1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2:
3: %Some useful definitions here:
4: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
5: \newcommand{\myemail}{noelia@iac.es}
6: \def\Deg{${}^\circ$\llap{.}}
7: \def\Min{${}^{\prime}$\llap{.}}
8: \def\Sec{${}^{\prime\prime}$\llap{.}}
9:
10: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
11: %\slugcomment{To appear in The Astrophysical Journal Letters}
12:
13: \shorttitle{The outskirts of the SMC}
14: \shortauthors{No\"el et al.}
15:
16: \begin{document}
17:
18: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
19: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
20: %% you desire.
21:
22: \title{Stellar Populations in the Outskirts of
23: the Small Magellanic Cloud: No Outer Edge Yet}
24: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
25: %% author and affiliation information.
26: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
27: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
28: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
29: %% As in the title, you can use \\ to force line breaks.
30:
31: \author{Noelia E. D. No\"el\altaffilmark{1} and Carme Gallart\altaffilmark{1}}
32:
33:
34: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
35: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
36: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
37: %% affiliation.
38:
39: \altaffiltext{1}{Instituto de Astrof\'\i sica de
40: Canarias, 38200, La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain; noelia@iac.es}
41: %% editorial office after submission.
42:
43: \begin{abstract}
44:
45: We report the detection of intermediate-age and old stars belonging to the SMC at 6.5 kpc from the SMC center in the southern direction.
46: We show, from the analysis of three high quality 34\arcmin $\times$ 33\arcmin CMDs,
47: that the age composition of the stellar population is similar at galactocentric distances of $\thicksim$4.7 kpc, $\thicksim$5.6 kpc, and $\thicksim$6.5 kpc.
48: The surface brightness profile of the SMC follows an exponential law, with no evidence of truncation, all the way out to 6.5 kpc.
49: These results, taken together, suggest that the SMC `disk' population is dominating over a possible old Milky Way-like stellar halo,
50: and that
51: the SMC may be significantly larger than previously thought.
52:
53: \end{abstract}
54:
55: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
56: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
57: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
58: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
59:
60: \keywords{galaxies: Magellanic Clouds; galaxies: halos; galaxies: evolution; galaxies: stellar content}
61:
62: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper.
63: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep
64: %% and \citet commands to identify citations. The citations are
65: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds
66: %% to the KEY in the \bibitem in the reference list below. We have
67: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus
68: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for
69: %% each reference.
70:
71: \section{INTRODUCTION} \label{intro}
72:
73: Many important clues about the galaxy assembly process lie in the faint outskirts of galaxies.
74: For example, recent galaxy formation simulations suggest that almost all galaxies, even the smallest, should contain an
75: extended old, metal poor, stellar halo (see e.g. Bekki \& Chiba 2005; Read et al. 2006a). Furthermore, evidence of recent merging and/or interaction should remain in the form of extended tidal debris
76: (see e.g. Mu\~noz et al. 2006). The distribution and extent of such debris, or a characteristic
77: underlying old stellar halo are both sensitive to the total mass and extent of a galaxy. Thus, probing the faint edges of galaxies can also give us constraints on their dark matter content.
78:
79: The extended extreme edges of galaxies are observed to be so faint ($\mu$$\geq$28 mag/arcsec$^{2}$; see e.g. Gallart et al. 2004)
80: that their study has been limited so far to just the Local Group dwarf galaxies, in which we can study the flux from the individual stars.
81: Such studies began with the discussion by Sandage (1962) on the outer parts of IC 1613, which showed
82: faint red stars significantly extended beyond the galaxy's central irregular body. More recently, evidence for outer, faint stellar envelopes
83: has been found, for example, in WLM
84: (Minniti \& Zijlstra 1996) and Leo A (Vansevi$\check{c}$ius et al. 2004). However, it may be premature
85: to label these extended stellar distributions as an `old stellar halo' like that observed in the Milky Way. There is evidence to suggest
86: that the faint outer stellar populations of nearby dwarf irregulars are composed of a range of ages
87: (Old main sequence [MS] turnoff photometry: Gallart et al. 2004, Hidalgo et al. 2003; C stars: Letarte et al. 2002;
88: CMD modelling: Aparicio \& Tikhonov 2000). In some cases, the
89: extended stellar light is almost certainly tidal debris (e.g. the case of Carina, Mu\~noz et al. 2006).
90:
91: In this letter, we present the first evidence for an extended distribution of stars in the southern direction of the
92: Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC),
93: up to $\thicksim$6.5 kpc (5.8\degr) from the optical centre of the galaxy. We
94: provide unambiguous information about the age composition of this population from a CMD reaching the oldest MS turnoffs.
95: Photometric studies of the outer SMC began with Gardiner \&
96: Hatzidimitriou (1992) who studied the age composition with CMDs reaching a magnitude limit at R=20, and hence, with
97: MS stars for which it was possible to determine precise ages up to $\thicksim$2 Gyr ago.
98: Their contour plots of the surface distribution of horizontal branch (HB)/clump stars reached a galactocentric radius of $\thicksim$6 kpc
99: in the semi-major axis direction (toward the LMC) but the star counts in these outer parts
100: are within the noise level.
101: Carbon stars were also detected in the outer regions of the SMC (Hatzidimitriou et al. 1997; Kunkel et al.
102: 2000). Few of these intermediate-age tracers were found in the southern direction up to $\thicksim$7 kpc.
103: Demers \& Battinelli (1998) observed 5 fields in the outer SMC Wing and in the Magellanic Bridge, finding a burst of star formation
104: occurred
105: between 10 and 25 Myr ago. Harris (2007) presented a detailed analysis of the star formation history of the young inter-Cloud population
106: along the ridgeline of the HI gas that forms the Magellanic Bridge and searched for the older population in this area. He found
107: an intermediate-age and old population of at 4.4\degr and 4.9\degr from the SMC center in that direction but only young
108: population at 6.4\degr.
109: Recently, No\"el et al. (2007) presented the age distribution of 12 SMC fields,
110: through CMDs which reach the oldest MS turnoff with an excellent photometric accuracy.
111: From the CMD of their outermost field, they inferred that, at $\thicksim$4 kpc from the center, the intermediate-age population
112: is still substantial.
113: Here, we extend this analysis using images obtained with the WFI at the ESO 2.2m telescope in La Silla,
114: Chile. We present the surface brightness together with the age composition of 3 fields in the southern direction of the SMC,
115: at 4.2\degr ($\thicksim$4.7 kpc), 4.9\degr ($\thicksim$5.6 kpc), and 5.8\degr ($\thicksim$6.5 kpc)
116: from the SMC optical center, through the analysis of the CMDs of each of these fields.
117:
118: \section{OBSERVATIONS AND DATA REDUCTION} \label{obs}
119:
120: In order to characterise the stellar content of the outer SMC and to search for the SMC outer edge,
121: we obtained {\it B}- and {\it R}-band images of 3 SMC fields centered at 4.2\degr, 4.9\degr, and 5.8\degr from the SMC center,
122: respectively. The observations were taken from June 2001 to June 2006, using the WFI attached to the 2.2m telescope
123: at La Silla Observatory, Chile, with a 4$\times$2 mosaic of 2048$\times$4096 CCD's. Each chip covers a sky
124: area of 8\arcmin.1 $\times$ 16\arcmin.2. This combination gives a field size of 34\arcmin $\times$ 33\arcmin
125: (aproximately 0.64 kpc $\times$ 0.615 kpc) with a scale of 0.238\arcsec/pixel.
126: %%The inverse gain and read-out noise are 2.0$\pm$0.1e$^{-}$/ADU and 4.5$\pm$0.1e$^{-}$/pixel, respectively.
127: Figure~\ref{SMC} shows the spatial distribution of our SMC fields. The large squares represent the WFI fields we present in this paper;
128: they are far from the optical center of the SMC, and lie well-away from any observed HI gas
129: (Stanimirovi$\check{c}$ et al. 1999). The small simbols denote the fields observed using the 100-inch telescope at LCO, presented in
130: No\"el et al. 2007.
131:
132: The coordinates of the WFI fields and the data obtained for each of
133: them are detailed in Table~\ref{fields}. The first column denotes the field name; the second and third columns the
134: right ascension and the declination, respectively; the
135: fourth column, the galactocentric distance
136: (r); and the fifth and sixth columns the integration
137: times in {\it B} and {\it R}. Seeing was typically
138: between 0.$\arcsec$7 and 1.$\arcsec$2.
139:
140:
141: For the basic reduction, bias exposures, sky flats, and dome flats were taken every night.
142: The reduction was performed using the MSCRED package within IRAF\footnote{IRAF is distributed by National Optical
143: Astronomy Observatory, which is operated
144: by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under cooperative agreement with National
145: Science foundation.}.
146: %% Images were flat fielded and, after many tests, we decided not to de-bias the images.
147: %%The subsequent procedure included the trimming for the elimination of the overscan areas, the alignement and the sum.
148: Profile-fitting photometry of the SMC fields was obtained using the DAOPHOT and ALLSTAR/ALLFRAME software packages (Stetson 1987, Stetson 1994).
149: We photometered every chip separately as in No\"el et al. (2007).
150: To compensate for the low density of stellar objects in the analyzed fields, we combined all chips to obtain a single deep CMD for each field.
151: The aperture corrections were obtained from synthetic aperture photometry by measuring several isolated bright stars through a
152: series of increasing apertures and the
153: construction of growth curves (Stetson 1990).
154: Errors in the aperture corrections were calculated as the
155: standard error of the mean of these differences, and were typically between $\pm$0.001 and $\pm$0.003.
156: During the photometric nights, Landolt (1992)
157: standard star fields SA92, SA95, SA104, SA110, SA113, RU149 were observed several
158: times for calibration purposes.
159: The total zero-point errors of the photometry, including the error in the extinction, in the aperture corrections, and the uncertainties in the calibrations, were $\sim$0.03 mag in both {\it B} and {\it R} bands.
160:
161: \section{The CMDs of the SMC outskirts} \label{cmd}
162:
163: Figures~\ref{three_outer}a, \ref{three_outer}b, and \ref{three_outer}c show the $[{\it (B-R),R}]$ CMDs of the three SMC fields in order of increasing distance from the SMC center. BaSTI isochrones (Pietrinferni et al. 2004) are
164: overlapped (see caption for details). Stars with at least one valid measurement in each filter have been selected using the
165: following limits for the error and shape parameters given by ALLFRAME: $\sigma_{(B-R)} (= \sqrt{\sigma_B^2+\sigma_R^2}) \le 0.15$,
166: $\mid sharp \mid \le 0.6$ and $\chi \le 5$. A total of
167: 10230 %%son 10914 si no corto o sea R=23.42!!!
168: stars down to $R\leq23$ were measured in field F1
169: (panel a in figure~\ref{three_outer}),
170: 7685 %%7799 si no corto o sea R=23.42!!!
171: in field F2 (panel b), and
172: 5642 %%5769 si no corto o sea R=23.42!!!
173: in field F3 (panel c).
174:
175:
176:
177:
178:
179:
180:
181:
182:
183: The CMD of the innermost field, F1, shown in figure~\ref{three_outer}a, reaches 1.2 magnitudes below the old MS turnoff,
184: while the CMDs of field F2 (figure~\ref{three_outer}b) and field F3 (figure~\ref{three_outer}c) reach 1 magnitude below this point.
185: Each of these CMDs shows, for the first time, the details of the age structure of the stellar population at these outer parts of the SMC.
186: At 4.7 kpc and 5.6 kpc from the SMC center (figures~\ref{three_outer}a and ~\ref{three_outer}b, respectively),
187: the areas around the 3 Gyr isochrone are quite well populated.
188: It is noticeable that, at 6.5 kpc from the SMC center, there is still galaxy, with intermediate-age and old stars,
189: as seen in figure~\ref{three_outer}c. Most of the main features of a CMD are present in F3:
190: a quite-well populated intermediate-age
191: and old MS and a well-defined subgiant branch.
192: The areas around the 5, 7, 10, and 13 Gyr isochrones are well populated in all of the CMDs and there is a lack of a blue extended HB in all of them.
193:
194: Panel d) in figure~\ref{three_outer} shows
195: the $[{\it (B-R),R}]$ CMD of the simulated
196: foreground Milky Way stars in the direction of our SMC field\footnote{We show only one CMD since
197: the three fields have similar foreground stars distributions.} F2, as
198: obtained using the TRILEGAL code (Girardi et al. 2005).
199: %% TRILEGAL makes use of 4 main elements: a library of theoretical evolutionary tracks, a library of
200: %%synthetic spectra, some parameters of the detection system, and the detail description of the Galaxy
201: %% components. The several Galactic components (halo, thin and thick disc, bulge, etc.) are specified by
202: %% their initial distributions of stellar ages and metallicities, masses, space densities, and absorption.
203: In the simulation we used the (l,b) coordinates of each of our SMC fields,
204: an area in the sky of 34\arcmin $\times$ 33\arcmin, down to a magnitude of 23.4 in $R$, an IMF from
205: Kroupa (2001) corrected for binaries, dA$_{V}$/dr$_{\odot}$= 0.00015 mag/pc, thin and thick discs
206: (squared hyperbolic secants) and a halo.
207: BaSTI isochrones were also overlapped in order to show the loci of the stars in the SMC fields.
208: %%(*** and a stellar halo? where did you take your Milky Way model from? Caldwell \& Ostriker 1996? ***). %% and a r$^{1/4}$ spheroid halo.
209: %% trilegalWFI5300real [5920] :trilegalWFI5300realistic2 [3683]
210: %% trilegalWFI5252real [6215] :trilegalWFI5252realistic2 [3866]
211: %% trilegalWFI5240real [6382] :trilegalWFI5240realistic2 [4016]
212: When the CMDs of our SMC fields (figures~\ref{three_outer}a to~\ref{three_outer}c) are compared with the foreground simulations,
213: it is clear that the main features of the CMDs
214: mentioned above are not presented in the latter. There are only a few stars in the region occupied by
215: the few Gyr old MS. There is a gradient in the population of predicted foreground stars in the range {\it (B-R)}$\leq$0.8, which increases
216: while going further south. %%: they are very likely to be faint Milky Way stars.
217: %%To test the difference between the overall foreground star densities of the outer SMC field and that of the
218: %% corresponding Milky Way simulation, we
219: %%counted the stars in the areas 1.6$\leq${\it (B-R)}$\leq$2.8 and 18$\leq${\it R}$\leq$22, where we do not expect
220:
221:
222:
223: \section{The surface brightness profile: reaching the SMC outer edge?} \label {surfacebrightness}
224:
225: We have derived the SMC surface brightness in the three observed fields. In order to minimize the error in the
226: substraction of the foreground stars' contamination,
227: we integrated the flux only in the areas of the CMDs
228: in which we expect SMC stars, as shown in figure~\ref{three_outer}d (thick solid lines).
229: We used the predictions of the TRILEGAL model described above
230: for foreground substraction purposes,
231: but scaling the flux predicted for the Milky Way stars inside the fiducial SMC area shown in figure~\ref{three_outer}d
232: by the ratio of the observed and predicted flux in regions of the CMDs
233: clearly devoided of SMC stars (dot-dashed boxes in figure~\ref{three_outer}d).
234:
235: In figure~\ref{surface_brightness}, we present the surface brightness (in mag/arcsec$^2$) of our fields
236: measured in ${\it B}$ (panel a)) and ${\it R}$ (panel b)) bands (filled circles), as a function of distance from the optical
237: center of the SMC.
238: The surface brightness of the fields from No\"el et al. (2007) are also plotted.
239: The open triangles represent the eastern
240: fiels, while the filled triangles are the western fields; the squares denote the southern fields.
241:
242: The total error bar is the difference between the values of the foreground flux in the fiducial SMC area
243: as predicted by the TRILEGAL code and after scaling by the
244: ratio of observed and predicted fluxes. The foreground flux predicted by TRILEGAL and actually observed in the boxes devoided
245: of SMC stars in field F1 differed by about 50\% in both {\it B} and {\it R} bands in all fields.
246:
247: The measured surface brightness profile is well-fit by an exponential law,
248: with: $B(0)$=22.3$\pm$0.3 %%sacado del regresion el error
249: and $\alpha$$^{-1}$=47.62\arcmin$\pm$0.02, and $R(0)$=21.5$\pm$0.2 and $\alpha$$^{-1}$=52.63\arcmin$\pm$0.01.
250: Note the slightly shallower profile in {\it R}, reflecting the larger extent of the intermediate-age and old populations.
251:
252:
253:
254: \section{Discussion}
255:
256:
257: In this paper, we have shown that, at 6.5 kpc from the SMC center, there is still a stellar population
258: belonging to the SMC, with a substantial amount of intermediate-age stars.
259: Fields located at 4.7 kpc and 5.6 kpc show stars as young as 3 Gyr old
260: and the field at 6.5 kpc as young as 5 Gyr old.
261: From the analysis of the CMDs, no strong
262: population gradients are present in the outer SMC disk, from
263: $\thicksim$2.7\degr outwards (field qj0047-7530 in figure~\ref{SMC}, see
264: No\"el et al. 2007).
265: The origin of the intermediate-age population in the outer SMC fields presented
266: here is still uncertain. If these stars formed at their current positions, it would imply that the SMC is significantly more
267: extended (and therefore more massive) than previously thought. Its original gas envelope must have
268: extended much further away in the past.
269:
270: Alternatively, these stars could represent tidal debris torn off through
271: interactions with the Milky Way or the LMC.
272: However, the surface brightness distribution in the outer parts is quite smooth.
273: Detailed
274: models of tidal interactions show flat or rising surface brightness distributions (e.g. Johnston et al. 2002; Read et al. 2006b),
275: unlike the falling surface
276: brightness profile we find here. In fact, the
277: surface brightness profile is well fit by an exponential
278: disk, indicating that the SMC disk is dominating over a possible old Milky Way-like
279: halo.
280: Our results indicate that the tidal radius of the SMC disk
281: is larger than the 5 kpc proposed by Gardiner \& Noguchi (1996) and the 6.3 kpc recently suggested by Connors et al. (2006).
282: This strengthens the hypothesis of a larger size for the SMC.
283: An upper limit for the SMC size in the direction of the Magellanic Bridge is provided by Harris (2007), who finds no signs of an
284: intermediate-age or old population (but only young Bridge population) at 6.4\degr from the center. Note, however, that Harris' field is
285: located along the ``minor axis'' of the main body and therefore could be misleading to do a direct comparison.
286: More studies further away from the SMC and with large spatial coverage are needed to confirm the
287: actual extent of the SMC.
288:
289:
290: \acknowledgments
291:
292: We would like to thank Justin I. Read for very useful comments and a careful reading of the manuscript in its early stages.
293: We are grateful for helpful discussions with Antonio Aparicio.
294: N.E.D.N. would like to thank Matteo Monelli for kindly supplying his IDL programs and his experience with WFI data.
295: We thank the anonymous referee for valuable comments.
296: The authors acknowledge support by the Plan Nacional de Investigaci\'on Cient\'ifica, Desarrollo, e Investigaci\'on Tecnol\'ogica,
297: (AYA2004-06343).
298:
299: \begin{thebibliography}{}
300:
301: \bibitem[]{509} Aparicio, A. \& Tikhonov, N. 2000, \aj, 119, 2183
302: \bibitem[]{455} Bekki, K. \& Chiba, M. 2005, \apj, 625, L107
303: \bibitem[]{ddd} Connors, T.W., Kawata, D., Gibson, B. 2006, MNRAS, 371, 108
304: \bibitem[]{513} Demers, S. \& Battinelli, P. 1998, \aj, 115, 154
305: \bibitem[]{513} Gallart, C., Stetson, P.B., Hardy, E., Pont, F., Zinn, R. 2004, \apj, 614, L109
306: \bibitem[]{513} Gardiner, L. T., Hatzidimitriou, D. 1992, MNRAS, 257, 195
307: \bibitem[]{513} Gardiner, L. T., Noguchi M. 1996, MNRAS, 278, 191
308: \bibitem[]{514} Girardi, L., Groenewegen, M. A. T., Hatziminaoglou, E., da Costa, L. 2005, A\&A, 436, 895
309: \bibitem[]{514} Harris J. 2007, \apj, 658, 345
310: \bibitem[]{514} Hatzidimitriou, D., Croke, B.F., Morgan, D.H., Cannon, R.D. 1997, A\&AS, 122, 507
311: \bibitem[]{514} Hidalgo, S.L., Aparicio, A., Martínez-Delgado, D. 2003, Ap\&SS, 284, 595
312: \bibitem[]{514} Johnston, K.V., Choi, P.I., Guhathakurta, P. 2002, AJ, 124, 127
313: \bibitem[]{526} Kroupa, P. 2001, MNRAS, 322, 231
314: \bibitem[]{527} Kunkel, W.E., Demers, S., Irwin, M.J. 2000 \aj, 119, 2789
315: \bibitem[Landolt1992]{landolt92} Landolt, A.U. 1992, \aj, 104, 340
316: \bibitem[]{529} Letarte, B., Demers, S., Battinelli, P., Kunkel, W.E. 2002, \aj, 123, 832
317: \bibitem[]{530} Minniti,D. \& Zijlstra, A. 1996, \apj, 467, L13
318: \bibitem[]{531} Mu\~noz, R.R., Majewski, S.R., Zaggia, S., Kunkel, W.E., et al. 2006, \apj, 649, 201
319: \bibitem[]{531} No\"el, N.E.D., Gallart, C., Costa, E., M\'endez, R.A. 2007, \aj, 133, 2037
320: \bibitem[]{532} Pietrinferni, A., Cassisi, S., Salaris, M. \& Castelli, F. 2004,\apj, 612, 168
321: \bibitem[]{533} Read, J.I., Pontzen, A.P., Viel, M. 2006a, MNRAS, 371, 885
322: \bibitem[]{533} Read, J.I., Wilkinson, M.I., Evans, N.W., Gilmore, G., Kleyna, J.T. 2006b, MNRAS, 367, 387
323: \bibitem[]{537} Sandage, A. 1962. IAUS no. 15, 359 (George Cunliffe McVittie ed.)
324: \bibitem[]{537} Stanimirovi$\check{c}$, S., Staveley-Smith, L., Dickey, J.M., Sault, R.J., Snowden, S.L. 1999, MNRAS, 302, 417
325: \bibitem[Stetson1987]{stetson87} Stetson, P.B. 1987, \pasp, 99, 191
326: \bibitem[Stetson1990]{stetson90} Stetson, P.B. 1990, \pasp, 102, 932
327: \bibitem[Stetson1994]{stetson94} Stetson, P.B. 1994, \pasp, 106, 250
328: \bibitem[]{545} Vansevi$\check{c}$ius, V., Arimoto, N., Hasegawa, T., et al., 2004, \apj, 611, L93
329:
330: \end{thebibliography}
331:
332: \clearpage
333:
334: \begin{deluxetable}{rrrrrrrrr}
335: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
336: \tablewidth{0pt}
337: \setlength{\tabcolsep}{0.05in}
338: \tablecaption{Data obtained from the outskirts of the SMC}
339: \tablehead{
340: \colhead{Field} & \colhead{$\alpha_{2000}$} & \colhead{$\delta_{2000}$} & r({\degr})\tablenotemark{a} & \colhead{{\it B}-band exposures (sec)} &
341: \colhead{{\it R}-band exposures (sec)} }
342: \startdata
343:
344: F1 & 00:53:00 & -77:00:00 & 4.2 &21$\times$407.9+2$\times$89.9 & 17$\times$256.9+2$\times$89.9\\
345: F2 & 00:52:52 & -77:46:00 & 4.9 &12$\times$407.9+1$\times$89.9& 15$\times$256.9$\times$89.9\\
346: F3 & 00:52:40 & -78:34:00 & 5.8 &13$\times$407.9 & 12$\times$256.9+1$\times$89.9\\
347:
348: \enddata
349: \tablenotetext{a}{Distance from the SMC center, $\alpha_{2000}=$ 00:52:44.8, $\delta_{2000}=$ -72:49:43}
350: \label{fields}
351: %\tablecomments{}
352: \end{deluxetable}
353:
354: \clearpage
355:
356: \begin{figure}
357: \plotone{f1_lowres2.eps}
358: \caption{Spatial distribution of our SMC fields. The large squares denote the 34$\arcmin$ $\times$ 33$\arcmin$
359: fields analyzed here. These WFI fields were chosen to be well away from any observed HI (Stanimirovi$\check{c}$ et al. 1999).
360: The small simbols represent the fields analyzed in No\"el et al. 2007.\label{SMC}}
361: \end{figure}
362:
363: \clearpage
364:
365: \begin{figure}
366: \includegraphics[width=5cm,height=5cm]{f2alowres.eps}
367: \includegraphics[width=5cm,height=5cm]{f2blowres.eps}
368: \includegraphics[width=5cm,height=5cm]{f2c.eps}
369: \includegraphics[width=5cm,height=5cm]{f2dlowres.eps}
370: \caption{ Panels a) to c) show the CMDs of our outer SMC fields in order of increasing distance from
371: the center of the galaxy. From left to right, the galactocentric distances are: 4.7 kpc, 5.6 kpc, and 6.5 kpc.
372: BaSTI isochrones (Pietrinferni et al. 2004) were overlapped. Only the 5 Gyr isochrone is drawn up to
373: the upper red giant branch (RGB) in order to show the extension in color and magnitude
374: of the RGB stars. The expected position of the RC is [{\it B,(B-R)}]=[18.9,1.3] and indeed an enhancement in the number of stars
375: is observed in fields F1 and F2 around this position.
376: Stars as young as 3 Gyr old are still present in fields F1 and F2, while there are a
377: non-negligible amount of stars around the 5 Gyr isochrone in our most peripheral field, F3.
378: Panel d) shows the TRILEGAL simulation of the foreground stars
379: (Girardi et al. 2005) in field F2. The dot-dashed boxes indicates the portion of CMD devoided of SMC stars taken for the scaling
380: (see text for details). BaSTI isochrones were overlapped in this simulation to show the
381: loci of the SMC stars. The thick solid lines denote the areas of the CMD selected to obtain the SMC surface brightness.}
382: \label{three_outer}
383: \end{figure}
384:
385: \clearpage
386:
387: \begin{figure}
388: \includegraphics[width=7cm,height=7cm]{f3a.eps}
389: \includegraphics[width=7cm,height=7cm]{f3b.eps}
390: \caption{The surface brightness profile of the SMC in the ${\it B}$ (panel a) and ${\it R}$ (panel b) bands. The filled circles
391: represent the three outer SMC fields discussed in this paper. Open triangles represent eastern SMC fields while
392: filled triangles denote the western SMC fields (qj0033-7028, qj0036-7225, qj0037-7218, qj0111-7249, qj0112-7236,
393: qj0116-7259 in figure~\ref{SMC})
394: and the squares denote the southern fields (smc0057-7353, smc0100-7457, smc0049-7544 in figure~\ref{SMC})
395: taken from No\"el et al. 2007. The profile has been fitted with an exponential disk (solid line).}
396: \label{surface_brightness}
397: \end{figure}
398:
399: \end{document}
400:
401:
402: