1: %%
2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
3: %%
4: %% Modified 2005 December 5
5: %%
6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
8:
9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
11: %% any data that comes before this command.
12:
13: %% The command below calls the preprint style
14: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
15: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
16: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
17: %%
18:
19:
20: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
21:
22: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
23:
24: %%\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
25:
26: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
27: \documentclass{emulateapj}
28:
29: %%\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
30:
31: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
32: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
33: %% use the longabstract style option.
34:
35: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
36:
37: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
38: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
39: %% the \begin{document} command.
40: %%
41: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
42: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
43: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
44: %% for information.
45: \def\Journal#1#2#3#4{{#4}, {#1}, {#2}, #3}
46: % Some useful journal names
47: \def\NCA{Nuovo Cimento}
48: \def\NAT{Nature}
49: \def\AAA{A\&A}
50: \def\ApJ{ApJ}
51: \def\AJ{Astronom. Journal}
52: \def\Aph{Astropart. Phys.}
53: \def\ApJS{ApJSS}
54: \def\ML{Machine Learning}
55: \def\MNRAS{MNRAS}
56: \def\NIM{Nucl. Instrum. Methods}
57: \def\NIMA{Nucl. Instrum. Methods A}
58: \def\NPB{Nucl. Phys. B}
59: \def\PLB{Phys. Lett. B}
60: \def\PRL{Phys. Rev. Lett.}
61: \def\PRD{Phys. Rev. D}
62: \def\ZPC{Z. Phys. C}
63: \def\SCI{Science}
64: \def\HESS{\mbox{H.E.S.S. }}
65:
66:
67: \shorttitle{1ES~1011+496}
68: \shortauthors{Albert et al.}
69:
70: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
71: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
72:
73: \begin{document}
74:
75: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
76: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
77: %% you desire.
78:
79: \title{Discovery of Very High Energy $\gamma$-rays from 1ES~1011+496 at $z=0.212$}
80:
81: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
82: %% author and affiliation information.
83: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
84: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
85: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
86: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
87:
88: \author{J.~Albert\altaffilmark{a},
89: E.~Aliu\altaffilmark{b},
90: H.~Anderhub\altaffilmark{c},
91: P.~Antoranz\altaffilmark{d},
92: A.~Armada\altaffilmark{b},
93: C.~Baixeras\altaffilmark{e},
94: J.~A.~Barrio\altaffilmark{d},
95: H.~Bartko\altaffilmark{f},
96: D.~Bastieri\altaffilmark{g},
97: J.~K.~Becker\altaffilmark{h},
98: W.~Bednarek\altaffilmark{i},
99: K.~Berger\altaffilmark{a},
100: C.~Bigongiari\altaffilmark{g},
101: A.~Biland\altaffilmark{c},
102: R.~K.~Bock\altaffilmark{f,}\altaffilmark{g},
103: P.~Bordas\altaffilmark{j},
104: V.~Bosch-Ramon\altaffilmark{j},
105: T.~Bretz\altaffilmark{a},
106: I.~Britvitch\altaffilmark{c},
107: M.~Camara\altaffilmark{d},
108: E.~Carmona\altaffilmark{f},
109: A.~Chilingarian\altaffilmark{k},
110: J.~A.~Coarasa\altaffilmark{f},
111: S.~Commichau\altaffilmark{c},
112: J.~L.~Contreras\altaffilmark{d},
113: J.~Cortina\altaffilmark{b},
114: M.T.~Costado\altaffilmark{m,}\altaffilmark{v},
115: V.~Curtef\altaffilmark{h},
116: V.~Danielyan\altaffilmark{k},
117: F.~Dazzi\altaffilmark{g},
118: A.~De Angelis\altaffilmark{n},
119: C.~Delgado\altaffilmark{m},
120: R.~de~los~Reyes\altaffilmark{d},
121: B.~De Lotto\altaffilmark{n},
122: E.~Domingo-Santamar\'\i a\altaffilmark{b},
123: D.~Dorner\altaffilmark{a},
124: M.~Doro\altaffilmark{g},
125: M.~Errando\altaffilmark{b},
126: M.~Fagiolini\altaffilmark{o},
127: D.~Ferenc\altaffilmark{p},
128: E.~Fern\'andez\altaffilmark{b},
129: R.~Firpo\altaffilmark{b},
130: J.~Flix\altaffilmark{b},
131: M.~V.~Fonseca\altaffilmark{d},
132: L.~Font\altaffilmark{e},
133: M.~Fuchs\altaffilmark{f},
134: N.~Galante\altaffilmark{f},
135: R.J.~Garc\'{\i}a-L\'opez\altaffilmark{m,}\altaffilmark{v},
136: M.~Garczarczyk\altaffilmark{f},
137: M.~Gaug\altaffilmark{m},
138: M.~Giller\altaffilmark{i},
139: F.~Goebel\altaffilmark{f},
140: D.~Hakobyan\altaffilmark{k},
141: M.~Hayashida\altaffilmark{f},
142: T.~Hengstebeck\altaffilmark{q},
143: A.~Herrero\altaffilmark{m,}\altaffilmark{v},
144: D.~H\"ohne\altaffilmark{a},
145: J.~Hose\altaffilmark{f},
146: C.~C.~Hsu\altaffilmark{f},
147: P.~Jacon\altaffilmark{i},
148: T.~Jogler\altaffilmark{f},
149: R.~Kosyra\altaffilmark{f},
150: D.~Kranich\altaffilmark{c},
151: R.~Kritzer\altaffilmark{a},
152: A.~Laille\altaffilmark{p},
153: E.~Lindfors\altaffilmark{l,}\altaffilmark{*},
154: S.~Lombardi\altaffilmark{g},
155: F.~Longo\altaffilmark{n},
156: J.~L\'opez\altaffilmark{b},
157: M.~L\'opez\altaffilmark{d},
158: E.~Lorenz\altaffilmark{c,}\altaffilmark{f},
159: P.~Majumdar\altaffilmark{f},
160: G.~Maneva\altaffilmark{r},
161: K.~Mannheim\altaffilmark{a},
162: O.~Mansutti\altaffilmark{n},
163: M.~Mariotti\altaffilmark{g},
164: M.~Mart\'\i nez\altaffilmark{b},
165: D.~Mazin\altaffilmark{b,}\altaffilmark{*},
166: C.~Merck\altaffilmark{f},
167: M.~Meucci\altaffilmark{o},
168: M.~Meyer\altaffilmark{a},
169: J.~M.~Miranda\altaffilmark{d},
170: R.~Mirzoyan\altaffilmark{f},
171: S.~Mizobuchi\altaffilmark{f},
172: A.~Moralejo\altaffilmark{b},
173: D.~Nieto\altaffilmark{d},
174: K.~Nilsson\altaffilmark{l},
175: J.~Ninkovic\altaffilmark{f},
176: E.~O\~na-Wilhelmi\altaffilmark{b},
177: N.~Otte\altaffilmark{f,}\altaffilmark{q},
178: I.~Oya\altaffilmark{d},
179: D.~Paneque\altaffilmark{f},
180: M.~Panniello\altaffilmark{m,}\altaffilmark{x},
181: R.~Paoletti\altaffilmark{o},
182: J.~M.~Paredes\altaffilmark{j},
183: M.~Pasanen\altaffilmark{l},
184: D.~Pascoli\altaffilmark{g},
185: F.~Pauss\altaffilmark{c},
186: R.~Pegna\altaffilmark{o},
187: E.~Perlman\altaffilmark{y},
188: M.~Persic\altaffilmark{n,}\altaffilmark{s},
189: L.~Peruzzo\altaffilmark{g},
190: A.~Piccioli\altaffilmark{o},
191: E.~Prandini\altaffilmark{g},
192: N.~Puchades\altaffilmark{b},
193: A.~Raymers\altaffilmark{k},
194: W.~Rhode\altaffilmark{h},
195: M.~Rib\'o\altaffilmark{j},
196: J.~Rico\altaffilmark{b},
197: M.~Rissi\altaffilmark{c},
198: A.~Robert\altaffilmark{e},
199: S.~R\"ugamer\altaffilmark{a},
200: A.~Saggion\altaffilmark{g},
201: T.~Saito\altaffilmark{f},
202: A.~S\'anchez\altaffilmark{e},
203: P.~Sartori\altaffilmark{g},
204: V.~Scalzotto\altaffilmark{g},
205: V.~Scapin\altaffilmark{n},
206: R.~Schmitt\altaffilmark{a},
207: T.~Schweizer\altaffilmark{f},
208: M.~Shayduk\altaffilmark{q,}\altaffilmark{f},
209: K.~Shinozaki\altaffilmark{f},
210: S.~N.~Shore\altaffilmark{t},
211: N.~Sidro\altaffilmark{b},
212: A.~Sillanp\"a\"a\altaffilmark{l},
213: D.~Sobczynska\altaffilmark{i},
214: A.~Stamerra\altaffilmark{o},
215: L.~S.~Stark\altaffilmark{c},
216: L.~Takalo\altaffilmark{l},
217: F.~Tavecchio\altaffilmark{z},
218: P.~Temnikov\altaffilmark{r},
219: D.~Tescaro\altaffilmark{b},
220: M.~Teshima\altaffilmark{f},
221: D.~F.~Torres\altaffilmark{u},
222: N.~Turini\altaffilmark{o},
223: H.~Vankov\altaffilmark{r},
224: V.~Vitale\altaffilmark{n},
225: R.~M.~Wagner\altaffilmark{f},
226: T.~Wibig\altaffilmark{i},
227: W.~Wittek\altaffilmark{f},
228: F.~Zandanel\altaffilmark{g},
229: R.~Zanin\altaffilmark{b},
230: J.~Zapatero\altaffilmark{e}
231: }
232: \altaffiltext{a} {Universit\"at W\"urzburg, D-97074 W\"urzburg, Germany}
233: \altaffiltext{b} {IFAE, Edifici Cn., E-08193 Bellaterra (Barcelona), Spain}
234: \altaffiltext{c} {ETH Zurich, CH-8093 Switzerland}
235: \altaffiltext{d} {Universidad Complutense, E-28040 Madrid, Spain}
236: \altaffiltext{e} {Universitat Aut\`onoma de Barcelona, E-08193 Bellaterra, Spain}
237: \altaffiltext{f} {Max-Planck-Institut f\"ur Physik, D-80805 M\"unchen, Germany}
238: \altaffiltext{g} {Universit\`a di Padova and INFN, I-35131 Padova, Italy}
239: \altaffiltext{h} {Universit\"at Dortmund, D-44227 Dortmund, Germany}
240: \altaffiltext{i} {University of \L\'od\'z, PL-90236 Lodz, Poland}
241: \altaffiltext{j} {Universitat de Barcelona, E-08028 Barcelona, Spain}
242: \altaffiltext{k} {Yerevan Physics Institute, AM-375036 Yerevan, Armenia}
243: \altaffiltext{l} {Tuorla Observatory, Univ. of Turku, FI-21500 Piikki\"o, Finland}
244: \altaffiltext{m} {Inst. de Astrofisica de Canarias, E-38200 Tenerife, Spain}
245: \altaffiltext{n} {Universit\`a di Udine, and INFN Trieste, I-33100 Udine, Italy}
246: \altaffiltext{o} {Universit\`a di Siena, and INFN Pisa, I-53100 Siena, Italy}
247: \altaffiltext{p} {University of California, Davis, CA-95616-8677, USA}
248: \altaffiltext{q} {Humboldt-Universit\"at zu Berlin, D-12489 Berlin, Germany}
249: \altaffiltext{r} {Inst. for Nucl. Research and Nucl. Energy, BG-1784 Sofia, Bulgaria}
250: \altaffiltext{s} {INAF/Osserv. Astronomico and INFN, I-34131 Trieste, Italy}
251: \altaffiltext{t} {Universit\`a di Pisa, and INFN Pisa, I-56126 Pisa, Italy}
252: \altaffiltext{u} {ICREA \& Institut de Cienci\`es de l'Espai (IEEC-CSIC), E-08193 Bellaterra, Spain}
253: \altaffiltext{v} {Depto. de Astrofísica, Universidad, E-38206 Tenerife, Spain}
254: \altaffiltext{y} {Department of Physics and Space Sciences, Florida Insitute of Technology, Melbourne, USA}
255: \altaffiltext{z} {INAF/Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera, Milano, Italy}
256: \altaffiltext{x} {deceased}
257: \altaffiltext{*} {Send offprint requests to: E. Lindfors elilin@utu.fi; D. Mazin mazin@ifae.es}
258:
259:
260:
261: \begin{abstract}
262: We report on the discovery of Very High Energy (VHE) $\gamma$-ray
263: emission from the BL Lacertae object 1ES~1011+496. The observation was
264: triggered by an optical outburst in March 2007 and the source was
265: observed with the MAGIC telescope from March to May 2007.
266: Observing for 18.7 hr, we find an excess of
267: 6.2\,$\sigma$ with an integrated
268: flux above 200\,GeV of (1.58$\pm0.32)\cdot 10^{-11}$ photons cm$^{-2}$
269: s$^{-1}$.
270: The VHE $\gamma$-ray flux is $>40\%$ higher than in March--April 2006
271: (reported elsewhere), indicating that the VHE emission state may be
272: related to the optical emission state. We have also determined the
273: redshift of 1ES~1011+496 based on an optical spectrum that reveals the
274: absorption lines of the host galaxy. The redshift of $z=0.212$ makes
275: 1ES~1011+496 the most distant source observed to emit VHE
276: $\gamma$-rays to date.
277: \end{abstract}
278:
279:
280: \keywords{gamma rays: observations, quasars: individual (1ES~1011+496)}
281:
282:
283: \section{Introduction}
284: Known Very High Energy (VHE defined as $>100$GeV) $\gamma$-ray
285: emitting Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN) show variable flux in all
286: wave bands. The relationship between the variability in different
287: wave bands appears rather complicated. The MAGIC collaboration is performing
288: Target of Opportunity (ToO) observations whenever alerted that sources
289: are in a high flux state in the optical and/or X-ray bands.
290: Previously, optically triggered observations resulted in the
291: discovery of VHE $\gamma$-ray emission from Markarian~180
292: \citep{mrk180}. Here we report the discovery of VHE $\gamma$-rays from
293: 1ES~1011+496 triggered by an optical outburst in March 2007.
294: Previous observations of the source with the MAGIC telescope did not
295: show a clear signal \citep{hbl}.
296:
297: 1ES~1011+496 is a high frequency peaked BL~Lac (HBL) object for which
298: we now determined a redshift of $z=0.212\pm0.002$
299: (Fig.~1). Previously, this was uncertain since it was based on an
300: assumed association with the cluster Abell 950 \citep{wisniewski}. The
301: redshift determined here makes 1ES~1011+496 the most distant
302: VHE $\gamma$-ray source yet detected
303: with the possible exception of PG~1553+113
304: \citep{hess1553, magic1553} (for which the redshift %has only a lower limit,
305: is $0.09<z<0.42$ \citep{sba,mazgoe}).
306:
307: %FIGURE 1
308:
309: \begin{figure}
310: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{fig1.eps}
311: %\plotone{fig1.eps}
312: \caption{Optical spectrum of 1ES~1011+496 obtained with the Multi
313: Mirror Telescope, using the Blue Channel Spectrograph with the 300
314: line/mm grating, a 1.5'' slit, and Loral 3kx1k CCD. Integration time
315: was 30 minutes. Absorption lines of the host galaxy (Ca H\&K, CH G, H$_{\beta}$ and Mg b) are clearly visible and indicate a redshift of $z=0.212\pm0.002$.}
316: \end{figure}
317:
318: %END FIGURE 1
319:
320: The spectral energy distribution (SED) of BL~Lac objects normally shows a
321: two-bump structure. The lower frequency peak is due to
322: synchrotron radiation. Various models have been proposed for the
323: origin of the high-frequency peak; the most popular invoke
324: inverse Compton scattering of ambient soft photons.
325: There have been several suggestions for
326: the origin of the low-frequency seed photons that are up scattered
327: to $\gamma$-ray energies: the soft photons may be produced within the jet
328: itself by synchrotron radiation (SSC, \citet{maraschi}) or come from
329: outside the jet, perhaps from the accretion disk (EC, \citet{dermer}). The
330: high-energy peak may, instead, also have a hadronic origin (e.g. \citet{mannheim}).
331:
332: When the synchrotron emission peak is located in the low energy range from the
333: sub-millimeter to optical, the objects are called low-frequency-peaked BL~Lac objects. HBLs,
334: on the other hand, have the peak synchrotron emission in the UV to
335: X-ray energy range. The peak of the second bump is often not
336: observable because of the low sensitivity above a few hundred MeV of
337: satellite-borne detectors or a too high energy threshold of
338: ground-based $\gamma$-ray detectors. With the exception of M\,87
339: \citep{hegram87,hessm87} and BL~Lac \citep{bllac}, all
340: known blazar sources detected at TeV energies with Cherenkov
341: telescopes show a synchrotron peak in the UV to X-ray energy range,
342: suggesting that the intensity of the TeV emission is related to a
343: synchrotron component extending to high frequencies.
344:
345: \section{Observations and Data Analysis}
346: The MAGIC telescope is located on the Canary Island La Palma
347: (2200 m above sea level, 28$^\circ$45$'$N, 17$^\circ$54$'$W).
348: The accessible energy range spans from~50-60 GeV
349: (trigger threshold at small zenith angles) up to tens of TeV \citep{crab}.
350:
351: The MAGIC observation was triggered by an observed high optical state
352: of 1ES~1011+496 on 2007 March 12 (see light curve Fig.~2). The source
353: has been monitored for more than 4 years in the optical
354: with the KVA\footnote{http://tur3.tur.iac.es} and Tuorla 1\,m telescopes as a
355: part of the Tuorla blazar monitoring
356: program.\footnote{http://users.utu.fi/$\sim$kani/1m/} In March 2007 the flux
357: reached the highest level ever observed during the
358: monitoring. The core flux, which is the host-galaxy-subtracted flux
359: (the host galaxy flux is taken from \citet{nilsson07} and is
360: $0.49\pm0.02$~mJy), increased more than $50\%$ from the local minimum
361: of the light curve. The high optical state with increasing flux was
362: continuing throughout the MAGIC observations, despite an observation gap
363: of 3 weeks due to bad weather.
364:
365:
366: 1ES~1011+496 is monitored by \textit{RXTE} ASM and \textit{Swift} BAT, but the X-ray
367: flux of the source is below the sensitivity of these
368: instruments and the light curves show no indication of flaring.
369: The source was also observed at Mets\"ahovi Radio Observatory in May 2007.
370: The source was not detected at 37~GHz, which indicates that it was not
371: in a high state at millimeter wavelengths (A. L\"ahteenm\"aki 2007,
372: private communication).
373:
374:
375: %FIGURE 2
376: \begin{figure}
377: \includegraphics[width=0.15\textwidth, angle=270]{fig2.ps}
378: %\plotone{f2.eps}
379: \caption{The optical R-band light curve of 1ES~1011+496 from Tuorla 1 meter and KVA 35cm telescopes. The vertical lines indicate the starting point of the MAGIC observations in 2006 and 2007.}
380: \end{figure}
381:
382: %END FIGURE 2
383:
384: After the alert, MAGIC observed 1ES~1011+496 in March--May 2007.
385: The total observation time was 26.2 hr, and the observation was
386: performed at zenith angles ranging from $20\degr$ to
387: $37\degr$.
388: The observation was done in the so-called Wobble-mode
389: \citep{daum}. After removing runs with unusual trigger rates, mostly
390: caused by bad weather conditions, the effective observational time
391: amounts to 18.7 hr.
392:
393:
394: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------
395:
396: The data were analyzed using the standard analysis and calibration
397: programs for the MAGIC telescope \citep{crab}.
398: The analysis is based on image parameters \citep{hillas}, the Random
399: Forest \citep{breiman,rf}, and the DISP methods \citep{domingo}.
400: After cuts for $\gamma$/hadron separation, the distribution of the
401: angle $\theta$, which is the angular distance between the source
402: position in the sky and the reconstructed shower origin, is used to
403: determine the signal in the ON-source region. Three background (OFF)
404: regions of the same size are chosen symmetrically to the ON-source
405: region with respect to the camera center. The final cut
406: $\theta^2<0.02\,\deg^2$ to determine the significance (Fig.~3) was optimized on
407: nearly contemporaneous Crab data to determine the significance of the
408: signal and the number of excess events.
409: %The energy of the
410: %$\gamma$-ray candidates was also estimated using the Random Forest
411: %technique.
412: %The applied cuts were chosen to be looser than those in
413: %Fig.~3 to have a higher number of $\gamma$-ray candidates.
414: The energy threshold was about 160\,GeV for this analysis, which, given the soft
415: spectrum of the source, allowed for signal extraction down to 100
416: GeV.
417: %Finally, the spectrum was unfolded to correct for the effects of
418: %limited energy resolution of the detector \citep{anykeyev}.
419: The data were also analyzed with an independent analysis. Within the
420: statistical errors the same significance, flux, and differential
421: spectrum were obtained.
422:
423: \section{Results}
424: The distribution of the $\theta^2$-values, after all cuts, is shown in
425: Fig.~3. The signal of 297 events over 1591 normalized background events
426: corresponds to an excess with significance of $6.2\sigma$ using
427: equation (17) in \citet{LiMa}.
428:
429: %FIGURE 3
430:
431: \begin{figure}
432: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{fig3.eps}
433: %\plotone{fig3.eps}
434: \caption{Distribution of $\theta^2$ for ON-region data and normalized OFF-region data. The signal region is marked by the dashed line.}
435: \end{figure}
436:
437: %END FIGURE 3
438:
439: To search for time variability the sample was divided into 14
440: subsamples, one for each observing night. Fig.~4 shows the integral
441: flux for each night calculated for a photon flux above 200~GeV. The energy
442: threshold has been chosen to reduce systematic effects arising from a
443: rapidly decreasing effective area for $\gamma$-rays for lower energies.
444: The flux is statistically constant at an emission level of
445: F($>$200~GeV)=(1.58$\pm0.32)\cdot 10^{-11}$ photons cm$^{-2}$s$^{-1}$.
446: %In the inset of Figure~4, we show integral fluxes
447: %above 200~GeV on a year-by-year basis. The first point in the inset
448: %corresponds to an earlier observation of 1ES1011+496 by MAGIC in 2006,
449: %which lead to a hint of a signal \citep{hbl}. This hint can
450: %now be interpreted as being due to a lower flux state of
451: %the source than measured in 2007.
452:
453: The energy spectrum of 1ES~1011+496 is shown in Fig.~5. It
454: extends from \mbox{$\sim 120$\,GeV} to \mbox{$\sim 750$\,GeV} and can
455: be well approximated by a power law:
456: \[
457: {\frac{\mathrm{d}N}{\mathrm{d}E}}=(2.0\pm0.1)\cdot10^{-10}\left({\frac{E}{0.2\,\mathrm{TeV}}}\right)^{-4.0\pm0.5}\,
458: \frac 1 {\mbox{TeV}\,\mbox{cm}^{2}\,\mbox{s}}
459: \]
460: The errors are statistical only. We estimate the systematic
461: uncertainity to be around 75\% for the absolute flux level
462: and 0.2 for the spectral index.
463: The observed spectrum is affected by the evolving extragalactic
464: background light (EBL, \citet{nikishov,stecker}) as the VHE
465: $\gamma$-rays are partially altered by interactions with the
466: low-energy photons of the EBL. Therefore, to obtain the intrinsic
467: spectrum of the source, the observed spectrum must be corrected. The optical
468: depth and the resulting attenuation of the VHE $\gamma$-rays from
469: 1ES~1011+496 are calculated using the number density of the evolving
470: EBL provided by the best-fit model of \citet{kneiske}. Within given
471: model uncertainties, the model is in good agreement
472: with alternative models \citep{primack,steckerNEW}
473: and EBL upper limits \citep{hessebl,mazinraue}.
474: Even after the correction,
475: the slope of the spectrum is $\Gamma_{\mathrm{int}} = 3.3 \pm 0.7$
476: (dashed brown line in Fig.~5,
477: $\chi^2\,/\,\mbox{NDF} = 2.55 / 2$),
478: softer than observed for other HBLs in TeV energies and thus not providing new
479: constraints on the EBL density.
480:
481: %FIGURE 4
482:
483: \begin{figure}
484: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{fig4.eps}
485: %\plotone{fig4.eps}
486: \caption{The night-by-night light curve of 1ES~1011+496 from 2007 March 17 (MJD 54176) to 2007 May 18 (MJD 54238).
487: The year-by-year light curve is shown in the inset, the 2006 data point is from \citet{hbl}.}
488: \end{figure}
489:
490: %END FIGURE 4
491:
492: %FIGURE 5
493:
494: \begin{figure}
495: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{fig5.eps}
496: %\plotone{fig5.eps}
497: \caption{The measured spectrum (black filled circles), the power-law
498: fit to the data (solid line), the deabsorbed spectrum (brown
499: open circles), and the fit to the deabsorbed spectrum
500: (dashed brown line). The last measured point is a 95\% upper limit.
501: In the deabsorbed spectrum, the last spectral point at $\approx$600\,GeV is 1.6\,$\sigma$
502: above the fit and thus not significant. The Crab Nebula spectrum (green dashed line, \citet{crab})
503: is shown for comparison.}
504: \end{figure}
505:
506: %END FIGURE 5
507:
508: \vspace{2cm}
509:
510: \section{Discussion}
511: We report the discovery of VHE $\gamma$-ray emission from BL Lac
512: object 1ES~1011+496. With the redshift of $z=0.212$, it is the most
513: distant source detected to emit VHE $\gamma$-rays to date.
514: %The
515: %energy spectrum of 1ES~1011+496 is one of the softest VHE
516: %$\gamma$-ray spectra yet measured;
517: %even after the attenuation correction
518: %the spectrum remains soft with an intrinsic index of
519: %$\Gamma_{\mathrm{int}} = 3.3 \pm 0.7 $.
520: The observed spectral properties
521: (soft and no significant excess above $\sim 800$~GeV)
522: are consistent with the state-of-the-art EBL models
523: \citep{kneiske,primack,steckerNEW} and confirm recently derived
524: EBL limits \citep{hessebl,mazinraue}.
525:
526: In Fig.~6 we show the SED of
527: 1ES~1011+496 using historical data (open circles;
528: \citet{costamante} and references therein) and our nearly simultaneous
529: optical \textit{R}-band data (triangle), together with the MAGIC spectrum
530: corrected for attenuation (filled
531: circles). We also display (square) the EGRET flux of the source
532: 3EG~J1009+4855, which has been suggested to be associated
533: with 1ES~1011+496 (\citet{hartman},
534: but see also \citet{soward} whose analysis disfavors the association).
535:
536: We model the SED by using a one-zone synchrotron-SSC model (see
537: \citet{tavecchio01} for a description). In brief, a spherical emission
538: region is assumed with radius $R$,
539: filled with a tangled
540: magnetic field of mean intensity $B$. The relativistic electrons follow a
541: % remove?: smooth
542: broken-power-law energy distributions specified by the limits
543: $\gamma _{\rm min}$ and $\gamma _{\rm max}$ and the break at $\gamma
544: _{\rm b}$. Relativistic effects are taken into account by the Doppler
545: factor $\delta$.
546:
547: %FIGURE 6
548:
549: \begin{figure}
550: \centering
551: \includegraphics[width=0.46\textwidth, bb = 40 200 590 670]{fig6.ps}
552: %\plotone{f6.eps}
553: \caption{Spectral energy distribution of 1ES~1011+496. The two
554: different fits are done by varying the minimum electron energy
555: $\gamma_{\rm min}$ (see text).
556: The other fit parameters are: R(radius of sphere)=$10^{16}$\,cm,
557: $\delta$(Doppler factor)=20, B(magnetic field) = 0.15\,G,
558: $\gamma_{\rm max}$(maximum electron Lorentz factor)= $2\cdot10^7$ %5e4,
559: $\gamma_{\rm b}$(break electron Lorenz factor)= $5\cdot10^4$ %5e4,
560: the slopes of the electron distribution $n_1 = 2$ and
561: $n_2 = 5$ before and after the break energy, respectively,
562: as well as
563: $n_{\rm e}$(normalization of the electron energy distribution) = $2\cdot10^4$\,cm$^{-3}$.
564: The model is not intended for describing the radio data,
565: which is assumed to origin from a larger emitting volume to avoid
566: an intrinsic absorption.}
567: \end{figure}
568:
569: %END FIGURE 6
570:
571: As discussed in \citet{tavecchio98}, if the position and the luminosity
572: of the synchrotron and SSC peaks are known and an estimate of the
573: minimum variability timescale is available, it is possible to uniquely
574: constrain the model parameters. Unfortunately, we do not
575: have all the required information to accomplish this. In particular, we
576: have fixed the synchrotron peak by
577: requiring that it reproduces the optical flux and the historical X-ray
578: spectrum and we assume the SSC peak to be close to the
579: MAGIC threshold. These choices minimize the required emitted
580: luminosity, since a lower SSC peak frequency would require a
581: higher SSC luminosity.
582:
583: We present two models. The first (solid line), assuming an
584: electron distribution extending down to $\gamma _{\rm min}=1$, clearly
585: overpredicts the MeV-GeV flux
586: measured by EGRET. In the second case (dashed line), which fixes the
587: low energy limit at $\gamma _{\rm min}=3\cdot 10^3$ (leading to a
588: ``narrowing'' of both the synchrotron and SSC bump, see
589: \citet{katarzynski}) the model is compatible with the reported EGRET
590: flux. It is evident that simultaneous \textit{GLAST}-MAGIC observations of this
591: source will provide important constraints on the model parameters.
592:
593: In both cases, the energy output of the SSC component (reaching
594: observed values of $L\sim
595: 10^{46}$ erg/s) dominates over the synchrotron luminosity, implying a
596: relatively low magnetic field, $B=0.15$ G. In that case the source
597: would be strongly electron dominated, since the magnetic energy
598: density would be several orders of magnitude below that of the
599: relativistic electrons. A larger synchrotron flux (limited by the
600: non-detection by BAT and ASM) could alleviate the
601: problem. Simultaneous X-ray and VHE observations are mandatory to
602: further investigate this issue. We also note the fit Doppler factor
603: ($\delta=20$) is rather high and should be verified by Very Long
604: Baseline Interferometric observations. The fitted parameters are
605: similar to those derived for other TeV-emitting BL Lacs. We note
606: however that adopting models where the jet has a velocity structure
607: (e.g. models by \citet{GK,Ghi05}) would considerably reduce the
608: required Doppler factors.
609:
610:
611: 1ES~1011+496 was previously observed with the HEGRA telescope array,
612: resulting in an upper limit of F(E$>$1 TeV)$\le 1.8\cdot 10^{-12}$
613: photons cm$^{-2}$s$^{-1}$ (Aharonian et al. 2004), which is well above
614: the detected flux we found. The source was also observed by MAGIC, as part of a
615: systematic scan of X-ray-bright HBLs, in March--April 2006.
616: Being in a lower optical state (the core flux was $\sim50\%$ lower than
617: that in March--May 2007), the observations showed a marginal signal with
618: $3.5\sigma$ significance corresponding to
619: an integral flux of F($>$180~GeV)=(1.26$\pm0.4)\cdot 10^{-11}$
620: photons cm$^{-2}$s$^{-1}$, i.e.\ $\sim 40\%$ \citep{hbl} lower than the detected
621: flux in March--May 2007 (see also the inset in Fig.~4).
622: A similar trend was also found for BL~Lac \citep{bllac}, where the
623: observations during a lower optical state failed to detect VHE
624: $\gamma$-rays. This seems to indicate that there is a connection
625: between the optical high state and the higher flux of VHE $\gamma$-ray
626: emission at least in some sources. To further investigate this
627: possibility, follow-up
628: observations of the detected objects as well as further observations
629: of other AGNs during high optical states are required.
630:
631:
632:
633:
634:
635: %\acknowledgments
636:
637: We thank the IAC for the excellent working conditions at the ORM. The
638: support of the German BMBF and MPG, the Italian INFN, the Spanish
639: CICYT, the ETH Research Grant TH~34/04~3 and the Polish MNiI Grant
640: 1P03D01028 is gratefully acknowledged. We thank A. Berdyugin for
641: performing the optical observations and A. L\"ahteenm\"aki
642: (Mets\"ahovi) for the radio observations.
643:
644:
645:
646: \begin{thebibliography}{}
647:
648: \bibitem[Aharonian et al.(2003)]{hegram87}Aharonian, F. et al. (HEGRA),
649: \newblock \Journal{\AAA}{403}{1}{2003}
650:
651: \bibitem[Aharonian et al.(2004)]{hegra} Aharonian, F. et al. (HEGRA),
652: \newblock \Journal{\AAA}{421}{529}{2004}
653:
654: \bibitem[Aharonian et al.(2006a)]{hess1553} Aharonian, F. et al. (H.E.S.S.),
655: \newblock \Journal{\AAA}{448}{19}{2006a}
656:
657: \bibitem[Aharonian et al.(2006b)]{hessm87} Aharonian, F. et al. (H.E.S.S.),
658: \newblock \Journal{\SCI}{314}{1424}{2006b}
659:
660: \bibitem[Aharonian et~al.(2006c)]{hessebl}Aharonian, F. et al. (H.E.S.S.),
661: \newblock 2006c, Nature, 440, 1018
662:
663:
664: \bibitem[Albert et al.(2006)]{mrk180} Albert, J. et al. (MAGIC),
665: \newblock \Journal{\ApJ}{648}{L105}{2006}
666:
667: \bibitem[Albert et al.(2007a)]{hbl} Albert, J. et al. (MAGIC),
668: \newblock 2007a, ApJ submitted, astro-ph/07064453
669:
670: \bibitem[Albert et al.(2007b)]{magic1553} Albert, J. et al. (MAGIC),
671: \newblock \Journal{\ApJ}{654}{L119}{2007b}
672:
673: \bibitem[Albert et al.(2007c)]{bllac} Albert, J. et al. (MAGIC),
674: \newblock \Journal{\ApJ}{666}{L7}{2007c}
675:
676: \bibitem[Albert et al.(2007d)]{crab} Albert, J. et al. (MAGIC),
677: \newblock 2007d, ApJ accepted, astro-ph/07053244
678:
679: %\bibitem[Anykeyev et~al.(1991)]{anykeyev}Anykeyev, V.B. et al.,
680: %\newblock \Journal{\NIMA}{303}{350}{1991}.
681:
682: \bibitem[Bock et~al.(2004)]{rf} Bock, R. K. et al.,
683: \newblock \Journal{\NIMA}{516}{511}{2004}.
684:
685: \bibitem[Breiman(2001)]{breiman} Breiman, L.,
686: \newblock \Journal{\ML}{45}{5}{2001}
687:
688: \bibitem[Costamante \& Ghisellini(2002)]{costamante} Costamante, L. \& Ghisellini, G.,
689: \newblock \Journal{\AAA}{384}{56}{2002}.
690:
691: \bibitem[Daum et al.(1997)]{daum} Daum, A. et al. (HEGRA),
692: \newblock \Journal{\Aph}{8}{1}{1997}.
693:
694: \bibitem[Dermer \& Schlickeiser (1993)]{dermer} Dermer, C. D. \& Schlickeiser, R.,
695: \newblock \Journal{ApJ}{416}{458}{1993}
696:
697: \bibitem[Domingo-Santamar\'\i a et al.(2005)]{domingo} Domingo-Santamar\'\i a, E. et al. (MAGIC),
698: \newblock 2005, Proc. 29th Int. Cosmic Ray Conf. (Pune), 5, 363.
699:
700: \bibitem[Georganopoulos \& Kazanas (2003)]{GK} Georganopoulos, M. \&
701: Kazanas, D.
702: \newblock \Journal{\ApJ}{594}{27}{2003}
703:
704: \bibitem[Ghisellini et al. (2005)]{Ghi05}Ghisellini, G., Tavecchio,
705: F. \& Chiaberge, M.
706: \newblock \Journal{\ApJ}{432}{401}{2005}
707:
708: \bibitem[Hartman et al.(1999)]{hartman} Hartman, R. C. et al.,
709: \newblock \Journal{\ApJS}{123}{79}{1999}.
710:
711: \bibitem[Hillas(1985)]{hillas} Hillas, A. M.,
712: \newblock 1985, Proc. of the 19th ICRC (La Jolla), 3, 445
713:
714: %\bibitem[Katarzynski et al.(2006)]{katarzynski} Katarzynski, K., Ghisellini, G., Tavecchio, F. et al.
715: \bibitem[Katarzynski et al.(2006)]{katarzynski} Katarzynski, K., et al.,
716: \newblock \Journal{\MNRAS}{2006}{368}{52}
717:
718: \bibitem[Kneiske et~al.(2002)]{kneiske}Kneiske, T.~M., Mannheim, K. \& Hartman, D.~H.
719: \newblock \Journal{\AAA}{386}{1}{2002}
720:
721: \bibitem[Li \& Ma(1983)]{LiMa} Li,T.-P., and Ma, Y.-Q.,
722: \newblock \Journal{\ApJ}{272}{317}{1983}.
723:
724: %\bibitem[Mannheim et~al.(1991)]{mannheim}Mannheim, K., Biermann, P. L., Kruells, W. M.,
725: \bibitem[Mannheim et~al.(1991)]{mannheim}Mannheim, K., et al.,
726: \newblock \Journal{\AAA}{251}{723}{1991}.
727:
728: \bibitem[Maraschi et al.(1992)]{maraschi} Maraschi, L., Ghisellini, G. \& Celotti, A.,
729: \newblock \Journal{\ApJ}{397}{L5}{1992}.
730:
731: \bibitem[Mazin \& Raue(2007)]{mazinraue} Mazin, D. \& Raue, M.,
732: %\newblock 2007, A\&A, in press, arXiv:astro-ph/0701694
733: %\newblock 2007, A\&A in press, astro-ph/0701694
734: \newblock \Journal{\AAA}{471}{439}{2007}
735:
736: \bibitem[Mazin \& Goebel(2007)]{mazgoe} Mazin, D. \& Goebel, F.,
737: \newblock \Journal{\ApJ}{655}{13}{2007}
738:
739: \bibitem[Nikishov(1962)]{nikishov}Nikishov, A.I.,
740: \newblock 1962, {Sov. Phys. JETP}, 14, 393.
741:
742: \bibitem[Nilsson et al.(2007)]{nilsson07} Nilsson, K., Pasanen, M., Takalo, L. et al.,
743: \newblock 2007, A\&A, submitted
744:
745: \bibitem[Primack et~al.(2005)]{primack}Primack, J. et al.,
746: \newblock {AIP Conf. Proc.}, 2005, 745, 23.
747:
748: %\bibitem[Sbarufatti et al. (2006)]{sba}Sbarufatti, B., Falomo, R.,
749: % Treves, A., Kotilainen, J.
750: \bibitem[Sbarufatti et al. (2006)]{sba}Sbarufatti, B., et al.,
751: \newblock \Journal{\AAA}{457}{35}{2006}
752:
753: %\bibitem[Sowards-Emmerd et al. (2003)]{soward} Sowards-Emmerd, D., Romani, R. W. \& Michelson, P. F.
754: \bibitem[Sowards-Emmerd et al. (2003)]{soward} Sowards-Emmerd, D. et al.,
755: \newblock \Journal{\ApJ}{590}{109}{2003}
756:
757: %\bibitem[Stecker et~al.(1992)]{stecker}Stecker, F.W., De Jager, O.C., Salamon, M.H.,
758: \bibitem[Stecker et~al.(1992)]{stecker}Stecker, F.W. et al.,
759: \newblock \Journal{\ApJ}{390}{L49}{1992}.
760:
761: \bibitem[Stecker et~al.(2006)]{steckerNEW}Stecker, F.W., Malkan, M.A., \& Scully , S.T.,
762: \newblock \Journal{\ApJ}{648}{774}{2006}.
763:
764: \bibitem[Tavecchio et al.(1998)]{tavecchio98} Tavecchio, F., Maraschi, L. \& Ghisellini, G.
765: \newblock \Journal{\ApJ}{509}{608}{1998}
766:
767: \bibitem[Tavecchio et al.(2001)]{tavecchio01} Tavecchio, F., Maraschi, L., Pian, E. et al.
768: \newblock \Journal{\ApJ}{554}{725}{2001}
769:
770: %\bibitem[Wisniewski et al.(1985)]{wisniewski} Wisniewski, W. Z., Sitko, M. L. \& Sitko, A. K.
771: \bibitem[Wisniewski et al.(1985)]{wisniewski} Wisniewski, W. Z., et al.,
772: \newblock \Journal{\MNRAS}{219}{299}{1986}
773:
774: \end{thebibliography}
775:
776: \end{document}
777:
778: