1: %\documentclass{aastex}
2: %\documentclass[preprint]{aastex}
3: \documentclass[preprint]{emulateapj}
4: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
5:
6: \newcommand{\etal}{et al.~}
7: \newcommand{\jybeam}{Jy beam$^{-1}$}
8: \newcommand{\mjybeam}{mJy beam$^{-1}$}
9: \newcommand{\kms}{km s$^{-1}$}
10:
11: \shorttitle{The JCMT Debris Disk Survey}
12: \shortauthors{Matthews et al.}
13: \begin{document}
14:
15: \title{An Unbiased Survey of 500 Nearby Stars for Debris Disks: A
16: JCMT Legacy Program}
17:
18: \author{Brenda C.\ Matthews\altaffilmark{1},
19: Jane S.\ Greaves\altaffilmark{2},
20: Wayne S.\ Holland\altaffilmark{3},
21: Mark C.~Wyatt\altaffilmark{4},
22: Michael J.\ Barlow\altaffilmark{5},
23: Pierre Bastien\altaffilmark{6},
24: Chas A.\ Beichman\altaffilmark{7},
25: Andrew Biggs\altaffilmark{3},
26: Harold M.\ Butner\altaffilmark{8},
27: William R.F.\ Dent\altaffilmark{3},
28: James Di Francesco\altaffilmark{1},
29: Carsten Dominik\altaffilmark{9},
30: Laura Fissel\altaffilmark{10},
31: Per Friberg\altaffilmark{11},
32: A.G.\ Gibb\altaffilmark{12}
33: Mark Halpern\altaffilmark{12},
34: R.\,J.\ Ivison\altaffilmark{3,13},
35: Ray Jayawardhana\altaffilmark{10},
36: Tim Jenness\altaffilmark{11},
37: Doug Johnstone\altaffilmark{1},
38: JJ Kavelaars\altaffilmark{1},
39: Jonathon L.\ Marshall\altaffilmark{14},
40: Neil Phillips\altaffilmark{3,13},
41: Gerald Schieven\altaffilmark{11},
42: Ignas A.G.\ Snellen\altaffilmark{15},
43: Helen J.\ Walker\altaffilmark{5},
44: Derek Ward-Thompson\altaffilmark{16},
45: Bernd Weferling\altaffilmark{11},
46: Glenn J.\ White\altaffilmark{14,17},
47: Jeremy Yates\altaffilmark{5},
48: Ming Zhu\altaffilmark{11}}
49:
50: \altaffiltext{1}{Herzberg Institute of Astrophysics, National Research Council
51: of Canada, 5071 West Saanich Road, Victoria, BC, V9E 2E7 Canada}
52: \altaffiltext{2}{School of Physics and Astronomy, University of St Andrews,
53: North Haugh, St Andrews, Fife KY16 9SS, UK}
54: \altaffiltext{3}{UK Astronomy Technology Center, Royal Observatory, Blackford Hill, Edinburgh EH9 3HJ, UK}
55: \altaffiltext{4}{Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley
56: Road, Cambridge, CB3 0HA, UK}
57: \altaffiltext{5}{University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E
58: 6BT, UK}
59: \altaffiltext{6}{D\'{e}partement de physique et Observatoire du Mont-M\'{e}gantic, Universit\'{e} de Montr\'{e}al, C. P. 6128, Succ. Centre-ville, Montr\'{e}al, QC H3C 3J7, Canada}
60: \altaffiltext{7}{Michelson Science Center, California Institute of
61: Technology, 770 South Wilson Avenue, Pasadena, CA 91125, U.S.A}
62: \altaffiltext{8}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, James Madison
63: University, Harrisonburg, VA 22807, U.S.A}
64: \altaffiltext{9}{Astronomical Institute ``Anton Pannekoek,'' University
65: of Amsterdam, Kruislaan 403 NL-1098 SJ Amsterdam, The Netherlands}
66: \altaffiltext{10}{Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of Toronto, 50 St. George Street, Toronto, ON M5S 3H4, Canada}
67: \altaffiltext{11}{Joint Astronomy Centre, Hilo, HI}
68: \altaffiltext{12}{Department of Physics \& Astronomy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z1, Canada}
69: \altaffiltext{13}{Scottish Universities Physics Alliance, Institute for Astronomy, University of
70: Edinburgh, Royal Observatory, Blackford Hill, Edinburgh EH9 3HJ, UK}
71: \altaffiltext{14}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, The Open
72: University, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, U.K.}
73: \altaffiltext{15}{Leiden Observatory, Leiden University, Postbus 9513, 2300 RA, Leiden, the Netherlands}
74: \altaffiltext{16}{School of Physics and Astronomy, Cardiff University,
75: Queens Buildings, The Parade, Cardiff CF24 3AA, U.K.}
76: \altaffiltext{17}{Rutherford Laboratory, Space Science \& Technology
77: Department, CCLRC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Chilton, Didcot,
78: Oxfordshire OX11 0QX, U.K.}
79:
80: \email{brenda.matthews@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca}
81:
82:
83: \begin{abstract}
84: We present the scientific motivation and observing plan for an
85: upcoming detection survey for debris disks using the James Clerk
86: Maxwell Telescope. The SCUBA-2 Unbiased Nearby Stars (SUNS) survey
87: will observe 500 nearby main sequence and sub-giant stars (100 of each
88: of the A, F, G, K and M spectral classes) to the 850 \micron\
89: extragalactic confusion limit to search for evidence of submillimeter
90: excess, an indication of circumstellar material. The survey distance
91: boundaries are 8.6, 16.5, 22, 25 and 45 pc for M, K, G, F and A stars,
92: respectively, and all targets lie between the declinations of
93: $-40^\circ$ to $80^\circ$. In this survey, no star will be rejected
94: based on its inherent properties: binarity, presence of planetary
95: companions, spectral type or age. The survey will commence in late
96: 2007 and will be executed over 390 hours, reaching 90\% completion
97: within two years. This will be the first unbiased survey for debris
98: disks since the {\it InfraRed Astronomical Satellite}. We expect to
99: detect $\sim 125$ debris disks, including $\sim 50$ cold disks not
100: detectable in current shorter wavelength surveys.
101: To fully exploit the order of magnitude increase in debris disks
102: detected in the submillimeter, a substantial amount of complementary
103: data will be required, especially at shorter wavelengths to constrain
104: the temperatures and masses of discovered disks. High resolution
105: studies will likely be required to resolve many of the disks.
106: Therefore, these
107: systems will be the focus of future observational studies using
108: a variety of observatories, including Herschel, ALMA, and JWST, to
109: characterise their physical properties. For non-detected systems,
110: this survey will set constraints (upper limits) on the amount of
111: circumstellar dust, of typically 200 times the Kuiper Belt mass, but
112: as low as 10 times the Kuiper Belt mass for the nearest stars in the
113: sample ($\approx 2$ pc).
114:
115: \end{abstract}
116:
117: \keywords{stars: circumstellar matter --- submillimeter, stars:
118: circumstellar disks}
119:
120:
121: \section{Introduction}
122:
123: Debris disks are the dust disks found around many nearby main sequence
124: stars. The dust is short-lived and so must be continuously
125: replenished by the destruction of comets and asteroids in these
126: systems, deduced to lie in fairly narrow belts between 10 to 200 AU
127: from the host stars. The {\it InfraRed Astronomical Satellite (IRAS)}
128: was the first and only large unbiased survey of debris disks, showing
129: that they occur around $\sim 15$\% of nearby stars
130: \citep{bp93,pv99,aum84}. There is evidence of a substantial
131: population of disks too cold to have been detected by IRAS and which
132: are only accessible to submillimeter observations \citep{les06,wdg03}
133: surrounding a 5-15\% of stars. This is substantiated by the
134: results of \cite{rhe07} who note that $\sim 10$\% of stars show 70
135: \micron\ dust emission in Spitzer MIPS maps, but below IRAS
136: sensitivity (either due to low mass or cold dust), suggesting the
137: overall frequency of disks may be as high as 25\%. Based on an
138: assumed disk incidence of 25\%, our survey of 500 stars could yield
139: as many as 125 disk detections, of which $\approx 50$ could be
140: cold disks. The survey is of sufficient size to measure the disk
141: frequency across spectral type, and as a function of age and
142: multiplicity.
143:
144: Submillimeter observations have already been pivotal in studies of
145: debris disks, having imaged or discovered seven of the fourteen
146: resolved disks and constrained the
147: mass and temperature and hence radial extent of many of the
148: remainder. The submillimeter emission is both optically-thin and
149: sensitive to relatively large, cold grains which dominate the massses
150: of these disks. Hence, our survey will provide immediate mass
151: estimates for detected disks. Constraining the temperature of newly
152: identified disks will require complementary data in the mid- or far-IR.
153: This will be particularly critical for warm disks, since the two
154: potential submillimeter wavelengths observable through our survey (850
155: and 450 \micron) will both lie longward of the peak of the spectral
156: energy distribution (SED) and provide little constraint on the
157: temperature.
158:
159: The study of these disks is revolutionizing our understanding of
160: planet formation. For the fourteen disks which have been resolved,
161: observed structures have even been used to infer the location of
162: unseen planets \citep[e.g.,][]{wya03}. Many more disks have been
163: characterized by their SEDs, showing that they are the extrasolar
164: equivalents of the Kuiper and asteroid belts of the Solar System. The
165: radial positions and masses of these belts, particularly when this
166: information can be compared for stars of different ages, spectral
167: types, multiplicity or known planetary companions, provide vital
168: constraints on planet formation processes and on how the resulting
169: planetary systems subsequently evolve.
170:
171: SCUBA-2 \citep{hol06} is a new submillimeter camera arriving at the
172: James Clerk Maxwell Telescope (JCMT) in late 2007. SCUBA-2 is expected
173: to be, per pixel, five times as sensitive as its predecessor SCUBA
174: \citep[Submillimeter Common User Bolometer Array,][]{hol99} at 850
175: \micron. Its larger (7\arcmin\ $\times$ 7\arcmin), fully-sampled
176: field of view makes it a premiere survey instrument, and seven
177: comprehensive surveys have been planned to maximize the scientific
178: output from the JCMT over the next five years (Ward-Thompson et
179: al. 2007, in prep; SLS paper \citep{plu07}. Like its predecessor, it
180: observes simultaneously at 850 and 450 \micron, with resolutions of
181: 15 and 7\arcsec, respectively. Unlike its predecessor, SCUBA-2 will
182: Nyquist sample the sky at 850 \micron; at 450 \micron, the array is
183: undersampled by a factor of two. The focal plane area coverage is
184: provided by four ``sub-arrays'' at each wavelength, where each
185: sub-array is comprised of $32 \times 40$ detectors
186: \citep[see][]{hol06}.
187:
188: The SCUBA-2 Unbiased Nearby Stars (SUNS) survey will utilize 390 hours
189: to observe 500 nearby stars (the 100 nearest M, K, G, F and A stars)
190: to the JCMT's extragalactic confusion limit at 850 \micron\ to detect
191: and map circumstellar dust. The survey is completely unbiased; no
192: star will be rejected due to its intrinsic properties. The survey
193: will determine the incidence of disks around nearby stars, constrain
194: masses (and temperatures of disks detected in the far-IR), discover
195: disks too cold to be detected in the far-IR, and provide limits on the
196: presence of dust which are vital to targeted planet search missions
197: such as Darwin and the Terrestrial Planet Finder (TPF), as well as
198: future missions which will resolve disks in unprecedented detail,
199: i.e., the Atacama Large Milliemeter-submillimeter Array, the James
200: Webb Space Telescope, and the Far-IR Interferometer
201: \citep[FIRI,][]{ivi05}.
202:
203: The mass sensitivity of the survey is a strong function of both
204: distance and disk temperature. For disks of 70 K, the sensitivity
205: ranges from $0.003 - 1.4 M_{\rm lunar}$ ($M_{\rm lunar} = 1/81 \
206: M_\oplus$) for the nearest (2 pc) and furthest (45 pc) stars. For
207: lower disk temperatures of 40 K, the range is $0.005 - 2.7 M_{\rm
208: lunar}$. At the mean distance of the survey stars (15 pc), we will be
209: sensitive to dust masses typically $\sim 200$ times the dust mass of
210: the Kuiper Belt ($\approx 10^{-5} M_\oplus$), which is the mass of the
211: disk around $\epsilon$ Eridani. Thus, while it will not be sensitive
212: to present day Solar System analogues, it will detect such systems
213: which are in a period of unusually high dust mass. We know that the
214: Kuiper Belt is a factor of $\approx 100$ times less massive than
215: expected from the distribution of solids in the Solar System
216: \citep{mor04}. Thus the Kuiper Belt used to be more massive.
217: Equally, an episodic mode of dust creation could render the Kuiper
218: Belt detectable in the future. The mass limit for undetected systems
219: will also be useful for future planet search missions. Missions such
220: as Darwin/TPF require a dust free system, typically below 10 times
221: that of the Solar System, to limit the integration time required to
222: detect Earth-like planets \citep{bei04}.
223:
224: The SUNS survey will provide a significant legacy for the field of
225: extrasolar planetary system research. This field is rapidly evolving, and
226: a variety of techniques are being developed to characterize the
227: planetary systems of nearby stars. This survey will determine the dust
228: and planetesimal content of these systems and so provide vital
229: complementary information on the outcome of planet formation in them;
230: for some techniques, the dust content even provides the limiting
231: factor determining whether such techniques are going to work \citep[e.g.,
232: TPF,][]{bei06b}.
233:
234: In this paper, we provide details about the SUNS survey, including the
235: motivation for the survey in the context of our current understanding
236: of debris disk systems ($\S$ \ref{motivation}), advantages of the
237: submillimeter compared to shorter wavelengths ($\S$ \ref{adsubmm}),
238: and the mass sensitivity of our survey ($\S$ \ref{masssen}).
239: Our science goals are described in $\S$ \ref{science},
240: and we describe the details of our target list in $\S$ \ref{targets},
241: including ancillary targets, subset populations and statistics. Plans
242: for complementary data to the SUNS survey are described in $\S$
243: \ref{complementary}. We describe the data products in $\S$
244: \ref{dataproducts} and summarize the survey in $\S$ \ref{summary}.
245:
246: \section{Motivation for the Survey}
247: \label{motivation}
248:
249: \subsection{Current Status of Debris Disk Studies}
250:
251: All of the approximately 200 known candidate debris disks were first
252: discovered by their thermal emission, which is brighter than the
253: photospheric emission of their host stars at far-IR and longer
254: wavelengths \citep[e.g.,][]{man98}. The majority of these disks and
255: disk candidates were discovered by {\it IRAS}, which provided the
256: first and only large unbiased survey of nearby stars for excess
257: thermal emission at 12-100 \micron\ (with resolutions 0.5\arcmin\ to
258: 2\arcmin). This survey showed that $\sim 15$\% of nearby stars exhibit
259: detectable excess emission \citep{bp93}, and the {\it IRAS} disk
260: candidates have been the subject of intense follow-up observations
261: from the ground at a range of wavelengths from optical to millimeter.
262: Re-analysis of the IRAS and ISO databases have resulted in additions,
263: and notably revisions, to the stars with identified infrared excess;
264: for instance, \cite{rhe07} found 153 IRAS excess stars among Hipparcos
265: dwarfs, 37 of which are newly identified. Forty-eight of their excess
266: stars are among the 60 disk candidates identified by \cite{moo06}
267: through a re-analysis of {\it IRAS} and {\it ISO} targets, eleven of
268: which were previously unknown. Based on these analyses, Rhee et al.\
269: revised the fraction of nearby A stars with detected 60 \micron\
270: excess to 20\%.
271:
272: Submillimeter observations have been pivotal in follow-up studies of
273: these disks: imaging with SCUBA had mapped or discovered seven of the
274: ten resolved disks at the time of its decommissioning in
275: mid-2005\citep[e.g.,][]{hol98}. Such images have also ruled out
276: ``disk candidate'' stars which turned out to have nearby, unassociated
277: background sources which fell within the relatively large {\it IRAS}
278: beamsizes \citep[e.g.,][]{jay02}. Finally, photometric submillimeter
279: observations of many disks have provided the best contraints on disk
280: masses, as well as constraining the SED and therefore the temperature
281: and radial extent of the disks. \citep[e.g.,][]{she04}.
282:
283: Subsequent surveys have been more modest than {\it IRAS} in the number
284: of stars surveyed but have probed more deeply in sensitivity. For
285: example, both the {\it ISO} and {\it Spitzer} strategies targeted
286: several well-defined samples, each of which comprised at most 100
287: stars. The emerging picture is that the fraction of stars with
288: detectable disks is a function of both stellar age
289: \citep{rhe07,spa01}, spectral type \citep{hab01}, and wavelength
290: \citep{lau02}. \cite{wer06} summarized the early results from Spitzer
291: surveys and targeted observations, including two Legacy Surveys ``The
292: Formation and Evolution of Planetary Systems''
293: \citep[FEPS,][]{mey04,kim05,sta05,hin06} and ``Galactic Legacy
294: Infrared Mid-Plane Survey Extraordinaire" \citep[GLIMPSE,][]{uzp05}.
295: Surveys have also targeted stellar associations, such as the nearby
296: $\approx 10$ Myr old TW Hydrae Association \citep{uch04,low05}, Cep OB2
297: clusters \citep{sic06}, Orion OB1a and OB1b \citep{her06}, and the
298: open clusters M47 \citep{gor04} and the Pleiades \citep{gor06,sta05}.
299: Projects to target nearby stars have concentrated on A stars
300: \citep{rie05} and field FGK stars \citep{bry06,bei06a}, including
301: selection by known planets \citep{bei05}, metallicity \citep{bei06b},
302: IRAS 60 \micron\ excess \citep{che06} and age \citep{smi06}.
303: \cite{bei06b} concluded that there is no increased incidence of disks
304: around stars of increased metallicity, in agreement with earlier
305: results based on disks detected by IRAS \citep{gre06}.
306:
307: Evidence of a disk has been detected around the white dwarf at the
308: center of the Helix Nebula \citep{su07}.
309: {\it Spitzer} has also produced serendipitous detections of disks
310: around individual stars, including HD 46190 \citep{slo04} and Be stars
311: in the LMC \citep{kas06}. Targeted observations toward the
312: well-studied debris disks around Fomalhaut \citep{sta05} and Vega
313: \citep{su05} have also been undertaken.
314:
315: In general, few extensive ground-based searches have been made for
316: excess emission. Recently, however, submillimeter surveys unbiased by
317: previous far-IR detections have shown that there is a substantial
318: population of disks only accessible in the submillimeter, since they
319: are too cold to have been detected by {\it IRAS} \citep{les06,wdg03}.
320: As Table \ref{surveys} shows, while individual submillimeter surveys are typically
321: small (10-20 stars), the detection rate in each is 5-25\%, indicating
322: that this population is both real and as numerous as the disks which
323: were detected by {\it IRAS}. Statistics are currently too poor to
324: ascertain whether the presence of such cold disks is favored around
325: young/old/early-type/late-type stars. \cite{les06} derived a
326: detection rate of $13_{-8}^{+6}$ \% for M dwarfs between 20-200 Myr
327: based on the combined results of their survey and that of
328: \cite{liu04}.
329:
330: \begin{deluxetable*}{llcccc}[h!]
331: \tablecolumns{6}
332: \tablewidth{0pc}
333: \tablecaption{Submillimeter Debris Disk Surveys}
334: \tablehead{\colhead{Reference} & \colhead{Targets} &
335: \colhead{$N_{\rm star}$} & \colhead{$N_{\rm disks}$} & \colhead{\%} &
336: \colhead{850 \micron\ 1 $\sigma$ rms [mJy]}}
337: \startdata
338: Wyatt et al.\ (2003) & Lindroos binaries & 22 & 3 & 13 & 1.2 \\
339: Holmes et al.\ (2003) & Nearby bright stars & 11 & 1 & 9 & 7 \\
340: Liu et al.\ (2004) & $\beta$ Pic comoving groups & 8 & 2 & 25 & 2 \\
341: Carpenter et al.\ (2004) & FEPS nearby stars & 127 & 4 & 3 & 28 \\
342: Greaves et al.\ (2005) & Nearby G Stars & 13 & 2 & 15 & 1.5 \\
343: Lestrade et al.\ (2006) & M Dwarfs & 32 & 2 & 6 & 0.7 \\
344: \enddata
345: \tablecomments{Flux limits at 850 \micron\ were adjusted from other
346: wavelengths through scaling of the fiducial 850 \micron\ opacity of
347: 1.7 cm$^2$ g$^{-1}$ and the scaling relations $\kappa \propto
348: (1/\lambda)$ and $F_\nu \propto \nu^{(2+\beta)}$ where $\beta = 0.7$.}
349: \label{surveys}
350: \end{deluxetable*}
351:
352: The current debris disk detection rates are shown in Figure
353: \ref{DDSincidence}, comparing the detection rates in the far-IR to
354: those in the submillimeter. The uncertainties in the disk frequencies
355: are still large for several spectral types. Already, it is evident
356: that the submillimeter is the favorable regime for detection of disks
357: around low-mass stars.
358:
359: \begin{figure}[h!]
360: \vspace*{7cm}
361: \special{psfile=./f1.eps angle=0
362: hoffset=40 voffset=0 hscale=35 vscale=35}
363: \caption{The frequency of debris disks as a
364: function of spectral type based on existing data. The errorbars are
365: presently large for several spectral types. It is also evident that
366: the submillimeter is the best wavelength range for which to search
367: for disks around later-type stars. This is consistent with the
368: detection of cold disks. The references for the data are
369: \cite[Greaves et al., in prep, ][]{gau07,su06,bei06a,bry06,les06,bei05,naj05,liu04,wdg03,hol03}.}
370: \label{DDSincidence}
371: \end{figure}
372:
373: \subsection{Advantages of the Submillimeter to the Far-IR}
374: \label{adsubmm}
375:
376: To understand the origin and frequency of debris disks, we require an
377: unbiased survey. In the past, large surveys for disks have been
378: conducted at near-IR wavelengths \citep[e.g.,][]{mam02,hai01};
379: however, these only sample warm dust in the inner $\approx 1$ AU. In
380: the far-IR, major surveys with {\it IRAS}, {\it ISO} and {\it Spitzer}
381: \citep[e.g.,][and references therein]{spa01,dec03,wer06} sample the
382: dust at $\approx$ 50-100 K (typically 40--100 AU radius), so these are
383: also biased towards warm dust disks. Yet we know cool debris disks do
384: exist; Figure \ref{epsiloneri} shows the SED of the bright nearby disk
385: around $\epsilon$ Eridani, and Figure \ref{lum.v.T} shows the fitted
386: temperatures of known debris disks versus stellar luminosity for stars
387: of differing spectral classes. Disks around lower mass stars tend to
388: be significantly cooler than their counterparts around A stars, with
389: virtually all such disks exhibiting temperatures of $< 70$ K. This is
390: consistent with the findings of \cite{wdg03} and \cite{rhe07} of a
391: disk population below the sensitivities of IRAS observations.
392:
393: \begin{figure}[h!]
394: \vspace*{8cm}
395: \special{psfile=./f2.ps angle=0
396: hoffset=0 voffset=-70 hscale=40 vscale=40}
397: \caption{850 \micron\ image of $\epsilon$ Eridani
398: \citep{gre05} and the SEDs of the star (solid line) and grey body
399: fit to the dust (dotted line). Note the much greater disk to star
400: contrast in the submillimeter compared to 60 \micron, even for this
401: mid-range temperature of 55 K.}
402: \label{epsiloneri}
403: \end{figure}
404:
405: \begin{figure}[h!]
406: \vspace*{6.5cm}
407: \special{psfile=./f4.ps angle=-90
408: hoffset=-15 voffset=200 hscale=35 vscale=35}
409: \caption{The observed temperatures of debris
410: disks versus stellar luminosities. The A stars (dark blue) are a
411: sample of 46 detected at both 24 and 70 \micron\ \citep{wya07}. The
412: data for the F (light blue), G (green), K (orange) and M stars (red)
413: are taken from \cite[][and references therein]{les06}, with the
414: addition of TWA 7 from \cite{mat07}.}
415: \label{lum.v.T}
416: \end{figure}
417:
418: To sample the cool dust, we must go to submillimeter wavelengths. The
419: number of unbiased surveys conducted in the submillimeter, however, is
420: very limited (see Table \ref{surveys}). In most cases, once the
421: submillimeter detections were made, only a few subsequent detailed
422: analysis of far-IR data showed detections \citep{zuc01}, indicating
423: that the dust is indeed cool. A further point illustrated in Table
424: \ref{surveys} is that the percentage detection rate increases sharply
425: with sensitivity, from 3\% in the least sensitive survey up to 10-15\%
426: in deep searches (and higher in the $\beta$ Pic group, perhaps because
427: these stars are young). Extrapolating to still deeper surveys, we
428: might expect a substantially higher detection rate of about 15\%. In
429: summary, there is growing evidence of a significant population of
430: submillimeter-bright disks with $T \le 40$ K. The final column in
431: Table \ref{surveys} shows depths reached thus far (where equivalent
432: flux limits of other wavelengths have been corrected to 850 \micron).
433: The SUNS survey, with an rms sensitivity of $1 \ \sigma = 0.7$ mJy
434: will be {\it 40 times deeper} in flux than the only previous large
435: scale survey \citep{car05}. This is the equivalent depth to the
436: observation of the disk around the 1 Gyr old star $\tau$ Ceti (Figure
437: \ref{tauceti}).
438:
439: \begin{figure}[h!]
440: \vspace*{5.8cm}
441: \special{psfile=./f3.ps angle=0
442: hoffset=50 voffset=10 hscale=30 vscale=30}
443: \caption{An example of disk extraction
444: \citep{gre04b} is the disk detection toward $\tau$ Ceti with SCUBA
445: at 850 \micron. The rms in this map is 0.7 mJy (per smoothed 20\arcsec\
446: beam). The faintest detected peaks are 2 \mjybeam. The disk is
447: recognized by its elliptical shape centered about the star. This
448: star is nearby but the disk is in fact one of the smallest yet
449: measured. In addition, this field is unusually rich in background sources. }
450: \label{tauceti}
451: \end{figure}
452:
453: Below, we discuss the effective limits on the submillimeter survey
454: compared to the current generation of far-IR detectors on {\it Spitzer}.
455:
456: \subsubsection{Photospheric Contributions}
457: For the nearby stars where photospheric emission dominates (Figure
458: \ref{epsiloneri}), the dust detection limit of far-IR instruments are
459: set by the accuracy with which a disk excess can be discriminated from
460: photospheric contributions. The limits on the detectability of a disk
461: are then dependent as well on the accuracy of synthetic stellar
462: spectra, which are not well-constrained by observations at these
463: wavelengths. In this case, it is not possible to improve the
464: detection limits, and, in the case of {\it Spitzer}, detections are
465: limited to $> 50$\% of the photospheric flux \citep{bei05}. As the
466: $\epsilon$ Eri SED shows, the excess flux over the photosphere is
467: larger by a factor of 4 at 850 \micron\ compared with 70 \micron, and
468: this contrast becomes much greater for cooler dust. Note that for the
469: very bright A0 star Vega at only 8 pc, the photosphere is only 5
470: mJy. Therefore, assuming SCUBA-2 calibration to 10\%, the largest
471: photospheric error in the survey at 850 \micron\ will be $\pm 0.5$
472: mJy, so the calibration error will {\it always} be less than the
473: confusion limit fluctuations of 0.7 mJy rms.
474:
475: \subsubsection{Background Confusion Limit}
476:
477: Background confusion is the absolute flux limit for any disk survey.
478: For {\it Spitzer}, the confusion limit is 0.7 mJy beam$^{-1}$ at 70
479: \micron\ (the best wavelength for debris detection), but the
480: photometric technique actually limits this to $\approx 2$ mJy
481: \citep{bei05} and often only 5 mJy is reached because of Galactic
482: foregrounds. For 5 mJy at 70 \micron\ and grain emissivity of $\beta
483: = 0.7$, the SUNS survey is {\it intrinsically} more sensitive to dust
484: cooler than 30 K. For far-IR limits of 2 mJy, single temperature
485: disks would be detectable down to 26 K and for a range of $\beta$ of
486: 1.0 to 0.0, the limit lies between 26-43 K.
487:
488: \subsubsection{Cirrus Confusion}
489:
490: The 20\arcsec\ beam of {\it Spitzer} at 70 \micron\ and the bright and
491: complex cirrus background are further limiting factors to the far-IR
492: sensitivity. With SCUBA-2, we lose less than 20\% of stars (i.e.,
493: those too far south) and importantly, with absolutely no additional
494: bias due the cirrus background, which is not a factor in submillimeter
495: observations.
496:
497: \subsubsection{Extended Disks}
498:
499: Submillimeter single dish observations of debris disks are constrained
500: by relatively poor resolution compared to optical observations. The
501: beamsize of the SUNSS observations will be 15\arcsec, the JCMT's
502: resolution at 850 \micron. However, the potential does exist to
503: follow-up detections with 450 \micron\ observations with a
504: substantially better resolution of 7\arcsec. Even out to a distance
505: of approximately 30 pc, we might expect significant extended emission based
506: on the largest examples with $\sim 300$ AU radii (i.e., 20\arcsec\
507: across) \citep{she04}, and so accurate photometry requires
508: fully-sampled maps to the same limiting sensitivity. Existing surveys
509: are limited by the sparse pixel spacing of current instrumentation
510: \citep[e.g.,][]{wdg03}. SCUBA-2's Nyquist sampling will be a valuable
511: new feature, which is important if we are looking for relatively cool
512: extended dust around nearby stars.
513:
514: Our detections of new debris disks will provide some clear possible
515: followup observations. Filling in the SED and thereby refining dust
516: temperatures and spectral indices can be carried out in the short
517: submillimeter and far-IR, and this prospect is imminent through the
518: current AKARI all-sky survey and targeted observations with the {\it
519: Herschel Space Observatory} using its photometric instruments SPIRE
520: \citep[the Spectral and Photometric Imaging REceiver,][]{gri06} and
521: PACS \citep[the Photodetector Array Camera and Spectrometer,][]{pog06}.
522:
523: \subsection{Mass Sensitivity}
524: \label{masssen}
525:
526: While the SUNS survey dataset will have a uniform flux sensitivity,
527: the mass sensitivity of the survey is a function of three factors: the
528: distance of the target, $d$, the temperature(s) of the material in the
529: disks, $T_d$, and the opacity of the disks, $\kappa_\nu$.
530:
531: \begin{equation}
532: M_d = \frac{F_\nu \ d^2}{\kappa_\nu \ B_\nu(T_d)}
533: \end{equation}
534:
535: At submillimeter wavelengths, in the Rayleigh-Jeans limit, the mass of
536: the disk becomes a linear function of the temperature in the disk.
537: This makes the mass relatively straight-forward to estimate if the
538: temperature can be constrained. The opacity in the disk is wavelength
539: dependent ($\kappa_\nu \propto \lambda^{-1}$) and difficult to measure
540: observationally, but the typical value adopted for debris disks at 850
541: \micron\ is 1.7 cm$^2$ g$^{-1}$, based on a modified blackbody with
542: $\beta = 1$ \citep{den00,pol94}.
543:
544: Figure \ref{mass_sensitivity} shows the mass sensitivity of the SUNS
545: survey as a function of temperature for circumstellar dust emission at
546: several key distances in our survey. The mass of the closest known
547: debris disk, $\epsilon$ Eridani, and the mass corresponding to ten
548: times that of the Kuiper Belt are also indicated. This mass
549: sensitivity is for unresolved sources. For resolved sources, our mass
550: sensitivity will be lower.
551:
552: \begin{figure}[h!]
553: \vspace*{6cm}
554: \special{psfile=./f5.ps angle=-90
555: hoffset=-10 voffset=190 hscale=35 vscale=35}
556: \caption{The disk mass sensitivity (3 $\sigma$) as a
557: function of dust temperature is shown for various limiting
558: distances. The outer bounds of the A stars sample is roughly 40
559: pc. The limits for F and G stars are $\approx 25$ pc, and
560: all the M stars lie within the 10 pc boundary. The horizontal lines
561: show the mass of the $\epsilon$ Eridani disk ({\it solid}) and ten
562: times the mass of the Kuiper Belt ({\it dashed}). An opacity of 1.7
563: cm$^2$ g$^{-1}$ is adopted.}
564: \label{mass_sensitivity}
565: \end{figure}
566:
567: For new disks, we won't immediately be able to constrain the disk
568: temperature, unless measurements (even resulting in non-detections)
569: have been made in the mid-IR or far-IR (e.g., through Spitzer, ISO or
570: IRAS). For some cold disks ($< 50$ K), additional 450 \micron\ data
571: will provide some temperature constraint, but for warmer disks, both
572: submillimeter measurements will lie on the Rayleigh-Jeans tail of the
573: SED, and shorter wavelength data will be essential.
574:
575: \section{Science Goals}
576: \label{science}
577:
578: The outcome of this survey will be an order of magnitude improvement
579: in the number of disks known in the submillimeter. These discoveries
580: will provide a significant legacy for the planet formation community
581: by achieving five key goals. The SUNS survey will:
582:
583: \begin{itemize}
584: \item{determine unbiased statistics on the incidence of disks around
585: nearby stars;}
586: \item{constrain masses and temperatures of disks previously detected in the
587: far-IR (e.g., {\it by IRAS, ISO, Spitzer, AKARI, Herschel});}
588: \item{discover numerous disks too cold to currently detect in the mid-
589: and far-IR, for which complementary data at shorter wavelengths will be
590: critical to constrain temperatures and hence masses;}
591: \item{be the basis of source lists for future observing campaigns
592: using instruments such as ALMA, Herschel and {\it JWST}; and}
593: \item{provide limits on the presence of dust around nearby stars
594: that are vital to future missions such as TPF.}
595: \end{itemize}
596:
597: Planet formation is thought to be largely complete by 10 Myr, so
598: studying debris disks tells us where planetesimals remain after planet
599: formation processes are complete. Such images may indicate locations
600: where planets may be located within the systems. The majority of
601: debris disks we detect will be the extrasolar counterparts to the
602: Kuiper Belt. Thus, their temperatures, which will be determined through
603: complementary far-IR data, tells us the sizes of the planetary systems
604: which are clearing the inner regions of dust and planetesimals.
605: Submillimeter fluxes also provide the most reliable method for
606: measuring the mass of the disks \citep{zuc01}.
607:
608: We can thus address questions of what affects the extent of a
609: planetary system and the mass of its planetesimal component. For
610: example, do more massive stars form the most massive planetary systems?
611: Are the disks truncated uniformly with spectral type indicating that a
612: universal process is at play, such as close stellar encounters in the
613: cluster in which the star formed, or photo-evaporation of the outer
614: disk edge by a nearby massive star in such a cluster. It already
615: appears that more massive stars host more massive disks \citep{gw03}
616: that are more readily detected \citep{hab01}. That said, a comparison
617: of the disk masses around members of the nearby young TW Hydrae
618: Association suggests no correlation between disk mass and spectral
619: type for these reasonably coeval disks \citep{mat07}. In addition,
620: comparisons of disk masses around low mass stars of comparable age,
621: i.e., AU Mic \citep{liu04} and TWA 7 \citep{mat07}, reveal a
622: difference of a factor of 10. Improved statistics are critical to
623: reveal whether a genuine trend exists. Moreover, information about
624: disk radii is scarce at present -- the only reliable determinations
625: are for the few disks which have submillimeter detections
626: \citep{she04}, and these comprise a significantly biased dataset.
627:
628: With the SUNSS data, it will be possible to test for planetary system
629: evolution. Based on our understanding of the Solar System's
630: evolution, it is reasonable to expect that both the radius and mass of
631: the belts will change with time. Within our own Solar System, the
632: outer planets may have migrated from the locations where they formed
633: \citep{mal95}, a scenario used to explain structure in some debris
634: disks \citep{wya03}. For example, Uranus and Neptune may have formed
635: in between Jupiter and Saturn until their orbits became unstable at a
636: few hundred Myr \citep{tho99}. The radius of the Kuiper Belt may have
637: also been significantly different in the past. The period of late
638: heavy bombardment in the inner Solar System and other evidence, such
639: as the fact that the Kuiper Belt must have been more massive in the
640: past \citep{mor04}, also indicates that the dust flux from the Kuiper
641: Belt must have varied significantly with time. Thus, understanding the
642: evolutionary changes in extrasolar systems will not only help place
643: the evolution of the Solar System in context, but could also help to
644: illuminate Earth's own origins.
645:
646: The survey will test the applicability of the Solar System itself.
647: One model for the origin of debris disks proposes that they flare into
648: detectability when a system matures to the extent that a Pluto-sized
649: object can form in its planetesimal belt \citep{ken04}. The new
650: planet then perturbs the belt out of which it formed, initiating the
651: collisional cascade that produces the copious amounts of dust that we
652: see for a short amount of time. Since such Pluto-analogies may take
653: longer to form further from the star, it can take up to 1 Gyr for
654: those outer disks to become detectable. This model would mean that we
655: could expect to detect disks at large distances around stars at late
656: times \citep{rie05}. Short bursts can also be produced when
657: lunar-sized embryos are ejected from the inner planetary system. Such
658: processes may explain the presence of dust around old stars, as well
659: as the apparently episodic nature of the debris disk phenomenon
660: \citep{rie05}. Such disks would be cool and so may only be detectable
661: at submillimeter wavelengths. Indeed it can be shown that for several
662: disks the dust we are seeing must be transient \citep{su05,wya07}. An
663: alternative view is that disks may be quasi-static in radii. These
664: models say that dust mass (but not radius) does evolve with time,
665: decaying through the collisional erosion of the belts \citep{dom03},
666: and such models can successfully explain the currently available
667: statistics (Wyatt et al., submitted). Episodic periods of high dust
668: mass are then provoked through the destruction of large planetesimals
669: \citep{wd02} or a recent stellar flyby \citep{kal01}. Our survey will
670: confront these models with hard statistics.
671:
672: The unbiased nature of the SUNS survey means that it will be possible to
673: correlate disk parameters with other planet formation indicators. For
674: example, we can assess whether the presence of a giant planet orbiting
675: near the star, or a distant planetary companion detected with adaptive
676: optics, affects the mass or size of an outer disk. Such planets may
677: form and evolve independently from the planetesimals in the system's
678: outer reaches. However, evolutionary processes which lead to planets
679: migrating inward (e.g., massive gas disk, fast core growth) may be
680: related to evolutionary processes further out, either promoting or
681: inhibiting the presence of cold disks.
682:
683: These are issues which can only be resolved with a large unbiased
684: survey so that the variations of disk frequency with spectral type,
685: binarity, and age can be untangled. The submillimeter is the ideal
686: waveband in which to do this, since it is not limited to warm (40-100
687: K) disks (and so small planetary systems). The incidence and evolution
688: of mass or radius of cold ($< 40$ K) disks is completely unconstrained
689: at present. Using the submillimeter also means that an estimate for
690: the disk mass is obtained immediately, with more accurate limits on
691: temperature and morphology possible once complementary data are
692: obtained at shorter wavelengths. As Figure \ref{parameterspace}
693: shows, the SUNS survey will be particularly sensitive to disks around
694: M stars, since the circumstellar dust is cold even at relatively close
695: proximity ($< 100$ AU) to the host stars.
696:
697: \begin{figure}[h!]
698: \vspace*{15cm}
699: \special{psfile=./f6.ps angle=0
700: hoffset=-70 voffset=-110 hscale=70 vscale=70}
701: \caption{These plots show the parameter space in
702: which the SCUBA-2 survey is uniquely sensitive ({\it shaded area}).
703: In each case, this is the location of cold dust. The different lines
704: show the limits of Spitzer 24 \micron\ sensitivity ({\it dotted
705: line}), assuming a limit of $F_{\rm disk} / F_* = 0.1$ and Spitzer
706: 70 \micron\ sensitivity ({\it dashed line}), assuming a limit of
707: $F_{\rm disk} / F_* = 0.55$ based on \cite{su07}. The solid lines
708: are the SCUBA-2 3 $\sigma$ limits for the closest and furthest stars
709: in the samples, assumed to be 2.6-45.2 pc for A0, 3.6-24.8 pc for
710: G0, and 1.8-8.6 pc for M0. For A0 stars, this space is relatively
711: narrow (shown by the shaded region). For M stars, however, the
712: region is much more extensive and includes significantly smaller
713: disks below the detection limits of Spitzer at 70 \micron. This
714: figure does not account for the fact that at these distances the
715: largest disks are going to be significantly resolved, and therefore,
716: we won't reach the 2 mJy limit, i.e., the SCUBA-2 limits are
717: optimistic for disks larger than the beam size.}
718: \label{parameterspace}
719: \end{figure}
720:
721: For the nearest disks, the SCUBA-2 observations will result in
722: resolved images. During its lifetime, SCUBA imaging at 850 \micron\
723: imaged seven of the fourteen resolved disks
724: \citep{hol98,gre98,she04,gre04b,wya05,wil04}. Images allow the inner
725: and outer radii of the disk to be determined directly, thereby
726: confirming inferences about inner cavities. The morphology
727: of disks can thereby reveal the presence of unseen planets
728: \citep[e.g.,][]{wya03}. The orbits, masses and even the evolutionary
729: histories of planets have been constrained in this way. Such images
730: will thus be an extremely powerful tool for telling us about a region
731: of parameter space unreachable with other techniques: planets
732: perturbing debris disks are both small (Neptune size) and at large
733: distances (tens of AU).
734:
735: For disks that are not resolved, the information returned by SCUBA-2
736: will provide critical information, since it can confirm that the
737: emission is star-centered. Associations of excesses with stars are
738: not always reliable from far-IR data alone because of the relatively
739: large beamsize \citep[e.g.,][]{jay02}. For unresolved sources, SED
740: fitting and radius estimation will indicate those that could be
741: resolved with future observatories, at a range of wavelengths from
742: optical to millimeter. Of particular importance will be ALMA
743: follow-up, with our survey giving prior knowledge of the submillimeter
744: disk flux and good indication of angular size. These parameters can
745: only be guessed at from far-IR data alone, so with these data far less
746: ALMA time will be spent observing sources which are ultimately too
747: faint to detect, or performed using non-optimal array configurations.
748:
749: \cite{wya07} modeled the population of disks around A stars, fitting
750: to the Spitzer statistics of \cite{rie05} and \cite{su07}, yielding
751: predictions for the outcome of the A star component of SUNSS,
752: excluding the cold disks which would not have been detected by
753: Spitzer. They predict that 17 (of 100 stars) would have detected
754: disks at $> 2$ mJy and that $> 5$ would be resolvable in 450 \micron\
755: imaging. This study also concluded that the SUNSS would be vital for
756: constraining the distribution of disk radii and for determining the
757: unknown population of disks that are too cold to detect with Spitzer
758: (not included in the 17\% of expected disks). Assuming the other
759: spectral types have a similar submillimeter detectability, we could
760: justify a prediction for the survey of 85 detections and 25 resolved
761: disks based on the model of the A star population. A cold disk
762: population not currently sampled by the Spitzer statistics would
763: result in an elevated number of disk detections. We have estimated
764: this value as approximately 10\% (50 disks), but deducing the true
765: incidence of cold disks is in fact one of the principle drivers for
766: this survey.
767:
768:
769:
770: \section{Target Details}
771: \label{targets}
772:
773: \subsection{The Sample}
774:
775: The survey will cover 500 nearest stellar systems -- 100 primaries of
776: each of the spectral types A, F, G, K, and M observable from the
777: JCMT. Subgiants are included for spectral types A, F and G, while only
778: dwarfs are included in the K and M targets. The aim is to obtain
779: samples that are statistically robust and can be inter-compared, while
780: keeping the survey completely unbiased with regard to choice of
781: star. This is a unique feature of our survey; no star will be rejected
782: because of its intrinsic properties. The nature of the mass function
783: of stars means that the five sub-samples cover different volumes. The
784: distance limits extend out to 45, 25, 22, 16.5 and 8.6 pc for A, F, G,
785: K and M stars respectively. The uncertainties on the parallax for
786: these stars are $\pm 1$ pc for A, F and G stars and $\pm 0.1$ pc for K
787: and M stars. These volume explored by this survey are similar to those
788: being explored with {\it Spitzer} and earlier with {\it ISO}, but the
789: SCUBA-2 survey will be the first unbiased study. Further details on
790: the selection of targets will be presented in a forthcoming paper
791: (Phillips et al., in preparation).
792:
793: The allocation of 390 hours includes 330 hours during the first two
794: years of SCUBA-2 operations. Of this time, 270 hours has been
795: allocated to weather band 3 ($0.08 < \tau_{\rm 225 GHz} < 0.12$) and
796: 60 hours is available within band 2 ($0.05 < \tau_{\rm 225 GHz} <
797: 0.08$) weather. (The lowest-elevation stars are prioritised for the
798: better conditions.) The number of targets that need close observing
799: constraints (having low elevation and thus priority for upper band 2
800: conditions) is only 10\% of the total number of targets. The remaining
801: 60 hours is allocated beyond the first two years of operation in band
802: 2 conditions; some followup may be possible in this period, although
803: completion of the 850 \micron\ survey will have priority.
804:
805: Figure \ref{distribution} shows the targets are distributed across the
806: sky; the furthest distance is $45\pm1$ pc, and there is no clustering
807: of stars towards the Galactic Plane. Observations at any time of the
808: year will have suitable targets. The declination limits of $-40$\degr\
809: to $+80$\degr\ ensure that targets rise to at least 30\degr\
810: elevation.
811:
812: \begin{figure}[h!]
813: \vspace*{6.8cm}
814: \special{psfile=./f7.ps angle=-90
815: hoffset=-10 voffset=205 hscale=35 vscale=35}
816: \caption{Distribution of target sources in
817: the DDS. The targets are all-sky. The declination limits are $-40 <
818: \delta < +80$. }
819: \label{distribution}
820: \end{figure}
821:
822: We will image the total sample of 500 stars down to our adopted
823: JCMT confusion limit of 0.7 mJy at 850 \micron. In borderline band 2/3
824: conditions ($\tau_{\rm 225 GHz} = 0.08$) at airmass 1.15 (30\degr\
825: from zenith), this sensitivity requires an average of 45 minutes
826: observing per star. The priority will be for 850 \micron\ observations
827: with 450 \micron\ imaging a bonus (giving first hints of disk
828: sub-structure suitable for follow-up). In general, 450 \micron\
829: observations will form a follow-up PI-driven project once the
830: population of suitable detected disks is known. The practical
831: strategy is to start with the nearest targets and work outwards, while
832: maintaining balance among the spectral types. Thus the best resolved
833: disks will be observed first, and these will have the highest priority for
834: follow-up imaging.
835:
836: Figure \ref{mass_sensitivity} shows the variation of mass sensitivity
837: for disks of different temperatures and the limitations for several
838: key distances in the survey, including the inner bound (2 pc)
839: and the outer bound (45 pc), as well as the outer bounds of the
840: M dwarf (8.6 pc) and G and F stars (22 pc and 25 pc). This figure
841: shows that, for unresolved disks, our sensitivity is sufficient to
842: detect masses comparable to that of $\epsilon$ Eridani (0.002
843: $M_\oplus$ = 0.16 $M_{\rm lunar}$) at most temperatures within 10 pc.
844: The mass of $\epsilon$ Eridani lies in the mid-range of dust masses
845: for the handful of detected Sun-like systems \citep{gre04}. The
846: detectable mass is of course modified by dust location, stellar
847: heating, and resolution, but we note that 15 pc is a useful reference
848: point as it is the far end of planet search distances for TPF. At
849: that distance, we will detect all unresolved systems with temperatures
850: exceeding 70 K.
851: Such limits mean that non-detections result in constraints on
852: dust mass in these systems of typically 200 times the dust content of
853: the solar system, but down to only approximately four times this for
854: our nearest target, GJ 699, at 1.8 pc.
855:
856: \subsection{Ancillary Targets}
857:
858: In addition to the 500 primary targets of the survey, the large FOV of
859: SCUBA-2 will enable us to image companions in multiple systems, and in
860: some fields, to include other nearby stars where they are present. In
861: our target list, at least 240 stars are members of multiple systems of
862: at least two members. This high fraction of multiple systems raises
863: the total number of stars surveyed to well over 750. Very few of
864: these systems require more than one SCUBA-2 sub-array, since even wide
865: binaries up to 1000 AU in separation will have an angular separation
866: of $< 2$\arcmin. In the case of binaries, their inclusion in the
867: survey is based on the spectral type of the primary; exempting the
868: secondary from the initial sample ensures that no bias is introduced
869: due to the probabilities of disks in binary systems or the weighting
870: of secondaries toward lower masses.
871:
872: \newpage
873: \subsection{Subset Populations}
874:
875: The sample-size for each of the spectral types was chosen so that we
876: could statistically distinguish between detection rates of 5, 10, 25
877: and 50\% when the primary dataset is divided into the following
878: sub-categories.
879:
880: \begin{itemize}
881: \item{Stellar type, with 100 stars each of A, F, G, K and M. (Properties
882: here and subsequently are from the NASA NStars database at
883: http://nstars.arc.nasa.gov).}
884: \item{Stellar age, with $\sim 150$ stars younger than 1 Gyr and $\sim
885: 350$ stars aged 1-10 Gyr. The division corresponds approximately to
886: the end of the heavy bombardment phase of the Earth, and this age
887: split can readily be applied from the decline in X-ray activity, as
888: measured by the ROSAT all-sky survey \citep{gai98}. The 150:350
889: division arises from the proportions within each stellar type
890: falling with this age bracket. This is $\sim$100\% of A-stars (1 Gyr
891: on the main-sequence), 20\% of F-stars (lasting 5 Gyr) and 10\% of
892: G, K and M stars (limited by the Galactic Disk age of 10 Gyr).}
893: \item{Stellar multiplicity, with $\approx 50$\% of target stars having another star as
894: a companion. }
895: \item{Presence of a planetary system, with $\sim 20$ examples within our volume
896: known at the present time from radial velocity searches.}
897: \end{itemize}
898:
899: \subsection{Statistics}
900:
901: The overall choice of sample size is driven by the aim of
902: differentiating detection rates among the listed sub-groups. The key
903: is to have a sample size large enough that the smallest sub-group with
904: the lowest detection rate can be distinguished from rates in other
905: sub-groups. The detection rate for X disks among Y stars is defined as
906: $Z = (X +/- \sqrt{X}) / Y$ as the uncertainty is Poissonian for small
907: counts. In the simplest interpretation, we accept rates as
908: differing if the upper bound of one Z value is below the lower bound
909: of the comparison Z value. In practice this means the survey size is
910: driven by the smallest samples, that are one-tenth of the comparison
911: group. The two cases are the planetary systems ($\sim$ 1 in 10
912: Solar-type systems) and young Sun-like stars (20 among 200 of the G
913: and K stars). Here we can distinguish observed detection rates $Z$ for
914: any pair of intrinsic detection rates among 10\%, 25\% and 50\%. The
915: formal minimum required to do so is 163 stars, which is just met by
916: our smallest group: the approximately 180 stars of late-F to mid-K
917: potential planet-hosts.
918:
919: Detection rates do not need to be compared within every spectral type.
920: For example, the effects of age on debris will be investigated for
921: stars of Sun-like mass, i.e., types both G and K, rather than G and K
922: separately. In fact, this approach is required to allow us to
923: establish robust distinctions (i.e., at the 2-3 $\sigma$ level)
924: between detection rates as a function of spectral type and age, due to
925: the practical limits on sample size. For instance, with 200 stars per
926: sample, a 15\% difference in detection rate can be identified at the 3
927: $\sigma$ level.
928:
929: Results from the far-IR surveys with {\it IRAS}, {\it ISO} and {\it
930: Spitzer} show that these rates actually occur amongst sub-groups of
931: stars. For example, 10\% is the global rate for Sun-like stars
932: \citep{gw03}, 25\% is the rate among Sun-like stars with known giant
933: planets \citep{bei05}, and 50\% is the rate among more luminous A
934: stars \citep{gw03,rie05}. It is useful to note that 10\% of disks
935: exist even at the limited {\it IRAS} sensitivity, and so this a
936: minimum frequency. However, we can also distinguish a 5\% disk
937: occurrence should it occur among one of the less well-studied
938: sub-groups. In the smallest sub-groups of only 20 stars, we have
939: evidence already for detection rates of 20-25\% \citep{gw03,bei05}.
940:
941:
942: \section{Complementary Data}
943: \label{complementary}
944:
945: To make the most of the JCMT Legacy survey dataset, it is essential
946: that we ensure that the targets are selected based on accurate
947: spectral classification. Although the targets are all very near the
948: Sun, this proximity does not guarantee that the optical spectrum of
949: each is well-characterized. This is critical to exclude K-giants and
950: brown dwarfs, as well as to ensure that the sub-categories of the
951: targets are accurately populated. As part of the ongoing RECONS
952: survey of nearby stars, \cite{hen06} have recently published spectral
953: classifications for most of the nearby stars on our target list. For
954: those which have not yet been observed spectroscopically, we have
955: undertaken a small optical survey. We are using the 1.2 m telescope at
956: the Dominion Astrophysical Observatory to obtain the bulk of these
957: spectra with a resolution $R = \delta \lambda / \lambda \approx 3000$.
958:
959: The SUNS survey is complementary to {\it Spitzer} programs searching
960: for warmer debris disks at 24, 70 and 160 microns. Synergy with {\it
961: Spitzer} data is important to construct the spectral energy
962: distributions of the full disk population, even where {\it Spitzer}
963: has failed to detect a disk in our targets. Due to the timescales of
964: the missions, most far-IR complementary data for our survey targets
965: are likely to come from AKARI and the Herschel Space Observatory.
966: AKARI is currently doing an all-sky far-IR survey.
967: A targeted Herschel debris disk survey is planned using guaranteed
968: time on the Herschel photometric instruments PACS and SPIRE. In
969: addition, other photometric observations are likely to be proposed
970: during open time.
971:
972: \section{Data Products}
973: \label{dataproducts}
974:
975: The data products of the survey will include an archive of 500 single
976: fields centered on the 500 target stars, publication quality images of
977: all the detected disks, and a catalogue of the measured fluxes and
978: flux limits at 850 \micron\ and 450 \micron. In addition, plots of
979: the fitted SEDs for each disk and star combination will be made using
980: optical and IR data combined with the submillimeter fluxes.
981:
982: It will be possible to extract systematically parameters from the data
983: \citep[see][]{she04}. These will also be included in the Legacy
984: database of the survey, and include dust temperatures,
985: masses, spectral indices, and characteristic disk radii (either
986: inferred from temperature and spectral index, or measured where the
987: disks are resolved). Systematic modeling will also yield masses of
988: colliding bodies within the debris belts (up to specified sizes), and
989: estimates of mass, location and orbital direction for perturbing
990: planets (where the disk structure is well-resolved).
991:
992: We have already developed additional tools for measuring disk sizes
993: and fitting spectral energy distributions and will make these publicly
994: available. For examples of development of public databases that we
995: have already made available\footnote{see
996: http://www.roe.ac.uk/ukatc/research/topics/dust/indentification.html}. Further,
997: our {\it Spitzer} contributors have developed tools using HIRES
998: techniques, specifically for resolution-enhanced mapping of debris
999: disks. These tools will be used in a unified analysis of the
1000: SCUBA-2/{\it Spitzer} database. Herschel data will be incorporated to
1001: our analysis where possible.
1002:
1003: \subsection{Ancillary Data Products}
1004:
1005: Some important ancillary data products will emerge from the survey.
1006: These will include a catalogue of fluxes and positions of background
1007: sources not associated with the star, the majority of which will be
1008: distant, dusty galaxies of the kind discovered by \cite{sma97}, and a
1009: list of fluxes for nearby stars where the photosphere is detected but
1010: there is no debris disk.
1011:
1012: The extragalactic catalogue has value in providing a large database of
1013: submillimeter galaxies (SMGs) that can be followed up with adaptive optics to
1014: measure optical/IR properties at very high spatial resolution. A
1015: unique aspect of these target fields is that the survey stars
1016: themselves will be available for guiding, and they are technically
1017: ideal, with magnitudes down to about $m_V = 12$ and offsets of up to
1018: about 5 arcminutes. Further, the fields add up to 7 square degrees of
1019: sky observed to the JCMT's 850 \micron\ confusion limit but split 500
1020: ways rather than in a few fields. Thus the sources counts provide a
1021: test for cosmological variance, in comparison to the SCUBA-2 cosmology
1022: survey. Each 49 square arcminute survey field is well-matched to the
1023: field of view of the KMOS near-IR facility on ESO's 8-m VLT
1024: \citep{sha04}, allowing up to 24 SMGs to be targeted spectroscopically
1025: using deployable integral field units, which promises to yield the
1026: least-biased spectroscopic redshift distribution to date.
1027:
1028: The stellar photospheric data are valuable because the long-wavelength
1029: end of the Rayleigh-Jeans tail has never been measured. As an example,
1030: the A0 star Vega at 8 pc has a photosphere of about 5 mJy at 850
1031: \micron, and so the equivalent for a non-debris star can be detected
1032: with our survey at the $7\sigma$ level. The science value is in
1033: observing the contribution of the photosphere to the SED of the star,
1034: a quantity that is poorly measured in the far-IR, especially for
1035: cooler stars (K and M) with deep molecular absorption bands. Measuring
1036: signals below the expected levels would show that the photosphere does
1037: not simply extrapolate as a blackbody, constraining stellar atmosphere
1038: models. At present, about 5\% of stars are known to have far-IR
1039: signals $3 \ \sigma$ or more below the photospheric prediction
1040: \citep[e.g.,][]{hab01}.
1041:
1042:
1043: \section{Summary}
1044: \label{summary}
1045:
1046: Many stars are surrounded by dusty cold debris disks. These are fed
1047: by asteroids and comets orbiting the stars. Studying the location,
1048: mass and morphology of these disks provides crucial information about
1049: the outcome of planet formation in these systems. For the fourteen
1050: disks which have been resolved at present, observed structures have
1051: even been used to suggest the location of unseen planets. Hundreds
1052: more stars have had their disks characterised from their SEDs showing
1053: that these disks are the extrasolar equivalents of the Kuiper and
1054: asteroid belts in the Solar System.
1055:
1056: In this Legacy survey, we will use 390 hours of SCUBA-2 time on the
1057: JCMT to observe 500 nearby main-sequence stars to search for debris
1058: disk signatures. This survey will be the first unbiased one since
1059: IRAS, as previous far-IR surveys have had to omit many
1060: stars. The crucial value of the submillimeter is that the stellar
1061: photospheric signal is irrelevant and so any star can be examined. The
1062: output of our survey will be robust statistics on the incidence of
1063: debris disks plus discovery of the underlying causes (in terms of the
1064: stellar environment and history). The nearer systems may also be
1065: resolved, contributing to planetary detection and planning for missions
1066: such as TPF/Darwin.
1067:
1068: The data products will be unique, comprising deep and uniform searches
1069: for debris without any bias towards particular stellar
1070: properties. This has never been done at any wavelength, and
1071: particularly not in the submillimeter where a new cold population of
1072: disks is barely explored. The SUNSS will exceed the modest, unbiased
1073: G-dwarf SCUBA survey \citep{gw03} by forty-fold in stellar numbers
1074: while being substantially deeper. The SCUBA-2 sensitivity will
1075: approach the Kuiper belt dust level for the closest Solar analogues; a
1076: disk around these targets could actually be detected in our survey
1077: before the equivalent has been mapped around the Sun. The survey can
1078: never be done better until large far-IR telescopes fly in space
1079: -- resolving the disk spatially from the stellar photosphere -- a
1080: prospect considerably downstream of JWST.
1081:
1082: The Science Legacy lies in answers to the five key outcomes:
1083: \begin{itemize}
1084: \item{determining unbiased statistics on the incidence of disks around nearby stars;}
1085: \item{constraining masses and temperatures of disks previously
1086: detected in the mid- and far-IR (e.g., in {\it Spitzer} surveys);}
1087: \item{discovering numerous disks too cold to detect in the far-IR;}
1088: \item{being the basis of source lists for future observing campaigns
1089: using, e.g., ALMA and {\it JWST}; and}
1090: \item{providing limits on the presence of dust that are vital to future missions such as Darwin/TPF.}
1091: \end{itemize}
1092:
1093: With these answers in hand, we will be able to understand for the
1094: first time the relation of debris disks -- tracing planetesimals up to
1095: tens of km across in orbits at tens of AU -- to the inner planetary
1096: systems detected by other methods. The results, especially when
1097: combined with shorter wavelength data to constrain temperature and
1098: mass, will test models of planet formation spanning across the scale
1099: of our Solar System (from inside Mercury's orbit to beyond
1100: Neptune's). The images of disks will be followed in the next decade by
1101: high-resolution imaging that may indicate perturbing planets, even
1102: following their orbital perturbations in real time. The results will
1103: be vital for the detection of extrasolar Earths with coronagraphs.
1104:
1105:
1106: \acknowledgements
1107:
1108: \clearpage
1109:
1110: \begin{thebibliography}{}
1111:
1112: \bibitem[Aumann et al.(1984)]{aum84}Aumann, H.H., et al. 1984, \apj,
1113: 278, 23
1114:
1115: \bibitem[Backman \& Paresce(1993)]{bp93}Backman, D.E., \& Paresce,
1116: F. 1993, in Protostars \& Planets III, ed. Levy (Tucson: UAP), 1253
1117:
1118: \bibitem[Beichman et al.(2004)]{bei04}Beichman, C.A., G\'{o}mez, G.,
1119: Lo, M., Masdemont, H., \& Romans, L. 2004, AdSpR, 34, 637
1120:
1121: \bibitem[Beichman et al.(2005)]{bei05}Beichman, C.A., et al. 2005,
1122: \apj, 622, 1160
1123:
1124: \bibitem[Beichman et al.(2006a)]{bei06a}Beichman, C.A., et al. 2006a,
1125: \apj, 639, 1166
1126:
1127: \bibitem[Beichman et al.(2006b)]{bei06b}Beichman, C.A., et al. 2006b,
1128: \apj, 652, 1674
1129:
1130: \bibitem[Bryden et al.(2006)]{bry06}Bryden, G., et al. 2006, \apj,
1131: 636, 1098
1132:
1133: \bibitem[Carpenter et al.(2005)]{car05}Carpenter, J.M., Wolf, S.,
1134: Schreyer, K., Launhardt, R., \& Henning, Th. 2005, AJ, 129, 1049
1135:
1136: \bibitem[Chen et al.(2006)]{che06}Chen, C.H., et al. 2006, \apjs, 166,
1137: 351
1138:
1139: \bibitem[Decin et al.(2003)]{dec03}Decin, G., et al. 2003, \apj, 598,
1140: 636
1141:
1142: \bibitem[Dent et al.(2000)]{den00}Dent, W.R., Walker, H.J., Holland,
1143: W.S., \& Greaves, J.S. 2000, \mnras, 314, 702
1144:
1145: \bibitem[Dominik \& Decin(2003)]{dom03}Dominik, C., \& Decin, G. 2003, \apj, 598, 626
1146:
1147: \bibitem[Gaidos et al.(1998)]{gai98}Gaidos, E.J. 1998, \pasp, 110, 1259
1148:
1149: \bibitem[Gautier et al.(2007)]{gau07}Gautier, et al., 2007, submitted
1150:
1151: \bibitem[Griffin et al.(2006)]{gri06}Griffin, M., et al. 2006, in
1152: ``Space Telescopes and Instrumentations I: Optical, Infrared, and
1153: Millimeter" eds. J. C. Mather, H. A. MacEwan, and M. W. de Graauw,
1154: Proceedings of the SPIE, Vol. 6265
1155: %For SPIRE
1156:
1157: \bibitem[Gorlova et al.(2006)]{gor06}Gorlova, N., et al. 2006, \apj,
1158: 649, 1028
1159:
1160: \bibitem[Gorlova et al.(2004)]{gor04}Gorlova, N., et al. 2004, \apjs,
1161: 154, 448
1162:
1163: \bibitem[Greaves, Fischer \& Wyatt(2006)]{gre06}Greaves, J.S.,
1164: Fischer, D., \& Wyatt, M.C. 2006, MNRAS, 366, 283
1165:
1166: \bibitem[Greaves et al.(2004)]{gre04}Greaves, J.S., Holland, W.S.,
1167: Jayawardhana, R., Wyatt, M.C., \& Dent, W.R.F. 2004, MNRAS, 348, 1097
1168:
1169: \bibitem[Greaves et al.(2005)]{gre05}Greaves, J.S., et al. 2005, \apj,
1170: 619, 187
1171:
1172: \bibitem[Greaves et al.(1998)]{gre98}Greaves, J.S., et al. 1998, \apj,
1173: 506, 133
1174:
1175: \bibitem[Greaves, Mannings \& Holland(2000)]{gre00}Greaves, J.S.,
1176: Mannings, V., Holland, W.S. 2000, Icarus, 143, 155
1177:
1178: \bibitem[Greaves \& Wyatt(2003)]{gw03}Greaves, J.S., \& Wyatt,
1179: M.C. 2003, MNRAS, 345, 1212
1180:
1181: \bibitem[Greaves et al.(2004b)]{gre04b}Greaves, J.S., Wyatt, M.C.,
1182: Holland, W.S., \& Dent, W.R.F. 2004b, MNRAS, 351, 54
1183:
1184: \bibitem[Habing et al.(2001)]{hab01}Habing, H.J., et al. 2001, \aap,
1185: 365, 545
1186:
1187: \bibitem[Haisch, Lada \& Lada(2001)]{hai01}Haisch, K.E, Jr., Lada, E.A., \&
1188: Lada, C.J. 2001, \apj, 553, 153
1189:
1190: \bibitem[Henry et al.(2006)]{hen06}Henry, T., et al. 2006, \aj, 132, 2360
1191:
1192: \bibitem[Hern\'{a}ndez et al.(2006)]{her06}Hern\'{a}ndez, J., et
1193: al. 2006, \apj, 652, 472
1194:
1195: \bibitem[Hines et al.(2006)]{hin06}Hines, D.C., et al. 2006, \apj,
1196: 638, 1070
1197:
1198: \bibitem[Holland et al.(2006)]{hol06}Holland, W.S., et al. 2006, SPIE,
1199: 6275, 45
1200:
1201: \bibitem[Holland et al.(1999)]{hol99}Holland, W.S., et al. 1999,
1202: MNRAS, 303, 659
1203:
1204: \bibitem[Holland et al.(1998)]{hol98}Holland, W.S., et al. 1998,
1205: Nature, 392, 788
1206:
1207: \bibitem[Holmes et al.(2003)]{hol03}Holmes, E.K., Butner, H.M.,
1208: Fajardo-Acosta, S.B., \& Rebull, L.M. 2003, AJ, 125, 3334
1209:
1210: \bibitem[Ivison \& Blain(2005)]{ivi05}Ivison, R., \& Blain, x. 2005,
1211: in Proc.\ 39th ESLAB Symposium, 'Trends in Space Science and Cosmic
1212: Vision 2020', ESA SP-588, p.\ 81
1213:
1214: \bibitem[Jayawardhana et al.(2002)]{jay02}Jayawardhana, R. et
1215: al. 2002, \apj, 570, L93
1216:
1217: \bibitem[Kalas, Deltorn \& Larwood(2001)]{kal01}Kalas, P., Deltorn,
1218: J.-M., \& Larwood, J., 2001, \apj, 553, 410
1219:
1220: \bibitem[Kastner et al.(2006)]{kas06}Kastner, J.H., et al. 2006, \apj,
1221: 638, L29
1222:
1223: \bibitem[Kenyon \& Bromley(2004)]{ken04}Kenyon, S., \& Bromley,
1224: B. 2004, \aj, 127, 513
1225:
1226: \bibitem[Kim et al.(2005)]{kim05}Kim, J.S., et al. 2005, \apj, 632, 659
1227:
1228: \bibitem[Laureijs et al.(2002)]{lau02}Laureijs, R.J., et al. 2002,
1229: \aap, 387, 285
1230:
1231: \bibitem[Lestrade et al.(2006)]{les06}Lestrade, J.-F., Wyatt, M.C.,
1232: Bertoldi, F., Dent, W.R.F., Menten, K.M. 2006, \aap, 460, 733
1233:
1234: \bibitem[Liu et al.(2004)]{liu04}Liu, M., Matthews, B., Williams, J.,
1235: \& Kalas, P. 2004, \apj, 608, 526
1236:
1237: \bibitem[Low et al.(2005)]{low05}Low, F.J., et al. 2005, \apj, 631, 1170
1238:
1239: \bibitem[Malhotra(1995)]{mal95}Malhotra, R. 1995, \aj, 110, 420
1240:
1241: \bibitem[Mamajek, Meyer \& Liebert(2002)]{mam02}Mamajek, E., Meyer,
1242: M., \& Leibert, J. 2002, \aj, 124, 1670
1243:
1244: \bibitem[Mannings \& Barlow(1998)]{man98}Manning, V., \& Barlow,
1245: M. 1998, \apj, 497, 330
1246:
1247: \bibitem[Matthews et al.(2007)]{mat07}Matthews, B.C., Kalas, P.G., \&
1248: Wyatt, M.C. 2007, \apj, 664, in press
1249:
1250: \bibitem[Meyer et al.(2004)]{mey04}Meyer, M.R., et al. 2004, \apjs,
1251: 154, 422
1252:
1253: \bibitem[Mo\'{o}r et al.(2006)]{moo06}Mo\'{o}r, A., et al. 2006, \apj,
1254: 644, 525
1255:
1256: \bibitem[Morbidelli(2004)]{mor04}Morbidelli, A. 2004, EM\&P, 92, 1
1257:
1258: \bibitem[Najita \& Williams(2005)]{naj05}Najita, J., \& Williams,
1259: J. 2005, \apj, 635, 625
1260:
1261: \bibitem[Plets \& Vynckier(1999)]{pv99}Plets, H., \& Vynckier,
1262: C. 1999, \aap, 343, 496
1263:
1264: \bibitem[Plume et al.(2007)]{plu07}Plume, R., et al. 2007, PASP, 119, 102
1265:
1266: \bibitem[Poglitsch et al.(2006)]{pog06} Poglitsch, A., et al. 2006, in
1267: ``Space Telescopes and Instrumentations I: Optical, Infrared, and
1268: Millimeter" eds. J. C. Mather, H. A. MacEwan, and M. W. de Graauw,
1269: Proceedings of the SPIE, Vol. 6265
1270: %For PACS
1271:
1272: \bibitem[Pollack et al.(1994)]{pol94}Pollack, J.B., Hollenbach, D.,
1273: Beckwith, S., Simonelli, D.P., Roush, T., \& Fong, W. 1994, \apj, 421, 615
1274:
1275: \bibitem[Rhee et al.(2007)]{rhe07}Rhee, J.H., Song, I., Zuckerman, B.,
1276: \& McElwain, M. 2007, \apj, in press
1277:
1278: \bibitem[Rieke et al.(2005)]{rie05}Rieke, G.H., et al. 2005, \apj,
1279: 620, 1010
1280:
1281: \bibitem[Sheret et al.(2004)]{she04}Sheret, I., Dent, W.R.F., \&
1282: Wyatt, M.C. 2004, \mnras, 348, 1282
1283:
1284: \bibitem[Sicilia-Aguilar et al.(2006)]{sic06}Sicilia-Aguilar, A., et
1285: al. 2006, \apj, 638, 897
1286:
1287: \bibitem[Sharples et al.(2004)]{sha04}Sharples, R.M. et al. 2004, SPIE,
1288: 5492, 1179
1289:
1290: \bibitem[Sloan et al.(2004)]{slo04}Sloan, G.C., et al. 2004, \apj,
1291: 614, L77
1292:
1293: \bibitem[Smail, Ivison \& Blain(1997)]{sma97}Smail, I., Ivison, R., \&
1294: Blain, A. 1997, \apj, 490, L5
1295:
1296: \bibitem[Smith et al.(2006)]{smi06}Smith, P.S., et al. 2006, \apj,
1297: 644, L125
1298:
1299: \bibitem[Spangler et al.(2001)]{spa01}Spangler, C. et al. 2001, \apj,
1300: 555, 932
1301:
1302: \bibitem[Stapelfelt et al.(2004)]{sta04}Stapelfeldt, K.R., et
1303: al. 2004, \apjs, 154, 458
1304:
1305: \bibitem[Stauffer et al.(2005)]{sta05}Stauffer, J.R. et al. 2005, \aj,
1306: 130, 1834
1307:
1308: \bibitem[Su et al.(2005)]{su05}Su, K.Y.L., et al. 2005, \apj, 628, 487
1309:
1310: \bibitem[Su et al.(2006)]{su06}Su, K.Y.L., et al. 2006, \apj, 653, 675
1311:
1312: \bibitem[Su et al.(2007)]{su07}Su, K.Y.L., et al. 2007, \apj, 657, 41
1313:
1314: \bibitem[Thommes, Duncan \& Levison(1999)]{tho99}Thommes, E., Duncan,
1315: M.J., \& Levison, H.F. 1999, Nature, 402, 635
1316:
1317: \bibitem[Uchida et al.(2004)]{uch04}Uchida, K.I., et al. 2004, \apjs,
1318: 154, 439
1319:
1320: \bibitem[Uzpen et al.(2005)]{uzp05}Uzpen, B., et al. 2005, \apj, 629, 512
1321:
1322: \bibitem[Werner et al.(2006)]{wer06}Werner, M. Fazio, G., Rieke, G.,
1323: Roellig, T.L., \& Watson, D.M. 2006, \araa, 44, 269
1324:
1325: \bibitem[Williams et al.(2004)]{wil04}Williams, J.C. et al. 2004, ApJ, 604, 414
1326:
1327: \bibitem[Wyatt(2003)]{wya03}Wyatt, M. 2003, ApJ, 598, 1321
1328:
1329: \bibitem[Wyatt \& Dent(2002)]{wd02}Wyatt, M.C., \& Dent, W.R.F. 2002, MNRAS, 334, 589
1330:
1331: \bibitem[Wyatt et al.(2003)]{wdg03}Wyatt M.C., Dent W.R.F., \& Greaves J.S. 2003, MNRAS, 342, 876
1332:
1333: \bibitem[Wyatt et al.(2005)]{wya05}Wyatt, M.C., et al. 2005, ApJ, 620, 492
1334:
1335: \bibitem[Wyatt et al.(2007)]{wya07}Wyatt, M.C., et al. 2007, ApJ, 658, 569
1336:
1337: \bibitem[Zuckerman(2001)]{zuc01}Zuckerman, B. 2001, \araa, 39, 549
1338:
1339:
1340: \end{thebibliography}
1341:
1342: \end{document}
1343: \clearpage
1344:
1345: \epsscale{1}
1346: \plotone{f1.eps}
1347:
1348: \clearpage
1349:
1350: \epsscale{0.9}
1351: \plotone{f2.ps}
1352:
1353: \clearpage
1354:
1355: \epsscale{0.9}
1356: \plotone{f3.ps}
1357:
1358: \clearpage
1359: \epsscale{0.9}
1360: \plotone{f4.ps}
1361:
1362: \clearpage
1363: \epsscale{0.9}
1364: \plotone{f5.ps}
1365:
1366: \clearpage
1367: \epsscale{0.9}
1368: \plotone{f6.ps}
1369:
1370: %\clearpage
1371: \epsscale{1}
1372: \plotone{f7.ps}
1373:
1374: % \plotfiddle{PSFILE}{VSIZE}{ROTANG}{HSCALE}{VSCALE}{HTRANS}{VTRANS}
1375: % \plotfiddle{sample.eps}{2.6in}{-90.}{32.}{32.}{-250}{225}
1376: % where HSCALE and VSCALE are percentages and HTRANS and VTRANS
1377:
1378: % in PostScript units, 72 PS units = 1 inch.
1379:
1380: \end{document}
1381: