1: % Submittal version.      

2: % G34.4, IRAS 18507+0121, 

3: % 	 OVRO:    CO, 13CO, C18O observations in 2004

4: %                 Note: cannot use continuum - line contamination big

5: %                 time. 

6: %	 Spitzer: Ed Churchwell has this

7: % 	 NIR:     Anything new from Dieter? 

8: %        Simba:   Leo Bronfman has a simba source - G34MM is

9: %                 detected.  See about adding the image to the paper

10: %                 even though absolute psn scale is unknown.  

11: 

12: % history: 

13: % 1st draft 2005,  Deb: rough stuff with ovro only

14: % 2nd draft oct06, Deb: full ovro, early glimpse ideas from Matt/Barb 

15: % 3rd draft nov06, Matt/Barb: added 1st draft of major glimpse results 

16: % 4th draft dec06, Matt & Deb: unifying ovro & glimpse, start

17: %                  discussion writeup 

18: % 5th draft jun07, Incorporate referee comments.  

19: 

20: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex} % one-column, single-spaced 

21: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex} % double-column, single-spaced

22: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex} % one-column, double-spaced 

23:  

24: %some definitions

25: %**********************************************

26: \def\hii{\hbox{H{ }{\sevenrm II}{ }}}

27: \def\farcs{\hbox{$.\!\!^{\prime\prime}$}} 

28: \def\farcss{\hbox{$.\!\!^{s}$}} 

29: \def\pagebreak{\vfill\eject}

30: \def\blankline{\vskip 2.5ex}

31: \def\Msun{{M$_\odot$}}

32: \def\sun{\mbox{$_\odot$}}

33: \def\per{{$^{-1}$}}

34: \def\deg{{$^\circ$}}

35: \def\half{{\leavevmode\kern.1em\raise.5ex

36: \hbox{\the\scriptfont0 1}\kern-.1em /

37: \kern-.15em\lower.25ex\hbox{\the\scriptfont02}}} %exercise 11.6

38: \def\gtsim{\lower.5ex\hbox{$\buildrel > \over\sim$}}

39: \def\ltsim{\lower.5ex\hbox{$\buildrel < \over\sim$}}

40: %\def\sun{\mbox{$_\odot$}}

41: \def\kms{\,km\,s$^{-1}$}

42: \def\jyb{\,Jy\,beam$^{-1}$}

43: \def\jybkms{\,Jy\,beam$^{-1}$ km\,s$^{-1}$}

44: \def\mjybkms{\,mJy\,beam$^{-1}$ km\,s$^{-1}$}

45: \def\mjyb{\,mJy\,beam$^{-1}$}

46: \def\co{CO}

47: \def\cof{CO(J=1$-$0)}

48: \def\tco{$^{13}$CO}

49: \def\tcof{$^{13}$CO(J=1$-$0)}

50: \def\ceo{C$^{18}$O}

51: \def\ceof{C$^{18}$O(J=1$-$0)}

52: \def\cso{C$^{17}$O}

53: \def\csof{C$^{17}$O(J=1$-$0)}

54: \def\hco{HCO$^+$}

55: \def\htco{H$^{13}$CO$^+$}

56: \def\h{H$_2$}

57: \def\ha{H$\alpha$}

58: \def\water{H$_2$O}

59: \def\methanol{CH$_3$OH}

60: \def\hf{H$_2$ $\nu=0$--$1$ S(1)}

61: \def\nht{NH$_3$}

62: \def\vlsr{$v_{LSR}$}

63: \def\ra#1#2#3{#1$^{\rm h}$#2$^{\rm m}$#3$^{\rm s}$}

64: \def\dec#1#2#3{$#1^\circ#2'#3''$}

65: \def\arcs{\hbox{$^{\prime\prime}$}}

66: \def\mag{\hbox{$^{\rm m}$}}

67: \def\fmag{\hbox{$\,.\!\!^{\rm m}$}}

68: % note: $16\farcm4$ produces 16.'4 with ' over .

69: \def\uchii{UC\,H{\sc ii}}

70: \def\um{$\mu$m}

71: 

72: % allow hyphenation

73: \pretolerance=500

74: \tolerance=500

75: 

76: % allow justification

77: \rightskip=0pt

78:   

79: \slugcomment{ApJ, accepted}

80: 

81: 

82: \begin{document}

83: 

84: \title{Molecular Outflows and a Mid-Infrared Census of the Massive

85:   Star-Formation Region Associated with IRAS\,18507$+$0121}

86: 

87: \author{

88: D. S. Shepherd\altaffilmark{1}$^,$\altaffilmark{2}, 

89: M. S. Povich\altaffilmark{3},

90: B. A. Whitney\altaffilmark{4},  

91: T. P. Robitaille\altaffilmark{5},

92: D. E. A. N\"{u}rnberger\altaffilmark{6},

93: L. Bronfman\altaffilmark{7},

94: D. P. Stark\altaffilmark{8}, 

95: R. Indebetouw\altaffilmark{9},

96: M. R. Meade\altaffilmark{3}, \& 

97: B. L. Babler\altaffilmark{3}

98: }

99: 

100: \vspace{-3mm}

101: \altaffiltext{1}{National Radio Astronomy Laboratory, P.O. Box O, 1003

102:   Lopezville Rd, Socorro, NM 87801.}

103: \altaffiltext{2}{The National Radio Astronomy Observatory is a

104:   facility of the National Science Foundation operated under

105:   cooperative agreement by Associated Universities, Inc.}

106: \altaffiltext{3}{Department of Astronomy, University of Wisconsin at

107:   Madison, 475 N. Charter St. Madison, WI 53706} 

108: \altaffiltext{4}{Space Science Institute, 4750 Walnut St. Suite 205,

109:   Boulder, CO 80301, bwhitney@spacescience.org.}  

110: \altaffiltext{5}{SUPA, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of

111:   St Andrews, North Haugh, KY16 9SS, St Andrews, United Kingdom;

112:   tr9@st-andrews.ac.uk.}  

113: \altaffiltext{6}{European Southern Observatory, Casilla 19001, 

114:   Santiago 19, Chile.}

115: \altaffiltext{7}{Departamento de Astronom\'{\i}a, Universidad de Chile, 

116:   Casilla 36-D, Santiago, Chile.}

117: \altaffiltext{8}{Division of Physics, Mathematics \& Astronomy,

118:   California Institute of Technology, MS 105-24, Pasadena, CA 91125.} 

119: \altaffiltext{9}{Department of Astronomy, University of Virginia,

120:   Charlottesville, VA 22903-0818.} 

121: 

122: 

123: \rightskip=\leftskip 

124: \vspace{-3mm}

125: 

126: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

127: \begin{abstract}

128: We have observed the central region of the IR-dark cloud filament

129: associated with IRAS\,18507$+$0121 at millimeter wavelengths in

130: {\cof}, {\tcof}, and {\ceof} line emission and with the {\it Spitzer

131: Space Telescope} at mid-IR wavelengths.  Five massive outflows from

132: two cloud cores were discovered.  Three outflows are centered on or

133: near an Ultracompact H{\sc ii} (\uchii) region (G34.4+0.23) while the

134: remaining two outflows originate from the millimeter core

135: G34.4+0.23\,MM.  Modeling of the SEDs of the mid-IR sources identified

136: 31 young stellar objects in the filament with a combined stellar mass

137: of $\sim 127 \pm 27$\,\Msun.  An additional 22 sources were identified

138: as probable cluster members based on the presence of strong 24\,\um\

139: emission.  The total star formation efficiency in the G34.4 cloud

140: filament is estimated to be $\sim$\,7\% while the massive and

141: intermediate mass star formation efficiency in the entire cloud

142: filament is estimated to be roughly 2\%.  A comparison of the

143: gravitational binding energy with the outflow kinetic energy suggests

144: that the compact core containing G34.4+0.23\,MM is being destroyed by its

145: molecular outflows whereas the outflows associated with more massive

146: core surrounding the G34.4 \uchii\ region are not likely to totally

147: disrupt the cloud.  Additionally, a qualitative evaluation of the

148: region appears to suggest that stars in this region may have formed in

149: two stages: first lower mass stars formed and then, a few Myrs later,

150: the more massive stars began to form.

151: 

152: \end{abstract}

153: 

154: \vspace{-.5cm}

155: \keywords{

156: stars: formation -- nebulae: HII regions -- ISM: molecules

157: }

158: 

159: \clearpage

160: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

161: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

162: \section{INTRODUCTION}

163: 

164: The massive star forming region associated with IRAS\,18507$+$0121

165: (hereafter IRAS\,18507) is located in an infrared dark cloud that was

166: mapped by Rathborne et al. (2005) in millimeter and submillimeter

167: continuum and compared to Spitzer mid-IR emission between 3.5 and

168: 8\um. IRAS\,18507 is roughly $11'$ north of the more famous

169: ultra-compact (UC) H{\sc ii} region complex G34.26+0.15 (Wood \&

170: Churchwell 1989; Molinari et al. 1996; Carral \& Welch 1992).  The

171: location of the infrared dark cloud relative to G34.26+0.15 is shown

172: in Figure 1.  

173: 

174: Near IRAS\,18507, Miralles et al. (1994) discovered a UC\,H{\sc ii}

175: region (G34.4+0.23) embedded in a 1000\,M\sun\ molecular cloud traced

176: by NH$_3$ emission.  The NH$_3$ emission is elongated in the N-S

177: direction with a total extent of about $7'$, however the $1.5'$

178: resolution of the observations was not adequate to discern the

179: structure of the core (Miralles et al. 1994).  Shepherd et al. (2004:

180: hereafter SNB04) observed IRAS\,18507 in 3\,mm continuum emission,

181: {\htco} and SiO line emission and in the near-infrared.  They detected

182: a dense molecular core associated with the UC\,H{\sc ii} region

183: G34.4+0.23 as well as a dense core and embedded protostellar object

184: detected only in millimeter continuum emission, G34.4+0.23\,MM

185: (hereafter G34.4\,MM).  G34.4\,MM appears to be a B2 protostar

186: surrounded by $\sim 150$ solar masses of warm gas and dust.  Based on

187: the non-detection of G34.4\,MM at near-IR wavelengths, SNB04 suggested

188: the source may be in a very early stage of evolution.

189: 

190: Rathborne et al. (2005) identified four clumps in 1.2\,mm continuum

191: emission which they named MM1-4 (see their figure 1).  MM1 corresponds

192: to G34.4\,MM, MM2 is coincident with the UC\,H{\sc ii} region

193: G34.4+0.23, MM3 is about 3$'$ north of G34.4\,MM while MM4 is about

194: 30$''$ south of the UC\,H{\sc ii} region.

195: 

196: IRAS\,18507 was detected in a CS(2-1) survey of IRAS point sources

197: with far-infrared colors suggestive of UC\,H{\sc ii} regions (Bronfman

198: et al. 1996).  The source was selected for further high resolution

199: studies because of its broad line wings, a signature of current star

200: formation.  By modeling {\hco}, {\htco}, CS and C$^{34}$S spectra

201: obtained at an angular resolution of $\sim\,16''$ Ramesh et al.\

202: (1997) demonstrated that the observed line profiles can be explained by

203: a collapsing hot core of about 800\,M$\sun$ which is hidden behind a

204: cold ($\sim$\,4\,K) and dense ($3 \times 10^{4}$\,cm$^{-3}$) envelope

205: of about 200\,M$\sun$.  

206: 

207: The kinematic distance to IRAS\,18507 has been reported to be between

208: 3.7 and 3.9\,kpc based on molecular line velocities that vary from 55

209: to 59{\kms} depending on the line observed and the position within the

210: cloud (3.9\,kpc: Molinari et al. 1996, Shepherd et al. 2004, Zhang et

211: al. 2005; 3.8\,kpc: Carral \& Welch 1992, Miralles et al. 1994, Ramesh

212: et al. 1997; \& 3.7\,kpc: Rathborne et al. 2005).  Kinematic distances

213: can easily have an error of more than 5 or even 10\% due to observed

214: deviations from circular symmetry and circular motion in our galaxy.

215: Thus, a difference of 0.2\,kpc is easily within the errors for this

216: type of distance determination.  Here we adopt the distance of

217: 3.9\,kpc to be consistent with Molinari et al. (1996, 1998), SNB04 and

218: Zhang et al. (2005).  If the closer distance of 3.7\,kpc is more

219: appropriate, then mass estimates derived in this work should be

220: decreased by about 10\% since the mass is proportional to $D^2$.

221: 

222: Fa\'{u}ndez et al (2004) mapped the IR-dark cloud with the SEST

223: telescope in 1.2\,mm continuum emission and derived mass of

224: 2000\,M$\sun$ in the main condensation based on a dust temperature of

225: 28\deg K.  The total mass of the filament was estimated to be about

226: 3700\,M\sun\ where 1000\,M\sun\ is associated with G34.4\,MM and

227: 2700\,M\sun\ is associated with the G34.4 {\uchii} region (Bronfman,

228: personal communication).  Rathborne et al (2005) mapped the dark cloud

229: with the IRAM\,30 telescope in 1.2\,mm continuum emission and derived

230: a cloud mass of $\sim 7500$\,M\sun\ based on a dust temperature of

231: 34\deg K, two times more mass than derived by Fa\'{u}ndez et al.  In

232: this work, we will assume the temperature and mass estimates of

233: Rathborne et al. since a dust temperature of 34\deg K would appear to

234: be more representative of massive star forming regions.  However, a

235: clear reason for why the derived temperature and, hence, mass

236: estimates differ by such a large amount is not clear.

237: 

238: The IRAS\,18507 region is also associated with variable {\water},

239: {\methanol} and OH maser emission (Scalise et al. 1989; Palla et

240: al. 1991; Schutte et al. 1993; Miralles et al. 1994; Szymczak et

241: al. 2000; Wang et al. 2006; Edris et al. 2007).  Molinari et

242: al. (1996, 1998) observed IRAS\,18507 (labeled Mol74 in their papers)

243: and estimated a deconvolved size of the UC\,H{\sc ii} region of 0.7''

244: (0.013\,pc at D=3.9\,kpc).

245: 

246: Based on observations with the NRAO 12\,m telescope, Zhang et

247: al. (2005) report that IRAS\,18507 is not associated with molecular

248: outflows.  The lack of outflow activity contrasts with the presence of

249: multiple star formation tracers (masers, dense gas, HII regions and

250: millimeter continuum).

251: 

252: In this work, we present observations of the dense molecular gas near

253: IRAS\,18507 at millimeter wavelengths in {\cof}, {\tcof}, and {\ceof}

254: line emission to map the dense gas morphology and determine if

255: there are massive outflows associated with IRAS\,18507.  Archive data

256: from the {\it Spitzer Space Telescope} GLIMPSE survey at mid-IR

257: wavelengths were studied to obtain a census of the massive and

258: intermediate-mass star cluster properties over the entire

259: infrared-dark cloud filament.  Section 2 gives an overview of the

260: observations, section 3 presents the results and section 4 discusses

261: implications.

262: 

263: 

264: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

265: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

266: \section{OBSERVATIONS}

267: 

268: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

269: \subsection{Observations in the 3~mm band}

270: 

271: Simultaneous observations in {\cof}, {\tcof} and {\ceof} lines were

272: made with the Owens Valley Radio Observatory (OVRO) array of six

273: 10.4~m telescopes on 2004 March 27 \& 29 and 2004 April 16 \& 18.

274: Projected baselines ranging from about 12 to 115 meters provided

275: sensitivity to structures up to about $20''$ with $\sim 5''$

276: resolution.

277: % 2 each of L and E configuration tracks 

278: Two fields were observed as a Nyquist-sampled mosaic.  The

279: observations were alternated between fields every 9 minutes to assure

280: that the $uv$ coverage in each field was similar.  The total

281: integration time on each field was approximately 8.8 hours.

282: % 135m + 135m + 126m + 135m = 531m = 8.85 hours

283: Cryogenically cooled SIS receivers operating at 4~K produced typical

284: single sideband system temperatures of about 400~K.  The gain

285: calibrator was the quasar $1751+096$ and the passband calibrators were

286: 3C\,345, 3C\,454.3 and 3C\,273.  Observations of Uranus provided the

287: flux density calibration scale with an estimated uncertainty of $\sim

288: 15$\%.  Calibration was carried out using the Caltech MMA data

289: reduction package (Scoville et al. 1993).  Images were produced using

290: the MIRIAD software package (Sault, Teuben, \& Wright 1995) and

291: deconvolved with a Maximum Entropy (MEM) algorithm.  Data analysis was

292: performed using both the MIRIAD package and the CASA (Common Astronomy

293: Software Applications) package.

294: 

295: The spectral band pass for each line was centered on a velocity of

296: $57.0$\kms.  The {\co} images have a synthesized beam of $3.83''

297: \times 3.45''$ (FWHM) at P.A. $-59.7$\deg, spectral resolution

298: 1.3{\kms} and RMS noise 60\mjyb.

299: %

300: The {\tco} images have a synthesized beam of $4.04'' \times 3.83''$

301: (FWHM) at P.A. $-49.9$\deg, spectral resolution 1.36{\kms} and RMS

302: noise 44.0\mjyb.

303: % 

304: The {\ceo} images have a synthesized beam of $4.04'' \times 3.83''$

305: (FWHM) at P.A. $-50.1$\deg, spectral resolution 0.683{\kms} and RMS

306: noise 56.0\mjyb.

307: 

308: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

309: \subsection{Spitzer images}

310: 

311: Mid-infrared images at 3.6, 4.6, 5.8 and 8.0 \um\ were obtained using

312: the Infrared Array Camera (IRAC; Fazio et al.\ 2004) of the {\it

313: Spitzer Space Telescope} as part of the Galactic Legacy Infrared

314: Mid-Plane Survey Extraordinaire (GLIMPSE; Benjamin et al.\ 2003).

315: Image mosaics were created by the GLIMPSE pipeline after image

316: artifacts such as cosmic rays, stray light, column pull-down, and

317: banding were removed.\footnote{Details of the data processing can be

318: found at http://www.astro.wisc.edu/glimpse/docs.html}.  Point sources

319: were extracted from the GLIMPSE images using a modified version of

320: Daophot (Stetson 1987). The astrometric uncertainty for point sources

321: is $\sim 0.3''$.  The GLIMPSE $5\sigma$ point-source sensitivities are

322: approximately 0.3, 0.3, 1.2, and 0.7 mJy in the four IRAC band passes,

323: respectively.  Point source sensitivities were generally higher in

324: areas of bright diffuse background emission.  The fluxes of point

325: sources that are detected at $\geq 5\sigma$ twice in one IRAC band or

326: once in each of two bands are entered in the GLIMPSE Point Source

327: Archive.  Each Archive entry includes the corresponding $J$, $H$, and

328: $K_s$ fluxes from the 2MASS Point Source Catalog (Skrutskie et al.\

329: 2006) if that source was detected in 2MASS.

330: 

331: The Multi-band Imaging Photometer for {\it Spitzer} (MIPS; Rieke et

332: al.\ 2004) was used to image the entire GLIMPSE survey area at 24 and

333: 70 \um\ as part of the MIPSGAL survey (Carey et al. 2005).  

334: % MIPSGAL photometry was done on the SSC mosaics of the AORs 

335: Fluxes at 24\,\um\ for point sources within the G34.4 IR dark cloud

336: were extracted from the frame using the GLIMPSE point-source

337: extractor.  The relative uncertainty between two sources in a MIPSGAL

338: image is roughly 0.3 to 0.5 pixels while the absolute positional

339: uncertainty is $\sim 1''$.

340: 

341: 

342: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

343: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

344: \section{RESULTS}

345: 

346: Figure 1 presents a four-color (3.6, 4.6, 5.8, \& 8.0 \um) GLIMPSE

347: image of the G34.4 environment in Galactic coordinates (North points

348: to the upper left corner).  The ``cometary'' \uchii\ region

349: G34.26+0.15 is located on the right side of the image.  An IR-bright

350: nebula extends below the G34.26 UC H{\sc ii} region. The UC H{\sc ii}

351: region contains a cluster of OB stars, the most luminous of which is

352: an O6.5 spectral type (Wood \& Churchwell 1989).  The nebula is bright

353: in the IRAC bands primarily due to PAH emission features stimulated

354: by UV radiation from the cluster.  The subject of this paper is the

355: dark filament in the upper left which is forming early B stars.  The

356: mid-IR emission from the UC\,H{\sc ii} region G34.4+0.23 is

357: significantly less than that of G34.26, as expected due to the lower

358: luminosity of the central source.  Figure 2 presents a close-up of the

359: IR-dark filament, now displayed in Equatorial coordinates with North

360: pointing upwards.  Along the dark filament, North and South of G34.4,

361: are embedded sources seen predominantly by their 4.5\,$\mu$m (green)

362: emission.  Our OVRO CO mosaic is centered on the southern core near

363: the UC\,H{\sc ii} region G34.4 and the millimeter core G34.4\,MM

364: located $\sim 40''$ north of the UC\,H{\sc ii} region.

365: 

366: Figure 3 presents the red and blue-shifted emission near G34.4\,MM and

367: G34.4 along with a 2\,$\mu$m K band image from SNB04.  Neither the

368: millimeter core nor the UC\,H{\sc ii} region is visible in the K band

369: image.  Both regions show complex high-velocity structure suggesting

370: the presence of multiple outflows.

371: 

372: Figure 4 shows the integrated emission (moment 0) in {\ceo} and {\tco}

373: along with the red and blue-shifted {\tco} emission.  The bottom two

374: panels in figure 4 show moment 1 maps of {\ceo} \& {\tco} in which the

375: brightness of the color is proportional to the intensity in the moment

376: 0 image.  This type of image provides some insight into how the dense

377: cloud structure and kinematics are being affected by the molecular

378: outflows.

379: 

380: Figures 5, 6 \& 7 present channels maps of CO, {\tco} and {\ceo}

381: emission, respectively.

382: 

383: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

384: \subsection{Molecular outflows}

385: 

386: At least two outflows can be seen emanating from G34.4\,MM (labeled A

387: and B in the upper left panel of Fig. 3) while at least three

388: outflows originate from the southern core near the G34.4 UC\,H{\sc ii}

389: region (labeled C, D and E).

390: 

391: The velocity structure of the outflows from the G34.4\,MM region is

392: consistent with a single outflow dominating the red-shifted kinematics

393: (outflow G34.4:A).  There is a weak blue-shifted counter flow

394: extending to the NE that can be traced to G34.4\,MM.  The red-shifted

395: lobe of outflow G34.4:A appears to have little or no associated

396: blue-shifted emission suggesting that it is oriented outside of the

397: plane of the sky (the blue-shifted emission in the red lobe appears to

398: be from the collimated flow G34.4:E coming from the southern region).

399: The full-opening angle of the red-shifted lobe is $\sim 43$\deg.

400: 

401: Marginal evidence for an outflow perpendicular to outflow G34.4:A is

402: seen in the red and blue-shifted emission clumps along the axis

403: labeled 'B'.  No source has been detected at millimeter wavelengths

404: which could drive outflow G34.4:B.  The source could be embedded in

405: G34.4\,MM and not resolved at the resolution of $\sim 5''$ of SNB04.  

406: 

407: The southern molecular core containing the G34.4 UC\,H{\sc ii} region

408: contains three overlapping flows seen in the CO emission (flows 'C',

409: 'D' and 'E').  Blue-shifted CO, {\tco} and {\ceo} gas is seen toward

410: the G34.4 UC\,H{\sc ii} region extending to the West (flow G34.4:C).

411: This outflow is seen most clearly in {\tco} and {\ceo} emission in

412: Figure 4.  {\tco} blue-shifted emission is traced back to the H{\sc

413: ii} region (top right panel in Fig. 4) while the bottom two panels

414: illustrating the velocity structure in the dense gas show that

415: blue-shifted emission extends from the UC\,H{\sc ii} region to the

416: west.  A possible red-shifted outflow lobe east of the UC\,H{\sc ii}

417: may be visible in {\tco} emission in the top right panel in Fig. 4

418: although the identification is not definitive.

419: 

420: The NE-SW flow (G34.4:D) appears to be centered about $10''$ SE of the

421: UC\,H{\sc ii} region, just off the peak of a dense {\ceo} clump.  The

422: flow appears to be relatively symmetric in the red and blue-shifted

423: gas distribution although the actual morphology is considerably

424: confused due to overlapping outflows.  If the flow is symmetric, then

425: one would expect the driving source to be located near the small,

426: filled triangle at \ra{18}{53}{19.0}, \dec{01}{24}{35} along the

427: G34.4:D outflow axis in Figs. 3 \& 4.   

428: 

429: The SE-NW flow (G34.4:E) is seen clearly in both CO and {\tco}

430: emission.  If the driving source is located between the red- and

431: blue-shifted emission along the outflow axis, it would be centered

432: about $5''$ S-SW of the UC\,H{\sc ii} region (indicated by a small,

433: filled triangle at \ra{18}{53}{18.6}, \dec{01}{24}{43} along the

434: G34.4:E outflow axis in Figs. 3 \& 4).  The outflow is not symmetric:

435: the red-shifted emission lobe extends about $20''$ to the SE while the

436: blue-shifted lobe extends roughly $60''$ to the NW, overlapping the

437: blue-shifted lobe from the G34.4 UC\,H{\sc ii} region flow and the

438: red-shifted lobe of flow G34.4:A farther north.

439: 

440: Outflow G34.4:A has a position angle of +58{\deg} (measured from North to

441: the axis of the blue-shifted lobe) while G34.4:B P.A. = --38{\deg} and

442: the difference in orientation between outflow axes is 96{\deg}.

443: The positions angles of the three outflows near the G34.4 UC\,H{\sc ii}

444: region are: 

445: G34.4:C P.A. = --100{\deg}; 

446: G34.4:D P.A. =   +38{\deg}; 

447: G34.4:E P.A. =  --34{\deg} 

448: and the maximum difference in orientation between the axes is

449: 138{\deg}. 

450: 

451: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

452: \subsection{Mass \& Kinematics of the Outflows} 

453: 

454: The mass associated with CO line emission is calculated following

455: Scoville et al. (1986).  The CO excitation temperature is taken to be

456: 34 K which is the dust temperature in MM1 derived from fits to the SED

457: (Rathborne et al. 2005).  We assume the gas is in LTE with

458: [CO]/[\h]~=~$10^{-4}$, [CO]/[\tco]~=~51 and [CO]/[{\ceo}] = 378 at

459: the galacto-centric distance of 5.8~kpc (Wilson \& Rood 1994).  

460: 

461: The CO optical depth at red and blue-shifted velocities is estimated

462: from the CO/{\tco} ratio of spectra taken at four positions in the

463: mosaic image that have been convolved with a $10''$ beam.  The open

464: triangles in the top, center panel of Fig. 4 show the locations where

465: the spectra were taken, while Figure 8 shows the spectra taken at those

466: positions.  In channels where no {\tco} is detected, we assume that

467: the CO is optically thin.  The CO and {\tco} line profiles show a dip

468: near $v_{\rm LSR}$ indicating that the lines suffer from

469: self-absorption and/or the interferometer is missing extended flux at

470: lower velocities.

471: 

472: Because multiple, overlapping flows are present, it is not possible to

473: obtain a reasonable estimate of the inclination of each flow.  Thus,

474: we assume an inclination angle of 45\deg\ which minimizes errors

475: introduced by inclination effects for flows that are not near the

476: plane of the sky or along the line-of-sight.  Table 1 summarizes the

477: physical properties of the molecular gas in the combined outflows

478: originating from G34.4\,MM and those centered near the UC\,H{\sc ii}

479: region.  The total flow mass $M_f$ is given by $\sum M_i$ where $M_i$

480: is the flow mass in velocity channel $i$ corrected for optical depth.

481: The momentum $P$ is given by $\sum M_i v_i$ and the kinetic energy E

482: by $\frac{1}{2} \sum M_i v_i^2$ where $v_i$ is the central velocity of

483: the channel relative to $v_{LSR}$.

484: 

485: The dynamical timescale $t_d$ is calculated using $R_{f}/<V>$, where

486: the intensity-weighted velocity $<V>$ is given by $P/(\sum M_i)$

487: (Cabrit \& Bertout 1990) and $R_{f}$ is the average outflow radius of

488: the flows.  This method of calculating $t_d$ is really only correct

489: for a single outflow; however, an independent outflow age cannot be

490: determined for both flows in the cores since they cannot be separated

491: near the central position.  Because of this uncertainty, the flow

492: dynamical timescale could easily be in error by a factor of 2 to 5.

493: 

494: The mass outflow rate $\dot M_{f}$ is $\sum M_i/t_d$, the force F is

495: $P/t_d$ and the mechanical luminosity L is $E/t_d$.  Since these

496: values are dependent on $t_d^{-1}$ uncertainties in $t_d$ are directly

497: applicable to $\dot M_{f}$, F, and L.

498: 

499: The combined outflows from the G34.4 core have a total mass of

500: 111~M\sun\ and energy, E $= 7.8 \times 10^{46}$~ergs.  The G34.4\,MM

501: outflows have a combined mass $34.8$~M\sun, E $= 4.9 \times

502: 10^{46}$~ergs.  Despite the uncertainties, the flow masses and

503: energies are consistent with those for outflows driven by young, early

504: B stars.

505: 

506: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

507: \subsection{The dense gas cores}

508: 

509: The {\ceo} and {\tco} moment 0 images (Fig. 4) show clearly that the

510: two cores have very different characteristics.  The southern core

511: centered on the G34.4 UC\,H{\sc ii} region is extended, with a largest

512: spatial scale of about 1.4\,pc at a distance of 3.9\,kpc.  The

513: northern core, centered on G34.4\,MM, is significantly more compact

514: with higher peak emission than the southern cloud.  The diameter of

515: the G34.4\,MM core is about 0.2\,pc and is surrounded by faint,

516: diffuse {\tco} emission that extends out to about 1\,pc in size.

517: 

518: The total mass of the 2 cores as measured from {\ceo} is given in

519: Table 2. {\ceo} is assumed to be optically thin although this is not

520: likely to be true near $v_{LSR}$ at the peak of the line profile.  The

521: extended, southern cloud in which the UC\,H{\sc ii} region is embedded

522: is almost 10 times more massive (692\,M{\sun}) than the G34.4\,MM core

523: (75\,M{\sun}).

524: 

525: As Fig. 8 illustrates, the {\ceo} line appears to be suffering from

526: missing flux due to the lack of short baselines.  This is most

527: apparent in the spectra taken SE of the UC\,H{\sc ii} region position

528: where {\ceo} is more extended and there is a clear double peaked line

529: profile.  The {\ceo} line is single peaked closer to the cloud core

530: suggesting that the interferometer is recovering most of the flux

531: density and we are not seeing significant self-absorption.  Thus, the

532: mass estimates based on {\ceo} are lower limits.

533: 

534: The G34.4 and G34.4\,MM molecular cores have a projected separation of

535: about $40''$ (0.75\,pc at 3.9\,kpc).  Their LSR velocities

536: as measured by the peak of the {\ceo} line differs by 1.4{\kms}.  

537: 

538: 

539: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

540: \subsection{Mid-Infrared Sources: GLIMPSE \& MIPSGAL}

541: 

542: G34.4\,MM and the G34.4 UC\,H{\sc ii} region are embedded in an

543: extended, filamentary IR-dark cloud complex seen against the diffuse

544: PAH background emission which is visible primarily in the Spitzer

545: 8.0\,$\mu$m band (Figures 1 \& 2).  The G34.4\,MM core is associated

546: with diffuse emission in all 4 IRAC bands, but is particularly

547: noticeable at 4.5 \um. The [4.5] band contains the H {\sc i}

548: Br$\alpha$ line along with some molecular forbidden lines, notably the

549: CO 1-0 P(8) fundamental band-head, but, unlike the other 3 bands, does

550: not contain any PAH emission feature.  The [4.5] band also contains

551: several \h\ lines (e.g. the \h\ 0-0 S(9) line at 4.694 \um) which

552: trace shocks in some massive outflows (e.g. DR21: Smith et al.  2006;

553: W75N: Davis et al. 2006).  Thus, the [4.5] band appears to readily

554: trace ionized and/or shocked gas.

555: 

556: Figure 9 shows the IRAC 4.5\,$\mu$m image in greyscale with {\tco}

557: contours overlayed for reference.  The plus symbols represent the

558: locations of the \uchii\ region and G34.4\,MM core.  The open diamonds

559: just south and south-east of the \uchii\ region represent the

560: predicted locations of sources driving outflows G34.4:E

561: (\ra{18}{53}{18.6}, \dec{01}{24}{43}) and G34.4:D (\ra{18}{53}{19.0},

562: \dec{01}{24}{35}) based on CO and {\tco} emission.  While the

563: predicted position of the YSO that was identified based on the CO

564: outflow morphology should be considered no better than an educated

565: guess, it is interesting that each position is associated with a

566: mid-IR source to within a few arcsec.  The characteristics of these

567: sources along with other sources in the cluster are discussed below.

568: 

569: The spectral energy distributions (SEDs) were analyzed by fitting

570: model SEDs to each observed source from a large pre-computed grid of

571: YSO models (Robitaille et al. 2006, 2007).  The grid consists of 20,000

572: 2-D YSO radiation transfer models spanning a complete range of stellar

573: mass and evolutionary stage.  Each YSO model outputs SEDs at ten

574: viewing angles (inclinations), so the fitter actually has 200,000 SEDs

575: to choose from.  The YSO models also output SEDs for each of 50

576: aperture sizes.  Thus, if the distance to the star formation region is

577: known, only the model SEDs with the appropriate aperture size compared

578: to the observed photometry are used.  A grid of stellar atmospheres

579: were also incorporated into the fitting algorithm in order to

580: facilitate the separation of main-sequence and evolved stars from YSOs

581: (Brott \& Hauschildt 2005; Kurucz 1993).  The fitting algorithm

582: includes a foreground extinction component to the model which allows

583: one to easily distinguish highly reddened stars from YSOs which have

584: an additional emission component in the mid-infrared.

585: 

586: The 24\,\um\ fluxes were cross correlated with positions of the 2199

587: GLIMPSE Archive sources lying within a 3.9\arcmin\ radius of the G34.4

588: \uchii\ region to account for observational errors in addition to

589: photon counting statistics.  For the purposes of the fitting, all flux

590: uncertainties that fell below the 10\% level were reset to a minimum

591: value of 10\%.  The SED fitter was then run on this combined 8-band

592: source list, fitting only the fluxes of sources detected in 4 or more

593: bands.  Sources with SEDs well fit by a stellar atmosphere are not

594: likely to be cluster members.  Sources with a $\chi^2$ per flux data

595: point ($\chi^2/N_{\rm data}$) of 4.8 provided a reasonable dividing

596: line between sources that, by eye, appeared to be well-fit by stellar

597: atmospheres and those that were not well-fit due to IR excesses.  Of

598: the total 2199 sources in the GLIMPSE Archive in this region, 868 were

599: detected in four or more bands.  Of those, 829 sources were well-fit

600: by stellar atmospheres and thus are likely foreground or background

601: stars rather than YSO cluster members.  The remaining sources were fit

602: with YSO models and 27 of these met the $\chi^2/N_{\rm data}\leq 4.8$

603: criterion. Of the 9 sources that were not well-fit either by stellar

604: atmospheres or YSO SEDs, 1 appears to be a YSO and 8 are probably Archive

605: sources with improperly extracted fluxes in one or more bands or

606: there was a mismatch of GLIMPSE with 2MASS or MIPS sources.

607: 

608: An overview of the results of the SED fitting procedure is presented

609: in Figure 10 and Tables 3 \& 4.  Most of the filamentary dark cloud is

610: visible in the three-color image (Fig. 10) in which red corresponds to

611: MIPS 24\,$\mu$m, green to GLIMPSE 8\,$\mu$m and blue to GLIMPSE

612: 4.5\,$\mu$m. The G34.4 complex is located near the center of Fig. 10

613: (in the region outlined with a large, white circle).  Point sources

614: are marked by small circles color-coded by source type as identified

615: by the Fit flag in Table 3.  Sources that were well-fit as YSOs are

616: marked by green circles and given a Fit flag of 1 in Table 3.  The

617: yellow circle identifies a probable YSO that was not well-fit (Fit =

618: 2).  Blue circles identify sources that were well-fit by stellar

619: photospheres.  MIPS 24 \um\ point sources that are detected in fewer

620: than 3 of the 2MASS+IRAC bands and hence were not run through the

621: fitter (Fit=4) are identified by red circles; the majority of these

622: are probably YSOs.  The cyan circle (source 32 located between sources

623: 8 and 10 in Fig. 10) marks the Archive source that coincides with the

624: proposed origin of outflow G34.4:D, it is detected only at 3.6 and

625: 4.5\,\um, and hence was not run through the fitter (Fit=3).  The area

626: covered by the OVRO observations is contained primarily within the

627: large white circle, which is referred to as ``region C'' in Table 3.

628: ``Region N'' is identified by the box north of region C, while

629: ``region S'' is identified by the box to the south.  The G34.4

630: UC\,H{\sc II} region appears white in this image because it is bright

631: in diffuse emission at all wavelengths.  There are two prominent MIPS

632: sources: G34.4\,MM and another, fainter source located about 2\arcmin\

633: north of G34.4\,MM at position \ra{18}{53}{20.602},

634: \dec{+01}{28}{25.61}.

635: 

636: Table 3 presents a summary of the positions and fluxes in each band

637: for all identified probable YSO cluster members in and near the dark

638: cloud.  Table 4 presents the best fit model parameters for each YSO

639: with enough flux points to be fitted.  Output model parameters are:

640: interstellar extinction to the source, $A_V$; stellar mass, $M_\star$;

641: total luminosity of the YSO, $L_\star$; envelope accretion rate,

642: $\dot{M}_{\rm env}$; and inclination, $i$.  Note that $A_V$ does not

643: include the extinction produced by a circumstellar disk or envelope

644: and thus it represents a lower limit for YSOs with significant

645: circumstellar material.  In general, each source can be well fit by

646: multiple YSO SED models and this generates a corresponding range of

647: the best-fit model parameters. For well-fit YSOs, results of all fits

648: with $\Delta \chi^2/N_{\rm data} \leq 1$ relative to the best-fit

649: model are reported. E.g., for a typical source detected in $N_{\rm

650: data}=5$ bands, all fits with $\Delta\chi^2 \geq 5$ with a formal

651: probability relative to the best fit of less than

652: $\exp(-\Delta\chi^2/2)=0.08$ are excluded. The cumulative probability

653: distribution for each parameter is then constructed using the

654: Gaussian-weighted probability of each fit relative to the best fit.  A

655: range of parameter values that has a greater than 95\% probability of

656: containing the actual value for the source is then determined and

657: reported in Table 4.

658:   

659: \noindent {\bf The central region of the filament:} \\

660: In the region for which CO outflow data is determined, 7 YSOs with

661: good fits have been identified (sources 6-12), along with one

662: poorly-fit, possibly massive YSO (source 31 in tables 3 \& 4) located

663: on the northeast edge of the G34.4\,MM 24\,\um\ emission.  Source 12,

664: the highly luminous, the mid-IR counterpart to G34.4\,MM, is most

665: likely the driving source of outflow G34.4:A.  Marked by a larger

666: green circle in Figure 10, source 12 is partially resolved in the

667: GLIMPSE images (this is seen most clearly in the 4.5\,\um\ greyscale

668: image in Fig. 9).  The morphology of source 12/G34.4\,MM is consistent

669: with two dust emission lobes separated by an absorption lane due to a

670: disk where the lobes are in rough alignment with the axis of outflow

671: G34.4:A.

672: 

673: The fluxes in the two lobes of source 12/G34.4\,MM in each GLIMPSE

674: band was summed and combined with the point-source fluxes from {\it

675: MSX} 21.3 \um\ (Price et al.\ 2001), MIPS 24 \um\, and MIPS 70\um\ to

676: model the source SED across the mid-IR.  The 10 best fits to source

677: 12/G34.4\,MM are plotted in Figure 11.  The fit parameters are

678: well-constrained and the best fit has $\chi^2=6.62$ which is

679: significantly lower than the second-best fit with $\chi^2=20.79$.  The

680: best fit parameters suggest a massive YSO with $M_\star \sim

681: $14\,M{\sun}, $L_\star \sim $ 9,400\,L{\sun}. The source is deeply

682: embedded, behind greater than $A_{V}\sim 40$ mag of extinction and it

683: is young with a high envelope accretion rate of $\dot{M}_{\rm env}\sim

684: 10^{-3}$ \Msun\ yr$^{-1}$.

685: 

686: The inclination angle of the best-fit model is $i=56${\deg},

687: consistent with the orientation of outflow G34.4:A which has a wide

688: opening angle of 43{\deg} but does not intersect the plane of the sky.

689: This interpretation assumes that a single YSO dominates the flux

690: density and geometry of the mid-IR emission.  Given that two outflows

691: have been identified emanating from the G34.4\,MM core and the far-IR

692: fluxes exceed those predicted by a single YSO SED, more than one YSO

693: is likely present.  However, the resolution of the GLIMPSE images is

694: not adequate to clearly distinguish between sources that are likely to

695: drive outflows G34.4:A and G34.4:B.

696: 

697: For the remaining six well-fit YSOs in region C, the best fit models

698: are presented in Figure 12a while the distribution of their

699: corresponding best-fit masses and luminosities are shown in Figure

700: 12b.  Of these, two YSOs (sources 10 \& 11) are nearly coincident with

701: the \uchii\ region.

702: 

703: Source 11 is a luminous YSO located near the projected center of the

704: {\uchii} region and appears to be the most likely candidate to drive

705: outflow G34.4:C.  The GLIMPSE position differs from the 6\,cm ionized

706: gas peak by $\sim 1.3''$.  This could be due to differences in

707: astrometry between the radio and IR data; however, the discrepancy

708: exceeds the GLIMPSE astrometric uncertainty of 0.3\arcsec\ and the Very

709: Large Array estimated uncertainty of $\sim 0.1''$.  It is more likely

710: that the centimeter peak tracing the ionized gas is offset from the

711: actual YSO.  This could easily happen if the ionized gas morphology

712: closely follows the confines of a bipolar outflow cavity.  It is also

713: possible that the center of the source is not detected in the IRAC

714: bands due to high extinction or the bright diffuse background of the

715: \uchii\ region itself. We may only see the warm outflow cavity

716: associated with the blue-shifted lobe in the mid-IR that is displaced

717: from the centimeter continuum emission.

718: 

719: Both sources 10 and 11 suffer from confusion with the \uchii\ region

720: at IR wavelengths longward of the IRAC bands.  The \uchii\ region

721: emits very strongly in all 4 {\it MSX} bands and in MIPS 24 and

722: 70\,\um.  These fluxes were used as upper limits for the fits to

723: sources 10 and 11, but they are very high limits (see Figure 12a), and

724: the fits to both sources are poorly constrained.  The best fit results

725: for source 11 suggest $M_\star = $2--10\,M{\sun} and $L_\star =

726: $200--5,200\,L{\sun}, but the probability distribution of fit

727: parameters shown in Figure 12b is skewed and allows for higher masses

728: and luminosities up to $M_\star\sim 20$ \Msun, $L_\star\sim 45,000$

729: L{\sun} (albeit at a formal probability level of only a few percent).

730: SNB04 determined a spectral type of B0.5 ($L_\star \sim

731: 40,000$\,L{\sun}) for the central star of the G34.4 \uchii\ region

732: assuming a single zero-age main sequence (ZAMS) star is producing the

733: observed Lyman continuum flux.  Thus, if source 10 is the ionizing

734: star of the \uchii\ region, the higher values of mass and luminosity

735: are more plausible.

736: 

737: Due to its physical location between the red and blue-shifted lobes of

738: outflow G34.4:E, source 10 appears to be the most probable driver of

739: this outflow.  The best fit results suggest that it is a YSO with

740: M$_\star = $0.5--10\,M{\sun} and L$_\star = $45--4,500\,L{\sun}.

741: Again, the association of this YSO with strong outflow activity

742: suggests that the upper end of this range of mass and luminosity may

743: be more appropriate.

744: 

745: Source 32 (cyan circle), the potential driver of outflow G34.4:D, is

746: detected in only two IRAC bands ([3.6] and [4.5]) at the $5\sigma$

747: level sufficient for inclusion into the GLIMPSE Archive.

748: % It is brighter at 4.5\,$\mu$m than it is at 3.6\,$\mu$m.  It is

749: % there, it is faint, it is red, based upon the fluxes in these two

750: % bands.   

751: Based on these two bands, source 32 has a red color of

752: $[3.6]-[4.5]=1.3$ which is consistent with it being a YSO (Robitaille

753: et al. 2006).  The lack of GLIMPSE Archive fluxes in bands [5.8] and

754: [8.0] means that this source was not detected at the $3\sigma$ level

755: in those two bands, corresponding to magnitudes fainter than 13.0 in

756: each band\footnote{See the GLIMPSE Quality Assurance Document at

757: http://www.astro.wisc.edu/glimpse/GQA-master.pdf}.  The colors of YSO

758: models for very young sources predict $[3.6]-[5.8]>0.4$ and

759: $[5.8]-[8.0]>0.4$, corresponding to magnitudes fainter than 13.6 and

760: 13.2 in bands [5.8] and [8.0], respectively (Robitaille et al.  2006).

761: Thus the non-detection in bands [5.8] and [8.0] is consistent with the

762: interpretation that source 32 is a YSO.

763: 

764: Source 32 is also not detected in the MIPS 24 \um\ band.  However,

765: given the proximity to the very bright \uchii\ and lower resolution of

766: MIPS compared to IRAC, this source is confused with the PSF wings of

767: the \uchii\ region.  Based on an estimate of the MIPS sensitivity in a

768: confused region, a $3 \sigma$ upper limit of 50 mJy (magnitude 5.4) is

769: expected for the 24 \um\ flux.  This could potentially allow a very

770: red $[3.6]-[24]\approx 8.6$ color for this source.  We therefore

771: conclude that the mid-IR colors of source 32 are consistent with those

772: for a YSO, however the strongest evidence for this remains the fact

773: that it lies along the CO outflow axis of G34.4:D near where one might

774: expect the driving source to be located.

775: 

776: In summary, 9 YSOs have been identified and characterized in region C near

777: G34.4\,MM and the {\uchii} region.  Four or five are probably massive

778: with $M_\star > 8$\,M{\sun} while the others are low-to-intermediate

779: mass with $M_\star$ between 0.5 and 8\,M{\sun}.

780: 

781: \noindent {\bf The northern filament:} \\

782: North of the G34.4\,MM and {\uchii} region complex (in region N) 17

783: YSOs have been successfully identified based on fits to the SEDs.

784: Most of these YSOs closely trace the IR-dark cloud structure.  At the

785: extreme north end of the field there is another 24\,$\mu$m bright

786: source (source 29 in Tables 3 \& 4) that may be similar to but less

787: massive than G34.4\,MM.  

788: % The position of source 29 is within a few arcseconds of the

789: % millimeter core identified by Rathborne et al. (2005) as MM3.

790: The SED is well-fit with $\chi^2=17.39$ suggesting a YSO with M$_\star

791: \sim $4.8--6.8\,M{\sun} and L$_\star \sim $170--340\,L{\sun}.  The

792: remaining 16 YSOs in region N are less massive than Source 29 with

793: mass estimates between about 0.5 and 6.5\,M{\sun}.

794: 

795: \noindent {\bf The southern filament:} \\ 

796: The southern part of the IR-dark filament (region S) contains 5

797: sources with SEDs that are well-fit as YSOs.  Five relatively faint

798: 24\,{\um} sources that are likely to be YSOs are also scattered

799: throughout this region.  Sources in this southern region are more

800: distributed and are not spatially well-correlated with the dark cloud

801: filament.  This is in contrast to the YSOs in the northern region

802: where they follow the cloud boundaries reasonably well.  Mass

803: estimates range from about 1 to 7\,M{\sun}.

804: 

805: 

806: 

807: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

808: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

809: \section{Discussion}

810: 

811: The IR-dark cloud associated with IRAS\,18507$+$0121 has a filamentary

812: structure that spans more than $9'$ on the sky ($> 10$\,pc at

813: 3.9\,kpc).  Splitting the cloud into three regions (south, central and

814: north) one finds that the southern region is associated with mostly

815: low to intermediate-mass YSO candidates (10 in total) that are not

816: spatially well-correlated with the dark cloud filament.  The northern

817: segment of the filament contains 23 low to intermediate-mass YSO

818: candidates that tend to trace the IR-dark cloud structure. The central

819: region of the filament is in the process of forming four or five mid-

820: to early-B stars with $M_\star > 8$\,M{\sun}.  Four more sources are

821: likely low-to-intermediate mass with $M_\star$ between 0.5 and

822: 8\,M{\sun}.  Together with an additional 11 YSO candidates seen at

823: 24\,{\um} this central region harbors a relatively compact cluster

824: with a total of 20 YSO candidates.

825: 

826: 

827: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

828: \subsection{GLIMPSE-detected source characteristics}

829: 

830: Bright emission in the 4.5\,$\mu$m Spitzer IRAC can be a strong

831: indicator of molecular outflow (e.g. Qiu et al. 2007, Smith et

832: al. 2006, Noriega-Crespo et al. 2004).  The most likely reason for

833: this is the presence of H$_2$ emission lines and/or emission from the

834: CO 1-0 P(8) bandhead.  All four IRAC bands contain H$_2$ emission

835: lines, but these features are narrow and hence can only significantly

836: enhance the brightness in the broadband images if the lines are

837: extremely bright relative to the continuum.  Because {\h} features are

838: distributed throughout the IRAC bands, strong {\h} lines will not

839: cause a greater enhancement of the flux in band [4.5] than in bands

840: [5.8] and [8.0] (see e.g., Smith et al. 2006).  In contrast, the CO 1-0

841: P(8) emission bandhead is a broad feature that occupies the entire

842: [4.5] filter and can become bright in the presence of shocked,

843: molecular gas.  There is not significant CO bandhead emission in the

844: remaining IRAC bands.  Thus, sources with {\it excess} emission in

845: band [4.5] relative to bands [5.8] and [8.0] appear likely to have CO

846: bandhead emission resulting from shocked, molecular gas.  This does

847: not preclude the possibility that significant {\h} emission may also

848: contribute to the brightness in all IRAC bands.

849: 

850: Three of the 29 YSOs listed in Table 3 that were detected in all four

851: IRAC bands have noticeable excess emission at 4.5{\um} and strong flux

852: at 24{\um}: sources 6 \& 12 in region C, and source 29 in region N.

853: Because of this, SED fits used the [4.5] fluxes as upper limits only

854: since the YSO SED models do not incorporate molecular line emission.

855: These sources are likely to have significant shocked, molecular gas

856: and are undergoing outflow \& accretion.  Source 31, although it was

857: not well-fit, should probably be considered in this group as well.  It

858: was not well-fit because it has a strong 4.5{\um} excess and it was

859: only detected in the four IRAC bands.  The SED (not shown) looks

860: similar to G34.4\,MM itself.  Further, its non-detection at 24{\um} is

861: almost certainly due to its proximity to G34.4\,MM.

862: % Only source 12 was mapped in CO emission in this work.  

863: % The remaining sources would be excellent candidates for detailed,

864: % follow-up outflow studies.

865: 

866: The most prominent of the 4.5{\um} excess sources is source 12, the

867: mid-IR counterpart to G34.4 MM and outflow G34.4:A.  The association

868: of this source with the CO outflow favors the interpretation that the

869: 4.5{\um} excess is due to shocked CO emission.

870: 

871: The potential drivers of outflows G34.4:C (source 11) and G34.4:E

872: (source 10) do not show similar 4.5{\um} excess fluxes.  A possible

873: reason for this may be that they are somewhat more evolved than source

874: 12.  In very young sources, particularly those with $M_\star > 2$

875: \Msun, high accretion rates create a cool, distended photosphere that

876: does not emit strongly enough in the UV to excite the PAH emission

877: features present in the IRAC [3.6], [5.8] and [8.0] bands.  In more

878: evolved sources, however, PAH emission can hide the contrast between

879: [4.5] and the other 3 bands.  Alternatively, as discussed above, both

880: sources 10 and 11 suffer from confusion with the {\uchii} region which

881: emits strongly in all four bands and this could also mask moderate

882: enhancements due to CO bandhead emission.

883: 

884: As a final note, three sources show marginal excess at 4.5{\um}

885: relative to bands [5.8] and [8.0]: source 7 in region C and sources 20

886: \& 26 in region N.  These sources do not appear to have strong

887: emission at 24{\um}, so they may be a different type of source than

888: those with strong 4.5 \& 24{\um} excesses.  

889: 

890: 

891: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

892: \subsection{Timescale for Massive Star Formation}

893: 

894: There are two cloud cores in the central region of the filament: one

895: more massive core in the south surrounded by a more diffuse molecular

896: cloud that contains the {\uchii} region and one that is more compact

897: containing source 12/G34.4\,MM.  The cores are separated by about

898: 0.75\,pc.  Each cloud core is producing a small cluster of massive

899: flows that look similar and are of similar ages although the northern

900: outflows associated with G34.4\,MM have about one third the mass as

901: the southern flows.

902: 

903: Due to the shorter formation timescales ($\ltsim 10^5$ years), massive

904: (proto)stars begin to burn hydrogen even while they continue to

905: accrete material.  The generation of a {\uchii} region identifies

906: which sources have reached the main sequence and begun hydrogen

907: burning while the detection of a molecular outflow traced to the

908: source identifies whether it is still accreting (and hence still

909: powering an outflow).  However, the addition of material onto the

910: stellar surface implies that the source will move up the main

911: sequence.  In this sense it is still a {\it protostar} because it has

912: not reached its final mass.

913: 

914: The central source in the G34.4 {\uchii} region (source 11) has a

915: spectral type of B0.5 while the spectral type of source 12/G34.4\,MM

916: is probably closer to a B2 star (this work \& SNB04). High-velocity CO

917: emission can be traced to both sources suggesting that they are still

918: accreting even though they have reached the main-sequence.

919: 

920: The characteristic time scale of the outflow/infall phase from early B

921: stars is roughly a few $\times 10^5$ years (Richer et al. 2000) while

922: the evolutionary timescale for a B0.5 star to reach the main-sequence

923: is roughly $10^5$ years.  Since ionized gas is seen toward both cores

924: and the outflow characteristics are similar, it seems reasonable to

925: assume that they began forming massive stars at approximately the same

926: time: about $10^5$ years ago.

927: 

928: SNB04 detected a lower mass population of this cluster (e.g. a few

929: solar masses or less) at near-infrared wavelengths (see their Fig. 6).

930: Their detected cluster population was more distributed, less embedded

931: and less massive than those detected in this work. They found that

932: this sub-population is less than 3\,Myrs old but probably more than

933: 0.3\,Myrs old.

934: 

935: There are numerous problems associated with these age estimates and

936: they could be in error easily by a factor of a few.  However, let us

937: take them at face value for now.  SNB04 discovered a distributed

938: population of low to intermediate mass stars that may have formed a

939: few Myrs ago.  The more massive stars detected in this work are more

940: tightly associated with the dense molecular gas (as expected) and

941: appear to be somewhat younger, more like $10^5$ years old.  This

942: suggests that the star formation in this cold, dark cloud may have

943: formed in two stages: first lower mass stars began to form, then, a

944: few Myrs later, the more massive, early B stars began to form.

945: 

946: Such a situation is predicted when clouds have magnetic fields that

947: are stronger than needed to provide support against gravitational

948: collapse and the core mass to magnetic flux ratio (M/$\Phi$) is

949: sub-critical.  Thus, low-mass stars would form in originally highly

950: magnetically sub-critical clouds, with ambipolar diffusion leading to

951: core formation, quasi-static contraction of the cores, and eventually,

952: massive star formation (see e.g. the review by Ward-Thompson et al

953: (2007) and references therein).  If this scenario is correct, then the

954: cold, dark filament associated with IRAS 18507 may provide an example

955: of a cloud with delayed massive star formation due to an initially

956: high magnetic field and sub-critical M/$\Phi$.  

957: 

958: 

959: 

960: 

961: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

962: \subsection{Star Formation Efficiency}

963: 

964: The set of best-fit SED models for YSO candidates can be used to

965: construct a $\chi^2$-weighted probability distribution of the best-fit

966: model parameters.  We sum the mass probability distributions for each

967: source to construct mass functions for all well-fit YSOs (Fit=1) in

968: Tables 3 \& 4.  The total mass of the GLIMPSE-detected YSOs in this

969: IR-dark cloud is then $127\pm 27$\,\Msun.  

970: 

971: The total stellar mass of the central (sub)cluster containing

972: G34.4\,MM and the \uchii\ region is $48\pm 20$\,\Msun (or $\sim 38$\%

973: of the total detected stellar mass).  About 14\,{M\sun} is in source

974: 12/G34.4\,MM, 10\,M{\sun} is in source 31 (the yellow source near

975: G34.4\,MM in Fig. 10), and the remaining 24\,{M\sun} of stellar mass

976: resides in the central star producing the {\uchii} region and its

977: surrounding cluster.  These rough stellar mass estimates are

978: incomplete for $M_\star < 3$\,\Msun.  They also do not include the

979: additional 20 YSO candidates that were detected at 24\,\um\ but in

980: fewer than three IRAC bands.  Thus, the stellar mass estimate should

981: be considered a lower limit.

982: 

983: Using the initial mass function (IMF) of Kroupa et al. (2001) (where

984: the IMF slope follows a Salpeter IMF for $M_\star >1$\,{M\sun} and it

985: becomes shallower for $0.1 < M_\star < 1$\,{M\sun}) one can estimate

986: the expected stellar mass for $M_\star < 3$\,\Msun.  Assuming $127\pm

987: 27$\,{M\sun} of mass in stars more massive than 3\,{M\sun}, roughly

988: $413\pm 103$\,{M\sun} of mass is expected to be in the form of stars

989: less massive than 3\,{M\sun}.  Thus, the total stellar mass content of

990: this cloud is expected to be $\sim 540 \pm 130$\,{M\sun}.

991: 

992: This stellar mass estimate is a little more than half of the derived

993: mass of the ammonia hot core of 1000\,{\Msun} surrounding the {\uchii}

994: region (Maralles, Rodr{\'{\i}}gues \& Scalise 1994).  And it is about

995: 7\% of the cloud mass of 7500\,{\Msun} derived from 1.2\,mm

996: continuum emission (Rathborne et al. 2005).  The total star formation

997: efficiency is then $M_\star / (M_{cloud} + M_\star) = 540/(8040) \sim

998: 0.07$ or 7\%.  This should be considered an upper limit because

999: 1.2\,mm continuum emission traces warm dust (typically 30-50\,K) which

1000: is heated predominantly by massive stars - it does not effectively

1001: trace the cold gas and dust (5-10\,K) which may represent the bulk of

1002: the total cloud mass.

1003: 

1004: We can also obtain an estimate of the massive and intermediate mass

1005: star formation efficiency in the warm gas traced by 1.2\,mm continuum

1006: emission and in the densest part of the hot core.  Assuming a warm

1007: cloud mass of 7500\,{\Msun} and a total mass of stars with $M_\star >

1008: 3$\,\Msun$= 127$ \,{M\sun}, the massive star formation efficiency is

1009: roughly 2\%.

1010: 

1011: 

1012: 

1013: 

1014: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1015: \subsection{Can the outflows destabilize the cloud cores? }

1016: 

1017: \noindent

1018: {\bf The G34.4 cloud core surrounding the \uchii\ region:} \\

1019: %

1020: Maralles, Rodr{\'{\i}}gues \& Scalise (1994) estimated a mass of the

1021: G34.4 cloud core surrounding the \uchii\ region to be $\sim

1022: 1000$\,M{\sun} based on NH$_3$ observations.  They only detect

1023: emission near the UC\,H{\sc ii} region, not near the G34.4\,MM core.

1024: The {\ceo} mass estimate of 693\,M{\sun} compares reasonably well with

1025: that of NH$_3$ given the uncertainties inherent with both estimates

1026: and the fact that our {\ceo} map is missing extended emission.

1027: 

1028: If we take the mass of the G34.4 core surrounding the \uchii\ region

1029: to be $M_{cloud} = 1000$\,M{\sun} we find that the core has about nine

1030: times more mass than in the high-velocity molecular outflows.  The

1031: gravitational binding energy of the cloud, can be calculated from $G

1032: M_{cloud}^2/c_1 r$, where $c_1$ is a constant which depends on the

1033: mass distribution ($c_1 = 1$ for $\rho \propto r^{-2}$).  We find that

1034: the gravitational binding energy is $2.4 \times 10^{47}$~ergs.

1035: Roughly 11\% of the molecular cloud core is participating in the

1036: outflow and the combined outflow energy is roughly one third the

1037: gravitational binding energy of the cloud.  The G34.4 outflows near the

1038: UC\,H{\sc ii} region are injecting a significant amount of mechanical

1039: energy into the cloud core and may help prevent further collapse of

1040: the cloud.  However, they are not likely to totally disrupt the cloud.

1041: As long as cloud material remains, this leaves the door open for

1042: possible future episodes of star formation.

1043: 

1044: \noindent

1045: {\bf The compact G34.4\,MM cloud core:} \\ 

1046: %

1047: SNB04 estimate the mass of the G34.4\,MM core based on 2.6 millimeter

1048: thermal dust emission to be between 150 and 650\,M{\sun} with

1049: 240\,M{\sun} being the value derived for an opacity index, $\beta$ of

1050: 1.5 and a temperature of 50\,K.  Our estimated mass based on {\ceo}

1051: emission is significantly less than this ($\sim 75$\,M\sun) suggesting

1052: that our {\ceo} maps are missing extended emission or the assumptions

1053: used to estimate the mass associated with warm dust emission in the

1054: G34.4\,MM core were not correct.  Thus, for example, if $\beta = 0.7$

1055: and $T_d = 70$\,K then the mass of the millimeter core would be $\sim

1056: 75$\,M{\sun} which is consistent with the mass derived from {\ceo}.

1057: Such a low opacity index and high temperature could be caused by the

1058: presence of strong shocks through most of the core mass which would

1059: prevent large grains from forming and maintain the bulk of the gas at

1060: higher temperatures.  Indeed, this could be possible given the small

1061: size of the core (0.2\,pc) and the fact that two outflows with a

1062: combined mass of nearly 35\,M{\sun} are blasting their way out of the

1063: core.

1064: 

1065: If we assume a mass of 75-240\,M{\sun} for the G34.4\,MM core, as

1066: derived from the {\ceo} and 2.6\,mm continuum observations, then the

1067: gravitational binding energy of the cloud is $5.6 \times 10^{45}$\,ergs

1068: to $5.7 \times 10^{46}$\,ergs.  The kinetic energy of the outflowing

1069: gas is between 1.2 to nearly nine times the gravitational binding energy

1070: of the cloud core.  Thus, the G34.4\,MM flows appear to have more

1071: energy relative to the core and are more likely to disrupt the compact

1072: core.  Therefore we may be seeing the first and only episode of

1073: massive star formation in this compact region.

1074: 

1075: 

1076: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1077: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1078: \section{Summary}

1079: 

1080: We have observed the central region of the IR-dark cloud associated

1081: with IRAS\,18507$+$0121 in CO J=1--0, {\tcof} and {\ceof} with the

1082: Owens Valley Radio Observatory at $\sim 4''$ resolution.  Five massive

1083: outflows from two cloud cores were discovered.  A total of 146\,M\sun\

1084: of material is participating in the combined outflows and injecting

1085: $\sim 1.3 \times 10^{45}$\,ergs of kinetic energy.  We also used

1086: archived Spitzer data from the GLIMPSE survey to gain an understanding

1087: of the stellar content of the cluster and the entire IR-dark filament.

1088: Modeling of the SEDs of GLIMPSE sources identified 31 young stellar

1089: objects in the filament with a combined stellar mass of $\sim 127 \pm

1090: 27$\,\Msun.  An additional 22 sources were identified as probable

1091: cluster members based on the presence of strong 24\,\um\ emission.

1092: 

1093: The total star formation efficiency in the G34.4 cloud filament is

1094: estimated to be about 7\% while the massive and intermediate mass

1095: star formation efficiency in the entire cloud filament is estimated to

1096: be roughly 2\%.

1097: 

1098: A qualitative evaluation of the outflow characteristics and presence

1099: of ionized gas in the central region of the IR-dark cloud filament

1100: suggests that the early B stars currently undergoing outflow and

1101: accretion began forming stars at approximately the same time: about

1102: $10^5$ years ago.  A population of lower mass stars were detected by

1103: SNB04 that appear to have an age of about a few Myrs.  This dual

1104: population suggests that stars in the IRAS 18507 cloud may have formed

1105: in two stages: first lower mass stars formed and then, a few Myrs

1106: later, the more massive, early B stars began to form.  Such a

1107: situation can occur in magnetically sub-critical clouds in which slow,

1108: ambipolar diffusion leads to the delayed onset of core contraction and

1109: eventual massive star formation.

1110: 

1111: A comparison of the gravitational binding energy with the outflow

1112: kinetic energy in the two cloud cores studied in molecular lines

1113: suggests that the compact core containing G34.4\,MM is being destroyed

1114: by its molecular outflows.  The outflows have as much or more kinetic

1115: energy than the gravitational binding energy of the cloud core.  Thus,

1116: we may be seeing the first and only episode of massive star formation

1117: in this compact region.

1118: 

1119: In contrast, the 690\,\Msun\ core surrounding the G34.4 \uchii\ region

1120: has twice the gravitational binding energy as the combined outflow

1121: kinetic energy.  Thus, although the outflows are injecting a

1122: significant amount of mechanical energy into the cloud core and may

1123: help prevent further collapse of the cloud, they are not likely to

1124: totally disrupt the cloud.  As long as cloud material remains, this

1125: leaves the door open for possible future episodes of star formation.

1126: 

1127: 

1128: 

1129: \noindent {\bf Acknowledgments}\\ 

1130: %

1131: DSS would like to thank Allison Sills for useful discussions on

1132: properties of young clusters.  Research at the Owens Valley Radio

1133: Observatory is supported by the National Science Foundation through

1134: NSF grant number AST 96-13717.  Star formation research at Owens

1135: Valley is also supported by NASA's Origins of Solar Systems program,

1136: Grant NAGW-4030, and by the Norris Planetary Origins Project.  LB

1137: acknowledges support from the Chilean Center for Astrophysics FONDAP

1138: grant 15010003. Support for GLIMPSE, part of the Spitzer Space

1139: Telescope Legacy Science Program, was provided by NASA through

1140: contracts 1224653 (University of Wisconsin at Madison) and 1224988

1141: (Space Science Institute).  BW gratefully acknowledges support from

1142: the NASA Astrophysics Theory Program (NNG05GH35G) and the Spitzer

1143: Space Telescope Theoretical Research Program (Subcontract 1290701).

1144: 

1145: 

1146: 

1147: 

1148: \begin{thebibliography}{}

1149: 

1150: \vspace{-1mm}

1151: \bibitem[]{566}

1152: Blake, G.A., Sutton, E.C., Masson, C.R., Phillips, T.G 1987, ApJ, 315,

1153: 621

1154: % Abundances in Orion

1155: 

1156: \vspace{-1mm}

1157: \bibitem[]{572}

1158: Bohlin, R. C., Savage, B. D., \& Drake, J. F. 1978, 

1159: ApJ, 224, 132 

1160: % A survey of interstellar H\,I from L-alpha absorption measurements. II. 

1161: 

1162: \vspace{-1mm}

1163: \bibitem[]{578}

1164: Bronfman, L., Nyman, L., \& May, J. 1996, A\&AS 115, 81

1165: % CS(2-1) survey, detected iras18507

1166: 

1167: \vspace{-1mm}

1168: \bibitem[{{Brott} \& {Hauschildt}(2005)}]{brott}

1169: Brott, I., \& Hauschildt, P. H. 2005, in ESA SP-576: The Three-

1170: Dimensional Universe with Gaia, ed. C. Turon, K. S. O'Flaherty, \&

1171: M. A. C. Perryman, p. 565

1172: 

1173: \vspace{-1mm}

1174: \bibitem[]{MIPSGAL}

1175: Carey, S. J., Noriega-Crespo, A., Price, S. D., et al. 2005, BAAS,

1176: 207, 6333

1177: % MIPSGAL: A Survey of the Inner Galactic Plane at 24 and 70 microns,

1178: % Survey Strategy and Early Results 

1179: 

1180: \vspace{-1mm}

1181: \bibitem[]{583}

1182: Carral, P. \& Welch, W. J. 1992, ApJ, 385, 244

1183: % The molecular core in G34.3 + 0.2 - Millimeter interferometric

1184: % observations of HCO(+), H(C-13)N, H(C-15)N, and SO (A star forming

1185: % core just 11'' away from the one we study here). 

1186: 

1187: \vspace{-1mm}

1188: \bibitem[]{590}

1189: Churchwell, 1999, in ``The Origin of Stars and Planetary Systems'',

1190: ed. Charles J. Lada and Nikolaos D. Kylafis (Kluwer Academic

1191: Publishers), p. 515

1192: % Massive star formation (a review). 

1193: 

1194: \vspace{-1mm}

1195: \bibitem[]{}

1196: Davis, C. J., Kumar, M. S. N., Sandell, G., Froebrich, D., Smith,

1197: M. D., \& Currie, M. J. 2006, MNRAS, 374, 29

1198: % WFCAM, Spitzer/IRAC and SCUBA observations of the massive

1199: % star-forming region DR21/W75 - I. The collimated molecular jets. 

1200: 

1201: \vspace{-1mm}

1202: \bibitem[]{}

1203: Edris, K. A., Fuller, G. A. \& Cohen, R. J. 2007, A\&A, 465, 865

1204: % A Survey of OH Masers Towards High Mass Protostellar Objects 

1205: 

1206: \vspace{-1mm}

1207: \bibitem[]{}

1208: Fa\'undez, S., Bronfman, L., Garay, G., Chini, R., Nyman, L.-A \&

1209: May, J. 2004, A\&A, 426, 97

1210: % SEST survey of 1.3mm continuum emission in many regions, G34.4 IR

1211: % dark cloud included - mass estimate of 2000 Msun.  

1212: 

1213: \vspace{-1mm}

1214: \bibitem[]{IRAC}

1215: Fazio, G. G. et al.\ 2004,

1216: ApJS, 154, 10

1217: %Description of the IRAC instrument

1218: 

1219: \vspace{-1mm}

1220: \bibitem[]{}

1221: Qiu, K., Zhang, Q., Gutermuth, R. A., Megath, S. T., Beuther, H.,

1222: Sridharan, T. K., Shepherd, D. S., Testi, L., \& De Pree, C. G. 2007,

1223: BAAS, poster presented at the January 2007 AAS meeting. 

1224: % Spitzer IRAC and MIPS Observations toward High-mass star forming

1225: % regions.  

1226: 

1227: \vspace{-1mm}

1228: \bibitem[]{626}

1229: Hildebrand, R. H. 1983, Q.Jl.R.astr.Soc, 24, 267.

1230: % measured opacity lambda0 value

1231: 

1232: \vspace{-1mm}

1233: \bibitem[]{637}

1234: Kramer, C., Alves, J., Lada, C., Lada, E., Sievers, A., Ungerechts,

1235: H., \& Walmsley, M. 1998, A\&A, 329, L33

1236: % The millimeter wavelength emissivity in IC5146, typical conditions

1237: % in outflows and molecular cores.  

1238: 

1239: \vspace{-1mm}

1240: \bibitem[]{}

1241: Kroupa, P. 2001, MNRAS, 322, 231

1242: % On the variation of the initial mass function - gives

1243: % the IMF for massive and low mass stars.  

1244: 

1245: \vspace{-1mm}

1246: \bibitem[{{Kurucz}(1993)}]{kurucz}

1247: Kurucz, R. 1993, ATLAS9 Stellar Atmosphere Programs and 2 km/s

1248: grid. Kurucz CD-ROM No. 13. Cambridge, Mass.: Smithsonian Astrophysical

1249: Observatory, 1993, 13

1250: 

1251: \vspace{-1mm}

1252: \bibitem[]{637}

1253: Meyer, M. R., \& Beckwith, S. V. W. 2000, in ``ISO Survey of a Dusty

1254: Universe,'' eds. D. Lemke, M. Stickel, \& K. Wilke, Lecture Notes in

1255: Physics, vol. 548, p. 341

1256: % Structure and Evolution of Circumstellar Disks Around Young Stars: New

1257: %    Views from ISO

1258: % ISO Survey of a Dusty Universe, Proceedings of a Ringberg Workshop

1259: % Held at Ringberg Castle, Tegernsee, Germany, 8-12 November 1999,

1260: % Edited by D. Lemke, M. Stickel, and K. Wilke, Lecture Notes in

1261: % Physics, vol. 548, p.341 

1262: 

1263: \vspace{-1mm}

1264: \bibitem[]{644}

1265: Miralles M. P., Rodriguez, L. F., \& Scalise, E. 1994, ApJS, 92, 173

1266: % distance to g34.4, detected NH3 and H2O masers too. T=20K

1267: 

1268: \vspace{-1mm}

1269: \bibitem[]{649}

1270: Molinari S., Brand, J., Cesaroni, R., \& Palla, F. 1996, A\&A, 308, 573

1271: % distance to g34.4 = 3.9 kpc, T = 22K from NH3(1,1) and (2,2) obs

1272: 

1273: %% \vspace{-1mm}

1274: %% \bibitem[]{654}

1275: %% Molinari, S., Brand, J., Cesaroni, R., Palla, F., Palumbo,

1276: %% G. G. C. 1998, A\&A, 336, 339 

1277: %% % deconvolved src size of uchii region = about 0.7''

1278: 

1279: \vspace{-1mm}

1280: \bibitem[]{660}

1281: Molinari, S., Brand, J., Cesaroni, R., Palla, F.,

1282: \& Palumbo, G. G. C. 1998, A\&A, 336, 339

1283: % A search for precursors of ultracompact H II regions in a sample of

1284: % luminous IRAS sources. II. VLA observations 

1285: % deconvolved src size of uchii region = about 0.7''

1286: 

1287: \vspace{-1mm}

1288: \bibitem[]{}

1289: Noriega-Crespo, A., Morris, P., Marleau, F. R., Carey, S., Boogert,

1290: A., van Dishoeck, E., Evans, N. J. II, Keene, J., Muzerolle, J.,

1291: Stapelfeldt, K., Pontoppidan, K., Lowrance, P., Allen, L. \& Bourke,

1292: T. L. 2004, ApJS, 154, 352 

1293: % ``A new look at stellar outflows: spitzer observations of the HH 46/47

1294: % system'' - outflow totally obvious in the IRAC [4.5] band.  

1295: 

1296: \vspace{-1mm}

1297: \bibitem[]{675}

1298: Palla, F., \& Stahler, S. W. 1993, 

1299: ApJ, 418, 414 

1300: % The Pre-Main-Sequence Evolution of Intermediate-Mass Stars 

1301: 

1302: \vspace{-1mm}

1303: \bibitem[]{681}

1304: Palla, F., Brand, J., Comoretto, G., Felli, M., \& Cesaroni, R. 1991,

1305: A\&A, 246, 249 

1306: % detected H2O masers toward g34.4

1307: 

1308: \vspace{-1mm}

1309: \bibitem[]{705}

1310: Pollack, J. B., Hollenbach, D., Beckwith, S., Simonelli, D. P., Roush,

1311: T., \& Fong, W. 1994, ApJ, 421, 615

1312: % Composition and radiative properties of grains in mol. clouds and

1313: % accretion disks.

1314: 

1315: \vspace{-1mm}

1316: \bibitem[]{MSX}

1317: Price, S. D., Egan, M. P., Carey, S. J., Mizuno, D. R., \& Kuchar, A.  

1318: 2001, AJ, 121, 2819

1319: %The Midcourse Space Experiment

1320: 

1321: \vspace{-1mm}

1322: \bibitem[]{712}

1323: Ramesh, B., Bronfman, L., \& Deguchi, S. 1997. PASJ  49 (3), 307

1324: % molecular line studies and modeling of iras18507

1325: 

1326: \vspace{-1mm}

1327: \bibitem[]{712}

1328: Rathborne, J. M., Jackson, J. M., Chambers, E. T., Simon, R., Shipman,

1329: R. \& Frieswijk, W. 2005, ApJ, 630, L181

1330: % Massive protostars in the infrared dark cloud MSXDC G034.43+00.24

1331: 

1332: \vspace{-1mm}

1333: \bibitem[]{IRACcal}

1334: Reach, W. T. et al.\ 2005, PASP, 117, 978

1335: %Absolute flux calibration of IRAC.

1336: 

1337: \vspace{-1mm}

1338: \bibitem[]{717}

1339: Richards, P. J., Little, L. T., Toriseva, M., \& Heaton, B. D. 1987, 

1340: MNRAS, 228, 43 

1341: % HCO$^+$ survey of unassociated compact molecular clouds in the IRAS PSC 

1342: 

1343: \vspace{-1mm}

1344: \bibitem[]{723}

1345: Rieke, G. H., \& Lebofsky, M. J. 1985, 

1346: ApJ, 288, 618 

1347: % The interstellar extinction law from 1 to 13 microns 

1348: 

1349: \vspace{-1mm}

1350: \bibitem[]{MIPS}

1351: Rieke, G. H., Young, E. T., Cadien, J., Engelbracht,

1352: C. W. et. al. 2004, SPIE, 5487, 50

1353: % On-orbit performance of the MIPS instrument

1354: 

1355: \vspace{-1mm}

1356: \bibitem[]{grid}

1357: Robitaille, T. P., Whitney, B. A., Indebetouw, R., Wood, K., \&

1358: Denzmore, P. 2006, ApJS, 167, 256 

1359: %The YSO model grid paper

1360: 

1361: \vspace{-1mm}

1362: \bibitem[]{fitter}

1363: Robitaille, T. P., Whitney, B. A., Indebetouw, R., \& Wood, K. 2007,

1364: ApJS, 169, 32

1365: %The YSO SED fitter paper

1366: 

1367: \vspace{-1mm}

1368: \bibitem[]{735}

1369: Sault, R. J., Teuben, P. J., \& Wright, M. C. H. 1995, in

1370: ``Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems IV'', ed. R. A. Shaw,

1371: H. E. Payne, \& J. J. E. Hayes, PASP Conf Series 77, 433

1372: % MIRIAD software reference

1373:  

1374: \vspace{-1mm}

1375: \bibitem[]{742}

1376: Scalise, E., Jr., Rodr\'{\i}guez, L. F. \& Mendoza-Torres, E. 1989,

1377: A\&A, 221, 105

1378: % H2O masers toward g34.4

1379: 

1380: \vspace{-1mm}

1381: \bibitem[]{748}

1382: Schutte, A. J., van der Walt, D. J., Gaylard, M. J., \& MacLeod, G. C. 

1383: 1993, MNRAS, 261, 783 

1384: % Detection of 35 new $5_1-6_0$ A$^+$ methanol masers towards IRAS sources 

1385: 

1386: \vspace{-1mm}

1387: \bibitem[]{754}

1388: Scoville, N. Z., Carlstrom, J. E., Chandler, C. J., Phillips, J. A.,

1389: Scott, S. L., Tilanus, R. P. J., \& Wang, Z. 1993, PASP, 105, 1482

1390: % MMA data reduction software

1391:   

1392: \vspace{-1mm}

1393: \bibitem[]{760}

1394: Shepherd, D. S., \& Watson, A. M. 2002, ApJ, 566, 966

1395: % A Detailed Study of G173.58+2.45: an Intermediate-Mass Star-forming

1396: % Region 

1397:   

1398: \vspace{-1mm}

1399: \bibitem[]{760}

1400: Shepherd, D. S., N\"urnberger, D. E. A., \& Bronfman, L. 2004, ApJ,

1401: 602, 850 (SNB04)

1402: % Discovery of a massive protostar near IRAS 18507+0121

1403: 

1404: \vspace{-1mm}

1405: \bibitem{}

1406: Shu, F., Tremaine, S., Adams, F., \& Ruden, S. 1990, ApJ, 358, 495

1407: %Mdisk = 0.3 Mstar

1408: 

1409: \vspace{-1mm}

1410: \bibitem[]{2MASS}

1411: Skrutskie, M. F. et al. 2006, AJ, 131, 1163

1412: %2MASS description

1413: 

1414: \vspace{-1mm}

1415: \bibitem[]{Smith06}

1416: Smith, H. A., Hora, J. L., Marengo, M., \& Pipher, J. L.

1417: 2006 ApJ, 645, 1264

1418: 

1419: \vspace{-1mm}

1420: \bibitem[]{Daophot}

1421: Stetson, P. B.  1987, PASP, 99, 191

1422: %Point-source extraction and photometry

1423: 

1424: \vspace{-1mm}

1425: \bibitem[]{773}

1426: Szymczak, M., Hrynek, G., \& Kus, A. J. 2000, A\&AS, 143, 269 

1427: % A survey of the 6.7\,GHz methanol maser emission from IRAS sources. 

1428: % I. Data 

1429: 

1430: \vspace{-1mm}

1431: \bibitem[]{779}

1432: Thompson, R. I. 1984, ApJ, 283, 165

1433: % Lyman anc Balmer continuum ionization in zero-age main sequence

1434: % stars: applications to the line excess phenomenon - relates number

1435: % of lyman continuum photons in an HII region to the bolometric

1436: % luminosity required in the star to produce those photons. 

1437: 

1438: \vspace{-1mm}

1439: \bibitem[]{}

1440: Wang, Y., Zhang, Q., Rathborne, J. M., Jackson, J. \& Wu, Y. 2006,

1441: ApJ, 651, L125

1442: % Water Masers Associated with Infrared Dark Cloud Cores

1443: 

1444: \vspace{-1mm}

1445: \bibitem[]{}

1446: Ward-Thompson, D., Andr\'e, P., Crutcher, R., Johnstone, D., Onishi,

1447: T., Wilson, C. 2007, in Protostars and Planets V, eds. B. Reipurth,

1448: D. Jewitt \& K. Keil (Tucson: Univ. of Arizona Press), 33

1449: % An observational perspective of low-mass dense cores II: Evolution

1450: % toward the initial mass function - magnetically sub-critical clouds

1451: % and how low mass stars would form first!  

1452: 

1453: \vspace{-1mm}

1454: \bibitem[]{787}

1455: Wilson, T. L. \& Rood, R. T. 1994, ARAA, 32, 191

1456: % abundances in the ISM (12c/13c ratio). - necessary to calculate the

1457: % [\hco+]\[h13co+] ratio. 

1458: 

1459: \vspace{-1mm}

1460: \bibitem[]{793}

1461: Wood, D. O. S. \& Churchwell, E. 1989, ApJS, 69, 831

1462: % The morphologies and physical properties of ultracompact H II regions

1463: 

1464: \vspace{-1mm}

1465: \bibitem[]{}

1466: Zhang, Q., Hunter, T. R., Brand,J., Sridharan, T. K., Cesaroni,

1467: R. Molinari, S., Wang, J. \& Kramer, M. 2005, ApJ, 625, 864

1468: % Search for CO Outflows toward a Sample of 69 High-Mass Protostellar

1469: % Candidates. II. Outflow Properties 

1470: %    Observed IRAS 18507 with the NRAO 12m and said no outflows

1471: %    existed.

1472: 

1473: \end{thebibliography}

1474: 

1475: 

1476: \clearpage

1477: % table 1

1478: \begin{table}

1479: \caption[]{G34.4 and G34\,MM Outflow Parameters}

1480: \label{tab:par}

1481: \smallskip

1482: \begin{tabular}{|lll|}

1483: \hline

1484: Source:             & G34.4 combined flows       

1485:                     & G34\,MM combined flows \\

1486: \hline

1487: \hline

1488: CO radius of outflow  

1489:                     &0.98 pc    &$0.85$ pc         \\

1490: Assumed inclination angle  

1491:                     &45\deg\   &45\deg\              \\

1492: Outflow Mass$^{\dagger}$ :       

1493:                     &          &              \\

1494: ~~~~Red-shifted: $^{12}$CO                        

1495:                     &22.6 M$_\odot$             

1496:                     &10.6 M$_\odot$         \\

1497: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~{\tco}                        

1498:                     &59.6 M$_\odot$             

1499:                     &12.7 M$_\odot$            \\

1500: ~~~Blue-shifted: $^{12}$CO

1501:                     &14.2 M$_\odot$ 

1502:                     &1.6 M$_\odot$ \\

1503: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~{\tco} 

1504:                     &\underline{14.8 M$_\odot$} 

1505:                     &\underline{9.9 M$_\odot$} \\

1506: ~~

1507:                     & 111.2 M$_\odot$           

1508:                     & ~34.8 M$_\odot$         \\

1509: Momentum 

1510:                     &$8.3 \times 10^2$ M$_\odot$ km s$^{-1}$  

1511:                     &$3.5 \times 10^2$ M$_\odot$ km s$^{-1}$  \\

1512: Kinetic Energy     

1513:                     &$7.8 \times 10^{46}$ ergs    

1514:                     &$4.9 \times 10^{46}$ ergs  \\

1515: Dynamical time scale of CO flow

1516:                     &$\sim 4 \times 10^4$ yr      

1517:                     &$\sim 3.8 \times 10^4$ yr   \\

1518: $\dot M_f$ 

1519:                     &$1.3 \times 10^{-3}$ M$_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$ 

1520:                     &$0.8 \times 10^{-3}$ M$_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$   \\

1521: Momentum Supply Rate (Force) 

1522:                     &$12.2 \times 10^{-3}$ M$_\odot$ km s$^{-1}$ yr$^{-1}$ 

1523:                     &$~8.0 \times 10^{-3}$ M$_\odot$ km s$^{-1}$ yr$^{-1}$ \\

1524: Mechanical Luminosity 

1525:                     &11.2  L$_\odot$             

1526:                     &~9.1  L$_\odot$ \\

1527: \hline

1528: \end{tabular}

1529: 

1530: \vspace{3mm}

1531: ~~{\small ${\dagger}$ $^{12}$CO outflow emission (corrected for

1532:   optical depth from [CO]/[{\tco}]) \\

1533: 

1534: \vspace{-6mm}

1535: ~~~~~~~~~~ measured between velocities 32.9 to 51.7\kms\ and 63.6 to

1536:             77.8\kms. \\ 

1537: 

1538: \vspace{-5mm}

1539: ~~~~{\tco} outflow emission (assumed to be optically thin) \\

1540: 

1541: \vspace{-6mm}

1542: ~~~~~~~~~~ measured between velocities 51.7 to 53.6\kms\ and 60.4 to

1543:             63.6\kms.} \\  

1544: 

1545: \end{table}

1546: 

1547: 

1548: \begin{table}

1549: % table 2

1550: \caption[]{G34.4 and G34\,MM Core Parameters measured from {\ceo}}

1551: \label{tab:par}

1552: \smallskip

1553: \begin{tabular}{|lll|}

1554: \hline

1555: Source:           & G34.4       

1556:                     & G34\,MM \\

1557: \hline

1558: \hline

1559: {\ceo}

1560: Core Mass:        &692.7 M$_\odot$        

1561:                     &75.2 M$_\odot$              \\

1562: $v_{LSR}$         &56.0{\kms}

1563:                     &57.4{\kms}         \\

1564: Momentum          &$2.0 \times 10^3$ M$_\odot$ km s$^{-1}$  

1565:                     &$2.5 \times 10^2$ M$_\odot$ km s$^{-1}$  \\

1566: Kinetic Energy    &$8.0 \times 10^{46}$ ergs    

1567:                     &$1.2 \times 10^{46}$ ergs  \\

1568: \hline

1569: \end{tabular}

1570: \end{table}

1571: 

1572: \clearpage

1573: % table 3

1574: \begin{deluxetable}{rccrrrrrrrrrrcc}

1575:   \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

1576:   \rotate

1577:   \tablecaption{YSO Cluster Members}

1578:   \tablewidth{0pt}

1579:   \tablehead{

1580:    \colhead{} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Coordinates} &

1581:    \multicolumn{10}{c}{Measured Mid-IR Fluxes and

1582:       Uncertainties (mJy)} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{} \\

1583:     \colhead{Src.\tablenotemark{a}} & \colhead{$\alpha$(J2000)} &

1584:     \colhead{$\delta$(J2000)} & \colhead{$F[3.6]$} & \colhead{$\delta

1585:       F[3.6]$} & \colhead{$F[4.5]$} & \colhead{$\delta F[4.5]$} &

1586:     \colhead{$F[5.8]$} & \colhead{$\delta F[5.8]$} &

1587:     \colhead{$F[8.0]$} & \colhead{$\delta F[8.0]$} & \colhead{$F[24]$}

1588:     & \colhead{$\delta F[24]$\tablenotemark{b}} & \colhead{Fit\tablenotemark{c}} & \colhead{Reg.\tablenotemark{d}} 

1589: }

1590: \startdata

1591:   1 & \ra{18}{53}{24.999} &  \dec{1}{23}{01.4} &    3.43 &    0.34 &    2.11 &    0.23 &    1.86 &    0.37 &     --- &     --- &     1.61  &     0.16  & 1 & S \\

1592:   2 & 18 53 18.649 &  1 23 21.8 &    1.78 &    0.18 &    2.01 &    0.20 &    2.85 &    0.28 &    2.68 &    0.40 &    10.54  &     1.68  & 1 & S \\

1593:   3 & 18 53 16.833 &  1 23 26.6 &    5.20 &    0.52 &    6.10 &    0.61 &    5.07 &    0.51 &    4.33 &    0.65 &     6.73  &     0.67  & 1 & S \\

1594:   4 & 18 53 19.694 &  1 23 36.2 &    6.78 &    0.68 &   16.79 &    1.68 &   28.13 &    2.81 &   20.32 &    3.05 &    60.00  & U.L. &  1 & S \\

1595:   5 & 18 53 17.773 &  1 23 49.4 &    8.66 &    0.87 &   12.26 &    1.23 &   13.92 &    1.39 &   15.76 &    2.36 &    45.29  &     4.53  & 1 & S \\

1596:   6 & 18 53 18.982 &  1 24 11.5 &    0.84 &    0.15 &    7.66 &    0.93 &    5.00 &    0.86 &    2.79 &    0.64 &   307.85  &    30.78  & 1 & C \\

1597:   7 & 18 53 18.825 &  1 24 19.6 &   12.22 &    1.22 &   26.14 &    2.61 &   26.69 &    2.67 &   23.15 &    3.47 &   150.00  & U.L. &  1 & C \\

1598:   8 & 18 53 19.404 &  1 24 24.2 &    0.25 &    0.07 &    1.46 &    0.16 &    3.33 &    0.36 &    4.18 &    0.63 &   150.00  & U.L. &  1 & C \\

1599:   9 & 18 53 21.127 &  1 24 27.5 &    3.79 &    0.38 &    3.56 &    0.36 &    3.07 &    0.52 &    2.00 &    0.30 &    19.92  &     2.54  & 1 & C \\

1600:  10\tablenotemark{e} & 18 53 18.727 &  1 24 43.0 &    5.13 &    0.92 &   19.57 &    1.96 &   40.99 &    6.81 &   59.72 &    8.96 & 18,024.00  & U.L. &  1 & C \\

1601:  11\tablenotemark{e} & 18 53 18.630 &  1 24 48.3 &   28.26 &    7.77 &   79.15 &   14.59 &  168.90 &   16.89 &  277.30 &   45.02 & 18,024.00  & U.L. &  1 & C \\

1602:  12\tablenotemark{f} & 18 53 18.058 &  1 25 25.3 &    2.24 &    0.22 &   16.20 &    8.00 &   13.85 &    1.38 &   11.34 &    1.13 &  8,682.80  &  868.28  & 1 & C \\

1603:  13 & 18 53 16.533 &  1 26 28.6 &    0.37 &    0.06 &    1.03 &    0.10 &    1.40 &    0.22 &    1.59 &    0.24 &     7.11  &     0.71  & 1 & N \\

1604:  14 & 18 53 17.321 &  1 26 33.0 &    1.88 &    0.19 &    2.65 &    0.27 &    2.83 &    0.40 &    1.77 &    0.27 &    15.01  &     1.50  & 1 & N \\

1605:  15 & 18 53 17.232 &  1 26 41.1 &    5.01 &    0.50 &    6.90 &    0.69 &    7.18 &    0.72 &    6.23 &    0.93 &    11.21  &     1.12  & 1 & N \\

1606:  16 & 18 53 29.815 &  1 26 52.7 &    3.30 &    0.33 &    4.12 &    0.41 &    4.68 &    0.53 &    5.80 &    0.87 &     8.09  &     0.81  & 1 &  \\

1607:  17 & 18 53 21.571 &  1 26 58.9 &    0.38 &    0.06 &    1.58 &    0.23 &    1.58 &    0.35 &     --- &     --- &    13.46  &     1.61  & 1 & N \\

1608:  18 & 18 53 11.979 &  1 27 09.5 &   13.41 &    1.34 &   10.45 &    1.04 &    8.31 &    0.83 &    7.87 &    1.61 &   119.71  &    37.16  & 1 & N \\

1609:  19 & 18 53 17.787 &  1 27 12.6 &    0.81 &    0.09 &    2.11 &    0.21 &    3.29 &    0.33 &    3.94 &    0.59 &    13.88  &     1.39  & 1 & N \\

1610:  20 & 18 53 18.181 &  1 27 28.5 &    1.40 &    0.19 &    3.23 &    0.32 &    3.30 &    0.41 &    3.40 &    0.51 &    13.21  &     1.32  & 1 & N \\

1611:  21 & 18 53 15.807 &  1 27 37.4 &   40.59 &    4.06 &   41.08 &    4.11 &   46.97 &    4.70 &   36.85 &    5.53 &    20.79  &     2.08  & 1 & N \\

1612:  22 & 18 53 18.604 &  1 27 38.8 &    0.49 &    0.09 &    0.71 &    0.11 &     --- &     --- &    2.66 &    0.40 &    10.97  &     1.40  & 1 & N \\

1613:  23 & 18 53 23.391 &  1 27 57.0 &    2.47 &    0.25 &    2.52 &    0.25 &    2.70 &    0.34 &    2.35 &    0.35 &     4.07  &     0.41  & 1 & N \\

1614:  24 & 18 53 23.784 &  1 28 01.1 &    0.49 &    0.08 &    0.55 &    0.06 &    1.02 &    0.32 &    0.96 &    0.14 &     4.94  &     0.49  & 1 & N \\

1615:  25 & 18 53 18.848 &  1 28 02.7 &    0.65 &    0.09 &    0.58 &    0.09 &     --- &     --- &    2.59 &    0.39 &      ---  &      ---  & 1 & N \\

1616:  26 & 18 53 19.404 &  1 28 16.1 &    0.83 &    0.09 &    2.12 &    0.21 &    2.60 &    0.42 &    2.93 &    0.44 &     4.16  &     0.42  & 1 & N \\

1617:  27 & 18 53 20.005 &  1 28 19.6 &    0.55 &    0.08 &    1.29 &    0.23 &    2.14 &    0.68 &    1.47 &    0.22 &    29.57  &     2.96  & 1 & N \\

1618:  28 & 18 53 19.049 &  1 28 21.5 &    2.53 &    0.29 &    2.64 &    0.26 &    2.23 &    0.24 &    1.68 &    0.25 &     5.42  &     0.54  & 1 & N \\

1619:  29 & 18 53 20.674 &  1 28 24.1 &    9.65 &    0.96 &   32.79 &    3.94 &   26.83 &    2.68 &    8.03 &    1.20 &   278.27  &    27.83  & 1 & N \\

1620:  30 & 18 53 20.078 &  1 28 43.1 &    0.27 &    0.05 &    1.02 &    0.11 &    1.83 &    0.28 &    2.49 &    0.37 &    15.80  &     1.58  & 1 & N \\

1621:  31 & 18 53 18.586 &  1 25 38.9 &    0.33 &    0.08 &    3.43 &    0.39 &    2.50 &    0.32 &    1.79 &    0.27 &      ---  &      ---  & 2 & C \\

1622:  32 & 18 53 19.144 &  1 24 35.4 &    0.68 &    0.09 &    1.46 &    0.18 &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &      ---  &      ---  & 3 & C \\

1623:  33 & 18 53 13.870 &  1 26 03.3 &    0.98 &    0.13 &    0.71 &    0.11 &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     3.31  &     0.59  & 4 & N \\

1624:  34 & 18 53 13.933 &  1 24 46.7 &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     5.79  &     0.40  & 4 &  \\

1625:  35 & 18 53 14.135 &  1 25 03.8 &    0.35 &    0.06 &    0.34 &    0.06 &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     5.52  &     1.00  & 4 &  \\

1626:  36 & 18 53 14.702 &  1 25 25.0 &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     8.00  &     0.99  & 4 &  \\

1627:  37 & 18 53 14.884 &  1 25 49.0 &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     4.56  &     0.50  & 4 &  \\

1628:  38 & 18 53 15.298 &  1 25 48.1 &    1.27 &    0.15 &    0.86 &    0.09 &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &    11.14  &     1.11  & 4 &  \\

1629:  39 & 18 53 15.562 &  1 23 25.2 &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     2.75  &     0.53  & 4 & S \\

1630:  40 & 18 53 16.029 &  1 24 25.4 &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &    21.63  &     1.27  & 4 & C \\

1631:  41 & 18 53 16.811 &  1 24 11.9 &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &    10.22  &     0.47  & 4 & C \\

1632:  42 & 18 53 16.908 &  1 26 32.0 &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     8.87  &     0.92  & 4 & N \\

1633:  43 & 18 53 18.026 &  1 26 25.9 &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &    42.84  &     2.55  & 4 & N \\

1634:  44 & 18 53 18.065 &  1 23 24.8 &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     7.76  &     0.97  & 4 & S \\

1635:  45 & 18 53 18.085 &  1 26 12.0 &    0.49 &    0.07 &    0.45 &    0.08 &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     8.27  &     3.97  & 4 & N \\

1636:  46 & 18 53 18.409 &  1 23 38.7 &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &    10.10  &     0.83  & 4 & S \\

1637:  47 & 18 53 18.516 &  1 23 56.8 &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &    17.53  &     4.67  & 4 & C \\

1638:  48 & 18 53 18.589 &  1 26 49.5 &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     4.47  &     0.50  & 4 & N \\

1639:  49 & 18 53 18.600 &  1 23 46.2 &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &    20.59  &     2.42  & 4 & S \\

1640:  50 & 18 53 19.904 &  1 28 08.6 &     --- &     --- &    0.68 &    0.08 &    1.30 &    0.36 &     --- &     --- &    12.96  &     1.30  & 4 & N \\

1641:  51 & 18 53 21.233 &  1 25 12.2 &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &    14.51  &     0.83  & 4 & C \\

1642:  52 & 18 53 22.760 &  1 22 30.3 &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &     6.44  &     0.95  & 4 & S \\

1643:  53 & 18 53 22.826 &  1 25 10.0 &    0.80 &    0.10 &    0.67 &    0.10 &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &    35.49  & U.L. &  4 &  \\

1644:  54 & 18 53 22.905 &  1 25 07.0 &    1.58 &    0.16 &    1.53 &    0.18 &     --- &     --- &     --- &     --- &    35.49  & U.L. &  4 &  \\

1645: \enddata

1646: \tablenotetext{a}{Sources are grouped in order of Fit flag, and

1647:   then listed in order of increasing declination.}

1648: \tablenotetext{b}{Where 2 or more GLIMPSE sources are confused with a

1649:   single MIPS source, we treat the 24 \um\ flux as an upper limit (U.L)

1650:   only.}

1651: \tablenotetext{c}{The Fit flags are designated as follows: \\

1652:   ~~~~~~1 =

1653:   Source well-fit as a YSO, meeting the $\chi^2/N_{\rm data} \leq 4.8$

1654:   criterion discussed in the text.\\

1655:   ~~~~~~2 = Fit failed to meet the $\chi^2$ criterion, but source is

1656:   considered to 

1657:   be a probable YSO based upon visual inspection of its mid-IR SED. \\

1658:   ~~~~~~3 = Not able to fit because source is detected only in the

1659:   GLIMPSE [3.6] \& [4.5] bands (includes the possible source of

1660:   Outflow G34.4:D). \\ 

1661:   ~~~~~~4 = MIPS 24-$\mu$m-detected source not

1662:   fittable because it is detected in fewer than 3 of the IRAC+2MASS

1663:   bands. The majority of these sources are probably YSOs due to their

1664:   location near the IR dark cloud, but a few could be field stars on

1665:   the asymptotic giant branch.}

1666: \tablenotetext{d}{Region of Figure 11 in which the

1667:   source is located. Region C refers to the central part of the IR

1668:   dark cloud containing

1669:   the OVRO observations. Region N represents the dark cloud north of C, while

1670:   Region S represents the dark cloud south of C. Unlabeled sources

1671:   lie outside of these 3 regions.}

1672: \tablenotetext{e}{These sources overlie the UC H{\scshape ii} region,

1673:   which produces bright diffuse emission in all 4 {\it MSX} bands as well as

1674:   at MIPS 24 $\mu$m and 70 $\mu$m. 

1675:   Although these YSOs may be bright enough to be detected

1676:   by {\it MSX} and MIPS, they are confused

1677:   with the UC H{\scshape ii}.}

1678: \tablenotetext{f}{The IR counterpart to G34.4\,MM. It is

1679:   detected also by {\it MSX} at 21.3 $\mu$m and by MIPS at 70 $\mu$m, 

1680:   with fluxes of 4,900$\pm 258$ and 322,000$\pm 128,000$ mJy,

1681:   respectively.}

1682: \end{deluxetable}

1683: 

1684: \clearpage

1685: % table 4

1686: \begin{deluxetable}{cccccrrrrr}

1687:   \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}

1688:   \rotate

1689:   \tablecaption{YSO Model Parameters\tablenotemark{a} from SED Fits to Cluster Members}

1690:   \tablewidth{0pt}

1691:   \tablehead{

1692:     \colhead{Src.} & \colhead{Fit}  & 

1693:     \colhead{$\chi^2_{min}$} &

1694:     \colhead{$\chi^2_{max}$\tablenotemark{b}} & \colhead{\# Fits} & \colhead{$A_{V}$} &

1695:     \colhead{$M_{\star}$ (\Msun)} & \colhead{$L_{\star}$

1696:       (L$_{\odot}$)} & \colhead{$\dot{M}_{\rm env}$ (\Msun\

1697:       yr$^{-1}$)\tablenotemark{c}} & \colhead{$i$}

1698: }

1699: \startdata

1700:   % # fit min(chi2) max(chi2) nfits A_V(95%)  MSTAR(95%)		 LTOT(95%)	       MDOT(95%)             INCL(95%)

1701:   1 & 1 &  7.63 & 13.57 &  112 &  8.5 --  15.1 & 2.63E+00 -- 4.34E+00 & 3.44E+01 -- 2.83E+02 &       0 & 18.2 -- 87.1 \\

1702:   2 & 1 &  1.82 &  7.81 &  322 &  1.5 --  24.7 & 5.81E-01 -- 3.95E+00 & 6.22E+00 -- 4.11E+01 &       0 -- 3.44E-05 & 18.2 -- 81.4 \\

1703:   3 & 1 &  8.24 & 14.21 &   96 & 11.4 --  22.8 & 2.65E+00 -- 4.24E+00 & 4.82E+01 -- 1.18E+02 &       0 -- 3.06E-07 & 41.4 -- 81.4 \\

1704:   4 & 1 &  8.18 & 12.08 &   29 & 22.5 --  58.3 & 1.03E+00 -- 6.77E+00 & 1.10E+02 -- 1.54E+03 &       0 & 18.2 -- 81.4 \\

1705:   5 & 1 &  0.86 &  7.85 &  185 & 11.4 --  26.5 & 3.32E+00 -- 5.03E+00 & 1.03E+02 -- 3.86E+02 &       0 -- 8.44E-06 & 18.2 -- 81.4 \\

1706:   6 & 1 &  5.16 & 11.15 &   53 &  0.0 --   6.9 & 2.41E+00 -- 6.59E+00 & 8.22E+01 -- 3.40E+02 & 5.36E-05 -- 1.10E-03 & 31.8 -- 69.5 \\

1707:   7 & 1 &  1.43 &  5.40 &  106 & 16.7 --  38.1 & 3.71E+00 -- 6.10E+00 & 1.82E+02 -- 9.68E+02 &       0 -- 1.60E-06 & 41.4 -- 81.4 \\

1708:   8 & 1 &  2.83 &  6.82 &  323 &  0.0 --  59.9 & 1.94E-01 -- 5.18E+00 & 4.75E+00 -- 2.27E+02 &       0 -- 4.22E-04 & 18.2 -- 75.5 \\

1709:   9 & 1 &  6.46 & 12.42 &   36 &  0.0 --  13.2 & 9.22E-01 -- 3.34E+00 & 9.97E+00 -- 3.53E+01 & 1.18E-06 -- 9.78E-05 & 49.5 -- 81.4 \\

1710:  10 & 1 &  0.69 &  4.69 &  846 &  0.0 --  60.0 & 5.00E-01 -- 9.97E+00 & 4.47E+01 -- 4.46E+03 &       0 -- 1.04E-03 & 18.2 -- 81.4 \\

1711:  11 & 1 &  0.17 &  5.17 &  879 &  5.2 --  50.2 & 2.13E+00 -- 9.92E+00 & 2.12E+02 -- 5.16E+03 &       0 -- 2.18E-03 & 18.2 -- 81.4 \\

1712:  12\tablenotemark{d} & 1 &  6.62 & 36.13 &   10 & 38.8 --  41.5 & 1.36E+01 -- 1.39E+01 & 6.92E+03 -- 9.39E+03 & 5.91E-04 -- 9.96E-04 & 56.6 \\

1713:  13 & 1 &  3.11 &  8.11 &  200 &  7.5 --  60.0 & 9.65E-01 -- 4.25E+00 & 1.12E+01 -- 1.49E+02 &       0 -- 1.01E-04 & 18.2 -- 87.1 \\

1714:  14 & 1 &  1.57 &  6.36 &   31 &  0.0 --  18.7 & 4.33E-01 -- 2.70E+00 & 5.32E+00 -- 3.16E+01 & 7.22E-06 -- 1.10E-04 & 41.4 -- 81.4 \\

1715:  15 & 1 &  0.78 &  5.77 &  186 &  0.0 --  25.5 & 1.46E+00 -- 4.40E+00 & 1.95E+01 -- 1.49E+02 &       0 -- 1.73E-05 & 18.2 -- 81.4 \\

1716:  16 & 1 &  0.03 &  5.02 &  697 &  0.0 --  30.4 & 2.17E+00 -- 4.24E+00 & 1.67E+01 -- 1.97E+02 &       0 -- 6.68E-07 & 18.2 -- 81.4 \\

1717:  17 & 1 &  7.49 & 11.49 &  470 & 15.8 --  60.0 & 2.04E+00 -- 5.44E+00 & 2.89E+01 -- 6.58E+02 &       0 -- 1.09E-07 & 18.2 -- 87.1 \\

1718:  18 & 1 &  6.78 & 14.64 &   19 &  0.0 --   9.4 & 3.60E+00 -- 5.64E+00 & 1.10E+02 -- 1.66E+02 & 2.74E-05 -- 9.41E-04 & 18.2 -- 69.5 \\

1719:  19 & 1 &  1.19 &  6.18 &  209 & 19.4 --  60.0 & 2.65E+00 -- 4.46E+00 & 2.89E+01 -- 3.14E+02 &       0 -- 2.82E-08 & 18.2 -- 81.4 \\

1720:  20 & 1 &  4.89 & 11.30 &   14 &  0.0 --   7.1 & 6.60E-01 -- 1.54E+00 & 4.82E+00 -- 1.44E+01 &       0 -- 8.48E-06 & 18.2 -- 81.4 \\

1721:  21 & 1 & 18.30 & 26.23 &   14 & 17.5 --  19.1 & 6.14E+00 -- 6.63E+00 & 9.96E+02 -- 1.34E+03 &       0 & 18.2 -- 87.1 \\

1722:  22 & 1 &  0.01 &  4.01 &  425 &  1.5 --  60.0 & 4.18E-01 -- 4.71E+00 & 5.00E+00 -- 3.18E+02 &       0 -- 1.09E-04 & 18.2 -- 81.4 \\

1723:  23 & 1 &  1.72 &  8.72 &  165 &  0.0 --  21.0 & 1.00E+00 -- 3.83E+00 & 1.04E+01 -- 5.35E+01 &       0 -- 1.88E-05 & 18.2 -- 81.4 \\

1724:  24 & 1 &  0.62 &  5.62 & 1070 &  0.0 --  45.6 & 1.80E-01 -- 3.73E+00 & 1.44E+00 -- 5.09E+01 &       0 -- 2.99E-05 & 18.2 -- 81.4 \\

1725:  25 & 1 &  0.24 &  4.23 &   22 &  6.7 --  10.5 & 1.89E+00 -- 2.77E+00 & 1.25E+01 -- 7.58E+01 &       0 & 18.2 -- 87.1 \\

1726:  26 & 1 &  0.02 &  3.98 &  221 & 18.6 --  54.0 & 2.05E+00 -- 3.99E+00 & 1.67E+01 -- 2.05E+02 &       0 & 18.2 -- 87.1 \\

1727:  27 & 1 &  0.39 &  5.38 &  293 &  0.0 --  52.3 & 4.14E-01 -- 5.03E+00 & 5.29E+00 -- 1.12E+02 & 2.95E-06 -- 3.31E-04 & 31.8 -- 81.4 \\

1728:  28 & 1 &  3.85 & 11.84 &   98 &  3.6 --  14.5 & 7.91E-01 -- 3.64E+00 & 6.74E+00 -- 3.20E+01 &       0 -- 1.86E-05 & 41.4 -- 81.4 \\

1729:  29 & 1 & 17.39 & 21.98 &    7 &  3.9 --  17.8 & 4.84E+00 -- 6.80E+00 & 1.69E+02 -- 3.42E+02 & 6.03E-05 -- 2.10E-04 & 41.4 -- 75.5 \\

1730:  30 & 1 &  3.54 &  8.54 &  186 &  1.4 --  60.0 & 1.49E-01 -- 4.71E+00 & 1.99E+00 -- 2.92E+02 &       0 -- 1.71E-04 & 18.2 -- 81.4 \\

1731:  31 & 2 & 39.45 & 51.32 &   19 &  7.4 --  40.5 & 7.51E+00 -- 1.34E+01 & 1.02E+03 -- 3.84E+03 & 2.67E-04 -- 2.21E-03 & 31.8 -- 87.1 \\

1732: \enddata

1733: \tablenotetext{a}{The range of values reported here for each YSO

1734:   parameter has a 95\% probability, based on the probability distribution of best

1735:   fits, of containing the actual value of that parameter for each source.}

1736: \tablenotetext{b}{Fits having $\chi^2 \leq \chi^2_{\rm max}$ are used in

1737:   computing the probability distribution of YSO parameters. For each

1738:   source, $\chi^2_{\rm max}-\chi^2_{\rm min}=\Delta N_{\rm data}$,

1739:   where $N_{\rm data}$ is

1740:   the number of flux data points used in the fit and $\Delta = 1$ for

1741:   Fit=1, $\Delta=3$ for Fit=2.}

1742: \tablenotetext{c}{For models with $\dot{M}_{\rm env}<10^{-9}$ \Msun\

1743:   yr$^{-1}$, the envelope accretion rate is considered to be zero.}

1744: \tablenotetext{d}{For this source, the IR counterpart to G34MM, we

1745:   report the probability distribution of parameters from the 10 best fits.}

1746: \end{deluxetable}

1747: 

1748: \clearpage

1749: \begin{center}  {\bf Figure Captions}  \end{center}

1750: 

1751: \noindent

1752: {\bf Figure~1.~~} Four-color GLIMPSE image showing 3.6\,$\mu$m,

1753: 4.6\,$\mu$m, 5.8\,$\mu$m, and 8.0\,$\mu$m as blue, green, orange, and

1754: red colors, respectively.  The image is displayed in galactic

1755: coordinates and is roughly $16.6' \times 21.5'$ in size. The white box

1756: at upper left gives the field of view shown in Figure 2.  The G34.4

1757: UC\,H{\sc ii} region is in the center of the box within a dense cloud

1758: filament seen as a dark lane. The mid-IR counterpart to the G34.4\,MM

1759: core is seen as a faint green smudge immediately to the upper left of

1760: the \uchii\ region.  The larger nebula in the lower right of the image

1761: is associated with the cometary UC H{\sc ii} region G34.26. The bright

1762: green emission emanating from this region traces a very energetic

1763: outflow.  This GLIMPSE image includes the same data as reported in

1764: Rathborne et al. (2005) but it covers a wider field-of-view to show

1765: the physical relationship between the IR-dark cloud in which the G34.4

1766: UC\,H{\sc ii} is located and the H{\sc ii} region G34.26.  

1767: 

1768: 

1769: \noindent

1770: {\bf Figure~2.~~} Four images, all showing the same field of view.

1771: Clockwise from the upper-left panel are: (a) 2MASS K-band, (b) GLIMPSE

1772: 4.5 \um, (c) GLIMPSE 8.0 \um, and (d) a 3-color image combining the

1773: three other images as blue, green, and red, respectively.  Green plus

1774: signs mark the positions of the UC\,H{\sc ii} and G34.4\,MM, while

1775: green circles show the locations predicted for the driving sources of

1776: outflows G34.4:D and G34.4:E. The white box gives the approximate

1777: field of view of Figure 3.  The locations of the millimeter cores

1778: detected by Rathborne et al. (2005) in J2000 coordinates are: MM1:

1779: \ra{18}{53}{18.0}, \dec{01}{25}{24}; MM3: \ra{18}{53}{20.4},

1780: \dec{01}{28}{23}; MM4: \ra{18}{53}{19.0}, \dec{01}{24}{08}; 

1781: 

1782: \noindent

1783: {\bf Figure~3.~~} {\cof} red and blue-shifted emission.  Top left

1784: panel shows red and blue-shifted emission from 62.3 to 79.2{\kms} and

1785: 37.5 to 53.2{\kms}, respectively.  The RMS is 470{\mjybkms} in the

1786: red-shifted image and 370{\mjybkms} in the blue-shifted image.  Bottom

1787: panels show low-velocity CO emission (left panel, 62.3 to 67.5{\kms}

1788: and 49.3 to 53.2{\kms}, RMS = 350{\mjybkms}) and higher velocity CO

1789: emission (right panel, 67.5 to 79.2{\kms} and 37.5 to 49.3{\kms}, RMS

1790: = 350{\mjybkms}).  In all contour maps, contours are plotted at $3, 4,

1791: 5, 7, 10, 15, 20\, \sigma$ and continue with a spacing of $5 \sigma$.

1792: The top right panel shows the NIR K band image of Shepherd et

1793: al. (2004) with the locations of the proposed outflows overlaid.

1794: % 

1795: % moment in=src.cm out=src.red region='images(16,28)' mom=0 62.3 to 79.2

1796: % moment in=src.cm out=src.blu region='images(36,47)' mom=0 37.5 to 53.2

1797: %   Map:   16  Velocity        78.5  79.2

1798: %   Map:   28  Velocity        62.9  62.3

1799: %   Map:   36  Velocity        52.5  53.2

1800: %   Map:   47  Velocity        38.1  37.5 

1801: % moment in=src.cm out=src.red.hv region='images(16,24)' mom=0 67.5 to 79.2

1802: % moment in=src.cm out=src.blu.hv region='images(39,47)' mom=0 37.5 to 49.3 

1803: % moment in=src.cm out=src.red.lv region='images(25,28)' mom=0 62.3 to 67.5

1804: % moment in=src.cm out=src.blu.lv region='images(36,38)' mom=0 49.3 to 53.2

1805: %   Map:   24  Velocity        68.1  

1806: %   Map:   25  Velocity        66.8  

1807: %   Map:   38  Velocity        49.9  

1808: %   Map:   39  Velocity        48.6  

1809: % 

1810: In all panels: the solid circle represents the location of G34.4\,MM,

1811: the star shows the location of the UC\,H{\sc ii} region, the outflow

1812: (A) from G34.4\,MM is outlined with a series of arcs which delineate

1813: the approximate boundaries of the flow.  Four other proposed outflows

1814: are shown as arrows. A solid triangle indicates the possible location

1815: of the driving source of an outflow.  The outflow from the UC\,H{\sc

1816: ii} region is one-sided since only the blue-shifted outflow is clearly

1817: detected.  The synthesized beam of $3.83'' \times 3.45''$ at

1818: P.A. --59.7{\deg} is shown in the bottom right of the upper left

1819: panel.

1820: 

1821: 

1822: \noindent

1823: {\bf Figure~4.~~} {\ceo} (top, left panel) and {\tco} (top, center

1824: panel) integrated emission (moment 0) from 62.1\kms\ to 54.6\kms\ and

1825: 64.5\kms\ to 49.5\kms, respectively ($v_{LSR} = 57$\kms).  The RMS in

1826: the {\ceo} image is 200\mjybkms; contours are plotted at $3, 5, 7, 9,

1827: 11, 13, 15, \& 17 \sigma$ while grey scale is shown from 200\mjybkms\

1828: to a peak of 3.1\jybkms.  The RMS in the {\tco} image is 280\mjybkms;

1829: contours are plotted at $3, 5, 7, 9, 12, 15, 20, 25,$ \& $30 \sigma$

1830: while grey scale is shown from 280\mjybkms\ to a peak of 9.0\jybkms.

1831: Plus symbols represent the locations of the UC\,H{\sc ii} region and

1832: G34.4\,MM.  Green triangles represent the locations of spectra taken

1833: for optical depth estimates in the outflows.  A scale size of 0.55 is

1834: shown in the left panel, synthesized beams are shown in the bottom

1835: right of each panel.

1836: %

1837: The top, right panel shows {\tco} red and blue-shifted emission from

1838: 63.1 to 61.8 {\kms} and 52.3 to 49.5{\kms}, respectively.

1839: % 13co red: channels 28,29

1840: %       Map:   28  Velocity        63.1

1841: %       Map:   29  Velocity        61.8

1842: %      blue:channels 36-38

1843: %       Map:   36  Velocity        52.3

1844: %       Map:   38  Velocity        49.5

1845: The RMS in the image is 100{\mjybkms}.  Contours are plotted at $3,

1846: 6, 9, 12, 15, 18$ and $21\, \sigma$.  Symbols are the same as in

1847: Figure 3.  The bottom two panels show moment 1 maps of {\ceo} \&

1848: {\tco} in which the brightness of the color is proportional to the

1849: intensity in the moment 0 image.  Color bars show velocity and

1850: brightness scales in each image.

1851: 

1852: \noindent

1853: {\bf Figure~5.~~} {\cof} channel maps at 1.3\kms\ spectral resolution.

1854: The central velocity is indicated in the upper left of each panel.

1855: The channel RMS is 60\mjyb, the peak is 3.3\jyb, and contours are

1856: plotted at $\pm 5, 15, 20, 30, 40$ and $50\, \sigma$.  The lower right

1857: panel shows the synthesized beam in the bottom right corner ($3.83''

1858: \times 3.45''$ at P.A. $-59.7^\circ$) and a scale size of 0.55 pc.

1859: Plus symbols represent the locations of the UC\,H{\sc ii} region at

1860: the 6~cm continuum peak and G34.4~MM as indicated in the upper left

1861: panel.

1862: 

1863: \noindent

1864: {\bf Figure~6.~~} {\tcof} channel maps at 1.36\kms\ spectral

1865: resolution.  The central velocity is indicated in the upper left of

1866: each panel.  The channel RMS is 44\mjyb, the peak is 1.7\jyb, and

1867: contours are plotted at $\pm 3, 5, 7, 9, 12, 15, 20$ and $25\,

1868: \sigma$.  The lower right panel shows the synthesized beam in the

1869: bottom right corner ($4.04'' \times 3.83''$ at P.A. $-49.9^\circ$) and

1870: a scale size of 0.55 pc.  Plus symbols represent the locations of the

1871: UC\,H{\sc ii} region at the 6~cm continuum peak and G34.4~MM as

1872: indicated in the upper left panel.

1873: 

1874: \noindent

1875: {\bf Figure~7.~~} {\ceof} channel maps at 0.7\kms\ spectral

1876: resolution.  The central velocity is indicated in the upper left of

1877: each panel.  The channel RMS is 60\mjyb, the peak is 0.92\jyb, and

1878: contours are plotted at $\pm 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13$ and $15\, \sigma$.

1879: The lower right panel shows the synthesized beam in the bottom right

1880: corner ($4.04'' \times 3.83''$ at P.A. $-50.1^\circ$) and a scale size

1881: of 0.55 pc.  Plus symbols represent the locations of the UC\,H{\sc ii}

1882: region at the 6~cm continuum peak and G34.4~MM as indicated in the

1883: upper left panel.

1884: 

1885: \noindent

1886: {\bf Figure~8.~~} Spectra convolved with a $10''$ beam taken in CO,

1887: {\tco} and {\ceo} at different locations in the image.  The ratio of

1888: the CO and {\tco} emission was used to calculate optical depth in the

1889: red and blue-shifted outflow lobes as indicated by the dashed-dot

1890: lines and arrows in the figure.  Panels i) \& ii) show spectra taken

1891: near the G34.4 UC\,H{\sc ii} region at positions \ra{18}{53}{18.320}\,

1892: \dec{1}{24}{45.84} and \ra{18}{53}{19.203}\, \dec{1}{24}{39.38},

1893: respectively.  Panels iii) \& iv) show spectra taken near the G34\,MM

1894: core at positions \ra{18}{53}{18.065}\, \dec{1}{25}{25.06} and

1895: \ra{18}{53}{17.284}\, \dec{1}{25}{13.52}, respectively.  The locations

1896: of the spectra relative to the {\tco} emission is shown in the center

1897: panel of Figure 4.  The dashed vertical line at 57{\kms} helps to

1898: illustrate that the peak of the {\ceo} line shifts from 57.4{\kms}

1899: toward the G34\,MM core to 56{\kms} toward the G34.4 UC\,H{\sc ii}

1900: region core.

1901: 

1902: \noindent

1903: {\bf Figure 9.}~~GLIMPSE 4.5\,$\mu$m image in inverted greyscale

1904: showing locations of G34.4\,MM and G34.4 UC\,H{\sc ii} region as

1905: crosses.  Open diamonds show the predicted locations of the driving

1906: sources of outflows G34.4:D and E based on CO and {\tco} morphology.

1907: GLIMPSE sources are located very near the predicted positions

1908: suggesting that GLIMPSE has detected two sources driving outflows D

1909: and E.  {\tco} red- and blue-shifted emission contours from Fig. 4 are

1910: overlaid for reference.

1911: 

1912: \noindent

1913: {\bf Figure 10.}~~GLIMPSE and MIPSGAL 3-color image with 4.5\,$\mu$m

1914: (blue), 8.0\,$\mu$m (green) and 24\,$\mu$m (red).  The probable YSO

1915: cluster members listed in Table 3 are marked by color-coded circles:

1916: green = good YSO fits ($\chi^2/N_{\rm data} \leq 4.8$), yellow = bad

1917: YSO fits ($\chi^2/N_{\rm data} > 14.8$), cyan = source detected in

1918: fewer than four bands, and green = MIPS 24\,$\mu$m point sources

1919: detected in too few IRAC+2MASS bands to be fit. Sources well-fit by

1920: stellar photospheres are marked by blue circles. The IR dark cloud has

1921: been divided into 3 regions for the purpose of the YSO census: Region

1922: C (large white circle) contains the OVRO observations and regions N

1923: and S are (large white rectangles) are the portions of the dark cloud

1924: lying to the north and south, respectively, of region C. Source

1925: numbers from Table 3 for the YSOs discussed in Section 3.4 are also

1926: shown. 

1927: 

1928: \noindent

1929: {\bf Figure 11:} (a) Ten best YSO SED model fits to the IR fluxes of

1930: source 12/G34.4\,MM.  The fitting assumes that the mid-IR flux from

1931: the millimeter core is dominated by a single source. The [4.5] upper

1932: limit (inverted triangle) was used because the source appears to have

1933: excess flux in this bandpass due to molecular emission associated with

1934: outflow activity that has not been incorporated into the YSO

1935: models. The thickest line represents the best fit to the data, and

1936: different colors represent the SED observed through different

1937: apertures, from smallest (IRAC, black) to largest ({\it MSX} 21.3 \um,

1938: green). The dashed line shows the photospheric flux from the best-fit

1939: YSO model, as it would appear if suffering from interstellar

1940: extinction only in the absence of circumstellar material.  (b) Masses

1941: and luminosities of the best fit models.  The shaded contour regions

1942: represent the logarithmic density of models in the mass-luminosity

1943: parameter space. The darkest gray represents a model density 1000

1944: times higher than that of the lightest grey. The white region beyond

1945: the lowest contour shows the part of parameter space that lies beyond

1946: the edge of the model grid.

1947: 

1948: \noindent

1949: {\bf Figure 12:} (a) Same as Figure 11a, but for the other 6 well-fit

1950: YSOs in region C.  All fits used to compute the model parameter ranges

1951: in Table 4 are plotted. Sources 10 and 11 overlap the \uchii\ region,

1952: and hence the diffuse mid-IR fluxes associated with the \uchii\ region

1953: in all 4 {\it MSX} bands and MIPS 24 and 70 \um\ were used as upper

1954: limits to the fits. (b) Same as Figure 11b, but for the 6 well-fit

1955: YSOs plotted in Figure 12a.

1956: 

1957: \newcommand{\gname}[2]{\includegraphics[width=#2in]{#1.jpg}}

1958: 

1959: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1960: \clearpage

1961: % Figure 1:

1962: \begin{figure}

1963: \gname{figure1}{6}

1964: \center{\bf Figure 1.}

1965: \end{figure}

1966: 

1967: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1968: \clearpage

1969: % Figure 2:

1970: \begin{figure}

1971: \gname{figure2}{6}

1972: \center{\bf Figure 2.}

1973: \end{figure}

1974: 

1975: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1976: \clearpage

1977: % Figure 3:

1978: \begin{figure}

1979: \gname{figure3}{6}

1980: \center{\bf Figure 3.}

1981: \end{figure}

1982: 

1983: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1984: \clearpage

1985: % Figure 4:

1986: \begin{figure}

1987: \gname{figure4}{6}

1988: \center{\bf Figure 4.}

1989: \end{figure}

1990: 

1991: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1992: \clearpage

1993: % Figure 5:

1994: \begin{figure}

1995: \gname{figure5}{6}

1996: \center{\bf Figure 5.}

1997: \end{figure}

1998: 

1999: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2000: \clearpage

2001: % Figure 6:

2002: \begin{figure}

2003: \gname{figure6}{6}

2004: \center{\bf Figure 6.}

2005: \end{figure}

2006: 

2007: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2008: \clearpage

2009: % Figure 7:

2010: \begin{figure}

2011: \gname{figure7}{6}

2012: \center{\bf Figure 7.}

2013: \end{figure}

2014: 

2015: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2016: \clearpage

2017: % Figure 8:

2018: \begin{figure}

2019: \gname{figure8}{5}

2020: \center{\bf Figure 8.}

2021: \end{figure}

2022: 

2023: 

2024: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2025: 

2026: \clearpage

2027: % Figure 9:

2028: \begin{figure}

2029: \gname{figure9}{6}

2030: \center{\bf Figure 9.}

2031: \end{figure}

2032: 

2033: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2034: 

2035: \clearpage

2036: % Figure 10:

2037: \begin{figure}

2038: \gname{figure10}{6}

2039: \center{\bf Figure 10.}

2040: \end{figure}

2041: 

2042: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2043: \clearpage

2044: % Figure 11a:

2045: \begin{figure}

2046: \gname{figure11a}{6}

2047: \center{\bf Figure 11a.}

2048: \end{figure}

2049: 

2050: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2051: \clearpage

2052: % Figure 11b:

2053: \begin{figure}

2054: \gname{figure11b}{6}

2055: \center{\bf Figure 11b.}

2056: \end{figure}

2057: 

2058: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2059: \clearpage

2060: % Figure 12a:

2061: \begin{figure}

2062: \gname{figure12a}{6}

2063: \center{\bf Figure 12a.}

2064: \end{figure}

2065: 

2066: 

2067: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2068: \clearpage

2069: % Figure 12b:

2070: \begin{figure}

2071: \gname{figure12b}{6}

2072: \center{\bf Figure 12b.}

2073: \end{figure}

2074: 

2075: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2076: \end{document}

2077: 

2078: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2079: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2080: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2081: 

2082: 

2083: 

2084: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2085: 

2086: \clearpage

2087: % Figure 9:

2088: \begin{figure}

2089: \epsscale{1.2}

2090: \plotone{fig.glimpse.co.ps}

2091: 

2092: \vspace{-6cm}

2093: \center{{\bf Figure 9.}~~Three color image of the near and

2094:   mid-infrared emission: blue = 2Mass K-band; green = GLIMPSE

2095:   4.5\,$\mu$m; and red = GLIMPSE 8\,$\mu$m.  Top panel: CO

2096:   red and blue-shifted emission.  Bottom panel: {\tco} red and

2097:   blue-shifted emission. } 

2098: \end{figure}

2099: 

2100: \noindent

2101: {\bf Figure 9.}~~Three color image of the near and mid-infrared

2102: emission: blue = 2Mass K-band; green = GLIMPSE 4.5\,$\mu$m; and red =

2103: GLIMPSE 8\,$\mu$m.  Top panel shows CO red and blue-shifted contours

2104: overlayed on the infrared image while bottom panel shows {\tco} red

2105: and blue-shifted contours.  White crosses indicate the positions of

2106: the UC\,H{\sc ii} and G34.4\,MM.

2107: 

2108: 

2109: %

2110: {\bf Matt: you and Barb had an e-mail discussion about the relative

2111:   importance of CO band head emission versus H2 emission for making

2112:   the 4.5um flux so bright.  I agree that H2 or CO band head emission

2113:   could be responsible for the flux density at 4.5 microns.  The Smith

2114:   et al. paper is on DR21 - an extreme example with the most powerful

2115:   H2 outflow I've ever seen.  No wonder the 4.5 micron is well

2116:   correlated with H2.  But for this outflow cluster that is not

2117:   producing as much H2, I think CO bandhead emission is likely to be

2118:   more important. See for example the K band image in Fig 4 of

2119:   shepherd 2004 on G34 - no real obvious H2 shocks here but the

2120:   extinction is probably too high to see anything at 2.12 microns.

2121:   But this is just a guess..  Check the sentence I've added above and

2122:   see if you think we need more here. {\it Debra: This looks fine to me.} }

2123: