et~al.}(2002){de Araujo}, {Miranda}, \&
591: {Aguiar}}]{arau02}
592: {de Araujo}, J.~C.~N., {Miranda}, O.~D., \& {Aguiar}, O.~D. 2002, \mnras, 330,
593: 651
594:
595: \bibitem[{{de Araujo} {et~al.}(2004){de Araujo}, {Miranda}, \&
596: {Aguiar}}]{arau04}
597: ---. 2004, \mnras, 348, 1373
598:
599: \bibitem[{{Dwek} {et~al.}(2005){Dwek}, {Arendt}, \& {Krennrich}}]{dwek05}
600: {Dwek}, E., {Arendt}, R.~G., \& {Krennrich}, F. 2005, \apj, 635, 784
601:
602: \bibitem[{{Epstein}(1978)}]{epst78}
603: {Epstein}, R. 1978, \apj, 223, 1037
604:
605: \bibitem[{{Farmer} \& {Phinney}(2003)}]{farm03}
606: {Farmer}, A.~J. \& {Phinney}, E.~S. 2003, \mnras, 346, 1197
607:
608: \bibitem[{{Ferrari} {et~al.}(1999){Ferrari}, {Matarrese}, \&
609: {Schneider}}]{ferr99b}
610: {Ferrari}, V., {Matarrese}, S., \& {Schneider}, R. 1999, \mnras, 303, 258
611:
612: \bibitem[{Fryer {et~al.}(2001)Fryer, Woosley, \& Heger}]{fryer01}
613: Fryer, C.~L., Woosley, S.~E., \& Heger, A. 2001, \apj, 550, 372
614:
615: \bibitem[{{Glover}(2005)}]{glov05}
616: {Glover}, S. 2005, Space Science Reviews, 117, 445
617:
618: \bibitem[{{Heger} {et~al.}(2003){Heger}, {Fryer}, {Woosley}, {Langer}, \&
619: {Hartmann}}]{hege03a}
620: {Heger}, A., {Fryer}, C.~L., {Woosley}, S.~E., {Langer}, N., \& {Hartmann},
621: D.~H. 2003, \apj, 591, 288
622:
623: \bibitem[{{Heger} {et~al.}(2000){Heger}, {Langer}, \& {Woosley}}]{hege00}
624: {Heger}, A., {Langer}, N., \& {Woosley}, S.~E. 2000, \apj, 528, 368
625:
626: \bibitem[{{Hils} {et~al.}(1990){Hils}, {Bender}, \& {Webbink}}]{hils90}
627: {Hils}, D., {Bender}, P.~L., \& {Webbink}, R.~F. 1990, \apj, 360, 75
628:
629: \bibitem[{{Hiramatsu} {et~al.}(2005){Hiramatsu}, {Kotake}, {Kudoh}, \&
630: {Taruya}}]{hira05}
631: {Hiramatsu}, T., {Kotake}, K., {Kudoh}, H., \& {Taruya}, A. 2005, \mnras, 364,
632: 1063
633:
634: \bibitem[{{Itoh} {et~al.}(1989){Itoh}, {Adachi}, {Nakagawa}, {Kohyama}, \&
635: {Munakata}}]{itoh89}
636: {Itoh}, N., {Adachi}, T., {Nakagawa}, M., {Kohyama}, Y., \& {Munakata}, H.
637: 1989, \apj, 339, 354
638:
639: \bibitem[{{Kotake} {et~al.}(2007){Kotake}, {Ohnishi}, \& {Yamada}}]{kota07}
640: {Kotake}, K., {Ohnishi}, N., \& {Yamada}, S. 2007, \apj, 655, 406
641:
642: \bibitem[{Kotake {et~al.}(2006)Kotake, Sato, \& Takahashi}]{kotarev}
643: Kotake, K., Sato, K., \& Takahashi, K. 2006, Rep. Prog. Phys., 69, 971
644:
645: \bibitem[{{Kotake} {et~al.}(2003){Kotake}, {Yamada}, \& {Sato}}]{kota03}
646: {Kotake}, K., {Yamada}, S., \& {Sato}, K. 2003, \prd, 68, 044023
647:
648: \bibitem[{{Kudoh} {et~al.}(2006){Kudoh}, {Taruya}, {Hiramatsu}, \&
649: {Himemoto}}]{kudo06}
650: {Kudoh}, H., {Taruya}, A., {Hiramatsu}, T., \& {Himemoto}, Y. 2006, \prd, 73,
651: 064006
652:
653: \bibitem[Liu et al.(2007)]{liu07} Liu, Y.~T., Shapiro, S.~L.,
654: \& Stephens, B.~C.\ 2007, submitted to \prd~(arXiv:0706.2360 [astro-ph])
655:
656: \bibitem[{{Maggiore}(2000)}]{magg00}
657: {Maggiore}, M. 2000, \physrep, 331, 283
658:
659: \bibitem[{{M{\"o}nchmeyer} {et~al.}(1991){M{\"o}nchmeyer}, {Schaefer},
660: {M{\"u}ller}, \& {Kates}}]{moen91}
661: {M{\"o}nchmeyer}, R., {Schaefer}, G., {M{\"u}ller}, E., \& {Kates}, R.~E. 1991,
662: \aap, 246, 417
663:
664: \bibitem[{{M{\"u}ller} \& {Janka}(1997)}]{muel97}
665: {M{\"u}ller}, E. \& {Janka}, H.-T. 1997, \aap, 317, 140
666:
667: \bibitem[{{M{\"u}ller} {et~al.}(2004){M{\"u}ller}, {Rampp}, {Buras}, {Janka},
668: \& {Shoemaker}}]{muel04}
669: {M{\"u}ller}, E., {Rampp}, M., {Buras}, R., {Janka}, H.-T., \& {Shoemaker},
670: D.~H. 2004, \apj, 603, 221
671:
672: \bibitem[{Nakamura \& Umemura(2001)}]{naka01}
673: Nakamura, F. \& Umemura, M. 2001, \apj, 548, 19
674:
675: \bibitem[{{Nakazato} {et~al.}(2006){Nakazato}, {Sumiyoshi}, \&
676: {Yamada}}]{naka06}
677: {Nakazato}, K., {Sumiyoshi}, K., \& {Yamada}, S. 2006, \apj, 645, 519
678:
679: \bibitem[{{New}(2003)}]{new03}
680: {New}, K.~C.~B. 2003, Living Reviews in Relativity, 6, 2
681:
682: \bibitem[{{Omukai} \& {Palla}(2003)}]{omuk03}
683: {Omukai}, K. \& {Palla}, F. 2003, \apj, 589, 677
684:
685: \bibitem[{Phinney(2001)}]{phin01}
686: Phinney, E.~S. 2001, astro-ph/0108028
687:
688: \bibitem[{Sandick {et~al.}(2006)Sandick, Olive, Daigne, \& Vangioni}]{sand06}
689: Sandick, P., Olive, K.~A., Daigne, F., \& Vangioni, E. 2006, Phys. Rev., D73,
690: 104024
691:
692: \bibitem[{{Santos} {et~al.}(2002){Santos}, {Bromm}, \& {Kamionkowski}}]{sant02}
693: {Santos}, M.~R., {Bromm}, V., \& {Kamionkowski}, M. 2002, \mnras, 336, 1082
694:
695: \bibitem[{{Schneider} {et~al.}(2000){Schneider}, {Ferrara}, {Ciardi},
696: {Ferrari}, \& {Matarrese}}]{schn00}
697: {Schneider}, R., {Ferrara}, A., {Ciardi}, B., {Ferrari}, V., \& {Matarrese}, S.
698: 2000, \mnras, 317, 385
699:
700: \bibitem[{Seto {et~al.}(2001)Seto, Kawamura, \& Nakamura}]{seto01}
701: Seto, N., Kawamura, S., \& Nakamura, T. 2001, Phys. Rev. Lett., 87, 221103
702:
703: \bibitem[{Shen {et~al.}(1998)Shen, Toki, Oyamatsu, \& Sumiyoshi}]{shen98}
704: Shen, H., Toki, H., Oyamatsu, K., \& Sumiyoshi, K. 1998, Nucl. Phys., A637, 435
705:
706: \bibitem[{{Sigl}(2006)}]{sigl06}
707: {Sigl}, G. 2006, Journal of Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics, 4, 2
708:
709: \bibitem[{{Smarr}(1977)}]{smar77}
710: {Smarr}, L. 1977, \prd, 15, 2069
711:
712: \bibitem[Spergel et al.(2007)]{sper07} Spergel, D.~N., et al.\
713: 2007, \apjs, 170, 377
714:
715: \bibitem[{{Stone} \& {Norman}(1992)}]{ston92}
716: {Stone}, J.~M. \& {Norman}, M.~L. 1992, \apjs, 80, 753
717:
718: \bibitem[{{Suwa} {et~al.}(2007){Suwa}, {Takiwaki}, {Kotake}, \&
719: {Sato}}]{suwa07a}
720: {Suwa}, Y., {Takiwaki}, T., {Kotake}, K., \& {Sato}, K. 2007, \pasj ~accepted
721: (arXiv:0704.1945 [astro-ph])
722:
723: \bibitem[{{Thorne}(1987)}]{thor87}
724: {Thorne}, K.~S. 1987, in Hawking S.W., Israel W., eds, 300 Years of
725: Gravitation. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, p331
726:
727: \bibitem[{{Turner}(1997)}]{turn97}
728: {Turner}, M.~S. 1997, \prd, 55, 435
729:
730: \bibitem[{Ungarelli {et~al.}(2005)Ungarelli, Corasaniti, Mercer, \&
731: Vecchio}]{unga05}
732: Ungarelli, C., Corasaniti, P., Mercer, R., \& Vecchio, A. 2005, Class. Quant.
733: Grav., 22, S955
734:
735: \end{thebibliography}
736:
737:
738: \end{document}
739: