1: %%
2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
3: %%
4: %% Modified 03 Jan 01
5: %%
6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
8:
9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
11: %% any data that comes before this command.
12:
13: %% The command below calls the preprint style
14: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
15: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
16: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
17:
18: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{emulateapj}
19:
20: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
21: % \documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
22: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
23: % \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
24:
25: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
26: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
27: %% the \begin{document} command.
28: %%
29: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
30: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
31: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
32: %% for information.
33:
34: %\usepackage{pjournal}
35: %\usepackage{natbib}
36:
37: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
38:
39: %\slugcomment{26-March-2004}
40:
41: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
42: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
43: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
44: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
45: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters. Running heads
46: %% will not print in the manuscript style.
47:
48: \shorttitle{CIB Correlated Anisotropies}
49: \shortauthors{G. Lagache et al.}
50:
51: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
52: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
53:
54: %\received{2004 March 26}
55: \begin{document}
56:
57: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
58: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
59: %% you desire.
60:
61: %________________________________________________________________
62: \title{Correlated Anisotropies in the Cosmic
63: Far-Infrared Background Detected by {\it MIPS/Spitzer}: Constraint on the Bias}
64:
65: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
66: %% author and affiliation information.
67: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
68: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
69: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
70: %% As in the title, you can use \\ to force line breaks.
71:
72: %________________________________________________________________
73: \author{G. \ Lagache\altaffilmark{1}, N. Bavouzet\altaffilmark{1},
74: N. Fernandez-Conde\altaffilmark{1}, N. Ponthieu\altaffilmark{1},
75: T. Rodet\altaffilmark{2}, H. \ Dole\altaffilmark{1}, M.-A. Miville-Desch\^enes\altaffilmark{1},
76: J.-L. Puget\altaffilmark{1}
77: }
78:
79: \altaffiltext{1} {Institut d'Astrophysique Spatiale (IAS), B\^atiment
80: 121, F-91405 Orsay (France); Universit\'e Paris-Sud 11 and CNRS (UMR
81: 8617);
82: [guilaine.lagache, nicolas.bavouzet, nestor.fernandez,
83: nicolas.ponthieu, herve.dole, mamd, jean-loup.puget]@ias.u-psud.fr}
84: \altaffiltext{2} {Laboratoire des signaux et syst\`emes (L2S),
85: Sup\'elec, 3 rue Joliot-Curie, 91190 Gif-sur-Yvette (France);
86: Thomas.Rodet@lss.supelec.fr}
87:
88: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
89: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
90: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
91: %% affiliation.
92:
93:
94: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
95: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
96: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
97: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
98: %% editorial office after submission.
99:
100: \begin{abstract}
101: We report the detection of correlated anisotropies in the Cosmic
102: Far-Infrared Background at 160 $\mu$m. We measure the power spectrum
103: in the {\it Spitzer}/SWIRE Lockman Hole field. It reveals unambiguously
104: a strong excess above cirrus and Poisson contributions, at spatial
105: scales between 5 and 30 arcminutes, interpreted as the signature
106: of infrared galaxy clustering. Using our model of infrared galaxy
107: evolution we derive a linear bias $b=1.74 \pm 0.16$. It is a factor 2
108: higher than the bias measured for the local {\it IRAS} galaxies. Our
109: model indicates that galaxies dominating the 160 $\mu$m correlated anisotropies
110: are at $z\sim 1$. This implies that infrared galaxies at high
111: redshifts are biased tracers of mass, unlike in the local Universe.
112:
113: \end{abstract}
114:
115: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
116: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
117: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
118: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
119:
120: \keywords{infrared: galaxies --galaxies: evolution --
121: (cosmology:) large-scale structure of universe}
122:
123: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper.
124: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep
125: %% and \citet commands to identify citations. The citations are
126: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds
127: %% to the KEY in the \bibitem in the reference list below. We have
128: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus
129: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for
130: %% each reference.
131:
132: %
133: %________________________________________________________________
134: \section{Introduction}
135:
136: The discovery of the Cosmic Far-Infrared Background (CIB) in 1996,
137: together with recent cosmological surveys from the mid-infrared to the
138: millimeter has revolutionized our view of star formation at high
139: redshifts. It has become clear, in the last decade, that infrared
140: galaxies contribute to a large part of the whole galaxy build- up in the
141: Universe. Since the discovery of the CIB, new results on the
142: identification of the sources contributing to the CIB, their redshift
143: distribution, and their nature, are coming out at increasing speed,
144: especially through multi-wavelength analysis (see for a review Lagache
145: et al. \cite{Lag05}). Stacking analysis are also very promising to
146: probe the CIB source populations (e.g. Dole et al. \cite{dole06}, Wang
147: et al. \cite{wang06}, Dye et al. \cite{dye07}). However, up to now,
148: very little information is available on the clustering of infrared
149: galaxies, although getting information on the clustering is essential
150: to understand their formation process and
151: to see how they relate to the other galaxy populations.\\
152:
153: The first three-dimensional quantitative measurements of the
154: clustering strength of Ultra and Hyper Luminous Infrared Galaxies
155: (ULIRGs, HyLIRGs) at high redshifts ($z>1.5$) have been made by Blain
156: et al. \cite{blain04}, Farrah et al. \cite{farrah06} and Magliocchetti
157: et al. \cite{maglio07}. These studies show that ULIRGs and HyLIRGs
158: are associated with the most massive dark matter halos at high
159: redshifts, unlike in the local Universe where the star formation is
160: quenched in the densest environments. CIB anisotropy observations
161: provide a powerful complement to direct high angular resolution
162: observations of individual sources. CIB fluctuations measure, at
163: large angular scales, the linear clustering bias
164: and, at small angular scales, the nonlinear clustering within
165: a dark-matter halo (Cooray \& Sheth \cite{cooray02}). They thus probe
166: both the dark-matter halo mass scale and the physics governing the
167: formation of infrared galaxies within a halo. However, up to now
168: correlated anisotropies have never been firmly detected. In the
169: far-infrared, detection of
170: anisotropies is limited to the Poisson contribution (Lagache \& Puget
171: \cite{Lag00}, Matsuhara et al. \cite{matsu00}, Miville-Desch\^enes et
172: al. \cite{mamd02})\footnote{Note however that Grossan \& Smoot
173: \cite{grossan} report
174: the detection of the clustering signature at 160 $\mu$m.}.\\
175: We report the detection of CIB correlated
176: anisotropies at 160 $\mu$m in the {\it Spitzer} SWIRE Lockman Hole
177: field and give a first constraint on the linear bias.
178: The paper is organised as follow: data are presented in
179: Sect. \ref{sect:data}. The power spectrum is analysed in
180: Sect. \ref{sect:pk}. Finally a summary and discussion are given in
181: Sect. \ref{sect:end}.\\ Throughout this paper we use the cosmological
182: parameters $h=0.71,\Omega_{\Lambda}=0.73,\Omega_{m}=0.27$. For the
183: dark matter linear clustering we set the normalization to
184: $\sigma_{8}=0.8$.
185: %
186: %________________________________________________________________
187: \section{The Lockman hole SWIRE field: map and power spectrum}
188: \label{sect:data}
189: SWIRE has surveyed 49 square degrees distributed over 6 fields in the
190: northern and southern sky (Lonsdale et al. \cite{Lonsdale04}). The
191: Lockman Hole is the largest field with the lowest cirrus emission. It
192: covers about 10 square degrees at 160 $\mu$m.
193:
194: \subsection{Data reduction and map}
195: Raw data were reduced using the Data Analysis Tool (Gordon et
196: al. \cite{gordon05}) version 2.71. We systematically removed each DCE
197: (data collection event) after the stimulator flash to minimize the
198: latency effect. We use the last calibration factor (44.7) to convert
199: {\it MIPS} units to MJy/sr. Data were finally projected on a grid with
200: 15.95 arcsecond pixels.
201: The map is shown on Fig. \ref{last_map}. Further processings were
202: necessary prior to measuring the power spectrum. We first needed to
203: remove residual stripes. This has been done exactly in the same
204: way as in Miville-Desch\^ene \& Lagache
205: \cite{mamd05}. This paper shows that our method efficiently removed
206: residual stripes without affecting the astrophysical signal. We then
207: remove all sources with S$_{160}>$200 mJy (200 mJy is the high
208: reliability threshold, as detailed in Surace et
209: al. \cite{surace05}). For this purpose we use DAOPHOT to detect the
210: sources (the image was wavelet filtered prior to the detection). We
211: then measure the fluxes using aperture photometry. After a fine
212: centering on the sources, we integrate within 25''. Sky values are
213: estimated in an [80''-110''] annulus. We compute the aperture
214: correction -- which is 2.02 -- using an effective instrumental
215: function (that we call PSF for Point Spread Function) measured
216: directly on a {\it MIPS} 160 $\mu$m map. Using an effective PSF
217: rather than the PSF computed using the STinyTim
218: program\footnote{http://ssc.spitzer.caltech.edu/archanaly/contributed/stinytim/}
219: is important to take into account the survey strategy. In the Lockman
220: Hole SWIRE field, the signal-to-noise ratio was not high enough to
221: accuratly measure the PSF. We thus use the GTO/CDFS field in which the
222: integration time is 6 times that in the Lockman hole SWIRE field. We
223: checked that our measured fluxes at 160 $\mu$m were in very good
224: agreement with the SWIRE DR2 catalog (better than 10$\%$ on average).
225: On Fig \ref{last_map} is shown the final map that will be used to
226: compute the power spectrum.
227:
228: \subsection{Power Spectra}
229:
230: There are four contributors to the power spectrum at 160 $\mu$m:
231: cirrus emission, Poisson (shot) noise from discrete unresolved
232: sources, CIB clustering (if any), and instrumental noise. If the
233: noise and the signal are not correlated, the measured power spectrum
234: $P(k)$ follows:
235: \begin{equation}
236: P(k) = \gamma (k) \left[P_{cirrus}(k) + P_{sources} + P_{clus}(k) \right] + N(k)
237: \end{equation}
238: where $k$ is the 2D wavenumber ($k=\sqrt{k_x^2 + k_y^2}$, expressed in arcmin$^{-1}$),
239: $P_{cirrus}(k)$, $P_{sources}$, $P_{clus}(k)$ and $N(k)$
240: are respectively the power spectrum of the
241: dust emission, the shot noise from unresolved sources (constant), the
242: clustering and the noise.
243: The factor $\gamma (k)$ represents the power spectrum of the PSF.
244: To isolate the astrophysical components,
245: we have to determine $N(k)$ and $\gamma (k)$.
246: \\
247: The noise power spectrum $N(k)$ is computed by subtracting two maps of
248: exactly the same region as detailed in Miville-Desch\^enes et
249: al. \cite{mamd02}. We construct two maps using the even and odd
250: scans. As
251: expected, $N(k)$ and $P(k)$ meet at small scales ($k \sim 1$
252: arcmin$^{-1}$) where the signal is noise-dominated. The noise power
253: spectrum $N(k)$ is subtracted from the raw power spectrum $P(k)$.\\
254:
255: One of the critical issues is to correct the power spectrum from the
256: PSF $\gamma (k)$. The PSF at 160 $\mu$m computed using the STinyTim
257: program is very accurate but does not include any effect induced by
258: the observing strategy. We have therefore also extracted direcly the
259: PSF from the data (as discussed in Sect. \ref{sect:data}). The
260: comparison of the power spectrum corrected by these two PSF is shown
261: on Fig. \ref{Pk_raw}. They are in very close agrement but we can
262: notice that the effective PSF gives a better result (i.e. a flat power
263: spectrum for $0.25<k<0.8$ arcmin$^{-1}$, as expected from
264: $P_{sources}$).
265: \\
266:
267: The error bars (shown in Fig. \ref{Pk_tot}) are estimated using a frequentist approach. Mock
268: signal plus noise maps are generated and analysed with the same
269: pipeline as for the data. This gives a set of power spectra of which
270: we compute the covariance matrix. The diagonal elements of the
271: covariance matrix are the errors on the measured power spectrum.
272:
273: \section{Power spectrum analysis}
274: \label{sect:pk}
275:
276: \subsection{Adding low spatial frequency data to constrain the cirrus
277: component} Several studies show that the cirrus component dominate the
278: power spectra at large scales for k$<$0.01 arcmin$^{-1}$
279: (e.g. Miville-Desch\^enes et al. \cite{mamd02, mamd07}). With the SWIRE
280: data only, in such a low interstellar dust column density field,
281: $P_{cirrus}$ cannot be constrained. Larger maps are needed. We
282: therefore compute the power spectrum of a large ($\sim$200 Sq. Deg.) {\it IRIS/IRAS} 100
283: $\mu$m maps (Miville-Desch\^enes \& Lagache
284: \cite{mamd05}).
285: The SWIRE Lockman Hole field is embedded in this large {\it IRIS}
286: map so that the average 100 $\mu$m
287: dust emission is the same in the SWIRE and larger map (4\%
288: difference). Having the same average brightness is important since the
289: normalisation of the cirrus power spectrum in the very diffuse region
290: scales as $I_{100}^2$ (Miville-Desch\^enes et al. \cite{mamd07}). We
291: compute the power spectrum of the 100 $\mu$m map after removing the
292: bright sources as in Miville-Desch\^enes et al. \cite{mamd07}. We
293: keep only the largest scales ($k<$9 $10^{-3}$ arcmin$^{-1}$), where we
294: have only the contribution from the cirrus component -- the
295: CIB being negligible at these very large scales -- and multiply the power
296: spectrum by the average dust emission color $(I_{160}/I_{100})^2$. The
297: color has been computed using DIRBE and FIRAS data. We compute the
298: average $|b|>40^o$ spectrum of the dust emission correlated with the
299: HI gas as in Lagache \cite{lag03}. We then fit the peak of the dust
300: emission spectrum to get the color. We obtain
301: $I_{160}/I_{100}$=2.06. If we take $|b|>30^o$, the color varies by
302: $\sim$10$\%$. We show on Fig. \ref{Pk_raw} the 160 $\mu$m power
303: spectrum derived from {\it IRIS} data together with the 160 $\mu$m
304: {\it MIPS} power spectrum. The spectra agree impressively well. We can
305: thus use this extended $P(k)$ to constrain the cirrus contribution. In
306: the following, the two spectra are stiched so that we use one spectrum
307: from k$\sim$0.001 to 1 arcmin$^{-1}$.
308:
309: \subsection{Detection of an excess at intermediate scales: signature
310: of correlated anisotropies}
311: \label{sec:excess}
312: The cirrus component follows:
313: \begin{equation}
314: \label{pk}
315: P_{cirrus}(k) = P_0 \left(\frac{k}{k_0} \right)^\beta
316: \end{equation}
317: where $P_0$ is the power spectrum value at $k_0$=0.01 arcmin$^{-1}$.
318: $P_0$ and $\beta$ are determined by fitting the power spectrum
319: (see Sect. \ref{allfit}). We obtain $P_0=(2.98 \pm 0.66) \times 10^6$
320: Jy$^2$/sr and $\beta =
321: -2.89 \pm 0.22$. The normalisation can be converted at 100 $\mu$m
322: using the 160/100 color given above; we obtain $P_0(100 \mu m)=7 \times 10^5$
323: Jy$^2$/sr.
324: Considering that the mean cirrus value at 100 $\mu$m in our field is
325: I$_{100}$=0.51 MJy/sr,
326: our measured $P_0(100 \mu m)$ and $\beta$ are in excellent agreement
327: with Miville-Desch\^enes et al. \cite{mamd07}.
328: %(Their Eq. 4 and 5, -2.7 and 7.e5).
329: The power spectrum of the cirrus component (Eq. \ref{pk}) is displayed on
330: Fig. \ref{Pk_raw}.
331: The measured power spectrum clearly has an excess of power w.r.t. the
332: cirrus contribution for $k>$0.3 arcmin$^{-1}$.
333: We interpret this strong excess as
334: the signature of correlated CIB anisotropies.\\
335:
336: We model the correlated anisotropies following Knox et
337: al. \cite{knox01}\footnote{Making a much more
338: complex description of the correlated CIB anisotropies (as for
339: example adding the contribution from the clustering within the same
340: dark matter halo) and the bias is beyond the scope of this paper.}.
341: Using the three-dimensional, linear-theory power spectrum of
342: dark matter density fluctuations today, $P_{M}(k)$ the power
343: spectrum of CIB anisotropies can be written as:
344: \begin{equation}
345: \label{BigEq}
346: C_{l}^{\nu}=\int\frac{dz}{r^{2}}\frac{dr}{dz}a^{2}(z)\bar{j}^2(\nu,z)b^2
347: P_{M}(k)\vert_{k=l/r}G^{2}(z) \equiv P_{clus}(k)
348: \end{equation}
349: where $r$ is the comoving proper-motion distance, k the 3D wavenumber
350: ($k=\sqrt{k_x^2 + k_y^2 + k_z^2}$, in Mpc$^{-1}$), a(z) the scale
351: factor, $\bar{j}(\nu,z)$ is the
352: mean infrared galaxy emissivity per unit of comoving volume,
353: and $G(z)$ is the linear theory growth function. $\ell$ is the angular
354: multipole sets using the Limber approximation, $k= \ell /r$.
355: We assume that the fluctuations in emissivity $\delta j/\bar{j}$
356: are a biased tracer of those in the mass and introduce the bias
357: parameter $b$, that we assume independent of redshift and scale:
358: \begin{equation}
359: \frac{\delta j(\bold{k}, \nu, z)}{\bar{j}(\nu, z)} = b \times
360: \frac{\delta \rho(\bold{k}, z)}{\bar{\rho}(z)}
361: \end{equation}
362: where $\rho$ is the dark matter density field.
363: We compute the emissivity using the infrared galaxy evolution model of Lagache et al. \cite{Lag04}.
364: This model, valid in the range 3-1000 $\mu$m, is in very
365: good agreement with mid-IR to far-IR
366: number counts, CIB observations, resolved sources redshift
367: distributions and local luminosity
368: functions and their evolution up to $z \sim 2$ (e.g. Lagache et al. \cite{Lag04},
369: Caputi et al. \cite{caputi06}, Dole et al. \cite{dole06}, Frayer et
370: al. \cite{frayer06}, Caputi et al. \cite{caputi07}).
371: Fixing the cosmology, the only unkown parameter in
372: Eq. \ref{BigEq} is the bias $b$.
373:
374: \subsection{Measuring the bias}
375: \label{allfit}
376: We fit simultaneously $P_0$, $\beta$, $b$ and $P_{sources}$
377: using the non-linear least-squares curve fitting mpfit
378: program\footnote{http://cow.physics.wisc.edu/$\sim$craigm/idl/idl.html}.
379: We obtain $P_0= (2.98\pm 0.66)\times 10^6$ Jy$^2$/sr, $\beta= -2.89 \pm 0.22$, $b=1.74
380: \pm 0.16$, and $P_{sources}= 9848 \pm 120$ Jy$^2$/sr. $P_0$ and $\beta$ have
381: been discussed in Sect. \ref{sec:excess}. $P_{sources}$ agrees quite
382: well with previous {\it ISOPHOT} determination at roughly the same
383: $S_160$ threshold
384: (Matsuhara et al. \cite{matsu00}). The fact that $P_0$, $\beta$, and
385: $P_{sources}$ are in very good agreement with previous measurements
386: give us confidence in our measurement of the linear bias $b \sim
387: 1.7$. It is well known that in the local Universe infrared galaxies
388: are not biased tracers of the mass. For example, Saunders et
389: al. \cite{saunders92} found $b \sigma _8$=0.69$\pm$0.09 for {\it IRAS}
390: galaxies. Assuming $\sigma _8$=0.8 gives $b=$ 0.86. This bias is
391: roughly comparable to the bias of the SDSS galaxies at $z \sim 0.1$
392: ($b \sim 1.1$, Tegmark et al. \cite{tegmark04}). We measure an average
393: bias about 2 times higher in the CIB anisotropies. Figure \ref{fluc}
394: shows the predicted redshift contribution to the correlated
395: anisotropies. At $k$=0.05 arcmin$^{-1}$, anisotropies from $0.7<z<1.5$
396: infrared galaxies contribute for
397: more $\sim$65\%. Lower redshift galaxies contribute for less than
398: 5\%. This shows that
399: infrared galaxies at z$\sim$1 are much more biased ($\sim$2 times) than locally.
400:
401: \section{Summary and Discussion}
402: \label{sect:end}
403: We presented the power spectrum measured in the {\it Spitzer}/SWIRE Lockman Hole
404: field at 160 $\mu$m. It is very well reproduced by the contribution
405: from three components, cirrus, correlated CIB, and Poisson noise.
406: The cirrus and Poisson contributions are very close to previous measurements.
407: We measure the linear bias, $b=1.74 \pm 0.16$.
408: This bias is likely to be that of infrared galaxies at $z \sim 1$
409: since $z \sim 1$ galaxies are dominating
410: the contribution to the correlated CIB anisotropies (Fig. \ref{fluc})
411: and local galaxies are ``anti-biased''.
412: Such a bias is analog (but somewhat higher) to the bias of the red optical galaxy population at $z \sim 1$.
413: For example, Marinoni et al. \cite{marinoni05} measured a
414: bias of 1.6 at $z \sim 1.2$ for the red $(B-I) >
415: 1.5$ galaxies in the VVDS. Blue galaxies at those redshifts are less biased
416: with a relative bias between red and blue population of 1.4.\\
417:
418: The very strong evolution of the bias (from $\sim$1.7 at $z \sim 1 $
419: to 0.86 at z=0) shows that as time progresses
420: and the density field evolves, nonlinear peaks become less rare events
421: and galaxy formation moves to lower-sigma
422: peaks. Thus galaxies become less biased tracers of the mass density field.
423: Moreover, for the infrared galaxy population it is likely that an additional
424: mecanism contributes significantly to the ``debiasing'' at low redshift.
425: Galaxies in dense environments are found to have suppressed star
426: formation rates (thus no or low infrared emission) and early morphological types
427: compared with those in the field.
428: Environmental effects in particular are important in quenching the star formation
429: through gas stripping (e.g. Postman et al. \cite{postman05}), though on some
430: cluster outskirts, some star formation goes on (Duc et al. \cite{duc02}, Coia et al. \cite{coia05}).
431: The high bias found for infrared galaxies at $z \sim 1$ shows that star
432: formation rates of galaxies are increasing with the environment (as
433: also shown by e.g. Elbaz et al. \cite{elbaz07}).
434: The ``merger bias'' is an alternative,
435: but somehow physically linked, way of boosting the bias at high
436: redshift. Clustering of objects that have undergone recent mergers
437: can be enhanced relative to the clustering of individual halos of
438: comparable masses (e.g. Furlanetto \& Kamionkowski \cite{furna06}; Wetzel et
439: al. \cite{wetzel07}). It is known that the star formation in infrared galaxies is triggered
440: to some extent by mergers in dense environments (at z$\sim$1,
441: 30-50\% of luminous infrared galaxies are major mergers).
442: Thus, the high measured bias may also point to ``merger bias''.
443:
444: %______________________________________________________________
445: \acknowledgments
446: This work is based on observations made with the {\it Spitzer} Space
447: Telescope, which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory,
448: California Institute of Technology under NASA contract 1407.
449: This work benefited from funding from the CNES (Centre National
450: d'Etudes Spatiales) and the PNC (Programme National de Cosmologie).
451: We warmly thanks Asantha Cooray for helpful comments and suggestions.
452: %______________________________________________________________
453: % FINAL REFERENCES
454: \begin{thebibliography}{}
455: \bibitem[2004]{blain04} Blain, A.W., Chapman, S.C., Smail, I., Ivison,
456: R.J. 2004, ApJ, 611, 725
457: \bibitem[2006]{caputi06} Caputi, K.I., Dole, H., Lagache, G., et al.
458: 2006, ApJ, 637, 727
459: \bibitem[2007]{caputi07} Caputi, K.I., Lagache, G., Yan, L., et al.
460: 2007, ApJ, 660, 97
461: \bibitem[2002]{cooray02} Cooray, C.J., \& Sheth, R. 2002, Phys. Rep.,
462: 372, 1
463: \bibitem[2005]{coia05} Coia, D., Metcalfe, L., McBreen, B., et al. 2005,
464: A\&A, 430, 69
465: \bibitem[2006]{dole06} Dole, H., Lagache, G., Puget, J.-L., et al.
466: 2006, A\&A, 45, 417
467: \bibitem[2002]{duc02} Duc, P.-A., Poggianti, B.M., Fadda, D., et al.
468: 2002, A\&A, 382, 60
469: \bibitem[2007]{dye07} Dye, S., Eales, S.A., Ashby, M.L.N., et al.
470: 2007, MNRAS, 375, 725
471: \bibitem[2007]{elbaz07} Elbaz, D., Daddi, E., Le Borgne, D., et al.
472: 2007, A\&A, 468, 33
473: \bibitem[2006]{farrah06} Farrah, D., Lonsdale, C.J., Borys C., et
474: al. 2006, ApJ, 643, 139
475: \bibitem[2006]{frayer06} Frayer, D.T., Farrah, D., Yan, L., et al. 2006, AJ, 131, 250
476: \bibitem[2005]{gordon05} Gordon, K.D., Rieke, G.H., Engelbracht, C.W., et
477: al. 2005, PASP, 117, 503
478: \bibitem[2006]{grossan} Grossan, B., \& Smoot, G.F., 2006, astro-ph/0604512
479: \bibitem[2005]{furna06} Furlanetto, S.R., \& Kamionkowski, M. 2006,
480: MNRAS 366, 529
481: \bibitem[2001]{knox01} Knox, L., Cooray, A., Eisenstein, D., Haiman,
482: Z. 2001, ApJ, 550, 7
483: \bibitem[2005]{Lag05} Lagache, G., Puget, J.-L., Dole, H. 2005, ARAA,
484: 43, 727
485: \bibitem[2004]{Lag04} Lagache, G., Dole, H., Puget, J.-L., et al. 2004,
486: ApJS, 154, 112
487: \bibitem[2003]{lag03} Lagache, G. 2003, A\&A, 405, 813
488: \bibitem[2000]{Lag00} Lagache, G., \& Puget, J.-L. 2000, A\&A, 355, 17
489: \bibitem[2004]{Lonsdale04} Lonsdale, C., Polletta, M., Surace, J., et al.
490: 2004, ApJS, 154, 54
491: \bibitem[2007]{maglio07} Magliocchetti, M., Silva, L., Lapi, A., et al.
492: 2007, MNRAS, 375, 1121
493: \bibitem[2002]{mamd02} Miville-Desch\^enes, M.-A., Lagache, G., Puget,
494: J.-L. 2002, A\&A, 393, 749
495: \bibitem[2005]{mamd05} Miville-Desch\^enes, M.-A., \& Lagache, G. 2005, ApJS, 157, 302
496: \bibitem[2007]{mamd07} Miville-Desch\^enes,
497: M.-A., Lagache, G., Boulanger, F., Puget, J.-L. 2007, A\&A, 469, 595
498: \bibitem[2005]{marinoni05} Marinoni, C., Le F\`evre, O., Meneux, B., et
499: al. 2005, A\&A, 442, 801
500: \bibitem[2000]{matsu00} Matsuhara, H., Kawara, K., Sato, Y., et
501: al. 2000, A\&A, 361, 407
502: \bibitem[2005]{postman05} Postman, M., Franx, M., Cross, N.J.G., et
503: al. 2005, ApJ, 623, 721
504: \bibitem[1992]{saunders92} Saunders, W., Rowan-Robinson M., Lawrence
505: A. 1992, MNRAS, 258, 134
506: \bibitem[2005]{surace05} Surace, J.A., Shupe, D.L., Fang F., et al.,
507: ``Data Release Paper for DR2'', accessible via:
508: http://swire.ipac.caltech.edu/swire/astronomers/data$\_$access.html.
509: \bibitem[2004]{tegmark04} Tegmark, M., Blanton, M.R., Strauss, M.A., et
510: al. 2004, ApJ, 740, 606
511: \bibitem[2006]{wang06} Wang, W.-H., Cowie, L.L., Barger, A.J. 2006,
512: ApJ, 647, 74
513: \bibitem[2007]{wetzel07} Wetzel, A.R., Cohn, J.D., White, M., Holz,
514: D., Warren, M.S. 2007, ApJ, 656, 139
515: \end{thebibliography}
516:
517: \clearpage
518: \begin{figure*}
519: \plottwo{f1a.eps}{f1b.eps}
520: \caption{\label{last_map} {\it Left:} 160 $\mu$m SWIRE map after standard data
521: reduction. {\it Right:} Final map used to compute the power spectrum.
522: Residual stripes have been corrected as in Miville-Desch\^enes \&
523: Lagache \cite{mamd05}. Sources with $S_{160}>$200 mJy have been
524: removed.}
525: \end{figure*}
526:
527: \begin{figure}
528: \plotone{f3.eps}
529: \caption{\label{Pk_raw} Total power spectrum measured in the
530: Lockman Hole at 160 $\mu$m.
531: In black (diamonds), the {\it MIPS}/SWIRE 160 $\mu$m power spectrum
532: ($P(k)-N(k)$, see Eq. 1), in purple (triangles) the {\it IRIS/IRAS} enlarged
533: Lockman Hole field power spectrum at 100 $\mu$m, scaled to the power spectrum at 160 $\mu$m using the 160/100
534: dust color measured at high
535: latitudes ($|b|>$40$^o$). In red and blue, the power spectra corrected from the
536: STinyTim and measured PSF -- $\frac{P(k)-N(k)}{\gamma(k)}$--,
537: respectively. The green dashed-3dotted line represents the best fit
538: cirrus power spectrum, as computed in Sect. \ref{allfit}.
539: }
540: \end{figure}
541:
542: \begin{figure*}
543: \plotone{f4.eps}
544: \caption{\label{Pk_tot} Power spectrum in the Lockman Hole at 160
545: $\mu$m (black diamonds with
546: error bars) with the
547: three components: cirrus (green dashed-3dotted line), clustering
548: (blue, dashed-dotted line), Poisson (light
549: blue, dashed line). The red continuous line is the sum of the three components.
550: }
551: \end{figure*}
552:
553: \begin{figure}
554: \plotone{f5.eps}
555: \caption{\label{fluc} Redshift contribution to the correlated
556: anisotropies at 160 $\mu$m for $b=1.7$.
557: }
558: \end{figure}
559:
560: \end{document}