1: 

2: \documentclass{emulateapj} 

3: \usepackage{apjfonts}        

4: \usepackage{graphicx}  

5: \usepackage{amsmath}   

6: 

7: \graphicspath{{./}}

8: 

9: \bibliographystyle{apj}

10:  

11: \newcommand{\Msun}{\rm M_{\odot}}

12: \newcommand{\MB}{M_{\rm B}}

13: \newcommand{\Lbsun}{\rm L_{\odot, \rm B}}

14: \newcommand{\Lsun}{\rm L_{\odot}}

15: \newcommand{\Lbol}{\rm L_{\rm {bol}}}

16: \newcommand{\LB}{\rm L_{\rm B}}

17: \newcommand{\Lb}{\rm L_{\rm B}}

18: \newcommand{\Lfir}{\rm L_{\rm {FIR}}}

19: \newcommand{\Lir}{\rm L_{\rm {IR}}}

20: \newcommand{\Lnir}{\rm L_{\rm {NIR}}}

21: \newcommand{\Lmir}{\rm L_{\rm {MIR}}}

22: \newcommand{\Lradio}{\rm L_{\rm {radio}}}

23: \newcommand{\Lx}{\rm L_{\rm {x-ray}}}

24: 

25: \newcommand{\Ledd}{\rm L_{\rm {Edd}}}

26: \newcommand{\BH}{\rm{BH}}

27: \newcommand{\MBH}{\rm M_{\rm{BH}}}

28: \newcommand{\Mbulge}{\rm M_{\rm{bulge}}}

29: \newcommand{\Mstar}{\rm M_{\rm{star}}}

30: \newcommand{\msigma}{\MBH\rm{-}\sigma}

31: \newcommand{\mbulge}{\rm{\MBH\rm{-}\Mbulge}}

32: \newcommand{\zquasar}{J1148+5251}

33: \newcommand{\mdm}{\rm m_{\rm{dm}}}

34: \newcommand{\tQ}{t_{Q}}

35: \newcommand{\Gpc}{\rm {Gpc}}

36: \newcommand{\Mpc}{\rm {Mpc}}

37: \newcommand{\kpc}{\rm {kpc}}

38: \newcommand{\yr}{\rm {yr}}

39: 

40: \newcommand{\vir}{\rm{vir}}

41: \newcommand{\Mvir}{M_{\rm{vir}}}

42: \newcommand{\Vvir}{V_{\rm{vir}}}

43: \newcommand{\Rvir}{R_{\rm{vir}}}

44: \newcommand{\Cvir}{C_{\rm{vir}}}

45: \newcommand{\rhoc}{\rho_{\rm{crit}}}

46: 

47: \def\Omm{{\Omega_m}}

48: \def\Ommz{{\Omega_m^{\,z}}}

49: \def\Omr{{\Omega_r}}

50: \def\Omk{{\Omega_k}}

51: \def\Oml{{\Omega_{\Lambda}}}

52: 

53: \def\beq{\begin{equation}}

54: \def\eeq{\end{equation}}

55: 

56: \shorttitle{Modeling Dust in $z \sim 6$ Quasars}

57: \shortauthors{Li et al.}

58: 

59: \begin{document}   

60: 

61: \title{Modeling the Dust Properties of $z \sim 6$ Quasars with ART$^2$ ---

62:   All-wavelength Radiative Transfer with Adaptive Refinement Tree}

63: 

64: \author

65: {

66: Yuexing Li\altaffilmark{1},

67: Philip F. Hopkins\altaffilmark{1},

68: Lars Hernquist\altaffilmark{1}, 

69: Douglas P. Finkbeiner\altaffilmark{1},

70: Thomas J. Cox\altaffilmark{1},  \\

71: Volker Springel\altaffilmark{2}, 

72: Linhua Jiang\altaffilmark{3}, 

73: Xiaohui Fan\altaffilmark{3},

74: Naoki Yoshida\altaffilmark{4}

75: }

76: 

77: \affil{$^{1}$Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Harvard

78:   University, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA}

79: %

80: \affil{$^{2}$Max-Planck-Institute for Astrophysics,

81:   Karl-Schwarzschild-Str. 1, 85740 Garching, Germany} 

82: %

83: \affil{$^{3}$Department of Astronomy, University of Arizona, 933 N. Cherry

84:   Ave, Tucson, AZ 85721} 

85: %

86: \affil{$^{4}$Nagoya University, Dept. of Physics, Nagoya, Aichi

87:   464-8602, Japan} 

88: %

89: %

90: \email{yxli@cfa.harvard.edu}

91: %

92: \keywords{quasar: formation --- quasar: evolution --- quasar: high redshift

93:   --- galaxies: starbursts --- infrared: galaxies --- radiative transfer ---

94:   interstellar medium --- dust, extinction --- individual: SDSS J1148+5251} 

95: 

96: \begin{abstract}

97: 

98: The detection of large quantities of dust in $z \sim 6$ quasars by

99: infrared and radio surveys presents puzzles for the formation and

100: evolution of dust in these early systems.  Previously \citep{Li2007},

101: we showed that luminous quasars at $z \gtrsim 6$ can form through

102: hierarchical mergers of gas-rich galaxies, and that these systems are

103: expected to evolve from starburst through quasar phases.  Here, we

104: calculate the dust properties of simulated quasars and their

105: progenitors using a three-dimensional Monte Carlo radiative transfer

106: code, ART$^2$ -- All-wavelength Radiative Transfer with Adaptive

107: Refinement Tree. ART$^2$ incorporates the radiative equilibrium

108: algorithm developed by \cite{Bjorkman2001} which treats dust emission

109: self-consistently, an adaptive grid method which can efficiently cover

110: a large dynamic range in spatial scales and can capture inhomogeneous

111: density distributions, a multiphase model of the interstellar medium

112: which accounts for the observed scaling relations of molecular clouds,

113: and a supernova-origin model for dust which can explain the existence

114: of dust in cosmologically young, starbursting quasars.  By applying

115: ART$^2$ to the hydrodynamic simulations of \cite{Li2007}, we reproduce

116: the observed spectral energy distribution (SED) and inferred dust

117: properties of SDSS J1148+5251, the most distant quasar detected in the Sloan

118: survey. We find that the dust and infrared emission are closely associated

119: with the formation and evolution of the quasar host.  As the system evolves

120: from a starburst to a quasar, the SED changes from being dominated by a

121: cold dust bump (peaking at $\sim 50\, \mu$m) to one that includes a

122: prominent hot dust component (peaking at $\sim 3\, \mu$m), and the

123: galaxy evolves from a cold to a warm ultraluminous infrared galaxy

124: (ULIRG) owing to heating and feedback from star formation and the

125: active galactic nucleus (AGN).  Furthermore, the AGN activity has

126: significant implications for the interpretation of observable aspects

127: of the hosts.  The hottest dust ($T \gtrsim 10^3$~K) is most

128: noticeable only during the peak quasar activity, and correlates with

129: the near-IR flux.  However, we find no correlation between the star

130: formation rate and far-IR luminosity during this phase owing to strong

131: AGN contamination.  Our results suggest that vigorous star formation in

132: merging progenitors is necessary to reproduce the observed dust

133: properties of $z \sim 6$ quasars, supporting a merger-driven origin

134: for luminous quasars at high redshifts and the starburst-to-quasar

135: evolutionary hypothesis.

136: 

137: \end{abstract}

138: 

139: \section{INTRODUCTION}

140: 

141: High-redshift quasars are important for understanding the formation

142: and evolution of galaxies and supermassive black holes (SMBHs) in the

143: early Universe.  In the past few years, nearly two dozen luminous

144: quasars have been discovered by the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS;

145: \citealt{York2000}) and the Canada-France High-z Quasar Survey 

146: (CFHQS; \citealt{Willott2007}) at $z \sim 6$, 

147: corresponding to a time when the Universe was less than a billion years old

148: (\citealt{Fan2003, Fan2004, Fan2006B, Fan2006A}).  As summarized by

149: \cite{Fan2006C}, these quasars are rare ($\sim 10^{-9}\, \Mpc^{-3}$ comoving);

150: believed to be powered by SMBHs with masses $\sim 10^9\, \Msun$ (e.g.,

151: \citealt{Willott2003, Barth2003}); reside near the end of the epoch of

152: reionization, as indicated by Gunn-Peterson absorption troughs

153: \citep{Gunn1965} in their spectra; and have similar spectral energy

154: distributions (SEDs) and comparable metallicity to lower-redshift counterparts    

155: (e.g., \citealt{Elvis1994, Glikman2006, Richards2006, Hopkins2007A}),

156: implying the early presence of ``mature'' quasars and the formation of

157: their hosts in rapid starbursts at even higher redshifts ($z \gtrsim

158: 10$).

159: 

160: Follow-up, multi-wavelength observations have been carried out for

161: these $z \sim 6$ quasars, from X-ray (e.g., \citealt{Brandt2002,

162: Strateva2005, Vignali2005, Steffen2006, Shemmer2005, Shemmer2006}), to

163: optical /infrared (e.g., \citealt{Barth2003, Pentericci2003,

164: Freudling2003, White2005, Willott2005, Hines2006}), and radio

165: wavelengths (e.g., \citealt{Carilli2001, Bertoldi2003B, Walter2003,

166: Carilli2004, Wang2007}).  A noteworthy result of these studies is their

167: detection of dust in these high-redshift objects.  In particular, deep

168: infrared and radio surveys (e.g., \citealt{Robson2004, Bertoldi2003A,

169: Carilli2004, Charmandaris2004, Beelen2006, Hines2006}) have revealed a

170: large amount of cold dust in SDSS J1148+5251 (hereafter J1148+5251),

171: the most distant Sloan quasar detected at redshift $z = 6.42$

172: \citep{Fan2003}. The dust mass is estimated to be $\sim 1-7\times 10^8\,

173: \Msun$. The detection of dust is also reported in the first four CFHQS quasars 

174: at $z > 6$, including the new record holder CFHQS J2329-0301 at $z = 6.43$

175: \citep{Willott2007}. \cite{Maiolino2004} argue, from the observed dust

176: extinction curve of SDSS J1048+4637 at $z = 6.2$, that the dust in these

177: high-z systems may be produced by supernovae.

178: 

179: \cite{Jiang2006} have performed a comprehensive study of thirteen $z

180: \sim 6$ quasars by combining new {\em Spitzer} observations with

181: existing multi-band data.  It appears that nearly all 13 of these

182: quasars exhibit prominent infrared bumps around both $\lambda \sim 3

183: \mu$m and $\lambda \sim 50 \mu$m.  In a dusty galaxy, most of the

184: radiation from newly formed stars or an AGN is absorbed by dust and

185: re-emitted at infrared wavelengths.  The SEDs of star-forming galaxies

186: typically peak at 50 -- 80 $\mu$m (rest frame) and can be approximated

187: by a modified blackbody spectrum with dust temperatures below 100 K

188: (e.g., \citealt{Dunne2001}), while in quasars, some dust can be

189: heated directly by the AGN to temperatures up to $1200$ K

190: (e.g., \citealt{Glikman2006}) and dominate the near- to mid-IR

191: emission.  Therefore, the observations by \cite{Jiang2006} indicate

192: the presence of large amounts of both hot and cold dust in these

193: high-z systems.

194: 

195: However, the nature of the dust, and its formation and evolution in

196: the context of the quasar host, are unclear.  For example, the dust

197: distribution is unknown.  It has been suggested that the hot dust lies

198: in the central regions and is heated by an AGN to produce near-IR

199: emission \citep{Rieke1981, Polletta2000, Haas2003}, while the warm and

200: cold dust can extend to a few kpc and dominate at mid-IR and far-IR

201: wavelengths \citep{Polletta2000, Nenkova2002, Siebenmorgen2005}.

202: However, the relative importance of heating by stars and AGN activity

203: is uncertain.  This is essential to an accurate determination of the

204: star formation rate (SFR), but cannot be inferred simply from observed

205: SEDs.  Currently, the most common method used to derive a star

206: formation rate is to assume that most of the FIR luminosity comes from

207: young stars.  However, if the FIR luminosity is mainly contributed by

208: an AGN, then the SFR would be substantially reduced.  Finally, it is

209: not known how the SED and dust content of a quasar and its host evolve

210: with time.

211: 

212: In order to address these questions, we must combine a model for the

213: formation of a quasar with radiative transfer calculations that treat

214: dust emission self-consistently, to follow the physical properties,

215: environment, and evolution of quasar hosts and their dust content.

216: 

217: Earlier \citep{Li2007}, we developed a quasar formation model which

218: self-consistently accounts for black hole growth, star formation,

219: quasar activity, and host spheroid formation in the context of

220: hierarchical structure formation.  We employed a set of multi-scale

221: simulations that included large-scale cosmological simulations and

222: galaxy mergers on galactic scales, together with a self-regulated

223: model for black hole growth, to produce a luminous quasar at $z \sim

224: 6.5$, which has a black hole mass ($\sim 2 \times 10^9\, \Msun$)

225: and a number of properties similar to \zquasar\ \citep{Fan2003}.  In our

226: scenario, luminous, high-redshift quasars form in massive halos that originate   

227: from rare density peaks in the standard $\Lambda$CDM cosmology, and

228: they grow through hierarchical mergers of gas-rich galaxies. Gravitational

229: torques excited in these mergers trigger large inflows of gas and produce

230: strong shocks that result in intense starbursts \citep{Hernquist1989B,

231:   Barnes1991, Barnes1992, Barnes1996, Hernquist1995, Mihos1996} and fuel rapid

232: black hole accretion \citep{DiMatteo2005, Springel2005B}.  Moreover, feedback 

233: from the accreting black hole disperses the obscuring material, briefly

234: yielding an optically visible quasar \citep{Hopkins2005A, Hopkins2005B,

235: Hopkins2005C, Hopkins2006A}, and regulating the $\msigma$ correlation

236: between the SMBHs and host galaxies \citep{DiMatteo2005, Robertson2006A}.  In

237: this picture, quasars are, therefore, descendents of starburst galaxies

238: \citep{Sanders1988, Norman1988, Scoville2003}. 

239: 

240: To make detailed contact with observations of $z \sim 6$ quasars, it

241: is necessary to theoretically predict the SEDs of these systems and

242: how they evolve with time.  Solving radiation transport in dusty,

243: starbursting quasars is, however, difficult owing to the non-locality

244: of the sources, the opacity and multiphase character of the

245: interstellar medium, and the complex morphology of these systems.

246: Over the last several decades, a variety of numerical techniques have

247: been developed to solve the radiative transfer problem with different

248: levels of approximation and in multi-dimensions.  Based on the

249: specific algorithms employed, the approaches can be classified into

250: two general categories: {\em finite-difference} and {\em Monte Carlo}

251: methods (e.g., \citealt{Jonsson2006}; see also \citealt{Pascucci2004}

252: who describe the codes as ``grid-based'' or ``particle-based'' by

253: analogy to hydrodynamic solvers).

254: 

255: {\em Finite-difference} codes solve the equations of radiative

256: transfer (RT) iteratively using finite convergence criteria.  They

257: either solve the moment equations for RT, originally formulated by

258: \cite{Hummer1971} for spherical geometry with a central point source

259: (e.g., \citealt{Scoville1976, Leung1976, Yorke1980, Wolfire1986,

260: Menshchikov1997, Dullemond2000}), or employ ray-tracing methods on a

261: discrete spatial grid for complex density configurations (e.g.,

262: \citealt{Rowan-Robinson1980, Efstathiou1990, Efstathiou1991,

263: Steinacker2003, Folini2003, Steinacker2006}). This technique provides

264: full error control but can be time-consuming.

265: 

266: {\em Monte Carlo} methods sample and propagate photons

267: probabilistically (e.g., \citealt{Witt1977, Lefevre1982, Lefevre1983,

268: Whitney1992, Witt1992, Code1995, Lopez1995, Lucy1999, Wolf1999,

269: Bianchi2000, Harries2000, Bjorkman2001, Whitney2003A, Jonsson2006,

270: Pinte2006}).  The Monte Carlo technique is more flexible than the

271: finite-difference one because it tracks the scattering, absorption and

272: re-emission of photons (or photon packets) in detail, and can handle

273: arbitrary geometries, but at the cost of computational expense to

274: reduce Poisson noise.  However, advances in computing technology and

275: algorithms have made high-accuracy Monte Carlo RT calculations feasible

276: and popular.

277: 

278: In particular, \cite{Bjorkman2001} have developed a Monte Carlo code

279: to handle radiative equilibrium and temperature corrections, which

280: calculates dust emission self-consistently.  It conserves the total

281: photon energy, corrects the frequency distribution of re-emitted

282: photons, and requires no iteration as the dust opacity is assumed to be 

283: independent of temperature.  This code has been used in a number of

284: applications, including protostars that have a disk and an envelope

285: with a single heating source in the center (e.g.,

286: \citealt{Whitney1992, Whitney1993, Whitney2003B, Whitney2003A,

287: Whitney2004}); circumstellar envelopes (e.g., \citealt{Wood1996B,

288: Wood1996A, Wood1998}); protoplanetary systems (e.g., \citealt{Wood2002,

289: Rice2003}); and galaxies that include a bulge and a disk with multiple

290: heating sources from these two populations (e.g., \citealt{Wood1997,

291: Wood2000}).  This code has also been able to generate optical--far-IR

292: SEDs that reproduce those of a sample of 21 X-ray selected AGNs

293: \citep{Kuraszkiewicz2003}, and the version of \cite{Whitney2003A} has been

294: applied to simulations of galaxy mergers with black hole feedback to study the

295: local ULIRGs \citep{Chakrabarti2007A} and

296: submillimeter galaxies \citep{Chakrabarti2007B}.

297: 

298: In order to produce accurate SEDs of quasars and their hosts formed by

299: galaxy mergers, as in \cite{Li2007}, the RT code must satisfy the

300: following requirements: (1) to be able to handle arbitrary geometries

301: and distributed heating sources; (2) resolve the large dynamic ranges

302: in spatial scales and densities in the merger simulations; (3)

303: incorporate a multiphase description of the interstellar medium

304: (ISM); and (4) employ a dust model appropriate for a young starburst

305: system.

306: 

307: In many earlier applications, radial logarithmic or uniformly spaced

308: meshes were used to generate density grids. However, in merging

309: galaxies, the ISM is clumpy and irregular owing to shocks and tidal

310: features produced during the interactions, and has multiple density

311: centers, making logarithmic algorithms inefficient.  In such a

312: situation, an adaptive grid approach appears ideal for resolving

313: localized high-density regions, while still covering the large volumes

314: of merging systems \citep{Wolf1999, Kurosawa2001, Harries2004,

315: Jonsson2006}.  

316: 

317: In addition, dust models commonly used in previous works are based on

318: observed extinction curves for the Milky Way (e.g.,

319: \citealt{Weingartner2001, Calzetti1994, Kim1994, Mathis1977,

320: Calzetti2000}), in which the dust is assumed to be produced mainly by

321: old, low-mass stars with ages $> 1$ Gyr \citep{Mathis1990,

322: Whittet2003, Dwek2005}.  However, a large amount of dust ($\sim 1-7

323: \times 10^8\, \Msun$) is detected in the $z \simeq 6.42$ quasar host

324: \citep{Bertoldi2003A} at a time when the Universe was only $\sim 850$

325: Myr old.  It has been suggested by observations (e.g.,

326: \citealt{Maiolino2004, Maiolino2006, Moseley1989, Dunne2003,

327: Morgan2003B, Sugerman2006}) and theoretical studies (e.g.,

328: \citealt{Todini2001, Nozawa2003, Schneider2004, Nozawa2007, Bianchi2007}) that  

329: supernovae can provide fast and efficient dust formation in the early

330: Universe, motivating other choices for the dust model in the

331: RT calculations.

332: 

333: Finally, in a multiphase description of the ISM \citep{McKee1977}, as

334: adopted in our simulations \citep{Springel2003A, Springel2003B, Hopkins2006A},  

335: the ``hot-phase'' (diffuse) and ``cold-phase'' (dense molecular and

336: ${\rm HI}$ core) components co-exist under pressure equilibrium but

337: have different mass fractions and volume filling factors (i.e., the

338: hot-phase gas is $\le 10\%$ in mass but $\gtrsim 99\%$ in volume), 

339: so both phases contribute to the dust extinction and should therefore be

340: included in the RT calculations. 

341: 

342: We have refined the Monte Carlo RT code developed by \cite{Bjorkman2001} and

343: \cite{Whitney2003A} by implementing: an adaptive grid algorithm similar to

344: that of \cite{Jonsson2006} for the density field and the arbitrarily

345: distributed sources; a multiphase ISM model \citep{Springel2003A} which

346: accounts for observed scaling relations of molecular clouds for the dust

347: distribution; and a supernova-origin dust model for the opacity using the

348: grain size distribution of \cite{Todini2001}. We refer to our new

349: code as ART$^2$ (All-wavelength Radiative Transfer with Adaptive

350: Refinement Tree). ART$^2$ is capable of producing SEDs and images in a wide

351: range of wavelengths from X-ray to millimeter. In the present paper we focus

352: on the dust properties from optical to submillimeter bands. As we show in what

353: follows, ART$^2$ reproduces the spectrum of a single galaxy with bulge and

354: disk calculated with the original code. More important, it captures the

355: inhomogeneous density distribution in galaxy mergers and reproduces the

356: observed SED and dust properties of \zquasar\ based on the simulations of

357: \cite{Li2007}.  Therefore, ART$^2$ can be used to predict multi-wavelength

358: properties of quasar systems and their galaxy progenitors.

359: 

360: This paper is organized as follows. In \S~2, we describe our

361: computational methods and models, including the multi-scale

362: simulations of \cite{Li2007} for $z \sim 6$ quasar formation, and our

363: implementation of ART$^2$ which incorporates radiative equilibrium as

364: in \cite{Bjorkman2001}, an adaptive grid, a multiphase ISM, and a

365: supernova-origin dust model. In \S~3, we present the multi-wavelength

366: SED from optical to submillimeter of a simulated quasar at $z \sim

367: 6.5$.  The dust distribution and properties of the quasar are

368: discussed in \S~4 and we describe their evolution in \S~5.  We consider

369: the robustness of our results in \S~6 and summarize in \S~7.

370: 

371: 

372: \section{Methodology}

373: 

374: In order to capture the physical processes underlying the formation

375: and evolution of quasars in the early Universe, and to compare their

376: multi-wavelength properties to observations, we combine quasar

377: formation and radiative transfer calculations.  We first perform a

378: set of novel multi-scale simulations that yield a luminous quasar at

379: $z \sim 6.5$ \citep{Li2007}. We then apply the 3-D, Monte Carlo

380: radiative transfer code, ART$^2$, to the outputs of the hydrodynamic

381: galaxy mergers simulations to calculate the SED of the system.  The

382: models and simulations of quasar formation are described in detail in

383: \cite{Li2007}.  Here, we briefly summarize the modeling of quasar

384: formation, and the specifications of ART$^2$.

385: 

386: \subsection{Formation Model of $z \sim 6$ Quasars}

387: 

388: \subsubsection{Multi-scale Simulations}

389: 

390: The $z \sim 6$ quasars are rare (space density $\sim 1\, \Gpc^{-3}$

391: comoving), and appear to be powered by supermassive black holes of

392: mass $\sim 10^9\, \Msun$. Therefore, simulations of high-redshift

393: quasar formation must consider a large cosmological volume to

394: accommodate the low abundance of this population, have a large dynamic

395: range to follow the hierarchical build-up of the quasar hosts, and

396: include realistic prescriptions for star formation, black hole growth,

397: and associated feedback mechanisms. The multi-scale simulations in

398: \cite{Li2007} include both N-body cosmological calculations in a

399: volume of $3\, \Gpc^3$ to account for the low number density of

400: quasars at $z \sim 6$, and hydrodynamical simulations of individual

401: galaxy mergers on galactic scales to resolve gas-dynamics, star

402: formation, and black hole growth.

403: 

404: First, we perform a coarse dark matter-only simulation in a volume of

405: $3\, {\rm Gpc^{3}}$. The largest halo at $z=0$, within which early,

406: luminous quasars are thought to reside \citep{Springel2005A}, is then

407: selected for resimulation at higher resolution.  The evolution of this

408: halo and its environment is re-simulated using a multi-grid zoom-in

409: technique \citep{Gao2005} that provides much higher mass and spatial

410: resolution for the halo of interest, while following the surrounding

411: large-scale structure at lower resolution. The merging history of the

412: largest halo at $z \sim 6$, which has then reached a mass of $\sim 7.7

413: \times10^{12}\, \Msun$ through seven major (mass ratio $<$ 5:1) mergers

414: between redshifts 14.4 and 6.5, is extracted. These major mergers are

415: again re-simulated hydrodynamically using galaxy models 

416: which include a \cite{Hernquist1990} halo and an exponential disk 

417: scaled appropriately for redshift \citep{Robertson2006A}, and adjusted to

418: account for mass accretion through minor mergers. Each of these eight

419: galaxy progenitors has a black hole seed assumed to originate from the

420: remnants of the first stars (\citealt{Abel2002, Bromm2004, Tan2004,

421: Yoshida2003, Yoshida2006, Gao2007}).

422: 

423: The simulations were performed using the parallel, N-body/Smoothed

424: Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) code GADGET2 \citep{Springel2005D}, which

425: conserves energy and entropy using the variational principle

426: formulation of SPH \citep{Springel2002}, and which incorporates a

427: sub-resolution model of a multiphase interstellar medium to describe

428: star formation and supernova feedback \citep{Springel2003A}. Star

429: formation is modeled following the Schmidt-Kennicutt Law

430: (\citealt{Schmidt1959, Kennicutt1998}). Feedback from supernovae is

431: captured by an effective equation of state for star-forming gas

432: \citep{Springel2003A}.  A prescription for supermassive black hole

433: growth and feedback is also included, where black holes are

434: represented by collisionless ``sink'' particles that interact

435: gravitationally with other components and accrete gas from their

436: surroundings.  The accretion rate is estimated from the local gas

437: density and sound speed using a spherical Bondi-Hoyle

438: \citep{BondiHoyle1944, Bondi1952} model that is limited by the

439: Eddington rate. Feedback from black hole accretion is modeled as

440: thermal energy injected into the surrounding gas \citep{Springel2005B,

441: DiMatteo2005}.  We note that implementations of our model for black

442: hole growth and feedback that do not explicitly account for 

443: Eddington-limited accretion achieve similar results to the

444: method employed by us (e.g. compare the works of \citealt{DiMatteo2007}

445: and \citealt{Sijacki2007}).

446: 

447: These hydrodynamic simulations adopted the $\Lambda$CDM model with

448: cosmological parameters from the first year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy

449: Probe data (WMAP1, \citealt{Spergel2003}), ($\Omega_{\rm{m}}$,

450: $\Omega_{\rm{b}}$, $\Omega_{\Lambda}$, $h$, $n_s$, $\sigma_8$)= (0.3, 0.04,

451: 0.7, 0.7, 1, 0.9). In this paper, we use the same parameters.

452:  

453: 

454: \subsubsection{Hierarchical Assembly of the Quasar System}

455: 

456: 

457: \begin{figure}

458: \begin{center}

459: \vspace{0.5cm}

460: \includegraphics[width=3.4in]{f1.ps}

461: \vspace{0.5cm}

462: \caption{Evolution of the star formation rate, black hole accretion rate, and

463:   masses of the black holes and stars, respectively, of the simulated quasar

464:   system at $z \sim 6.5$, adopted from \cite{Li2007}. }   

465: \label{Fig_quasar} 

466: \end{center}

467: \end{figure}

468: 

469: In the simulation analyzed here, the quasar host galaxy builds up

470: hierarchically through seven major mergers of gas-rich progenitors

471: between $z = 14.4 - 6.5$.  Gravitational interactions between the

472: merging galaxies form tidal tails, strong shocks and efficient gas

473: inflows that trigger intense starbursts. The highly concentrated gas

474: fuels rapid black hole accretion. Figure~\ref{Fig_quasar} shows the

475: evolution of some aspects of the system. Between $z \sim$~14--9, the

476: merging galaxies are physically small and the interactions occur on

477: scales of tens of kiloparsecs. By $z \sim$~9-7.5, when the last major

478: mergers take place, the interactions have increased dramatically in

479: strength.  Galaxies are largely disrupted in close encounters, tidal

480: tails of gas and stars extend over hundreds of kiloparsecs, and

481: powerful bursts of star formation are triggered, resulting in an

482: average star formation rate of $\sim 10^3\, \Msun\, \yr^{-1}$ that

483: peaks at $z\sim 8.5$. During this phase, the black holes are heavily

484: obscured by circumnuclear gas. The luminosity from the starbursts

485: outshines that from the accreting black holes. So, we refer to this

486: period ($z \sim 14-7.5$) as the ``starburst phase.''

487: 

488: Once the progenitors have coalesced, the multiple SMBHs from the

489: galaxies merge and grow exponentially in mass and feedback energy via

490: gas accretion.  During this period ($z \sim 7.5-6$, hereafter referred

491: to as ``quasar phase''), the black hole luminosity outshines that of

492: the stars.  At redshift $z \approx 6.5$, when the galaxies coalesce,

493: the induced high central gas densities bring the SMBH accretion and

494: feedback to a climax. The black hole reaches a mass of

495: $\sim 2\times 10^{9}\, \Msun$, and has a peak bolometric luminosity

496: close to that of \zquasar.  Black hole feedback then drives a powerful

497: galactic wind that clears the obscuring material from the center of

498: the system.  The SMBH becomes visible briefly as an optically-luminous

499: quasar similar to \zquasar. Once the system relaxes, the SMBH and the host

500: satisfy the relation, $\MBH \approx 0.002\, \Mstar$, similar to that 

501: measured in nearby galaxies (\citealt{Magorrian1998, Marconi2003}), as a

502: result of co-eval evolution of both components \citep{Li2007,

503: Robertson2006A, Hopkins2007D}.  

504: 

505: After $z < 6$ (the ``post-quasar phase''), feedback from star

506: formation and the quasar quenches star formation and self-regulates

507: SMBH accretion.  Consequently, both star formation and quasar activity

508: decay, leaving behind a remnant which rapidly reddens. The object will

509: eventually evolve into a cD-like galaxy by the present day.  (For an

510: overview of this scenario, see e.g., \citealt{Hopkins2007C,

511: Hopkins2007B}.)

512: 

513: The photometric calculations by \cite{Robertson2007} show that this quasar

514: system satisfies a variety of photometric selection criteria based on

515: Lyman-break techniques. The massive stellar spheroid descended from these $z

516: \sim 6$ quasars could be detected at $z \sim 4$ by existing surveys,

517: while the galaxy progenitors at higher redshifts will likely require future

518: surveys of large portions of the sky ($ \gtrsim$ 0.5\%) at wavelengths

519: $\lambda \gtrsim 1\, \mu$m owing to their low number densities. 

520: 

521: \subsection{ART$^2$: All-wavelength Radiative Transfer with Adaptive

522:   Refinement Tree}  

523: 

524: ART$^2$ is based on a unification of the 3-D Monte Carlo radiative

525: equilibrium code developed by \cite{Bjorkman2001} and

526: \cite{Whitney2003A}, an adaptive grid, a multiphase ISM model, and a

527: supernova-origin dust model.  Below, we describe our implementation of

528: ART$^2$.

529: 

530: 

531: \subsubsection{Monte Carlo Radiative Transfer for Dust in Radiative Equilibrium}

532: 

533: 

534: \begin{figure}

535: \begin{center}

536: \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f2.ps}

537: \vspace{0.5cm}

538: \caption{Test run of the radiative equilibrium algorithm adopted from

539:   \cite{Bjorkman2001} on 3-D Cartesian coordinates for a simple galaxy with

540:   a bulge and a disk. The input spectrum of the stars is a blackbody

541:   with a temperature of 15000 K (black curve). The red curve is our output,

542:   the blue curve is simulation data from Kenny Wood, while the crosses are 

543:   observations of a lenticular galaxy NGC 5866, which has an unusual

544:   extended dust disk seen exactly edge-on. Both Wood's data and the

545:   observations come with the code release package from Kenny

546:   Wood (http://www-star.st-and.ac.uk/$\sim$kw25/research/montecarlo/gals/gals.html).} 

547: \label{Fig_sed_jaffe} 

548: \end{center}

549: \end{figure}

550: 

551: 

552: The Monte Carlo RT method follows the propagation, scattering,

553: absorption, and reemission of "photon packets" (groups of

554: equal-energy, monochromatic photons that travel in the same

555: direction), by randomly sampling the various probability distribution

556: functions that determine the optical depth, scattering angle, and

557: absorption rates.  For the dusty environments we are concerned with,

558: the re-emitted spectrum depends on the temperature of the dust, which

559: is assumed to be in thermal equilibrium with the radiation field.  In

560: the traditional scheme, the frequencies of the re-emitted photons are

561: sampled from local reemission spectra with fixed temperatures.  The

562: dust radiative equilibrium is ensured by performing the Monte Carlo

563: transfer iteratively until the dust temperature distribution

564: converges.  Such methods often require a large number of iterations

565: and are therefore computationally expensive \citep{Bjorkman2001,

566: Pascucci2004}.

567: 

568: \cite{Bjorkman2001} proposed a solution to this problem by formulating

569: an ``immediate reemission'' algorithm, in which the dust temperature

570: is immediately updated upon absorption of a photon packet, and the

571: frequencies of re-emitted photons are sampled from a spectrum that

572: takes into account the modified temperature.  The advantage of this

573: approach is that dust radiative equilibrium and the radiative transfer

574: solutions are obtained simultaneously without iteration. This

575: algorithm is described in detail in \cite{Bjorkman2001}; here we

576: briefly outline the steps.

577:  

578: Assuming that each photon packet carries an energy $E_\gamma$, and after

579: absorption of $N_i$ packets in the $i-th$ grid cell, the total energy absorbed

580: in the cell is

581: \begin{equation}

582:   E_i^{\rm abs} = N_i E_\gamma \; .

583: \label{eq:Eabs} 

584: \end{equation} 

585: 

586: In radiative equilibrium, this energy must be re-radiated, with a thermal

587: emissivity of $j_\nu = \kappa_\nu \rho B_\nu(T)$, where $\kappa_\nu$ is the

588: absorptive opacity, $\rho$ is the dust density, and $B_\nu(T)$ is the Planck

589: function at temperature $T$,  

590: 

591: \begin{equation}

592:  B_\nu(T)=\frac{2h_{\rm P}}{c^2}\frac{\nu^3}{e^{h_{\rm p}\nu/(kT)}-1}  \; ,

593: \label{eq:planck} 

594: \end{equation} 

595: where $h_{\rm P}$ is Planck's constant, $c$ the speed of light, and $k$ is

596: Boltzmann's constant. The emitted energy in the time interval $\Delta t$ is

597: \begin{eqnarray}

598: \label{eq:Eem} 

599:  E_i^{\rm em} &=& 4\pi\Delta t \int dV_i \int \rho \kappa_\nu B_\nu(T) \,d\nu \cr

600:               &=& 4\pi\Delta t \kappa_{\rm P}(T_i) B(T_i) m_i \;,

601: \end{eqnarray} 

602: where $\kappa_{\rm P}=\int\kappa_\nu B_\nu\,d\nu / B$ is the Planck mean

603: opacity, $B = \sigma T^4 / \pi$ is the frequency integrated Planck

604: function, and $m_i$ is the dust mass in the cell.

605: 

606: Equating the absorbed (\ref{eq:Eabs}) and emitted (\ref{eq:Eem})

607: energies, we obtain the dust temperature as follows after absorbing $N_i$ packets:

608: \begin{equation}

609:     \sigma T_i^4= { {N_i L }\over {4 N_\gamma \kappa_{\rm P}(T_i) m_i} } \;,

610: \label{eq:REtemp} 

611: \end{equation}

612: where $N_\gamma$ is the total number of photon packets in the simulation, and $L$

613: is the total source luminosity. Note that 

614: because the dust opacity is temperature-independent, the product 

615: $\kappa_{\rm P}(T_i) \sigma T_i^4$ increases monotonically with temperature.  

616: Consequently, $T_i$ always increases when the cell absorbs an additional 

617: packet.

618: 

619: The added energy to be radiated owing to the temperature increase $\Delta T$

620: is determined by a temperature-corrected emissivity $\Delta j_\nu$ in the

621: following approximation when the temperature increase, $\Delta T$, is small:

622: \begin{equation}

623: \Delta j_\nu \approx \kappa_\nu \rho \Delta T {{dB_\nu(T)} \over {dT}} \;.

624: \end{equation}

625: The re-emitted packets, which comprise the diffuse radiation field, then

626: continue to be scattered, absorbed, and re-emitted until they finally escape

627: from the system. This method conserves the total energy exactly, and does not

628: require any iteration as the emergent SED, $\nu L_\nu = \kappa_\nu B_\nu(T)$,

629: corresponds to the equilibrium temperature distribution \citep{Bjorkman2001}.  

630: 

631: This Monte Carlo radiative equilibrium code works as follows: first, the

632: photon packets are followed to random interaction locations, determined by the

633: optical depth. Then they are either scattered or absorbed with a probability

634: given by the albedo ($a = n_s \sigma_s/(n_s \sigma_s + n_a

635: \sigma_a)$, where $n$ and $\sigma$ are number density and cross section for

636: either scattering or absorption, respectively). If the packet is scattered, a

637: random scattering angle is obtained from the scattering phase function. If

638: instead the packet is absorbed, it is reemitted immediately at a new frequency

639: determined by the envelope temperature, using the algorithm described

640: above. After either scattering, or absorption plus reemission, the photon

641: packet continues to a new interaction location. This process is repeated until

642: all the packets escape the dusty environment. Upon completion of the Monte

643: Carlo transfer, the code produces emergent SEDs and images at any given

644: inclination for a wide range of broadband filters, including those of {\em

645:   Hubble Space Telescope} (NICMOS bands), {\em Spitzer} (IRAC and MIPS bands),

646: and {\em SCUBA} submillimeter bands. 

647: 

648: 

649: \cite{Bjorkman2001} tested this algorithm extensively by comparing a

650: set of benchmark calculations to those of \cite{Ivezic1997} for

651: spherical geometry. \cite{Baes2005} critically study the frequency

652: distribution adjustment used by \cite{Bjorkman2001}, and give a firm

653: theoretical basis for their method, although it may fail for small dust

654: grains.    

655:  

656: One drawback of this code, however, is its fixed geometry and limited

657: dynamic range.  It can handle only 2-D or 3-D spherical-polar grids,

658: which are not suitable for capturing the arbitrary geometry and large

659: dynamic ranges characteristic of merging galaxies, which

660: have multiple density centers, and where gas and stars extend hundreds

661: of kpc and shocks produce highly condensed gas on scales of

662: pcs.  We have developed an improved version of this code by

663: implementing an adaptive Cartesian grid on top of the code released by

664: Wood~\footnote{http://www-star.st-and.ac.uk/$\sim$kw25/research/montecarlo/gals/gals.html}. 

665: 

666: 

667: To ensure that our implementation of the algorithm is correct, we

668: rerun the test problem that comes with the code release package of

669: Wood using a uniform Cartesian grid.  The test problem consists of a

670: simple galaxy with bulge and disk components.  As is shown in

671: Figure~\ref{Fig_sed_jaffe}, our code reproduces the result of Wood

672: very well.

673: 

674: 

675: \subsubsection{Adaptive-mesh Refinement Grid}

676: \label{subsec_grid}

677: 

678: \begin{figure*}

679: \begin{center}

680: \includegraphics[width=3.0in]{f3a.ps}

681: \hspace{0.5cm}

682: \includegraphics[width=3.0in]{f3b.ps} \\

683: \includegraphics[width=3.0in]{f3c.ps} 

684: \hspace{0.5cm}

685: \includegraphics[width=3.0in]{f3d.ps} \\

686: \includegraphics[width=3.0in]{f3e.ps} 

687: \hspace{0.5cm}

688: \includegraphics[width=3.0in]{f3f.ps} 

689: \vspace{0.5cm}

690: \caption{Example of the adaptive grid applied to a snapshot of the galaxy

691:   merger from \cite{Li2007}. From top to bottom is: uniform grid, and adaptive

692:   grids with maximum refinement levels of RL=5, and RL=12, respectively. The

693:   label GN indicates the total grid number covering the entire volume (in case

694:   of adaptive grids, it provides the number of the finest grid and that of the

695:   total grid). This plot demonstrates that adaptive grids with

696:   sufficient refinement capture the density distribution well, while the

697:   uniform grid fails to do so unless an unreasonably large number of cells is

698:   employed. Throughout this paper, we use a maximum refinement level

699:   of 12, which has a grid resolution comparable to that of the hydrodynamic

700:   simulations in \cite{Li2007}.}

701: \label{Fig_grid} 

702: \end{center}

703: \end{figure*}

704: 

705: 

706: The SPH simulations using GADGET2 \citep{Springel2005D} output

707: hydrodynamic information as particle data. However, the ray tracing in

708: the RT calculation is done on a grid. Therefore, it is necessary to

709: interpolate the particle-based density field onto a

710: grid. \cite{Jonsson2006} performed radiative transfer calculations on

711: SPH simulations of galaxy mergers using an adaptive grid as

712: implemented in his Monte Carlo RT code, SUNRISE.  Unfortunately,

713: self-consistent calculations of dust radiative equilibrium and emission

714: are not yet included in SUNRISE.

715: 

716: Our algorithm for constructing adaptive grids is similar to that of

717: \cite{Jonsson2006}. We typically start with a base grid of a $4^3$ box

718: covering the entire simulation volume. Each cell is then adaptively

719: refined by dividing it into $2^3$ sub-cells. The refinement is stopped

720: if a predefined maximum refinement level, RL, is reached, or if the

721: total number of particles in the cell becomes less than a certain

722: threshold, whichever criterion is satisfied first. The maximum refinement

723: level used in the present work is 12, and the maximum particle number allowed

724: in the cell is 32, half the number of the SPH smoothing kernel neighbors used

725: in the GADGET2 simulations. The resolution of the finest level is therefore

726: $L_{\rm min}=L_{\rm box}/2^{(\rm RL+1)}$, where $L_{\rm box}$ is the box length,

727: and ${\rm RL}$ is again the maximum refinement level. For example, for the

728: parameters used in this simulation, $L_{\rm box}=200$ kpc, ${\rm RL}=12$, we

729: have $L_{\rm min}= 24.4$ pc. 

730: 

731: The adaptive-mesh refinement grid serves as an efficient tree for mass

732: assignment owing to fast neighbor finding within the grids for SPH

733: smoothing. After the grid is constructed, the gas properties at the

734: center of each grid cell, such as density, temperature, and

735: metallicity, are calculated using the SPH smoothing kernel

736: \citep{Hernquist1989A} of the original simulation. All physical quantities  

737: are assumed to be uniform across a single cell. 

738: 

739: Figure~\ref{Fig_grid} gives an example of the adaptive grid applied to a

740: snapshot from the galaxy merger simulations in \cite{Li2007}, and compared

741: with a uniform grid.  This particular snapshot represents the time when the

742: system reaches the peak quasar phase, when the galaxies are in the final

743: stages of coalescence. The system is highly dynamical as much gas is falling

744: into the center, while feedback from the central massive black hole drives an

745: outflow. The gas distribution is thus inhomogeneous.

746: 

747: As is apparent in Figure~\ref{Fig_grid}, a uniform grid of $50^3$ (top

748: panel) barely captures the density distribution with a spatial

749: resolution of $4\, \kpc$. The resolution is worse than an adaptive grid with a 

750: moderate maximum refinement level (i.e., RL=5, middle panel), which has a

751: finest cell length of $\sim 3.1\, \kpc$. The grid with a maximum refinement

752: level of 12 shown in the bottom panel fully 

753: captures the large dynamic range of the gas density distribution in

754: three dimensions. It has a minimum cell length of $\sim 24.4$ pc for

755: the finest cells, which is comparable to the spatial resolution of the

756: original hydrodynamic simulation of \cite{Li2007}. This resolution is

757: equivalent to a ${\sim 10000 }^3$ uniform grid, which is impractical

758: with existing computational facilities.

759: 

760: \subsubsection{A Multiphase Model for the Interstellar Medium}

761: \label{subsec_ism}

762: 

763: In determining the dust distribution, we adopt the multiphase model of

764: \cite{Springel2003A} for the ISM.  The ISM is then comprised of

765: condensed clouds in pressure equilibrium with an ambient hot gas, as

766: in the picture of \cite{McKee1977}.  In the hydrodynamic simulations,

767: individual SPH particles represent regions of gas that contain cold,

768: dense cores embedded in a hot, diffuse medium. The hot and cold phases

769: of the ISM co-exist in pressure equilibrium but have different mass

770: fractions and volume filling factors (i.e., the hot-phase gas is $\le

771: 10\%$ in mass but $\gtrsim 99\%$ in volume).  In our previous studies,

772: \cite{Li2007} and \cite{Hopkins2006A} used only the hot-phase density

773: to determine e.g. the obscuration of the central AGN, as the majority

774: of sight lines will pass through only this component owing to its

775: large volume filling factor.  However, this method gives only an

776: effective lower limit on the column density.

777: 

778: Here, we consider two components of the dust distribution, having

779: different dust-to-gas ratios and being associated with the two phases

780: of the ISM.  Within each grid cell in the RT calculation, the hot gas

781: is uniformly distributed, while the cold, dense cores are randomly

782: embedded.  Because of the much higher density and smaller volume of

783: the cold phase, it is impractical to resolve these clouds either in

784: hydrodynamic simulations or in our radiative transfer calculations.

785: Consequently, we implement an observationally-motivated,

786: sub-resolution prescription to treat the cold clouds, constrained by

787: the observed mass spectrum and size distribution of molecular clouds

788: in galaxies.

789: 

790: Observations of giant molecular clouds (GMCs) in galaxies show that

791: the GMCs follow simple scaling relations \citep{Larson1981},

792: namely a power-law mass distribution, ${\rm d}N/{\rm d}M \propto

793: M^{-2}$ (e.g., \citealt{Fuller1992, Ward-Thompson1994, Andre1996,

794: Blitz2006}), as well as a power-law mass-radius relation $M \propto

795: R^2$ (.e.g, \citealt{Sanders1985, Dame1986, Scoville1987, Solomon1987,

796: Rosolowsky2005, Rosolowsky2007}). It has been suggested by theoretical

797: modeling that the mass function is produced by turbulence in

798: self-gravitating clouds (e.g., \citealt{Elmegreen1996, Elmegreen2002,

799: Ballesteros-Paredes2002, Li2003}), while the mass-radius relation is

800: attributed to virial equilibrium \citep{Larson1981}.

801: 

802: Here we incorporate these two empirical relations into our ISM model

803: for the RT calculations. For a given cell, the two-phase break-down in

804: \cite{Springel2003A} determines the hot and cold phase gas density

805: according to pressure equilibrium. The cold clouds are assumed to

806: follow the Larson scaling relations:

807: 

808: \begin{eqnarray}

809: \label{eq:ms}

810: \frac{dn}{dM} &=& A M^{-\alpha}, \\

811: M &=& BR^{\beta},

812: \end{eqnarray}

813: where $dn/dM$ is the number density of the clouds differential in cloud

814: mass $M$, and $R$ is the cloud radius. From these equations, one

815: obtains the cloud size distribution

816: \begin{eqnarray}

817: \frac{dn}{dR} &=& \beta A B^{1-\alpha} R^{-(\alpha\beta+1-\beta)} \nonumber\\

818: &=& C R^{-\gamma},

819: \end{eqnarray}

820: where $C = \beta A B^{1-\alpha}$, and $\gamma = \alpha\beta+1-\beta$.

821: 

822: Assume that the minimum and maximum values of the cloud mass are $M_0$ and $M_1$,

823: then the normalization constant of the mass spectrum for each cell can be

824: determined using

825: \begin{equation}

826: \int \frac{dn}{dM}MdM = x_c\rho_c,

827: \end{equation}

828: or

829: \begin{equation}

830: A = x_c\rho_c\frac{2-\alpha}{M_1^{2-\alpha} - M_0^{2-\alpha}} \, ,

831: \end{equation}

832: where $\rho_c$ and $x_c$ are the cold gas density and volume filling factor,

833: respectively. The normalization constant of the $M$-$R$ relation may be

834: determined using 

835: \begin{equation}

836: x_c = \int \frac{4\pi}{3}R^3\frac{dn}{dM}dM,

837: \end{equation}

838: or 

839: \begin{equation}

840: B = \left[\frac{4\pi A}{3\eta x_c}\left(M_1^\eta -

841:   M_0^\eta\right)\right]^{\beta/3},

842: \end{equation}

843: where 

844: \begin{equation}

845: \eta = 1 + \frac{3}{\beta} - \alpha.

846: \end{equation}

847: The minimum and maximum cloud radii in the cell are therefore

848: \begin{eqnarray}

849: R_0 &=& \left(\frac{M_0}{B}\right)^{1/\beta} \nonumber\\

850: R_1 &=& \left(\frac{M_1}{B}\right)^{1/\beta}.

851: \end{eqnarray}

852: 

853: For a photon traveling a distance $L$ in the cell, the average number of

854: cold clouds of radius $R$ the photon will intersect is given by

855: \begin{eqnarray}

856: \label{eq:NR}

857: \frac{dN}{dR} &=& \pi R^2 L \frac{dn}{dR} \nonumber\\

858: &=& \pi C R^{2-\gamma}.

859: \end{eqnarray}

860: Integrating over the cloud radius, one obtains

861: \begin{equation}

862: N = \pi LC \frac{R_1^{3-\gamma} - R_0^{3-\gamma}}{3-\gamma}.

863: \end{equation}

864: Therefore, the average distance the photon must travel to hit a cold cloud

865: (the mean free path) is

866: given by

867: \begin{equation}

868: L_{m} = \frac{3-\gamma}{\pi

869:   C\left(R_1^{3-\gamma}-R_0^{3-\gamma}\right)}.

870: \end{equation}

871: 

872: In the dust RT calculation, we assume that dust is associated

873: with both the cold and hot phase gases through certain dust-to-gas ratios. When a

874: photon enters a cell, we first determine the distance $L_h$ it travels in the

875: hot phase gas before hitting a cold cloud, which is an exponential

876: distribution function 

877: \begin{equation}

878: p(L) = \frac{1}{L_{m}}\exp{\left(-\frac{L}{L_{m}}\right)}.

879: \end{equation}

880: Therefore, $L_h=-L_{m}\ln \xi$, where $\xi$ is a random number

881: uniformly distributed between 0 and 1. The radius of the cloud the photon just

882: hits is also determined randomly assuming the distribution function of

883: Equation~(\ref{eq:NR}); i.e.,

884: \begin{equation}

885: R = \left[R_0^{3-\gamma} +

886:   (R_1^{3-\gamma}-R_0^{3-\gamma})\xi\right]^{1/(3-\gamma)}. 

887: \end{equation}

888: 

889: The distance $L_c$ the photon travels in this cold cloud is again a random

890: variable given by $L_c=2R\sqrt{\xi}$, because clouds are assumed to be

891: uniformly distributed. These equations completely define the statistical

892: procedure for determining the dust column densities associated 

893: with $L_h$ and $L_c$ as:

894: \begin{eqnarray}

895: \label{eq:NhNc}

896: N_h &=& \rho_h L_h \nonumber\\

897: N_c &=& \frac{3BR^{\beta-3}L_c}{4\pi}.

898: \end{eqnarray}

899: 

900: With a given dust opacity curve, these equations allow one to calculate the

901: optical depths, $\tau_h$ and $\tau_c$ for the hot and cold dust,

902: respectively. They relate the photon path lengths in the multiphase ISM to the

903: total optical depth $\tau_{\rm tot}$, which is then compared with a randomly

904: drawn number $\tau_i$, to determine whether the photon should be stopped for

905: scattering or absorption. In detail, the Monte Carlo ray-tracing

906: procedure for the radiative transfer therefore involves the following steps:

907: 

908: \begin{enumerate}

909: 

910: \item

911: A photon packet is emitted from either a blackhole or a stellar source with

912: random frequencies consistent with the source spectra. The photon is emitted

913: with a uniformly distributed random direction. The probability of a photon

914: being emitted by any given source is determined by its luminosity relative to

915: the total. 

916: 

917: \item

918: A random optical depth over which the photon must travel before an interaction

919: with the dust occurs, $\tau_i=-\ln\xi$, is drawn to determine the interaction

920: location. The interaction includes scattering and absorption. In our method,

921: the photon energies are not weighted, only one event is allowed. That

922: is, at any given interaction site, the photon is either scattered or absorbed,

923: but not both.   

924: 

925: \item

926: Starting from the location of the photon emission, the cumulative optical

927: depth of the photon, $\tau_{\rm tot}$, is calculated stochastically using

928: Equation \ref{eq:NhNc} for both hot and cold dusts. If the photon is stopped

929: for interaction within a single cell, then $\tau_{\rm tot}$ is the sum of

930: contributions from possibly multiple segments of both hot and cold dusts

931: within this cell. If the photon passes through multiple cells before an

932: interaction occurs, then $\tau_{\rm tot}$ is the sum of all contributions from 

933: relevant segments in these cells.  

934: 

935: \item

936: At each boundary between the hot and cold phase gas clouds, or at the boundary

937: of the grid cell, the next interaction point is determined by the comparison

938: between $\tau_i$ and $\tau_{\rm tot}$. If $\tau_i \le \tau_{\rm tot}$, then

939: the photon is either scattered or absorbed, with a probability given by the

940: scattering albedo. The exact interaction location is then determined inside

941: either hot or cold phase gas, such that $\tau_{\rm tot}$ becomes exactly

942: $\tau_i$. If the photon is scattered, its direction and polarization state are

943: altered using the Henyey-Greenstein phase function, and the ray-tracing of the

944: new photon is repeated from step 2. If the photon is absorbed, depending on

945: whether the absorption site occurs in the hot or cold phase dust, the

946: temperature of the appropriate dust cell is raised, and a new photon is

947: reemitted according to the scheme of \citet{Bjorkman2001}. The ray-tracing of

948: the newly emitted photon again restarts from step 2. 

949: 

950: \item 

951: If the photon escapes from the system without reaching the optical depth

952: $\tau_i$, it is then collected in the output spectrum and image. The next

953: photon will be picked up from the source, and the whole Monte Carlo procedure

954: from step 1 will be restarted. 

955: \end{enumerate}

956: 

957: After all $N_{\gamma}$ photons have been traced, one obtains the

958: dust temperature distribution for both hot and cold dusts in radiative

959: equilibrium, as well as the output spectra and images. Note that such a 

960: stochastic procedure outlined here may not be as accurate as physically

961: tracking the locations and sizes of the cold phase gas clouds, which can be

962: rather difficult, if not impossible. However, this method works

963: efficiently for a large number of cold clouds uniformly distributed in the

964: cells, and it gives correct average extinction properties for a multiphase

965: ISM model we are interested here.

966: %

967: 

968: Hereafter, we refer to ``HPG-dust'' as the dust that originates from

969: the hot-phase gas, and ``CPG-dust'' as that originating from the 

970: cold-phase gas. Note that the gas only determines the distribution and mass

971: of the dust through a given dust-to-gas ratio. The dust temperature is

972: not associated with the gas temperature, and is calculated

973: self-consistently according to radiative equilibrium.  We further

974: refer to ``cold dust'', ``warm dust'' and ``hot dust'' as dust with

975: temperatures $T \lesssim 100$~K, $100 \lesssim T \lesssim 1000$~K, and $ 1000

976: \lesssim T \lesssim 1200$~K, respectively.

977:  

978: In the RT calculations, we adopt a mass spectrum with $\alpha=1.8$, as

979: suggested by the observations of \cite{Blitz2006}, and an observed

980: mass-radius relation with $\beta=2.0$, which is also a result of the

981: virial theorem. The resulting mass-radius relation in our simulations

982: has a normalization in the range $\sim 10 - 10^4\, \Msun/{\rm

983: pc^2}$. For a cloud size of $\sim 1\, {\rm pc}$, the normalization is

984: $\sim 300\, \Msun/{\rm pc^2}$, similar to observations of the Milky Way

985: \citep{Scoville1987, Rosolowsky2007}. It has been shown that the

986: normalization of the mass-radius relationship depends on galactic

987: environment (e.g., \citealt{Elmegreen1989, Rosolowsky2005,

988: Blitz2007}).  For example, it is about $\sim 50\, \Msun/{\rm pc^2}$ in the

989: Large Magellanic Cloud but could be two orders of magnitude higher in

990: ULIRGs. In extreme starburst galaxies, the normalization could go up

991: to $10^4\, \Msun/{\rm pc^2}$, as we find in our simulations. 

992: 

993: We assume the cold clouds to be in the mass range of $M_0=10^3\,

994: M_\odot$ and $M_1=10^7\, M_\odot$, which is similar to that of

995: protoclusters clouds in star forming galaxies, as shown in

996: \cite{Li2004, Li2005A, Li2005B, Li2006}. For the cold clouds, we have

997: enhanced the pressure by a factor of 10 over the thermal pressure to

998: account for the effects of turbulence (e.g., \citealt{Blitz2006,

999: Chakrabarti2007A}). This enhancement factor is referred to as ``CP''

1000: hereafter. The dust-to-gas ratio of the cold clouds is chosen

1001: to be the same as the Milky Way value (1:124; \citealt{Weingartner2001}), as

1002: found in a large sample of ULIRGs \citep{Dunne2001, Klaas2001}, while that of

1003: the hot, diffuse gas is chosen to be 1\% of the Milky Way value, consistent

1004: with the dust survival rate of sputtering in a hot, diffuse ISM

1005: \citep{Burke1974, Reynolds1997}. Observations of some obscurred or red AGNs

1006: also suggest a ratio significantly lower than that of Milky Way (e.g.,

1007: \citealt{Maiolino2001, Kuraszkiewicz2003, Hall2006}). We will perform a

1008: systematic parameter study of these choices in \S~\ref{sec_param}. However, we

1009: note that these values are found to best reproduce the observed quasar SED at

1010: $z\sim 6.5$. Because the dust opacity is proportional to the gas metallicity,

1011: therefore the dust opacity is weighted by the metallicity of the gas for both

1012: hot and cold gas phases.    

1013: 

1014: 

1015: 

1016: 

1017: \subsubsection{Supernova-origin Dust Model}

1018: \label{subsec_sndust}

1019: 

1020: 

1021: \begin{figure}

1022: \begin{center}

1023: \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f4.ps} 

1024: \vspace{0.5cm}

1025: \caption{

1026: Comparison of the dust absorption opacity curves from a supernova-origin dust

1027: model (SN model, with silicate fraction $f_{\rm s}=10\%$, 20\% in red and

1028: black, respectively) and those of \cite{Weingartner2001} (WD01 model,

1029: with $R_{\rm V}=3.1$, 4.0, 5.5, in blue, cyan, and green, respectively). Note

1030: there are two differences between these two models: the silicate feature at $\sim

1031: 9.7\, \mu$m, and a higher opacity in the optical band.}   

1032: \label{Fig_opac}

1033: \end{center}

1034: \end{figure}

1035: 

1036: 

1037: \begin{figure}

1038: \begin{center}

1039: \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f5.ps}

1040: \vspace{0.5cm}

1041: \caption{Distribution of the optical depths of both HPG- and CPG-dust,

1042:   respectively, at $\lambda=0.1\, \mu$m where the dust opacity peaks as shown

1043:   in Figure~\ref{Fig_opac}. The density grid corresponds to the simulation

1044:   snapshot at $z=6.5$ shown in Figure~\ref{Fig_grid} (bottom panel). The

1045:   ``HPG-dust'' and ``CPG-dust'' refer to the dust associated with hot-phase and

1046:   cold-phase gas, respectively, as described in \S~\ref{subsec_ism}. }    

1047: \label{Fig_tau} 

1048: \end{center}

1049: \end{figure}

1050: 

1051: 

1052: Our understanding of the formation and distribution of dust has benefited

1053: from dust maps of the  Milky Way (e.g., \citealt{Gehrz1989, Schlegel1998}). In

1054: particular, \cite{Gehrz1989} concludes from a detailed Galactic 

1055: survey of dust-producing stars that dust in the Milky Way originates in three

1056: principle ways: (1) by condensation in winds of evolved,

1057: post-main-sequence objects, which accounts of $\sim 90\%$ of the stellar dust;  

1058: (2) by condensation in ejecta from massive novae, supernovae and Wolf-Rayet

1059: stars, which amounts to $< 10\%$; and (3) by slow accretion in molecular 

1060: clouds (see also \citealt{Marchenko2006} for a review). 

1061: 

1062: Over the past several decades, various dust models have been developed

1063: based on the observed extinction curves of the Large Magellanic Cloud

1064: (LMC), the Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC) and the Milky Way (e.g., see

1065: reviews by \citealt{Savage1979, Mathis1990, Calzetti1994,

1066: Dorschner1995, Calzetti2000, Whittet2003, Draine2003}). In these

1067: classical models, dust is assumed to form in the envelopes of

1068: old, low-mass stars such as asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars

1069: with ages $\gtrsim 1$ Gyrs \citep{Mathis1990, Morgan2003A, Dwek2005,

1070: Marchenko2006}.

1071: 

1072: However, this picture may be different for young, high-redshift

1073: objects. Recent deep millimeter and submillimeter observations of

1074: several $z \sim 6$ quasars, which trace the far-infrared thermal dust

1075: emission from these systems, show large masses of dust in these quasar

1076: hosts when the Universe was less than 1 Gyr old (e.g.,

1077: \citealt{Bertoldi2003A, Charmandaris2004, Robson2004, Carilli2004,

1078: Maiolino2004, Beelen2006, Hines2006, Jiang2006, Willott2007}).

1079: In particular, 

1080: \cite{Maiolino2004} find that the extinction curve of the reddened

1081: quasar SDSS J1048+46 at $z = 6.2$ is different from those observed at

1082: $z < 4$ (similar to that of the Small Magellanic Cloud,

1083: \citealt{Hopkins2004}), but matches the extinction curve expected for

1084: dust produced by supernovae. 

1085: 

1086: It has been suggested that core-collapse supernovae (Type-II SNe) may

1087: provide a fast and efficient mechanism for dust production. The

1088: observational evidence for dust formation in SNe comes from

1089: observations of SN1987A (e.g., \citealt{Gehrz1987, Moseley1989,

1090: Roche1993, Spyromilio1993, Colgan1994}), Cassiopeia A

1091: (\citealt{Dunne2003, Dwek2004}; see however \citealt{Krause2004} who

1092: argue that the dust emission is not associated with the remnant), Kepler's

1093: supernova remnant \citep{Morgan2003B}, and SNe 2003gd

1094: \citep{Sugerman2006}. Theoretically, several groups have calculated

1095: dust formation in the ejecta of Type-II SNe \citep{Todini2001,

1096: Nozawa2003, Schneider2004, Hirashita2005, Dwek2007}. In particular,

1097: \cite{Todini2001} have developed a dust model based on standard nucleation

1098: theory and tested it on the well-studied case of SN1987A. They find that SNe

1099: with masses in the range of $12 - 35\, \Msun $ produce about 1\% of the mass

1100: in dust per supernova for primordial metallicity, and $\sim 3\%$ for

1101: solar metallicity. 

1102:   

1103:   

1104: 

1105: In the present work, we adopt the dust size distribution of

1106: \cite{Todini2001} for solar metallicity and a $M=22\, \Msun$ SN model, as in

1107: Figure~5 in their paper. This size distribution is then combined with the dust

1108: absorption and scattering cross sections of \cite{Weingartner2001}, to

1109: calculate dust absorption opacity curves \citep{Finkbeiner1999A, Finkbeiner1999B}. 

1110: We note that \cite{Bianchi2007} re-analysize the model of \cite{Todini2001} and 

1111: follow the evolution of newly condensed grains from the time of formation to

1112: their survival. This new feature shows better agreement with

1113: observations and further supports our motivation to use a SN dust model. 

1114: Figure~\ref{Fig_opac} shows dust absorption

1115: opacity curves, in the range $10^{-2} - 10^4\, \mu$m, from both

1116: the supernova-origin dust model (hereafter SN model) and

1117: \cite{Weingartner2001} (hereafter WD model), respectively. The SN

1118: models include silicate fractions $f_{\rm s}=10\%$ (in red) and $f_{\rm

1119: s}=20\%$ (in black), which show slight differences in the silicate

1120: feature at $\sim 9.7\, \mu$m ($f_{\rm s}=20\%$ model has a slightly

1121: higher opacity). The WD models include all the curves commonly used

1122: with extinction $R_{\rm V}=\frac{A(V)}{A(B)-A(V)}=3.1$, 4.0, 5.5,

1123: which differ in the opacity in the UV-NIR ($0.01\, \mu \rm{m} - 1\,

1124: \mu \rm{m}$) bands ($R_{\rm V}=3.1$ model has the highest

1125: opacity).

1126: 

1127: Between the SN and WD models, there are two noticeable differences; one is 

1128: the silicate feature at $\sim 9.7\, \mu$m, and the second is the UV-NIR

1129: band. On one hand, the WD model has strong peaks around $\sim 9.7\, \mu$m

1130: (silicate feature), while the SN model produces an opacity lower by

1131: nearly one order of magnitude, because the ejecta of SNe with mass

1132: above $15\, \Msun$ predominantly form amorphous carbon grains, which

1133: decreases the silicate fraction in the dust grains. On the other hand,

1134: the SN model increases the opacity in the optical band by a factor of

1135: a few owing to the smaller grain size. We note that the 

1136: small grain sizes may cause

1137: quantum fluctuations 

1138: in the temperature and high-temperature transients (e.g.,

1139: \citealt{Draine2001}). However, the dust produced by the SN model is dominated  

1140: by graphite grains, which have a size distribution from 

1141: $\sim 100 - 2000$~\AA, comparable to the size range of the dust grains in the

1142: WD model, so the temperature fluctuation is expected to be insignificant.   

1143: Note we do not include polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) features at $\sim

1144: 7.7\, \mu$m, which was modeled in detail by \cite{Li2002} and

1145: \cite{Draine2007}. The PAH feature is a good diagnostic of starbursts 

1146: at low redshifts \citep{Houck2005}, however it is very difficult to

1147: detect in $z \gtrsim 6$ systems. Also dust spin is not included in our

1148: modeling, which could be significant around $10$~mm

1149: \citep{Draine1998, Finkbeiner2002}.

1150:  

1151: The differences between these two models, in particular the silicate

1152: feature, may be diminished by choosing different grain compositions

1153: and size distributions \citep{Laor1993}. For example, the WD model

1154: would converge to the SN model if the silicate fraction is reduced to

1155: $\sim 5\%$.  We note that \cite{Elvis2002} propose an alternative

1156: mechanism for dust production in quasars. They suggest that the

1157: physical conditions (i.e., low temperature and high density) in the

1158: quasar outflow are similar to those in the envelopes of AGB stars, and

1159: hence may produce dust similar to that made by AGB stars. This

1160: scenario does not have the same timescale issue as does the AGB model, but

1161: only requires heavy metals such as carbon and silicate, which should

1162: be available even in high-redshift quasars, as noted in the

1163: introduction. Therefore, quasar winds may also serve as efficient

1164: factories for producing dust with extinction curves similar to those

1165: of the WD model. Currently there are no observations available to

1166: distinguish between these models at high redshifts. We will return to

1167: this in \S~\ref{subsec_dustcomp}.

1168:  

1169: Figure~\ref{Fig_tau} shows an example of the resulting optical depths

1170: of both HPG- and CPG-dust at wavelength $\lambda=0.1\, \mu$m where the

1171: dust opacity reaches its maximum, as shown in Figure~\ref{Fig_opac}. This plot

1172: demonstrates that the optical depth is resolved very well in the hot, diffuse

1173: gas which occupies $\sim 99\%$ of the volume, while the optical depth of the

1174: cold, dense cores is usually much larger than unity, in particular in optical

1175: bands with high frequencies.  The energy absorbed by the cold dust in these

1176: wavelengths is then re-emitted at infrared or longer wavelengths.

1177: 

1178: 

1179: \section{The Spectral Energy Distribution of A Quasar System at $z \simeq 6.5$}

1180: \label{sec_sed}

1181: 

1182: 

1183: \begin{figure*}

1184: \begin{center}

1185: \includegraphics[width=5.0in]{f6.ps}

1186: \vspace{1.5cm}

1187: \caption{

1188: {\small SEDs of a quasar system at $z \simeq 6.5$ determined by applying ART$^2$ to

1189: the SPH simulations of \cite{Li2007}. The input spectra (top

1190: panel) include the stellar spectrum (in blue) calculated with STARBURST99

1191: \citep{Leitherer1999, Vazquez2005}, and the composite spectrum of the AGN (in

1192: black, \citealt{Hopkins2007A}).  Note this snapshot corresponds to the peak

1193: quasar phase of the system, the stellar radiation is insignificant compared to

1194: that from the AGN at this evolution stage.   

1195: The red curve is the total input spectrum. The

1196: output spectra are shown in the bottom panel. The red curve is

1197: the total SED assuming an isotropic distribution of photon energies in all

1198: directions, while the grey region indicates the range from two orthogonal

1199: angles corresponding to the z-axis and xy-plane of the Cartesian grid,

1200: respectively.  The filled black circles with error bars are observations from

1201: \cite{Jiang2006}. } }        

1202: \label{Fig_sed_z6}

1203: \end{center}

1204: \end{figure*}

1205: 

1206: 

1207: We now calculate the spectral energy distribution from UV/optical to

1208: submillimeter of the modeled quasar in \cite{Li2007} by applying

1209: ART$^2$ to our SPH simulations, which provide the gas density field

1210: and heating sources for the RT calculations. The input spectrum

1211: includes that from stars and black holes, as shown in

1212: Figure~\ref{Fig_sed_z6} (top panel). The stellar spectrum is

1213: calculated using the stellar population synthesis code STARBURST99

1214: \citep{Leitherer1999, Vazquez2005}. The age, mass and metallicity of

1215: the stars are taken from the SPH simulations of quasar formation in

1216: \cite{Li2007}, while the stellar initial mass function (IMF) is

1217: assumed to be a top-heavy Kroupa IMF \citep{Kroupa2002}, which

1218: characterizes a starburst better than the classical Salpeter IMF

1219: \citep{Salpeter1955}.

1220: 

1221: The input black hole spectrum is a composite template from

1222: \cite{Hopkins2007A}, which consists of a broken power-law (e.g.,

1223: \citealt{Laor1993, Marconi2004}) and an IR component thought

1224: to come from the hottest dust around the AGN, which cannot 

1225: be fully resolved in our hydrodynamic simulations. The normalization

1226: of this spectrum is the total bolometric luminosity of the black

1227: holes. Compared to the luminosity calculation in \cite{Li2007}, the

1228: black hole spectrum here is normalized to 

1229: the bolometric luminosity of \zquasar. Heating by cosmic microwave

1230: background radiation at different redshifts $z$ is also taken into

1231: account by including a uniform radiation field with temperature of

1232: $T_{\rm cmb}=2.73\times(1+z)$ K.

1233: 

1234: The emergent spectrum has a wavelength range of $10^2 - 2\times 10^7

1235: \AA\ $ in the rest frame, and 50 viewing angles (10 in polar angle evenly

1236: divided in ${\rm cos}\theta$ and 5 in azimuthal $\phi$). 

1237: We use $10^7$ photon packets isotropically emitted from sources, and the

1238: maximum refinement level of the adaptive grid is RL=12, which is

1239: above the requirement for convergence (see \S~\ref{subsec_res} for

1240: resolution studies).

1241: 

1242: The calculated rest-frame SEDs of the system during the peak quasar phase at

1243: $z=6.5$ are shown in Figure~\ref{Fig_sed_z6} (bottom panel). The output SED

1244: depends on the viewing angle. The red curve is the isotropically averaged SED

1245: (e.g., it can be understood as an average SED multiplied by the solid angle

1246: $4\pi$). This averaged SED agrees very well with observations of \zquasar\

1247: \citep{Jiang2006}. A prominent feature of this SED is the two infrared bumps

1248: peaking around $3\, \mu$m and $50\, \mu$m. The $50\, \mu$m bump is produced by

1249: cold dust ($T \sim 50$ K) heated by strong star formation, as commonly seen in

1250: the SEDs of starburst galaxies \citep{Sanders1996, Siebenmorgen2007}. The $3\,

1251: \mu$m bump is produced by the hot dust ($T \sim 1000$ K) heated by the central

1252: AGN. This unique feature appears to be ubiquitous in most of the quasar SEDs

1253: over a wide range of redshifts (e.g., \citealt{Elvis1994, VandenBerk2001,

1254: Telfer2002, Vignali2003, Richards2006, Jiang2006}).

1255: 

1256: To demonstrate the line-of-sight dependence, Figure~\ref{Fig_sed_z6} also

1257: shows the range of SEDs viewed from two orthogonal angles of the Cartesian

1258: grid: along the z-axis (upper range) and the xy-plane (lower range),

1259: respectively. This range indicates difference in column density along

1260: the sight lines, and shows that dust extinction in the UV/optical

1261: bands differs by a factor of $\sim 3$, but no difference at wavelengths

1262: longward of $1\, \mu$m. This suggests that the dust is close to optically thin

1263: along these two viewing angles during this time, and that infrared or

1264: submillimeter observations of luminous quasars may not be diagnostics for the

1265: orientation of the host. We have also checked the three major

1266: components of the output SED, namely the scatter, escape and reemission, and

1267: found that the photon energy is conserved. This confirms the photon

1268: conservation algorithm used in the radiative transfer calculation. Moreover,

1269: we find that the emergent SED in the UV/optical bands ($0.01 - 1\, \mu$m) is

1270: dominated by scattering. 

1271: 

1272: It is interesting to comment on the spectral feature at wavelength

1273: $\lambda_{\rm {rest}} = 9.7\mu$m where the silicate cross section

1274: peaks \citep{Draine2003}. This feature can produce either emission or

1275: absorption in the  spectrum depending on the optical depth of the medium at

1276: this wavelength \citep{Bjorkman2001}. In order to have absorption at this

1277: wavelength, the medium has to be optically thick (i.e., $\tau_{\rm

1278: {9.7\mu m}} >> 1$). Generically, this would also result in deep

1279: absorption in the optical/NIR bands ($\sim 0.01 - 1\, \mu$m) owing to

1280: their much higher dust opacity, which is almost two orders of

1281: magnitude higher than that at $9.7\mu$m according to the dust opacity

1282: curve in Figure~\ref{Fig_opac}.  Our spectra exhibit absorption when

1283: the system is in the starburst phase (e.g., $z \gtrsim 10$) when the object

1284: is highly obscured. As the system proceeds to the quasar phase (e.g.,

1285: $z < 8$), the emission feature becomes increasingly prominent as dust

1286: becomes more and more transparent to the radiation.

1287: 

1288: In observations, both absorption and emission features at

1289: $\lambda_{\rm {rest}} = 9.7\mu$m have been detected for a wide range

1290: of objects up to $z \sim 3$ \citep{Armus2004, Papovich2006}. An

1291: absorption feature is frequently seen in dusty star-forming

1292: galaxies such as M82 (e.g., \citealt{Sturm2000}), Arp 220 (e.g.,

1293: \citealt{Spoon2004}), and ULIRG IRAS08572+3915 which exhibits the most

1294: extreme absorption \citep{Spoon2006}. A comprehensive collection of

1295: the SEDs of starburst nuclei and ULIRGs is reviewed by

1296: \cite{Siebenmorgen2007}, who also provide a library of 7000 SEDs for

1297: dusty galaxies. 

1298: 

1299: On the other hand, an emission feature is also reported in many

1300: observations \citep{Hao2005, Siebenmorgen2005, Sturm2005}. In

1301: particular, \cite{Hao2007} analyze a sample of 196 local AGNs and

1302: ULIRGs observed by the Infrared Spectrograph (IRS; \citealt{Houck2004}) on

1303: board the Spitzer Space Telescope \citep{Werner2004} to study the distribution

1304: of strengths of the $9.7\mu$m silicate feature. These authors find a wide

1305: range of silicate strengths: quasars are characterized by silicate emission

1306: and Seyfert 1s equally by emission or weak absorption. Seyfert 2s are

1307: dominated by weak silicate absorption, and ULIRGs are characterized by

1308: strong silicate absorption (mean apparent optical depth of about

1309: 1.5). \cite{Spoon2007} find that the same sample of galaxies is

1310: systematically distributed along two distinct branches: one with

1311: AGN-dominated spectra and one with deeply obscured nuclei and

1312: starburst-dominated spectra. These authors suggest that the separation

1313: may reflect a fundamental difference between the dust geometries in

1314: the sources: clumpy for AGNs versus non-clumpy obscuration for

1315: starbursts. For example, \cite{Levenson2007} suggest that the

1316: extremely deep absorption in IRAS08572+3915 requires a source to be

1317: embedded in a smooth distribution of material that is both

1318: geometrically and optically thick.  Our simulations show that the dust

1319: distribution around the quasar is quite clumpy, and that the SEDs

1320: changes from starburst to AGN-dominated as the system evolves from the

1321: starburst to quasar phases (see Figure~\ref{Fig_sed_z}). These are

1322: consistent with the observations.

1323: 

1324: 

1325: \section{Parameter Studies}

1326: \label{sec_param}

1327: 

1328: In this Section, we explore the large parameter space involved in this

1329: radiative transfer calculation, and systematically study the resolution

1330: convergence, parameters in the two-ISM model, input spectra for

1331: the BHs, the dust models, and the dust-to-gas ratios for both the cold- and

1332: hot-phase gas. 

1333: 

1334: \subsection{Resolution Studies}

1335: \label{subsec_res}

1336: 

1337: \begin{figure}

1338: \begin{center}

1339: \includegraphics[width=3.2in]{f7a.ps}\\

1340: \vspace{0.5cm}

1341: \includegraphics[width=3.2in]{f7b.ps}

1342: \vspace{1cm}

1343: \caption{

1344: Resolution studies of the number of photons (top panel), and the grid

1345: refinement level (bottom panel), respectively. The top panel shows the SEDs

1346: produced with photon number $N_{\rm ph}=10^4 - 10^9$. These SEDs have similar

1347: shapes, and they converge when $N_{\rm ph} \gtrsim 10^6$. A smaller photon

1348: number results in larger fluctuations in the SED owing to greater Poisson

1349: error. The bottom panel compares the SEDs produced with a uniform grid and those

1350: with adaptive grids of different refinement level. Compared to an adaptive grid

1351: method, SEDs using uniform grids with grid number ${\rm GN}=30^3$ and $50^3$

1352: do not have sufficient dynamic range to resolve both the cold and hot dust, which

1353: result in an underestimate of the dust emission longward of $10\, \mu$m. As

1354: the grid refinement level increases, hot dust is

1355: better resolved, 

1356: contributing to the hot dust bump at $1 - 10\, \mu$m. The SEDs converge when the

1357: refinement level goes above 10, which has a minimum cell size approaching 

1358: that of the spatial resolution of the original hydrodynamic simulations. Level

1359: 12 is the standard refinement level used in this paper.}     

1360: \label{Fig_res}

1361: \end{center}

1362: \end{figure}

1363: 

1364: 

1365: Figure~\ref{Fig_res} shows resolution studies for photon number (top panel)

1366: and grid size (bottom panel). The SEDs converge when the photon number is

1367: larger than $10^6$. If the photon number is low, then Poisson noise is 

1368: significant, which results in large fluctuations in the SEDs. Therefore,

1369: throughout the paper, we use a photon number of $10^7$ for SED production, and

1370: $10^8$ for images in order to have higher signal-to-noise.

1371: 

1372: For the adaptive grids, as the refinement level increases, the hot

1373: dust in the central region around the AGN is better resolved, 

1374: contributing to the hot dust bump in $1 - 10\, \mu$m. The SEDs converge when

1375: the refinement level goes above 10, which has a minimum cell size close to

1376: the spatial resolution ($\sim$30 pc) of the original hydrodynamic

1377: simulations. Compared to the adaptive grid

1378: method, SEDs using uniform grids with reasonable computing expense

1379: have poor resolution. As demonstrated in Figure~\ref{Fig_grid}, a

1380: $50^3$ uniform grid has a resolution of $4$ kpc, which can only resolve the

1381: dust in the diffuse gas in the outskirts of the system, but not the clumpy,

1382: dense regions around the central AGN.  Consequently, the resulting SEDs do not

1383: entirely resolve dust emission in $1 - 10\, \mu$m which comes 

1384: partly from hot dust near the AGN, and the cold dust bumps are lower by up to

1385: one order of magnitude. 

1386: 

1387: 

1388: \subsection{ISM Model Parameters}

1389: 

1390: 

1391: \begin{figure}

1392: \begin{center}

1393: \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f8.ps}

1394: \vspace{0.5cm}

1395: \caption{Parameter study of the two-phase break down of the ISM with

1396:   hot and cold phases. In the legend, HP=1 indicates existence of

1397:   hot-phase gas, while CP=10 indicates that the cold pressure is enhanced by a

1398:   factor of 10 (see \S~\ref{subsec_ism} for more details). The purple curve

1399:   represents the ``no phase  break-down'' case in which the cold gas is not

1400:   considered; there is only hot-phase gas whose density is the same as that

1401:   given directly by the SPH simulations. The blue and cyan curves represent cases

1402:   in which no hot-phase gas is present (only cold-phase gas is considered), but the

1403:   pressure enhancement factor for cold-phase gas varies from 10 to 100,

1404:   respectively. The rest of the colored curves represent cases in which both

1405:   hot and cold phases co-exist, with cold gas pressure varying from 1 to

1406:   100. In the RT calculations, we use standard values CP=10 and HP=1.}     

1407: \label{Fig_phase}

1408: \end{center}

1409: \end{figure}

1410: 

1411: 

1412: \begin{figure}

1413: \begin{center}

1414: \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f9.ps}

1415: \vspace{0.5cm}

1416: \caption{Parameter study of the 

1417:   power-law indices of the mass spectrum $\alpha$ and

1418:   mass-radius relation $\beta$ of the cold clouds (see \S~\ref{subsec_ism} for

1419:   more details). The output SED is not sensitive to the ranges of

1420:   $\alpha$ and $\beta$ considered here. In the RT simulations, we adopt

1421:   $\alpha=1.8$ and $\beta=2.0$ as suggested by observations. }     

1422: \label{Fig_MR}

1423: \end{center}

1424: \end{figure}

1425: 

1426: 

1427: Figure~\ref{Fig_phase} shows the SEDs with various parameters for the

1428: two-phase breakdown of the ISM. When there is no phase break-down

1429: (purple curve), only hot-phase gas is considered (no cold gas). In

1430: this case, the hot gas has both large volume filling factor and

1431: mass fraction, so the extinction is extremely high, which leads

1432: to significant emission in the NIR but little emission in the $20 -

1433: 1000\, \mu$m range (the cold dust is sparse). In cases with cold gas

1434: only (no hot-phase gas), the SEDs show big cold dust bumps but no hot

1435: dust emission, as indicated by the blue and cyan curves. A comparison

1436: of these two curves shows that a larger cold phase pressure leads to a

1437: higher volume filling factor for the cold dust, resulting in stronger

1438: cold dust emission.

1439: 

1440: In the cases where both hot and cold phases coexist, the amount of

1441: cold dust emission depends on the cold gas pressure, as indicated by

1442: the other colored curves. We find that cold pressure in the range of

1443: 10 -- 100 is able to produce cold dust bumps that fit the

1444: submillimeter observations of \zquasar.  However, because the SED with

1445: CP=10 has both the hot and cold dust bumps that agree better with the

1446: mean SEDs of luminous quasars in the Sloan samples of

1447: \cite{Richards2006}, we choose CP=10 as a standard value in our

1448: calculations. 

1449: 

1450: Figure~\ref{Fig_MR} shows a study of the output SEDs obtained by

1451: varying the power-law indices of both the mass spectrum and the

1452: mass-radius relation of the cold clouds. Increasing $\alpha$ would

1453: steepen the cloud mass function, leading to more smaller cold clouds

1454: that boost the cold dust bump.  A similar effect is seen by increasing

1455: $\beta$. However, the SEDs are not very sensitive to the change of

1456: either $\alpha$ or $\beta$ in the ranges of 1.5 -- 2.5 and 1.5 -- 3.0,

1457: respectively. Changing $\alpha$ from 1.5 to 2.5, or $\beta$ from 1.5

1458: to 3.0 only results in a change in the SED by a factor of about 2.  In

1459: the RT calculations, we adopt the standard values of $\alpha=1.8$ and

1460: $\beta=2.0$, as suggested by observations \citep{Blitz2006,

1461: Rosolowsky2007}.

1462: 

1463: \subsection{Input Spectrum}

1464: 

1465: 

1466: \begin{figure}

1467: \begin{center}

1468: \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f10.ps}

1469: \vspace{0.5cm}

1470: \caption{A parameter study of the input spectrum for the black hole. The solid

1471:   curves represent the output SEDs, while the dotted lines represent the input

1472:   black hole spectra. The blue and red curves indicate the use of an

1473:   intrinsic, broken power-law as in \cite{Marconi2004}, and a composite

1474:   spectrum from \cite{Hopkins2007A}, respectively. Both input spectra have the

1475:   same bolometric luminosity. A power-law input spectrum would require

1476:   pc-scale resolution to resolve the dust near the AGN in order to produce the

1477:   near-IR emission, which is below the resolution of our hydrodynamic

1478:   simulations. A composite spectrum therefore serves as a sub-resolution

1479:   recipe to resolve the dust emission within parsecs of the AGN.}     

1480: \label{Fig_inspec}

1481: \end{center}

1482: \end{figure}

1483: 

1484: 

1485: Figure~\ref{Fig_inspec} shows a comparison of the emergent SEDs using  

1486: different input black hole spectrum, namely a broken power-law as in

1487: \cite{Marconi2004} (blue curve), and a composite spectrum from

1488: \cite{Hopkins2007A} (red curve). All other parameters being equal, the SED

1489: using the power-law spectrum shows more emission in the optical bands and

1490: lower emission in the IR than the SED with the composite input spectrum. These

1491: differences owe their origin to differences in the input spectrum.  The

1492: composite spectrum includes emission from hot dust residing in the

1493: vicinity of the AGN that is below the resolution limit of our hydrodynamic

1494: simulations. This figure emphasizes the care that must be taken when including

1495: an AGN and performing radiative transfer on scales that are not well-resolved,

1496: and demonstrates that a composite black hole spectrum as in

1497: \cite{Hopkins2007A} provides a viable sub-resolution prescription for the dust 

1498: emission contributed within parsecs of the AGN. 

1499: 

1500: \subsection{Dust Models}

1501: \label{subsec_dustcomp}

1502: 

1503: \begin{figure}

1504: \begin{center}

1505: \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f11.ps}

1506: \vspace{0.5cm}

1507: \caption{

1508: Comparison of the SEDs from using the dust extinction curves of

1509: \cite{Weingartner2001} with $R_{\rm V}=3.1$ (WD model) and that from

1510: Type-II supernovae (SN model). The arrow at $\sim$ 9.43 $\mu$m indicates a

1511: 2$\sigma$ upper limit. \zquasar\ was observed with MIPS at 70 $\mu$m but with

1512: no detection. The arrow indicates a $2\sigma$ upper limit. The current

1513: observations cannot distinguish between these two dust models.}     

1514: \label{Fig_dustcomp}

1515: \end{center}

1516: \end{figure}

1517: 

1518: 

1519: Figure~\ref{Fig_dustcomp} shows the emergent SEDs using dust extinction curves 

1520: from the WD model \citep{Weingartner2001} with $R_{\rm V}=3.1$ and our

1521: SN model, respectively.  The SEDs agree well at wavelengths $\lambda \gtrsim

1522: 10\, \mu$m, but differ by a factor of a couple in the optical /NIR bands $0.1

1523: - 10\, \mu \rm{m}$. It appears that WD model would require a higher dust-to-gas

1524: ratio than that of the Milky Way by a factor of a few in order to produce the

1525: observed SED of \zquasar. In such case, the WD model would produce a stronger

1526: peak at the $9.7\, \mu$m silicate feature by a similar factor relative to the

1527: SN model. Observation of \zquasar\ at $\sim 9.7\, \mu$m would be helpful in

1528: distinguishing between these two models. However, the current data-point at

1529: that wavelength (observed by MIPS at 70 $\mu$m) is only a $2\sigma$ upper

1530: limit, insufficient to constrain the model. 

1531: 

1532: As discussed in \S~\ref{subsec_sndust}, \cite{Elvis2002} suggest that

1533: quasars may also be copious producers of dust, as condensation in

1534: quasar outflows is similar to dust formation in the envelopes of AGB

1535: stars. In this case, the dust extinction curve would be similar to the

1536: WD model. However, the contribution of dust from quasar winds in the

1537: early Universe remains unknown. The recent report by

1538: \cite{Stratta2007} of dust extinction in the host galaxy of GRB 050904

1539: at $z = 6.3$ independently supports a supernova-origin dust model. 

1540: If both supernovae from starbursts and quasar outflows play important

1541: roles in dust production in these young quasar systems at $z \sim 6$,

1542: then the resulting dust extinction curve would be intermediate to the

1543: WD and SN models shown in Figure~\ref{Fig_dustcomp}. More observations

1544: and deeper surveys for dust in high-z galaxies and quasars will be

1545: necessary to constrain dust formation mechanisms at early 

1546: cosmic times.

1547: 

1548: 

1549: \subsection{Dust-to-gas Ratios}

1550: 

1551: \begin{figure}

1552: \begin{center}

1553: \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f12a.ps}\\

1554: \vspace{0.5cm}

1555: \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f12b.ps}

1556: \vspace{0.5cm}

1557: \caption{A parameter study of the dust-to-gas ratio relative to Milky Way

1558:   value, for the Cold Phase Gas (CPG, top panel) and Hot Phase Gas (HPG,

1559:   bottom panel), respectively. This figure shows that the emergent SED is more

1560:   sensitive to the dust-to-gas ratio of the HPG than to the CPG owing to the

1561:   large covering factor of the HPG. In the regular RT calculations, the

1562:   default values are 1 and 1\% Milky Way value for CPG and HPG, respectively.} 

1563: \label{Fig_dtg}

1564: \end{center}

1565: \end{figure}

1566: 

1567: It has been suggested that ULIRGs have dust-to-gas ratio (mostly cold gas as

1568: in our modeling) close to that of the Milky Way (e.g., \citealt{Dunne2001,

1569: Klaas2001}). While some observations of obscurred, X-ray selected AGNs seem to

1570: suggest that the dust-to-gas ratio in these objects has a wide range, from $\sim

1571: 10^{-3}$ to a few of MW value (e.g., \citealt{Maiolino2001, Kuraszkiewicz2003,

1572: Hall2006}). Although this range may apply mainly to the hot, fully or

1573: partially ionized gas in the circumnuclear regions of the AGNs, it would be

1574: interesting to see how such a range affects the output SED in our calculations. 

1575: 

1576: Figure~\ref{Fig_dtg} shows the comparsion of the emergent SEDs with different

1577: dust-to-gas ratios in a wide range, for both cold (top panel) and

1578: hot-phase gases (bottom panel), respectively. The values in the plot are

1579: relative to the MW value. A change of two orders of magnitude in the

1580: dust-to-gas ratio of the cold phase gas results in a difference in the cold

1581: dust bump only by a factor of a few. However, a similar change in the

1582: dust-to-gas ratio in the hot phase gas would result in substantial difference

1583: in the output SED. This study shows the extinction is dominated by the hot

1584: dust, which has a much larger covering factor that the cold dust. We find that

1585: using 1 and 1\% of MW value for the cold and hot phase gas, respectively,

1586: reproduce the observation of SDSS J1148 reasonably well. Therefore, we elect

1587: to use them as default values for our standard RT calculations. Note this

1588: choice of 1\% of MW value for the hot, diffuse gas has little effect for the

1589: starburst or ULIRG phase, because a substantial fraction of gas during that

1590: stage is in the cold clouds. However, it may affect the SEDs of major quasar

1591: phase, as the gas is heated by the AGN. We should point out that in our ISM

1592: model, we do not have the warm phase as in the picture of

1593: \cite{McKee1977}. Such a warm phase medium may have a dust-to-gas ratio 

1594: similar to that of MW. We will explore such a treatment in future work.

1595: 

1596: 

1597: \section{The Dust Distribution}

1598: \label{sec_dust}

1599: 

1600: \begin{figure}

1601: \begin{center}

1602: \includegraphics[width=3.1in]{f13a.ps} \\

1603: \includegraphics[width=3.1in]{f13b.ps} 

1604: \vspace{1cm}

1605: \caption{

1606: Maps of the projected density (top panel) and temperature (bottom

1607: panel) of the HPG-dust (dust associated with hot phase gas). The

1608: origin of the map is the location of the central quasar, and the coordinates

1609: are comoving. Note that the gas only determines the distribution and mass of

1610: the dust; the dust temperature is not associated with the gas temperature but

1611: is calculated self-consistently from the radiation field (see

1612: \S~\ref{subsec_ism} for more details).}    

1613: \label{Fig_dustmap}

1614: \end{center}

1615: \end{figure}

1616: 

1617: The distribution of dust is essential to investigating dust formation

1618: mechanisms and heating sources. Figure~\ref{Fig_dustmap} shows the projected

1619: spatial distribution of the dust density and temperature in the system at

1620: $z=6.5$. The projected quantity is calculated with $\int f(l){\rm d}l/L$, where

1621: $f(l)$ is density or temperature distribution along the line of sight, while

1622: $L$ is the total length of the sight line. Gravitational torques in the

1623: interaction produce strong shocks and tidal features, making the dust

1624: distribution highly inhomogeneous and clumpy. The dynamic range in density can

1625: be up to six orders of magnitude. Both the dust density and temperature peak

1626: in the central regions near the AGN. 

1627: 

1628: \begin{figure}

1629: \begin{center}

1630: \vspace{1cm}

1631: \includegraphics[width=3.2in]{f14.ps}

1632: \vspace{1cm}

1633: \caption{

1634: Radial distribution of dust mass (top panel) and temperature (bottom

1635: panel) as a function of the distance from the central AGN. The blue and red

1636: curves represent the CPG- and HPG-dust, respectively, while the black curve in

1637: the bottom panel is a power-law temperature profile, $T \propto

1638: R^{-1/2}$ as expected from heating by the central AGN.}    

1639: \label{Fig_rdust}

1640: \end{center}

1641: \end{figure}

1642: 

1643: The detailed radial distributions of the dust mass and temperature are

1644: quantified in Figure~\ref{Fig_rdust}. The blue and red curves in this figure 

1645: represent CPG- and HPG-dust, dust associated with cold- and hot-phase gas,

1646: respectively, as defined in \S~\ref{subsec_ism}. The CPG-dust has high

1647: density but a small volume filling factor; it is generally optically thick to

1648: radiation. On the other hand, the HPG-dust has a lower density but fills $\gtrsim

1649: 99\%$ of the volume, and is generally optically thin. Both the dust mass and

1650: temperature vary with distance from the central AGN. The cold dust is

1651: typically surrounded by hot dust. In the inner hundred parsecs, the cold cores

1652: are highly condensed and are optically thick even to the hard radiation from

1653: the black hole. However, the HPG-dust at the edges surrounding these cold

1654: cores is heated directly by the central AGN. This is indicated by the

1655: power-law temperature profile in the lower panel of Figure~\ref{Fig_rdust}, $T

1656: \propto R^{-1/2}$ as expected from Equation (\ref{eq:REtemp}): $T^4(R) \propto

1657: E(R) \propto R^{-2}$. The hottest dust is heated up to $\sim 1200$~K, which is

1658: below the dust sublimation temperature $\sim 1600$~K

1659: \citep{Hoenig2006}. Cooler dust ($T \sim$ tens to hundreds K) is distributed

1660: in an extended region from $\sim$ 100 pc to several kiloparsecs. The 

1661: heating sources come both from stars and the central AGN. Beyond 10 kpc, the

1662: dust temperature drops to below 100 K. Note that the minimum temperature in

1663: Figure~\ref{Fig_rdust} is $\sim 20$~K, which is the CMB temperature at z=6.5.  

1664: 

1665: \begin{figure}

1666: \begin{center}

1667: \includegraphics[width=3.2in]{f15.ps}

1668: \vspace{1cm}

1669: \caption{

1670: Mass-temperature distribution of both the CPG- (in blue) and HPG-dust (in

1671: red). In the bottom panel, $M_{\rm cold}$, $M_{\rm warm}$, and $M_{\rm hot}$

1672: represent the total mass of cold-, warm- and hot-dust with $T \lesssim 100$~K,

1673: $100 < T < 1000$~K, and $1000 \lesssim T \lesssim 1200$~K, respectively.}   

1674: \label{Fig_mdust}

1675: \end{center}

1676: \end{figure}

1677: 

1678: Figure~\ref{Fig_mdust} shows histograms of the dust mass and

1679: temperature. The dust temperature ranges from $\sim 10 - 10^3$ K. The

1680: amount of the hottest dust ($\sim 10^3$ K) is $\sim 1.4\times 10^2\, \Msun$,

1681: while that of the cold dust ($T \lesssim 10^2$ K) is $\sim 1.4\times 10^8\,

1682: \Msun$. This is in agreement with the estimates of the dust detected in the

1683: host of \zquasar\ \citep{Bertoldi2003A, Beelen2006, Jiang2006}. 

1684: 

1685: The large amount of cold dust ($\sim 1.4\times 10^8\, \Msun$) located

1686: within 3 kpc from the AGN provides efficient cooling for the formation of

1687: molecular gas. In \cite{Narayanan2007}, we calculate carbon monoxide emission

1688: using a non-local thermodynamic equilibrium radiative transfer code

1689: \citep{Narayanan2006b, Narayanan2006c}, and find that CO gas forms in this

1690: region, with a total mass of $\sim 10^{10}\, \Msun$, similar to observations 

1691: by \cite{Walter2004}. This suggests that cold dust and molecular gas are

1692: closely associated, and both depend on the star formation history. Our results

1693: show that significant metal enrichment takes place early in the quasar

1694: host, as a result of strong star formation in the progenitors, and that   

1695: intense starbursts ($\rm {SFR} \gtrsim 10^3\, \Msun, \yr^{-1}$)

1696: within $\lesssim 10^8$ yr are necessary to produce the observed

1697: properties of dust and molecular gas in the host of \zquasar, a conclusion

1698: which is also supported by the analytical models of \cite{Dwek2007}. 

1699: 

1700: \section{Evolution of the Quasar System}

1701: 

1702: \subsection{Transition from cold to warm ULIRG}

1703: 

1704: \begin{figure}

1705: \begin{center}

1706: \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f16.ps}

1707: \vspace{1cm}

1708: \caption{Evolution of the SEDs of the quasar system and its

1709:   galaxy progenitors in the observed frame. The colored curves represent SEDs

1710:   from $z \sim 14$ to  $z \sim 5.2$, while the black dots are again

1711:   observations from \cite{Jiang2006}, as described in the legend. Absorption

1712:   of the Lyman line series and continuum by the intergalactic medium

1713:   \citep{Madau1995} is taken into account, which results in a sharp drop at

1714:   short wavelengths.}  

1715: \label{Fig_sed_z}

1716: \end{center}

1717: \end{figure}

1718: 

1719: 

1720: \begin{figure}

1721: \begin{center}

1722: \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f17.ps} 

1723: \vspace{0.8cm}

1724: \caption{Evolution of rest-frame infrared luminosities of the quasar

1725:   system (top panel) and the rest-frame color $f_{25\mu\rm m}/f_{60 \mu\rm m}$

1726:   (bottom panel). In the top panel, the solid curves represent the luminosity in

1727:   near-IR ($1 - 10\, \mu$m), mid-IR ($10 - 40\, \mu$m), far-IR ($40 - 120\,

1728:   \mu$m), and IR ($8 - 1000\, \mu$m), respectively. The grey shades indicate

1729:   regimes for LIRG ($\Lir > 10^{11}\, \Lsun$), ULIRG ($\Lir > 10^{12}\,

1730:   \Lsun$), and HLIRG ($\Lir > 10^{13}\, \Lsun$),

1731:   respectively, as classified by \cite{Sanders1996}. The ratio $f_{25\mu\rm

1732:   m}/f_{60 \mu\rm m}$ in the bottom panel is an indicator of the coldness of

1733:   the SED with a critical value of 0.3 \citep{Sanders1996}. The quasar system

1734:   in our model evolves from ``cold'' ULIRG ($f_{25\mu\rm m}/f_{60 \mu\rm

1735:   m}<0.3$) to ``warm'' ULIRG (including HLIRG, $f_{25\mu\rm m}/f_{60 \mu\rm m}

1736:   \ge 0.3$) as it transforms from starburst to quasar phases.} 

1737: \label{Fig_LIR_color}

1738: \end{center}

1739: \end{figure}

1740: 

1741: 

1742: In \cite{Li2007}, we show that the host of the $z\sim 6$ quasar

1743: undergoes hierarchical mergers starting from $z\sim 14$, and the

1744: quasar descends from starburst galaxies. The evolution of the SEDs of

1745: the system in the observed frame is shown in

1746: Figure~\ref{Fig_sed_z}. Note that absorption of the Lyman lines and

1747: continuum by the intergalactic medium \citep{Madau1995} is taken into

1748: account. During early stages at $z \sim 14$, the SED of the quasar

1749: progenitor shows only a cold dust bump that peaks around $\sim

1750: 60\mu$m, which is characteristic of starburst galaxies

1751: \citep{Sanders1996}. As the system evolves from starburst to quasar

1752: phases, dust extinction in the UV-optical bands increases, boosting

1753: the emission reprocessed by dust at wavelengths longward of $1\,

1754: \mu$m. The gradually increasing radiation from the accreting black

1755: holes heats the nearby dust to high temperatures, contributing to

1756: the hot dust bump which peaks around $\sim 3\mu$m (rest frame). At the maximum  

1757: quasar phase at $z \simeq 6.5$ indicated by the red curve, the hot

1758: dust bump SED reaches its peak with a temperature of $\sim 1200$~K, as

1759: we have seen in the previous section. Such an SED represents 

1760: luminous, blue quasars in the samples of \cite{Jiang2006} and

1761: \cite{Richards2006}. As the system ages and reddens in the post-quasar

1762: phase (indicated by the black curve), the total luminosity of the

1763: system drops. However, there is still some residual hot dust,

1764: and the infrared luminosity is dominated by the NIR and MIR.  This

1765: resembles the class of infrared-bright, optically-red quasars found in

1766: recent surveys (e.g., \citealt{Brand2006}). Overall, the evolution of

1767: the SED from a starburst to a quasar can be characterized by the slope of

1768: the infrared SED ($3 - 50\, \mu$m), as it decreases from the starburst

1769: to quasar phases owing to the increase of NIR emission from the hot

1770: dust heated by the AGN.

1771: 

1772: Infrared luminosities are powerful tools to study starburst galaxies and

1773: quasars. From the results in the previous sections, we see that the emission

1774: in near-IR ($1 - 10\, \mu$m), mid-IR ($10 - 40\, \mu$m) and far-IR ($40 -

1775: 120\, \mu$m) comes from re-emission by hot, warm, and cold dust, 

1776: respectively. Note that the meaning of FIR varies in the literature. Here we

1777: use the definition of FIR given by \cite{Condon1992} in order to compare our

1778: results with the observations by \cite{Carilli2004} who used the same FIR

1779: range. 

1780: 

1781: Using $\Lir$ ($8 - 1000\, \mu$m), \cite{Sanders1996}  

1782: classified infrared luminous galaxies into three categories, namely luminous

1783: infrared galaxy (LIRG, $\Lir > 10^{11}\, \Lsun$), ultra-LIRG (ULIRG, 

1784: $\Lir > 10^{12}\, \Lsun$), and hyper-LIRG (HLIRG, $\Lir > 10^{13}\,

1785: \Lsun$). Figure~\ref{Fig_LIR_color} (top) shows the evolution of the infrared

1786: luminosities of the quasar system in our simulations. The luminosities

1787: increase with the star formation rate and black hole accretion rate. The

1788: system is ultraluminous most of the time, with periods in HLIRG phases

1789: associated with bursts of star formation or quasar activity. When the last

1790: major mergers take place between $z \sim 9 - 7.5$, the strong shocks and highly

1791: concentrated gas fuel rapid star formation and black hole growth. This

1792: also produces a large amount of dust heated by the central AGN and

1793: stars. As a result, the infrared luminosities increase

1794: dramatically, pushing the system to HLIRG class. 

1795: 

1796: The infrared luminosities strongly peak at $z\sim 8.7$ when the

1797: star formation rate reaches $\gtrsim 10^4\, \Msun\, \yr^{-1}$,

1798: suggesting a significant contribution from stars in heating the dust

1799: to emit in the range $1 - 1000\, \mu$m. During the major quasar phase

1800: ($z \sim 7.5 - 6$) the star formation declines to $\sim 10^2\,

1801: \Msun\, \yr^{-1}$, and the emission in NIR and MIR outshines that in FIR,

1802: demonstrating that AGN can play a dominant role in heating the dust and

1803: producing NIR and MIR emission.  Furthermore, the AGN can also contribute

1804: to FIR emission.  For example, while the star formation rate drops by a

1805: factor of $\sim 500$ from $z\sim 8.7$ (when star formation rate peaks)

1806: to $z\sim 6.5$ (when black hole accretion rate peaks, see

1807: Figure~\ref{Fig_quasar}), the $\Lfir$ declines by only a factor of $\sim

1808: 50$, indicating substantial contribution to the $\Lfir$ by the AGN. 

1809: This significant AGN contribution has important implications for estimating

1810: the star formation rate. We will discuss this issue at length in the next

1811: section. During the ``post-quasar'' phase at $z<6$, as a result of

1812: feedback which suppresses both star formation and black hole

1813: accretion, and gas depletion which reduces the amount of dust, the

1814: infrared luminosities drop rapidly.

1815: 

1816: The flux ratio $f_{25\mu\rm m}/f_{60 \mu\rm m}$ is a color indicator

1817: for the coldness of the SED, and can be used as a diagnostic for AGN

1818: activity, as suggested by \cite{Sanders1996}. For example, starburst

1819: galaxies usually have cold colors $f_{25\mu\rm m}/f_{60 \mu\rm

1820: m}<0.3$, while quasars are warm with $f_{25\mu\rm m}/f_{60 \mu\rm

1821: m}\gtrsim0.3$.  The evolution of the color $f_{25\mu\rm m}/f_{60

1822: \mu\rm m}$ of the simulated quasar system is shown in

1823: Figure~\ref{Fig_LIR_color} (bottom panel). The color index is below

1824: 0.3 most of the time, i.e. during both starburst- and post-quasar

1825: phases. However, it rises above 0.3 during the short quasar

1826: phase. This figure clearly demonstrates that the system evolves from a

1827: cold to warm ULIRG (including HLIRG) as it transforms from starburst

1828: to quasar phases. Similar trend is also reported by

1829: \cite{Chakrabarti2007A}. Our results provide further theoretical support for 

1830: the starburst-to-quasar conjecture, as suggested by observations

1831: \citep{Sanders1996, Scoville2003}. 

1832: 

1833: 

1834: \subsection{AGN Contamination and the {\rm SFR} -- $\Lfir$ Relation}

1835: 

1836: \begin{figure}

1837: \begin{center}

1838: \includegraphics[width=3in]{f18.ps} 

1839: \vspace{1cm}

1840: \caption{Contribution to the infrared luminosities, $\Lnir$, $\Lmir$, and

1841:     $\Lfir$, from both AGN and stars, respectively. During the 

1842:     starburst phase, stars are the main heating source for the infrared

1843:     emission. However, during the peak quasar phase, AGN heating dominates. 

1844:      } 

1845: \label{Fig_lir_stars_bhs}

1846: \end{center}

1847: \end{figure}

1848: 

1849: \begin{figure}

1850: \begin{center}

1851: \includegraphics[width=3.2in]{f19a.ps} \\

1852: \vspace{0.5cm}

1853: \includegraphics[width=3.2in]{f19b.ps} \\

1854: \vspace{0.5cm}

1855: \includegraphics[width=3.2in]{f19c.ps} \\

1856: \vspace{1cm}

1857: \caption{Evolution of the SFR -- $\Lfir$ relation in our

1858: simulations. Here we consider the relation in three cases where $\Lfir$ is

1859: contributed by AGNs only (case 1, top panel), stars only (case 2, middle 

1860: panel), and both AGNs and stars (case 3, bottom panel). The colored filled

1861: symbols indicate the system at different redshifts, while the black open diamond

1862: represents the model quasar at $z=6.5$.  The black curve in the middle panel

1863: is the least-squares fit to all the data, while that in the bottom panel is the

1864: fit to data points from $z \sim 14 - 7.5$ only (starburst phase). Case 1 has no

1865: SFR -- $\Lfir$ correlation; case 2 has a tight, linear correlation similar to

1866: that used in observations; and case 3 has a non-linear correlation.} 

1867: \label{Fig_sfr_lir}

1868: \end{center}

1869: \end{figure}

1870: 

1871: AGN contamination in infrared observations of dusty, star-forming

1872: quasar systems has been a long-standing problem. In our simulations, we

1873: see that the contributions from AGNs and stars both vary according to

1874: the activity of these two populations. As shown in

1875: Figure~\ref{Fig_lir_stars_bhs}, during the starburst phase, not

1876: surprisingly nearly all the infrared emission comes from dust heated

1877: by stars. However, during the peak quasar phase, the contribution from

1878: the AGN dominates the infrared light production in the system. This result

1879: has significant implications for the interpretation of observational

1880: data, such as estimates of the star formation rate.

1881: 

1882: In particular, owing to the lack of other indicators such as UV flux

1883: or $\rm H{\alpha}$ emission, in observations of high-redshift objects

1884: the far-infrared luminosity is commonly used to estimate the star

1885: formation rate, assuming most or all of $\Lfir$ is contributed by

1886: young stars.  For example, \zquasar\ has $\Lfir \sim 2\times 10^{13}\, \Lsun$, 

1887: and the star formation rate is estimated to be $\sim 3\times 10^3\,

1888: \Msun\, \yr^{-1}$ \citep{Bertoldi2003A, Carilli2004}. However, these

1889: studies cannot rule out a substantial contribution (e.g. $\sim 50\%$) to

1890: $\Lfir$ by the AGN. If $\Lfir$ is indeed heavily contaminated by AGN

1891: activity, then the SFR -- $\Lfir$ relation would be invalid, and the actual 

1892: star formation rate would be much lower.

1893:  

1894: To demonstrate this, we show in Figure~\ref{Fig_sfr_lir} the SFR -- $\Lfir$

1895: relation in three cases: (1) only black holes are included as a 

1896: heating source of the dust (top panel); (2) only stars are included (middle

1897: panel); and (3) both black holes and stars are included (bottom panel). The

1898: top panel shows that there is no correlation between the SFR and the $\Lfir$

1899: which is produced by AGNs. However, if all the $\Lfir$ is 

1900: produced solely from stars, then there is a tight, linear correlation. If the

1901: $\Lfir$ is contributed by both AGN and stars, then the correlation would

1902: change. The bottom panel in Figure~\ref{Fig_sfr_lir} shows that during the

1903: starburst phase where stars dominate dust heating, there is

1904: still a correlation between SFR and $\Lfir$ with modified slope and

1905: normalization. However, during the peak quasar phase where the 

1906: AGN dominates dust heating, there is no correlation at all.  To summarize,

1907: Figure~\ref{Fig_sfr_lir} gives the following SFR -- $\Lfir$ relations:  

1908: 

1909: \begin{eqnarray}

1910: \label{eq:SFR} 

1911: \frac{\rm SFR}{\Msun\, \yr^{-1}} & = & 2.3\times 10^{-10}\left(\frac{L_{\rm

1912: FIR}}{\Lsun}\right)^{1.01}\; (\rm {stars-only}) \, ,\\

1913: \frac{\rm SFR}{\Msun\, \yr^{-1}} & = & 4.9\times 10^{-7}\left(\frac{L_{\rm

1914: FIR}}{\Lsun}\right)^{0.76}\; (\rm {AGN + stars}) \, .

1915: \end{eqnarray} 

1916: 

1917: Here, the FIR is in the range of $40 - 120\mu$~m (rest frame). This

1918: correlation in the stars-only case is very close to that found by

1919: \cite{Kennicutt1998B}, $\frac{\rm SFR}{\Msun\, \yr^{-1}} \simeq 1.7\times

1920: 10^{-10}\frac{\Lfir}{\Lsun}$ for starburst galaxies. Note the slight 

1921: difference in the normalization might owe to different stellar IMFs used --

1922: we use the top heavy Kroupa IMF \citep{Kroupa2002}, while \cite{Kennicutt1998B}

1923: adopts a Salpeter IMF \citep{Salpeter1955}.  Also, the $\Lfir$ in that work

1924: refers the infrared luminosity integrated over the range of $8 -

1925: 1000\mu$~m. 

1926: 

1927: 

1928: In our simulation, the model quasar at $z=6.5$ has $\Lfir \simeq

1929: 1.8\times10^{13}\, \Lsun$, which is close to that of \zquasar\ derived 

1930: from radio observation \citep{Bertoldi2003A, Carilli2004}. If we assume a 

1931: perfect SFR -- $\Lfir$ correlation as in the middle panel of

1932: Figure~\ref{Fig_sfr_lir} (Equation~[\ref{eq:SFR}]), then the SFR would be $\sim 

1933: 4\times 10^3\, \Msun\, \yr^{-1}$, similar to the estimate of \cite{Bertoldi2003A,

1934:   Carilli2004}. However, the SFR of the model quasar from our

1935: simulations is about $\sim 112\, \Msun\, \yr^{-1}$, which is significantly

1936: lower than that derived from an ideal SFR -- $\Lfir$ correlation. This

1937: discrepancy is largely due to significant contribution to 

1938: the $\Lfir$ by AGN activity. Several studies by \cite{Bertoldi2003A,

1939: Carilli2004} and \cite{Wang2007} find that most $z \sim 6$ quasars

1940: do not seem to show a $\Lfir$ -- $\LB$ correlation, but instead follow a

1941: strong $\Lfir$ -- $\Lradio$ correlation as measured in local star-forming

1942: galaxies \citep{Condon1992}. These authors therefore suggest that these $z

1943: \sim 6$ quasars are strong starbursts, and that most of the $\Lfir$ may come

1944: from stars. However, the $\Lfir$ -- $\Lradio$ correlation may not guarantee the

1945: stellar origin of the $\Lfir$ as the physical basis for this correlation is

1946: unknown. Our results suggest that in quasar systems, $\Lfir$ alone may no

1947: longer be a reliable estimator for star formation rates; other diagnostics

1948: should also be considered. We will study this topic with more detail in a

1949: future paper by investigating the correlations in a multiple luminosity plane,

1950: $\Lb$ -- $\Lfir$ -- $\Lx$ -- $\Lradio$, of starburst galaxies and quasars.

1951: 

1952: \subsection{Evolution of the Dust Properties}

1953: 

1954: \begin{figure}

1955: \begin{center}

1956: \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f20.ps}

1957: \vspace{0.5cm}

1958: \caption{Evolution of the dust mass and temperature as a function of

1959:   redshift. The dust is heated by both stars and AGN. As the system evolves

1960:   from starburst to quasar phases, the amount of hot dust increases. The dust

1961:   reaches the highest temperature during the peak quasar phase. After that, the

1962:   dust cools owing to the decline of AGN radiation.}   

1963: \label{Fig_mdust_z}

1964: \end{center}

1965: \end{figure}

1966: 

1967: 

1968: Figure~\ref{Fig_mdust_z} shows the evolution of the dust properties,

1969: including the dust mass and temperature, as a function of redshift. As

1970: the system evolves from starburst to quasar phases, the amount of hot

1971: dust increases accordingly owing to the enhanced heating from the

1972: central AGN, as well as replenishment of gas /dust from incoming new

1973: galaxy progenitors during mergers. The amount of cold dust

1974: ($T \lesssim 100$ K) reaches a maximum at $z \sim 8.8$ when the last major

1975: merger takes place, then decreases steadily as the dust is heated to

1976: higher temperatures, or as the gas is consumed by star formation and black

1977: hole accretion. Strong star formation is able to heat the dust nearly

1978: to $T \sim 1000$~K. However, the hottest dust at $T \sim 1200$~K 

1979: is associated only with the peak quasar phase at $z \sim 6.5$ when the hot

1980: dust is directly heated by the AGN. After that, the amount of hot dust drops

1981: dramatically as a result of the rapidly declining radiation from the

1982: central AGN.

1983: 

1984: \begin{figure}

1985: \begin{center}

1986: \includegraphics[width=3.0in]{f21a.ps}\\

1987: \vspace{0.5cm}

1988: \includegraphics[width=3.0in]{f21b.ps}

1989: \vspace{0.8cm}

1990: \caption{Relations between rest-frame flux $f_{3 \mu\rm m}$ and hot dust

1991:   mass $M_{\rm hot}$ (top panel), and $f_{50 \mu\rm m}$) and cold dust mass

1992:   $M_{\rm cold}$ (bottom panel). The black curve is the least-squares fit to

1993:   all the data in top panel, and data during starburst phase at redshift

1994:   $z\sim 14 - 7.5$ in bottom panel.}  

1995: \label{Fig_f3_f50_mdust}

1996: \end{center}

1997: \end{figure}

1998: 

1999: In observations, the dust mass is usually determined by assuming that the dust

2000: radiates as a black- or grey-body \citep{Hughes1997, Jiang2006}. In the

2001: emergent SEDs from our radiative transfer calculations, the cold dust 

2002: bumps at different redshifts appear to peak around $\sim 50 \mu\rm m$

2003: (rest-frame), while the hot dust bumps peak around $\sim 3 \mu\rm

2004: m$. Figure~\ref{Fig_f3_f50_mdust} shows the relations between the dust mass

2005: and fluxes at these two wavelengths. The top panel shows that $M_{\rm hot}$

2006: ($T \gtrsim 10^3$~K) increases with $f_{3\mu \rm m}$ flux, while $M_{\rm

2007: cold}$ ($T \lesssim 10^2$~K) correlates with $f_{50\mu \rm m}$

2008: flux linearly during the starburst phase:

2009: 

2010: \begin{eqnarray} 

2011: \frac{M_{\rm hot}}{\Msun} & = & 4.2\times 10^{2}\left(\frac{f_{3\mu \rm m}}{\rm

2012:   mJy}\right)^{1.22} \,, \\

2013: \frac{M_{\rm cold}}{\Msun}& = & 6.0\times 10^{8}\left(\frac{f_{50\mu \rm

2014:   m}}{\rm mJy}\right)^{0.98}\,. 

2015: \end{eqnarray} 

2016: 

2017: However, during the quasar phase, there appears to be an excess in

2018: $f_{50\mu \rm m}$, so the $M_{\rm cold}$ -- $f_{50\mu \rm m}$

2019: correlation does not apply. These results suggest that rest-frame

2020: $3\mu \rm m$ and $50\mu \rm m$ might serve as good diagnostics for

2021: dust, the former for hot dust in quasar systems, and the latter for

2022: cold dust in starburst galaxies.

2023: 

2024: \begin{figure}

2025: \begin{center}

2026: \includegraphics[width=3.0in]{f22.ps} 

2027: \vspace{1cm}

2028: \caption{Evolution of the relation between rest-frame 3.5 $\mu$m

2029:   luminosity and B-Band luminosity (4400 \AA) for the quasar system in our

2030:   simulations. The filled circles represent starburst phases, squares

2031:   represents quasar phases, and triangles represent post-quasar phases. Colors 

2032:   indicates redshift of the object. } 

2033: \label{Fig_NIR_B}

2034: \end{center}

2035: \end{figure}

2036: 

2037: It has been suggested by \cite{Jiang2006} that the NIR-to-optical flux

2038: ratio may be used to probe dust properties. From a sample of

2039: thirteen $z\sim 6$ quasars observed with {\em Spitzer}, these authors

2040: find that two quasars have a remarkably low flux ratio (rest-frame

2041: $3.5\mu \rm m$ to B-band) compared to other quasars at different

2042: redshifts, and they are also weak in FIR. Furthermore, such a low flux

2043: ratio was not seen in low-redshift quasar counterparts. These findings lead to

2044: the suggestion that these two quasars may have different dust properties from

2045: others \citep{Jiang2006}.  

2046: 

2047: From our model, we find that the dust properties are associated with the 

2048: evolutionary stages of the host. Figure~\ref{Fig_NIR_B} shows the evolution of  

2049: the ratio $\Lnir/\Lb$ from the quasar system at different stages of its

2050: life. Early on, during the starburst phase, the ratio $\Lnir/\Lb$ is low. As

2051: the system proceeds to its peak quasar activity, the heating from

2052: the central AGN increases the hot dust emission around $3\, \mu$m,

2053: boosting the $\Lnir/\Lb$ ratio. After that, in the post-quasar

2054: phase, as the radiation from the AGN declines, the hot dust emission

2055: drops rapidly, resulting in a lower $\Lnir/\Lb$.

2056: According to our model, there might be two possible explanations for the two 

2057: outliers in the \cite{Jiang2006} sample. One possibility is that they may be

2058: young quasars that are still in the starburst phase but have not yet reached

2059: peak quasar activity, so the light from star formation may be dominant or

2060: comparable to that from the accreting SMBH still buried in dense gas. This may

2061: explain the low NIR flux, as well as the B-band luminosity and the narrow

2062: ${\rm Ly}{\alpha}$ emission line, which are primarily produced by the

2063: starburst. From Figure~\ref{Fig_LIR_color}, we note that there are ``valleys''

2064: between major starbursts (or mergers) where the infrared luminosities are

2065: low. This may explain the weak FIR in these two quasars. Another possibility

2066: is that these two objects may be in the post-quasar phase, which would also

2067: have low $\Lnir/\Lb$ and FIR (see also Figure~\ref{Fig_LIR_color} and

2068: \ref{Fig_sfr_lir}).   

2069: 

2070: However, our model predicts that the same evolution should apply to every

2071: luminous quasar formed in gas-rich mergers. It cannot explain statistically 

2072: why such a low $\Lnir/\Lb$ ratio is only found in the $z \sim 6$ quasars, but

2073: not at low redshifts. Perhaps these two quasars indeed have unusual dust

2074: properties that cannot be explained by our current model. More observations of

2075: dust in high-z objects are needed to resolve the issues surrounding

2076: the IR-weak quasars in \cite{Jiang2006}, and to test our model.

2077: 

2078: 

2079: \section{Discussion}

2080: 

2081: Our three-dimensional Monte Carlo radiative transfer code ART$^2$

2082: makes it possible to calculate self-consistently the radiative transfer and

2083: dust emission from galaxies and quasars which have large dynamic ranges and

2084: irregular geometries. It works efficiently on hydrodynamics simulations of  

2085: galaxies and mergers, and has flexible grid resolution that can be

2086: adjusted to any SPH resolution in hydrodynamic simulations. 

2087: 

2088: To date, only a limited number of RT calculations have been performed on

2089: galaxy mergers \citep{Jonsson2006, Chakrabarti2007A, Chakrabarti2007B}. In

2090: particular, the parallel SUNRISE code developed by \cite{Jonsson2006} marked a  

2091: milestone in this direction. It has an adaptive grid similar to ours

2092: and works efficiently on the arbitrary geometry in galaxy mergers. However,

2093: radiative equilibrium is not yet included in this code, so SUNRISE can not

2094: currently calculate dust emission self-consistently. 

2095: 

2096: On the other hand, \cite{Chakrabarti2007A, Chakrabarti2007B} had a similar

2097: approach to ours. They apply the code of \cite{Whitney2003A}, which employs

2098: the same radiative equilibrium algorithm as in \cite{Bjorkman2001}, to

2099: hydrodynamic simulations of galaxy mergers with black holes. However, the

2100: spherical, logarithmically-spaced grid used by these authors is not optimal

2101: for describing an inhomogeneous distribution of gas and dust with multiple

2102: density centers in galaxies and mergers, as exemplified by

2103: Figure~\ref{Fig_grid}. Moreover, our methodology is based on a treatment of

2104: the multiphase ISM that includes extinction from dust in the diffuse phase,

2105: which was ignored in the work of \cite{Chakrabarti2007A, Chakrabarti2007B}.

2106: Furthermore, we adopt an AGN input spectrum that includes emission from dust

2107: on scales that the simulations do not resolve, unlike \cite{Chakrabarti2007A,

2108: Chakrabarti2007B} who employ a power-law AGN spectrum.  The tests

2109: described above demonstrate that the near- and mid-IR emission is sensitive to 

2110: the resolution of the RT calculation (Figure~\ref{Fig_res}),

2111: extinction by dust in the diffuse phase of the ISM (Figure~\ref{Fig_phase}),

2112: and the template spectrum of the AGN (Figure~\ref{Fig_inspec}).  The SEDs in

2113: the work of \cite{Chakrabarti2007A, Chakrabarti2007B} show only cold dust

2114: emission characteristic of a starburst during all evolutionary phases, even

2115: when the quasar peaks (e.g., Figure~20 in \citealt{Chakrabarti2007B}), and,

2116: in particular, do not at any time exhibit hot dust emission.  We

2117: attribute the differences between our computed SEDs and those of

2118: \cite{Chakrabarti2007A, Chakrabarti2007B} mainly to the different grid method

2119: employed, the handling of extinction by the diffuse ISM, and our choice of an

2120: AGN input spectrum that includes emission on scales that cannot be resolved in

2121: our hydrodynamic simulations.

2122: 

2123: In our radiative transfer calculations, we do not explicitly include a dust

2124: torus near the AGN. The resolution of our RT grid is constrained by

2125: that of the hydrodynamic simulations, which is of $\sim 30$~pc. As a result,

2126: we can not resolve the near vicinity of the AGN. In the Unification Scheme

2127: for AGN \citep{Miller1983}, a parsec-scale dust torus, both optically and

2128: geometrically thick, has been used to successfully explain the different

2129: appearances of Type 1 and Type 2 AGNs. For example, Type 1 AGNs are typically

2130: viewed face-on and show blue UV bump in their spectra, while Type 2 AGNs are

2131: viewed edge-on without the blue UV bump. It is believed that the NIR and MIR

2132: emission of an AGN comes from the hot dust in the torus structure, as

2133: suggested by various observations, for examples, the MIR and NIR detection of a

2134: Seyfert 2 galaxy NGC 1068 \citep{Jaffe2004, Wittkowski2004}, and the MIR

2135: emission of a lensed quasar Q2237+0305 by \cite{Wyithe2002} in the CfA

2136: Redshift Survey \citep{Huchra1985}. The radiative transfer modeling by 

2137: \cite{Hoenig2006}, which concentrates on the inner parsecs of the AGN, has

2138: successfully reproduced the SED of NGC 1068 in the NIR and MIR with a

2139: three-dimensional, clumpy dust torus. Such a scale is, however, below the

2140: resolution of our modeling, which follows the dynamical evolution of the

2141: quasar system on a galactic scale. Moreover, it is not clear whether such a

2142: well-defined torus structure would exist in luminous quasars at high

2143: redshifts. Nevertheless, we have adopted a composite AGN spectrum

2144: \citep{Hopkins2007A} as a sub-resolution recipe for the IR emission from the 

2145: hottest dust near the AGN. Such an approach is supported by the fact 

2146: that the composite spectrum represents the average near- to mid-IR emission in 

2147: thousands of quasars \citep{Richards2006}, and that the torus does not

2148: contribute much to the far-IR emission, which comes mainly from cold dust on

2149: kiloparsec scales. Therefore, for spatial scales of interest, the

2150: results should be reliable, and they are expected be similar to those from

2151: calculations with a torus included. We defer such a calculation to the future

2152: when sub-parsec resolution is feasible in hydrodynamic simulations of quasar

2153: formation.       

2154: 

2155: We should point out that dust destruction is not explicitly included in our

2156: modeling. It has been suggested (e.g., \citealt{McKee1989, Draine1993, 

2157: Draine2003, Nozawa2006}) that dust destruction might be efficient in

2158: non-radiative shocks by non-thermal and thermal sputtering owing to a high

2159: shock velocity ($> 100$ km s$^{-1}$) and a high gas temperature ($> 10^6$

2160: K). However, the sputtering timescale for this temperature is of $\sim 3\times

2161: 10^6$ yr for a gas density $n=1\, {\rm cm}^{-1}$, and even shorter if the gas

2162: density is higher \citep{Burke1974, Reynolds1997}. It has also been suggested

2163: that dust grains may be destroyed behind radiative shocks

2164: \citep{Todini2001, Bianchi2007}. However, it is expected that the efficiency cannot 

2165: be significant at high redshifts as magnetic fields are likely weak

2166: \citep{Gnedin2000}. In our dust treatment in the RT analysis, the

2167: dust is re-calculated based on the gas content in every snapshot

2168: from the hydrodynamic simulations, which has a time interval of 2

2169: Myr. This is equivalent to dust destruction within this

2170: timescale. Moreover, we assume different dust-to-gas ratios for the

2171: cold and hot gas, which accounts for dust survival in

2172: these different phases of the interstellar medium.

2173: 

2174: One limitation of our ART$^2$ code is that it does not include the transient

2175: heating of small dust grains (size $<200${\AA}), which may cause temperature

2176: fluctuation and produce enhanced near-infrared emission \citep{Li2001,

2177: Misselt2001}, in particular for the PAH feature. Although PAH is not

2178: studied in this present work, the code can be improved in the future by

2179: implementing a temperature distribution for those small grains. Moreover, 

2180: one potential caveat of our RT work is that it is a post-processing

2181: procedure. It would be ideal to couple the radiation with

2182: hydrodynamics; i.e., having the radiative transfer done simultaneously

2183: with the hydrodynamic simulations (as in e.g., \citealt{Yoshida2007})

2184: as the dynamical evolution of the gas might affect the formation and

2185: properties of the dust. However, this effect is currently uncertain because

2186: such a technique is not yet available for dust emission in galaxy

2187: simulations. Although ART$^2$ is not parallelized, it works fairly efficiently 

2188: owing to the adaptive refinement tree. 

2189: 

2190: We have done extensive resolution studies which include both the number of

2191: photon packets and the refinement level of the grid, and parameters for the

2192: ISM model such as the cloud mass spectrum and size distribution, as well as

2193: different dust models. We find convergence of the modeled SEDs with parameters

2194: within observational ranges (see \S~2 and \S~3). Therefore, we conclude that

2195: the RT calculations we present here with ART$^2$ are robust, and that our

2196: model is more self-consistent, more realistic, and more versatile than

2197: previous approaches. 

2198:  

2199:  

2200: \section{Summary}

2201: 

2202: We have implemented a three-dimensional Monte Carlo radiative transfer

2203: code, ART$^2$ -- All-wavelength Radiative Transfer with Adaptive Refinement

2204: Tree, and use it to calculate the dust emission and multi-wavelength

2205: properties of quasars and galaxies. ART$^2$ includes the following essential

2206: implementations: 

2207: 

2208: \begin{enumerate}

2209: 

2210: \item A radiative equilibrium algorithm developed by \cite{Bjorkman2001}. It

2211:   conserves the total photon energy, and corrects the dust temperature

2212:   without iteration. This algorithm calculates dust emission efficiently and

2213:   self-consistently.  

2214: 

2215: \item An adaptive grid scheme in 3-D Cartesian coordinates similar to that of

2216:   \cite{Jonsson2006}, which handles an

2217:   arbitrary geometry and covers a large dynamic range over several orders of

2218:   magnitude. This is indispensable for capturing the inhomogeneous and clumpy

2219:   density distribution in galaxies and galaxy mergers. It easily achieves a

2220:   $\sim$10 pc-scale grid resolution equivalent to a $\sim 10000^3$ uniform grid,

2221:   which is prohibitive with current computation schemes.  

2222: 

2223: \item A two-phase ISM model in which the cold, dense clouds are embedded in

2224:   a hot, diffuse medium in pressure equilibrium

2225:   \citep{Springel2003A}. Moreover, the cold clouds follow a mass spectrum and a  

2226:   size distribution similar to the \cite{Larson1981} scaling relations

2227:   inferred for giant molecular clouds. This model ensures an appropriate

2228:   sub-grid recipe for the ISM physics, which is important for studying dust

2229:   properties in galaxies.  

2230: 

2231: \item A supernova-origin dust model in which the dust is produced by Type-II

2232:   supernovae, and the size distribution of grains follows that derived by

2233:   \cite{Todini2001}. This model may be especially  relevant for dust in

2234:   high-redshift, young objects. In traditional dust models, the dust is

2235:   produced by old, low mass stars such as AGB stars, which are typically over

2236:   1 Gyr old. However, quasar systems at $\sim 6.4$ are only a few hundred

2237:   Myr old, and there would be insufficient AGB stars to produce the abundant dust

2238:   as observed in \zquasar. 

2239: 

2240: \item The input spectra include those from both stars, calculated

2241:   using STARBURST99 \citep{Leitherer1999, Vazquez2005}, and black holes

2242:   represented by a composite AGN template developed by

2243:   \cite{Hopkins2007A}. The composite spectrum includes a broken power-law  

2244:   as the intrinsic black hole spectrum, and infrared components that come from 

2245:   the torus near the AGN. The torus structure is unresolved in our

2246:   hydrodynamic simulations. This template is a sub-grid recipe to include the

2247:   hot dust emission within pc-scales which is below the resolution   

2248:   of our hydrodynamic simulations.   

2249:  

2250: \end{enumerate}

2251: 

2252: ART$^2$ works efficiently on hydrodynamic simulations of galaxies and

2253: quasars performed with GADGET2 \citep{Springel2005D}. By applying

2254: ART$^2$ to the quasar simulations of \cite{Li2007}, in which luminous

2255: quasars at $z \gtrsim 6$ form rapidly through hierarchical mergers of

2256: gas-rich galaxies, we are able to calculate the multi-wavelength SEDs (from

2257: optical to millimeter) and dust properties of the model quasar at $z

2258: \sim 6.5$ and its galaxy progenitors at even higher redshifts.

2259: 

2260: We find that a supernova-origin dust model may be able to explain the

2261: dust properties as observed in the high-redshift quasars. Our

2262: calculations reproduce the observed SED and properties such as the

2263: dust mass and temperature of \zquasar, the most distant Sloan quasar.

2264: The dust and infrared emission in quasar hosts are closely associated

2265: with the formation and evolution of the system. As the system

2266: transforms from starburst to quasar phases, the evolution of the SEDs

2267: is characterized by a transition from a cold to warm ULIRG. During the

2268: starburst phase at $z \gtrsim 7.5$, the SEDs of the quasar progenitors

2269: exhibit cold dust bumps (peak at $\sim 50\, \mu$m rest frame) that are

2270: characteristic of starburst galaxies. During the peak quasar phase ($z

2271: \sim 7.5 - 6$), the SEDs show a prominent hot dust bump (peaks at $\sim

2272: 3\, \mu$m rest frame) as observed in luminous quasars at both low and high

2273: redshifts (e.g, \citealt{Richards2006, Jiang2006}).  

2274: 

2275: Furthermore, we find that during the quasar phase, AGN activity

2276: dominates the heating of dust and the resulting infrared

2277: luminosities. This has significant implications for the interpretation

2278: of observables from the quasar host. The hottest dust ($T \gtrsim

2279: 10^3$~K) is present only during the peak quasar activity, and

2280: correlates strongly with the near-IR flux. The SFR -- $\Lfir$

2281: correlation depends sensitively on the relative heating contributed from AGN

2282: and stars. If the dust heating is dominated by stars, as in the

2283: starburst phase, then there is a tight, linear SFR -- $\Lfir$

2284: correlation similar to the one widely used to interpret observations

2285: \citep{Kennicutt1998B}. However, if both AGN and stars contribute to

2286: the dust emission in the far-IR, then the correlation becomes

2287: non-linear with a modified normalization.  If the AGN dominates the

2288: $\Lfir$, as in the peak quasar phase, we find no correlation at all.

2289: Finally, we find correlations between dust masses and rest-frame

2290: fluxes at $3\, \mu$m and $50\, \mu$m. The $f_{3\, \mu \rm m}$ flux may

2291: serve as a good diagnostic for hot dust in quasars, while $f_{50\,

2292: \mu \rm m}$ may be used to estimate the amount of cold dust in

2293: starburst galaxies, as $f_{50\, \mu \rm m}$ correlates linearly with

2294: the cold dust mass.

2295: 

2296: Our model demonstrates that massive star formation at higher

2297: redshifts ($ z \gtrsim 10$) is necessary in order to produce the observed

2298: dust properties in these quasars. This suggests that the quasar

2299: hosts should have already built up a large stellar population by $z

2300: \sim 6$. Our results support a merger-driven origin for luminous

2301: quasars at high redshifts, and provide further evidence for the

2302: hypothesis of starburst-to-quasar evolution.

2303: 

2304: 

2305: \acknowledgments{Special thanks to Kenny Wood\footnotemark[2] and Barbara

2306:   Whitney\footnotemark[3] for generously making their Monte Carlo radiative

2307:   equilibrium codes publicly available;

2308:   \footnotetext[2]{http://www-star.st-and.ac.uk/$\sim$kw25/research/montecarlo/montecarlo.html}

2309:   \footnotetext[3]{http://gemelli.colorado.edu/$\sim$bwhitney/codes/codes.html}

2310:   and to Patrik Jonsson for sharing publicly his fantastic

2311:   radiative transfer code SUNRISE\footnotemark[4]

2312:   \footnotetext[4]{http://www.ucolick.org/$\sim$patrik/sunrise/}.  

2313:   We thank Gurtina Besla, Stephanie Bush, Sukanya Chakrabarti,

2314:   Suvendra Dutta, Giovanni Fazio, Jiasheng Huang, Dusan Keres, Desika

2315:   Narayanan, Erik Rosolowsky and Josh Younger for many stimulating discussions. 

2316:   YL thanks Lee Armus, Frank Bertoldi, Bruce Draine, Patrik Jonsson, 

2317:   Carol Lonsdale, Mike Nolta, Casey Papovich, George Rybicki, Nick

2318:   Scoville, Rodger Thompson and Lin Yan for inspiration and

2319:   discussions.  Finally, we thank the referee for a thoughtful report that has

2320:   helped improve this manuscript. YL gratefully acknowledges a Keck

2321:   Fellowship sponsored by the Keck Foundation, as well as an Institute for

2322:   Theory and Computation Fellowship, under which support most of this work was

2323:   done. The computations reported here were performed at the Center for 

2324:   Parallel Astrophysical Computing at Harvard-Smithsonian Center for

2325:   Astrophysics. This work was supported in part by NSF grant 03-07690 and NASA 

2326:   ATP grant NAG5-13381.}   

2327: 

2328: \bibliography{ms}

2329: 

2330: 

2331: \end{document}

2332: