1: %%\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

2: 

3: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:

4: 

5: \documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}

6: 

7: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:

8: 

9: %%\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}

10: 

11: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the

12: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,

13: %% use the longabstract style option.

14: 

15: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}

16: 

17: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}

18: \newcommand{\myemail}{D.Ward-Thompson@astro.cf.ac.uk}

19: 

20: \slugcomment{Draft version, 2007, May 23}

21: 

22: \shorttitle{JCMT Gould Belt Legacy Survey}

23: \shortauthors{Ward-Thompson et al.}

24: 

25: \begin{document}

26: 

27: \title{The James Clerk Maxwell Telescope Legacy Survey of

28: Nearby Star-forming Regions in the Gould Belt}

29: 

30: \author{D. Ward-Thompson\altaffilmark{1}, 

31: J. Di Francesco\altaffilmark{2},

32: J. Hatchell\altaffilmark{3}, 

33: M. R. Hogerheijde\altaffilmark{4},

34: P. Bastien\altaffilmark{5}, 

35: S. Basu\altaffilmark{6}, 

36: I. Bonnell\altaffilmark{7}, 

37: J. Bowey\altaffilmark{8}, 

38: C. Brunt\altaffilmark{3}, 

39: J. Buckle\altaffilmark{9},

40: H. Butner\altaffilmark{10}, 

41: B. Cavanagh\altaffilmark{11}, 

42: A. Chrysostomou\altaffilmark{11,12},

43: E. Curtis\altaffilmark{9}, 

44: C. J. Davis\altaffilmark{11}, 

45: W. R. F. Dent\altaffilmark{13},

46: E. van Dishoeck\altaffilmark{4},

47: M. G. Edmunds\altaffilmark{1},

48: M. Fich\altaffilmark{14},

49: J. Fiege\altaffilmark{15},

50: L. Fissel\altaffilmark{16},

51: P. Friberg\altaffilmark{11}, 

52: R. Friesen\altaffilmark{2,17}, 

53: W. Frieswijk\altaffilmark{18},

54: G. A. Fuller\altaffilmark{19},

55: A. Gosling\altaffilmark{20},

56: S. Graves\altaffilmark{9}, 

57: J. S. Greaves\altaffilmark{7},

58: F. Helmich\altaffilmark{18},

59: R. E. Hills\altaffilmark{9}, 

60: W. S. Holland\altaffilmark{13}, 

61: M. Houde\altaffilmark{6},

62: R. Jayawardhana\altaffilmark{16},

63: D. Johnstone\altaffilmark{2,17},

64: G. Joncas\altaffilmark{21},

65: H. Kirk\altaffilmark{2,17}, 

66: J. M. Kirk\altaffilmark{1},

67: L. B. G. Knee\altaffilmark{2}, 

68: B. Matthews\altaffilmark{2}, 

69: H. Matthews\altaffilmark{22}, 

70: C. Matzner\altaffilmark{16}, 

71: G. H. Moriarty-Schieven\altaffilmark{2,11} 

72: D. Naylor\altaffilmark{23},

73: D. Nutter\altaffilmark{1},

74: R. Padman\altaffilmark{9}, 

75: R. Plume\altaffilmark{24},

76: J. M. C. Rawlings\altaffilmark{8}, 

77: R. O. Redman\altaffilmark{2}, 

78: M. Reid\altaffilmark{25},

79: J. S. Richer\altaffilmark{9}, 

80: R. Shipman\altaffilmark{4},

81: R. J. Simpson\altaffilmark{1},

82: M. Spaans\altaffilmark{4},

83: D. Stamatellos\altaffilmark{1},

84: Y. Tsanis\altaffilmark{8},

85: S. Viti\altaffilmark{8},

86: B. Weferling\altaffilmark{11},

87: G. J. White\altaffilmark{26,27}, 

88: A. P. Whitworth\altaffilmark{1},

89: J. Wouterloot\altaffilmark{11},

90: J. Yates\altaffilmark{8},

91: M. Zhu\altaffilmark{2,11}}

92: 

93: 

94: \altaffiltext{1}{School of Physics \& Astronomy, Cardiff University,

95: 5 The Parade, Cardiff, UK}

96: \altaffiltext{2}{Herzberg Institute of Astrophysics,National Research 

97: Council of Canada, 5071 West Saanich Road, Victoria, BC, Canada}

98: \altaffiltext{3}{School of Physics, University of Exeter, Stocker Road,

99: Exeter, UK}

100: \altaffiltext{4}{Leiden Observatory, Leiden University, 

101: PO Box 9513, 2300 RA, Leiden, The Netherlands}

102: \altaffiltext{5}{D\'epartement de physique et Observatoire due 

103: Mont-M\'egantic, Universit\'e de Montr\'eal, C.P. 6128, 

104: Succ. Centre-ville, Montr\'eal, QC, Canada}

105: \altaffiltext{6}{Physics and Astronomy Department, 

106: University of Western Ontario, 1151 Richmond Street, London,

107: ON, Canada}

108: \altaffiltext{7}{Scottish Universities Physics Alliance, Physics \& 

109: Astronomy, University of St Andrews, North Haugh, St Andrews, Fife, UK}

110: \altaffiltext{8}{Dept of Physics \& Astronomy, University College London, 

111: Gower Street, London, UK}

112: \altaffiltext{9}{Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge University, 

113: J J Thomson Avenue, Cambridge, UK}

114: \altaffiltext{10}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, James Madison 

115: University, 901 Carrier Drive, Harrisonburg, VA 22807, USA}

116: \altaffiltext{11}{Joint Astronomy Center, 660 N. A'Ohoku Drive,

117: University Park, Hilo, Hawaii}

118: \altaffiltext{12}{School of Physics, Astronomy and Mathematics,

119: University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield, UK}

120: \altaffiltext{13}{UK Astronomy Technology Centre, Royal Observatory, 

121: Blackford Hill, Edinburgh, UK}

122: \altaffiltext{14}{Dept of Physics \& Astronomy, University of Waterloo,

123: Waterloo, ON, Canada}

124: \altaffiltext{15}{Dept of Physics and Astronomy, 

125: University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada}

126: \altaffiltext{16}{Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 

127: University of Toronto, 50 St. George St., Toronto, ON, Canada}

128: \altaffiltext{17}{Dept of Physics \& Astronomy, University of 

129: Victoria,  3800 Finnerty Rd., Victoria, BC, Canada}

130: \altaffiltext{18}{SRON, Netherlands Institute for Space Research,

131: Landleven 12, 9747 AD Groningen, The Netherlands}

132: \altaffiltext{19}{School of Physics \& Astronomy, University of Manchester, 

133: Sackville Street, Manchester, UK}

134: \altaffiltext{20}{Astrophysics Group, Department of Physics, 

135: Oxford University, Denys Wilkinson Building, Keble Road, Oxford, UK}

136: \altaffiltext{21}{Dept de Physique et Observatoire du Mont Megantic, 

137: Universite Laval, QC, Canada}

138: \altaffiltext{22}{National Research Council of Canada, Dominion Radio 

139: Astrophysical Observatory, 717 White Lake Rd., Penticton, BC, Canada}

140: \altaffiltext{23}{Department of Physics, University of Lethbridge, 

141: 4401 University Dr., Lethbridge, AB, Canada}

142: \altaffiltext{24}{Dept of Physics \& Astronomy, University of Calgary, 

143: 2500 University Drive, Calgary, AB, Canada}

144: \altaffiltext{25}{Department of Physics \& Astronomy, McMaster University,

145: 1280 Main St. W., Hamilton, ON, Canada}

146: \altaffiltext{26}{Dept of Physics and Astronomy,

147: Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, UK}

148: \altaffiltext{27}{Science and Technology Facilities Council,

149: Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Chilton, Didcot, UK}

150: 

151: %\newpage

152: 

153: \begin{abstract}

154: 

155: This paper describes a James Clerk Maxwell Telescope (JCMT) legacy survey 

156: that has been awarded roughly 500 hrs of observing time to be carried 

157: out from 2007 to 2009. In this survey we will map with SCUBA-2 

158: (Submillimetre Common User Bolometer Array 2) almost all of

159: the well-known low-mass and intermediate-mass

160: star-forming regions within 0.5\,kpc that are accessible from the JCMT.

161: Most of these locations are associated with the Gould Belt.

162: From these observations we will  produce a flux-limited snapshot of star 

163: formation near the Sun,  providing a legacy of images, as well as 

164: point-source and

165: extended-source catalogues, over almost 700 square degrees of sky. 

166: The resulting images will yield the

167: first catalogue of prestellar and protostellar

168: sources selected by submillimetre continuum

169: emission, and should increase the number of known sources 

170: by more than an order of magnitude.

171: We will also obtain CO maps with the array receiver

172: HARP (Heterodyne Array Receiver Programme), 

173: in three CO isotopologues, of a large typical sample of

174: prestellar and protostellar sources. 

175: We will then map the brightest hundred sources with the SCUBA-2

176: polarimeter (POL-2), producing the first statistically significant set of

177: polarization maps in the submillimetre. 

178: The images and

179: source catalogues will be a powerful reference set for

180: astronomers, providing

181: a detailed legacy archive for future telescopes, including ALMA,  

182: Herschel and JWST.  

183: 

184: \end{abstract}

185: 

186: \keywords{ISM}

187: 

188: \section{Introduction}

189: 

190: \subsection{Nearby star formation}

191: 

192: Understanding star formation is a crucial goal of astronomy. Star 

193: formation plays a pivotal role in most aspects of astronomy from 

194: the formation and evolution of galaxies to the origins of extra-solar 

195: planets and the potential for life elsewhere in our Galaxy. Our knowledge 

196: of the star-formation process has increased dramatically due to the advent 

197: of sensitive far-infrared and submillimetre

198: detectors but has suffered from the piece-meal 

199: fashion in which such observations have been undertaken to date. We

200: describe here a project that aims to produce a large and 

201: unbiased sample of star-forming molecular material in the solar vicinity

202: at relatively high resolution

203: (8--14 arcsec).

204: 

205: To understand star formation, we need to probe the physical 

206: conditions of molecular clouds before and during the star formation 

207: process. Although near-IR images can tell us a great deal about the results 

208: of star formation, the objects visible are too old to assess the crucial 

209: conditions in which star formation originates. We need to illuminate 

210: the earliest conditions in order to understand the formation process

211: (e.g. Di Francesco et al., 2007; Ward-Thompson et al., 2007).

212: 

213: Submillimetre continuum imaging

214: selects the very earliest stages of star formation because it traces

215: the high column densities of dust, even when that dust is

216: at low temperatures, within

217: star-forming cores and allows important physical parameters such as

218: density to be traced in detail.  

219: From its earliest days the 

220: James Clerk Maxwell Telescope (JCMT)

221: has been mapping submillimetre continuum

222: emission from star-forming regions (e.g. Ward-Thompson et al., 1989; 1995).

223: The JCMT identified first the youngest

224: known protostars (Class 0 objects; Andr\'e et al. 1993) and molecular

225: cloud cores on the verge of collapse to form protostars (prestellar

226: cores; Ward-Thompson et al. 1994).  

227: 

228: The JCMT also helped determine that

229: the prestellar core mass function mimics the IMF, indicating that it

230: may be determined at the very beginning of the star formation process

231: -- this was

232: the first observational breakthrough in understanding its

233: origin in nearly 50 years (Johnstone et al. 2000; Motte et al. 2001;

234: Nutter \& Ward-Thompson 2007).

235: Many large area continuum mapping

236: surveys have also been carried out with 

237: the Submillimetre Common-User Bolometer Array

238: (SCUBA) on JCMT

239: of star-forming regions

240: (e.g. Johnstone \& Bally 1999; Pierce-Price et al., 2000; 

241: Johnstone et al., 2000; 2001; 2006;

242: Hatchell et al., 2005; 2007; Nutter et al., 2005; 2006;

243: Nutter \& Ward-Thompson 2007; J. Kirk et al., 2005;

244: Moriarty-Schieven et al., 2006).

245: Many of these regions lie in a ring around the sky, coincident with the

246: Gould Belt. 

247: 

248: \subsection{The Gould Belt}

249: 

250: The Gould Belt is a ring of nearby O-type stars inclined at about 20$^\circ$

251: to the Galactic Plane. It was first discovered in the southern hemisphere

252: in fact by

253: John Herschel (1847), who noted that many of the brightest stars in

254: the southern sky lie in a band that is inclined to the plane of the Galaxy.

255: Subsequently, Gould (1879) traced the northern part of the band,

256: thereby completing the ring.

257: 

258: The Gould Belt is

259: centred on a point $\sim 200\,$pc from the Sun and 

260: is about 350 pc in radius

261: (e.g. Clube 1967; Stothers \& Frogel 1974; Comeron et al. 1992;

262: de Zeeuw et al., 1999; P\"oppel 2001).

263: Figure~1 shows a schematic of the Gould Belt, and Figure~2

264: shows its projection onto the plane of the sky,

265: showing the inclination to the Galactic Plane.

266: 

267: The formation mechanism of the Belt remains 

268: something of a mystery. One hypothesis is that it

269: may be the result of a high velocity cloud impacting 

270: the Galactic Plane

271: (Comeron \& Torra, 1992; 1994; Guillout et al., 1998).

272: An alternative possibility is a

273: local massive supernova remnant or stellar wind interacting

274: with a large molecular cloud (Blaauw 1991).

275: 

276: Whatever the cause, the Gould Belt is a highly active ring

277: of nearby star formation, and

278: most of the local star-forming

279: molecular clouds are associated with it, including Taurus,

280: Auriga, Orion, Lupus, Ophiuchus, Scorpius, Serpens and Perseus.

281: Study of the star formation within the Gould Belt sheds light on the

282: process of star formation within these respective clouds.

283: Moreover, it may also help to shed light on the whole of

284: the Gould Belt itself. For example, accurate dating

285: of the bursts of star formation around the Belt may be able to test the

286: various formation mechanisms of the Gould Belt.

287: 

288: \subsection{A new era for JCMT}

289: 

290: The JCMT is currently undergoing a complete overhaul of its instrumentation,

291: including a new bolometer array camera, 

292: the Submillimetre Common-User Bolometer Array 2

293: (SCUBA-2; Holland et al., 2006), 

294: with an imaging

295: polarimeter, the SCUBA-2 Polarimeter

296: (POL-2; Bastien et al., 2005), 

297: and a heterodyne array receiver, 

298: the Heterodyne Array Receiver Programme for B-band

299: (HARP; Smith et al., 2003).

300: The combination of SCUBA-2, 

301: HARP, and POL-2

302: are a powerful tool set with 

303: which to study star formation.

304: 

305: SCUBA-2 is an innovative 10,000 pixel submillimetre camera due to be 

306: delivered shortly to the JCMT. The camera is 

307: expected to revolutionize submillimetre astronomy in terms of its ability 

308: to carry out wide-field surveys to unprecedented depths.

309: SCUBA-2 uses Transition Edge Super-conducting

310: (TES) bolometer arrays, which come complete with in-focal-plane 

311: Superconducting Quantum Interference Device

312: (SQUID) amplifiers and multiplexed readouts, and are cooled to 

313: 100mK by a liquid cryogen-free dilution refrigerator.

314: SCUBA-2 will observe simultaneously at 850 and 450 microns, with

315: angular resolutions of 14 and 8 arcsec respectively

316: (Holland et al., 2006).

317: 

318: The polarimeter POL-2 will have an achromatic continuously 

319: rotating half-wave plate in order to modulate the signal at a rate 

320: faster than atmospheric transparency fluctuations. Such a modulation 

321: should improve significantly the reliability and accuracy of submillimetre 

322: polarimetric measurements. The signal will be analyzed by a wire-grid 

323: polarizer. For calibration, a removable polarizer will also be available. 

324: The components, in the order that the radiation will encounter them, are 

325: the calibration polarizer, the rotating wave plate, and the polarizer. 

326: The components will be mounted in a box fixed permanently in front of 

327: the entrance window of the main cryostat of SCUBA-2. All components 

328: will be mounted so that they can be taken in and out of the beam 

329: remotely, making it very easy and fast to start polarimetry at the 

330: telescope (Bastien et al., 2005).

331: 

332: HARP is a 350GHz, 4$\times$4 element, heterodyne focal plane array, using 

333: SIS detectors, recently commissioned on the JCMT. 

334: Working in conjunction with the backend

335: Auto-Correlation and Spectral-line Imaging System (ACSIS;

336: Hovey et al., 2000),

337: HARP provides 3-dimensional imaging capability with high sensitivity at 

338: 325 to 375GHz. This is the first submillimetre spectral imaging system on JCMT,

339: affording significantly improved productivity in terms of speed of mapping. 

340: The core specification for the array is that the combination of the 

341: receiver noise temperature and beam efficiency, weighted optimally 

342: across the array is $<$330K single side-band (SSB) for the central 

343: 20GHz of the tuning range (Smith et al., 2003).

344: The 16 pixels have receiver temperatures of 94--165~K.

345: The angular resolution of HARP is 14 arcsec, matching the 850-$\mu$m

346: resolution of SCUBA-2.

347: 

348: ACSIS has 16 inputs (actually 32, paired up), with a maximum bandwidth 

349: per channel of approximately 2GHz in a 2$\times$1 GHz configuration.

350: It has a minimum sample time of 50ms and a maximum output map size of 

351: 16 Gbytes. It has a number of spectral bandwidths and resolutions that

352: can be selected by the user: 250MHz bandwidth with 30kHz resolution;

353: 500MHz bandwidth with 61kHz resolution 

354: (multi-subsystem mode); 1GHz bandwidth

355: with 500kHz resolution; and 2GHz bandwidth with 1000kHz resolution (merged).

356: In practise, the usable bandwidth will be about 10\% less than this, 

357: because of the filter roll-off.

358: 

359: ACSIS and HARP together have a number of observing modes,

360: including raster mapping with position switching for mapping large areas, 

361: chopped jiggle mapping for fully sampled mapping of areas comparable to 

362: the HARP focal plane area, and jiggle mapping with fast frequency switching

363: for fully sampled mapping of compact areas where no nearby off-source 

364: reference position is available. 

365: 

366: During the planning phase of observations with

367: the new JCMT instrumentation, numerous ideas

368: were put forward for science questions that could be addressed 

369: (e.g. Ward-Thompson 2004). From these plans a number of proposals emerged.

370: One such proposal, described herein, was  

371: to map local star-forming regions

372: with SCUBA-2, HARP and POL-2.

373: This was one of seven proposals accepted as part of the JCMT Legacy

374: Programme. 

375: 

376: With the increased mapping speed of SCUBA-2, one can cover

377: essentially all of the star-forming regions within 0.5\,kpc

378: in a reasonable amount of time, 

379: detecting all of the protostars and prestellar cores.  

380: SCUBA-2 is designed to have

381: increased sensitivity in each pixel, but also has

382: two orders of magnitude more pixels than SCUBA, giving it

383: about a 1000-fold increase in mapping speed.

384: The increased mapping speed of SCUBA-2 can be illustrated by

385: comparison with the large-scale mapping survey carried out by SCUBA

386: of the Galactic Centre (Pierce-Price et al., 2000), which took

387: $\sim$50 hours of telescope time and covered only 1.4 square degrees. 

388: By contrast this survey with SCUBA-2 will cover

389: roughly 700 square degrees to a

390: greater depth in $\sim$120 hours.

391: 

392: We will use SCUBA-2 to map

393: the submillimetre continuum emission from as many clouds within 0.5 kpc

394: as are visible

395: from the JCMT, including several well known Gould Belt

396: clouds such as

397: Orion, Taurus, Perseus, and Ophiuchus.  Several objects

398: outside of the Gould Belt, including nearby Bok Globules, will also be

399: mapped (c.f. Launhardt et al., 1997).

400: We estimate that the source catalogue that we will produce

401: will contain over five thousand sources. 

402: Such large

403: samples of protostars and starless cores are required to provide

404: robust statistics on objects over a range of evolutionary stages.

405: With SCUBA-2's predicted improvement in per-pixel

406: sensitivity over SCUBA, we will measure the 

407: prestellar clump mass functions down to substellar masses.

408: 

409: HARP increases the heterodyne mapping speed of the JCMT by

410: over an order of magnitude. 

411: We will use this increased mapping speed to map a significant fraction of

412: the SCUBA-2 sources in isotopologues of CO.

413: The combination

414: of dust continuum maps from SCUBA-2 plus spectral line data cubes from

415: the heterodyne array at matched resolution will be extremely powerful.

416: Since molecular clouds are highly turbulent, and star formation

417: generates infall, outflow, and rotational motions, velocity

418: measurements are critical in understanding the mass-assembly process,

419: feedback, and star-formation efficiency

420: (e.g. Goodwin et al., 2004a \& b; Vazquez-Semadeni et al., 2005).

421: In addition, another use of the HARP data will be a determination 

422: of the amount of line

423: contamination in the SCUBA data. Johnstone et al. (2003) 

424: considered this problem

425: in Orion and argued that it was not significant except for faint sources. 

426: With the increased sensitivity of

427: SCUBA2 such contamination may be important.

428: 

429: POL-2 will be able to make

430: polarization maps of both high and low density material in

431: molecular clouds.  

432: We will use it to map one hundred bright sources found in the

433: SCUBA-2 survey.

434: At present there is a debate 

435: over the relative importance of magnetic fields and turbulence 

436: in regulating the star formation process

437: (e.g. Mouschovias 1991; Padoan \& Nordlund 2002).

438: Combined with kinematics from HARP, the POL-2 observations

439: will allow for an investigation into the balance between gravity,

440: turbulent support, and magnetic fields over a statistically

441: meaningful number of star-forming cores. Previously only a few cores have

442: been mapped (e.g., Holland et al., 1999;

443: Ward-Thompson et al., 2000; Matthews \& Wilson 2002;

444: Crutcher et al., 2004; J. Kirk et al., 2006).

445: 

446: The goal of this 

447: paper is to outline the aims of the

448: Gould Belt Survey and to describe the 

449: observations that will be carried out.

450: In total this programme will take roughly 1000 hours of observing

451: time on the JCMT, 500 of which have been allocated over the first two years

452: between 2007/8 and 2009/10. 

453: Section 2 details the SCUBA-2 aspects of the survey,

454: section 3 discusses the HARP survey, 

455: section 4 describes the survey to be carried out with POL-2, 

456: section 5 outlines some surveys at far-infrared wavelengths being carried out

457: in parallel with this survey, and

458: section 6 provides a brief summary of the paper.

459: 

460: \section{SCUBA-2 Survey}

461: 

462: To obtain a complete view of the star formation in the Gould Belt, we

463: need an inventory of all protostellar objects contained in these clouds.

464: We will map with SCUBA-2 all of the star-forming 

465: regions within 0.5 kpc in the Gould Belt accessible by the 

466: JCMT. The sample, which includes many well-known regions, 

467: will provide a very significant 

468: snapshot of star formation near the Sun.  

469: We will map the thermal dust emission at 850 microns towards the A$_V$

470: $>$ 1 areas of our target clouds (see Table 1) to a uniform depth,

471: with a resolution of 14 arcsec. In higher extinction

472: regions (A$_V$ $>$ 3), we will go deeper, and will utilize better weather

473: to observe at both 850 and 450 microns -- the latter 

474: has a superior resolution of 8 arcsec.

475: 

476: Table 1 lists details of

477: the main clouds to be mapped, and Figures 3 -- 12 

478: illustrate the approximate mapping areas.

479: This will provide a legacy

480: of images, as well as point-source

481: and extended-source catalogues, of

482: roughly 700 square degrees of sky.  These maps will be sensitive to every

483: Class 0 \& I protostar in the Gould Belt

484: and every L1544-like prestellar core within 200 pc

485: (J. Kirk et al., 2005).

486: The maps will yield the first extensive

487: catalogue of such objects selected by

488: submillimetre continuum emission and will increase the number of known

489: sources by more than an order of magnitude.

490: Comparison with observations taken at other wavelengths, such as 

491: with Spitzer or Herschel, will allow correct classification

492: of the sources.

493: 

494: The key science goals of the SCUBA-2 survey are:

495: 

496: \begin{itemize}

497: 

498: \item

499: to calculate

500: the duration of each of the protostellar stages;

501: 

502: \item

503: to elucidate the nature of

504: the evolution of protostellar collapse;

505: 

506: \item

507: to discover

508: the origin of the initial mass

509: function (IMF) of stars

510: from intermediate-mass stars to sub-stellar objects;

511: 

512: \item

513: to discern

514: the connection between protostars and the molecular cloud structure from

515: which they formed.  

516: 

517: \end{itemize}

518: 

519: In addition, the SCUBA-2 maps will provide `finding charts' both for

520: the other aspects of this survey and for future projects. SCUBA-2

521: will take this subject beyond the source-by-source approach of the

522: past, into the domain where large-number statistics on the earliest

523: stages of star formation can finally be carried out, through a wide 

524: census of starless and prestellar cores and protostars.  

525: 

526: To avoid mapping large areas of blank sky,

527: molecular clouds have been

528: pre-selected by visual extinction, $A_V$, from the recent  

529: extinction atlas of Dobashi et al. (2005).  The continuum mapping will

530: be divided into two layers, a wide survey of areas with A$_{V}$ = 1-3,

531: and a deep survey of area with A$_{V} >$ 3.  Figures 3--12 show the extents

532: of each of the surveys in each region. In addition, some `blank field'

533: areas will also be mapped as a control sample.

534: 

535: \subsection{Shallow Survey} 

536: 

537: For the shallow survey, we will map areas with $A_V >$

538: 1 at 850\,$\mu$m to a depth of 1 $\sigma$ = 10\ mJy\,beam$^{-1}$.   Within

539: the Gould Belt, this comprises an area of $\sim$400 square degrees.

540: In addition, we will map 120 square degrees outside 

541: of the major star-forming complexes, but positionally 

542: associated with the Gould Belt. This will

543: cover nearby small clouds and isolated star formation

544: regions selected from dark cloud catalogues 

545: (e.g. Lynds 1962; Cambresy 1999;

546: Dobashi et al., 2005) and previous catalogues 

547: (e.g. Clemens \& Barvainis 1988; Jijina et al. 1999;

548: Lee \& Myers 1999; Visser et al. 2002).

549: 

550: Finally,

551: we will map $\sim$10 square degrees of blank sky (i.e. $A_{V}$ $<$ 1) 

552: split into several fields near the Gould Belt to the same depth.

553: This will act as a control

554: sample to see if we have missed significant numbers of objects by

555: using $A_V$ to select our target regions. 

556: The data from the shallow survey will

557: be sensitive at 3 $\sigma$ to masses down to the sub-stellar mass limit

558: of 0.08\ M$_\odot$ per beam for objects at 0.5 kpc that have 

559: T$_d$ $\geq$ 20\,K, which is

560: typical of the low extinction parts of molecular clouds.

561: 

562: \subsection{Deep Survey} 

563: 

564: Temperatures vary within molecular clouds and the inner

565: regions are colder (T$_d$ $\sim$ 10\,K) than the outer regions (T$_d$ 

566: $\sim$ 20\,K) 

567: due to increased shielding from the interstellar UV field.  For the 

568: deep survey

569: we will map regions with $A_{V}$ $>$ 3 to a depth of 1 $\sigma$ = 3\ 

570: mJy\,beam$^{-1}$ at 850\,$\mu$m to ensure a complete census of star-forming

571: cores.  These regions comprise an area of $\sim$64 square degrees.

572: These data

573: will also reach the sub-stellar mass limit of 0.08 M$_\odot$ per beam

574: at 3 $\sigma$ for objects at 0.5\,kpc at T$_d$ = 10\,K.  

575: 

576: Furthermore, these

577: observations will simultaneously provide maps at 450\,$\mu$m with a mean

578: 1 $\sigma$ rms of 12\ mJy per 450\,$\mu$m beam (i.e. equal to 6\ mJy per

579: 850\,$\mu$m beam after smoothing).  

580: This is because this aspect of the survey will be carried out in

581: `Grade 1' weather conditions ($\tau_{\rm 225GHZ} \leq$ 0.05).

582: The 450\,$\mu$m and 850\,$\mu$m data

583: together will provide spectral index information, where it is essential

584: to have comparable resolution, to constrain the dust opacity indices

585: and thus the masses of the objects.

586: 

587: \subsection{Source Count Predictions} 

588: 

589: The total star formation rate for

590: clouds within 0.5 kpc is $\sim$6 $\times$ 10$^{-3}\ $M$_\odot$\ yr$^{-1}$

591: (e.g. McKee \& Williams 1997).  Using the measured IMF (e.g. Kroupa

592: 2001), the total stellar production rate within this distance is

593: therefore

594: $\sim$0.02 stars yr$^{-1}$.  The best

595: current estimates of the timescales for

596: prestellar cores and Class 0 protostars are $\sim$3 $\times$ 10$^{5}$

597: yr and $\sim$3 $\times$ 10$^{4}$ yr respectively (e.g. Andr\'e et al., 2000).

598: Thus, we expect $\sim$6000 prestellar cores and $\sim$600 Class 0 

599: protostars to be found in our wide survey.  Even allowing for possible

600: uncertainties in these by factors of $\sim$2, we would still expect 

601: thousands of objects in total, with hundreds at low mass 

602: (M $< 0.5$\,M$_\odot$) and tens at high-mass (M $> 8$\,M$_\odot$).

603:   

604: These objects will 

605: fill in the under-populated extremes of currently measured mass functions.  

606: Note that only tens of

607: Class 0 protostars and hundreds of prestellar 

608: cores in total are currently known (Andr\'e et al., 2000).

609: Finally, the expected numbers of 

610: objects at the mass function peak (M $\approx 0.5$\,M$_\odot$) will be large

611: enough ($\sim$20-50 in each cloud) to reveal statistically if

612: differences in characteristic stellar masses that exist between clouds

613: are caused by local environmental influences on core formation such as

614: cloud density and sound speed.

615: 

616: \subsection{Protostellar Lifetimes and Accretion Rates} 

617: 

618: The census of

619: prestellar cores and protostars from the continuum mapping will allow

620: us to calculate the relative duration of these stages.  Since half of the

621: envelope mass is accreted during the Class 0 stage and the rest during

622: the Class I stage (Andr\'e et al., 1993),

623: the duration of each stage tells us about the

624: protostellar accretion rate.   For instance, if they are roughly equal

625: then the accretion rate is probably constant, as in the Shu collapse

626: model (Shu 1977).   

627: 

628: Alternatively, if the Class 0 duration is only

629: one-tenth the Class I duration, as is currently suspected (Andr\'e et

630: al., 2000), then accretion must start very rapidly and decrease over time

631: (e.g. Whitworth \& Ward-Thompson 2001), implying a very different collapse

632: scenario. In addition, if much of the envelope mass is ejected

633: (e.g. Matzner \& McKee 2000), then the fractions accreted will sum to 

634: less than 1. Current observations are limited by small-number statistics

635: (e.g. Visser et al. 2002)

636: but the wide survey will provide a sufficiently large sample to answer

637: this question.  

638: 

639: Furthermore, the relative quantities

640: of prestellar cores at varying degrees of central condensation (given

641: by continuum radial profiles) will inform models that 

642: predict the onset of protostellar collapse (e.g.

643: turbulent dissipation vs. magnetic regulation).

644: 

645: \subsection{Origin of the IMF} 

646: 

647: With the census of nearby

648: prestellar cores provided by the continuum mapping, we will be able to

649: plot a very well-populated mass spectrum of these objects over a very

650: wide range of masses.  This will allow us to confirm or refute the claim

651: that this mass function (e.g. Motte et al. 2001; Johnstone et al., 2006;

652: Nutter \& Ward-Thompson 2007) mimics the stellar IMF (Salpeter 1955).

653: Recent observations appear to show that the prestellar core mass function

654: follows the same form as the IMF down to very low masses -- see Figure~13

655: (Nutter \& Ward-Thompson 2007).   

656: 

657: Such a steep mass function implies that low-mass cores dominate (both by

658: number and by mass). This is in contrast to the cloud mass function where 

659: most of the mass resides in

660: the largest structures (e.g. Williams et al., 1994), 

661: implying that a different 

662: physical mechanism is responsible for the cores.

663: Two other obvious differences 

664: between the cloud and core mass function

665: also exist. First, while the cloud mass function includes all the mass in 

666: the cloud (by definition),

667: the core mass function generally only adds up to a few percent of the mass 

668: of the parent cloud (Johnstone et al., 2004; H. Kirk et al., 2006).

669: Second, the mass-radius relation for

670: clouds implies non-thermal motions for the largest 

671: structures whereas the cores reveal mostly thermal motions.

672: 

673: If the link between the core mass function and the IMF is

674: confirmed, this will provide very strong evidence

675: that the IMF is determined at the prestellar

676: core stage of star formation -- i.e. the physics behind core formation

677: is also the cause of the IMF.  The two currently competing theories of

678: core formation invoke either magnetic fields or turbulence

679: (e.g. Mouschovias 1991; Ballesteros-Paredes et al., 2003).

680: Of particular note will be the detection of numerous objects with masses

681: below the substellar limit (0.08 M$_{\odot}$), allowing for the first

682: time a comparison between the mass functions of very low mass molecular

683: cloud cores with the brown dwarf IMF.  

684: Some detections have already been made of sub-stellar mass cores

685: (e.g. Greaves et al., 2003), but the numbers are very limited so far.

686: Similarities between these mass

687: functions would imply a similar formation process for brown dwarfs and

688: stars.  A statistically significant deviation, however, would imply

689: differing origins -- for example,

690: brown dwarfs may form out of protostellar disks

691: (for a review, see: Whitworth et al., 2007).

692: 

693: Additional important questions for these very low-mass cores include:

694: whether they resemble 

695: the solar mass cores, or

696: exist only inside a collapsing region;

697: whether they

698: also resemble Bonnor-Ebert spheres, and if so, what

699: provides the confining pressure; or

700: alternatively, whether they only form within protostellar disks

701: (e.g. Matzner \& Levin 2005).

702: Thus the survey has a capacity to constrain brown dwarf formation

703: directly, as well as through IMF/CMF comparisons.

704: 

705: \subsection{Structure of Cores to Clouds} 

706: 

707: With a distance limit of 0.5\,kpc, the linear 

708: resolution of the continuum mapping

709: at 850\,$\mu$m will be 0.03\,pc (7000 AU) or better.  

710: This scale is well matched for probing the 

711: structures of the detected prestellar and protostellar envelopes, as 

712: well as their surrounding environments.  For example, the radial density 

713: profiles of prestellar cores show

714: a flat inner region and steep outer region with the turnover at 

715: $\sim$0.03 pc (Ward-Thompson et al., 1994; J. Kirk et al., 2005).

716: 

717: Some have claimed that the observed radial density profiles

718: indicate cores are pressure-supported Bonnor-Ebert spheres 

719: (e.g. Alves et al., 2001), while others have argued

720: that such configurations result naturally from dynamic evolution of gas 

721: on large scales and do not indicate equilibrium (Ballesteros-Paredes et al.,

722: 2003). The differences between the model predictions centre around the

723: velocity profiles of the cores.

724: The larger sample of cores revealed by the continuum mapping, 

725: and followed up by CO spectroscopy with HARP (see section 3 below),

726: will provide enough examples of both velocity

727: structure and detailed morphology to settle this 

728: debate. On slightly larger scales, the 

729: continuum mapping will have the sensitivity to probe the lower-density 

730: surroundings of these cores, allowing insights into core formation.

731: For instance, if one assumes that the continuum maps trace the mass, 

732: then one could use them to assess the

733: importance of gravitational torques on assembling disks (Jappsen \& 

734: Klessen 2004).

735: 

736: Previously, these surroundings could be probed only by lower 

737: density tracers such as CO 

738: (in regions where it is not depleted and its lines 

739: are optically thin), but with continuum mapping 

740: it will be possible to link the structures of cores 

741: with their environments using the same tracer.  On even larger scales, 

742: the continuum mapping (especially that of the deep survey) will reveal the 

743: structure of extended filaments within clouds

744: (c.f. Johnstone \& Bally 1999; Fiege et al. 2004; Hatchell et al. 2005).

745: 

746: Molecular clouds exhibit filamentary structures, which are often the

747: locus of star formation along their length. Although turbulence and

748: magnetic fields have been suggested to explain the filamentary

749: structures in molecular clouds, few detailed studies have been made

750: due to limitations in mapping both the velocity fields and the

751: polarized light which traces the magnetic field. 

752: Coupled with the dynamical information obtained with 

753: HARP and the magnetic field geometry obtained with POL-2,

754: the morphologies and structures of filaments revealed by the continuum

755: mapping will provide clues both to the origins and evolution of

756: molecular clouds (c.f. Khalil et al., 2004).

757: 

758: \section{HARP Survey}

759: 

760: In addition to

761: the SCUBA-2 survey of the local molecular cloud

762: population,

763: we will also carry out a CO survey with HARP to trace

764: the kinematics of cores and clusters,

765: at the same spatial resolution as the 850-micron SCUBA-2

766: observations of dust emission (14 arcsec). This

767: will allow us to address a large number of

768: fundamental scientific problems in star formation in samples of

769: statistically significant size for the first time.  

770: 

771: In typical 

772: star-forming molecular cloud cores, temperatures and densities are in the

773: ranges 10--50~K and 10$^4$--10$^5$~cm$^{-3}$, which are the conditions

774: under which the CO and isotopic lines in the 350~GHz range are

775: excited -- see Table 2.

776: 

777: The key goals of the line observations are: 

778: 

779: \begin{itemize}

780: 

781: \item

782: to search for and map any high velocity outflows present in the

783: cores, to differentiate between starless and protostellar

784: cores;

785: 

786: \item

787: to derive simple

788: constraints on the column density and CO depletion in these cores; 

789: 

790: \item

791: to help understand the support mechanisms and core evolution; 

792: 

793: \item

794: to characterize the cloud kinematics in a large sample of environments

795: and investigate the evolution and role of turbulence in star formation.

796: 

797: \end{itemize}

798: 

799: We note that these goals are also very closely coupled to those

800: of the polarimetric study presented below

801: and that many of the goals of the continuum survey also

802: require these data for

803: interpretation, particularly to classify and determine the

804: ages of the embedded sources.  

805: 

806: \subsection{Target Regions} 

807: 

808: HARP is a much faster mapping

809: instrument than previous single-pixel receivers.

810: However,

811: it is still not possible to map all of

812: the regions covered by the SCUBA-2 survey.  Hence we will select

813: a typical sample of cores and cloud regions from the SCUBA-2 survey,

814: and observe these with HARP. 

815: 

816: The proposed molecular line observations consist of two sets of

817: targets. We will make single fully-sampled

818: footprint images ($\sim$4 square arcmin)

819: of a set of 1000 cores, and larger

820: (0.08 degree$^2$) maps of 10 cloud regions containing

821: filaments and clustered star formation. 

822: For the well-studied clouds,

823: many of the target regions are already known from previous SCUBA

824: surveys.

825: The cores, selected from the

826: SCUBA-2 catalogue, will consist of a flux-limited sample plus a

827: representative selection covering the full range of conditions and

828: clouds.  

829: 

830: In order to meet the science goals outlined above,

831: we will map all of the cloud regions and 300 of the cores in

832: the $^{12}$CO, C$^{18}$O and $^{13}$CO~J = 3--2 lines -- the

833: latter two lines can be obtained simultaneously within the

834: ACSIS bandwidth.  A further 700 cores will be mapped in the

835: $^{12}$CO~3--2 line only. Most of the core maps will be a single

836: fully-sampled HARP footprint, but for clustered cores we will

837: combine footprints to map contiguous areas.

838: 

839: As summarised in Table 2, the $^{12}$CO maps will be made with a channel

840: width of 1.0 km/s.  The target root-mean-square (rms) 1-$\sigma$ noise

841: level will be 0.3 K in each channel. The  $^{13}$CO and C$^{18}$O 

842: maps will both

843: have a channel width of 0.1 km/s, and the target rms 1-$\sigma$ noise

844: level in each channel will be 0.25 and 0.3 K respectively.  The

845: slightly poorer predicted rms in C$^{18}$O 

846: is due to its location near the

847: edge of an atmospheric band.  The equivalent H$_2$ column density

848: sensitivities are noted in Table 2.

849: 

850: \subsection{Molecular outflows: classification and mass ejection} 

851: 

852: The first observation

853: targeting cores will be in the $^{12}$CO\ J = $3-2$ line, to search

854: for and image any high velocity gas -- see Figure~14.  

855: The presence of a high velocity

856: molecular outflow is a standard way to

857: differentiate between prestellar and protostellar

858: cores (e.g. Bontemps et al., 1996b;

859: Wolf-Chase et al., 1998; Visser et al., 2002;

860: Hatchell et al., 2007).

861: For compact submillimetre objects with no IR detection, 

862: outflows are a critical discriminant between

863: prestellar and protostellar cores.

864: Where outflows are detected, we will estimate outflow

865: momentum flux (e.g.,  Bontemps et al., 1996a) in this large homogeneous

866: sample, allowing us to put on a firm statistical footing the proposed

867: correlations with bolometric luminosity and envelope mass. 

868: 

869: The envelope mass-luminosity-momentum flux relationships test models of

870: mass accretion and outflow ejection, and therefore how much of the

871: envelope mass is ultimately converted into stars

872: (Matzner \& McKee 2000). Reasonable estimates

873: of momentum flux can be made without mapping the whole outflow, as

874: most of the momentum flux is seen close to the star (Fuller \& Ladd

875: 2002).

876: 

877: In the larger cloud regions, mapping the outflows of a large

878: number of protostellar objects will make it possible to determine

879: their energy input to the cloud

880: (e.g.  Norman \& Silk 1980; Li \& Nakamura 2006; Matzner 2007).

881: The magnitudes of these energies will allow a determination of

882: the roles of outflows in stimulating turbulent motions or parent 

883: cloud dispersal (e.g. Silk 1995).

884: 

885: \subsection{CO depletion}

886: 

887: We note that all molecular tracers are affected by chemistry and 

888: depletion onto dust grains. CO is

889: no exception, depleting in the densest regions of molecular cores

890: (e.g. Caselli et al., 1999; Redman et al., 2002).

891: We will use these observations to

892: investigate CO depletion. 

893: 

894: Prestellar cores are known to be heavily affected,

895: with CO depletion factors reaching 10 or more 

896: (e.g. Crapsi et al., 2005). A

897: limited study suggests that Class~0 sources are also centrally

898: depleted by factors of 5, but by the time the Class~I phase is

899: reached, CO abundances have returned to the canonical

900: value of $10^{-4}$ (Jorgensen et al., 2002).  

901: 

902: Typical size scales for depletion are $\sim$6000~AU (Caselli et al.,

903: 1999), which corresponds to $12''$ at

904: 500~pc or $40''$ at 150~pc. Outside the density

905: peaks, CO abundance should be stable (e.g. van Dishoeck 2006; Di

906: Francesco et al., 2007).

907: 

908: This survey will produce simultaneous dust and CO isotopologue images

909: of hundreds of cloud cores classified on the basis of infrared

910: counterparts or molecular outflows.  We can use this sample to

911: statistically investigate the levels and size scales for CO depletion

912: as a function of core properties such as mass and evolution.

913: 

914: \subsection{Fundamental properties of cores: mass, temperature and density}

915: 

916: Two independent measurements of the envelope gas mass, to compare with the

917: dust mass, can be derived from C$^{18}$O. Firstly, the C$^{18}$O

918: integrated line strength, assuming optically thin emission, will yield

919: a gas mass.  

920: Although this will be a lower limit due to depletion it

921: is still valuable as it relies on a different set of assumptions (CO

922: abundance, gas excitation) to mass estimates from dust, where the dust

923: opacity and dust temperature are subject to their own uncertainties.

924: Secondly, the velocity dispersion and size provide a virial mass

925: estimate largely unaffected by depletion as linewidths fall towards

926: cloud cores (e.g. Goodman et al. 1998a \& b). 

927: 

928: In total, the CO observations are vital

929: to deriving reliable core parameters in order to understand how

930: clusters form and how the initial mass function is determined.

931: Combining the HARP data with existing lower-$J$ maps of these

932: clouds (e.g. Ridge et al., 2006) will

933: allow us to estimate temperature and density using multi-transition

934: multi-isotopologue radiative transfer methods.

935: 

936: \subsection{Kinematic tests of star formation models}

937: 

938: Measurement of the detailed

939: kinematic and density properties of the cores will be carried out using the

940: C$^{18}$O and $^{13}$CO lines, observable simultaneously

941: -- see Figure~14. In nearly all cores, we expect

942: the C$^{18}$O line to be optically thin. Hence, we will be able to

943: measure the thermal and non-thermal contributions to the line width,

944: enabling a study of core support mechanisms

945: and their evolution (e.g. Jessop \& Ward-Thompson 2001).

946: 

947: The combination of a high-density tracer such as the J=3--2

948: transition, with lower-density tracers (e.g. lower-J CO lines) allows an

949: investigation of the dynamical motion of cores through their parent

950: cloud (e.g. Walsh et al., 2004; 2006; Ayliffe et al., 2007).

951: 

952: Where cores are clustered, we will

953: also compare the velocity dispersion between

954: cores, a simple quantity to measure which can be compared both with

955: star formation simulations and with young clusters of

956: pre-main-sequence stars (e.g. Belloche et al., 2001).

957: 

958: These quantities may potentially discriminate

959: between competitive accretion/core mergers

960: (e.g. Bate et al., 2003) and the alternative

961: where one submillimetre core results in one star system

962: (e.g. Goodwin et al., 2004a,b).

963: 

964: In addition, the distribution of C$^{18}$O line velocities of cores 

965: observed with HARP

966: in individual molecular clouds will probe theories of cloud 

967: turbulence. Such

968: cores may act as test particles within the larger-scale 

969: turbulent motions within

970: such clouds. Similar smaller-scale studies have recently been 

971: carried out in, for example,

972: %Taurus (Tafalla et al., 2007) and 

973: Perseus (H. Kirk et al., 2007).

974: 

975: \subsection{Clouds and Filaments} 

976: 

977: We will also produce large maps of 10 filamentary or clustered star

978: formation regions.  Many of these will be well-studied regions (e.g. the

979: Orion filament and the $\rho$ Ophiuchi cluster), but not all of them

980: have pre-existing submillimetre maps (e.g. the Pipe Nebula and L1506 in

981: Taurus).  These regions will be mapped in 

982: $^{12}$CO, C$^{18}$O and $^{13}$CO lines to

983: the spectral resolutions summarized in Table 2.  These maps will

984: cover regions of order 300 square arcminutes (0.08 deg$^2$) in

985: size.

986: 

987: The key

988: goal here will be to compare the observations to gas dynamic and MHD

989: turbulence simulations (e.g. Balsara et al., 2001; Padoan \& Nordlund

990: 2002; Bate et al. 2003; Vazquez-Semadeni et

991: al. 2005).  These models make strong predictions on the expected clump

992: mass spectrum, the spatial and velocity structure, the shapes of the

993: cores and filaments, and the star formation efficiency. 

994: 

995: Comparisons

996: can be made by analysing cloud spatial and velocity structure using

997: techniques such as clumping analyses (Williams et al., 1994), axial

998: ratios (e.g. Kerton et al., 2003), delta variance (Stutzki et al. 1998;

999: Bensch et al. 2001),

1000: principal component analysis (e.g. Heyer

1001: \& Schloerb 1997), structure

1002: function (e.g. Brunt et al., 2003), and spectral correlation function

1003: (Rosolowsky 1999).

1004: 

1005: Mapping the J = 3--2 transitions, which trace

1006: reasonably high densities, at an angular resolution typically less 

1007: than a thermal

1008: Jeans length (for an H$_2$ number density of $10^5\,$cm$^{-3}$), reveals

1009: the kinematics over the critical transition to gravitational dominance

1010: (Ossenkopf 2002), whereas existing low J CO maps (e.g. Dame et al.,

1011: 2001; Wilson et al., 2005) trace only the lower density large-scale 

1012: molecular cloud structure and kinematics. 

1013: We note that lower J (usually J=1--0) maps exist for many of our

1014: clouds and can be analysed in conjunction with the HARP data

1015: (e.g. Ridge et al., 2006).

1016: 

1017: In total, the CO observations are vital in deriving reliable core parameters 

1018: in order to understand how clusters form and how the initial mass

1019: function is determined.  

1020: When combined with the SCUBA-2 data, the HARP

1021: data will provide a powerful way to explore the detailed dynamics and

1022: density structure in star-forming clouds, presenting rigorous tests of

1023: the details of the theoretical models. 

1024: 

1025: \section{POL-2 Survey}

1026: 

1027: We will also carry out a polarimetric survey of the brightest

1028: cores and clouds, since

1029: measurements of polarized emission

1030: from dust are the most effective means of probing the magnetic field.

1031: By contrast, absorption polarimetry is

1032: limited to the periphery of dense clouds, and Zeeman splitting

1033: detections are made in only a small fraction of

1034: regions observed (Crutcher 1999).  

1035: 

1036: Polarized dust

1037: emission is detected from objects on all scales measured (e.g.

1038: Matthews et al. 2001; Crutcher et al. 2004) and from compact

1039: cores, regardless of evolutionary epoch (e.g. Ward-Thompson et al. 2000;

1040: Matthews \& Wilson 2002), as illustrated in 

1041: Figure~15.  

1042: Sensitivity limitations and practical limits on observing times 

1043: have previously

1044: restricted observations to several dozen bright 

1045: (i.e. S$_{850\mu m} \geq 1$\,Jy), compact objects.   

1046: 

1047: Attempts to measure the magnetic field 

1048: in star-forming regions are driven by the need to understand its

1049: significance in the formation of cloud structure and/or the regulation

1050: of collapse of cloud cores.  These factors are related to star

1051: formation rates and molecular cloud lifetimes, on which there is

1052: substantial debate in the literature (e.g. Myers \& Goodman 1988; Hartmann

1053: et al.\ 2001; Elmegreen 2000).

1054: 

1055: The key goals of the polarimetric mapping are: 

1056: 

1057: \begin{itemize}

1058: 

1059: \item

1060: to obtain maps of polarization position angle and fractional

1061: polarization in a statistically meaningful sample of cores;

1062: 

1063: \item

1064: to characterize the evidence for, and the relevance of, the field

1065: and turbulence (in conjunction with HARP observations) in cores

1066: and their surrounding environments;

1067: 

1068: \item

1069: to test the predictions of low-mass star formation

1070: theories (core, outflow, field geometry);

1071: 

1072: \item

1073: to generate a large sample of cores suitable for follow-up with 

1074: forthcoming instruments such as ALMA.

1075: 

1076: \end{itemize}

1077: 

1078: \subsection{Target regions} 

1079: 

1080: From the SCUBA-2 850\,$\mu$m continuum survey

1081: we expect to detect at least 100 cores of sufficient

1082: brightness ($>$250 mJy beam$^{-1}$ peak 850\,$\mu$m flux) for

1083: observation with POL-2 in single SCUBA-2 footprints. These

1084: polarimetry targets will be located in different star-forming regions

1085: and be of various classes (starless, prestellar, Class 0, Class I).  

1086: 

1087: To probe the

1088: initial field conditions for core formation, maps of $\sim$0.08 deg$^2$

1089: in extent will be made of 10 cloud regions containing

1090: filaments and clustered star formation in synergy with the HARP

1091: large-scale mapping to measure the gas dynamics and

1092: characterize the turbulence. 

1093: 

1094: Candidate types of regions would

1095: include a starless fragment of a filamentary cloud, such as a portion

1096: of the Pipe Nebula (see Figure~9). In addition we will map

1097: filamentary clouds for which absorption

1098: polarimetry exists, such as the L1506 filament in Taurus.

1099: We will use these data to

1100: compare directly the magnetic field directions yielded by

1101: emission and absorption polarimetry at the same locations, 

1102: allowing these methods to be directly compared for the first time.

1103: We will also map regions

1104: around clusters exhibiting different rates of star formation.

1105: 

1106: \subsection{Tests of the Models} 

1107: 

1108: According to one

1109: paradigm of low-mass star formation, collapse is guided by

1110: magnetic fields, producing flattened cores and disks

1111: (e.g. Mouschovias 1991). Outflows are

1112: then generated orthogonal to the disk, producing outflows aligned with

1113: the nascent field direction.  Greaves et al. (1997) tested this

1114: correlation for five sources, finding the alignment of field and

1115: outflow appeared to be correlated to the angle of the outflow to the

1116: line of sight (see also Matthews et al. 2007).

1117: 

1118: With $\sim$ 70 sources with outflows (Class 0 and

1119: Class I), we will be able to establish statistically whether outflows

1120: are preferentially oriented with respect to the field direction.

1121: Using the SCUBA-2 data, we will also determine whether the field

1122: direction is related to the core morphology.  

1123: Many cores for which polarization maps

1124: exist are too distant to compare field geometry to core morphology,

1125: since the cores are poorly resolved.  A sizeable fraction of the

1126: objects mapped are also embedded in filaments, making measurements of

1127: core axis ratios particularly challenging.

1128: 

1129: Models predict different

1130: relations between core morphology and polarization position angle

1131: depending on field geometry (straight or helical) and core morphology

1132: (oblate, prolate or triaxial). Since the outflow, core and

1133: field orientations are all measured in 2D projection, statistical

1134: corrections can be made for an ensemble of cores which are not

1135: applicable to individual objects.

1136: 

1137: \subsection{Models of Magnetic Field Geometry} 

1138: 

1139: Polarized

1140: dust emission yields only the 2D field geometry projected onto the

1141: plane of the sky.  Utilizing all three components from the survey

1142: (continuum, line and dust polarimetry), we will generate a set of

1143: analytic models of the three dimensional field geometry of all 100

1144: cores as well as extended coherent structures such as filaments.  

1145: This will be practical utilizing a new generalized

1146: modelling code (Fiege 2005), which has already been applied to the case

1147: of a filamentary cloud (Fiege et al., 2004).  

1148: 

1149: The

1150: most general question to be addressed is whether there are any

1151: quasi-static magnetic models of cores that can explain the

1152: polarization and continuum maps for a statistically significant number

1153: of sources, as some theoretical models predict (e.g.  Mouschovias

1154: 1976; Tomisaka et al. 1988). 

1155: 

1156: If all quasi-static models fail to provide adequate fits to the data, then

1157: the data could only be explained by MHD turbulence.  Regardless of the

1158: outcome, the polarization dataset will settle this important question

1159: in star formation theory.  It will also provide a polarization

1160: catalogue of legacy value, which can be used as a definitive test for

1161: future models and simulations, and a powerful tool for their

1162: refinement. 

1163: 

1164: The resulting modelling database will provide the theoretical

1165: counterpart to the observational dataset, which would be augmented as

1166: new and improved models are developed.  In principle, one could search

1167: for regions in parameter space where the allowed solution sets

1168: intersect for multiple cores.  This would provide a way to search for

1169: preferred ranges of parameters, which would help to refine future

1170: models.

1171: 

1172: \subsection{Magnetic Field Strength}

1173: 

1174: The fractional polarization from dust

1175: yields no direct estimate of the magnetic field strength, since it is

1176: dependent on several additional unknowns (e.g. degree of grain alignment,

1177: grain shape and composition).  The field strength will be derived from

1178: the commonly-used Chandrasekhar-Fermi (CF) method (Chandrasekhar \& Fermi

1179: 1953) utilizing dispersion in polarization vectors (where high

1180: dispersion indicates a highly turbulent field and a weak mean field

1181: component), the line widths estimated from the HARP C$^{18}$O/$^{13}$CO 

1182: data, and the density from the SCUBA-2 fluxes

1183: (c.f. Crutcher et al., 2004; J. Kirk et al., 2006).

1184: 

1185: Simulations show that this

1186: estimate can be corrected for a statistical ensemble of objects to

1187: yield realistic estimates of the field strength (Ostriker et al.,

1188: 2001; Heitsch et al. 2001).  Due to measurements of line widths

1189: and dispersion estimates, we will be able to test effectively whether

1190: the cores with broader line widths show more dispersion, thereby

1191: determining the applicability of the CF method in molecular clouds.

1192: 

1193: \subsection{Large-Scale Fields and Turbulence} 

1194: 

1195: The same

1196: extended regions will be mapped with POL-2 and HARP.

1197: The relation between the core field geometry and

1198: that of the larger-scale structure in clustered and filamentary

1199: regions will be observed and modelled. Polarization maps can reveal

1200: abrupt changes in polarization direction (see Figure~15), which

1201: indicate underlying changes in the magnetic field direction.  

1202: 

1203: The gas dynamics from 

1204: HARP C$^{18}$O/$^{13}$CO observations will be used with the polarization

1205: maps to test predictions of magnetized simulations of turbulence

1206: (e.g., Heitsch et al.\ 2001; Ostriker et al. 2001; Padoan \& Nordland

1207: 2002).  Such large-scale maps are the key to unraveling the overall

1208: geometry of the magnetic field.

1209: 

1210: \section{Other Surveys}

1211: 

1212: In parallel with this survey, there are a number of far-infrared surveys

1213: also being carried out of the Gould Belt. The two most relevant

1214: to this paper are those being carried out on the Spitzer Space Telescope and

1215: the Herschel Space Telescope.

1216: 

1217: The Spitzer Space Telescope -- formerly SIRTF, the Space Infrared Telescope 

1218: Facility (Werner et al., 2004)

1219: -- was launched on 25 August 2003. It

1220: consists of an 85-cm telescope and three cryogenically-cooled science 

1221: instruments, covering a wavelength range of 3--180$\mu$m.

1222: The three instruments are

1223: the Infrared Array Camera (IRAC; Fazio et al., 2004), 

1224: the Infra-red Spectrograph (IRS; Houck et al., 2004), and

1225: the Multi-band Imaging Photometer for Spitzer (MIPS; Rieke et al., 2004).

1226: IRAC is a four-channel camera that provides simultaneous 

1227: 5.12 $\times$ 5.12 arcmin 

1228: images at 3.6, 4.5, 5.8, and 8 microns. Each of the four detector arrays in 

1229: the camera are 256 $\times$ 256 pixels in size. 

1230: The IRS has four separate modules: a low-resolution, short-wavelength mode 

1231: covering the 5.3-14 micron interval; a high-resolution, short-wavelength 

1232: mode covering 10-19.5 microns; a low-resolution, long-wavelength mode for 

1233: observations at 14-40 microns; and a high-resolution, long-wavelength mode 

1234: for 19-37 microns. MIPS consists of

1235: a 128 $\times$ 128 array for imaging at 24 microns, a

1236: 32 $\times$ 32 array for imaging at 70 microns, 

1237: and a 2 $\times$ 20 array for imaging 

1238: at 160 microns.

1239: 

1240: One legacy programme on Spitzer is currently mapping the

1241: same Gould Belt clouds as are described in this paper using IRAC and MIPS

1242: -- for more information see: $http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/gouldbelt/$.

1243: This is a follow-up to the `Cores to disks' Spitzer Legacy Project (c2d;

1244: Evans et al. 2003; see also: Allen et al. 2007; Guedel et al. 2007)

1245: 

1246: The Herschel Space Telescope (Pilbratt, 2005a,b) is

1247: a 3.5 metre diameter passively cooled telescope due to be launched in 2008.

1248: The science payload complement comprises: the

1249: Heterodyne Instrument for the Far Infrared (HIFI;

1250: de Graauw et al., 2005), a very high resolution 

1251: heterodyne spectrometer; the

1252: Photo-detector Array Camera and Spectrometer (PACS;

1253: Poglitsch et al., 2005), an imaging photometer 

1254: and medium-resolution grating spectrometer, and the

1255: Spectral and Photometric Imaging Receiver (SPIRE;

1256: Griffin et al., 2002), an imaging photometer 

1257: and an imaging Fourier transform spectrometer.

1258: 

1259: One Guaranteed Time Programme on Herschel will use

1260: PACS and SPIRE to map the same clouds in the Gould Belt at

1261: wavelengths of 75, 170, 250, 350 and 500$\mu$m.

1262: For a full description of this programme see:

1263: $http://starformation-herschel.iap.fr/$.

1264: 

1265: \section{Summary}

1266: 

1267: We have presented a programme of observations that will be carried out by 

1268: the JCMT using its new suite of instruments SCUBA-2, HARP and POL-2.

1269: These instruments will be used to survey the nearby star-forming regions

1270: in the Gould Belt to answer key questions in star formation research.

1271: The results of the survey will include legacy images 

1272: and submillimetre source catalogues of the mapped

1273: regions. The data will be presented in a series of data papers

1274: followed by a number of papers interpreting the data and

1275: addressing the science questions discussed above.

1276: The combination of this survey ,

1277: together with those mentioned in the previous section,

1278: will provide a unique set of complementary

1279: data, and a powerful legacy for many years to come.

1280: 

1281: \begin{thebibliography}{}

1282: 

1283: \bibitem[]{}

1284: Alves, J. F., Lada, C. J., \& Lada, E. A. 2001, Nature, 409, 159

1285: 

1286: \bibitem[]{} 

1287: Allen L., Megeath, S. T., Gutermuth, R., Myers, P. C., Wolk, S.,

1288: Adams, F. C., Muzerolle, J., Young, E., \& Pipher, J. L. 2007,

1289: in `Protostars and Planets V', eds.

1290: B. Reipurth, D. Jewitt, K. Keil, University of Arizona Press,

1291: Tucson, Arizona, p. 361

1292: 

1293: \bibitem[]{} 

1294: Andr\'e, P., Ward-Thompson, D., \& Barsony, M. 1993, \apj, 

1295: 406, 122

1296: 

1297: \bibitem[]{} 

1298: Andr\'e, P., Ward-Thompson, D., \& Barsony, M. 2000, in 

1299: Protostars \& Planets IV, eds. V. Mannings, S. S. Russell, \& A. Boss 

1300: Univ. of Arizona Press, Tucson, p. 59

1301: 

1302: \bibitem[]{} 

1303: Ayliffe, B., Langdon, J. C., Cohl, H. S., \& Bate, M. R. 

1304: 2007, MNRAS, 374, 1198

1305: 

1306: \bibitem[]{} 

1307: Ballasteros-Paredes, J., Klessen, R. S., \& Vazquez-Semadeni, 

1308: E. 2003, \apj, 592, 188

1309: 

1310: \bibitem[]{} 

1311: Balsara D., Ward-Thompson D., \& Crutcher R. M. 2001, MNRAS, 327, 715

1312: 

1313: \bibitem[]{} 

1314: Bastien, P., Bissonnette, E., Ade, P. A. R., Pisano, G., Savini, G., 

1315: Jenness, T., Johnstone, D., \& Matthews, B. 2005, JRASC, 99, 133

1316: 

1317: \bibitem[]{} 

1318: Bate, M. R., Bonnell, I. A., \& Bromm, V. 2003, MNRAS, 339, 577

1319: 

1320: \bibitem[]{} 

1321: Belloche, A., Andr\'e, P., \& Motte, F. 2001, Proc. ASP Conf. 243, eds. 

1322: T. Montmerle \& P. Andr\'e, 313

1323: 

1324: \bibitem[]{} 

1325: Bensch, F., Stutzki, J., \& Ossenkopf, V. 2001, A\&A, 366, 636

1326: 

1327: \bibitem[]{} 

1328: Blaauw A., 1991, in: `The Physics of Star Formation and Early Stellar 

1329: Evolution', C. J. Lada \& N. D. Kylafis (eds.), Kluwer, Dordrecht

1330: 

1331: \bibitem[]{} 

1332: Bontemps, S., Andr\'e, P., Terebey, S., \& Cabrit, S. 1996a, A\&A, 311, 858

1333: 

1334: \bibitem[]{} 

1335: Bontemps, S., Ward-Thompson, D., \& Andr\'e, P. 1996b, A\&A, 314, 477

1336: 

1337: \bibitem[]{} 

1338: Brunt, C. M., Heyer, M. H., Vazquez-Semadeni, E., \& Pichardo, B. 2003,

1339: ApJ, 595, 824

1340: 

1341: \bibitem[]{} 

1342: Cambr\'esy, L. 1999, \apj, 345, 965

1343: 

1344: \bibitem[]{} 

1345: Caselli, P., Walmsley, C. M., Tafalla, M., Dore, L., \& Myers, P. C. 1999,

1346: ApJ, 523, L165

1347: 

1348: \bibitem[]{} 

1349: Chandrasekhar, S., \&  Fermi, E. 1953, \apj, 118, 113

1350: 

1351: \bibitem[]{}

1352: Clemens, D. P., \& Barvainis, R. 1988, ApJS, 68, 257

1353: 

1354: \bibitem[]{}

1355: Clube, S. V. M. 1967, MNRAS, 137, 189

1356: 

1357: \bibitem[]{} 

1358: Comeron, F., \& Torra, J. 1992, A\&A, 261, 94

1359: 

1360: \bibitem[]{} 

1361: Comeron, F., \& Torra, J. 1994, A\&A, 281, 35

1362: 

1363: \bibitem[]{} 

1364: Comeron F., Torra, J., \& Gomez, A. E. 1992, Ap\&SS, 187, 187

1365: 

1366: \bibitem[]{} 

1367: Crapsi, A., et al. 2005, A\&A, 439, 1023

1368: 

1369: \bibitem[]{} 

1370: Crutcher, R. M. 1999, \apj, 520, 706

1371: 

1372: \bibitem[]{} 

1373: Crutcher, R. M., Nutter, D. J., Ward-Thompson, D., \& Kirk, J. M.

1374: 2004, \apj, 600, 279

1375: 

1376: \bibitem[]{} 

1377: Dame, T. M., Hartmann, D., \& Thaddeus, P. 2001, \apj, 547, 792

1378: 

1379: \bibitem[]{} 

1380: Davis, C. J., Chrysostomou, A., Matthews, H. E., Jenness, T., \& Ray, T. P.

1381: 2000, \apj, 530, 115

1382: 

1383: \bibitem[]{} 

1384: Di Francesco, J., Evans, N. J. II, Caselli, P., Myers, P. C., Shirley, Y., 

1385: Aikawa, A., \& Tafalla, M. 2007,  in `Protostars and Planets V', eds. 

1386: B. Reipurth, D. Jewitt, K. Keil, University of Arizona Press,

1387: Tucson, Arizona, p. 17

1388: 

1389: \bibitem[]{} 

1390: Dobashi, K., Uehara, H., Kandori, R., Sakurai, T., Kaiden, M., Umemoto, T.,

1391: \& Sato, F. 2005, PASJ, 57, S1

1392: 

1393: \bibitem[]{} 

1394: Dotson, J. L., Davidson, J., Dowell, C. D., Schleuning, D. A., \&

1395: Hildebrand, R. H. 2000, \apjs, 128, 335

1396: 

1397: \bibitem[]{} 

1398: Elmegreen, B. G. 2000, MNRAS, 311, 5

1399: 

1400: \bibitem[]{} 

1401: Evans, N. J., et al. 2003, PASP, 115, 965

1402: 

1403: \bibitem[]{} 

1404: Fazio, G., et al. 2004, ApJS, 154, 10

1405: 

1406: \bibitem[]{} 

1407: Fiege, J. D., Johnstone, D., Redman, R. O., \& Feldman, P. A. 

1408: 2004, \apj, 616, 925

1409: 

1410: \bibitem[]{} 

1411: Fiege, J. D. 2005, in ``Astronomical Polarimetry --

1412: Current Status and Future Directions'', 

1413: eds. Adamson A. J., Aspin C. A., Davis C. J., Fujiyoshi T.,

1414: ASP Conf. Series, 343, 171

1415: 

1416: \bibitem[]{} 

1417: Frerking, M. A., Langer, W. D., \& Wilson, R. W. 1982, ApJ, 262, 590

1418: 

1419: \bibitem[]{} 

1420: Fuller, G. A., \& Ladd, E. F. 2002, \apj, 573, 699

1421: 

1422: \bibitem[]{} 

1423: Goodman, A. A., Barranco, J. A., Wilner, D. J., \& Heyer, M. H.	

1424: 1998a, ApL\&C, 37, 109

1425: 

1426: \bibitem[]{} 

1427: Goodman, A. A., Barranco, J. A., Wilner, D. J., \& Heyer, M. H.

1428: 1998b, ApJ, 504, 223

1429: 

1430: \bibitem[]{} 

1431: Goodwin, S. P., Whitworth, A. P., \& Ward-Thompson, D., 2004a, A\&A, 414, 633

1432: 

1433: \bibitem[]{} 

1434: Goodwin, S. P., Whitworth, A. P., \& Ward-Thompson, D., 2004b, A\&A, 423, 169

1435: 

1436: \bibitem[]{} 

1437: Gould, B. A., 1879, 'Uranometria Argentina', Resultados del Observatorio 

1438: Nacional Argentino en Cordoba, vol. 1, Impr. de P.E. Coni, Buenos Aires

1439: 

1440: \bibitem[]{} 

1441: de Graauw, T., et al. 2005, BAAS, 37, 1219

1442: 

1443: \bibitem[]{} 

1444: Greaves, J. S., Holland, W. S., \& Pound, M. W. 2003, MNRAS, 346, 441

1445: 

1446: \bibitem[]{} 

1447: Greaves, J. S., Holland, W. S., \& Ward-Thompson D. 1997, ApJ, 480, 255

1448: 

1449: \bibitem[]{}

1450: Griffin, M. J., et al. 2006, Proc. SPIE, 6265, 7

1451: 

1452: \bibitem[]{}

1453: Gudel, M., Padgett, D. L., \& Dougados, C. 2007,

1454: in `Protostars and Planets V', eds. 

1455: B. Reipurth, D. Jewitt, K. Keil, University of Arizona Press,

1456: Tucson, Arizona, p. 329

1457: 

1458: \bibitem[]{}

1459: Guillout, P., Sterzik, M. F., Schmitt, J. H. M. M., Motch, C., \&

1460: Neuhauser, R. 1998, A\&A, 337, 113

1461: 

1462: \bibitem[]{} 

1463: Hartmann, L., Ballesteros-Paredes, J., \& Bergin, 

1464: E.A. 2001, \apj, 562, 852

1465: 

1466: \bibitem[]{} 

1467: Hatchell, J., Richer, J. S., Fuller, G. A., Qualtrough, C. J., 

1468: Ladd, E. F., \& Chandler, C. J. 2005, A\&A, 440, 151

1469: 

1470: \bibitem[]{} 

1471: Hatchell, J., Fuller, G. A., Richer, J. S., Harries, T. J., \& Ladd, E. F.

1472: 2007, A\&A, in press

1473: 

1474: \bibitem[]{} 

1475: Heitsch, F., Zweibel, E. G., Mac Low, M-M., Li, P., \& Norman, M. L. 2001, 

1476: \apj, 561, 800

1477: 

1478: \bibitem[]{} 

1479: Herschel, J. F. W. 1847, `Results of astronomical observations made 

1480: at the Cape of Good Hope', Smith, Elder \& Co., London

1481: 

1482: \bibitem[]{} 

1483: Heyer, M. H., \& Schloerb, F. P. 1997, ApJ, 475, 173

1484: 

1485: \bibitem[]{} 

1486: Holland, W. S., et al. 1999, MNRAS, 303, 659

1487: 

1488: \bibitem[]{} 

1489: Holland, W. S., et al. 2006, SPIE, 6275, 45

1490: 

1491: \bibitem[]{}

1492: Houck, J. R., et al. 2004, ApJS, 154, 18

1493: 

1494: \bibitem[]{}

1495: Hovey, G. J., Burgess, T. A., Casorso, R. V., Dent, W. R. F., Dewdney, P. E.,

1496: Force, B., Lightfoot, J. F., Willis, A. G., \& Yeung, K. K. 2000, 

1497: Proc. SPIE, 4015, 114

1498: 

1499: \bibitem[]{}

1500: Jappsen, A. K., \& Klessen, R. S., 2004, A\&A, 423, 1

1501: 

1502: \bibitem[]{} 

1503: Jessop, N. E., \& Ward-Thompson, D. 2001, MNRAS, 323, 1025

1504: 

1505: \bibitem[]{} 

1506: Jijina, J., Myers, P. C., \& Adams, F. C. 1999, ApJS, 125, 161

1507: 

1508: \bibitem[]{} 

1509: Johnstone, D., \& Bally J., 1999, \apj, 510, L49

1510: 

1511: \bibitem[]{} 

1512: Johnstone, D., Wilson, C. D., Moriarty-Schieven, G., Joncas, G., Smith, G.,

1513: Gregersen, E., \& Fich, M. 2000, \apj, 545, 327

1514: 

1515: \bibitem[]{} 

1516: Johnstone, D., Fich, M., Mitchell, G., \&  Moriarty-Schieven, G. 

1517: 2001, ApJ, 559, 307 

1518: 

1519: \bibitem[]{} 

1520: Johnstone, D., Boonman, A. M. S., \& van Dishoeck, E. F. 2003, A\&A, 412, 157

1521: 

1522: \bibitem[]{} 

1523: Johnstone, D., Di Francesco, J., \& Kirk, H. 2004, ApJ, 611, 45

1524: 

1525: \bibitem[]{} 

1526: Johnstone, D., Matthews, H., Mitchell, G. F. 2006, \apj, 639, 259

1527: 

1528: \bibitem[]{}

1529: Jorgensen, J. K., Schoier, F. L., \& van Dishoeck, E. F. 2002, A\&A, 389, 908

1530: 

1531: \bibitem[]{}

1532: Khalil, A., Joncas, G., \& Nekka, F. 2004, ApJ, 601, 352

1533:  

1534: \bibitem[]{} 

1535: Kerton, C. R., Brunt, C. M., Jones, C. E., \& Basu, S. 2003, A\&A, 411, 149

1536: 

1537: \bibitem[]{} 

1538: Kirk, H., Johnstone, D., \& Di Francesco, J. 2006, \apj, 646, 1009

1539: 

1540: \bibitem[]{} 

1541: Kirk, H., Johnstone, D., \& Tafalla, M. 2007, \apj, in press

1542: 

1543: \bibitem[]{} 

1544: Kirk, J. M., Ward-Thompson, D., \& Andr\'e, P. 2005, MNRAS, 360, 1506

1545: 

1546: \bibitem[]{} 

1547: Kirk, J. M., Ward-Thompson, D., \& Crutcher, R. M. 2006, MNRAS, 369, 1445

1548: 

1549: \bibitem[]{} 

1550: Kroupa, P. 2001, MNRAS, 322, 231

1551: 

1552: \bibitem[]{} 

1553: Launhardt, R., Ward-Thompson, D., \& Henning, T. 1997, MNRAS, 288, L45

1554: 

1555: \bibitem[]{} 

1556: Lee, C. W., \& Myers, P. C. 1999, ApJS, 123, 233

1557: 

1558: \bibitem[]{} 

1559: Li, Z. Y., \& Nakamura, F. 2006, ApJ, 640, L187

1560: 

1561: \bibitem[]{} 

1562: Lynds, B. 1962, ApJS, 7, 1

1563: 

1564: \bibitem[]{} 

1565: Matthews, B. C., Fiege, J. D., \& Moriarty-Schieven, G. H. 2002, 

1566: \apj, 569, 304

1567: 

1568: \bibitem[]{} 

1569: Matthews, B. C., \& Wilson, C. D. 2002, \apj, 574, 822

1570: 

1571: \bibitem[]{} 

1572: Matthews, B. C., Wilson, C. D., \& Fiege, J. D. 2001, 

1573: \apj, 562, 400

1574: 

1575: \bibitem[]{} 

1576: Matthews, B. C., et al. 2007, PASP, in press

1577: 

1578: \bibitem[]{} 

1579: Matzner, C. D., 2007, ApJ, in press, astro-ph/0701022

1580: 

1581: \bibitem[]{} 

1582: Matzner, C. D., \& McKee, C. F. 2000, \apj, 545, 364

1583: 

1584: \bibitem[]{} 

1585: McKee, C. F., \& Williams, J. P. 1997, \apj, 476, 144

1586: 

1587: \bibitem[]{}

1588: Moriarty-Schieven, G. H., Johnstone, D., Bally, J., \& Jenness, T., 2006,

1589: ApJ, 645, 357

1590: 

1591: \bibitem[]{} 

1592: Motte, F., Andr\'e, P., Ward-Thompson, D., \& Bontemps, 

1593: S. 2001, A\&A, 372, L41

1594: 

1595: \bibitem[]{} 

1596: Mouschovias, T. 1976, \apj, 206, 753

1597: 

1598: \bibitem[]{} 

1599: Mouschovias, T. 1991, \apj, 373, 169

1600: 

1601: \bibitem[]{} 

1602: Myers, P. C., \& Goodman, A. A. 1988, \apj, 326, 27

1603: 

1604: \bibitem[]{} 

1605: Norman, C., \& Silk J. 1980, ApJ, 238, 158

1606: 

1607: \bibitem[]{} 

1608: Nutter D. J., \& Ward-Thompson D. 2007, MNRAS, 374, 1413

1609: 

1610: \bibitem[]{} 

1611: Nutter D. J., Ward-Thompson D., \& Andr\'e P. 2005, MNRAS, 357, 975

1612: 

1613: \bibitem[]{} 

1614: Nutter D. J., Ward-Thompson D., \& Andr\'e P. 2006, MNRAS, 368, 1833

1615: 

1616: \bibitem[]{} 

1617: Ossenkopf, V. 2002, A\&A 391, 295

1618: 

1619: \bibitem[]{} 

1620: Ostriker, E. C., Stone, J. M., \& Gammie, C. F. 2001, 

1621: \apj, 546, 980

1622: 

1623: \bibitem[]{} 

1624: Padoan, P., \& Nordlund, A. 2002, \apj, 576, 870

1625: 

1626: \bibitem[]{} 

1627: Pierce-Price D., et al. 2000, \apj, 545, L121

1628: 

1629: \bibitem[]{} 

1630: Pilbratt, G., 2005a, BAAS, 37, 1219

1631: 

1632: \bibitem[]{} 

1633: Pilbratt, G., 2005b, in: 'The Dusty and Molecular Universe', p.3

1634: 

1635: \bibitem[]{} 

1636: Poglitsch, A., et al. 2005, BAAS, 207, 3502

1637: 

1638: \bibitem[]{} 

1639: Poppel, W. G. L., 2001, Proc. ASP Conf., 243, 667

1640: 

1641: \bibitem[]{} 

1642: Redman, R. O., Feldman, P. A., Cote, S., Wyrowski, F., Carey, S. J., \&

1643: Egan, M. P. 2002, Proc. ASP Conf., 267, 409

1644: 

1645: \bibitem[]{} 

1646: Ridge, N., Di Francesco, J., Kirk, H., Li, D., Goodman, A. A., Alves, J. F.,

1647: Arce, H. G., Borkin, M. A., Caselli, P., \& Foser, J. B. 2006, AJ, 131, 2921

1648: 

1649: \bibitem[]{} 

1650: Rosolowsky, E. W., Goodman, A. A., Wilner, D. J., \& Williams, J. P.	

1651: 1999, ApJ, 524, 887

1652: 

1653: \bibitem[]{} 

1654: Rieke, G., et al. 2004, ApJS, 154, 25

1655: 

1656: \bibitem[]{} 

1657: Salpeter, E. E. 1955, \apj, 121, 161

1658: 

1659: \bibitem[]{} 

1660: Shu, F. H. 1977, \apj, 214, 488

1661: 

1662: \bibitem[]{} 

1663: Silk, J. 1995, ApJ, 438, L41

1664: 

1665: \bibitem[]{} 

1666: Smith, H., et al. 2003, SPIE, 4855, 338

1667: 

1668: \bibitem[]{} 

1669: Stothers, R., \& Frogel, J. A. 1974, AJ, 79, 456

1670: 

1671: \bibitem[]{} 

1672: Stutzki, J., Bensch, F., Heithausen, A., Ossenkopf, V., \& Zielinsky, M. 

1673: 1998, A\&A, 336, 697

1674: 

1675: \bibitem[]{} 

1676: Tafalla, M., Santiago-Garcia, J., Myers, P. C., Caselli, P., Walmsley, C. M.,

1677: \& Crapsi, A. 2006, A\&A, 455, 577

1678: 

1679: \bibitem[]{} 

1680: Tomisaka, K., Ikeuchi, S., \& Nakamura, T. 1988, \apj, 326, 208

1681: 

1682: \bibitem[]{} 

1683: van Dishoeck, E. F. 2006, PNAS, 103, 12249

1684: 

1685: \bibitem[]{} 

1686: Vazquez-Semadeni, E., Kim, J., Shadmehri, M., \& Ballesteros-Paredes, J.

1687: 2005, \apj, 618, 344

1688: 

1689: \bibitem[]{} 

1690: Visser, A. E., Richer, J. S., \& Chandler, C. J. 2002, AJ, 124, 2756

1691: 

1692: \bibitem[]{} 

1693: Walsh, A. J., Myers, P. C., \& Burton, M. G. 2004, ApJ, 614, 194

1694: 

1695: \bibitem[]{} 

1696: Walsh, A. J., Bourke, T. L., \& Myers, P. C. 2006, ApJ, 637, 860

1697: 

1698: \bibitem[]{} 

1699: Ward-Thompson, D., 2004, Observatory Magazine, 124, 362

1700: 

1701: \bibitem[]{} 

1702: Ward-Thompson, D., Robson, E. I., Whittet, D. C. B., Gordon, M. A., 

1703: Walther, D. M., \& Duncan, W. D. 1989, MNRAS, 241, 119

1704: 

1705: \bibitem[]{} 

1706: Ward-Thompson, D., Scott, P. F., Hills, R. E., \& Andr\'e, P.

1707: 1994, MNRAS, 268, 276

1708: 

1709: \bibitem[]{} 

1710: Ward-Thompson, D., Chini, R., Krugel, E., Andr\'e, P., \& Bontemps, S.

1711: 1995, MNRAS, 274, 1219

1712: 

1713: \bibitem[]{} 

1714: Ward-Thompson, D., Kirk, J. M., Crutcher, R. M., Greaves, J. S., 

1715: Holland, W. S., \& Andr\', P. 2000, \apj, 537, L135

1716: 

1717: \bibitem[]{} 

1718: Ward-Thompson, D., Andr\'e, P., Crutcher, R., Johnstone, D., Onishi, T., 

1719: \& Wilson, C. 2007, in `Protostars and Planets V', eds. B. Reipurth,

1720: D. Jewitt, K. Keil, University of Arizona Press,

1721: Tucson, Arizona, p. 33  

1722: 

1723: \bibitem[]{} 

1724: Werner, M. W., et al. 2004, ApJS, 154, 1

1725: 

1726: \bibitem[]{} 

1727: Whitworth, A. P., \& Ward-Thompson, D. 2001, \apj, 547, 317

1728: 

1729: \bibitem[]{} 

1730: Whitworth, A. P., Bate, M. R., Nordlund, A., Reipurth, B., \& Zinnecker, H.

1731: 2007, in `Protostars and Planets V', eds. B. Reipurth,

1732: D. Jewitt, K. Keil, University of Arizona Press,

1733: Tucson, Arizona, p.459

1734: 

1735: \bibitem[]{} 

1736: Williams, J. P., de Geus, E. J., \& Blitz, L. 1994, \apj, 428, 693

1737: 

1738: \bibitem[]{} 

1739: Wilson, B. A., Dame, T. M., Masheder, M. R. W., Thaddeus, P. 

1740: 2005, A\&A, 430, 523

1741: 

1742: \bibitem[]{}

1743: Wilson, T. L., \& Rood R. 1994, ARA\&A, 32, 191

1744: 

1745: \bibitem[]{}

1746: Wolf-Chase, G. A., Barsony, M., Wootten, H. A., Ward-Thompson, D., 

1747: Lowrance, P. J., Kastner, J. H., \& McMullin, J. P. 

1748: 1998, \apj, 501, L193

1749: 

1750: \bibitem[]{}

1751: de Zeeuw, P. T., Hoogerwerf, R., de Bruijne, J. H. J., Brown, A. G. A., 

1752: \& Blaauw, A. 1999, AJ, 117, 354

1753: 

1754: \end{thebibliography}

1755: 

1756: \newpage

1757: 

1758: {\bf FIGURE CAPTIONS}

1759: 

1760: {\bf Fig.1.}

1761: Diagram illustrating the Gould Belt and the positions of each

1762: of its constituent clouds relative to the Sun. The shaded area represents 

1763: that part of the Belt not visible from the JCMT.

1764: 

1765: {\bf Fig.2.}

1766: All-sky image of the IRAS 100-$\mu$m data plotted in Galactic coordinates,

1767: showing the projection of the Gould Belt onto the plane of the sky and the

1768: positions of the various clouds.

1769: 

1770: {\bf Fig.3.}

1771: Extinction map of Orion, showing the approximate area it is planned to map

1772: with SCUBA2. The area surrounded by the dark box

1773: will be mapped in the wide shallow 

1774: survey and the area surrounded by the white box

1775: will be mapped in the narrow, deep survey.

1776: 

1777: {\bf Fig.4.}

1778: Extinction map of Taurus. 

1779: Details as in Figure~3.

1780: 

1781: {\bf Fig.5.}

1782: Extinction map of Auriga. 

1783: Details as in Figure~3.

1784: 

1785: {\bf Fig.6.}

1786: Extinction map of Perseus. 

1787: Details as in Figure~3.

1788: 

1789: {\bf Fig.7.}

1790: Extinction map of Cepheus. 

1791: Details as in Figure~3.

1792: 

1793: {\bf Fig.8.}

1794: Extinction map of IC5146. 

1795: Details as in Figure~3.

1796: 

1797: {\bf Fig.9.}

1798: Extinction map of Serpens. 

1799: Details as in Figure~3.

1800: 

1801: {\bf Fig.10.}

1802: Extinction map of the Pipe Nebula. 

1803: Details as in Figure~3.

1804: 

1805: {\bf Fig.11.}

1806: Extinction map of Oph-Sco. 

1807: Details as in Figure~3.

1808: 

1809: {\bf Fig.12.}

1810: Extinction map of Lupus. 

1811: Details as in Figure~3.

1812: Note that Lupus III, IV \& VI are too far south to map with JCMT.

1813: 

1814: {\bf Fig.13.}

1815: Extinction map of Corona Australis. 

1816: Details as in Figure~3.

1817: 

1818: {\bf Fig.14.}

1819: The core mass function (CMF) in Orion, from Nutter \& Ward-Thompson 2006.

1820: A three-part stellar IMF, normalised to the peak of the CMF,

1821: is overlaid as a thin solid line. The dotted line shows a three-part mass

1822: function, with the same slopes as the IMF, superimposed on the CMF.

1823: The agreement between the two appears to indicate that the stellar IMF is 

1824: determined by the CMF.

1825: 

1826: {\bf Fig.15.}

1827: The Class~0 source L1157 mapped in

1828: C$\,^{18}$O~3--2 (greyscale and thin contours) 

1829: and $^{12}$CO~3--2 (thick contours).

1830: 

1831: {\bf Fig.16.}

1832: SCUBA polarisation maps.

1833: These images show the importance of

1834: mapping the ambient environment around cores and the advantage of high

1835: resolution.

1836: (a) The SCUBA Serpens map (Davis et al. 2000) shows that the

1837: field structure can be more complex between the cores than their

1838: polarization patterns indicate. 

1839: (b) The same is true in Barnard 1 at centre

1840: (Matthews \& Wilson 2002). 

1841: (c) NGC 2024 shows that SCUBA

1842: observations (dark grey vectors) 

1843: of extended structure in Orion (Matthews, Fiege \&

1844: Moriarty-Schieven 2002) reveal systematic variations missed in earlier

1845: lower resolution maps (light grey vectors; Dotson et al. 2000).  This map

1846: reveals how critical resolution is to the effective mapping of

1847: magnetic field geometry.

1848: 

1849: \newpage

1850: 

1851: \begin{table}

1852: \begin{tabular}{lcccccc}

1853: Region 		& \multicolumn{3}{c}{Shallow Survey Details} & 

1854: \multicolumn{3}{c}{Deep Survey Details} \\

1855: Name 		& \multicolumn{2}{c}{Field centre} & 

1856: Area & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Field centre} & Area \\

1857:  & RA(2000) &  Dec (2000) & Degree$^2$ &

1858:    RA(2000) &  Dec (2000) & Degree$^2$ \\

1859: 		& 	& 	& 	& \\

1860: Orion 		& 05$^{\rm h}$40$^{\rm m}$00$^{\rm s}$ &  

1861: $-$02$^{\circ}$00$^{\prime}$00$^{\prime\prime}$ & 81.1	

1862: & 05$^{\rm h}$40$^{\rm m}$00$^{\rm s}$ &  

1863: $-$02$^{\circ}$00$^{\prime}$00$^{\prime\prime}$	& 14.3 \\

1864: Taurus	 	& 04$^{\rm h}$32$^{\rm m}$00$^{\rm s}$ &  

1865: $+$26$^{\circ}$10$^{\prime}$00$^{\prime\prime}$	& 45.5	

1866: & 04$^{\rm h}$32$^{\rm m}$00$^{\rm s}$ &  

1867: $+$26$^{\circ}$10$^{\prime}$00$^{\prime\prime}$	& 4.5 \\

1868: Auriga		& 04$^{\rm h}$20$^{\rm m}$00$^{\rm s}$ &  

1869: $+$38$^{\circ}$05$^{\prime}$00$^{\prime\prime}$	& 60.3	

1870: & 04$^{\rm h}$31$^{\rm m}$00$^{\rm s}$ &  

1871: $+$36$^{\circ}$40$^{\prime}$00$^{\prime\prime}$	& 2.5 \\

1872: Perseus 	& 03$^{\rm h}$37$^{\rm m}$00$^{\rm s}$ &  

1873: $+$31$^{\circ}$15$^{\prime}$00$^{\prime\prime}$	& 15.5	

1874: & 03$^{\rm h}$37$^{\rm m}$00$^{\rm s}$ &  

1875: $+$31$^{\circ}$15$^{\prime}$00$^{\prime\prime}$	& 2.3\\

1876: Cepheus 	& 21$^{\rm h}$20$^{\rm m}$00$^{\rm s}$ &  

1877: $+$72$^{\circ}$30$^{\prime}$00$^{\prime\prime}$	& 37.7	

1878: & 21$^{\rm h}$20$^{\rm m}$00$^{\rm s}$ &  

1879: $+$72$^{\circ}$30$^{\prime}$00$^{\prime\prime}$	& 1.0\\

1880: IC5146 		& 02$^{\rm h}$48$^{\rm m}$00$^{\rm s}$ &  

1881: $+$47$^{\circ}$30$^{\prime}$00$^{\prime\prime}$	& 0.8	

1882: & 02$^{\rm h}$48$^{\rm m}$00$^{\rm s}$ &  

1883: $+$47$^{\circ}$30$^{\prime}$00$^{\prime\prime}$	& 0.5\\

1884: Serpens 	& 18$^{\rm h}$23$^{\rm m}$00$^{\rm s}$ &  

1885: $-$03$^{\circ}$10$^{\prime}$00$^{\prime\prime}$	& 29.1	

1886: & 18$^{\rm h}$23$^{\rm m}$00$^{\rm s}$ &  

1887: $-$03$^{\circ}$10$^{\prime}$00$^{\prime\prime}$	& 14.7\\

1888: Pipe 		& 17$^{\rm h}$31$^{\rm m}$00$^{\rm s}$ &  

1889: $-$26$^{\circ}$00$^{\prime}$00$^{\prime\prime}$	& 16.4	

1890: & 17$^{\rm h}$31$^{\rm m}$00$^{\rm s}$ &  

1891: $-$26$^{\circ}$00$^{\prime}$00$^{\prime\prime}$	& 7.2\\

1892: Ophiuchus 	& 16$^{\rm h}$26$^{\rm m}$00$^{\rm s}$ &  

1893: $-$24$^{\circ}$30$^{\prime}$00$^{\prime\prime}$	& 30.4	

1894: & 16$^{\rm h}$26$^{\rm m}$00$^{\rm s}$ &  

1895: $-$24$^{\circ}$30$^{\prime}$00$^{\prime\prime}$	& 6.5\\

1896: Scorpius 	& 16$^{\rm h}$51$^{\rm m}$00$^{\rm s}$ &  

1897: $-$25$^{\circ}$20$^{\prime}$00$^{\prime\prime}$	& 31.6	

1898: & 16$^{\rm h}$51$^{\rm m}$00$^{\rm s}$ &  

1899: $-$25$^{\circ}$20$^{\prime}$00$^{\prime\prime}$	& 1.4\\

1900: Lupus I		& 15$^{\rm h}$40$^{\rm m}$00$^{\rm s}$ &  

1901: $-$34$^{\circ}$30$^{\prime}$00$^{\prime\prime}$ & 23.3	

1902: & 15$^{\rm h}$40$^{\rm m}$00$^{\rm s}$ &  

1903: $-$34$^{\circ}$30$^{\prime}$00$^{\prime\prime}$	& 3.5\\

1904: Lupus II	& 16$^{\rm h}$00$^{\rm m}$00$^{\rm s}$ &  

1905: $-$38$^{\circ}$00$^{\prime}$00$^{\prime\prime}$ & 1.7	

1906: & 16$^{\rm h}$00$^{\rm m}$00$^{\rm s}$ &  

1907: $-$38$^{\circ}$00$^{\prime}$00$^{\prime\prime}$	& 0.2\\

1908: Lupus V		& 16$^{\rm h}$20$^{\rm m}$00$^{\rm s}$ &  

1909: $-$37$^{\circ}$30$^{\prime}$00$^{\prime\prime}$ & 15.7	

1910: & 16$^{\rm h}$20$^{\rm m}$00$^{\rm s}$ &  

1911: $-$37$^{\circ}$30$^{\prime}$00$^{\prime\prime}$	& 2.4\\

1912: CrA 		& 19$^{\rm h}$15$^{\rm m}$00$^{\rm s}$ &  

1913: $-$37$^{\circ}$30$^{\prime}$00$^{\prime\prime}$	& 11.0	

1914: & 19$^{\rm h}$02$^{\rm m}$00$^{\rm s}$ &  

1915: $-$37$^{\circ}$00$^{\prime}$00$^{\prime\prime}$	& 2.8\\

1916: %Crossbones	& 06$^{\rm h}$27$^{\rm m}$00$^{\rm s}$ &  

1917: %$-$09$^{\circ}$40$^{\prime}$00$^{\prime\prime}$	& 19.9	

1918: %& 06$^{\rm h}$27$^{\rm m}$00$^{\rm s}$ &  

1919: %$-$09$^{\circ}$40$^{\prime}$00$^{\prime\prime}$	& 0.9 \\	

1920:  		& 	& 	& 	& \\

1921: \end{tabular}

1922: \caption{Technical details of approximate areas to be mapped with SCUBA-2.}

1923: \end{table}

1924: 

1925: \newpage

1926: 

1927: \begin{table}

1928: 

1929: \begin{center}

1930: 

1931: \begin{tabular}{cccccc}

1932: Transition              &$\nu$    &$E_U/ k$ &$\Delta v$ &$T_{\mathrm RMS}$  

1933: &$N_{H_2} (3\sigma)$\\

1934:                         &GHz    &K            &km s$^{-1}$  &K   

1935: &cm$^{-2}$\\

1936:  & & & & & \\

1937: $^{12}\hbox{CO }J=3\hbox{--}2$ &345.7960 &33.2 &1.0  &0.3         

1938: &$4.5\times 10^{18}$ \\

1939: $^{13}\hbox{CO }J=3\hbox{--}2$ &330.5880 &31.7 &0.1  &0.25        

1940: &$3.6\times 10^{19}$ \\

1941: C$^{18}$O~$J=3\hbox{--}2$ &329.3305 &31.6 &0.1  &0.3         

1942: &$3.3\times 10^{20}$ \\

1943:  & & & & & \\

1944: \end{tabular}

1945: 

1946: \end{center}

1947: 

1948: \caption{CO isotopologues to be observed with HARP.

1949: Column density calculations assume LTE at 50~K  for $^{12}$CO

1950: and 20~K 

1951: for $^{13}$CO \& C$^{18}$O. Abundances relative to H$_2$ 

1952: are taken to be 10$^{-4}$

1953: for $^{12}$CO and $1.7\times 10^{-7}$ for C$^{18}$O (Frerking et al. 1982).

1954: The ratio of

1955: $^{13}\hbox{CO}/\hbox{C}^{18}\hbox{O}$ is assumed to be 77

1956: (Wilson \& Rood 1994). The

1957: standard conversion of column density to visual extinction is

1958: taken, such that an $A_v$ of 1 corresponds to a column density of 

1959: $0.9\times 10^{21} (N_{H} + 2N_{H{_2}})$~cm$^{-2}$.}

1960: \label{colines}

1961: 

1962: \end{table}

1963: 

1964: 

1965: \newpage

1966: 

1967: \begin{figure}

1968: \setlength{\unitlength}{1mm}

1969: \begin{picture}(120,120)

1970: \special{psfile=f1.eps angle=0 hoffset=0 voffset=0 hscale=70

1971: vscale=70}

1972: \vspace*{20cm}

1973: \end{picture}

1974: \caption{}

1975: \label{fig1}

1976: \end{figure}

1977: 

1978: \newpage

1979: 

1980: \begin{figure}

1981: \setlength{\unitlength}{1mm}

1982: \begin{picture}(120,120)

1983: \special{psfile=f2.eps angle=0 hoffset=0 voffset=0 hscale=60

1984: vscale=60}

1985: \vspace*{20cm}

1986: \end{picture}

1987: \caption{}

1988: \label{fig2}

1989: \end{figure}

1990: 

1991: \newpage

1992: 

1993: \begin{figure}

1994: \setlength{\unitlength}{1mm}

1995: \begin{picture}(120,120)

1996: \special{psfile=f3.eps angle=0 hoffset=0 voffset=0 hscale=70

1997: vscale=70}

1998: \vspace*{20cm}

1999: \end{picture}

2000: \caption{}

2001: \label{fig3}

2002: \end{figure}

2003: 

2004: \newpage

2005: 

2006: \begin{figure}

2007: \setlength{\unitlength}{1mm}

2008: \begin{picture}(120,120)

2009: \special{psfile=f4.eps angle=0 hoffset=0 voffset=0 hscale=70

2010: vscale=70}

2011: \vspace*{20cm}

2012: \end{picture}

2013: \caption{}

2014: \label{fig4}

2015: \end{figure}

2016: 

2017: \newpage

2018: 

2019: \begin{figure}

2020: \setlength{\unitlength}{1mm}

2021: \begin{picture}(120,120)

2022: \special{psfile=f5.eps angle=0 hoffset=0 voffset=0 hscale=70

2023: vscale=70}

2024: \vspace*{20cm}

2025: \end{picture}

2026: \caption{}

2027: \label{fig5}

2028: \end{figure}

2029: 

2030: \newpage

2031: 

2032: \begin{figure}

2033: \setlength{\unitlength}{1mm}

2034: \begin{picture}(120,120)

2035: \special{psfile=f6.eps angle=0 hoffset=0 voffset=0 hscale=70

2036: vscale=70}

2037: \vspace*{20cm}

2038: \end{picture}

2039: \caption{}

2040: \label{fig6}

2041: \end{figure}

2042: 

2043: \newpage

2044: 

2045: \begin{figure}

2046: \setlength{\unitlength}{1mm}

2047: \begin{picture}(120,120)

2048: \special{psfile=f7.eps angle=0 hoffset=0 voffset=0 hscale=70

2049: vscale=70}

2050: \vspace*{20cm}

2051: \end{picture}

2052: \caption{}

2053: \label{fig7}

2054: \end{figure}

2055: 

2056: \newpage

2057: 

2058: \begin{figure}

2059: \setlength{\unitlength}{1mm}

2060: \begin{picture}(120,120)

2061: \special{psfile=f8.eps angle=0 hoffset=0 voffset=0 hscale=70

2062: vscale=70}

2063: \vspace*{20cm}

2064: \end{picture}

2065: \caption{}

2066: \label{fig8}

2067: \end{figure}

2068: 

2069: \newpage

2070: 

2071: \begin{figure}

2072: \setlength{\unitlength}{1mm}

2073: \begin{picture}(120,120)

2074: \special{psfile=f9.eps angle=0 hoffset=0 voffset=0 hscale=70

2075: vscale=70}

2076: \vspace*{20cm}

2077: \end{picture}

2078: \caption{}

2079: \label{fig9}

2080: \end{figure}

2081: 

2082: \newpage

2083: 

2084: \begin{figure}

2085: \setlength{\unitlength}{1mm}

2086: \begin{picture}(120,120)

2087: \special{psfile=f10.eps angle=0 hoffset=0 voffset=0 hscale=70

2088: vscale=70}

2089: \vspace*{20cm}

2090: \end{picture}

2091: \caption{}

2092: \label{fig10}

2093: \end{figure}

2094: 

2095: \newpage

2096: 

2097: \begin{figure}

2098: \setlength{\unitlength}{1mm}

2099: \begin{picture}(120,120)

2100: \special{psfile=f11.eps angle=0 hoffset=0 voffset=0 hscale=70

2101: vscale=70}

2102: \vspace*{20cm}

2103: \end{picture}

2104: \caption{}

2105: \label{fig11}

2106: \end{figure}

2107: 

2108: \newpage

2109: 

2110: \begin{figure}

2111: \setlength{\unitlength}{1mm}

2112: \begin{picture}(120,120)

2113: \special{psfile=f12.eps angle=0 hoffset=0 voffset=0 hscale=70

2114: vscale=70}

2115: \vspace*{20cm}

2116: \end{picture}

2117: \caption{}

2118: \label{fig12}

2119: \end{figure}

2120: 

2121: \newpage

2122: 

2123: \begin{figure}

2124: \setlength{\unitlength}{1mm}

2125: \begin{picture}(120,120)

2126: \special{psfile=f13.eps angle=0 hoffset=0 voffset=0 hscale=70

2127: vscale=70}

2128: \vspace*{20cm}

2129: \end{picture}

2130: \caption{}

2131: \label{fig13}

2132: \end{figure}

2133: 

2134: \newpage

2135: 

2136: \begin{figure}

2137: \setlength{\unitlength}{1mm}

2138: \begin{picture}(120,120)

2139: \special{psfile=f14.eps angle=-90 hoffset=0 voffset=250 hscale=60

2140: vscale=60}

2141: \vspace*{20cm}

2142: \end{picture}

2143: \caption{}

2144: \label{fig14}

2145: \end{figure}

2146: 

2147: \newpage

2148: 

2149: \begin{figure}

2150: \setlength{\unitlength}{1mm}

2151: \begin{picture}(120,120)

2152: \special{psfile=f15.eps angle=0 hoffset=0 voffset=0 hscale=40

2153: vscale=40}

2154: \vspace*{20cm}

2155: \end{picture}

2156: \caption{}

2157: \label{fig15}

2158: \end{figure}

2159: 

2160: \newpage

2161: 

2162: \begin{figure}

2163: \setlength{\unitlength}{1mm}

2164: \begin{picture}(120,120)

2165: \special{psfile=f16a.eps angle=0 hoffset=0 voffset=200 hscale=33

2166: vscale=33}

2167: \special{psfile=f16b.eps angle=0 hoffset=200 voffset=200 hscale=33

2168: vscale=33}

2169: \special{psfile=f16c.eps angle=0 hoffset=0 voffset=0 hscale=33

2170: vscale=33}

2171: \vspace*{20cm}

2172: \end{picture}

2173: \caption{}

2174: \label{fig16}

2175: \end{figure}

2176: 

2177: \end{document}

2178: 

2179: