1: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex' 

2: %% 

3: %% Modified 03 Jan 01 

4: %% 

5: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the 

6: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros. 

7:  

8: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document 

9: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore 

10: %% any data that comes before this command. 

11:  

12: %% The command below calls the preprint style 

13: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document. 

14: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use 

15: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes. 

16:  

17: %%\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex} 

18: \documentclass{emulateapj} 

19:  

20: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document: 

21: % \documentclass[manuscript]{aastex} 

22: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document: 

23: % \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex} 

24:  

25:  

26: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so 

27: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before 

28: %% the \begin{document} command. 

29: %% 

30: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts 

31:  

32: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing 

33: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide 

34: %% for information. 

35:  

36: %%\usepackage{pjournal} 

37: \usepackage{natbib} 

38: \usepackage{graphicx} 

39:  

40: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below. 

41:  

42: \slugcomment{to appear in ApJ}% 

43:  

44: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although 

45: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices. 

46: %% The left head contains a list of authors, 

47: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.).  The right 

48: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.  Running heads 

49: %% will not print in the manuscript style. 

50:  

51:  

52:  

53: %% This is the end of the preamble.  Indicate the beginning of the 

54: %% paper itself with \begin{document}. 

55:  

56: \begin{document} 

57:  

58: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than 

59: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if 

60: %% you desire. 

61: \shorttitle{Debris disks in NGC2547} 

62: \shortauthors{Gorlova et al.} 

63:  

64: %________________________________________________________________ 

65:  

66: \title{Debris Disks in NGC 2547}

67: 

68:  

69: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format 

70: %% author and affiliation information. 

71: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command 

72: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address 

73: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter. 

74: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks. 

75:  

76: \author{N. Gorlova$^{1,2}$, Z. Balog$^2$, G. H. Rieke$^2$, J. Muzerolle$^2$,

77: K. Y. L. Su$^2$, V. D. Ivanov$^3$, E. T. Young$^2$} 

78: \affil{$^1$Department of Astronomy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-2055, {\it ngorlova@astro.ufl.edu}}

79: \affil{$^2$Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, 933 North Cherry Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85721-0065}

80: \affil{$^3$European Southern Observatory, Ave. Alonso de Cordova 3107, Casilla 19, Santiago 19001, Chile } 

81: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which 

82: %% identified by the \altaffilmark after each name.  Specify alternate 

83: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each 

84: %% affiliation. 

85:  

86:  

87: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript 

88: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the 

89: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author 

90: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the 

91: %% editorial office after submission. 

92:  

93: \begin{abstract}

94: 

95: We have surveyed the 30 Myr-old cluster NGC 2547 for planetary debris disks using {\it Spitzer}.

96: At 4.5--8 $\mu$m we are sensitive to the photospheric level down to mid-M stars (0.2 M$_{\odot}$) 

97: and at 24 $\mu$m to early-G stars (1.2 M$_{\odot}$). We find only two to four stars with

98: excesses at 8 $\mu$m out of $\sim$400--500 cluster members, resulting in an excess fraction $\lesssim$1\% at this wavelength. 

99: By contrast, the excess fraction at 24 $\mu$m is $\sim$40\% (for B--F types).

100: Out of four late-type stars with excesses at 8 $\mu$m

101: two marginal ones are consistent with asteroid-like debris disks.

102: Among stars with strong 8 $\mu$m excesses one is possibly

103: from a transitional disk, while another one

104: can be a result of a catastrophic collision. Our survey demonstrates that the inner 0.1--1 AU parts

105: of disks around solar-type stars clear out very thoroughly by 30 Myrs of age.

106: Comparing with the much slower decay of excesses at 24 and 70 $\mu$m, disks clear from the inside out,

107: of order 10 Myr for the inner zones probed at 8 $\mu$m compared with a hundred or more 

108: Myr for those probed with the two longer wavelengths. 

109: 

110: \end{abstract}

111:  

112: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented 

113: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors 

114: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine 

115: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate. 

116:  

117: %% Authors who wish to have the most important objects in their paper 

118: %% linked in the electronic edition to a data center may do so in the 

119: %% subject header.  Objects should be in the appropriate "individual" 

120: %% headers (e.g. quasars: individual, stars: individual, etc.) with the 

121: %% additional provision that the total number of headers, including each 

122: %% individual object, not exceed six.  The \objectname{} macro, and its 

123: %% alias \object{}, is used to mark each object.  The macro takes the object 

124: %% name as its primary argument.  This name will appear in the paper 

125: %% and serve as the link's anchor in the electronic edition if the name 

126: %% is recognized by the data centers.  The macro also takes an optional 

127: %% argument in parentheses in cases where the data center identification 

128: %% differs from what is to be printed in the paper. 

129:  

130: \keywords{infrared: stars --- circumstellar matter --- planetary systems: formation --- 

131:  open clusters and associations }

132: 

133:  

134: %% \keywords{globular clusters: general --- 

135: %% globular clusters: individual(\objectname{NGC 6397}, 

136: %% \object{NGC 6624}, \objectname[M 15]{NGC 7078}, 

137: %% \object[Cl 1938-341]{Terzan 8})} 

138:  

139: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper. 

140: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep 

141: %% and \citet commands to identify citations.  The citations are 

142: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds 

143: %% to the KEY in the \bibitem in the reference list below. We have 

144: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus 

145: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for 

146: %% each reference. 

147:  

148: \section{Introduction} 

149: 

150: The 5 to 50 Myr age range is critical for tracing the formation of terrestrial planets. 

151: At the beginning of this range, protoplanetary disks are ending their lives, the gas

152: has mostly escaped the system, and the remaining material is in the form of solid bodies

153: that do not yet approach planetary scale \citep{Meyer06,Hernandez05,Pascucci06,Sicilia07}.

154: By the end of the range, planetary embryoes thousands

155: of kilometers in size have formed in the inner few AU zone \citep{Chambers01, Kenyon06}. 

156: They are capable of stirring up smaller bodies and creating collisional cascades,

157: forming debris disks that might take a number of forms, such as a single ring \citep{Kenyon04a},

158: or of numerous rings in the presence of giant planets that gravitationally scatter

159: and trap dust into resonances \citep{MoroMartin02}. The Earth-Moon system was created

160: in a grand collision at this age \citep{Kleine02}. These debris systems are warmed by the central

161: stars and emit in the mid- and far-infrared. Therefore, by studying the infrared excess emission

162: of stars over this range of ages, we can characterize some features of the early evolution of terrestrial planets. 

163: 

164: NGC 2547 is an excellent target to examine the late stages of this critical period.

165: It is a rich open cluster in the Southern Hemisphere

166: at a distance of 400-450 pc \citep{Claria82,Naylor02}. \citet{Claria82} was first to carry out an extensive

167: photoelectric survey (in the $UBV$ bands) and determine its main properties.

168: He identified 70 members up to $V=13.4^{m}$ (B3 to $\sim$K0) and estimated the age to be

169: between 30 and 80 Myr from the brightest members at the Main Sequence (MS) turn off. Despite

170: lying only 8$\degr$ from the Galactic plane, the cluster was found to have only a small amount of reddening,

171: $E(B-V)$=0.06 $\pm$ 0.02.

172: \citet{Jeffries98} and \citet{Naylor02} extended the cluster sequence further 

173: down to $V=20^{m}$ (mid-Ms or $\sim$0.2 M$_{\odot}$, according to the models of

174: \citet{Siess00}),

175: by carrying out a $BVI$ survey within 15$\arcmin$ from the cluster center 

176: and identifying counterparts to \textit{ROSAT} sources.

177: Recently, \citet{Jeffries04} performed an $RIZ$ survey identifying members in the

178: substellar domain (down to 0.05 M$_{\odot}$).

179: \citet{Jeffries98} inferred an age of 10--20 Myr from isochronal fitting to the low mass pre-MS population,

180: at odds with the estimate of  $\sim$50 Myr from the cluster turn-off (though the latter is defined by only one or two stars).

181: The first measurements of lithium depletion in the K-M members again favored 50 Myr,

182: casting doubt on the validity of the pre-MS evolutionary models \citep{Jeffries03,Oliveira03}.

183: The age discrepancy was finally reconciled at 30 $\pm$ 5 Myr based on more precise observations

184: of X-rays with \textit{XMM-Newton} \citep{Jeffries06} and of the Li 

185: depletion boundary with the VLT \citep{Jeffries05}. The most recent $UBVRI$ study of  \citet{Lyra06}

186: confirms a 30--40 Myr age range after fitting four independent contraction tracks;

187: the distance and reddening from this study are on the low side of the previous range of

188: estimates (390 pc and $E(B-V)=0.03$). 

189: 

190: By comparing the disk population in NGC 2547 with clusters and field stars

191: of different ages we can verify whether indeed this age corresponds to a high level

192: of planetesimal activity, and whether the time-scale for inner planet formation differs among stars

193: of various masses. The \textit{Spitzer} survey of \citet{Young04} demonstrated the lack of dust near

194: the sublimation temperature for the bulk of members down to mid-K, while $\sim$200 K dust was

195: found for a quarter of the early-type members. An ambiguity remained for late K--M stars however,

196: where mid-IR excesses were marginally detected in a dozen stars. The uncertainty was partly due to

197: measurement errors, but also due to low number statistics of known members for the empirical

198: determination of the photospheric locus in the \textit{Spitzer} bands. 

199: 

200: The present study is a re-analysis of the \textit{Spitzer} data for NGC 2547 first presented in \citet{Young04}.

201: That study was performed early in the \textit{Spitzer} mission; we can now use improved image processing techniques

202: and flux calibrations, resulting in more precise photometry. Secondly, to identify debris disks we apply improved

203: color-selection criteria developed in the successive studies of other clusters, within the framework of the MIPS

204: open cluster survey \citep{Gorlova04, Gorlova06, Siegler06}. Thirdly, we use a new extended membership list,

205: allowing an improvement in the statistical significance of the results. We therefore can probe disks around the lower mass

206: stars and over the full area covered by \textit{Spitzer}. Finally, we report a multi-slit medium-resolution spectroscopic

207: survey of a subsample of photometric members. We improve the spectroscopic membership list for F-M stars

208: and confirm chromospheric emission in K and M members, a result that was somewhat ambiguous in previous studies. 

209: 

210: \section{Observations and Data Reduction}\label{red} 

211: 

212: \subsection{\textit{Spitzer} Photometry}

213: 

214: \textit{Spitzer} observed a $\sim 1\degr$-wide area centered on NGC 2547

215: with the IRAC and MIPS instruments at 3.6, 4.5, 5.8, 8.0, and 24 $\mu$m central wavelengths.

216: Observations of NGC 2547 with IRAC were obtained on Dec 19, 2003.

217: The high dynamic range mode survey with integration times of 0.4 s and 10.4 s covers about half 

218: a square degree centered on RA=08:10:13 and DEC=$-$49:13:25. The observation was repeated

219: twice in each position giving a total of 20.8 s integration time. The BCD frames from the SSC pipeline 13.2 were processed

220: and mosaiced using a custom IDL program provided by the IRAC team. We then performed photometry

221: for a new member list (\S\ref{memb}). Source finding and aperture photometry for IRAC were carried out

222: using {\tt PhotVis} version 1.10 which is an IDL-GUI based photometry visualization tool \citep{Gutermuth04}.

223: The radii of the source aperture, and the inner and outer sky annuli were at 2.4, 2.4 and 7.2 arc-second respectively.

224: We converted the MJy/sr units to DN/s using conversion factors 0.1088, 0.1388, 0.5952, and 0.2021 for channels

225: 1, 2, 3, and 4 respectively. Then we calculated the standard IRAC magnitudes

226: using $-2.5\cdot log(flux_{DN/s})+zp$ where $zp$ is 21.9929, 21.2583, 19.0747 and 19.4372 for channels

227: 1--4 respectively. The zero point term $zp$ includes: 1) the zero point of the flux

228: to magnitude transformation based on the large aperture

229: measurements of a standard star (19.66, 18.94, 16.88, 17.39 mag

230: for channels 1--4); 2) the aperture corrections

231: to account for the difference between the aperture sizes used for the standard star and for NGC~2547 photometry

232: ($-0.21$, $-0.23$, $-0.35$ and $-0.50$ mag for channels 1--4);

233: 3) 2.54 mag correction for exposure time in the mosaic. Originally we accepted all sources with photometric error less than 0.2 mag

234: as good detections, then we examined the detected sources visually to clean the sample of spurious

235: detections and non-stellar objects. However, because the IRAC images were obtained with only two dithers,

236: this procedure is limited at removing the effects of the cosmic rays. This issue is discussed further in \S \ref{iracexc}. 

237: We compared our photometry with the photometry of \citet{Young04} and found that the two datasets

238: agree within the errors. The IRAC counterparts of the known members of NGC 2547 were found

239: using a 2$\arcsec$ matching radius. 

240: 

241: The Multi-band Imaging Photometer for Spitzer (MIPS)

242: observed NGC 2547 at 24 $\mu$m on Jan 28, 2004 \citep{Young04}.

243: We used the image of \citet{Young04} but re-did the photometry. 

244: At 24 $\mu$m we performed PSF-fitting photometry; this approach is preferred

245: (compared to the aperture photometry we used with IRAC data) because of the good PSF sampling;

246: it also helps suppress the effects of the complex background at this wavelength. The procedure was identical

247: to that \citet{Gorlova06} initially applied to the Pleiades. Briefly, we first applied the {\sc iraf} package

248: {\tt daophot}, task {\tt phot} to obtain aperture photometry for the cluster members based on 2MASS coordinates.

249: We used these results as input into task {\tt allstar} with the template PSF constructed from 19 isolated

250: stars in our image with a range of brightness. The calibration of the PSF-fitting photometry is based

251: on a comparison of it with the aperture photometry of these isolated, well-measured stars.

252: To put instrumental magnitudes produced by {\tt allstar} into the ``Vega system'', we used the following

253: conversion factors: the aperture correction for an aperture radius of 3.5 px (1 pixel$=1.247\arcsec$)

254: and sky annulus from 5 to 10.5 pixels is 0.86 mag; 1 DN/s/px$=$ 1.63742E-06 Jy/px; $[24]=0^{m}$ is

255: equivalent to 7.14 Jy. The {\tt allstar} re-centered coordinates deviate by no more than 2$\arcsec$ from

256: 2MASS coordinates, except for a few of the faintest members and bright extended objects. 

257: 

258: Our \textit{Spitzer} photometry for optical candidate members

259: is given in Tables \ref{table1a} and \ref{table1b}.

260: Out of 860 objects we detect 606, 638, 589, 582, and

261: 84 at maximum magnitudes 15.5, 15.7, 15.4, 15.0, and 11.7

262: in IRAC channels 1--4 and at MIPS 24 $\mu$m respectively.

263: We achieve 3--5 times more detections 

264: and go 1--2 mag deeper than \citet{Young04}.   

265: Figure \ref{fig1} shows the \textit{Spitzer} view of NGC 2547 composed of

266: the 4.5, 8 and 24 $\mu$m maps.

267: Fig. \ref{fig2} shows the 8 $\mu$m image onto which we

268: have overplotted the optical members,

269: those detected at 4.5, 8,

270: and 24 $\mu$m respectively, and the subsample we observed spectroscopically.

271: The IRAC images have a good match in depth and coverage 

272: to the optical surveys (except for a 0.2$\degr$ NE offset 

273: of the 3.5 and 5.8 $\mu$m channels from the cluster center).

274: The MIPS coverage is only slightly smaller in the NS direction,

275: but confusion with background sources and interstellar (ISM) nebulosity

276: limits its sensitivity to intermediate mass members

277: in the center of the cluster.

278: 

279: \subsection{Multi-slit Spectroscopy}

280: 

281: To evaluate the level of contamination

282: of our sample of photometrically selected members, as

283: well as to investigate the properties of excess sources, we have obtained

284: medium-resolution spectra in the red for a number

285: of candidate members, covering a wide range

286: of spectral types from B to mid-M.

287: These sources are marked by open circles in the

288: color-color plots in this paper.

289: 

290: The observations were performed in two runs in 2005 with the multi-object

291: spectrograph IMACS on the 6.5m Baade telescope (Magellan-1) at Las Campanas,

292: Chile. The atmospheric conditions were excellent with seeing typically around 0.6$\arcsec$.

293: We observed 3 fields with 5 masks. Two 15$\arcmin \times 15\arcmin$ fields were centered

294: on the cluster center and one was adjacent to the North-West (Table \ref{tablemasks}, 

295: Fig. \ref{fig2}). For the central fields we created separate masks for bright stars ($V=8-13^{m}$)

296: and faint stars ($V=13-20^{m}$) to avoid bleeding from the bright stars in long exposures. 

297: The faint masks contained 20--30 slits each. About a quarter of the spectra were rejected in

298: the final analysis due to overlap with other spectra, closeness to chip edges, or underexposure. 

299: 

300: We observed with the f/4 camera, 2$\times$2 binning (for higher S/N),

301: 6$\arcsec$ $\times$ 0.7$\arcsec$ slits and the 1200 lines/mm grating, at the maximum

302: available angle of 32$\degr$.8 in 1st order. The spectra were dispersed across 4 chips

303: resulting in 3 gaps $\sim$100 \AA\,-wide. The aim was to target the region around the

304: Ca II IR triplet at 8500-8700 \AA\, at the maximum resolution. With a plate scale

305: of 0.22$\arcsec$/binned pixel, this resulted in resolution of 1 \AA\, (for 0.6$\arcsec$ seeing),

306: or $R=8,200$ (36 km/s) at the central wavelength of 8350 \AA\,. When reducing the data however we

307: discovered that the filter we used transmitted also in the 2nd order, contaminating the targeted red region

308: with 3600--4750 \AA\, flux. This affects mostly F-K stars that have strong metallic lines in the blue.

309: The effect is reduced at higher airmass. We alleviated the order overlap problem by carrying out

310: a spectral analysis relative to several templates chosen from the sample itself (as discussed in \S \ref{sp}),

311: and also with reference to external digital libraries that cover both spectral regions. 

312: 

313: We normally observed 3 science exposures, followed by quartz flat fields

314: and He-Ne-Ar arcs. Bias frames were obtained every other night.

315: The reduction was performed with the IMACS reduction package

316: {\sc Cosmos}, that performs alignment of the frames,

317: summation with cosmic ray rejection, flat-fielding,

318: wavelength calibration, sky subtraction

319: and 2-dimensional spectrum extraction. Final extraction was performed with the {\sc iraf} task

320: {\tt apall}.

321: 

322: In total, we extracted spectra for 88 sources, 84 of which are

323: in our member lists (Tables \ref{table1a}, \ref{table1b}).

324: 2MASS 08093815-4918403 was resolved into 2 objects 1$\arcsec$ apart.

325: With seeing of 0.6$\arcsec$, the wings of the spectral PSFs overlap,

326: so we carried out their extraction with reduced aperture size.

327: The spectrum of the brighter source was given designation ``a'', and of the fainter one ``b''.

328: One more object was resolved into a pair -- 2MASS 08100398-4913027,

329: but only the spectrum of the brighter star was extracted.

330: The companion star is 1.3$\arcsec$ NE away, unresolved in 2MASS, and probably explains

331: the non-stellar flag in \citet{Jeffries04}. 

332: 

333: \subsection{Near-Infrared Spectroscopy}

334: 

335: For two solar-type members with strong \textit{Spitzer} excesses,

336: ID 8 \& 9, we obtained

337: K-band spectra targeting the CO band-head at 2.3 $\mu$m

338: to verify that these stars are not late-type interlopers.

339: The spectra were obtained with SofI (Son of ISAAC;

340: \citet{Moorwood98}) at the ESO 3.6m NTT telescope

341: on September 5, 2006. 

342: We used the medium resolution mode ($R=1300$)

343: with a 1$\arcsec$ wide slit.

344: The data were taken by nodding the target

345: along the slit. For each target

346: we obtained 4 images of 150 sec integration each. 

347: 

348: The data reduction consisted of the usual steps: flat fielding, sky

349: subtraction, and extraction of a one-dimensional spectrum from each

350: frame. Then, we wavelength calibrated the spectra with images of

351: Neon and Xenon lamps and combined the individual spectra into a

352: single spectrum. A B2.5 V star HIP 041781 and a G2 V HIP 43141 A 

353: were observed for telluric absorption correction.

354: Both targets and standards were observed at a narrow airmass

355: range of 1.4--1.5. Considering that the target stars

356: were expected to be of G--K type, to preserve

357: numerous weak atomic lines dominating their spectra,

358: we preferred to divide out telluric absorption with a B

359: rather than a G-type standard.

360: The K-band spectrum of a main sequence B star

361: is essentially featureless except for the

362: Br$\gamma$ line at 2.166 $\mu$m \citep{Hanson96},

363: which we removed by continuum interpolation

364: before division. A G-type telluric standard was reduced

365: in a similar way and served as a reference. 

366: The continuum shape of the final spectra

367: was straightened with a low-order polynomial,

368: to facilitate comparison of line strengths with spectroscopic standards

369: from the literature (Sec. \ref{trans}).

370: 

371: 

372: \section{Cluster Membership}\label{memb}

373: 

374: \subsection{Photometric Sample} 

375: 

376: \citet{Young04} used a sample of 184 stars from \citet{Naylor02} with membership

377: based on \citet{Dantona97} (DM97) isochrones, of which 169 were detected at least

378: in one IRAC band and 31 at 24 $\mu$m. \citet{Rieke05} report 24 $\mu$m measurements

379: for an additional 15 B-A members. Since then a deeper and wider survey has been carried

380: out in the $RIZ$ bands by \citet{Jeffries04}, that covers the central area within a 30$\arcmin$

381: radius from the cluster center, plus two fields 60$\arcmin$ away. Their $RIZ$ sample consists

382: of DM97 and \citet{Baraffe02} (BCAH02) - selected objects (their Tables ``A3'' and ``A2'' respectively).

383: In short, the selection process consisted of finding for each model a semi-empirical isochrone that best fits

384: color-magnitude diagrams of X-ray sources in NGC 2547 and the brown dwarfs in the Pleiades,

385: and identifying as members sources that lie 0.25 mag below and 0.9 mag above this isochrone,

386: which accounts for the photometric errors and unresolved binaries respectively.  

387: For our survey we decided not to give preference to either of the evolutionary

388: calculations and formed member sample by including all sources from both tables. The brightest stars

389: were saturated in this survey, we therefore complemented it 

390: with the ``enhanced catalog'' from \citet{Littlefair03} (``Table 1'') 

391: that is a combination of the \citet{Naylor02} $BVI$ ``wide catalog'' with the $UBV$ catalog of \citet{Claria82}.

392: The tables are available in electronic form at the Cluster Collaboration's Photometric Catalog

393: Page\footnote{{\tt http://www.astro.ex.ac.uk/people/timn/Catalogues/description.html}}. 

394: 

395: A number of $BV$-selected candidate members do not have $RIZ$ counterparts

396: in Table ``A2'' or ``A3'' of \citet{Jeffries04}. 

397: They are however listed in their Table ``A1'', 

398: which contains $RIZ$ photometry for everything in the NGC 2547 field.

399: After checking image quality flags for these sources,

400: we retained in the main member list (Table \ref{table1a})

401: those that were omitted apparently because of the saturation in the $RIZ$ bands. 

402: Those with non-stellar designation, flawed photometry due to bad pixels,

403: closeness to the CCD edge, or problematic background, as well as fainter sources

404: with good $RIZ$ photometry but not placed into tables ``A2'' and ``A3'' anyway,

405: were all moved into a separate table of less probable members (Table \ref{table1b}).

406: After removal of $\sim$4\% of sources without 2MASS counterpart within 2$\arcsec$,

407: the total number of objects in the two tables is 860.

408: 

409: \subsection{Spectroscopic Subsample}\label{sp}

410: 

411: Because of the unfortunate overlap of the blue and red regions

412: in our spectra, spectral classification is not trivial.

413: To interpret the spectra we first plotted them

414: along a sequence in $V-K$ color, assuming that members would form

415: a monotonic sequence of spectral line strengths from which excess members and 

416: interlopers might stand out.

417: Fig. \ref{fig3} shows representative spectra along this sequence,

418: while Fig. \ref{fig4} shows spectra of excess candidates (\S\ref{exc}).

419: The segments shown contain prominent features used in spectral classification.

420: 

421: We found variability in the strength of the blue spectrum

422: that correlates with the airmass of observations.

423: The February observations were obtained at a slightly larger airmass

424: and the blue lines are weaker than in December.

425: As a result, we can not accurately differentiate between late F to K classes

426: based on the strength of such

427: classical indicators as Ca II H \& K, Balmer lines and the G-band.

428: The IR Ca II triplet itself does not vary significantly between F--K types \citep{Allen95,Carquillat97},

429: while the weaker Fe I and Ti I lines get mingled with metallic lines from the blue.

430: On the other hand, we can confidently identify B--A types based on the presence of the Pashen series,

431: and M types based on the K I and Na I strong lines in the red. Our analysis

432: significantly expands the spectral characterization of the cluster population, which previously

433: concentrated on the brightest B--A members

434: and a few K--M stars for the Li studies.

435: 

436: To measure radial velocities, we split our spectroscopic sample

437: into four groups that we designate ``B--F'', ``G'', ``K'' and ``M'',

438: with 13, 13, 40 and 23 objects respectively.

439: The names of these radial velocity groups

440: only roughly represent spectral types, due to variations

441: in the visibility of the blue spectrum. 

442: Within each group we picked a template to use for cross correlation,

443: requiring only for it to be of high S/N and contain no

444: chip gaps or bad pixels in the main features of interest.

445: These templates are 2MASS 08095066-4912493, 08095109-4859022,

446: 08101944-4907444, and 08092437-4906282 respectively.

447: 

448: We measured the radial velocities of these templates using 3--6 

449: lines of Ca II, Fe, Ti in the 8500--8700 \AA\, interval

450: with line identifications from \citet{Munari99}.

451: We obtained 27.4, 58.0, -20.6 and 21.1 km/s with an RMS uncertainty

452: of few km/s.

453: We then used the {\sc iraf} task {\tt fxcor} to correlate

454: the template spectra with the objects in each group in the same 8500--8700 \AA\, region,

455: and converted the relative wavelength shifts into heliocentric velocities.

456: \citet{Robichon99} reports the radial velocity for the cluster to be 14.4 $\pm$ 1.2 km/s based on 5 stars,

457: \citet{Claria82} 15.4 km/s based on 10 stars,

458: and \citet{Jeffries00} 12.8 km/s $\pm$ 0.9 based on 20 stars.

459: Since we did not observe radial velocity standards, to put our measurements on the absolute scale,

460: we averaged our values in the M group (for which we achieved the highest accuracy)

461: to obtain 21.7 km/s (with RMS$=\pm$3.5 for 22 stars) and then subtracted

462: 8.9 km/s from all our values to put them on the same scale

463: as in \citet{Jeffries00}.

464: 

465: The histograms of these adjusted radial velocities

466: for each radial velocity group and for all the groups together are plotted in

467: Fig. \ref{fig5}, while the individual values are listed

468: in Table \ref{tablesp}.

469: Two 1 $\sigma$ error bars are shown in each panel of Fig. \ref{fig5},

470: $\sigma_{abs}=$2--5 km/s being the uncertainty of the standard star velocity determination,

471: and $\sigma_{rel}=$1--6 km/s an average uncertainty of the relative velocity

472: between the standard and a given star in the group.   

473: The first error gives the limit on the

474: shift of the entire distribution along the x-axis,

475: while the second error contributes to the width of the distribution.

476: $\sigma_{abs}$ is taken to be the RMS deviation from the mean

477: when measuring velocity of the standard from several lines;

478: it compares well with the uncertainty of the wavelength calibration

479: of the arc lamp spectrum.

480: $\sigma_{rel}$ is calculated by {\tt fxcor} based on the goodness of the match

481: of the target and the shifted standard spectra;

482: it only exceeds $\sigma_{abs}$ in the BF group, due to

483: the cross-correlation of the broader hydrogen lines.

484: The larger $\sigma_{abs}$ of the G standard

485: is due to strong blending with the blue spectrum,

486: which makes it difficult to identify clean lines for the radial velocity determination.

487: A secondary peak at $\sim$75 km\,s$^{-1}$ in the K group

488: is real and most certainly arises from contaminating background stars, as one might expect in this spectral range.

489: \citet{Naylor02} estimated that the contamination

490: of the $BVI$ sample by background stars is negligible,

491: except in the 14.0 $<V<$ 15.5 range where the cluster

492: sequence crosses the ``finger'' of Galactic red giants

493: and contamination is predicted to be as high as 40\%.

494: The combined histogram at the bottom panel does not include the 4 earliest type

495: stars with the biggest $v\,sin\,i$ and discrepantly large radial velocities.

496: It can be used to identify as potential non-members stars with radial velocity $\gtrsim$50 km/s.

497: None of them appears among the 8 $\mu$m excess objects, and only one has

498: a possible 24 $\mu$m excess (2MASS 08101474-4912320).

499: 

500: \subsection{Proper Motions}\label{pm}

501: 

502: As an additional constraint on membership, we analyzed proper motions

503: for our photometric sample. The UCAC2 catalog and its bright stars supplement

504: \citep{ucac2}\footnote{Also available

505: via the VizieR Online Data Catalogs I/289 and I/294.}

506: contain measurements for all NGC 2547 B--F stars and 86\% of G--K stars,

507: but only for 6\% of M stars (when using 

508: a coordinate matching radius of 2$\arcsec$)\footnote{Spectral classes

509: are assigned based on $(V-K)_{0}$

510: or on $(R-K)_{0}$ color when the former is not available,

511: following \citet{Bessell88} and \citet{Kenyon95} dwarf calibrations.

512: Reddening $E(B-V)=0.06$ and following relations were adopted for all NGC 2547 stars:

513: $A_{V}=3.1E(B-V)=A_{R}/0.748=A_{K}/0.112=A_{[5.8]}/0.048=A_{[8]}/0.048=A_{[24]}/0.0$}.

514: We fitted each distribution of proper motions (in RA$*$cos(Dec) and Dec) with a Gaussian

515: to get a mean of $-$4.6 mas/yr and 5.7 mas/yr,

516: and $\sigma$ of 5.0 and 4.8 mas/yr, respectively.

517: Objects with proper motion vectors within 10 mas/yr (2$\sigma$)

518: of the cluster mean have been marked as members (flag "Y"

519: in the last column of Tables \ref{table1a} and \ref{table1b}). Objects more than

520: 10 mas/yr from the mean are marked as proper motion non-members.

521: We find the proper-motion-confirmed member fraction to be 95\%, 81\%, 52\%, 77\% and 80\%

522: among BA, F, G, K, and M-type photometric members, respectively. 

523: 

524: \section{Identifying Excess Candidates}\label{exc}

525: 

526: \subsection{IRAC Excesses}\label{iracexc}

527: 

528: The four IRAC bands spanning 3-8 $\mu$m

529: trace dust from the near-sublimation temperature of $\sim$1000 K to about 400 K,

530: corresponding to radii within 1 AU for solar-type stars.

531: To identify possible

532: 8 $\mu$m excesses from the IRAC data, we plot sources

533: from Tables \ref{table1a} and \ref{table1b} on the $V-K$ vs $K-[8]$ diagram 

534: in Figure \ref{fig6}. The large baseline of the $V-K$ color results in a monotonic

535: relationship between increasing redness and increasingly late stellar spectral type. 

536: For stars with no excess, the similarity of the photospheric colors for a given

537: spectral type results in a narrow locus, extending from $V-K \sim 0$ (for A-type and

538: earlier stars) to 5 (early M); the scatter in this locus increases for $V - K > 5$

539: due to measurement errors. Stars to the right of this locus are candidates to have

540: excesses at 8 $\mu$m.

541: 

542: We visually examined the quality of the image of each object with an apparent 8 $\mu$m excess.

543: We removed nine objects from the plot because of a nearby companion, cosmic ray hit,

544: artifact from a bright star, or a non-uniform nebulosity contaminating the 4 px-wide aperture.

545: One more object (2MASS 08104684-4927452) was rejected because

546: it was too faint on the $V$ vs $V-K$ diagram.

547: Four more were not plotted because they had non-stellar flags on the $RIZ$ magnitudes.

548: Only one of these 14 objects is detected at 24 $\mu$m (2MASS 08100961-4915540), and its

549: 24 $\mu$m excess is in question

550: as well, due to strong nebulosity.

551: All these sources were omitted from Fig. \ref{fig6}.

552: 

553: A similar diagram was constructed in the $R-K$ color (Fig. \ref{fig7}). 

554: We omitted the objects excluded from Fig. \ref{fig6}

555: plus nine additional objects (none of which has a $V$ mag) with questionable 8 $\mu$m excesses

556: due to poor image quality.

557: One more (2MASS 08111674-4906564) was rejected because

558: it is too faint on the $R$ vs $R-K$ diagram.

559: Of these 10 objects only one is detected at 24 $\mu$m, with only marginal excess

560: due to closeness to the detection limit (2MASS 08090351-4909148).

561: Tables \ref{table1a} and \ref{table1b} include footnotes regarding source selection issues.

562: 

563: The remaining 8 $\mu$m excesses were marked with numbers on Figures \ref{fig6} and \ref{fig7}.

564: Excess objects were visually selected by being $\geq$3 $\sigma$ away from the

565: average locus formed by the majority of members of the corresponding $V-K$ ($R-K$) color.

566: The 8 $\mu$m channel is significantly affected by the cosmic ray hits. Since the size of the IRAC beam

567: is only about 4 pixels, for faint objects

568: it is sometimes difficult to decide whether a detection is real or an artifact of a cosmic ray hit.

569: However, if an excess is found at 8 $\mu$m,

570: we can expect to detect it also in the 5.8 $\mu$m band.

571: We therefore constructed $V-K$ vs $K-[5.8]$, $R-K$ vs $K-[5.8]$ diagrams

572: (Figs \ref{fig8}, \ref{fig9}). As can be seen from these plots,

573: most faint members with 8 $\mu$m excesses do not stand out

574: at 5.8 $\mu$m: ID 3 (2MASS 08104343-4930158),  5 (2MASS 08085856-4911171), 6 (2MASS 08101041-4858052), 

575: 7 (2MASS 08093547-4913033), 10 (2MASS 08104401-4859372),

576: 11 (2MASS 08083389-4907176), 12 (2MASS 08094287-4903413).

577: To guard against bad photometry due to cosmic ray hits, we required

578: an excess in faint sources to be apparent at both 5.8 and 8 $\mu$m. 

579: In the absence of additional information about objects rejected

580: based on this requirement we do not discuss them further,

581: with the exception of ID 7, which was already noticed by \citet{Young04} 

582: to have a 24 $\mu$m excess and for which we obtained a spectrum.

583: Properties of ID 7 together with the remaining 8 $\mu$m excess

584: objects are presented in Table \ref{tableexc}.

585:  

586: \subsection{MIPS Excesses}

587: 

588: The cluster has mass segregation, with members

589: above 2 $M_{\odot}$ (mid-Fs) all gathered within the central 20$\arcmin$

590: \citep{Littlefair03, Jeffries04}. This mass limit coincides with the limit for photospheric

591: detection at 24 $\mu$m,

592: which is at $\sim$10.8$^{m}$, or 0.3 mJy (where the distribution

593: of [24] magnitudes experiences a sharp downturn).

594: We can achieve excess \textit{detections} to lower masses,

595: but we will be unable to calculate the 

596: excess \textit{fraction} (the fraction of stars with excess) there.

597: Thus, compared to \citet{Young04}, we are probing the disk fraction at 24 $\mu$m to a similar

598: (stellar) mass limit. The advantage of our study

599: is improved statistics for excess detections down to early M stars,

600: due to the larger area covered; as a result,

601: we detect a few sources with excesses even more extreme than in \citet{Young04} (\S \ref{prop}).

602: 

603: How do we identify 24 $\mu$m excesses?

604: The cluster is young and has a continuum of objects

605: with $K-[24]$ bigger than $\sim$0 expected from the Rayleigh-Jeans tail

606: of the pure photospheric emission for stars earlier than early M (Figs. \ref{fig10}, \ref{fig11}).

607: The non-excess locus thus cannot be easily identified from the stars of NGC 2547 itself.

608: We therefore use the Pleiades locus as a fiducial.  

609: One can see that all the NGC 2547 stars fall inside or to the right of the

610: adopted non-excess boundaries relative to this locus.

611: We regard objects 3 $\sigma$ to the red relative to the

612: central line to have a 24 $\mu$m excess and report them in Table \ref{tableexc}.

613: To reproduce the Pleiades locus in the $R-K$ color in Fig. \ref{fig11},

614: we used the relation between $R-K$ and $V-K$ for B9--K7 MS stars

615: from \citet{Kenyon95}. Two new excesses are identified on this diagram, with

616: $K-[24]$ between 1.5 and 2 mag.

617: 

618: The five optically brightest members (B stars) formally show excess at 24 $\mu$m,

619: but in all of them the emission is extended beyond the 6$\arcsec$-wide MIPS beam,

620: corresponding to 2400 AU at 400 pc.  This scale is too big for a typical

621: debris disk. The behavior was first encountered in follow-up studies of 

622: $IRAS$-discovered excesses, and was dubbed 

623: ``the Pleiades phenomenon''.  It is explained by accumulation of matter

624: around massive stars as a result of either mass loss or

625: the radiation pressure exerted on the interstellar dust,

626: and should not be confused with a debris disk that results from

627: the shattering of planetesimals.

628: Indeed, two bubbles are seen on Fig. \ref{fig1} around these ``halo'' stars.

629: The bigger one in the northern part of the cluster is centered

630: on the B5 II member HD 68451, and the more compact one in the center of the cluster

631: is clearly produced by the B3 IV star HD 68478.

632: We mark these stars in Table \ref{table1a}

633: and omit them from the $K-[24]$ plots.  

634: 

635: At magnitudes near the detection limit one has to worry about confusion

636: with ISM clumps and extragalactic objects.

637: We examined the images of all 24 $\mu$m excess sources.

638: To help the discussion and guide the eye on Fig. \ref{fig10}, we split these objects

639: into several groups based on $V-K$ (see Table \ref{tableexc}).

640: Three of the four excess sources with $V-K\sim1.6$ and $K-[24]=0.6-0.9$

641: have distorted shapes, while 6 sources out of 8 with $V-K>2.5$ ($R-K>1.8$),

642: $K-[24]=0.6-4$ are at the level of fluctuations in the nebulosity.

643: We therefore call these excesses ``possible''.

644: We note that the region of $V-K=2-4$ is also where contamination from

645: background giants is strongest \citep{Littlefair03}. Indeed, 2MASS 08101474-4912320,

646: whose membership is only based on $BVI$ photometry, has a radial velocity $>100$ km/s

647: which is much larger than the cluster mean (\S \ref{sp}).

648: We do not discuss objects from this group any further.

649: The images of the remaining excess sources however (including the four most

650: extreme ones with $K-[24]>3.5$) appear symmetrical,

651: and where radial velocities are measured,

652: they are consistent with cluster membership. We discuss them in \S \ref{prop}.

653: 

654: \section{Properties of the Excess Candidates}\label{prop}

655: 

656: \subsection{8 $\mu$m excesses}\label{prop8}

657: 

658: Sources with excesses at 8 $\mu$m are rare in this cluster. 

659: We discuss the characteristics of each of them below.

660: 

661: \textit{ID 1} has only a marginal excess at 8 $\mu$m and has a border-line one at 24 $\mu$m.

662: The RV and proper motion are consistent with membership. The weak excess may

663: arise from the ISM nebulosity affecting the photometry.

664: 

665: \textit{ID 2} shows only marginal excess at 8 $\mu$m but a significant level in the NIR

666: and at 24 $\mu$m. It is a highly probable member according to its proper motion.

667: We resolved it into two objects 1$\arcsec$ apart.

668: The system is entered in the Washington Visual Double Star Catalog \citep{Worley96}

669: with only three observations from 1929-1949, leaving

670: open the question of the physical association of the objects.

671: Our spectrum of the primary is consistent with late A7-A9 reported in the literature,

672: and the radial velocity is close to the cluster mean.

673: The secondary has stronger Ca II lines, lacks Pa lines and

674: a radial velocity larger by 23 km/s. We speculate that it may

675: be a background K giant, which would explain the anomalous $H-K$ color of the system.

676: Does the 24 $\mu$m excess originate from the primary A type member

677: or the K giant then?

678: We are inclined to attribute it to the former since excesses around G-K giants are rare

679: \citep{Zuckerman95,Jura90,Plets97}, while excesses around A stars of this age are very common \citep{Rieke05}. 

680: 

681: \textit{ID 4} in \citet{Jeffries03} is indicated as a K5 radial velocity member with Li absorption 

682: and weak chromospheric emission in H$\alpha$ (RX 9).

683: It is interesting that besides a weak 8 $\mu$m excess it also

684: shows a robust excess at 4.5 $\mu$m and a marginal one at 3.5 and 5.8 $\mu$m.

685: We did not obtain a spectrum of it.

686: 

687: \textit{ID 7} is the latest-type member with a

688: robust detection at 24 $\mu$m, indicating an excess of $\sim$3 mag.

689: It was the largest excess detected in \citet{Young04}.

690: \citet{Jeffries05} classified it as an M4.5 radial velocity member with no Li.

691: It does not show excess at 5.8 $\mu$m, but has the reddest $K-[8]$ color

692: among late-type members (we do not count ID 12 as a reliable detection).

693: The strong K I at 7699\AA\, and Na I doublet at 8200\AA\, in our spectrum firmly rule out

694: the possibility of a low-gravity background giant \citep{Torres93, Schiavon97},

695: while our radial velocity again confirms membership. The spectrum shows emission in H$\delta$

696: and H$\gamma$, but higher resolution is needed to tell whether the emission is

697: due to a chromosphere or to accretion.

698: The 24 $\mu$m excess of ID 7 is surpassed by only one other candidate M-type member,

699: 2MASS 08090344-4859210 (Fig. \ref{fig10}).

700: With F$_{24}=$1.2 mJy, this source is a clear detection

701: despite the expected low mass. 

702: It makes a close match with ID 7 in optical colors, being only 0.15 mag bluer in

703: $R-I$ and $V-K$, indicating a spectral type of $\sim$M3.

704: Similarly to ID 7, the excess vanishes in the shorter IRAC bands.

705: If this object is a sibling of ID 7,

706: it would mean that stars of $\sim$30 Myr age and $\sim$0.25 M$_{\odot}$

707: are capable of generating dusty disks

708: even more vigorously than massive stars.

709: There is a caveat though. \citet{Jeffries04} dismiss it as a member

710: based on the $RIZ$ photometry. However, it is only

711: 0.05 mag off the nearest members on the $I$ vs $R-I$ and

712: $I-Z$ vs $R-I$ diagrams, and is a legitimate member on

713: $I$ vs $I-Z$, $V$ vs $V-K$ ($R-K$, $I-K$) color-magnitude diagrams.

714: With $J-H=0.76\pm0.06$, $H-K=0.25\pm0.06$

715: it is slightly above other late type members on the $J-H$ vs $H-K$ diagram,

716: with errorbars allowing either a dwarf or a giant interpretation.

717: Spectroscopy of gravity-sensitive features similar to that for ID 7

718: is needed to resolve this interesting case.

719: 

720: 

721: \textit{ID 8} is a single mid-G member according to the optical and

722: NIR color-magnitude diagrams.

723: Our spectrum is consistent with this classification

724: and indicates that its radial velocity is also consistent with membership.

725: Together with ID 9, it is unique in that its excess starts already at 3 $\mu$m.

726: 

727: \textit{ID 9} has the biggest excesses at all IRAC wavelengths

728: and at 24 $\mu$m in our survey.

729: It was detected already by {\it IRAS}; the Serendipitous Survey Catalog \citep{Kleinmann86}

730: contains a measurement at 25 $\mu$m and upper limits at 12 and 60 $\mu$m.

731: The {\it IRAS} flux at 25 $\mu$m is in excellent agreement with ours:

732: 0.16 Jy.

733: According to the $VRK$ color-magnitude diagrams,

734: it could be an equal-mass binary late-K dwarf.

735: Our spectrum is consistent with this classification.

736: The radial velocity of $+29$ km/s 

737: is consistent with membership, being within the HWHM from the cluster

738: value in its radial velocity group (Fig. \ref{fig5}).

739: The only notable difference between it and the

740: other members with similar colors

741: is the shallower and broader lines, indicating

742: faster than typical rotation with $v\,sin\,i > $20 km/s (see Fig. 4  

743: in  \citet{Jeffries00}).

744: Its $H-K$ color of 0.3 mag is however more characteristic of a mid-M dwarf.

745: We can rule out the latter classification with our spectrum.

746: It appears therefore that ID 9 has an IR excess starting

747: at 2 $\mu$m and rising all the way to 24 $\mu$m.

748: 

749: The fraction of 8 $\mu$m excesses for all sources in Tables \ref{table1a} and \ref{table1b}

750: except for those with peculiarities discussed in footnotes is

751: $<$5\% (0/20), $\leq$7\% (0 -- 2 out of 28, depending on the marginal cases of

752: ID1 and ID2), 1.5\% (1/68), 1.0\% (2/208), and 0.4\% (1/227)

753: for BA, F, G, K and M stars respectively.

754: When discarding proper motion non-members and applying the proper motion

755: membership fraction found in \S \ref{pm} to those without proper motion estimates,

756: we obtain correspondingly

757: $<$5\% (0/19), $\leq$9\% (0-2/23), 2.6\% (1/(35+7$\times$0.52)), 1.2\% (2/(143+30$\times$0.77)),

758: $\leq$0.6\%

759: ($\leq$1/(8+216$\times$0.80\footnote{Though high membership probability for M stars in NGC2547 is based

760: on only 21 stars with known proper motions, it was confirmed

761: in the RV and Li study of \citet{Jeffries05} with three times larger sample.}),

762: depending on whether ID7 is a proper motion 

763: member or not).

764: Summarizing, we find the 8 $\mu$m excess fraction at 30 Myr

765: to be $\sim$1\% for the intermediate-mass to low-mass stars.

766: Among four detected 8 $\mu$m excesses two

767: (ID 4, ID 7) are weak and two (ID 8, 9) are highly significant;

768: three of them also have detected 24 $\mu$m excesses.

769: 

770: \subsection{24 $\mu$m excesses}

771: 

772: Excesses at 24 $\mu$m are far more common than at 8 $\mu$m. 

773: There are 27 objects in Table \ref{tableexc} that show excess

774: at the former but not at the latter wavelength. 

775: To compare NGC 2547 to other (mostly older) clusters, we compute the fraction

776: of members with 24 $\mu$m excess.

777: As we have seen, by $(V-K)_0 \sim 1.4$ we start

778: missing members in the MIPS band, while the identified excesses

779: are prone to confusion with unrelated sources and nebulosity.

780: We therefore calculate the excess fractions below this limit.

781: In the range $-0.2 \leq (V-K)_0 < 0.7$, corresponding to

782: $\sim$B8--A9, 8 out of 18 highly probable members with good photometry show excess,

783: resulting in an excess fraction of 44\%. Adding 2 possible members of which one

784: has excess (triangles on Fig.\ref{fig10}) results in 45\% (9 out of 20).

785: All these sources are also proper motion members,

786: except for non-excess 2MASS 08094610-4914270,

787: which however qualifies as member based on the Tycho Catalog measurement\footnote{Available

788: via the VizieR Online Data Catalog I/250.}.

789: In the range of $0.7 \leq (V-K)_0 < 1.4$ , F0--F9,

790: the excess fraction among the highly probable photometric members is 

791: 33\% (7/21) and the same (33\%) with addition of 3 possible members (8/24).

792: Excluding 4 proper motion non-members, all of which are

793: non-excess stars, increases the excess fraction in F stars to 40\% (8/20).

794: 

795: \section{Discussion}

796: 

797: \subsection{Evolution of 8 micron excess}

798: 

799: The inner accretion disks

800: have been extensively studied at 2--4 $\mu$m already from the ground,

801: and the colder debris disks at 24--70 $\mu$m in the recent large {\it Spitzer} surveys

802: \citep[e.g.,][]{Kim05, Rieke05, Bryden06, Su06, Meyer07}). Recent {\it Spitzer}

803: studies are also starting to

804: put together a picture of the evolution of inner disks

805: probed at 8 $\mu$m.

806: 

807: Emission at 8 $\mu$m traces dust hotter than $\sim$300 K,

808: corresponding to distances of $\sim$1--10 AU around G--A stars,

809: and $\sim$0.1--1 AU around M--K stars.

810: Non-detection of 8 $\mu$m excess in the majority of

811: NGC 2547 members signals a thorough cleaning of hot dust by 30 Myr.

812: Assuming that grains emitting at 8 $\mu$m are astronomical silicates with a

813: dust temperature of 350 K, grain density of 2.5 g cm$^{-3}$ and a

814: radius of 10 $\mu$m, a 8 $\mu$m excess of 0.1 mag 

815: around A--F type stars corresponds to a dust mass of $\sim10^{-4}$M$_{Moon}$, and

816: $\sim10^{-5}$M$_{Moon}$ for an excess of 0.15 mag around G to early-M

817: stars in NGC 2547.

818: 

819: Excess at 8 $\mu$m is generally found in young stars

820: simultaneously with excesses at shorter IRAC bands and at 24 $\mu$m,

821: implying presence of optically thick primordial disks.

822: Stars with colors close to photospheric in the shorter IRAC bands but with excesses starting

823: at $\sim$8--10 $\mu$m are less frequent.

824: In stars several Myr old such disks

825: are called ``transition'', meaning they can be in the

826: evolutionary state from primordial to debris \citep[e.g.,][]{Hartmann05a, Lada06}. 

827: The reduced emission in the IRAC bands

828: is interpreted as either grain growth/settling

829: or clearing by the dynamical effects of giant planets.

830: Depending on the excess at longer wavelengths, 

831: further subdivision of transition disks can be found in the literature.

832: It is also possible that some of the transition-like SEDs 

833: may actually belong to young debris systems \citep{Currie07, Furlan07, Hernandez07, Rhee07}. 

834: 

835: \citet{Hernandez06} surveyed 60 B--F stars in

836: the two Orion subassociations OB1b (5 Myr old) and OB1a (10 Myr old).

837: They found two 8 $\mu$m excesses in the younger group

838: (one arising from the accretion disk of a Herbig Ae star

839: and another from a massive debris),

840: and one excess in the older group (from a Herbig Ae star),

841: resulting in 8 $\mu$m excess fractions among hot stars of 9\% and 5\%

842: at 5 and 10 Myr respectively.  

843: \citet{Sicilia06} studied two clusters in Cepheus OB2 association.

844: Among 21 B--F stars with 8 $\mu$m measurements in the 4 Myr old Tr 37,

845: two show excesses, only one of which may be due to a dusty disk

846: (the other star is of the classical Be type). In the 10 Myr old NGC 7160

847: 2 out of 68 stars show weak 8 $\mu$m excesses.

848: These fractions, 5--10\% at 4 Myr and 3\% at 10 Myr are quite

849: consistent with the Orion results, indicating a fast decline of 8 $\mu$m emission

850: in massive stars.      

851: The fraction of G--M stars with measured 8 $\mu$m excess

852: is much higher: $\sim$60\% (of which 15\% are classified

853: as transitional) in Tr 37 and 5--8\% in NGC 7160

854: (1--2 of excesses are transitional and the other one is primordial).

855:   

856: \citet{Megeath05} studied 15 K--M stars in the $\eta$ Chameleon 5--9 Myr association.

857: They found 6 to have excesses at the IRAC bands (excess fraction 40\%),

858: five of these are accretors, one not.

859: None of the two A members shows excess.

860: \citet{Low05} summarize SEDs for the 8--10 Myr old TW Hydrae

861: association. Among 22 K--M members, 3 show excesses

862: at 8--10 $\mu$m, two of which are from primordial disks (TW Hya and Hen 3-600)

863: and one from a debris disk (HD 98800AB), resulting in an excess fraction of 14\%.

864: \citet{Curry06} found in the 13 Myr-old double cluster $\chi$ \& $h$ Persei

865: 8 $\mu$m excesses in 1--3\% of the intermediate-mass stars

866: and up to 4--8\% in the solar-mass stars (at their completeness

867: limit of 1.2--1.4 M$_{\odot}$). 

868: \citet{Silverstone06} surveyed 74 solar-mass (G--mid-K) young nearby stars

869: with IRAC and MIPS. They found 5 stars with IRAC excesses,

870: all of them from optically-thick disks;

871: all are younger than 20 Myr. The

872: excess fractions are 14$^{+11}_{- 7}$ \%  and 2$^{+5}_{-2}$ \%

873: for the 3--10 Myr and 10--30 Myr bins respectively.

874: 

875: Although there is some scatter (probably in part due to statistical

876: uncertainties in relatively small samples), 

877: these studies agree on a dramatic overall decay in 8 $\mu$m excess incidence

878: over the first 20 Myr of stellar evolution. Beyond this age such

879: excesses become very uncommon, and based on the dynamic arguments of the grain

880: survival time are expected to have debris origin.

881: At 30 Myr among $\sim$500 B--M stars in NGC 2547 we identify

882: 4 with IRAC excesses, two of which are only marginal,

883: while the other two are extremely strong (\S \ref{trans}).

884: \citet{Mamajek04} studied 14 F--M members of the 30 Myr old Tucana-Horologium association

885: and found none with 10 $\mu$m excess, resulting in an excess fraction $<$7\%.

886: The less homogeneous {\it Spitzer} studies of field stars have yielded only a few

887: discoveries of hot disks beyond 30 Myr.

888: \citet{Chen06} obtained {\it Spitzer} IRS spectra for 59 nearby mostly B--F stars with {\it IRAS}

889: 60 $\mu$m excesses.

890: They found 7 at ages $\leq$10 Myr, 2 at ages 20--50 Myr and

891: 2 at 500-1000 Myr ($\zeta$ Lep and $\eta$ Crv)

892: to have 8-13 $\mu$m excess (in amount $\geqslant$10\% above the photospheric flux).

893: From a similar study of 41 main sequence F5--K5 stars \citet{Beichman06}

894: found another two (HD 69830 and HD 72905), only one of which is older

895: than 1 Gyr, resulting in an excess fraction of 2.5\% among old stars.

896: \citet{Uzpen05,Uzpen06} searched the MSX and the GLIMPSE {\it Spitzer} Legacy Program fields

897: in the Galactic plane for excess due to hot circumstellar disks.

898: They found $\sim$50 such candidates among B--K field stars.

899: Unfortunately we can not include them

900: in our analysis due to the lack of information about

901: their ages, but a significant proportion show signs of youth \citep{Uzpen06}.

902: 

903: As we have seen, unlike the shorter IRAC wavebands,

904: the 8 $\mu$m excess can trace both primordial and debris material,

905: and therefore should be used in combination with other diagnostics

906: to interpret its overall decay with age.

907: The above studies indicate an inside-out evolution for \textit{primordial} disks.

908: The inner-most parts of the disks (within few stellar radii),

909: as traced by the NIR photometry and spectroscopic signatures of accretion,

910: clear out on a time scale of $\sim$3 Myr, with the disk fraction falling by 10 Myr to a few percent

911: for solar-mass stars and essentially to zero

912: for intermediate-mass ones. Excess at 6--8 $\mu$m holds longer,

913: being at a level of 5--10\% for low-mass stars

914: at 10 Myr and dropping to 1\% by 30 Myr. 

915: The evolution of \textit{debris} disks is more slowly,

916: with a characteristic time scale of 150 Myr for the 24 $\mu$m

917: excess \citep{Rieke05, Gorlova06, Siegler06, Su06}

918: and $\sim$400 Myr for 70 $\mu$m \citep{Su06}.

919: The collisional cascades beyond 10 Myr are maintained

920: with the formation of the large icy bodies in the outer disk

921: that are capable to steer leftover planetesimals

922: \citep{Dominik03, Kenyon04b, Kenyon05, Hernandez06}.

923: Unlike 24 $\mu$m excess, 8 $\mu$m excess does not show a secondary peak after first few Myrs,

924: and is less frequent among B--A stars.

925: This behavior may imply a rapid depletion of the material within 1 AU,

926: inhibiting planet formation and the corresponding debris stage in this radial zone.

927: Even if planets do form in a few Myr,

928: as rare cases with inner holes suggest,

929: the end process of planet formation in this zone must lead to 

930: the rapid dissipation of smaller bodies to inhibit

931: collisional cascades (e.g., due to the absence of icy bodies

932: or because of the rapid inward planet migration

933: \citep{Burkert06}).

934: 

935: \subsection{Transitional disks at 30 Myr?}\label{trans}

936: 

937: De-reddened spectral energy distributions of NGC 2547

938: sources with 8 $\mu$m excess are presented in Fig. \ref{fig12}.

939: First we over-plot Kurucz models with effective temperatures corresponding to

940: the expected spectral types and sub-giant gravity,

941: normalizing them to fit the observations in the J band.

942: The flux beyond 10 $\mu$m was extrapolated with the Planck function.

943: As one can see, photospheric models match 

944: the SEDs of the excess stars well from 0.4 (B band) to 2 $\mu$m (K),

945: with only a slightly worse fit for ID 7 (M4.5) with strong molecular features.

946: These fits confirm that excess emission is present in all \textit{Spitzer} bands in

947: ID 8 and 9, and starts at 8 $\mu$m in ID 7, a result we obtained

948: previously from empirical color-color diagrams.

949: We fit the excess emission with a series of black bodies,

950: by varying the temperature and the normalization factor.

951: The best fits together with the fraction of the excess flux

952: relative to the photospheric value $\tau$ ($=L_{Exc}/L_{*Bol}$)

953: are given in Fig. \ref{fig12}. For comparison, we also show

954: the median SED for the low-mass stars with optically-thick disks in the 1--2 Myr-old Taurus region

955: \citep{Dalessio99,Hartmann05a}.    

956: We could not obtain a satisfactory single-temperature fit for ID 9,

957: so a 250 K black body curve is shown for reference only. 

958: For ID 4 the small IRAC excesses and the low upper limit on 24 $\mu$m flux

959: require temperature for excess emission of no less than 1000 K.

960: The best fit is achieved with a maximum possible temperature of 1500 K,

961: corresponding to dust sublimation temperature.

962: While the fractional excess luminosities of ID 4 and 7 place them

963: in the range of typical debris systems, the luminosities of ID 8 and 9

964: are too big, suggesting that at least ID 9 must have an optically-thick disk. 

965: 

966: Three possibilities exist to explain the excesses of ID 8 and 9:

967: 1) the disks are transitional, evolving

968: from primordial to debris (as seen in the smaller IRAC excesses

969: compared to Taurus),

970: 2) a catastrophic collision occurred between two planetary-size bodies,

971: 3) these objects are background post-MS stars experiencing mass-loss.

972: 

973: The 3.5--5.8 $\mu$m colors of both ID 8 and 9 are consistent with colors of

974: classical T Tau stars (CTTS) \citep{Hartmann05a}.

975: The 8 and 24 $\mu$m excesses of ID 8

976: are also more characteristic of CTTS and only rarely observed in weak T Tau stars,

977: while the excesses of ID 9 are extreme even for CTTS \citep{Padgett06}.

978: Despite big mid-IR excesses, the two stars however

979: lack strong excess in the NIR (ID 8 has none).

980: They also lack emission for example in H$\delta$ and the Ca II triplet in our spectra.

981: These are characteristics of transitional disks

982: where gas accretion has ceased and dust has dissipated

983: from the inner 0.1 AU,

984: but primordial dust at larger radii is still present.

985: The question is whether the 30 Myr age of the cluster 

986: is widely discrepant with this interpretation.

987: The typical ages of T Tau and transitional disks are a few Myr.

988: On the other hand, K-band excess may persist at the level of few percent

989: at ages of 10 Myr \citep{Hillenbrand05,Bonatto06}.

990: The cases of gas accretion beyond 10 Myr are rare

991: but also exist, the most famous being a low-mass Classical T Tau star St 34

992: in the Taurus, whose Li age is at least 25 Myr according to \citet{White05} and \citet{Hartmann05b}. 

993: They suggest that the long-lived accretion is maintained

994: due to binarity of this star with sub-AU separation.

995: ID 8 does not appear to be a binary though. 

996: The nearby associations like TW Hya and $\eta$ Cha present the best

997: examples of how diverse disks can be at 10 Myr \citep{Low05,Riaz06,Megeath05}. 

998: Considering that our study is one of the first that explore

999: disks at 0.1--1 AU at the 20--40 Myr age range with good statistics, 

1000: we can not dismiss the possibility that ID 8 and 9 may

1001: be the oldest known transitional disks around solar-mass stars.

1002: 

1003: Interesting, NGC 2547 is at a similar era when the Earth-Moon system

1004: formed. It is believed that the Earth-Moon system resulted from a giant

1005: impact between the proto-Earth and a Mars-sized body \citep{canup04}.

1006: After the impact, it is thought that the proto-Earth accreted less

1007: than 5\% of a current Earth mass from the impactor, while $\sim$30\%

1008: of the impactor mass was vaporized and escaped. Only 1.5 to 2 M$_{Moon}$

1009: of material stayed bound to the proto-Earth orbit, forming a disk around

1010: the Earth that eventually consolidated into the Moon.

1011: We have explored whether such a giant impact might be

1012: responsible for the infrared excess we observe around ID 8.

1013: Using an optically thin disk model with the

1014: assumptions of constant surface density and a power-law grain size

1015: distribution ($\Delta N\sim a^{-3.5}\Delta a$) of astronomical silicates, the 8 and 24 $\mu$m excesses

1016: are consistent with a disk with an inner radius of $\sim$0.1 AU (dust

1017: sublimation radius for 0.1 $\mu$m grains) and an outer radius of

1018: $\sim$1 AU. A wide range of grain size distributions can yield

1019: reasonable fits to the data, but all the fits require a dust mass on

1020: the order of 10$^{-3}$ M$_{Moon}$. The mass we derived here is a lower

1021: mass limit of the total material around ID 8 since we used an

1022: optically thin model. In addition, the mid-infrared observations do not

1023: trace the population of large (km-size) parent

1024: bodies. Following the same approach as for HD 69830 by

1025: \citet{beichman05}, we estimate a total mass of parent bodies on the

1026: order of 3-10 M$_{Moon}$, assuming the maximum size of the parent

1027: bodies is 1 to 10 km. 

1028: 

1029: Could ID 8 \& 9 be interpreted as

1030: background interlopers with dusty envelopes?

1031: Indeed, ID 9 is in the region of the cluster color-magnitude

1032: sequence that is most strongly contaminated by Galactic G--K giants

1033: \citep{Littlefair03}. ID 8 is not, but it comfortably lies

1034: among dusty evolved stars on the $[3.5]-[8]$ vs. $[8]-[24]$

1035: diagram of the LMC field in \citet{Meixner06}.

1036: Despite their big mid-IR excess, the $H-K$ excess in ID 8 and 9

1037: is much weaker compared with the AGB stars \citep{Buchanan06}.

1038: Perhaps ID 8 and 9 then belong to a rare class of the

1039: first-ascent G--K giants where IR excess originates

1040: from a shell thrown off as a result of a mixing event

1041: in the stellar interior \citep{deLaReza96,Drake05}?

1042: CO first-overtone bands at 2.3 $\mu$m can be used to probe

1043: the background giant explanation for ID 8 and 9

1044: from low-resolution spectra.

1045: This feature appears at spectral type mid-G and strengthens

1046: at lower temperatures. It is also

1047: strongly gravity-sensitive, for the same spectral type

1048: being deeper in supergiants and giants ($log\,g \leq 3$)

1049: than in dwarfs ($log\,g \sim 4.5$) \citep{KH86,Wallace97,Ivanov04}. 

1050: According to the evolutionary models

1051: \citep{Siess00}, G-K stars in NGC 2547 are close enough to the Main Sequence

1052: to have dwarf gravities within a few tenths of a dex;

1053: therefore, the CO band should be weak in them.

1054: In Fig. \ref{fig13} we show our K-band spectra of ID 8 \& 9

1055: overplotted on the spectra of field stars from \citet{KH86}\footnote{Available

1056: in the electronic form from the VizieR on-line catalog III/114},

1057: and a spectrum of HIP 43141A obtained

1058: and reduced by us in the same manner as ID 8 \& 9.

1059: The spectra of ID 8 \& 9

1060: lack strong features, consistent

1061: with G to mid-K spectral types expected from observed colors

1062: and negligible extinction in the cluster.

1063: ID 8 shows a weak but distinctive Br$\gamma$ line,

1064: indicating an earlier SpT than ID 9.

1065: ID 9 in turn clearly shows a CO(2,0) band-head at 2.294$\mu$m,

1066: which best compares with the K5 dwarf 61 Cyg A.

1067: Despite residual telluric noise in that region,

1068: we can firmly rule out any possibility for ID 8 \& 9

1069: to be common late K -- M giants.  

1070: However at this low resolution

1071: we can not exclude possibility

1072: of ID 8 \& 9 being mass-losing G supergiants,

1073: with simultaneously shallow Br$\gamma$ and CO lines

1074: due to filling emission and residuals

1075: induced in the telluric correction process.

1076: Such stars are however extremely rare \citep{Oudmaijer95}.

1077: In summary, the near-IR spectra of ID 8 \& 9 are

1078: consistent with a mid-G and mid-K dwarf types respectively,

1079: supporting their membership in the cluster. 

1080: 

1081: \section{Conclusions}

1082: 

1083: We have extended the survey of \citet{Young04}

1084: of the circumstellar disks in the 30 Myr old cluster NGC 2547

1085: to include the newly identified members over the

1086: entire $1.5\degr \times 1\degr$ area covered by {\it Spitzer}.

1087: Among $\sim$600 B--mid-M probable members (corresponding to masses down to 0.2 M$_{\odot}$)

1088: where we are sensitive to the photospheric level,

1089: only 4 stars show convincing excesses in the IRAC bands,

1090: corresponding to an excess fraction $\lesssim$1\%.

1091: This behavior is in striking contrast with the 24 $\mu$m excesses

1092: exhibited by 30--45\% of the B--F members.

1093: 

1094: Of the four 8 $\mu$m excesses, two are marginal

1095: and have SEDs consistent with debris disks (around an M4 dwarf discovered

1096: by \citet{Young04} and a K5 dwarf).

1097: The other two members have strong 8 $\mu$m excesses.

1098: One is a mid-G dwarf with SED consistent with a massive

1099: hot debris disk, perhaps the result of a giant impact.

1100: Another is a mid-K dwarf whose SED

1101: is more consistent with an optically-thick disk,

1102: though with depressed 2--6 $\mu$m emission compared

1103: with the average SED of a CTTS.

1104: Though we do not find signatures of gas accretion in

1105: our spectra of these two stars, spectroscopic

1106: investigation at higher resolution is needed

1107: to confirm the transitional nature of

1108: these disks.

1109: We identify another possible mid-M member with excess

1110: starting between 8--24 $\mu$m; if confirmed, it will be

1111: one of the few known M dwarfs older than 20 Myr with mid-IR excess

1112: \citep{Siegler06}.

1113: 

1114: Our survey provides the best evidence to date that 

1115: the frequency of the 8 $\mu$m excess that traces the disk zone inside $\sim$1 AU

1116: around solar-type stars diminishes to less than $\sim$1\%

1117: by 30 Myr. If planetary formation occurs inside 1 AU, it must be complete by 30 Myrs.

1118: \\

1119: \\

1120: \textbf{Note in proof.} The recent paper by \citet{Naylor06}

1121: obtains  a somewhat older mean age of 38.5$^{+3.5}_{-6.5}$ Myr for NGC 2547

1122: (for a smaller distance of 361$^{+19}_{-8}$ pc). This estimate of the age

1123: is within the errors of the previous estimates.

1124: The conclusions of our paper are not affected significantly if

1125: we adopt the new age estimate.

1126: 

1127: \acknowledgments 

1128: 

1129: We would like to thank J. Harris, D. Kelson, A. Oemler, G. Walth and Y. Yang 

1130: for help with IMACS reduction, and J. S. Kim and N. Siegler for help with

1131: observations. An anonymous referee provided many insightful comments.

1132: This paper includes data gathered with the 6.5 meter 

1133: Magellan Telescopes located at Las Campanas Observatory, Chile.

1134: This publication makes use of data products from the Two Micron All Sky Survey,

1135: which is a joint project of the University of Massachusetts 

1136: and the Infrared Processing and Analysis Center/California Institute 

1137: of Technology, funded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration 

1138: and the National Science Foundation.

1139: This work was supported by JPL/Caltech under contract 1255094. 

1140:  

1141: \begin{thebibliography}{} 

1142: 

1143: \bibitem[Allen \& Strom(1995)]{Allen95} Allen, L. E. \& Strom, K. M.  1995, \aj, 109, 1379

1144: \bibitem[Baraffe et al.(2002)]{Baraffe02} Baraffe, I., Chabrier, G., Allard, F., \& Hauschildt, P. H.  2002, \aap, 382, 563 

1145: \bibitem[Beichman et al.(2005)]{beichman05} Beichman, C.~A., et al.  2005, \apj, 626, 1061

1146: \bibitem[Beichman et al.(2006)]{Beichman06} Beichman, C. A., Tanner, A., Bryden, G., Stapelfeldt, K. R.,

1147: Werner, M. W., Rieke, G. H., Trilling, D. E., Lawler, S., \& Gautier, T. N.  2006, \apj, 639, 1166

1148: \bibitem[Bessell \& Brett(1988)]{Bessell88} Bessell, M. S. \& Brett, J. M.  1988, \pasp, 100, 1134

1149: \bibitem[Bonatto et al.(2006)]{Bonatto06} Bonatto, C., Bica, E., Ortolani, S., \& Barbuy, B.  2006, \aap, 453, 121

1150: \bibitem[Bryden et al.(2006)]{Bryden06} Bryden, G. et al.  2006, \apj, 636, 1098

1151: \bibitem[Buchanan et al.(2006)]{Buchanan06} Buchanan, C. L., Kastner, J. H., Forrest, W. J.,

1152: Hrivnak, B. J., Sahai, R., Egan, M., Frank, A., \& Barnbaum, C.  2006, \aj, in press (astro-ph/0606756)

1153: \bibitem[Burkert \& Ida(2006)]{Burkert06} Burkert, A. \& Ida, S.  2006, \apj, submitted (astro-ph/0608347)

1154: \bibitem[Canup(2004)]{canup04} Canup, R.~M.  2004, \araa, 42, 441 

1155: \bibitem[Carquillat et al.(1997)]{Carquillat97} Carquillat, J. M., Jaschek, C., Jaschek, M., \& Ginestet, N.  1997, \aaps, 123, 5

1156: \bibitem[Chambers(2001)]{Chambers01} Chambers, J. E. 2001, Icarus, 152, 205 

1157: \bibitem[Chen et al.(2006)]{Chen06} Chen, C. H. et al.  2006, \apjs, in press (astro-ph/0605277)

1158: \bibitem[Clari\'{a}(1982)]{Claria82} Clari\'{a}, J. J.  1982, \aaps, 47, 323 

1159: \bibitem[Currie et al.(2007a)]{Currie07} Currie, T., Kenyon, S., Rieke, G., Balog, Z., \& Bromley, B. C.  

1160:   2007a, \apjl, in press (astro-ph/0706.0535)

1161: \bibitem[Currie et al.(2007b)]{Curry06} Currie, T., Balog, Z., Kenyon, S. J., Rieke, G.,

1162:  Prato, L., Muzerolle, J., \& Young, E. T.  2007b, \apj, 659, 599

1163: \bibitem[D'Alessio et al.(1999)]{Dalessio99} D'Alessio, P., Calvet, N., Hartmann, L., Lizano, S., \& Cant\'{o}, J.

1164:   1999, \apj, 527, 893

1165: \bibitem[D'Antona \& Mazzitelli(1997)]{Dantona97} D'Antona, F. \& Mazzitelli, I.  1997,  Mem. Soc. Astron. Ital., 68, 807

1166: \bibitem[de La Reza, Drake, \& da Silva(1996)]{deLaReza96} de La Reza, R., Drake, N. A., \& da Silva, L.  1996, \apj, 456, L115

1167: \bibitem[Dias et al.(2006)]{Dias06}  Dias W.S., Florio, V., Assafin M., Alessi B.S., Libero V.  2006, \aap, 446, 949 

1168: \bibitem[Dominik \& Decin(2003)]{Dominik03} Dominik, C. \& Decin, G.  2003, \apj, 598, 626

1169: \bibitem[Drake et al.(2005)]{Drake05} Drake, N. A., de la Reza, R., da Silva, L., \& Lambert, D. L.  2002, \aj, 123, 2703 

1170: \bibitem[Furlan et al.(2007)]{Furlan07} Furlan, E. et al.  2007, \apj in press (astro-ph/0705.0380)

1171: \bibitem[Gorlova et al.(2004)]{Gorlova04} Gorlova, N. et al.  2004, \apjs, 154, 448 

1172: \bibitem[Gorlova et al.(2006)]{Gorlova06} Gorlova, N., Rieke, G., Muzerolle, J., Stauffer, J., Siegler, N., 

1173:  Young, E., \& Stansberry, J.  2006, \apj, in press (astro-ph/0606039)

1174: \bibitem[Gutermuth et al.(2004)]{Gutermuth04} Gutermuth, R. A., Megeath, S. T., Muzerolle, J.,

1175:  Allen, L. E., Pipher, J. L., Myers, P. C., \& Fazio, G. G.  2004, \apjs, 154, 374

1176: \bibitem[Hanson et al.(1996)]{Hanson96} Hanson, M. M., Conti, P. S., \& Rieke, M. J.  1996, \apjs, 107, 281

1177: \bibitem[Hartmann et al.(2005a)]{Hartmann05a} Hartmann, L., Megeath, S. T., Allen, L., Luhman, K., Calvet, N.,

1178: D\'Alessio, P., Franco-Hernandez, R., \& Fazio, G.  2005a, \apj, 629, 881 

1179: \bibitem[Hartmann et al.(2005b)]{Hartmann05b} Hartmann, L. et al. 2005b, \apj, 628, 147

1180: \bibitem[Hern\'{a}ndez et al.(2005)]{Hernandez05} Hern\'{a}ndez, J. et al. 2005, \apj, 129, 856

1181: \bibitem[Hern\'{a}ndez et al.(2006)]{Hernandez06} Hern\'{a}ndez, J., Brice\~{n}o, C., 

1182:   Calvet, N., Hartmann, L., Muzerolle, J., \& Quintero, A.  2006, \apj, in press (astro-ph/0607562)

1183: \bibitem[Hern\'{a}ndez et al.(2007)]{Hernandez07} Hern\'{a}ndez, J. et al.  2007, \apj, 662, 1067

1184: \bibitem[Hillenbrand(2005)]{Hillenbrand05} Hillenbrand, L. A.  2005, "A Decade of Discovery: Planets Around Other Stars" 

1185:   STScI Symposium Series 19, ed. M. Livio (astro-ph/0511083)

1186: \bibitem[Ivanov et al.(2004)]{Ivanov04} Ivanov, V. D., Rieke, M. J., Engelbracht, C. W.,

1187:  Alonso-Herrero, A., Rieke, G. H., \& Luhman, K. L.  2004, \apjs, 151, 387

1188: \bibitem[Jeffries \& Tolley(1998)]{Jeffries98} Jeffries, R. D. \& Tolley, A. J.  1998, \mnras, 300, 331

1189: \bibitem[Jeffries, Totten, \& James(2000)]{Jeffries00}  Jeffries, R. D., Totten, E. J., \& James, D. J.  2000, \mnras, 316, 950 

1190: \bibitem[Jeffries et al.(2003)]{Jeffries03} Jeffries, R. D., Oliveira, J. M., Barrado y Navascu\'{e}s, D., \& Stauffer, J. R.

1191:   2003, \mnras, 343, 1271

1192: \bibitem[Jeffries et al.(2004)]{Jeffries04} Jeffries, R. D., Naylor, T., Devey, C. R., Totten, E. J.  2004, \mnras, 351, 1401

1193: \bibitem[Jeffries \& Oliveira(2005)]{Jeffries05} Jeffries, R. D. \& Oliveira,  J. M.,  2005, \mnras, 358, 13

1194: \bibitem[Jeffries et al.(2006)]{Jeffries06}  Jeffries, R. D.,  Evans, P. A., Pye, J. P., \& Briggs, K. R.  2006,

1195: \mnras, 367, 781

1196: \bibitem[Jura(1990)]{Jura90} Jura, M.  1990, \apj, 365, 317

1197: \bibitem[Kenyon \& Hartmann(1995)]{Kenyon95} Kenyon, S. J. \& Hartmann, L.  1995, \apjs, 101, 117

1198: \bibitem[Kenyon \& Bromley(2004a)]{Kenyon04a} Kenyon, S. J. \& Bromley, B. C.  2004a, \apj, 602, L133

1199: \bibitem[Kenyon \& Bromley(2004b)]{Kenyon04b} Kenyon, S. J. \& Bromley, B. C.  2004b, \aj, 127, 513

1200: \bibitem[Kenyon \& Bromley(2005)]{Kenyon05} Kenyon, S. J. \& Bromley, B. C.  2005, \aj, 130, 269

1201: \bibitem[Kenyon \& Bromley(2006)]{Kenyon06} Kenyon, S. J. \& Bromley, B. C.  2006, \aj, 131, 1837

1202: \bibitem[Kim et al.(2005)]{Kim05} Kim, J. S., et al.  2005, \apj, 632, 659 

1203: \bibitem[Kleine et al.(2002)]{Kleine02} Kleine, T., Munker, C., Mezger, K., \& Palme, H.  2002, \nat, 418, 952

1204: \bibitem[Kleinmann et al.(1986)]{KH86} Kleinmann, S. G. \& Hall, D. N. B.  1986, \apjs, 62, 501

1205: \bibitem[Kleinmann et al.(1986)]{Kleinmann86} Kleinmann S. G., Cutri R. M., Young E. T., Low F. J., \& Gillett F.C.  1986, 

1206: IRAS Serendipitous Survey Catalog (On-line VizieR catalog II/126)

1207: \bibitem[Lada et al.(2006)]{Lada06} Lada, C. J. et al.  2006, \aj, 131, 1574

1208: \bibitem[Littlefair et al.(2003)]{Littlefair03} Littlefair, S. L., Naylor, T., Jeffries, R. D., Devey, C. R., \& Vine, S.

1209:  2003, \mnras, 345, 1205

1210: \bibitem[Low et al.(2005)]{Low05} Low, F. J., Smith, P. S., Werner, M., Chen, C., Krause, V., Jura, M., 

1211: \& Hines, D. C.  2005, ApJ, 631, 1170

1212: \bibitem[Lyra et al.(2006)]{Lyra06} Lyra, W., Moitinho, A., van der Bliek, N. S., \& Alves, J.  2006, \aap, 453, 101

1213: \bibitem[Mamajek et al.(2004)]{Mamajek04} Mamajek, E. E., Meyer, M. R., Hinz, P. M., Hoffmann, W. F., Cohen, M., Hora, J. L.

1214:   2004, \apj, 612, 496

1215: \bibitem[Mathis (1990)]{Mathis90} Mathis, J. S.  1990, \araa, 28, 37

1216: \bibitem[Megeath et al.(2005)]{Megeath05} Megeath, S. T., Hartmann, L., Luhman, K. L., \& Fazio, G. G.  2005, \apj, L634, 113

1217: \bibitem[Meixner et al.(2006)]{Meixner06} Meixner, M. et al.  2006, \apj, in press (astro-ph/0606356)  

1218: \bibitem[Meyer et al.(2006)]{Meyer06} Meyer, M. R, Backman, D. E., Weinberger, A. J., \& Wyatt, M. C.  2006, 

1219:  in ``Protostars and Planets V'', Univ. of Arizona Press, editors: B. Reipurth, D. Jewitt, and K. Keil 

1220: \bibitem[Meyer et al.(2007)]{Meyer07} Meyer, M. R. et al.  2007, PASP, in press (astro-ph/0701058)

1221: \bibitem[Moorwood et al.(1998)]{Moorwood98} Moorwood, A., et al. 1998, Messenger, 94, 7

1222: \bibitem[Moro-Mart\'{i}n \& Malhotra(2002)]{MoroMartin02} Moro-Mart\'{i}n, A. \& Malhotra, R.  2002, \aj, 124, 2305

1223: \bibitem[Munari \& Tomasella(1999)]{Munari99} Munari, U. \& Tomasella, L.  1999, \aaps, 137, 521 

1224: \bibitem[Naylor et al.(2002)]{Naylor02} Naylor, T., Totten, E. J., Jeffries, R. D., Pozzo, M., Devey, C. R., \& Thompson, S. A.,

1225:   2002, \mnras, 335, 291

1226: \bibitem[Naylor \& Jeffries(2006)]{Naylor06} Naylor, T. \& Jeffries, R. D. 2006, \mnras, 373, 1251

1227: \bibitem[Oliveira et al.(2003)]{Oliveira03} Oliveira, J. M., Jeffries, R. D., Devey, C. R.,

1228:   Barrado y Navascu\'{e}s, D., Naylor, T., Stauffer, J. R., \& Totten, E. J.  2003, \mnras, 342, 651

1229: \bibitem[Oudmaijer et al.(1995)]{Oudmaijer95} Oudmaijer, R. D., Waters, L. B. F. M., van der Veen, W. E. C. J.,

1230:   \& Geballe, T. R.  1995, \aap, 299, 69

1231: \bibitem[Padgett et al.(2006)]{Padgett06} Padgett, D. L. et al.  2006, \apj, 645, 1283

1232: \bibitem[Pascucci et al.(2006)]{Pascucci06} Pascucci, I. et al.  2006, \apj, 651, 1177 

1233: \bibitem[Patten et al.(2006)]{Patten06} Patten, B. M., et al.  2006, \apj, 651, 502

1234: \bibitem[Plets et al.(1997)]{Plets97} Plets, H., Waelkens, C., Oudmaijer, R. D., \& Waters, L. B. F. M.  1997, \aap, 323, 513 

1235: \bibitem[Rhee et al.(2007)]{Rhee07} Rhee, J. H., Song, I., \& Zuckerman, B.  2007, \apj, in press (astro-ph/0706.1265)

1236: \bibitem[Riaz, Gizis, \& Hmiel(2006)]{Riaz06} Riaz, B., Gizis, J. E., \& Hmiel, A.  2006, \apj, 639, L79

1237: \bibitem[Rieke et al.(2005)]{Rieke05} Rieke, G. H., et al.  2005, \apj, 620, 1010

1238: \bibitem[Robichon et al.(1999)]{Robichon99} Robichon., N., Arenou, F., Mermilliod, J.-C., Turon, C.  1999,  \aap, 345, 471

1239: \bibitem[Schiavon et al.(1997)]{Schiavon97} Schiavon, R. P., Barbuy, B., Rossi, S. C. F., \& Milone, A.

1240: \bibitem[Sicilia-Aguilar et al.(2006)]{Sicilia06} Sicilia-Aguilar, A. et al.  2006, \apj, 638, 897

1241: \bibitem[Sicilia-Aguilar et al.(2007)]{Sicilia07} Sicilia-Aguilar, A. et al.  2007, \apj, 659, 1637

1242: \bibitem[Siegler et al.(2006)]{Siegler06} Siegler, N., Muzerolle, J., Mamajek, E., Young, E., Rieke, G., 

1243:  Trilling, D., Gorlova, N., \& Su, K. Y. L.  2006, \apj, in press

1244: \bibitem[Siess et al.(2000)]{Siess00}  Siess L., Dufour E., Forestini M. 2000, \aap, 358, 593

1245: \bibitem[Silverstone et al.(2006)]{Silverstone06} Silverstone, M. D., et al.  2006, \apj, 639, 1138

1246: \bibitem[Su et al.(2006)]{Su06} Su, K. Y. L. et al.  2006, \apj, submitted

1247: \bibitem[Torres-Dodgen \& Weaver(1993)]{Torres93} Torres-Dodgen, A. V. \& Weaver, W. B.  1993, \pasp, 105, 693

1248: \bibitem[Uzpen et al.(2005)]{Uzpen05} Uzpen, B., et al. 2005, \apj, 629, 512

1249: \bibitem[Uzpen et al.(2006)]{Uzpen06} Uzpen, B., et al. 2006, \apj, in press (astro-ph/0612235)

1250: \bibitem[Wallace \& Hinkle(1997)]{Wallace97} Wallace, L. \& Hinkle, K. 1997, \apjs, 111, 445

1251: \bibitem[White \& Hillenbrand(2005)]{White05} White, R. J \& Hillenbrand, L. A.  2005, \apj, 621, L65

1252: \bibitem[Worley \& Douglass(1997)]{Worley96} Worley C., E. \& Douglass G., G. 1997, \aaps, 125, 523 (On-line VizieR catalog  I/237)

1253: \bibitem[Young et al.(2004)]{Young04} Young, E. T., et al.  2004, \apjs, 154, 428

1254: \bibitem[Zacharias et al.(2003)]{ucac2} Zacharias N., Urban S. E., Zacharias M. I., Wycoff G. L., Hall D. M., 

1255:      Germain M. E., Holdenried E.R., \& Winter L.  2003,  The Second U.S. Naval Observatory CCD 

1256:      Astrograph Catalog

1257: \bibitem[Zuckerman, Kim \& Liu(1995)]{Zuckerman95} Zuckerman, B., Kim, S. S., \& Liu, T.  1995, \apj, 446, L79

1258: 

1259: \end{thebibliography} 

1260:  

1261: \clearpage

1262: \begin{deluxetable}{llrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrl} 

1263: %\rotate

1264: \tablecolumns{19}  

1265: \tablewidth{0pt} 

1266: \tabletypesize{\tiny} 

1267: \tablecaption{\textit{Spitzer} photometry for NGC 2547 highly-probable photometric members\label{table1a}}

1268: \tablehead{ \colhead{RA $\degr$} & \colhead{DEC $\degr$} & \textit{V-K} & \textit{R$_{C}$-K} & \textit{K}\tablenotemark{1} &

1269:  \it{$\pm$} & \it{[3.6]} & \it{$\pm$} & \it{[4.5]} & \it{$\pm$} & \it{[5.8]}  & \it{$\pm$} & \it{[8.0]} & \it{$\pm$} &

1270:  \it{[24]}  & \it{$\pm$} &  Field & Star &  \\ 

1271: \multicolumn{2}{c}{(2000, 2MASS)} &  &  &  &  &  &  &  & & & & & & & &  No.\tablenotemark{2} & No.\tablenotemark{2} & 

1272: } 

1273: \startdata 

1274: 122.532396 & -48.919441 &  99.99 &   1.17 &  11.62 &   0.02 &  11.61 &   0.00 &  11.63 &   0.01 &  11.66 &   0.02 &  11.56 &   0.03 &  99.99 &  99.99  &  23 &    27  &  Y \\

1275: 122.532740 & -49.276600 &  -0.01 &  99.99 &   8.43 &   0.02 &   8.50 &   0.01 &   8.46 &   0.01 &   8.49 &   0.00 &   8.51 &   0.00 &   7.64\tablenotemark{h} &   0.04 &    9 &  8432  &  Y \\

1276: 122.534364 & -49.183403 &  99.99 &  99.99 &  99.99 &  99.99 &  14.99 &   0.02 &  15.01 &   0.05 &  99.99 &  99.99 &  99.99 &  99.99 &  99.99 &  99.99 &    13 &  1776  &  N/A \\

1277: 122.534440 & -49.332378 &  99.99 &   1.16 &  11.21 &   0.02 &  11.18 &   0.00 &  11.22 &   0.00 &  11.23 &   0.01 &  11.16 &   0.01 &  99.99 &  99.99 &    8 &    15  &  Y \\

1278: 122.535073 & -49.012066 &   0.29 &  99.99 &   9.55 &   0.02 &   9.54 &   0.01 &   9.64 &   0.00 &   9.54 &   0.01 &   9.54 &   0.00 &   8.43 &   0.02 &    30 &  8420  &  Y \\

1279: 122.537235 & -49.261490 &   3.28 &   2.58 &  12.19 &   0.03 &  12.06 &   0.00 &  12.13 &   0.01 &  12.06 &   0.03 &  12.03 &   0.08 &  99.99 &  99.99 &    13 &   174  &  N \\

1280: 122.538460 & -49.048122 &  99.99 &   2.17 &  12.27 &   0.03 &  12.24 &   0.01 &  12.34 &   0.01 &  12.22 &   0.02 &  12.25 &   0.04 &  99.99 &  99.99 &    18 &   103  &  Y \\

1281: 122.538682 & -49.348309 &   1.64 &   1.27 &  10.81 &   0.02 &  10.82 &   0.00 &  10.82 &   0.00 &  10.88 &   0.01 &  10.81 &   0.01 &  10.74 &   0.16 &    8 &    19  &  Y \\

1282: 122.539099 & -49.015720 &   2.06 &  99.99 &  10.43 &   0.02 &  10.42 &   0.00 &  10.59 &   0.00 &  10.37 &   0.01 &  10.36 &   0.01 &  10.35 &   0.11 &   18 &    43  &  Y \\

1283: 122.539829 & -48.942863 &  99.99 &   2.54 &  12.22 &   0.03 &  12.14 &   0.00 &  12.23 &   0.01 &  12.21 &   0.02 &  12.14 &   0.04 &  99.99 &  99.99 &   18 &   116  &  Y \\

1284: 122.540051 & -49.265015 &   2.89 &   2.24 &  11.20 &   0.02 &  11.13 &   0.00 &  11.20 &   0.00 &  11.11 &   0.01 &  10.97\tablenotemark{c} &   0.03 &  10.57 &   0.14 &    13 &   114  & Y \\

1285: 122.541465 & -49.609333 &  99.99 &   2.67 &  11.33 &   0.03 &  11.21 &   0.00 &  11.42 &   0.00 &  11.31 &   0.01 &  11.28 &   0.02 &  99.99 &  99.99 &     3 &    32  &  Y \\

1286: \\

1287:            &            &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &         &  PM?\tablenotemark{3}    &     &    \\

1288: 122.532396 & -48.919441 &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &         &   Y  &       &    \\

1289: 122.532740 & -49.276600 &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &                         &        & Y     &       &    \\

1290: 122.534364 & -49.183403 &        &        &   &  &   &    &  &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &   N/A    &     &      \\

1291: 122.534440 & -49.332378 &        &        &  &   &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &  Y    &       &    \\

1292: 122.535073 & -49.012066 &        &        &   &  &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &    Y   &       &    \\

1293: 122.537235 & -49.261490 &        &        &   &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &    N   &       &    \\

1294: 122.538460 & -49.048122 &        &        &   &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &     Y  &       &    \\

1295: 122.538682 & -49.348309 &        &        &   &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &    Y  &       &    \\

1296: 122.539099 & -49.015720 &        &        &  &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &    Y  &      &    \\

1297: 122.539829 & -48.942863 &        &        &  &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &    Y  &       &    \\

1298: 122.540051 & -49.265015 &        &        &   &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &                         &        &        &        & Y      &       &   \\

1299: 122.541465 & -49.609333 &        &        &   &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &     Y  &       &    \\

1300: \enddata 

1301: \tablenotetext{1}{\textit{K$_{S}$} from 2MASS} 

1302: \tablenotetext{2}{Designations from  ``Wide catalog'' of \citet{Naylor02} or from ``$RIZ$'' catalog of \citet{Jeffries04}}

1303: \tablenotetext{3}{Proper motion membership flag (\S \ref{memb}), N/A: proper motion not available}

1304: \tablenotetext{h}{Extended (\underline{h}alo-like) sources at 24 $\mu$m} 

1305: \tablenotetext{c}{Excess at 8 $\mu$m may be due to \underline{c}ontamination of the aperture by

1306: a nearby source, cosmic ray or strong nebulosity}

1307: \tablecomments{

1308: \\

1309: Objects from this table are shown as solid circles

1310: on Figures \ref{fig6}, \ref{fig7}, \ref{fig8}, \ref{fig9}, \ref{fig10}, \ref{fig11},

1311: except for those with questionable photometry (notes h, c).\\

1312: 99.99 means no data.

1313: The complete version of this table will be in the electronic edition of

1314: the ApJ. The printed edition contains only a sample.} 

1315: \end{deluxetable}  

1316:  

1317: \clearpage

1318: \begin{deluxetable}{llrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrl} 

1319: %\rotate

1320: \tablecolumns{19}  

1321: \tablewidth{0pt} 

1322: \tabletypesize{\tiny} 

1323: \tablecaption{\textit{Spitzer} photometry for NGC 2547 less plausible photometric members\label{table1b}}

1324: \tablehead{ \colhead{RA $\degr$} & \colhead{DEC $\degr$} & \textit{V-K} & \textit{R$_{C}$-K} & \textit{K} &

1325:  \it{$\pm$} & \it{[3.6]} & \it{$\pm$} & \it{[4.5]} & \it{$\pm$} & \it{[5.8]}  & \it{$\pm$} & \it{[8.0]} & \it{$\pm$} &

1326:  \it{[24]}  & \it{$\pm$} &  Field & Star &   \\ 

1327: \multicolumn{2}{c}{(2000, 2MASS)} &  &  &  &  &  &  &  & & & & & & & &  No. & No. & 

1328: } 

1329: \startdata 

1330: 122.716280 & -48.971233 &   2.84 &  99.99 &  11.06 &   0.02 &  11.02 &   0.00 &  11.14 &   0.00 &  11.08 &   0.01 &  10.98 &   0.01 &  99.99 &  99.99 &    18 &   490 &  Y \\

1331: 122.730125 & -49.443478 &   4.84 &  99.99 &  13.80 &   0.04 &  13.53 &   0.01 &  13.47 &   0.01 &  13.42 &   0.06 &  13.45 &   0.08 &  99.99 &  99.99 &     9 &  1394 &  N/A \\

1332: 122.747649 & -49.142479 &   5.12 &  99.99 &  13.50 &   0.04 &  13.23 &   0.01 &  13.19 &   0.01 &  13.19 &   0.06 &  13.18 &   0.08 &  99.99 &  99.99 &    12 &  1176 &  N/A \\

1333: 122.769807 & -49.054371 &   3.96 &  99.99 &  11.85 &   0.04 &  11.73 &   0.01 &  11.64 &   0.01 &  11.60 &   0.02 &  11.64 &   0.04 &  99.99 &  99.99 &    19 &  1086 &  N \\

1334: 122.802249 & -49.093540 &   5.60 &  99.99 &  14.43 &   0.07 &  14.12 &   0.04 &  14.09 &   0.04 &  13.72 &   0.11 &  13.41\tablenotemark{c} &   0.10 &  99.99 &  99.99 &    19 &   633  &  N/A \\

1335: 122.803718 & -49.162022 &   2.50 &  99.99 &  10.85 &   0.02 &  10.80 &   0.00 &  10.89 &   0.00 &  10.84 &   0.01 &  10.81 &   0.01 &  99.99 &  99.99 &    12 &   137 &  N \\

1336: 122.819776 & -49.115688 &  99.99 &   4.02 &  14.80 &   0.10 &  14.47 &   0.02 &  14.36 &   0.03 &  14.22 &   0.10 &  13.94 &   0.14 &  99.99 &  99.99 &    12 &   731\tablenotemark{nm} & N/A \\

1337: 122.836424 & -49.219448 &   1.35 &  99.99 &  10.69 &   0.02 &  10.68 &   0.00 &  10.66 &   0.00 &  10.71 &   0.01 &  10.66 &   0.01 &  99.99 &  99.99 &   12 &    22 &  Y \\

1338: 122.836981 & -49.151585 &   1.68 &  99.99 &  11.39 &   0.02 &  11.31 &   0.00 &  11.39 &   0.01 &  11.36 &   0.02 &  11.29 &   0.02 &  99.99 &  99.99 &    12 &    64 &  N \\

1339: 122.899746 & -48.946228 &   3.17 &  99.99 &  10.95 &   0.02 &  10.90 &   0.00 &  11.00 &   0.00 &  10.96 &   0.01 &  10.88 &   0.01 &  99.99 &  99.99 &    19 &   910 &  Y \\

1340: 122.910886 & -49.239845 &   5.29 &  99.99 &  13.87 &   0.05 &  13.70 &   0.01 &  13.69 &   0.02 &  13.58 &   0.06 &  13.68 &   0.09 &  99.99 &  99.99 &   12 &  2353 &  N/A \\

1341: 122.945855 & -49.215736 &   3.55 &  99.99 &  12.06 &   0.02 &  11.96 &   0.00 &  12.05 &   0.01 &  11.94 &   0.02 &  12.00 &   0.03 &  99.99 &  99.99 &    12 &  1013 &  N \\

1342: \\

1343:            &            &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &         &  PM?\tablenotemark{3}    &     &    \\

1344: 122.716280 & -48.971233 & &  &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        & &        &      Y  &    & \\

1345: 122.730125 & -49.443478 & &  &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        & &        &     N/A   &   & \\

1346: 122.747649 & -49.142479 &  & &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        & &        &      N/A  &    & \\

1347: 122.769807 & -49.054371 &  &  &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        & &        &      N  &    & \\

1348: 122.802249 & -49.093540 &   &  &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        & &        &     N/A   &    &\\

1349: 122.803718 & -49.162022 &  & &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        & &        &      N  &     & \\ 

1350: 122.819776 & -49.115688 &  & &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        & &        &     N/A   &   & \\

1351: 122.836424 & -49.219448 &  & &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        & &        &      Y  &    & \\

1352: 122.836981 & -49.151585 & &  &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        & &        &     N   &    & \\

1353: 122.899746 & -48.946228 & &  &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        & &        &     Y   &    &\\

1354: 122.910886 & -49.239845 &   &  &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        & &        &    N/A    &    &\\

1355: 122.945855 & -49.215736 &  &  &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        &        & &        &      N  &    &\\

1356: \enddata 

1357: \tablenotetext{ns}{\underline{N}on-\underline{s}tellar flag in \citet{Jeffries04}}

1358: \tablenotetext{nm}{Below the cluster sequence on the $V-(V-K)$ or $R-(R-K)$ diagram -- \underline{n}on\underline{m}ember?}

1359: \tablenotetext{c}{Excess at 8 $\mu$m may be due to \underline{c}ontamination of the aperture by

1360: a nearby source}

1361: \tablecomments{

1362: \\

1363: Objects from this table are shown as triangles on Fig. \ref{fig6}, \ref{fig8}, \ref{fig10}, 

1364: except for those with notes.\\ 

1365: For description of columns see Table \ref{table1a}.

1366: The complete version of this table will be in the electronic edition of

1367: the ApJ. The printed edition contains only a sample.} 

1368: \end{deluxetable} 

1369: 

1370: \clearpage

1371: \begin{deluxetable}{ccclccrr} 

1372: %\rotate

1373: \tablecolumns{8}  

1374: \tablewidth{0pt} 

1375: \tabletypesize{\tiny} 

1376: \tablecaption{Log of IMACS observations\label{tablemasks}}

1377: \tablehead{\colhead{Mask No.} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Mask Center} & \colhead{UT Date} & \colhead{Airmass} & \colhead{Seeing} & \colhead{Integr. Time} & \colhead{$V$} \\

1378:  & RA (h:min:s) & DEC ($\degr:\arcmin:\arcsec$) & & &  FWHM($\arcsec$) & sec $\times$ frames & mag

1379: } 

1380: \startdata

1381: 1  & 08:09:40.000 & -49:12:00.00 & 2005 Feb 02 & 1.11--1.12 & 0.6 &  15 $\times$ 7 &   9-13 \\   

1382: 2  & 08:09:40.000 & -49:12:00.00 & 2005 Dec 23 & 1.07--1.11 & 0.6 & 900 $\times$ 3 &  13-19 \\   

1383: 3  & 08:10:36.000 & -49:15:00.00 & 2005 Dec 21 & 1.09--1.10 & 0.6 & 150 $\times$ 3 &  10-12 \\  

1384: 4  & 08:10:36.000 & -49:15:00.00 & 2005 Feb 03 & 1.13--1.18 & 0.7 & 600 $\times$ 3 &  13-15 \\ 

1385: 5  & 08:09:40.000 & -48:57:30.00 & 2005 Dec 21 & 1.07--1.07 & 0.6 & 900 $\times$ 3 &  13-18 \\ 

1386: \enddata 

1387: \end{deluxetable}  

1388: 

1389: \clearpage

1390: \LongTables

1391: \begin{deluxetable}{crrrrccrrrcl} 

1392: %\rotate

1393: \tablecolumns{12}  

1394: \tablewidth{0pt} 

1395: \tabletypesize{\tiny} 

1396: \tablecaption{IMACS spectroscopy of NGC 2547 candidate members\label{tablesp}}

1397: \tablehead{2MASS & $(V-K)_{0}$ & 

1398: $V_{0}$ & $(K-[8])_{0}$ & $(K-[24])_{0}$ &

1399: SpT\tablenotemark{1} & RV\tablenotemark{2} & Prob.\tablenotemark{3}\ & RV\tablenotemark{4} & S/N\tablenotemark{5} & Sp. No\tablenotemark{6} & Remarks\tablenotemark{7} \\ 

1400:  & & & & & & group & \% & km/s & & mask:slit & 

1401: }

1402: \startdata 

1403:  08095753-4908202 & -0.20 & 8.73 & 0.05 & 1.62 & A0Vn & BF   & 37 & 67 & 83    & 1:23  & Broad lines \\

1404:  08093671-4911383 & 0.02 & 8.67 & -0.05 & -0.05 & A0-A1 & BF   & 52 & 59   & 280  & 1:19  & Broad lines \\

1405:  08100607-4914180 & 0.04 & 9.68 & 0.02 & 1.47 & B8-A1 & BF   & 59 & 32   & 38   & 1:18  & Low S/N \\

1406:  08095221-4911022 & 0.06 & 9.48 & 99.99 & 99.99 & 99.99 & BF   & 54 & 34   & 120  & 1:7  & Broad lines \\

1407:  08092958-4906166 & 0.35 & 10.03 & 99.99 & 99.99 & A0-A2V & BF  & 48 & 19   & 180 & 1:22  & Broad lines \\

1408:  08095066-4912493 & 0.36 & 10.03 & -0.05 & 0.02 & A2-A3IV & BF   & 66 & 18   & 93 & 1:21  &  \\

1409:  08095060-4913194 & 0.53 & 10.40 & 99.99 & 99.99 & A0 & G    & 0 & 12   & 95 & 3:7  & Broad lines \\

1410:  08094610-4914270 & 0.53 & 10.49 & -0.00 & -0.00 & F0 & BF   & 99.99 & 20   & 79 & 1:13  & \\

1411:  08092668-4914371 & 0.58 & 10.70 & 0.04 & 1.27 & 99.99 & BF   & 51 & 11   & 120 & 1:8  & \\

1412:  08093053-4920443 & 0.81 & 10.90 & 0.01 & 0.07 & F0 & BF   & 52 & 13   & 104 & 1:14  & Broad lines \\

1413:  08091401-4904029 & 0.84 & 11.23 & 0.14 & 0.16 & 99.99 & G    & 65 & 1   & 91 & 1:17  & Broad lines; ID 1 \\

1414:  08104662-4917312 & 0.89 & 10.57 & 0.01 & 0.11 & 99.99 & G    & 34 & -5    & 31 & 3:5  & Low S/N \\

1415:  08094893-4909370 & 0.93 & 10.74 & 99.99 & 99.99 & 99.99 & BF  & 4 & 10   & 79 & 1:11 & Broad lines \\

1416:  08093815-4918403 & 0.96 & 10.62 & 0.11 & 0.95 & A7-A9 & BF   & 42 & 16   & 110 & 1:20a  & ID 2a \\ 

1417:  08093815-4918403 & 0.96 & 10.62 & 0.11 & 0.95 & 99.99 & K    & 42 & 39   & 72 & 1:20b  & ID 2b \\

1418:  08090287-4906022 & 1.02 & 11.60 & 0.02 & -0.07 & 99.99 & G    & 51 & 0.6  & 56 & 1:26  & \\

1419:  08100087-4908324 & 1.04 & 10.80 & -0.01 & 0.01 & 99.99 & BF   & 44 & 13   & 31 & 1:9  & Emission? Low S/N \\

1420:  08101352-4920438 & 1.10 & 10.78 & 0.00 & 0.03 & 99.99 & BF   & 22 & 26   & 15 & 1:10  & Low S/N \\

1421:  08092293-4907575 & 1.14 & 12.00 & -0.06 & 0.60 & 99.99 & K    & 26 & 9   & 81 & 1:15  & \\

1422:  08102774-4912095 & 1.15 & 10.81 & 0.04 & -0.14 & 99.99 & G    & 19 & -10.6 & 46 & 3:6  & \\

1423:  08104984-4911258 & 1.16 & 11.58 & 0.06 & 0.14 & 99.99 & G    & 29 & 6   & 29 & 3:8  & \\

1424:  08112074-4913100 & 1.18 & 11.85 & 0.02 & 99.99 & 99.99 & G    & 46 & 19   & 20 & 3:10  & \\

1425:  08103470-4908399 & 1.30 & 12.20 & -0.03 & 0.05 & 99.99 & G    & 13 & 5   & 27 & 3:9  & \\

1426:  08095109-4859022 & 1.37 & 12.96 & 0.10 & 99.99 & 99.99 & G    & 0 & 49   & 99 & 5:23  & \\

1427:  08085790-4854189 & 1.38 & 99.99 & 0.02 & 99.99 & 99.99 & G    & 99.99 & 14   & 97 & 5:28  & \\

1428:  08100380-4901071 & 1.49 & 12.36 & 0.02 & 0.02 & 99.99 & G    & 42 & 8   & 120 & 5:14  & Broad lines \\

1429:  08093456-4920553 & 1.58 & 13.01 & 0.03 & 0.87 & 99.99 & K    & 40 & 27   & 190 & 2:13  & \\

1430:  08090250-4858172 & 1.61 & 12.95 & 1.54 & 3.66 & 99.99 & G    & 99.99 & 14   & 62 & 5:11  & ID 8 \\

1431:  08095421-4919220 & 1.62 & 12.50 & 0.01 & -0.09 & 99.99 & K    & 99.99 & 16   & 29 & 1:27  & \\

1432:  08094117-4855146 & 1.63 & 99.99 & 0.03 & 99.99 & 99.99 & G    & 99.99 & 22   & 84 & 5:32  & \\

1433:  08110234-4916249 & 1.65 & 12.90 & 0.01 & 0.79 & 99.99 & K    & 64 & 16   & 35 & 4:8  & \\

1434:  08101542-4911095 & 1.81 & 13.03 & 0.18 & 99.99 & 99.99 & K    & 49 & 70   & 29 & 4:6  & \\

1435:  08103793-4914225 & 1.87 & 13.20 & 0.11 & 99.99 & 99.99 & K    & 57 & 17   & 36 & 4:9  & \\

1436:  08092276-4916309 & 1.91 & 13.42 & 0.07 & 99.99 & 99.99 & K    & 7 & 7   & 170 & 2:14  & Emission\\

1437:  08101292-4914094 & 1.92 & 13.45 & 0.02 & 99.99 & 99.99 & K    & 99.99 & 13   & 190 & 2:9  & Emission \\

1438:  08095274-4922170 & 1.97 & 13.33 & -0.06 & 99.99 & 99.99 & K    & 0 & 26   & 160 & 2:15  & \\

1439:  08101799-4923502 & 2.09 & 13.71 & 0.05 & 99.99 & 99.99 & K    & 41 & 14   & 22 & 4:11  & Low S/N\\

1440:  08091928-4904260 & 2.19 & 14.26 & 0.15 & 99.99 & K3e & K    & 99.99 & 21   & 26 & 5:36  & \\

1441:  08110637-4912267 & 2.19 & 13.97 & 0.08 & 99.99 & 99.99 & K    & 36 & 23   & 22 & 4:13  & \\

1442:  08092916-4901240 & 2.20 & 14.17 & 0.01 & 99.99 & 99.99 & K    & 6 & 3   & 29 & 5:10  & \\

1443:  08091332-4857599 & 2.20 & 13.72 & 0.14 & 99.99 & 99.99 & K    & 99.99 & 0    & 40 & 5:33  & Emission?\\

1444:  08092129-4900412 & 2.20 & 14.13 & 0.05 & 99.99 & 99.99 & K    & 59 & 1   & 38 & 5:35  & \\

1445:  08085572-4857167 & 2.41 & 14.49 & 0.14 & 99.99 & 99.99 & K    & 99.99 & 31   & 31 & 5:17  & \\

1446:  08104410-4913153 & 2.41 & 13.33 & 0.06 & 99.99 & 99.99 & K    & 71 & 68   & 37 & 4:7  & \\

1447:  08101944-4907444 & 2.42 & 14.02 & 0.09 & 99.99 & 99.99 & K    & 66 & -30  & 170 & 2:17  & \\

1448:  08092387-4915041 & 2.50 & 13.94 & 0.01 & 99.99 & 99.99 & K    & 0 & 22   & 130 & 2:24  & \\

1449:  08101474-4912320 & 2.51 & 13.39 & 0.12 & 0.74 & 99.99 & K    & 3 & 110  & 220  & 2:7  & \\

1450:  08090022-4920332 & 2.56 & 14.41 & 0.03 & 99.99 & 99.99 & K    & 40 & 9   & 110  & 2:20  & Emission \\

1451:  08100398-4913027 & 2.65 & 13.87 & 0.14 & 99.99 & 99.99 & K    & 99.99 & 4   & 140  & 2:10a  & \\

1452:  08094482-4902195 & 2.67 & 14.15 & 0.06 & 99.99 & 99.99 & K    & 99.99 & 54   & 40   & 5:29  & \\

1453:  08100961-4915540 & 2.72 & 13.90 & 0.22 & 0.61 & 99.99 & K    & 48 & 8   & 170  & 2:8  &  \\

1454:  08101083-4858477 & 2.74 & 14.41 & 0.06 & 99.99 & 99.99 & K    & 38 & 73   & 52   & 5:8  & \\

1455:  08101987-4856000 & 2.75 & 14.46 & 0.05 & 99.99 & 99.99 & K    & 99.99 & 16   & 66   & 5:24  & Emission \\

1456:  08100558-4914581 & 2.77 & 14.46 & 0.21 & 99.99 & 99.99 & K    & 26 & 35   & 140  & 2:11  & \\

1457:  08091164-4857019 & 2.77 & 14.87 & 0.12 & 99.99 & 99.99 & K    & 99.99 & 70   & 24   & 5:20  & \\

1458:  08092019-4907045 & 2.79 & 14.41 & 0.11 & 99.99 & 99.99 & K    & 0 & 33   & 150  & 2:16  & \\

1459:  08101679-4913171 & 2.84 & 14.76 & -0.01 & 99.99 & 99.99 & K    & 0 & 91  & 110  & 2:18  & \\

1460:  08092683-4900187 & 2.94 & 14.73 & 0.10 & 99.99 & 99.99 & K    & 0 & 50   & 30   & 5:19  & \\

1461:  08101691-4856291 & 3.10 & 14.20 & 3.10 & 6.99 & 99.99 & K    & 99.99 & 29   & 64   & 5:12  & Broad lines; ID 9 \\

1462:  08100955-4856343 & 3.11 & 15.31 & 0.06 & 99.99 & 99.99 & K    & 99.99 & 68   & 47   & 5:21  & \\

1463:  08100893-4915413 & 3.12 & 15.29 & 0.15 & 99.99 & K7e & K    & 0 & -13   & 15   & 4:17  & Low S/N; emiss.? \\

1464:  08100442-4850544 & 3.21 & 99.99 & 0.06 & 99.99 & 99.99 & K    & 99.99 & 26   & 17   & 5:38  &  \\

1465:  08103186-4921296 & 3.25 & 15.04 & 0.14 & 99.99 & K7e & K    & 62 & -14   & 17   & 4:12  & Low S/N; emiss.? \\

1466:  08100759-4900035 & 3.27 & 14.44 & 0.18 & 0.47 & 99.99 & K    & 69 & 136  & 49   & 5:25  & \\

1467:  08095507-4858140 & 3.57 & 15.96 & 0.16 & 99.99 & 99.99 & K    & 99.99 & 15   & 23   & 5:22  & Emission \\

1468:  08102318-4912086 & 3.61 & 15.99 & 0.20 & 99.99 & 99.99 & M    & 99.99 & 17   & 90   & 2:26  & Emission \\

1469:  08091657-4909309 & 3.62 & 15.92 & 0.26 & 99.99 & M0e & M    & 99.99 & 11   & 84   & 2:21  & Emission \\

1470:  08100749-4910447 & 3.72 & 16.09 & 0.07 & 99.99 & M0e & M    & 99.99 & 16   & 92   & 2:23  & Emission \\

1471:  08091025-4902250 & 3.74 & 15.85 & 0.38 & 0.27 & 99.99 & M    & 0 & 10   & 18   & 5:18  & Emission \\

1472:  08093105-4853166 & 3.75 & 99.99 & 0.04 & 99.99 & 99.99 & K    & 99.99 & 89   & 28 & 5:27  & \\ 

1473:  08094556-4917364 & 3.90 & 16.12 & 0.16 & 99.99 & M0e & M     & 99.99 & 9   & 68   & 2:19  & Low S/N \\

1474:  08102553-4906335 & 3.98 & 16.56 & 0.18 & 99.99 & M1e & M    & 99.99 & 16   & 80   & 2:28  & Emission \\

1475:  08093685-4914214 & 4.00 & 15.74 & 0.27 & 99.99 & M1e & M    & 99.99 & 17   & 100  & 2:12  & Emission \\

1476:  08102150-4901339 & 4.21 & 17.03 & 0.21 & 99.99 & 99.99 & M    & 99.99 & 10   & 27   & 5:30  & Low S/N; emiss.? \\

1477:  08092437-4906282 & 4.27 & 17.04 & 0.19 & 99.99 & M2e & M    & 99.99 & 8   & 68   & 2:31  & Emission \\

1478:  08092131-4905540 & 4.36 & 16.64 & 0.25 & 99.99 & 99.99 & M    & 99.99 & 13   & 86   & 2:25  & Emission \\

1479:  08100180-4915454 & 4.42 & 17.38 & 0.19 & 99.99 & M1e & M    & 99.99 & 12   & 61   & 2:29  & Emission \\

1480:  08102210-4911230 & 4.43 & 17.47 & 0.42 & 99.99 & M2e & M    & 99.99 & 22   & 64   & 2:32  & Emission \\

1481:  08102103-4910448 & 4.64 & 17.81 & 0.08 & 99.99 & M3e & M    & 99.99 & 17   & 58   & 2:33  & Emission \\

1482:  08093892-4915051 & 4.70 & 17.34 & 0.19 & 99.99 & 99.99 & M    & 99.99 & 16   & 61   & 2:22  & Emission \\

1483:  08095429-4908418 & 4.71 & 18.27 & 0.21 & 99.99 & 99.99 & M    & 99.99 & 15   & 48   & 2:37  & Emission \\

1484:  08085758-4911261 & 4.77 & 18.16 & 0.15 & 99.99 & 99.99 & M    & 99.99 & 12   & 42   & 2:34  & Emission \\

1485:  08094273-4921168 & 4.85 & 18.64 & 0.22 & 99.99 & 99.99 & M    & 99.99 & 11   & 34   & 2:38  & \\

1486:  08091111-4914183 & 5.03 & 18.19 & 0.39 & 99.99 & 99.99 & M    & 99.99 & 6   & 361 & 2:30  & \\

1487:  08094499-4906241 & 5.06 & 18.04 & 0.72 & 99.99 & M4e & M    & 99.99 & 15   & 48   & 2:35  & \\

1488:  08092592-4909585 & 5.07 & 18.45 & 0.03 & 99.99 & 99.99 & M    & 99.99 & 8   & 43   & 2:36  & Emission ? \\

1489:  08100063-4853392 & 5.24 & 99.99 & 0.12 & 99.99 & 99.99 & M    & 99.99 & 8   & 16   & 5:31  & \\

1490:  08094946-4916189 & 5.49 & 18.59 & 0.36 & 99.99 & 99.99 & M    & 99.99 & 17   & 47   & 2:27  & \\

1491:  08093547-4913033 & 5.50 & 19.55 & 0.95 & 3.70 & M4.5 & M    & 99.99 & 11   & 28   & 2:6  & ID 7 \\

1492: \enddata 

1493: \tablenotetext{1}{Range of spectral types found in the \textit{VizieR}}

1494: \tablenotetext{2}{Rough estimate of the spectral type for use with the corresponding radial velocity template,

1495: a combination of the actual SpT and the airmass of observation (see \S \ref{sp})}

1496: \tablenotetext{3}{Membership probability based on proper motion from \citet{Dias06}}

1497: \tablenotetext{4}{Heliocentric velocity (as explained in \S \ref{sp})} 

1498: \tablenotetext{5}{Signal-to-noise of spectrum estimated as the square root of counts in the continuum near 8490\AA\, }  

1499: \tablenotetext{6}{Designation of spectrum based on the mask number (Table \ref{tablemasks}) and slit number within the mask}  

1500: \tablenotetext{7}{ID for stars with 8 $\mu$m excess, their spectra shown on Fig. \ref{fig4}. Emission means emission inside Ca II NIR absorption lines} 

1501: \tablecomments{Magnitudes de-reddened assuming uniform reddening of $A_{V}=0.19$. Where $V$ is unavailable,

1502: we estimated $V-K$  from $I-K$ vs $V-K$ sequence constructed for cluster members. Objects sorted according to $(V-K)_{0}$. Radial

1503: velocities and spectra are not reliable when S/N is low or lines are broad.} 

1504: \end{deluxetable} 

1505: 

1506: \clearpage

1507: \begin{deluxetable}{ccrrrrl} 

1508: \tablecolumns{7}  

1509: \tablewidth{0pt} 

1510: \tabletypesize{\tiny} 

1511: \tablecaption{NGC 2547 Members with mid-IR Excess\label{tableexc}}

1512: \tablehead{ \colhead{2MASS Name} & \colhead{Sp. No} & \colhead{$(V-K)_{0}$} & \colhead{$(R-K)_{0}$} & 

1513: \colhead{$(K-[8])_{0}$\tablenotemark{1}} & \colhead{$(K-[24])_{0}$\tablenotemark{1}} & \colhead{Remarks\tablenotemark{2}}

1514: } 

1515: \startdata

1516: \sidehead{Selected based on 8 $\mu$m excess:} \\

1517:   08091401-4904029 & 1:17         & 0.84 & 99.99 & \textbf{0.14} &  0.16          & ID 1 \\ 

1518:   08093815-4918403 & 1:20a, 1:20b & 0.96 & 99.99 & \textbf{0.11} &  \textbf{0.95} & ID 2; EXC $K,[3]$\\ 

1519:   08090720-4919144 & 99.99        & 2.76 &  2.04 & \textbf{0.26} & 99.99          & ID 4; EXC $[4],[5]$\\ 

1520:   08093547-4913033 & 2:6          & 5.50 &  4.29 & \textbf{0.95} &\textbf{3.70}   & ID 7; EXC $[5]$\\  

1521:   08090250-4858172 & 5:11         & 1.61 &  1.25 & \textbf{1.55} &\textbf{3.66}   & ID 8; EXC $[3],[4],[5]$\\

1522:   08101691-4856291 & 5:12         & 3.10 &  2.47 & \textbf{3.10} & \textbf{6.99}  & ID 9; EXC $K,[3],[4],[5]$\\ 

1523: \\

1524: \sidehead{Selected based on 24 $\mu$m excess:} \\

1525:    08092602-4911553 & 99.99        &-0.18 & 99.99 & 0.04          & \textbf{0.22} &            \\  

1526:    08084981-4913437 & 99.99        &-0.04 & 99.99 & 0.02          & \textbf{0.17} &              \\   

1527:    08100607-4914180 & 1:18         & 0.04 & 99.99 & 0.02          & \textbf{1.47} &              \\ 

1528:    08112585-4912288 & 99.99        & 0.08 & 99.99 & -0.01         & \textbf{0.70} &               \\  

1529:    08104233-4857253 & 99.99        & 0.12 & 99.99 & 0.00          & \textbf{0.28} &              \\   

1530:    08100841-4900434 & 99.99        & 0.12 & 99.99 & 0.00          & \textbf{1.10} &               \\  

1531: \\

1532:    08110323-4900374 & 99.99        & 0.57 & 99.99 & 0.03          & \textbf{1.08} &            \\   

1533:    08092668-4914371 & 1:8          & 0.58 & 99.99 & 0.04          & \textbf{1.27} &               \\ 

1534:    08084571-4923473 & 99.99        & 0.62 & 99.99 & 0.00          & \textbf{0.96} &              \\   

1535:    08111134-4904442 & 99.99        & 0.71 & 99.99 & 0.07          & \textbf{0.54} &              \\   

1536:    08101673-4915173 & 99.99        & 0.72 & 99.99 & 0.03          & \textbf{0.79} &               \\  

1537: \\

1538:    08092293-4907575 & 1:15         & 1.14 & 99.99 & -0.06         & \textbf{0.60} &             \\ 

1539:    08104546-4901068 & 99.99        & 1.23 & 99.99 & 0.05          & \textbf{0.43} &               \\  

1540:    08101836-4906461 & 99.99        & 1.27 & 99.99 & 0.01          & \textbf{0.42} &               \\  

1541:    08094507-4856307 & 99.99        & 1.27 & 99.99 & -0.01         & \textbf{0.45} &               \\  

1542:    08085576-4923085 & 99.99        & 1.33 & 99.99 & 0.00          & \textbf{0.36} &               \\  

1543: \\

1544:    08090344-4859210 & 99.99        & 5.37 & 99.99 & 0.60          & \textbf{4.62} &       \\ 

1545: \\

1546: \sidehead{Selected based on possible 24 $\mu$m excess:} \\

1547:    08104815-4923385 & 99.99        & 1.51 &  1.15 & -0.01         & \textbf{0.62} &               \\ 

1548:    08093456-4920553 & 2:13         & 1.59 &  1.20 & 0.03          & \textbf{0.87} &               \\  

1549:    08110009-4906442 & 99.99        & 1.59 &  1.23 & 0.03          & \textbf{0.84} &              \\  

1550:    08110234-4916249 & 4:8          & 1.65 &  1.24 & 0.01          & \textbf{0.79} &              \\  

1551: \\

1552:    08101474-4912320 & 2:7          & 2.51 & 99.99 & 0.12          & \textbf{0.74} & RV \& PM NM \\ 

1553:    08100961-4915540 & 2:8          & 2.72  & 2.12 & 0.22          & \textbf{0.61} &               \\ 

1554:    08091758-4859252 & 99.99        & 2.67 &  2.11 & 0.09          & \textbf{0.69} &               \\  

1555: \\

1556:    08125256-4912123 & 99.99        & 99.99 & 2.21 & 99.99         & \textbf{1.48} &        \\ 

1557:    08102491-4851482 & 99.99        & 99.99 & 1.83 & 0.12          & \textbf{1.90} & PM NM        \\  

1558: \\

1559:    08091770-4908344 & 99.99        & 5.56 & 4.30  & 0.64          & \textbf{3.18} &     \\    

1560: \enddata 

1561: \tablenotetext{1}{In bold are colors indicating excess} 

1562: \tablenotetext{2}{RV: radial velocity; PM: proper motion; NM: non-member; EXC: ``excess also at'',

1563: square brackets denote IRAC wavebands in $\mu$m}

1564: \end{deluxetable}  

1565: 

1566: \begin{figure} 

1567: \plotone{f1sm.eps}

1568: \caption{NGC 2547 color mosaic composed of two IRAC bands and the MIPS 24 $\mu$m one.

1569: The optically brightest members in the center of the cluster

1570: are surrounded by extended 24 $\mu$m emission, a result of winds and heating of the interstellar cirrus.

1571: They also excite the 7.7 $\mu$m aromatic feature, 

1572: seen as the bright green area.

1573: Two dashes indicate position of ID 9, a candidate low-mass member with a strong mid-IR excess.

1574: }\label{fig1}   

1575: \end{figure}  

1576: 

1577: \begin{figure} 

1578: \plotone{f2sm.eps}

1579: \caption{IRAC 8 $\mu$m image showing area surveyed photometrically and spectroscopically

1580: in this work. {\it Asterisks:} optically-selected photometric members from 

1581: \citet{Naylor02} and \citet{Jeffries04}; {\it squares:} members detected with {\it Spitzer},

1582: {\it diamonds:} sources for which we obtained spectra.

1583: }\label{fig2}   

1584: \end{figure}  

1585: 

1586: \begin{figure} 

1587: \epsscale{0.9}

1588: \plotone{f3.eps}

1589: \caption{Spectroscopic sequence in NGC 2547 based on the representative IMACS spectra

1590: of non-excess stars.

1591: All spectral segments have been normalized to unity

1592: at the short-wavelength end and shifted vertically for clarity;

1593: horizontal dashes on the right mark the level of the zero flux for each spectrum.

1594: Spectral features marked in \textit{black} with the wavelength scale

1595: given at top correspond to the red light (flux transmitted in the 1-st grating order).

1596: Features marked in \textit{grey} with the wavelength scale on bottom

1597: correspond to the blue light (unblocked flux from the 2-nd order). 

1598: Distance between ticks: 10 \AA\, on the top scale and 5 \AA\, on the bottom one.

1599: The wavelength scale is heliocentric. 

1600: Line identifications are from \citet{Munari99}, \citet{Torres93}, and the Digital Spectral

1601: Classification Atlas of R. O. Gray.

1602: Examples of fast and slow rotation are given for A types,

1603: and with and without emission in the Ca II lines for K and M types. 

1604: Colon means that spectral type was estimated based on the $V-K$ color.

1605: From top to bottom: 2MASS08092958-4906166, 2MASS08095066-4912493,

1606: 2MASS08102774-4912095, 2MASS08101292-4914094,

1607: 2MASS08101944-4907444,

1608: 2MASS08093685-4914214, 2MASS08092592-4909585.

1609: }\label{fig3}   

1610: \end{figure}  

1611: 

1612: \begin{figure} 

1613: \epsscale{0.9}

1614: \epsscale{0.9}

1615: \plotone{f4.eps}

1616: \caption{IMACS spectra of some excess stars from Table \ref{tableexc}. 

1617: From top to bottom: 2MASS08091401-4904029,

1618: 2MASS08093815-4918403 (resolved into two components), 2MASS08090250-4858172, 2MASS08101691-4856291,

1619: 2MASS08100961-4915540, 2MASS08093547-4913033. They compare well with spectra of non-excess

1620: members in Fig. \ref{fig3}. 

1621: }\label{fig4}   

1622: \end{figure}  

1623: 

1624: \begin{figure} 

1625: \plotone{f5.eps}

1626: \caption{Distribution of radial velocities in NGC 2547 measured from IMACS spectra

1627: relative to the respective template in each spectral group. Contamination of K type

1628: members by background giants can be seen from the secondary peak at 75 km/s.

1629: $N$ gives the number of spectra in each group.

1630: }\label{fig5}   

1631: \end{figure}  

1632: 

1633: \begin{figure} 

1634: \plotone{f6sm.eps}

1635: \caption{Color-color diagram (de-reddened) for identifying 8 $\mu$m excesses

1636: using $V-K$ color to trace photospheric flux. {\it Solid circles:}

1637: $BVRIZ$-selected NGC 2547 members (from Table \ref{table1a}); {\it triangles:} $BV$-selected

1638: possible members (from Table \ref{table1b}); {\it open circles:} spectroscopically observed (from

1639: Table \ref{tablesp}). The solid line connects seven M3--M6.5 field dwarfs from \citet{Patten06},

1640: $V$ mags are taken from VizieR. 

1641: }\label{fig6}   

1642: \end{figure}  

1643: 

1644: \begin{figure} 

1645: \plotone{f7sm.eps}

1646: \caption{Color-color diagram for identifying 8 $\mu$m excesses

1647: using $R-K$ color to trace photospheric flux. Symbols same as in Fig. \ref{fig6}.

1648: $R$ mags for field dwarfs of \citet{Patten06} 

1649: are derived from $V-R$ vs. SpT relation of \citet{Kenyon95}.

1650: }\label{fig7}   

1651: \end{figure}  

1652: 

1653: \begin{figure} 

1654: \plotone{f8sm.eps}

1655: \caption{Color-color diagram to confirm 8 $\mu$m excesses in the neigboring

1656: 5.8 $\mu$m IRAC band. Symbols same as in Fig. \ref{fig6}.

1657: }\label{fig8}   

1658: \end{figure}  

1659: 

1660: \begin{figure} 

1661: \plotone{f9sm.eps}

1662: \caption{Similar diagram as in Fig. \ref{fig8} but with $R-K$ color.

1663: }\label{fig9}   

1664: \end{figure}

1665: 

1666: \begin{figure} 

1667: \plotone{f10sm.eps}

1668: \caption{Color--color diagram used to identify 24 $\mu$m excesses.

1669: The solid gray line represents our detection limit at 24 $\mu$m.

1670: It approximates the locus of the non-detected members by assuming their $[24]<10.8^{m}$,

1671: and so is a reflection of the $K$ vs $V-K$ sequence. It shows that we are complete

1672: at 24 $\mu$m up to $V-K \sim$1.3 (late Fs).

1673: Objects to the left of this line are either binaries or

1674: situated in the very clean from nebulosity region.

1675: Dashed lines are the non-excess locus $\pm$ 3 $\sigma$ derived for the Pleiades stars

1676: (from \citet{Gorlova06}), which we utilize here to identify excesses in NGC 2547. 

1677: Symbols are the same as on the previous figures. The triangle at (4.62, 5.37) is 2MASS08090344-4859210

1678: discussed in \S \ref{prop8}.

1679: }\label{fig10}   

1680: \end{figure} 

1681: 

1682: \begin{figure} 

1683: \plotone{f11sm.eps}

1684: \caption{Same diagram as in Fig. \ref{fig10} but with $R-K$ color.

1685: }\label{fig11}  

1686: \end{figure} 

1687: 

1688: \begin{figure} 

1689: \epsscale{0.9}

1690: \plotone{f12sm.eps}

1691: \caption{Spectral energy distributions of stars with 8 $\mu$m excess.

1692: {\it Diamonds:} $BVRIJHK$, IRAC and MIPS 24 $\mu$m derddened photometry

1693: ($A_{V}=0.19$, extinction coefficients from \citet{Mathis90});

1694: {\it solid line:} Kurucz photospheric model spectra with

1695: effective temperature T$_{*}$ and $log\,g=3.0$; {\it dot-dashed line:}  photospheric

1696: flux plus a black-body flux of temperature T$_{disk}$ and fractional luminosity

1697: $\tau$; {\it dotted line:} median SED with the quartiles of the distribution

1698: for the class II K7--M2 sources in the Taurus. 

1699: }\label{fig12}   

1700: \end{figure}  

1701:   

1702: \begin{figure} 

1703: \plotone{f13sm.eps}

1704: \caption{SofI spectra of ID 8 \& 9 (\textit{thin black lines}) compared to the

1705: spectra of standard stars from \citet{KH86}, and to HIP 43141A obtained on the same night

1706: (\textit{thick gray lines}). Standard spectra have been smoothed

1707: to match the SofI resolution. All spectra have been continuum normalized

1708: and shifted in the vertical direction  (except $\gamma$ Dra).

1709: The spectrum of ID 8 is consistent with a G type,

1710: while the spectrum of ID 9 matches a mid-K dwarf. 

1711: }\label{fig13}   

1712: \end{figure}  

1713:   

1714:   

1715: \end{document} 

1716:  

1717: