1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

2: 

3: \usepackage{natbib}

4: \newcommand{\lsim}{\

5: \raise-2.truept\hbox{\rlap{\hbox{$\sim$}}\raise5.truept\hbox{$<$}\ }}

6: \newcommand{\gsim}{\

7: \raise-2.truept\hbox{\rlap{\hbox{$\sim$}}\raise5.truept\hbox{$>$}\ }}

8: 

9: 

10: \shorttitle{SBF for distances and stellar populations studies}

11: \shortauthors{Cantiello et al.}

12: 

13: 

14: \begin{document}

15: 

16: 

17: \title{Surface Brightness Fluctuations from archival ACS images: 

18: a stellar population and distance study\altaffilmark{1}}

19: 

20: 

21: \author{Cantiello, Michele\altaffilmark{2,3}}

22: \author{Blakeslee, John P.\altaffilmark{2}}

23: \author{Raimondo, Gabriella\altaffilmark{3}}

24: \author{Brocato, Enzo\altaffilmark{3}}

25: \author{Capaccioli, Massimo\altaffilmark{4,5}}

26: 

27: 

28: \altaffiltext{1}{Based on observations made with the NASA/ESA Hubble

29: Space Telescope, obtained from the Data Archive at the Space

30: Telescope Science Institute, which is operated by the Association of

31: Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under NASA contract NAS

32: 5-26555. These observations are associated with program \#10642.}

33: \altaffiltext{2}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, Washington State University,

34: Pullman, WA 99164;  email: jblakes@wsu.edu}

35: \altaffiltext{3}{INAF--Osservatorio Astronomico di

36: Teramo, Via M. Maggini, I-64100 Teramo, Italy; email: brocato, cantiello, raimondo@oa-teramo.inaf.it}

37: \altaffiltext{4}{Dipartimento di Scienze Fisiche, Universit\`a Federico II di

38: Napoli, Complesso Monte S. Angelo, via Cintia, 80126, Napoli, Italy}

39: \altaffiltext{5}{INAF--Osservatorio Astronomico di Capodimonte, via

40: Moiariello 16, 80131 Napoli, Italy; email: mc@na.infn.it }

41: 

42: 

43: \begin{abstract}

44: We derive Surface Brightness Fluctuations (SBF) and integrated

45: magnitudes in the V- and I-bands using Advanced Camera for Surveys

46: (ACS) archival data. The sample includes 14 galaxies covering a wide

47: range of physical properties: morphology, total absolute magnitude,

48: integrated color. We take advantage of the latter characteristic of

49: the sample to check existing empirical calibrations of absolute SBF

50: magnitudes both in the I- and V-passbands. Additionally, by

51: comparing our SBF and color data with the Teramo-SPoT simple stellar

52: population models, and other recent sets of population synthesis

53: models, we discuss the feasibility of stellar population studies

54: based on fluctuation magnitudes analysis. The main result of this

55: study is that multiband optical SBF data and integrated colors can be

56: used to significantly constrain the chemical composition of the

57: dominant stellar system in the galaxy, but not the age in the case of

58: systems older than 3 Gyr.

59: 

60: SBF color gradients are also detected and analyzed. These SBF gradient

61: data, together with other available data, point to the existence of

62: mass dependent metallicity gradients in galaxies, with the more

63: massive objects showing a non--negligible SBF versus color

64: gradient. The comparison with models suggests that such gradients

65: imply more metal rich stellar populations in the galaxies' inner

66: regions with respect to the outer ones.

67: \end{abstract}

68: 

69: 

70: \keywords{galaxies: distances and redshift --- galaxies: stellar content ---

71: galaxies: evolution}

72: 

73: 

74: \section{Introduction}

75: 

76: The direct investigation of the evolutionary properties of the stars

77: in a galaxy relies on the availability of individual stellar

78: spectro--photometric data. However, detailed resolved star information

79: is achievable only for a few nearby galaxies, thus the present

80: understanding of stellar populations properties in external galaxies

81: is basically founded on unresolved star studies, i.e., integrated

82: starlight information \citep[e.g.][]{trager06}. Therefore, much effort

83: has been made to establish new, more powerful instruments, and

84: observational techniques to restore the information lost in the light

85: integration.

86: 

87: In the last few years the Surface Brightness Fluctuations (SBF) method

88: has proved to be a powerful technique for both determining the

89: distance and to probe the stellar populations in extragalactic

90: systems.

91: 

92: The theoretical basis of the SBF technique is described in

93: \citet{ts88}, and \citet{tal90}. The fluctuations in the surface

94: brightness are due to the Poissonian distribution of unresolved stars

95: in a galaxy. By definition the SBF is the variance of these

96: fluctuations, normalized to the local mean flux of the galaxy (after

97: subtracting a smooth galaxy model). As a consequence of its definition,

98: the SBF amplitude corresponds to the ratio of the second to the first

99: moment of the stellar luminosity function. Hence, coupling SBF

100: magnitudes and colors, with classical integrated magnitudes and colors

101: gives at the same time informations on the first two moments of the

102: stellar luminosity function in a galaxy.  Specifically, in consequence

103: of their definitions, the first moment of the stellar luminosity

104: function (surface brightness, color) carries information on the most

105: populated stellar phases, i.e. the Main Sequence, while the SBF is

106: weighted towards the brightest component of the system, namely Red

107: Giant Branch, and Asymptotic Giant Branch (RGB, and AGB respectively)

108: stars.

109: 

110: Taking advantage of these properties, unresolved stellar populations

111: studies have been presented by several authors using SBF to integrated

112: magnitudes comparisons. Such analysis is based on the comparison of

113: data with populations synthesis models. Besides the first attempts to

114: model the SBF signal using numerical techniques \citep{tal90,

115: buzzoni93,worthey93a}, more models have been provided by several

116: groups \citep[][to quote only the most recent

117: ones]{mouhcine05,raimondo05,marin06} covering a wide range of ages,

118: chemical compositions, and photometric systems.

119: 

120: The first targets for SBF studies were normal elliptical galaxies, as

121: they were thought to represent a fairly uniform morphological class.

122: Nevertheless, the SBF method has been subsequently extended to a

123: wealth of other sources: bulges of spirals \citep{tonry97}, dwarf

124: galaxies \citep[][and references therein]{rekola05}, giant

125: ellipticals, galactic and Magellanic Clouds stellar clusters

126: \citep{at94,gonzalez04,raimondo05}.

127: 

128: The increase of the family of objects with SBF measurements,

129: accompanied by the fact that ellipticals are not a homogeneous class

130: in terms of stellar populations properties, had two main effects.

131: First, concerning distance studies, a few authors engaged in large

132: campaigns with the purpose of calibrating the absolute SBF magnitude

133: against physical properties of galaxies, e.g. the $(V-I)_0$ color, so

134: that reliable distance estimations can be derived for galaxies with

135: substantial physical differences \citep{tonry01,mieske06,mei07vii}.

136: 

137: Second, since different classes of objects are on average expected to

138: host different stellar systems, several groups faced the problem

139: of revealing/analyzing the physical and chemical attributes of

140: unresolved stellar populations using the SBF technique. Typically, the

141: comparison of data with models has been adopted to investigate the

142: properties of unresolved old stellar systems, by using either SBF

143: absolute magnitudes, SBF colors, or even SBF gradients

144: \citep[][]{cantiello03,jensen03,cantiello05}; also resolved stellar

145: systems  have been analyzed using SBF data \citep[][R05

146: hereafter]{gonzalez04,raimondo05}.

147: 

148: Taking advantage of the encouraging results offered by the SBF

149: technique for both distance and stellar populations studies, in this

150: paper we carry out a multi--color SBF analysis using the rich archive

151: of HST/ACS data. 

152: 

153: The large format, high resolution, sharp Point Spread Function (PSF),

154: good sampling, and public access to ACS \citep{ford98,sirianni05}

155: images obtained for other science goals, make this camera ideal for

156: SBF archival research studies. As demonstrated by \citet{mei05iv} and

157: \citet[][C05 hereafter]{cantiello05}, the significant geometric

158: distortion that affects the ACS images does not represent a major

159: problem in the measurement of SBF magnitudes -- see the quoted papers

160: for more details.

161: 

162: We present multi--color SBF and integrated magnitudes measurements for

163: a sample of galaxies imaged with the ACS. The list of objects included

164: in our sample covers a wide range of galaxy properties. We take

165: advantage of this to examine the accuracy of existing SBF absolute

166: magnitude calibrations. In addition, using recent populations

167: synthesis models, we discuss the properties of the dominant stellar

168: populations in the galaxies.

169: 

170: The paper is organized as follows: Section~2 describes the selected

171: sample of galaxies, together with the selection criteria. The

172: procedures to derive surface photometry, isophotal analysis, sources

173: maps and photometry, and SBF magnitudes are presented in Section~3.

174: In Section~4 the results of our measurements are analyzed. We discuss

175: separately the two aspects of SBF as distance indicator, and the SBF

176: as a stellar population tracer. A summary of the work is given in

177: Section~5.

178: 

179: \section{Observational data}

180: 

181: We have undertaken an analysis of Archival HST data as part of program

182: AR-10642. We obtained from the HST archive the images of galaxies for

183: which ACS/Wide Field Camera V (either F555W, or F606W), and I (F814W)

184: passband data were available. Among these objects we finally selected

185: the galaxies with exposure times, and surface brightness profiles

186: properties sufficient to allow SBF measurements with sufficient signal

187: to noise (S/N$\gsim$7, \citet{blake99}).

188: 

189: The data have been downloaded from the HST archive.  The image

190: processing, including cosmic--ray rejection, alignment, and final

191: image combination, is performed with the APSIS ACS data reduction

192: software \citep{blake03}. The drizzling kernel adopted is the Lancosz3

193: as suggested by \citet{mei05iv} and C05.

194: 

195: Table \ref{tab_dati} provides the final catalog of galaxies, together

196: with some useful quantities, and the image exposure times. The table

197: columns are (1) galaxy name; (2-3) right ascension and declinations

198: from NED\footnote{http://nedwww.ipac.caltech.edu} (J2000); (4) the

199: flow-corrected recession velocity based on the local velocity field

200: model by \citet{mould00} (km s$^{-1}$, from NED); (5) morphological T

201: type from Leda\footnote{http://leda.univ-lyon1.fr}; (6) Mg$_2$ index

202: from Leda; (7) velocity dispersion $\sigma$, from Leda; (8) H$_{\beta}$

203: from the compilation of \citet{jensen03}; (9) total apparent B

204: magnitude from Leda; (10) B-band extinction; (11)

205: group distance modulus; (12) bibliographic reference for the distance

206: modulus; (13) total exposure time in the I-band; (14) total exposure

207: time for the V-band image.

208: 

209: The distance moduli in the table are derived from the weighted average

210: distances of galaxies lying in the same group. The distance are

211: estimated using several different distance indicators (no SBF

212: distances are used). For NGC\,474 no group distance is available so we

213: adopt the single distance.

214: 

215: Data are corrected for galactic extinction using the \citet{sfd98}

216: extinction maps. The extinction ratios, as well as the

217: transformations from the ACS photometric system to the standard BVRI

218: filters, follow the \citet{sirianni05} prescriptions.

219: 

220: In the forthcoming sections we will always consider the standardized

221: SBF and integrated magnitudes, instead of the ACS ones. In our

222: previous works -- C05 and \citet{cantiello07} -- we have discussed the

223: reliability of the \citet{sirianni05} equations for the (F435W, F606W,

224: F814W)--to--(B, V, I) transformations. Here we mention that for the

225: sample of galaxies with available (V-I)$_0$ color, the average

226: difference between our standardized colors and those from literature

227: is $\Delta (V-I)_{0,~this~work-literature}=0.00 \pm 0.03$ -- this

228: quantity refers to the average difference between this work colors and

229: the values from \citet[][T01 hereafter]{tonry01} for the galaxies

230: NGC\,1316, NGC\,1344, NGC\,3610 and NGC\,3923 derived in the same

231: galaxy regions.

232: 

233: \section{Photometric, Isophotal and SBF analysis}

234: The SBF data analysis is done following the  procedure

235: described in C05 and \citet{cantiello07}. For the present analysis, we

236: used the same techniques and the same software developed in our

237: previous works.  In the following sections we give a brief summary of

238: the procedure. A detailed description can be found in the quoted

239: papers and references therein.

240: 

241: 

242: \subsection{Galaxy modeling}

243: We adopted an iterative process to determine (1) the sky value, (2)

244: the best fit of the galaxy, and (3) the mask of the sources in the

245: frames.

246: 

247: A provisional sky value is obtained as the median pixel value in the

248: CCD corner with the lowest number of counts. This value is subtracted

249: from the original image and all the obvious sources whose presence

250: could badly affect the process of galaxy modeling (bright stars,

251: extended galaxies, dusty regions) are masked out. The gap region

252: between the two ACS detectors and other detector artifacts are masked

253: too.

254: 

255: Then, we fit the galaxy isophotes using the IRAF/STSDAS task ELLIPSE,

256: which is based on the method described by \citet{jedrzejewski87}.

257: Once the preliminary galaxy model is subtracted from the

258: sky--subtracted frame, a wealth of faint sources appears. In the

259: following we refer to all these sources -- mainly globular clusters

260: (GC), and background galaxies -- as ``external sources''.  A mask of

261: the external sources is derived from the frame of external

262: sources obtained with SExtractor (OBJECTS frame), the mask is obtained by convolving

263: the external sources frame with a gaussian kernel having the same

264: FWHM of the PSF. The new mask is then fed to ELLIPSE to refit the

265: galaxy's isophotes.

266: 

267: After the geometric profile of the isophotes has been determined, we

268: measure the surface brightness profile of the galaxy in regions matching the

269: ellipticity and position angle of the isophotes. Then, to improve the

270: estimation of the sky, we fit the surface brightness profiles with a

271: de Vaucouleurs $r^{1/4}$ profile plus the constant sky offset

272: \footnote{It is worth emphasizing here that, as in C05, we have performed some

273: experiments to test the robustness of the procedure of sky estimation.

274: In particular, we have studied how the assumption of a de Vaucouleurs

275: $r^{1/4}$ profile instead of a more general Sersic $r^{1/n}$ profile

276: affects our results. As a result we have found that adopting a Sersic

277: profile does not alter substantially the integrated color and SBF

278: values as these quantities agree within uncertainty with the ones

279: derived using the $r^{1/4}$ profile approximation.}.

280: 

281: The new sky value is then adopted and the whole procedure of galaxy

282: fitting, source masking, and surface brightness profile analysis is

283: repeated, until convergence. Usually, for the less luminous galaxies

284: of our sample, the sky value obtained from the outer corner is a good

285: estimation of the final sky value. In those cases were the ACS field

286: of view is completely filled with the galaxy, the final sky counts are

287: on average $\sim$10\% smaller than the first estimation -- for the six

288: galaxies in common with \citet{sikkema06} our sky values agree with

289: their values within the uncertainties, we have on average

290: $(sky_{this~work}-sky_{Sikkema}) / sky_{this~work} \sim 0.03 \pm

291: 0.06$.

292: 

293: 

294: After sky and galaxy model have been subtracted, some large--scale

295: deviations are present in the frame. We remove these deviations using

296: the background map (BACK\_SIZE parameter set to 25) obtained running

297: SExtractor \citep{bertin96} on the sky+galaxy subtracted frame. We

298: will refer to this sky+galaxy+large--scale residuals subtracted frame

299: as ``residual frame''. ACS images of the 14 selected galaxies are

300: shown in Figure \ref{fig1}, together with the residual frames.

301: 

302: We must emphasize that we succeeded in modeling the galaxy light with

303: elliptical isophotes for all the selected galaxies, including the

304: objects classified as irregular galaxies (Table \ref{tab_dati}) and

305: for the galaxies which show prominent shells. This was possible

306: since $a$) the shells are prominent with respect to the smooth galaxy

307: profile only in more external regions respect to the ones we

308: considered for SBF and color measurements (Figure \ref{fig1}); $b$)

309: the iterative modeling procedure provides a good model of the galaxy

310: profile; $c$) the large scale residuals subtraction removes most of the

311: large-scale (shell) features left behind by the modeling.

312: 

313: \subsection{Sources Photometry}

314: 

315: The next step in our procedure is to evaluate the photometric

316: properties of point--like and extended external sources left in the

317: image. The construction of the photometric catalog is critical for SBF

318: measurement, as the estimation of the luminosity function of external

319: sources is fundamental to properly evaluate the extra fluctuations due

320: to the undetected sources present in the frame \citep{tal90}.

321: 

322: The photometry of the sources is obtained independently on the I- and

323: V-band frames using SExtractor, the output catalogs are then matched

324: using a 0.1$''$ radius. Aperture corrections and extinction

325: corrections are applied before transforming the ACS magnitudes into

326: the standard I and V (C05).

327: 

328: The fit of the luminosity function is obtained assuming a gaussian

329: Luminosity Function for the GC component \citep[GCLF,][]{harris91}:

330: \begin{equation}

331: n_{GC}(m) =\frac{N_{0,GC}} {\sqrt{2 \pi \sigma^2}}~~e^{- \frac {(m -

332: m_{X,GC})^2}{2 \sigma ^2}},

333: \end{equation}

334: %

335: plus a power-law luminosity function \citep{tyson88} for the background

336: galaxies:

337: \begin{equation}

338: n_{gxy}(m) =N_{0,gxy} 10 ^ {\gamma m},

339: \end{equation}

340: where $N_{0,GC}$ \citep[$N_{0,gxy}$,][]{blake95} is the globular

341: cluster (galaxy) surface density, and $m_{X,GC}$ is the X-band

342: turnover magnitude of the GCLF at the galaxy distance. In expression

343: (2) we used the $\gamma$ values obtained by \citet{benitez04}. For the

344: GCLF we assumed the turnover magnitude and the width of the gaussian

345: function from \citet{harris01}, i.e -7.4 mag, -8.5 mag for the V-

346: and I-band turnover magnitudes respectively, and dispersion

347: $\sigma=1.4$ mag (see also \S 3.3). To fit the total LF we used the

348: software developed for the SBF distance survey (T01) and optimized for

349: our purposes; we refer the reader to C05 and references therein for a

350: detailed description of the procedure. Briefly: a distance modulus

351: ($\mu_{0}$) for the galaxy is adopted in order to derive a first

352: estimation of $m_{X,GC}=\mu_0+M_{X,GC}$, then an iterative fitting

353: process is started with the number density of galaxies and GC, and the

354: galaxy distance allowed to vary until the best values of $N_{0,GC}$,

355: $N_{0,gxy}$ and $m_{X,GC}$ are found via a maximum likelihood method.

356: 

357: The whole procedure of luminosity function fitting is not applied to

358: DDO\,71, KDG\,61, KDG\,64, and VCC\,941. For these objects the

359: few candidate globular clusters (if present) appear resolved in the

360: ACS images, and are masked out. Similarly, the images of these

361: galaxies allow us to recognize and mask out most of the brighter

362: background galaxies (e.g. all sources brighter than 25th

363: magnitude in the I-band), so that the contribution of the faint

364: background galaxies is very small compared to the stellar fluctuations

365: ($P_r / (P_0 - P_r) \equiv P_r /P_f$ $<$ 0.001, see Table

366: \ref{tab_measures} and next paragraph). As a consequence no

367: extra--fluctuation correction has been applied to these galaxies.

368: 

369: \subsection{SBF measurements}

370: 

371: The pixel--to--pixel variance in the residual image has several

372: contributors: ($i$) the poissonian fluctuation of the stellar counts

373: (the signal we are interested in), ($ii$) the galaxy's GC system, ($iii$)

374: the background galaxies, and ($iv$) the photon and read out noise.

375: 

376: To analyze all such fluctuations left in the residual frame, it is

377: useful to study the image power spectrum as all the sources of

378: fluctuation are convolved with the instrumental PSF, except for the

379: noise. We performed the Fourier analysis of the data with the

380: IRAF/STSDAS task FOURIER.

381: 

382: In the Fourier domain the photon and read out noise are characterized

383: by a white power spectrum, thus their contribution to the fluctuations

384: can be easily recognized as the constant level at high wave numbers in

385: the image power spectrum.  On the other hand, since the stellar,

386: globular clusters, and background galaxy fluctuation signals are all

387: convolved with the PSF in the spatial domain, they multiply the PSF

388: power spectrum in the Fourier domain. Thus, the total fluctuation

389: amplitude can be determined as the factor to be multiplied to the PSF

390: power spectrum to match the power spectrum of the residual frame.

391: 

392: The residual frame, divided by the square root of the galaxy model

393: \citep{tal90}, is fourier transformed and azimuthally averaged. The

394: azimuthal average $P(k)$ is used to evaluate the constants $P_0$, and

395: $P_1$ by fitting the expression:

396: 

397: \noindent

398: \begin{equation}

399: P(k)= P_0 \cdot E (k) + P_1 \,,

400: \end{equation}

401: \noindent

402: where $P_1$ is the constant white noise contribution, $P_0$ is the PSF

403: multiplicative factor that we are looking for, and $E(k)$ is the

404: azimuthal average of the PSF power spectrum convolved with the mask

405: power spectrum \citep{tal90}. Since neither contemporary

406: observations of isolated stars, nor good PSF candidates were available

407: in our frames, we used the template PSFs from the ACS IDT, constructed

408: from bright standard star observations.

409: 

410: As mentioned in the previous section, the fluctuation amplitude $P_0$

411: estimated so far includes stellar fluctuation and the contribution of

412: unmasked external sources.  To reduce the effect of this spurious

413: signal, all the sources above a defined signal to noise level

414: (typically we adopted a $S/N \sim3.5$) have been masked out before

415: evaluating the residual image power spectrum. Thus, at each radius

416: from the galaxy center, a well defined faint cutoff magnitude

417: ($m_{lim}$) fixes the magnitude of the faintest objects masked in that

418: region.  Such masking operation greatly reduces the contribution to

419: $P_0$ due to the external sources, but the undetected faint and the

420: unmasked low S/N objects could still affect $P_0$, thus their

421: contribution -- the residual variance $P_r$ -- must be properly

422: estimated and subtracted. The residual variance is computed evaluating

423: the integral of the second moment of the luminosity function in the

424: flux interval $[0,~f_{lim}]$:

425: 

426: \noindent

427: \begin{equation}

428: \sigma_r^2 = \int_0^{f_{lim}} N_{Obj}(f) f^2 df

429: \end{equation}

430: \noindent

431: where $f_{lim}$ is the flux corresponding to $m_{lim}$, and

432: $N_{Obj}(f)$ is the luminosity function previously obtained as the sum

433: of the GCLF and the galaxies power law.  The residual variance $P_r$

434: is then $\sigma_r^2$ normalized by the galaxy surface brightness.

435: %

436: On average, the $P_r$ correction is small for all the galaxies.

437: Thanks to the faint completeness limit of these images, it is

438: typically $\sim$5\% (7\%) of the total fluctuations amplitude $P_0$ in

439: the I (V) band frames, except for the dwarf galaxies for which no

440: $P_r$ correction has been applied.

441: 

442: Finally, the SBF magnitude is obtained as follows:

443: 

444: \begin{equation}

445: \bar{m}_X = -2.5 ~ \log (P_0 - P_r) + m_{zero}^{X,ACS} +

446: 2.5~\log(T) - A_{X}

447: \end{equation}

448: %

449: where X refers to the I or V passband, $m_{zero}^{X,ACS}$ is the

450: zeropoint ACS magnitude reported by S05 (VEGAMAG system), T is the

451: exposure time, and A$_{X}$ is the reddening correction.

452: 

453: Since we are also interested in studying the radial behavior of SBF,

454: the procedure described above is applied to several distinct

455: elliptical annuli for each galaxy; the annuli shape reflects the

456: geometry of the isophotes profile.

457: 

458: Table \ref{tab_measures} reports the final results of our measurements

459: for each annulus and for all galaxies of the sample. Only annuli with

460: SBF S/N$\geq$7 are taken into account

461: \citep{jensen96,mei01,cantiello07}.  The table columns give: (1) the

462: average annular radius in $arcsec$; (2-3) the annulus color and

463: uncertainty; (4-5) $P_0$ and $P_r$ for the V-band images ; (6-7) the

464: V-band SBF magnitude; (8-9) $P_0$ and $P_r$ for the I-band images;

465: (10-11) the I-band SBF magnitude.  For each galaxy also the weighted

466: average ($\langle av. \rangle_w$) color and SBF magnitudes are

467: reported, when possible.

468: 

469: The quoted uncertainties are the statistical errors due to the sky

470: estimations, and the PSF power spectrum fitting. A default $20\%$

471: uncertainty is associated to $P_r$ \citep{tal90,cantiello07}, and

472: included in the final SBF error. To test the robustness of the $P_r$

473: correction versus the sigma fitting parameter adopted for the GCLF, we

474: have performed some tests by changing the sigmas in the range 0.8 to

475: 1.6 \citep{jordan06}, as a result we find that the effect on the

476: final SBF magnitudes is $< 0.1$ mag in all cases. All uncertainties

477: also include the error propagation of the color equations from

478: \citet{sirianni05}.

479: 

480: Additional systematic errors are $\sim$0.03 mag in the PSF

481: normalization, $\sim$0.01 mag error from filter zeropoint, and

482: $\sim$0.01 mag from the flat--fielding -- see C05 for details.

483: 

484: Figure \ref{sbf_vi} shows the V- and I-band SBF apparent magnitudes

485: and the $(\bar{V}-\bar{I})_0$ annular data versus the annulus

486: integrated color. As a first impression we see that, unlike our

487: previous study (C05), no systematic SBF versus color 

488: gradient feature can be recognized.  The presence of a SBF gradient

489: has been estimated by fitting a least squares line to the I-band SBF

490: and (V-I)$_0$ color data\footnote{We have chosen I-band images as

491: reference due to their higher S/N.}, and comparing the slope,

492: $\alpha=\delta \bar{m}_I / \delta (V-I)_0$, with its uncertainty.

493: Since, in all cases the change in color and $\bar{m}_I$ occurs as

494: function of radius, we indicate in Table \ref{tab_measures} as

495: ``SBF-gradient'' those galaxies with slope $\alpha$ at least twice

496: bigger than its estimated uncertainty (i.e. $\alpha / \Delta \alpha

497: \geq 2$), the galaxies which do not fulfill this condition are labeled

498: as ``SBF-flat''.

499: 

500: \section{Discussion}

501: As mentioned before, the link between SBF amplitudes and stellar

502: population properties lies at the base of the determination of the

503: absolute SBF magnitudes for distances studies, via theoretical or

504: empirical calibrations, and of the use of SBF to analyze the

505: properties of the stellar populations in galaxies.

506: 

507: Taking advantage of the characteristics of our set of measurements, in

508: the following sections we try to answer at two different

509: questions. First, what can we infer in terms of stellar populations

510: properties from SBF- and SBF-gradient versus color analysis?  Second, given

511: the number of calibrations available in literature, which one, applied

512: to our measurements, gives the best results, i.e. distance moduli in

513: agreement with the group distances reported in Table \ref{tab_dati}?

514: 

515: 

516: \subsection{Stellar population properties}

517: \subsubsection{Population properties from observational data}

518: 

519: One major difference of the present data from most of the SBF works,

520: is that the new dataset provides a sample of galaxies covering a wide

521: range physical properties (total magnitude, morphological type);

522: as a consequence we expect to find different stellar components to

523: dominate the light emitted by these objects. Figure \ref{single} shows

524: a comparison of some galaxy's physical quantities, from Table

525: \ref{tab_dati}, versus the average integrated color from Table

526: \ref{tab_measures}. As readily apparent, large differences exist

527: between the various objects, in particular the sample spans a range of

528: 10 magnitudes in absolute B-band magnitude M$_{Bt}$.

529: 

530: By inspecting the panels of Figure \ref{single}, we note that the

531: sample can be split in two subsamples: a blue subsample at

532: (V-I)$_{0}\leq 1.0$ mag, and a red subsample at (V-I)$_{0}> 1.0$ mag. The blue

533: galaxies, with an average (V-I)$_{0}\sim 0.92$ mag, are generally 

534: less luminous (M$_{Bt}\sim -13.0 \pm 1.1$) and cover a large range of

535: morphological types. On the contrary, the red galaxies, at average

536: (V-I)$_{0}\sim 1.16$ mag, are brighter (M$_{Bt}\sim -20.5 \pm 1.8$),

537: and morphologically more uniform.

538: 

539: Keeping in mind these points, in this section we take advantage of the

540: SBF and color data reported in Table \ref{tab_measures} to infer

541: information on the physical properties of the dominant stellar system

542: in the galaxies of our sample. We begin our comparisons by considering

543: the average SBF measurements. Hence, only observational

544: quantities are considered. We will introduce the comparison with

545: models, and discuss the caveats of such discussion, later on.

546: 

547: As a first step, we plot the galaxy's physical quantities used in

548: Figure \ref{single} against the SBF absolute magnitudes

549: (Fig. \ref{singlesbf}, panels $a$ and $b$) as derived by assuming the

550: distance modulus quoted in Table \ref{tab_dati}. In the ($b$) panels

551: the C05 data are also included. As a general result the plots disclose

552: that SBF magnitudes show trends which are well consistent with what is

553: found with integrated colors (Fig. \ref{single}). Clearly, the

554: relationships are far from being well established due to the small

555: number of galaxies in the sample. In spite of this, the $\bar{V}$ and

556: $\bar{I}$ $versus$ M$_{Bt}$ panels show a quite defined correlation.

557: 

558: For most of the blue galaxies, no H$_{\beta}$, Mg$_2$, or velocity

559: dispersion $\sigma$ estimation is available from literature. However,

560: taking into account the extrapolations shown by the dashed lines

561: in the panels of Figure \ref{single}, these galaxies are also expected

562: to have smaller Mg$_2$ and velocity dispersion, and higher H$_{\beta}$

563: values with respect to the red counterpart. All these general

564: properties agree with a scenario where the blue objects are low mass

565: galaxies (low M$_{Bt}$ and $\sigma$), with a relatively young/metal

566: poor dominant stellar component (low Mg$_2$, high H$_{\beta}$), while

567: the red objects are expected to be mostly massive galaxies populated

568: by old, metal rich stellar systems -- see for example

569: \citet{gallazzi06} for a discussion based on a large sample of

570: galaxies.

571: 

572: Somewhat more interesting are the correlations shown in the panels

573: ($c$) of Figure \ref{singlesbf}, where we plot the same physical

574: quantities as function of the SBF color. These measurements have the

575: relevant feature of being distance-free. Contrary to the absolute SBF

576: magnitudes, the SBF color shows little or no correlation with the

577: plotted physical quantities. For example, the lower-left panel shows

578: that $(\bar{V}-\bar{I})_0$ SBF color does not have a strong

579: correlation with M$_{Bt}$ absolute magnitude. This is expected on

580: theoretical basis \citep[e.g.][\S 5.3]{cantiello03}, however this

581: is the first time that such behavior is explicitly shown.

582: 

583: A further insight of these results is obtained when the presence or

584: the absence of a radial SBF gradient is taken into account. The

585: galaxies listed in Table \ref{tab_measures} have been accordingly

586: divided in two classes: $i)$ ``SBF-gradient'' galaxies are the ones

587: showing a radial SBF gradient and $ii)$ ``SBF-flat'' galaxies

588: which show nearly constant SBF magnitudes (within the uncertainties)

589: over the explored annuli. The class $i)$/$ii$) is shown with

590: full/empty squares in all the panels of Fig. \ref{singlesbf}. The SBF

591: galaxies studied in C05 are also plotted in panels ($b$), with empty

592: circles, to enlarge the present sample with 6 giant ellipticals, and a

593: dwarf galaxy. All the galaxies of the C05 sample have a significant

594: I-band SBF versus color gradient, with the only exception of the local

595: dwarf NGC\,404 (shown with an arrow in panels $b$).

596: 

597: Inspecting Figure \ref{singlesbf}, we find that the SBF-gradient

598: galaxies tend to have fainter SBF magnitudes than SBF-flat galaxies,

599: with VCC\,941 being the only obvious exception to such behavior. More

600: specifically, the average SBF absolute magnitudes are $\langle \bar{V}

601: \rangle = -0.3 \pm 0.1$, and $\langle \bar{I} \rangle = -2.1\pm0.1$

602: for the SBF-flat objects, while they are $\langle \bar{V} \rangle = 0.7

603: \pm 0.2$, and $\langle \bar{I} \rangle = -1.5\pm0.3$ for the

604: SBF-gradient galaxies if the VCC\,941 data are excluded.  If also the

605: absolute SBF magnitudes for this latter galaxy are taken into account,

606: the differences between the SBF-flat and SBF-gradient galaxies are

607: less evident but still recognizable, as we have $\langle \bar{V}

608: \rangle= 0.6 \pm 0.5$ and $\langle \bar{I} \rangle =-1.5\pm0.3$.

609: 

610: Since the presence or absence of a SBF gradient is related to the

611: properties of the dominant stellar population, this feature could

612: represent a relevant tracer of galaxy formation. As an example, as

613: discussed in C05 (\S 4.2.1), the monolithic and hierarchical galaxy

614: formation scenarios make opposite predictions on the radial behavior

615: of the stellar population properties in a galaxy. In particular, in

616: the hierarchical scenario of galaxy formation the radial differences

617: of stellar population properties will flattens as galaxies undergo

618: mergers. On the contrary, substantial radial gradients are expected if

619: the galaxy formed following a pure monolithic collapse path

620: \citep[e.g.]{white80,bekki01}. 

621: 

622: In conclusion, the analysis of the SBF radial gradients in galaxies

623: might represent an interesting and innovative tool, to be used in

624: parallel with other techniques, to study the history of galaxy

625: assembly. SBF radial gradients are an observable physical quantity

626: that can be analyzed and compared between galaxies, independent of the

627: many model uncertainties.  However, in order to constrain galaxy

628: formation models using observed gradients, it is necessary to use

629: models to go from observational quantities to physical properties. As

630: will be shown in the next sections, currently the last step is very

631: uncertain in some metallicity regimes. In this respect, new

632: measurements are also necessary to enlarge the sample and to

633: strengthen the use of SBF gradients as a tool to analyze galaxy

634: formation.

635: 

636: As an additional way to examine such stellar population properties,

637: SBF and color data can be compared to population synthesis models. In

638: the following section we discuss the stellar population properties in

639: our sample of galaxies by comparing data with model predictions.

640: 

641: 

642: \subsubsection{Comparison with models and bias in the color transformations}

643: 

644: In this section we derive and discuss the properties of the

645: dominant stellar system in our sample of galaxies by comparing

646: observations of SBF and integrated color data with SSP model

647: predictions. At first we adopt the

648: Teramo-SPoT\footnote{http://www.oa-teramo.inaf.it/SPoT} models from

649: R05 as the reference ones. We adopt these models as reference since

650: they have proved to reproduce fairly well the Color--Magnitude

651: Diagrams, integrated magnitudes and colors, and the SBF amplitudes

652: both for star clusters (Galactic and Magellanic Clouds, MC, clusters),

653: and for galaxies in the optical and near--IR passbands

654: \citep[][R05]{brocato00,cantiello03}. We will also consider other sets

655: of models later on in this section.

656: 

657: In Figure \ref{single_sbf} we show the comparison of the average

658: ($\bar{V}-\bar{I}$)$_0$ color and the absolute V- and I-band SBF

659: magnitudes versus the galaxy color. The R05 models are shown for ages

660: 3$\leq$ t (Gyr) $\leq$ 14, and metallicity 0.0003 $\leq Z \leq$ 0.04.

661: In the Figure, models of equal metallicity are connected by dashed

662: lines.

663: 

664: Taking into account the upper two panels in this Figure, a good match

665: between models predictions and observational data is found, that

666: is, the observational data generally overlap the grid of models, with

667: the only exceptions of NGC\,2865 and NGC\,7626.

668: 

669: Even if the absolute magnitudes contain as additional uncertainty the

670: distance modulus adopted, the relevant result in these panels is the

671: good overlap between models and data, obtained for a wide range of

672: observed galaxy colors, i.e. from 0.85$\lsim (V-I)_{0} \lsim$ 1.30. In

673: this range, the observed $\bar{M}_I$ and $\bar{M}_V$ magnitudes

674: decrease by moving from blue to red integrated colors. According to

675: the R05 models shown in the figure, this means that the light emitted

676: by blue-faint galaxies is dominated by metal poor stellar populations

677: while red-bright galaxies are mostly populated by very metal rich

678: stars.

679: 

680: SBF color data can be used to derive the two color SBF versus

681: integrated diagram, which are independent of the distance modulus. By

682: inspecting the lower panel in Figure \ref{single_sbf} we find, as

683: expected, that the observed SBF and integrated colors cover a large

684: range of chemical compositions.  In this panel, it can be recognized

685: that the blue subpopulation, with an average $(\bar{V}-\bar{I})_0\sim

686: 1.7 \pm 0.2$ lies in the area of models with Z$\lsim$0.001, possibly

687: higher than 0.0001. The red subpopulation, at $(\bar{V}-\bar{I})_0\sim

688: 2.2 \pm 0.2$, seems more likely to be dominated by a

689: Z$\gsim$Z$_{\sun}$ stellar population. Moreover, while redder

690: galaxies, at (V-I)$_{0} > 1.2$, are mostly located near the edge of

691: old SSP models, the blue galaxies are spread over the whole age

692: interval.

693: 

694: The drawback with the $(\bar{V}-\bar{I})_0$ color is that the models

695: in the high metallicity regime are not well separated, leading to a

696: highly uncertain data to models comparison.  Note that such behavior

697: is predicted by all recent SBF models, as will be shown in the

698: following. In order to obtain more information from our SBF data, in

699: what follows we will consider the single annulus SBF and color

700: measurements for each galaxy, instead of the average values. This is

701: done in Figure \ref{spot} where we compare the annular absolute SBF

702: magnitudes and colors with R05 models. Again, the good matching of

703: models with data in the $\bar{M}$ versus (V-I)$_{0}$ planes is

704: encouraging, but we rather prefer to use the distance free SBF-color

705: versus color data and models comparison to infer the properties of the

706: stellar systems in the galaxy. Based on the content of the right panel

707: in Figure \ref{spot}, for each galaxy of our list we have obtained the

708: age and chemical composition reported in Table \ref{tab_ssp} (see also

709: the appendix for some more comments on individual galaxies).

710: 

711: First, we note that NGC\,2865, and NGC\,7626 data are noticeably far

712: from the grid of models. In general, it can be argued that our

713: measurements might suffer of the bias due to the ACS-to-standard

714: magnitudes transformations\footnote{It is worth noting that, by

715: inspecting the GC systems in NGC\,2865 and NGC\,7625,

716: \citet{sikkema06} have found that these galaxies show anomalous GC

717: $(V-I)_0$ color histograms.}. In fact, the observed SBF color range is

718: redder than the range used by \citet{sirianni05} to derive their

719: transformation equations. Furthermore, this bias could be stronger for

720: the measurements obtained from F606W images due to the uncertainty of

721: the F606W-to-V transformation -- e.g. Figure 21 from

722: \citet{sirianni05} shows that there is a non negligible difference

723: between the F606W-to-V synthetic and empirical transformations. As a

724: consequence, the V-band SBF data derived from F606W might be more

725: uncertain than others.

726: 

727: Although the presence of some bias in our data cannot be ruled out,

728: possible systematics can be highlighted by comparing these

729: measurements with those available in literature, derived in standard V

730: and I filters from ground based observations.

731: 

732: \citet{bva01} obtained $(\bar{V}-\bar{I})_0= 2.38 \pm 0.11$, for a

733: sample of galaxies in the Fornax cluster with M$_{Bt}\leq -20.3$

734: mag. For the galaxies presented in this work we find that the SBF

735: color for objects with M$_{Bt}\leq - 20.3$ mag is

736: $(\bar{V}-\bar{I})_0= 2.16 \pm 0.23$, but it becomes $2.29 \pm 0.08$

737: when NGC\,2865, and NGC\,7626 are excluded. If the latter number is

738: taken into account, we can consider our measurements and the ones from

739: \citeauthor{bva01} in good agreement. In addition, by comparing our

740: measurements for NGC\,1316 and NGC\,1344 with those from

741: \citeauthor{bva01} and T01, we find a good agreement for NGC\,1316,

742: while for NGC\,1344, that is one of the F606W-to-V SBF measurements,

743: the measurements still agree with each other, but to a lower degree.

744: 

745: The whole sample of objects with contemporary V and I SBF measurements

746: from the literature is shown in Figure \ref{mg2sig}, together with our

747: measurements. In this figure, the $(\bar{V}-\bar{I})_0$ data are

748: compared with the Mg$_2$ index and the central velocity dispersion

749: (both data from Leda). The GC data shown in the figure come from

750: \citet{at94}, and R05, the galaxies data are from

751: \citet{bva01}, \citet{tal90}, \citet{tonry90}, and this work. As

752: mentioned above, by inspecting this Figure we find that, if NGC\,2865,

753: and NGC\,7626 are excluded, the data presented in this work do not

754: show any peculiar behavior with respect to other (galaxies) data.

755: 

756: Moreover, comparing the left panel of Figure \ref{mg2sig} with the

757: Figures 14 and 15 from \citet{at94}, we find that the only ``unusual''

758: galaxy is NGC\,2865. More in detail, as discussed by \citet{at94},

759: there is a continuous trend in $(\bar{V}-\bar{I})_0$ versus Mg$_2$

760: from GC up to bright galaxies, but there seems to be a wide spread

761: when Mg$_2$ reaches $\gsim 0.3$. \citet{at94} argued that this could

762: be due to the behavior of the giant branch with metallicity, as the

763: ``Mg$_2$ saturates before demonstrating the entire behavior of

764: $(\bar{V}-\bar{I})_0$''. In particular, the different saturation

765: limits of the blanketing with the metallicity in the V and I bands,

766: might cause the $\bar{V}$ to reach a saturation minimum brightness,

767: while the $\bar{I}$ still gets fainter at increasing metallicity. The

768: location of NGC\,7626 (and NGC\,4365, from the \citet{tal90} sample)

769: in the panels of Figure \ref{mg2sig} seems to confirm such behavior.

770: 

771: In other words, although our measurements could be affected at some

772: degree by the presence of a bias due to the ACS to standard magnitudes

773: transformations, the comparison of the present data with the data from

774: literature seems to exclude the presence of an overall bias

775: effect. Moreover, the unusual blue SBF color for NGC\,7626 could be

776: related to a differential metallicity saturation effect already

777: discussed by \citet{at94}. On the other hand, the behavior of

778: NGC\,2865 still appears peculiar with respect to the whole set of data

779: shown in Figure \ref{mg2sig}, possibly related to a bias in the data

780: (e.g. transformations), or to intrinsic properties of this galaxy (e.g.

781: dust, young stellar systems), or both\footnote{As a matter of fact

782: NGC\,2865 shows its peculiar behavior also when other, non-SBF, physical

783: properties are taken into account (Fig. \ref{single}).}.

784: 

785: A second consideration is that, using the R05 models, the model

786: predictions are generally confined to a narrow range of chemical

787: compositions for each galaxy, while the age limits are defined only in

788: few cases (e.g. VCC\,941). In the appendix, for each galaxy of

789: our list we quote the stellar properties derived using other

790: indicators; however, to further check the general age and metallicity

791: values obtained, here we compare our estimations with other

792: age/metallicity sensitive properties.

793: 

794: Concerning the chemical compositions, in Figure \ref{mgmbfeh} the

795: upper and lower bounds of the metallicity estimations drawn from the

796: models comparison are plotted against the metallicity sensitive index

797: $Mg_2$ (panel $a$), and with the total absolute magnitude M$_{Bt}$ of

798: the galaxy (panel $b$). From these panels we can recognize the

799: correlation of the Mg$_2$ index with metallicity, and the

800: metallicity-luminosity relation.  More specifically, it is confirmed

801: that the light from the blue sample of galaxies is dominated by a more

802: metal poor stellar component with respect to the red subsample.

803: 

804: We have additionally compared our age estimations with the age

805: sensitive index $H_{\beta}$. In this case, no significant

806: correlation emerges. However, it is worth noting that the $H_{\beta}$

807: measurements are confined to very small radii.

808: 

809: These findings should be considered as encouraging results in the

810: sense that they confirm the use of SBF magnitudes, color and gradients

811: as a valuable stellar population tracer mostly sensitive to the

812: chemical content of the galaxy.

813: 

814: One final comment, for the R05 models, is that the two-color diagram

815: in Figure \ref{spot} shows that the SBF color of red galaxies is not

816: well reproduced by models, with SBF color predictions systematically

817: $\sim 0.2$ mag redder than the observed ones. Moreover, one could

818: argue that the validity of stellar population properties presented in

819: this section is strictly model dependent. To encompass such evidence,

820: and test the robustness of predictions against models systematics, let

821: us we take into account several other recent SBF models derived from

822: SSP simulations.

823: 

824: In Figure \ref{others} we show the same comparison presented in Figure

825: \ref{spot}, but for the \citet{bva01}, \citet{liu02}, and

826: \citet{marin06} (BVA01, L02, and MA06 respectively hereafter) stellar

827: population models.

828: 

829: As a first comment, we notice that at the high metallicity regime

830: (Z$\gsim$0.01) the SBF magnitudes versus (V-I)$_0$ color behavior is

831: quite similar for all models. This is probably due also to the fact

832: that the topology of the grid of models here can be very complex,

833: leading to high degeneracy. On the other side the slight mismatch for

834: the red galaxies noted with the R05 models is still present in these

835: other sets of models. As suggested by BVA01, this could be due to the

836: use of SSP models, while composite stellar populations would be more

837: appropriate. Additionally, we mention that in most of the red galaxies

838: SBF gradients (i.e. stellar populations gradients) have been

839: found. Moreover, it must be noted the non--negligible differences

840: between the various models in the low-Z regime.

841: 

842: Keeping in mind such limits of SSP models, we have analyzed the

843: location of each galaxy in the SBF-color versus color plane with

844: respect to models in order to derive the stellar population

845: properties, as for the R05 models. The results are reported in

846: Col. 3-5 of Table \ref{tab_ssp} (see also appendix). As can be

847: recognized from the data in the Table, the chemical composition ranges

848: obtained with the different models show a general good overlap. 

849: 

850: On the other hand, we find that the ranges of acceptable ages are

851: quite large, similarly to what obtained with R05 models. Thus, a

852: robust conclusion of this work is that SBF can provide, given the

853: current stage of the models, reliable estimates of the typical

854: metallicities of galaxies, while the age of the dominant stellar

855: system cannot be well constrained with this technique.

856: 

857: The right panel of Figure \ref{mgmbfeh} shows the metallicity versus

858: Mg$_2$ and M$_{Bt}$ comparisons already discussed for the R05 models,

859: except that in this case the average metallicity from the four

860: different models is considered. The [Fe/H]--Mg$_2$ correlation is

861: still present, although the data refer only to the red sample of

862: galaxies. The relationship between [Fe/H] and M$_{Bt}$ is more

863: interesting. In fact, a mean least--squares fit to the data shown in

864: Figure \ref{mgmbfeh} (panel $d$) yields: [Fe/H]$\sim$ (-0.12 $\pm$

865: 0.02) $\times$ M$_{Bt}$ - (2.8 $\pm$ 0.3). The agreement of this

866: equation with similar relations existing in literature

867: \citep[e.g.][]{kobulnicky99,contini02} leads us to conclude that,

868: within the limits of the present treatment, the method proposed

869: provides us with reliable ranges of acceptable metallicities.

870: Therefore, the metallicity properties derived from models can be

871: considered by and large acceptable. Once again, no noteworthy

872: correlation of ages with the H$_{\beta}$ index is recognizable.

873: 

874: Let us now look more in detail to the model predictions for the single

875: galaxies. Doing such comparison, consistent results with different

876: models would imply a significant constraint on the properties of the

877: stellar system observed, on the other hand a lack of agreement between

878: models will possibly highlight uncertainties in the theoretical

879: predictions.

880: 

881: Inspecting single galaxies it can be seen that at high metallicity

882: (Z$\gsim$ 0.01) the differences between model predictions are less

883: severe with respect to the case of Z$\lsim$0.001. More in detail, the L02

884: and R05 models predict that age variations in the low metallicity

885: regime do not affect the SBF color, while integrated colors suffer a

886: noticeable change. On the contrary, BVA01 and MA06 models predict

887: almost constant integrated colors at different ages, and a substantial

888: SBF color variation.

889: 

890: 

891: The differences at low metallicity are possibly originated by a

892: different treatment of the evolutionary properties of the bright, cold

893: stellar component along the RGB and AGB in the various models.  Until

894: such discrepancies are resolved, little can be said about the origins

895: of SBF gradients in this metallicity regime. However, such differences

896: are interesting for the purpose of refining the models for the

897: evolution of RGB and AGB stars. As well known, in fact, the SBF

898: magnitude at these wavelengths is very sensitive to the properties of

899: RGB/AGB stars, which suffer from large uncertainties, e.g. in

900: atmosphere models, mass loss and stellar wind. In the optical regime,

901: at lower metallicities the giant branch is brighter with respect to

902: higher metallicities, thus it has a stronger effect on the luminosity

903: weighted SBF signal. As a consequence, the discrepancies between

904: various models in the treatment of the bright RGB/AGB phases appear

905: more clearly in the SBF models at the low Z regime.  Adopting this

906: view, the disagreement between models can be solved by refining the

907: modeling of the evolutionary properties of giant branch stars. Or,

908: viceversa, coupling the bright star sensitive SBF color and integrated

909: color data with metallicity and age information from independent

910: indicators, would provide information useful to the challenge of a

911: refined modeling of RGB/AGB stars.

912: 

913: 

914: 

915: \subsubsection{SBF gradients and models}

916: 

917: In addition to the above considerations, we now discuss the gradients

918: of stellar populations properties, also taking advantage of some C05

919: results. As noted before, differently from C05 where we succeeded in

920: revealing the systematic presence of SBF gradients in seven elliptical

921: galaxies over eight, in our new sample of data we do not find a

922: systematic presence of SBF gradients.

923: 

924: 

925: Before going on with the discussion of the gradients we must emphasize

926: that such discussion, as for the results presented in the previous

927: sections, is highly model--dependent. However, in contrast to the

928: previous comparisons, where we compared observations with absolute

929: values of SBF and colors, here we are only considering the slopes of

930: such SBF versus color relations. On the other hand, it is easy to

931: recognize that the slopes of the SBF versus (V-I)$_0$ relations can

932: change quite a lot depending on the models. For example, if one

933: considers the slope $\delta \bar{M}_I / \delta (V-I)_0$ at fixed Z, it

934: has an average value of 3.3 for the R05 models, but it can be as high

935: as $\delta \bar{M}_I / \delta (V-I)_0 = 14.3$ if the BVA01 models are

936: considered. As explained before this is mostly due to the strong

937: differences between models at the low metallicity regime. If only

938: models at $Z\gsim 0.01$ are considered, in fact, such differences

939: disappear, as we find that $\delta \bar{M}_I / \delta (V-I)_0$ at

940: fixed metallicity lies in the range of 3.2-4.5 for all the models. At

941: the same time the $\delta \bar{M}_I / \delta (V-I)_0$ at fixed age

942: lies in the range 7.3-9.7, in good agreement for all the models at

943: $Z\gsim 0.01$.

944: 

945: These numbers tell us that any obvious SBF-gradient in the low

946: metallicity regime cannot be interpreted clearly as age--driven or

947: metallicity--driven gradients, because of the differences between

948: models. On the contrary, in the high-Z regime all models predict that

949: a gradient related to pure age variations has a SBF versus color slope

950: one half the slope of a gradient due to pure age

951: variations. Obviously, real galaxies do not follow the simple scheme

952: of ``pure age(metallicity) radial variations'', however, as done in

953: the previous sections, our observational data can be used to set some

954: constraints at least to the effective dominant stellar system in the

955: galaxy. Keeping in mind these limits, let us make some considerations

956: on the SBF-gradients for the galaxies located in the area of high-Z

957: models.

958: 

959: In C05, we have found that the gradients were mainly explained by

960: metallicity variations within the galaxy, the inner regions being more

961: metal rich than the outer ones. In the new sample we find that in the

962: cases where a stellar population gradient is evident (SBF-gradient

963: galaxies in Table \ref{tab_measures}), it is mostly explained by a age

964: gradient rather than by a metallicity one. For example, this is the

965: case of NGC\,1344, where $\alpha \equiv \delta \bar{m}_I / \delta

966: (V-I)_0 =2.8 \pm 0.3$. However, in few cases (e.g., UGC\,7369 where

967: $\alpha = 9.0 \pm 3.2$) a metallicity gradient is probably observed,

968: no matter what set of models is considered.

969: 

970: For the galaxies in the low-Z regime, as already mentioned, the

971: diversity between models hampers any clear justification of the source

972: of the gradient itself, and different models predict opposite

973: explanations to the presence of the gradient.

974: 

975: The differences between the present results and those by C05 can be

976: ascribed to the sample selection. In fact, the list of objects taken

977: into account in this work covers a wider range galaxy properties with

978: respect to the C05 sample, which is mostly limited to massive

979: ellipticals.  In C05, the only exceptions to the uniform SBF gradient

980: behavior were NGC\,1344 and NGC\,404, that is the galaxies with the

981: lowest mass in the sample. For NGC\,1344 an age--driven gradient was

982: predicted, as also confirmed by the SBF color measurements in this

983: work; while for the local dwarf galaxy NGC\,404 no sign of evident age

984: or chemical composition gradient was recognized, as it is the case for

985: almost all the present dwarf galaxies.

986: 

987: By coupling the data in this work, with the results from C05 we are

988: lead to the general indication that normal/bright ellipticals

989: preferentially show a metallicity gradient, with the inner galactic

990: regions being more metal rich with respect to the outer ones.  

991: 

992: On the other hand, we have found that in some galaxies it is very

993: likely that the observed gradient is probably due to a radial change

994: of age, although the absolute age estimation is not feasible using

995: available models. Most of such galaxies, like NGC\,1344, show evidence

996: of morphological irregularities indicative of recent merging activity.

997: 

998: Finally, the less massive objects invariably show no evident signs of

999: SBF-gradients, or, as in the case of VCC\,941, the gradient

1000: cannot be obviously interpreted in terms of metallicity or age

1001: variation effects, because of the disagreement existing between

1002: different models in this metallicity regime.

1003: 

1004: In conclusion, our SBF color versus integrated color study seems to

1005: point out that there is a metal enrichment in the stellar populations

1006: at inner galaxy regions, and that such behavior is related to the

1007: galaxy mass, as it can only be recognized in the more massive

1008: objects. The possible age--driven gradients, also observed in

1009: our sample, are mostly related to specific environmental properties

1010: (e.g. galaxy interactions).

1011: 

1012: Before closing this section, we say a few words about the consequences

1013: of the metallicity properties derived above on the RGB Tip

1014: distances. All the galaxies of the blue subsample, in fact, come from

1015: proposals designed to derive RGB Tip distances of the target

1016: galaxy. By using the R05 models we find that for all the galaxies at

1017: (V-I)$_0\lsim 1$, the age and chemical compositions limits given above

1018: imply a RGB Tip magnitude in the I-band which is practically constant

1019: for the whole intervals quoted, i.e. $M_{I,RGBTip}\sim -4.2$ mag. The

1020: model predictions are slightly brighter with respect to the

1021: observational RGB Tip magnitudes adopted by \citet{karachentsev06},

1022: which use $M_{I,RGBTip}\sim -4.05$ mag. However, we must mention that

1023: $i$) both the theoretical and observational data agree within

1024: uncertainties; $ii$) the light of galaxies at (V-I)$_{0}\lsim 1$ is

1025: expected to be dominated by a metal poor (Z$\lsim$0.001) stellar

1026: system, thus brighter RGB Tip magnitudes are expected

1027: \citep[e.g.][]{salaris98}; and that $iii$) the theoretical predictions

1028: do fully agree with the recent calibration from

1029: \citet{rizzi07}. Adopting the above theoretical calibration implies an

1030: average of 8\% higher distances with respect to the one adopted by

1031: \citet{karachentsev06}.

1032: 

1033: 

1034: \subsection{Determining the best $\bar{M}$ versus (V-I)$_0$ calibration}

1035: Since the first appearance of the SBF method, a few different

1036: calibrations of the $\bar{M}_I$ absolute SBF magnitude versus the

1037: (V-I)$_0$ color have been introduced, by using either observations, or

1038: theoretical models. In this section we focus our attention on

1039: empirical calibrations reviewing the most recent ones \footnote{ We

1040: exclude from this section the data of NGC\,2865 due to the peculiar

1041: behavior of this galaxy (\S 4.1.2, and Appendix).}. Typically such

1042: equations are derived from different observational data, and they are

1043: valid only within the range of colors of the defining sample, which is

1044: basically narrower than the color range of the present sample.  We

1045: apply these calibrations to our set of measurements and compare the

1046: distance moduli so derived $\mu_{0,cal}$ with the group ones

1047: $\mu_{0,group}$ obtained from literature data (Table

1048: \ref{tab_dati}). The minimization of the $\Delta \mu_0 =

1049: \mu_{0,cal}-\mu_{0,group}$ versus the calibration equations, will

1050: enable us to identify the best empirical calibration in the color

1051: interval 0.85$\lsim (V-I)_{0} \lsim$ 1.30.  For this study we use the

1052: average SBF and color measurements from Table \ref{tab_measures}.

1053: 

1054: Among the few available, we will consider the following calibrations:

1055: 

1056: \begin{equation}

1057: \bar{M}_{I,T01} = -1.74 \pm 0.08 + (4.5 \pm 0.25) [(V-I)_0 -1.15]

1058: \label{eqt01}

1059: \end{equation}

1060: from T01, obtained using a sample of $\sim$ 300 galaxies

1061: in different groups, zeropoint magnitude calibrated using the $HST$

1062: Key Project Cepheids distances by \citet{ferrarese00}.

1063: 

1064: Then we consider the other:

1065: \begin{equation}

1066: \bar{M}_{I,J03} = -1.58 \pm 0.08 + (4.5 \pm 0.25) [(V-I)_0 -1.15]

1067: \label{eqj03}

1068: \end{equation}

1069: from \citet{jensen03}, which is essentially the same as the

1070: Eq. \ref{eqt01}, but the zeropoint is derived using the revised $HST$

1071: Key Project Cepheid distances from \citet{freedman01}, without the

1072: metallicity correction. Both equations are valid in the range of color

1073: 0.95 $\leq$ (V-I)$_0 \leq$ 1.30.

1074: 

1075: In combination with these equations, for those objects at (V-I)$_0

1076: \leq 1.00$ we apply the calibration derived by \citet{at94} from

1077: globular clusters, upgraded by using the most recent distances and

1078: extinctions from the \citet{harris96} catalog\footnote{Available at

1079: the web address http://www.physics.mcmaster.ca/$\sim$harris/mwgc.dat},

1080: including also the measurements for old (t$\gsim$ 10 Gyr) LMC globular

1081: clusters from R05. With all these upgrades we obtain:

1082: \begin{equation}

1083: \bar{M}_I = 2.17 \pm 0.27

1084: \label{eqggc}

1085: \end{equation}

1086: using the star clusters with (V-I)$_0 \leq 1.00$.

1087: 

1088: Finally, we also take into account the recent calibration from

1089: \citet{mieske06}, derived from Fornax cluster galaxies, in the color

1090: range 0.85 $\leq$ (V-I)$_0 \leq$ 1.10:

1091: 

1092: 

1093: \begin{equation}

1094: \bar{M}_{I,M06} = -2.13 \pm 0.17 + (2.44 \pm 1.94) [(V-I)_0 -1.00],

1095: \label{eqm06}

1096: \end{equation}

1097: 

1098: we coupled this equation with Eq. \ref{eqj03} for galaxies at

1099: (V-I)$_0 > $ 1.10.

1100: 

1101: The calibration from \citet{ferrarese00} is not considered here as it

1102: agrees within uncertainties with Eq. \ref{eqt01}. These authors, in

1103: fact, using a similar approach to T01, adopted the same slope of

1104: Eq. \ref{eqt01}, but found a zero point of -1.79 $\pm$ 0.09 mag.

1105: 

1106: In Table \ref{tab_distances} we show the distance moduli obtained

1107: adopting the above calibrations. In the Table we also show the group

1108: distance modulus for each object, which is used to derive the reduced

1109: $\chi^2$, and the average differences $\Delta \mu_0 \equiv \langle

1110: \mu_{0,cal} -\mu_{0,group} \rangle$. Both the quantities $\chi^2$ and

1111: $\Delta \mu_0$ are reported in the last rows of the Table.

1112: 

1113: As shown by the numbers in the last two rows of Table

1114: \ref{tab_distances}, the best matching with the group distances is

1115: obtained coupling equation \ref{eqj03} with the \ref{eqggc}, namely:

1116: 

1117: \begin{eqnarray}

1118: \bar{M}_I = -1.58 \pm 0.08 + (4.5 \pm 0.25)\times [(V-I)_0 -1.15],~~~~1.00 < (V-I)_0 \leq 1.30  \label{eqbest1}

1119: \\

1120: \bar{M}_I = -2.17 \pm 0.27,~~~~0.80 < (V-I)_0 \leq 1.00. 

1121: \label{eqbest2}

1122: \end{eqnarray}

1123: 

1124: We note that if we apply the latter equations to the SBF measurements

1125: for 25 Fornax Cluster galaxies from \citet{mieske06}, a median

1126: distance modulus 31.3 $\pm$ 0.4 is obtained, which is consistent with

1127: the expected group distance for this cluster $\mu_0 \sim$31.5.

1128: 

1129: As an additional check, we have carried out for our V-band

1130: measurements the same analysis performed on I-band calibrations. The

1131: main difference in this case is that there is one only recent

1132: empirical calibration, from BVA01. These authors provide:

1133: \begin{equation}

1134: \bar{M}_{V,BVA01} = 0.81 \pm 0.12 + (5.3 \pm 0.8) [(V-I)_0 -1.15].

1135: \label{eqv}

1136: \end{equation}

1137: 

1138: Although this equation has been derived using data in a narrow range

1139: of colors (1.05$\leq (V-I)_0 \leq$ 1.25), we tentatively extend its

1140: validity to the same range of Eq. (\ref{eqbest1}) colors -- such

1141: assumption is not completely arbitrary: in fact, as shown by numerical

1142: simulations, at fixed age the V-band SBF magnitudes have a more linear

1143: behavior versus $(V-I)_0$ respect to the I-band \citep[e.g., Figures

1144: \ref{spot}-\ref{others}, and Figure 5 in][]{cantiello03}. We have

1145: renormalized the BVA01 zeropoint using the same criteria adopted by

1146: \citet{jensen03}.

1147: 

1148: Again, for the blue galaxies we adopt the calibration derived from

1149: globular clusters using the \citet{at94} and R05 measurements. In

1150: this case we obtain:

1151: \begin{equation}

1152: \bar{M}_V = -0.50 \pm 0.27.

1153: \label{eqggcv}

1154: \end{equation}

1155: 

1156: Coupling the latter two equations with our SBF and color measurements,

1157: we obtained the distance moduli also reported in Table

1158: \ref{tab_distances} (Col. 7).

1159: 

1160: Using the best I- and V-band calibrations

1161: (Eqs. \ref{eqbest1}-\ref{eqbest2}, and \ref{eqv}-\ref{eqggcv},

1162: respectively) we obtain the weighted average distance moduli reported

1163: in the last column Table \ref{tab_distances}. Once more, we note that

1164: the general validity of the calibrations is shown by the satisfactory

1165: agreement between the distance moduli derived and the group distance

1166: moduli.

1167: 

1168: As an aside, we also derived an independent calibration for the

1169: $\bar{M}_V$ versus (V-I)$_0$ equation, coupling our measurements with

1170: other data from literature. As a result we have found that the

1171: calibration obtained agrees within uncertainties with

1172: Eq. \ref{eqv}-\ref{eqggcv} in the whole range of $(V-I)_0$ colors

1173: considered here.

1174: 

1175: Before concluding this section we point out three facts.  First,

1176: \citet{karachentsev06} obtained a distance modulus $\mu_0 = 30.32$ for

1177: UGC\,7369, based on the RGB Tip method.  However, they also state that

1178: this galaxy ``does not look to be a nearby object'', and that it is

1179: ``plausible association with the Coma I group'' at a distance modulus

1180: 31.07 $\pm$ 0.07 (T01). As shown by the data in Table

1181: \ref{tab_distances} our SBF measurements support this last hypothesis.

1182: 

1183: Second, it has been widely discussed by \citet{richtler03} that the

1184: Globular Cluster Luminosity Function (GCLF) is a quite reliable

1185: distance indicator, although some exceptions exist. In his review,

1186: \citeauthor{richtler03} uses the SBF distances from T01 to derive the

1187: GCLF absolute Turn Over Magnitude (TOM). One of the main exceptions to

1188: the universality of the GCLF is NGC\,3610, whose TOM is $\sim$ 2

1189: magnitudes fainter than expected. \citeauthor{richtler03} argues that

1190: one of the possible causes of such mismatch is the presence of a

1191: population of intermediate-age metal-rich clusters, resulting in a

1192: fainter TOM. However, even though only the blue subpopulation of

1193: clusters is taken into account, there is still a large offset between

1194: NGC\,3610 and the other galaxies. We find worth noting that, in

1195: their recent study on the GC system of NGC\,3610, \citet{goudfrooij07}

1196: have found $M_V^{TOM} \sim -7.2$ mag. However, these authors

1197: erroneously state that they adopt a ``distance modulus of

1198: $(m-M)_0=32.65$ as measured from T01''. The distance modulus quoted

1199: for this galaxy by T01, in fact, is 31.65 $\pm$ 0.22, which leads to

1200: $M_V^{TOM} \sim -6.2$, one magnitude fainter than the typical value

1201: for normal elliptical galaxies.

1202: 

1203: On the other hand, if we adopt the average distance modulus of

1204: NGC\,3610 from Table \ref{tab_distances}, $\mu_{Ave} = 32.71 \pm

1205: 0.08$, and the blue clusters TOM 25.44$\pm$0.10 from

1206: \citet{whitmore02}, the absolute TOM is $M_V^{TOM}=-7.27 \pm 0.13$, in

1207: good agreement with the universal TOM from \citeauthor{richtler03}

1208: $M_V^{TOM}=-7.35 \pm 0.24$\footnote{We have corrected the mean

1209: $M_V^{TOM}$ from \citeauthor{richtler03} value applying the -0.16 mag

1210: zeropoint shift as discussed in \citet{jensen03}.}. The

1211: difference between our distance and the estimation from T01 is

1212: probably due to the much lower quality of the NGC\,3610 ground-based

1213: data used by T01, compared to these high resolution ACS

1214: images. Inspecting the data quality flags from T01 (see their Table 1,

1215: Q and PD values), we find that the SBF magnitude of NGC\,3610 should

1216: be considered as poorly constrained. Moreover, the T01 distance of the

1217: other galaxy NGC\,3613, which is classified as same group member of

1218: NGC\,3610, agrees within uncertainties with our new SBF distance.

1219: 

1220: Finally, by using the average distance moduli in the last column of

1221: Table \ref{tab_distances}, and the $v_{flow}$ values reported in Table

1222: \ref{tab_dati}, we obtain $H_0 \sim 71 \pm 14$ km s$^{-1}$

1223: Mpc$^{-1}$, if the galaxies with $v_{flow} \gsim~1000~km/s $ are taken

1224: into account. 

1225: 

1226: 

1227: \section{Conclusions}

1228: 

1229: The SBF and color properties obtained from ACS V- and I-band images of

1230: 14 galaxies have been discussed. The data were drawn from the HST

1231: archive. Classical integrated and SBF magnitudes have been derived

1232: using the standard analysis procedures. Our set of measurements is

1233: unique in terms of the wide range of $(V-I)_0$ color. We have taken

1234: advantage of this property to address different questions concerning

1235: both the use of SBF measurements as a distance indicator, and as a

1236: stellar population tracer.

1237: 

1238: With regard to the use of SBF to study stellar populations issues, we

1239: have analyzed the properties of the dominant stellar population in the

1240: selected galaxies by coupling V- and I-band SBF magnitudes with the

1241: $(V-I)_0$ color of the galaxies. As expected the list of objects

1242: covers a wide range of stellar populations properties. Since the

1243: outcome of this study depends on the set of population synthesis

1244: models adopted, we have taken into account different models to test

1245: the robustness of the predictions against the models systematics.

1246: Different sets of SSP models typically provide chemical composition

1247: estimations similar to each other and to our reference R05

1248: models. However, from this comparison we have found that generally

1249: {\it it is not possible to derive reliable age constraints} for the

1250: stellar component in each galaxy, due to the non--negligible

1251: differences between models, especially at lower metallicities. In

1252: other words, multi--models comparison has shown that this technique is

1253: not efficient to strongly constrain the age for old (t$\gsim$3 Gyr)

1254: stellar systems, but it can realistically be used to confine the

1255: metallicity range of the stellar system that dominates the light

1256: emitted by the galaxy.

1257: 

1258: These results confirm the usefulness of this kind of analysis to

1259: investigate the evolutionary properties of the unresolved stellar

1260: component in distant galaxies. On the other hand -- where model

1261: differences arise -- they also indicate that the present knowledge of

1262: stellar evolution, with particular regard to the properties of cool,

1263: bright giant branch stars, is still an open question which could be

1264: efficiently challenged taking advantage of SBF color data.

1265:  

1266: We have also examined radial SBF behavior for the sample of 14

1267: galaxies. Comparing the gradients with models, and taking also into

1268: account the results from C05, we observe that usually the dwarf

1269: galaxies do not show substantial SBF gradients, thus we do not

1270: find any sign of systematic radial age/metallicity

1271: variation. Moreover, where such gradients are observed (e.g. VCC\,941)

1272: the opposite predictions made by different sets of models make it

1273: difficult to understand if such gradients are related to radial

1274: changes of age or metallicity.  On the contrary, for more massive

1275: objects a preferential metallicity driven gradient is noticed, with

1276: the outer galaxy regions being more metal poor than the inner

1277: ones. Possible age gradients have also been found, however they

1278: are usually related to a recent merging event. As a consequence, our

1279: SBF gradient data seem to point out the existence of a mass--related

1280: metallicity gradient in spheroidal galaxies. Given the connection

1281: between the gradients of stellar populations properties (i.e. SBF- and

1282: color-gradients) and the possible galaxy formation scenarios, we

1283: suggest that a future, enlarged database of SBF gradient data will

1284: also provide a valuable tool to trace the history of galaxy formation.

1285: 

1286: In conclusion, our study illustrates the potential of a study of

1287: galaxy properties based on the comparison of SBF colors with

1288: populations synthesis predictions. The current state of SBF

1289: models allows for a robust determination of the mean metallicities of

1290: galaxies, and an improved understanding of the stellar evolution

1291: phases important for SBF might allow the use of SBF in the future for

1292: detailed population studies. As in \citet{cantiello03}, again we

1293: remark that multi--wavelength SBF data involving optical to near--IR

1294: observations are of paramount interest to push forward this

1295: technique. As shown by model predictions, indeed, SBF colors like

1296: $\bar{B}-\bar{K}$ are not affected by the models degeneracy shown by

1297: the $\bar{V}-\bar{I}$ color. Additionally, such color data are

1298: sensitive to stars in different phases of their evolution -- e.g.,

1299: $\bar{B}$ to Horizontal Branch stars, $\bar{K}$ to Thermally--Pulsing

1300: AGB stars -- and are expected to be much more efficient to trace the

1301: stellar content of the galaxy, that is to trace back the history of

1302: galaxy formation.

1303: 

1304: Concerning distance studies, to check the validity of some I-band (and

1305: V-band) empirical calibrations existing in literature, we have

1306: estimated the galaxy distance moduli coupling our data with the

1307: various empirical calibrations. Then, these distance moduli have been

1308: compared with group distances derived from literature.  We have found

1309: that the best I-band calibration is obtained matching two relations:

1310: $a$) in the range 1.00$<(V-I)_0\leq$1.30 the equation by

1311: \citet{jensen03}, which is basically the one obtained by T01 with a

1312: different (fainter) zeropoint; $b$) for the range of color

1313: 0.80$\leq(V-I)_0\leq$1.00, a constant absolute magnitude, derived from

1314: Galactic and MC globular clusters. Adopting a similar approach with

1315: the V-band data, we have found that the calibration provided by BVA01

1316: extended to interval 1.00$<(V-I)_0\leq$1.30, with a constant SBF

1317: magnitude for colors within 0.80$\leq(V-I)_0\leq$1.00, gives SBF

1318: distances in good agreement with group distances.

1319: 

1320: Using the best I- and V-band calibrations, and taking into account

1321: only the galaxies at $v_{flow}\geq$1000 km/s, we estimated $H_0 \sim

1322: 71 \pm$ 14 Km s$^{-1}$ Mpc.

1323: 

1324: 

1325: 

1326: \acknowledgments

1327: 

1328: This work was supported by the NASA grant AR-10642, by COFIN 2004

1329: under the scientific project ``Stellar Evolution'' (P.I.: Massimo

1330: Capaccioli), and by PRIN-INAF2006 "From local to cosmological

1331: distances" (P.I. G.Clementini).

1332: 

1333: \appendix

1334: \section{A comparison of the observed $\bar{V}-\bar{I}$ colors with models. Comments on

1335: individual galaxies}

1336: 

1337: Based on the content of the right panel in Figure \ref{spot}, and

1338: Figure \ref{others}, in the following we discuss the chemical and

1339: physical properties each single galaxy of our sample by

1340: interpolating between models at different ages and chemical

1341: compositions.

1342: 

1343: \begin{itemize}

1344: \item DDO\,71 -- This galaxy does not show an obvious gradient (Table

1345: \ref{tab_measures}). On average, observational data are located in

1346: between models of Z$\sim$ 0.004, and in the age interval 4-11 Gyr.

1347: BVA01 and MA06 models predict older ages ($\gsim 10$ Gyr) respect to

1348: L02 and R05.

1349: 

1350: \item KDG\,61 -- All models predict a $Z < 0.004$ stellar system.

1351: Within the R05 and L02 SSP scenarios, the radial change of SBF and

1352: integrated color could be interpreted by a radial change in the age of

1353: the dominant stellar component. The opposite conclusion would be drawn

1354: by using the BVA01 and MA06 models. Moreover, it must be noted the

1355: criss-crossing of data at different radii for this galaxy.

1356: 

1357: \item KDG\,64 -- A 0.0004$\leq Z \leq 0.001$, t$>$ 5 Gyr system is

1358: predicted. It is worth mentioning that for this galaxy, and for the

1359: two previous -- all members of the M\,81 group -- \citet{dacosta07}

1360: quotes an average chemical content of Z$\lsim$ 0.001 comparing the

1361: mean RGB color to the colors of Galactic Globular Clusters. The

1362: location of these galaxies in the low metallicity regime, where

1363: significant discrepancies between models exist, does not allow us to

1364: obtain any substantial conclusion on the possible origin of SBF versus

1365: color gradients.

1366:   

1367: \item NGC\,474 -- The single measurement available for this galaxy

1368: agrees with a Z$\sim$ 0.01, old (t$\gsim 14$ Gyr) stellar population,

1369: for all models considered. Lower ages, and slightly higher metallicity

1370: have been found using high S/N spectral analysis \citep{howell06},

1371: though the spectral data refer to a smaller, more centrally

1372: concentrated area compared to our measurements.

1373: 

1374: \item NGC\,1316 -- A Z$\sim 0.01$ is found from models, with age t$>$8

1375: Gyr. The inner annuli seem to be populated by a rather old (t$\sim13$)

1376: stellar system with respect to the outer annuli (t$\sim$8). Such

1377: radial change of the stellar age would be also supported by the fact

1378: that this galaxy is a known merger remnant \citep{goudfrooij01}.

1379:   

1380: \item NGC\,1344 -- Models to data comparison seems to point out a

1381:  Z$\gsim 0.01$, t$>$5 Gyr stellar system. Also, for this galaxy all

1382:  the models predict that the observed trend of SBF and color could be

1383:  explained by an age gradient along the radius, with the inner regions

1384:  being older than the outer ones. In fact, for this galaxy we find

1385:  $\alpha \equiv \delta \bar{m}_I / \delta (V-I)_0 =2.8 \pm 0.3$, and all

1386:  models predict $\alpha \equiv \delta \bar{M}_I / \delta (V-I)_0 \sim 3.5$ in

1387:  this metallicity regime. As in the case of NGC\,1316, this galaxy

1388:  shows indications of a recent merger activity \citep{carter82} which

1389:  could possibly be related to the observed age gradient.

1390: 

1391: \item NGC\,2865 -- It is not unexpected that the only measurement

1392: available for this galaxy is significantly out the grid of models,

1393: no matter what set of SSP simulations is considered. In fact, as

1394: shown in Figure \ref{single} and discussed in \S 4.1.2, this

1395: galaxy has a peculiar behavior even when other physical properties are

1396: taken into account.  With these caveats, NGC\,2865 data are located

1397: between models of Z=0.004 and Z=0.01, on the side of the oldest

1398: ages. Combining optical spectra and spectral synthesis

1399: \citet{raimann05} have found that the light of this galaxy is mostly

1400: dominated ($\sim$ 70 \% of the flux) by an t$\sim$10 Gyr stellar

1401: system (these authors do not differentiate on metallicity). In spite

1402: of such age agreement between the results obtained with two different

1403: stellar population indicators, we must highlight that the V-band image

1404: of NGC\,2865 clearly shows the presence of diffuse dust in this

1405: galaxy. This finding, together with the peculiar behavior of this

1406: galaxy with respect to other data from literature, lead us to reject

1407: NGC\,2865 in the section dedicated to distance measurements.

1408: 

1409: \item NGC\,3610 -- Observational data match with models at 0.004 $\leq

1410: Z\leq$0.01, in agreement with \citet{howell04}. The age range

1411: predicted by different models is quite broad, going from $\sim$5 to

1412: $\sim$ 16 Gyr. 

1413: 

1414: \item NGC\,3923 -- The metallicity predicted is Z$\sim$0.02, with old

1415: ages (t$\gsim 10$ Gyr). The dominance of an old stellar population is

1416: also found by \citet{raimann05}.

1417: 

1418: \item NGC\,5237 -- The chemical composition from models is generally

1419: $Z\lsim 0.004$, with ages generally smaller than $\sim$11 Gyr.

1420: 

1421: \item NGC\,5982 -- A Z$\gsim$ 0.02, old stellar population is

1422: invariably predicted for this galaxy. A comparable result is found by

1423: \citet{denicolo05} from spectroscopic data -- though their data refer

1424: to a smaller aperture.

1425:  

1426: \item NGC\,7626 -- This galaxy's data are significantly off the grid

1427: of models.  A general feature that can be recognized from the location

1428: of this galaxy in the SBF versus color panels, is that the stellar

1429: population is very likely old, and metal rich, as also found by

1430: \citet{denicolo05}. The galaxy shows the presence of a dust lane,

1431: however we do not recognize irregular dust patches (neither from the

1432: V-band image, nor from the B--band images also available from the ACS

1433: archive) which might lead to mark as unreliable the SBF value for this

1434: galaxy.

1435: 

1436: \item UGC\,7369 -- Data are consistent with a metallicity in the range

1437: 0.004 $\leq Z \leq $ 0.01, and ages typically t$\gsim 9$ Gyr. A

1438: non--negligible preference on a metallicity gradient is

1439: recognizable, with outer regions being more metal poor than the

1440: inner ones.

1441: 

1442: \item VCC\,941 -- This galaxy's data match with models of very low

1443: metallicity ($Z\sim 0.0004$), and old ages ($t\gsim$ 12 Gyr). The

1444: SBF-gradient observed cannot be interpreted as related to age or

1445: metallicity variations because of the substantial differences between

1446: models in this metallicity regime. While BVA01 and MA06 models, in

1447: fact, predict that the observed gradient might be related to

1448: metallicity variations with the galaxy radius, the R05 and L02 are

1449: much more consistent with age variations.

1450: \end{itemize}

1451: 

1452: 

1453: \clearpage

1454: 

1455: 

1456: \begin{figure}[!ht]

1457: \begin{center}

1458: \includegraphics[angle=0,scale=.60]{fig1.eps}

1459: \caption{The original I-band images and residual frames. The object plotted

1460: are (from left to right, upper rows) DDO\,71, KDG\,61, KDG\,64,

1461: NGC\,474, NGC\,1316, NGC\,1344 and NGC\,2865. Lower rows (left to

1462: right): NGC\,3610, NGC\,3923, NGC\,5237, NGC\,5982, NGC\,7626,

1463: UGC\,7369 and VCC\,941. In the original frames a 10$\arcsec$ segment

1464: is also shown.

1465: \label{fig1}}

1466: \end{center}

1467: \end{figure}

1468: 

1469: 

1470: 

1471: \begin{figure}[!ht]

1472: \plotone{fig2.eps}

1473: \caption{SBF apparent magnitudes and color versus integrated (V-I)$_0$

1474: color. Different colors refer to different galaxies as labeled.

1475: \label{sbf_vi}}

1476: \end{figure}

1477: 

1478: 

1479: 

1480: \begin{figure}[!ht]

1481: \plotone{fig3.eps}

1482: \caption{Observational properties of the sample of galaxies versus the

1483: integrated (V-I)$_0$ color. NGC\,2865 data are marked with a

1484: five-pointed star.The least--squares dashed lines are obtained

1485: excluding NGC\,2865 from the fit.

1486: \label{single}}

1487: \end{figure}

1488: 

1489: 

1490: \begin{figure}[!ht]

1491: \epsscale{1.1}

1492: \plotone{fig4a.eps}

1493: \plotone{fig4b.eps}

1494: \plotone{fig4c.eps}

1495: \caption{The same observational properties shown in Figure

1496: \ref{single} (upper quote in each panel) plotted against the absolute

1497: V-band SBF magnitudes (panels $a$), I-band absolute SBF (panels $b$),

1498: and the SBF $(\bar{V}-\bar{I})_0$ color (panels $c$). In all panels

1499: empty/full squares show the location of galaxies without/with a

1500: significant SBF gradient.  NGC\,2865 and NGC\,474 data are marked with a

1501: five-points star and cross, respectively.  In addition to the data in

1502: Table \ref{tab_measures}, the C05 galaxies data are also shown with

1503: empty circles in panels $b$.  All the galaxies from the C05 sample have

1504: a substantial gradient, except the dwarf NGC\,404.

1505: \label{singlesbf}}

1506: \end{figure}

1507: 

1508: 

1509: 

1510: 

1511: \begin{figure}[!ht]

1512: \epsscale{1.}

1513: \plotone{fig5.eps}

1514: \caption{SBF magnitudes versus the integrated color. The average data

1515: from Table \ref{tab_measures} are plotted. The R05 models for

1516: t=3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 14 Gyr are over-plotted in the panels. Increasing

1517: symbols size refer to older ages. Different symbols shape mark

1518: different chemical compositions, as labeled.

1519: \label{single_sbf}}

1520: \end{figure}

1521: 

1522: 

1523: 

1524: \begin{figure}[!ht]

1525: \epsscale{1}

1526: \plottwo{fig6a.eps}{fig6b.eps}

1527: \caption{Left panels: Absolute SBF profiles versus the integrated

1528: (V-I)$_0$ color. Right panel: The distance free SBF-color versus

1529: integrated color panel.  R05 models symbols are the same as in Figure

1530: \ref{single_sbf}. The dotted line connects the models at lowest

1531: ages, 3 Gyr, for all chemical compositions.

1532: \label{spot}}

1533: \end{figure}

1534: 

1535: \begin{figure}[!ht]

1536: \plottwo{fig7a.eps}{fig7b.eps}

1537: \caption{SBF  $(\bar{V}-\bar{I})_0$ color versus the 

1538: Mg$_2$ index (left panel), and versus the central velocity dispersion

1539: (right panel). Empty symbols show data taken from literature: diamonds for GC,

1540: squares for galaxies. Full squares refer to the measurements from this work. 

1541: \label{mg2sig}}

1542: \end{figure}

1543: 

1544: 

1545: \begin{figure}[!ht]

1546: \plottwo{fig8a.eps}{fig8b.eps}

1547: \caption{Left panels: Minimum and maximum metallicity limits derived

1548: using R05 populations synthesis models as a function of the $Mg_2$

1549: (left), and of the total B magnitude $M_{Bt}$ of the galaxy

1550: (right). Right panels: as left panels, but the average metallicity

1551: derived from all models is considered (Table \ref{tab_ssp}). In panel

1552: ($d$) also a linear fit to the data is shown.

1553: \label{mgmbfeh}}

1554: \end{figure}

1555: 

1556: 

1557: \begin{figure}[!ht]

1558: \plottwo{fig9a.eps}{fig9b.eps}

1559: \plottwo{fig9c.eps}{fig9d.eps}

1560: \plottwo{fig9e.eps}{fig9f.eps}

1561: \caption{As Figure \ref{spot} but for the BVA01 (upper panels), L02

1562: (middle), and MA06 models (lower panels). The age range is t=5 to

1563: t=17.8 Gyr (step of 12\%) for BVA01; t=3,5,8,12,17 Gyr for L02 models;

1564: t=3,5,7,9,11,13,15 Gyr for MA06 models. The dotted lines connect

1565: models at 5, 3, and 3 Gyr for the three models, respectively. 

1566: \label{others}}

1567: \end{figure}

1568: 

1569: 

1570: \clearpage

1571: 

1572: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1573: %%%%%%%%%%%TABLES %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1574: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1575: 

1576: \input{tab1}

1577: \input{tab2}

1578: \input{tab3}

1579: \input{tab4}

1580: 

1581: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1582: %%%%%%%%%%%BIBLIO %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1583: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1584: \clearpage

1585: 

1586: \bibliographystyle{apj}

1587: \bibliography{cantiello_jun07}

1588: 

1589: \end{document}

1590: 

1591: 

1592: