1: \documentclass[12pt, preprint]{aastex}
2:
3: %\documentclass{emulateapj}
4: %\textwidth 6.5in
5: %\textheight 8.8in
6: %\oddsidemargin 0.0in
7: %\evensidemargin 0.0in
8: %\topmargin -0.1truein
9: %\raggedbottom
10: %\parskip 8pt
11:
12: \def\eg{{\it e.g.}}
13: \def\etal{{\it et al.}~}
14: \def\kms{{km~s$^{-1}$}}
15: \def\sqd{{deg$^{2}$}}
16: \def\arcmin{$^{\prime}~$}
17: \def\arcsec{$^{\prime\prime}~$}
18: \def\msun{$M_\odot$}
19: \def\mhi{$M_{HI}$}
20: \def\lsun{$L_\odot$}
21: \def\h70i{{$h_{70}^{-1}$}}
22: \def\be{\begin{equation}}
23: \def\ee{\end{equation}}
24: \def\apjl{{ApJL}}
25: \def\apj{{ApJ}}
26: \def\apjs{{ApJS}}
27: \def\aj{{AJ}}
28: \def\aap{{A\&A}}
29: \def\aaps{{A\&AS}}
30: \def\apss{{Ap.Sp.Sci.}}
31: \def\araa{{Ann.Rev.Astron.Ap.}}
32: \def\mnras{{MNRAS}}
33: \def\nat{{Nature}}
34:
35: \newcommand{\hi}{\ion{H}{1}}
36:
37: \newcommand{\dg}{\ensuremath{^{\circ}}}
38: \newcommand{\ints}{\ensuremath{\int S \rm{d} V}}
39: \newcommand{\jykms}{\ensuremath{\mathrm{Jy} \,\kms}}
40: \newcommand{\cm}{\ensuremath{\mathrm{cm}^{-2}}}
41:
42:
43: %\usepackage{epsfig}
44:
45:
46:
47: \begin{document}
48:
49:
50:
51: \title{Optically Unseen HI Detections towards the Virgo Cluster detected in the Arecibo Legacy Fast ALFA Survey}
52: \author {Brian R. Kent\altaffilmark{1}, Riccardo Giovanelli\altaffilmark{1,2}, Martha P. Haynes\altaffilmark{1,2},
53: Am\'elie Saintonge\altaffilmark{1}, Sabrina Stierwalt\altaffilmark{1}, Thomas Balonek\altaffilmark{2,3},
54: Noah Brosch\altaffilmark{4}, Barbara
55: Catinella\altaffilmark{5}, Rebecca A. Koopmann\altaffilmark{2,6},
56: Emmanuel Momjian\altaffilmark{5}, Kristine Spekkens\altaffilmark{7}}
57:
58:
59: \altaffiltext{1}{Center for Radiophysics and Space Research, Space Sciences Building,
60: Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853. {\it e--mail:} bkent@astro.cornell.edu, riccardo@astro.cornell.edu,
61: haynes@astro.cornell.edu, amelie@astro.cornell.edu, sabrina@astro.cornell.edu}
62:
63: \altaffiltext{2}{National Astronomy and Ionosphere Center, Cornell University,
64: Space Sciences Building,
65: Ithaca, NY 14853. The National Astronomy and Ionosphere Center is operated
66: by Cornell University under a cooperative agreement with the National Science
67: Foundation.}
68:
69: \altaffiltext{3}{Dept. of Physics \& Astronomy, Colgate University, Hamilton, NY 13346.
70: {\it e--mail:} tbalonek@mail.colgate.edu}
71:
72: \altaffiltext{4}{The Wise Observatory \& The School of Physics and Astronomy,
73: Raymond \& Beverly Sackler Faculty of Exact Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Israel.
74: {\it e--mail:} noah@wise.tau.ac.il}
75:
76: \altaffiltext{5}{Arecibo Observatory, National Astronomy and Ionosphere Center,
77: Arecibo, PR 00612. {\it e--mail:} bcatinel@naic.edu, emomjian@naic.edu}
78:
79: \altaffiltext{6}{Dept. of Physics \& Astronomy, Union College, Schenectady, NY 12308.
80: {\it e--mail:} koopmanr@union.edu}
81:
82: \altaffiltext{7}{National Radio Astronomy Observatory and
83: Dept. of Physics \& Astronomy, Rutgers University, 136 Frelinghuysen Road, Piscataway,
84: NJ 08854. NRAO is a facility of the National Science Foundation operated under
85: cooperative agreement by Associated Universities, Inc. {\it e--mail:} spekkens@physics.rutgers.edu}
86:
87:
88: \begin{abstract}
89:
90: We report the discovery by the Arecibo Legacy Fast ALFA (ALFALFA)
91: survey of eight HI features not coincident with stellar counterparts
92: in the Virgo Cluster region. All of the HI clouds have $cz < $ 3000 \kms
93: and, if at the Virgo distance,
94: HI masses between 1.9$\times 10^7$ \msun~ and 1.1$\times 10^9$ \msun. Four of the
95: eight objects were reported or hinted at by previous studies and ``rediscovered''
96: by ALFALFA. While some clouds appear to be associated with optical galaxies in
97: their vicinity, others show no clear association with a stellar counterpart.
98: Two of them are embedded
99: in relatively dense regions of the cluster and are associated with M49 and M86; they
100: were previously known. The others are mostly located in peripheral regions of the
101: cluster. Especially notable are a concentration of objects towards the so-called
102: M cloud, $3^\circ$ to $5^\circ$ to the NW of M87, and a complex of several clouds
103: projected roughly halfway between M87 and M49. The object referred to as VIRGOHI21
104: and proposed to be a ``dark galaxy''
105: is also detected and shown to be a tidal feature associated with NGC~4254.
106:
107: \end{abstract}
108:
109: \keywords{galaxies: intergalactic medium ---
110: galaxies: halos ---
111: individual:Virgo cluster ---
112: radio lines: galaxies ---
113: galaxies:clusters ---
114: galaxies:interactions}
115:
116: \section{Introduction}
117:
118: The predictions of the galaxy formation paradigm in the hierarchical scenario
119: requires corroboration by observational data. Optically selected samples of
120: galaxies do not detect low luminosity, and hence presumably low mass objects,
121: in the predicted numbers. This has often been referred to as the ``substructure''
122: or ``missing satellite'' problem (Klypin \etal 1999). The possible existence of
123: a statistically significant population of dark matter dominated, optically faint
124: halos would be of cosmological importance (Hawkins 1997; Somerville 2002).
125: While the statistics of halos that are completely devoid of baryons would be
126: difficult to assess, optically faint but gas rich systems could be detected via
127: their 21 cm line emission. ALFALFA, the Arecibo Legacy Fast ALFA extragalactic
128: HI survey (Giovanelli \etal 2005) currently underway, will cover 7000 square degrees
129: of sky at $cz <$ 18000 \kms. At this time more than half of the solid angle
130: encompassing the Virgo Cluster has been fully surveyed. ALFALFA can detect
131: $\sim 2\times 10^7$ \msun~ at the cluster distance, which in this paper will
132: be assumed to be 16.7 Mpc. The Virgo Cluster offers a fertile environment for
133: the possible detection of gas-rich, optically faint systems.
134:
135: A number of extragalactic HI clouds have been reported in the past
136: (e.g. Schneider \etal 1983; Sancisi \etal 1987; Giovanelli \& Haynes 1989;
137: Chengalur \etal 1995; Kilborn \etal 2000; Ryder \etal 2001; Minchin \etal 2005a;
138: Oosterloo \& van Gorkom 2005); they are however not necessarily identified with
139: optically dark halos. Some have been shown to be tidal appendages or to be associated with
140: optical counterparts, e.g. the NE component of the HI~1225+01 pair of objects
141: (Giovanelli, Williams \& Haynes 1991) and the object known as VIRGOHI21 (Davies \etal ~2004;
142: Minchin \etal ~2005a,b; Haynes \etal ~in preparation); others are thought
143: to be the result of ram pressure stripping in the cluster environment, e.g. the Oosterloo \&
144: van Gorkom feature near NGC 4388. The interactions between sub-groups in Virgo
145: play an important role in the cluster's evolution, acting as a preprocessing step
146: of the material as the galaxies fall into the cluster.
147:
148: Here we present a catalog of 21 cm line sources detected by ALFALFA in the central portion
149: of the Virgo Cluster region which have no obvious optical counterparts.
150: Parameters of the detections and descriptions of their environments are given. Three
151: of the sources were previously reported and one hinted at by other studies and
152: ``rediscovered'' by ALFALFA.
153:
154: \section{Observations and Source Parameters}
155:
156: The sources presented in this paper are part of the ALFALFA catalog and refer to
157: the region $12^h <$ R.A.(J2000) $< 13^h$ and $+8^\circ <$ Dec.(J2000) $<+16^\circ$.
158: Complete source catalogs of this region have been reported by Giovanelli \etal (2007)
159: and Kent \etal (2007 in preparation); they are accessible at
160: http://arecibo.tc.cornell.edu/hiarchive/alfalfa/. Sources are extracted from the
161: ALFALFA data set via an automated algorithm (Saintonge 2007), successively
162: inspected by eye, measured and classified according to a code which primarily
163: depends on signal to noise (S/N). The objects reported in this paper are all
164: classified as {\it bona fide} detections (code 1; see Giovanelli \etal 2007),
165: typically of S/N $\gtrsim$ 6.5, where S/N is defined as
166: \be
167: S/N=\Bigl({1000 F_c\over W_{50}}\Bigr){w^{1/2}_{smo}\over \sigma_{rms}}
168: \ee
169: %From Giovanelli et al. 2007
170: where $F_c$ is the integrated flux density in Jy \kms,
171: %the ratio $1000 F_c/W50$ is the mean flux across the feature in mJy,
172: $w_{smo}$ is either $W_{50}/(2\times 10)$ for $W_{50}<400$ \kms ~or
173: $400/(2\times 10)=20$ for $W_{50} \geq 400$ \kms ~[$w_{smo}$ is a
174: smoothing width expressed as the number of spectral resolution
175: bins of 10 \kms ~bridging half of the signal width], and $\sigma_{rms}$
176: is the r.m.s noise figure across the spectrum measured in mJy at 10
177: \kms ~resolution.
178: All of them have been confirmed by corroborating observations carried out with
179: the Arecibo telescope or with the Very Large Array (VLA) as discussed below.
180: Details of the ALFALFA observations can be found in Giovanelli \etal (2005)
181: and Giovanelli \etal (2007).
182:
183: Table 1 contains the observed and derived parameters of the HI clouds. Their
184: velocities indicate that an association with the Virgo cluster is possible
185: for most of them, with the exception of the group associated with NGC 4795/4796.
186: The latter is more likely to be in the background of the Virgo cluster, at a
187: distance of $\sim$40 Mpc which is assumed for the clouds in that group.
188:
189: The fields of each of the sources in Table 1 have been inspected in
190: the Sloan Digital Sky Survey\footnote{
191: Funding for the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) has been
192: provided by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, the Participating Institutions,
193: the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the National Science
194: Foundation, the U.S. Department of Energy, the Japanese Monbukagakusho,
195: and the Max Planck Society. The SDSS Web site is http://www.sdss.org/.
196: The SDSS is managed by the Astrophysical Research Consortium (ARC) for
197: the Participating Institutions. The Participating Institutions are The
198: University of Chicago, Fermilab, the Institute for Advanced Study, the
199: Japan Participation Group, The Johns Hopkins University, Los Alamos National
200: Laboratory, the Max-Planck-Institute for Astronomy (MPIA), the Max-Planck-Institute
201: for Astrophysics (MPA), New Mexico State University, University of Pittsburgh,
202: Princeton University, the United States Naval Observatory, and the University
203: of Washington.}
204: and the DSS2 via {\it Skyview.}\footnote{{\it Skyview} was developed and
205: maintained under NASA ADP Grant NAS5--32068 under the auspices of the High
206: Energy Astrophysics Science Archive Research Center at the Goddard Space
207: Flight Center Laboratory of NASA.} The contents of Table 1 are as follows.\\
208: \textit{Col.(1)} - Cloud ID number\\
209: \textit{Col.(2 \& 3)} - HI source center coordinates (J2000); these positions are typically
210: accurate to within 30\arcsec or better (see Giovanelli \etal 2007)\\
211: \textit{Col.(4)} - Heliocentric velocity in \kms\\
212: \textit{Col.(5)} - Velocity width measured at half peak power in \kms\\
213: \textit{Col.(6)} - Integrated flux in Jy \kms\\
214: \textit{Col.(7)} - Signal to noise ratio\\
215: \textit{Col.(8)} - Base 10 logarithm of the HI mass in solar units, assuming HI is optically thin\\
216: \textit{Col.(9)} - Angular distance from M87 in degrees\\ %Column 10 removed by BK
217:
218: For three of the sources, we separately list the parameters of several clumps,
219: identified with italic qualifiers.
220: Figure 1 shows locations of the sources within the Virgo cluster region; the
221: grayscale background image shows hard X-ray counts (0.5-2.0 keV) from the ROSAT
222: dataset of Snowden \etal (1995), smoothed with a 5\arcmin ~kernel. The approximate
223: boundaries of the M and W\arcmin ~clouds are indicated by dashed circles (Binggeli,
224: Popescu \& Tammann 1993).
225: We note that the fields of the HI clouds often contain one or several small
226: optical objects; the possibility that one of them may be a small dwarf
227: or low surface brightness galaxy associated with the HI source cannot be excluded at this time.
228: We discuss the characteristics of each HI source below.
229:
230: \textit{Cloud 1}.--This object, unresolved by the Arecibo beam of 3.3\arcmin $\times$
231: 3.8\arcmin,
232: is near the detection limit of ALFALFA at the Virgo distance; S/N and spectrum used are
233: those of the ALFALFA survey observations. That detection has been confirmed by
234: successive, more sensitive Arecibo observations. This is the object with the lowest
235: HI mass in Table 1. We note that the Irr galaxy UGC~7003
236: lies 30\arcmin ~NW of the HI source at $cz= 1286$ \kms, the NGC~4019 group lies 15\arcmin
237: ~W at $cz= 1524$ \kms~ and UGC~7038 lies 32\arcmin NW at $cz= 889$ \kms.
238:
239: \textit{Cloud 2}.--This object, also unresolved by the Arecibo beam, lies 3.8\arcmin
240: away from a small optical galaxy for which no optical redshift is known.
241: The optical galaxy AGC~220171 at 121035.6+114539, an apparently undisturbed object classified
242: as a BCD, lies 29\arcmin ~to the SE at a redshift of $cz= 1296$ \kms. A VLA map
243: of the source has been obtained and the results will be discussed in a forthcoming study.
244:
245: \textit{Cloud 3}.--This object, also unresolved by the Arecibo beam, is located
246: in a crowded field - a host of galaxies are in the surrounding periphery at
247: a comparable redshift. The density of galaxies with known optical or HI redshifts
248: in this region is high and 21 are known with $1800 < cz < 2500$ \kms~ within
249: one degree of the HI source. The nearest optical galaxy with similar velocity is
250: AGC 221651 at 121336.4+130201, 8\arcmin N of the HI feature at $cz= 1932$ \kms.
251: A VLA map of the source has been obtained and the results will be discussed
252: in a forthcoming study.
253:
254: \textit{Cloud 4}.--The HI source is located 3.6\arcmin southeast of M86 (=NGC 4406; $cz = -244$ \kms), the
255: large Virgo S0 galaxy. It was previously reported by Davies
256: \etal (2004) as VIRGOHI4. They also suggested that the source could lie behind
257: M86. HI synthesis imaging by Oosterloo \& van Gorkom (2005)
258: showed the HI source to be a plume extending from NGC~4388($cz=$2524 \kms) and possibly resulting
259: from interaction between that galaxy and the intracluster gas. Jacoby \etal (2005) indicated
260: that H$\alpha$ filaments detected could be associated with this plume.
261: In the same vicinity ALFALFA makes a separate detection of M86 (Giovanelli \etal 2007) at
262: negative velocities with the HI centroid located 18$^{\prime\prime}$ to
263: the south.
264: The features reported by Bregman \& Roberts (1990) are associated with the
265: ALFALFA HI detection of
266: M86.
267:
268:
269:
270: \textit{Cloud 5}.--This object was first reported by Sancisi \etal (1987). Later,
271: aperture synthesis observations were presented by Henning \etal (1993) and
272: McNamara \etal (1994). The HI source is located 2.6\arcmin southeast of M49($cz= 997$ \kms) and
273: it is proposed to be related to the interaction between M49 and the dwarf
274: irregular UGC~7636($cz= 276$ \kms).
275:
276: \textit{Cloud 6}.--Two sources(6{\it a\&b}) are the brightest clumps in a stream found
277: in the vicinity of NGC~4254(M99; $cz= 2407$ \kms). The brightest of the two is an object first detected
278: at Jodrell Bank (Davies \etal ~2004; Minchin \etal 2005a)
279: and more recently mapped at Westerbork by the same team (Minchin
280: \etal 2005b). Dubbed ``VirgoHI21'', it was proposed by that group that the source
281: is a giant ``dark galaxy.'' The ALFALFA observations clearly show the feature to
282: be part of a stream connected to NGC~4254, continuously extending some 250 kpc to
283: the North of that galaxy. The feature appears of tidal origin.
284: A third ALFALFA detection
285: (6{\it c}) lies 18 \arcmin west of NGC~4254. A more detailed
286: analysis of the ALFALFA evidence on this object is given in Haynes \etal (2007).
287:
288: \textit{Cloud 7}.--A complex of five HI clouds, it projects between
289: M87 and M49, roughly $3^\circ$ south of the former. The five clouds,
290: spread in velocity between 480 and 607 \kms, extend over approximately
291: 35\arcmin in the plane of the sky, or 200 kpc at the Virgo cluster distance.
292: In HI mass, the clouds range between $0.5\times 10^8$ and $2.0\times 10^8$
293: \msun. VLA observations have been obtained and clouds 7c and 7d have
294: been clearly detected. Detailed results of both the ALFALFA and VLA
295: observations are in preparation by Kent {\it et al.}
296:
297: \textit{Cloud 8}.--Three clouds comprise an HI complex that surrounds
298: the SB0/a galaxy NGC~4795($cz=2781$ \kms) and its dwarf companion NGC~4796($cz=2406$ \kms). It was previously
299: noted that a large flux measurement discrepancy between Arecibo and Effelsberg
300: measurements was likely due to an offset of the HI from the center of the
301: NGC~4795/4796 pair (Hoffman \etal 1989). Later observations at Arecibo by
302: Duprie \& Schneider (1996) are suggestive of an extension of the HI
303: emission from NGC~4796 towards its irregular companions UGC~8042/5,
304: perhaps arising from a tidal interaction. ALFALFA maps show that HI emission
305: surrounds the NGC~4795/6 pair, and that it is indeed connected to the two
306: nearby galaxies, UGC~8045 and UGC~8042, which are respectively at
307: $cz= 2801$ and $cz= 2856$ \kms. The HI masses computed in Table 1
308: assume a distance of $\sim$40 Mpc. The kinematics of the HI indicate
309: that all the galaxies in this system are at a comparable redshift and are
310: interacting as a group.
311:
312: \section{Discussion}
313:
314: The characteristics of the eight sources reported here are quite diverse.
315: They can be grouped into three categories: isolated objects, objects in
316: the vicinity of large galaxies, and disturbed objects that could be remnants
317: of an encounter with a larger system, such as the collective cluster potential.
318: Except for cloud 8, the projected distances to M87 and heliocentric velocities
319: place the HI sources within the canonical boundaries of the Virgo Cluster, as
320: defined by Binggeli, Sandage, \& Tammann (1985).
321:
322: Clouds 4 and 5 have been extensively studied in the past, using higher
323: aperture synthesis data which indicate a clear association with Virgo
324: cluster galaxies M49 and NGC~4388. The proximity to these galaxies and the
325: cluster environment are important in determining their properties.
326: The clouds in the vicinity of NGC~4795 (cloud 8) are most likely the
327: result of tidal stripping in interacting members of a close group, not
328: an uncommon occurrence.
329:
330: Cloud 6 has raised significant attention, as it
331: was proposed to be a rare representative of a category of massive, yet
332: starless galaxies. The ALFALFA observations clearly show that rather
333: than an isolated ``dark galaxy,'' this object is an extended stream
334: connected to NGC~4254. While no nearby companion with which NGC~4254
335: may have had a close encounter is clearly identifiable, the origin of
336: the feature appears most likely to be of a tidal nature, an event of
337: ``harassment'' of the type graphically illustrated in simulations, e.g.
338: by Moore \etal (1996) and Lake \etal (1998).
339:
340: ALFALFA observations of clouds 1, 2 and 3 offer no clear hints as to
341: their origin. They are all unresolved by the Arecibo beam, hence their
342: HI is contained within a $\sim 10$ kpc diameter or less. The HI masses
343: of the clouds are relatively low, especially for clouds 1 and 2, and
344: the lack of a size determination impedes an estimate of their dynamical masses;
345: upper limits for the latter on order of 1--6$\times 10^8$ \msun ~can be
346: obtained if one assumes turbulent or rotational motion amplitudes as indicated
347: by the velocity widths. These objects are projected near or within the boundaries of
348: the M cloud, a loose subclump thought to be behind and falling into
349: the main cluster around M87, although little coherence in the velocities
350: of the trio exists to firmly substantiate such association. At any rate,
351: they appear to be relatively isolated and far removed from the central parts
352: of the cluster so that gravitational, rather than hydrodynamical processes
353: involving the intracluster gas, are more likely to be invoked in explaining
354: their nature. While the mean number density of VCC galaxies in the M cloud
355: region is less than 1.5 $\times 10^{-3}$ (arcmin)$^{-2}$ (Binggeli, Sandage, \& Tammann 1985, Schindler
356: \etal 1999), cloud 3 lies in a locally overdense region, where galaxy-galaxy
357: interactions may be more frequent. It cannot be excluded however that these
358: clouds may be primordial, low mass halos, perhaps associated with
359: small dwarf or low surface brightness
360: optical counterparts. Analysis of recently obtained
361: VLA data and planned follow-up optical studies will help elucidate this issue.
362:
363: Cloud 7 is resolved by ALFALFA data into several separate clouds,
364: spread over more than 200 kpc (if located at the cluster distance)
365: and 250 \kms ~in extent. With a mean velocity near 540 \kms, the complex
366: could well be located in the foreground of the cluster, although cluster
367: galaxies of similar redshift are found in the vicinity. Most notably,
368: NGC~4424, an SBa at $cz=476$ \kms ~is located about 40\arcmin ~to the west
369: of the complex. ALFALFA and VLA HI maps of that object (Chung \etal 2007),
370: as well as CO maps (Cortes \etal 2006)
371: indicate that its structure is disturbed, showing an appendage extending
372: to the south of the galaxy, pointing opposite
373: the direction of the cloud complex. Assuming the whole of the complex is not a
374: gravitationally bound unit, the velocity differences between the individual
375: clouds will separate them at the approximate rate of $\sim 250$ kpc Gyr$^{-1}$.
376: Differential motions of this amplitude are consistent with tidal forces
377: within the cluster potential and suggest the complex may disperse within
378: a cluster crossing time. A more detailed analysis based on ALFALFA and
379: VLA observations will be explored in a future study (Kent {\it et al.}, in preparation).
380:
381: While a detailed statistical study of the ALFALFA catalogs in the Virgo
382: regions awaits completion of the survey effort therein, it is interesting
383: to preliminarily note that ALFALFA does not detect very large numbers of low
384: HI mass sources in the cluster. This is an indication that, at least in the
385: cluster region, the HI mass function faint end slope does not rise
386: sufficiently to significantly contribute to solving the ``substructure''
387: problem mentioned in our introduction.
388:
389: We gratefully acknowledge Dr. Tom Oosterloo
390: for his critical reading of this paper and
391: providing comments. This research has made use of the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED) which is
392: operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology,
393: under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. KS is
394: a Jansky Fellow.
395: This work has been supported by NSF
396: grants AST--0307661, AST--0435697, AST--0607007 and the Brinson Foundation.
397:
398: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
399:
400: \bibitem[Binggeli et al.(1985)]{1985AJ.....90.1681B} Binggeli, B., Sandage, A., \& Tammann, G.~A.\ 1985, \aj, 90, 1681
401: \bibitem[Binggeli et al.(1993)]{1993A&AS...98..275B} Binggeli, B., Popescu, C.~C., \& Tammann, G.~A.\ 1993, \aaps, 98, 275
402: \bibitem[Bregman \& Roberts(1990)]{1990ApJ...362..468B} Bregman, J.~N., \& Roberts, M.~S.\ 1990, \apj, 362, 468
403: \bibitem[Chengalur et al.(1995)]{1995AJ....109.2415C} Chengalur, J.~N., Giovanelli, R., \& Haynes, M.~P.\ 1995, \aj, 109, 2415
404: \bibitem[Chung et al.(2007)]{2007ApJ...659L.115C} Chung, A., van Gorkom, J.~H., Kenney, J.~D.~P., \& Vollmer, B.\ 2007, \apjl, 659, L115
405: \bibitem[Cort{\'e}s et al.(2006)]{2006AJ....131..747C} Cort{\'e}s, J.~R., Kenney, J.~D.~P., \& Hardy, E.\ 2006, \aj, 131, 747
406: \bibitem[Davies et al.(2004)]{2004MNRAS.349..922D} Davies, J., Minchin, R., Sabatini, S., van Driel, W., Baes, M. \etal ~2004, \mnras, 349, 922
407: \bibitem[Duprie \& Schneider(1996)]{1996AJ....112..937D} Duprie, K., \& Schneider, S.~E.\ 1996, \aj, 112, 937
408: \bibitem[Giovanelli, et al.(2005)]{2005AJ....130.2598G} Giovanelli, R., Haynes, M.~P., Kent, B.~R. \etal\ 2005, \aj, 130, 2598
409: \bibitem[Giovanelli et al.(2007)]{2007AJ....133.2569G} Giovanelli, R., Haynes, M.~P., Kent, B.~R. \etal\ 2007, \aj, 133, 2569
410: \bibitem[Giovanelli \& Haynes(1989)]{1989ApJ...346L...5G} Giovanelli, R., \& Haynes, M.~P.\ 1989, \apj, 346, L5
411: \bibitem[]{395}Giovanelli, R., Williams, J.P. \& Haynes, M.P. 1991, \aj, 101, 1242
412: \bibitem[Haynes \& Giovanelli(1986)]{1986ApJ...306..466H} Haynes, M.~P., \& Giovanelli, R.\ 1986, \apj, 306, 466
413: \bibitem[]{397} Haynes, M.~P., Giovanelli, R., \& Kent, B.~R. \ 2007, \apjl, in press
414: \bibitem[Hawkins(1997)]{1997A&A...328L..25H} Hawkins, M.~R.~S.\ 1997, \aap, 328, L25
415: \bibitem[Henning et al.(1993)]{1993A&A...268..536H} Henning, P.~A., Sancisi, R., \& McNamara, B.~R.\ 1993, \aap, 268, 536
416: \bibitem[Hoffman et al.(1989)]{1989ApJS...69...65H} Hoffman, G.~L., Williams, B.~M., Lewis, B.~M., Helou, G., \& Salpeter, E.~E.\ 1989, \apjs, 69, 65
417: \bibitem[Jacoby et al.(2005)]{2005AAS...20713806J} Jacoby, G.~H., Kenney,
418: J.~D.~P., Tal, T., Crowl, H.~H., \& Feldmeier, J.~J.\ 2005, Bulletin of the
419: American Astronomical Society, 37, 1392
420: \bibitem[Klypin et al.(1999)]{1999ApJ...522...82K} Klypin, A., Kravtsov, A.~V., Valenzuela, O., \& Prada, F.\ 1999, \apj, 522, 82
421: \bibitem[Lake et al.(1998)]{1998ApJ...495..152L} Lake, G., Katz, N., \& Moore, B.\ 1998, \apj, 495, 152
422: \bibitem[McNamara et al.(1994)]{1994AJ....108..844M} McNamara, B.~R., Sancisi, R., Henning, P.~A., \& Junor, W.\ 1994, \aj, 108, 844
423: \bibitem[Minchin et al.(2005a)]{2005ApJ...622L..21M} Minchin, R., Davies, J., Disney, M., Boyce, P., Garcia, D. \etal ~2005a, \apjl, 622, L21
424: \bibitem[Minchin et al.(2005b)]{405} Minchin, R.F., Davies, J.I., Disney, M.J., Marble, A. R., Impey, C. D., \etal ~2005b, astro-ph/0508153
425: \bibitem[Moore et al.(1996)]{1996Natur.379..613M} Moore, B., Katz, N., Lake, G., Dressler, A., \& Oemler, A.\ 1996, \nat, 379, 613
426: \bibitem[Oosterloo \& van Gorkom(2005)]{2005A&A...437L..19O} Oosterloo, T., \& van Gorkom, J.\ 2005, \aap, 437, L19
427: \bibitem[Saintonge(2007)]{2007AJ....133.2087S} Saintonge, A.\ 2007, \aj, 133, 2087
428: \bibitem[Sancisi et al.(1987)]{1987ApJ...315L..39S} Sancisi, R., Thonnard, N., \& Ekers, R.~D.\ 1987, \apjl, 315, L39
429: \bibitem[Schindler et al.(1999)]{1999A&A...343..420S} Schindler, S., Binggeli, B., B\"{o}hringer, H.\ 1999, A\&A, 343, 420
430: \bibitem[Schneider et al.(1983)]{1983ApJ...273L...1S} Schneider, S.~E., Helou, G., Salpeter, E.~E., \& Terzian, Y.\ 1983, \apjl, 273, L1
431: \bibitem[Snowden et al.(1995)]{1995ApJ...454..643S} Snowden, S.~L., \etal\ 1995, \apj, 454, 643
432: \bibitem[Somerville(2002)]{413} Somerville, R.S. 2002, ApJ, 572, L23
433:
434: \end{thebibliography}
435:
436: %Table here
437: \input tab1.tex
438:
439: \clearpage
440:
441: \begin{figure}
442: \plotone{f1.eps}
443: \caption{Sky distribution of the HI detections (star symbols and corresponding Table 1 numbers) presented in this paper.
444: The X-ray peaks of cluster members M87, M86, and M49 are labeled for reference. The background grayscale image is a
445: hard X-ray counts image from ROSAT (Snowden \etal 1995), smoothed with a 5\arcmin Gaussian kernel.
446: The portions of the M and W\arcmin~ subclouds are indicated by the dashed circles (Binggeli, Popescu, \& Tammann 1993).}
447: \end{figure}
448:
449:
450:
451: \end{document}
452: