1: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2:
3: %% Produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
4: %%
5:
6:
7: %\documentclass{/home/users/torrelle/iaa/aastex52/emulateapj}
8:
9: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
10: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
11: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
12:
13:
14: %% \documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
15:
16: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
17:
18: %% \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
19:
20: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
21: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
22: %% use the longabstract style option.
23:
24: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
25:
26: %\usepackage{graphicx}
27: %\usepackage{fancyhdr}
28: %\usepackage{amssymb}
29: %\usepackage{here}
30: %\usepackage{color}
31: %\usepackage{framed}
32: %\usepackage{multicol}
33: %\usepackage{wrapfig}
34: %\usepackage{charter} % Charter
35: %\usepackage{courier} % Courier, \texttt only
36: %\usepackage{charter} %charter font
37: %\usepackage[OT1, T1]{fontenc} %use TeX encoding then Type 1.
38:
39: %%Local%definitions%%%%%%%%%%%%
40: \newcommand{\kms} {km~s$^{-1}$}
41: \newcommand{\kmp} {km~s$^{-1}$~pc$^{-1}$}
42: \newcommand{\mjy} {mJy~beam$^{-1}$}
43: \newcommand{\kl} {k$\lambda$}
44: \newcommand{\cmt} {cm$^{-3}$}
45: \newcommand{\vlsr} {v_{\rm LSR}}
46: \newcommand{\lo} {$L_{\sun}$}
47: \newcommand{\mo} {$M_{\sun}$}
48: \newcommand{\ceh} {Cep A$/$HW2}
49: \newcommand{\cea} {Cep A}
50: \newcommand{\et} {et al.}
51: \newcommand{\ie} {i.\,e.,}
52: \newcommand{\eg} {e.\,g.,}
53: \newcommand{\id} {\it id.}
54: \newcommand{\rmaa} {RevMexAA}
55: \newcommand{\aujp} {Aust.\ J.\ Phys.}
56: \newcommand{\rod} {Rodr{/'/i}guez}
57: \newcommand{\divi} {\frac{S-I}{\Delta S+\Delta I}}
58: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
59: \newcommand{\myemail}{npatel@cfa.harvard.edu}
60:
61: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
62:
63: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
64: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
65: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
66: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
67: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.
68: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.
69:
70: \shorttitle{\sc disk and excitation effects around HW~2}
71: \shortauthors{\sc Torrelles et al.}
72:
73: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
74: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
75:
76: \begin{document}
77:
78: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
79: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
80: %% you desire.
81:
82: \title{The Circumstellar Structure and Excitation Effects around the Massive Protostar Cepheus A HW~2}
83:
84: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
85: %% author and affiliation information.
86: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
87: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
88: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
89: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
90:
91:
92: \author{J. M. Torrelles\altaffilmark{1}, N. A. Patel\altaffilmark{2}, S. Curiel\altaffilmark{3},
93: P. T. P. Ho\altaffilmark{2,4}, G. Garay\altaffilmark{5}, L. F. Rodr\'{\i}guez\altaffilmark{6}}
94:
95: \altaffiltext{1}{Instituto de Ciencias del Espacio (CSIC)-IEEC, Facultat de F\'{\i}sica,
96: Universitat de Barcelona, Mart\'{\i} i Franqu\`es 1, 08028 Barcelona, Spain; torrelles@ieec.fcr.es}
97: \altaffiltext{2}{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138; npatel@cfa.harvard.edu, pho@cfa.harvard.edu}
98: \altaffiltext{3}{Instituto de Astronom{\'\i}a (UNAM), Ap. P. 70-264, M\'exico D.F., Mexico; scuriel@astroscu.unam.mx}
99: \altaffiltext{4}{Academia Sinica Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Taipei, Taiwan}
100: \altaffiltext{5}{Departamento de Astronom\'{\i}a, Universidad de Chile, Casilla 36-D, Santiago, Chile; guido@das.uchile.cl}
101: \altaffiltext{6}{Centro de Radioastronom\'{\i}a y Astrof\'{\i}sica (UNAM), Morelia 58089, Mexico; l.rodriguez@astrosmo.unam.mx}
102:
103: \begin{abstract}
104:
105: We report SMA 335 GHz continuum observations with angular resolution
106: of $\sim$ $0\rlap.{''}3$, together with VLA ammonia
107: observations with $\sim$ $1''$ resolution toward
108: Cep A HW~2. We find that the flattened disk structure of the dust emission observed by Patel et al. is preserved at the $0\rlap.{''}3$ scale, showing an elongated
109: structure of $\sim$ $0\rlap.{''}6$ size (450 AU) peaking
110: on HW~2. In addition, two ammonia cores are observed, one associated with a hot-core previously reported, and an elongated core with a double peak separated by $\sim$ $1\rlap.{''}3$
111: and with signs of heating at the inner edges of the gas
112: facing HW~2. The double-peaked ammonia structure, as well as the
113: double-peaked CH$_3$CN structure reported previously (and proposed
114: to be two independent hot-cores), surround both the dust emission as well as the
115: double-peaked SO$_2$ disk structure
116: found by Jim\'enez-Serra et al. All these results argue against
117: the interpretation of the elongated dust-gas structure as
118: due to a chance-superposition of different cores; instead,
119: they imply that it
120: is physically related to the central massive object within a {\it disk-protostar-jet} system.
121:
122: \end{abstract}
123:
124: \keywords{
125: ISM: individual (\objectname{Cepheus A}) ---
126: ISM: jets and outflows ---
127: stars: formation
128: }
129:
130: \section{Introduction}
131:
132: HW~2 is the brightest of the radio continuum objects detected in
133: the star forming region of Cepheus A (725 pc distance, Johnson 1957)
134: harboring a massive young star (probably a B0.5 zero-age main
135: sequence star; Hughes \& Wouterloot 1984, Garay et al. 1996). This
136: object, in addition to the strong radio continuum emission seen at
137: $\lambda$cm, is also related to well-known signatures typical of
138: young massive stars, such as bright masers, and intense magnetic fields
139: (e.g., Torrelles et al. 1996, 2001, Minier, Booth, \&
140: Conway 2000, Gallimore et al. 2003, Niezurawska et al. 2004,
141: Bartkiewicz et al. 2005, Vlemmings et al. 2006, Patel et al. 2007).
142: However, what makes this a unique object is its association with
143: similar phenomena as has been observed toward low-mass young stellar
144: objects. The HW~2 radio continuum jet detected at
145: the base ($\sim 1''$) appears to be driving the more extended
146: ($\sim$ 1$'$) bipolar molecular outflow seen in HCO$^+$ (Rodr\'{\i}guez
147: et al. 1994, G\'omez et al. 1999). Especially remarkable are the large
148: proper motions observed in the two main components of the HW~2 radio
149: jet, moving away at $\sim$ 500~km~s$^{-1}$ from the central source
150: in nearly opposite directions and parallel to the HCO$^+$ bipolar
151: outflow (Curiel et al. 2006). These observations strongly
152: support theoretical models of high-mass star formation through an
153: accretion disk (McKee \& Tan 2003, De Buizer, Osorio, \& Calvet
154: 2005, Beltr\'an et al. 2006, Banerjee \& Pudritz 2007), with the
155: ejection of bipolar outflows sharing similar characteristics with
156: the star-formation process of low-mass stars (Shu, Adams, \& Lizano
157: 1987). This is in contrast to models requiring merging of low-mass stars
158: (Bonnell \& Bate 2005) where collimated jets are not expected.
159:
160: The detection of a rotating disk of dust and molecular gas of $\simeq$ 330 AU radius oriented
161: perpendicular to, and spatially coincident with, the HW~2 radio
162: jet, has been reported through Submillimeter Array (SMA)
163: observations with an angular resolution of $\simeq$
164: $0\rlap.{''}75$ (Patel et al. 2005). Those results gave additional support to the picture that during the formation
165: of this massive object a {\it disk-protostar-jet} system has been formed. Moreover, Jim\'enez-Serra et al. (2007),
166: through a detailed analysis of Very Large Array (VLA) and
167: Plateau de Bure Interferometer (PdBI) subarcsecond ($\sim$
168: $0\rlap.{''}2$-$0\rlap.{''}6$) $\lambda$mm observations, have resolved for the
169: first time the hot gas surrounding HW~2.
170: They find that the radiation from HW~2 could be photoevaporating the disk and that the disk does
171: not appear to be rotating with a Keplerian law due to the extreme youth of the object.
172: The size and kinematics of the SO$_2$ disk
173: inferred by Jim\'enez-Serra et. al. is consistent with the conclusions of Patel
174: et al. However, an alternative interpretation is that
175: the disk structure and kinematics observed are due
176: to the superposition on the plane of the sky of
177: independent
178: hot-cores (Comito et al. 2007, Brogan et al. 2007). Here we report new SMA
179: continuum observations and VLA NH$_3$(3,3) and NH$_3$(4,4)
180: observations, both with very high angular resolution, giving
181: further support to the circumstellar disk interpretation.
182:
183: \section{Observations and results}
184: \subsection{SMA continuum}
185: The submillimeter continuum observations were carried out in two
186: configurations of the SMA (Ho et al. 2004)\footnote{The Submillimeter Array is a
187: joint project between the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory
188: and the Academia Sinica Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics,
189: and is funded by the Smithsonian Institution and the Academia
190: Sinica.}, the extended configuration with a maximum baseline length
191: of 220 m, on 30 August 2004, and the very extended configuration with a maximum
192: baseline length of 472 m, on 4 November 2005. We summarize here
193: the observations of this latter date (see Patel et al. 2005, 2007
194: for the details on the observations in the extended configuration).
195: We used a tuning of 331.1 GHz centered in the lower sideband (and 341.1 GHz centered in the upper sideband). The quasar BL Lac was observed for 5 minutes
196: between every cycle of 10 minutes on the main source. The spectral
197: band-pass was calibrated using observations of Mars and absolute
198: flux calibration was done using the asteroid Ceres and the quasar
199: 3C111. Continuum data were obtained from the line-free regions of
200: the spectral band of the two sidebands. Weather was excellent
201: during the observations with relative humidity of $\sim$ 20\% and
202: $\tau_{225 GHz}\sim 0.06$ ($\sim$ 0.22 @ 335~GHz), measured at the nearby Caltech Submillimeter
203: Observatory. The track was $\sim$~8 h long with an on-source integration
204: time of $\sim$~4.2 h. $T_{sys,DSB}$ varied from 220 to 500 K. The
205: visibility data were calibrated and mapped using the Berkeley
206: Illinois Maryland Array's Miriad package. We estimate an uncertainty
207: of $\sim$~20\% in the absolute flux scale in the SMA data and an uncertainty of $\sim$ $0\rlap.{''}1$ in absolute astrometry. Final maps were obtained by combining the two configurations (extended + very extended) and the two sidebands. Two continuum sources are detected with a beam size of $0\rlap.{''}37$, one coincident with HW~2 (S$_{(335~GHz)}$ $\simeq$ 0.6~Jy~beam$^{-1}$) and the another one with HW~3c (S$_{(335~GHz)}$ $\simeq$ 0.1~Jy~beam$^{-1}$), which is located $\sim$ 3$''$ south from HW~2. The continuum emission around HW~2 shows (Fig. 1) an elongated structure with a deconvolved size of $\simeq$ $0\rlap.{''}62\times0\rlap.{''}35$
208: (450$\times$250~AU; PA $\simeq$ 120$^{\circ}$) and
209: total flux density of $\simeq$ 2~Jy (brightness temperature T$_B$ $\simeq$ 100~K) (similar to the flux density measured with a beam size of $\simeq$ $0\rlap.{''}75$ by Patel et al. 2005). A weak feature (6$\sigma$ level, $\sigma$ $\simeq$ 7~mJy/beam) located $\sim$ 1$''$ north from the peak of the elongated structure is also observed.
210: The implications of these high-angular resolution continuum observations are discussed in \S~3.
211: An analysis of the SMA spectral line data combining the two configurations
212: will be presented in a forthcoming paper by Patel et al.
213: \subsection{VLA ammonia}
214:
215: We have reanalyzed the NH$_3$(3,3) and NH$_3$(4,4) line data
216: ($\lambda$1.3cm) observed by Torrelles et al. (1999) who reported
217: detection of the lower transition but non-detection of the higher
218: one. These observations were carried out with the VLA of the
219: NRAO\footnote{The National Radio Astronomy Observatory is a facility
220: of the National Science Foundation operated under cooperative
221: agreement by Associated Universities, Inc.} in the C configuration
222: and 4IF spectral line mode, allowing us to observe simultaneously the
223: two transitions with a spectral resolution of $\simeq$ 0.6~km~s$^{-1}$
224: and covering a velocity range of --30 $\leq$ V$_{LSR}$ $\leq$
225: 8~km~s$^{-1}$ (covering only the main hyperfine component of these transitions; see Ho \& Townes 1983).
226: More details of these observations are given in
227: Torrelles et al. (1999). The re-calibration of the observations
228: was performed using the new recommended procedure of NRAO for
229: reducing high-frequency VLA data. The continuum emission contribution from
230: HW~2 to the spectral line data was subtracted. Emission from both transitions
231: is detected in the velocity range from $\simeq$ --13.6 to --2.6~km~s$^{-1}$
232: with a beam size of $\sim$ 1$''$.
233: The integrated flux density images in this range are
234: consistent with those reported by Torrelles et al. (1999) [NH$_3$(3,3)]
235: and Brogan et al. (2007) [NH$_3$(4,4)], showing a rather complex structure
236: around HW~2.
237: However, more simple structures are differentiated from integrated
238: intensity maps made in two different velocity ranges, from --13.6 to
239: --8.1~km~s$^{-1}$ and from --7.5 to --2.6~km~s$^{-1}$.
240: In the former range of integration, a distinct spatially ``isolated''
241: ammonia core is identified in both transitions, spatially coinciding
242: with the hot-core reported by Mart\'{\i}n-Pintado et al. (2005) in SO$_2$
243: $\sim$ $0\rlap.{''}5$ to the east of HW~2 (Fig. 2). This core is also seen in CH$_3$CN (Comito et al. 2007).
244: On the other hand, an elongated core centered on HW~2 is
245: distinguished in the
246: --7.5 to --2.6~km~s$^{-1}$ range
247: (more prominent in the NH$_3$(4,4) transition; Fig. 2).
248: This structure has a similar
249: orientation as the CH$_3$CN and SO$_2$ structures reported by
250: Patel et al. (2005) and Jim\'enez-Serra et al. (2007), respectively,
251: within the same velocity range, although the ammonia structure is
252: about two times larger ($\sim$ 2$''$). In addition, the ammonia emission in the
253: --7.5 to --2.6~km~s$^{-1}$ range shows a velocity pattern which is roughly consistent
254: with the pattern observed in SO$_2$ by Jimenez-Serra et al. (2007); that is, the gas of the northwestern part of the elongated structure appears to be redshifted with respect to the southeastern part.
255: However, the S/N ratio of the individual ammonia velocity
256: channels is not good enough (S/N $\lesssim$ 5-6~$\sigma$) to make a detailed kinematical
257: comparison, even more considering the different angular resolution of both
258: observations (NH$_3$ and SO$_2$).
259:
260: An additional relevant result is obtained when a spatial comparison
261: of the (4,4) and (3,3) ammonia emission is made, given that their
262: flux density ratio is sensitive to the rotational temperature
263: describing the population of these two rotational states (Ho \&
264: Townes 1983). In fact, from Fig. 2 we see that in the --13.6 to
265: --8.1~km~s$^{-1}$ range the (4,4) and (3,3) peaks of the ammonia
266: clumps do not coincide, but are separated by $0\rlap.{''}2$, with
267: the (4,4) peak being closer to HW~2, suggesting external heating effects
268: by the massive protostar. A relative spatial displacement between
269: the (4,4) and (3,3) emission is also observed in the
270: elongated structure (--7.5 to --2.6~km~s$^{-1}$ range),
271: with the two (4,4) peaks separated by $1\rlap.{''}2$ and being closer to HW~2 than the corresponding (3,3)
272: ammonia peaks which are separated by $1\rlap.{''}4$, suggesting that the
273: inner edges of the
274: elongated structure facing HW~2 is being heated by the massive protostar.
275: This relative spatial displacement is significant
276: considering that the accuracy in the relative position of the (4,4) and (3,3) ammonia emission is estimated to be $\sim$ $0\rlap.{''}05$.
277: From the (4,4) to (3,3) ratios ($\gtrsim$ 0.4, obtained from the spectra),
278: assuming optically thin emission,
279: we estimate overall rotational temperatures T$_R$(4,4;3,3)
280: $\gtrsim$ 160~K for the elongated structure. These temperatures are consistent with those obtained by Mart\'{\i}n-Pintado et al.
281: (2005) through SO$_2$ observations and with the brightness dust temperature of $\sim$ 100~K (\S~2.1).
282:
283: \section{Discussion}
284:
285: Our new high-angular resolution SMA observations show that the
286: flattened disk-like structure
287: of the dust emission observed previously by Patel et al. (2005) is still
288: preserved at $\sim$ $0\rlap.{''}37$ scale, with a single continuum
289: peak on HW~2. In fact, the dust continuum peak coincides in absolute position within $0\rlap.{''}07$ with the HW~2 position
290: estimated at cm wavelengths by Curiel et al. (2006). In addition, this elongated structure is similar in size and orientation
291: to the molecular SO$_2$ disk structure detected by Jim\'enez-Serra et
292: al. (2007) (Fig. 1), but with the dust continuum peaking in between the two peaks of the SO$_2$ structure. Both the dust continuum
293: and SO$_2$ structures are engulfed by the elongated double-peaked ammonia structure as well as by the double-peaked
294: CH$_3$CN structure detected at 230 GHz with arcsecond resolution
295: (proposed to be delineating two hot cores,
296: HC2 and HC3; Comito et al. 2007) (Fig. 1). Our results argue against the interpretation that the elongated structure
297: observed perpendicular to the
298: HW~2 jet and proposed to be a disk by Patel et al. (2005) is due to a
299: chance superposition of different hot-cores (HC~2 and HC~3) given
300: that they have an angular separation ($\sim$ $1"$)
301: that is significantly larger than the size of the
302: elongated dust continuum structure ($\sim$ $0\rlap.{''}6$). Furthermore,
303: the fact that a main single continuum peak on HW~2 is observed,
304: gives additional evidence that the observed dust continuum emission
305: distribution is dominated by the gas directly associated with HW~2.
306: We note that notwithstanding the importance of chemistry, with molecules being enhanced and depleted depending
307: on the physical conditions, dust emission is much less affected by such
308: chemical effects and hence is a more reliable indicator of the
309: structure of material in the immediate vicinity of HW~2.
310: We would like to emphasize, however, that we are not discarding the presence of multiple hot-cores
311: in the immediate vicinity of HW~2. Furthermore, these hot-cores seem to be necessary
312: to explain the observed chemical inhomogeneities in the region
313: (Comito et al. 2007, Brogan et al. 2007). However, what we find here is that the SMA
314: dust disk structure is not made up of these reported hot-cores.
315:
316: The question arises as to the meaning of the double-peaked molecular
317: structure observed in SO$_2$ (Jim\'enez-Serra et al.) inside of
318: the double-peaked molecular structures observed in CH$_3$CN (Comito et al. 2007) and in
319: NH$_3$ (this paper), all these structures observed within the same integrated velocity range ($\sim$ --7.5 to --2.6~km~s$^{-1}$; Fig. 1). As far as we know, this is the first time that this behaviour
320: has been observed and reported at (sub)arcsecond scale toward a high-mass star forming region.
321: As an open issue,
322: we discuss here three different
323: interpretations, not necessarily independent. The first one is that each of the different molecular
324: peaks are tracing molecular fragments from the remnant of the parental
325: core from which the central massive object has been formed.
326: The fact that all of them are almost aligned along the same axis,
327: roughly perpendicular to the HW~2 jet, would favor this possibility.
328: In addition, the observed heating of
329: the gas facing HW~2 (\S 2.2),
330: indicates a physical association of the
331: large (2$''$) elongated molecular structure with the massive
332: protostar, rather than a projection effect by the superposition in
333: the plane of the sky of different molecular cores.
334: A second possible explanation is that chemical and
335: excitation effects produce different spatial molecular peaks
336: for different molecular transitions.
337: This could be consistent with the fact that SO$_2$ (observed closer to HW ~2) trace
338: regions with densities two order of magnitud higher than the ammonia (van der Tak et al. 2007).
339: This would also be consistent with the fact first noted by Jim\'enez-Serra et al. (2007) that
340: the water masers reported by Torrelles et al. (1996) are distributed along the SO$_2$ emission
341: (water masers arise in regions with very high densities, $\sim$ 10$^9$~cm$^{-3}$; Elitzur 1989).
342: A third possible explanation is that a more
343: or less continuous structure but with chemical variations becomes denser and thinner as we
344: probe closer to the protostar, giving rise to concentric flattened
345: structures of similar shape and orientation.
346: A beam-averaged radius of the disk growing with increasing beam size
347: would then produce the concentric double-peaked structures.
348: We hypothesize that this could be the case for HW~2 given that
349: the angular separation of the two peaks of the different molecular structures found around HW~2
350: decreases with decreasing beam size (Fig. 3).
351: This possible scenario might be tested
352: by observing with the VLA the ammonia emission with higher angular resolution ($\sim$ $0\rlap.{''}3$).
353: If this scenario is correct, a smaller separation between the corresponding double ammonia peaks should be measured. On the contrary, if the spatial separation
354: between the ammonia peaks does not change when observed with higher angular resolution, it would indicate that chemical and excitation effects are the dominant effects in producing the different double-peaked
355: molecular structures.
356:
357:
358: The main heating mechanism of the gas
359: around HW~2,
360: can be explained
361: via collisions with hot dust, which in turn is heated by the absorption
362: of the radiation of this high-mass protostar (although a shock-heating
363: contribution from the HW~2 wind and/or from the external material infalling into the disk is also expected). From
364: Scoville \& Kwan (1976) and Zhang et al. (2007), we find that the expected dust temperature at a distance of $0\rlap.{''}3$
365: (220~AU) from HW~2 is T$_d$ $\simeq$ 100-180~K (depending on the grain emissivity spectral index $\beta$ = 2 to 1) for a source
366: with a luminosity of $\sim$ 2.5$\times$10$^4$~L$_{\odot}$ (Evans et
367: al. 1981, Lenzen et al. 1984). Since collisional coupling of the
368: gas and dust is expected for densities n(H$_2$) $\gtrsim$
369: 10$^5$~cm$^{-3}$ (Goldsmith \& Langer 1978), a value consistent
370: with the detection of NH$_3$, CH$_3$CN, and SO$_2$ emission, we
371: conclude that molecular gas heating up to the observed temperatures and distances
372: is possible. Comito et al. (2007) conclude that the mm/submm portion of the continuum emission is
373: optically thick. Therefore, to calculate the gas mass of the disk we follow the procedure outlined
374: by Beuther et al. (2007), assuming optically thin emission and correct that
375: through the opacity correction factor C = $\tau$/(1-e$^{-\tau}$), with $\tau$ the dust opacity.
376: In this way we estimate the gas mass to be (0.4-3)$\times$C~M$_{\odot}$,
377: assuming a gas to dust ratio of 100, temperature of $\sim$ 160~K, and depending on the grain emissivity spectral index $\beta$ = 1 to 2.
378:
379: \acknowledgments
380: We are grateful to the SMA staff in Cambridge, Hilo and Taipei, for
381: their help with observations.
382: We thank I. Jim\'enez-Serra and C. Comito for kindly providing respectively the SO$_2$ and
383: CH$_3$CN images shown in Fig. 1. We also thanks J. M. Girart and P. F. Goldsmith for their very valuable comments.
384: The excellent comments and suggestions of an anonymous referee helped improve this Letter. SC acknowledges support from DGAPA/UNAM
385: and from CONACyT (M\'exico) grant 43120$-$F. G.G. acknowledges support from FONDAP 15010003 (Chile). JMT acknowledges support from the Spanish grant AYA2005-08523-C03.
386:
387: \begin{references}
388:
389: %\begin{thebibliography}{}
390:
391: \reference{} Bartkiewicz, A., Szymczak, M., Cohen, R. J., \& Richards, A. M. S. 2005, MNRAS, 361, 623
392: \reference{} Beltr\'an, M. T., Cesaroni, R., Codella, C., Testi, L.,
393: Furuya, R. S., \& Olmi, L. 2006, Nature, 443, 427
394: \reference{} Beuther, H., Zhang, Q., Bergin, E. A., Sridharan, T. K., Hunter, T. R., Leurini, S. 2007, A\&A, in press
395: \reference{} Bonnell, I. A., \& Bate, M. R. 2005, MNRAS, 362, 915
396: \reference{} Brogan, C. L., et al. 2007, ApJ, 660, L133
397: \reference{} Comito, C., Schilke, P., Endesfelder, U., Jim\'enez-Serra, I., \&
398: Mart\'{\i}n-Pintado, J. 2007, A\&A, 469, 207
399: \reference{} Curiel, S., et al. 2006, ApJ, 638, 878
400: \reference{} De Buizer, J. M., Osorio, M., \& Calvet, N. 2005, ApJ, 635, 452
401: \reference{} Elitzur, M., Hollenbach, D. J., McKee, C. F. 1989, ApJ, 346, 983
402: \reference{} Evans, N. J. II, et al. 1981, ApJ, 244, 115
403: \reference{} Gallimore, J. F., Cool, R. J., Thornley, M. D., \& McMullin, J. 2003, ApJ, 586, 306
404: \reference{} Garay, G., Ram\'{\i}rez, S., Rodr\'{\i}guez, L. F., Curiel, S., \& Torrelles, J. M. 1996, ApJ, 459, 193
405: \reference{} Goldsmith, D. F., \& Langer, W. D. 1978, ApJ, 222, 881
406: \reference{} G\'omez, J. F., Sargent, A. I., Torrelles, J. M.,
407: Ho, P. T. P., Rodr{\'\i}guez, L. F., Cant\'o, J., \& Garay, G., 1999, ApJ, 514, 287
408: \reference{} Ho, P. T. P., Moran, J. M., \& Lo, K. Y. 2004, ApJ, 616, L1
409: \reference{} Ho, P. T. P., \& Townes, C. H. 1983, ARA\&A, 21, 239
410: \reference{} Hughes, V. A., \& Wouterloot, J. G. A.,
411: 1984, ApJ, 276, 204
412: \reference{} Jim\'enez-Serra, I., Mart\'{\i}n-Pintado, J., Rodr\'{\i}guez-Franco, A., Chandler, C., Comito, C., \& Schilke, P. 2007, ApJ, 661, L187
413: \reference{} Johnson, H. L. 1957, ApJ, 126, 121
414: \reference{} Lenzen, R. 1988, A\&A, 190, 269
415: %\reference{} Loren, R. D., \& Wootten, A. H. 1978, ApJ, 225, L81
416: \reference{} Mart\'{\i}n-Pintado, J., Jim\'enez-Serra, I., Rodr\'{\i}guez-Franco, A., Mart\'{\i}n, S., \& Thum, C. 2005, ApJ, 628, L61
417: \reference{} McKee, C. F., \& Tan, J. C. 2003, ApJ, 585, 850
418: \reference{} Minier, V., Booth, R. S., \& Conway, J. E. 2000, A\&A, 362, 1093
419: \reference{} Niezurawska, A., Szymczak, M., Cohen, R. J., \& Richards, A. M. S. 2004, MNRAS, 350, 1409
420: \reference{} Patel, N. A., et al. 2005, Nature, 437, 109
421: \reference{} Patel, N. A., Curiel, S., Zhang, Q., Sridharan, T. K.,
422: Ho, P. T. P., \& Torrelles, J. M. 2007, ApJ, 658, L55
423: \reference{} Rodr\'{\i}guez, L. F., et al. 1994, ApJ, 430, L65
424: \reference{} Scoville, N. Z., Kwan, J. 1976, ApJ, 206, 718
425: \reference{} Shu, F. H., Adams, F. C., \& Lizano, S. 1987,
426: ARA\&A, 25, 23
427: \reference{} Torrelles, J. M., G\'omez, J. F., Rodr{\'\i}guez, L. F.,
428: Curiel, S., Ho, P. T. P., \& Garay, G., 1996, ApJ, 457, L107
429: \reference{} Torrelles, J. M., et al. 1999, MNRAS, 307, 58
430: \reference{} Torrelles, J. M., et al. 2001,
431: ApJ, 560, 853
432: \reference{} van der Tak, F. F. S., Black, J. H., Sch\"oier, F. L., Jansen, D. J., \& van Dishoeck, E. F. 2007, A\&A, 468, 627
433: \reference{} Vlemmings, W. H. T., Diamond, P. J., van Langevelde, H. J., \& Torrelles, J. M. 2006, A\&A, 448, 597
434: \reference{} Zhang, Q., Sridharan, T. K., Hunter, T. R., Chen, Y., Beuther, H., \& and Wyrowski, F.
435: 2007, A\&A, in press
436:
437: \end{references}
438:
439: %\end{thebibliography}
440:
441: %\vfil\eject
442:
443: \clearpage
444:
445: \begin{figure}
446: \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=6.5in]{f1.eps}
447: \caption{{\it Left panel}: Contour map of the integrated ammonia emission of the (4,4) transition (blue contours) in the velocity range from --7.5 to --2.6~km~s$^{-1}$ (beam $\simeq$ $1\rlap.{''}1$, this paper; see Fig. 2) superposed on the
448: CH$_3$CN contour map (red contours) obtained by Comito et al. (2007) within the same velocity range (beam $\simeq$ $0\rlap.{''}8$).
449: Cross indicates the position of HW~2 (Curiel et al. 2006). {\it Right panel}: Contour map (black contours) of the continuum emission at 335~GHz obtained with the SMA toward Cep A HW~2 (this paper). Beam size = $0\rlap.{''}37$ is indicated in the panel.
450: Contour levels are --0.5, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 times 58~mJy/beam. Superposed on this map the SO$_2$ structure found
451: with the VLA by Jim\'enez-Serra et al. (2007) is also shown (white contours;
452: beam $\simeq$ $0\rlap.{''}37$).}
453: \end{figure}
454:
455: \clearpage
456:
457: \begin{figure}
458: \includegraphics[angle=0, width=6.5in]{f2.eps}
459: \caption{Contour maps of the integrated flux density ammonia emission of the (3,3) and (4,4) inversion transition lines for different velocity ranges in km~s$^{-1}$ (indicated in the figures). Contour levels are 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12 times 14~mJy~beam$^{-1}$~km~s$^{-1}$.
460: Beam size $\simeq$ $1\rlap.{''}1$ is indicated in the lower right panel.
461: The cross indicates the position of HW~2 (Curiel et al. 2006). The accuracy in the relative position of the (4,4) and (3,3) ammonia emission is estimated to be $\sim$ $0\rlap.{''}05$.}
462: \end{figure}
463:
464: %\vfil\eject
465:
466:
467: %\vfil\eject
468:
469: \clearpage
470:
471: \begin{figure}
472: \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=6.0in]{f3.eps}
473: \caption{Angular separation of the two peaks of the different molecular structures found around HW~2 as a function of the observing beam size. The separation decreases with decreasing beam size.
474: SO$_2$ (PdBI and VLA; Jim\'enez-Serra et al. 2007), CH$_3$CN (PdBI; Comito et al. 2007), NH$_3$ (VLA; this paper).}
475: \end{figure}
476:
477: \end{document}
478: