1: \documentclass{emulateapj}
2: \shorttitle{the SSA 22 LAB1}
3: \shortauthors{Matsuda et al.}
4: \slugcomment{Received 2007 May 10; Accepted 2007 June 20}
5:
6: \begin{document}
7:
8: \title{High-Resolution Submillimeter Imaging of the Ly$\alpha$ Blob1 in SSA 22}
9:
10: \author{Y. Matsuda\altaffilmark{1}, D. Iono\altaffilmark{2},
11: K. Ohta\altaffilmark{1}, T. Yamada\altaffilmark{2,3},
12: R. Kawabe\altaffilmark{2}, T. Hayashino\altaffilmark{4},
13: A. B. Peck\altaffilmark{5}, G. R. Petitpas\altaffilmark{5}}
14:
15: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Astronomy, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan; matsdayi@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp}
16: \altaffiltext{2}{National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, 2-21-1 Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588}
17: \altaffiltext{3}{Astronomical Institute, Tohoku University, Aramaki, Aoba, Sendai 980-8578, Japan}
18: \altaffiltext{4}{Research Center for Neutrino Science, Tohoku University, Aramaki, Aoba, Sendai 980-8578, Japan}
19: \altaffiltext{5}{Harvard-Smithsonian CfA, 60 Garden St., Cambridge, MA 02138}
20:
21: \begin{abstract}
22: We present $\sim 2\arcsec$ resolution submillimeter observations of the
23: submillimeter luminous giant Ly$\alpha$ blob (LAB1) in the SSA 22
24: protocluster at redshift $z=3.1$ with the Submillimeter Array (SMA).
25: Although the expected submillimeter flux density is 16 mJy at
26: $880\micron$, no emission is detected with the $2\farcs4 \times 1\farcs9$
27: ($18\times 14$ kpc) beam at the 3$\sigma$ level of 4.2 mJy beam$^{-1}$
28: in the SMA field of view of $35\arcsec$. This is in contrast to the
29: previous lower angular resolution ($15\arcsec$) observations where a
30: bright (17 mJy) unresolved submillimeter source was detected at
31: $850\micron$ toward the LAB1 using the Submillimeter Common-User
32: Bolometer Array on the James Clerk Maxwell Telescope. The SMA
33: non-detection suggests that the spatial extent of the submillimeter
34: emission of LAB1 should be larger than $4\arcsec$ ($>30$ kpc). The most
35: likely interpretation of the spatially extended submillimeter emission
36: is that starbursts occur throughout the large area in LAB1. Some part of
37: the submillimeter emission may come from spatially extended dust expelled
38: from starburst regions by galactic superwind. The spatial extent of
39: the submillimeter emission of LAB1 is similar to those of high redshift
40: radio galaxies rather than submillimeter galaxies.
41:
42: \end{abstract}
43:
44: \keywords{cosmology:observations --- galaxies: formation ---
45: galaxies: starburst --- cosmology: observations ---
46: galaxies: high-redshift --- galaxies: submillimeter}
47:
48:
49: \section{INTRODUCTION}
50:
51: Ly$\alpha$ blobs (LABs) are radio-quiet, giant ($30$--$200$ kpc)
52: Ly$\alpha$ nebulae often discovered in overdense regions of
53: star-forming galaxies at high redshifts \citep{1999AJ....118.2547K,
54: 2000ApJ...532..170S,2001ApJ...554.1001F,2004ApJ...602..545P,
55: 2004AJ....128..569M,2005ApJ...629..654D,2006A&A...452L..23N,
56: 2007astro.ph..3522S}. This new population of LABs may be related to
57: important physical processes in galaxy formation. However, the physical
58: origin of the extended Ly$\alpha$ nebulae is mysterious. Although
59: similar giant Ly$\alpha$ nebulae are often seen around high
60: redshift radio galaxies (HzRGs), they are thought to be related to
61: their radio jets \citep[e.g.,][]{1987ApJ...319L..39M,
62: 1997A&A...317..358V} and are presumably not the same population as
63: the radio-quiet LABs. There are at least three possibilities for the
64: origin of LABs: (1) Ly$\alpha$ cooling radiation resulting from
65: gravitational heating \citep{2000ApJ...537L...5H,2001ApJ...562..605F,
66: 2004MNRAS.351...63B,2006ApJ...640..539Y,2006ApJ...649...14D,
67: 2006ApJ...649...37D,2006A&A...452L..23N}, (2) photoionization by
68: metal free massive (PopIII) stars, or obscured starburst and AGN
69: \citep{2000ApJ...532..170S,2001ApJ...548L..17C,2004ApJ...606...85C,
70: 2004ApJ...614L..85B,2005ApJ...622....7F,2006Natur.441..120J}, and
71: (3) shock heating by starburst-driven galactic superwind
72: \citep{2000ApJ...532L..13T,2001ApJ...562L..15T,2003ApJ...591L...9O,
73: 2004ApJ...613L..97M,2005Natur.436..227W,2005MNRAS.363.1398G,
74: 2006Natur.440..644M}. Recent observations have revealed that LABs
75: show large ($\ge$ 500 km s$^{-1}$) Ly$\alpha$ velocity widths
76: \citep{2000ApJ...532..170S,
77: 2003ApJ...591L...9O,2004MNRAS.351...63B,2005Natur.436..227W,
78: 2006ApJ...640L.123M} and that a significant fraction of LABs
79: display high luminosity infrared dust continuum emission
80: \citep{2001ApJ...548L..17C,2003ApJ...583..551S,2005ApJ...629..654D,
81: 2005MNRAS.363.1398G,2006ApJ...637L..89C}. These properties suggest
82: (2) and/or (3) as the possible origin of the LABs, and a close
83: relationship to the formation of massive galaxies.
84:
85: SSA 22 LAB1 at $z=3.1$ is the best suitable target to reveal the
86: origin of LABs. Its spatial extent of
87: $\sim 150$ kpc and a Ly$\alpha$ luminosity of $\sim 10^{44}$ ergs s$^{-1}$
88: places this as one of the largest and brightest objects among
89: the known LABs \citep{2000ApJ...532..170S}.
90: In a very deep Ly$\alpha$ image taken with the Subaru Prime-Focus
91: Camera (Suprime-Cam), bubble like structures are seen in LAB1, which
92: may be evidence for galactic superwind \citep{2004AJ....128..569M}.
93: \citet{2006Natur.440..644M}
94: demonstrated in their numerical simulations that such bubbles can be
95: produced by galactic superwind from a proto-galaxy.
96: In their model, at first, multiple gas clumps are distributed
97: throughout a dark matter halo. Subsequently, starbursts occur
98: coincidently in these clumps through interactions or mergers,
99: and drive large scale gas outflows. The system evolves into an
100: elliptical galaxy at the present epoch.
101:
102: SSA 22 LAB1 has been observed \citep{2001ApJ...548L..17C,
103: 2004ApJ...606...85C} with the Submillimeter Common-User Bolometer
104: Array (SCUBA) on the James Clerk Maxwell Telescope. An unresolved
105: submillimeter source was detected towards LAB1 with a $850\micron$
106: flux density of $17.4\pm2.9$ mJy, which makes this one of the brightest
107: submillimeter
108: sources at high redshifts detected to date \citep{2005ApJ...622..772C}.
109: However, the angular resolution of $15\arcsec$ of the SCUBA is
110: insufficient to precisely identify the optical counterpart and to
111: investigate the spatial extent of the star-formation activity in LAB1.
112: Although several faint optical components were detected near the center
113: of LAB1 with Hubble Space Telescope (HST) observations
114: \citep{2004ApJ...606...85C}, it has not been confirmed that they are
115: optical counterparts to the submillimeter source yet. A radio source
116: was detected with a 1.4 GHz flux density of $41.2\pm9.3~\mu$Jy
117: ($4\sigma$) at one of the optical
118: components, J1, which is possibly the counterpart to the submillimeter
119: source \citep{2004ApJ...606...85C,2005ApJ...622..772C}. However, a very
120: red $K_{S}$ band source ($R-K_{S}>4.5$) was detected at another optical
121: component, J2 \citep{2000ApJ...532..170S}, which is $\sim 2\arcsec$
122: from J1. Very recently, J2 was also identified as a mid-infrared
123: source with Spitzer/IRAC observations and it is also possibly the
124: counterpart to the submillimeter source \citep{2006astro.ph.12272G}. It
125: is also possible that the submillimeter emission of LAB1 may not be
126: associated with compact source(s), but has a large spatial extent due to
127: galactic superwind similar to the nearby starburst galaxy, M82, in which the
128: distribution of dust is spread out beyond the central (optical) starburst
129: region \citep[e.g.][]{1999A&A...353...51A}. In order to examine the spatial
130: extent of star-formation activity and to seek the relation between the
131: production of LABs and galactic superwinds, higher angular resolution
132: and more sensitive submillimeter observations are required.
133:
134: The Submillimeter Array \citep[SMA,][]{2004ApJ...616....L1} provides
135: an angular resolution of $\sim 2\arcsec$, which is about eight times
136: higher than that with SCUBA. It is also sensitive enough
137: to detect bright submillimeter sources at high redshifts in a full
138: night of observation. For these reasons, the SMA is a very powerful
139: instrument to examine the morphology of submillimeter sources at high
140: redshifts. For example, \citet{2006ApJ...640L...1I} have successfully
141: detected submillimeter emission at the $10\sigma$ level for two 20
142: mJy submillimeter galaxies (SMGs), SMM J123711+6222212 and MIPS
143: J142824.0+352619, using the SMA, and they obtained firm upper limits
144: of $1\farcs2$ to the source sizes.
145: In this letter we report a result of $\sim 2\arcsec$ resolution
146: interferometric submillimeter observation of SSA22 LAB1 with the
147: SMA and discuss
148: the nature of the object. We assume a flat universe of $\Omega_{\rm M}
149: = 0.3$, $\Omega_{\Lambda} = 0.7$, and $H_0 = 70$ km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$
150: ($1\farcs0$ corresponds to a physical length of 7.6 kpc at $z=3.1$).
151:
152: \begin{figure}[hbt]
153: \plotone{f1.eps}
154: \caption{ Natural weighted map of the $880\micron$ continuum emission of SSA22 LAB1. The synthesized beam size has a FWHM of $2\farcs4 \times 1\farcs9$ (P.A. = $36^\circ$), which is shown in the lower left corner. The contours are at -3, -2, 2, and $3 \sigma$, with $\sigma=1.4$ mJy beam$^{-1}$. The circle shows the FWHM of the primary beam ($35\arcsec$).}
155: \label{map}
156: \end{figure}
157:
158: \section{OBSERVATIONS AND DATA REDUCTION}
159:
160: Observations were carried out on 2006 September 24 (1 track, 4.5 hours
161: on source) using eight antennas in the compact configuration of the
162: SMA\footnote{The Submillimeter Array is a joint project
163: between the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory and the Academia
164: Sinica Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics, and is funded by the
165: Smithsonian Institution and the Academia Sinica.}. The SIS receivers
166: were tuned to a center frequency of 345~GHz
167: (869$\micron$) in the upper sideband (USB), yielding 335~GHz
168: (895$\micron$) in the lower sideband (LSB). The SMA correlator had
169: 2 GHz total bandwidth in each sideband. The adopted phase reference
170: center of the target source was
171: $\alpha$~(J2000)~$= 22^{\rm h} 17^{\rm m} 25^{\rm s}.97$,
172: $\delta$~(J2000)~$=00^{\circ} 12' 38\farcs9$ \citep{2005ApJ...622..772C}.
173: The track was taken under good atmospheric opacity (i.e.
174: $\tau_{225} \le 0.06$). The range of (unprojected) baseline lengths
175: was 16 -- 69 meters.
176:
177: The SMA data were calibrated using the Caltech software package MIR,
178: modified for the SMA. Antenna based passband calibration was done using
179: two bright QSOs, J2225$-$0457 (3C446, 1.4~Jy) and J2148+0657 (1.0~Jy),
180: as well as Uranus (69.0~Jy) and Callisto (5.0~Jy). Antenna based
181: time-dependent complex gain calibration was carried out using two
182: QSOs, J2225$-$0457 (1.4~Jy; 6$^\circ$ away from the target) and
183: J2148+0657 (1.0~Jy; 10$^\circ$). The astrometry was checked by
184: applying the phase calibration to a nearby QSO J2218$-$0335 (0.2~Jy;
185: 4$^\circ$) and we assess the accuracy of the astrometry to be
186: $\sim 0\farcs2$. The astrometric accuracy of all of these
187: calibrators is better than 10 milliarcsec, and the positional
188: reference is the International Celestial Reference Frame
189: \citep[ICRF,][]{1998AJ....116..516M}. Finally, absolute flux
190: calibration was performed
191: using Callisto. Data calibrations were carried out by two independent
192: groups, which allowed us to confirm the repeatability and the robustness
193: of the results. Imaging was carried out in MIRIAD \citep{miriad}. The
194: natural weighted beam gave a synthesized beam size of
195: $2\farcs4 \times 1\farcs9$ (FWHM, P.A. = $36^\circ$). The rms noise
196: after combining the two sidebands (effectively at $882 \micron$) is
197: 1.4~mJy. The FWHM of the primary beam is $35\arcsec$.
198:
199: \begin{figure*}[hbt]
200: \plotone{f2.eps}
201: \caption{ Simulated SMA 880$\micron$ maps of spatially extended sources
202: with a single Gaussian profile. The model sources are placed at the phase
203: reference center. The FWHMs of the model sources are 1{\arcsec},
204: 4{\arcsec}, and 8{\arcsec} from left to right. The contours are at -3, -2, 2, 3, 4, and $5 \sigma$, with $\sigma=1.4$ mJy beam$^{-1}$. The
205: circles show the FWHM of the primary beam ($35\arcsec$).
206: The components located at $\sim 10\arcsec$ north and $\sim 10\arcsec$ south
207: from the center are side-lobe response of the model source.}
208: \label{sim}
209: \end{figure*}
210:
211: \section{RESULTS}
212:
213: Figure~\ref{map} shows the 880$\micron$ continuum map of SSA 22 LAB1.
214: No significant emission is detected at the 3$\sigma$ limit of 4.2 mJy
215: beam$^{-1}$ in the field of view of $35\arcsec$. If we adopt a dust
216: temperature of $T_{d}=32.1$ K and a power-law emissivity spectral
217: index of $\beta=1.5$ \citep{2005ApJ...622..772C}, the extrapolated
218: $880\micron$ flux density of LAB1 is 16.2 mJy from the SCUBA
219: $850\micron$ flux density of 17.4 mJy. If there were a single
220: unresolved source, it would be detected at $11\sigma$ level in the
221: $880\micron$ map. Thus the non-detection suggests the existence of a
222: spatially extended submillimeter emission associated with LAB1 assuming
223: that the SCUBA detection is real. Alternatively, if there are multiple
224: compact sources, the flux density
225: of each source is lower than the 3$\sigma$ limit of 4.2 mJy beam$^{-1}$
226: and therefore at least four sources are needed to produce the total
227: flux density of 16.2 mJy. Widely spaced distribution of the sources
228: is also required to satisfy the $3\sigma$ limit; the separation of
229: the sources should be larger than the beam size of $\sim 2\arcsec$
230: (15 kpc). We note that what appears like artifacts in the map actually
231: arises from high side-lobe level that extends N-S of the synthesized
232: beam. The synthesized beam has up to 70\% side-lobes because the source
233: is at zero declination. The noise peaks in the resultant maps also
234: carry this high side-lobe, resulting in structure that appears like
235: diagonal ridges. The theoretical noise level derived using the
236: observed SMA parameters are consistent with the observed rms of
237: 1.4 mJy.
238:
239: In order to check the appearance of spatially extended sources in
240: the SMA 880$\micron$ map, we carried out simulations of the SMA
241: observations using $uvgen$ in MIRIAD (Figure~\ref{sim}). In this
242: simulation, we consider three model sources, each of which has a
243: single Gaussian profile with the FWHM of 1{\arcsec}, 4{\arcsec},
244: and 8{\arcsec}. We assume that the sources have a total flux density
245: of 16.2 mJy intrinsically and are placed at the phase center of
246: the maps. We use the same observational parameters
247: (i.e. the configuration of the SMA antennas, the coordinates of the
248: source, and the hour angle range) for this simulation. The rms noise of
249: 1.4 mJy beam$^{-1}$ in the simulated maps is the same as that of the
250: observed map. The simulation shows that we could detect the source
251: with FWHM of 1{\arcsec} at 10$\sigma$ level, and with FWHM of
252: 4{\arcsec} at 3$\sigma$ level in the observed map. However, the
253: source is resolved out when the diameter of the source is larger than
254: FWHM of 8{\arcsec}. Note that these simulations do not include possible
255: pointing and phase calibration errors. Thus, a conservative lower limit
256: of the FWHM of the spatial extent of the submillimeter emission is
257: $4\arcsec$. Since the source is unresolved in the previous $15\arcsec$
258: resolution SCUBA map \citep{2001ApJ...548L..17C}, a conservative upper
259: limit of the FWHM is $15\arcsec$. The FWHM of the submillimeter emission
260: associated to LAB1 should range from $4\arcsec$ to $15\arcsec$, which
261: corresponds to $30 - 110$ kpc at $z=3.1$, if it is indeed a single source.
262:
263: Figure~\ref{uv} shows the visibility amplitude versus projected baseline
264: with $1\sigma$ error bars. Assuming the source position is at the phase
265: center, we calculate the vector averaged amplitudes from
266: the visibility data in circular bins of $10-20$, $20-40$, $40-60$, and
267: $60-80$ k$\lambda$. Each bin contains about 3000 -- 8000 raw visibility
268: points. The visibility amplitude shows a marginal (2.7$\sigma$) excess
269: at the bin that represents data for $10-20$ k$\lambda$. We also plot the
270: total $880\micron$ flux density
271: extrapolated from the SCUBA measurement ($16.2\pm2.7$~mJy) at the
272: projected baseline of zero. In order to constrain the spatial extent
273: of the submillimeter emission, we fit a Gaussian profile to the visibility
274: data and the total flux density data. The best fit Gaussian source has a
275: flux density of $16.5\pm 2.6$ mJy and a FWHM of $5\farcs2\pm1\farcs3$,
276: which corresponds to $40\pm10$ kpc at $z=3.1$. The suggested source size
277: of $5\farcs2$ from the visibility data is consistent with the range of
278: the source size of $\sim 4 - 15 \arcsec$ expected from the simulations.
279:
280: To increase the detectability of the extended submillimeter emission,
281: we tapered the visibility data with a Gaussian that has a FWHM of
282: $6\arcsec$ (Figure~\ref{taper}). The synthesized beam size of the map
283: is $5\farcs5 \times 4\farcs5$ and the rms noise is 2.8 mJy beam$^{-1}$.
284: However, we could not detect the extended submillimeter emission in the
285: map at the 3 $\sigma$ limit of 8.4 mJy beam$^{-1}$. The peak flux
286: density of 6.0 mJy beam$^{-1}$ (2.1 $\sigma$) is expected for the
287: source with the FWHM of $5\farcs2$ and the total flux density of
288: 16.2mJy. Thus the non-detection in the lower resolution map is
289: consistent with the expected peak flux density of the extended
290: submillimeter emission.
291:
292: In summary, the data suggest that the spatial extent of the
293: submillimeter emission of LAB1 should be larger than $4\arcsec$ ($>30$
294: kpc), if the source has a Gaussian profile. However, the S/N of the data
295: is too low to distinguish whether the submillimeter emission comes from
296: a single extended source, widely spaced multiple compact sources, or a
297: combination of both.
298:
299: \section{DISCUSSION}
300:
301: \subsection{Origin of the Submillimeter Emission}
302:
303: \subsubsection{Extended Starbursts}
304:
305: We discuss possible interpretations of the spatially extended
306: submillimeter emission of LAB1. One possible (and probably most
307: likely) interpretation is spatially extended star-formation
308: in LAB1. There is evidence to support this interpretation. It
309: seems that the UV continuum emission is also spatially extended
310: in LAB1. Figure~\ref{spcam}~(left) shows $R$-band (UV continuum at
311: the rest frame of LAB1) image contours superposed on the 880$\micron$
312: map. The resolution of the $R$-band image is $1\farcs0$. The
313: astrometric system of the image is defined by the reference
314: frame of the 2MASS All-Sky Catalog of Point Sources
315: \citep{2003tmc..book.....C}, and the typical rms error is
316: less than $0.2\arcsec$. In Figure~\ref{spcam}~(left), we label
317: UV continuum sources that are possibly associated with LAB1,
318: C11 \citep{2000ApJ...532..170S}, J1 -- 4 sources
319: \citep{2004ApJ...606...85C}, and A1 -- 6. The UV continuum sources
320: are widely spaced and have the median separation of $\sim 6\arcsec$.
321: The spectroscopic redshift of C11 was measured to be the same as LAB1
322: \citep{2003ApJ...592..728S}. There is a marginal ($2.5\sigma$) excess
323: of submillimeter emission at the position of C11, suggesting that C11
324: is one of the counterparts of the submillimeter emission. A2 shows a
325: marginal narrow-band deficit ($\sim 0.4$ mag), which suggests it has
326: Ly$\alpha$ absorption at $z=3.1$ and is associated with LAB1. We derived
327: the photometric redshifts of the UV continuum sources inside the
328: Ly$\alpha$ nebula using Palomar $U_n$-band image
329: \citep{2003ApJ...592..728S} and Suprime-Cam $B$, $V$, $R$, $i'$,
330: and, $z'$ bands images \citep{2004AJ....128.2073H} with Hyperz
331: \citep{2000A&A...363..476B}. We found that the sources brighter than
332: $R=26$ magnitude (i.e. C11, J1 -- 3, and A1 -- 3) show photometric
333: redshifts between $z=2.6$ and $z=3.4$. These redshifts are consistent
334: with $z=3.1$, if we consider the estimated uncertainty of the
335: photometric redshifts of $\Delta z\sim 0.3$. Moreover diffuse UV
336: continuum emission seems to connect these sources with each other.
337: The diffuse UV continuum emission may be tidal tails and bridges
338: due to interactions of these sources. The photometric redshifts
339: of the UV continuum sources and the connecting diffuse UV continuum
340: emission suggest that most of the UV continuum sources are associated
341: with LAB1. It is possible that the distribution of the submillimeter
342: emission is similar to that of the UV continuum emission.
343:
344: \begin{figure}
345: \plotone{f3_color.eps}
346: \caption{Visibility plot for the $880\micron$ emission. The circles show the visibility amplitude averaged in circular bins ($10-20$, $20-40$, $40-60$, and $60-80$ k$\lambda$) on $u$,$v$-plane. The vertical bars show the $1\sigma$ errors. The square shows the total $880\micron$ flux density extrapolated from the previous SCUBA observations \citep{2005ApJ...622..772C}. The solid curve is the best fit Gaussian source with a flux density of $16.5\pm2.6$ mJy and a FWHM of $5\farcs2\pm1\farcs3$.}
347: \label{uv}
348: \end{figure}
349:
350: We derive a star-formation rate (SFR) in LAB1 of 1400 $M_{\odot}$
351: yr$^{-1}$ from the far-infrared (FIR) luminosity of
352: $L_{\rm FIR} = 7.9 \times 10^{12} L_{\odot}$ \citep{2005ApJ...622..772C}
353: and the relation between far-infrared (FIR) luminosity and SFR,
354: $SFR(M_{\odot} {\rm yr}^{-1})=1.7 \times 10^{-10} L_{\rm FIR}(L_{\odot})$
355: \citep{1998ARA&A..36..189K}. The large SFR of LAB1 suggests that intense
356: starbursts occur in LAB1. We also derive an average SFR surface density
357: of $1.1$ $M_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-2}$ from dividing the SFR by the
358: area of the submillimeter emission, $\pi r_{\rm submm}^2$, where
359: $r_{\rm submm}$ is a half size of the FWHM of the submillimeter
360: emission of 40 kpc. The average SFR surface density of LAB1 is
361: comparable to those of local starburst galaxies estimated from
362: FIR luminosity and H$\alpha$ size \citep{1997AJ....114...54M}.
363: Thus the large spatial extent of the submillimeter emission and
364: the high average SFR surface density suggest that
365: starbursts occur throughout the large area in LAB1.
366:
367: We also derive a SFR in LAB1 of 220 $M_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$ from the
368: UV luminosity density at $1600$ \AA\ of $L_{\nu} = 1.6 \times
369: 10^{30}~{\rm ergs}~{\rm s}^{-1}~{\rm Hz}^{-1}$ for the UV continuum
370: emission inside the Ly$\alpha$ nebula and the relation between UV
371: luminosity density and SFR, $SFR(M_{\odot}~{\rm yr}^{-1}) = 1.4
372: \times 10^{-28}~L_{\nu}({\rm ergs}~{\rm s}^{-1}~{\rm Hz}^{-1})$
373: \citep{1998ARA&A..36..189K}. We do not correct for dust extinction
374: in this calculation. The SFR derived from the UV continuum emission
375: is about an order of magnitude lower than that derived from the
376: submillimeter emission. The difference suggests that most of the
377: UV continuum emission produced from star-formation activity in LAB1
378: is attenuated by dust. There may be buried, unidentified UV
379: continuum sources in LAB1.
380:
381: It is worth noting here that recent Spitzer/MIPS $24\micron$
382: observations have also given us a hint that LABs have multiple dusty
383: sources. \citet{2006ApJ...637L..89C} detected two or three $24\micron$
384: sources at the positions of two LABs at $z=2.4$, which are possibly
385: associated with the LABs. The separations of these $24\micron$ sources
386: are $60-70$ kpc, similar to or somewhat larger than the separations
387: of the possible optical counterparts (i.e. UV continuum sources) of
388: LAB1. The widely spaced dusty sources may be a common feature of LABs.
389:
390: \begin{figure}
391: \plotone{f4.eps}
392: \caption{ Lower resolution (Gaussian tapered) $880\micron$ map of SSA22 LAB1. The synthesized beam size has a FWHM of $5\farcs5 \times 4\farcs5$ (P.A. = $70^\circ$). The contours are at -3, -2, 2, and $3 \sigma$, with $\sigma=2.8$ mJy beam$^{-1}$. The circle shows the FWHM of the primary beam ($35\arcsec$).}
393: \label{taper}
394: \end{figure}
395:
396: \begin{figure*}[hbt]
397: \plotone{f5_color.eps}
398: \caption{ ({\it a}) Subaru/Suprime-Cam $R$-band image contours
399: superposed on the same $880\micron$ map. Possible optical counterparts (C11, J1 -- 4 , and A1 -- 6) are labeled. ({\it b}) Subaru/Suprime-Cam Ly$\alpha$ image contours superposed on the $880\micron$ map. The contours show 3, 6, and $9 \sigma$ per arcsec$^2$ for each image. The FWHM of the beam is shown at the bottom left. }
400: \label{spcam}
401: \end{figure*}
402:
403: \subsubsection{Galactic Superwind}
404:
405: Some part of the submillimeter emission can be interpreted as thermal
406: emission from spatially extended dust expelled from starburst regions
407: by galactic superwind. Since LAB1 shows possible
408: evidence for galactic superwind (i.e bubble like structures seen in
409: its Ly$\alpha$ nebula), it may have a large amount of dust entrained
410: in gas outflows. Figure~\ref{spcam}~(right) shows Ly$\alpha$
411: image contours superposed on the 880$\micron$ map. While the S/N
412: of the submillimeter emission is low and may not be adequate for
413: conclusive determinations, the submillimeter features seem to
414: correlate with the high surface brightness regions
415: of Ly$\alpha$ emission. The possible correlation in distributions
416: between submillimeter and Ly$\alpha$ emissions is consistent with
417: this interpretation. \citet{2004MNRAS.351...63B} found a Ly$\alpha$
418: velocity gradient around C11 and argued that a bipolar outflow
419: seen in M82 is a local analog for C11. In fact, M82 shows not only
420: an extended H$\alpha$ emission-line nebula associated with the
421: bipolar gas outflow \citep{1990ApJS...74..833H,2002PASJ...54..891O}
422: but also extended dust emission \citep{1999A&A...353...51A,
423: 2006ApJ...642L.127E}. \citet{2006ApJ...642L.127E} found that
424: $8\micron$ dust emission extends to 6 kpc from the central starburst
425: region of M82, and the extended emission accounts for about one-third of
426: the total $8\micron$ flux with IRAC observations. Thus, it is possible
427: that the thermal emission from the spatially extended dust expelled
428: from starburst regions also contributes the spatially extended
429: submillimeter emission of LAB1. In this picture, some of the
430: extended Ly$\alpha$ and UV continuum emission of LAB1 may be
431: light scattered by spatially extended dust.
432:
433: \subsubsection{Other Possible Interpretations}
434:
435: The Sunyaev-Zeldovich (S-Z) increment is another possible
436: interpretation for the spatially extended submillimeter emission.
437: There is evidence that LAB1 lies in a deep dark matter potential
438: well made by the proto-cluster at $z=3.1$
439: \citep{2000ApJ...532..170S,2005ApJ...634L.125M}. The dynamical mass of
440: LAB1 is estimated to be $2\times 10^{13}$ M$_{\odot}$ from the size and
441: the velocity width of Ly$\alpha$ emission \citep{2004MNRAS.351...63B}.
442: However, a 450$\micron$ emission with a flux density of $76\pm24$
443: mJy was detected toward LAB1 and the measured 450/850 $\micron$
444: ratio is an order of magnitude higher than the expected one from
445: the S-Z increment \citep{2001ApJ...548L..17C}. Thus, the S-Z
446: increment is not a likely interpretation.
447:
448: The {\it non-detection} of submillimeter emission in the SMA map may be
449: due to time-variability of dust emission around a buried AGN, but past
450: observational results provide evidence that this is unlikely. The
451: spectral energy distribution of LAB1 \citep[Fig.7,][]
452: {2004ApJ...606...85C} suggests that the contribution of non-thermal
453: emission to submillimeter wavelength must be negligible. The SMA
454: observations of LAB1 are about five years after the SCUBA
455: observations. If the source shows
456: time-variability, the submillimeter flux density had to decrease by
457: a factor of four or more in five years (one year in rest frame).
458: In order to produce the time-variability in such time-scale, the
459: required size of dust distribution around a nucleus is less than about
460: one light year ($r \sim 0.3$ pc). Taking the FIR luminosity of
461: $L_{\rm FIR} = 7.9 \times 10^{12} L_{\odot}$ and the dust temperature
462: of $T_{d}=32.1$ K, we estimate the minimum source size of
463: $r_{\rm min} = (L_{\rm FIR} / 4 \pi \sigma T_{d}^4)^{1/2} \sim 2$ kpc.
464: For the optically thin case, the source size is estimated to be much
465: larger. Thus, the minimum source size is inconsistent with the required
466: source size for time-variability.
467:
468: \subsection{Comparison with Other Submillimeter Luminous Populations at High-z}
469:
470: In order to investigate the relation of LAB1 to other luminous
471: submillimeter populations at high redshifts such as SMGs and HzRGs,
472: we compare the spatial extents of the submillimeter emission of
473: these objects.
474:
475: The spatial extents of the submillimeter emission of SMGs are
476: 5 -- 20 times smaller than that of LAB1. \citet{2006ApJ...640..228T}
477: estimated the median submillimeter source size to be
478: $\le 0.5\arcsec$ (4 kpc) from $\sim 0\farcs6$ resolution millimeter
479: continuum and CO imaging of eight SMGs at $z\sim 2 - 3.4$ with
480: the IRAM Plateau de Bure Interferometer (PdBI).
481: \citet{2006ApJ...640L...1I} directly constrain the upper limits of
482: the submillimeter source size of $1\farcs2$ from $\sim 2\arcsec$
483: resolution submillimeter imaging of two luminous SMGs with the SMA.
484: Although some of the SMGs are resolved into two compact sources
485: \citep{2006ApJ...640..228T}, most SMGs are single compact sources.
486: Thus the majority of the SMGs appear to be much more compact in
487: submillimeter than LAB1.
488:
489: The spatial extent of the submillimeter emission of HzRGs is similar to
490: or somewhat larger than that of LAB1. High resolution millimeter observations
491: with the IRAM PdBI revealed the spatially extended dust and gas in
492: HzRGs. \citet{2000ApJ...528..626P} found that the millimeter and CO
493: emissions in a radio galaxy 4C 60.07 at $z=3.8$ extends over $\sim 30$
494: kpc. \citet{2003A&A...401..911D} also found that evidence for spatially
495: resolved dust emission at scales of $0\farcs5$ to $6\arcsec$ in B3
496: J2330+3927 at $z=3.1$. \citet{2003Natur.425..264S} found that five of
497: seven HzRGs are resolved even with the $15\arcsec$ SCUBA beam and the
498: FWHM of the submillimeter emission ranges from 50 to 250 kpc. Since
499: HzRGs are known to lie in overdense regions \citep[e.g.][]
500: {2007A&A...461..823V} as well as LAB1, both of HzRGs and LAB1 may have
501: spatially extended starbursts induced by interactions and mergers of gas
502: clumps in overdense environments at high redshifts.
503:
504: \section{CONCLUSIONS}
505:
506: The $\sim 2\arcsec$ resolution submillimeter observations of SSA22
507: LAB1 provide evidence that the associated submillimeter emission
508: extends larger than $4\arcsec$ ($30$ kpc). The most likely
509: interpretation for the extended submillimeter emission is spatially
510: extended star-formation
511: in LAB1. The derived SFR surface density suggests that starbursts
512: occur throughout the large area in LAB1. The hint of a possible
513: correlation in distributions between submillimeter and Ly$\alpha$
514: emissions suggests that the thermal emission from the spatially
515: extended dust expelled from starburst regions by galactic superwind
516: may contribute the spatially extended submillimeter emission of LAB1.
517: The spatial extent of submillimeter emission of LAB1 is similar to
518: those of HzRGs rather than SMGs. Further data will be required
519: to determine whether spatially extended submillimeter emission is
520: a common feature of LABs and to investigate the relationship
521: between radio-quiet LABs and HzRGs.
522:
523: \acknowledgments
524: We thank Takashi Hattori, Tomoki Saito, Masao Mori, Keiichi Umetsu,
525: Koichiro Nakanishi, Masakazu Kobayashi, Thomas Greve, Masayuki Umemura,
526: and Hiroyuki Hirashita for insightful discussion. We also thank Ian
527: Smail for encouragement. This work is supported
528: by the Grant-in-Aid for the 21st Century COE "Center for Diversity and
529: Universality in Physics" from the Ministry of Education, Culture,
530: Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) of Japan.
531:
532: \begin{thebibliography}{}
533:
534: \bibitem[Alton et al.(1999)]{1999A&A...353...51A} Alton, P.~B., Davies,
535: J.~I., \& Bianchi, S.\ 1999, \aap, 353, 51
536:
537: \bibitem[Bolzonella et al.(2000)]{2000A&A...363..476B} Bolzonella, M.,
538: Miralles, J.-M., \& Pell{\'o}, R.\ 2000, \aap, 363, 476
539:
540: \bibitem[Bower et al.(2004)]{2004MNRAS.351...63B} Bower, R.~G., et al.\
541: 2004, \mnras, 351, 63
542:
543: \bibitem[Basu-Zych \& Scharf(2004)]{2004ApJ...614L..85B} Basu-Zych, A., \&
544: Scharf, C.\ 2004, \apjl, 615, L85
545:
546: \bibitem[Chapman et al.(2001)]{2001ApJ...548L..17C} Chapman, S.~C., Lewis,
547: G.~F., Scott, D., Richards, E., Borys, C., Steidel, C.~C., Adelberger,
548: K.~L., \& Shapley, A.~E.\ 2001, \apjl, 548, L17
549:
550: \bibitem[Chapman et al.(2004)]{2004ApJ...606...85C} Chapman, S.~C., Scott,
551: D., Windhorst, R.~A., Frayer, D.~T., Borys, C., Lewis, G.~F., \& Ivison,
552: R.~J.\ 2004, \apj, 606, 85
553:
554: \bibitem[Chapman et al.(2005)]{2005ApJ...622..772C} Chapman, S.~C., Blain,
555: A.~W., Smail, I., \& Ivison, R.~J.\ 2005, \apj, 622, 772
556:
557: \bibitem[Colbert et al.(2006)]{2006ApJ...637L..89C} Colbert, J.~W.,
558: Teplitz, H., Francis, P., Palunas, P., Williger, G.~M., \& Woodgate, B.\
559: 2006, \apjl, 637, L89
560:
561: \bibitem[Cutri et al.(2003)]{2003tmc..book.....C} Cutri, R.~M., et al.\
562: 2003, The IRSA 2MASS All-Sky Point Source Catalog, NASA/IPAC Infrared
563: Science Archive.~http://irsa.ipac.caltech.edu/applications/Gator/,
564:
565: \bibitem[De Breuck et al.(2003)]{2003A&A...401..911D} De Breuck, C., et
566: al.\ 2003, \aap, 401, 911
567:
568: \bibitem[Dey et al.(2005)]{2005ApJ...629..654D} Dey, A., et al.\ 2005,
569: \apj, 629, 654
570:
571: \bibitem[Dijkstra et al.(2006a)]{2006ApJ...649...14D} Dijkstra, M., Haiman,
572: Z., \& Spaans, M.\ 2006, \apj, 649, 14
573:
574: \bibitem[Dijkstra et al.(2006b)]{2006ApJ...649...37D} Dijkstra, M., Haiman,
575: Z., \& Spaans, M.\ 2006, \apj, 649, 37
576:
577: \bibitem[Engelbracht et al.(2006)]{2006ApJ...642L.127E} Engelbracht, C.~W.,
578: et al.\ 2006, \apjl, 642, L127
579:
580: \bibitem[Fardal et al.(2001)]{2001ApJ...562..605F} Fardal, M.~A., Katz, N.,
581: Gardner, J.~P., Hernquist, L., Weinberg, D.~H., \& Dav{\'e}, R.\ 2001,
582: \apj, 562, 605
583:
584: \bibitem[Francis et al.(2001)]{2001ApJ...554.1001F} Francis, P.~J., et al.\
585: 2001, \apj, 554, 1001
586:
587: \bibitem[Furlanetto et al.(2005)]{2005ApJ...622....7F} Furlanetto, S.~R.,
588: Schaye, J., Springel, V., \& Hernquist, L.\ 2005, \apj, 622, 7
589:
590: \bibitem[Geach et al.(2005)]{2005MNRAS.363.1398G} Geach, J.~E., et al.\
591: 2005, \mnras, 363, 1398
592:
593: \bibitem[Geach et al.(2006)]{2006astro.ph.12272G} Geach, J.~E., Smail, I.,
594: Chapman, S.~C., Alexander, D.~M., Blain, A.~W., Stott, J.~P., \& Ivison,
595: R.~J.\ 2006, ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints, arXiv:astro-ph/0612272
596:
597: \bibitem[Haiman et al.(2000)]{2000ApJ...537L...5H} Haiman, Z., Spaans, M.,
598: \& Quataert, E.\ 2000, \apjl, 537, L5
599:
600: \bibitem[Hayashino et al.(2004)]{2004AJ....128.2073H} Hayashino, T., et
601: al.\ 2004, \aj, 128, 2073
602:
603: \bibitem[Heckman et al.(1990)]{1990ApJS...74..833H} Heckman, T.~M., Armus,
604: L., \& Miley, G.~K.\ 1990, \apjs, 74, 833
605:
606: \bibitem[Ho, Moran \& Lo(2004)]{2004ApJ...616....L1} Ho, P. T. P.,
607: Moran, J. M., \& Lo, K. Y. 2004, \apj, 616, L1
608:
609: \bibitem[Iono et al.(2006)]{2006ApJ...640L...1I} Iono, D., et al.\ 2006,
610: \apjl, 640, L1
611:
612: \bibitem[Jimenez \& Haiman(2006)]{2006Natur.441..120J} Jimenez, R., \&
613: Haiman, Z.\ 2006, \nat, 441, 120
614:
615: \bibitem[Keel et al.(1999)]{1999AJ....118.2547K} Keel, W.~C., Cohen, S.~H.,
616: Windhorst, R.~A., \& Waddington, I.\ 1999, \aj, 118, 2547
617:
618: \bibitem[Kennicutt(1998)]{1998ARA&A..36..189K} Kennicutt, R.~C., Jr.\ 1998,
619: \araa, 36, 189
620:
621: \bibitem[Ma et al.(1998)]{1998AJ....116..516M} Ma, C., et al.\ 1998, \aj,
622: 116, 516
623:
624: \bibitem[Matsuda et al.(2004)]{2004AJ....128..569M} Matsuda, Y., et al.\
625: 2004, \aj, 128, 569
626:
627: \bibitem[Matsuda et al.(2005)]{2005ApJ...634L.125M} Matsuda, Y., et al.\
628: 2005, \apjl, 634, L125
629:
630: \bibitem[Matsuda et al.(2006)]{2006ApJ...640L.123M} Matsuda, Y., Yamada,
631: T., Hayashino, T., Yamauchi, R., \& Nakamura, Y.\ 2006, \apjl, 640, L123
632:
633: \bibitem[McCarthy et al.(1987)]{1987ApJ...319L..39M} McCarthy, P.~J.,
634: Spinrad, H., Djorgovski, S., Strauss, M.~A., van Breugel, W., \& Liebert,
635: J.\ 1987, \apjl, 319, L39
636:
637: \bibitem[Meurer et al.(1997)]{1997AJ....114...54M} Meurer, G.~R., Heckman,
638: T.~M., Lehnert, M.~D., Leitherer, C., \& Lowenthal, J.\ 1997, \aj, 114, 54
639:
640: \bibitem[Mori et al.(2004)]{2004ApJ...613L..97M} Mori, M., Umemura, M., \&
641: Ferrara, A.\ 2004, \apjl, 613, L97
642:
643: \bibitem[Mori \& Umemura(2006)]{2006Natur.440..644M} Mori, M., \& Umemura,
644: M.\ 2006, \nat, 440, 644
645:
646: \bibitem[Nilsson et al.(2006)]{2006A&A...452L..23N} Nilsson, K.~K., Fynbo,
647: J.~P.~U., M{\o}ller, P., Sommer-Larsen, J., \& Ledoux, C.\ 2006, \aap, 452,
648: L23
649:
650: \bibitem[Ohyama et al.(2002)]{2002PASJ...54..891O} Ohyama, Y., et al.\
651: 2002, \pasj, 54, 891
652:
653: \bibitem[Ohyama et al.(2003)]{2003ApJ...591L...9O} Ohyama, Y., et al.\
654: 2003, \apjl, 591, L9
655:
656: \bibitem[Osterbrock(1989)]{1989agna.book.....O} Osterbrock, D.~E.\ 1989,
657: Research supported by the University of California, John Simon Guggenheim
658: Memorial Foundation, University of Minnesota, et al.~Mill Valley, CA,
659: University Science Books, 1989, 422 p.,
660:
661: \bibitem[Palunas et al.(2004)]{2004ApJ...602..545P} Palunas, P., Teplitz,
662: H.~I., Francis, P.~J., Williger, G.~M., \& Woodgate, B.~E.\ 2004, \apj,
663: 602, 545
664:
665: \bibitem[Papadopoulos et al.(2000)]{2000ApJ...528..626P} Papadopoulos,
666: P.~P., R{\"o}ttgering, H.~J.~A., van der Werf, P.~P., Guilloteau, S.,
667: Omont, A., van Breugel, W.~J.~M., \& Tilanus, R.~P.~J.\ 2000, \apj, 528,
668: 626
669:
670: \bibitem[Sault, Teuben \& Wright(1995)]{miriad} Sault, R. J., Teuben,
671: P. J., \& Wright, M. C. H. 1995, in ASP
672: Conf. Ser. 77, Astronomical Data Analysis
673: Software and Systems IV, ed. R. A. Shaw,
674: H.E. Payne, \& J. J. E. Haynes (San
675: Francisco:ASP), 433
676:
677: \bibitem[Smail et al.(2003)]{2003ApJ...583..551S} Smail, I., Ivison, R.~J.,
678: Gilbank, D.~G., Dunlop, J.~S., Keel, W.~C., Motohara, K., \& Stevens,
679: J.~A.\ 2003, \apj, 583, 551
680:
681: \bibitem[Smith \& Jarvis(2007)]{2007astro.ph..3522S} Smith, D.~J.~B., \&
682: Jarvis, M.~J.\ 2007, ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints, arXiv:astro-ph/0703522
683:
684: \bibitem[Steidel et al.(2000)]{2000ApJ...532..170S} Steidel, C.~C.,
685: Adelberger, K.~L., Shapley, A.~E., Pettini, M., Dickinson, M., \&
686: Giavalisco, M.\ 2000, \apj, 532, 170
687:
688: \bibitem[Steidel et al.(2003)]{2003ApJ...592..728S} Steidel, C.~C.,
689: Adelberger, K.~L., Shapley, A.~E., Pettini, M., Dickinson, M., \&
690: Giavalisco, M.\ 2003, \apj, 592, 728
691:
692: \bibitem[Stevens et al.(2003)]{2003Natur.425..264S} Stevens, J.~A., et al.\
693: 2003, \nat, 425, 264
694:
695: \bibitem[Tacconi et al.(2006)]{2006ApJ...640..228T} Tacconi, L.~J., et al.\
696: 2006, \apj, 640, 228
697:
698: \bibitem[Taniguchi \& Shioya(2000)]{2000ApJ...532L..13T} Taniguchi, Y., \&
699: Shioya, Y.\ 2000, \apjl, 532, L13
700:
701: \bibitem[Taniguchi et al.(2001)]{2001ApJ...562L..15T} Taniguchi, Y.,
702: Shioya, Y., \& Kakazu, Y.\ 2001, \apjl, 562, L15
703:
704: \bibitem[van Ojik et al.(1997)]{1997A&A...317..358V} van Ojik, R.,
705: Roettgering, H.~J.~A., Miley, G.~K., \& Hunstead, R.~W.\ 1997, \aap, 317,
706: 358
707:
708: \bibitem[Venemans et al.(2007)]{2007A&A...461..823V} Venemans, B.~P., et
709: al.\ 2007, \aap, 461, 823
710:
711: \bibitem[Wilman et al.(2005)]{2005Natur.436..227W} Wilman, R.~J., Gerssen,
712: J., Bower, R.~G., Morris, S.~L., Bacon, R., de Zeeuw, P.~T., \& Davies,
713: R.~L.\ 2005, \nat, 436, 227
714:
715: \bibitem[Yang et al.(2006)]{2006ApJ...640..539Y} Yang, Y., Zabludoff,
716: A.~I., Dav{\'e}, R., Eisenstein, D.~J., Pinto, P.~A., Katz, N., Weinberg,
717: D.~H., \& Barton, E.~J.\ 2006, \apj, 640, 539
718:
719: \end{thebibliography}
720:
721: \end{document}
722: