1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2:
3: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex} %% <---
4: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex} % FOR submission
5: %\documentclass{emulateapj}
6: %\documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
7:
8: %\slugcomment{Submitted to ApJL}
9:
10: \shorttitle{Albus~1}
11: \shortauthors{J. A. Caballero \& E. Solano}
12:
13: \begin{document}
14: \title{Albus~1: A very bright white dwarf candidate}
15:
16: \author{Jos\'e Antonio Caballero\altaffilmark{1,2}}
17: \affil{Max-Planck-Institut f\"ur Astronomie, K\"onigstuhl 17, D-69117
18: Heidelberg, Germany}
19: \email{caballero@mpia.de}
20: \author{Enrique Solano\altaffilmark{2}}
21: \affil{Laboratorio de Astrof\'{\i}sica Espacial y F\'{\i}sica Fundamental, INSA,
22: P.O. Box 50727, E-28080 Madrid, Spain}
23: \email{esm@laeff.inta.es}
24:
25: \altaffiltext{1}{Alexander von Humboldt Fellow at the MPIA.}
26: \altaffiltext{2}{Members of the Spanish Virtual Observatory Thematic Network.}
27:
28: \begin{abstract}
29: We have serendipitously discovered a previously-unknown, bright source ($B_T$ =
30: 11.75$\pm$0.07\,mag) with a very blue $V_T-K_{\rm s}$ color, to which we have
31: named Albus~1.
32: A photometric and astrometric study using Virtual Observatory tools has shown
33: that it possesses an appreciable proper motion and magnitudes and colors
34: very similar to those of the well known white dwarf G~191--B2B.
35: We consider Albus~1 as a DA-type white dwarf located at about 40\,pc.
36: If confirmed its nature, Albus~1 would be the sixth brightest isolated white
37: dwarf in the sky, which would make it an excellent spectrophotometric standard.
38: \end{abstract}
39:
40: \keywords{white dwarfs -- subdwarfs -- solar neighbourhood}
41:
42:
43: \section{Introduction}
44: \label{intro}
45:
46: The three classical white dwarfs were, at the beginning of the twentieth
47: century, \object{$o^2$~Eri~B}, \object{Sirius~B}, and the
48: \object{van~Maanen's~star}.
49: Although $o^2$~Eri~B had been discovered by Herschel (1785) and Sirius~B had
50: been predicted by Bessel (1844), it was not until the 1920s when other great
51: astronomers noticed their oddness (Luyten 1922) and popularized the term ``white
52: dwarf'' (Eddington 1924).
53: The extreme physical conditions by which the white dwarfs are supported against
54: gravitational collapse could not be understood until the Quantum Mechanic was
55: properly developed.
56: Since the 1930s, the number of known white dwarfs has exponentially increased,
57: from 18 in 1939 (Schatzman 1958) and over a hundred in 1950 (Luyten 1950) to a
58: few thousands at present (McCook \& Sion 1999; Eisenstein et al. 2006).
59: %%% Added: Koester (2002) and Hansen & Liebert (2003)
60: See Liebert (1980), Koester (2002) and Hansen \& Liebert (2003) for extensive
61: reviews of the general properties of white~dwarfs.
62:
63: The vast majority of the known white dwarfs are very faint, with typical
64: magnitudes in the optical from $V$ = 15 to 20\,mag, or even fainter.
65: Only a few very bright white dwarfs ($V <$ 12\,mag), including the three
66: classical white dwarfs and \object{Procyon~B}, are known.
67: Many of them, especially those that are not in double degenerate systems, are
68: extensively used as spectrophotometric stars (see, e.g., the recent catalogue by
69: Landolt \& Uomoto 2007).
70: Except for rare exceptions, as the very hot dwarfs and cataclysmic variables
71: found in the {\em ROSAT} all-sky survey of extreme-ultraviolet sources by Pounds
72: et al. (1993), all the very bright white dwarfs were discovered during
73: photometric and astrometric surveys before the early 70s
74: %%% Added: Giclas, Burnham \& Thomas 1965
75: (e.g. Kuiper 1941; Luyten 1949; Thackeray 1961; Eggen \& Greenstein 1965;
76: Giclas, Burnham \& Thomas 1965; Schwartz 1972).
77: Afterwards, and in particular with the advent of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey,
78: the detection of new white dwarfs and blue subdwarfs has been biased towards
79: magnitudes fainter than $V$ = 12\,mag.
80: Because of that, the photometry-based discovery of a very bright white dwarf
81: candidate 35 years later would be outstanding.
82: %%% Besides --> If confirmed
83: If confirmed, it would yield doubts on the real knowledge that we have of the solar
84: neighbourhood and on the completeness of previous and current surveys for
85: white~dwarfs.
86:
87: In this work we present \object{Albus~1}, a previously-unknown very bright
88: ($V_T$ = 11.80$\pm$0.14\,mag) white dwarf candidate\footnote{{\em Albus} is the
89: Latin term for~``white''.}.
90: Its finding chart is provided in~Fig.~\ref{findingchart}.
91: Albus~1 was serendipitously discovered during an optical-near
92: infrared photometric study by Caballero \& Solano (2007), devoted to
93: characterize the young stars and brown dwarfs surrounding \object{Alnilam}
94: ($\epsilon$~Ori) and \object{Mintaka} ($\delta$~Ori).
95: As part of this study, they made a correlation between the Tycho-2 (H{\o}g et
96: al. 2000) and the 2MASS (Cutri et al. 2003) catalogues in ten 45\,arcmin-radius
97: comparison fields at the same galactic latitude of the brightest stars of the
98: young \object{Ori~OB~1~b} Association (the Orion Belt; $b \sim$ --17.5\,deg).
99: The total investigated area was only 17.7\,deg$^2$ ($\sim$0.04\,\% of the whole
100: sky).
101: Albus~1 has a $V_T-K_{\rm s}$ color that clearly deviates from those of the
102: other 1275 investigated sources (see Fig.~\ref{colormagnitude}).
103: In particular, while the bluest remaining sources have $V_T-K_{\rm s} \gtrsim$
104: --0.3\,mag, Albus~1 has a color $V_T-K_{\rm s}$ = --0.95$\pm$0.14\,mag.
105: The Tycho-2 $B_T V_T$ and 2MASS $JHK_{\rm s}$ photometry shows that the object
106: is extremely blue at all the wavelenghts from 0.4 to 2.2\,$\mu$m.
107: Given the extreme blueing of Albus~1, we decided to investigate it in~detail.
108:
109:
110: \section{Analysis}
111: \label{analysis}
112:
113: In this work we have taken advantage of the tools offered by the Virtual
114: Observatory (VO; {\tt http://www.ivoa.net}), which is an international,
115: community-based initiative to provide seamless access to the data available from
116: astronomical archive and services.
117: The VO also aims to provide state-of-the-art tools for the efficient analysis of
118: this huge amount of information.
119: In particular, we have used
120: Aladin ({\tt http://aladin.u-strasbg.fr/aladin.gml}), a VO-compliant
121: interactive sky atlas developed by CDS that allows the user to visualize
122: and analyze astronomical images, spectra and catalogues available from
123: the VO~services.
124:
125: Albus~1 has an appreciable Tycho-2 proper motion of 19\,mas\,a$^{-1}$.
126: Since the comparison fields are relatively close to the antapex (the point the
127: Sun is moving away from), the foreground objects in this region have not very
128: large proper motions except for some very nearby stars with large tangential
129: velocities.
130: Indeed, the proper motion of Albus~1 is in the percentile 23\,\% of the
131: investigated sources (i.e.
132: %%% 77\.\% --> 77\,\%
133: 77\,\% of the investigated Tycho-2 stars have $\mu <$ 19\,mas\,a$^{-1}$).
134: %%% Added: nearby
135: This makes Albus~1 to be a nearby Galactic~object.
136:
137: Apart from the coordinates, proper motion and $B_T V_T$ magnitudes from Tycho-2
138: and the $JHK_{\rm s}$ magnitudes from 2MASS, taken from Caballero \& Solano
139: (2007), we have also collected additional photometric and astrometric data from
140: other catalogues: SuperCOSMOS Science Archive (Hambly et al. 2001), USNO-B1
141: (Monet et al. 2003), NOMAD1 (Zacharias et al. 2005) and DENIS (DENIS Consortium
142: 2005).
143: They nicely match between them and Tycho-2 and 2MASS, except for the fact that
144: for very blue objects the Tycho-2 $B_T$ and photographic $B_J$ photometry are
145: not comparable.
146: To avoid superfluous, repetitive information in Table~\ref{albus1}, we provide
147: only the Tycho-2 and 2MASS information and the $RI_N$ photometric data
148: from~USNO-B1.
149:
150: The search with Aladin concluded that there is no radio (NRAO VLA), mid-infrared
151: ($IRAS$), ultraviolet ($EUVE$), X-ray ($ROSAT$) source, or object discussed in
152: the literature (SIMBAD) at less than 4\,arcmin to Albus~1.
153: Neither spectroscopic information exists nor photometry in the Johnson
154: passbands has been obtained~yet.
155:
156:
157: \section{Results}
158: \label{results}
159:
160: To ascertain the real nature of Albus~1, we must compare its photometry with
161: that of other very blue objects.
162: There is a limited number of Galactic objects with $V_T-K_{\rm s}$ colors as
163: blue as those of Albus~1: white dwarfs, hot subdwarfs, and early-type main
164: sequence, blue horizontal branch and Population~II stars.
165: %%% Removed: the very young open clusters
166: Fig.~\ref{colorcolor} compares the optical-near infrared colors of Albus~1 with
167: those of dwarf and giant stars in the direction to Alnilam and Mintaka.
168: Our blue source is even bluer than the late O- and early B-type stars.
169: %%% should be --> are
170: %%% 0.5\,kpc --> 0.4\,kpc
171: Besides, such luminous stars are located at long heliocentric distances
172: ($d \gtrsim$ 0.4\,kpc), which implies very low proper motions, in contrast with
173: what we have measured for Albus~1.
174: Population~II stars are common in the bulge near the centre of the Galaxy and in
175: the Galactic halo.
176: Some of the latters cross the Solar neighbourhood, but only a few of them
177: display extremely blue colors (see, e.g., the recent photometric study of
178: horizontal-branch and metal-poor candidates by Beers et al. 2007).
179: Therefore, Albus~1 is an early-type hot subdwarf or a white~dwarf.
180:
181: The extreme blueing of Albus~1 prevents from transforming the $B_T V_T$
182: magnitudes to Johnson $BV$ magnitudes using standard relations and, therefore,
183: to compare its colors with other white dwarfs tabulated in exhaustive works such
184: as in Bergeron, Leggett \& Ruiz (2001).
185: A new comparison may come, instead, from the available Tycho-2 and 2MASS data.
186: In Table~\ref{WDs} we have compiled the basic data of the brightest white dwarfs
187: and blue subdwarfs identified in the Tycho-2 catalogue.
188: We used the white dwarf lists by McCook \& Sion (1999) and Holberg, Oswalt \&
189: Sion (2002), and looked for the Tycho-2 counterparts of the white dwarfs
190: brighter than $V$ = 13.0\,mag.
191: Fainter objects were not considered due to their poor photometric accuracy.
192: This list surpasses the sample of white dwarf observed by the $Hipparcos$
193: satellite in Vauclair et al. (1997).
194: There are three evident absences: Sirius~B, $o^2$~Eri~B, and Procyon~B (the
195: three brightest known white dwarfs), which are too close to other bright stars
196: and were, thus, not identified by Tycho-2.
197: Among the tabulated objects, there is only one hot subdwarf with blue colors,
198: GJ~3435, which indicates its~rarity.
199:
200: Data in Table~\ref{WDs} is represented in Fig.~\ref{colorcolor}.
201: Albus~1 is located in the color-color diagram very close to the well known
202: white dwarfs G~191--B2B (DA1) and GJ~433.1 (DA3), at $V_T-J \sim$
203: --0.8\,mag, $J-K_{\rm s} \sim$ --0.2\,mag.
204: The resemblance between the spectral energy distributions of Albus~1 and
205: G~191--B2B (``the best studied of all hot white dwarfs''; Barstow et al. 2003),
206: shown in Fig.~\ref{sed}, is evident.
207: Both of them have the same $K_{\rm s}$ magnitude within the error bars (Albus~1:
208: $K_{\rm s}$ = 12.76$\pm$0.03\,mag; G~191--B2B: $K_{\rm s}$ =
209: 12.76$\pm$0.02\,mag), but G~191--B2B is 0.40$\pm$0.11\,mag brighter in $B_T$.
210: It leads to tentatively classify Albus~1 as an early DA white dwarf slightly
211: cooler than G~191--B2B and, therefore, slightly closer to the Sun.
212: The stellar common proper-motion companion of G~191--B2B has an accurate
213: parallax determination by {\em Hipparcos} at $d$ = 46$\pm$4\,pc.
214: Hence, Albus~1 could be located at about 40\,pc, which would explain its
215: appreciable proper-motion.
216: The probability of Albus~1 being a more distant blue subdwarf is smaller (see
217: Table~\ref{WDs}).
218: From the blue $J-K_{\rm s}$ color in Fig.~\ref{colorcolor}, it is deduced,
219: besides, that Albus~1 has no main sequence close companion or forms part of a
220: cataclysmic variable~system.
221:
222: %%% New paragraph
223: As shown by Salim \& Gould (2002), an optical-infrared reduced proper motion
224: digram (e.g. $V + 5 \log{\mu}$ vs. $V-J$) can be used to classify stars even if
225: no parallax information is available.
226: In particular, white dwarfs and subdwarf stars are easily distinguished from
227: main sequence stars as they are several magnitudes dimmer at the same color.
228: The position of Albus~1 in the reduced proper motion diagram in fig.~4 in Gould
229: \& Morgan (2003; $V_T + 5 \log{\mu} =$ 3.2$\pm$0.6\,mag, $V_T-J$ =
230: --0.76$\pm$0.14\,mag) agrees with this requirement.
231:
232:
233: \section{Conclusions}
234: \label{conclusions}
235:
236: Of the 30 white dwarfs and blue subdwarfs listed in Table~\ref{WDs}, only
237: thirteen have Tycho-2 $V_T$ magnitudes brighter than 12.0\,mag.
238: Albus~1, with $V_T$ = 11.80$\pm$0.14\,mag, is included in this group.
239: Accounting for the three brightest known white dwarfs not in the Table, and
240: discarding the close binary systems BL~Psc~AB, V841~Ara~AB, V3885~Sgr~AB, and
241: BD+28~4211~AB, whose spectral energy distributions are affected by the main
242: sequence close companions, then Albus~1 is the 12th brightest white dwarf
243: yet known.
244: Since six of the white dwarfs brighter than it are in multiple systems (the
245: binary status of GJ~127.1~AB claimed by Gill \& Kaptein 1896 is, however, not
246: confirmed), then Albus~1 would be the sixth brightest isolated white dwarf,
247: after the long-time known Feige~34, L~145--141, BD--07~3632, and HD~340611
248: (Luyten 1949; Eggen \& Greenstein 1965) and the very hot white dwarf and extreme
249: ultraviolet source RE~J2214--49 (Holberg et~al.~1993).
250:
251: Albus~1, although located in the southern hemisphere, is visible from the most
252: important northern observatories.
253: % spectrophotmetric --> spectrophotometric
254: % Added: candidate
255: This fact, together with its brightness, makes our blue source an appropiate
256: candidate spectrophotometric standard provided that its white dwarf or hot
257: subdwarf nature is spectroscopically confirmed.
258: Our serendipitous detection has also shown that the $V_T-K_{\rm s}$ color is a
259: good and simple discriminator to look for very blue, relatively bright objects.
260: A search for new very bright white dwarf candidates using Tycho-2 and 2MASS
261: is currently~ongoing.
262:
263:
264: \acknowledgments
265:
266: This research has made use of the Spanish Virtual Observatory supported
267: from the Spanish Ministerio de Educaci\'on y Ciencia through grants
268: AyA2005--04286 and AyA2005--24102--E of the Plan Nacional de Astronom\'{\i}a y
269: Astrof\'{\i}sica.
270:
271: %%%
272: %{\em NOTE TO THE EDITORS:
273: %Table~\ref{albus1} should occupy only one column.
274: %If there are room problems (quite probably), Table~\ref{WDs} could go as on-line
275: %material.}
276:
277:
278: \begin{thebibliography}{}
279:
280: \bibitem[2003]{Ba03} Barstow M. A., Good S. A., Holberg J. B., Hubeny I.,
281: Bannister N. P., Bruhweiler F. C., Burleigh M. R. \& Napiwotzki R. 2003, MNRAS,
282: 341, 870
283: \bibitem[2007]{Be07} Beers T. C., Flynn C., Rossi S. et al. 2007, ApJS, 168, 128
284: \bibitem[2001]{Be01} Bergeron P., Leggett S. K. \& Ruiz M. T. 2001, ApJS, 133,
285: 413
286: \bibitem[1844]{Be1744} Bessel F. W. 1844, MNRAS, 6R, 136
287: %\bibitem[2007]{Ca07} Caballero J. A. 2007, A\&A, 466, 917
288: \bibitem[2007]{CS07} Caballero J. A. \& Solano E. 2007, A\&A, to be submitted
289: \bibitem[2003]{Cu03} Cutri R. M., Skrutskie M. F., van Dyk S. et al. 2003,
290: VizieR On-line Data Catalog: II/246.
291: Originally published in: University of Massachusetts and Infrared Processing and
292: Analysis Center (IPAC/California Institute of Technology)
293: \bibitem[2005]{DE05} DENIS Consortium 2005, VizieR On-line Data Catalog:
294: B/denis. Originally published in: The DENIS consortium (2005)
295: \bibitem[2007]{DB07} Desidera S. \& Barbieri M. 2007, A\&A, 462, 345
296: \bibitem[1924]{Ed24} Eddington A. S. 1924, MNRAS, 84, 308
297: \bibitem[1965]{EG65} Eggen O. J. \& Greenstein J. L. 1965, ApJ, 141, 83
298: \bibitem[2006]{Ei06} Eisenstein D. J., Liebert J., Harris H. C. et al. 2006,
299: ApJS, 167, 40
300: \bibitem[1965]{GBT65} Giclas H. L., Burnham R. \& Thomas N. G. 1965, Bulletin
301: Lowell Observatory, 6, 155
302: \bibitem[1896]{GK1896} Gill D. \& Kapteyn J. C. 1896, The Cape photographic
303: durchmusterung for the equinox 1875, London, printed for H. M. Stationery off.,
304: by Darling \& son, ltd., 1896--1900
305: %%% New GM03
306: \bibitem[2003]{GM03} Gould A. \& Morgan C. W. 2003, ApJ, 585, 1056
307: \bibitem[2001]{Ha01} Hambly N. C., MacGillivray H. T., Read M. A. et al. 2001,
308: MNRAS, 326, 1279
309: %%% New HL03
310: \bibitem[2003]{HL03} Hansen B. M. S. \& Liebert J. 2003, ARA\&A, 41, 465
311: \bibitem[1785]{He1785} Herschel W. 1785, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal
312: Society of London, 75, 40
313: \bibitem[2000]{Hog00} H{\o}g E., Fabricius C., Makarov V. V., Urban S., Corbin
314: T., Wycoff G., Bastian U., Schwekendiek P. \& Wicenec A. 2000, A\&A, 355, L27
315: \bibitem[1993]{Ho93} Holberg J. B., Barstow M. A. \& Buckley D. A. H. 1993, ApJ,
316: 416, 806
317: \bibitem[2002]{Ho02} Holberg J. B., Oswalt T. D. \& Sion E. M. 2002, ApJ, 571,
318: 512
319: %%% New Ko02
320: \bibitem[2002]{Ko02} Koester D. 2002, A\&ARv, 11, 33
321: \bibitem[1941]{Ku41} Kuiper G. K. 1941, PASP, 53, 248
322: \bibitem[2007]{Lu07} Landolt A. U. \& Uomoto A. K. 2007, AJ, 133, 768
323: \bibitem[1980]{Li80} Liebert J. 1980, ARA\&A, 18, 363
324: \bibitem[1922]{Lu22} Luyten W. J. 1922, PASP, 34, 156
325: \bibitem[1949]{Lu49} Luyten W. J. 1949, ApJ, 109, 528
326: \bibitem[1950]{Lu50} Luyten W. J. 1950, AJ, 55, 86
327: \bibitem[1996]{Mc96} McAlister H. A., Mason B. D., Hartkopf W. I., Roberts L. C.
328: Jr. \& Shara M. M. 1996, AJ, 112, 1169
329: \bibitem[1999]{McS99} McCook G. P. \& Sion E. M. 1999, ApJS, 121, 1
330: \bibitem[2003]{Mo03} Monet D. G., Levine S. E., Casian B. et al. 2003, AJ, 125,
331: 984
332: \bibitem[1993]{Po93} Pounds K. A., Allan D. J., Barber C. et al. 1993, MNRAS,
333: 260, 77
334: \bibitem[2007]{RD07} Ribeiro F. M. A. \& Diaz M. P. 2007, AJ, 133, 2659
335: %%% New SG02
336: \bibitem[2002]{SG02} Salim S. \& Gould A. 2002, ApJ, 585, L83
337: \bibitem[1958]{Sh58} Schatzman E. 1958, White Dwarfs, Amsterdam, North-Holland
338: Pub. Co.; New York, Interscience Publishers, 1958.
339: \bibitem[1972]{Sh72} Schwartz R. D. 1972, PASP, 84, 28
340: \bibitem[1961]{Th61} Thackeray A. D. 1961, MNSSA, 20, 40
341: \bibitem[1997]{Va97} Vauclair G., Schmidt H., Koester D. \& Allard N. 1997,
342: A\&A, 325, 1055
343: \bibitem[2004]{Zach04} Zacharias N., Monet D. G., Levine S. E., Urban S. E.,
344: Gaume R. \& Wycoff G. L. 2004, American Astronomical Society Meeting 205,
345: \#48.15; Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, Vol. 36, p. 1418
346:
347: \end{thebibliography}
348:
349: \clearpage
350:
351: \begin{deluxetable}{lccc}
352: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
353: \tablecaption{Basic data of Albus~1.\label{albus1}}
354: \tablewidth{0pt}
355: \tablehead{
356: & & \colhead{Unit}& \colhead{Ref.$^a$}}
357: \startdata
358: Name & Albus~1 & & 1 \\
359: WD number & WD~0604--203 & & 1 \\
360: $\alpha$ (J2000)& 06 06 13.39 & & 2 \\
361: $\delta$ (J2000)& --20 21 07.3 & & 2 \\
362: $\mu_\alpha \cos{\delta}$& +7$\pm$3 & mas\,a$^{-1}$ & 2 \\
363: $\mu_\delta$ & --18$\pm$3 & mas\,a$^{-1}$ & 2 \\
364: $B_T$ & 11.75$\pm$0.07 & mag & 2 \\
365: $V_T$ & 11.80$\pm$0.14 & mag & 2 \\
366: $R$ & 11.84 & mag & 3 \\
367: $I_N$ & 11.90 & mag & 3 \\
368: $J$ & 12.56$\pm$0.02 & mag & 4 \\
369: $H$ & 12.66$\pm$0.03 & mag & 4 \\
370: $K_{\rm s}$ & 12.76$\pm$0.03 & mag & 4 \\
371: Sp. type & DA? & & 1 \\
372: $d$ & $\sim$40? & pc & 1 \\
373: \enddata
374: \tablenotetext{a}{References:
375: 1,~this work;
376: 2,~Tycho-2 catalogue;
377: 3,~USNO-B1;
378: 4,~2MASS catalogue.}
379: \end{deluxetable}
380:
381:
382: \begin{deluxetable}{llcccc}
383: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
384: \tablecaption{The brightest white dwarfs and hot subdwarfs in the Tycho-2
385: catalogue.\label{WDs}}
386: \tablewidth{0pt}
387: \tablehead{
388: \colhead{WD} &
389: \colhead{Alternative} &
390: \colhead{Sp.} &
391: \colhead{$V_T$} &
392: \colhead{$J$} &
393: \colhead{$K_{\rm s}$} \\
394: \colhead{number} &
395: \colhead{name} &
396: \colhead{type} &
397: \colhead{(mag)} &
398: \colhead{(mag)} &
399: \colhead{(mag)} }
400: \startdata
401: \object{WD~0041+092} & \object{BL~Psc}~AB & DA2+K0IV & 10.18$\pm$0.04 & 8.45$\pm$0.03& 7.80$\pm$0.03 \\ % & Barstow et al. 1994 \\ % Pounds et al. 1993
402: \object{WD~0046+051} & \object{van~Maanen's~star} & DZ7 & 12.559$\pm$0.018 & 11.69$\pm$0.02& 11.50$\pm$0.02 \\ % & Kuiper 1941 \\ % van Maanen 1917
403: \object{WD~0148+467} & \object{GJ~3121} & DA3.5 & 12.552$\pm$0.010 & 12.77$\pm$0.02& 12.85$\pm$0.03 \\ % & Giclas et al. 1967 \\ %
404: \object{WD~0227+050} & \object{GJ~100.1}, Feige~22 & DA2.5 & 12.848$\pm$0.019 & 13.28$\pm$0.03& 13.42$\pm$0.02 \\ % & Eggen \& Greenstein 1965 \\ % Feige 1958
405: \object{WD~0232+035} & \object{FS~Cet}~AB, Feige~24 & DA+M1V & 12.6$\pm$0.2 & 11.26$\pm$0.03& 10.557$\pm$0.019 \\ % & Eggen \& Greenstein 1965 \\ % Feige 1958
406: \object{WD~0310--688} & \object{GJ~127.1~A}$^a$ & DA3 & 11.15$\pm$0.07 & 11.76$\pm$0.02& 11.86$\pm$0.02 \\ % & Thackeray 1961 \\ %
407: \object{WD~0426+588} & \object{GJ~169.1~B}$^b$ & DQ7 & 12.13$\pm$0.18 & 6.62$\pm$0.02& 5.72$\pm$0.02 \\ % & Eggen \& Greenstein 1967 \\ %
408: \object{WD~0501+527} & \object{G~191--B2B} & DA1 & 11.65$\pm$0.17 & 12.54$\pm$0.02& 12.76$\pm$0.02 \\ % & Greenstein 1969 \\ % , BD+52~913B
409: \bf{WD~0604--203} & \bf{Albus~1} & \bf{DA?} & \bf{11.80$\pm$0.14} & \bf{12.56$\pm$0.02}& \bf{12.76$\pm$0.03} \\ % & {\bf this work} \\ %
410: \object{WD~0621--376} & \object{RE~J0623--374} & DA1 & 12.3$\pm$0.2 & 12.85$\pm$0.03& 13.09$\pm$0.03 \\ % & Holberg et al. 1993 \\ % Pounds et al. 1993
411: \object{WD~0644+375} & \object{GJ~246}, He~3 & DA2.5 & 12.2$\pm$0.2 & 12.7$\pm$0.3 & 12.8$\pm$0.3 \\ % & Kuiper 1937 \\ % He 3: Hertzsprung?, Lippincott 1951
412: \object{WD~0713+584} & \object{GJ~3435}, GD~294 & sdB & 12.03$\pm$0.16 & 11.77$\pm$0.02& 11.721$\pm$0.018 \\ % & Giclas et al. 1967 \\ % Vauclair et al. 1997
413: \object{WD~1036+433} & \object{GJ~398.2}, Feige~34 & DA0: & 11.10$\pm$0.07 & 11.64$\pm$0.02& 11.540$\pm$0.019 \\ % & Eggen \& Greenstein 1965 \\ % Thejll et al. (1995)
414: \object{WD~1134+300} & \object{GJ~433.1} & DA3 & 12.14$\pm$0.19 & 12.99$\pm$0.02& 13.18$\pm$0.03 \\ % & Giclas et al. 1965 \\ % Schwassmann \& van Rhijn 1947
415: \object{WD~1142--645} & \object{GJ~440}, L~145--141 & DQ6 & 11.34$\pm$0.09 & 11.19$\pm$0.02& 11.10$\pm$0.03 \\ % & Luyten 1949 \\ %
416: \object{WD~1314+293} & \object{HZ~43}~AB$^c$ & DA1+M3.5Ve & 12.667$\pm$0.009 &10.373$\pm$0.019& 9.56$\pm$0.02 \\ % & Luyten 1949 \\ % Humason \& Zwicky 1947
417: \object{WD~1327-083} & \object{BD--07~3632}$^d$ & DA4 & 11.77$\pm$0.18 & 12.62$\pm$0.04& 12.74$\pm$0.05 \\ % & Kuiper 1934 \\ %
418: \object{WD~1337+705} & \object{G~238--44} & DA3 & 12.839$\pm$0.010 & 13.25$\pm$0.02& 13.45$\pm$0.04 \\ % & Luyten 1949 \\ %
419: \object{WD~1620--391} & \object{HD~147513~B}$^e$ & DA2 & 11.00$\pm$0.08 & 11.58$\pm$0.02& 11.77$\pm$0.02 \\ % & Luyten 1949 \\ %
420: \object{WD~1634--573} & \object{V841~Ara}~AB$^f$ & DOZ1+K0V & 11.26$\pm$0.07 & 7.12$\pm$0.02& 6.57$\pm$0.03 \\ % & Wegner 1979 \\ %
421: \object{WD~1647+591} & \object{DN~Dra}, G~226--29$^g$& DAV4.7 & 12.00$\pm$0.16 & 12.42$\pm$0.02& 12.52$\pm$0.03 \\ % & Schwartz 1972 \\ %
422: \object{WD~1917--077} & \object{GJ~754.1~A}$^h$ & DBQA5 & 13.1$\pm$0.3 & 12.35$\pm$0.03& 12.42$\pm$0.03 \\ % & Luyten 1949 \\ %
423: \object{WD~1944--421} & \object{V3885~Sgr}~AB$^i$ & DB:p+M:V & 10.33$\pm$0.05 & 9.96$\pm$0.03& 9.62$\pm$0.02 \\ % & Bond \& Landolt 1971 \\ %
424: \object{WD~2007--303} & \object{GJ~2147} & DA4 & 12.9$\pm$0.3 & 12.58$\pm$0.02& 12.70$\pm$0.03 \\ % & Baldwin \& Stone 1984 \\ % Stone \& Baldwin 1983
425: \object{WD~2032+248} & \object{HD~340611} & DA2.5 & 11.55$\pm$0.10 & 12.04$\pm$0.03& 12.19$\pm$0.03 \\ % & Kuiper 1939--41 \\ %
426: \object{WD~2039--202} & \object{GJ~7991.1} & DA2.5 & 13.1$\pm$0.3 & 12.82$\pm$0.03& 13.00$\pm$0.03 \\ % & Eggen \& Greenstein 1965 \\ %
427: \object{WD~2117+539} & \object{V2151~Cyg} & DA3.5 & 12.7$\pm$0.3 & 12.68$\pm$0.02& 12.85$\pm$0.04 \\ % & Schwartz 1972 \\ %
428: \object{WD~2148+286} & \object{BD+28~4211}~AB$^j$ & sdO:p+G: & 10.53$\pm$0.05 & 11.28$\pm$0.03& 11.56$\pm$0.03 \\ % & MacRae et al. 1951 \\ % Harris 1951
429: \object{WD~2149+021} & \object{GJ~838.4} & DA3 & 13.2$\pm$0.4 & 13.20$\pm$0.02& 13.39$\pm$0.04 \\ % & Eggen \& Greenstein 1965 \\ %
430: \object{WD~2211--495} & \object{RE~J2214--49} & DA.76 & 11.52$\pm$0.08 & 12.44$\pm$0.03& 12.64$\pm$0.03 \\ % & Holberg et al. 1993 \\ %
431: \enddata
432: \tablenotetext{a}{The status of the hypothetical companion \object{GJ~127.1~B}
433: is~unknown.}
434: \tablenotetext{b}{The 2MASS pipeline did not identify the white dwarf, which
435: is visible in $JHK_{\rm}$ at $\sim$8.0\,arcsec from \object{GJ~169.1~A}.}
436: \tablenotetext{c}{Neither Tycho-2 nor 2MASS resolved the HZ~43~AB system
437: (L~1409--4~AB), whose components are separated by 2.23$\pm$0.03\,arcsec
438: (McAlister et~al.~1996).}
439: \tablenotetext{d}{Common proper motion companion of the low-mass star
440: \object{GJ~514.1} (LHS~353;~M4.5V).}
441: \tablenotetext{e}{Common proper motion companion of the exoplanet-harbour star
442: \object{HD~147513} (G5V; Desidera \& Barbieri~2007).}
443: \tablenotetext{f}{2MASS did not resolve the V841~Ara~AB system
444: (HD~149499~AB), whose components are separated by 1.320\,arcsec (Tycho-2).}
445: \tablenotetext{g}{ZZ~Ceti-type pulsating white~dwarf.}
446: \tablenotetext{h}{Common proper motion companion of the low-mass star
447: \object{GJ~754.1~B} (L~923--22;~M3.5V).}
448: \tablenotetext{i}{UX~UMa nova-like cataclysmic variable in which the secondary
449: is a $\sim$0.5\,$M_\odot$ red dwarf that fills its Roche lobe (orbital period:
450: $P \approx$ 0.207\,d; Ribeiro \& Diaz~2007).}
451: \tablenotetext{j}{The binary status of BD+28~4211 has not been confirmed.}
452: %(Napiwotzki 1993; Ulla \& Tejll~1996).}
453: \end{deluxetable}
454:
455: \clearpage
456:
457: \begin{figure}
458: \plotone{f1.eps}
459: \caption{False-color composite image, 5.6\,$\times$\,5.6\,arcmin$^2$ wide,
460: centred on Albus~1.
461: Blue is for $B_J$, green for $R$, and red is for $I_N$ (DSS1 and DSS2
462: photographic plates from ESO and MAMA).
463: North is up, east is~left.
464: \label{findingchart}}
465: \end{figure}
466:
467: \clearpage
468:
469: \begin{figure}
470: \plotone{f2.eps}
471: \caption{$V_T$ vs. $V_T-K_{\rm s}$ color-magnitude diagram
472: from the data in Caballero \& Solano (2007).
473: Tycho-2/2MASS sources with proper motions larger and smaller than
474: 15\,mas\,a$^{-1}$ are shown with crosses and dots, respectively.
475: Albus~1 is highlighted with a big filled (red) star.
476: \label{colormagnitude}}
477: \end{figure}
478:
479: \clearpage
480:
481: \begin{figure}
482: \plotone{f3.eps}
483: \caption{$V_T-J$ vs. $J-K_{\rm s}$ color-color diagram of the white
484: dwarfs and blue subdwarfs listed in Table~\ref{WDs}.
485: Code:
486: (red) filled star, Albus~1;
487: (blue) filled circles, single white dwarfs;
488: (blue) open circles, white dwarfs in unresolved systems or hot subdwarfs.
489: GJ~169.1~B and V841~Ara, that were resolved by Tycho-2 but not by 2MASS, are not
490: shown;
491: (black) dots, a sample of dwarf and giant stars covering the whole spectral type
492: range from late O to early M, taken from Caballero \& Solano~(2007).
493: \label{colorcolor}}
494: \end{figure}
495:
496: \clearpage
497:
498: \begin{figure}
499: \plotone{f4.eps}
500: \caption{Spectral energy distributions of Albus~1, the DA1 white dwarf
501: G~191--B2B, and the B2Vp star $\sigma$~Ori~E (shifted to an heliocentric
502: distance of 0.5\,kpc).
503: The seven passbands ($B_T V_T R I_N J H K_{\rm s}$) are~indicated.
504: \label{sed}}
505: \end{figure}
506:
507:
508:
509: \end{document}
510:
511:
512: