1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: % \documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
3: % \documentclass{emulateapj}
4: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
5: %\documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
6:
7: \newcommand{\fad}{Faraday~Discuss.} % Faraday Discussions
8: \newcommand{\jmst}{J.~Mol.~Struct.} % Journal of Molecular Structure
9: \newcommand{\jmsp}{J.~Mol.~Spectr.} % Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy
10: \newcommand{\jpca}{J.~Phys.~Chem.~A} % Journal of Physical Chemistry A
11: \newcommand{\jpcs}{J.~Phys.:~Conf.~Ser.} % Journal of Physics Conference Series
12:
13:
14: \shorttitle{Discovery of Interstellar Propylene}
15: \shortauthors{Marcelino et al.}
16:
17:
18: \begin{document}
19:
20: \title{Discovery of Interstellar Propylene (CH$_2$CHCH$_3$):\\
21: Missing Links in Interstellar Gas--Phase Chemistry}
22:
23:
24: \author{N. Marcelino\altaffilmark{1,4},
25: J. Cernicharo\altaffilmark{1},
26: M. Ag\'undez\altaffilmark{1},
27: E. Roueff\altaffilmark{2},
28: M. Gerin\altaffilmark{3},
29: J. Mart\'{\i}n-Pintado\altaffilmark{1},
30: R. Mauersberger\altaffilmark{4},
31: and
32: C. Thum\altaffilmark{5}}
33:
34:
35: \altaffiltext{1}{Departamento de Astrof\'{\i}sica Molecular e
36: Infrarroja, Instituto de Estructura de la Materia, CSIC, Serrano
37: 121, 28006 Madrid, Spain; nuria@damir.iem.csic.es,
38: cerni@damir.iem.csic.es, marce@damir.iem.csic.es,
39: martin@damir.iem.csic.es}
40:
41: \altaffiltext{2}{LUTH, Observatoire de Paris, Section de Meudon,
42: Place Jules Janssen, 92195 Meudon, France;
43: evelyne.roueff@obspm.fr}
44:
45: \altaffiltext{3}{LERMA, UMR 8112, CNRS, Observatoire de Paris and
46: \'Ecole Normale Sup\'erieure, 24 Rue Lhomond, 75231 Paris Cedex
47: 05, France; gerin@lra.ens.fr}
48:
49: \altaffiltext{4}{IRAM, Av. Divina Pastora, 7, 18012 Granada, Spain;
50: mauers@iram.es}
51:
52: \altaffiltext{5}{IRAM, 300 rue de la Piscine, Domaine
53: Universitaire 38406 Saint Martin d'H\`eres, France; thum@iram.fr}
54:
55:
56: \begin{abstract}
57: We report the discovery of propylene (also called propene, CH$_2$CHCH$_3$)
58: with the IRAM 30-m radio telescope toward the dark cloud \objectname{TMC-1}.
59: Propylene is the most saturated hydrocarbon ever detected
60: in space through radio astronomical techniques. In spite of its weak dipole
61: moment, 6 doublets ($A$ and $E$ species) plus another line from the $A$ species
62: have been observed with main beam temperatures above
63: 20 mK. The derived total column density of propylene is 4$\times10^{13}$ cm$^{-2}$,
64: which corresponds to an abundance relative to H$_2$ of 4$\times10^{-9}$, i.e.,
65: comparable to that of other well known and abundant hydrocarbons in this cloud,
66: such as c-C$_3$H$_2$. Although this isomer of C$_3$H$_6$ could play an important
67: role in interstellar chemistry, it has been ignored by previous chemical models of
68: dark clouds as there seems to be no obvious formation pathway in gas phase.
69: The discovery of this species in a dark cloud
70: indicates that a thorough analysis of the completeness of gas phase
71: chemistry has to be done.
72:
73: \end{abstract}
74:
75:
76: \keywords{astrochemistry --- line: identification --- ISM: abundances ---
77: ISM: clouds --- ISM: molecules}
78:
79:
80:
81: \section{Introduction}
82: Cold ($T_{\rm kin}\sim$10 K), moderately dense ($n(\rm H_2)\sim10^4$ cm$^{-3}$)
83: dark clouds are the sites of low mass star formation.
84: They exhibit a complex gas-phase ion-neutral chemistry leading to the
85: formation of a large variety of molecules. The lack of internal heating
86: sources and violent physical processes, like shocks, make these dense and
87: quiescent cores the best sites to explore and to model interstellar
88: gas-phase chemistry and molecular depletion into the dust grain surfaces.
89: The dense filament TMC-1, embedded in the Heiles Cloud 2
90: \citep[see, e.g.,][]{Cer87} in the Taurus region, is one of the richest
91: molecular sources, with a large wealth of organic species such as
92: unsaturated carbon chain radicals (C$_n$H) and cyanopolyynes (HC$_{2n+1}$N).
93: Whereas a common and well adopted view in the literature is to consider
94: this region as dense, cold and quiescent (as indicated by the extremelly
95: narrow lines), some authors suggest that the
96: presence of shocks could induce explosive injection of grain mantles
97: and contribute to the formation of large carbon molecules such as
98: methylcyanodiacetilene \citep{Mar00,Sny06}.
99:
100: The history of molecular astronomy shows that interstellar molecules
101: can be detected by specific searches, when frequencies are known
102: and one has hints that a certain molecule is abundant. The most
103: unexpected discoveries, however, resulted from spectral line
104: surveys or were serendipitous.
105: To our knowledge there are only two spectral line surveys of dark
106: clouds, both in the direction of TMC-1. One was carried out using
107: the Nobeyama radio telescope \citep{Ohi98,Kai04} in the 8.8-50 GHz
108: domain, with 414 detected lines arising from 38 different molecules,
109: 11 of them unknown prior to the survey.
110: Only two of the 38 species are diatomic (CS and SO), four are triatomic
111: and the rest are polyatomic, the longest one having 11 atoms (HC$_9$N).
112: The other survey was performed at lower frequencies, with the Arecibo
113: radio telescope \citep{Kal04}, covering the range 4--6 GHz
114: besides selected frequencies in the 8--10 GHz interval.
115: They detected 29 lines arising from carbon-chain species such as C$_4$H,
116: H$_2$C$_4$, HC$_3$N, HC$_5$N, HC$_7$N, HC$_9$N, C$_2$S and C$_3$S.
117:
118: Apart from CO and NO, all observed molecules in dark clouds
119: usually have large dipole moments and most of them have rather
120: low abundances (a few 10$^{-10}$).
121: From this, one would naively expect that only polyatomic molecules with
122: a large dipole moment should be detectable.
123: Due to the low kinetic temperature of these clouds, heavy molecules will
124: have their emission peak in the centimeter and millimeter wavelength
125: domains.
126: As a result of a 3\,mm spectral line survey of several dark cloud cores
127: (Marcelino et al. in prep.) and follow-up observations performed thereafter,
128: we report the first detection of interstellar propylene (CH$_2$CHCH$_3$).
129: This unexpected, nearly saturated hydrocarbon was detected toward TMC-1.
130: This species, which is naively expected in hot cores rather than in dark
131: clouds, has so far not been considered in any chemical model of TMC-1
132: in spite of having an abundance similar to that of c-C$_3$H$_2$.
133:
134:
135:
136: \section{Observations}
137: The observations were carried out with the IRAM 30-meter
138: telescope\footnote{IRAM is supported by INSU/CNRS (France),
139: MPG (Germany) and IGN (Spain).} near Granada (Spain)
140: Two SIS receivers sensitive in the 3\,mm band were used
141: simultaneously at the same frequency. Both receivers were
142: tuned in single sideband mode with image rejections of
143: $\sim$20 dB. System temperatures were between
144: 110--150 K during all observing periods. We used frequency
145: switching mode with a frequency throw of 1.8 MHz (survey
146: observations), while a throw of 7.2 MHz was used to obtain the
147: new spectra outside the survey range in order to remove
148: instrumental ripples and to improve baselines \citep[see,][]{Thu95}.
149: The backend was the VESPA autocorrelator, with 40 kHz of spectral
150: resolution ($\sim$0.13 km\,s$^{-1}$), providing a maximum effective
151: bandwidth of 315 MHz. Intensity calibration was performed using two
152: absorbers at different temperatures, and the atmospheric opacity
153: was obtained from measurements of the sky emissivity and using
154: the ATM code \citep{Cer85}. On-source integration times were
155: typically $\sim$3 hours. Pointing and focus were checked on
156: strong and nearby sources every 1.5 and 3 hours respectively.
157:
158: The temperature scale is main-beam brightness temperature ($T_{\rm MB}$).
159: At the observed frequencies the beamwidth of the antenna is 24--29$''$
160: and the main beam efficiency is 0.78--0.75.
161: The observed lines are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:fig_lines} and the
162: line parameters are given in Table~\ref{tab:lines}.
163:
164:
165:
166: \section{Results}
167: During the 3\,mm line survey of TMC-1, which was obtained in several
168: observing runs between 2003 and 2007,
169: we detected a pair of lines at 86.650 GHz with similar intensities and
170: separated by 3 km\,s$^{-1}$, towards the cyanopolyyne peak (CP) of this
171: source [R.A.(J2000.0)=04$^{\rm h}$ 41$^{\rm m}$ 41.9$^{\rm s}$,
172: Decl.(J2000.0)=+25$^\circ$ 41$'$ 27.1$''$].
173: These lines appear neither in the JPL nor in the CDMS catalogs
174: \citep{Pic98,Mul01,Mul05}. Using the spectral line catalog
175: developed and maintained at the DAMIR-IEM-CSIC \citep{Cer00},
176: we tentatively identified these two lines as one doublet arising from the
177: $(5_{05}-4_{04})$ rotational transition ($A$ and $E$ species) of propylene
178: (also called propene, CH$_2$CHCH$_3$) in the survey data of TMC-1.
179: This molecule, whose structure is depicted in Fig.~\ref{fig:fig_molec},
180: is an internal rotor with a moderately high barrier against the torsion
181: of the methyl group. This internal rotation produces a splitting of each
182: rotational line by a value in the range of 0.3 MHz to 4 MHz, each member
183: of the doublet belonging to the $A$ and $E$ species. Its rotational spectrum
184: has been measured in the laboratory between 8--245 GHz \citep{Wlo94} and up
185: to 412 GHz \citep{Pea94}, which allows
186: accurate frequency predictions within the frequency domain of our search.
187: It has a small dipole moment, $\mu_a$=0.36 D, $\mu_b$=0.05 D \citep{Lid57}.
188:
189: Encouraged by this tentative identification, we searched for other
190: transitions of this molecule in the frequency range covered by our survey
191: (85.9--93 GHz). The fact that the lines must appear as a doublet separated
192: by 0.3--4 MHz, and having similar intensities helped us in the search.
193: Using the mentioned catalog, which contains only complete predictions for
194: the $A$ species, together with the frequencies measured in the laboratory
195: for the $E$ species \citep{Pea94}, three more doublets at 87.1 GHz, 87.7
196: GHz and 90.0 GHz were identified at the 3--4 $\sigma$ level.
197: Director's Discretionary Time at the 30-m telescope was used to confirm
198: the identification of propylene in April and May 2007: We re-observed
199: the latter three mentioned doublets and searched for three
200: additional doublets lying outside the frequency range of the
201: survey, at 84.1 GHz, 100.9 GHz and 103.7 GHz. We detected all the
202: lines searched for, except for the $E$ component of the
203: 5$_{15}$-4$_{14}$ transition at 84.1 GHz, for which the frequency
204: is not known, since this transition was not measured in the
205: laboratory by \citet{Pea94}. However, since the separation in
206: frequency of each doublet is small, the $E$ line could be hidden by one
207: hyperfine component of the $N = 1-0$ transition of $^{13}$CCH at
208: 84151.5 MHz (see top panel in Fig.~\ref{fig:fig_lines}). In fact,
209: this hyperfine component of $^{13}$CCH has a line strength twice
210: less than that at 84153.4 MHz (also shown in the top panel of
211: Fig.~\ref{fig:fig_lines}). Therefore, with a total of 13 observed
212: lines, the first detection of interstellar propylene is
213: definitively confirmed in TMC-1.
214:
215:
216: Line parameters were obtained from gaussian fits
217: using the GILDAS package\footnote{http://www.iram.fr/IRAMFR/GILDAS}
218: and are given in Table~\ref{tab:lines}.
219: All the observed lines are centered at a systemic velocity around
220: 5.6 km s$^{-1}$, which is in agreement with that derived from
221: other molecules in TMC-1 \citep{Kai04}. However, several
222: lines show a weaker second peak at a higher velocity, that could
223: arise from the emission of a different component of the cloud,
224: at 5.9 or 6.1 km s$^{-1}$ \citep{Pen98,Dic01}.
225: Line widths range from 0.3 to 0.6 km\,s$^{-1}$, being sometimes
226: wider than the expected value of $\sim$0.4 km\,s$^{-1}$.
227: The larger widths could imply again the emission from another
228: component of the cloud.
229:
230:
231: Collisional rates are not available
232: for this molecule. Hence we have used a standard rotational diagram,
233: including both species, to derive its column density and the rotational
234: temperature, $T_{\rm rot}$, of the energy levels.
235: We have obtained $T_{\rm rot}$ = 9.5$\pm$2.0 K and
236: $N(A$-CH$_2$CHCH$_3) = N(E$-CH$_2$CHCH$_3$) =
237: (2.0$\pm$0.8) $\times$ 10$^{13}$ cm$^{-2}$,
238: i.e., a total column density for propylene of
239: (4.0$\pm$1.5) $\times$ 10$^{13}$ cm$^{-2}$.
240: The rotational temperature is similar, within the errors, to that found
241: for other species in TMC-1 \citep{Ohi98,Fos01,Kal04}.
242: However, the column density of propylene is particularly high for
243: a saturated species and for a molecule having 9 atoms
244: (compare Table~\ref{tab:dens}). It
245: is similar to that of $c$-C$_3$H$_2$ and to that of CH$_3$CCH, which
246: also contain the methyl group and has a rather low dipole moment
247: (see Table~\ref{tab:dens}).
248: It is worth to note that for some transitions the $E$ species shows
249: a slightly higher intensity than the $A$ species (see
250: Fig.~\ref{fig:fig_lines} and Table~\ref{tab:lines}), then
251: the column density could be higher for the $E$ species.
252: In fact, performing separate rotational diagrams for the two
253: species, the derived rotational temperature for the $E$ species,
254: $T_{rot}$ = 12 K, is slightly higher than for the $A$, $T_{rot}$ = 8 K.
255: The total column density, however, do not differ much from the
256: value obtained with a single rotational diagram. Hence, within
257: experimental accuracy both species seem to have the same abundance.
258:
259:
260:
261: \section{Discussion}
262:
263: Propylene, a rather simple hydrocarbon, has escaped detection because
264: apparently nobody ever considered a directed search worthwhile, and also
265: because of its small dipole moment, 10 times
266: smaller than that of other three carbon molecules (see
267: Table~\ref{tab:dens}). \citet{Pea94} already
268: suggested that this molecule could be detected in space. However,
269: as this hydrocarbon is nearly saturated, they pointed out that the
270: best place to search for it could be hot cores in high-mass star
271: forming regions. Prior to this detection, we had already searched for
272: propylene in the spectral line survey of Orion (Tercero and
273: Cernicharo, in preparation), but no lines were found within a
274: detection limit of 50 mK.
275: We have checked the U-lines in previous line surveys of Orion
276: and Sgr B2 at different frequency bands
277: \citep{Sut85,Cum86,Tur89,Sch97,Num98,Fri04}, and also the
278: unidentified lines reported by \citet{Kai04} towards TMC-1.
279: None of these lines coincide with the predicted strongest
280: lines of propylene.
281:
282: The abundance of propylene relative to H$_2$ in TMC-1 is 4
283: $\times$ 10$^{-9}$, assuming that $N$(H$_2$) = 10$^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$
284: \citep{Cer87}. In spite of being a fairly
285: abundant hydrocarbon, it has not been previously considered in
286: chemical models of dark clouds. Reaction networks used to model
287: interstellar chemistry are usually tested by comparing with the
288: molecular abundances observed in TMC-1 \citep{Smi04,Woo07}. Thus,
289: much effort has been done to explore and include reactions leading
290: to the formation of the observed molecules, the abundances of
291: which are in general satisfactorily explained, although the
292: chemistry of not observed molecules is far from complete.
293:
294:
295: We have searched in the literature for reactions relevant to the
296: chemistry of propylene and performed chemical models to
297: investigate the most likely formation pathways. The synthesis of
298: many hydrocarbons in dark clouds involve a sequence of
299: ion-molecule reactions with the dissociative recombination (DR) of
300: a molecular cation and an electron as the last step \citep{Her89}.
301: Thus, the DR of the C$_3$H$_7^+$ ion, which is known to produce
302: C$_3$H$_6$ + H with a branching ratio of 0.42 \citep{Ehl03}, could
303: be a key step in the synthesis of propylene. If so, the problem of
304: producing propylene translates into how to form the ion
305: C$_3$H$_7^+$. Condensation reactions of an ionic and a neutral
306: hydrocarbon such as C$_2$H$_4^+$ + CH$_4$ $\rightarrow$
307: C$_3$H$_7^+$ + H as well as other similar ones, are endothermic,
308: too slow or tend to produce products other than C$_3$H$_7^+$
309: \citep{Ani03}. Consideration of radiative association reactions of
310: hydrocarbon ions with H$_2$ is an interesting possibility when
311: other channels are endothermic. We have checked that such a
312: possibility occurs for C$_2$H$_2^+$ and larger hydrocarbon ions
313: with 2, 3, 4 and 5 carbon atoms. However, the corresponding
314: reaction rates are not available in the literature and different
315: reaction channels may occur. Introducing these reactions with
316: realistic rate coefficient values and subsequent dissociative
317: recombination allows to build propylene at a reasonable level.
318:
319: Propylene could also be one of the products in the DR of ions
320: larger than C$_3$H$_7^+$. Recent storage ring experiments have
321: shown that substantial fragmentation, with break of C-C bonds,
322: occurs in the DR of hydrocarbon ions \citep{Vig05}. For example,
323: chemical models predict an efficient synthesis of the ion
324: C$_6$H$_7^+$ in dark clouds, the DR of which is assumed to give
325: benzene and C$_6$H$_2$ (both predicted with an abundance of
326: $\sim$ 10$^{-9}$; \citealt{Mce99}), although it could also
327: produce smaller neutral fragments such as propylene. The synthesis
328: of propylene through neutral-neutral reactions such as CH$_3$ +
329: C$_2$H$_4$ or C$_2$H$_3$ + CH$_4$ is not effective as these
330: reactions are endothermic.
331:
332: Lastly, highly saturated hydrocarbons form easily in grain
333: surfaces by direct hydrogenation, although it is not clear how
334: these mantle-species would be desorbed to the gas phase at the low
335: temperatures of dark clouds.
336: A possibility is to involve shocks and their role in the release
337: of saturated adsorbed species from the surface of the grains
338: \citep{Mar00}, or involve a local enhancement of the cosmic
339: ionization rate which will have an important effect on the
340: chemistry and evolutionary status of TMC-1 \citep{Har01}.
341: However, the detected column density of methanol in TMC-1
342: does not support this scenario.
343: Furthermore, if this mechanism is working
344: in TMC-1, other hot-core like molecules (CH$_3$OCH$_3$,
345: CH$_3$OCOH, \ldots) should be detectectable there.
346: Recent work on non thermal desorption mechanisms from dust
347: grains \citep{Gar07} show that some molecules formed on
348: grain surfaces could go to the gas phase. The presence
349: of hydrocarbons such as propene is an important information
350: to improve the models as the hydrogenation proceeds on grain
351: surfaces and the degree of surface hydrogenation increases with time.
352: In any case, it seems that gas-phase chemistry is missing important reactions
353: involving small hydrocarbons, which could make molecules like
354: propylene to have large abundances.
355: The detection of propylene suggest that other small hydrocarbons,
356: like propane, could be present in dark clouds. A search for it is
357: currently undergoing with the IRAM 30-m telescope.
358:
359:
360: \acknowledgments
361: We thank Spanish MEC for funding support through grants AYA2003-2785,
362: AYA2006-14876, ESP2004-665, and AP2003-4619 (MA), and by DGU of the Madrid
363: community government under IV-PRICIT project S-0505/ESP-0237 (ASTROCAM).
364: We also thank our referee for useful comments and suggestions.
365:
366: \begin{thebibliography}{}
367: \bibitem[Anicich(2003)]{Ani03}Anicich, V., G. 2003, JPL Publication 03-19
368: \bibitem[Cernicharo (1985)]{Cer85} Cernicharo, J. 1985, IRAM report No. 52
369: \bibitem[Cernicharo \& Gu\'elin (1987)]{Cer87} Cernicharo, J., Gu\'elin, M., 1987, \aap, 176, 299
370: \bibitem[Cernicharo et al. (2000)]{Cer00} Cernicharo, J., Gu\'elin, M., \& Kahane, C. 2000, \aaps, 142, 181
371: \bibitem[Cummins et al. (1986)]{Cum86} Cummins, S. E., Linke, R. A., \& Thaddeus, P. 1986, \apjs, 60, 819
372: \bibitem[Dickens et al. (2001)]{Dic01} Dickens, J. E., Langer, W. D., \& Velusamy, T. 2001, \apj, 558, 693
373: \bibitem[Ehlerding et al.(2003)]{Ehl03} Ehlerding, A., et al. 2003, \jpca, 107, 2179
374: \bibitem[Foss\'e et al. (2001)]{Fos01} Foss\'e, D., Cernicharo, J., Gerin, M., Cox, P., 2001, \apj, 552, 168
375: \bibitem[Friedel et al. (2004)]{Fri04} Friedel, D. N., Snyder, L. E., Turner, B. E., \& Remijan, A. 2004, \apj, 600, 234
376: \bibitem[Garrod et al. (2007)]{Gar07} Garrod, R. T., Wakelam, V., \& Herbst, E. 2007, \aap, 467, 1103
377: \bibitem[Gu\'elin et al. (1982)]{Gue82} Gu\'elin, M., Mezaoui, A., \& Friberg, P. 1982, \aap, 109, 23
378: \bibitem[Hartquist et al. (2001)]{Har01} Hartquist, T. W., Williams, D. A., \& Viti, S. 2001, \aap, 369, 605
379: \bibitem[Herbst \& Leung(1989)]{Her89} Herbst, E., \& Leung, C. M. 1989, \apjs, 69, 271
380: \bibitem[Kaifu et al. (2004)]{Kai04} Kaifu, N., Ohishi, M., Kawaguchi, K., et al., 2004, \pasj, 56, 69
381: \bibitem[Kalenskii et al. (2004)]{Kal04} Kalenskii, S. V., Slysh, V. I., Goldsmith, P. F., \& Johansson, L. E. B. 2004, \apj, 610, 329
382: \bibitem[Langer et al. (1997)]{Lan97} Langer, W. D., Velusamy, T., et al. 1997, \apjl, 480, L63
383: \bibitem[Lide \& Mann (1957)]{Lid57} Lide, D. R., Mann, D. E., 1957, J. Chem. Phys., 27, 868
384: \bibitem[Markwick et al. (2000)]{Mar00} Markwick, A. J., Millar, T. J., \& Charnley, S. B. 2000, \apj, 535, 256
385: \bibitem[McEwan et al.(1999)]{Mce99} McEwan, M. J., Scott, G. B. I., Adams, N. G., et al. 1999, \apj, 513, 287
386: \bibitem[M\"uller et al. (2001)]{Mul01} M\"uller, H. S. P., Thorwirth, S., Roth, D. A., \& Winnewisser, G. 2001, \aap, 370, L49
387: \bibitem[M\"uller et al. (2005)]{Mul05} M\"uller, H. S. P., Schl\"oder, F., Stutzki, J., \& Winnewisser, G. 2005, J. Mol. Struct., 742, 215
388: \bibitem[Nummelin et al. (1998)]{Num98} Nummelin, A., Bergman, P., Hjalmarson, \AA., et al. 1998, \apjs, 117, 427
389: \bibitem[Ohishi \& Kaifu (1998)]{Ohi98} Ohishi, M., Kaifu, N., 1998, \fad, 109, 205
390: \bibitem[Pearson et al. (1994)]{Pea94} Pearson, J. C., Sastry, K. V. L. N., Herbst, E., \& De Lucia, F. C. 1994, \jmsp, 166, 120
391: \bibitem[Peng et al. (1998)]{Pen98} Peng, R., Langer, W. D., Velusamy, T., Kuiper, T. B. H., \& Levin, S. 1998, \apj, 497, 842
392: \bibitem[Pickett et al. (1998)]{Pic98} Pickett, H. M., Poynter, R. L., Cohen, E. A., et al. 1998, \jqsrt, 60, 883
393: \bibitem[Pratap et al. (1997)]{Pra97} Pratap, P., Dickens, J. E., Snell, R. L., et al. 1997, \apj, 486, 862
394: \bibitem[Remijan et al. (2006)]{Rem06} Remijan, A. J., Hollis, J. M., Snyder, L. E., Jewell, P. R., \& Lovas, F. J. 2006, \apjl, 643, L37
395: \bibitem[Schilke et al. (1997)]{Sch97} Schilke, P., Groesbeck, T. D., Blake, G. A., \& Phillips, T. G. 1997, \apjs, 108, 301
396: \bibitem[Smith et al.(2004)]{Smi04} Smith, I. W. M., Herbst, E., \& Chang, Q. 2004, \mnras, 350, 323
397: \bibitem[Snyder et al. (2006)]{Sny06} Snyder, L. E., Hollis, J. M., Jewell, P. R., Lovas, F. J., \& Remijan, A. 2006, \apj, 647, 412
398: \bibitem[Sutton et al. (1985)]{Sut85} Sutton, E. C., Blake, G. A., Masson, C. R., \& Phillips, T. G. 1985, \apjs, 58, 341
399: \bibitem[Thum et al. (1995)]{Thu95} Thum, C., Sievers, A., Navarro, S., Brunswig, W., \& Pe\~nalver, J. 1995, IRAM report No. 228
400: \bibitem[Turner (1989)]{Tur89} Turner, B. E. 1989, \apjs, 70, 539
401: \bibitem[Viggiano et al.(2005)]{Vig05} Viggiano, A. A., Ehlerding, A., Arnold, S. T., \& Larsson, M. 2005, \jpcs, 4, 191
402: \bibitem[Wlodarczak et al. (1994)]{Wlo94} Wlodarczak, G., Demaison, J., Heineking, N., Cs\'asz\'ar, G., 1994, \jmsp, 167, 239
403: \bibitem[Woodall et al.(2007)]{Woo07} Woodall, J., Ag\'undez, M., Markwick-Kemper, A. J., \& Millar, T. J. 2007, \aap, 466, 1197
404: \end{thebibliography}
405:
406: \clearpage
407:
408: %% Tables
409:
410: \begin{deluxetable}{rcccccccc}
411: % \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
412: % \rotate
413: \tablecaption{Line parameters of the observed transitions from
414: gaussian fits\label{tab:lines}}
415: % \tablewidth{0pt}
416: % \startdata
417: \tablehead{
418: \multicolumn{1}{c}{Rest Frequency \tablenotemark{a}} & Species & Transition & $E_{up}$ & $\mu^2S$ & $\int T_{\rm MB} dv$ & $V_{\rm LSR}$ & $\Delta v$ & $T_{\rm MB}$ \\
419: \multicolumn{1}{c}{(MHz)} & & & (K) & (D$^2$) & (K km s$^{-1}$) & (km s$^{-1}$) & (km s$^{-1}$) & (K) \\
420: }
421: \tablecolumns{9}
422: \startdata
423: %\sidehead{$A$-CH$_2$CHCH$_3$}
424: 84151.670 (7) & $A$ & $5_{15}-4_{14}$ & 13.9 & 0.610 & 0.014 (4) & 5.72 & 0.46 & 0.028 (4) \\
425: 86651.566 (7) & $A$ & $5_{05}-4_{04}$ & 12.5 & 0.635 & 0.027 (4) & 5.52 & 0.62 & 0.041 (4) \\
426: 87134.576 (6) & $A$ & $5_{24}-4_{23}$ & 19.8 & 0.534 & 0.005 (2) & 5.68 & 0.32 & 0.016 (3) \\
427: 87677.584 (6) & $A$ & $5_{23}-4_{22}$ & 19.8 & 0.534 & 0.007 (2) & 5.65 & 0.41 & 0.017 (3) \\
428: 89998.180 (7) & $A$ & $5_{14}-4_{13}$ & 14.8 & 0.610 & 0.012 (2) & 5.53 & 0.31 & 0.036 (3) \\
429: 100911.394 (8) & $A$ & $6_{16}-5_{15}$ & 18.8 & 0.741 & 0.010 (2) & 5.62 & 0.43 & 0.022 (4) \\
430: 103689.979 (8) & $A$ & $6_{06}-5_{05}$ & 17.5 & 0.761 & 0.020 (2) & 5.71 & 0.55 & 0.033 (4) \\
431: %\sidehead{$E$-CH$_2$CHCH$_3$}
432: \multicolumn{9}{c}{} \\
433: 86650.873 (24) & $E$ & $5_{05}-4_{04}$ & 12.5 & 0.635 & 0.017 (2) & 5.68 & 0.35 & 0.044 (4) \\
434: 87137.941 ( 6) & $E$ & $5_{24}-4_{23}$ & 19.8 & 0.531 & 0.011 (2) & 5.76 & 0.42 & 0.024 (3) \\
435: 87673.663 (29) & $E$ & $5_{23}-4_{22}$ & 19.8 & 0.531 & 0.008 (2) & 5.68 & 0.42 & 0.018 (2) \\
436: 89997.232 (13) & $E$ & $5_{14}-4_{13}$ & 14.8 & 0.610 & 0.014 (2) & 5.63 & 0.46 & 0.029 (3) \\
437: 100911.141 ( 5) & $E$ & $6_{16}-5_{15}$ & 18.8 & 0.741 & 0.018 (2) & 5.72 & 0.56 & 0.031 (4) \\
438: 103689.117 (35) & $E$ & $6_{06}-5_{05}$ & 17.5 & 0.761 & 0.017 (2) & 5.79 & 0.41 & 0.040 (4) \\
439: \enddata
440: \tablecomments{Number in parentheses are 1$\sigma$ uncertainties
441: in units of the last digits.}
442: \tablenotetext{a}{Frequencies for the $A$ especies are from \citet{Cer00} catalog, and those for the $E$ especies are the ones measured by \citet{Pea94}.}
443: \end{deluxetable}
444:
445: \clearpage
446:
447: \begin{deluxetable}{lcc|lcc}
448: % \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
449: % \rotate
450: \tablecaption{Column densities of several hydrocarbons in TMC-1
451: \label{tab:dens}}
452: % \tablewidth{0pt}
453: % \startdata
454: \tablehead{
455: Species & $\mu$\tablenotemark{a} & $N$ & Species & $\mu$\tablenotemark{a} & $N$ \\
456: & (D) & (cm$^{-2}$) & & (D) & (cm$^{-2}$) \\
457: }
458: \tablecolumns{6}
459: \startdata
460: C$_2$H $^{(1)}$ & 0.77 & 7$\times10^{13}$ & $c$-C$_3$H$_2$ $^{(2)}$ & 3.43 & 6$\times10^{13}$ \\
461: $l$-C$_3$H $^{(2)}$ & 3.55 & 8$\times10^{11}$ & H$_2$C$_4$ $^{(4)}$ & 4.10 & 8$\times10^{12}$ \\
462: $c$-C$_3$H $^{(2)}$ & 2.40 & 1$\times10^{13}$ & H$_2$C$_6$ $^{(5)}$ & 6.20 & 5$\times10^{11}$ \\
463: C$_4$H $^{(3)}$ & 0.87 & 3$\times10^{14}$ & CH$_3$CCH $^{(1)}$ & 0.78 & 8$\times10^{13}$ \\
464: C$_5$H $^{(4)}$ & 4.88 & 9$\times10^{12}$ & CH$_3$C$_4$H $^{(4)}$ & 1.21 & 1$\times10^{13}$ \\
465: C$_6$H $^{(2)}$ & 5.54 & 8$\times10^{12}$ & CH$_3$C$_6$H $^{(6)}$ & 1.50 & 3$\times10^{12}$ \\
466: $l$-C$_3$H$_2$ $^{(2)}$ & 4.10 & 2$\times10^{12}$ & CH$_2$CHCH$_3$ $^{(7)}$ & 0.36 & 4$\times10^{13}$ \\
467: \enddata
468: % \tablecomments{}
469: \tablenotetext{a}{Dipole moments are from JPL and CDMS catalogs}
470: \tablerefs{(1) \citet{Pra97}; (2) \citet{Fos01}; (3) \citet{Gue82}; (4) \citet{Ohi98}; (5) \citet{Lan97}; (6) \citet{Rem06}; (7) This work}
471: \end{deluxetable}
472:
473:
474: \clearpage
475:
476: %% figures
477:
478: \begin{figure}
479: \includegraphics[scale=.65]{f1.eps}
480: \caption{Observed transitions arising from both $A$ and $E$
481: species of CH$_2$CHCH$_3$. Rest frequency is computed for
482: an $v_{LSR}$ = 5.6 km s$^{-1}$. Note on the top panel that only the
483: $A$ species was detected (see text). \label{fig:fig_lines}}
484: \end{figure}
485:
486: \clearpage
487:
488: \begin{figure}
489: \centering
490: \includegraphics[scale=.25]{f2.eps}
491: \caption{Molecular structure of Propylene. Spheres represent carbon (dark grey) and hydrogen (light grey) atoms.
492: \label{fig:fig_molec}}
493: \end{figure}
494:
495:
496: \end{document}
497:
498: %%
499: %% End of file `sample.tex'.
500:
501: