1: %% This manuscript is marked up using the
2: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
3:
4: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
5: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
6: %% any data that comes before this command.
7:
8: %% The command below calls the preprint style
9: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
10: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
11: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
12: %%
13: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
14:
15: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
16:
17: %%\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
18:
19: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
20:
21: %%\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
22:
23: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
24: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
25: %% use the longabstract style option.
26:
27: %%\documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
28:
29: %% Produce a paper in the ApJ style
30:
31: %\documentclass{emulateapj}
32:
33: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
34: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
35: %% the \begin{document} command.
36: %%
37: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
38: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
39: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
40: %% for information.
41:
42: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
43: \newcommand{\myemail}{aloisi@stsci.edu}
44:
45: \newcommand{\etal}{{et al.~}}
46:
47: \newcommand{\lta}{\lesssim}
48: \newcommand{\gta}{\gtrsim}
49:
50: \newcommand{\kms}{\>{\rm km}\,{\rm s}^{-1}}
51: \newcommand{\Gyr}{\>{\rm Gyr}}
52: \newcommand{\pc}{\>{\rm pc}}
53: \newcommand{\kpc}{\>{\rm kpc}}
54: \newcommand{\Mpc}{\>{\rm Mpc}}
55: \newcommand{\Msun}{\>{\rm M_{\odot}}}
56: \newcommand{\Lsun}{\>{\rm L_{\odot}}}
57:
58: \def\xx{XX}
59: \def\tbd#1{{\baselineskip=9pt\medskip\hrule{\small\it
60: #1}\smallskip\hrule\medskip}}
61: \def\com#1{{\baselineskip=9pt\medskip\hrule{\small\sl
62: #1}\smallskip\hrule\medskip}}
63:
64: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
65:
66: \slugcomment{Submitted to ApJL}
67:
68: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
69: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
70: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
71: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
72: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.
73: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.
74:
75: \shorttitle{I~Zw~18 Distance and Age}
76: \shortauthors{Aloisi et al.}
77:
78: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
79: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
80:
81: \begin{document}
82:
83: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
84: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
85: %% you desire.
86:
87: \title{I~Zw~18 revisited with {\it HST/ACS} and Cepheids:\\
88: New Distance and Age$^1$}
89:
90: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
91: %% author and affiliation information.
92: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
93: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
94: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
95: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
96:
97: \author{A.~Aloisi\altaffilmark{2,3}, G.~Clementini\altaffilmark{4},
98: M.~Tosi\altaffilmark{4}, F.~Annibali\altaffilmark{2},
99: R.~Contreras\altaffilmark{4},
100: G.~Fiorentino\altaffilmark{4},
101: J.~Mack\altaffilmark{2},
102: M.~Marconi\altaffilmark{5}, I.~Musella\altaffilmark{5},
103: A.~Saha\altaffilmark{6}, M.~Sirianni\altaffilmark{2,3},
104: and R.~P.~van der Marel\altaffilmark{2}}
105:
106: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
107: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
108: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
109: %% affiliation.
110:
111: \altaffiltext{1}{Based on observations with the NASA/ESA Hubble
112: Space Telescope, obtained at the Space Telescope Science Institute,
113: which is operated by AURA for NASA under contract NAS5-26555}
114:
115: \altaffiltext{2}{Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Drive,
116: Baltimore, MD 21218; aloisi@stsci.edu}
117: %, annibali@stsci.edu,
118: %sirianni@stsci.edu, marel@stsci.edu}
119:
120: \altaffiltext{3}{On assignment from the Space Telescope Division of the
121: European Space Agency}
122:
123: \altaffiltext{4}{INAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Bologna, Via Ranzani 1,
124: I-40127 Bologna, Italy}
125: %; gisella.clementini@oabo.inaf.it,
126: %monica.tosi@oabo.inaf.it,
127: %rodrigo.contreras@oabo.inaf.it,
128: %giuliana.fiorentino@oabo.inaf.it}
129:
130: \altaffiltext{5}{INAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Capodimonte, Via
131: Moiariello 16, I-80131 Napoli, Italy}
132: %; marcella@na.astro.it,
133: %ilaria@na.astro.it}
134:
135: \altaffiltext{6}{National Optical Astronomy Observatory, P.O. Box 26732,
136: Tucson, AZ 85726}
137: %; saha@noao.edu}
138:
139: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
140: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
141: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
142: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
143: %% editorial office after submission.
144:
145: \begin{abstract}
146: We present new $V$ and $I$-band HST/ACS photometry of I~Zw~18, the
147: most metal-poor blue compact dwarf (BCD) galaxy in the nearby
148: universe. It has been argued in the past that I~Zw~18 is a very young
149: system that started forming stars only $\lesssim 500$ Myr ago, but
150: other work has hinted that older ($\gtrsim 1$ Gyr) red giant branch
151: (RGB) stars may also exist. Our new data, once combined with archival
152: HST/ACS data, provide a deep and uncontaminated optical
153: color-magnitude diagram (CMD) that now strongly indicates an RGB. The
154: RGB tip (TRGB) magnitude yields a distance modulus $(m-M)_0 = 31.30
155: \pm 0.17$, i.e., $D = 18.2 \pm 1.5$ Mpc. The time-series nature of our
156: observations allows us to also detect and characterize for the first
157: time three classical Cepheids in I~Zw~18. The time-averaged Cepheid
158: $\langle V \rangle $ and $\langle I \rangle$ magnitudes are compared
159: to the $VI$ reddening-free Wesenheit relation predicted from new
160: non-linear pulsation models specifically calculated at the metallicity
161: of I~Zw~18. For the one {\it bona-fide} classical Cepheid with a
162: period of 8.63 days this implies a distance modulus $(m-M)_0 = 31.42
163: \pm 0.26$. The other two Cepheids have unusually long periods (125.0
164: and 129.8 d) but are consistent with this distance. The coherent
165: picture that emerges is that I~Zw~18 is older and farther away than
166: previously believed. This rules out the possibility that I~Zw~18 is a
167: truly primordial galaxy formed recently ($z \lesssim 0.1$) in the
168: local universe.\looseness=-2
169: \end{abstract}
170:
171: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
172: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
173: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
174: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
175:
176: %% Authors who wish to have the most important objects in their paper
177: %% linked in the electronic edition to a data center may do so in the
178: %% subject header. Objects should be in the appropriate "individual"
179: %% headers (e.g. quasars: individual, stars: individual, etc.) with the
180: %% additional provision that the total number of headers, including each
181: %% individual object, not exceed six. The \objectname{} macro, and its
182: %% alias \object{}, is used to mark each object. The macro takes the object
183: %% name as its primary argument. This name will appear in the paper
184: %% and serve as the link's anchor in the electronic edition if the name
185: %% is recognized by the data centers. The macro also takes an optional
186: %% argument in parentheses in cases where the data center identification
187: %% differs from what is to be printed in the paper.
188:
189: \keywords{galaxies: dwarf --- galaxies: irregular --- galaxies: evolution
190: --- galaxies: individual (\objectname{I~Zw~18}) --- galaxies: stellar
191: content --- galaxies: Cepheids}
192:
193: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper.
194: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep
195: %% and \citet commands to identify citations. The citations are
196: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds
197: %% to the KEY in the \bibitem in the reference list below. We have
198: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus
199: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for
200: %% each reference.
201:
202: \section{Introduction}
203: The BCD galaxy I~Zw~18 is one of the most intriguing nearby
204: objects. With $12 + \log (O/H) = 7.2$, corresponding to 1/50
205: Z$_{\odot}$ (Skillman \& Kennicutt 1993), it has the lowest nebular
206: oxygen abundance of all known star-forming galaxies in the nearby
207: Universe. It has a high gas fraction (e.g., van Zee et al.~1998) and
208: extremely high star formation (SF) rate per unit mass (Searle \&
209: Sargent 1972), producing a blue young stellar population that
210: dominates the integrated luminosity and color. All these observational
211: evidences make I~Zw~18 a chemically unevolved stellar system. As such,
212: it has long been regarded as a possible example of a galaxy undergoing
213: its first burst of star formation, hence a local analog to primordial
214: galaxies in the distant Universe.\looseness=-2
215:
216: Many Hubble Space Telescope (HST) studies have focused on the
217: evolutionary state of I~Zw~18. After other groups had already
218: resolved the brightest individual stars in the galaxy, our group
219: managed to detect fainter asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars in
220: HST/WFPC2 images with ages of at least several hundreds Myr (Aloisi,
221: Tosi, \& Greggio 1999). These results were confirmed by \"Ostlin
222: (2000) through deep HST/NICMOS imaging. More recently, Izotov \& Thuan
223: (2004; IT04) presented new deep HST/ACS imaging observations. Their
224: $I$ vs.~$V-I$ CMD shows no sign of an RGB (i.e., low-mass stars with
225: ages $\sim 1$-13 Gyr that are burning H in a shell around a He core)
226: at an assumed distance $D \lesssim 15$ Mpc. Their conclusion is that
227: the most evolved (AGB) stars are not older than 500 Myr and that
228: I~Zw~18 is a {\it bona-fide} young galaxy. This result was subsequently
229: challenged by Momany et al.~(2005) and our group (Tosi et al.~2006)
230: based on a better photometric analysis of the same data. This showed
231: that many red sources do exist at the expected position of an RGB, and
232: that their density in the CMD drops exactly where a RGB tip (TRGB, at
233: the luminosity of the He flash) would be expected. However, the small
234: number statistics, large photometric errors, and incompleteness, did
235: not allow a more conclusive statement.\looseness=-2
236:
237: The actual nature of I~Zw~18 has important cosmological implications.
238: According to hierarchical formation scenarios, dwarf ($M$ $\lesssim$
239: 10$^9$ M$_{\odot}$) galaxies should have been the first systems to
240: collapse and start forming stars. Indeed an RGB has been detected in
241: all metal-poor dwarf irregular galaxies of the Local Group and BCDs
242: within $D \lesssim 15$ Mpc that have been imaged with HST (e.g.,
243: SBS~1415+437, Aloisi et al.~2005, and references therein). I~Zw~18
244: has remained the only elusive case so far.
245:
246: The lack of RGB evidence has also made it impossible to pinpoint the
247: distance of I~Zw~18 via the TRGB method. Its distance therefore
248: continues to be debated. With a recession velocity of $745 \pm 3$ km
249: s$^{-1}$, I~Zw~18 has often been assumed to be at a distance of $\sim
250: 10$ Mpc ($H_0$ = 75 km\,s$^{-1}$Mpc$^{-1}$). Correction for
251: Virgocentric infall implies a slightly larger distance between 10 and
252: 14.5 Mpc ($30.0 \lesssim m-M \lesssim 30.8$; \"Ostlin 2000). Izotov et
253: al.~(2000) argued that I~Zw~18 should be as distant as 20 Mpc to
254: provide consistency between the CMD, the presence of Wolf-Rayet stars
255: and the ionization state of the H~{\sc ii} regions. But they suggested
256: in IT04 a shorter distance $D \lesssim 15$ Mpc from the brightness of AGB
257: stars.\looseness=-2
258:
259: In this Letter we present new $V$ and $I$ time-series photometry of
260: I~Zw~18 with HST/ACS that allows the first detection and study of the
261: galaxy's Cepheid stars. Our new data, once combined with the archival
262: ones, also yield a better CMD than has been hitherto available,
263: reaching about 1.5 mag below the TRGB. The results demonstrate that
264: I~Zw~18 is actually farther away and older than previously believed.
265:
266:
267: \section{Observations and Data Reduction}
268:
269: Time-series photometry of I~Zw~18 was collected with ACS/WFC in 12
270: different epochs between 2005 October and 2006 January (GO program
271: 10586, PI Aloisi). Due to the failure of the F814W exposure in one
272: of the 12 visits (subsequently repeated), an additional epoch in
273: F606W is available.
274: Total integration times of $\sim 27700$ and $\sim
275: 26200$ s were obtained in F606W and F814W, respectively. The 4
276: optimally dithered single exposures per epoch per filter were
277: registered by carefully measuring stars in the individual frames. The
278: pipeline-calibrated exposures were then corrected for geometric
279: distortion and co-added with cosmic-ray rejection using the
280: MultiDrizzle software to create an image per epoch each filter. The
281: images were drizzled onto a smaller pixel scale than the $0.05''$ ACS
282: pixels, to take advantage of the small scale dithers and improve the
283: $S/N$ for photometry. A similar procedure was used on all the single
284: exposures to create a master image in both filters. Similarly, the
285: archival ACS/WFC data in F555W and F814W (GO program 9400, PI Thuan)
286: taken over a period of 11 days in 2003 May-June were combined into a
287: master image for a total integration time of $\sim 43500$ and $\sim
288: 24300$ s in F555W and F814W, respectively. Single images per epoch
289: were also produced for the archival data (5 in F555W and 3 in
290: F814W).\looseness=-2
291:
292: The CMD shown in Figure~1 was obtained by performing PSF-fitting
293: photometry with the DAOPHOT/ALLSTAR package (Stetson 1987) on the
294: master images from our new and the archival data. Aperture corrections
295: were measured from stars in the frame and applied to all photometry.
296: Corrections for imperfect charge transfer efficiency (Riess \& Mack
297: 2004) resulted to be negligible (e.g., $\lesssim 0.03$ in all filters
298: for a red TRGB star) and were not applied. Count rates were transformed
299: to the Johnson-Cousins $V$ and $I$ magnitudes using the transformations
300: given by Sirianni et al.~(2005), which have been shown to be accurate
301: to $\sim 0.02$ mag. The values shown and discussed hereafter are
302: corrected for $E(B-V)=0.032$ mag of Galactic foreground extinction,
303: but not for any extinction intrinsic to I~Zw~18. For conciseness, we
304: refer to these magnitudes throughout this paper as $V$ and $I$ instead
305: of $V_0$ and $I_0$. The two ACS datasets were combined using several
306: different approaches and rejection schemes. The results discussed here
307: were obtained by demanding that stars should be detected in all the
308: four deep images ($V$ and $I$ for both datasets), yielding a catalog
309: of $\sim 2100$ stars. At the expense of some depth, this approach has
310: the advantage of minimizing the number of false detections and
311: therefore providing a relatively clean CMD. Annibali et al.~(2007, in
312: preparation) will present more details about the data reduction and
313: photometric analysis, as well as a Star Formation History (SFH)
314: analysis.\looseness=-2
315:
316: PSF-fitting photometry of the single epochs in both our own and the
317: archival ACS/WFC time-series data was performed with the
318: DAOPHOTII/ALLSTAR/ALLFRAME package (Stetson 1987, 1994) to search for
319: and obtain light curves of the galaxy's variable stars. Candidate
320: variables were identified using four independent methods on the
321: single-epoch images: {\it i.)} the Optimal Image Subtraction
322: Technique and the package ISIS 2.2 (Alard 2000), {\it ii.)} the
323: variability index (Welch \& Stetson 1993), {\it iii.)} an independent
324: PSF-fitting photometry performed with the DoPHOT program (Schechter,
325: Mateo, \& Saha 1993) to search for periodic variables as detailed in
326: Saha \& Hoessel (1990), and {\it iv.)} visual inspection of a $\chi^2$
327: image, where each pixel is the $\chi^2$ value calculated from the
328: corresponding pixels in the co-registered target images at all epochs.
329: In addition, all suspected variables were examined by visually
330: `blinking' the relevant spots in the images at the various epochs.
331:
332: The four procedures returned 4 confirmed variables. These are
333: discussed in Section~4 below and they are highlighted with open
334: circles in the CMD of Figure~1. In addition, some 30 other objects
335: were flagged as candidate variables, but we were generally unable to
336: find convincing periods nor otherwise classify them. Most of these
337: objects are in the main body of IZw18, where crowding complicates the
338: characterization of variables.
339:
340: \section{The Color-Magnitude Diagram}
341:
342: At magnitudes brighter than $I \simeq 27$ mag, we find in the CMD the
343: same star types previously detected with ACS by IT04: main-sequence
344: (MS) stars and their more evolved counterparts, i.e., young
345: supergiants (SGs) and AGB stars. A ``blue plume'' which is the
346: combined feature of MS stars and blue SGs (evolved stars at the hot
347: edge of their core He-burning phase), shows up near $V-I \simeq 0.0$
348: mag. At $V-I \simeq 1.3$ mag, red SGs appear at magnitudes $I \lesssim
349: 24$ mag, while AGB stars dominate in the magnitude range $I \simeq
350: 25$--27 mag and form the upper part of what we will call a ``red plume''.
351: The morphology of the AGB star features compares well with the positions
352: at which oxygen-rich and carbon-rich AGB stars are predicted in
353: evolutionary models (e.g., Figure~12 of Marigo, Girardi, \& Chiosi 2003).
354: Our ACS data show that both the blue and red plumes extend down to much
355: fainter magnitudes. But more importantly, they reveal the presence of
356: a much older stellar population. Indeed, below $I \simeq 27.3$ mag
357: and around $V-I \simeq 1.3$ mag, we detect faint red stars exactly at
358: the position where an RGB would be expected (see the Padua isochrones
359: overplotted in Figure~1). The small median error around $I \simeq
360: 27.5$ mag suggests that these faint red stars are not more massive
361: younger stars with large photometric uncertainties.
362:
363: Figure~2 shows the $I$-band luminosity function (LF) for stars in
364: I~Zw~18 CMD with red colors in the range $V-I = 0.75$--1.5 mag. This
365: LF presents a sharp drop towards brighter magnitudes, exactly as would
366: be expected from a TRGB. We used a Savitzky-Golay filtering technique
367: developed by one of us (R.~P.~v.~d.~M.) and described in Cioni et
368: al.~(2000) to determine the TRGB magnitude. This yields $I_{TRGB} =
369: 27.27 \pm 0.14$ mag, with the error bar being dominated by random
370: uncertainties from the finite number of stars. At the metallicity of
371: I~Zw~18, the absolute magnitude of the TRGB discontinuity is
372: $M_{I,TRGB} = -4.03 \pm 0.10$ (Bellazzini et al.~2004). This implies a
373: distance modulus $(m-M)_0 = 31.30 \pm 0.17$ mag, i.e., $D = 18.2 \pm
374: 1.5$ Mpc, assuming that the evolved RGB stars have negligible
375: intrinsic extinction (see, e.g., Cannon et al.~2002).
376:
377: The evidence for an RGB in I~Zw~18 is further strengthened by
378: comparison to another BCD, SBS~1415+437, observed by us with a similar
379: HST/ACS set-up (Aloisi et al.~2005). This galaxy is not quite as metal
380: poor as I~Zw~18 ($12 + \log (O/H) = 7.6$) and is nearer at $D \simeq
381: 13.6$ Mpc. But taking into account the differences in distance,
382: corresponding to a $\Delta (m-M) \simeq 0.61$ mag, the two BCDs have
383: very similar LFs (see Figure~2). Since SBS 1415+437 has an
384: unmistakable RGB sequence, this suggests that such an RGB sequence
385: exists in I~Zw~18 as well. The larger distance of I~Zw~18 explains why
386: with a similar observational setup we detect $\sim 10$ times fewer
387: stars than in SBS 1415+437.
388:
389: \section{Classical Cepheids in I~Zw~18}
390:
391: Periods and classification in type of the 4 confirmed variable stars
392: in I~Zw~18 were derived from the study of the $V$ and $I$ light curves
393: separately, using GRaTiS (Graphical Analyzer of Time Series), custom
394: software developed at the Bologna Observatory by P. Montegriffo
395: (Clementini et al.~2000 and references therein) which uses both the Lomb
396: periodogram and light-curve fitting with a truncated Fourier series.
397:
398: Our ACS/WFC data along with the archival ones span a total time
399: baseline of about 2.5 years. The combined dataset allowed us to derive
400: reliable periods for three of the four confirmed variable stars. All
401: of them are classified as classical Cepheids, both based on the shape
402: of the light curve and the star's position on the CMD, where they all
403: fall within or close enough to the instability strip for Classical
404: Cepheids at the metallicity of I~Zw~18. One of these Cepheids has a
405: period of 8.63 d (see Figure~3), well within the typical range used to
406: statistically define period-luminosity (PL) relations in other
407: galaxies. The other two Cepheids have instead periods of 125.0 d and
408: 129.8 d, respectively. This is much longer than ever observed in other
409: galaxies, with the periods of Cepheids typically being $P \lesssim
410: 70$--80 d (see Udalski et al. 1999; Freedman et al. 2001). The
411: precision of our period determinations is of the order of 1-2 decimal
412: places. The residuals from the truncated Fourier series that best fit
413: the folded light curves are in the ranges 0.02--0.12 and 0.02--0.11
414: mag, in $V$ and $I$, respectively.\looseness=-2
415:
416: The fourth confirmed variable is very bright and red. Only a portion
417: of its light curves is covered by our observations, leading to two
418: possible alternative periodicities of 139 and 186 days
419: respectively. In spite of the unusually long period and the red color,
420: probably due to the star being blended by a red companion, both the
421: high luminosity and the shape of the light curve suggest that this
422: variable star is probably a Classical Cepheid as well. In absence of a
423: well-determined period, it will not be considered further in our
424: discussion below. A more detailed description of the sample of
425: variable stars, and the data analysis performed to identify and
426: characterize them, will be presented in Fiorentino et al.~(2007, in
427: preparation). This sample will be unique for probing the properties of
428: variable stars at previously unexplored metallicities. Here we focus
429: merely on the implied distance of I~Zw~18.
430:
431: New non-local time-dependent convective pulsating theoretical models
432: of Classical Cepheids were computed at the proper metallicity of
433: I~Zw~18 ($Z = 0.0004$, $Y=0.24$) by our group (Marconi et al.~2007, in
434: preparation). These models build on our previous modeling expertise at
435: higher metallicities (e.g., Marconi, Musella, \& Fiorentino 2005;
436: Fiorentino et al.~2007). The new models were used to obtain a
437: theoretical reddening-free $VI$ Wesenheit relation that was directly
438: compared to the Wesenheit relation of the observed Cepheids in order
439: to infer a distance. The 8.63 d Cepheid yields a distance modulus
440: $(m-M)_0 = 31.42 \pm 0.26$ mag if a canonical mass-luminosity relation
441: is assumed in the model computations and of $(m-M)_0 = 31.27 \pm 0.26$
442: mag in case of overluminous noncanonical models (e.g., Caputo et
443: al.~2005; Fiorentino et al.~2007). We have no models yet that
444: reproduce the very long-periods of the other two Cepheids with
445: well-determined periods, so the Wesenheit relation needs to be
446: extrapolated at such long periods to obtain a distance. But if we do
447: this, the average of all three Cepheids yields a very similar
448: distance, $(m-M)_0 = 31.38 \pm 0.17$.
449:
450: The Cepheid distance estimates of I~Zw~18 are in excellent agreement
451: with our new TRGB distance. This agreement supports the view that the
452: feature identified in Figure~1 is indeed the TRGB, and therefore, that
453: I~Zw~18 does indeed have RGB stars. In turn, this implies that the
454: galaxy cannot have formed in the last $\sim 1$ Gyr. Moreover, the RGB
455: stars are unlikely to be as young as 1--2 Gyr, because for such ages
456: the TRGB is up to $\sim 2$ mag fainter than the standard candle value
457: used here that applies to populations with ages $\gtrsim 2$ Gyr (e.g.,
458: Figure~2 of Barker, Sarajedini, \& Harris 2004).
459:
460: The extraordinary long periods of several of the I~Zw~18 classical
461: Cepheids deserve some further comments. They could be a metallicity
462: effect, since I~Zw~18 is the lowest metallicity galaxy where Cepheids
463: have been observed. They could also be related to the peculiar SFH of
464: this BCD, since I~Zw~18 is currently experiencing a strong starburst
465: that makes it more likely to detect more massive (i.e., brighter and
466: shorter-lived) and thus longer-period Cepheids than in more regular
467: (spiral) galaxies. Particularly striking is also the lack of observed
468: Cepheids with periods anywhere between $\sim 10$--120 days. We
469: attribute this absence to the lack of a detectable SF activity in
470: I~Zw~18 at the epochs when the missing Cepheids should have formed.
471: Indeed, once we scale the SFH derived by Aloisi et al.~(1999) from 10
472: Mpc to the new distance derived here, we expect few stars in the mass
473: range 6--20 M$_{\odot}$ (corresponding to pulsation periods of $\sim
474: 10$--120 days) currently in the instability strip.
475:
476: \section{Discussion and Conclusions}
477:
478: We have obtained new deep HST/ACS observations of I~Zw~18 that provide
479: improved insight into the evolutionary state of this benchmark
480: metal-poor BCD. Our results indicate that this galaxy contains RGB
481: stars, in agreement with findings for other local metal-poor BCDs
482: studied with HST. Underlying old ($\gtrsim 1$ Gyr) populations are
483: therefore present in even the most metal-poor systems, so they must
484: have started forming stars at $z \gtrsim 0.1$. Deeper studies (well
485: below the TRGB) will be needed to pinpoint the exact onset of SF in
486: these galaxies. We also find that our TRGB distance of I~Zw~18, $D =
487: 18.2 \pm 1.5$ Mpc, which is confirmed by our Cepheids results, places
488: the galaxy farther away than the values $\sim 15$ Mpc that have often
489: been assumed in previous work. This may explain why it has remained
490: difficult for so long to unambiguously detect or rule out the presence
491: of old resolved (RGB) stars in this galaxy.
492:
493: %% If you wish to include an acknowledgments section in your paper,
494: %% separate it off from the body of the text using the \acknowledgments
495: %% command.
496:
497: %% Included in this acknowledgments section are examples of the
498: %% AASTeX hypertext markup commands. Use \url without the optional [HREF]
499: %% argument when you want to print the url directly in the text. Otherwise,
500: %% use either \url or \anchor, with the HREF as the first argument and the
501: %% text to be printed in the second.
502:
503: \acknowledgments
504:
505: Support for proposal \#10586 was provided by NASA through a grant from
506: STScI, which is operated by AURA, Inc., under NASA contract NAS
507: 5-26555. GC and MT acknowledge support from PRIN-INAF 2005. We are
508: grateful to Marcella Maio for her invaluable contribution in setting
509: the parameters of the photometric ACS data reductions.\looseness=-2
510:
511: %% To help institutions obtain information on the effectiveness of their
512: %% telescopes, the AAS Journals has created a group of keywords for telescope
513: %% facilities. A common set of keywords will make these types of searches
514: %% significantly easier and more accurate. In addition, they will also be
515: %% useful in linking papers together which utilize the same telescopes
516: %% within the framework of the National Virtual Observatory.
517: %% See the AASTeX Web site at http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AAS/AASTeX
518: %% for information on obtaining the facility keywords.
519:
520: %% After the acknowledgments section, use the following syntax and the
521: %% \facility{} macro to list the keywords of facilities used in the research
522: %% for the paper. Each keyword will be checked against the master list during
523: %% copy editing. Individual instruments can be provided in parentheses,
524: %% after the keyword, but they will not be verified.
525:
526: %% The reference list follows the main body and any appendices.
527: %% Use LaTeX's thebibliography environment to mark up your reference list.
528: %% Note \begin{thebibliography} is followed by an empty set of
529: %% curly braces. If you forget this, LaTeX will generate the error
530: %% "Perhaps a missing \item?".
531: %%
532: %% thebibliography produces citations in the text using \bibitem-\cite
533: %% cross-referencing. Each reference is preceded by a
534: %% \bibitem command that defines in curly braces the KEY that corresponds
535: %% to the KEY in the \cite commands (see the first section above).
536: %% Make sure that you provide a unique KEY for every \bibitem or else the
537: %% paper will not LaTeX. The square brackets should contain
538: %% the citation text that LaTeX will insert in
539: %% place of the \cite commands.
540:
541: %% We have used macros to produce journal name abbreviations.
542: %% AASTeX provides a number of these for the more frequently-cited journals.
543: %% See the Author Guide for a list of them.
544:
545: %% Note that the style of the \bibitem labels (in []) is slightly
546: %% different from previous examples. The natbib system solves a host
547: %% of citation expression problems, but it is necessary to clearly
548: %% delimit the year from the author name used in the citation.
549: %% See the natbib documentation for more details and options.
550:
551: \begin{thebibliography}{}
552:
553: \bibitem[]{} Alard 2000, A\&AS, 144, 363
554:
555: \bibitem[]{} Aloisi, A., Tosi, M., \& Greggio, L.~1999, AJ, 118, 302
556:
557: %\bibitem[]{} Aloisi, A., Savaglio, S., Heckman, T., Hoopes, C.,
558: % Leitherer, C., \& Sembach, K.~2003, ApJ, 595, 760
559:
560: \bibitem[]{} Aloisi, A., van der Marel, Mack, J., Leitherer, C.,
561: Sirianni, M., \& Tosi, M.~2005, ApJ, 631, L45
562:
563: %\bibitem[]{} Babul, A., \& Rees, M.~J.~1992, MNRAS, 255, 346
564:
565: \bibitem[]{} Barker, M. K., Sarajedini, A., \& Harris, J.
566: 2004, ApJ, 606, 869
567:
568: %\bibitem[]{} Barning, F. J. M. 1963, Bull. Astron. Inst. Netherlands, 17, 22
569:
570: \bibitem[]{} Bellazzini, M., Ferraro, F. R., Sollima, A., Pancino, E., \&
571: Origlia, L. 2004, A\&A, 424, 199
572:
573: \bibitem[]{} Bertelli, G., Bressan, A., Chiosi, C., Fagotto, F., \&
574: Nasi, E.~1994, A\&AS, 106, 275
575:
576: %\bibitem[]{} Bono, G., Marconi, M., \& Stellingwerf, R.~F.~1999, ApJS, 122,
577: % 167
578:
579: \bibitem[]{} Cannon, J.~M., Skillman, E.~D., Garnett, D.~R., \& Dufour,
580: R.~J.~2002, ApJ, 565, 931
581:
582: \bibitem[]{} Caputo, F., Bono, G., Fiorentino, G., Marconi, M., \& Musella,
583: I.~2005, ApJ, 629, 1021
584:
585: %\bibitem[]{} Chiosi, C., Wood, P.~R., \& Capitanio, N.~1993, ApJS, 86, 541
586:
587: \bibitem[]{} Cioni, M.-R.~L., van der Marel, R.~P., Loup, C., \& Habing,
588: H.~J.~2000, A\&A, 359, 601
589:
590: \bibitem[]{} Clementini et al.~2000, AJ, 120, 2054
591:
592: %\bibitem[]{} Dean, J.~F., Warren, P.~R., \& Cousins, A.~J.~W.~1978, MNRAS,
593: % 183, 569
594:
595: %\bibitem[]{} Di Fabrizio, L.~1999, M.S. Thesis, Universit\`a degli Studi
596: % di Bologna
597:
598: % \bibitem[]{} Dufour, R.~J., Esteban, C., \& Casta\~{n}eda, H.~O.~1996a,
599: % ApJ, 471, L87
600:
601: % \bibitem[]{} Dufour, R.~J., Garnett, D.~R., Skillman, E.~D., \& Shields,
602: % G.~A.~1996b, in From Stars to Galaxies: The Impact of Stellar
603: % Physics on Galaxy Evolution, eds.~C.~Leitherer,
604: % U.~Fritze-v.~Alvensleben, \& J.~Huchra (San Francisco: ASP),
605: % 358
606:
607: %\bibitem[]{} Fagotto, F., Bressan, A., Bertelli, G., \& Chiosi, C.~1994,
608: % A\&AS, 104, 365
609:
610: %\bibitem[]{} Fiorentino, G., Caputo, F., Marconi, M., \& Musella, I.~2002,
611: % ApJ, 576, 402
612:
613: \bibitem[]{} Fiorentino, G., Marconi, M., Musella, I., \& Caputo, F.~2007,
614: A\&A, in press (astro-ph/0707.0959v1)
615:
616: \bibitem[]{} Freedman, W.~L., et al.~2001, ApJ, 553, 47
617:
618: %\bibitem[]{} Holtzman, J., et al.~1995, PASP, 107, 1065
619:
620: %\bibitem[]{} Hunt, L.~K., Thuan, T.~X., \& Izotov, Y.~I.~2003, ApJ, 588,
621: % 281
622:
623: % \bibitem[]{} Hunter, D.~A., \& Thronson, H.~A., Jr.~1995, ApJ, 452, 238
624:
625: %\bibitem[]{} Izotov, Y.~I., Guseva, N.~G., Lipovetsky, V.~A., Kniazev, A.~Y.,
626: % Stepanian, J.~A.~1990, Nature, 343, 238
627:
628: \bibitem[]{} Izotov, Y.~I., Papaderos, P., Thuan, T.~X., Fricke, K.~J.,
629: Foltz, C., \& Guseva, N.~G.~2000, in The First Stars,
630: eds.~A.~Weiss, T.~G.~Abel, \& V.~Hill (Springer)
631:
632: %\bibitem[]{} Izotov, Y.~I., \& Thuan, T.~X.~1999, ApJ, 511, 639 (IT99)
633:
634: \bibitem[]{} Izotov, Y.~I., \& Thuan, T.~X.~2004, ApJ, 616, 768 (IT04)
635:
636: %\bibitem[]{} Kennicutt, R.~C., et al.~1998, ApJ, 498, 181
637:
638: %\bibitem[]{} Kunth, D., Matteucci, F., \& Marconi, G.~1995, A\&A, 297,
639: % 634
640:
641: %\bibitem[]{} Lecavelier des Etangs, A., D\'esert, J.-M., Kunth, D.,
642: % Vidal-Madjar, A., et al.~2004, A\&A, 413, 131
643:
644: %\bibitem[]{} Legrand, F., Kunth, D., Roy, J.-R., Mas-Hesse, J.~M.,
645: % \& Walsh, J.~R.~2000, A\&A, 355, 891
646:
647: %\bibitem[]{} Lomb, N.~R.~1976, \apss, 39, 447
648:
649: \bibitem[]{} Marconi, M., Musella, I., \& Fiorentino, G.~2005, ApJ, 632, 590
650:
651: %\bibitem[]{} Madore, B.~F., \& Freedman, W.~L.~1991, PASP, 103, 933
652:
653: \bibitem[]{} Marigo, P., Girardi, L., \& Chiosi, C. 2003, A\&A, 403, 225
654:
655: \bibitem[]{} Momany, Y., et al.~2005, A\&A, 439, 111
656:
657: %\bibitem[]{} Origlia, L., \& Leitherer, C.~2000, AJ, 119, 2018
658:
659: \bibitem[]{} \"Ostlin, G.~2000, ApJ, 535, L99
660:
661: %\bibitem[]{} Papaderos, P., Izotov, Y., Thuan, T., Noeske, K.,
662: % Fricke, K., Guseva, N., \& Green, R.~2002, A\&A,
663: % 393, 461
664:
665: %\bibitem[]{} Ratnatunga, K.~U., \& Bahcall, J.~N.~1985, ApJS, 59, 63
666:
667: \bibitem[]{} Riess, A., \& Mack, J.~2004, ISR ACS 2004-006
668:
669: %\bibitem[]{} Romaniello, M. Primas, F., Mottini, M., Groenewegen, M., Bono,
670: % G., Francois, P. 2005, A\&A, 429, L37
671:
672: \bibitem[]{} Saha, A., \& Hoessel, J.~G.~1990, AJ, 99, 97
673:
674: %\bibitem[]{} Saha, A., Sandage, A., Labhardt, L., Tammann, G.~A.,
675: % Macchetto, F.~D., \& Panagia, N.~1997, ApJ, 486, 1
676:
677: %\bibitem[]{} Saio, H., \& Gautschy, A.~1998, ApJ, 498, 360
678:
679: %\bibitem[]{} Sakai, S., Ferrarese, L., Kennicutt, R. C., Jr., Saha, A. 2004,
680: % ApJ, 608, 42
681:
682: %\bibitem[]{} Sandage, A., Tammann, G.~A., \& Reindl, B.~2004, A\&A, 424, 43
683:
684: %\bibitem[]{} Sasselov, D.~D., et al.~1997, A\&A, 324, 471
685:
686: %\bibitem[]{} Scargle, J.~D.~1982, \apj, 263, 835
687:
688: \bibitem[]{} Schechter, P.~L., Mateo, M., \& Saha, A.~1993, PASP, 104, 1342
689:
690: \bibitem[]{} Searle, L., \& Sargent, W.~L.~W.~1972, ApJ, 173, 25
691:
692: \bibitem[]{} Sirianni, M., et al.~2005, PASP, 117, 1049
693:
694: \bibitem[]{} Skillman, E.~D., \& Kennicutt, R.~C.~1993, ApJ, 411, 655
695:
696: \bibitem[]{} Stetson, P.~B.~1987, PASP, 99, 191
697:
698: \bibitem[]{} Stetson, P.~B.~1994, PASP, 106, 250
699:
700: %\bibitem[]{} Storm, J., Carney, B., Gieren, W., Fouqu\'e, P.,
701: % Freedman, W., et al.~2004, A\&A, 415, 521
702:
703: %\bibitem[]{} Thuan, T.~X.~1991, in Massive Stars in Starbursts,
704: % ed.~C.~Leitherer, N.~R.~Walborn, T.~M.~Heckman, \& C.~A.~Norman
705: % (Cambridge Univ.~Press), 183
706:
707: %\bibitem[]{} Thuan, T.~X., Izotov, Y.~I., \& Foltz, C.~B.~1999, ApJ,
708: % 525, 105 (T99)
709:
710: % \bibitem[]{} Thuan, T.~X., Izotov, Y.~I. \& Lipovetsky, V.~A.~1995, ApJ,
711: % 445, 108
712:
713: % \bibitem[]{} Thuan, T.~X., Izotov, Y.~I., Lipovetsky, V.~A., Pustilnik,
714: % S.~A.~1994, in ESO/OHP Workshop on Dwarf Galaxies,
715: % ed.~G.~Meylan \& P.~Prugniel (Garching, ESO), 421
716:
717: %\bibitem[]{} Thuan, T.~X., \& Martin, G.~E.~1981, ApJ, 247, 823
718:
719: \bibitem[]{} Tosi, M., Aloisi, A., Mack, J., \& Maio, M.~2006,
720: Proc.~IAU Symp.~235, eds.~F.~Combes \& J.~Palous, in press
721:
722: %\bibitem[]{} Tosi, M., Sabbi, E., Bellazzini, M., Aloisi, A., Greggio, L.,
723: % Leitherer, C., \& Montegriffo, P.~2001, AJ, 122, 1271
724:
725: \bibitem[]{} Udalski, A., et al.~1999, AcA, 49, 223
726:
727: \bibitem[]{} van Zee, L., Westpfahl, D., Haynes, M.~P., \& Salzer,
728: J.~J.~1998, AJ, 115,1000
729:
730: \bibitem[]{} Welch, D.~l., \& Stetson, P.~B.~1993, AJ, 105, 1813
731:
732: %\bibitem[]{} Zwicky, F.~1966, ApJ, 143, 192
733:
734: \end{thebibliography}
735:
736: %\clearpage
737:
738: %% Use the figure environment and \plotone or \plottwo to include
739: %% figures and captions in your electronic submission.
740: %% To embed the sample graphics in
741: %% the file, uncomment the \plotone, \plottwo, and
742: %% \includegraphics commands
743: %%
744: %% If you need a layout that cannot be achieved with \plotone or
745: %% \plottwo, you can invoke the graphicx package directly with the
746: %% \includegraphics command or use \plotfiddle. For more information,
747: %% please see the tutorial on "Using Electronic Art with AASTeX" in the
748: %% documentation section at the AASTeX Web site,
749: %% http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AAS/AASTeX.
750: %%
751: %% The examples below also include sample markup for submission of
752: %% supplemental electronic materials. As always, be sure to check
753: %% the instructions to authors for the journal you are submitting to
754: %% for specific submissions guidelines as they vary from
755: %% journal to journal.
756:
757: \begin{figure}
758: \epsscale{0.55}
759: \plotone{f1.eps}
760: \vspace{0.2cm}
761: \caption{Johnson-Cousins $I$, $V-I$ CMD of the resolved stellar
762: population in both the main and secondary bodies of I~Zw~18. The data
763: are corrected for foreground extinction, but not for possible
764: extinction internal to the galaxy. Padua isochrones for {\it (roughly
765: from top left to bottom right)} log (age) = 6.75, 7.00, 7.25, ...,
766: 9.75, 10.00 are overlaid, with the RGB phase for isochrones with log
767: (age) = 9.25, 9.50, 9.75, and 10 colored red (Bertelli et
768: al.~1994). The isochrones have metallicity $Z = 0.0004$ (as inferred
769: from the H~{\sc ii} regions of I~Zw~18) and are shown for the distance
770: of $D=18.2$ Mpc ($m-M = 31.30$) inferred from the TRGB. Blue open
771: circles highlight the four confirmed variables (see Section~4), which
772: are plotted according to their intensity-averaged magnitudes. Their
773: periods are (from bottom to top) 8.63d, 129.8d, and 125.0d. The period
774: of the brightest variable is even longer, but its exact value is not
775: well determined. Median photometric errors at $V-I = 1$ (determined by
776: comparison of measurements from GO-9400 and GO-10586) are shown as
777: function of $I$-band magnitude on the right. The dashed curve is an
778: estimate of the 50\% completeness level (obtained by fitting the
779: combination of a parametrized completeness function and a model Star
780: Formation History (SFH) to the observed CMD). More sophisticated
781: estimates of the errors and completeness based on artificial star
782: tests will be presented in Annibali et al.~(2007, in preparation).
783: \label{fig2}}
784: \end{figure}
785:
786: \begin{figure}
787: \epsscale{1.0}
788: \plotone{f2.eps}
789: \vspace{0.2cm}
790: \caption{$I$-band LF histogram for stars in I~Zw~18, showing (in
791: black) the number of stars $N$ with colors in the range $V-I =
792: 0.75$--1.5 mag per $0.25$ mag $I$-magnitude bin, inferred from the CMD
793: in Figure~1. For comparison, the LF of SBS~1415+437 from the ACS data
794: presented in Aloisi et al.~(2005) is also plotted (in red),
795: arbitrarily renormalized. Vertical marks indicate the positions of the
796: TRGB, determined as described in the text. At these magnitudes there
797: is a steep LF drop towards brighter magnitudes, due to the end of the
798: RGB sequence. By contrast, the LF drop towards fainter magnitudes at
799: $I \gtrsim 28$ mag is due to incompleteness in both cases. Apart from
800: a distance shift $\Delta (m-M) \simeq 0.61$, these metal-poor BCD
801: galaxies have very similar LFs.
802: \label{fig3}}
803: \end{figure}
804:
805: \begin{figure}
806: \epsscale{1.00}
807: \plotone{f3.eps}
808: \vspace{0.2cm}
809: \caption{$V$ and $I$ light curves, corrected for Galactic foreground
810: extinction, for the 8.63 d Cepheid. The single-epoch photometry was
811: calibrated to the Johnson-Cousins $V$ and $I$-bands by calculating the
812: zero point offset between the intensity-averaged instrumental
813: magnitudes of the light curves and the DAOPHOT/ALLSTAR photometry of
814: the master images.
815: \label{fig4}}
816: \end{figure}
817:
818: \end{document}
819:
820: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
821: % FIGURES and TEXT from La Palma Proceedings
822: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
823:
824: \begin{figure}[t]
825: \begin{center}
826: \vspace{-0.1truecm}\includegraphics[width=0.95\hsize]{cmd_lapalma.ps}
827: \caption{(\textit{a}) HST/ACS CMD for I~Zw~18. Median photometric
828: errors at $V-I = 1$ (determined by comparison of measurements from
829: GO-9400 and GO-10586) are shown as function of $I$-band magnitude on
830: the right side of the panel. Padua isochrones from 5.5 Myr to 10 Gyr
831: are overlaid, with the RGB phase for isochrones from 1.7 to 10 Gyr
832: colored red. The isochrones have metallicity $Z = 0.0004$ (as inferred
833: from the HII regions of I~Zw~18) and are shown for the distance $D=19$
834: Mpc ($m-M = 31.39$). The CMD shown here includes stars in both the
835: main and secondary bodies of I~Zw~18. (\textit{b}) HST/ACS CMD for
836: SBS~1415+437 (Aloisi et al.~2005). The main evolutionary sequences
837: seen in the data are indicated in approximate sense as colored
838: straight lines: main sequence (MS), blue supergiants (BSG), red
839: supergiants (RSG), the red giant branch (RGB) with its tip (TRGB), the
840: asymptotic giant branch (AGB), and carbon stars. Both CMDs are
841: corrected for Galactic foreground extinction. Dashed lines are
842: estimates of the 50\% completeness level. The vertical axes of the
843: panels are offset from each other by 0.66 mag, which is the difference
844: in distance modulus between the galaxies (see Fig.~2). Some $\sim 10$
845: times more stars were detected in SBS 1415+437, owing to its smaller
846: distance; stars for this galaxy are shown with smaller symbols. The
847: faint red stars in both galaxies indicate that these metal-poor BCD
848: galaxies started forming stars $\gtrsim 1$ Gyr ago.}
849: \end{center}
850: \end{figure}
851:
852: The evidence for an RGB in I~Zw~18 is further strengthened by
853: comparison to another BCD, SBS~1415+437, observed by us with a similar
854: HST/ACS set-up (Aloisi et al.~2005). This galaxy is not quite as metal
855: poor as I~Zw~18 ($12 + \log (O/H) = 7.6$) and is somewhat nearer at $D
856: \approx 13.6$ Mpc. But taking into account the differences in distance
857: and completeness, the CMDs of these galaxies look very similar. Since
858: SBS 1415+437 has an unmistakable RGB sequence, this suggests that such
859: an RGB sequence exists in I~Zw~18 as well. It has previously been
860: suggested that I~Zw~18 has no stars with ages $\gtrsim 500$ Myr. It is
861: therefore interesting to ask the question whether there exist Star
862: Formation Histories (SFHs) which do not have stars older than $\sim 1$
863: Gyr (and by extension, do not have an RGB), yet which can still fit:
864: (1) the observed number of faint red stars in I~Zw~18 ($V-I \gtrsim
865: 1.0$, $I \gtrsim 27.3$); and (2) the observed LF drop-off at $I
866: \approx 27.3$. Preliminary results of SFH modeling that we have
867: performed indicate that such SFHs do not exist.
868:
869: %Finally, the remaining two confirmed variable stars of I~Zw~18
870: %are located on the galaxy main sequence and are likely $\beta$ Cepheid
871: %stars.
872:
873:
874:
875:
876:
877:
878:
879:
880:
881:
882:
883:
884:
885:
886:
887:
888:
889: