0707.3119/ms.tex
1: %%%% VERSION 4.2 after referee's report and modified by DPKB,
2: %%%% additonal minor mods by KAM 7/05/07
3: %%%% 
4: 
5: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
6: \documentclass{emulateapj}
7: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
8: 
9: %\newcommand\micron{\,{\rm \mu m}}
10: 
11: % \documentclass[manuscript]{emulateapj}
12: 
13: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
14: 
15: %\documentclass[preprint2]{emulateapj}
16: %\usepackage{apjfonts}
17: \shorttitle{Alumina dust in V4332 Sgr}
18: \shortauthors{Banerjee et al.}
19: 
20: \begin{document}
21: \title{Spitzer observations of V4332 Sagittarii: Detection of Alumina Dust}
22: 
23: \author{D.\ P.\ K.\ Banerjee\altaffilmark{1},  K.\ A.\
24:   Misselt\altaffilmark{2}, K.\ Y.\ L.\ Su\altaffilmark{2},
25:   N.\ M.\ Ashok\altaffilmark{1}, P.\ S.\ Smith\altaffilmark{2}}
26: 
27: \altaffiltext{1}{Physical Research Laboratory, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad
28:   Gujarat 380009, India. orion,ashok@prl.res.in} 
29: \altaffiltext{2}{Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, 933 North
30:   Cherry Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85721. kmisselt,ksu,psmith@as.arizona.edu}
31: 
32: \begin{abstract}
33:  
34: We present broad-band 24, 70 and 160~$\micron$ photometry,
35: 5-35~$\micron$ and 55-90~$\micron$ spectra of the eruptive variable
36: V4332~Sgr from {\it Spitzer} observations. The distinguishing feature
37: of the 5-35~$\micron$ spectrum is an unusually broad absorption
38: feature near $10~\micron$ at the position generally associated with
39: silicate-rich dust. Through radiative transfer modeling, we show that
40: this broad feature cannot arise from silicates alone but requires the
41: inclusion of alumina (Al$_2$O$_3$) as a dust condensate. The case for
42: including Al$_2$O$_3$ is strengthened further by the presence of the AlO
43: radical, a potentially important molecule in forming Al$_2$O$_3$.  The
44: present detection indicates that porous alumina manifests itself
45: through a broadening of the 9.7~$\micron$ silicate feature and
46: additionally displays, on the shoulder of the silicate feature, a
47: component at $\sim11.5~\micron$.  We discuss how further observations 
48: of V4332~Sgr may have the potential of verifying some general 
49: predictions of the dust condensation process.
50: 
51: \end{abstract}
52: 
53: 
54: \keywords{infrared: stars-novae, cataclysmic variables - stars: individual 
55: (V4332 Sagittarii) }
56:     
57: \section{Introduction}
58: 
59: Alumina (Al$_2$O$_3$) is considered to play a significant role in dust
60: formation around oxygen-rich cool stars. Thermodynamic equilibrium
61: calculations indicate that it, along with titanium oxides, is one of
62: the earliest condensates in the mineralogical condensation sequence
63: \citep{1990fmpn.coll..186T,1999A&A...347..594G}. Observationally, there
64: is some debate and uncertainty regarding the spectral signatures that
65: can be ascribed to alumina that permit a firm conclusion to be drawn
66: for the presence of alumina.  In particular features at 11.3~$\micron$
67: and 13~$\micron$, seen in the spectra of O-rich AGB and
68: supergiant stars have often been attributed to alumina
69: \citep[e.g.,][and references
70: therein]{2000A&AS..146..437S}. Additionally, various authors have
71: shown that the inclusion of alumina grains in dust models yields
72: better fits to the observed profile of the silicate feature at
73: 9.7~$\micron$ (especially when the feature is broad) and also
74: reproduces better the overall infrared spectral energy distribution
75: (SED) in selected AGB and OH/IR stars
76: \citep{2000A&AS..146..437S,2005MNRAS.362..872M,2006ApJ...640..971D}. In this paper, we
77: present evidence for alumina dust detection from {\it Spitzer Space
78: Telescope} observations of the nova-like variable V4332 Sgr. The
79: distinguishing feature of its mid/far IR spectrum is a deep, unusually
80: broad absorption feature at 10~$\micron$.  We show that this feature
81: cannot be reproduced by silicate dust alone and that it is necessary
82: to invoke the presence of amorphous alumina grains to explain it.
83: 
84: V4332~Sgr erupted in 1994 in what was initially considered a nova-like
85: outburst \citep{1999AJ....118.1034M}.  However, its subsequent
86: post-outburst evolution to a cool spectral type indicated that this was
87: not a classical nova eruption. The exact nature of V4332~Sgr is of
88: considerable interest as it, along with V838 Mon and M31 RV 
89: (a red-variable which erupted in M31 in 1988), may form a new class of
90: eruptive objects
91: \citep[e.g.][]{2002A&A...389L..51M,2003Natur.422..405B}. V4332~Sgr
92: shows an intriguing emission-line spectrum in the optical and
93: near-infrared with several rare spectral features. Prominent molecular
94: bands of TiO, ScO, VO and AlO are also seen in the optical
95: \citep{2005A&A...439..651T,2006AN....327...44K} implying an oxygen
96: rich environment. The fundamental band of $^{12}$CO at 4.67$\micron$
97: has also been detected in the source along with water ice at
98: 3.05$\micron$ \citep{2004ApJ...615L..53B}. The IR excess detected in
99: the source, along with the molecular and ice features, suggest a cool
100: dusty environment around the central star whose effective temperature
101: is estimated to be $\sim$ 3250-3280K
102: \citep{2003ApJ...598L..31B,2005A&A...439..651T}.
103: 
104: 
105: \section{Observations and Data reduction}
106: 
107: V4332~Sgr was imaged with the Multiband Imaging Photometer for {\it
108: Spitzer} \citep[MIPS;][]{2004ApJS..154...25R} at 24 and 70~$\micron$ on 15 Oct
109: 2005 and 2 Nov 2006 (70~$\micron$ Fine and Default modes,
110: respectively). Data at 160~$\micron$ were 
111: obtained on 15 Oct 2005. Spectra were obtained using the Infrared
112: Spectrograph on {\it Spitzer} \citep[IRS;][]{2004ApJS..154...18H} on 18 April
113: 2005 and 19 April 2006. In 2005, low resolution (R $\sim$ 60-100) data
114: from $\sim 5-38~\micron$ and high resolution data (R = 600) from $\sim
115: 18-38~\micron$ were obtained. In 2006, high resolution data from $\sim
116: 19-38~\micron$ and low resolution data from $\sim 5-14~\micron$ were
117: obtained. In addition, MIPS SED mode data covering the wavelength
118: range from $\sim 55-90~\micron$ were obtained on 27 Sept 2005.  For
119: the following discussion, data obtained in 2005 and 2006 will be
120: referred to as epoch 1 and epoch 2, respectively.
121: 
122: \begin{figure}
123: \plotone{f1.eps}
124: \caption{Top: Epoch 1 (solid curve and points) along with the best model
125:   fit (dashed curve); see Table
126:   \ref{tab:modpar}, column 3. Bottom: Expanded view around the 10~$\micron$
127:   complex. In addition to the best fit model, the best fit silicate only
128:   model is over plotted (dash-dotted curve).  It is clearly seen that a pure silicate model
129:   yields a poor fit to the extended red wing of the
130:   data. \label{fig:fullSED}}\
131: \end{figure}
132: 
133: The MIPS data were reduced using the Data Analysis Tool v3.06
134: \citep{2005PASP..117..503G}. V4332~Sgr was detected as a point source
135: by MIPS at 24, 70, and 160~$\micron$, and the flux densities were
136: extracted using both PSF fitting and aperture photometry.  The
137: measured MIPS flux densities were 2.34$\pm$0.07, 1.07$\pm$0.11, and
138: 0.12$\pm$0.02~Jy at 24, 70, and 160~$\micron$\, respectively.  At 24
139: and 70~$\micron$\, the flux densities measured in Epochs 1 and 2 were
140: identical within the errors and we report the weighted mean of those
141: measurements. The basic instrumental calibration of the MIPS SED mode
142: is similar to that of the 70~$\micron$ imaging mode
143: \citep{2007ApJ..InPress} but with a wavelength-dependent illumination
144: correction. The final spectrum of the source is obtained by extracting
145: a 5-column (49\farcs25) aperture from the sky subtracted 2-D spectrum
146: after correcting for slit losses.  The MIPS SED data were scaled by a
147: factor of 0.88 to match the flux density in the 70~$\micron$ bandpass.
148: Details of the SED reduction can be found in Lu et al.~(2007, in
149: prep.). 
150: 
151: The IRS data were processed and extracted using the {\it
152: Spitzer} Science Center (SSC) Pipeline S15.3 product. Since V4332~Sgr
153: is a bright point source, the final spectrum of the low resolution
154: modules were combined using the SSC post-BCD co-added, nod-subtracted
155: spectra. No background observation was obtained for the high
156: resolution modules and the background level for the epoch 1 observations
157: was $\sim$ 0.06 Jy (a factor of 20 fainter than the source) at
158: $\sim$20~$\micron$ and fairly uniform in the co-added 2-D low
159: resolution spectra. The SSC post-BCD extraction of the high-resolution
160: spectrum agrees with the low-resolution spectrum within the
161: uncertainties. There is no obvious emission/absorption lines seen in
162: the high-resolution spectrum; therefore, the final spectra of V4332
163: Sgr in epochs 1 and 2 are computed by averaging both low- and
164: high-resolution modules. In Figure \ref{fig:fullSED}, we present the
165: observed IRS and MIPS SED spectra of V4332~Sgr and the combined broad
166: band MIPS fluxes at 24, 70 and 160~$\micron$.  Since there is little
167: apparent evolution between the epoch 1 and 2 broad band fluxes, we show
168: only the epoch 1 data in Figure \ref{fig:fullSED}. Evidence for changes
169: in the detailed shape of the SED between epochs will be examined
170: below.
171: 
172: \section{Results}
173: The spectrum of V4332~Sgr is dominated by a deep, broad feature at
174: $\sim10~\micron$, normally associated with the presence of amorphous
175: Mg-Fe silicate grains. However, this observed $10~\micron$ feature is
176: relatively broad, with an additional feature at $\sim11\micron$ and a
177: flattened wing beyond $\sim13~\micron$. Additionally, signatures of
178: ices and organic materials are evident from $\sim5-8~\micron$ (water
179: ice at 6~$\micron$, ``organics'' at 6.8~$\micron$ and possibly methane
180: ice at 7.7~$\micron$; see e.g. Bowey \& Hofmeister 2005).  We have
181: modeled the V4332~Sgr spectrum using the radiation transfer code DUSTY
182: \citep{1999DUSTYManual}.  The limitations of DUSTY include the
183: assumption of a spherically symmetric shell of material which may not
184: be appropriate for V4332~Sgr as the system may have a disk
185: \citep{2004ApJ...615L..53B}. However since we are interested in
186: exploring the overall shape of the observed SED rather than providing
187: a detailed physical model of the complete system, we have restricted
188: ourselves to the simplest and most generalized assumptions in our
189: calculations.  As the luminosity of V4332~Sgr is poorly known, we have
190: fixed the stellar luminosity for V4332~Sgr at 10$^4$~L$_\odot$, the
191: default input value assumed by DUSTY. This assumption does not affect
192: the shape of the computed spectrum, only the physical scale of the
193: system when combined with the dust temperature at the inner radius of
194: the shell.  We have fit the observed SED with two models viz. model 1
195: that contains silicate dust only and model 2 with a mixture of
196: silicate and alumina dust, where the inclusion of alumina is prompted
197: by the presence of a feature at $\sim11~\micron$ often attributed to
198: amorphous alumina \citep{2000A&AS..146..437S,2006ApJ...640..971D}.
199: Prompted by the presence of ice absorption at $\sim6~\micron$, the
200: grains in both models are coated with an ice mantle (20\% by
201: volume). The silicate dust optical constants are from
202: \citet{1984ApJ...285...89D} while the alumina optical data used are
203: from \citet{1997ApJ...476..199B}.  Corundum was not included in our
204: model as there is no evidence in our spectra for the feature at
205: $\sim$13~$\micron$ associated with the presence of this mineral
206: \citep{2006ApJ...640..971D}.  We tested both the 'porous' and
207: 'compact' alumina samples of \citet{1997ApJ...476..199B}; as there was no
208: substantive differences between the models, we restricted ourselves to
209: the 'porous' sample for the subsequent modeling. The ice optical
210: constants are those of Wiscombe
211: (ftp://climate1.gsfc.nasa.gov/wiscombe/). The range of parameters
212: explored is given in Table \ref{tab:modpar}. The output spectra
213: computed using both dust models are shown in Figure
214: \ref{fig:fullSED}. It is clearly seen that a pure silicate composition
215: matches the observed 10~$\micron$ feature poorly. On the other hand,
216: the inclusion of alumina in model 2 improves the fit
217: significantly. While there is considerable degeneracy in the fits,
218: especially between the optical depth and the dust temperature (low
219: temperature, low optical depth models are somewhat degenerate with
220: high temperature, high optical depth models, though they consistently
221: yield formally worse fits), it is notable that no model consisting of
222: only silicate grains provided a satisfactory fit to the 10~$\micron$
223: absorption feature. While model 2 provides a good fit overall fit to
224: the SED and the 10~$\micron$ feature from 9--12.5~$\micron$, it
225: reproduces neither the flattening beyond $\sim$13~$\micron$, nor the
226: relatively narrow blue wing. We explored using different silicate
227: optical constants \citep[e.g.][]{1992A&A...261..567O} as well as
228: varying the size distribution ($a_{max}$ and $q$) but neither approach
229: improved the fit in these spectral regions.  It is possible that a
230: more complex geometry than the simple spherical shell utilized in
231: DUSTY could improve the fit in these regions. 
232: 
233: \begin{deluxetable}{lll} 
234: \tablecaption{DUSTY Modeling \label{tab:modpar}}   
235: \tablehead{ 
236: \colhead{Parameter} & \colhead{Value}  & \colhead{Best Fit} \\   
237: }      
238: \startdata
239: Stellar Luminosity  & $10^4$L$_{\sun}$ & fixed \\
240: Stellar Temperature & 3250~K\tablenotemark{1}  & fixed          \\
241: $R_{out}/R_{in}$    & 1000\tablenotemark{2}  & fixed           \\
242: Shell $\rho$ Distribution & $r^{-2}$    & fixed \\
243: Composition         & silicates/alumina       & 65\%/35\%  \\
244: (fraction by number) & & \\
245: $\tau_{9.8~\micron}$ &   2 -- 55      & 45 \\
246: $T_{dust}(R_{in}$)  & 300 -- 1750~K  & 1750~K    \\
247: Grain Size Distribution & MRN\tablenotemark{3} & fixed \\ 
248: \enddata
249: \tablenotetext{1}{Banerjee et al. 2003.}
250: \tablenotetext{2}{Maldoni et al. 2005.}
251: \tablenotetext{3}{Mathis et al. 1977; $n(a)\sim a^{-q}$ with
252:   $a_{min,max}=0.005,0.25~\micron$, $q=3.5$.}
253: \end{deluxetable}
254: 
255: The plots in Figure \ref{fig:fullSED} permit a few conclusions to be
256: drawn: (i) the substantial improvement in the fits to the broad
257: 10~$\micron$ feature with the inclusion of alumina indicates that
258: alumina is being detected in the source and its presence is
259: manifested by a broadening of the 9.7~$\micron$ silicate feature. A
260: similar conclusion was reached by \citet{2000A&AS..146..437S} using
261: data extending to $\leq$13.5~$\micron$.  (ii) A small, yet clearly
262: discernible, feature is seen at 11~$\micron$. This feature is
263: attributable to alumina since our model calculations show that
264: increasing the percentage of alumina in the alumina-silicate mixture
265: of model 2 enhances the strength of this feature. We note that this
266: 11$\micron$ feature is seen in a significant number of stars studied
267: by \citet{2000A&AS..146..437S} implying that alumina grains are fairly
268: prevalent.  
269: 
270: \section{Discussion} 
271: 
272: \subsection{The Case for Alumina Condensation} 
273: It is perhaps not surprising to see evidence for alumina in the dust
274: surrounding V4332~Sgr given the presence of the AlO radical in its
275: optical and NIR spectra
276: \citep{2003ApJ...598L..31B,2005A&A...439..651T,2006AN....327...44K} and
277: since AlO can play a critical role in the production of
278: alumina. Laboratory experiments by \citet{2004A&A...420..547D} show
279: that aluminum oxide clusters with stoichiometry AlO-(Al$_2$O$_3$)$_n$
280: are readily formed in laser vaporized metallic Al when quenched in
281: oxygen and argon.  These clusters are found to be very stable and thus
282: very good nucleation sites for dust growth. Additionally,
283: \citet{1995JPChem...99...12225} studied the kinetics of AlO + O$_2$
284: reactions at temperatures in the range 300-1700K with a view to
285: studying the fate of aluminum in combustion. The higher end of this
286: temperature range, it may be noted, is very close to the predicted
287: condensation temperature \citep[1760K;][]{1990fmpn.coll..186T} of
288: alumina dust around stars. The \citet{1995JPChem...99...12225}
289: experiment shows that AlO becomes oxidized to AlO$_2$ by O$_2$. An
290: additional reaction involving AlO is AlO + O +M = AlO$_2$ + M, where
291: the ``chaperon'', M, is any atom or molecule present that can remove
292: some energy from the newly-formed, activated AlO$_2$ (A. Fontijn,
293: private communication). Newly formed AlO$_2$ can further interact with
294: AlO to generate alumina: AlO + AlO$_2$ + M = Al$_2$O$_3$ + M.
295: 
296: These results suggest that AlO is likely to play a significant role in
297: the route to Al$_2$O$_3$ formation. This conclusion has theoretical
298: support in the work of \citet{1999A&A...347..594G} who show 
299: that any possible nucleation species that can go on to form dust
300: around stars should begin with a monomer with exceptionally high bond
301: energy. The AlO monomer satisfies this criterion and is thus a favored
302: candidate to lead to the formation of larger Al$_m$O$_n$ clusters that
303: serve as nucleation sites for the formation of other grains or to
304: alumina grains themselves by homogeneous nucleation. While the
305: \citet{1999A&A...347..594G} analysis is based on thermal equilibrium
306: considerations, an alternative model is the non-equilibrium formation
307: of chaotic silicates proposed by \citet{1990ApJ...350L..45S} and
308: \citet{1990Ap&SS.163...79N}. Chaotic silicates form rapidly from a
309: supersaturated vapor of metal atoms, SiO, AlO and OH in a hydrogen
310: atmosphere \citep{1990ApJ...350L..45S}. In the initial stages, the
311: higher reduction of Al with respect to Si will lead to the
312: preferential formation of Al-O bonds at the expense of Si-O
313: bonds. This implies that the IR bands of alumina associated with the
314: Al-O stretching mode should be prominent early in the formation of the
315: chaotic silicates. However, as the Al atoms become fully oxidized, the
316: higher abundance of Si will make the 9.7${\rm{\mu}}$m band associated
317: with Si-O bonds dominate.
318: 
319: Titanium oxides are considered to also be an early dust condensate
320: along with alumina. Given that the dust that has formed around
321: V4332~Sgr is of fairly recent origin as implied by the abrupt infrared
322: brightening that developed in the source between 2MASS observations in
323: 1998 and subsequent observations in 2003 \citep{2003ApJ...598L..31B},
324: we might expect some signature of these species in the spectra,
325: though Ti is nearly 30 times less abundant than Al
326: \citep{2000A&AS..146..437S}. Bulk titanium oxides can have different
327: forms: TiO, TiO$_2$, Ti$_2$O$_3$ and Ti$_3$O$_5$
328: \citep{2004A&A...420..547D}. The most common, TiO$_2$ can exist as
329: brookite and anatase which convert at high temperature into rutile
330: which is the third and most common form. The rutile spectrum is
331: expected to show a broad and strong band at 13-17~$\micron$; the
332: spectrum of anatase shows two strong and broad bands around 17 and
333: 29~$\micron$. The titanium oxide clusters, studied by
334: \citet{2004A&A...420..547D} as possible nucleation sites, have a
335: vibrational transition at $\sim$13.5~$\micron$. 
336: %It is possible that
337: %the flattening of the absorption long ward of 13~$\micron$ in our
338: %spectra is indicating the presence of titanium oxides, especially if, 
339: %like the alumina and silicate present, the titanium oxide is in an
340: %amorphous form. 
341: The above discussion pertains mostly to crystalline forms of titanium oxides 
342: while in V4332 Sgr the amorphous form may  more likely  be present
343: given that both the silicates and alumina are of  amorphous nature. 
344: But a reasonable possibility exists that the flattening of the absorption 
345: band longward of 13.5~$\micron$  is indicating the presence of titanium oxides.
346: 
347: \subsection{Evolution of the Dust Condensates}
348: There is potential in the present data to address certain aspects of
349: the dust condensation process in astrophysical environments. Since the
350: dust formation  process in V4332 Sgr has begun
351: recently - certainly less than 10 years ago - and is possibly still
352: ongoing, there are a few spectral features that could change with
353: time. As an example, in the ``chaotic silicates'' hypothesis, it is
354: predicted that a strengthening of the silicate component of
355: the 9.7~$\micron$ feature should take place relative to that of the
356: alumina and other early condensate components that blend with this
357: feature.  There is observational support for such evolution comparing
358: our data between epochs 1 and 2 (see Fig \ref{fig:epoch_comp}). There
359: is a hint that the broad red wing of 9.7~$\micron$ feature has
360: weakened in epoch 2 relative to epoch 1 and that there has been an overall
361: narrowing of the 10~$\micron$ absorption complex. Although the
362: evidence is tentative given the small change ($\sim 1 \sigma$) and
363: only two epochs of data, such a behavior might be expected as Al and
364: Ti atoms become oxidized and Si-O begins to dominate the composition.
365: Further, it is also predicted that the ratio of the
366: 10~$\micron$/18~$\micron$ silicate features could be expected to
367: change monotonically as silicate dust nucleates and anneals in a
368: circumstellar environment \citep{1990Ap&SS.163...79N}. Freshly
369: nucleated silicates, as laboratory experiments show, are expected to
370: have a large 10~$\micron$/18~$\micron$ ratio i.e. the 18~$\micron$
371: feature is expected to be weak (consistent with what is seen in the
372: V4332~Sgr spectrum). Thermal processing  should increase the
373: strength of the 18~$\micron$ feature.  
374: %Although the time scales
375: %involved in the above processes are not clear, it would be worthwhile
376: %to follow V4332~Sgr in the future to monitor the spectrum of V4332~Sgr
377: %as a test of the evolution of dust condensates.
378: Although the time scales involved in the above processes are not clear,
379: it would be worthwhile to monitor the spectrum of V4332 Sgr in the
380: future to  discriminate between possible scenarios for the evolution of dust
381: condensates (Dijkstra et al. 2005 and references therein).
382: 
383: \begin{figure} 
384:   \plotone{f2.eps}
385:   \caption{Enlargement of the 10~$\micron$ absorption complex comparing
386:     epoch 1 (black) and 2 (blue) data. There is evidence for a narrowing of the
387:     absorption complex between the two epochs.
388:     \label{fig:epoch_comp}}
389: \end{figure}
390: 
391: The detection of alumina condensate in V4332~Sgr may have implications
392: for the origin of this object. It has been postulated that, along with
393: V838 Mon and M31 RV, V4332~Sgr forms a new class of eruptive
394: variables.  The nature of these objects and the source of their
395: eruptive behavior has not been established and ideas ranging from an
396: outburst from a compact object in a red giant envelope, various
397: thermonuclear events in a single high-mass evolved star, a late
398: He-shell flash, stellar mergers and even the
399: swallowing of multiple planets by a massive star have been proposed
400: \citep[e.g.][and references therein]{2006A&A...451..223T}. Within the
401: scope of this work, it is not possible to discuss in depth the
402: complexities of the origin and nature of the V4332~Sgr system. To
403: date, alumina dust has been almost exclusively detected in AGB and
404: other cool evolved stars and, as discussed above, is
405: likely a very early condensate in any oxygen rich environment, so the
406: detection of alumina in the early condensate of V4332~Sgr indicates
407: that conditions in the ejecta are similar to those found
408: around cool evolved stars.  Thus the detection of alumina in V4332~Sgr
409: may provide a constaint on the nature of the eruption if more detailed
410: modeling of some of the proposed eruption mechanisms rules out conditions
411: conducive to the formation of alumina grains.  In addition, the
412: detection of alumina around V4332~Sgr motivates long-term monitoring
413: of the ejecta formed around V838 Mon \citep{2006ApJ...644L..57B}. If
414: indeed these objects are related at a more fundamental level than
415: simply having roughly similar outburst characteristics, we might
416: expect that the conditions in the post outburst ejecta of V838 Mon to
417: be similar to those in V4332~Sgr.  Given that V838 Mon erupted $\sim$8
418: years after V4332~Sgr and exhibits AlO lines in its spectrum
419: \citep{2004ApJ...607..460L}, we might detect similar
420: signatures of alumina formation around V838 Mon in the coming years if
421: both objects do indeed share a common origin.
422: 
423:  
424: \begin{acknowledgements}
425: Research at the Physical Research Laboratory is funded by the
426: Department of Space, Government of India. This work is based on
427: observations made with the {\it Spitzer} Space Telescope, which is operated
428: by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology
429: under a contract with NASA. Support for this work was provided by NASA
430: through Contract Number 1277253 and 1256424 issued by JPL/Caltech.
431: 
432:          
433: \end{acknowledgements}
434: 
435: %______________________________________________________________
436: \begin{thebibliography}{}
437: 
438: \bibitem[Banerjee et al.(2003)]{2003ApJ...598L..31B} Banerjee, D.~P.~K., 
439: Varricatt, W.~P., Ashok, N.~M., \& Launila, O.\ 2003, \apjl, 598, L31 
440: 
441: \bibitem[Banerjee et al.(2004)]{2004ApJ...615L..53B} Banerjee, D.~P.~K., 
442: Varricatt, W.~P., \& Ashok, N.~M.\ 2004, \apjl, 615, L53
443: 
444: \bibitem[Banerjee et al.(2006)]{2006ApJ...644L..57B} Banerjee, D.~P.~K., 
445: Su, K.~Y.~L., Misselt, K.~A., \& Ashok, N.~M.\ 2006, \apjl, 644, L57 
446: 
447: \bibitem[Begemann et al.(1997)]{1997ApJ...476..199B} Begemann, B., 
448: Dorschner, J., Henning, T., Mutschke, H., Guertler, J., 
449: Koempe, C., \& Nass, R.\ 1997, \apj, 476, 199 
450: 
451: \bibitem[Belyung \& Fontijn(1995)]{1995JPChem...99...12225}
452: Belyung, D.P., $\&$ Fontijn, A. 1995, J. Phys. Chem., 99, 12225
453: 
454: \bibitem[Bond et al.(2003)]{2003Natur.422..405B} Bond, H.~E., et al.\ 2003, 
455: \nat, 422, 405 
456: 
457: \bibitem[Bowey \& Hofmeister (2005)]{2005MNRAS.358.1383B} Bowey, J.~E., \& 
458: Hofmeister, A.~M.\ 2005, \mnras, 358, 1383 
459: 
460: \bibitem[Demyk et al.(2004)]{2004A&A...420..547D} Demyk, K., van 
461: Heijnsbergen, D., von Helden, G., \& Meijer, G.\ 2004, \aap, 420, 547 
462: 
463: \bibitem[DePew et al.(2006)]{2006ApJ...640..971D} DePew, K., Speck, A., \& 
464: Dijkstra, C.\ 2006, \apj, 640, 971 
465: 
466: \bibitem[Dijkstra et al. (2005)]{2005ApJ..633..133} Dijkstra, C., Speck, A.K., 
467: Reid, R.B., \& Abraham, P. \ 2005, \apj, 633, L133
468: 
469: \bibitem[Draine \& Lee(1984)]{1984ApJ...285...89D} Draine, B.~T., \& Lee, 
470: H.~M.\ 1984, \apj, 285, 89
471: 
472: \bibitem[Gail \& Sedlmayr(1999)]{1999A&A...347..594G} Gail, H.-P., \& 
473: Sedlmayr, E.\ 1999, \aap, 347, 594 
474: 
475: \bibitem[Gordon et al.(2005)]{2005PASP..117..503G} Gordon, K.~D., et al.\ 
476: 2005, \pasp, 117, 503 
477: 
478: \bibitem[Gordon et al.(2007)]{2007ApJ..InPress} Gordon, K.~D., et al.\ 
479: 2007, ApJ, in press
480: 
481: \bibitem[Houck et al.(2004)]{2004ApJS..154...18H} Houck, J.~R., et al.\ 
482: 2004, \apjs, 154, 18 
483: 
484: \bibitem[Ivezic, Nenkova, \& Elitzur(1999)]{1999DUSTYManual}
485: Ivezic, Z., Nenkova, M., \&  Elitzur, M. 1999, "User Manual for Dusty", 
486: http://www.pa.uky.edu/~moshe/dusty
487: 
488: \bibitem[Kimeswenger(2006)]{2006AN....327...44K} Kimeswenger, S.\ 2006, 
489: Astronomische Nachrichten, 327, 44 
490: 
491: \bibitem[Lynch et al.(2004)]{2004ApJ...607..460L} Lynch, D.~K., et al.\ 
492: 2004, \apj, 607, 460 
493: 
494: \bibitem[Mathis et al.(1977)]{1977ApJ...217..425M} Mathis, J.~S., Rumpl, 
495: W., \& Nordsieck, K.~H.\ 1977, \apj, 217, 425 
496: 
497: \bibitem[Maldoni et al.(2005)]{2005MNRAS.362..872M} Maldoni, M.~M., 
498: Ireland, T.~R., Smith, R.~G., \& Robinson, G.\ 2005, \mnras, 362, 872 
499: 
500: \bibitem[Martini et al.(1999)]{1999AJ....118.1034M} Martini, P., Wagner, 
501: R.~M., Tomaney, A., Rich, R.~M., della Valle, M., \& Hauschildt, P.~H.\ 
502: 1999, \aj, 118, 1034 
503: 
504: \bibitem[Munari et al.(2002)]{2002A&A...389L..51M} Munari, U., et al.\ 
505: 2002, \aap, 389, L51 
506: 
507: 
508: \bibitem[Nuth \& Hecht(1990)]{1990Ap&SS.163...79N} Nuth, J.~A., III, \& 
509: Hecht, J.~H.\ 1990, \apss, 163, 79 
510: 
511: \bibitem[Ossenkopf et al.(1992)]{1992A&A...261..567O} Ossenkopf, V., 
512: Henning, T., \& Mathis, J.~S.\ 1992, \aap, 261, 567 
513: 
514: \bibitem[Rieke et al.(2004)]{2004ApJS..154...25R} Rieke, G.~H., et al.\ 
515: 2004, \apjs, 154, 25 
516: 
517: \bibitem[Speck et al.(2000)]{2000A&AS..146..437S} Speck, A.~K., Barlow, 
518: M.~J., Sylvester, R.~J., \& Hofmeister, A.~M.\ 2000, \aaps, 146, 437
519: 
520: \bibitem[Stencel et al.(1990)]{1990ApJ...350L..45S} Stencel, R.~E., Nuth, 
521: J.~A., III, Little-Marenin, I.~R., \& Little, S.~J.\ 1990, \apjl, 350, L45
522: 
523: \bibitem[Tielens(1990)]{1990fmpn.coll..186T} Tielens, A.~G.~G.~M.\ 1990, 
524: >From Miras to Planetary Nebulae: Which Path for Stellar Evolution?, 186
525: 
526: \bibitem[Tylenda et al.(2005)]{2005A&A...439..651T} Tylenda, R., Crause, 
527: L.~A., G{\'o}rny, S.~K., \& Schmidt, M.~R.\ 2005, \aap, 439, 651 
528: 
529: \bibitem[Tylenda \& Soker(2006)]{2006A&A...451..223T} Tylenda, R., \& 
530: Soker, N.\ 2006, \aap, 451, 223 
531: 
532: \end{thebibliography}
533: 
534: 
535: 
536: \end{document}
537: