1:  %Moire Prescott SINGS Paper

2: 

3: %% \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

4: %% The command above calls the preprint style

5: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.

6: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:

7: \documentclass{emulateapj}

8: % \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

9: \usepackage{subfigure}

10: \def\ang{$\hbox{\AA$\!$}$}

11: \newcounter{countfig}

12: \newcounter{counttab}

13: \addtocounter{countfig}{1}

14: \addtocounter{counttab}{1}

15: 

16: \newcommand{\fignum}{\thecountfig \addtocounter{countfig}{1} }

17: \newcommand{\tabnum}{\thecounttab \addtocounter{counttab}{1} }

18: 

19: \shorttitle{Highly-Obscured Star-Forming Regions in SINGS}

20: \shortauthors{Prescott et al.}

21: 

22: 

23: \begin{document}

24: 

25: \title{The Incidence of Highly-Obscured Star-Forming Regions in SINGS Galaxies}

26: 

27: 

28: \author{Moire K. M. Prescott\altaffilmark{1}, Robert C. Kennicutt, Jr.\altaffilmark{1,2,3}, 

29: George J. Bendo\altaffilmark{4,1}, Brent A. Buckalew\altaffilmark{5}, Daniela Calzetti\altaffilmark{3,6,7}, 

30: Charles W. Engelbracht\altaffilmark{1,3}, Karl D. Gordon\altaffilmark{1,3}, David J. Hollenbach\altaffilmark{8}, 

31: Janice C. Lee\altaffilmark{9,1,13}, John Moustakas\altaffilmark{10}, Daniel A. Dale\altaffilmark{3,11}, George Helou\altaffilmark{5}, 

32: Thomas H. Jarrett\altaffilmark{5}, Eric J. Murphy\altaffilmark{12}, John-David T. Smith\altaffilmark{1,3}, Sanae Akiyama\altaffilmark{1}, 

33: Megan L. Sosey\altaffilmark{6}}

34: \altaffiltext{1}{Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, 933 North Cherry Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85721; 

35: mprescott@as.arizona.edu, sakiyama@as.arizona.edu, cengelbracht@as.arizona.edu, kgordon@as.arizona.edu, jdsmith@as.arizona.edu}

36: \altaffiltext{2}{Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA, 

37: United Kingdom; robk@ast.cam.ac.uk}

38: \altaffiltext{3}{Visiting Astronomer, Kitt Peak National Observatory, National Optical Astronomy Observatories, 

39: which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc. (AURA) undercooperative agreement 

40: with the National Science Foundation.}

41: \altaffiltext{4}{Astrophysics Group, Imperial College, Blackett Laboratory, Prince Consort Road, London SW7 2AX United Kingdom; g.bendo@imperial.ac.uk}

42: \altaffiltext{5}{Caltech, IPAC, MS 220-6, 1200 E. California Boulevard, Pasadena, CA 91125;  brentb@ipac.caltech.edu, gxh@ipac.caltech.edu, jarrett@ipac.caltech.edu}

43: \altaffiltext{6}{Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218; calzetti@stsci.edu, sosey@stsci.edu}

44: \altaffiltext{7}{University of Massachussetts, Department of Astronomy, LGRT-B 619E, 710 North Pleasant Street, Amherst, MA 01003}

45: \altaffiltext{8}{NASA/Ames Research Center, MS 245-6, Moffett Field, CA 94035; hollenba@ism.arc.nasa.gov}

46: \altaffiltext{9}{National Optical Astronomy Observatory, 950 North Cherry Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85719; jlee@noao.edu}

47: \altaffiltext{10}{Department of Physics, New York University, 4 Washington Place, New York, NY 10003; john.moustakas@nyu.edu}

48: \altaffiltext{11}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071; ddale@uwyo.edu}

49: \altaffiltext{12}{Department of Astronomy, Yale University, P.O. Box 208101, New Haven, CT 06520; murphy@astro.yale.edu}

50: \altaffiltext{13}{Hubble Fellow.}

51: 

52: \begin{abstract}

53: Using the new capabilities of the Spitzer Space Telescope and extensive multiwavelength data from the 

54: Spitzer Infrared Nearby Galaxies Survey (SINGS), it is now possible to study the infrared properties of star formation 

55: in nearby galaxies down to scales equivalent to large H~\textsc{ii} regions.  We are therefore able to determine 

56: what fraction of large, {\it infrared-selected} star-forming regions in normal galaxies are highly obscured and address 

57: how much of the star formation we miss by relying solely on the optical portion of the spectrum.  

58: Employing a new empirical method for deriving attenuations of infrared-selected star-forming regions 

59: we investigate the statistics of obscured star formation on 500~pc scales in a sample of 38 

60: nearby galaxies.  We find that the median attenuation is 1.4 magnitudes in H$\alpha$ and that 

61: there is no evidence for a substantial sub-population of uniformly highly-obscured 

62: star-forming regions.  The regions in the highly-obscured tail of the attenuation distribution (A$_{H\alpha} \gtrsim$ 3) 

63: make up only $\sim$4\% of the sample of nearly 1800 regions, 

64: though very embedded infrared sources on the much smaller scales and lower luminosities of 

65: compact and ultracompact H~\textsc{ii} regions are almost certainly present 

66: in greater numbers.  The highly-obscured cases in our sample are generally the bright, central regions of 

67: galaxies with high overall attenuation but are not otherwise remarkable.  We also find that a majority of 

68: the galaxies show decreasing radial trends in H$\alpha$ attenuation.  The small fraction of highly-obscured 

69: regions seen in this sample of normal, star-forming galaxies suggests that on 500~pc scales the 

70: timescale for significant dispersal or break up of nearby, optically-thick dust clouds is short 

71: relative to the lifetime of a typical star-forming region.  

72: 

73: \end{abstract}

74: 

75: \keywords{galaxies: photometry -- galaxies: ISM --  stars: formation -- H~\textsc{ii} regions}

76: 

77: 

78: \section{INTRODUCTION}

79: 

80: Stars form enshrouded in their parent molecular clouds, but in time clusters of stars emerge from the obscuring dust 

81: and gas as H~\textsc{ii} regions and disperse part of this natal material.  

82: In the simplest case, the emission that we observe from such systems should undergo a transition from being strongly attenuated in 

83: the optical and ultraviolet (UV) to being less attenuated as the stars begin to break free of their birth clouds.  

84: 

85: In reality, the amount of obscuration observed in regions of star formation can vary widely depending on the environment.  

86: In nuclear starburst galaxies, V-band attenuations ($A_{V}$)\footnote{The attenuation at a given wavelength $\lambda$ 

87: is defined as $A_{\lambda} = k(\lambda) \times E(B-V)$ where $k(\lambda)$ is the assumed reddening curve and $E(B-V)$ is the color excess 

88: \citep[e.g.,][]{cal01}.  For comparison purposes, in this paper we assume $A_{H\alpha} = 0.82 \times A_{V}$.} 

89: as high as 10-100 magnitudes are commonplace.  The most well-studied of all, M82, has a central starburst with 

90: A$_{V}\sim$25-30 \citep{rie80, puxl91, matt01}, and 

91: the central starbursts of NGC~253 and NGC~4945 show $V$-band attenuations of 30-100 magnitudes \citep{genz98}.  

92: In a number of well-studied dwarf and irregular galaxies, a few compact 

93: regions dominate the infrared flux of the galaxy but remain invisible in the optical: Henize 2-10 \citep{kob99, vac02, cab05}, 

94: NGC~5253 \citep{gorj01}, SBS 0335-052 \citep{pla02, dal01, hou04}, and II~Zw~40 \citep{bec02}.  

95: \citet{soi01} found that more than half of the infrared luminosity in infrared-luminous starburst galaxies is generated 

96: in regions 100~pc--1~kpc in size, and

97: in the Antennae merger system, \citet{mir98} found that the most intense star-forming region is located outside both 

98: galaxy nuclei in an $\sim$50~pc area that is entirely unremarkable at optical wavelengths.

99: 

100: In contrast to these highly obscured cases, most normal H~\textsc{ii} regions show attenuations of only a few magnitudes.  

101: In the Large Magellanic Cloud, an $A_{V}\approx 1$ magnitude is typical \citep{cap86, bel02}.  

102: Balmer decrement measurements for optically-selected H~\textsc{ii} regions in samples of spiral galaxies 

103: yield attenuations of A$_{V}\sim$0.3-3.5 magnitudes \citep{zar94}.  The mean $V$-band attenuation derived from radio continuum measurements 

104: for H~\textsc{ii} regions in nearby galaxies is $\sim$1.7-2.0 magnitudes \citep{isr80, van88}.

105: 

106: Probing to smaller scales in the Milky Way, we see examples of a highly-embedded phase of star formation in the form of 

107: compact, ultracompact, or even ``superultracompact'' H~\textsc{ii} regions which range in size from 1~pc down to 0.01~pc \citep{kur00}. 

108: A study of the compact H~\textsc{ii} region S88B measured attenuations of A$_{V} \le 30$ along with 

109: attenuation gradients that suggested gaps in the molecular cloud had allowed optical emission to emerge alongside the thermal 

110: dust emission in the infrared \citep{goe03}.  

111: Results from carbon recombination line studies of ultracompact H~\textsc{ii} regions such as those in the W48 star-forming complex 

112: are consistent with being pressure-confined \citep{ros05a, ros05b}.  

113: 

114: The new capabilities of the Spitzer Space Telescope \citep{wer04} allow us to investigate the infrared properties of star formation within 

115: nearby galaxies down to scales as small as several hundred parsecs, the size of large H~\textsc{ii} regions.  

116: We are thus able to ask the following question: what fraction of {\it infrared-selected} star-forming regions in normal galaxies are highly 

117: obscured?  In other words, how much of the star formation in these galaxies have we been missing on these scales by only 

118: looking in the optical portion of the spectrum? 

119: 

120: Spitzer also gives us a new way to investigate radial attenuation properties of nearby galaxies.  Previous studies have 

121: found evidence for decreasing radial gradients in attenuation in samples of late-type galaxies using far-infrared to ultraviolet 

122: (FIR/UV) profiles and UV colors \citep{boi04, boi05, pop05, hil97} and in highly-inclined galaxies using broadband optical 

123: and near-infrared colors \citep{jan94}.  

124: In a detailed study of NGC~300, \citet{rou05} found a decreasing radial gradient in total 

125: infrared to far-ultraviolet (TIR/FUV).  They suggest that while variations in the metallicity, 

126: and presumably in the dust-to-gas ratio, may play a role in producing this gradient, 

127: other factors such as local variations in geometry or spectral energy distribution 

128: (SED) may be more important.  In contrast, \citet{zar94} found radial gradients in metallicity using optical spectra 

129: but saw only weak evidence for a gradient in attenuation.  With the advent of Spitzer, 

130: these questions can now be investigated on the scale of individual star-forming regions.

131: 

132: Taking advantage of the improved mid- and far-infrared resolution and sensitivity of Spitzer, the Spitzer Infrared Nearby 

133: Galaxies Survey (SINGS) is a multiwavelength imaging and spectroscopic survey of 75 galaxies within 30 Mpc \citep{ken03}.  

134: Designed to span the range of properties seen in nearby, normal galaxies, SINGS includes large spiral galaxies 

135: such as M51 and M81 as well as dwarf galaxies.  In addition to the 

136: Spitzer MIPS, IRAC, and IRS datasets, SINGS boasts a suite of ancillary data from radio continuum, HI, and CO to 

137: ground-based $BVRIJHK$, P$\alpha$, H$\alpha$, UV, and X-ray wavelengths.  

138: This combination of high resolution and multiwavelength coverage opens up the possibility of studying 

139: the attenuation properties of infrared-selected star-forming regions drawn from the local population of nearby galaxies.  

140: 

141: In this work, we investigated the attenuation properties of infrared-selected star-forming regions 

142: drawn from a sample of SINGS galaxies using multiband photometry and an empirical method for deriving attenuations of infrared-selected star-forming regions.

143: The paper is organized as follows.  We describe our galaxy sample in Section 2 and the observation and reduction steps in Section 3.  

144: In Sections 4 and 5 we describe our method of multiband photometry and our treatment of H$\alpha$ attenuation measurements.  

145: In Section 6 we present evidence of a paucity of large highly-obscured regions and of galaxy-wide radial trends in attenuation.  

146: We discuss the implications of these results for the lifetimes of star-forming regions in Section 7, and we conclude in Section 8.

147: 

148: 

149: 

150: \section{THE GALAXY SAMPLE}

151: 

152: The SINGS sample was selected to span the range of properties seen in nearby normal galaxies.  While not numerically representative of 

153: the local volume \citep{ken07b}, the survey was constructed to contain objects with the full range of morphological types, luminosities, and FIR/optical 

154: luminosity ratios \citep{ken03}.  The subset used in this work consists of 38 galaxies and represents nearly all of the 

155: galaxies in SINGS that have discrete infrared star-forming regions.  For reference, Table~1 gives the list of galaxies included in this 

156: work along with pertinent information.  The quoted $B$ magnitudes are total broadband 

157: magnitudes uncorrected for Galactic extinction and inclination and derive from the Third Reference 

158: Catalog of Bright Galaxies \citep[][hereafter RC3]{devauc91}.  

159: The galaxy dimensions were taken from \citet{ken03}; the morphological types were taken from RC3.  

160: The inclinations were calculated using the quoted galaxy dimensions and position angles taken from 

161: the 2MASS Large Galaxy Atlas \citep{jar03}, and the following standard equation \citep{hol58}:  

162: \begin{equation}

163: i = \cos^{-1}\left(\left(\frac{(b/a)^2-q_0^2}{1-q_0^2}\right)^{1/2}\right)

164: \label{eqn:incl}

165: \end{equation}   

166: where $a$ and $b$ are the optical major and minor axis diameters, and where $q_0$, the intrinsic optical axis ratio 

167: for an edge-on system, is set to 0.2 \citep{tul77}.  In the clearly edge-on cases -- NGC~3190 and NGC~4631 -- the inclination was set to 90$^{\circ}$, 

168: and the irregular galaxy NGC~6822 was set to an inclination of 0$^{\circ}$.  

169: While inclinations derived in this manner suffer from systematic errors due to warps and spiral arms, 

170: kinematically-derived inclination measurements exist for only a subset of the galaxies \citep[The HI Nearby Galaxies Survey, THINGS: ][]{wal05}.  

171: We have used the subset of our galaxy sample for which kinematically-derived inclinations exist in order to estimate the error 

172: in applying equation \ref{eqn:incl}.  The quoted error is the standard deviation of three measurements: the inclination derived from 2MASS ellipticities, 

173: an inclination derived by fitting an ellipse to the IRAC 3.6~$\mu$m data, and the kinematically-derived inclination 

174: from THINGS.  We quote the average error (7 degrees) for all other cases in which kinematically-derived inclinations are not available.  

175: The distances were taken from a number of sources with preference given to direct distance measurements from the literature; 

176: where direct measures were not available, we used flow-corrected estimates from \citet{mast07} (H$_{0} = 70$ km/s/Mpc).

177: 

178: 

179: \section{OBSERVATIONS AND REDUCTIONS}

180: 

181: The Spitzer images used in this work consist of the MIPS \citep{rie04} 24~$\mu$m and the IRAC \citep{faz04} 3.6, 4.5, 5.8, and 8.0~$\mu$m datasets obtained as part 

182: of the SINGS project.  The MIPS data reduction is described in \citet{gor05}, the IRAC data reduction in \citet{reg04}.  The 

183: ground-based H$\alpha$ and $R$-band images were obtained at NOAO using the KPNO 2.1-meter and CTIO 1.5-meter telescopes between 2001 and 2003.  

184: A description of the SINGS observing strategy can be found in \citet{ken03}.

185: 

186: Prior to beginning our analysis, the images were aligned, resampled to the same pixel scale, and convolved to match the full-width-half-maximum 

187: (FWHM) of the MIPS 24~$\mu$m point-spread-function (PSF) using SINGS\_TOOL\footnote{SINGS\_TOOL is an IDL program developed by Don Lindler 

188: (2006) for the SINGS Team for the automatic registration, alignment, resampling, and PSF-matching of multiwavelength images.}.  

189: Convolving to the 24~$\mu$m PSF mitigates some of the inconsistency that would result from 

190: comparing higher resolution ground-based optical data with lower resolution 24~$\mu$m imaging where some fraction of the light from a given 

191: point source has spilled into neighboring regions.  The 24~$\mu$m PSF, however, has fairly large diffraction lobes that are not replicated 

192: during our simple Gaussian convolution; for this reason, aperture corrections are applied at all wavelengths as described in Section 4.  

193: 

194: In order to correct the H$\alpha$ images for the stellar continuum contribution, we subtracted off a scaled R-band image.  

195: The resultant images were corrected for [N~\textsc{ii}]$\lambda\lambda$6548,6584\AA\ emission and the transmission curve of the H$\alpha$ filter; 

196: these methods are described in more detail in \citet{ken07b}.  

197: Where available, the applied [N~\textsc{ii}]$/$H$\alpha$ ratios were taken from SINGS radial driftscan spectra, where available \citep{mou06a}.  

198: Otherwise the corrections are approximate values derived from the $B$-band magnitude of the galaxy and the following empirical relation \citep{mou07}: 

199: \begin{equation}

200: \log([N~\textsc{ii}]\lambda6584]/H\alpha)= -5.19+0.468 Log(L_{B}/L_{B,\odot})

201: \label{eqn:niihalpha}

202: \end{equation}

203: \begin{equation}

204: \log([N~\textsc{ii}]\lambda6584]/H\alpha)= -0.187 (M_{B} - 22.254)

205: \label{eqn:niihalpha2}

206: \end{equation}

207: where $M_{B,\odot}=5.47$.  This relation is based on a sample of integrated spectra of galaxies \citep{mou06a, jan00} with the 

208: AGN component removed as described in \citet{mou06b}.  Table~2 summarizes the correction factors used.  

209: 

210: \section{REGION SELECTION AND MULTIBAND PHOTOMETRY}

211: Since most regions are unresolved at the 24~$\mu$m resolution ($\sim$6 arcseconds), 

212: we selected regions in the 24~$\mu$m image using DAOfind, a point-source selection task included in the DAOphot stellar 

213: photometry package \citep{ste87}.  For the initial selection we set a detection threshold of 10$\sigma$, which 

214: corresponds to a typical infrared luminosity limit of $\sim$3$\times10^{39}$ erg~s$^{-1}$); the infrared luminosity limits 

215: for each galaxy are given in Table~1.  For reference, 

216: the lowest corresponding H$\alpha$ luminosity limit is comparable to the luminosity of 

217: a few Orion-type H~\textsc{ii} regions ($\sim3\times10^{37} $erg s$^{-1}$).  

218: The median 24~$\mu$m luminosity of the region sample is $\sim$10$^{40}$, corresponding to a median H$\alpha$ luminosity 

219: of $\sim$2$\times$10$^{38}$ erg s$^{-1}$ or a few tens of Orion-type H~\textsc{ii} regions.  

220: 

221: We measured region fluxes using 500~pc diameter circular apertures ($\sim$ 13\arcsec\ for a galaxy at 8~Mpc).  

222: While this aperture size is larger than a typical H~\textsc{ii} region ($\sim$100~pc), it was chosen as a compromise 

223: in order to accommodate the large 24~$\mu$m PSF and to allow a comparison of regions of the same physical 

224: size between galaxies at different distances.  As an example, in Figure~\ref{fig:m51} we show the 24~$\mu$m image of NGC~5194 with the final 

225: region selection of 500~pc circular regions marked.  In some cases, a 500~pc region was smaller than the FWHM of 

226: the 24~$\mu$m PSF; the aperture corrections discussed below were used to address this issue.

227: 

228: Measuring robust fluxes for this work was complicated by the issue of how 

229: to determine the background value that should be subtracted from the raw region flux measurement.  In addition to the sky 

230: background of the image, each 24~$\mu$m source sits on top of a diffuse component associated with the overall galaxy profile 

231: and internal structures such as spiral arms.  Simple aperture photometry methods dictate using an annulus around each aperture 

232: to get a measure of the local background; however at the 24~$\mu$m resolution many star-forming regions lie within what would 

233: make up the sky annulus of a neighboring region, thereby contaminating the background estimate.  On the other hand, ignoring 

234: the contribution of the diffuse component and subtracting only a global sky background is not entirely satisfactory either as 

235: it systematically overestimates the flux by 1--10\% for regions on spiral arms or near the center of the galaxy.    

236: 

237: For this study, therefore, we employed three separate methods of sky subtraction.  First, we used a global sky subtraction 

238: method by subtracting a simple sky background defined as the $\sigma$-clipped mean value from two off-galaxy portions of the image.  

239: Second, we employed a local background subtraction method where we measured the background within large annuli (spanning 

240: from the measurement aperture to an outer radius equal to 4 times the measurement aperture radius) 

241: centered on each region using a $\sigma$-clipped mode or mean estimation technique.  The large

242: annuli are needed to minimize contamination due to the inclusion of neighboring IR-selected regions.  To 

243: further reduce contamination, we removed pixels assigned to neighboring IR-selected regions prior to calculating the local background value.  

244: The success of this technique depends on the size of the 

245: background annuli used as well as properties of the galaxy such as the inclination, the spacing of the spiral arms, and the 

246: surface density of star-forming regions across the face of the galaxy.  Figure~\ref{fig:m51} shows a small subset of the background annuli used 

247: in the case of NGC~5194.  Finally, we applied a profile background subtraction method which involved dividing the galaxy into 

248: elliptical annuli according to the inclination and position angle and deriving a $\sigma$-clipped mean background value at each 

249: radius.  As in the local background subtraction method, we removed pixels belonging to IR-selected regions prior to calculating the 

250: background value in order to reduce the effects of contamination.  This method is less sensitive to neighbor contamination than 

251: the local background method, but it does assume azimuthal symmetry.  Fortunately, a majority of the targets in our 

252: current study are spiral galaxies that do not deviate far from this assumption.    

253: 

254: As an independent check on our background methods, we compared our flux measurements with those of \citet{cal05}, a detailed 

255: multiwavelength study of NGC~5194.  In that study background subtraction of region flux measurements was done using many rectangular 

256: background areas defined by hand with statistics computed on the portion of the background area appropriate to the region being 

257: measured.  We make the assumption that the level of fine-tuning demonstrated in \citet{cal05} for NGC~5194 provides the closest 

258: approximation of the true local background for each region that one could achieve in treating each galaxy by hand.  In the first 

259: three panels of Figure~\ref{fig:calzetticompare} we show a comparison between the 24~$\mu$m and H$\alpha$ luminosities measured with each of the three 

260: background methods versus those of \citet{cal05} for a matched sample of 13 arsecond ($\sim$517~pc) regions in NGC~5194.  

261: We find that the most luminous regions are measured consistently regardless of the background subtraction method because the 

262: background flux makes up a very small fraction of the raw region measurement.  For faint, low surface brightness regions, however, 

263: the background is a more considerable portion of the measurement and thus the final value is highly dependent on the method applied.  

264: The global sky subtraction systematically underestimates the background because it neglects the diffuse component 

265: of the galaxy.  The local background subtraction using large sky apertures is robust in many cases but tends to fail in crowded areas.  

266: The profile background subtraction tends to overestimate the background in interarm regions and underestimate 

267: the background in the spiral arms.  

268: Taken together, there is no standard method for dealing with the complexity of these nearby galaxies that is not in some 

269: way biased by the assumptions made or by the manner in which it is applied.  In this work, we have taken the average of these 

270: three methods as our best estimate of the flux and quote a standard error of the mean.  In doing so, we reject 

271: individual measurements that are negative (i.e., the background was estimated to be higher than the source) as unphysical and 

272: average the remaining two measurements; this occured in only a small fraction ($\sim$5\%) of the region sample.  

273: The success of the average versus the results of \citet{cal05} is shown in the last panel 

274: of Figure~\ref{fig:calzetticompare}.

275: 

276: We estimated aperture corrections using the available MIPS and IRAC PSFs\footnote{http://ssc.spitzer.caltech.edu/mips/psf.html; 

277: http://ssc.spitzer.caltech.edu/irac/psf.html} as well as Gaussian PSF models derived from measurements of the H$\alpha$ and $R$ 

278: images.  Since the images are all convolved with a large Gaussian kernel in order to match the 24~$\mu$m data, the resulting PSF profiles are 

279: nearly Gaussian, particularly in the ground-based data.  However, the aperture corrections for the ground-based and IRAC images 

280: are higher than they would be for unconvolved data due to the fact that our convolution does not precisely replicate the 24~$\mu$m diffraction 

281: lobes.  The aperture corrections were independently derived for each galaxy depending on the aperture sizes used; Table~3 

282: summarizes these corrections.  

283: 

284: Contaminant sources that show up in the 24~$\mu$m images arise from either the Rayleigh-Jeans emission of foreground stars or the 

285: redshifted emission of background galaxies.  We flagged objects that are located at a distance greater than $R_{25}$ from the 

286: center of the galaxy or that are included in the USNO catalog \citep{mon98} or 2MASS point source catalog \citep{skru06}.  

287: We also removed the 24~$\mu$m detections corresponding to the galaxy nucleus to avoid contamination of our region sample by embedded AGN.  

288: To verify the contaminant selection and ensure that the 2MASS catalog did not accidentally identify objects within the galaxy, 

289: we then did a visual inspection of the images to confirm or reject the flagged objects as contaminants 

290: based on morphology in the unconvolved IRAC and ground-based images.  

291: 

292: Depending on the distance of the galaxy, and therefore the luminosity sensitivity limit, the output of DAOFIND may include many 

293: regions that, when measured with 500~pc apertures, are significantly overlapping.  The net effect is that the same patch of a 

294: galaxy could be measured multiple times, and while this double-counting would not affect our results qualitatively, it would artificially 

295: boost the number of 500~pc regions measured in the nearest galaxies.  To limit this problem, we culled 

296: the region sample, weighting by a region's 24~$\mu$m flux in order to remove cases that overlapped spatially with a nearby, brighter 

297: region by more than 20\%.   

298: 

299: 

300: \section{H$\alpha$ ATTENUATIONS}

301: Most previous measurements of dust attenuations for H~\textsc{ii} regions in

302: normal galaxies have been based on Balmer decrements (e.g.,

303: H$\alpha$/H$\beta$ ratios) derived from optical spectra \citep[e.g.,][]{mcc85, cap86, zar94}, 

304: or in a few instances P$\alpha$/H$\alpha$ decrements \citep{qui01, sco01}.  

305: However such 

306: studies are based on star-forming regions selected from optical

307: or near-infrared emission lines, and since our primary interest is

308: in very dusty regions, we need a method for estimating the nebular

309: attenuations that is valid for regions with up to several magnitudes

310: of visual attenuation.  A few authors have used multi-frequency radio

311: continuum maps together with H$\alpha$ photometry to estimate thermal 

312: radio fluxes and H$\alpha$ attenuations, but this method is limited 

313: to the brightest 10--30 H~\textsc{ii} regions in the nearest galaxies \citep[e.g.,][]{kau87, van88}.  

314: Instead we use the combination of mid-infrared luminosities and H$\alpha$

315: luminosities of the star-forming regions to derive attenuation estimates

316: for an infrared-selected sample.

317: 

318: Our method is based on the recent work by \citet{ken07a}, who

319: have generated a prescription for estimating H$\alpha$ attenuations 

320: ($A_{H\alpha}$) of star-forming 

321: regions using measurements of the 24~$\mu$m and H$\alpha$ fluxes for individual star-forming regions.  This empirically-derived 

322: method treats the 24~$\mu$m flux of a region as a tracer of the obscured portion of the emission due to star formation and the 

323: uncorrected H$\alpha$ flux as a tracer of the unobscured portion.  The attenuation is then related to the ratio of the total 

324: [24$\mu$m+H$\alpha$] emission relative to the unobscured emission: 

325: \begin{eqnarray}

326: A_{H\alpha} = 2.5~\log[1+0.038~\nu L_{\nu}(24)/L(H\alpha)], 

327: \label{eqn:AHa}

328: \end{eqnarray}

329: where $L(H\alpha)$ stands for the uncorrected H$\alpha$ luminosity in erg s$^{-1}$ and $\nu L_{\nu}(24)$ indicates the 

330: ``monochromatic'' 24~$\mu$m luminosity also in erg s$^{-1}$.  

331: The coefficient 0.038 in eq.~\ref{eqn:AHa} was calibrated using 

332: H$\alpha$/P$\alpha$ attenuation measurements of 42 H~\textsc{ii} regions

333: in M51 from \citet{cal05}.

334: 

335: As is emphasized in \citet{ken07a}, this method provides only an

336: approximate estimate of the attenuation on an object by object basis,

337: because the actual ratio of 24~$\mu$m luminosity to H$\alpha$

338: luminosity of a given object will depend on variable factors such

339: as the geometry of the stars, dust, and gas and the ratio of 

340: ionizing flux to bolometric luminosity of the OB association, which

341: in turn varies with the age and mass function of the embedded cluster.

342: This scatter can be quantified by comparing attenuations derived

343: from eq.~\ref{eqn:AHa} with independent measurements from the P$\alpha$/H$\alpha$

344: decrements or other methods.  Such comparisons have been carried

345: out for large samples of H~\textsc{ii} regions in M51 and M81 by \citet{cal05}

346: and \citet{per06} and for 220 regions in 33 

347: galaxies by \citet{cal07}.  Comparisons of attenuation-corrected H$\alpha$ 

348: fluxes with those derived via this infrared method show dispersions 

349: of $\pm$0.3 dex, which corresponds to uncertainties in the 

350: individual H$\alpha$ attenuation measurements

351: of $\pm$0.6$-$0.8 magnitudes.  This confirms that this method

352: provides only a crude estimate of the H$\alpha$ attenuation for

353: any individual H~\textsc{ii} region.  However since the main aim of this

354: paper is to identify strongly obscured regions ($A_{H\alpha} \gtrsim 3$ magnitudes),

355: this precision is more than adequate for our purposes.  Nevertheless

356: readers should bear in mind the uncertainties associated with

357: individual attenuation measurements.

358: 

359: 

360: \section{RESULTS}

361: 

362: \subsection{Distribution of Star-Forming Region Attenuations}

363: 

364: In order to address the question of how many infrared-selected regions are highly obscured, we used 24~$\mu$m and H$\alpha$ photometry 

365: to investigate the statistics of obscured star formation on 500~pc scales in a subset of SINGS galaxies.  For our primary region sample, 

366: we identified a total of 1772 regions using the 24~$\mu$m datasets as discussed above.  

367: In Figure~\ref{fig:ghist}a we show a histogram of Log[$\nu L_{\nu}(24)$/L(H$\alpha$)] 

368: along with the corresponding H$\alpha$ attenuations.  From the distribution of attenuations it is 

369: immediately clear that we do not see a large sub-population of highly-obscured star-forming regions within this infrared-selected sample 

370: on 500~pc spatial scales.  The median value is 1.8 which corresponds to an H$\alpha$ attenuation of 1.4 magnitudes 

371: (A$_{V} \sim$ 1.7), and there is a slight tail to attenuations higher than 3-4 magnitudes (skew = 0.35).  

372: Contaminant sources such as foreground stars or background galaxies would also populate the high attenuation portion of parameter space; 

373: to address this concern, we carefully verified that contaminant 

374: sources had been removed from the sample using the approach described in Section 4.  

375: At this point, we must make clear what is meant by the ``highly obscured

376: population" or ``subpopulation."  Our beam encompasses many tens or hundreds

377: of massive stars (see Table~1, minimum luminosities) and entire giant molecular clouds (GMCs).  

378: If all the stars are uniformly attenuated, then $A_{H\alpha}$ in Figure~\ref{fig:ghist} represents

379: the attenuation to each star.  However, if, as is likely, some of the stars

380: lie outside the GMC (due to breakout, blister H\textsc{ii} regions, etc.) and

381: some of the stars are embedded, then the $A_{H\alpha}$ represents an average

382: attenuation, weighted heavily toward the unattenuated stars.  

383: In this study, we do not find evidence for any large subpopulation of 

384: uniformly highly-obscured star-forming regions on 500~pc scales; we discuss 

385: the question of smaller scales in Section 7.1.2.  

386: 

387: Figure~\ref{fig:ghist}b presents the same data in the form of a cumulative histogram.  

388: For illustration, the cumulative distribution can be fit by a simple power law with an index of $\sim$1.4 with high 

389: significance ($R^2=0.98$) suggesting that the higher attenuation regions are simply an extension of a smooth distribution.  

390: To quantify the fraction of regions in the highly-obscured tail relative to the entire sample, we make a 

391: cut at Log[$\nu L_{\nu}(24)$/L(H$\alpha$)]$ = 2.7$ (A$_{H\alpha} \sim$ 3.3, A$_{V} \sim 4.0$).  This cut corresponds to $\sim$2 times the 

392: standard deviation of a Gaussian fit to the overall region distribution.  By this definition, the number of regions in the sample 

393: found in this highly-obscured tail of the distribution is 69, $\sim$4\% of the sample.  

394: 

395: Thus far, we have treated the entire sample of regions as one; 

396: however, the attenuation distribution changes slightly if we divide the sample by 

397: inclination and luminosity.  In Figure~\ref{fig:gcolorlumgal}, we have split the sample into two panels 

398: by the inclination of the host galaxy, where high inclination is defined here as $i > 60^{\circ}$.  The 

399: median Log[$\nu L_{\nu}(24)$/L(H$\alpha$)] values from the low and high inclination subsets are 

400: essentially equal within the errors --- 1.8 for the low inclination and 1.9 for the high inclination cases.  

401: More striking, however, is the difference in shape between the two distributions: the low inclination 

402: subsample distribution is more sharply peaked (kurtosis=0.71, with 0 signifying a normal distribution) than that of 

403: the high inclination subsample (kurtosis=-0.28).  This likely reflects the fact that the use of 

404: our empirical attenuation method becomes more complicated at high inclination; measured attenuations 

405: may be boosted in some cases due to increased pathlength through the disk, causing larger scatter.  

406: In addition, at the highest inclinations the region selection will be affected by confusion, 

407: and there may be a bias towards selecting more regions from the near side of the galaxy.  

408: In each panel of Figure~\ref{fig:gcolorlumgal}, we divide the subsample into two bins of total galaxy 24~$\mu$m luminosity, 

409: divided at the region-weighted mean galaxy 24~$\mu$m luminosity of the sample (8.4$\times$10$^{42}$ erg~s$^{-1}$).  

410: The region attenuation distributions are similar to that of the full sample, with minimal change in the 

411: median attenuation as a function of galaxy luminosity.  Thus, highly-obscured regions are drawn 

412: from both high and low luminosity galaxies.

413: 

414: In this study we are interested in the attenuation properties of star-forming regions on large, 500~pc scales.  

415: It is important to note, however, that this aperture may be much larger than the size of a given star-forming region as viewed 

416: at 24~$\mu$m.  

417: To get a sense of how the chosen aperture size affects our results, we have done photometry at scales spanning between roughly 200 and 

418: 1000~pc for most of the sample, between 100 and 1000~pc for NGC~2403 (a particularly nearby case at 3.2 Mpc), and down to 20~pc 

419: for NGC~6822 (a dwarf galaxy at 0.5 Mpc).  In Figure~\ref{fig:gapsize} we plot the median galaxy 24$\mu$m/H$\alpha$ ratio versus aperture size for 

420: a representative set of 4 galaxies: NGC~0925, NGC~2403, NGC~4725, and NGC~6822.  

421: The vertical dashed line represents the point at which the aperture diameter is equal to the FWHM of the 24~$\mu$m PSF, and below which 

422: the aperture measurement effectively undersamples the PSF.  We see very little variation in the 

423: median attenuation 

424: down to 100~pc scales, while the scatter increases slightly over this range with decreasing aperture size.  In our most nearby case, 

425: NGC~6822, we do see a 

426: significant rise in our measured attenuation as we probe below 100~pc, but at these scales we are also likely seeing the 

427: effects of the complex morphologies of H$\alpha$ structures - shells and bubbles - that may be offset spatially from the brightest 

428: corresponding 24~$\mu$m source.  For the purposes of the current study, this analysis illustrates the fact that our application of 

429: the empirical method applies to large scales, i.e. greater than 100~pc, where the results are fairly insensitive to the 

430: particular aperture diameter chosen.  

431: 

432: \subsection{Infrared Colors of Star-Forming Regions}

433: 

434: The infrared colors of the entire sample of regions are presented as flux density ratios in Figure~\ref{fig:gcolors}.  

435: Following the discussion of \citet{dop05} we have chosen 

436: F(8.0)/F(4.5) versus F(24)/F(4.5) as a representative pair of colors that include contributions from the 

437: stellar (4.5~$\mu$m), PAH (8.0~$\mu$m), and dust (24~$\mu$m) components of a given region, 

438: although we note that the IRAC bands do not sample the 10~$\mu$m silicate feature.  

439: We have corrected the 8.0~$\mu$m flux densities for the contribution of stellar emission using the following relation: 

440: \begin{equation}

441: F(8.0)_{corr} = F(8.0) - 0.232 \times F(3.6)

442: \end{equation}

443: where F(8.0)$_{corr}$ is the corrected 8.0~$\mu$m flux density, F(8.0) is the observed value, 

444: and F(3.6) is the 3.6~$\mu$m stellar flux density \citep{hel04}.  

445: The contribution of dust emission to the 3.6 and 4.5~$\mu$m bands is assumed to be negligible 

446: for the purposes of this work.  We have not applied any additional correction for the complex scattering 

447: that occurs when light from extended sources is incident on the IRAC focal 

448: plane\footnote{http://ssc.spitzer.caltech.edu/irac/calib/extcal/} and that cause flux measurements to be systematically overestimated.  

449: The effect is negligible for the more distant galaxies in the sample, but even for the nearby cases 

450: the magnitude of the shift is less than 0.11 dex in Log[F(8.0)/F(4.5)] and less than 0.03 dex in Log[F(24)/F(4.5)]; 

451: this offset does not affect our conclusions. 

452: The contour encloses 95\% of the total sample of regions, and the open and filled circles represent the 

453: individual regions and the highly-obscured subset, respectively.  

454: We can see that the highly-obscured regions do not stand out from the rest of the region sample in terms of their 

455: infrared colors.  

456: The positive correlation seen between the F(8.0)/F(4.5) and 

457: F(24)/F(4.5) appears to plateau at Log[F(8.0)/F(4.5)]$\sim$1.25.  This behavior is seen in the region sample as a whole as 

458: well as in some of the individual galaxies.  

459: One plausible explanation is that at low fluxes, both the 8~$\mu$m PAH emission and the 24~$\mu$m emission are 

460: excited by single optical/UV photons and are therefore proportional to the number 

461: of absorbed stellar photons.  This would imply that at low values of $F(24)$ one would 

462: expect a linear correlation of $F(8.0)$ to $F(24)$, as is observed.  

463: As the 24~$\mu$m emission increases, however, larger grains could be

464: sufficiently heated to provide a contribution to 24~$\mu$m emission from

465: the Wien tail of this steady state warm dust.  This then, may provide

466: the plateau (increasing 24~$\mu$m emission versus constant 8~$\mu$m emission).

467: 

468: In Figures~\ref{fig:gcolorsflux}-\ref{fig:gcolorsflux4}, we plot the measured 24$\mu$m/H$\alpha$ attenuation versus the region 24~$\mu$m luminosity, again 

469: using a 95\% contour to represent the entire region sample; the dotted line represents the subsample defined by attenuation in 

470: the previous section (A$_{H\alpha} > 3.3, A_{V} > 4.0$).  

471: In the entire sample, we see a general trend for more attenuated regions to be more luminous, a trend that is roughly reproduced within 

472: individual galaxies, with a few exceptions like NGC~3031. 

473: 

474: 

475: \subsection{Properties of the Most Obscured Regions}

476: 

477: In applying the arbitrary cut from Section 6.1 (A$_{H\alpha} > 3.3, A_{V} > 4.0$), we were aiming to illustrate the relative 

478: paucity of uniformly highly obscured regions in the sample ($\sim$4\%), 

479: but we did not mean to imply that they are physically distinct from the rest of 

480: the population.  To demonstrate this fact we have further characterized the regions that make up the tail of the attenuation distribution 

481: (see Figure~\ref{fig:ghist}).  In Table~1, we list for each galaxy the total number of regions selected, the 24~$\mu$m luminosity of the faintest region measured, 

482: and the number of highly-obscured regions using our arbitrary definition.  The number of such regions in a galaxy is typically small, and 

483: there are many galaxies with none.  The exceptions are NGC~5713 and NGC~3198, in which all but a handful of the measured regions qualify as 

484: highly obscured by our definition.  As discussed in the next section, these two cases show globally high attenuation relative to the rest of 

485: the galaxy sample.   

486: 

487: The first question we ask is where the more highly-obscured regions are located within the host galaxy.  In Figure~\ref{fig:ghistlocat} 

488: we present a histogram of the deprojected radius of the more highly-obscured regions within the host galaxy compared with 

489: the entire region sample (excluding the edge-on cases NGC~4631 and NGC~3190).  The histogram for the 

490: full sample extends out to 1.38 $R_{25}$ and has a median radius around 0.38 $R_{25}$.  

491: In contrast, the population in the highly-obscured tail is only found within 0.59 $R_{25}$ with a median position of 0.26 R$_{25}$.  

492: Thus, the highly-obscured subset is drawn primarily from the inner parts of the host galaxies.   

493: To characterize these regions further, we investigate the colors of the highly-obscured tail compared with those of the rest 

494: of the regions in the host galaxy and with those of the entire region sample.  Returning to Figure~\ref{fig:gcolors}, we see that for the most part, the 

495: highly-obscured cases do not stand out in terms of infrared colors, but instead are scattered throughout the rest of the region color 

496: distribution of the host galaxy.  In Figures~\ref{fig:gcolorsflux}-\ref{fig:gcolorsflux4}, we see that the loose trend between region luminosity and attenuation 

497: means that the regions which make up the tail of the attenuation distribution tend to also be more luminous.  These comparisons all suggest 

498: that the more highly obscured regions in our sample are not a distinct sub-population; rather, they are simply the bright, central 

499: regions of their host galaxies.

500: 

501: 

502: \subsection{Radial Attenuation Gradients}

503: 

504: Looking at the global properties of our galaxy sample, we find that a majority of the galaxies show a distinct and nearly 

505: linear decreasing radial trend in 24$\mu$m/H$\alpha$, a finding consistent with other studies \citep{boi04, boi05, pop05, rou05}.  

506: Figures~\ref{fig:iradialfitlow}-\ref{fig:iradialfithigh2} illustrate this result by showing the 24$\mu$m/H$\alpha$ ratio versus deprojected radius for each galaxy, with the 

507: galaxy sample split into two groups by inclination.  

508: The error bars are the standard errors of the mean derived using the three different background measurements described in Section 4.  

509: Galaxies that do not contain enough regions to determine the extent of a radial trend 

510: are not shown (NGC~1291, NGC~1316, NGC~1705, NGC~4450, Tololo~89, IC~4710); NGC~6822 is similarly excluded due to complicated morphology.  

511: The edge-on nature of NGC~4631 and NGC~3190 preclude an accurate radial deprojection.

512: In cases where the region profile is well-described by linear regression we have shown the best linear fit to the radial range 

513: 0.0--0.65 $R_{25}$.  

514: In a few cases, the region profile is not adequately described by a linear fit due 

515: to more complex structure (e.g. bends in the profile); we will discuss this further in Section 7.2.

516: 

517: In using the empirical conversion outlined in Section 5, we are making the assumption 

518: that attenuation is the only mechanism responsible for varying the 24$\mu$m/H$\alpha$ ratio.  

519: We will proceed with this assumption here but will return to the question of what else could be 

520: causing the observed radial gradients in Section 7.2.

521: Using an unweighted, linear least-squares fit to the radial profiles we have investigated the relationship between 

522: these gradients and global galaxy properties of luminosity and inclination.  

523: We use the zeropoint, the linear extrapolation of the attenuation at the galaxy center, as a typical 

524: attenuation measure for each galaxy, and in Figure~\ref{fig:igallumfit} we plot the best fit attenuation slope and zeropoint against 

525: galaxy $H$-band luminosity \citep{jar03} and inclination.  

526: We find no strong trends; a tentative correlation appears to exist between the attenuation zeropoint and the galaxy $H$-band 

527: luminosity and is corroborated by a similar trend between M$_{B}$ and zeropoint.  

528: \citet{dal07} studied the global total infrared-to-ultraviolet (TIR/UV) ratios, often used as a proxy for attenuation, 

529: within the entire SINGS sample 

530: and found that TIR/UV increases with increasing $H$-band luminosity.  Our data are consistent with this result, 

531: though the relationship between attenuation zeropoint and galaxy $H$-band luminosity is not as strong.  

532: The galaxy inclination does not appear to regulate either the observed slope or zeropoint of the attenuation profile, 

533: consistent with findings by \citet{dal07} on global TIR/UV ratios. 

534: In terms of morphology, we see a weak tendency for early type galaxies with bars to show somewhat steeper slopes that 

535: early type galaxies without bars; no such relation is seen for late types.  We note that most of the 

536: highly-obscured regions in our sample are found in barred galaxies, consistent with other studies that 

537: have found an association between bars and circumnuclear star-forming regions \citep{reg06, ken98}.  

538: 

539: In the two overlapping cases between this work and \citet{boi04} (NGC~5194 and NGC~3031) we find similar results.  \citet{boi04} 

540: used FUV/IR ratios to derive UV attenuation estimates and compared these with A$_{H\alpha}$ measured from Balmer 

541: decrements of H~\textsc{ii} regions.  

542: In NGC~5194, they see a radial gradient of roughly 1 magnitude in H$\alpha$ attenuation over the optical radius of the galaxy, compared with 

543: $\sim$0.9 magnitudes in our study.  

544: In NGC~3031, they see a much shallower attenuation profile with a radial drop of $\sim$0.1 magnitudes, comparable to our result 

545: (A$_{H\alpha}\sim$0.2 magnitudes).

546: 

547: \citet{zar94} looked at the subject of attenuation gradients using optical spectra of a sample of 159 H~\textsc{ii} regions from 14 galaxies.  

548: They found only weak evidence for a radial trend in attenuation (see their Figure 7c).  However, we can interpret this result within the context 

549: of our study by noting that due to their more limited sample, they plotted the A$_{V}$ of the entire region sample versus fractional 

550: isophotal radius.  Since we find that the attenuation zeropoint can vary from galaxy to galaxy, viewing the region sample as a whole 

551: tends to wash out a radial signature.  Figure~\ref{fig:zaritcompare}a shows our version of their Figure 7c; a radial gradient is evident, although it is much 

552: less clear than what is seen in any individual galaxy.  When we randomly select 159 regions from our sample to match the sample size of \citet{zar94}, 

553: we obtain a result that is qualitatively indistinguishable from \citet{zar94} Figure 7c (Figure~\ref{fig:zaritcompare}b).

554: 

555: In view of the range in attenuation zeropoints found within the sample and the fact that 

556: our targets display decreasing radial attenuation gradients, we can return to the question of the nature of the tail of the attenuation 

557: distribution.  In defining a global attenuation cut, we selected the central regions of galaxies with the highest attenuation 

558: zeropoints.  To visualize that this is indeed the case, we have included in Figures~\ref{fig:iradialfitlow}-\ref{fig:iradialfithigh2} a dotted line corresponding to the 

559: attenuation cut applied in Section 6.1.  Regions that fall above the dotted line are preferentially the central regions of galaxies 

560: with overall high attenuation.  

561: This discussion underscores the fact that the highly-obscured fraction we quoted initially is quite arbitrary and dependent on the 

562: particular galaxy sample.  Nonetheless, while the precise value of the highly-obscured fraction is dependent on the sample, the statement that only 

563: $\sim$4\% of the regions in this particular set of galaxies have 24$\mu$m/H$\alpha$ attenuations higher than 2.7 (A$_{H\alpha} \sim$ 3.3) is 

564: representative of the robust result that these galaxies are not hosting a large number of 500~pc regions in which the vast 

565: majority of luminous stars are highly obscured.    

566: 

567: In a few galaxies there are a handful of regions that stand out relative to the rest of the regions in the host galaxy.  These regions are 

568: not necessarily highly-obscured in a global sense -- that is, they are not part of the highly-obscured tail of the global attenuation distribution -- but 

569: they do have higher attenuations than the rest of the region population of the host galaxy near that radius.  NGC~3938 and NGC~5474 are examples, 

570: with a few of these local outlier regions at 0.6-0.8 R$_{25}$.  Future work will be needed to look into the question of whether these regions 

571: are in some way exceptional or whether they simply reflect the stochasticity of the disk at large radii.

572: 

573: 

574: 

575: \section{DISCUSSION}

576: 

577: \subsection{Obscured Star Forming Regions}

578: The main purpose of this study was to characterize the attenuation distribution of infrared-selected star-forming regions as measured on large scales.  

579: In other words, the goal was to determine what fraction of bright infrared sources have H$\alpha$ counterparts and what fraction could be 

580: defined as highly obscured.  The median attenuation we found (A$_{H\alpha}\approx$1.4 magnitudes) indicates that roughly 72\% of 

581: the H$\alpha$ emission is typically ``missing'' 

582: from a 500~pc region, but cases where the H$\alpha$ is attenuated by more than 3 magnitudes are quite rare ($\sim$4\% of our sample).  

583: A complementary picture has been seen in direct measurements of mid-infrared silicate absorption within 

584: kiloparsec-sized regions in normal galaxies where most do not show foreground dust screen attenuation 

585: greater than $A_{V} \sim 3$ \citep{smi06}.  Similarly, optical nuclear spectra of SINGS galaxies show an average 

586: $A_{V} \sim 1$ \citep{dal06}. 

587: However, the fact that we see such a small fraction of uniformly highly-obscured regions could be due to a number of possible scenarios.  

588: 

589: \subsubsection{Timescales}

590: While dramatic examples of highly-obscured sources do exist in the local Universe on a variety of size scales, the main result 

591: of this study is that the fraction of such regions in normal, star-forming disk galaxies is small on 500~pc scales.  

592: Equivalently, we can say that the vast majority of current star formation in these galaxies is not 

593: hidden from view at optical wavelengths.  If we were to make the very simple assumptions that all large star-forming regions go through a highly-embedded 

594: phase and that a single star cluster dominates on 500~pc scales, we can estimate the lifetime of such an obscured period.  

595: Taking a typical H~\textsc{ii} region lifetime to be 

596: 5-10 Myr, our observed obscured fraction of $\sim$4\% implies that a region would spend only $\sim10^{5}$ years 

597: being obscured by more than 3.3 magnitudes in H$\alpha$ ($A_{V} \gtrsim 4$ magnitudes).  

598: One could also account for these statistics if only a small fraction of the star-forming regions

599: undergo a more lengthy obscured phase.

600: These short time scales are in rough agreement with

601: those inferred for the lifetime and dynamical timescales of Young Stellar Object (YSO) outflows 

602: in nearby Galactic molecular clouds, \citep[e.g.,][]{qui05, zha05, bon96}.  

603: Furthermore, our sample consists of large 500~pc regions 

604: perhaps containing hundreds of stars which should shorten the time 

605: for sufficient cloud disruption even further.  

606: 

607: That said, in the above estimate we have envisioned simplified regions in which 

608: all stars are uniformly obscured.  In reality, each 500~pc region potentially encompasses  

609: many highly-obscured, compact infrared knots as well as emerged clusters which, 

610: when blended together in the large beam, would yield a lower average attenuation.  

611: We will return to this issue in the following section, but we note here that the 

612: observed highly-obscured fraction could also be explained by envisioning a toy model in which 

613: each 500~pc region half of the massive stars are embedded while half 

614: have broken out of one side of the giant molecular cloud in which they formed.  

615: Roughly half of the emerged cases have broken out on the opposite side 

616: of the cloud, and thus remain obscured from the point of view of an observer 

617: over the short lifetime of massive stars.  

618: The net H$\alpha$ absorption in this case would be of order 75\% (A$_{H\alpha}=1.5$), similar 

619: to the measured median attenuation in our sample.  This suggests breakout times 

620: of order one half of the massive star lifetime, or roughly 1 Myr.  

621: In either scenario, the small fraction of regions with nearly 

622: all of their stars highly-obscured indicates that breakout times must be less 

623: than the typical lifetime of a star-forming region and also less than or of 

624: order of the main sequence lifetime of the dominant sources of luminosity.

625: 

626: Although we have shown that infrared-luminous star-forming regions

627: with relatively faint optical counterparts are very rare in the 

628: extended disks of the SINGS spirals, we have also seen that they

629: are considerably more common in the circumnuclear regions of the

630: galaxies.  This difference may reflect the higher interstellar

631: pressures in the nuclear regions, which will act to slow the 

632: expansion of H~\textsc{ii} regions and prolong the lifetime of any dust-embedded

633: phase, as modeled, for example, by \citet{dop05}.  These 

634: regions are also characterized by much larger mean gas column

635: densities, however, so we would expect higher dust opacities even

636: without the dynamical effects of the higher pressure environment.

637: More detailed studies of individual regions will be needed to

638: separate these effects.

639: 

640: The strong association that we find between 24~$\mu$m sources and optical

641: H~\textsc{ii} regions also provides interesting contraints on the maximum lifetimes

642: of the star forming clouds.  If the molecular/atomic clouds and their

643: associated dust remained intact for lifetimes much longer than that

644: of the H~\textsc{ii} regions, we would expect many of the 24$\mu$m-bright H~\textsc{ii} regions

645: to be associated with the older clusters and OB associations, coincident

646: with ultraviolet-bright regions.  Since the dust can be heated by

647: non-ionizing stars such regions would stand out as having anomalously

648: high 24$\mu$m/H$\alpha$ ratios, effectively masquerading as highly

649: obscured regions.  While the obscured fraction that we find ($\sim$4\%) 

650: is therefore an upper limit, the scarcity of regions with high 

651: 24$\mu$m/H$\alpha$ ratios means that 24$\mu$m-bright 

652: clusters older than 5--10 Myr are even more rare.  

653: This suggests that the dust and gas clouds surrounding

654: the star clusters/associations must largely dissipate on this time scale.

655: Independent evidence for such time scales comes from observations of

656: expansion lifetimes of HI giant shells in the LMC and SMC, which

657: also show an absence of objects with expansion ages of more than 10 Myr \citep[e.g.,][]{kim99, hat05}.

658: 

659: \subsubsection{Size scales}

660: Our results do not preclude the presence of embedded protostars or ultra-compact H~\textsc{ii} regions within the larger complexes that we have studied.

661: In this work we have presented attenuation measurements for large, 500~pc apertures.  A common aperture size allowed us to compare the same 

662: spatial scale between galaxies at distances ranging from 3 to 25 Mpc; however, a 500~pc aperture corresponds to a larger scale than that 

663: of a typical H~\textsc{ii} region, let alone a compact H~\textsc{ii} region ($\sim$1~pc).  In every aperture applied to the 24~$\mu$m data, we are 

664: potentially summing together a number of smaller infrared star-forming knots with varying attenuations; the net result of this blending is that the 

665: attenuation measured is an average for the region.  This situation is of course only exacerbated in global star formation 

666: studies at high redshift in which measurements are necessarily averaged over an entire galaxy.  

667: In Section 6.1, we addressed the question of whether probing to smaller scales 

668: would have drastically changed the fraction of highly obscured sources.  Based on these tests we do not expect our results on the highly-obscured 

669: fraction to change dramatically down to 100~pc scales.  When we repeat our analysis on similar datasets for the Antennae galaxies, for example, 

670: we are able recover the highly-obscured case despite the blending that occurs due to our large aperture.  The region itself is $\sim$50~pc with 

671: an attenuation of $\sim$9-10 magnitudes in V derived from NIR spectra \citep{gil00}; our empirically-calibrated photometric attenuation measurement 

672: is $\sim$4.8 in V ($A_{H\alpha}\approx$ 3.9) using a 500~pc aperture, with the region being a clear (8$\sigma$) outlier from the rest of the regions in the system.  

673: Thus, if a large sub-population of similarly luminous and embedded regions existed in our sample of SINGS galaxies, 

674: we should have found them in this study.  

675: 

676: This is not to suggest the absence of much smaller or less luminous embedded infrared sources.  We know from studies of the Milky Way 

677: that ultracompact and compact H~\textsc{ii} regions exist on scales of $\sim$0.1 - 1~pc with TIR luminosities of $\sim10^{37} - 10^{39}$ 

678: erg s$^{-1}$ \citep{cro05,aka05}.  Star-forming regions in our sample are typically at least $\sim$100 times more luminous than a compact 

679: H~\textsc{ii} region just in the 24$\mu$m-band ($\sim10^{39}-10^{42}$ erg s$^{-1}$).  

680: No doubt a multitude of such regions exist within each galaxy in our sample, but they are not large enough or luminous enough to be studied with the 

681: current data.

682: 

683: \subsection{Radial Gradients}

684: 

685: The fact that we see few highly-obscured cases and such smooth radial gradients suggests that the measured attenuations on these scales 

686: are dictated to a greater extent by the global properties of the galaxy such as metallicity, gas surface density, inclination, geometry, 

687: or gradual changes in the region SED than by region-to-region fluctuations.  

688: Since metallicity is related to dust content and since decreasing gradients in metallicity are observed in many galaxies, it is reasonable 

689: to expect it to contribute to the attenuation properties of star-forming regions in a manner that varies with radius \citep{zar94}.  

690: In contrast to previous work \citep{boi04, boi05}, a preliminary comparison of the metallicity and attenuation gradients for the low 

691: inclination galaxies in our sample did not suggest any correlation between the two.  However, this is perhaps not surprising as our sample 

692: does not cover a wide baseline in metallicity, and   

693: gradients in gas column density in galaxies may play a larger role in the global attenuation profiles.  

694: \citet{rou05} found a similar radial gradient in FUV/TIR in NGC~300 and noted that while the dispersion in FUV/TIR 

695: ratios of individual regions was at least a factor of $\sim$2 ($\gtrsim$0.30 dex), the standard deviation of abundances was only 0.11 dex.  

696: From this they suggested that metallicity was likely not the only factor responsible for the gradient.  

697: The inclination of the galaxy is a consideration since distributed dust seen along a line-of-sight through the disk may cause additional 

698: attenuation of the region's H$\alpha$ flux.  In this sample, however, galaxy inclination does not appear to play a dominant role in 

699: regulating either the slope or the zeropoint of the global attenuation profile.  

700: Instead, the situation appears to be more complicated and may depend strongly on properties of an individual galaxy such as the thickness and 

701: morphology of dust lanes and the dust and gas scale heights.  

702: 

703: It is interesting to note that while the majority of the sample show linear radial trends in 24$\mu$m/H$\alpha$, there are two cases (NGC~1097 and NGC~4254) that 

704: show a bend in the profile at roughly 0.6 R$_{25}$.  Since metallicity presumably plays a role in the dust-to-gas ratio, 

705: it is reasonable to ask whether a bend in the attenuation profile could be related to a bend in the abundance profile of a galaxy.  

706: Previous work by numerous authors presented examples of bends in abundance gradients and discussed the question of whether they were real 

707: or simply an artifact of the method used to determine (O/H) \citep[ and references therein]{zar94}.  

708: \citet{pily03} argued strongly that the bends were in fact artificial, that they were due to either an inappropriate application to low metallicity regions 

709: of the high-metallicity relationship between oxygen abundace and strong lines or due to a gradient in the excitation parameter within the disk.  

710: While beyond the scope of this paper, it is interesting to note that we find examples of bends in attenuation gradients using a completely 

711: different technique.  This leads to the question of whether these bends could be related to gradients in the [N~\textsc{ii}]/H$\alpha$ ratio or 

712: systematics inherent to the empirical method of estimating attenuation, or whether they represent a real change in the attenuation properties of the disk.

713: 

714: The results summarized above assume that all of the radial trends observed

715: in the 24$\mu$m/H$\alpha$ ratios of the H~\textsc{ii} regions arise from changes

716: in dust attenuation.  However it

717: is possible that some of the radial trends that we observe are produced

718: by systematic changes in the infrared SED of the emitting regions with galactocentric radius, 

719: independent of extinction.  For example, if

720: the diameter of H~\textsc{ii} regions becomes systematically larger with galactocentric

721: radius, this would lower the characteristic intensity of the heating

722: radiation field at larger radii and tend to lower the mean dust temperatures

723: and the fraction of total dust luminosity emitted in the 24-$\mu$m band.

724: Spatially-resolved measurements of the infrared spectral energy distributions

725: of SINGS galaxies show little evidence for such radial gradients in infrared SED

726: shape \citep[][]{ben06, dal05, per06}, 

727: but we cannot exclude the possibility that there is at least some small contribution

728: from this effect to the gradients that we observe in Figures~\ref{fig:iradialfitlow}-\ref{fig:iradialfithigh2}.

729: 

730: 

731: \section{CONCLUSIONS}

732: In this work, we have studied the incidence of obscured star formation and the distribution of attenuation properties for 

733: infrared-selected star-forming regions measured on large scales ($\sim$500~pc) in a sample of 38 SINGS galaxies.  

734: We have made use of an empirical method for deriving H$\alpha$ 

735: attenuations which combines the 24~$\mu$m and H$\alpha$ datasets \citep{ken07a}.  Under the assumption that the 24$\mu$m/H$\alpha$ ratio 

736: can be used as a proxy for attenuation, our main results are as follows:

737: 

738: \begin{enumerate} 

739: \item  We do {\it not} find a distinct sub-population of uniformly highly-obscured regions on large ($\sim$500~pc) scales.  Instead our data suggest a 

740: continuous distribution of attenuations (power law index of $\sim$1.4) within the entire sample of 1772 regions.  

741: 

742: \item  With a few exceptions, those regions that do have higher obscuration (A$_{H\alpha} > 3.3$) are the bright, central regions of luminous galaxies with high 

743: global attenuation.  The regions in the tail of the attenuation distribution represent a small fraction ($\sim$4\%) of the region population. 

744: 

745: \item  Most galaxies show a decreasing radial trend in 24$\mu$m/H$\alpha$; the current sample shows a range of slopes and zeropoints.  

746: A weak correlation may exist between the attenuation zeropoint and the galaxy luminosity, consistent with previous studies, but 

747: the galaxy inclination does not appear to play a dominant role in either the observed slope or zeropoint of the profile.

748: 

749: \item This study reports on the attenuation (A$_{H\alpha}$) properties of large ($\sim$500~pc) star-forming regions, but does 

750: not comment on the prevalence of embedded infrared sources that no doubt exist on smaller scales and at lower 

751: luminosities similar to compact and ultracompact H{\sc ii} regions in the Milky Way.  

752: 

753: \item A more general conclusion of our work is the high degree of spatial correlation between 24~$\mu$m and H$\alpha$ emission in 

754: SINGS galaxies.  In agreement with other studies \citep[e.g.,][]{per06}, this work suggests that for every bright 24~$\mu$m source 

755: in a normal galaxy there is a visible H$\alpha$ counterpart, a fact which opens the door not only to attenuation studies but also to the 

756: possibility of using the empirical [24$\mu$m+H$\alpha$] combination as a new measure of star-formation rates in galaxies.  

757: 

758: \end{enumerate}

759: 

760: 

761: \acknowledgments

762: 

763: We are grateful to Kristian Finlator and Christy Tremonti 

764: for many thoughtful discussions.  M. P. was supported by a NSF Graduate Research Fellowship.  

765: 

766: This work is based in part on observations made with the Spitzer Space Telescope, which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, 

767: California Institute of Technology under a contract with NASA.  Support for this work was provided by NASA through an award issued by JPL/Caltech.

768: 

769: This research has made use of the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED) which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, 

770: California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

771: 

772: This publication makes use of data products from the Two Micron All Sky Survey, which is a joint project of the University of Massachusetts and 

773: the Infrared Processing and Analysis Center/California Institute of Technology, funded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration 

774: and the National Science Foundation.

775: 

776: \clearpage

777: \begin{thebibliography}{}

778: \bibitem[Akabane \& Kuno(2005)]{aka05} Akabane, K., \& Kuno, N.\ 2005, \aap, 431, 183 

779: \bibitem[Beck et al.(2002)]{bec02} Beck, S.~C., Turner, J.~L., Langland-Shula, L.~E., Meier, D.~S., Crosthwaite, L.~P., \& Gorjian, V.\ 2002, \aj, 124, 2516 

780: \bibitem[Bell et al.(2002)]{bel02} Bell, E.~F., Gordon, K.~D., Kennicutt, R.~C., Jr., \& Zaritsky, D.\ 2002, \apj, 565, 994 

781: \bibitem[Bendo et al.(2006)]{ben06} Bendo, G.~J., et al.\ 2006, \apj, 652, 283 

782: \bibitem[Boissier et al.(2004)]{boi04} Boissier, S., Boselli, A., Buat, V., Donas, J., \& Milliard, B.\ 2004, \aap, 424, 465 

783: \bibitem[Boissier et al.(2005)]{boi05} Boissier, S., et al.\ 2005, \apjl, 619, L83 

784: \bibitem[Bontemps et al.(1996)]{bon96} Bontemps, S., Andre, P., Terebey, S., \& Cabrit, S.\ 1996, \aap, 311, 858 

785: \bibitem[Buat \& Xu(1996)]{bua96} Buat, V., \& Xu, C.\ 1996, \aap, 306, 61 

786: \bibitem[Buat et al.(2005)]{bua05} Buat, V., et al.\ 2005, \apjl, 619, L51 

787: \bibitem[Burstein \& Heiles(1982)]{bur82} Burstein, D., \& Heiles, C.\ 1982, \aj, 87, 1165 

788: \bibitem[Cabanac et al.(2005)]{cab05} Cabanac, R.~A., Vanzi, L., \& Sauvage, M.\ 2005, \apj, 631, 252 

789: \bibitem[Calzetti et al.(2001)]{cal01} Calzetti, D..\ 2001, \pasp, 113, 1449 

790: \bibitem[Calzetti et al.(2005)]{cal05} Calzetti, D., et al.\ 2005, \apj, 633, 871 

791: \bibitem[Calzetti et al.(2007)]{cal07} Calzetti, D., et al.\ 2007, in preparation 

792: \bibitem[Caplan \& Deharveng(1986)]{cap86} Caplan, J., \& Deharveng, L.\ 1986, \aap, 155, 297

793: \bibitem[Crowther(2005)]{cro05} Crowther, P.~A.\ 2005, IAU Symposium, 227, 389 

794: \bibitem[Dale et al.(2001)]{dal01} Dale, D.~A., Helou, G., Neugebauer, G., Soifer, B.~T., Frayer, D.~T., \& Condon, J.~J.\ 2001, \aj, 122, 1736 

795: \bibitem[Dale et al.(2005)]{dal05} Dale, D.~A., et al.\ 2005, \apj, 633, 857 

796: \bibitem[Dale et al.(2006)]{dal06} Dale, D.~A., et al.\ 2006, \apj, 646, 161 

797: \bibitem[Dale et al.(2007)]{dal07} Dale, D.~A., et al.\ 2007, \apj, 655, 863 

798: \bibitem[de Vaucouleurs et al.(1991)]{devauc91} de Vaucouleurs, G., de Vaucouleurs, A., Corwin, H.~G., Buta, R.~J. Paturel, G., \& Fouque, P. 1991, Third Reference Catalogue of Bright Galaxies (Volume 1-3, XII, 2069 pp. 7 figs.  Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York) 

799: \bibitem[Dopita et al.(2005)]{dop05} Dopita, M.~A., et al.\ 2005, \apj, 619, 755 

800: \bibitem[Drozdovsky \& Karachentsev(2000)]{dk00} Drozdovsky, I.~O., \& Karachentsev, I.~D.\ 2000, \aaps, 142, 425 

801: \bibitem[Fazio et al.(2004)]{faz04} Fazio, G.~G., et al.\ 2004, \apjs, 154, 10 

802: \bibitem[Freedman et al.(2001)]{free01} Freedman, W.~L., et al.\ 2001, \apj, 553, 47 

803: \bibitem[Genzel et al.(1998)]{genz98} Genzel, R., et al.\ 1998, \apj, 498, 579 

804: \bibitem[Giovanelli et al.(1995)]{gio95} Giovanelli, R., Haynes, M.~P., Salzer, J.~J., Wegner, G., da Costa, L.~N., \& Freudling, W.\ 1995, \aj, 110, 1059 

805: \bibitem[Gilbert et al.(2000)]{gil00} Gilbert, A.~M., et al.\ 2000, \apjl, 533, L57 

806: \bibitem[Goetz et al.(2003)]{goe03} Goetz, J.~A., Gutermuth, R., Pipher, J.~L., Forrest, W.~J., \& Howard, E.~M.\ 2003, \apj, 599, 1173 

807: \bibitem[Gordon et al.(2005)]{gor05} Gordon, K.~D., et al.\ 2005, \pasp, 117, 503 

808: \bibitem[Gorjian et al.(2001)]{gorj01} Gorjian, V., Turner, J.~L., \& Beck, S.~C.\ 2001, \apjl, 554, L29 

809: \bibitem[Hatzidimitriou et al.(2005)]{hat05} Hatzidimitriou, D., Stanimirovic, S., Maragoudaki, F., Staveley-Smith, L., Dapergolas, A., \& Bratsolis, E.\ 2005, \mnras, 360, 1171 

810: \bibitem[Helou et al.(2004)]{hel04} Helou, G., et al.\ 2004, \apjs, 154, 253

811: \bibitem[Hill et al.(1997)]{hil97} Hill, J.~K., et al.\ 1997, \apj, 477, 673 

812: \bibitem[Holmberg(1958)]{hol58} Holmberg, E.\ 1958, Meddelanden fran Lunds Astronomiska Observatorium Serie II, 136, 1 

813: \bibitem[Houck et al.(2004)]{hou04} Houck, J.~R., et al.\ 2004, \apjs, 154, 211 

814: \bibitem[Israel \& Kennicutt(1980)]{isr80} Israel, F.~P., \& Kennicutt, R.~C.\ 1980, \aplett, 21, 1 

815: \bibitem[Jansen et al.(1994)]{jan94} Jansen, R.~A., Knapen, J.~H., Beckman, J.~E., Peletier, R.~F., \& Hes, R.\ 1994, \mnras, 270, 373 

816: \bibitem[Jansen et al.(2000)]{jan00} Jansen, R.~A., Fabricant, D., Franx, M., \& Caldwell, N.\ 2000, \apjs, 126, 331 

817: \bibitem[Karachentsev et al.(2000)]{kar00} Karachentsev, I.~D., Sharina, M.~E., \& Huchtmeier, W.~K.\ 2000, \aap, 362, 544 

818: \bibitem[Karachentsev et al.(2002)]{kar02} Karachentsev, I.~D., et al.\ 2002, \aap, 383, 125 

819: \bibitem[Karachentsev et al.(2003a)]{kar03a} Karachentsev, I.~D., et al.\ 2003a, \aap, 398, 479 

820: \bibitem[Karachentsev et al.(2003b)]{kar03b} Karachentsev, I.~D., et al.\ 2003b, \aap, 404, 93 

821: \bibitem[Kaufman et al.(1987)]{kau87} Kaufman, M., Bash, F.~N., Kennicutt, R.~C., Jr., \& Hodge, P.~W.\ 1987, \apj, 319, 61 

822: \bibitem[Kennicutt(1998)]{ken98} Kennicutt, R.~C., Jr.\ 1998, \araa, 36, 189 

823: \bibitem[Kennicutt et al.(2003)]{ken03} Kennicutt, R.~C., et al.\ 2003, \pasp, 115, 928 

824: \bibitem[Kennicutt et al.(2007a)]{ken07a} Kennicutt, R.~C., et al.\ 2007, ({\it The Global Schmidt Law}), in preparation 

825: \bibitem[Kennicutt et al.(2007b)]{ken07b} Kennicutt, R.~C., et al.\ 2007, ({\it The 11 Mpc H$\alpha$ and Ultraviolet Galaxy Survey}),  in preparation 

826: \bibitem[Kim et al.(1999)]{kim99} Kim, S., Dopita, M.~A., Staveley-Smith, L., \& Bessell, M.~S.\ 1999, \aj, 118, 2797 

827: \bibitem[Kobulnicky \& Johnson(1999)]{kob99} Kobulnicky, H.~A., \& Johnson, K.~E.\ 1999, \apj, 527, 154 

828: \bibitem[Kurtz(2000)]{kur00} Kurtz, S.~E.\ 2000, Revista Mexicana de Astronomia y Astrofisica Conference Series, 9, 169 

829: \bibitem[Jarrett et al.(2003)]{jar03} Jarrett, T.~H., Chester, T., Cutri, R., Schneider, S.~E., \& Huchra, J.~P.\ 2003, \aj, 125, 525 

830: \bibitem[Leonard et al.(2002)]{leo02} Leonard, D.~C., et al.\ 2002, \aj, 124, 2490 

831: \bibitem[Macri et al.(2001)]{mac01} Macri, L.~M., Stetson, P.~B., Bothun, G.~D., Freedman, W.~L., Garnavich, P.~M., Jha, S., Madore, B.~F., \& Richmond, M.~W.\ 2001, \apj, 559, 243 

832: \bibitem[Masters et al.(2007)]{mast07} Masters, K.~L. et al. 2007, in preparation

833: \bibitem[Mattila \& Meikle(2001)]{matt01} Mattila, S., \& Meikle, W.~P.~S.\ 2001, \mnras, 324, 325 

834: \bibitem[McCall et al.(1985)]{mcc85} McCall, M.~L., Rybski, P.~M., \& Shields, G.~A.\ 1985, \apjs, 57, 1 

835: \bibitem[Miller \& Mathews(1972)]{mil72} Miller, J.~S., \& Mathews, W.~G.\ 1972, \apj, 172, 593 

836: \bibitem[Mirabel et al.(1998)]{mir98} Mirabel, I.~F., et al.\ 1998, \aap, 333, L1 

837: \bibitem[Monet et al.(1998)]{mon98} Monet, D., Bird A., Canzian, B., Dahn, C., Guetter, H., Harris, H., Henden, A., Levine, S., Luginbuhl, C., Monet, A. K. B., Rhodes, A., Riepe, B., Sell, S., Stone, R., Vrba, F., Walker, R. 1998, The USNO-A2.0 Catalogue, (U.S. Naval Observatory, Washington DC)

838: \bibitem[Moustakas \& Kennicutt(2006)]{mou06a} Moustakas, J., \& Kennicutt, R.~C., Jr.\ 2006, \apjs, 164, 81 

839: \bibitem[Moustakas et al.(2006)]{mou06b} Moustakas, J., Kennicutt, R.~C., Jr., \& Tremonti, C.~A.\ 2006, \apj, 642, 775

840: \bibitem[Moustakas et al.(2007)]{mou07} Moustakas, J. et al., 2007, in preparation 

841: \bibitem[P{\'e}rez-Gonz{\'a}lez et al.(2006)]{per06} P{\'e}rez-Gonz{\'a}lez, P.~G., et al.\ 2006, \apj, 648, 987 

842: \bibitem[Pietrzy{\'n}ski et al.(2004)]{piet04} Pietrzy{\'n}ski, G., Gieren, W., Udalski, A., Bresolin, F., Kudritzki, R.-P., Soszy{\'n}ski, I., Szyma{\'n}ski, M., \& Kubiak, M.\ 2004, \aj, 128, 2815 

843: \bibitem[Pilyugin(2003)]{pily03} Pilyugin, L.~S.\ 2003, \aap, 397, 109 

844: \bibitem[Plante \& Sauvage(2002)]{pla02} Plante, S., \& Sauvage, M.\ 2002, \aj, 124, 1995 

845: \bibitem[Popescu et al.(2005)]{pop05} Popescu, C.~C., et al.\ 2005, \apjl, 619, L75 

846: \bibitem[Puxley(1991)]{puxl91} Puxley, P.~J.\ 1991, \mnras, 249, 11P 

847: \bibitem[Quillen \& Yukita(2001)]{qui01} Quillen, A.~C., \& Yukita, M.\ 2001, \aj, 121, 2095 

848: \bibitem[Quillen et al.(2005)]{qui05} Quillen, A.~C., Thorndike, S.~L., Cunningham, A., Frank, A., Gutermuth, R.~A., Blackman, E.~G., Pipher, J.~L., \& Ridge, N.\ 2005, \apj, 632, 941 

849: \bibitem[Regan et al.(2004)]{reg04} Regan, M.~W., et al.\ 2004, \apjs, 154, 204 

850: \bibitem[Regan et al.(2006)]{reg06} Regan, M.~W., et al.\ 2006, \apj, 652, 1112 

851: \bibitem[Rieke et al.(1980)]{rie80} Rieke, G.~H., Lebofsky, M.~J., Thompson, R.~I., Low, F.~J., \& Tokunaga, A.~T.\ 1980, \apj, 238, 24 

852: \bibitem[Rieke et al.(2004)]{rie04} Rieke, G.~H., et al.\ 2004, \apjs, 154, 25 

853: \bibitem[Roshi et al.(2005a)]{ros05a} Roshi, D.~A., Balser, D.~S., Bania, T.~M., Goss, W.~M., \& De Pree, C.~G.\ 2005a, \apj, 625, 181 

854: \bibitem[Roshi et al.(2005b)]{ros05b} Roshi, D.~A., Goss, W.~M., Anantharamaiah, K.~R., \& Jeyakumar, S.\ 2005b, \apj, 626, 253 

855: \bibitem[Roussel et al.(2005)]{rou05} Roussel, H., Gil de Paz, A., Seibert, M., Helou, G., Madore, B.~F., \& Martin, C.\ 2005, \apj, 632, 227 

856: \bibitem[Schlegel et al.(1998)]{sch98} Schlegel, D.~J., Finkbeiner, D.~P., \& Davis, M.\ 1998, \apj, 500, 525 

857: \bibitem[Scoville et al.(2001)]{sco01} Scoville, N.~Z., Polletta, M., Ewald, S., Stolovy, S.~R., Thompson, R., \& Rieke, M.\ 2001, \aj, 122, 3017 

858: \bibitem[Shapley et al.(2001)]{shap01} Shapley, A., Fabbiano, G., \& Eskridge, P.~B.\ 2001, \apjs, 137, 139 

859: \bibitem[Skrutskie et al.(2006)]{skru06} Skrutskie, M.~F., et al.\ 2006, \aj, 131, 1163

860: \bibitem[Smith et al.(2006)]{smi06} Smith, J.~D.~T., et al.\ 2006, in press (astro-ph/0610913) 

861: \bibitem[Soifer et al.(2001)]{soi01} Soifer, B.~T., et al.\ 2001, \aj, 122, 1213 

862: \bibitem[Stetson(1987)]{ste87} Stetson, P.~B.\ 1987, \pasp, 99, 191 

863: \bibitem[Tonry et al.(2001)]{ton01} Tonry, J.~L., Dressler, A., Blakeslee, J.~P., Ajhar, E.~A., Fletcher, A.~B., Luppino, G.~A., Metzger, M.~R., \& Moore, C.~B.\ 2001, \apj, 546, 681 

864: \bibitem[Tosi et al.(2001)]{tosi01} Tosi, M., Sabbi, E., Bellazzini, M., Aloisi, A., Greggio, L., Leitherer, C., \& Montegriffo, P.\ 2001, \aj, 122, 1271 

865: \bibitem[Tully \& Fisher(1977)]{tul77} Tully, R.~B., \& Fisher, J.~R.\ 1977, \aap, 54, 661 

866: \bibitem[Vacca et al.(2002)]{vac02} Vacca, W.~D., Johnson, K.~E., \& Conti, P.~S.\ 2002, \aj, 123, 772 

867: \bibitem[Valentijn(1994)]{val94} Valentijn, E.~A.\ 1994, \mnras, 266, 614 

868: \bibitem[van der Hulst et al.(1988)]{van88} van der Hulst, J.~M., Kennicutt, R.~C., Crane, P.~C., \& Rots, A.~H.\ 1988, \aap, 195, 38 

869: \bibitem[Walter et al.(2005)]{wal05} Walter, F., Brinks, E., de Blok, W.~J.~G., Thornley, M.~D., \& Kennicutt, R.~C.\ 2005, Extra-Planar Gas, 331, 269 

870: \bibitem[Wang \& Heckman(1996)]{wan96} Wang, B., \& Heckman, T.~M.\ 1996, \apj, 457, 645 

871: \bibitem[Werner et al.(2004)]{wer04} Werner, M.~W., et al.\ 2004, \apjs, 154, 1 

872: \bibitem[Zaritsky et al.(1994)]{zar94} Zaritsky, D., Kennicutt, R.~C., \& Huchra, J.~P.\ 1994, \apj, 420, 87 

873: \bibitem[Zhang et al.(2005)]{zha05} Zhang, Q., Hunter, T.~R., Brand, J., Sridharan, T.~K., Cesaroni, R., Molinari, S., Wang, J., \& Kramer, M.\ 2005, \apj, 625, 864 

874: 

875: 

876: \end{thebibliography}

877: 

878: \clearpage

879: \input{tab1.tex}

880: 

881: \input{tab2.tex}

882: 

883: \input{tab3.tex}

884: 

885: \clearpage

886: \begin{figure}

887: \plotone{f1.new.ps}

888: \caption{24~$\mu$m image of NGC~5194 (M51) with the final region selection indicated as small black circles, each 500~pc in diameter, 

889: along with several examples of background annuli (white circles), each with an inner diameter of 500~pc and an outer diameter of 2000~pc.}  

890: \label{fig:m51}

891: \end{figure}

892: 

893: \begin{figure}

894: \plotone{f2.new.ps}

895: \caption{Measurements of region luminosities - $\nu L_{\nu}(24)$ (circles) and $L(H\alpha)$ (diamonds) - for the 

896: four different techniques described in the text 

897: compared with those of \citet{cal05} for a sample of matched 13 arcsecond ($\sim$517~pc) regions in NGC~5194.  Final flux measurements were made using the 

898: mean of the global, local, and profile methods, as described in Section~4.}

899: \label{fig:calzetticompare}

900: \end{figure}

901: 

902: 

903: \begin{figure}

904: \plotone{f3.eps}

905: \caption{Histograms of Log($\nu L_{\nu}(24)$/$L(H\alpha)$) or A$_{H\alpha}$ for 1772 regions selected from the sample of 

906: 38 SINGS galaxies.  The open histogram represents the entire region sample.  The dot-dashed line is the fiducial cut proposed in the text at 

907: Log($\nu L_{\nu}(24)$/$L(H\alpha)$) = 2.7 (A$_{H\alpha} \sim 3.3$, A$_{V} \sim 4$), corresponding to $\sim$2 sigma above the mean of a Gaussian 

908: fit to the full distribution.  The panel (b) is a cumulative histogram 

909: of the entire region sample; the dashed line is a fit to Log($\nu L_{\nu}(24)$/$L(H\alpha)$)=[1.9,3.4] with high significance ($R^2=0.98$) yielding 

910: a power-law index of 1.4.  There is no large sub-population of uniformly highly obscured regions in SINGS galaxies.}  

911: \label{fig:ghist}

912: \end{figure}

913: \begin{figure}

914: \plottwo{f4a.new.ps}{f4b.new.ps}

915: \caption{Attenuation distributions (Log($\nu L_{\nu}(24)$/$L(H\alpha)$) or A$_{H\alpha}$) are shown separated by host galaxy 24~$\mu$m 

916: luminosity for the low inclination galaxies ($i > 60^{\circ}$; (a)) 

917: and high inclination galaxies ($i > 60^{\circ}$; (b)).  In each panel the narrow-hatched histogram is the low luminosity bin 

918: ($\nu L_{\nu}(24) < 8.4\times10^{42}$ [erg s$^{-1}$]), while the wide-hatched histogram the high luminosity bin ($\nu L_{\nu}(24) > 8.4\times10^{42}$ [erg s$^{-1}$]), 

919: and the open histogram includes all luminosities.  The region attenuation distribution is more strongly peaked for low inclination 

920: galaxies, while high inclination cases populate the wings of the distribution.  The dashed line in each panel represents the median value of the distribution.  

921: Highly-obscured regions are found in both high and low luminosity galaxies.}

922: \label{fig:gcolorlumgal}

923: \end{figure}

924: 

925: 

926: \begin{figure}

927: \plotone{f5.new.ps}

928: \caption{Median attenuation for a representative set of galaxies as a function of aperture diameter used.  

929: The error bars indicate the standard deviation of all the region measurements included in the median.  The dashed line 

930: indicates the size of the FWHM of the 24~$\mu$m PSF, below which the measurement is unresolved.  The median attenuation is 

931: nearly constant with aperture size between 100 and 1000~pc scales.  In the sole case where we can probe below 100~pc, the dwarf galaxy 

932: NGC~6822, the measured attenuation appears to climb substantially; however, at these scales we are affected by the individual region morphology.  

933: For large apertures ($>$100~pc) the measured value of Log($\nu L_{\nu}(24)$/$L($H$\alpha)$) is relatively insensitive to aperture size.}  

934: \label{fig:gapsize}

935: \end{figure}

936: 

937: 

938: 

939: 

940: 

941: \begin{figure}

942: \plotone{f6.new.ps}

943: \caption{(a)  F(8.0)$_{corr}$/F(4.5) versus F(24)/F(4.5) plot for the entire region sample.  (b)  F(8.0)$_{corr}$/F(4.5) 

944: versus F(24)/F(4.5) plot for the 

945: highly-obscured subset, as defined by the attenuation cut described in the text.  The contour encloses 95\% of the total region sample.  

946: F(8.0)$_{corr}$ values have been corrected for the contribution of stellar emission, as discussed in the text.  

947: Flux densities are F$_{\nu}$ quantities in erg s$^{-1}$ Hz$^{-1}$.  Highly-obscured regions do not stand out from the rest of the region 

948: sample in terms of their infrared colors.}  

949: \label{fig:gcolors}

950: \end{figure}

951: 

952: 

953: \begin{figure}

954: \plotone{f7.new.ps}

955: \caption{Log[$\nu L_{\nu}(24)$/$L($H$\alpha)$] versus Log[$\nu L_{\nu}(24)$] for the region sample, divided by host galaxy.  

956: The contour is common to all panels and encloses 95\% of the total region sample, while 

957: the small points are regions within the individual galaxy.  The dotted line is the attenuation cut defined in the text, and 

958: the filled circles represent those regions in the galaxy that have been 

959: classified as highly obscured.  The galaxy inclination is given in each panel.  Highly attenuated regions tend to be more luminous.}  

960: \label{fig:gcolorsflux}

961: \end{figure}

962: \begin{figure}

963: \plotone{f8.new.ps}

964: \caption{Same as Figure~\ref{fig:gcolorsflux}.}

965: \label{fig:gcolorsflux2}

966: \end{figure}

967: \begin{figure}

968: \plotone{f9.new.ps}

969: \caption{Same as Figure~\ref{fig:gcolorsflux}.}

970: \label{fig:gcolorsflux3}

971: \end{figure}

972: \begin{figure}

973: \plotone{f10.new.ps}

974: \caption{Same as Figure~\ref{fig:gcolorsflux}.}

975: \label{fig:gcolorsflux4}

976: \end{figure}

977: 

978: \clearpage

979: 

980: \begin{figure}

981: \plotone{f11.new.ps}

982: \caption{Histogram of highly-obscured region locations in the host galaxy, 

983: given as a deprojected radial position in units of R$_{25}$ (hatched histogram; multiplied by a factor of 10 for clarity).  

984: The open histogram shows the corresponding locations for the entire region sample.  

985: The dashed line shows the median location for the entire sample (0.38 R$_{25}$) while the dotted line is the median location for more 

986: highly-obscured regions (0.26 R$_{25}$).  More highly-obscured regions are generally located closer to the center of the host galaxy.}  

987: \label{fig:ghistlocat}

988: \end{figure}

989: \begin{figure}

990: \plotone{f12.new.ps}

991: \caption{Deprojected radial profiles of Log($\nu L_{\nu}(24)/L($H$\alpha)$) for galaxies in the sample with inclinations less than 60$^{\circ}$.  In cases 

992: where the region profile can be well fit by linear regression, the dashed line gives the linear fit to the radial range 0.0--0.65 R$_{25}$.  

993: The dotted line corresponds to the attenuation cut (A$_{H\alpha}>$3.3) applied in Section 6.1.}  

994: \label{fig:iradialfitlow}

995: \end{figure}

996: \begin{figure}

997: \plotone{f13.new.ps}

998: \caption{Same as Figure~\ref{fig:iradialfitlow}.}

999: \label{fig:iradialfitlow2}

1000: \end{figure}

1001: \begin{figure}

1002: \plotone{f14.new.ps}

1003: \caption{Same as Figure~\ref{fig:iradialfitlow}.}

1004: \label{fig:iradialfitlow3}

1005: \end{figure}

1006: \begin{figure}

1007: \plotone{f15.new.ps}

1008: \caption{Deprojected radial profiles of Log($\nu L_{\nu}(24)/L($H$\alpha)$) for galaxies in the sample with inclinations greater than 60$^{\circ}$.  In cases 

1009: where the region profile can be well fit by linear regression, the dashed line gives the linear fit to the radial range 0.0--0.65 R$_{25}$.  

1010: The dotted line corresponds to the attenuation cut (A$_{H\alpha}>$3.3) applied in Section 6.1.}  

1011: \label{fig:iradialfithigh}

1012: \end{figure}

1013: \begin{figure}

1014: \plotone{f16.new.ps}

1015: \caption{Same as Figure~\ref{fig:iradialfithigh}.}

1016: \label{fig:iradialfithigh2}

1017: \end{figure}

1018: 

1019: \begin{figure}

1020: \plotone{f17.new.ps}

1021: \caption{Zeropoint and slope measurements derived from radial trends in star-forming region attenuation 

1022: versus the total galaxy H-band luminosity and galaxy inclination.  The open squares correspond 

1023: to low inclination ($i < 60^{\circ}$) galaxies, while the filled circles are more highly-inclined cases.  H-band 

1024: luminosity errors are negligible; inclination errors are described in Section 2.  Slope 

1025: and zeropoint error bars are formal fitting errors.  No strong correlations are seen; a tentative trend appears to exist between 

1026: galaxy $H$-band luminosity and attenuation zeropoint and is corroborated by a similar trend between M$_{B}$ and zeropoint.  

1027: Inclination does not play a dominant role in governing the observed slope and zeropoint of the attenuation profile.

1028: }  

1029: \label{fig:igallumfit}

1030: \end{figure}

1031: 

1032: \begin{figure}

1033: \plotone{f18.new.ps}

1034: \caption{(a) Radial profile of Log($\nu L_{\nu}(24)/L($H$\alpha)$) for the entire region sample.  While \citet{zar94} Figure 7c showed little indication of 

1035: a radial trend in A$_{V}$, with our larger sample a radial trend is evident though much less tight than in any 

1036: individual galaxy.  (b) Radial profile of Log($\nu L_{\nu}(24)/L($H$\alpha)$) for subset of our sample chosen to roughly replicate 

1037: that of \citet{zar94} with only a tentative indication of a radial trend.  

1038: The apparent lack of a radial attenuation gradient in \citet{zar94} was simply a consequence of plotting a region sample 

1039: drawn from many galaxies, each with its own attenuation zeropoint.}  

1040: \label{fig:zaritcompare}

1041: \end{figure}

1042: 

1043: \end{document}

1044: 

1045: