1: \documentclass[11pt,preprint2]{aastex}
2:
3: \begin{document}
4:
5: \title{A Silver Anniversary Observation of the X-Ray Luminous SN 1978K
6: in NGC 1313}
7:
8: \author{E. Lenz\altaffilmark{1}, E. M. Schlegel\altaffilmark{2}}
9:
10: \altaffiltext{1}{Tom C. Clark High School, San Antonio, TX 78249}
11:
12: \altaffiltext{2}{Department of Physics and Astronomy,
13: University of Texas-San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78249}
14:
15:
16: \begin{abstract}
17:
18: We describe the results of a 2003 {\it Chandra} ACIS-I observation of
19: SN 1978K. The spectrum shows little flux below 0.6 keV, in contrast
20: to the 2002 {\it Chandra} ACIS-S observation which showed flux to 0.4
21: keV. Fitting the ACIS-I spectrum alone leads to two solutions
22: depending upon the value of the column density. A joint fit using a
23: dual thermal plasma model applied to the ACIS-I and a contemporaneous
24: {\it XMM} spectrum, which if fit alone also leads to a two-column
25: solution, yields a single column density fit. The fitted temperature
26: of the joint fit for the soft component remains constant within the
27: errors from previous {\it Chandra, XMM,} and {\it ASCA} data. The
28: hard temperature recovers from its 2000-2002 decline and corresponds
29: to an increase in the column density during that time. The hard (2-10
30: keV) light curve is confirmed to be declining. The derived number
31: density represents a lower limit of $\sim$10$^5$ depending upon the
32: adopted filling factor of the emitting volume, leading to an estimated
33: mass cooling rate of $\sim$0.1-0.15 M$_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$.
34:
35: \end{abstract}
36:
37: \keywords{supernovae: individual (SN1978K); X-rays: stars}
38:
39:
40: \section{Introduction}
41:
42: The late X-ray emission of supernovae remains relatively
43: unexplored. SN 1987A's initial emission turned on near day 115 and
44: merged into the background near day 400 post-explosion
45: \citep{Inoue91}. Recent observations show a reappearance of the
46: emission as the shock propagates into circumstellar matter
47: \citep{Zhekov06}. Other than SN 1987A, the only supernovae studied
48: beyond ${\sim}$500 days have been SN 1978K (\cite{Schlegel04}, and
49: references therein, hereafter, S04), SN 1995N \citep{Chandra05}, SN
50: 1993J \citep{Zimm03}, and SN 1986J \citep{Temple05} plus a few objects
51: recovered at late times (eg, SN 1979C and SN 1970G;
52: \citealt{ImmKuntz05,Immler05}) that presumably will continue to be
53: studied. Of these, SN 1978K has been the most luminous and hence the
54: most frequently observed.
55:
56: Though SN 1978K was first detected as a powerful radio source in 1982
57: \citep{R93}, it was not realized that it emitted X-rays until an
58: observation was obtained with the {\it ROSAT} PSPC in 1992. The
59: subsequent investigation examined archival optical plates, uncovered a
60: light curve and assigned an explosion date near 1978 May 22
61: \citep{R93}. Follow-up observations of SN 1978K in the X-ray,
62: ultraviolet, optical, and radio bands were obtained during the mid-
63: and late-1990s with {\it ASCA}, the {\it Hubble Space Telescope}, the
64: {\it ROSAT} High Resolution Imager (HRI), the Australia Telescope
65: Compact Array (ATCA), and the Anglo-Australian Observatory (AAO)
66: \citep{S99}.
67:
68: S04 described a 2002 {\it Chandra} and a 2000 {\it XMM-Newton}
69: observation of SN 1978K. The spectra were best fit by a
70: two-temperature variable-abundance optically thin gas model with
71: temperatures of 0.6 and $\sim$3 keV. The authors reported Si emission
72: in the soft component at 90\% significance. The flux in the 2-10 keV
73: band showed the first hint of a decline in the X-ray flux from the
74: 1990s plateau.
75:
76: Since the 2004 paper, additional data have become available. Here we
77: briefly describe a {\it Chandra} ACIS-I observation of SN 1978K
78: obtained in 2003 October and an {\it XMM-Newton} observation obtained
79: in 2003 November. We first describe the data and the spectral fit,
80: then discuss the results in the context of the previous observations.
81: Throughout we adopt a distance to NGC 1313 of 4.13$\pm$0.11 Mpc
82: (M\'endez et al. 2002).
83:
84: \section{Data and Analysis}
85:
86: {\it Chandra} observed SN 1978K and the other X-ray emitting sources
87: in NGC 1313 on 2003 Oct 2 for 14,827 seconds with the ACIS detector
88: (observation ID 3551, PI G. Garmire) \citep{Garmire03}. The aim point
89: of the detector fell on the front-illuminated I3 CCD. The aimpoint on
90: the I3 CCD differs from previous observations that were obtained with
91: the back-illuminated S3 CCD; the effective area behaviors of the two
92: types of CCDs differ. We discuss our approach to this difference
93: below.
94:
95: We extracted a background light curve and spectrum from a region
96: proximal to the source. This much larger, source-free region was
97: 1$'$.5 in radius and was positioned immediately west of SN 1978K. We
98: examined the light curve for bright transients or flaring events and
99: did not detect any evidence for either, consequently the good exposure
100: time was not reduced from 14.8 ksec. The net source count rate was
101: $\sim$0.083 ${\pm}$ 0.002 counts s$^{-1}$.
102:
103: We fit the extracted spectra using XSPEC version 12.2.1
104: \citep{Arnaud96}; for the background spectrum, we adopted a simple
105: power law continuum with a gaussian at ${\sim}$1.8 keV to model the
106: possible Si fluorescent feature present in the ACIS background
107: (S04).
108:
109: The source events were extracted and binned to a spectrum using a
110: region at the location of SN 1978K with an aperture of radius
111: $\sim$18$''$.5. Though the sharp point-spread function of the {\it
112: Chandra} mirrors may cause concern about possible event pileup, the
113: large off-axis angle of 2$'$.6 and low net count rate ensure that
114: pileup in this case is negligible.
115:
116: A single spectral bin exists below 0.6 keV which is consistent with
117: the background; this is in marked contrast to the 2002 spectrum for
118: which source events were detected to $\sim$0.4 keV. We refer the
119: reader to S04 for a description of a variety of models that did not
120: provide good fits to that data. Our adopted best-fit model is
121: described below and is based on the best-fit model from 2004 paper.
122:
123: In S04, we used variable-abundance thermal plasma models ('VMEKAL' in
124: {\tt xspec}, \citealt{Arnaud96}). In the interim, updated atomic
125: parameters have become available through the APED project
126: \citep{Smith03}. Along with the database, the project has developed a
127: new thermal plasma model for {\tt xspec} ('VAPEC') that we have used
128: in fitting the data discussed here.
129:
130: To fit the 2003 October {\it Chandra} spectrum, we may either fit the
131: data without regard to previous fits, or constrain the fit assuming
132: little change over the intervening twelve months. This consideration
133: is critical because of the differing spectral responses of the -S and -I
134: chips. Given the effective area behavior of the ACIS-I3 CCD, the
135: critical parameter to constrain is the column density. Fixing its
136: value at 0.15, the best fit from the 2004 paper, we obtain a fit that
137: differs largely in flux: the soft and hard temperatures are
138: essentially identical (Figure~\ref{sn_specCh}, Table~\ref{fit_table},
139: referred to as VAPEC-L, for Low N$_{\rm H}$).
140:
141: If we do not place any constraints on the 2003 spectrum, the fit with
142: the lowest ${\chi}^2/{\nu}$ yields a high column, N$_{\rm H}$
143: $\sim$0.63$^{+0.18}_{-0.19}{\times}$10$^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$ and a low soft
144: temperature of $\sim$0.28 keV (Table~\ref{fit_table}, referred to as
145: VAPEC-H, for High N$_{\rm H}$). The hard temperature drops slightly
146: to 2.22 keV but the error bars cover the value from the dual fit. The
147: anti-correlation between N$_{\rm H}$ and the soft temperature is
148: expected given that there are few data points below ${\sim}$0.8 keV to
149: constrain the parameters separately. We note that the 99\% contour
150: includes the values obtained from the 2000 and 2002 data sets. We will
151: include both possibilities in our discussion.
152:
153: The seemingly abrupt change in the N$_{\rm H}$ parameter could stem
154: solely from the differing behaviors of the effective areas of the -I
155: vs -S CCDs which differ, particularly at energies below $\sim$0.7 keV
156: and above $\sim$4 keV \citep{CPG}. Consequently, a spectral fit to the
157: I spectrum could lead to systematic differences from the previous
158: spectrum.
159:
160: To investigate any possible systematic differences, we extracted a
161: spectrum from an {\it XMM-Newton} observation of SN1978K. The {\it
162: XMM-Newton} observation was obtained on 2003 November 25 (obsid
163: 0150280101, PI I. Smith) for $\sim$12 ksec. The spectrum was
164: extracted after filtering the data to eliminate times of high
165: background that generally afflict {\it XMM} observations. The
166: extracted net spectrum contains $\sim$600 counts. The background
167: spectrum was obtained from 1$'$.6 south of SN1978K's location.
168: It was featureless in the area of interest ($\sim$0.5-3 keV) and
169: represents $<$15\% of the source signal.
170:
171: In fitting the VAPEC model to the {\it XMM} spectrum, we again obtain
172: a dual solution to the soft temperature because of differing values of
173: the column density (Figure~\ref{xmm_Tcont}). Otherwise, the {\it
174: Chandra}-only and {\it XMM}-only fits are similar.
175:
176: To extract the best spectral fit parameters with the least number of
177: constraints, we fit the ACIS-I3 and {\it XMM} data simultaneously.
178: Figure~\ref{sn_spec_both} shows the resulting spectral fit;
179: Figure~\ref{T1T2_cont} shows the temperature contours. The
180: simultaneous fit yields a lower value for the column density than
181: described in S04 (0.12$^{+0.07}_{-0.05}$ vs. 0.23$^{+0.04}_{-0.03}$ in
182: units of 10$^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$), an identical soft temperature
183: (0.64$^{+0.08}_{-0.05}$ keV vs. 0.61$^{+0.04}_{-0.05}$ keV) and a
184: higher hard temperature (3.36$^{+0.72}_{-0.38}$ keV
185: vs. 3.16$^{+0.44}_{-0.40}$ keV), although the 90\% confidence ranges
186: of the hard temperatures overlap.
187:
188: Variable models such as VMEKAL and VAPEC permit altering the
189: abundances of elements known to produce emission lines. We
190: investigated elemental abundances because S04 reported Si to be
191: present in the soft spectral component. We started with all element
192: abundances frozen at 1.0 and checked the spectrum for visible lines.
193: We in turn relaxed and fixed each element's abundance, each time
194: looking for significant changes in the ${\chi}^2$/${\nu}$. In all
195: cases, including Si, within the errors, the abundances were consistent
196: with 1.0 (Figure~\ref{sn_spec_both}). We report upper limits only for
197: Si (Table~\ref{fit_table}).
198:
199: \section{Discussion}
200:
201: We base our discussion on the dual {\it Chandra-XMM} spectral fit
202: because the evidence shows that fitting only one spectrum leads to
203: systematic differences with the prior {\it Chandra} ACIS-S spectra
204: (S04).
205:
206: The normalization values in the hard and soft components for the 2003
207: data (Table~\ref{fit_table}) are nonzero at the 90\% level, so it is
208: evident that the two components remain significantly detected as was
209: true in the 2002 {\it Chandra} observation.
210:
211: To maintain consistency between the 2003 {\it Chandra} data and the
212: earlier {\it XMM-Newton}, {\it ASCA}, and 2002 {\it Chandra} data, we
213: also refit the previously-published spectra using the dual-component
214: VAPEC model. The fits yielded values very similar to those of the
215: published VMEKAL values. The updated numbers are shown in
216: Table~\ref{APEC_table} and are included for completeness. Differences
217: between column densities and temperatures were generally within 5\% of
218: the values published in S04. The {\it ASCA}-1 and {\it ASCA}-2 values
219: appeared to differ the most ($\sim$10-20\%), likely due to the poor
220: low-energy response.\footnote{For additional information, see the {\it
221: ASCA} Guest Observer Facility's "Watch Out" page
222: (heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/asca/watchout.html).}
223:
224: We include in Table~\ref{fluxes} the fluxes for the {\it Chandra} and
225: {\it XMM}-only model fits, the joint {\it Chandra-XMM} fit, as well as
226: the re-fitted spectra from S04. Of particular interest is the soft
227: {\it Chandra} component that shows a high column density. The
228: corresponding unabsorbed flux is very high, demonstrating the
229: necessity for care in handling the ACIS-I spectrum.
230:
231: With a consistent set of model fits, the light curves of the soft and
232: hard components may be constructed. Figure~\ref{lc} displays the soft
233: (top) and hard (bottom) {\it un}absorbed light curves. Both light
234: curves shows a continuing decrease in flux, confirming the decline
235: reported in S04.
236:
237: Though the 2002 and 2003 data share the dual-component structure,
238: significant differences exist between the two epochs. The results are
239: shown schematically in Figure~\ref{param_plot}. Note that the values
240: of two of the parameters have been divided by a constant to place the
241: points into the plot.
242:
243: The soft component kT has held steady within the errors at $\sim$0.6
244: keV. In contrast, the hard component temperature has held steady at
245: $\sim$3.2-3.4 keV with the exception of the day 8910 spectrum, when it
246: dropped to $\sim$2.4 keV at the same time that the column density
247: increased.
248:
249: The column density varied from $\sim$0.15 to 0.25 (in units of
250: 10$^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$) and back. The known column toward NGC 1313 is
251: $\sim$3.7${\times}$10$^{20}$ cm$^{-2}$ (S04). As pointed out in S04,
252: the E$_{\rm B - V}$ value from the optical spectrum is $\sim$0.31
253: which corresponds to N$_{\rm H}$ $\sim$1.6${\times}$10$^{21}$
254: cm$^{-2}$, a value matched by the fitted N$_{\rm H}$ for days 5531,
255: 8184, and 9209/9263. The E$_{\rm B-V}$-derived value also matches the
256: day 6401 column within the errors. The difference between the known
257: column to NGC 1313 and the fitted or derived column values requires
258: considerable absorption local to SN1978K. That the column density
259: increased at day 8910 and then declined suggests the existence of a
260: recent, local density enhancement.
261:
262: Finally, another difference in the two data sets is the abundance of
263: Si. The 2003 spectra show no detection of Si in either component,
264: though the 2002 data showed an abundance well above solar and
265: significant at the 90\% level.
266:
267: The ratio of kT$_{\rm soft}$ and kT$_{\rm hard}$ determines the power
268: law indices, ({\it n} and {\it s}), of the ejecta and circumstellar
269: matter distribution, respectively \citep{Fransson96}. The usual
270: adoption of {\it s} = 2 allows us to solve for {\it n} using one of
271: the predictions of the thin shell model \citep{Fransson96}:
272: (T$_r$/T$_f$) = ((3--s)$^2$/(n--3)$^2$) where T$_r$ is the reverse
273: shock temperature and T$_f$ is the forward shock temperature.
274: {\it Assuming} that T$_r$ is given by T$_{soft}$ and T$_f$ is given by
275: T$_{hard}$, {\it n} is calculated as 5.29${\pm}$0.88 for the 2003 {\it
276: Chandra} observation. The {\it n} values for the 2002 {\it Chandra},
277: {\it XMM-Newton}, {\it ASCA}-2 and {\it ASCA}-1 observations are
278: 4.96${\pm}$0.04, 5.29${\pm}$0.10, 7.97${\pm}$0.62 and 5.23${\pm}$0.83,
279: respectively. The weighted mean value is 5.02. This is a lower value
280: for the power law index than is generally assumed for mass
281: distributions (typically 8-12; \citealt{Fransson96}), but within the
282: errors of other X-ray-emitting SNe (eg, SN1993J, S04). Smaller values
283: of the index lead to longer cooling times as is observed in SN1978K.
284:
285: We may infer X-ray properties following the arguments in \cite{SP06}
286: that were based on analyses first used by Immler and co-workers
287: (summarized in \cite{IL03}). Thermal plasma emission is given by
288: L$_{\rm X}$ = ${\Lambda}(T)n^2_{\rm e}V_{\rm X}$ where ${\Lambda}$(T)
289: is the emissivity, n$_{\rm e}$ is the electron density, and V$_{\rm
290: X}$ is the emitting volume. ${\Lambda}$ is $\sim$10$^{-23}$ erg
291: s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-3}$ for plasmas with temperatures of $\sim$0.5-10 keV
292: in the 0.2-5 keV band \citep{Raymond76}. The quantity n$_{\rm
293: e}V_{\rm X}$ is the volume emission measure. An estimate of the
294: volume then delivers an estimate of the number density from which we
295: may calculate the mass of the cooling gas, M$_{\rm X}$
296: (Table~\ref{inferred}).
297:
298: Table~\ref{inferred} lists the inferred quantities where we also
299: include a volume filling factor, ${\phi}$, that describes the emitting
300: matter within the volume enclosed by the shock. The shock volume is
301: estimated from the maximum observed line width of the 1996 optical
302: spectrum ($\sim$600 km s$^{-1}$, \citealt{S99}). To estimate
303: velocities for the other epochs, we adopt the velocity profile from SN
304: 1988Z, t$^{-(5/7)}$, as described by \citep{Aretxaga99}. We justify
305: the adoption of this velocity profile on the basis of the similar
306: X-ray luminosities and optical spectral line widths. SN1988Z is the
307: only other supernova with sufficient data at late times, hence our
308: adoption of the velocity profile.
309:
310: If the plasma uniformly fills the shock volume, the density must be
311: $>$10$^5$ cm$^{-3}$. An order of magnitude higher density requires a
312: filling factor smaller by the factor ${\sqrt{10}}$. These estimates
313: require the assumption of collisional ionization equilibrium which
314: occurs if the product $n_{\rm e}t > 10^{13}$ s cm$^{-3}$. Our
315: estimates at the age of SN 1978K exceed that criterion by at least a
316: factor of 20.
317:
318: If we take at face value the results of the spectral fits, then the
319: column density increased between 2000 and 2003 from
320: ${\sim}$1.5$\times$10$^{21}$ cm$^{-2}$ to ${\sim}$2.5$\times$10$^{21}$
321: cm$^{-2}$ and back. Is the increase real? The larger effective area
322: of the ACIS-S CCD in the 2002 observation, as well as the longer
323: exposure time, serve to establish that the increase in column density
324: is not an instrumental effect or an artifact of effective area.
325:
326: Is the increase physically reasonable? The path length during that
327: interval increased by ${\sim}$3$\times$10$^{15}$ cm based on the
328: adopted shock velocity from Table~\ref{inferred}. This translates to
329: an increase in the number density from ${\sim}$2--4$\times$10$^5$
330: cm$^{-3}$ to ${\sim}$7-8$\times$10$^5$ cm$^{-3}$, or an increase of a
331: factor of ${\sim}$1.7--2. This range has been observed in SN 2001ig
332: where an increase in the radio flux by a factor of ${\sim}$3 was
333: attributed to an increase in the number density by a factor of
334: ${\sim}$2 over a time span of ${\sim}$150 d \citep{Ryder04}. For
335: SN1978K, the time span could be as long as 400-500 days, assuming the
336: enhancement started immediately after the {\it XMM} observation in
337: 2000 and halted immediately before the {\it Chandra} observation of
338: 2003. Hence we conclude that the increase in column density is
339: physically possible.
340:
341: That the Si abundance also appears to have increased implies enhanced
342: emission as a shock overran a density enhancement and specifically a
343: Si enhancement. A Si enhancement requires production of Si which
344: occurs in stars of mass 11-35 M$_{\odot}$ based on a study of the
345: integrated yield assuming a Salpeter initial mass function
346: \citep{LC06}.
347:
348: In summary, with the 2003 observation, we now see a higher column
349: occurring approximately in 2002. The increase in column density can
350: be explained as an local increase in prior mass loss as observed in
351: several X-ray-emitting SNe (eg, SN1979C, SN2001ig). This behavior
352: argues for increased time sampling of the late phases of
353: X-ray-emitting SNe. The benefit of such observations is the
354: possibility of insight into the mass loss of massive stars. Will, for
355: example, the flux from SN1978K increase if the outgoing shock runs
356: over another density enhancement? We also confirm the decrease in the
357: X-ray flux from SN1978K that started in $\sim$2000-2002 and was first
358: reported in S04, a forlorn epitaph for a silver anniversary.
359:
360:
361: \section{Acknowledgements}
362:
363: We thank the referee for comments that improved this paper.
364: The research of EL and EMS was supported in part by Grant GO4-5017A from the
365: {\it Chandra} X-ray Center operated by the Smithsonian Astrophysical
366: Observatory under contract to NASA.
367:
368:
369: \begin{thebibliography}{}
370:
371: \bibitem[Arnaud(1996)]{Arnaud96} Arnaud, K. A. 1996, in ASP
372: Conf. Ser. 101, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V,
373: ed. G. H. Jacoby \& J. Barnes (San Francisco: ASP), 17
374:
375: \bibitem[Aretxaga et al.(1999)]{Aretxaga99} Aretxaga, I., Benetti, S.,
376: Terlevich, R., Fabian, A. C., Cappellaro, E., Turatto, M., \& Della
377: Valle, M. 1999, MNRAS, 309, 343
378:
379: \bibitem[Chandra IPI Teams(2005)]{CPG} {\it Chandra} Proposer's
380: Observatory Guide (Cambridge: {\it Chandra} X-ray Center)
381:
382: \bibitem[Chandra et al.(2005)]{Chandra05} Chandra, P., Ray, A.,
383: Schlegel, E. M., Sutaria, F., \& Pietsch, W. 2005, ApJ, 629, 933
384:
385: \bibitem[Dopita \& Ryder(1990)]{DR90} Dopita, M., \&Ryder, s. 1990,
386: IAU Circ., 4950, 3
387:
388: \bibitem[Dotani et al.(1987)]{Dotani87} Dotani, T., et al. 1987, Nature,
389: 330, 230
390:
391: \bibitem[Fransson et al.(1996)]{Fransson96} Fransson, C., Lundqvist,
392: P., \& Chevalier, R. 1996, ApJ, 461, 993
393:
394: \bibitem[Garmire et al.(2003)]{Garmire03} Garmire, G. P., Bautz,
395: M. W., Ford, P. G., Nousek, J. A., \& Ricker, G. R., Jr. 2003,
396: Proc. SPIE, 4851, 28
397:
398: \bibitem[Immler et al.(2005)]{Immler05} Immler, S. et al. 2005, ApJ,
399: 632, 283
400:
401: \bibitem[Immler \& Kuntz(2005)]{ImmKuntz05} Immler, S. \& Kuntz,
402: K. 2005, ApJ, 632, L99
403:
404: \bibitem[Immler \& Lewin(2003)]{IL03} Immler, S., \& Lewin, W. 2003,
405: in Supernovae and Gamma-Ray Bursters, ed. K. Weiler (New York:
406: Springer), 91
407:
408: \bibitem[Inoue et al.(1991)]{Inoue91} Inoue, H., Hayashida, K., Itoh,
409: M., Kondo, H., Mitsuda, K., Takeshima, T., Yoshida, K., \& Tanaka, Y.,
410: et al. 1991, PASJ, 43, 213
411:
412: \bibitem[Kaastra(1992)]{K92} Kaastra, J. S. 1992, An X-Ray Spectral
413: Code for Optically Thin Plasmas (Internal SRON-Leiden Rep., ver 2.0;
414: Leiden: SRON)
415:
416: \bibitem[Liedahl, Osterheld \& Goldstein (1995)]{LOG95} Liedahl,
417: D. A., Osterheld, A. L., \& Goldstein, W. H. 1995, ApJ, 438, L115
418:
419: \bibitem[Limongi \& Chieffi(2006)]{LC06} Limongi, M. \& Chieffi,
420: A. 2006, astro-ph/0611140
421:
422: \bibitem[M\'endez et al.(2002)]{Mendez02} M\'endez, B., Davis, M.,
423: Moustakas, J., Newman, J., Madore, B. F. \& Freedman, W. L. 2002, AJ,
424: 124, 213
425:
426: \bibitem[Mewe, Gronenschild \& van den Oord(1985)]{MGV85} Mewe, R.,
427: Gronenschild, E. H. B. M., \& van den Oord, G. H. J. 1985, A\&AS, 62,
428: 197
429:
430: \bibitem[Mewe, Lemen \& van den Oord(1986)]{MLV86} Mewe, R., Lemen,
431: J. R., \& van den Oord, G. H. J. 1986, A\&AS, 65, 551
432:
433: \bibitem[Raymond et al.(1976)]{Raymond76} Raymond, J. C., Cox, D. P.,
434: \& Smith, B. W. 1976, ApJ, 204, 290
435:
436: \bibitem[Ryder et al.(1993)]{R93} Ryder, S., Staveley-Smith, L.,
437: Dopita, M., Petre, R., Colbert, E. J. M. 1994, PASJ, 46, 167
438:
439: \bibitem[Ryder et al.(2004)]{Ryder04} Ryder, S., Sadler, E. M.,
440: Subrahmanyan, R., Weiler, K. W., Panagia, N., Stockdale, C. 2004,
441: MNRAS, 349, 1093
442:
443: \bibitem[Schlegel(1995)]{Schlegel95} Schlegel, E. M. 1995,
444: Rep. Prog. Phys., 58, 1375
445:
446: \bibitem[Schlegel \& Petre(2006)]{SP06} Schlegel, E. M. \& Petre,
447: R. 2006, ApJ, 646, 378
448:
449: \bibitem[Schlegel et al.(1999)]{S99} Schlegel, E. M., Ryder, S.,
450: Stavely-Smith, L., Petre, R., Colbert, E. J. M., Dopita, M., \&
451: Campbell-Wilson, D. 1999, AJ, 118, 2689
452:
453: \bibitem[Schlegel et al.(2004)]{Schlegel04} Schlegel, E. M., Kong, A.,
454: Kaaret, P., DiStefano, R., Murray, S. 2004, ApJ, 603, 644
455:
456: \bibitem[Smith, Brickhouse, \& Liedahl(2003)]{Smith03} Smith, R. K.,
457: Brickhouse, N. S., \& Liedahl, D. A. 2003, IAU JD 23, Atomic Data for
458: X-ray Astronomy
459:
460: \bibitem[Temple, Raychaudhury, \& Stevens(2005)]{Temple05} Temple, R.,
461: Raychaudhury, S., \& Stevens, I. 2005, MNRAS, 362, 581
462:
463: \bibitem[Zhekov et al.(2006)]{Zhekov06} Zhekov, S. A., McCray, R.,
464: Borkowski, K. J., Burrows, D. N., Park, S. 2006, ApJ, 645, 293
465:
466: \bibitem[Zimmermann \& Aschenbach(2003)]{Zimm03} Zimmermann, H. U. \&
467: Aschenbach, B. 2003, A\&A, 406, 969
468:
469: \end{thebibliography}
470:
471:
472: \newpage
473:
474: \begin{table*}
475: \centering
476: \caption{Results of Spectral Fits\tablenotemark{a}}
477: \label{fit_table}
478: \begin{tabular}{lrrrrrrrr}
479: & & & N$_{H}$ & T$_{\rm soft}$ & T$_{\rm hard}$ & & \\
480: Model & ${\chi}_{\nu}^2$ & DoF & (10$^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$ & (keV) & (keV) & Si$_1$, Si$_2$ & Norm-1 & Norm-2 \\ \hline
481: \multicolumn{9}{c}{October 2003 Chandra Spectrum only} \\
482: VMEKAL & 1.220 & 87 & 0.72$^{+0.15}_{-0.26}$ & 0.22$^{+0.09}_{-0.05}$ & 1.97$^{+0.53}_{-0.33}$ & 5.3$^{+3.9}_{-2.2}$, $<$54 & 3.62$^{+17}_{-2.20}$E-3 & 49$^{+7.6}_{-7.5}$E-5 \\
483: %Brems & 1.33 & 83 & 0.93$^{+0.30}_{-0.29}$ & 0.12$^{+0.04}_{-0.02}$ & 1.23$^{+0.41}_{-0.21}$ & 2.72$^{+98}_{-2}$ & 5.97$^{+4.38}_{-2.58}$E-4 \\
484: VAPEC-L & 1.22 & 72 & 0.15f & 0.63$^{+0.11}_{-0.09}$ & 2.61$^{+0.72}_{-0.38}$ & 1.0, 3.19$^{+2.27}_{-1.60}$ & 7.90$^{+1.12}_{-2.10}$E-5 & 3.32$^{+0.45}_{-0.41}$E-4 \\
485: VAPEC-H & 1.17 & 71 & 0.63$^{+0.18}_{-0.19}$ & 0.28$^{+0.10}_{-0.06}$ & 2.22$^{+1.12}_{-0.37}$ & 1.0f, 2.75$^{+2.91}_{-0.88}$ & 1.58$^{+0.28}_{-0.23}$E-3 & 4.03$^{+0.34}_{-0.32}$E-4 \\
486: \\
487: \multicolumn{9}{c}{November 2003 XMM Spectrum only} \\
488: VAPEC & 0.89 & 29 & 0.15$^{+0.08}_{-0.05}$ & 0.62$^{+0.12}_{-0.42}$ & 3.83$^{+4.2}_{-1.6}$ & $<$3.5, $<$3.0 & 8.91$^{+}_{-}$E-5 & 22.89$^{+}_{-}$E-5 \\
489: \\
490: \multicolumn{9}{c}{Dual Chandra/XMM Spectra} \\
491: VAPEC & 0.98 & 95 & 0.12$^{+0.07}_{-0.05}$ & 0.64$^{+0.08}_{-0.05}$ & 3.36$^{+0.53}_{-0.39}$ & $<$4.5, $<$3.3 & 6.71$^{+2.84}_{-2.28}$E-5 & 43.62$^{+3.39}_{-3.17}$E-5 \\
492: & & & & & & & 7.18$^{+3.44}_{-2.13}$E-5 & 23.38$^{+3.64}_{-3.18}$E-5 \\
493: \hline
494: \end{tabular}
495: \tablenotetext{a}{Errors are 90\%; a small 'f' indicates a quantity fixed at the specified value.}
496: \end{table*}
497:
498: \begin{table*}
499: \centering
500: \caption{APEC Fits to Previous CCD-Resolution Spectra\tablenotemark{a}}
501: \label{APEC_table}
502: \begin{tabular}{lrrrr}
503: Observation & Age\tablenotemark{b} & N$_{H}$ & T$_{soft}$ & T$_{hard}$ \\ \hline
504: {\it Chandra} & 8910 & 0.25${\pm}$0.02 & 0.63${\pm}$0.02 & 2.43${\pm}$0.16 \\
505: {\it XMM-Newton} & 8184 & 0.15${\pm}$0.01 & 0.71${\pm}$0.02 & 3.17${\pm}$0.21 \\
506: {\it ASCA}-2 & 6401 & 0.41${\pm}$0.22 & 0.64${\pm}$0.09 & 3.19${\pm}$1.18 \\
507: {\it ASCA}-1 & 5531 & 0.11${\pm}$0.02 & 0.77${\pm}$0.12 & 3.83${\pm}$1.80 \\ \hline
508: \end{tabular}
509: \tablenotetext{a}{Details of the previous observations are listed in
510: \cite{Schlegel04}. Units for the columns are: Age: days; N$_{\rm H}$:
511: 10$^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$; T$_{soft}$ and T$_{hard}$: keV.}
512: \tablenotetext{b}{Age based on date of optical maximum = 1978 May 22, MJD 43650.}
513: \end{table*}
514:
515: \begin{table*}
516: \centering
517: \caption{Fluxes\tablenotemark{a} for VAPEC model\tablenotemark{b}: {\it Chandra}, {\it XMM-Newton}, and {\it ASCA}}
518: \label{fluxes}
519: \begin{tabular}{lrrrrrrrr}
520: & Age & Band & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Complete} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Soft} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Hard} \\
521: Observation & (days) & (keV) & Abs'd & Unabs'd & Abs'd & Unabs'd & Abs'd & Unabs'd \\ \hline
522: joint {\it Chandra} & 9209 & 0.5-2 & 3.33 & 4.65 & 1.06 & 1.59 & 2.27 & 3.07 \\
523: & & 2-10 & 3.58 & 3.64 & 0.04 & 0.05 & 3.54 & 3.59 \\
524: + {\it XMM} & 9263 & 0.5-2 & 2.35 & 3.34 & 1.13 & 1.70 & 1.61 & 1.92 \\
525: & & 2-10 & 1.90 & 1.93 & 0.05 & 0.05 & 1.85 & 1.88 \\ \hline
526: {\it XMM} only & 9263 & 0.5-2 & 2.36 & 3.72 & 1.22 & 2.09 & 1.13 & 1.63 \\
527: & & 2-10 & 2.20 & 2.24 & 0.05 & 0.05 & 2.15 & 2.18 \\
528: {\it Chandra} only & 9209 & 0.5-2 & 3.29 & 4.86 & 1.56 & 2.28 & 2.24 & 3.00 \\
529: Low N$_{\rm H}$ & & 2-10 & 3.58 & 3.64 & 1.10 & 1.11 & 3.51 & 3.56 \\
530: {\it Chandra} only & 9209 & 0.5-2 & 3.30 & 27.2 & 2.25 & 23.8 & 1.46 & 3.76 \\
531: High N$_{\rm H}$ & & 2-10 & 3.41 & 3.63 & 1.15 & 1.12 & 3.35 & 3.60 \\ \hline
532: 2002 {\it Chandra}\tablenotemark{c} & 8910 & 0.5-2 & 4.25 & 6.57 & 2.06 & 3.37 & 2.21 & 3.20 \\
533: & & 2-10 & 2.78 & 2.84 & 0.11 & 0.12 & 2.67 & 2.72 \\
534: {\it XMM-Newton}\tablenotemark{c} & 8184 & 0.5-2 & 4.50 & 7.45 & 2.15 & 3.79 & 2.35 & 3.65 \\
535: & & 2-10 & 3.44 & 3.53 & 0.17 & 0.18 & 3.27 & 3.35 \\
536: {\it ASCA}-2\tablenotemark{c} & 6401 & 0.5-2 & 6.29 & 16.9 & 4.08 & 11.8 & 3.40 & 6.23 \\
537: & & 2-10 & 8.62 & 8.94 & 1.03 & 1.06 & 8.35 & 8.67 \\
538: {\it ASCA}-1\tablenotemark{c} & 5531 & 0.5-2 & 4.25 & 5.30 & 1.02 & 1.31 & 3.21 & 3.96 \\
539: & & 2-10 & 6.37 & 6.43 & 0.08 & 0.09 & 6.29 & 6.34 \\ \hline
540: \end{tabular}
541: \tablenotetext{a}{All fluxes in units of 10$^{-13}$ ergs s$^{-1}$
542: cm$^{-2}$. The values generally differ by a few percent from those
543: reported in \cite{Schlegel04}. We include the values here to be
544: complete, having re-defined the best-fit adopted model from that
545: paper.}
546: \tablenotetext{b}{"Abs'd" and "Unabs'd" represent fluxes determined
547: from the model with (Absorbed) and without (Unabsorbed) the column
548: density component.}
549: \tablenotetext{c}{Fluxes recalculated for VAPEC model; values should be
550: considered to replace those presented in S04.}
551: \end{table*}
552:
553:
554: \newpage
555:
556:
557: \begin{figure}
558: \centering
559: \caption{The best fit VAPEC model to the {\it Chandra} ACIS I3 2003
560: spectrum fitting only the ACIS spectrum. The stepped line indicates
561: the best-fit VAPEC model. The lower stepped line and data are the
562: {\it Chandra} background spectrum and illustrates that the background
563: is a small fraction of the source below $\sim$5 keV.}
564: \label{sn_specCh}
565: %\scalebox{0.35}{\rotatebox{-90}{\includegraphics{sn78k_spec_oct03.ps}}}
566: \scalebox{0.35}{\rotatebox{-90}{\includegraphics{f1.eps}}}
567: \end{figure}
568:
569: %\newpage
570:
571: \begin{figure}
572: \centering
573: %\scalebox{0.35}{\rotatebox{-90}{\includegraphics{xmm_T1T2_cont.ps}}}
574: \scalebox{0.35}{\rotatebox{-90}{\includegraphics{f2.eps}}}
575: \caption{Contour plots of the fitted temperatures for the {\it XMM}
576: November 2003 spectrum illustrating the possible double-valued soft temperature.}
577: \label{xmm_Tcont}
578: \end{figure}
579:
580: %\newpage
581:
582: \begin{figure}
583: \centering
584: \caption{The best fit VAPEC model to the {\it Chandra} ACIS I3 and
585: {\it XMM} MOS-1 2003 spectra. The background spectra have been
586: suppressed for clarity. The upper curve is {\it Chandra}; the lower
587: is {\it XMM}. (See the online journal for a color version of this
588: figure.)}
589: \label{sn_spec_both}
590: %\scalebox{0.35}{\rotatebox{-90}{\includegraphics{sn78k_X1C1_spec_v2.ps}}}
591: \scalebox{0.35}{\rotatebox{-90}{\includegraphics{f3.eps}}}
592: \end{figure}
593:
594:
595: \newpage
596:
597: \begin{figure}
598: \centering
599: %\scalebox{0.35}{\rotatebox{-90}{\includegraphics{sn78k_X1C1_NHT1_cont.ps}}}
600: %\scalebox{0.35}{\rotatebox{-90}{\includegraphics{sn78k_X1C1_NHT2_cont.ps}}}
601: \scalebox{0.35}{\rotatebox{-90}{\includegraphics{f4a.eps}}}
602: \scalebox{0.35}{\rotatebox{-90}{\includegraphics{f4b.eps}}}
603: \caption{Contour plots of the fitted temperatures and column density
604: for the {\it XMM} November and {\it Chandra} 2003 spectra. (top) soft
605: component temperature and column density; (bottom) hard component
606: temperature and column density.}
607: \label{T1T2_cont}
608: \end{figure}
609:
610: %\newpage
611:
612:
613:
614:
615: \begin{figure}
616: \centering
617: %\scalebox{0.35}{\rotatebox{-90}{\includegraphics{sn78k_lc_052.ps}}}
618: \scalebox{0.35}{\rotatebox{-90}{\includegraphics{f5a.eps}}}
619: %\scalebox{0.35}{\rotatebox{-90}{\includegraphics{sn78k_lc_2_10.ps}}}
620: \scalebox{0.35}{\rotatebox{-90}{\includegraphics{f5b.eps}}}
621: \caption{Light curves of (top) soft and (bottom) hard spectral
622: components. The fluxes used in all cases are the {\it un}absorbed
623: values.}
624: \label{lc}
625: \end{figure}
626:
627:
628: \newpage
629:
630: \begin{figure}
631: \centering
632: \caption{Schematic plot of the fitted parameter values vs. time
633: including N$_{H}$, kT$_{\rm soft}$, kT$_{\rm hard}$ and Si abundance.
634: The kT$_{\rm hard}$ and Si abundance values have been divided by a
635: constant to fit them into the range. Several data points have been
636: shifted in age for clarity.}
637: \label{param_plot}
638: %\scalebox{0.35}{\rotatebox{-90}{\includegraphics{sn78k_params.ps}}}
639: \scalebox{0.35}{\rotatebox{-90}{\includegraphics{f6.eps}}}
640: \end{figure}
641:
642:
643: \newpage
644:
645:
646: \begin{table*}[h!]
647: \centering
648: \caption{Inferred Properties of SN1978K}
649: \label{inferred}
650: \begin{tabular}{rrrrrrr}
651: Age & Velocity\tablenotemark{a} & Radius & n$^2_e {\phi} V$\tablenotemark{b} & n$_e {\phi}^{1/2}$ & & M$_{\rm X}$\tablenotemark{d} \\
652: (days) & (km s$^{-1}$) & (pc) & (10$^{61}$ cm$^3$) & (10$^5$ cm$^{-3}$) & ${\phi}_7$\tablenotemark{c} & (M$_{\odot}$) \\ \hline
653: \multicolumn{7}{c}{Soft Component} \\
654: 5531 & 690 & 0.010 & 2.84 & 4.82 & 4.8$\times$10$^{-2}$ & 0.05 \\
655: 6401 & 620 & 0.011 & 26.11 & 12.66 & 1.3$\times$10$^{-1}$ & 0.17 \\
656: 8184 & 520 & 0.011 & 8.06 & 7.03 & 7.0$\times$10$^{-2}$ & 0.10 \\
657: 8910 & 490 & 0.012 & 7.08 & 5.79 & 5.8$\times$10$^{-2}$ & 0.10 \\
658: 9209 & 480 & 0.012 & 3.33 & 3.97 & 3.9$\times$10$^{-2}$ & 0.07 \\
659: 9263 & 475 & 0.012 & 3.55 & 4.10 & 4.1$\times$10$^{-2}$ & 0.07 \\
660: \multicolumn{7}{c}{Hard Component} \\
661: 5531 & 690 & 0.010 & 20.91 & 13.09 & 1.3$\times$10$^{-1}$ & 0.13 \\
662: 6401 & 620 & 0.011 & 30.25 & 13.62 & 1.4$\times$10$^{-1}$ & 0.18 \\
663: 8184 & 520 & 0.011 & 14.21 & 9.34 & 9.3$\times$10$^{-2}$ & 0.13 \\
664: 8910 & 490 & 0.012 & 12.02 & 7.55 & 7.5$\times$10$^{-2}$ & 0.13 \\
665: 9209 & 480 & 0.012 & 13.52 & 8.00 & 8.0$\times$10$^{-2}$ & 0.14 \\
666: 9263 & 475 & 0.012 & 7.71 & 6.04 & 6.0$\times$10$^{-2}$ & 0.11 \\ \hline
667: \end{tabular}
668: \tablenotetext{a}{Velocity estimated adopting velocity profile of t$^{-(5/7)}$ from \cite{Aretxaga99}
669: and based upon the optical emission line width (described in text).}
670: \tablenotetext{b}{${\phi}$ is the dimensionless filling factor; n$^2_eV$ is the emission measure; an
671: estimate of the volume V leads to an estimate of the number density n$_e$.}
672: \tablenotetext{c}{${\phi}_7$ assumes n$_{\rm e}$ = 10$^7$ cm$^{-3}$.}
673: \tablenotetext{d}{M$_{\rm X}$ is the mass of cooling gas in M$_{\odot}$.}
674: \end{table*}
675:
676: \newpage
677:
678:
679: \end{document}
680: