1: %%
2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
3: %%
4: %% Modified 2005 December 5
5: %%
6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
8:
9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
11: %% any data that comes before this command.
12:
13: %% The command below calls the preprint style
14: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
15: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
16: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
17: %%
18: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
19:
20: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
21:
22: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
23:
24: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
25:
26: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
27: \documentclass[]{emulateapj}
28:
29: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
30: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
31: %% use the longabstract style option.
32:
33: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
34:
35: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
36: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
37: %% the \begin{document} command.
38: %%
39: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
40: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
41: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
42: %% for information.
43:
44: \bibliographystyle{apj}
45:
46: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
47: \newcommand{\myemail}{knudsen@mpia-hd.mpg.de}
48:
49: \def\decdeg {\rlap . {}^\circ} %e.g. $40\decdeg 5$ for 40.5 degrees
50:
51: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
52:
53: %\slugcomment{Not to appear in Nonlearned J., 45.}
54: %\slugcomment{To be submitted to Astrophysical Journal - Draft version \today}
55: \slugcomment{Submitted to Astrophysical Journal}
56:
57: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
58: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
59: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
60: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
61: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.
62: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.
63:
64: \shorttitle{HCN and HCO$^+$ in NGC253}
65: \shortauthors{Knudsen et al.}
66:
67: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
68: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
69:
70: \begin{document}
71:
72: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
73: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
74: %% you desire.
75:
76: \title{New insights on the dense molecular gas in NGC253 as traced by HCN and HCO$^+$}
77: %\title{The spatial distribution and flux ratios of HCN and HCO$^+$ in NGC253} % // }
78:
79: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
80: %% author and affiliation information.
81: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
82: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
83: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
84: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
85:
86: \author{K.K. Knudsen\altaffilmark{1}, F. Walter\altaffilmark{1}, A. Weiss\altaffilmark{2}, A. Bolatto\altaffilmark{3}, D.A. Riechers\altaffilmark{1}, \& K. Menten\altaffilmark{2}}
87:
88: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
89: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
90: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
91: %% affiliation.
92:
93: \altaffiltext{1}{Max-Planck-Institut f\"ur Astronomie, K\"onigstuhl 17, D-69117 Heidelberg, Germany}
94: \altaffiltext{2}{Max-Planck-Institut f\"ur Radioastronomie, Auf dem H\"ugel 69, D-53121 Bonn, Germany}
95: \altaffiltext{3}{Department of Astronomy and Radio Astronomy Laboratory, University of California, 601 Campbell Hall, Berkeley}
96:
97: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
98: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
99: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
100: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
101: %% editorial office after submission.
102:
103: \begin{abstract}
104: We have imaged the central $\sim 1$\,kpc of the circumnuclear starburst
105: disk in the galaxy NGC\,253 in the \mbox{HCN(1$\to$0)},
106: \mbox{HCO$^{+}$(1$\to$0)}, and \mbox{CO(1$\to$0)} transitions
107: at 60\,pc resolution
108: using the Owens Valley Radio Observatory Millimeter-Wavelength Array (OVRO).
109: We have also obtained Atacama Pathfinder Experiment (APEX) observations
110: of the HCN(4$\to$3) and the HCO$^+$(4$\to$3) lines of the starburst disk.
111: We find that the emission from the \mbox{HCN(1$\to$0)} and
112: \mbox{HCO$^{+}$(1$\to$0)} transitions, both indicators of
113: dense molecular gas, trace regions which are
114: non--distinguishable within the uncertainties of our observations.
115: Even though the continuum flux varies by more than a factor 10 across
116: the starburst disk, the HCN/HCO$^+$ ratio is
117: constant throughout the disk, and we derive an average ratio of
118: $1.1\pm0.2$.
119: From an excitation analysis we find that all lines from
120: both molecules are subthermally excited and that they are optically thick.
121: This subthermal excitation implies that the observed HCN/HCO$^+$ line ratio
122: is sensitive to the underlying chemistry.
123: The constant line ratio thus implies that there are no strong abundance
124: gradients across the starburst disk of NGC253.
125: This finding may also explain the variations in $L'_{\rm HCN}/L'_{\rm
126: HCO^+}$ between different star forming galaxies both nearby and at high
127: redshifts.
128: \end{abstract}
129:
130: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
131: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
132: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
133: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
134:
135: \keywords{
136: ISM: molecules -- galaxies: individual (NGC253) -- galaxies: starburst -- galaxies: ISM}
137:
138: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper.
139: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep
140: %% and \citet commands to identify citations. The citations are
141: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds
142: %% to the KEY in the \bibitem in the reference list below. We have
143: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus
144: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for
145: %% each reference.
146:
147:
148: %% Authors who wish to have the most important objects in their paper
149: %% linked in the electronic edition to a data center may do so by tagging
150: %% their objects with \objectname{} or \object{}. Each macro takes the
151: %% object name as its required argument. The optional, square-bracket
152: %% argument should be used in cases where the data center identification
153: %% differs from what is to be printed in the paper. The text appearing
154: %% in curly braces is what will appear in print in the published paper.
155: %% If the object name is recognized by the data centers, it will be linked
156: %% in the electronic edition to the object data available at the data centers
157: %%
158: %% Note that for sources with brackets in their names, e.g. [WEG2004] 14h-090,
159: %% the brackets must be escaped with backslashes when used in the first
160: %% square-bracket argument, for instance, \object[\[WEG2004\] 14h-090]{90}).
161: %% Otherwise, LaTeX will issue an error.
162:
163: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
164: %% %%
165: %% 1. INTRODUCTION %%
166: %% %%
167: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
168:
169: \section{Introduction}
170:
171: Constraining the physical properties of the dense molecular gas phase
172: is important for understanding the relation between the gas properties
173: and the star formation process in nearby and high-$z$ galaxies.
174: HCO$^+$ has successfully been used as a tracer of dense gas
175: ($n_{\rm H_2} > 10^4$\,cm$^{-3}$) both in star forming regions of the
176: Milky Way (e.g., \citealt{christopher05}) and in nearby galaxies (e.g.,
177: \citealt{nguyen92,brouillet05}). Recently, it has also been
178: detected at high redshifts towards the Cloverleaf quasar \citep{riechers06}
179: and towards APM\,08279+5255 \citep{garcia06}.
180: HCN is another good tracer of dense gas and has also been observed
181: both locally (e.g., \citealt{gao04}) and towards high redshift sources
182: (e.g., \citealt{solomon03,vandenbout04,carilli05,wagg05,gao07}).
183: \citet{gao04} found that
184: the HCN luminosity is correlated with the far-infrared luminosity
185: for starforming galaxies over several decades.
186: \citet{wu05} found that this correlation holds all the way to the
187: smaller scales of the local star forming regions, i.e.\ over 7--8 orders
188: of magnitude.
189:
190: The number of nearby galaxies in which molecular gas observations allow
191: resolving the emission across the dense gas starburst regions is limited
192: to only a few.
193: At a distance of only about 3.5 Mpc \citep{rekola05}, NGC\,253, a
194: member of the Sculptor group of galaxies, is one of the closest
195: starbursting galaxies. This makes it one of the best-suited laboratories
196: for studies of a circumnuclear starburst and its effect on the
197: ambient interstellar medium (ISM).
198: Some early detections of HCN and HCO$^+$ towards the center of NGC253 came
199: from \citet{rickard77} and \citet{rickard81}, both using single-dish
200: telescopes.
201: \citet{paglione95} presented first interferometry maps of HCN
202: towards NGC253 using the Nobeyama Millimeter Array.
203:
204: We here present Owens Valley Radio Observatory (OVRO) interferometry maps
205: and Atacama Pathfinder Experiment (APEX)\footnote{This publication is based on data acquired with the Atacama Pathfinder Experiment (APEX). APEX is a collaboration between the Max-Planck-Institut fur Radioastronomie, the European Southern Observatory, and the Onsala Space Observatory.}
206: single-dish mapping
207: of both HCN and HCO$^+$, which we use for studying the spatial
208: distribution and excitation of the two molecules in the circumnuclear
209: starburst of NGC253.
210: The paper is structured as follows:
211: section~2 presents the observations and data reduction,
212: the results are given in \S 3, and in \S 4 we discuss the
213: implications both in the context of other nearby galaxies and
214: for high redshift sources.
215: %
216: At a distance of 3.5 Mpc, $1''$ on the sky corresponds to 17.0 pc.
217:
218:
219:
220: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
221: %% %%
222: %% 2. OBSERVATIONS AND REDUCTION %%
223: %% %%
224: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
225:
226: \section{Observations and Reduction}
227:
228: \begin{figure*}
229: \plotone{f1.eps}
230: \caption[]{Channel maps of the HCN (thick contours) and HCO$^+$ (thin
231: contours) emission in NGC 253. The beamsize for both maps is identical
232: ($3.9''\times 2.7''$)
233: and two contours are plotted for each cubes at 50 and 200
234: mJy\,beam$^{-1}$ ($1\sigma$ rms = 22 mJy\,beam$^{-1}$).
235: The central velocities for each channel map are given in
236: the top left corner (in units of km\,s$^{-1}$).
237: \label{fig:chanmaps}}
238: \end{figure*}
239:
240: \subsection{OVRO observations}
241:
242: We observed NGC\,253 in the HCN(1$\to$0) ($\nu_{\rm rest}$ =
243: 88.63185\,GHz), HCO$^+$(1$\to$0) ($\nu_{\rm rest}$ = 89.18852\,GHz)
244: and CO(1$\to$0) ($\nu_{\rm rest}$ = 115.2712\,GHz) transitions with
245: the OVRO Millimeter-Wavelength Array in its C and E configurations.
246: The HCN and HCO$^+$ observations were obtained simultaneously during four
247: tracks taken between 1999 November and 2000 February (60 channels,
248: with a channel width of 4\,MHz, corresponding to
249: $\sim$13.5\,km\,s$^{-1}$); the CO observations were taken during six
250: tracks from 2001 October to 2002 March (120 channels with a width of
251: 2\,MHz $\sim$5.2\,km\,s$^{-1}$); the duration of one track was
252: typically 5~hr. The observations for each array were edited and
253: calibrated separately with the {\sc mma} and the {\sc miriad}
254: packages. The {\it uv--}data were inspected and bad data points due
255: to either poor atmospheric conditions or shadowing were removed, after
256: which the data were calibrated. Flux calibration was determined by
257: observing Neptune during most observing runs. For observing runs
258: without planet observations the flux calibration has been bootstrapped
259: using the gain calibrator 3C454.3 ($\sim$9~Jy). These calibrators and
260: an additional noise source were used to derive the complex bandpass
261: corrections. The nearby calibrators B0135-247 ($\sim$0.37~Jy),
262: B0048-097 ($\sim$0.72~Jy), and B0003-066 ($\sim$1.25~Jy) were used
263: as secondary amplitude and phase calibrators. We estimate our flux
264: calibration to be accurate to within 15\%.
265:
266: For each transition, we produced a data cube using ``robust'' weighting which
267: was cleaned down to a level of twice the rms noise. This resulted in
268: beam sizes (and position angles) of 3.79$''\times$2.56$''$ (13$\decdeg$7) and
269: 3.84$''\times$2.64$''$ (8$\decdeg$9) for the HCN and the HCO$^+$ observations,
270: respectively. As one of the main aims of this study is to compare the
271: properties of the HCN and the HCO$^+$ emission, we convolved both cubes to a
272: common resolution of 3.9$''\times$2.7$''$ (10$\decdeg$0), which resulted in an
273: rms noise of $\sim22$\,mJy\,beam$^{-1}$ in one 4\,MHz channel. The
274: resulting beam size for the CO(1$\to$0) observations is 4.9$''\times$2.7$''$
275: ($-1\decdeg$9) with an rms of $\sim65$\,mJy\,beam$^{-1}$ per 2\,MHz channel.
276: The channels not containing HCN and HCO$^+$ line emission were combined to
277: create a continuum map at 3\,mm; the resulting rms in this image is
278: 5\,mJy\,beam$^{-1}$. We note that the resolution of the CO and HCN maps is
279: comparable to that of the interferometric maps from
280: \citet{paglione95,paglione04}, while the HCO$^+$ has a higher
281: resolution than the Hat Creek Array map from \citet{carlstrom90}.
282: Furthermore, the resolution of our 3\,mm continuum map is a bit better than
283: those of \citet{peng96} and \citet{garcia00}.
284:
285: As the channel width of the CO(1$\to$0) observations is different from
286: the HCN(1$\to$0) and HCO$^+$(1$\to$0) observations, we regridded the
287: CO(1$\to$0) data cube to match the channel width of the other
288: transitions. Subsequently, we used the high signal--to--noise ratio
289: CO(1$\to$0) data cube to define, in each channel map, the regions that
290: contain emission (this is called the ``master'' cube). We used this
291: master cube to blank both the HCN and HCO$^+$ cubes. All integrated
292: maps shown here are based on these blanked cubes and contain the same
293: areas of emission for all three transitions.
294:
295:
296:
297: \subsection{APEX observations}
298:
299: We also obtained observations of the HCN(4$\to$3) ($\nu_{\rm rest}$ =
300: 354.50547\,GHz) and HCO$^+$(4$\to$3) ($\nu_{\rm rest}$ = 356.73413\,GHz)
301: transition using the APEX 12m telescope on Chajnantor. For these
302: frequencies the half--power beamwidth of the antenna is $18''$.
303: The observations were carried out during two runs in 2006 September
304: in good weather
305: conditions (typical water columns: 0.7--1mm) using the dual--side--band receiver
306: APEX-2A. Calibration was achieved using the standard hot--cold--sky
307: observing scheme roughly every 10\,minutes. For both runs typical system
308: temperatures were $\sim200$\,K ($T_a^*$). Spectra were recorded using
309: the Fast Fourier Transform Spectrometer on APEX
310: \citep{klein06} providing a bandwidth
311: of 1\,GHz with an effective resolution of 120\,kHz (0.12\,km\,s$^{-1}$).
312: The telescope pointing was checked on the nearby carbon star R\,Scl and
313: found to be accurate to $\sim3''$. The observations were performed in
314: the standard raster-mapping mode covering the full region where
315: emission has been detected in the OVRO maps in both transitions. Data
316: processing was done using the CLASS software package. In the data processing,
317: we dropped all scans with distorted baselines, subtracted linear baselines
318: from the remaining spectra, and then rebinned to a velocity resolution of
319: 20\,km\,s$^{-1}$.
320: Finally, temperatures were converted to $T_{\rm mb}$ using a forward
321: efficiency
322: and a main beam efficiency of 0.97 and 0.73 respectively \citep{guesten06}.
323: The conversion from $T_{mb}$ to flux is 32\,Jy\,K$^{-1}$ at 350\,GHz.
324: We estimate our flux calibration to be accurate to within 15\%.
325:
326: \begin{figure}
327: %\epsscale{0.7}
328: \plotone{f2.eps}
329: \caption[]{{\em Top:} Integrated HCN map of NGC\,253.
330: {\em Bottom:} Integrated HCO$^+$ map of NGC\,253.
331: In both panels, the beamsize ($3.9''\times 2.7''$) is
332: indicated in the bottom left corner. Contours are plotted starting at
333: 5 Jy\,beam$^{-1}$\,km\,s$^{-1}$ in steps of 5
334: Jy\,beam$^{-1}$\,km\,s$^{-1}$.
335: \label{fig:int_maps}}
336: \end{figure}
337:
338:
339: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
340: %% %%
341: %% 3. RESULTS %%
342: %% %%
343: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
344:
345: \section{Results}
346: \label{sect:res}
347:
348: Figure~\ref{fig:chanmaps} shows the OVRO channel maps for the HCN(1$\to$0) and
349: HCO$^+$(1$\to$0) data. It is striking that their spatial distributions
350: are essentially identical.
351: Both molecules are tracing dense molecular gas in the circumnuclear
352: starburst region of NGC\,253.
353:
354: Figure~\ref{fig:int_maps} shows the integrated maps of HCN(1$\to$0) and
355: HCO$^+$(1$\to$0) line emission, respectively.
356: The slightly different morphology towards the southwest in the
357: HCO$^+$(1$\to$0) map compared to HCN(1$\to$0) is likely due to the
358: slightly lower signal--to--noise ratio in the map.
359: The HCN(4$\to$3) and HCO$^+$(4$\to$3) spectra from APEX are shown in
360: Figure~\ref{fig:apexspectra}.
361: The line profiles are very similar at all observed positions, and
362: the rotation of the circum\-nuclear gas is nicely visible in both transitions.
363: The integrated fluxes for all transitions are given in Table~\ref{tab:results}
364: along with the line luminosities, which
365: we derive using the equations given in \citet{solomon97}.
366: The values for HCN and HCO$^+$ ground transitions are consistent with
367: previous results from \citet{nguyen89} and \citet{nguyen92}
368: for both molecules and \citet{paglione95} for HCN.
369:
370: The fluxes and luminosities given in Table~\ref{tab:results} imply a
371: HCN(1$\to$0)/CO(1$\to$0) flux ratio of 0.084 or a luminosity ratio of 0.14,
372: and a HCO$^+$(1$\to$0)/CO(1$\to$0) flux ratio of 0.077 or a luminosity ratio
373: of 0.13, which is similar to other starbursts
374: (e.g., \citealt{nguyen94,jackson95,sorai02,gao04,nakanishi05}).
375: If only measuring the CO flux in those pixels where there is HCN emission,
376: the CO flux decreases by 12\%, indicating that there is relatively
377: little diffuse CO emission present around the bright nucleus.
378:
379: \begin{figure*}
380: %\epsscale{0.5}
381: %\plotone{f3.eps}
382: \begin{center}
383: \includegraphics[scale=0.7,angle=-90]{f3.eps}
384: \end{center}
385: \caption[]{{\em left:} APEX HCN(4$\to$3) (thin black lines) and HCO$^+$(4$\to$3)
386: (thick grey lines) spectra maps towards the nucleus of
387: NGC253. Spectra are shown on a velocity scale of -100 to 620
388: km\,s$^{-1}$ and on a $T_{\rm mb}$ brightness temperature scale from
389: -0.1 to 0.4 K. Spectra have been observed on a regular raster with
390: half beam spacing ($9''$). {\em right:} Enlargement of the
391: HCN(4$\to$3) and HCO$^+$(4$\to$3) spectra towards the central position.
392: \label{fig:apexspectra}}
393: \end{figure*}
394:
395: For all three molecules we measure the peak surface brightness at the
396: central position:
397: CO(1$\to$0), 2.4\,Jy\,beam$^{-1}$,;
398: HCN(1$\to$0), 0.49\,Jy\,beam$^{-1}$;
399: and HCO$^+$(1$\to$0), 0.38\,Jy\,beam$^{-1}$.
400: From this we determine the peak brightness temperature
401: using the conversions 6.95\,Jy\,K$^{-1}$ at 115.27\,GHz and 14.9\,Jy\,K$^{-1}$
402: at 89\,GHz for our observations
403: and derive the following temperatures: 17\,K for CO(1$\to$0), 7.3\,K for
404: HCN(1$\to$0), and 5.7\,K for HCO$^+$(1$\to$0).
405: Thus, our CO data set a lower limit to the kinetic temperature $>20$\,K
406: (Planck temperature).
407: The CO(1$\to$0) brightness temperature is in agreement with
408: \citet{paglione04}, although it is somewhat lower than the
409: 36\,K derived by \citet{sakamoto06} at comparable angular resolution.
410:
411: For several high redshift sources it has been found that lines from HCN
412: appear to be narrower than the CO lines.
413: This is the case for the Cloverleaf quasar
414: \citep{weiss03,solomon03,riechers06}, APM\,08279+5255 \citep{wagg05,weiss07},
415: and IRAS\,F10214+4724 \citep{downes95,vandenbout04}. It has been argued
416: that this indicates that the dense gas is more concentrated around the
417: nucleus. Even though NGC253 does not match these high redshift galaxies
418: in far-infrared luminosity, we extract the spectra for CO(1$\to$0),
419: HCN(1$\to$0), and HCO$^+$(1$\to$0) (shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:spectra}).
420: Here we find that the line widths are the same for all three lines.
421: This agrees with the interferometric channel maps (Fig.~\ref{fig:chanmaps}),
422: in that the emission emerges from the same cloud or system of clouds.
423:
424: \begin{deluxetable}{lccc}
425: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
426: %\rotate
427: \tablecaption{Resulting flux and luminosity \label{tab:results}}
428: \tablewidth{0pt}
429: \tablehead{
430: \colhead{Transition} & aperture & \colhead{$I$} & \colhead{$L'$} \\
431: \colhead{} & \colhead{(arcsec)} & \colhead{(Jy km\,s$^{-1}$)} & \colhead{(K km\,s$^{-1}$ pc$^2$)}
432: }
433: \startdata
434: HCN(1$\to$0) & 20 & 186 & $9.4\times10^6$ \\
435: HCN(1$\to$0) & 27 & 208 & $1.1\times10^7$ \\
436: HCN(1$\to$0) & Full map & 370 & $1.8\times10^7$ \\
437: HCN(4$\to$3) & 20 & 1338 & $4.5\times10^6$ \\
438: HCN(4$\to$3) & 27 & 1634 & $5.5\times10^6$ \\
439: HCN(4$\to$3) & Full map & 2310 & $7.7\times10^6$ \\
440:
441: HCO$^+$(1$\to$0) & 20 & 178 & $8.9\times10^6$ \\
442: HCO$^+$(1$\to$0) & 27 & 203 & $1.0\times10^7$ \\
443: HCO$^+$(1$\to$0) & Full map & 340 & $1.7\times10^7$ \\
444: HCO$^+$(4$\to$3) & 20 & 1302 & $4.1\times10^6$ \\
445: HCO$^+$(4$\to$3) & 27 & 1723 & $5.4\times10^6$ \\
446: HCO$^+$(4$\to$3) & Full map & 2860 & $8.9\times10^6$ \\
447:
448: CO(1$\to$0) & Full map & 4400 & $1.3\times10^8$
449:
450: \enddata
451: %% Text for table notes should follow after the \enddata but before
452: %% the \end{deluxetable}. Make sure there is at least one \tablenotemark
453: %% in the table for each \tablenotetext.
454: \tablecomments{The lines are detected at $20-30\sigma$.
455: This is well within the 15\% uncertainty of the flux calibration. }
456: %\tablenotetext{a}{}
457: %\tablenotetext{b}{}
458: \end{deluxetable}
459:
460: For illustration purposes we also compare the distribution of dense gas
461: to H$\alpha$ emission and 20\,cm radio continuum in
462: Figure~\ref{fig:halpha_radio}.
463: Strong H$\alpha$ emission is seen in the dense gas regions traced by
464: HCN(1$\to$0) and HCO$^+$(1$\to$0). In the H$\alpha$ image (from
465: \citealt{lehnert95}) the outflow from the central region is very pronounced.
466: In the radio 20\,cm map (from \citealt{ulvestad00}), we see that
467: the radio emission traces the starburst region as well as the outflow.
468: The 20\,cm map compared to high-frequency radio maps is particularly
469: useful for comparison with the HCN and HCO$^+$ maps as the resolution
470: is similar.
471: The region towards the southwest is not seen in the H$\alpha$ image,
472: although radio continuum is detected at 20\,cm, indicating that this
473: likely is a highly obscured star forming region.
474:
475: \begin{figure}
476: %\epsscale{.80}
477: \plotone{f4.eps}
478: \caption[]{
479: Global CO(1$\to$0), HCN(1$\to$0) and HCO$^+$(1$\to$0) spectra of NGC253
480: derived from the OVRO data cubes.
481: The CO spectrum has been arbitrarily scaled down (by a factor 9.5).
482: Each channel is 13.5\,km\,s$^{-1}$ wide.
483: The same spectral region is shown as in Fig.~\ref{fig:apexspectra}.
484: \label{fig:spectra}}
485: \end{figure}
486:
487: \begin{figure}
488: %\epsscale{.70}
489: \plotone{f5.eps}
490: \caption[]{{\em Top:} H$\alpha$ image (greyscale) with HCN contours
491: (contour levels as in Fig.~\ref{fig:int_maps}). {\em Bottom:} Radio continuum
492: image at 20\,cm, shown as greyscale with a logarithmic scale (again
493: overplotted with the HCN contours).
494: \label{fig:halpha_radio}}
495: \end{figure}
496:
497: \begin{figure}
498: %\epsscale{.70}
499: \plotone{f6.eps}
500: \caption[]{HCN(1$\to$0)/HCO$^+$(1$\to$0) ratio map of NGC 253.
501: Values range from 0.7 (light grey) to 3 (black).
502: The beamsize ($3.9''\times2.7''$) is shown in the bottom left corner.
503: \label{fig:hcn_by_hco}}
504: \end{figure}
505:
506: From the line-free channels of the OVRO observations, we
507: derive a 3\,mm continuum image.
508: The 20\,cm emission peaks at the center at a flux level of
509: 0.1\,Jy\,beam$^{-1}$, while the flux level in surrounding regions has
510: dropped to about 0.01\,Jy\,beam$^{-1}$.
511: In the 3\,mm continuum map, the same is seen, where the flux level also
512: peaks around 0.1\,Jy\,beam$^{-1}$ and also falls off by about an order
513: of magnitude.
514: The continuum emission as seen at 20\,cm is dominated by synchrotron emission
515: and the 3\,mm emission is likely a combination of free-free emission and dust
516: continuum.
517: A similar behaviour is seen in the Submillimetre Common-User Bolometer Array
518: (SCUBA) maps from \citet{alton99}, where
519: the submillimeter observations trace the thermal dust emission.
520:
521: \begin{figure}
522: %\epsscale{.70}
523: \plotone{f7.ps}
524: \caption[]{Histogram showing the distribution in the
525: HCN(1$\to0$)/HCO$^+$(1$\to$0) flux ratio map
526: (see Fig.~\ref{fig:hcn_by_hco}). The solid line histogram represents the whole
527: starburst region, while the dashed-line histogram shows the distribution
528: of the central region, where the continuum emission at 20\,cm, 3\,mm
529: and 850\,$\mu$m peaks. The dotted lines show Gaussian fits to the
530: distributions.
531: \label{fig:hist}}
532: \end{figure}
533:
534: Figure~\ref{fig:hcn_by_hco} shows the HCN/HCO$^+$ ratio map. Some of the
535: pixels along the edges suffer from low signal--to--noise ratio,
536: resulting in large
537: uncertainties in the ratio in those pixels.
538: We construct a histogram of the HCN(1$\to$0)/HCO$^+$(1$\to$0) ratio map,
539: shown in Figure~\ref{fig:hist} (solid line), where the tails of the
540: distribution are dominated by the low signal pixels.
541: We perform a Gaussian fit to the histogram and find an average ratio
542: $\langle$HCN(1$\to$0)/HCO$^+$(1$\to$0)$\rangle = 1.1\pm0.3$.
543: To check for spatial variations of this value, we also show the
544: histogram for the central region only (Fig.~\ref{fig:hist}, dashed line),
545: where the continuum level is the highest. The ratio is $1.1\pm0.2$, while in
546: the surrounding regions, where the continuum level has dropped by almost
547: a factor 10, it is $1.1\pm0.4$.
548: We find no evidence for a change in the HCN/HCO$^+$ ratio across the
549: regions with large variation in the continuum level (i.e., radiation field).
550:
551: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
552: %% %%
553: %% 4. DISCUSSION %%
554: %% %%
555: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
556:
557: \section{Discussion}
558:
559: \subsection{HCN and HCO$^+$ excitation}
560:
561: \begin{figure*}
562: \epsscale{.95}
563: \plotone{f8.eps}
564: \caption[]{
565: HCO$^+$ (right) and HCN (left) line SEDs towards
566: the nucleus of NGC\,253 in a $27''$ beam.
567: The data points are from: \citet[][triangles]{nguyen92},
568: \citealt{paglione97} and \citet{paglione_phd} (HCN and HCO$^+$, respectively,
569: open square),
570: and this work (Table~1; solid squares and circle).
571: The lines in both diagrams are selected single-component LVG model
572: fluxes for [$n({\rm H_2})$, $T_{\rm kin}$]
573: combinations;
574: solid line: $10^{5.2}$ cm$^{-3}$, 50\,K;
575: dashed line: $10^{4.9}$ cm$^{-3}$, 150\,K;
576: dotted line: $10^{5.5}$ cm$^{-3}$, 20\,K. The implied area filling
577: factors are 1.4\%, 2.0\% and 1.6\% for HCN and 0.9\%, 1.6\% and 1.1\% for
578: HCO$^+$.
579: \label{fig:lvg27sec}}
580: \end{figure*}
581:
582: A comparison of the 4$\to$3 to the 1$\to$0 line luminosities of both molecules
583: shows that the 4$\to$3
584: transitions are both subthermally excited independent of the aperture
585: chosen (L$'_{\rm HCN(4\to3)}$/L$'_{\rm
586: HCN(1\to0)}=0.45$, L$'_{\rm HCO^+(4\to3)}$/L$'_{\rm HCO^+(1\to0)}=0.45$).
587: At a spatial resolution of $20''$, the APEX data is directly
588: comparable to previous HCN(4$\to$3) measurements from the CSO \citep{jackson95}.
589: Although the peak brightness temperatures of both
590: measurements are roughly comparable, our integrated intensity is a
591: factor of 2 lower than the measurements by Jackson et al (35 vs
592: 71.4 K km\,s$^{-1}$). A similar difference is apparent in the HCO$^+$(4$\to$3)
593: data (31 vs. 50.8 K km\,s$^{-1}$).
594: The APEX data in comparison to the Caltech Submillimeter Observatory (CSO)
595: data have a much broader bandwidth
596: and thus result in a much more reliable baseline subtraction and total fluxes.
597: Given the quality of our new APEX data we adopt our values for the
598: following excitation analysis.
599:
600: As the HCN(4$\to$3) and HCO$^+$(4$\to$3) intensities are critical to constrain
601: the excitation, we have reinvestigated the gas excitation by applying a series
602: of spherical, single-component, large velocity gradient (LVG) models. We
603: use the collision rates from \citet{schoier05} and relative abundance
604: ratios of [HCN/H$_2$] = $5\times10^{-9}$ and [HCO$^+$/H$_2$] =
605: $1.6\times10^{-9}$ determined for NGC\,253 by \citet{martin06} and
606: a velocity gradient of 8 km\,s$^{-1}$\,pc$^{-1}$.
607: The latter is motivated from CO
608: studies which indicate that the a large velocity spread is required in
609: order to model the high $^{12}$CO/$^{13}$CO line ratios observed towards
610: NGC253 and other starburst galaxies
611: \citep[e.g.][]{aalto91,paglione01,weiss05b}.
612: To compare the LVG predicted
613: line brightness temperatures to the observations we convert the LVG
614: line temperatures to integrated flux densities.
615: Note that for fixed abundance ratios and a fixed velocity gradient the
616: column density per velocity bin scales linearly with the density:
617: $N_{\rm mol}/dV \sim X{\rm [mol]}*n({\rm H_2})/(dv/dr)$.
618:
619: Figure\ref{fig:lvg27sec} shows line spectral energy distributions (SEDs),
620: i.e., rotational quantum number versus flux density,
621: for HCN and HCO$^+$ for the central 27$''$ beam
622: which allows us to also include the HCN(3$\to$2) and HCO$^+$(3$\to$2) from
623: \citet{paglione_phd} and \citet{paglione97} to this plot.
624: Both SEDs limit the possible range in H$_2$ density to about
625: 10$^{4.9}$-10$^{5.5}$\,cm$^{-3}$. Models with lower density
626: fail to reproduce the observed 4$\to$3 flux densities for both molecules.
627: Similarly, higher densities over-predict the 3$\to$2 and 4$\to$3 lines even
628: for very cold temperatures of 15\,K.
629: The kinetic temperature is
630: poorly constrained from the models (see also the LVG models in
631: \citealt{jackson95}; our Fig.~\ref{fig:lvg27sec}, dotted and dashed lines);
632: however, a kinetic
633: temperature of 50\,K is the most plausible solution as it is consistent
634: with the dust temperature \citep{melo02} and also
635: in agreement with models of the CO SED \citep{guesten06}.
636: We note that a temperature of $\sim100$\,K, as derived by \citet{bradford03},
637: cannot be ruled out by the model.
638: With this, a good match to both line SEDs in our fixed
639: chemistry framework is provided by an H$_2$ density of 10$^{5.2}$
640: cm$^{-3}$, a kinetic gas temperature of $T_{\rm kin}=50$\,K, and an area
641: filling factor of about 1\% (Fig.~\ref{fig:lvg27sec} solid line).
642: All solutions which match the data predict that
643: HCN and HCO$^+$ lines are {\it optically thick and subthermally
644: excited}, even in the ground transition of HCN and HCO$^+$.
645: For the 50K model we get an excitation temperature $T_{ex}$ of 26K for
646: HCN(1$\to$0) and of 42K for HCO$^+$(1$\to$0) and all higher transitions have
647: lower $T_{ex}$.
648: For a very cold solution of 20K ($n_{H_2} = 10^{5.5}$\,cm$^{-3}$)
649: the HCO$^+$(1$\to$0) emission would be close to being thermalized.
650: %
651: Although the area filling factors for HCN and HCO$^+$ differ slightly for
652: a given $n_{H_2}$ -- $T_{\rm kin}$ LVG input, the good agreement of the model
653: predicted SEDs for HCN and HCO$^+$ with the observations suggests that the
654: emission from HCN and HCO$^+$ arise from a common volume.
655:
656: \begin{figure}
657: \plotone{f9.eps}
658: \caption[]{Comparison of the HCN line SEDs of selected local
659: galaxies. The SEDs are shown for NGC253 (this paper; no data points
660: plotted; Fig.\ref{fig:lvg27sec}),
661: M82 (solid squares; \citealt{seaquist00}),
662: Arp220 (open squares; \citet{greve06} and references therein),
663: NGC6240 (open triangles; \citet{greve06} and references therein
664: [For the SED fit to NGC6240 we have used
665: the HCN(1$\to$0) flux measurement of \citet{solomon92} as the more recent value
666: by \citet{greve06} does not provide a good fit in conjunction with the
667: HCN(3$\to$2) and HCN(4$\to$3) measurements.]),
668: Mrk231 (solid triangles; \citet{papado06}),
669: and NGC4945 (open circles; \citealt{wang04}). The HCN line SEDs
670: are normalized by their HCN(1$\to$0) flux density.
671: \label{fig:normseds}}
672: \end{figure}
673:
674: We repeat the analysis for the central position of NGC253 after convolving
675: the data to a resolution of 20$''$.
676: For our LVG model with $n({\rm H_2})=10^{5.2}$ cm$^{-3}$ and
677: $T_{\rm kin}=50$\,K, the
678: results are consistent with those derived from 27$''$ resolution.
679: The only difference
680: is the area filling factor which increases for higher resolution.
681: If we apply the same LVG model to the total flux within
682: the maps covered by the OVRO and APEX observations, the LVG predicted HCN and
683: HCO$^+$ (4$\to$3) fluxes are slightly higher than the observed values which
684: suggests that the HCN and the HCO$^+$ excitation is somewhat lower in the
685: outer most regions of the data cubes. At a fixed temperature of
686: $T_{\rm kin}=50$\,K, however, a small decrease of the H$_2$ density to
687: $n({\rm H_2})=10^{5.1}$ cm$^{-3}$ is sufficient to bring the model
688: prediction and the observations into agreement.
689:
690: In summary, the constant HCN/HCO$^+$ flux ratio across the starburst disk
691: would require a highly unlikely combination between varying abundances and
692: excitation conditions. Hence it is safe to conclude that there is no
693: significant abundance gradient across the disk.
694:
695:
696: \subsection{Comparison to excitation conditions in other galaxies}
697:
698: \begin{figure}
699: \plotone{f10.ps}
700: \caption[]{
701: Flux ratios of HCN(1$\to$0)/HCO$^+$(1$\to$0)
702: plotted as function of 20\,cm flux for each pixel. The three crosses
703: embedded in a diamond are taken from the central position very close
704: to the peak of 20\,cm emission, where the angular HCO$^+$ flux distribution
705: hints at a divergence from the angular HCN flux distribution.
706: \label{fig:ratios}}
707: \end{figure}
708:
709: We have used our new HCN observations as well as data from the literature to
710: compare the excitation of the dense gas via the HCN SEDs in NGC253, M82,
711: NGC4945, NGC6240, Mrk231 and Arp220 (references are given in the caption of
712: Fig.~\ref{fig:normseds}). We restrict ourselves here to HCN because
713: it provides the most complete data set among tracers of the dense gas for
714: these active galaxies. All galaxies except Mrk231 have been measured in
715: HCN(1$\to$0), HCN(3$\to$2), and HCN(4$\to$3). For Mrk231, only the
716: HCN(1$\to$0) and HCN(4$\to$3) have been published in the literature.
717: Figure~\ref{fig:normseds} shows a comparison
718: of the HCN SEDs of the six galaxies normalized by their HCN(1$\to$0)
719: flux density. This comparison shows that among these sources
720: NGC\,253 exhibits one of the highest HCN excitations. Given that the
721: HCN emission in NGC253 is subthermally excited, this comparison
722: shows that subthermal HCN is a common property of star forming galaxies.
723: The only source
724: where the HCN excitation exceeds that of NGC253 is Arp220 (see also
725: \citealt{greve06}; \citealt{papado06}). We note, however, that the HCN line
726: intensities of Arp220 in \citet{greve06} (which have been used to
727: fit the HCN SED of Arp220 in Fig.\,\ref{fig:normseds}) are higher by a
728: factor of $\sim\,1.5-3$ compared to other studies
729: \citep{solomon92,wiedner02,cernicharo06}.
730: Therefore, the available data is not conclusive and does
731: not allow to rule out that HCN is subthermally excited also in Arp\,220.
732: Interestingly, NGC6240 and Mrk231 show a lower excitation of the dense
733: gas phase compared to NGC253 (Fig.~\ref{fig:normseds})
734: despite their much higher FIR luminosities (Fig.~\ref{fig:hcnhco_vs_lir}).
735:
736: \subsection{Possible interpretation of $L'_{\rm HCN}$/$L'_{\rm HCO^+}$ variations between galaxies}
737: \label{subsect:interp}
738:
739: \begin{figure}
740: \plotone{f11.ps}
741: \caption[]{
742: HCN/HCO$^+$ luminosity ratio vs.\ the far-infrared luminosity for
743: spiral/starbursts
744: galaxies \citep{nguyen92,imanishi04,imanishi06,wang04} and LIRGs/ULIRGs
745: \citep{gracia06}. We have
746: included our measurements for NGC\,253, the recent high redshift detection
747: of HCO$^+$ in the Cloverleaf quasar (\citealt{riechers06};
748: HCN from \citealt{solomon03}) and in the APM08279+5255 (\citealt{garcia06};
749: HCN from \citealt{wagg05}),
750: and indicate the ratio for the circumnuclear
751: disk of the Milky Way \citep{christopher05}.
752: Note that for all galaxies the $1\to0$ transition was used, expect for
753: APM08279+5255 where the $5\to4$ transition was used.
754: For the high-$z$ objects, a standard concordance cosmology is used, with
755: $H_0 = 73$\,km\,s$^{-1}$\,Mpc$^{-1}$, $\Omega_M = 0.24$, and $\Omega_{\Lambda} = 0.72$ \citep{spergel03,spergel06}.
756: \label{fig:hcnhco_vs_lir}}
757: \end{figure}
758:
759: While our results show that the HCN/HCO$^+$ ratio is statistically constant
760: across the starburst disk, we do inspect the details.
761: In Figure~\ref{fig:ratios} we plot the HCN/HCO$^+$
762: flux ratios as function of the 20cm fluxes for each pixel.
763: Towards higher 20cm flux, there are three data points which hint at a
764: higher HCN/HCO$^+$ ratio
765: (this increase is due to a relative decrease of the HCO$^+$ emission).
766: They correspond to the peak in the 20cm flux.
767: This is also towards the peak of the hard X-ray emission as measured with
768: {\it Chandra} \citep{strickland00}, where it is possible that there is an
769: absorbed active galactic nucleus (AGN)
770: present in the very center of NGC253 \citep{weaver02}.
771: While these data points are within the scatter, we speculate that the
772: small increase in the HCN/HCO$^+$ ratio could be a consequence of the
773: presence of an AGN based on the relations suggested by \citet{kohno01}.
774: This, however, can only be resolved when future instruments with larger
775: resolving power and higher sensitivity will become available.
776:
777: The line ratio between HCN and HCO$^+$ has been studied for several classes
778: of star forming galaxies, mostly through single-dish observations
779: \citep{nguyen92,imanishi04,imanishi06,gracia06}, where ratios have
780: been found in the range 0.5-2.7.
781: \citet{gracia06} presented a data set of HCN/HCO$^+$ for luminous IR galaxies
782: (LIRGs; $L_{\rm IR} > 10^{11}$\,L$_\odot$) and ultra-luminous IR galaxies
783: (ULIRGs; $L_{\rm IR} > 10^{12}$\,L$_\odot$). They present a possible
784: correlation between the HCN/HCO$^+$ ratio and the IR luminosity. If, however,
785: other measurements from the literature, including those of less luminous
786: star forming galaxies and a recent high-redshift measurement
787: \citep{nguyen92,imanishi06,imanishi04,nakanishi05}
788: are included in such a plot, there remains little evidence for such a
789: correlation with $L_{\rm IR}$ \citep[Fig.~\ref{fig:hcnhco_vs_lir}; see also][]{riechers06}.
790:
791: \begin{figure}
792: \plotone{f12.eps}
793: \caption[]{LVG predicted $L'_{\rm HCN(1\to0)}$/$L'_{\rm HCO^+(1\to0)}$
794: ratios as a function of the HCN (top) and the HCO$^+$ abundance
795: (bottom). The lines show LVG models with a H$_2$ density of
796: 10$^{4.5}$\,cm$^{-3}$ (light grey squares), 10$^{5.0}$\,cm$^{-3}$
797: (black circles) and 10$^{5.5}$\,cm$^{-3}$ (grey triangles). The
798: kinetic temperature has been fixed to $T_{\rm
799: kin}=50$\,K, the adopted velocity gradient is 8 km\,s$^{-1}$\,pc$^{-1}$ for
800: all models .
801: \label{fig:chemistry}}
802: \end{figure}
803:
804: The large number of galaxies with $L'_{\rm HCN}$/$L'_{\rm HCO^+}>1$
805: seems surprising at the first glance since the emission in both lines
806: is likely optically thick in all galaxies \citep[see also][]{greve06},
807: and the critical densities of HCO$^+$ are lower than those for HCN.
808: From this one would expect that the HCO$^+$(1$\to$0) line
809: is brighter than the HCN(1$\to$0) line if both molecules trace the same
810: gas. However, as both molecules are
811: subthermally excited, their line intensity depends on
812: the underlying chemistry despite their high optical depth. This is
813: exemplified in Figure~\ref{fig:chemistry}, where we show the LVG
814: predicted $L'_{\rm HCN}$/$L'_{\rm HCO^+}$ ratio as a function of reasonable
815: HCN and HCO$^+$ abundance for different H$_2$ densities. From the plot
816: it can be seen that a decrease of the HCO$^+$ abundance can
817: indeed explain even the highest observed line ratios independent on
818: the underlying density of the gas. Alternatively, an increase of the HCN
819: abundance will also increase the $L'_{\rm HCN}$/$L'_{\rm HCO^+}$
820: ratio. The latter process, however, is only effective for H$_2$ gas densities
821: below a few times 10$^{5}$\,cm$^{-3}$, as for higher densities HCN(1$\to$0)
822: will become thermalized and, therefore, insensitive to abundance variations.
823: Given the gas density derived by us for NGC253 (10$^{5.2}$\,cm$^{-3}$),
824: both processes can effectively modify the observed line ratio.
825:
826: A decrease of the HCO$^+$ abundance due to the ionizing field
827: produced by cosmic rays has been proposed by \citet{seaquist00}.
828: Cosmic rays ionize H$_2$, leading to
829: the production of H$_3^+$, which reacts with
830: CO to form HCO$^+$. The abundance of HCO$^+$ is thus affected by ratio of
831: cosmic--ray ionization rate and gas density.
832: While a higher ionizing flux favours the production of HCO$^+$, it also
833: increases the number of free electrons, which
834: leads to a higher probability for recombination. At a gas density of
835: $3\times10^4$\,cm$^{-3}$, an ionizing field comparable
836: to that of the Galaxy may already be strong enough to significantly decrease
837: the abundance of HCO$^+$ due to dissociative
838: recombination of H$_3^+$ (e.g.\ Phillips \& Lazio \citeyear{phillips95}).
839:
840: Theoretical modelling by
841: \citet{meijerink05} and \citet{meijerink07} suggest that for modest column densities
842: $N_H< 10^{22.5}$\,cm$^{-2}$ the presence of an embedded X-ray source, such
843: as
844: an AGN, can enhance the HCN/HCO$^+$ and HCN/CO abundance ratios relative
845: to a pure UV source, such as young massive stars in a starburst. Note,
846: however,
847: that for larger column densities the reverse would be true.
848: There are hints of enhanced HCN/HCO$^+$ ratios in nearby Seyfert galaxies
849: \citep[e.g.,][]{kohno01}. Nonetheless, similar
850: enhancements are not found for the far-infrared bright Cloverleaf
851: QSO \citep{riechers06}.
852:
853: An alternative explanation for the observed variations of the
854: $L'_{\rm HCN}$/$L'_{\rm HCO^+}$ ratio could be that HCO$^+$ and HCN
855: are not arising form the same volume. From an analysis of the dense gas
856: properties in Arp220 and NGC6240, \citet{greve06} recently concluded,
857: that the HCO$^+$ emission is dominantly emitted from regions with 10
858: times lower density than HCN. In this picture the
859: $L'_{\rm HCN}$/$L'_{\rm HCO^+}$ ratio would then be explained by the
860: relative area filling factors of the denser cores and the less dense
861: surounding medium in combination with the excitation conditions in
862: both gas phases. This picture, however, is not supported by our
863: observation of NGC253, where the excitation of both molecules can be
864: explained by a single density--temperature combination.
865:
866:
867: \section{Conclusions}
868:
869: We have presented maps of HCN(1$\to$0) and HCO$^+$(1$\to$0)
870: obtained with OVRO and observations of HCN(4$\to$3) and HCO$^+$(4$\to$3)
871: obtained with APEX of the starburst disk of NGC253.
872: We find that the spatial distribution of the two molecules is very similar,
873: even when compared on a channel-by-channel basis.
874: We find the ratio between HCN(1$\to$0) and HCO$^+$(1$\to$0) is $1.1\pm0.2$
875: across the whole circumnuclear starburst region independent of the strength
876: of the central radiation field.
877: The emission from the \mbox{HCN(1$-$0)} and
878: \mbox{HCO$^{+}$(1$-$0)} transitions, both indicators of the
879: dense molecular gas, trace regions that are
880: non--distinguishable within the uncertainties of our observations.
881:
882: From an excitation analysis we find that both molecules are subthermally
883: excited and that their emission lines are optically thick.
884: The constant line ratio implies that there are no strong abundance gradients
885: across the starburst disk.
886: A consequence of both molecules being subthermally excited is that the
887: line intensity is sensitive to the underlying chemistry despite their
888: high optical depth. This finding may also explain the variations
889: in $L'_{\rm HCN}/L'_{\rm HCO^+}$ between different star forming galaxies.
890:
891: The advent of the Atacama Large Millimeter Array (ALMA),
892: Expanded Very Large Array (EVLA), and Square Kilometer Array (SKA)
893: will open up improved prospects for
894: observations of dense molecular gas phase in galaxies through molecular
895: line transitions such as HCN and HCO$^+$ at low and high redshifts.
896: As both HCN and HCO$^+$ appear to trace the same dense gas regions
897: where the formation of the stars are
898: taking place,
899: observations of
900: these two molecules will be important probes in future
901: projects aimed at studying galaxies during phases of the build-up
902: of their stellar mass.
903:
904: %% The \notetoeditor{TEXT} command allows the author to communicate
905: %% information to the copy editor. This information will appear as a
906: %% footnote on the printed copy for the manuscript style file. Nothing will
907: %% appear on the printed copy if the preprint or
908: %% preprint2 style files are used.
909:
910: %% If you wish to include an acknowledgments section in your paper,
911: %% separate it off from the body of the text using the \acknowledgments
912: %% command.
913:
914: %% Included in this acknowledgments section are examples of the
915: %% AASTeX hypertext markup commands. Use \url without the optional [HREF]
916: %% argument when you want to print the url directly in the text. Otherwise,
917: %% use either \url or \anchor, with the HREF as the first argument and the
918: %% text to be printed in the second.
919:
920: \acknowledgments
921:
922: The Owens Valley Radio Observatory is supported by the National Science
923: Foundation through grant AST 99-81546.
924: We thank the referee, Tim Paglione, for useful comments that helped
925: improved the text.
926: We thank Michael Dahlem and Rolf G\"usten for useful discussions.
927: We thank Matt Lehnert and Jim Ulvestad for making their H$\alpha$ image
928: and 20\,cm radio continuum data, respectively, available to us.
929: D.A.R.\ acknowledges support from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
930: Priority Programme 1177.
931:
932:
933: \begin{thebibliography}{62}
934: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi
935:
936: \bibitem[{{Aalto} {et~al.}(1991){Aalto}, {Johansson}, {Booth}, \&
937: {Black}}]{aalto91}
938: {Aalto}, S., {Johansson}, L.~E.~B., {Booth}, R.~S., \& {Black}, J.~H. 1991,
939: \aap, 249, 323
940:
941: \bibitem[{{Alton} {et~al.}(1999){Alton}, {Davies}, \& {Bianchi}}]{alton99}
942: {Alton}, P.~B., {Davies}, J.~I., \& {Bianchi}, S. 1999, \aap, 343, 51
943:
944: \bibitem[{{Bradford} {et~al.}(2003){Bradford}, {Nikola}, {Stacey}, {Bolatto},
945: {Jackson}, {Savage}, {Davidson}, \& {Higdon}}]{bradford03}
946: {Bradford}, C.~M., {Nikola}, T., {Stacey}, G.~J., {Bolatto}, A.~D., {Jackson},
947: J.~M., {Savage}, M.~L., {Davidson}, J.~A., \& {Higdon}, S.~J. 2003, \apj,
948: 586, 891
949:
950: \bibitem[{{Brouillet} {et~al.}(2005){Brouillet}, {Muller}, {Herpin}, {Braine},
951: \& {Jacq}}]{brouillet05}
952: {Brouillet}, N., {Muller}, S., {Herpin}, F., {Braine}, J., \& {Jacq}, T. 2005,
953: \aap, 429, 153
954:
955: \bibitem[{{Carilli} {et~al.}(2005){Carilli}, {Solomon}, {Vanden Bout},
956: {Walter}, {Beelen}, {Cox}, {Bertoldi}, {Menten}, {Isaak}, {Chandler}, \&
957: {Omont}}]{carilli05}
958: {Carilli}, C.~L., {Solomon}, P., {Vanden Bout}, P., {Walter}, F., {Beelen}, A.,
959: {Cox}, P., {Bertoldi}, F., {Menten}, K.~M., {Isaak}, K.~G., {Chandler},
960: C.~J., \& {Omont}, A. 2005, \apj, 618, 586
961:
962: \bibitem[{{Carlstrom}(1990)}]{carlstrom90}
963: {Carlstrom}, J.~E. 1990, in ASP Conf. Ser. 12: The Evolution of the
964: Interstellar Medium, ed. L.~{Blitz}, 337
965:
966: \bibitem[{{Cernicharo} {et~al.}(2006){Cernicharo}, {Pardo}, \&
967: {Weiss}}]{cernicharo06}
968: {Cernicharo}, J., {Pardo}, J.~R., \& {Weiss}, A. 2006, \apjl, 646, L49
969:
970: \bibitem[{{Christopher} {et~al.}(2005){Christopher}, {Scoville}, {Stolovy}, \&
971: {Yun}}]{christopher05}
972: {Christopher}, M.~H., {Scoville}, N.~Z., {Stolovy}, S.~R., \& {Yun}, M.~S.
973: 2005, \apj, 622, 346
974:
975: \bibitem[{{Downes} {et~al.}(1995){Downes}, {Solomon}, \& {Radford}}]{downes95}
976: {Downes}, D., {Solomon}, P.~M., \& {Radford}, S.~J.~E. 1995, \apjl, 453, L65
977:
978: \bibitem[{{Gao} {et~al.}(2007){Gao}, {Carilli}, {Solomon}, \& {Vanden
979: Bout}}]{gao07}
980: {Gao}, Y., {Carilli}, C.~L., {Solomon}, P.~M., \& {Vanden Bout}, P.~A. 2007,
981: \apj, accepted (astro-ph/0703548)
982:
983: \bibitem[{{Gao} \& {Solomon}(2004)}]{gao04}
984: {Gao}, Y. \& {Solomon}, P.~M. 2004, \apjs, 152, 63
985:
986: \bibitem[{{Garc{\'{\i}}a-Burillo} {et~al.}(2006){Garc{\'{\i}}a-Burillo},
987: {Graci{\'a}-Carpio}, {Gu{\'e}lin}, {Neri}, {Cox}, {Planesas}, {Solomon},
988: {Tacconi}, \& {Vanden Bout}}]{garcia06}
989: {Garc{\'{\i}}a-Burillo}, S., {Graci{\'a}-Carpio}, J., {Gu{\'e}lin}, M., {Neri},
990: R., {Cox}, P., {Planesas}, P., {Solomon}, P.~M., {Tacconi}, L.~J., \& {Vanden
991: Bout}, P.~A. 2006, \apjl, 645, L17
992:
993: \bibitem[{{Garc{\'{\i}}a-Burillo} {et~al.}(2000){Garc{\'{\i}}a-Burillo},
994: {Mart{\'{\i}}n-Pintado}, {Fuente}, \& {Neri}}]{garcia00}
995: {Garc{\'{\i}}a-Burillo}, S., {Mart{\'{\i}}n-Pintado}, J., {Fuente}, A., \&
996: {Neri}, R. 2000, \aap, 355, 499
997:
998: \bibitem[{{Graci{\'a}-Carpio} {et~al.}(2006){Graci{\'a}-Carpio},
999: {Garc{\'{\i}}a-Burillo}, {Planesas}, \& {Colina}}]{gracia06}
1000: {Graci{\'a}-Carpio}, J., {Garc{\'{\i}}a-Burillo}, S., {Planesas}, P., \&
1001: {Colina}, L. 2006, \apjl, 640, L135
1002:
1003: \bibitem[{{Greve} {et~al.}(2006){Greve}, {Papadopoulos}, {Gao}, \&
1004: {Radford}}]{greve06}
1005: {Greve}, T.~R., {Papadopoulos}, P.~P., {Gao}, Y., \& {Radford}, S.~J.~E. 2006,
1006: \apj, submitted (astro-ph/0610378)
1007:
1008: \bibitem[{{G{\"u}sten} {et~al.}(2006){G{\"u}sten}, {Nyman}, {Schilke},
1009: {Menten}, {Cesarsky}, \& {Booth}}]{guesten06}
1010: {G{\"u}sten}, R., {Nyman}, L.~{\AA}., {Schilke}, P., {Menten}, K., {Cesarsky},
1011: C., \& {Booth}, R. 2006, \aap, 454, L13
1012:
1013: \bibitem[{{Imanishi} {et~al.}(2006){Imanishi}, {Nakanishi}, \&
1014: {Kohno}}]{imanishi06}
1015: {Imanishi}, M., {Nakanishi}, K., \& {Kohno}, K. 2006, \aj, 131, 2888
1016:
1017: \bibitem[{{Imanishi} {et~al.}(2004){Imanishi}, {Nakanishi}, {Kuno}, \&
1018: {Kohno}}]{imanishi04}
1019: {Imanishi}, M., {Nakanishi}, K., {Kuno}, N., \& {Kohno}, K. 2004, \aj, 128,
1020: 2037
1021:
1022: \bibitem[{{Jackson} {et~al.}(1995){Jackson}, {Paglione}, {Carlstrom}, \&
1023: {Rieu}}]{jackson95}
1024: {Jackson}, J.~M., {Paglione}, T.~A.~D., {Carlstrom}, J.~E., \& {Rieu}, N.-Q.
1025: 1995, \apj, 438, 695
1026:
1027: \bibitem[{{Klein} {et~al.}(2006){Klein}, {Philipp}, {Kr{\"a}mer}, {Kasemann},
1028: {G{\"u}sten}, \& {Menten}}]{klein06}
1029: {Klein}, B., {Philipp}, S.~D., {Kr{\"a}mer}, I., {Kasemann}, C., {G{\"u}sten},
1030: R., \& {Menten}, K.~M. 2006, \aap, 454, L29
1031:
1032: \bibitem[{{Kohno} {et~al.}(2001){Kohno}, {Matsushita}, {Vila-Vilar{\'o}},
1033: {Okumura}, {Shibatsuka}, {Okiura}, {Ishizuki}, \& {Kawabe}}]{kohno01}
1034: {Kohno}, K., {Matsushita}, S., {Vila-Vilar{\'o}}, B., {Okumura}, S.~K.,
1035: {Shibatsuka}, T., {Okiura}, M., {Ishizuki}, S., \& {Kawabe}, R. 2001, in ASP
1036: Conf. Ser. 249: The Central Kiloparsec of Starbursts and AGN: The La Palma
1037: Connection, ed. J.~H. {Knapen}, J.~E. {Beckman}, I.~{Shlosman}, \& T.~J.
1038: {Mahoney}, 672
1039:
1040: \bibitem[{{Lehnert} \& {Heckman}(1995)}]{lehnert95}
1041: {Lehnert}, M.~D. \& {Heckman}, T.~M. 1995, \apjs, 97, 89
1042:
1043: \bibitem[{{Mart{\'{\i}}n} {et~al.}(2006){Mart{\'{\i}}n}, {Mauersberger},
1044: {Mart{\'{\i}}n-Pintado}, {Henkel}, \& {Garc{\'{\i}}a-Burillo}}]{martin06}
1045: {Mart{\'{\i}}n}, S., {Mauersberger}, R., {Mart{\'{\i}}n-Pintado}, J., {Henkel},
1046: C., \& {Garc{\'{\i}}a-Burillo}, S. 2006, \apjs, 164, 450
1047:
1048: \bibitem[{{Meijerink} \& {Spaans}(2005)}]{meijerink05}
1049: {Meijerink}, R. \& {Spaans}, M. 2005, \aap, 436, 397
1050:
1051: \bibitem[{{Meijerink} {et~al.}(2007){Meijerink}, {Spaans}, \&
1052: {Israel}}]{meijerink07}
1053: {Meijerink}, R., {Spaans}, M., \& {Israel}, F.~P. 2007, \aap, 461, 793
1054:
1055: \bibitem[{{Melo} {et~al.}(2002){Melo}, {P{\'e}rez Garc{\'{\i}}a},
1056: {Acosta-Pulido}, {Mu{\~n}oz-Tu{\~n}{\'o}n}, \& {Rodr{\'{\i}}guez
1057: Espinosa}}]{melo02}
1058: {Melo}, V.~P., {P{\'e}rez Garc{\'{\i}}a}, A.~M., {Acosta-Pulido}, J.~A.,
1059: {Mu{\~n}oz-Tu{\~n}{\'o}n}, C., \& {Rodr{\'{\i}}guez Espinosa}, J.~M. 2002,
1060: \apj, 574, 709
1061:
1062: \bibitem[{{Nakanishi} {et~al.}(2005){Nakanishi}, {Okumura}, {Kohno}, {Kawabe},
1063: \& {Nakagawa}}]{nakanishi05}
1064: {Nakanishi}, K., {Okumura}, S.~K., {Kohno}, K., {Kawabe}, R., \& {Nakagawa}, T.
1065: 2005, \pasj, 57, 575
1066:
1067: \bibitem[{{Nguyen-Q-Rieu} {et~al.}(1992){Nguyen-Q-Rieu}, {Jackson}, {Henkel}, {Truong}, \&
1068: {Mauersberger}}]{nguyen92}
1069: {Nguyen-Q-Rieu}, {Jackson}, J.~M., {Henkel}, C., {Truong}, B., \&
1070: {Mauersberger}, R. 1992, \apj, 399, 521
1071:
1072: \bibitem[{{Nguyen-Q-Rieu} {et~al.}(1989){Nguyen-Q-Rieu}, {Nakai}, \&
1073: {Jackson}}]{nguyen89}
1074: {Nguyen-Q-Rieu}, {Nakai}, N., \& {Jackson}, J.~M. 1989, \aap, 220, 57
1075:
1076: \bibitem[{{Nguyen-Rieu} {et~al.}(1994){Nguyen-Rieu}, {Viallefond}, {Combes},
1077: {Jackson}, {Lequeux}, {Radford}, \& {Truong-Bach}}]{nguyen94}
1078: {Nguyen-Rieu}, N.-R., {Viallefond}, F., {Combes}, F., {Jackson}, J.~M.,
1079: {Lequeux}, J., {Radford}, S., \& {Truong-Bach}, T.-B. 1994, in ASP Conf. Ser.
1080: 59: IAU Colloq. 140: Astronomy with Millimeter and Submillimeter Wave
1081: Interferometry, ed. M.~{Ishiguro} \& J.~{Welch}, 336
1082:
1083: \bibitem[{{Paglione}(1997)}]{paglione_phd}
1084: {Paglione}, T.~A.~D. 1997, PhD thesis, Boston University
1085:
1086: \bibitem[{{Paglione} {et~al.}(1997){Paglione}, {Jackson}, \&
1087: {Ishizuki}}]{paglione97}
1088: {Paglione}, T.~A.~D., {Jackson}, J.~M., \& {Ishizuki}, S. 1997, \apj, 484, 656
1089:
1090: \bibitem[{{Paglione} {et~al.}(1995){Paglione}, {Tosaki}, \&
1091: {Jackson}}]{paglione95}
1092: {Paglione}, T.~A.~D., {Tosaki}, T., \& {Jackson}, J.~M. 1995, \apjl, 454, L117
1093:
1094: \bibitem[{{Paglione} {et~al.}(2001){Paglione}, {Wall}, {Young}, {Heyer},
1095: {Richard}, {Goldstein}, {Kaufman}, {Nantais}, \& {Perry}}]{paglione01}
1096: {Paglione}, T.~A.~D., {Wall}, W.~F., {Young}, J.~S., {Heyer}, M.~H., {Richard},
1097: M., {Goldstein}, M., {Kaufman}, Z., {Nantais}, J., \& {Perry}, G. 2001,
1098: \apjs, 135, 183
1099:
1100: \bibitem[{{Paglione} {et~al.}(2004){Paglione}, {Yam}, {Tosaki}, \&
1101: {Jackson}}]{paglione04}
1102: {Paglione}, T.~A.~D., {Yam}, O., {Tosaki}, T., \& {Jackson}, J.~M. 2004, \apj,
1103: 611, 835
1104:
1105: \bibitem[{{Papadopoulos}(2007)}]{papado06}
1106: {Papadopoulos}, P.~P. 2007, \apj, 656, 792
1107:
1108: \bibitem[{{Peng} {et~al.}(1996){Peng}, {Zhou}, {Whiteoak}, {Lo}, \&
1109: {Sutton}}]{peng96}
1110: {Peng}, R., {Zhou}, S., {Whiteoak}, J.~B., {Lo}, K.~Y., \& {Sutton}, E.~C.
1111: 1996, \apj, 470, 821
1112:
1113: \bibitem[{{Phillips} \& {Lazio}(1995)}]{phillips95}
1114: {Phillips}, J.~A. \& {Lazio}, T.~J.~W. 1995, \apjl, 442, L37
1115:
1116: \bibitem[{{Rekola} {et~al.}(2005){Rekola}, {Richer}, {McCall}, {Valtonen},
1117: {Kotilainen}, \& {Flynn}}]{rekola05}
1118: {Rekola}, R., {Richer}, M.~G., {McCall}, M.~L., {Valtonen}, M.~J.,
1119: {Kotilainen}, J.~K., \& {Flynn}, C. 2005, \mnras, 361, 330
1120:
1121: \bibitem[{{Rickard} \& {Palmer}(1981)}]{rickard81}
1122: {Rickard}, L.~J. \& {Palmer}, P. 1981, \apj, 243, 765
1123:
1124: \bibitem[{{Rickard} {et~al.}(1977){Rickard}, {Turner}, {Palmer}, {Morris}, \&
1125: {Zuckerman}}]{rickard77}
1126: {Rickard}, L.~J., {Turner}, B.~E., {Palmer}, P., {Morris}, M., \& {Zuckerman},
1127: B. 1977, \apj, 214, 390
1128:
1129: \bibitem[{{Riechers} {et~al.}(2006){Riechers}, {Walter}, {Carilli}, {Weiss},
1130: {Bertoldi}, {Menten}, {Knudsen}, \& {Cox}}]{riechers06}
1131: {Riechers}, D.~A., {Walter}, F., {Carilli}, C.~L., {Weiss}, A., {Bertoldi}, F.,
1132: {Menten}, K.~M., {Knudsen}, K.~K., \& {Cox}, P. 2006, \apjl, 645, L13
1133:
1134: \bibitem[{{Sakamoto} {et~al.}(2006){Sakamoto}, {Ho}, {Iono}, {Keto}, {Mao},
1135: {Matsushita}, {Peck}, {Wiedner}, {Wilner}, \& {Zhao}}]{sakamoto06}
1136: {Sakamoto}, K., {Ho}, P.~T.~P., {Iono}, D., {Keto}, E.~R., {Mao}, R.-Q.,
1137: {Matsushita}, S., {Peck}, A.~B., {Wiedner}, M.~C., {Wilner}, D.~J., \&
1138: {Zhao}, J.-H. 2006, \apj, 636, 685
1139:
1140: \bibitem[{{Sch{\"o}ier} {et~al.}(2005){Sch{\"o}ier}, {van der Tak}, {van
1141: Dishoeck}, \& {Black}}]{schoier05}
1142: {Sch{\"o}ier}, F.~L., {van der Tak}, F.~F.~S., {van Dishoeck}, E.~F., \&
1143: {Black}, J.~H. 2005, \aap, 432, 369
1144:
1145: \bibitem[{{Seaquist} \& {Frayer}(2000)}]{seaquist00}
1146: {Seaquist}, E.~R. \& {Frayer}, D.~T. 2000, \apj, 540, 765
1147:
1148: \bibitem[{{Solomon} {et~al.}(2003){Solomon}, {Vanden Bout}, {Carilli}, \&
1149: {Guelin}}]{solomon03}
1150: {Solomon}, P., {Vanden Bout}, P., {Carilli}, C., \& {Guelin}, M. 2003, \nat,
1151: 426, 636
1152:
1153: \bibitem[{{Solomon} {et~al.}(1992){Solomon}, {Downes}, \&
1154: {Radford}}]{solomon92}
1155: {Solomon}, P.~M., {Downes}, D., \& {Radford}, S.~J.~E. 1992, \apjl, 387, L55
1156:
1157: \bibitem[{{Solomon} {et~al.}(1997){Solomon}, {Downes}, {Radford}, \&
1158: {Barrett}}]{solomon97}
1159: {Solomon}, P.~M., {Downes}, D., {Radford}, S.~J.~E., \& {Barrett}, J.~W. 1997,
1160: \apj, 478, 144
1161:
1162: \bibitem[{{Sorai} {et~al.}(2002){Sorai}, {Nakai}, {Kuno}, \&
1163: {Nishiyama}}]{sorai02}
1164: {Sorai}, K., {Nakai}, N., {Kuno}, N., \& {Nishiyama}, K. 2002, \pasj, 54, 179
1165:
1166: \bibitem[{{Spergel} {et~al.}(2007){Spergel}, {Bean}, {Dor{\'e}}, {Nolta},
1167: {Bennett}, {Dunkley}, {Hinshaw}, {Jarosik}, {Komatsu}, {Page}, {Peiris},
1168: {Verde}, {Halpern}, {Hill}, {Kogut}, {Limon}, {Meyer}, {Odegard}, {Tucker},
1169: {Weiland}, {Wollack}, \& {Wright}}]{spergel06}
1170: {Spergel}, D.~N., et al. 2007, ApJS, 170, 377
1171:
1172: \bibitem[{{Spergel} {et~al.}(2003){Spergel}, {Verde}, {Peiris}, {Komatsu},
1173: {Nolta}, {Bennett}, {Halpern}, {Hinshaw}, {Jarosik}, {Kogut}, {Limon},
1174: {Meyer}, {Page}, {Tucker}, {Weiland}, {Wollack}, \& {Wright}}]{spergel03}
1175: {Spergel}, D.~N., {Verde}, L., {Peiris}, H.~V., {Komatsu}, E., {Nolta}, M.~R.,
1176: {Bennett}, C.~L., {Halpern}, M., {Hinshaw}, G., {Jarosik}, N., {Kogut}, A.,
1177: {Limon}, M., {Meyer}, S.~S., {Page}, L., {Tucker}, G.~S., {Weiland}, J.~L.,
1178: {Wollack}, E., \& {Wright}, E.~L. 2003, \apjs, 148, 175
1179:
1180: \bibitem[{{Strickland} {et~al.}(2000){Strickland}, {Heckman}, {Weaver}, \&
1181: {Dahlem}}]{strickland00}
1182: {Strickland}, D.~K., {Heckman}, T.~M., {Weaver}, K.~A., \& {Dahlem}, M. 2000,
1183: \aj, 120, 2965
1184:
1185: \bibitem[{{Ulvestad}(2000)}]{ulvestad00}
1186: {Ulvestad}, J.~S. 2000, \aj, 120, 278
1187:
1188: \bibitem[{{Vanden Bout} {et~al.}(2004){Vanden Bout}, {Solomon}, \&
1189: {Maddalena}}]{vandenbout04}
1190: {Vanden Bout}, P.~A., {Solomon}, P.~M., \& {Maddalena}, R.~J. 2004, \apjl, 614,
1191: L97
1192:
1193: \bibitem[{{Wagg} {et~al.}(2005){Wagg}, {Wilner}, {Neri}, {Downes}, \&
1194: {Wiklind}}]{wagg05}
1195: {Wagg}, J., {Wilner}, D.~J., {Neri}, R., {Downes}, D., \& {Wiklind}, T. 2005,
1196: \apjl, 634, L13
1197:
1198: \bibitem[{{Wang} {et~al.}(2004){Wang}, {Henkel}, {Chin}, {Whiteoak}, {Hunt
1199: Cunningham}, {Mauersberger}, \& {Muders}}]{wang04}
1200: {Wang}, M., {Henkel}, C., {Chin}, Y.-N., {Whiteoak}, J.~B., {Hunt Cunningham},
1201: M., {Mauersberger}, R., \& {Muders}, D. 2004, \aap, 422, 883
1202:
1203: \bibitem[{{Weaver} {et~al.}(2002){Weaver}, {Heckman}, {Strickland}, \&
1204: {Dahlem}}]{weaver02}
1205: {Weaver}, K.~A., {Heckman}, T.~M., {Strickland}, D.~K., \& {Dahlem}, M. 2002,
1206: \apjl, 576, L19
1207:
1208: \bibitem[{{Weiss} {et~al.}(2007){Weiss}, {Downes}, {Neri}, \&
1209: {Walter}}]{weiss07}
1210: {Weiss}, A., {Downes}, D., {Neri}, R., \& {Walter}, F. 2007, \aap, in press
1211: (astro-ph/0702669)
1212:
1213: \bibitem[{{Wei{\ss}} {et~al.}(2003){Wei{\ss}}, {Henkel}, {Downes}, \&
1214: {Walter}}]{weiss03}
1215: {Wei{\ss}}, A., {Henkel}, C., {Downes}, D., \& {Walter}, F. 2003, \aap, 409,
1216: L41
1217:
1218: \bibitem[{{Wei{\ss}} {et~al.}(2005){Wei{\ss}}, {Walter}, \&
1219: {Scoville}}]{weiss05b}
1220: {Wei{\ss}}, A., {Walter}, F., \& {Scoville}, N.~Z. 2005, \aap, 438, 533
1221:
1222: \bibitem[{{Wiedner} {et~al.}(2002){Wiedner}, {Wilson}, {Harrison}, {Hills},
1223: {Lay}, \& {Carlstrom}}]{wiedner02}
1224: {Wiedner}, M.~C., {Wilson}, C.~D., {Harrison}, A., {Hills}, R.~E., {Lay},
1225: O.~P., \& {Carlstrom}, J.~E. 2002, \apj, 581, 229
1226:
1227: \bibitem[{{Wu} {et~al.}(2005){Wu}, {Evans}, {Gao}, {Solomon}, {Shirley}, \&
1228: {Vanden Bout}}]{wu05}
1229: {Wu}, J., {Evans}, II, N.~J., {Gao}, Y., {Solomon}, P.~M., {Shirley}, Y.~L., \&
1230: {Vanden Bout}, P.~A. 2005, \apjl, 635, L173
1231:
1232: \end{thebibliography}
1233:
1234:
1235:
1236: \end{document}
1237:
1238: