1: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: \documentclass[apj]{emulateapj}
3: \usepackage{mathptmx}
4:
5: \def\d{\mathrm{d}}
6:
7:
8: \begin{document}
9:
10: \title{On the connection between metal absorbers and quasar nebulae}
11:
12: \author{Doron Chelouche\altaffilmark{1,2},
13: Brice M\'enard\altaffilmark{3,1},
14: David V. Bowen\altaffilmark{4},
15: and Orly Gnat\altaffilmark{5}}
16:
17: \altaffiltext{1} {School of Natural Sciences, Institute for Advanced
18: Study, Einstein Drive, Princeton 08540, USA; doron@ias.edu}
19:
20: \altaffiltext{2} {Chandra Fellow}
21:
22: \altaffiltext{3} {Canadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics,
23: University of Toronto, 60 Saint George Street, Toronto, ON M5S 3H8,
24: Canada}
25:
26: \altaffiltext{4} {Department of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton
27: University, Princeton, NJ 08544}
28:
29: \altaffiltext{5} {School of Physics and Astronomy and the Wise
30: Observatory; Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel}
31:
32: \shortauthors{D. Chelouche et al.}
33:
34: \shorttitle{Metal Absorbers \& Quasar Nebulae}
35:
36: \begin{abstract}
37:
38: We establish a simple model for the distribution of cold gas around
39: $L^\star$ galaxies using a large set of observational constraints on
40: the properties of strong \ion{Mg}{2}\ absorber systems. Our analysis suggests
41: that the halos of $L^\star$ galaxies are filled with cool gaseous
42: clouds having sizes of order 1\,kpc and densities of $\sim 10^{-2}$
43: cm$^{-3}$. We then investigate the physical effects of cloud
44: irradiation by a quasar and study the resulting spectral
45: signatures. We show that quasar activity gives rise to (i) extended
46: narrow-line emission on $\sim100$ kpc scales and (ii) an anisotropy in
47: the properties of the absorbing gas arising from the
48: geometry of the quasar radiation field. Provided that quasars reside in
49: halos several times more massive than those of $L^\star$ galaxies, our
50: model predictions appear to be in agreement with observations of
51: narrow emission-line nebulae around quasars and the recent detections
52: of $\sim100$\,kpc cold gaseous envelopes around those objects,
53: suggesting a common origin for these phenomena. We discuss the
54: implications of our results for understanding absorption systems,
55: probing quasar environments at high redshifts, and testing the quasar
56: unification scheme.
57:
58:
59: \end{abstract}
60:
61: \keywords{ atomic processes --- galaxies: halos --- quasars:
62: absorption lines --- quasars: emission lines}
63:
64: \section{Introduction}
65:
66:
67: Observational data on quasar absorption lines indicates that $L^\star$
68: galaxies are surrounded by cool ($\sim 10^4$\,K) gas condensations
69: ranging up to radii of $\sim
70: 100\,h_{70}^{-1}$\,kpc\footnote{Throughout the paper we use
71: $H_0=70\,h_{70}~{\rm km~s^{-1} Mpc^{-1}}$, $\Omega_M=0.7$, and
72: $\Omega_\Lambda=0.3$.} (Bergeron et al. 1987, Steidel et al. 1995,
73: Churchill et al. 2005, Zibetti et al. 2006). Similar distributions
74: have recently been found around quasars (Bowen et al. 2006, 2007). In
75: addition, several teams have discovered that bright quasars are
76: surrounded by giant line-emitting nebulae observed at transitions such
77: as Ly$\alpha$ (e.g., Wampler et al. 1975, Heckman et al. 1991a,b,
78: Christensen et al. 2006). In this paper we investigate whether the
79: two phenomena could originate from the same type of gas clouds around
80: galaxies thereby connecting gas absorption and line emission in galaxy
81: and quasar halos.
82:
83: Quasar spectra have historically been a main source of information
84: about large scale matter distribution in the universe. Such
85: information has been obtained by studying absorption lines induced by
86: intervening material between us and the quasar. In the optical
87: wavelength range, absorption lines by metal-enriched gas at $z
88: \lesssim 2$ originate from low to moderate-ionization species and the easiest
89: feature to detect is usually the \ion{Mg}{2}\ doublet ($\lambda\lambda
90: 2796.35,2803.53$). It is the first resonance transition of an abundant
91: element with a large oscillator strength to enter the optical range
92: and has therefore been the most commonly used tracer of cool
93: gas. Several studies have shown that \ion{Mg}{2}\ arises in gas
94: spanning more than five orders of magnitude in neutral hydrogen column
95: density, from $N_{\rm HI} \simeq 10^{17}-10^{22}~{\rm cm^{-2}}$
96: \citep{bergeron_stasinska_86, steidel_sargent_92,churchill+00}.
97: Following the suggestion by Bahcall
98: \& Spitzer (1969) that quasar absorption lines might arise in halos around galaxies, an association between absorbers and galaxies has been
99: reported, starting from small samples of a few to $\sim50$ galaxies
100: (\citealp{bergeron_86,cristiani_87,bergeron_boisse_91,1997ApJ...480..568S};
101: Churchill et al. 2005) to statistical measurements involving thousands
102: of objects (Zibetti et al. 2005 \& 2006, M{\'e}nard et al. 2007).
103:
104: While a connection between galaxies and metal absorbers has been
105: firmly established, the origin of the absorbing gas remains unclear.
106: Whether these absorption line systems trace gas being accreted by a
107: galaxy or outflowing from it is still a matter of debate. Among the
108: possible origins for absorption line systems in galaxy halos are condensations of
109: cool clouds from hot and dilute halo gas via thermal instability
110: (e.g., Mo \& Miralda-Escude 1996, Maller \& Bullock 2004), cool gas
111: that is bound to dark matter sub-halos embedded within the main halo
112: (e.g., Sternberg, McKee, \& Wolfire 2002 and references therein), and
113: starburst driven winds from galaxies (e.g., Oppenheimer \& Dav{\'e}
114: 2006, Prochter et al. 2006). Additional explanations include (warped) galaxy disks (Bowen et
115: al. 1995, Prochaska \& Wolfe 1998) as well as low surface brightness
116: companion objects (York et al. 1986, Petitjean \& Bergeron 1994).
117:
118: Some galaxies contain active nuclei and it is thought that all quasars
119: are harbored in galaxies. The properties of quasar hosts are not well
120: characterized but it is believed that bright quasars are usually
121: harbored in rather massive, star-forming galaxies ranging from $\sim$
122: 1 to $\sim 30 L^\star$ (Jahnke \& Wisotzki 2003). Little is known
123: about the environments of quasars, with recent studies suggesting that
124: brightest objects live in somewhat over-dense environments (Serber et
125: al. 2006). Like galaxies, the immediate environment of quasars can
126: also be probed in absorption: using a survey of projected quasar pairs
127: from the {\it Sloan Digital Sky Survey} (SDSS) our team has recently
128: showed that quasars, like galaxies, are surrounded by Mg\,II gas on
129: scales ranging up to 100\,$h_{70}^{-1}$\,kpc (Bowen et
130: al. 2006). Using a larger sample of quasar pairs, we have now found
131: that the transverse gas distribution around quasars, as traced by
132: Mg\,II, suggests a covering factor of order unity up to $\sim
133: 100\,h_{70}^{-1}$ kpc (Bowen et al. 2007).
134:
135: Gas which is associated with the quasar environment is also commonly
136: observed (via resonance line absorption such as \ion{C}{4}\,$\lambda
137: 1548$) in our line-of-sight toward quasars and is identified by its
138: proximity (within $\sim10^3~{\rm km~s^{-1}}$) to the quasar
139: redshift. Nevertheless, it is generally hard to establish whether such
140: gas lies in the vicinity of the black hole (on sub-pc scales) or
141: whether it originates in its host galaxy or its surrounding halo
142: (see Crenshaw et al. 2003 for a review).
143:
144: Deep imaging and spectroscopic observations of quasars reveal that a
145: significant fraction of them have surrounding emission-line
146: nebulosities extending out to $\sim 100\,h_{70}^{-1}$\,kpc. Such
147: nebulosities are often detected in Ly$\alpha$ emission (e.g.,
148: Heckman et al. 1991, Christensen et al. 2006) or the
149: [\ion{O}{3}]\,$\lambda 5007$ line (Stockton \& MacKenty 1987, Fu \&
150: Stockton 2006) with recent surveys suggesting that radio-loud quasars
151: (RLQ) may have brighter Ly$\alpha$ nebulosities (Christensen et
152: al. 2006). Little is known about the physical nature of these nebulae
153: and various scenarios pertaining to both gas accretion onto the quasar
154: as well as gas ejection from it have been put forward as possible
155: explanations (e.g., Heckman et al. 1991, Haiman \& Rees 2001).
156:
157: Motivated by these recent findings, we investigate in this work
158: whether the emitting gas seen around quasars is consistent with being
159: the same material as that observed around galaxies (and quasars) in
160: absorption. The paper is organized as follows: In \S 2 we first
161: summarize some observational constraints on the properties of cool gas
162: around galaxies used to calibrate our model. A geometrical model is
163: then constructed and its physics is discussed. We then (\S 3) use
164: this model to study the effects on the absorption and emission
165: properties of halo gas when exposed to a quasar radiation field. In
166: addition, we show that such a model can naturally explain the
167: distribution of cool gas around quasars and the existence of
168: large-scale Ly$\alpha$ emitting nebulae. We discuss the implications
169: of our results for galaxy formation, baryon fraction in the Universe,
170: and quasar physics in \S 4. Summary follows in \S 5.
171:
172:
173:
174:
175: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%5
176: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%5
177: \section{The distribution of cool gas\\ around $L^\star$ galaxies}
178: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%5
179: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%5
180: \label{section_model}
181:
182:
183: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%5
184: \subsection{Observational constraints from \ion{Mg}{2}\ absorbers}
185:
186:
187: Observational data on \ion{Mg}{2}\ absorption lines have provided a
188: number of constraints on the spatial distribution and characteristics
189: of the cool gas around galaxies. Here we list the most relevant
190: results that can be used to model the \ion{Mg}{2}\ distribution in the halo of
191: an $L^\star$ galaxy:
192:
193: \textbf{1.)~} Strong \ion{Mg}{2}\ systems, defined with a rest equivalent
194: width $W_0>0.3$\AA, inhabit the halos of $\sim L^\star$
195: galaxies, as was found by Steidel et al. (1997). These authors found that Mg\,II
196: selected galaxy luminosities lie in the range $0.3-5\,L^\star$ with a
197: mean $\langle L \rangle\simeq 0.8\,L^\star$. Their results also
198: suggested a unit covering factor up to $\sim$50\,$h_{70}^{-1}$\,kpc
199: and the absence of strong \ion{Mg}{2}\ absorption on larger scales. More
200: recent studies (Zibetti et al. 2005 \& 2006, Churchill et al. 2005)
201: indicate that strong Mg\,II absorption can actually be detected on
202: scales reaching more than 100\,$h_{70}^{-1}$\,kpc but that the
203: covering factor falls off in this range. We note that the study done
204: by Zibetti et al. (2006) implies little evolution in the properties of
205: absorbing galaxies up to $z\sim 1$.
206:
207:
208: \textbf{2.)~} Strong \ion{Mg}{2}\ absorbers usually show saturated absorption
209: lines (as implied by the doublet ratio). High-resolution
210: spectroscopy reveals that strong systems usually break into several
211: kinematically distinct components (e.g., Churchill \& Vogt 2001). When resolved,
212: the widths of these components are consistent with gas at a temperature of $\sim
213: 10^4$\,K (e.g., Lanzetta \& Bowen 1990). It has been established that
214: the rest equivalent width of strong systems is roughly proportional to the
215: number of distinct kinematical components. Bergeron \& Petitjean
216: (1990) found the relation between total rest equivalent width and
217: number of clouds to be $W_0({\rm {Mg}\,{II}}) \simeq 0.3\times N_{\rm
218: c}$\,\AA\ and Churchill (1997) reported $W_0({\rm {Mg}\,{II}}) \simeq
219: 0.07\times N_c$\,\AA\ where $N_{\rm c}$ is the number of clouds
220: along the line-of-sight. If the individual clouds observed in these
221: systems are relatively similar, then these results suggest that, even
222: if the rest equivalent width of \ion{Mg}{2}\ systems is mostly driven by a
223: velocity dispersion, it can be used as a proxy for the number of
224: clouds along the line of sight.
225:
226: \textbf{3.)~} Constraints on the sizes of \ion{Mg}{2}\ systems have been
227: obtained by studying the spectra of strongly lensed quasars.
228: Limits on the size of individual absorption components are
229: obtained by comparing absorption features across different lines of
230: sight. Typical values span the range $0.1-10$
231: kpc for \ion{Mg}{2}\ clouds (e.g., Rauch et al. 2002, Ellison et al. 2004)
232: and perhaps somewhat larger sizes for systems detected by high
233: ionization lines such as \ion{C}{4}\,$\lambda\lambda 1548,1550$. At
234: present this is the only direct means for estimating the size of cool
235: gaseous clouds in galaxy halos (for an indirect method relying on
236: photoionization modeling see e.g., Ding et al. 2003).
237:
238: \textbf{4.)~} Finally, HI measurements show that strong \ion{Mg}{2}\ systems with
239: $W_0\sim 0.5$\AA\ give rise to HI column densities in the range
240: $10^{18-20}$ cm$^{-2}$ while stronger systems with $W_0\sim 2$\AA\
241: have $N_{\rm HI}\sim 10^{19-21}$ cm$^{-2}$ (Rao et al. 2006).
242: Emission-based results from 21 cm surveys at $z=0$ (Zwaan et al. 2005)
243: indicate that the contribution of galaxy \emph{disks} to the observed
244: HI column density distribution can be substantial within $\sim$20 kpc
245: for certain orientations. (See also Bowen et al. 1995 and Prochaska
246: \& Wolfe 1997). However, on larger scales, the contribution of halo
247: gas clouds is in general expected to dominate the HI column density
248: distribution. The lack of correlation between \ion{Mg}{2}\ absorption
249: properties and galaxy size or inclination further supports this
250: assertion (Steidel et al. 2002; see also Kacprzak et al. 2007).
251:
252:
253: \subsection{Modeling the spatial distribution}
254:
255:
256: % - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
257: \begin{figure*}
258: \begin{center}
259: \plottwo{f1a.eps}{f1b.eps}
260: %\includegraphics[width=.45\hsize]{f1.eps}
261: %\includegraphics[width=.45\hsize]{f2.eps}
262: \caption{The number-count distribution of Mg\,II clouds along
263: different lines-of-sight through a halo of an $L^\star$ galaxy (see
264: text). Note the increase in the number of intercepted cloud with
265: decreasing impact parameter. Note also that clouds are distributed up
266: to the virial radius though the probability for intercepting them on
267: large scales is small. \emph{Right:} The covering factor for strong
268: Mg\,II absorption around galaxies. The different solid lines
269: correspond to model predictions of the covering factor for different
270: $W_0$ limits (denoted to the right of each curve) around an $L^\star$
271: galaxy. As shown, the covering factor for strong, $W_0>0.5$\AA\
272: absorption is below 50\% for impact parameters greater than
273: 50\,kpc. Conversely, weak absorption with $W_0<0.3$\AA\ is common for
274: impact parameters greater than 70\,kpc. The dashed lines are
275: model predictions for galaxy halo models with cool gas mass 0.25 and 4
276: times that of an $L^\star$ galaxy and for $W_0>0.5$.}
277: \end{center}
278: \label{fig_model_realization}
279: \end{figure*}
280: % - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
281:
282:
283:
284:
285: We now introduce a simple phenomenological model aimed at reproducing
286: the main aspects of the observational constraints presented above,
287: namely the spatial extent of the gas, the cross-section for strong
288: \ion{Mg}{2}\ absorption and the distribution of hydrogen column densities
289: observed around $\sim L^\star$ galaxies. We emphasize that, in this
290: study, we do \emph{not} attempt to investigate the physical origin of
291: the gas, i.e. whether it is bound to satellite dark matter halos,
292: infalling or being ejected out of the galaxy via winds. We consider a
293: case in which the total mass density (baryonic and dark matter) for
294: such a system is described by an isothermal profile:
295: \begin{equation}
296: \rho(r)=\frac{\sigma^2}{2\pi G r^2}\,, ~~~~~r\le
297: r_v=\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{50}\,H_0}
298: \end{equation}
299: where $\sigma$ is the velocity dispersion, $r_v$ the virial radius,
300: and $\rho$ is the density. The mass within a given radius $r$ is then
301: given by
302: \begin{equation}
303: M(<r)=\frac{2\,\sigma^2\,r}{G}
304: \end{equation}
305: and by definition, the density enclosed within the virial radius is
306: 200 times the critical density. According to Fukugita \& Peebles
307: (2006), the one-dimensional mass-weighted velocity dispersion for late
308: type galaxies is $\sigma_{\rm late}=140\,\rm{km\,s^{-1}}$ which
309: corresponds to a virial mass $M_\star\simeq 2.5\times10^{12} M_\sun$ within $r_v=282$\,kpc.
310:
311: For simplicity we assume that the cool gas around $L^\star$ galaxies
312: is of the form
313: \begin{equation}
314: \rho_{\rm cool}(r) \propto r^{-2} .
315: \label{eq_rho}
316: \end{equation}
317: Such a density profile arises naturally in a wide range of models for
318: the origin of the absorbing gas. In particular, it characterizes gas
319: which follows the dark matter distribution in isothermal halos. It
320: also a property of mass conserving outflowing winds or infalling gas
321: (in spherical geometry) that holds over a range of radii where the
322: velocity is roughly constant. As we shall later see, deviations from
323: this power-law do not significantly affect our conclusions.
324:
325: The multiple components observed in high-resolution spectra indicate
326: that the gas does not follow an overall smooth distribution but is
327: distributed in discrete systems. To reproduce this property, we
328: consider the cool gas to be in the form of clouds that are distributed
329: within the halo following a Poisson distribution with a mean number
330: density, $n_{\rm cloud}$ following $\rho_{\rm cool}(r)$. Considering
331: a line-of-sight through the gaseous halo of a galaxy, the number of
332: clouds intercepted along a physical path $\d l$ is
333: \begin{equation}
334: dN_{\rm cloud}=n_{\rm cloud}({\bf r})\,\pi R_{\rm cloud}^2\, d{\bf l},
335: \label{dn}
336: \end{equation}
337: where $\pi R^2$ is the cloud cross-section for inducing \ion{Mg}{2}
338: absorption, ${\bf r}$ is a vector from the halo center, and $d{\bf l}$
339: is measured along the line-of-sight. By integrating over the
340: density profile of the gas we find the number of clouds along a given
341: line-of-sight at some impact parameter, $b$, to be
342: \begin{eqnarray}
343: N_{\rm cloud}(b)&=&\,\frac{\pi}{2} \Psi(r_v/b)
344: \times n_{\rm cloud}(b)\,\pi R^2\,b
345: \label{ncb}
346: \end{eqnarray}
347: where $\Psi(r_v/b)=(2/\pi) \int_1^{r_v/b} d\xi
348: \xi^{-1}/\sqrt{\xi^2-1}$.
349:
350: As mentioned above, the overall rest equivalent width of strong \ion{Mg}{2}\
351: systems is roughly proportional to the number of subcomponents. We can
352: therefore use this empirical relation and approximate the rest
353: equivalent width of a \ion{Mg}{2}\ absorber by
354: \begin{equation}
355: W_0 \simeq N_{\rm cloud} W_c
356: \label{eq_propto}
357: \end{equation}
358: with $W_c= 0.2$\AA. Here we have used the mean of the
359: proportionality factors reported by Bergeron \& Petitjean (1990) and
360: Churchill et al (2003)
361:
362: The final constraint needed for our model is the normalization of the
363: overall amplitude. Steidel (1993) has shown that \ion{Mg}{2}\
364: absorption with $W_0\gtrsim0.5$\AA\ is found within $\sim$50 kpc of
365: $L^\star$ galaxies with a unit covering factor. This imposes a
366: constraint on our model: $\langle W_0(r=50 \rm{kpc}) \rangle \simeq
367: 0.5$\AA . Given the previous relation, it implies that, on average,
368: about two \ion{Mg}{2}\ clouds are intercepted by a line-of-sight with
369: an impact parameter of 50 kpc. More recent results by Zibetti et
370: al. (2005) \& Churchill et al. (2005) have shown that there in fact
371: exists a continuous distribution of impact parameters up to more than
372: 100 kpc and the data suggest that the covering factor is less than
373: unity on those scales. We note that once the function $W_0(r)$ has
374: been normalized at 50 kpc, the cloud-distribution of \ion{Mg}{2}\
375: systems introduced above automatically reproduces the drop of the
376: covering factor for absorption and allows absorbing clouds to be found
377: on scales $>$100\,kpc, as indicated by recent studies. We
378: note that the scatter in $W_0(b) \propto N_{\rm cloud}(b)$ is largely
379: due to the relatively small number of clouds. Specifically, the
380: standard deviation is given by $[1+\sqrt{N_{\rm cloud}(b)+0.75}]W_c$
381: (Gehrels 1986) and is therefore considerable ($\Delta W_0/W_0 \lesssim
382: 1$). Interestingly, a large scatter is also seen in the data yet
383: its magnitude is poorly constrained due to small number statistics per
384: galaxy luminosity bin (Steidel et al. 1993).
385:
386: We now combine all the above properties and display the resulting
387: cloud distribution in Fig. 1. The left panel shows the distribution
388: of intercepted clouds of cool gas as a function of impact parameter
389: as well as the expected scatter. The right panel presents, for
390: different absorption line sensitivities, the covering factor for
391: absorption around $L^\star$ galaxies. We note that the observational
392: constraints we are using are valid on scales greater than $\sim$20
393: kpc. This is denoted in Fig. 1 by the white dashed circle. On scales
394: smaller than 20 kpc, the contribution from the disk of late-type
395: galaxies becomes important. In this paper we are only interested in
396: gas distribution in the halo and we will focus only on these larger
397: scales.
398:
399:
400: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%5
401: \subsection{Properties of \ion{Mg}{2}\ clouds}
402: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%5
403:
404:
405: We now investigate the possible range of physical conditions which allow
406: the existence of \ion{Mg}{2}\ clouds around a galaxy. Given the low gas
407: temperatures associated with individual \ion{Mg}{2}\ absorption components, we
408: neglect the effect of collisional heating by shocks, conduction,
409: and cosmic ray heating (e.g., Bergeron \& Stasinka 1986, Charlton et
410: al. 2000) and only consider the effects of photoionization.
411: For clouds in a galactic halo, most of the ionizing flux originates from the
412: meta-galactic field (Haardt \& Madau 1996) and the central
413: galaxy. Contributions to the mean ionizing photon flux from satellite
414: galaxies and other diffuse sources can be neglected.
415: %
416: The background UV/X-ray ionizing radiation is due to quasars and
417: stars. Characterizing this spectrum requires knowledge of the star
418: formation rate and quasar activation history as well as the opacity of
419: intervening material. In this work we use the Haardt \& Madau
420: (1996) calculations and consider the background radiation at $z\sim1$.
421: The spectrum, integrated over $4\pi$ steradians, is shown in
422: Fig. \ref{sed} with a dashed line.
423:
424: In addition to diffuse background radiation there is also the ionizing
425: radiation from the central galaxy. We model the galaxy spectrum
426: using the Bruzual \& Charlot (1996) models and the Chabrier (2003)
427: initial mass function. We assume grey opacity beyond the Lyman
428: edge so that 5\% of the ionizing continuum escapes to the halo (e.g.,
429: Bland-Hawthorn \& Maloney 2001). A population of X-ray binaries is
430: also included (Norman et al. 2004) using the infra-red to X-ray
431: scaling of Ranalli et al. (2003). The galaxy ionizing radiation is
432: shown in Fig. \ref{sed}.\\
433:
434: % - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
435: \begin{figure}[t]
436: \includegraphics[width=\hsize]{f2.eps}
437: \caption{The various components of the ionizing radiation field
438: considered in this work. The quasar spectral energy distribution (solid line), the galaxy
439: ionizing radiation field (dash-dotted line), and the UV/X-ray background
440: radiation field (dash line). The relative normalizations of the different
441: components were scaled to the values that would be measured at a distance of 50kpc from the center of the galaxy (see
442: text).}
443: \label{sed}
444: \end{figure}
445: % - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
446:
447:
448: To model the photoionization and thermal equilibrium of the cool gas
449: clouds in the halo, we use the {\sc cloudy} c06.02a photoionization
450: code (Ferland et al. 1998) with the Badnell di-electronic
451: recombination coefficients (Badnell 2006). We simplify the
452: calculations by assuming a slab geometry with one surface of the cloud
453: exposed to half of the total ionizing flux. Photoionization
454: calculations are carried out to the center of the cloud and symmetry
455: is assumed when calculating the total column density of ions (see Gnat
456: \& Sternberg 2004 for a more realistic treatment of the problem). We assume the
457: gas composition to be $0.1\times$solar (Turnshek et al. 2005, York et al. 2006).
458:
459: We investigated several possible scenarios for the structure of the
460: clouds: (a) constant density; this is perhaps the simplest model yet
461: has been the main route by which a wide range of astrophysical
462: phenomena are modeled, (b) constant radiation and gas pressure; this
463: may be relevant to clouds in pressure equilibrium with their
464: surroundings (e.g., with the inter-cloud medium), (c) constant
465: temperature; this could be envisioned as gas which is collisionally
466: heated to the virial temperature of dark matter minihaloes. Given the
467: parameter space of interest, it appears that the different models do
468: not give appreciably different results. For clarity we will show only
469: the results obtained for a constant density medium.
470:
471: We have calculated the column density of \ion{Mg}{2} and \ion{H}{1} as
472: a function of cloud hydrogen (ionized and neutral) column density and
473: the number density of particles. The results are shown in Fig.
474: \ref{mg2_h1}.
475:
476:
477: % - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
478: \begin{figure}
479: \includegraphics[width=\hsize]{f3.eps}
480: \caption{A contour plot of the \ion{Mg}{2}\,$\lambda 2796$ optical
481: depth (blue contours) and the \ion{H}{1} column density (red
482: contours), both in logarithmic units, as a function of the cloud
483: particle number density and total hydrogen column density. Only the
484: UV/X-ray ionizing background radiation is assumed. Lines
485: corresponding to several cloud sizes are also drawn (see text).}
486: \label{mg2_h1}
487: \end{figure}
488: % - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
489:
490:
491: We have repeated the calculations including the effect of the ionizing
492: radiation field of the galaxy and found it to be dominant within the
493: central $\sim 40$\,kpc (see \S2.4 for the effect of cloud
494: shielding). The gas considered here, having a low ionization level, is
495: sensitive to the ionizing flux just above the Lyman edge. To first
496: order, gas which is exposed to the galaxy ionizing flux (in addition
497: to the UV ionizing radiation flux, $f_{\rm UV}$), $f_{g}$ would attain
498: a similar ionization structure to that shown in Fig. \ref{mg2_h1}
499: provided its density is greater by a factor $1+f_{\rm g}/f_{\rm UV}$.
500: Similarly, at higher redshifts, where the UV background radiation is
501: stronger the density of a cloud with a similar ionization level to
502: that shown in Fig. \ref{mg2_h1} would be higher by the UV flux ratio
503: of the epochs.
504:
505: % - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
506: \begin{figure}[t]
507: \includegraphics[width=\hsize]{f4.eps}
508: \caption{HI column density vs. the rest equivalent width of \ion{Mg}{2}\
509: for \ion{Mg}{2}\ selected systems (see Rao et al. 2006). Data appear as black
510: points with upper limits marked by triangles. Different point size
511: indicates different selection criteria employed by Rao
512: et al. (large points are systems selected by criteria 1-2 while
513: smaller points by 3-4; see Rao et al. 2006); both sets of points have
514: similar properties for the low column density range considered
515: here. The contribution of galaxy disks to the measured H\,I column
516: density may become important in the shaded region of the diagram
517: (Zwaan et al. 2005) and our model does not attempt to account for it.
518: The simulated data are drawn in red points and reproduce the lower
519: column density envelope (see text).}
520: \label{rao}
521: \end{figure}
522: % - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
523:
524:
525: Constraining the parameter range relevant to strong \ion{Mg}{2}\
526: absorbers is not straightforward since strong \ion{Mg}{2}\ lines are
527: usually saturated and additional observational constraints are needed
528: to estimate their typical density and column density. A useful
529: constraint is the size of the clouds derived from strong lensing
530: studies. As noted above, such studies indicate that the size of
531: \ion{Mg}{2}\ absorbers is $\sim$1\,kpc. This constraint substantially
532: reduces the relevant parameter space in Fig. \ref{mg2_h1}. A second
533: constraint comes from the \ion{H}{1}\ column density measurements for
534: strong absorbers (Rao et al. 2006). Using the rest equivalent width as
535: a proxy for the column density along the line-of-sight (see
536: eq. \ref{eq_propto}) we see from Fig. \ref{rao} that a typical cloud
537: has an \ion{H}{1}\ column density of $\sim 10^{18}~{\rm cm^{-2}}$,
538: implying a density of about $2\times 10^{-2}~{\rm cm^{-3}}$. Such
539: values are consistent with previous estimates in the literature for the density of cool gas in galaxy halos (e.g.,
540: Sternberg, McKee, \& Wolfire 2002 for the case of high velocity clouds in the Galaxy).
541:
542:
543: The scatter in the $\mathrm{N_{HI}}$ vs. $W_0$ relation presented in Fig.
544: \ref{rao} is significantly larger than that of the simplified model
545: presented in the previous section. Several effects not included in
546: our model could also contribute to this scatter: a distribution of
547: galaxy masses, types, star formation histories, etc. -- all of which
548: are beyond the scope of this paper and are not observationally
549: motivated at this stage. In the absence of a clear physical
550: motivation, we attempt to take this effect into account by introducing
551: a distribution of cloud sizes (as implied by the observations; \S
552: 2.1). Here, clouds have similar densities which allow them to be in
553: pressure equilibrium with their environment. (We find the alternative
554: scenario in which all clouds have the same size but different
555: densities less plausible since the implied evaporation times would be
556: embarrassingly short compared to the Hubble time; see appendix.) To
557: this end we assume that the size of individual Mg\,II clouds is drawn
558: from an intrinsic distribution $\phi(R_{\rm cloud})$ so that observed
559: one (taking into account cloud cross-section effects on the
560: detectability rates) $\phi_{\rm obs}(R_{\rm cloud})\propto\phi(R_{\rm
561: cloud})\times R_{\rm cloud}^2$. A simple power-law distribution gives
562: a reasonably good description of the data:
563: \begin{eqnarray}
564: \phi(R_{\rm cloud}) \propto R_{\rm cloud}^\beta\,, {\rm ~~with~~} R_{\rm
565: cloud}^{\rm min}<R_{\rm cloud}<R_{\rm cloud}^{\rm max} \,,
566: \end{eqnarray}
567: which implies a mass distribution:
568: \begin{eqnarray}
569: \phi(M_{\rm cloud}) \propto M_{\rm cloud}^{(\beta-2)/3}\,, {\rm
570: ~~with~~} M_{\rm cloud}^{\rm min}<M_{\rm cloud}<M_{\rm cloud}^{\rm max}
571: \end{eqnarray}
572: where $M_{\rm cloud}$ is the mass of a single cloud. This distribution
573: is defined between some minimum and maximum sizes. We generate a
574: population of clouds as follows: in each rest-equivalent width bin we
575: randomly picked the sizes of $N_{\rm cloud}$ clouds drawn from $\phi$
576: and calculated their ionization structure and their \ion{H}{1}\ column
577: densities. The total \ion{H}{1}\ column of all clouds was then summed
578: taking into account the scatter caused by intercepting a spherical
579: cloud at various positions. This procedure resulted in one simulated
580: point in Fig. \ref{mg2_h1} which was then repeated covering the entire
581: rest-equivalent width range spanned by the data. As we are only
582: interested in modeling the gas contribution originating from the halo
583: of a galaxy, we do not model the high HI column density values with
584: $N_{\rm HI}>10^{20} \rm{cm}^{-2}$ and for which a disk is a likely
585: contributor (Zwaan et al. 2005). We note that our estimates for the
586: total mass of cool gas in the halos of galaxies will change by a
587: factor of order unity by including the upper end of the column density
588: distribution in our model. Given our density estimates from
589: photoionization calculations and the constraints on the mean size of
590: clouds then a good fit for the Rao et al. dataset is obtained for
591: $R_{\rm cloud}^{\rm min}=0.3$\,kpc, $R_{\rm cloud}^{\rm max}=1.5$\,kpc
592: and $\beta=-2.5$ (corresponding to $\beta=-0.5$ for the observed
593: distribution). Our approach allows us to reproduce the main
594: observational trends summarized in Fig. \ref{rao}.
595:
596: The gas temperature in our model is $\sim 10^4$\,K and so the gas
597: pressure $P/k_B\sim 200~{\rm cm^{-3}\,K}$ (i.e., similar to the value
598: used by e.g., Mo \& Miralda-Escude 1996 and Gnat \& Sternberg 2004 but
599: somewhat lower than that implied by Fukugita \& Peebles 2006). The
600: implied cloud mass distribution, $\phi(M_{\rm cloud})\propto M_{\rm
601: cloud}^{-1.5}$, with $M_{\rm cloud}^{\rm min}=6\times 10^4~{\rm
602: M_\sun}$ and $M_{\rm cloud}^{\rm max}=7\times 10^6~{\rm M_\sun}$.
603: Clouds are Jeans stable provided that the total mass (dark and
604: baryonic matter) is $M_{\rm cloud}<10^8~{\rm M_\sun}$. The clouds are
605: also relatively stable with respect to hydrodynamic instabilities
606: (such as Klevin-Helmholtz) and evaporation (Maller \& Bullock 2004).
607:
608: It is interesting to note that our typical \ion{Mg}{2} absorbing
609: cloud hydrogen is mostly ionized. Most of the metals are in singly or
610: doubly ionized configuration. Nevertheless, the large total gas columns
611: result in higher ionization levels having a non-negligible column
612: density. Specifically, the column density of
613: \ion{C}{4} in our model can exceed $10^{13}~{\rm cm^{-2}}$ which
614: translates to an optical depth of order unity and is therefore
615: consistent with a picture in which \ion{C}{4}\ and \ion{Mg}{2}\
616: absorption have a common origin. The uniform density, cool clouds
617: considered here cannot account for the strong intervening \ion{O}{6}\,$\lambda
618: 1035$ systems (see Danforth \& Shull 2005, Bergeron \& Herbert-Fort 2005) and
619: an additional component/physics is required to explain them (e.g., Mo \& Miralda-Escude
620: 1996, McKee \& Begelman 1990 and references therein).
621:
622: In our analysis we have assumed that all clouds are exposed to a
623: similar flux level regardless of their location in the
624: halo. Nevertheless, the effect of shielding of the ionizing flux by
625: other clouds could be, in principal, important. To estimate the magnitude
626: of this effect let us consider a cloud located 50\,kpc from the
627: galaxy. Such a cloud would see an effective column density of a
628: few\,$\times 10^{18}~{\rm cm^{-2}}$ (corresponding to a few
629: clouds). When shielding is included as well as the contribution from
630: the central galaxy, we find an overall decrease in the photoionization
631: rate by a factor $\sim 2$ compared to the non-shielded case.
632:
633:
634: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%5
635: \subsection{Summary \& limitations of the model}
636:
637: As stated above, our model is aimed at providing a
638: framework for studying the effects of a quasar radiation field on the
639: absorption and emission properties of the corresponding system. We
640: have calibrated it using observational constraints on the spatial
641: distribution of \ion{Mg}{2}\ clouds within the halo of $\sim L^\star$ galaxies
642: and the corresponding HI column densities, and using photoionization
643: calculations we have shown that the implied cloud parameters are
644: consistent with the existence of \ion{Mg}{2}\ gas. We summarize the main model
645: parameters in Table \ref{table_summary}.
646:
647:
648: % - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
649: \begin{figure}
650: \begin{center}
651: \includegraphics[width=\hsize]{f5.eps}
652: \caption{The extended cool gas component considered in this work
653: within the framework of the massive corona model by Fukugita \&
654: Peebles (2006; see their paper for the assumptions and physical
655: motivation behind each component). The total mass in cool gas is
656: comparable to that of the hot component within the virial
657: radius. Given the condensed form of the extended cool component it
658: occupies only a small fraction ($\sim 1\%$) of the entire volume.}
659: \end{center}
660: \label{fig_masataka}
661: \end{figure}
662: % - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
663:
664: %- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
665: \begin{table}[!t]
666: \begin{center}
667: \caption{Model summary}
668: \begin{tabular}{ll}
669: \hline\hline
670: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Cloud parameters&\\
671: \hline
672: Gas mass & $6\times10^4<M_{\rm cloud}<7\times10^6 M_\sun$\\
673: Radius & $0.3<R_{\rm cloud}<1.5$ kpc\\
674: Density & $\rho_{\rm cloud}=0.02$ atom cm$^{-3}$\\
675: Metallicity & 0.1 $Z_\sun$\\
676: \hline\hline
677: ~~~~~~Halo parameters ($20\, \rm{kpc}<r< r_v$)&\\
678: \hline
679: Cool gas density profile & $\rho\propto r^{-2}$\\
680: Dark matter velocity dispersion & $\sigma=140$ km/s\\
681: Virial radius & $r_v=282$ kpc\\
682: Virial mass & $M\simeq10^{12} M_\sun$ \\
683: Cool gas Mass\footnote{for a covering factor of unity and within $r_v$ (see section 2.4)} & $M_{\rm cool}\sim10^{11} M_\sun$ \\
684: Number of clouds\footnotemark[a] & $\sim7\times 10^4$ \\
685: \hline\hline
686: \end{tabular}
687: \label{table_summary}
688: \end{center}
689: \end{table}
690: %- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
691:
692:
693: This model leads to a picture in which $L^\star$ halos are filled
694: with gaseous clouds which are partially ionized and sufficiently
695: optically thick to be detected in both low- and high-ionization (e.g.,
696: \ion{C}{4}) absorption lines. These clouds have sizes of order 1\,kpc,
697: masses of $\sim10^6 {\rm M}_\sun$ and particle densities $\sim
698: 10^{-2}\,\rm{cm^{-3}}$, amounting to a cool gas mass of $\sim 10^{11}
699: {\rm M}_\sun$ \emph{within the virial radius}, i.e. $\sim 280$ kpc.
700:
701: The results presented above assume that cool gas clouds are
702: distributed throughout the entire volume of the halo up to the virial
703: radius. Nevertheless, the virial radius has no clear physical
704: connection to the scale, $r_{\rm cool}$, up to which cool clouds
705: exist. In particular, the value of $r_{\rm cool}$ is expected to
706: depend on the (unknown) origin of the cool gas. For example, if the
707: gas is ejected from the galaxy $r_{\rm cool}$ is likely to be smaller
708: than the case in which cool gas is accreted from the inter-galactic
709: medium. Moreoever, different values may be obtained if the cool gas
710: condenses out of the virialized halo gas (e.g., Mo \& Miralda-Escude
711: 1996). At present, little is known with confidence about the origin of
712: such cool gas and observations provide only very loose constraints,
713: hence $r_{\rm cool}$ is ill-determined. That being said, we find that the
714: mass of cool gas in galaxy halos depend relatively little on $r_{\rm
715: cool}$ for the relevant scale range. Specifically, to reproduce the
716: covering factor statistics on large scales, we obtain $M_{\rm
717: cool}\sim 3\,(4)\times 10^{10}\,{\rm M_\odot}$ for $r_{\rm
718: cool}=50\,(100)$\,kpc. Clearly, the mass of cool gas in galaxy halos
719: is considerable for all plausible values of $r_{\rm cool}$ and a
720: covering factor of order unity. In what follows we therefore assume
721: the gas occupies the entire virial volume (i.e., $r_{\rm cool}=r_v$).
722:
723: We note that, given our model assumptions and calibration constraints,
724: the overall mass of cool gas, $M$, scales with the mean cloud size,
725: $\left < R_{\rm cloud} \right >$ and is inversely proportional to the
726: assumed gas density. It must be emphasized that the total mass of
727: cool gas depends on the assumed covering for absorption, i.e. a
728: quantity still debated in the literature. In the present study we
729: have used a covering factor of unity for strong MgII absorption within
730: $\sim 50$ kpc, as suggested by Steidel et al. (1997). However, other
731: studies claim lower values ($\sim0.2$ from \citet{1992ApJ...396...20B}
732: and $\sim 0.5$ from {Tripp
733: \& Bowen 2005}). As the total mass of cool gas scales linearly with
734: this quantity, we might be overestimating the mass if the actual
735: covering factor is not unity.
736:
737:
738: According to our model, the mass of cool gas in galaxy halos scales
739: linearly with halo size. Specifically, the mass within 30\,kpc is
740: $M_{\rm cool} < 10^{10}\,{\rm M_\odot}$ and, by extrapolation to
741: smaller scales, is comparable to that estimated by Martin (2006) for
742: ultra-luminous infrared galaxy outflows. In Fig. \ref{fig_masataka}
743: we show the different components of the average mass profile of
744: late-type galaxies proposed by Fukugita \& Peebles (2006), and show
745: that including the distribution of cool gas proposed in the present
746: paper is only a modest departure from it.
747:
748:
749:
750:
751: \begin{figure}
752: \includegraphics[width=\hsize]{f6.eps}
753: \caption{The ionization fraction of the abundant elements as a
754: function of the ionization parameter, $U$. In this case the radiation
755: field of the quasar overwhelms all other sources within $\sim 10Mpc$
756: of the quasar. Gas with the same density and distance as a
757: typical \ion{Mg}{2}\ absorbing cloud would be highly ionized.}
758: \label{quasar}
759: \end{figure}
760: % - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
761:
762:
763: % - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
764: \begin{figure*}[ht]
765: \plottwo{f7a.eps}{f7b.eps}
766: %\includegraphics[width=.49\hsize]{f7.eps}
767: %\includegraphics[width=.49\hsize]{f8.eps}
768: \caption{The thermal and ionization properties of halo gas ($f_M=5$) illuminated by a quasar. {\it Left:} The temperature profile for a constant density, optically
769: thin medium with density of $0.02\,{\rm cm^{-3}}$ (see text) for
770: several values of quasar luminosity. Clearly, the temperature drops
771: with distance as the ionization parameter decreases ($\propto
772: r^{-2}$). The radiative effect of Seyfert galaxies on their
773: environment is more localized than that of bright quasars. {\it
774: Right:} The ionization structure as a function of distance from a
775: $L_{46}=1$ quasar. As expected, the ionization level decreases with
776: distance due to the dilution of the radiation field. The fraction of
777: \ion{Mg}{2}\ recovers only on Mpc scales while closer to the quasar
778: (on $\sim 100$\,kpc scales) \ion{C}{4}\ is expected to show absorption
779: signatures while on smaller scales still ($\sim 20$\,kpc) \ion{O}{6}\ would
780: show up in the spectrum. The gas is very highly ionized within $\sim
781: 30$\,kpc and could be detected in the X-rays. For quasars with
782: different luminosities the abscissa should be rescaled by
783: $L_{46}^{1/2}$. Thus, brighter quasars would ionize their environment
784: to larger distances. The dashed line corresponds to the ionization
785: fraction of \ion{H}{1}\ for the case of $L_{46}=0.1$. The hump beyond $\sim
786: 50$\,kpc is the result of self-shielding (see text).}
787: \label{TIvsD}
788: \end{figure*}
789: % - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
790:
791:
792: So far we have concentrated on modeling the gas within the halo of an
793: $L^\star$ galaxy with $M_{vir}=2.5\times 10^{12}\, {\rm M}_\sun$. It
794: is interesting to note that our model \emph{may} be scaled to
795: different galaxy luminosities and masses. Indeed, analyses by Steidel
796: et al. (1997) and Guillemin \& Bergeron (1997) have indicated that the
797: normalization of the \ion{Mg}{2}\ rest equivalent width follows a
798: relation
799: \begin{equation}
800: W_0(r,L)=W_0(r)\times
801: \left( \frac{L}{L^\star} \right)^\gamma
802: \label{sca}
803: \end{equation}
804: with $\gamma\simeq 0.1-0.4$. Such a scaling
805: has been reported in the luminosity range $0.3-5 L^{\star}$ and at
806: redshifts $0.5<z<1$. Extrapolating it further is therefore
807: uncertain. The above relation may be understood within the framework
808: of our model as a dependence of the number of clouds, hence mass of
809: cool gas, on luminosity. Denoting the mass of cool gas in $L^\star$
810: galaxies by $M^\star$ then the mass of cool gas in halos of galaxies
811: with luminosity $L$ may be written as $M(L)=f_M(L) M^\star$ where $f_M$ is a dimensionless scaling factor.
812:
813:
814:
815: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
816: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
817: \section{Quasar haloes}
818: \label{section_quasar}
819: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
820: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
821:
822:
823: We now investigate the effects of a quasar on the gas distribution
824: within a halo and discuss the observational signature in absorption
825: and emission. Our main assumption is that quasar halos are analogous
826: to those of non-active galaxies. As indicated by recent studies (e.g.,
827: Jahnke et al. 2004), the hosts of bright quasars seem to correspond to
828: a few$\times L^\star$ galaxies. Furthermore, a recent study by Serber
829: et al. (2006) seems to indicate that bright quasars reside in
830: over-dense regions implying that their dark matter halos are several
831: times those typical of $L^\star$ galaxies. Motivated by these studies
832: we shall allow $f_M$ to deviate from unity. We show below that
833: many observational constraints may be accommodated by using $f_M\sim
834: 5-10$ for the mass of cool gas in quasar halos.
835:
836:
837:
838: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
839: \subsection{Thermal and Ionization Structure}
840:
841:
842:
843:
844:
845:
846:
847:
848:
849: % - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
850:
851: In what follows we compute the time-{\it independent} ionization and
852: thermal structure of a cloud exposed to a constant quasar ionizing
853: flux. In the Appendix we present time-{\it dependent} calculations and show
854: that the steady-state assumption suffices for the luminosity range and
855: the relevant spectral features considered here.
856:
857:
858: In modeling the spectral energy distribution (SED) of the quasar we
859: have used the continuum defined by Sazonov, Ostriker, \& Sunyaev
860: (2004) which is shown in Fig. \ref{sed}. Ionizing sources other than
861: the quasar can be safely neglected. We start by introducing
862: the ionization parameter, $U$, which is the ratio of photon density
863: to particle number density and is a measure of the ionization
864: level for photoionized gas. For the chosen SED we obtain that
865: \begin{equation}
866: U\simeq 0.6\, L_{46}\,\left ( \frac{n}{10^{-2}~{\rm cm^{-3}}} \right
867: )^{-1} \left ( \frac{r}{50~{\rm kpc}} \right )^{-2}.
868: \label{ion_param}
869: \end{equation}
870: where the quasar luminosity is $L=10^{46}L_{46}~{\rm erg~s^{-1}}$.
871: The ionization structure of several commonly detected ions as a
872: function of $U$ is shown in Fig. \ref{quasar}. By combining these
873: results with the density estimates from our model (\S 2), we can compute the ionization level and temperature
874: as a function of the radius from the center of the galaxy.
875: %
876: The results for the temperature profile are shown in Fig.
877: \ref{TIvsD}. As expected, the quasar has a substantial effect on the
878: thermal state of the inner parts of the halo and can heat the
879: (initially cool) gas to high temperatures by means of
880: photo-absorption. The extent to which the \ion{Mg}{2}\ halo is
881: ionized depends mainly on the quasar luminosity. For example, a quasar with
882: $L_{46}=1$ heats gas within the inner 20\,kpc to some $10^5$\,K with
883: gas at 50\,kpc being ionized to a few\,$\times 10^4$\,K. Objects with
884: Seyfert-like luminosities ($L_{46}\lesssim0.1$) have a smaller effect
885: on their immediate environments and heat the gas within their inner
886: 20\,kpc to a few\,$\times 10^4$\,K with clouds at larger radii
887: remaining relatively cool. In contrast, very luminous quasars can heat
888: their 100\,kpc environment to temperatures of order $10^5$\,K with gas
889: within the inner 10\,kpc being able to reach the Compton temperature.
890: The effect of a luminous quasar is not necessarily limited to halo gas
891: and low density gas may be affected on much larger (Mpc)
892: scales. Our calculations indicate (Fig. \ref{quasar}) that for
893: clouds to remain relatively cool within the central 30\,kpc of a
894: $L_{46}=1$ source, their density should be $\gg 10^2~{\rm cm^{-3}}$,
895: i.e. considerably higher than the values considered here and those thought
896: to be representative of
897: \ion{Mg}{2}\ clouds (c.f., Stockton et al. 2002).
898:
899:
900: \begin{figure}
901: \includegraphics[width=\hsize]{f8.eps}
902: \caption{The geometry considered here whereby a quasar emits ionizing radiation into a cone with opening angle $\theta$. Cool gas clouds which are exposed to the ionizing radiation (circles) are heated while those that are shielded from the ionizing radiation remain cool (filled circles) and their properties resemble those of halos associated with non-active galaxies. Off-center lines of sight will intercept cool gas in the transverse direction, while those that point radially toward the quasar will mostly see ionized gas (see text).}
903: \label{geometry}
904: \end{figure}
905:
906:
907: % - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
908: \begin{figure}
909: \plotone{f9.eps}
910: \caption{The covering factor for strong \ion{Mg}{2}\ absorption as a function of the impact parameter for lines-of-sight passing through the halo of a quasar (see figure \ref{geometry}). Thick (thin) lines correspond to the covering factor for systems with $W_0>1$\AA\ ($W_0>0.6$\AA). Four halo models are considered that differ by the mass of cool gas within the virial radius (denoted by $f_M$; see text) and the opening angle, $\theta$, of the quasar radiation field. As expected, the covering factor declines with increasing impact parameter due to the decreasing cloud density with distance. The covering factor for strong absorption is sensitive to both $\theta$ and $f_M$. As $\theta$ increases, more gas is ionized and the halo becomes transparent to \ion{Mg}{2}\ absorption. As $f_M$ rises, more clouds are intercepted along lines-of-sight through the halo. As shown, different combinations of $f_M$ and $\theta$ can result in a similar covering factor for strong \ion{Mg}{2}\ absorption (see text). }
911: \label{mg2_transverse}
912: \end{figure}
913:
914:
915:
916:
917: The ionization structure closely follows the temperature
918: profile. Fig. \ref{TIvsD} shows the ionization fraction of several
919: ions as a function of radius in the halo for the case of
920: $L_{46}=1$. Clearly, gas within the inner 100\,kpc is devoid of
921: \ion{Mg}{2}, with \ion{C}{4}\, \ion{O}{6}, and \ion{O}{8}\ being most
922: abundant; the ionization fraction of the latter peaking on the
923: smallest scales. For a $f_M=5$ halo with a $L_{46}=1$ quasar (e.g.,
924: Jahnke et al. 2004 and equation \ref{sca}), the gas remains optically
925: thin above the Lyman edge. For different source luminosities the
926: abscissa should be rescaled by $L_{46}^{-1}$. For low quasar
927: luminosities ($L_{46} <0.1$) even the inner regions of the halo remain
928: at low temperatures and the gas is less affected by the quasar on
929: $\sim 100$\,kpc scales (see Fig.
930: \ref{TIvsD}).\\
931:
932:
933: The active galactic nuclei (AGN) unification scheme (Antonucci 1993)
934: suggests that quasars emit light in a double cone geometry with an
935: opening angle $\theta$ (see Fig. \ref{geometry}). Such an
936: anisotropy in the radiation field will be imprinted in the properties
937: of the gas distribution around the quasar. In the next sections we
938: discuss the observational implications, both in absorption and
939: emission.
940:
941:
942:
943: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
944: \subsection{Quasar-halo absorption properties}
945:
946: Clouds of gas that lie within the ionization cone of the quasar would be heated
947: and ionized, and would follow the ionization structure presented in
948: Fig. \ref{TIvsD}. Therefore, the line-of-sight to a quasar would be
949: largely devoid of associated Mg\,II absorption due to the halo clouds
950: modelled in this paper. Nevertheless, such highly ionized clouds are expected
951: to give rise to associated absorption features from species like H\,I,
952: C\,IV, and O\,VI -- depending on their ionization structure which is
953: determined by the quasar luminosity and their distance from the source. In contrast, lines-of-sight
954: probing the quasar halo at finite impact parameters from the quasar
955: would intercept cool gas which is not affected by the quasar radiation
956: field and is therefore likely to show absorption features due to low
957: ionization species as those seen around non-active galaxies. The
958: number of \ion{Mg}{2}\ clouds intercepted by a given sight-line depends not
959: only on the total number of clouds within the halo (which, for
960: non-active galaxies, depends on the galaxy luminosity; see equation 9)
961: but also on the opening angle of the quasar.
962:
963:
964: Given the above model, we now discuss the observable properties of
965: quasar haloes in terms of their expected absorption signatures. In a
966: recent work we have used pairs of quasars at different
967: redshifts and investigated the presence of \ion{Mg}{2}\ absorption around the
968: foreground objects (Bowen et al. 2006). In 4/4 cases we have detected
969: \ion{Mg}{2}\ absorption with $W_0>0.5$\AA\ in the spectrum of the background
970: quasars with a redshift matching that of the foreground quasar. This
971: suggests that strong \ion{Mg}{2}\ absorbers are common in the
972: transverse direction of quasars. We have extended our analysis to a
973: larger sample of systems and our new results (Bowen et al. 2007)
974: indicate that the presence of strong \ion{Mg}{2}\ absorption around
975: quasars with a covering factor close to unity within 100 kpc, with
976: a rapid decline on larger scales. Such behavior is similar to that
977: of \ion{Mg}{2}\ gas which is detected around galaxies. Interestingly,
978: the high covering factor for \ion{Mg}{2}\ gas in the transverse
979: direction seem to be in contrast with smaller values ($\sim 10\%$;
980: Aldcroft et al. 1994) derived for \ion{Mg}{2}\ absorption along the
981: line-of-sight to these objects (see Fig. \ref{geometry}). As we
982: show below, this surprising finding is naturally explained by our
983: model.
984:
985:
986:
987: Quasar radiation is thought to be emitted into cones of opening angle
988: $\theta$ (Antonucci 1993). As such, $\theta$ is a measure of the mass
989: of cool gas within the halo which is exposed to the ionizing field and
990: determines the mass of the remaining cool gas. The connection between
991: $\theta$ and $W_0$ is therefore apparent within the framework of the
992: model (see figure \ref{geometry}). Model predictions for the
993: absorption covering factor as a function of the rest equivalent width,
994: the impact parameter, and the mass of cool gas, $f_M$, are given in Fig.
995: \ref{mg2_transverse}. These results are analogous to those of galaxies
996: but for the additional dependence on $\theta$. As shown, quasars that emit more isotropically have less
997: cool gas at any impact parameter due to ionization effects. More
998: massive envelopes of cool gas have a larger number of clouds and so result in broader \ion{Mg}{2}\ troughs. Clearly,
999: different combinations of $f_M$ and $\theta$ can yield similar covering
1000: fractions. At present, neither the mass of cool gas
1001: in quasar halos nor the opening angle of quasar ionization cones are
1002: well determined with recent surveys indicating that of $\theta$ may
1003: depend on the quasar luminosity and is in the range $45^\circ
1004: <\theta<70^\circ$ for bright quasars (Willott et al. 2000, Treister \&
1005: Urry 2005). Fig. \ref{mg2_transverse} shows that $f_M\simeq 5-10$ is
1006: required to explain the high occurrence of transverse strong
1007: \ion{Mg}{2}\ absorption around quasars within 100 kpc in the Bowen et
1008: al. (2006, 2007) sample.
1009:
1010:
1011: We can further compare the predictions of our model to observations by
1012: considering the fraction of quasars showing associated absorption,
1013: i.e. absorption arising along the quasar line-of-sight close to the
1014: quasar redshift (Fig. \ref{geometry}). As mentioned above, in such a
1015: case, low-ionization species are not expected to be abundant due to
1016: rapid ionizations by the quasar radiation field. However, the same
1017: clouds are expected to give rise to higher ionization absorption
1018: lines. In Fig. \ref{associated_abs} we present predictions for the
1019: covering factor of \ion{H}{1}, \ion{Mg}{2}, \ion{C}{4}, and \ion{O}{6}
1020: lines as a function of halo mass and quasar quasar luminosity. The
1021: covering factor for all lines is seen to decrease exponentially with
1022: increasing $W_0$ due to Poisson statistics. As shown, the covering
1023: factor for absorption is more sensitive to the quasar luminosity than
1024: to the mass of cool gas in the halo. In particular, the halos of more
1025: luminous quasars are more ionized resulting in a lower covering factor
1026: for strong low ionization systems. As expected, more massive halos
1027: produce stronger absorption due to the larger number of clouds
1028: intercepted along the line-of-sight. Predictions appear to be in
1029: qualitative agreement with recent surveys indicating a covering factor
1030: of $\sim 30\%$ for strong \ion{C}{4}\,$\lambda \lambda 1548,1550$
1031: absorption (Vestergaard et al. 2003). Our model predicts little
1032: associated
1033: \ion{Mg}{2} absorption due to halo gas. We note however, that our
1034: model does not include the, possibly important, contribution from
1035: absorption by gas in the immediate vicinity of the black hole
1036: (sometimes termed intrinsic absorption). That said, our model is
1037: consistent with the notion that most low ionization associated systems
1038: are intrinsic to the quasar. Additional data concerning the covering
1039: factor of various ionization stages as a function of quasar luminosity
1040: (and perhaps host mass) are required to test our model.
1041:
1042: \begin{figure}
1043: \plotone{f10.eps}
1044: \caption{The predicted covering factor for associated absorption where lines-of-sight probe the ionized part of the halo. Covering factors for several high ionization lines are considered correspnding to: \ion{H}{1}\,$\lambda 1216$ (dash-dotted line), \ion{Mg}{2}\,$\lambda 2800$ (dotted line), \ion{C}{4}\,$\lambda 1548$ (solid line), and \ion{O}{6}\,$\lambda 1035$ (dashed line). The results are shown as a function of the quasar luminosity for $L_{46}=0.1-10$ (columns) and mass in cold gas with $f_M=1-10$. As shown, the covering factor is more sensitive to the luminosity rather than the mass in cold gas. The covering factor follows the exponential cutoff of the
1045: Poisson distribution for the respective lines. Low luminosity quasars
1046: have a higher covering factor for low ionization lines since the halo
1047: is less ionized. For bright objects the halo is more ionized and
1048: low ionization lines become weaker.}
1049: \label{associated_abs}
1050: \end{figure}
1051: % - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1052:
1053:
1054: We note that a complementary configuration to the one used in the
1055: Bowen et al. (2006, 2007) survey is provided by radio galaxies. For
1056: these objects our line-of-sight passes outside the quasar radiation
1057: cone. Measurements of large-scale \ion{H}{1}\ absorption by Van Ojik
1058: et al. (1997) have shown that typical column densities through the
1059: neutral part of the halo are of order $\lesssim 10^{19}~{\rm
1060: cm^{-2}}$. Such values are in qualitative agreement with our model and
1061: with the Rao et al. (2006) dataset (see \S 2). A more detailed
1062: comparison is unwarranted at this stage.
1063:
1064: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%5
1065: \subsection{Quasar-halo emission properties}
1066:
1067:
1068: As the gas is photo-excited by the radiation field of the quasar,
1069: clouds would not only absorb but also emit and scatter continuum and
1070: line photons. In this section we calculate the expected emission line flux from
1071: the halo.
1072:
1073: Line emissivity depends on the ionization state of the gas as well as
1074: on the optical depth through which line photons need to propagate,
1075: escape, and reach the observer. In calculating the emissivity of lines
1076: we have assumed that once line photons escape individual clouds, they
1077: reach the observer; i.e., we assume no photon scattering or absorption
1078: among different clouds. This approximation is adequate if clouds along
1079: our line-of-sight have little overlap in velocity space, which is the
1080: case considered in this paper. The fraction of line photons escaping
1081: from a single cloud was calculated using {\sc cloudy} using the escape
1082: probability method for a static cloud. The resulting emissivity per
1083: unit mass as a function of distance from the ionizing source is shown
1084: in Fig. \ref{lumi_lumi} for Ly$\alpha$ emission line. As shown,
1085: averaged over volume, Ly$\alpha$ emissivity is relatively
1086: insensitive to the luminosity of the central object. This results from
1087: the gas temperature having only a weak dependence on luminosity for
1088: the relevant parameter range and from hydrogen being fully
1089: ionized. Emissivity is suppressed on small scales near very luminous
1090: sources due to suppression of the recombination rate at high ($\gg
1091: 10^5$\,K) temperatures.
1092:
1093: We have also studied the emissivity of other lines and, in particular,
1094: that of [\ion{O}{3}] $\lambda 5007$ forbidden line
1095: (Fig. \ref{lumi_lumi}). The line emissivity in this case is very
1096: different from that of Ly$\alpha$ and other hydrogen-like lines
1097: since the recombination rate is much lower (\ion{O}{3}\ and
1098: \ion{O}{4}\ abundances in the gas are negligible). Relatively neutral
1099: gas, which is required for efficient [\ion{O}{3}] $\lambda 5007$
1100: emission, becomes abundant only on large scales and even then only for
1101: relatively low luminosity quasars. As quasars get brighter the peak
1102: \ion{O}{3}\ emissivity is shifted to larger scales where cooler gas is found. We emphasize that,
1103: unlike Ly$\alpha$ emission, [\ion{O}{3}] $\lambda 5007$ emission is
1104: sensitive to gas composition and is roughly linear with it.
1105:
1106:
1107: Our calculations allow us to predict how quasar halos would appear for
1108: different emission lines. We show an example for a Ly$\alpha$ image in
1109: Fig. \ref{lumi_lumi} for the case of $\theta=70^\circ,~f_M=5,~L_{46}=1$ and
1110: assume that our line-of-sight is along the symmetry axis of the
1111: quasar. The image is symmetric with the surface brightness profile
1112: being roughly $\propto b^{-1}$ from the center (neglecting the effects
1113: of scattering; see below). We note that asymmetric images are
1114: obtained if the axis of symmetry is at an angle to our line-of-sight,
1115: as likely to be the case in general.
1116:
1117: Different lines have different emissivity profiles and hence different
1118: luminosities and inferred nebular sizes. Table 2 lists a few of the
1119: more important lines which could, in principal, be observed in quasar
1120: haloes. Ly$\alpha$, \ion{C}{4} $\lambda 1548$, and \ion{O}{6}
1121: $\lambda 1035$ are the strongest transitions with the latter two
1122: lines depending roughly linearly on the Metallicity. The typical
1123: nebular extent (from which most of the flux is emitted) of low ionization
1124: lines is $>100$\,kpc. This is in contrast to the apparent size of high ionization lines
1125: which come from compact, highly ionized regions of the halo (e.g., the nebular extent
1126: of \ion{O}{8} X-ray lines is $\gtrsim 10$\,kpc for $L_{46}=1$).
1127:
1128:
1129:
1130: % - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1131: \begin{figure*}%[!htp]
1132: \includegraphics[width=.49\hsize]{f11a.eps}
1133: \includegraphics[width=.49\hsize]{f11b.eps}
1134: \caption{The Ly$\alpha$ (solid) and [\ion{O}{3}]\,$\lambda 5007$ (dashed)
1135: emissivities for various color coded luminosities. While the Ly$\alpha$
1136: emissivities of the nebulae at large radii are similar, the emissivity
1137: decreases with increasing quasar luminosity on smaller, $\lesssim
1138: 30$\,kpc scales due to ionization effects. The [\ion{O}{3}]\,$\lambda 5007$ emissivities
1139: are lower than those of $L\alpha$ and have their maxima at larger
1140: radii where cool gas is more abundant.
1141: \emph{Right:} The Ly$\alpha$ halo surrounding an $L_{46}=1$
1142: ($f_M=5,~\theta=70^\circ$) quasar at $z=1$ with colors reflecting the flux
1143: level. Also shown in an inset is the surface brightness profile
1144: including (solid line) and excluding (dashed line) scattering of
1145: Ly$\alpha$ photons from the broad emission line region of the quasar
1146: (see text).}
1147: \label{lumi_lumi}
1148: \end{figure*}
1149: % - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1150:
1151: \subsubsection{Scattering}
1152:
1153: In addition to line emission there is scattering (i.e. absorption
1154: followed by emission) of the photons emitted by the quasar. Here broad
1155: emission line photons can be
1156: scattered off gas clouds in the halo provided the neutral hydrogen
1157: fraction is large enough. Owing to the low gas density, the
1158: population of excited levels is negligible and so only resonance lines
1159: are able to scatter efficiently. To correctly calculate the surface
1160: brightness profile due to photon scattering one requires detailed
1161: knowledge of the 3D distribution of clouds in real and velocity
1162: space. In addition, the fraction of photons reaching the halo depends
1163: on the amount of intrinsic absorption and the relative velocities of
1164: the emission line and halo gas. Detailed calculations should include
1165: the effect of multiple scatterings even in this relatively optically
1166: thin medium.
1167:
1168: Despite the overall complexity of scattering problems, it is
1169: relatively straightforward to estimate the maximum scattered flux
1170: expected for different lines. This is simply the flux in the broad
1171: emission line with velocity dispersion, $\sigma_l$ which is
1172: intercepted by halo clouds with velocity dispersion, $\sigma_c$ given
1173: by roughly $\sigma_c/\sigma_l\simeq 10\%$ (here we used $\sigma_l
1174: \simeq 2000$; e.g., Vanden Berk et al. 2001). Given our quasar SED and
1175: taking the mean rest equivalent width for Ly$\alpha$ to be $\sim
1176: 90$\AA\ (e.g., Zheng et al. 1997; Vanden Berk et al. 2001) we find
1177: that the the maximum scattered Ly$\alpha$ luminosity, $L_{\rm
1178: Ly\,\alpha}^{\rm scat,max}\sim 2\times 10^{43}\left [ 1-{\rm sin} ( \theta )
1179: \right ] L_{46}~{\rm erg~s^{-1}}$. Table 2 lists the results for
1180: other lines based on the same line-of-reasoning and shows that the contribution
1181: of scattered broad line region photons to the large scale nebular emission is
1182: probably less than 50\% for all prominent lines (and for $L_{46}<10^2$).
1183:
1184:
1185: \begin{table}
1186: \begin{center}
1187: {\sc TABLE 2 \\ Emission Line Properties of Quasar Nebulae}
1188: \vskip 4pt
1189: \begin{tabular}{llllllll}
1190: \tableline
1191: \tableline
1192: Line ID & $L $ & Size & $\frac{L^{\rm scat,max}}{L+L^{\rm scat,max}}$\\
1193: & $[{\rm erg~s^{-1}}]$ & $[{\rm kpc}]$ & [ ] \\
1194: \tableline
1195: \ion{H}{1}\ Ly$\alpha$ & $3\times 10^{43}$ & 150 & $0.25$\\
1196: \ion{O}{6}\ $\lambda 1035$ & $4\times10^{42}$ & 80 & $0.25$ \\
1197: \ion{N}{5}\ $\lambda 1238$ & $2\times10^{42}$ & 150 & $0.25$ \\
1198: \ion{C}{4}\ $\lambda 1548$ & $2\times10^{42}$ & 200 & $0.5$ \\
1199: \ion{H}{1}\ H$\alpha$ & $1\times 10^{42}$ & 100 & - \\
1200: \ion{H}{1}\ H$\beta$ & $8\times 10^{42}$ & 150 & - \\
1201: \ion{C}{3}\ $\lambda 977$ & $7\times10^{41}$ & 200 & - \\
1202: \ion{O}{8}\ $\lambda 18.97$ & $4\times 10^{41}$ & 20 & ?\\
1203: $[$\ion{O}{3}$]$\, $\lambda 5007$ & $2\times10^{41}$ & 200 & - \\
1204: \tableline
1205: \end{tabular}
1206: \vskip 2pt
1207: \parbox{4.2in}{ % use this to define the width of the notes under the
1208: \small\baselineskip 9pt \footnotesize \indent Luminosities for
1209: doublets are the sum for individual transitions. Size is defined \\ as
1210: the extent of the emitting nebula which contains 90\% of the flux for a given \\
1211: transition. The last column is an order of magnitude estimate for
1212: the maximum \\ luminosity in scattered light (see text). Transitions
1213: that do not scatter are marked \\ with ``-'' while those for which the
1214: broad emission line flux is very uncertain \\ are marked with ``?''
1215: (see text). $L_{46}=1,~\theta=70^\circ$ and $f_M=5$ are assumed.}
1216: \end{center}
1217: \end{table}
1218:
1219: To better evaluate the flux due to broad emission line photons
1220: scattering off halo gas, we define an effective optical depth over the
1221: (dynamically broadened) absorption line profile of halo gas,
1222: $\tau_{\rm eff}(r) = C(r)\tau(r)$ where $C(r)$ is the geometric
1223: covering factor of clouds at a given distance (i.e., the number of
1224: clouds intercepted at some distance interval) and $\tau(r)$ is the
1225: line optical depth of a single cloud at position $r$. In our model,
1226: $C(r)$ is large on small scales due to the clouds density peaking
1227: toward the center yet, $\tau(r)$, is low since the gas is more
1228: ionized. For Ly$\alpha$, $\tau_{\rm eff}$ is decreasing with
1229: decreasing $r$. On scales larger than $\sim 30$\,kpc, clouds become
1230: opaque to Ly$\alpha$ and $\tau_{\rm eff}\propto C\propto r^{-2}$. We
1231: have approximated the problem by running monte-carlo simulations
1232: (e.g., Zheng \& Miralda-Escude 2002; Z. Zheng, private communication)
1233: of photons emitted by a point source and being scattered off halo gas
1234: with $\tau_{\rm eff}$ being of order a few and having the radial
1235: dependence described above. We find that the surface brightness of the
1236: scattered photons is $\propto b^{-2.5}$ and therefore that most of the
1237: scattering occurs in the inner nebular regions (within $\sim
1238: 30$\,kpc). The results are shown in the inset of Fig. \ref{lumi_lumi} for the case of
1239: $L_{46}=1$. We note, however, that these provide only
1240: order-of-magnitude estimates since the gas kinematics in the central
1241: regions of the halo is rather uncertain.
1242:
1243: \subsubsection{Detectability}
1244:
1245: It is interesting to examine the detectability of line emitting
1246: nebulae around quasars within the framework of our model. Here we
1247: focus on Ly$\alpha$ nebulosity and study its observed luminosity and
1248: size as a function of the limiting flux of the observation (see
1249: Fig. \ref{plot_sensitivity}). As before, $f_M=10,~\theta=70^\circ$ and
1250: $L_{46}=10$ are assumed. We also examine these quantities for several
1251: redshifts assuming the observed nebulae at those redshifts are similar
1252: so that the surface brightness is $\propto (1+z)^4$. Our calculations
1253: indicate that the limiting flux required to observe extended
1254: Ly$\alpha$ emission around $z=1$ quasars is better than $\sim
1255: 10^{-16}~{\rm erg~s^{-1}~cm^{-2}~asec^{-2}}$. In particular, our
1256: model suggests that the observed nebular extent is sensitive to the
1257: limiting flux with a factor two increase in sensitivity allowing to
1258: detect emission from an order of magnitude larger volume. At low-$z$,
1259: a limiting flux of a few$\times 10^{-18}~{\rm
1260: erg~s^{-1}~cm^{-2}~asec^{-2}}$ is required to probe the full extent of
1261: the nebulosity and correctly estimate its luminosity. Once the
1262: appropriate sensitivity is reached, our model suggests that large
1263: scale emission line nebulae in general, and Ly$\alpha$ nebulae in
1264: particular, should be a rather common phenomenon around quasars. More
1265: massive halos or quasars having a wider ionization cones are better
1266: emitters and their halos can be observed to higher-$z$. Our
1267: calculations suggest that Ly$\alpha$ scattering can have a substantial
1268: contribution to the observed luminosity (compare models B,C and D in
1269: figure \ref{plot_sensitivity}). As expected, halos with lower mass of
1270: cool gas ($f_M=1$) are poor emitters (compare models A and B in figure
1271: \ref{plot_sensitivity}). Similar considerations also apply for metal
1272: lines whose detection can be used to put more stringent constraints on
1273: the ionization level of the emitting gas as well as estimate its mean
1274: metallicity. For example, the \ion{N}{5}\,$\lambda 1238$ emission line
1275: could have a flux comparable to that of Ly$\alpha$ for $\gtrsim$solar
1276: metallicity gas (see table 2).\\
1277:
1278: \subsubsection{Comparison with observations}
1279:
1280: Extended narrow-line emission around quasars and radio galaxies has
1281: been observed for more than two decades and the accumulation of data
1282: has shown that giant Ly$\alpha$ nebulae can be found around QSOs, up
1283: to scales of $\sim$ 100 kpc (e.g., Wampler et al. 1975, Stockton 1976,
1284: Bremer et al. 1992, Boroson, Oke, \& Green 1982, Bergeron et al. 1983,
1285: Boroson, Persson, \& Oke 1985, Stockton \& MacKenty 1987, Reuland et
1286: al. 2003, Labiano et al. 2005). Early studies focused mostly on radio
1287: loud quasars but more recent ones showed that radio-quiet quasars also
1288: show extended Ly$\alpha$ emission on large scales.
1289: %
1290: It is interesting to note that Hu et al. (1991) observed a sample of 7
1291: radio-quiet quasars down to a limiting flux of $2\times10^{-16}
1292: \rm{erg s}^{-1} \rm{cm}^{-2}$ and found no extended Ly$\alpha$
1293: emission. However, subsequent and more sensitive observations showed
1294: that quasar nebulae are commonly observed around radio-quiet quasars
1295: (Weidinger et al. 2005, Bremer et al. 1992., Steidel et al. 1991, Hu
1296: et al. 1996, Petitjean et al. 1996). These authors report Ly$\alpha$
1297: luminosities in the range $7-58\times10^{42}\,\rm{erg s}^{-1}$, values
1298: which are largely consistent with our predictions as shown in Fig. 12.
1299: Christensen et al. (2006) report Ly$\alpha$ luminosities from $z\sim
1300: 3$ nebulae which are of order $\sim 10^{43}~{\rm erg~s^{-1}}$ and
1301: extend up to a median value of 15\,kpc (with some extending up to
1302: 60\,kpc) for a flux limit of $\sim 10^{-17}~{\rm erg~
1303: cm^{-2}~s^{-1}~asec^{-2}}$. This is consistent with quasar halos having a considerable
1304: amount of gas in cool form (model A in figure \ref{plot_sensitivity}
1305: corresponding to $f_M=1$ with no line scattering is excluded by the
1306: data; c.f. Binette et al. 2006). Christensen et al. place limits on
1307: \ion{C}{4}\ line emission down to fluxes $\sim 10$ times lower than
1308: Ly$\alpha$. In our model this is roughly the predicted flux ratio of
1309: the lines for 0.1 solar metallicity. More detailed modeling is,
1310: however, beyond the scope of this paper.
1311:
1312: The statistical properties of quasar halos and their underlying
1313: physics are poorly known and few models have been devised to account
1314: for them (e.g., Heckman et al. 1991). Common explanations for the
1315: existence of such line emission nebulae include gas accretion onto the
1316: central object (Haiman \& Rees 2001) and matter ejection by the quasar
1317: and its host galaxy (e.g., Heckman et al. 1991). Moreover, the
1318: interpretation of the data is controversial: while several teams have
1319: reported high pressures of order $P\sim10^{6-7} \rm{cm}^{-3}$\,K for
1320: radio loud quasars (RLQ), a study by Fu \& Stockton (2006) points to
1321: lower pressures, of order $10^4\rm{cm}^{-3}$ K. These estimates come
1322: from compact emission regions of [O\,II] and [O\,III] lines and from
1323: absorption by excited states (e.g., Hamann et al. 2001). In our model
1324: for the halo of an $L^\star$ galaxy the pressure is even lower,
1325: $P\sim$a few$\times 10^2$ cm$^{-3}$. It is possible that RLQ are
1326: different from radio-quiet quasars (RQQ) given their overall higher
1327: Ly$\alpha$ luminosities (e.g., Christensen et al. 2006) and their
1328: apparently large X-ray and [OIII] emission on small scales (e.g.,
1329: Crawford \& Fabian 1989). Our model predicts relatively faint and
1330: diffuse [\ion{O}{3}] emission from the halo which seems to be at odds
1331: with recent detections of [\ion{O}{2}] and [\ion{O}{3}] emitting
1332: filaments around RLQs. Deep optical observations of low-$z$ RQQs may
1333: help to determine whether there is a relatively dense and filamentary
1334: structure in quasar halos in addition to the more diffuse component
1335: considered here.
1336:
1337: % - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1338: \begin{figure}
1339: \includegraphics[width=\hsize]{f12.eps}
1340: \caption{The observed Ly$\alpha$ nebula size (containing 90\% of the total obsrved flux) vs. the observed luminosity for a halo illuminated by a $L_{46}=10$ quasar with an opening angle $\theta=70^\circ$. The following models are considered: (A) $f_M=1$ with no line scattering. (B) $f_M=10$ with no line scattering. (C) $f_M=10$ with scattered Ly$\alpha$ luminosity, $L_{\rm Ly\alpha}^{\rm scat}=0.5L_{\rm Ly\alpha}^{\rm scat, max}$. (D) $f_M=10$ and $L_{\rm Ly\alpha}^{\rm scat}=L_{\rm Ly\alpha}^{\rm scat, max}$. We assume no evolution in the nebular properties with redshift. Placing the same nebula at different redshifts (denoted by different symbols; see legend) decreases its observed luminosity and size for a survey with a given limiting flux (denoted by colors in units of ${\rm erg~s^{-1} cm^{-2} asec^{-2}}$). Clearly, unless the nebula is close and/or the sensitivity is high, only the brighter inner part of the nebula is observed which results in an under-estimation of its luminosity and size (see text). In particular, sensitivities of order $10^{-18}~{\rm erg~s^{-1} cm^{-2} asec^{-2}}$ are required to probe the full extent of quasar nebulae at $z\lesssim 2$ (blue square and circle). }
1341: \label{plot_sensitivity}
1342: \end{figure}
1343: % - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1344:
1345:
1346: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%5
1347: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%5
1348: \section{Discussion}
1349: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%5
1350: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%5
1351:
1352: \subsection{Galaxies}
1353:
1354: Our model implies considerable mass in cool gas out to the virial
1355: radius of $L^\star$ galaxy halos at $z\sim 1$. As explained above,
1356: this assumes a unit covering factor for strong absorption within
1357: 50\,kpc of the galaxy. The lower covering factors suggested by
1358: Bechtold \& Ellingson (1992) and Tripp \& Bowen (2005) would actually
1359: lead to an agreement between our model predictions and the results of Maller
1360: \& Bullock (2004) who estimated the mass of cool gas in the Galaxy
1361: halo to be $2\times 10^{10}~{\rm M_\odot}$ and argued for consistency
1362: with observations of high-velocity clouds. At present, radio surveys
1363: do not possess the required sensitivity to probe low column density,
1364: $\sim 100$\,kpc diffuse gas in 21\,cm emission, as predicted by our
1365: model. We caution, however, that it is not clear whether our model
1366: predictions for $z\sim 1$ objects are directly applicable to present
1367: day galaxies. In particular, Nestor et al. (2005) find evidence for
1368: evolution of cool gas properties with cosmic time whereby the
1369: occurrance of strong systems appreciably declines from $z=1$ to
1370: $z=0.5$. Understanding the distribution of cool gas around present day
1371: galaxies will require extensive UV spectroscopic surveys.
1372:
1373: The notion of massive galaxy halos has been promoted by Fukugita \&
1374: Peebles (2006) to provide a solution to the missing baryon problem. In
1375: their model, the gas mass up to the virial radius is a few$\times
1376: 10^{11}~{\rm M_\odot}$. Their total gas mass estimates provide a
1377: natural explanation to the missing baryon problem and are consistent
1378: with a large range of observational constraints which are independent
1379: of those considered here. Their model did not consider the possible
1380: existence of cool gas beyond the extent of the disk. Here we have
1381: shown that converting a fraction of the hot plasma into cool clumps
1382: allows us to reproduce a number of observational constraints from
1383: absorption line studies, while not significantly changing the total
1384: amount of gas within the virial radius (see Fig. 5).
1385:
1386: More work is needed to establish how much mass there is in the halos
1387: of present day galaxies. On the observational side, better estimates
1388: of the covering fraction of cool gas around galaxies are required,
1389: possibly as a function of galaxy type. On the theoretical side,
1390: numerical simulations of galaxy formation need to include realistic
1391: cooling rates and reach high resolutions to reliably trace cool and
1392: condensed forms of gas. Understanding the properties of the dilute and
1393: ellusive, yet likely very massive, cool gas component in galaxy halos
1394: is essential for understanding galaxy formation and evolution from the
1395: early Universe, to present times and beyond.
1396:
1397: \subsection{Quasars}
1398:
1399: Quasars are known to reside in galaxies yet their large scale
1400: environments are poorly understood. The recent discovery of
1401: \ion{Mg}{2}\ absorbing gas around those objects (Bowen et al. 2006,
1402: 2007) suggests an interesting link between galaxy and quasar
1403: environments. This implies that the presence of a quasar can be used to shed
1404: light on the distribution of matter in the halos of galaxies.
1405:
1406: We have shown that it is possible to construct a model which unifies
1407: several distinct astrophysical phenomena pertaining to intervening
1408: absorption, associated absorption, and quasar emission nebulae. In our
1409: model, these phenomena are different manifestations of the same
1410: physical entity, that being of cool gas condensations distributed
1411: within the halo of galaxies. If our model is correct then the
1412: properties of cool gas in the vicinity of galaxies may be revealed by
1413: studying the influence of an active nucleus on its thermal and ionization
1414: structure. In particular, the study of associated absorption may help
1415: to constrain the density and distance of halo gas from the
1416: quasar. Cool gas around galaxies is notoriously difficult to detect in
1417: emission. Nevertheless, the presence of an ionizing source enhances
1418: emission and renders the detection of circum-galactic material more
1419: accessible. Furthermore, by studying the nebulosities around quasars,
1420: one can obtain a 2D-spatial$\times$1D-velocity picture of the
1421: gas. Mean quantities pertaining to the mass of the gas and its
1422: metallicity can be more easily deduced for individual objects.
1423:
1424: In addition to shedding light on gas distribution in the halos of
1425: galaxies, it is possible to deduce important conclusions about quasar
1426: physics: the recent results by Bowen et al. (2006, 2007) indicate a covering
1427: factor of order unity for cool gas in the transverse direction around
1428: quasars in contrast to the much lower covering factor for associated
1429: \ion{Mg}{2}\ absorption. Our
1430: model implies that this is merely a consequence of the quasar
1431: unification scheme: gas in the radial direction to the quasar is
1432: heated to high temperatures while that which is at right angles to the
1433: quasar ionization cone remains unaffected. This is not a trivial
1434: result since, although the unification scheme is well established for
1435: active galactic nuclei, it is less secure for bright quasars at
1436: high-$z$. Further tests of this conjecture may be carried out by
1437: comparing model predictions to the occurrence of associated absorbers
1438: for a wide range of ionization levels as well as by studying emission
1439: line nebulae in detail.
1440:
1441: Our model can reproduce the emission and absorption properties of
1442: quasars by requiring quasar halos to be more extended and therefore
1443: more massive than those of $L^\star$ galaxies (c.f. Serber et
1444: al. 2006). Such a scaling combined with the radiation properties of
1445: quasars can simultaneously explain the anisotropic absorption
1446: properties and the Ly$\alpha$ nebulae observed on scales reaching
1447: $\sim$100 kpc. Finally, if the correlation found between the size of
1448: cool gaseous halos and galaxy luminosity (Steidel et al. 1997,
1449: Guillemin \& Bergeron 1997) can be extended to quasars then this
1450: implies that quasar hosts are a few$\times L^\star$, which is in
1451: agreement with results from Jahnke et al. (2004).
1452:
1453: Better
1454: understanding of quasar emission line nebulae may allow us to deduce
1455: the long-term light-curve behavior of quasars. This will require
1456: better understanding of the matter distribution in quasar halos which
1457: can be achieved by deep imaging and spatially resolved spectroscopy of
1458: quasar environments. The detection of orphan nebulae (where the active nucleus is obscure) may provide a new
1459: means for identifying type-II quasars. Combining large samples of
1460: emitting and absorbing gaseous nebulae may allow us to statistically
1461: constrain the mass of cool gas in quasar halos as well as the opening
1462: angle of quasars. This has implications for re-ionization and
1463: background radiation determination. A survey of emission line nebulae
1464: around a large number of quasars may also reveal environmental
1465: differences among quasar types (e.g., the RQQ-RLQ dichotomy).
1466:
1467: The detection of metal emission lines, whose presence (depending on
1468: the gas composition) is predicted by our model, may allow to estimate
1469: the metallicity of gas in the halo and test models for metal enrichment
1470: of galaxies and the inter-galactic/intra-cluster medium.
1471:
1472:
1473: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%5
1474: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%5
1475: \section{Summary}
1476: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%5
1477: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%5
1478:
1479: We have presented a phenomenological model for the distribution of
1480: cool gas around $L^\star$ galaxies, calibrated with a wide range of
1481: observational constraints from absorption line studies (rest
1482: equivalent width distribution of \ion{Mg}{2}\ absorbers, HI column
1483: density, etc.). We argue that the halos of $L^\star$ galaxies are
1484: filled with gaseous clouds with sizes of order 1\,kpc, masses of
1485: $\sim10^6 M_\sun$ and particle densities $\sim 10^{-2}\rm{cm^{-3}}$.
1486: The total amount of cool gas within the virial radius of $L^\star$
1487: galaxies depends on the covering factor for strong \ion{Mg}{2}\
1488: absorption (which is a matter of debate) and is likely to be in the
1489: range $10^{10}<M_{\rm cool}<10^{11}\,M_\sun$, within the virial
1490: radius.
1491:
1492: By assuming self-similarity, we show that the obtained solution for
1493: the distribution of cool gas around galaxies, if appropriately scaled,
1494: can reproduce the properties of cool gas seen quasars. Our model
1495: simultaneously provides an explanation for the L$\alpha$ nebulosities
1496: observed observed on $\sim100$ kpc scales around quasars as well
1497: as the main properties of the cool gas seen in absorption around
1498: quasars.
1499:
1500: Comparison of model predictions with future surveys will shed light
1501: on the missing baryon problem and will deepen our understanding with
1502: respect to galaxy formation and quasar activation.
1503:
1504:
1505:
1506: \acknowledgements
1507:
1508: We thank Gary Ferland for creating and maintaining {\sc cloudy} as a
1509: publicly available code. We are grateful to Z. Zheng for invaluable help with
1510: the Ly$\alpha$ scattering calculations. We thank K. Jahnke, N. Murray, and
1511: D. York for commenting on an earlier version of this paper. This
1512: research has been supported by NASA through a Chandra Postdoctoral
1513: Fellowship award PF4-50033. DVB is funded through NASA Long Term Space
1514: Astrophysics Grant NNG05GE26G.
1515:
1516:
1517:
1518: \appendix
1519: %\section{Appendix}
1520:
1521:
1522: Here we describe the time-dependent ionization and thermal structure
1523: of an initially cool cloud which is exposed to a quasar's ionizing
1524: radiation. As the quasar phenomenon is short lived compared to the
1525: Hubble time (the quasar lifetime, $\tau_q\sim 10^7$\,years; e.g., Worseck \& Wisotzki
1526: 2006), it is instructive to first consider a few relevant timescales
1527: of the problem:
1528: \begin{itemize}
1529: \item
1530: The dynamical timescale of a halo of size $R_{\rm halo}$ at a virial temperature,
1531: $T_v$ (corresponding to some sound speed, $v_s$) is
1532: \begin{equation}
1533: \tau_{\rm dyn}\sim \frac{R_{\rm halo}}{v_s} \simeq 10^9
1534: \frac{r}{100\,{\rm kpc}} \left ( \frac{T_v} {10^7{\rm K}} \right )
1535: ^{-1/2}~{\rm yr}
1536: \label{tdyn}
1537: \end{equation}
1538: \item
1539: The sound crossing timescale for a cloud of size $2R_{\rm cloud}$ at
1540: temperature $T$ is
1541: \begin{equation}
1542: \tau_{\rm cross} \sim \frac{2R_{\rm cloud}}{v_s} \simeq 10^8 \frac{R_{\rm cloud}}{1\,{\rm kpc}} \left ( \frac{T} {10^4{\rm K}} \right ) ^{-1/2}~{\rm yr}
1543: \end{equation}
1544: \item
1545: The photoionization timescale for ion $X$ is
1546: \begin{equation}
1547: \tau_{\rm ion}^{X}=\left ( \int \frac{ \sigma_X(E) L_E}{4\pi r^2E}
1548: dE \right )^{-1}\sim 10^3 L_{46}^{-1} \left ( \frac{r}{{\rm 10^2kpc}} \right )^2\,{\rm yr}
1549: \end{equation}
1550: where $\sigma_X$ is the cross-section, $E$ the energy, $L_E$ the flux per unit energy,
1551: $r$ the distance from the quasar. We assumed a mean ionizing photon
1552: energy of $E=10$\,eV and an ionization cross-section of $10^{-19}~{\rm
1553: cm^{2}}$ (roughly that of \ion{Mg}{2}).
1554: \item
1555: The recombination timescale for ion $X$ is
1556: \begin{equation}
1557: \tau_{\rm rec}^{X}=\frac{1}{ n \alpha_X(T)} \sim
1558: 5\times 10^4\left ( \frac{n}{0.02{\rm cm^{-3}}} \right ) ^{-1}~{\rm yr}
1559: \end{equation}
1560: where $n$ is the number density of atoms and $\alpha_X$ the
1561: recombination coefficient (taking only the radiative term for
1562: \ion{Mg}{2}).
1563: \end{itemize}
1564: The photoionization and recombination timescales are the
1565: shortest in the problem. The cloud and halo dynamical timescales
1566: (approximated by the sound-crossing time) are probably longer than the
1567: quasar lifetime, $\tau_q$; hence, while the ionization structure of
1568: the clouds can vary rapidly (see below), the structure of the halo and
1569: embedded clouds remains approximately constant during the quasar
1570: lifetime. We note, however, that the sound-crossing timescale for
1571: the smallest clouds in our model could be as short as $\sim
1572: 10^7$\,years if their temperature rises to high values once the quasar
1573: activates. We choose to ignore this complication here since (a) the
1574: quasar lifetime is poorly known and (b) the evaporation timescale is a
1575: few times the sound-crossing timescale (e.g., Bertoldi 1989). Also,
1576: due to the spectrum of the cloud's size-distribution, the evaporation
1577: of the smallest clouds will make little difference to our final
1578: conclusions.
1579:
1580: % - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1581: \begin{figure*}
1582: \plottwo{f13a.eps}{f13b.eps}
1583: \caption{Time dependent thermal structure of the halo after a quasar
1584: ignites at $t=0$ (and a cloud at a distance $r$ from it is then exposed at time $t+r/c$) assuming $L_{46}(t)=\Theta(t)$ where $\Theta(t)$ is a
1585: step function. Also plotted are estimates for typical quasar
1586: lifetimes. Time dependent photoionization effects are
1587: important and prevent the gas from reaching very high temperatures
1588: (close to the Compton temperature) over the quasar
1589: lifetime. \emph{Right:} Ionization fractions for several abundant
1590: elements as a function of time. Colors denote different ions (see
1591: legend) while different lines denote gas at different distances from
1592: the quasars: 30\,kpc (solid), and 300\,kpc (dashed) lines. The rapid
1593: ionization of all low level ions is clearly seen and takes place over
1594: $\lesssim 10^4$\,years. Such gas will therefore disappear from the
1595: line-of-sight and would become transparent. We note the general
1596: agreement between the ionization timescales obtained and the analytic
1597: approximation (equation A3).}
1598: \label{orly}
1599: \end{figure*}
1600: % - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1601:
1602: In addition to the above analytic approximations, we have numerically
1603: computed several time-dependent photoionization and thermal
1604: models. This is necessary to quantify just how important the effects
1605: of the varying quasar flux are compared to time independent
1606: calculations and to see which ions are affected most. The algorithm used for
1607: these calculations is fully described in Gnat \&
1608: Sternberg (2006).
1609:
1610: At the beginning of the calculation we assume that the cloud is exposed
1611: to the meta-galactic field and is in ionization and thermal
1612: equilibrium. We then turn on a quasar and assume a step function
1613: description for its light curve, i.e., the quasar if off for $t<0$ and
1614: on at $t\geq 0$. The quasar is assumed to maintain a constant flux
1615: level to $t\rightarrow \infty$. The calculations are carried out under
1616: isochoric conditions, as appropriate given the above considerations.
1617:
1618: The thermal calculations are shown in Fig. \ref{orly} for the case
1619: of $L_{46}=1$, and demonstrate the limitations of the assumption of
1620: photoionization and thermal equilibrium. The gas heats up
1621: very quickly near the quasar where the ionizing flux is high and less
1622: so on larger scales. Typically, the gas within the inner 50\,kpc heats
1623: up to $\sim 2\times 10^4$\,K over a period of $\sim 10^4$ years
1624: (cf. equations A3,A4). Further heating occurs on somewhat longer
1625: timescales which can be comparable to the quasar lifetime. Unless one
1626: happens to intercept young quasars then the inner $50$\,kpc region of
1627: the halo would be heated to $\lesssim 10^5$\,K over the quasar
1628: lifetime. We conclude that, for moderate luminosity quasars, the gas
1629: in the central regions of the haloes can be efficiently heated to
1630: $\lesssim 10^5$\,K. Nevertheless, further heating is delayed and may
1631: take longer than the quasar duty-cycle or other relevant dynamical
1632: timescales of the problem. Assuming $\tau_q$ is similar for all
1633: quasars then higher temperatures can be reached in the inner regions
1634: of the haloes of bright quasars since the ionization timescale is
1635: shorter and the flux higher.
1636:
1637: We have also calculated the time-dependent ionization structure of the
1638: halo and trace several of the ionization levels in Fig.
1639: \ref{orly}. As shown, all the low ionization stages usually probed
1640: by absorption line studies quickly attain negligible abundances and are not
1641: likely to be observed unless the quasar brightened over short
1642: timescales. For example, \ion{Mg}{2}\ and \ion{H}{1}\ would be
1643: immediately ionized and the gas is quickly heated. Time-dependent
1644: ionization deviations from a steady-state solution can be important
1645: but mainly for the high ionization levels whose absorption lines would
1646: appear in the X-ray region of the quasar spectrum.
1647:
1648: The above analysis suggests that it may be possible to treat the halos of
1649: quasars as having the same structure as galaxy halos since little
1650: structural changes are likely to occur over the quasar lifetime by
1651: radiation effects alone. We note that this is may not be the case if
1652: quasar activity is a recurring phenomenon or if they have
1653: additional means of affecting their environment (e.g., via jets, winds,
1654: etc.). To conclude, for the purpose of this work, steady-state photoionization
1655: calculations can be adequately used to describe the ionization and
1656: thermal state of the halo gas at all times.
1657:
1658:
1659:
1660:
1661: \begin{thebibliography}{}
1662:
1663:
1664: \bibitem[Antonucci(1993)]{1993ARA&A..31..473A} Antonucci, R.\ 1993,
1665: \araa, 31, 473
1666:
1667: \bibitem[Badnell(2006)]{2006A&A...447..389B} Badnell, N.~R.\ 2006, \aap,
1668: 447, 389
1669:
1670: \bibitem[Bahcall \& Spitzer(1969)]{1969ApJ...156L..63B} Bahcall, J.~N., \&
1671: Spitzer, L.~J.\ 1969, \apjl, 156, L63
1672:
1673: \bibitem[Bechtold \& Ellingson(1992)]{1992ApJ...396...20B} Bechtold, J., \&
1674: Ellingson, E.\ 1992, \apj, 396, 20
1675:
1676: \bibitem[Bergeron et al.(1983)]{1983MNRAS.202..125B} Bergeron, J.,
1677: Dennefeld, M., Boksenberg, A., \& Tarenghi, M.\ 1983, \mnras, 202, 125
1678:
1679: \bibitem[Bergeron(1986)]{bergeron_86} Bergeron, J.\ 1986, \aap,
1680: 155, L8
1681:
1682: \bibitem[Bergeron \& Stasinska(1986)]{bergeron_stasinska_86} Bergeron, J., \&
1683: Stasinska, G.\ 1986, \aap, 169, 1
1684:
1685: \bibitem[Bergeron et al.(1987)]{1987A&A...180....1B} Bergeron, J., Kunth,
1686: D., \& D'Odorico, S.\ 1987, \aap, 180, 1
1687:
1688: \bibitem[Bergeron \& Durret(1987)]{1987A&A...184...93B} Bergeron, J., \&
1689: Durret, F.\ 1987, \aap, 184, 93
1690:
1691: \bibitem[Bergeron \& Boisse(1991)]{bergeron_boisse_91} Bergeron, J., \&
1692: Boisse, P.\ 1991, \aap, 243, 344
1693:
1694: \bibitem[Bergeron \& Herbert-Fort(2005)]{2005pgqa.conf..265B} Bergeron, J.,
1695: \& Herbert-Fort, S.\ 2005, IAU Colloq.~199: Probing Galaxies through Quasar
1696: Absorption Lines, 265
1697:
1698: \bibitem[Bertoldi(1989)]{1989ApJ...346..735B} Bertoldi, F.\ 1989, \apj,
1699: 346, 735
1700:
1701: \bibitem[Binette et al.(2006)]{2006A&A...459...31B} Binette, L., Wilman,
1702: R.~J., Villar-Mart{\'{\i}}n, M., Fosbury, R.~A.~E., Jarvis, M.~J.,
1703: R{\"o}ttgering, H.~J.~A.\ 2006, \aap, 459, 31
1704:
1705: \bibitem[Bland-Hawthorn \& Maloney(2001)]{2001ApJ...550L.231B}
1706: Bland-Hawthorn, J., \& Maloney, P.~R.\ 2001, \apjl, 550, L231
1707:
1708: \bibitem[Boroson et al.(1982)]{1982ApJ...263...32B} Boroson, T.~A., Oke,
1709: J.~B., \& Green, R.~F.\ 1982, \apj, 263, 32
1710:
1711: \bibitem[Boroson et al.(1985)]{1985ApJ...293..120B} Boroson, T.~A.,
1712: Persson, S.~E., \& Oke, J.~B.\ 1985, \apj, 293, 120
1713:
1714: \bibitem[Bowen et al.(1995)]{1995ApJ...448..634B} Bowen, D.~V., Blades,
1715: J.~C., \& Pettini, M.\ 1995, \apj, 448, 634
1716:
1717: \bibitem[Bowen et al.(2006)]{2006ApJ...645L.105B} Bowen, D.~V., et al.\
1718: 2006, \apjl, 645, L105
1719:
1720: \bibitem[Bowen et al.(2007)]{2007ApJ...999L.999B} Bowen, D.~V., et al.\
1721: 2007, \apj, submitted
1722:
1723: \bibitem[Bremer et al.(1992)]{1992MNRAS.258P..23B} Bremer, M.~N., Fabian,
1724: A.~C., Sargent, W.~L.~W., Steidel, C.~C., Boksenberg, A., \& Johnstone,
1725: R.~M.\ 1992, \mnras, 258, 23P
1726:
1727: \bibitem[Bruzual A.~\& Charlot(1993)]{1993ApJ...405..538B} Bruzual A., G.,
1728: \& Charlot, S.\ 1993, \apj, 405, 538
1729:
1730: \bibitem[Chabrier(2003)]{2003PASP..115..763C} Chabrier, G.\ 2003, \pasp,
1731: 115, 763
1732:
1733: \bibitem[Charlton et al.(2000)]{2000ApJ...545..635C} Charlton, J.~C.,
1734: Mellon, R.~R., Rigby, J.~R., \& Churchill, C.~W.\ 2000, \apj, 545, 635
1735:
1736: \bibitem[Cristiani(1987)]{cristiani_87} Cristiani, S.\ 1987, \aap,
1737: 175, L1
1738:
1739: \bibitem[Christensen et al.(2006)]{2006A&A...459..717C} Christensen, L.,
1740: Jahnke, K., Wisotzki, L., \& S{\'a}nchez, S.~F.\ 2006, \aap, 459, 717
1741:
1742: \bibitem[Churchill et al.(2000)]{churchill+00} Churchill, C.~W.,
1743: Mellon, R.~R., Charlton, J.~C., Jannuzi, B.~T., Kirhakos, S., Steidel,
1744: C.~C., \& Schneider, D.~P.\ 2000, \apjs, 130, 91
1745:
1746: \bibitem[Churchill \& Vogt(2001)]{2001AJ....122..679C} Churchill, C.~W., \&
1747: Vogt, S.~S.\ 2001, \aj, 122, 679
1748:
1749: \bibitem[Churchill et al.(2003)]{2003AJ....125...98C} Churchill, C.~W.,
1750: Vogt, S.~S., \& Charlton, J.~C.\ 2003, \aj, 125, 98
1751:
1752: \bibitem[Churchill et al.(2005)]{2005pgqa.conf...24C} Churchill, C.~W.,
1753: Kacprzak, G.~G., \& Steidel, C.~C.\ 2005, IAU Colloq.~199: Probing Galaxies
1754: through Quasar Absorption Lines, 24
1755:
1756: \bibitem[Crawford \& Fabian(1989)]{1989MNRAS.239..219C} Crawford, C.~S., \&
1757: Fabian, A.~C.\ 1989, \mnras, 239, 219
1758:
1759: \bibitem[Crenshaw et al.(2003)]{2003ARA&A..41..117C} Crenshaw, D.~M.,
1760: Kraemer, S.~B., \& George, I.~M.\ 2003, \araa, 41, 117
1761:
1762: \bibitem[Danforth \& Shull(2005)]{2005ApJ...624..555D} Danforth, C.~W., \&
1763: Shull, J.~M.\ 2005, \apj, 624, 555
1764:
1765: \bibitem[Ding et al.(2003)]{2003ApJ...590..746D} Ding, J., Charlton, J.~C.,
1766: Churchill, C.~W., \& Palma, C.\ 2003, \apj, 590, 746
1767:
1768: \bibitem[Ellison et al.(2004)]{2004A&A...414...79E} Ellison, S.~L., Ibata,
1769: R., Pettini, M., Lewis, G.~F., Aracil, B., Petitjean, P., \& Srianand, R.\
1770: 2004, \aap, 414, 79
1771:
1772: \bibitem[Ferland et al.(1998)]{1998PASP..110..761F} Ferland, G.~J.,
1773: Korista, K.~T., Verner, D.~A., Ferguson, J.~W., Kingdon, J.~B., \& Verner,
1774: E.~M.\ 1998, \pasp, 110, 761
1775:
1776: \bibitem[Fu \& Stockton(2006)]{2006ApJ...650...80F} Fu, H., \& Stockton,
1777: A.\ 2006, \apj, 650, 80
1778:
1779: \bibitem[Fukugita \& Peebles(2006)]{2006ApJ...639..590F} Fukugita, M., \&
1780: Peebles, P.~J.~E.\ 2006, \apj, 639, 590
1781:
1782: \bibitem[Gehrels(1986)]{1986ApJ...303..336G} Gehrels, N.\ 1986, \apj, 303,
1783: 336
1784:
1785: \bibitem[Gnat \& Sternberg(2004)]{2004ApJ...608..229G} Gnat, O., \&
1786: Sternberg, A.\ 2004, \apj, 608, 229
1787:
1788: \bibitem[Gnat \& Sternberg(2006)]{2999ApJ...999..999G} Gnat, O., \&
1789: Sternberg, A.\ 2006, \apj, accepted
1790:
1791: \bibitem[Guillemin \& Bergeron(1997)]{1997A&A...328..499G} Guillemin, P.,
1792: \& Bergeron, J.\ 1997, \aap, 328, 499
1793:
1794: \bibitem[Haardt \& Madau(1996)]{1996ApJ...461...20H} Haardt, F., \& Madau,
1795: P.\ 1996, \apj, 461, 20
1796:
1797: \bibitem[Haiman \& Rees(2001)]{2001ApJ...556...87H} Haiman, Z., \& Rees,
1798: M.~J.\ 2001, \apj, 556, 87
1799:
1800: \bibitem[Hamann et al.(2001)]{2001ApJ...550..142H} Hamann, F.~W., Barlow,
1801: T.~A., Chaffee, F.~C., Foltz, C.~B., \& Weymann, R.~J.\ 2001, \apj, 550,
1802: 142
1803:
1804: \bibitem[Heckman et al.(1991)]{1991ApJ...370...78H} Heckman, T.~M., Miley, G.~K., Lehnert, M.~D., \& van Breugel, W.\ 1991, \apj, 370, 78
1805:
1806: \bibitem[Heckman et al.(1991)]{1991ApJ...381..373H} Heckman, T.~M.,
1807: Lehnert, M.~D., Miley, G.~K., \& van Breugel, W.\ 1991, \apj, 381, 373
1808:
1809: \bibitem[Heckman et al.(2001)]{2001ApJ...558...56H} Heckman, T.~M.,
1810: Sembach, K.~R., Meurer, G.~R., Leitherer, C., Calzetti, D., \& Martin,
1811: C.~L.\ 2001, \apj, 558, 56
1812:
1813: \bibitem[Hu et al.(1991)]{1991ApJ...368...28H} Hu, E.~M., Songaila, A.,
1814: Cowie, L.~L., \& Stockton, A.\ 1991, \apj, 368, 28
1815:
1816: \bibitem[Hu et al.(1996)]{1996ApJ...459L..53H} Hu, E.~M., McMahon, R.~G.,
1817: \& Egami, E.\ 1996, \apjl, 459, L53
1818:
1819: \bibitem[Jahnke \& Wisotzki(2003)]{2003MNRAS.346..304J} Jahnke, K., \&
1820: Wisotzki, L.\ 2003, \mnras, 346, 304
1821:
1822: \bibitem[Jahnke et al.(2004)]{2004MNRAS.352..399J} Jahnke, K., Kuhlbrodt,
1823: B., \& Wisotzki, L.\ 2004, \mnras, 352, 399
1824:
1825: \bibitem[Kacprzak et al.(2007)]{2007ApJ...662..909K} Kacprzak, G.~G.,
1826: Churchill, C.~W., Steidel, C.~C., Murphy, M.~T., \& Evans, J.~L.\ 2007,
1827: \apj, 662, 909
1828:
1829: \bibitem[Krolik \& Kriss(2001)]{2001ApJ...561..684K} Krolik, J.~H., \&
1830: Kriss, G.~A.\ 2001, \apj, 561, 684
1831:
1832: \bibitem[Labiano et al.(2005)]{2005A&A...436..493L} Labiano, A., et al.\
1833: 2005, \aap, 436, 493
1834:
1835: \bibitem[Lanzetta \& Bowen(1990)]{1990ApJ...357..321L} Lanzetta, K.~M., \&
1836: Bowen, D.\ 1990, \apj, 357, 321
1837:
1838: \bibitem[Lanzetta et al.(1995)]{1995ApJ...442..538L} Lanzetta, K.~M.,
1839: Bowen, D.~V., Tytler, D., \& Webb, J.~K.\ 1995, \apj, 442, 538
1840:
1841: \bibitem[Maller \& Bullock(2004)]{2004MNRAS.355..694M} Maller, A.~H., \&
1842: Bullock, J.~S.\ 2004, \mnras, 355, 694
1843:
1844: \bibitem[Martin(2006)]{2006ApJ...647..222M} Martin, C.~L.\ 2006, \apj, 647,
1845: 222
1846:
1847: \bibitem[McKee \& Begelman(1990)]{1990ApJ...358..392M} McKee, C.~F., \&
1848: Begelman, M.~C.\ 1990, \apj, 358, 392
1849:
1850: \bibitem[M{\'e}nard et al.(2007)]{8888ApJ...999..999G} M{\'e}nard et al.\ 2007, \apj, submitted (astro-ph/0706.0898)
1851:
1852: \bibitem[Mo \& Miralda-Escude(1996)]{1996ApJ...469..589M} Mo, H.~J., \&
1853: Miralda-Escude, J.\ 1996, \apj, 469, 589
1854:
1855:
1856: \bibitem[Nestor et al.(2005)]{2005ApJ...628..637N} Nestor, D.~B., Turnshek, D.~A., \& Rao, S.~M.\ 2005, \apj, 628, 637
1857:
1858: \bibitem[Norman et al.(2004)]{2004ApJ...607..721N} Norman, C., et al.\
1859: 2004, \apj, 607, 721
1860:
1861: \bibitem[Oppenheimer \& Dav{\'e}(2006)]{2006MNRAS.373.1265O} Oppenheimer,
1862: B.~D., \& Dav{\'e}, R.\ 2006, \mnras, 373, 1265
1863:
1864: \bibitem[Petitjean \& Bergeron(1994)]{1994A&A...283..759P} Petitjean, P.,
1865: \& Bergeron, J.\ 1994, \aap, 283, 759
1866:
1867: \bibitem[Petitjean et al.(1996)]{1996Natur.380..411P} Petitjean, P.,
1868: P{\'e}contal, E., Valls-Gabaud, D., \& Chariot, S.\ 1996, \nat, 380, 411
1869:
1870: \bibitem[Prochaska \& Wolfe(1997)]{1997ApJ...487...73P} Prochaska, J.~X.,
1871: \& Wolfe, A.~M.\ 1997, \apj, 487, 73
1872:
1873: \bibitem[Prochaska \& Wolfe(1998)]{1998ApJ...507..113P} Prochaska, J.~X.,
1874: \& Wolfe, A.~M.\ 1998, \apj, 507, 113
1875:
1876: \bibitem[Prochter et al.(2006)]{2006ApJ...639..766P} Prochter, G.~E.,
1877: Prochaska, J.~X., \& Burles, S.~M.\ 2006, \apj, 639, 766
1878:
1879: \bibitem[Ptak et al.(2006)]{2006ApJ...637..147P} Ptak, A., Zakamska, N.~L.,
1880: Strauss, M.~A., Krolik, J.~H., Heckman, T.~M., Schneider, D.~P., \&
1881: Brinkmann, J.\ 2006, \apj, 637, 147
1882:
1883: \bibitem[Ranalli et al.(2003)]{2003A&A...399...39R} Ranalli, P., Comastri,
1884: A., \& Setti, G.\ 2003, \aap, 399, 39
1885:
1886: \bibitem[Rao et al.(2006)]{2006ApJ...636..610R} Rao, S.~M., Turnshek,
1887: D.~A., \& Nestor, D.~B.\ 2006, \apj, 636, 610
1888:
1889: \bibitem[Rauch et al.(2002)]{2002ApJ...576...45R} Rauch, M., Sargent,
1890: W.~L.~W., Barlow, T.~A., \& Simcoe, R.~A.\ 2002, \apj, 576, 45
1891:
1892: \bibitem[Reuland et al.(2003)]{2003ApJ...592..755R} Reuland, M., et al.\
1893: 2003, \apj, 592, 755
1894:
1895: \bibitem[Sazonov et al.(2004)]{2004MNRAS.347..144Y} Sazonov, S.~Y.,
1896: Ostriker, J.~P., \& Sunyaev, R.~A.\ 2004, \mnras, 347, 144
1897:
1898: \bibitem[Serber et al.(2006)]{2006ApJ...643...68S} Serber, W., Bahcall, N.,
1899: M{\'e}nard, B., \& Richards, G.\ 2006, \apj, 643, 68
1900:
1901: \bibitem[Steidel \& Sargent(1992)]{steidel_sargent_92} Steidel, C.~C., \&
1902: Sargent, W.~L.~W.\ 1992, \apjs, 80, 1
1903:
1904: \bibitem[Steidel(1993)]{1993eeg..conf..263S} Steidel, C.~C.\ 1993, ASSL
1905: Vol.~188: The Environment and Evolution of Galaxies, 263
1906:
1907: \bibitem[Steidel et al.(1994)]{1994ApJ...437L..75S} Steidel, C.~C.,
1908: Dickinson, M., \& Persson, S.~E.\ 1994, \apjl, 437, L75
1909:
1910: \bibitem[Steidel et al.(1997)]{1997ApJ...480..568S} Steidel, C.~C.,
1911: Dickinson, M., Meyer, D.~M., Adelberger, K.~L., \& Sembach, K.~R.\ 1997,
1912: \apj, 480, 568
1913:
1914: \bibitem[Steidel et al.(2002)]{2002ApJ...570..526S} Steidel, C.~C.,
1915: Kollmeier, J.~A., Shapley, A.~E., Churchill, C.~W., Dickinson, M., \&
1916: Pettini, M.\ 2002, \apj, 570, 526
1917:
1918: \bibitem[Sternberg et al.(2002)]{2002ApJS..143..419S} Sternberg, A., McKee, C.~F., \& Wolfire, M.~G.\ 2002, \apjs, 143, 419
1919:
1920: \bibitem[Stockton(1976)]{1976ApJ...205L.113S} Stockton, A.\ 1976, \apjl,
1921: 205, L113
1922:
1923: \bibitem[Stockton \& MacKenty(1987)]{1987ApJ...316..584S} Stockton, A., \& MacKenty, J.~W.\ 1987, \apj, 316, 584
1924:
1925: \bibitem[Stockton et al.(2002)]{2002ApJ...572..735S} Stockton, A.,
1926: MacKenty, J.~W., Hu, E.~M., \& Kim, T.-S.\ 2002, \apj, 572, 735
1927:
1928: \bibitem[Treister \& Urry(2005)]{2005ApJ...630..115T} Treister, E., \&
1929: Urry, C.~M.\ 2005, \apj, 630, 115
1930:
1931: \bibitem[Turnshek et al.(2005)]{2005pgqa.conf..104T} Turnshek, D.~A., Rao,
1932: S.~M., Nestor, D.~B., Belfort-Mihalyi, M., \& Quider, A.~M.\ 2005, IAU
1933: Colloq.~199: Probing Galaxies through Quasar Absorption Lines, 104 (astro-ph/0506701)
1934:
1935: \bibitem[van Ojik et al.(1997)]{1997A&A...317..358V} van Ojik, R.,
1936: Roettgering, H.~J.~A., Miley, G.~K., \& Hunstead, R.~W.\ 1997, \aap, 317,
1937: 358
1938:
1939: \bibitem[Vanden Berk et al.(2001)]{2001AJ....122..549V} Vanden Berk, D.~E.,
1940: et al.\ 2001, \aj, 122, 549
1941:
1942: \bibitem[Vestergaard(2003)]{2003ApJ...599..116V} Vestergaard, M.\ 2003,
1943: \apj, 599, 116
1944:
1945: \bibitem[Wampler et al.(1975)]{1975ApJ...198L..49W} Wampler, E.~J.,
1946: Burbidge, E.~M., Baldwin, J.~A., \& Robinson, L.~B.\ 1975, \apjl, 198, L49
1947:
1948: \bibitem[Weidinger et al.(2005)]{2005A&A...436..825W} Weidinger, M.,
1949: M{\o}ller, P., Fynbo, J.~P.~U., \& Thomsen, B.\ 2005, \aap, 436, 825
1950:
1951: \bibitem[Willott et al.(2000)]{2000MNRAS.316..449W} Willott, C.~J.,
1952: Rawlings, S., Blundell, K.~M., \& Lacy, M.\ 2000, \mnras, 316, 449
1953:
1954: \bibitem[Worseck \& Wisotzki(2006)]{2006A&A...450..495W} Worseck, G., \&
1955: Wisotzki, L.\ 2006, \aap, 450, 495
1956:
1957: \bibitem[York et al.(1986)]{1986ApJ...311..610Y} York, D.~G., Dopita, M.,
1958: Green, R., \& Bechtold, J.\ 1986, \apj, 311, 610
1959:
1960: \bibitem[York et al.(2006)]{2006MNRAS.367..945Y} York, D.~G., et al.\ 2006,
1961: \mnras, 367, 945
1962:
1963: \bibitem[Zheng et al.(1997)]{1997ApJ...475..469Z} Zheng, W., Kriss, G.~A.,
1964: Telfer, R.~C., Grimes, J.~P., \& Davidsen, A.~F.\ 1997, \apj, 475, 469
1965:
1966: \bibitem[Zheng \& Miralda-Escud{\'e}(2002)]{2002ApJ...578...33Z} Zheng, Z.,
1967: \& Miralda-Escud{\'e}, J.\ 2002, \apj, 578, 33
1968:
1969: \bibitem[Zibetti et al.(2005)]{2005ApJ...631L.105Z} Zibetti, S.,
1970: M{\'e}nard, B., Nestor, D., \& Turnshek, D.\ 2005, \apjl, 631, L105
1971:
1972: \bibitem[Zibetti et al.(2005)]{2006ApJ...888L.888Z} Zibetti, S.,
1973: M{\'e}nard, B., Nestor, D., \& Turnshek, D.\ 2006, \apj, in press
1974:
1975: \bibitem[Zwaan et al.(2005)]{2005MNRAS.364.1467Z} Zwaan, M.~A., van der
1976: Hulst, J.~M., Briggs, F.~H., Verheijen, M.~A.~W., \& Ryan-Weber, E.~V.\
1977: 2005, \mnras, 364, 1467
1978:
1979:
1980: \end{thebibliography}
1981:
1982:
1983: \end{document}
1984:
1985:
1986:
1987: